Upload
doannhu
View
218
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Practice Information: Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Ref: S:\CHURCH STREET\INFORMATION CS\PATIENT PARTICIPATION GROUP
\REPORTS & SURVEYS\ Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Version: 15.03.01
Page 2 of 10
Created by: Neil Lindsey-Taylor Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Review Date: 18 / 03 / 2015
Authorised by: R Weir - Chair Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Next Review Due: 01 / 03 / 2016
The purpose of this report is to provide patients of Church Street Medical Centre with an insight
into the activities that the Practice and Friends of Church Street Medical Centre (PPG (Patient
Participation Group)) have taken during 2014/2015 through regular meetings and patient surveys
conducted to aid the understanding of Practice performance and perception, identifying where
applicable areas for improvement.
The report is presented in a standardised format to ensure that all relevant information is made
available to all patients in a consistent way across all practices.
A Busy Year for the Prac�ce
During 2014/15 the way in which patients have been able to interact with the practice services has
continued to change. Beginning with the trial of on-line access to full patient’s records, which after
a successful trial was adopted as a permanent service. This was additionally enhanced with the
introduction of access to a summary of patient’s records being made available to all online users,
who make up 29% of practice patients well ahead of other practices.
Other changes have been the removal of the overcrowded and under read noticeboards with a
new 42” monitor which acts as the patient call system and provides patients with all the
information that was previously displayed on the notice board and more including health
promotion videos. At the same time the whole ground floor was decorated and the waiting room
layout changed so that all seating faced away from the reception desk adding greater privacy and
focused on the display screen.
Practice Information: Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Ref: S:\CHURCH STREET\INFORMATION CS\PATIENT PARTICIPATION GROUP
\REPORTS & SURVEYS\ Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Version: 15.03.01
Page 3 of 10
Created by: Neil Lindsey-Taylor Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Review Date: 18 / 03 / 2015
Authorised by: R Weir - Chair Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Next Review Due: 01 / 03 / 2016
Table of Contents
A Busy Year for the Practice .......................................................................................................................... 2
Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................................. 3
How do We Engage with Our Patient Participation Group ........................................................................... 4
Patient Participation Group Profile ............................................................................................................... 4
Are there any specific Minority Groups within the Practice Population? ................................................. 4
What steps has the practice taken to recruit patients and to ensure it is representative of the practice
profile? ....................................................................................................................................................... 5
Comparison of the PPG with the practice profile and description of the differences between the
practice population and membership of the PPG? ................................................................................... 5
Explanation of any differences in section above and the efforts of the practice to communicate with
groups not represented? ........................................................................................................................... 5
Review of Patient Feedback .......................................................................................................................... 6
Outline the sources of feedback that were reviewed during the year: .................................................... 6
How frequently were these reviewed with the PPG? ............................................................................... 6
Action plan priority areas and implementation ............................................................................................ 7
Priority Area 1 ............................................................................................................................................ 7
Priority Area 2 ............................................................................................................................................ 8
Priority Area 3 ............................................................................................................................................ 9
Progress on Previous Years ......................................................................................................................... 10
PPG Sign Off ................................................................................................................................................. 10
Report signed off by PPG: ........................................................................................................................ 10
Practice Information: Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Ref: S:\CHURCH STREET\INFORMATION CS\PATIENT PARTICIPATION GROUP
\REPORTS & SURVEYS\ Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Version: 15.03.01
Page 4 of 10
Created by: Neil Lindsey-Taylor Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Review Date: 18 / 03 / 2015
Authorised by: R Weir - Chair Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Next Review Due: 01 / 03 / 2016
How do We Engage with Our Pa�ent Par�cipa�on Group
The Friends of Church Street Medical Centre meet on a bimonthly basis to discuss a range of topics
affecting the practice and its patients. Between meetings we communicate by phone and email to
ensure the regular flow of information.
Pa�ent Par�cipa�on Group Profile
Practice Population: 8400
Sex: Male 48.6% Female 51.4%
Age: Under 16's 16.6%
16 – 24 8.8% 45 - 54 14.9% 65 - 74 14.1%
25 - 34 10.3% 55 - 64 14.0% 75 + 9.5%
35 – 44 11.8%
Ethnicity: 3675
British, Mixed British 96.4% Polish 0.3%
Caribbean 0.7% Other Asian 0.4%
African 0.2% Irish 0.2%
Chinese 0.2% Others 1.1%
Indian, British Indian 0.5%
Are there any specific Minority Groups within the Prac�ce Popula�on?
There are currently no large minority groups within the practice population. Although as a practice
we do capture ethnicity at registration, we have identified that historical data does not allow a full
up to date profile of our practice population due to historical break downs of data groups. The
large sample used (5246 (larger than last year)), does reflect a meaningful representation of the
population.
