48
Francesco Menichetti (Pisa, Italy) Choosing antibiotics in difficult to treat staphylococcal infections

Choosing antibiotics in difficult to treat staphylococcal ... · Francesco Menichetti (Pisa, Italy) Choosing antibiotics in difficult to treat staphylococcal infections

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Francesco Menichetti (Pisa, Italy)

Choosing antibiotics in difficult to treat staphylococcal infections

New anti gram-positives antibiotics

ABSSSI CAP HAP VAP note

CeftarolineZinforo

Astra Zeneca X X No VAP600 mg bid

CeftobiproleMabelio

Basilea X X No VAP500 mg bid

Telavancina *Vibativ

Astellas X X X Once-daily10 mg/KgNo IR

DalbavancinXydalba

Angelini X Once-weeklyIV 1500mg

OritavancinOrbactiv

The MedicinesCompany

X IV Single dose1200 mg

TedizolidSivextro

MSD X 200 mg IV/OSX 6 days

* When alternative treatment is not suitable

Review of new antibiotics

• Drug profile

• Personal experience

• Place in therapy today & tomorrow

5th Generation Cephalosporins

Ceftobiprole

Broad-spectrum cephalosporin

Enhanced gram-positive spectrum

including MRSA, VISA, and EF

CAP, HAP

Bactericidal

IV with q8h – q12h dosing

t1/2 = 3 – 4 h

Elimination: renal

MIC range 0.5 – 2 mg/L

500 mg TID

Ceftaroline

Broad-spectrum cephalosporin

Enhanced gram-positive spectrum, including MRSA, VISA, and EF

CAP, ABSSSI

Bactericidal

IV with q8h – q12h dosing

t1/2 = 2 – 3 h

Elimination: renal

MIC range 0.5 – 2 mg/L

600 mg BID

Case 1: ceftaroline

• Male, 73 years-old

• HIV infection (2004), on Antiretroviral Therapy

• COPD (heavy smoker)

• Admitted for bilateral pneumonia

Chest X-Ray

Lung CT-scan

MRSA bilateral pneumonia

• MRSA isolated from sputum & BAL

• MDR strain: Fluoroquinolone R, Gentamicin-R, Cotrimoxazole-R; susceptible to glycopeptideantibiotics, doxicicline, tygecicline, rifampin

• Ceftaroline MIC: 1 mg/ml (E-test)

MRSA bilateral pneumonia

• Ceftaroline 600 mg bid x 14 days,

• Favorable response

• C. difficile relapse: fidaxomicin

• Pathogen-directed therapy of CAP

Case 2: ceftobiprole

• Male, 93-years-old

• E. faecalis aortic valve endocarditis

• Spondylodiscitis L1/L2

• Treated with ampi/sulbactam plus daptomycin

• Bilateral nosocomial pneumonia

• No sputum, no BAL

• Urinary antigens (SP, LP): negatives

Chest X-Ray

Lung CT-scan

CT-Pet

Case 2

• Ceftobiprole 500 mg tid x 21 days

• Patient improved, no toxicity

• Ceftobiprole combined with daptomycin wasthen continued for E. faecalis endocarditis

• Empiric therapy for nosocomial pneumonia

Case 3: ceftobiprole

• Male, 62 years-old

• Arterial hypertension, BPH

• Post surgical (removal of the nail) left foot ABSSSI

• Polimicrobial (MRSA+P.aeruginosa)

• MIC: MRSA 0.75 mg/l; P. aeruginosa: 2 mg/l

Case 3

• Previous antibiotic therapy

• Ceftobiprole 500 mg tid, 14 days

• No side effects

• Improved

Ceftobiprole monotherapy for nosocomial polimicrobial infection

(Off-label)

Ceftaroline/Ceftobiprole: overall personal impression

• Cephalosporins with anti-MRSA activity

• Ceftobiprole: activity against some gram-neg. rods(i.e.: P.aeruginosa)

• PK/PD, efficacy and safety of the class

• Good choice for CAP, HAP, ABSSSI with respect to combination antibiotic therapy

• Potentially useful, alone or in combo, for othersevere infections

Ceftaroline/Ceftobiprole: place in therapy today

Pneumonia

• CAP requiring hospitalization

• HAP (not VAP) ceftobiprole

ABSSSI

• ceftaroline

• Severe Infections (data required !!) due to MRSA, MSSA, (polimicrobial, ceftobiprole)

• Potentially useful for MRSA endocarditis, meningitis, bone infection, etc.

