141
Planning Strategies for Best Results for 3.8% Surtax & 2014 Expiration of Charitable IRA Rollover East Coast Estate Planning Council Palm Beach Gardens – January 21, 2014 CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City School of Law

CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City School of Law

  • Upload
    step

  • View
    36

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Planning Strategies for Best Results for 3.8% Surtax & 2014 Expiration of Charitable IRA Rollover East Coast Estate Planning Council Palm Beach Gardens – January 21, 2014. CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City School of Law. INCOME TAX RATES. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Planning Strategies for Best Results for 3.8% Surtax

& 2014 Expiration of Charitable IRA Rollover

East CoastEstate Planning Council

Palm Beach Gardens – January 21, 2014

CHRISTOPHER R. HOYTUniversity of Missouri - Kansas City

School of Law

Page 2: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

INCOME TAX RATES INVEST WAGES LTCGIncome Level -MENT (+1.45%) & Divid• AGI < $200k/$250k 28% 29.4% 15%

Congratulations! Brilliant tax planning! “Bush tax cuts” remain in full effect for people with adjusted gross income under $200,000 ($250,000 on a joint return)

Page 3: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

INCOME TAX RATES INVEST WAGES LTCGIncome Level -MENT (+1.45%) & Divid• AGI < $200k/$250k 28% 29.4% 15%• AGI > $200k/$250k 33% 34.4% 15%

33% rate when taxable income > $183,250 -- single > $223,050 – married filing jointly

Page 4: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

TAX RATES paid on TAXABLE INCOMEADJUSTED GROSS INCOME (“AGI”)• Minus: Greater of -- Standard Deduction ($6,100) or -- Itemized Deductions (Mortgage interest; charitable contributions; state & local taxes)• Minus: Personal Exemption & Dependents

($3,900 each)

= TAXABLE INCOME

Page 5: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

WEALTHY PAY SOME TAXES ON “AGI”

ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME (“AGI”)• Minus: Greater of -- Standard Deduction ($6,100) or -- Itemized Deductions (Mortgage interest; charitable contributions; state & local taxes)• Minus: Personal Exemption & Dependents

($3,900 each)

= TAXABLE INCOME

Page 6: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

INCOME TAX RATES INVEST WAGES LTCGIncome Level -MENT (+1.45%) & Divid• AGI < $200k/$250k 28% 29.4% 15%• AGI > $200k/$250k 33% 34.4% 15%

33% rate when taxable income > $183,250 -- single > $223,050 – married filing jointly

Page 7: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

INCOME TAX RATES INVEST WAGES LTCGIncome Level -MENT (+1.45%) & Divid• AGI < $200k/$250k 28% 29.4% 15%• AGI > $200k/$250k 33% 34.4% 15% plus health care surtax 3.8% 0.9% 3.8% 36.8% 35.3% 18.8%

Page 8: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

0.9% MEDICARE SURTAX:When Compensation Exceeds $200,000

($250,000 married joint return)

• Compensation -- wages & self-employment income (Added to 1.45% Medicare/Medicaid tax ) (Employee pays entire 0.9%; no employer match)

• Employer must withhold when W-2 Form compensation exceeds $200,000• Married joint? Together over $250,000? -- Pay on Form 1040 if neither spouse has over $200,000 . (e.g., Husband has $100k and Wife has $160k = $260k)

Page 9: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

3.8% Net Investment Income TaxMAGI > $200,000 ($250,000 joint returns)

3.8% surtax on the lesser of:• Net Investment Income or• MAGI over $200,000 ($250,000 joint) ( $200k/$250k not indexed for inflation )

Trusts and estates pay 3.8% at $11,950

Page 10: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

3.8% Net Investment Income TaxMAGI > $200,000 ($250,000 joint returns)

Net Investment Income• Interest & Dividends• Annuities• Rents & Royalties• Profits from LLC / S Corp (if not employed) • Business of trading commodities & fin instruments• Most capital gains

Page 11: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

3.8% Net Investment Income TaxMAGI > $200,000 ($250,000 joint returns)

Income Exempt from Surtax:• Trade / Business income from an LLC,

partnership or Subchapter S corporation provided the recipient is employed at the business.

-- “material participation” test (work 500+ hours during the year?) • Gain from selling property used in trade/

business [rental property gains -> 3.8% tax]

Page 12: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

3.8% Net Investment Income TaxMAGI > $200,000 ($250,000 joint returns)

Other Income Exempt from 3.8% Surtax:Income that isn’t interest, rents, gains, etc :• Retirement income – social security,

qualified plans: IRAs, 401(k), pensions, etc – (non-qualified annuities are subject to tax)

• Wages & self-employment income ( 0.9% tax)• Alimony income• Lottery winnings

Page 13: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

INCOME TAX RATES INVEST WAGES LTCGIncome Level -MENT (+1.45%) & Divid• AGI < $200k/$250k 28% 29.4% 15%• AGI > $200k/$250k 33% 34.4% 15%• AGI > $250k/$300k 33% 34.4% 15%