Patient Representative Group Profile (PPG): 9 members
Sex: Male 33.3% Female 66.7%
Age: Under 16's 0.0%
16 – 24 0.0% 45 - 54 0.0% 65 - 74 44.4%
25 - 34 0.0% 55 - 64 44.4% 75 + 11.2%
35 – 44 0.0%
Ethnicity: 3675
British, Mixed British 100.0% Polish 0.0%
Caribbean 0.0% Other Asian 0.0%
African 0.0% Irish 0.0%
Chinese 0.0% Others 0.0%
Indian, British Indian 0.0%
Practice Information: Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Ref: S:\CHURCH STREET\INFORMATION CS\PATIENT PARTICIPATION GROUP
\REPORTS & SURVEYS\ Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Version: 15.03.01
Page 5 of 10
Created by: Neil Lindsey-Taylor Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Review Date: 18 / 03 / 2015
Authorised by: R Weir - Chair Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Next Review Due: 01 / 03 / 2016
Figure 1 PPG Leaflet
What steps has the prac�ce taken to recruit pa�ents and to ensure it is representa�ve of the
prac�ce profile?
The Patient Reference Group (PPG) constitution has a maximum membership of 10 members
which has been full throughout the year. Currently (March 15) we are looking to recruit 1 new
member with requests being made for patient representatives via the practice web site and the
practice information. The dominance of one ethnic profile in the practice is reflected in the
representative’s profiles. The Patient Reference Group (PPG) has been part of the practice since
January 2007 and currently consists of 9 patient members.
During 2012 a Friends leaflet (Figure 1 PPG Leaflet) was professionally printed to raise awareness
of the group. The Practice has a dedicated PPG (Friends) Notice board section on the large screen
Jayex board which displays activities and actively promotes the need for new members.
Comparison of the PPG with the prac�ce profile and descrip�on of the differences between the
prac�ce popula�on and membership of the PPG?
The dominance of one ethnic profile in the practice is reflected in the profile of the
representatives. The nature of the activities of the group; attending meetings and support of
practice in ventures such as flu clinics, has led to a predominance of members aged 55 plus. The
gender profile of 33.3% male members against a 48.6 male representation in the practice
population, with the current membership being at the upper end of the constituted levels a
change will not be made until an existing member leaves.
Explana�on of any differences in sec�on above and the efforts of the prac�ce to communicate
with groups not represented?
The group is committed to attracting younger members, who have been targeted on the web site,
via the Jayex notice board, and Newsletters.
Are there any specific characteristics of your practice population which means that other groups
should be included in the PPG? e.g. a large student population, significant number of
jobseekers, large numbers of nursing homes, or a LGBT community?
The are no specific groups to target
Practice Information: Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Ref: S:\CHURCH STREET\INFORMATION CS\PATIENT PARTICIPATION GROUP
\REPORTS & SURVEYS\ Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Version: 15.03.01
Page 6 of 10
Created by: Neil Lindsey-Taylor Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Review Date: 18 / 03 / 2015
Authorised by: R Weir - Chair Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Next Review Due: 01 / 03 / 2016
Review of Pa�ent Feedback
Outline the sources of feedback that were reviewed during the year:
Patient feedback is gathered from a variety of sources; The PPG has its own patient’s suggestions
box to gain patient feedback, website polls, NHS Choices feedback, patient surveys and
complaints. Additionally the introduction of the Friends & Family Test has opened up a further
source of review.
The practice also leads a locality based patient carers group which helps provide the group with
additional feedback. Note: The practice are the 2014 national winner of the RCGP Caring about
Carers award.
How frequently were these reviewed with the PPG?
• Any suggestions placed in the PPG feedback box were reviewed at the bimonthly
meetings.
• NHS Choices feedback were discussed 6 monthly
• Patient complaints were discussed annually (Jan 15)
• Online polls were discussed at the first meeting following the end of the poll
• FFT is now a permanent agenda item at each bimonthly meeting
• Patients Survey (The PPG agreed to avoid overloading patients with surveys and only
conduct the CCG wide survey February 2015 which had involved PPG representatives in
its development) 450 surveys were returned. Unfortunately the analysis of the results
will not be completed by the publication of this report. (The public report will be
updated once the data is available).
Practice Information: Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Ref: S:\CHURCH STREET\INFORMATION CS\PATIENT PARTICIPATION GROUP
\REPORTS & SURVEYS\ Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Version: 15.03.01
Page 7 of 10
Created by: Neil Lindsey-Taylor Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Review Date: 18 / 03 / 2015
Authorised by: R Weir - Chair Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Next Review Due: 01 / 03 / 2016
Ac�on plan priority areas and implementa�on
Priority Area 1
Description of priority area:
The practice and PPG wanted to increase the identification and support for carers in not only our
own practice population but in the local community as a whole.
What actions were taken to address the priority?
The practice identified a carers champion within the practice, who worked to develop a carer’s
support strategy for the practice.
The strategy was twofold; to introduce carers drop-in sessions in the practice supported by the
Carers federation, and to establish a community based meeting venue for carers, where they
could meet other carers, gain support from organisations such as the carers federation and have
guest speakers i.e. CPR and first aid.