• Empiric monotherapy for pts with sepsis or febrileneutropenia (risk factors for MRSA)

• Not (alone) for ESBL-producers or carbapenemasegram-negative bugs

Ceftaroline/Ceftobiprole: place in therapy tomorrow

Why I consider/decide touse ceftaroline/ceftobiprole

• Monotherapy (in place of combo) for registeredindications (hospitalized CAP, HAP, ABSSI) especially(but not exclusively) for pts with MRSA risk factors

• Empiric, broad-spectrum, antibiotic therapy in ptswith sepsis syndrome (monotherapy or combo according to local epidemiology)

• Selected severe infections caused by susceptiblepathogens when a betalactam may be the preferredchoice

POTENTIAL COMPETITORS: LINEZOLID, DAPTOMYCIN,

TEICOPLANIN, VANCOMYCIN

Dalbavancin: a long-acting anti-gram-positive antibiotic for the treatment

of ABSSSI (and other severe infections)

Dalbavancin (Angelini)

• Activity vs most G+

• bactericidal

• Good PK profile (high concentrations, long half-life, low potential for interactions)

– 63% in bone similar to linezolid (60%)

• Good safety proflie

FDA approves Dalvance to treat skin infections QIDP; May 23, 2014

Comparative Activity vsStaphylococci

MIC90 (mg/L)

2221Vancomycin

4441Teicoplanin

0.120.060.060.06Dalbavancin

(1129)(353)(1119)(2834)(N)

Antibiotic

MR CoNSMS CoNSMRSAMSSAOrganism

Jones. ICAAC 2004. Abstract E-2009.

Personal experience

• Recurrent cellulitis (strepto, staphylo) in pts with post-surgical chronic arm lymphedema (i.e. mastectomy)

• Dalbavancin 1500 mg IV every 2/3 weeks for preventing recurrence

• A costly alternative to montly benzatin-penicillin

• Maximum-dose-limit ?

• Potential for decreasing the risk of recurrence i.e:. after 4-6 doses ??

• Prosthetic joint infections in place of chronicsuppressive oral/parenteral antibiotic therapy(linezolid, teicoplanin etc.)

• Need for defined etiology (MSSA/MRSA)

• Less pressure on gastrointestinal flora ?

• Less toxicity ?

• Chronic osteomyelitis: in place of daptomycin

Personal experience

De-escalation, step-down therapy

• Shifting from a glycopeptide/daptomycinantibiotic to complete/continue prolongedantibiotic course

• Selected case of MSSA/MRSA endocarditis, vascular prosthetic infection, vertebralosteomyelitis for an earlier discharge from hospital

Personal experience

Case report - 1

Male, 51 years-old

Vertebral osteomyelitis L1-L2, Staphylococcus hominis MS

oxacillin 4 gr/day for 7 d., then ceftriaxone 2 gr/day for 14 d.

Case report - 1

• Need to discharge from hospital

• Need to complete 6 weeks of antibiotic therapy

• No vein acces (drug abuser)

• Dalbavancin 1500 mg every 15 d., three doses

• EOT: WBC 17300 6530/mmc; PCR 9,92 0,87 mg/dl

• No more pain, no more analgesic drugs

NMR during… NMR 4 months FU

Case report- 1

Male, 77 years-old

May 2016: low-grade fever, low-back pain

Aorto-bisiliac vascular prosthesis

Mild dementia, vascular enecephalophaty

September 2016 admitted to Vascular Surgery Unit

Mild increase of inflammation index

TTE: negative

Abdominal US: negative

Spine NMR …

Case report - 2

Spine NMR

Tonelli, GiuseppeTonelli, Giuseppe

E778F3DC-2B30-424B-9A95-AF0ADA399C7BE778F3DC-2B30-424B-9A95-AF0ADA399C7B

14/08/193914/08/1939

77 YEAR77 YEAR

MM

Page: 3 of 3Page: 3 of 3

Ospedale di Livorno Ospedale di Livorno

Scintigrafia globale corporea con cellule autologhe marcateScintigrafia globale corporea con cellule autologhe marcate

TC/SPET FUSIONTC/SPET FUSION

02/09/2016 15.00.0099FA247B-E58E-49E2-B650-D16D6843191399FA247B-E58E-49E2-B650-D16D68431913

------

------

------

IM: 0IM: 0

T: 256T: 256B: 0B: 0

Z: 0,62Z: 0,62

WBC scintigraphy

Case report 2

• Blood culture: MSSA

• Paravertebral needle aspirate: MSSA

• Vascular prosthesis MSSA infection with vertebral (L3-L4, L4-L5) and paravertebral tissue involvement

• High-risk for surgery: no prosthesis removal

• Long.term suppressive antibiotic therapy• Daptomycin + ceftaroline for 25 d.• Need to discharge, need to continue ATBT• Dalbavancin 1500 mg every 15 days for three doses…….