-- 3% phase-out itemized deductions -- Phase-out personal exemptions

Page 14: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

PHASEOUTSAGI > $250,000 ($300,000 joint returns)

• 3% Phase-out Itemized Deductions -- disguised 1% tax rate hike (3% x 33% rate)• Personal and Dependent Exemptions -- $3,900 apiece for self & each dependent-- lose 2% for every $2,500 income increase-- 100% eliminated AGI > $372k ($422k jnt) (Phase-out $250k-$372k ( $300k-$422k jnt))

Page 15: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

INCOME TAX RATES INVEST WAGES LTCGIncome Level -MENT (+1.45%) & Divid• AGI < $200k/$250k 28% 29.4% 15%• Taxb>$400/$450 39.6% 41.0% 20%

Page 16: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

INCOME TAX RATES INVEST WAGES LTCGIncome Level -MENT (+1.45%) & Divid• AGI < $200k/$250k 28% 29.4% 15%• Taxb>$400/$450 39.6% 41.0% 20% plus 3% phase-out 1% 1 % 1% plus health care surtax 3.8% 0.9% 3.8% With $12,000+ income, 44.4% 42.9% 24.8%Trusts & Estates >> 43.4% 23.8%

Page 17: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

3.8% Net Investment Income TaxMAGI > $200,000 ($250,000 joint returns)

Two Ways to reduce the 3.8% surtax :

#1 - Reduce Net Investment Income and/or

#2 – Reduce AGI to less than $200,000 ($250,000 joint)

Page 18: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

3.8% Net Investment Income TaxMAGI > $200,000 ($250,000 joint returns)

Strategies for three different taxpayers:

#1 - Richest 1% - Income over $400,000 -- Reduce NII (not likely to get AGI <200k)

#2 – Taxpayers with AGI near $200k ($250 jt) -- Either reduce NII or reduce AGI

#3 - Taxpayers with AGI below $200k ($250 jt) -- Avoid spikes in income that trigger 3.8% tax

Page 19: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Reduce Net Investment Income

Two Ways to reduce Net Investment Income:

#1 - Convert NII into income that isn’t NII #2 – Shift NII to family and to charity that aren’t subject to tax on their NII

Page 20: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Reduce Net Investment Income

Convert NII into Income That Isn’t NII#1 - Taxable interest to tax-free muni interest

#2 – Life insurance

#3 – Work 500+ hours at business

#4 – Monster-size Roth IRA Conversions

Page 21: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Roth IRA Conversions Reg IRA Brokerage Roth IRA Assets $300,000 $120,000 -0-5% income $15,000 $6,000Tax Rate 39.6% 43.4%/23.8%Tax -5,940 -1,428 $13,632 $9,060 $4,572

Page 22: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Roth IRA ConversionsDo a Roth IRA Conversion of IRA• Triggers $300,000 of taxable income• Taxed at 39.6% rate (no 3.8% surtax)• Use $120,000 in brokerage to pay taxCONCEPT: You have moved $120,000 from taxable account into tax-exempt Roth IRA; Moved income out of 3.8% surtax account

Page 23: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Roth IRA Conversions Reg IRA Broker Roth IRA Assets $300,000 $120,000 $300,0005% income $15,000 $6,000 $15,000Tax Rate 39.6% 44.4%/23.8% 0%Tax -5,940 -1,428 . -0- $13,632 $9,060 $4,572 $15,000

Page 24: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Roth IRA ConversionsChildren liquidate inherited accounts?

Reg IRA Brokerage Roth IRA Assets $300,000 $120,000 $300,000 Tax Rate 39.6% -0- -0-Tax -120,000 -0- . -0-$300,000 $180,000 $120,000 $300,000The $420,000 of assets were only worth $300,000, after-taxes. (IRA: pre-tax income)

Page 25: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Reduce Net Investment Income

Shift NII to Family/Charity who pay no 3.8% tax [note: trusts do pay 3.8%]Family: Give income-generating investmentsCharity: #1 – Make gifts with appreciated stock#2 – Donor advised funds & private foundations

#3 – Charitable lead trusts

Page 26: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

WHICH ASSET TO GIVE ?

