Upload
gertrude-grant
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Effects of Analysis Method, Bolt Pre-Stress, and Cover Plate
Thickness on the Behavior of Bolted Flanges of Different
SizesFinal Presentation
Chris WowkMANE 6970
Master’s Project
The objective of this project was to evaluate the behavior of flat faced cover plate/flange joints using:◦ Radial Beam Theory (Analytic Solution)◦ Solid Element Finite Element Models◦ Shell/Beam Element Finite Element Models
The effect of the following design variables on joint behavior were also investigated:◦ Bolt pre-stress◦ Cover plate thickness◦ Nominal pipe size
Objective
ASME B16.5 standard flange/cover plate sizes were used
Typical flange (steel) and bolting (CRES) materials were used
Cases Analyzed
Analytical Solution Analytical solution
developed by considering the annular portion of the flange and cover plate as a collection of radial beams
Moment diagram allowed for expressions for flange rotations and deflections be determined through integration
Separation of the joint was then calculated
FEA Analyses
Solid Element Model Shell/Beam Element Model
Cases RunNPS Size
Cover Thickness
Bolt Pre-Stress 0Pressure
Load25% Yield
80% Yield
0Pressure
Load25% Yield
80% Yield
0Pressure
Load25% Yield
80% Yield
0Pressure
Load25% Yield
80% Yield
Radial Beam Theory
Solid Element FEA
Shell Element FEA
Radial Beam Theory
Appendix Y Equations
Solid Element FEA
Shell Element FEA
Radial Beam Theory
Appendix Y Equations
Solid Element FEA
Shell Element FEA
Radial Beam Theory
Solid Element FEA
Shell Element FEA
Joint Separation Along Length
Radial Location of Contact
Stress In Center of Cover
Maximum Joint Separation
AnalysisMethod
t1 0.5*t1 2*t1
4"
t2
16"
Differences exist in the joint behaviors predicted by the different analysis types ◦ Shell/beam FEA predicted joint separations typically smaller than
other methods Bolt modeling method is the expected causes
◦ RBT not able to predict complete separation between cover plate and flange at zero pre-stress
General conclusions that the different analysis types were in agreement on:◦ Joint separation decreases as bolt pre-stress and/or cover plate
thickness increase◦ Radial location of contact moves closer to the bolt circle as bolt
pre-stress increases Results from smaller pipe size could not be scaled for larger
pipe size (non-linear)
Joint Behavior Results
Radial and tangential stresses in the center of the cover plate generally decreased as bolt pre-stress and/or thickness increases
Values differed between the analysis types FEA results showed increases in stress at
80% yield pre-stress◦ Cause is unknown – potential element distortion
issue
Cover Plate Stress Results
Analysis type matters in evaluating flat faced bolted flange joints
High bolt pre-stress is required to limit separation of flange components and reduce leak potential
Separation can also be reduced by increasing cover plate thickness
Be wary of how you model bolts in FEA
Overall Conclusions
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII – Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels, 2013 Edition, Appendix Y.
Galai, H and Bouzid, A.H, “Analytical Modeling of Flat Face Flanges with Metal-to-Metal Contact Beyond the Bolt Circle,” Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Vol 132, 2010.
Schneider, R.W, “Flat Face Flanges with Metal-to-Metal Contact Beyond the Bolt Circle,” Transactions of the ASME, Vol 90, 1968, pgs 82-88.
Waters, E.O and Schneider, R.W, “Axisymmetric, Nonidentical, Flat Face Flanges with Metal-to-Metal Contact Beyond the Bolt Circle,” Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol 91, 1969, pgs 615-622.
References