35
C i f D t Ri Comparison of Deepwater Riser Systems UTC, Bergen seabed-to-surface 4-5 JUNE 2008

Ci fDt i RComparison of Deepwater Riser Systems …possibility.no/utc2008/ps/B1 - Jean-Francois Saint-Marcoux.pdf · Ci fDt i RComparison of Deepwater Riser Systems UTC, Bergen

  • Upload
    hahuong

  • View
    221

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

C i f D t Ri Comparison of Deepwater Riser SystemsUTC, Bergen

seabed-to-surface

4-5 JUNE 2008

Agenda

Factors Influencing Riser SelectionSCR’sFlexiblesMonobore HRT (SLOR)Monobore HRT (SLOR)Bundle HRTField ArchitectureCost ComparisonConclusions

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 2

Factors influencing riser selection

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 3

Factors influencing riser selection

Functional Specification DiameterInternal Pressure, Design temperatureOverall Heat Transfer CoefficientOverall Heat Transfer CoefficientFluid service (H2S, CO2,…WAT)Requirement for riser base gaslift

Characteristics of the fieldWater depthWater depthFPU type and environmentNumber of risers and layout of the wells and manifolds

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 4

Factors influencing riser selection (Continued):

Other factorsAvailability of installation vessels/construction sitePossibility of Installation before FPU arrivalEase of maintenance and inspection (”Integrity Ease of maintenance and inspection ( Integrity management”)

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 5

Steel Catenary Risers (SCRs)

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 6

Steel Catenary Risers (SCRs)

Erha (Acergy EPCI)

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 7

SCRs feasibility

Feasibility is OK when:The thermal insulation requirements are limited: a maximum insulation thickness should not be exceeded to avoid compression issues.For spread-moored FPSO: Fatigue is acceptable at the Touch Down Zone.For turret-moored FPSO: Fatigue of a catenary configuration g y gis likely to be unacceptable and to require alternative SCR configurations (Lazy wave, heavy bottom,…).SCR’s can be installed after FPU arrival: constraint on time to first oil and SIMOPS.

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 8

SCRs feasibility (continued):

Concept advantages DrawbacksNo limitation on water depth.No limitation on pressure.

In-place fatigue is driving the requirements of welding quality, which No limitation on pressure.

No local yard requirement.Low cost.

g q y,decreases laying rate.Riser base far from FPSO (gas lift, subsea (gas lift, subsea processing).Field layout issues to accommodate a large accommodate a large number of risers.

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 9

SCR’s technological envelope

Large diameter, thickness (40mm).Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient: more than 2.5W/m2K Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient: more than 2.5W/m2K (wet insulation).Pipe-in-pipe in dynamic applications is questionable.Temperature limited by flexible joint at FPU (130°C)Temperature limited by flexible joint at FPU (130°C).Capacity of Heavy installation vessel.Capacity of the FPU to accept large vertical loads and increasing with water depth.H2S content degrades fatigue resistance and may require the use of Corrosion Resistant Alloys (CRA), or CRA clad y ( ),pipe.Fatigue and compression at Touch Down Point relates to W/D ratio and FPU motion

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 10

W/D ratio, and FPU motion.

Flexibles

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 11

Flexibles

Maximum Water Depth : 1310 m

Water Depth at FPSO : 1050 m

Water Depth at shallow end of Gas import export : 100 m

Frade Acergy (Installation)

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 12

gy ( )

Flexibles: feasibility

Concept advantagesN l l d i

Feasibility is OK when:Th l i l ti No local yard requirements

Can be used in shallow water

D b k

Thermal insulation requirements are relatively low: there is a limitation on the amount of insulation

DrawbacksCost

compatible with installation squeeze loads.Service fluids such as water, oil export gas : there are oil export, gas : there are some limitations on gas service (dewatering and high velocity gas).Risers can be installed after FPU arrival: constraint on time to first oil and SIMOPS.Wellfluid is corrosive

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 13

Wellfluid is corrosive.

Flexibles technological envelope

Diameter: less than 16” Fatigue and fatigue External Pressure (collapse): less than 2500m

The tensioner crushing l d d d f l

assessmentAdvantages

Can be used in “shallow” loads needed for laying and the hydrostatic pressure tend to collapse the carcass and the vault

waterMultibore

the carcass and the vaultThe reverse end cap effect in deep sea, tends to destroy the pipe by destroy the pipe by armours buckling

OHTC larger than 3.4W/m2KTemperature 130°C maximum

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 14

Temperature 130 C maximum

Flexibles logistics

The following table gives an idea of the range of pipe lengthswhich can be accommodated on standard reel and carousel fordifferent diameters

PIPE INSIDE DIAMETER

CAROUSEL REEL

8” 15 000 1 500

12” 7 000 800

16” 3 500 400

Lengths in meters

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 15

g

Monobore HRT (SLOR)

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 16

Monobore tower

XOM Kizomba fieldXOM Blk15 gas gathering (Acergy EPIC).