PLANNING FOR CHARITABLE GIFTS

OF APPRECIATED STOCKIN LIGHT OF FUTURETAX RATE CHANGES

Page 27: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

DONORS LIKE TO CONTRIBUTE APPRECIATED STOCK

DOUBLE-TAX ADVANTAGE• Charitable Income Tax Deduction for the

Full Appreciated Value of the Stock• Never Pay Income Tax on the Growth of

the Value of the Stock• Loss Property? Sell for tax loss; give cash

Page 28: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

DOUBLE BENEFIT FROM GIFT OF APPRECIATED L.T.C.G. PROPERTY

<< AVOID LONG-TERM CAPITAL GAIN TAX

<< CHARITABLE INCOME TAX DEDUCTION

Page 29: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

$ Benefits Max Federal Taxes Saved

Person in 2012

50%

<< 15%* LTCG Tax Rate

<< 35% Marginal Tax Rate

* 25% RE Dep Recap * 28% Collectibles

Page 30: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

IMPACT OF INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX

RATE CHANGES in 2012 and 2013

Page 31: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

FUTURE INCOME TAX RATES

Highest tax rates 2012 2013• Investment income 35% 44.4%• Earned income 36.4% 43.0% (wages – 1.45% health)• LT Capital Gains 15% 24.8%

Page 32: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

$ Benefits Max Federal Taxes Saved

Person in the Year 201250%

<< 15%* LTCG Tax Rate

<< 35% Marginal Tax Rate

* 25% RE Dep Recap * 28% Collectibles

Page 33: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

$ Benefits Max Federal Taxes Saved

Person in the Year 201365.4%

<< 24.8%* LTCG Tax Rate

<< 39.6*% Marginal Tax Rate(3.8% surtax not avoided by charitable deduction)

* 29.8% RE Dep Recap * 32.8% Collectibles

Page 34: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Reduce Net Investment Income

Shift NII to Family/Charity who pay no 3.8% tax [note: trusts do pay 3.8%]Family: Give income-generating investmentsCharity: #1 – Make gifts with appreciated stock

#2 – Donor advised funds & private foundations#3 – Charitable lead trusts

Page 35: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

SO YOU WANNA BE A PHILANTHROPIST?

Administrative Convenience of Donor Advised Funds & Private Foundations – split large gift to many charities-- one receipt from DAF/PF instead of many CWAs from many charities-- anonymous gifts possible with DAFs

Page 36: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Shift Net Investment Income

Client with $400,000+ of income says:• “My $100,000 investment produces

$4,000 of taxable income every year”• “I give away $4,000 to charity every year”• “I want a charitable bequest of $100,000”CONCEPT: Put $100,000 into a DAF while alive. Reducing NII by $4,000 beats itemized deduction.

Page 37: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Reduce Net Investment IncomeShift NII to Family/Charity who pay no 3.8% tax [note: trusts do pay 3.8%]

Charity: #1 – Donor advised funds & private foundations#2 – Charitable lead trusts

COST/BENEFIT – Is administrative cost of PF or CLT worth doing just for 3.8% tax savings? Other benefits are needed. ( Compare: DAF cheap!)

Page 38: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Taxpayers with AGI Near $200,000

Two Ways to reduce the 3.8% surtax :

#1 - Reduce Net Investment Income and/or

#2 – Reduce AGI to less than $200,000 ($250,000 joint)

Page 39: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Taxpayers with AGI Near $200,000 and with lots of Net Investment Income

Reduce AGI to less than $200k ($250 jnt)

• Reduce NII (see strategies listed earlier)• Avoid large Roth IRA conversions• Maximize compensation deferral -- 401(k) contributions -- Non-qualified deferred comp (Sec. 409A)• “Charitable IRA Rollover”

Page 40: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Taxpayers with AGI Near $200,000

”Charitable IRA Rollover” - over age 70 ½

• “QCD” – Qualified Charitable Distribution• Have charitable gift made directly from

IRA to charity (max: $100,000 /year)• QCD distribution not counted as income

(Price? No itemized charitable deduction)• QCD can satisfy annual RMD

Page 41: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

REQUIRED MINIMUM DISTRIBUTIONS*LIFETIME DISTRIBUTIONS*

Age of Account Owner Required Payout

70 1/2 3.65% 75 4.37% 80 5.35% 85 6.76% 90 8.75% 95 11.63% 100 15.88%

Page 42: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

ADVANTAGES OF ROTH IRAs

• Unlike a regular IRA, no mandatory lifetime

distributions from a Roth IRA after age 70 ½• Yes, there are mandatory

distributions after death

Page 43: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Taxpayers with AGI Near $200,000 and with lots of Net Investment Income

”Charitable IRA Rollover” - over age 70 ½

71 year old professional• $150,000 compensation income• $50,000 net investment income• This year: first RMD from IRA ($40,000)• Intends to make charitable gift: $30,000

Page 44: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Taxpayers with AGI Near $200,000”Charitable IRA Rollover” - over age 70 ½

Normal GiftCompensation $150,000Investment 50,000 IRA RMD 40,000 AGI $240,000 << 3.8% surtaxTaxable Income $210,000 on $40,000

Page 45: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Taxpayers with AGI Near $200,000”Charitable IRA Rollover” - over age 70 ½

Normal Gift IRA GiftCompensation $150,000 $150,000Investment 50,000 50,000IRA RMD 40,000 10,000 AGI $240,000 $210,0003.8% surtax on: $40,000 $10,000

Page 46: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Will Law Be Extended to 2014?