Dalbavancin: overall personal impression

• A lipo-glycopeptide with anti-MRSA activity

• PK/PD, efficacy and safety of the class

• Good choice for single shot therapy of ABSSSI with respect to prolonged treatment

• Advantage in terms of adherence, compliance, lenght of hospital stay

• Potentially useful, alone or in combo, for othersevere infections

Dalbavancin: overall personal impression

• A lipo-glycopeptide with anti-MRSA activity

• PK/PD, efficacy and safety of the class

• Good choice for single shot therapy of ABSSSI with respect to prolonged treatment

• Advantage in terms of adherence, compliance, long of hospital stay

• Potentially useful, alone or in combo, for othersevere infections

Dalbavancin: place in therapy today

ABSSSI

• Cellulitis

• Diabetic foot infection due to staphylococci

De-escalation, step-down therapy

• Shifting from a glycopeptide/daptomycin antibiotic to complete/continue prolonged antibiotic course

Situations warranting consideration for use of dalbavancin to treat ABSSSIs

• Pts necessitating IV therapy who are not candidates for indwelling intravenous catheters or with a history of intravenous catheter-related complications;

• Pts in whom deferment of hospital admission is planned;

• Pts requiring continuation of therapy at or after hospital discharge;

• Pts who are candidates for OPAT where home health or frequent infusion center visits are not feasible;

• Pts with a history or risk for non-compliance with oral therapy.

• Severe Infections (data required !!) due to MRSA, MSSA, other gram-positives

• Potentially useful for MRSA endocarditis, bacteremia, bone infection, etc.

• Empiric combo therapy for pts with sepsis or febrileneutropenia (risk factors for MRSA/streptococci)

Dalbavancin: place in therapy tomorrow

Type of infections

• ABSSSI: one-two shots!

– Erysipelas, cellulitis, abscess, skin ulces, nosocomial cellulitis

• CBSIs: empiric and targeted use

– One shot could be enough for CNS MR

• Bone and joint infections

• Endocarditis

Why I consider/decide to use Dalbavancin

• Monotherapy, for registered indications

• Empiric, broad-spectrum, antibiotic therapy in ptswith sepsis syndrome when an anti-gram-positive agent is required (combo according to localepidemiology)

• Selected severe infections caused by susceptiblepathogens when glycopeptide antibiotic or daptomycin may be the preferred choice

Tedizolid 200 mg OD 6 days vs linezolid 600 mg BID 10 days

Prokocimer P et al. JAMA. 2013;309(6):559-569

Tedizolid is a promising antibiotic for the treatment of ABSSSIs. Once daily dosing (IV/OS) and shorter duration of therapy compared to linezolid and other traditional antibiotics are attractive.Tedizolid has several potential benefits over linezolid:• it may be more potent than linezolid; • it may be less prone to developing resistance; • less likely to cause thrombocytopenia &

neuropathy.• it may be less likely to cause serotonin syndrome;• it may be less likely to interact with MAO inhibitors; Tedizolid has one drawback: it is expensive (??)

Tedizolid vs. Linezolid

Leading determinantsof antimicrobial resistance (AMR)

Determinants/criticity * Goal Instruments

ABs selective pressure reduction Antimicrobial Stewardship

Patient-to-patienttransmission of R bugs

reduction Infection Control

Paucity of new ABs* Implement PI research

New rules, fast-track, incentives

Paucity of validatedtherapeutic strategies *

New scientificevidence

Funds fo indipendentresearch

The knowledge of new antibiotics:a clinician must !

• …..and a chance for the pts…….

• Curiosity, not indolent drug prescription !

• Evidence from registration RCT: insufficient

• Potential usefullness of personal experience

• Need to consider off-label use

• More independent clinical research