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 17

Monobore HRTs

FeasibilityNo limitationNo limitation.

AdvantagesLower cost than bundle HRT in Lower cost than bundle HRT in case of a few risers; depending on riser type and service.service.

DrawbacksComplex gas lift systemComplex gas lift system.Riser Interference issues impacting the field layout beyond a few risers

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 18

beyond a few risers .

Bundle HRT

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 19

Bundle HRT

Total Girassol (Acergy EPCI)Total RosaBP Greater Plutonio BP Greater Plutonio (Acergy EPCI)

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 20

Bundle HRTs (Continued):

FeasibilityNo limitation.

AdvantagesAdvantagesLower cost in case of severe functional requirement (thermal insulation, gas lift).Robust field layout, open for future expansion.

DrawbacksDrawbacksRequires a fabrication yard in the geographical area.

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 21

Hybrid riser towers

A vertical structure

Tensioned by buoyancy

composed of various independent risers

Secured by suction pile and flexjoint

Linked to floating facility by flexible jumpersjumpersConnected to flowlines by remotely installed spools

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 22

installed spools

Hybrid riser tower

Technological limitationsTemperature flexible (130°C but at top of risers): High p ( p ) gtemperature flexibles being considered (PEEK).

AdvantagesNo water depth limits.High pressure.Thermal insulation: U-value to 1.7 W/m.K with 150mm of wet insulation or pipe-in-pipe if a lower U-value is required.G lift ithi th tGas-lift within the tower.Insensitive to floater motion.Small load on FPU.Low fatigue damage in placeLow fatigue damage in-place.Installation can take place before FPSO arrival. Large installation vessel/barge not necessary.

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 23

Risers Differentiators

SCR’s Flexibles Multibore Monobore HRT HRT

Water depth: Cost Cost Little Impact Little ImpactDiameter of

d ti li N Li it 10" N Li it N Li itproduction lines: No Limit ~ 10" No Limit No LimitCladding: Cost Cost Onshore Weld Possible Onshore WeldU-value (W/m2.K): >2.5 wet >3.5 wet No Limit No LimitPresence of H2S Cost Cost No Impact No Impacts o o o o pa o paPresence of CO2 Cost Cost No Impact No ImpactWater Injection lining: Cost N/A Onshore Stalk Possible Onshore StalkFPSO t tFPSO turret-moored: Load Load No Impact No Impact

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 24

Field architecture

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 25

Field architecture

Field layout arrangement drives the riser type selection.

Management of the available space around the FPUCorridors for future developmentsNumber of risers

Choice between monobore and multibore HRTDistance between towers driven by riser interference (wake shielding and wake instability)

Choice between Catenary / and multibore HRTThe location of the gaslift manifold is a driver of the layout

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 26

Field architecture

SCR/Flexible/SLOR

Bundle HRTseabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 27

Bundle HRT

Field architecture: Dalia

IPBs

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 28

Field architectureSCRs : ErhaWD: 1200m4 production2 test2 gas lift2 gas lift2 WI1 Gas injection

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 29

Riser selection main driver

Moho-Bilondo(Fl ibl )

Water depthL h l i(Flexible) Low thermal requirement

Dalia(IPB)

Low thermal requirement/Electrical heatingIntegrated gas lift

Bonga/Erha(SCR) No site for riser tower fabricationGreater Plutonio(Bundle riser tower)

Severe thermal insulation requirementIntegrated gas lift, field lay-out, liner for WILocal content

Kizomba(Single riser tower)

No gas liftLimited number of risers

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 30

tower)

Cost comparison

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 31

Cost differentiation

Differentiation between riser solutions by water depth:

161820 Cost

10121416

SCRHRT

468

10 HRTFlexibles

02

500m 1000m 1250m 1500m 2000m 2500mWater Depth

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 32

Water Depth

Conclusions

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 33

Conclusions

All riser systems have their role to playFlexibles have the most severe limitations in diameter water Flexibles have the most severe limitations in diameter, water depth and U-valueSCR’s have limitations in term of U-value (except if PIP)H b id Rise To e s ha e the idest ange of feasibilitHybrid Riser Towers have the widest range of feasibility

It is necessary to evaluate SLOR’s for potential riser interference in the case on many risersB dl HRT’ i f b i ti f ilit i th Bundle HRT’s require a fabrication facility in the area

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 34

Thank you very much for your attention.Any questions?

[email protected]: 1 832 630 2197

seabed-to-surfaceprivate and confidential06 June 2008slide 35