Proposed: Public Good IRA Rollover Act of 2013 Expand law to include deferred gifts; DAFs; SOs

>Planning strategy for 2014 if, as in 2008, 2010 & 2012, law has not

been extended until December!:

Give RMD to charity; can’t lose ! (Some IRAs balk)

Page 47: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

3.8% Net Investment Income TaxMAGI > $200,000 ($250,000 joint returns)

Strategies for three different taxpayers:

#1 - Richest 1% - Income over $400,000 -- Need to reduce NII (won’t have AGI <200k) #2 – Taxpayers with AGI near $200k ($250 jt) -- Either reduce NII or reduce AGI

#3 - Taxpayers with AGI below $200k ($250 jt)

Page 48: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Taxpayers with AGI Under $200,000

Keep AGI Under $200,000, and prepare for future years• Modest-size Roth IRA conversions ($200,000 threshold not indexed for inflation)

• Modest-size capital gain harvesting• Avoid spikes in income -- Installment sales -- Charitable remainder trusts

Page 49: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

CHARITABLE REMAINDER

TRUSTS

Page 50: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUSTS

• Payment to non-charitable beneficiary (ies) for life *or* for a term of years (maximum 20 years)• Remainder interest distributed to

charity

• Exempt from income tax

Page 51: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUSTS

EXAMPLE• Husband & wife age 65• Sell stock or land for $1 million gain• Other option: contribute to CRT

before sale is finalized; have CRT make the sale

Page 52: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUSTS

CRT PROVIDES:• 1. Charitable income tax deduction• 2. Greater cash flow for life• 3. Avoid spike in income – 3.8% tax• 4. “Wealth replacement” strategy

with life insurance.

Page 53: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUSTS DONATE STOCK TO C.R.T.; KEEP THE STOCK C.R.T. SELLS STOCK

Sales Price $ 1,000,000 $1,000,000Cost of Stock -0- -0-Gain on Sale $ 1,000,000 $1,000,000

Capital GainsTax (about 25%) 250,000 None

Remaining Proceeds $ 750,000 $1,000,000

Page 54: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUSTS DONATE STOCK TO C.R.T.;

KEEP THE STOCK C.R.T. SELLS STOCK

Remaining Proceeds $ 750,000 $1,000,000

Interest Rate x 5% x 5%

Annual Income $ 37,500 $ 50,000 ══════ ══════

• (33% more)

Page 55: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUSTS

CRT PROVIDES:• 1. Charitable income tax deduction• 2. Greater cash flow for life• 3. Avoid spike in income – 3.8% tax

• 4. “Wealth replacement” strategy with life insurance.

Page 56: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Planning for Retirement Assets

Page 57: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

THREE STAGES OF A RETIREMENT ACCOUNT

•Accumulate Wealth

•Retirement Withdrawals

•Distributions After Death

Page 58: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Accumulate Wealth

• Tax deduction at contribution• Accumulate in tax-exempt

trust• Taxed upon distribution = Tax Deferred Compensation

Page 59: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Objective of Tax Laws:Provide Retirement Income

Consequently, there are laws to:• Discourage distributions before

age 59 ½• Force distributions after age 70 ½

Page 60: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

TYPES OF QRPs

• 1. Sec. 401 – Company plans• 2. Sec. 408 – IRAs -- SEP & SIMPLE IRAs• 3. Sec. 403(b) & 457–Charities• 4. Roth IRAs & 401(k)/403(b)

Page 61: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS

ESTATE PLANNER’S DILEMMA:• Cannot* make a lifetime gift of retirement

assets, like stock or land * exception: “Charitable IRA” • Cannot put into FLP for discount • Can make a bequest of retirement assets,

but usually taxable income to recipient

Page 62: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Roth IRA, Roth 401(k), or Roth 403(b)

INVERSE OF TRADITIONAL:• No tax deduction at contribution• Accumulate in tax-exempt trust• Not taxed upon distribution

Page 63: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

THREE STAGES

• Accumulate Wealth

•Retirement Withdrawals

• Distributions After Death

Page 64: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

RETIREMENT

TAXATIONGeneral Rule – Ordinary incomeExceptions: -- Tax-free return of capital-- NUA for appreciated employer stock-- Roth distributions are tax-free

Page 65: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

USUAL OBJECTIVE: Defer paying income taxes

in order to get greater cash flow

Principal 10% Yield

• Pre-Tax Amount $ 100,000 $ 10,000• Income Tax on Distribution (40%) 40,000

• Amount Left to Invest $ 60,000 $ 6,000

Page 66: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

REQUIRED MINIMUM DISTRIBUTION (“RMD”)

BACKGROUND: 50% penalty if notreceive distribution from IRA, 401(k), etc:#1 – lifetime distributions from own IRA:

beginning after age 70 ½#2 – an inherited IRA, 401(k), etc – beginning year after death *