To ensure that the initiative was correctly supported the practice secured CCG funding to have a
dedicated display in all 3 local practices, and support the booking of a suitable venue and
speakers.
As the project was developed the carers lead attended PPG meetings to update the group.
Result of actions and impact on patients and carers:
The local group and carers drop in sessions have been extremely well patronised and as a result
the CCG have rolled out the initiative across all practices.
Carers who attend the sessions have fed
back that they now feel there is support for
them.
How were these actions publicised?
The practice have promoted the sessions
on the carers dedicated noticeboard, on
the website and on the Jayex display. As a
result of these actions the practice has
been awarded the 2014 National RCGP
Caring about Carers Award.
Practice Information: Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Ref: S:\CHURCH STREET\INFORMATION CS\PATIENT PARTICIPATION GROUP
\REPORTS & SURVEYS\ Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Version: 15.03.01
Page 8 of 10
Created by: Neil Lindsey-Taylor Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Review Date: 18 / 03 / 2015
Authorised by: R Weir - Chair Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Next Review Due: 01 / 03 / 2016
Priority Area 2
Description of priority area:
To improve the patient experience whilst visiting the practice.
What actions were taken to address the priority?
The practice had the opportunity to participate in an initiative which involved a team called
‘Kissing it better’ who had been working with secondary care with the same objective. As one of
two practices selected nationally, we with the KIB team, PPG members and practice staff, held a
brain storming session to identify how we could achieve the objective. Four initial objectives were
identified;
1. Reorganise the waiting room so patients weren’t facing the desk, resulting in a loss of privacy.
2. Remove the large notice boards which were not being utilised by patients with a new Jayex 42”
monitor which allow for integrated patient calling and displays of both static informations and
NHS Choices health promotion videos.
3. Refresh the public area decoration and create a welcoming environment. The whole ground
floor has been redecorated and two clinical rooms are to be painted by a local school with work
of their design to enhance the environment.
4. Identify who to engage patients who could have visited the practice who always request home
visits. We are currently developing criteria to agree with the CCG for them to fund the use of a
local volunteer group who taxi patients to and from the surgery.
Result of actions and impact on patients and carers:
The whole waiting room has been significantly upgraded from a patient experience and
information perspective. Patient feedback has been very positive. The PPG all feel that patients
will be more comfortable whilst in the waiting area, and can access information in a more discrete
way. The patient experience at the reception counter has improved due to the repositioning of the
seating and the introduction of
background music (or video sound)
which significantly distracts from the
discussions at the counter.
How were these actions publicised?
The waiting room changes promote
themselves.
Practice Information: Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Ref: S:\CHURCH STREET\INFORMATION CS\PATIENT PARTICIPATION GROUP
\REPORTS & SURVEYS\ Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Version: 15.03.01
Page 9 of 10
Created by: Neil Lindsey-Taylor Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Review Date: 18 / 03 / 2015
Authorised by: R Weir - Chair Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Next Review Due: 01 / 03 / 2016
Priority Area 3
Description of priority area:
Increase the promotion of healthy lifestyles to patients.
What actions were taken to address the priority?
PPG members have led the promotion of healthy living in the local community. Working with two
other practices group members have organised, secured CCG funding, promoted and delivered 4
‘Lifestyle’ events in community and schools settings.
These events have had a range of activities and promotions including using a bike to make
smoothies etc.
Result of actions and impact on patients and carers:
. The events have been well attended, being supported by local dignitary’s i.e. the mayor. The
impact of these events is hard to quantify, healthy living is a long-term strategy so no real-time
results can be provided.
The success of the events has been such that the PPG members are continuing to organise future
events in the community.
How were these actions publicised?
All the events will be promoted in practice, on the website and in local papers. The practice also
displays all the healthy living videos within reception.
Practice Information: Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Ref: S:\CHURCH STREET\INFORMATION CS\PATIENT PARTICIPATION GROUP
\REPORTS & SURVEYS\ Church Street Medical Centre – Patient Participation Report 2015
Version: 15.03.01
Page 10 of 10
Created by: Neil Lindsey-Taylor Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Review Date: 18 / 03 / 2015
Authorised by: R Weir - Chair Date: 18 / 03 / 2015 Next Review Due: 01 / 03 / 2016
Progress on Previous Years
The PPG have been established for 8 years, it con�nues to support the delivery of the prac�ce and
works in a posi�ve way to shape the development of prac�ce ini�a�ves. No outstanding ac�ons
exist from previous years.
PPG Sign Off
Report signed off by PPG: YES
Date of sign off: 18th March 2015
How has the practice engaged with the PPG?
The practice has promoted activities on the practice website, in practice, with significant focus on
Carers during the year.
Has the practice received patient and carer feedback from a variety of sources? Yes
Was the PPG involved in the agreement of priority areas and the resulting action plan? Yes
How has the service offered to patients and carers improved as a result of the implementation
of the action plan?
The general waiting area is much more patient focused in its layout and the way information is
presented. The whole profile of carers and the support available to them has significantly
improved due to the practice efforts.