Page 67: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

REQUIRED MINIMUM DISTRIBUTIONS*LIFETIME DISTRIBUTIONS*

Age of Account Owner Required Payout

70 1/2 3.65% 75 4.37% 80 5.35% 85 6.76% 90 8.75% 95 11.63% 100 15.88%

Page 68: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

ADVANTAGES OF ROTH IRAs

• Unlike a regular IRA, no mandatory lifetime

distributions from a Roth IRA after age 70 ½• Yes, there are mandatory

distributions after death

Page 69: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

THREE STAGES

• Accumulate Wealth

• Retirement Withdrawals

•Distributions After Death

Page 70: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Distributions After Death

> Income taxation> Mandatory ERISA distributions> Estate taxation

Collision of three tax worlds at death

Page 71: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

INCOME IN RESPECT OF A DECEDENT - “IRD” – Sec. 691

• No stepped up basis for retirement assets• After death, payments are income in

respect of a decedent (“IRD”) to the beneficiaries• Common mistake in the past: children

liquidate inherited retirement accounts.

Page 72: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Distributions After Death

> Income taxation> Mandatory ERISA distributions> Estate taxation

Collision of three tax worlds at death

Page 73: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Distributions After Death

After death, must start liquidating account• Tax planning for family members who inherit: DEFER distributions as long as possible – greater tax savings• “Stretch IRA” – make payments over beneficiary’s life expectancy

Page 74: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Distributions After Death

“ life expectancy“Oversimplified: Half of population will die before that age, and half will die after

Implication: For the 50% of people who live beyond L.E. date, an inherited IRA will be empty before they die.

Page 75: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

REQUIRED MINIMUM DISTRIBUTIONS*LIFE EXPECTANCY TABLE*

Age of Beneficiary Life Expectancy 30 83 53.3 more years 40 83 43.6 50 84 34.2 60 85 25.2 70 87 17.0 80 90 10.2

90 97 6.9

Page 76: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

REQUIRED MIN. DISTRIBUTIONS*LIFE EXPECTANCY TABLE*

“STRETCH IRAS”

Age of Beneficiary Life Expectancy 30 53.3 more years 40 43.6 50 34.2 60 25.2 70 17.0 80 10.2

90 6.9

Page 77: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

REQUIRED MIN. DISTRIBUTIONS*LIFE EXPECTANCY TABLE*

“STRETCH IRAS”

Age of Beneficiary Life Expectancy 30 1.9% 53.3 more years 40 2.3% 43.6 50 2.9% 34.2 60 4.0% 25.2 70 5.9% 17.0 80 10.0% 10.2

90 14.5% 6.9

Page 78: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

REQUIRED MINIMUM DISTRIBUTIONS* DEFINITIONS *

• Designated Beneficiary (“DB”) A human being. An estate or charity can be a beneficiary of an account, but not a DB.• Determination Date September 30 in year after death.

Page 79: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

HOW TO ELIMINATE BENEFICIARIES BEFORE DETERMINATION DATE

• Disclaimers• Full distribution of share• Divide into separate accounts

Page 80: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

HOW TO LEAVE ACCOUNT TO BOTH FAMILY & CHARITY

• Other beneficiaries cannot do stretch IRA if charity is also a beneficiary?

• Solutions: * cash out charity’s share by Sept 30 or * separate account for charity

Page 81: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

2012 SENATE PROPOSAL: LIQUIDATE ALL INHERITED IRAs IN FIVE YEARS

• Feb 7, 2012 – Highway Bill – not enacted• Senator Baucus – Senator Kyl – “We will look

at it again later” EXCEPTIONS• -- Spouse -- minor child -- disabled• -- Person not more than ten years younger

Page 82: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

REQUIRED MINIMUM DISTRIBUTIONSExample: Death at age 80?

CURRENT LAW: *Life Expectancy Table*

Age of Beneficiary Life Expectancy 30 1.9% 53.3 more years 40 2.3% 43.6 50 2.9% 34.2 60 4.0% 25.2 70 5.9% 17.0 80 10.0% 10.2

90 10.0% 6.9 * [10.2 yrs]

Page 83: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

REQUIRED MINIMUM DISTRIBUTIONSExample: Death at age 80?

PROPOSED: FIVE YEARS if >10 yrs younger

Age of Beneficiary Life Expectancy 30 5 years 40 5 50 5 60 5 70 5.9% 17.0 80 10.0% 10.2

90 10.00% 6.9 * [10.2 yrs]

Page 84: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

2012 SENATE PROPOSAL: LIQUIDATE ALL INHERITED IRAs IN FIVE YEARS

EXCEPTIONS• -- Spouse -- minor child -- disabled• -- Person not more than ten years youngerTAX TRAP: Does naming a trust for a spouse (e.g., QTIP trust; credit shelter trust) as an IRA beneficiary mean required liquidation in 5 years?

Page 85: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

2012 SENATE PROPOSAL: LIQUIDATE ALL INHERITED IRAs IN FIVE YEARS

IMPLICATIONS FOR CHARITIESDonors more likely to consider• Outright bequests• Retirement assets to tax-exempt CRT– Payable over child’s remaining life– Spouse only (marital estate tax deduction)– Spouse & children (no marital deduction)

Page 86: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

FUNDING TRUSTS WITH RETIREMENT ASSETS

Page 87: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

FUNDING TRUSTS

General Rule: Trust is not DBException: “Look-through” trust

if four conditions Types:-- “accumulation trusts” -- “conduit trusts”

Page 88: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

MULTIPLE BENEFICIARIES OF A SINGLE IRA?

• Must liquidate over life expectancy of oldest beneficiary• Payable to a trust? Use life

expectancy of oldest trust beneficiary

Page 89: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

FUNDING TRUSTS WITH RETIREMENT ASSETS

Challenges when there are multiple beneficiaries with a big age spread (Mom and children)

Common problem with marital bypass trusts and QTIP trusts when surviving spouse is elderly and other beneficiaries are young secret – long marriage

Page 90: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

AGE AT DEATHMEDIAN AGE AT DEATH ON FEDERAL

ESTATE TAX RETURNS:

Age 80 – MenAge 84 - Women

Page 91: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

AGE AT DEATHPercentage of Federal Estate Tax Returns

<50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90 90+

2.65.2

10.5

24.4

38.0

19.4

Page 92: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

AGE AT DEATH

Under 60 60 - 70 70 - 80 Over 80 Under 60 60 - 70 70 - 80 Over 80Men Women

914

24

53

5 9

20

66

Men/Women Percentage of

2007 Federal Estate Tax Returns

Page 93: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

MARITAL STATUS AT DEATH

Married Widowed Single Divorce/Sep Married Widowed Single Divorce/SepMen Women

61.5

24.7

8.94.8

24.4

61.1

9.64.9

Marital Status of Decedentson Federal Estate Tax Returns

(in percentages)

Page 94: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

AGE AT DEATHMEDIAN AGE AT DEATH ON FEDERAL

ESTATE TAX RETURNS:

Age 80 – MenAge 84 - Women

Page 95: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

REQUIRED MINIMUM DISTRIBUTIONS*LIFE EXPECTANCY TABLE*

Age of Beneficiary Life Expectancy 30 53.3 more years 40 43.6 50 34.2 60 25.2 70 17.0

80 10.2 more years 90 6.9 more years

Page 96: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

USUAL OBJECTIVE: Defer paying income taxes in order to get greater cash flow

Principal 10% Yield

• Pre-Tax Amount $ 100,000 $ 10,000• Income Tax on Distribution (40%) 40,000

• Amount Left to Invest $ 60,000 $ 6,000

Page 97: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

MANDATORY DISTRIBUTIONS[Assume inherit IRA at age 80 and die at 92]

Own Accumulation ConduitAGE IRA Trust Trust . 80 5.35% 9.80% 9.80% 85 6.76% 19.23% 13.16% 90 8.78% 100.00% 18.18%91 9.26% empty 19.23%92 9.81% empty 20.41%

Page 98: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

2-GENERATION CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUST

• Typically pays 5% to elderly surviving spouse for life, then 5% to children for life, then liquidates to charity• Like an IRA, a CRT is exempt from

income tax• Can operate like a credit-shelter trust

for IRD assets [no marital deduction]

Page 99: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

2-GENERATION CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUST

• Can be a solution for second marriages when estate is top-heavy with retirement assets. Example:

-- Half of IRA to surviving spouse -- Other half of IRA to a CRT for 2nd

spouse and children from 1st marriage

Page 100: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

2-GENERATION CHARITABLE REMAINDER TRUST

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS• Minimum 10% charitable deduction -- all children should be over age 40 • CRUT – minimum 5% annual distrib• Not eligible for marital deduction (see 2002 article on topic)

Page 101: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

MANDATORY DISTRIBUTIONS[Assume inherit IRA at age 80 and die at 92]

Own Accumulation ConduitAGE IRA Trust Trust . 80 5.35% 9.80% 9.80% 85 6.76% 19.23% 13.16% 90 8.78% 100.00% 18.18%91 9.26% empty 19.23%92 9.81% empty 20.41%

Page 102: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

MANDATORY DISTRIBUTIONS[Assume inherit IRA at age 80 and die at 92]

Own Accumulation ConduitAGE IRA Trust Trust . C R T . 80 5.35% 9.80% 9.80% 5.00% 85 6.76% 19.23% 13.16% 5.00% 90 8.78% 100.00% 18.18% 5.00%91 9.26% empty 19.23% 5.00%92 9.81% empty 20.41% 5.00%

Page 103: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

WOULD THE OUTCOME OF ROLLOVER vs. TRUST

BE ANY BETTER WITH A YOUNGER SURVIVING SPOUSE?

ANSWER: NO

Page 104: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

MANDATORY DISTRIBUTIONS[Assume surv. spouse inherits IRA at age 70]

Own Accumulation Own AccumulAGE IRA Trust AGE IRA Trust . 70 3.65% 5.88% 82 5.85% 20.00% 83 6.14% 25.00%75 4.37% 8.33% 84 6.46% 33.33% 80 5.35% 14.29% 85 6.76% 50.00% 86 7.10% 100.00%

87 7.47% empty

Page 105: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

MANDATORY DISTRIBUTIONS[Assume surv. spouse inherits IRA at age 70]

Own Conduit Own ConduitAGE IRA Trust AGE IRA Trust . 70 3.65% 5.88% 82 5.85% 11.00% 83 6.14% 11.63%75 4.37% 7.46% 84 6.46% 12.35% 80 5.35% 9.80% 85 6.76% 13.16% 86 7.10% 14.08%

87 7.47% 14.93%

Page 106: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

RETIREMENT ASSETS IN THE CROSSFIRE OF:

> Income taxation> Mandatory ERISA distributions

> Estate taxationCollision of three tax worlds at death

Page 107: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

FUTURE OF ESTATE TAX ?Year Threshold2001 $ 675,0002002-2003 $ 1,000,0002004-2005 $ 1,500,0002006-2008 $ 2,000,0002009 $ 3,500,0002010 REPEALED ! [* carryover basis]2011-2012 $ 5,000,000 inflation indexed2013 $ 5,250,000 inflation indexed

Page 108: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

MARRIED? 61% of male decedents

24% of female decedents-MARITAL DEDUCTION !!- DEFER ESTATE TAX UNTIL

DEATH OF SURVIVING SPOUSE

Page 109: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS AND PORTABILITY

For a surviving spouse, rollovers and portability

will usually be your first choice

Page 110: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

PORTABILITY* Law that gives a married couple a

potential combined $10+ million exemption – double the $5+ million exemption available to others. Section 2010( c)

* When 2nd spouse dies, estate can claim DSUEA from estate of first spouse

Page 111: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS AND PORTABILITY

• Portability permits rollovers to a surviving spouse• Rollovers are better than

retirement assets to a trust for a surviving spouse

Page 112: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

MANDATORY DISTRIBUTIONS[Assume inherit IRA at age 80 and die at 92]

Own Accumulation ConduitAGE IRA Trust Trust . 80 5.35% 9.80% 9.80% 85 6.76% 19.23% 13.16% 90 8.78% 100.00% 18.18%91 9.26% empty 19.23%92 9.81% empty 20.41%

Page 113: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

RETIREMENT ASSETS IN THE CROSSFIRE OF:

> Income taxation> Mandatory ERISA distributions

> Estate taxationCollision of three tax worlds at death

Page 114: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

NOT MARRIED? 39% of male decedents

75% of female decedents- NO MARITAL DEDUCTION- ESTATE TAX WILL BE DUE ON

I.R.D.

Page 115: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

NOT MARRIED? NO MARITAL DEDUCTION

WHAT IS THE TAX RATE THAT RICH PEOPLE PAY ON THEIR INCOME ?

• Income tax?• Estate tax?

Page 116: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

IF RICH ENOUGH TO PAY ESTATE TAX, CONSIDER CHARITY & PHILANTHROPY.

Combination of income & estate taxesIncome $100Income tax 40 (40%)

Net $ 60Estate Tax 24 (40% )

Net to Heirs $ 36 ….. in 2013

Page 117: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Roth IRA Conversion and a Charitable Bequest Disclaimer

• Pre-Mortem Planning: Roth IRA Conversion• Post-Mortem Planning: Charitable

Bequest via Disclaimer (charity named as contingent beneficiary of a retirement account)

Page 118: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

A ROTH IRA CONVERSION IS A TAXABLE EVENT

Treated as taxable withdrawal from traditional IRA or QRP,

followed by a non-deductible contribution to a Roth IRA

Page 119: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Roth IRA & Estate Tax

AssetsCash, etc. $ 4.1 millionIRA (taxable IRD) 1.0 millionTx-exmp Roth - 0-Liab -0-Net Estate $ 5.1 million

Page 120: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Roth IRA & Estate Tax

Before AfterCash, etc. 4.1 4.1IRA 1.0 0.7Tx-exmp Roth - 0- 0.3Liab -0-Net Estate 5.1

Page 121: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Roth IRA & Estate Tax

Before AfterCash, etc. 4.1 4.1IRA 1.0 0.7Tx-exmp Roth - 0- 0.3Liab -0- -0.1Net Estate 5.1 5.0

Page 122: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Roth IRA & Estate Tax

Before AfterCash, etc. 4.1 paid> 4.0IRA (taxable IRD) 1.0 0.7Tx-exmp Roth - 0- 0.3Liab -0- paid> -0- Net Estate 5.1 5.0

Page 123: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Roth IRA & Estate Tax Assets DeathCash, etc. $ 4.1 million $4.3IRA 1.0 million Tx-exmp Roth - 0- Charit. Bequest - 0 - Liab -0- Net Estate $ 5.1 million $5.3

Page 124: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Roth IRA & Estate Tax Before AfterCash, etc. 4.3 4.3IRA 1.0 0.7Tx-exmp Roth - 0- 0.3Charit. Bequest - 0- - 0 -Liab -0- -0.1

Net Estate 5.3 5.2

Page 125: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Charitable Disclaimer Before AfterCash, etc. 4.3 4.3IRA 1.0 0.7Tx-exmp Roth - 0- 0.3Charit. Bequest - 0- -0.2Liab -0- -0.1Net Estate 5.3 5.0

Page 126: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Charitable Disclaimer Before AfterCash, etc. 4.3 paid> 4.2IRA (taxable) 1.0 paid> 0.5Tx-exmp Roth - 0- 0.3Charit. Bequest - 0- paid> 0.2Liab -0- paid> -0-Net Estate 5.3 5.0 0.2

Page 127: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Charitable Disclaimer

Estate planner said to me: “Show me the child that will actually disclaim an inheritance to a charity to avoid an estate tax”

Page 128: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Charitable Disclaimer

•A charity the child supports•Donor advised fund

(problems with disclaimers to a private foundation)

Page 129: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

HOW TO LEAVE A RETIREMENT ACCOUNT TO BOTH FAMILY & CHARITY

Page 130: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Avoiding Problems With Charitable Bequests

* Let Other Beneficiaries Have Stretch IRA

*Keep IRD Off of Estate’s Income Tax Return* Guarantee Offsetting Charitable Income Tax

Deduction if Have to Report Income

Page 131: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

REQUIRED MIN. DISTRIBUTIONS*LIFE EXPECTANCY TABLE*

“STRETCH IRAS”

Age of Beneficiary Life Expectancy 30 53.3 more years 40 43.6 50 34.2 60 25.2 70 17.0 80 10.2

90 6.9

Page 132: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Avoiding Problems With Charitable Bequests

* Let Other Beneficiaries Have Stretch IRA

*Keep IRD Off of Estate’s Income Tax Return

* Guarantee Offsetting Charitable Income Tax Deduction if Have to Report Income

Page 133: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

WHAT CAN GO WRONG ?

TWO WAYS TO MAKE A CHARITABLE BEQUEST FROM A RETIREMENT ACCOUNT

#1 – NAME CHARITY AS BENEFICIARY OF THE ACCOUNT

#2 – PAY ACCOUNT TO ESTATE OR TRUST THAT THEN MAKES A CHARITABLE BEQUEST

Page 134: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Avoiding Problems With Charitable Bequests

* Let Other Beneficiaries Have Stretch IRA

*Keep IRD Off of Estate’s Income Tax Return* Guarantee Offsetting Charitable Income Tax

Deduction if Have to Report Income

Page 135: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

WHAT CAN GO WRONG #1?

• Other beneficiaries cannot do stretch IRA if charity is beneficiary?

• Solutions: * cash out charity’s share by Sept 30 or * separate account for charity p. 39

Page 136: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

WHAT CAN GO WRONG #2 ?

TWO WAYS TO MAKE A CHARITABLE BEQUEST FROM A RETIREMENT ACCOUNT

#1 – NAME CHARITY AS BENEFICIARY OF THE ACCOUNT

#2 – PAY ACCOUNT TO ESTATE OR TRUST THAT THEN MAKES A CHARITABLE BEQUEST

Page 137: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

WHAT CAN GO WRONG #2?

Estate or trust has taxable income from receiving IRA distribution, but maybe there is no offsetting charitable income tax deduction when the IRA check is given to a charity.

Page 138: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

WHAT CAN GO WRONG?• IRS Chief Counsel Memorandum ILM 200848020• Decedent left his IRA to a trust that benefited

his six children and several charities• Trust received cash from IRA; paid entire

charitable share, leaving the six children as the only remaining beneficiaries of the trust.

• IRS: “Taxable income from IRA, but no charitable deduction.” Reason: trust had no instructions to pay income to charities p.39

Page 139: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

WHAT CAN GO WRONG?

• Solution #1 – Keep IRD off of estate’s/trust’s income tax return

a. Name charity as beneficiary of IRA b. “Distribute” IRA to charity if document allows Caution: IRS memo on danger of using retirement accounts to satisfy pecuniary bequests

p.41

Page 140: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

WHAT CAN GO WRONG?

SOLUTION #2 – draft document to get an offsetting charitable income tax deduction in case estate or trust has income

• I instruct that all of my charitable gifts, bequests and devises shall be made, to the extent possible, from "income in respect of a decedent" ….. P.42

Page 141: CHRISTOPHER R. HOYT University of Missouri - Kansas City  School of Law

Planning for Retirement Assets in an Estate

CHRISTOPHER R. HOYTUniversity of Missouri - Kansas City

School of Law