Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
C.C.Wang
2/
Flavor Physics & CP Violation2006/04/09
Chin-chi WangNational Taiwan University
C.C.Wang
Outline
� Introduction.
� What is
�
2
�� �
� Isospin analysis.
� Measurement of 2/
� from B factory.
� B0 �� �
� B0 �� �
� B0 �� � � 0
� � � � �
� Summary of 2/� measurement.
C.C.Wang
Introduction
C.C.Wang
Introduction
B0B0–
V V*
tbtd
Mixing
B0 ��������
0
2
B0
b–
du–
d–
��������*
Tree diagramu
B0 � � � ��
B0 � � � � �
B0 � � � � �
C.C.Wang
Isospin Analysis
12
A
���
A
� 0 � A
� 0
A00
12
A
��
A00�
A+-=A(B0 �� +� -/ + -)A+0=A(B+ �� +� 0/ + 0)A00=A(B0 �� 0� 0/ 0 0)
A+-=e2i
!3A(B0 �� +� -/ + -)
A+0=e2i!
3A(B- �� -� 0/ - 0)A00=e2i
!3A(B0 �� 0� 0/ 0 0)
""
"
_
_�=2( 2eff - 2)
Ignoring EWP
C.C.Wang
CPV measurement of B0 # $ # %
Prospects for 2/
& extraction:
' Good point
( all charged track )good backgrund suppression.' Bad (difficult) points( large branching fraction from B )* 0* 0
)large penguin contribution.
C.C.Wang
CPV measurement of B0 + ,.- /12
A
0�1
A
2 0 3 A
4 0
A00
12
A
5�6
A007
InputsBr(B+ 89 + :0)=(5.5 ;0.6) <10-6
Br(B0 => + ?-)=(5.0 @0.4) A10-6
Br(B0 BC 0 D0)=(1.5 E0.3) F10-6
A(B0 GH 0 I0)=+0.28 J0.4S(B0 KL + M-)=-0.50 N0.12A(B0 OP + Q-)=+0.37 R0.10
C.C.Wang
B0 S T.U V CPV measurement at Belle
High Quality region
MBC (GeV)
W
E (GeV)
Num
ber o
f eve
nts
4 X evidence of Direct CPV!
PRL 95, 101801 (2005)
S Y Y = -0.67 Z0.16 [0.06A \ \= +0.56 ]0.12 ^0.06
_` a bced f
C.C.Wang
B0 g h.i j CPV measurement at BaBar
No observation of CPV!
PRL 95, 151803 (2005)
S k k = -0.30 l0.17 m0.03C n n = -0.09 o0.15 p0.04
qr r steu v
C.C.Wang
B0 w x.y z Experimental Summary
S { {
-A | |(Cππ )
C.C.Wang
CPV measurement of B0 } ~�� �
Prospects for 2/
� extraction:
� Good point
� Small branching fraction of B0 �� 0 �0 (<1/20) compared with B0 �� �e� �− and B+ �� �e� 0�Small penguin contribution
� Bad (difficult) points
� two �0s are contained in the decay products�lower efficiency, larger BG
� Consists of three polarization states�polarization measurement is essential
C.C.Wang
CPV measurement of B0 � ��� �Inputs
Br(B+ �� + �0)=(26 �6) 10-6
Br(B0 ¡¢ + £-)=(26 ¤4) ¥10-6
Br(B0 ¦§ 0 ¨0)<1.1 ©10-6
A(B0 ª« 0 ¬0)=N.A.S(B0 ® + ¯-)=-0.22 °0.22A(B0 ±² + ³-)=-0.02 ´0.17
12
A
µ�¶
A
· 0 ¸ A
¹ 0
A00
12
A
º�»
A00¼
small branching ratio of B0 ½¾ 0 ¿0
C.C.Wang
B0 À0 Á0 analysis at BaBar
ÂÃ Ã ÄÅÇÆ È
BR(B0 ÉÊ 0 Ë0) = (0.54 Ì0.19) Í10-6+0.36-0.32
ÎÏÐ ÑÒÔÓ ÕÖ Õ×Ø Õ ÙÚØ Ø Ò Û
UL<1.1 Ü10-6 90%C.L.
Ý Small branching ratio
Þ small penguin contribution.
ß good sensitivity for
à
2/
á extraction from B0 âã äæå ç
C.C.Wang
CPV measurement of B0 è é�ê ë
Longitudinal Transverse
1ì d 2 í
d cos
î
1 cos
ï
2
ð 94
14
1 ñ f L sin2 ò
1 sin2 ó
2
ô f L cos2 õ
1 cos2 ö
2
Three polarization of ÷ øúù û
C.C.Wang
B0 ü ý�þ ÿ CPV measurement at BaBar � � � �� � �� �� � � �� � �� � � �
CL(
� ��� �) = -0.03 �0.18 �0.09SL(
� ��� �) = -0.33 �0.24+0.08-0.14
fL(
!#" -) =0.978 $0.014 +0.021-0.029
%=100°±13° 79°< &<123°(95% C.L.)
C.C.Wang
B0 ' (*) + CPV measurement at Belle
,.- / , - 0 /
12 23 456 6 2 2 7 456
continuumb 8 cb 9 u
Helicity Mππ
signal
signal
continuum:; ;continuum
<= > ?@BA CDFE GIH E J K L M LN LO P
A = 0.00 Q0.30 R0.09S SL
T TL S = 0.08 U0.41 V0.09
fL =0.941 W0.030 +0.034-0.040 2=88°±17°
59°<
X
2<115°(95% C.L.)
C.C.Wang
Other B Y Y measurements
Br(B+ Z [*\ 0):31.7 7.1 /17.2 2.5 2.8+3.8-6.7
Br(B0 ] ^*_ -):24.4 2.2 /30 4 5+3.8-4.1
Belle/BaBar (×10-6)
fL:0.95 0.11 0.02/0.96 0.04 0.05
06 Moriond QCD
C.C.Wang
2
`ba summary of B0 c d*e f
C.C.Wang
CPV measurement of B0 g h i j kml npo qsr 0)
Prospects for 2/
t extraction:u Good pointv two scenarios by assuming isospin symmetry:w quasi-two-body approach.x direct measurement of
y
2/
z from Dalitz analysis.{ Bad (difficult) points of Dalitz analysis| complicated } ~�� ��� 0 resonant modes� higher resonance.� �� � mixing.� other resonance.� complicated backgrounds on Dalitz plot.
C.C.Wang
B0 �� ��� �
CPV measurement at Belle
� ��� � � �� �
���� � �� ¢¡ £ ¤
¥¦§©¨ ª« ¥¬ ®¯ ° ±²³ ´²µ ¶·¸³ ¹ º» ¼ ½
¾¿ À ÁÂBà Ä
A ÅÇÆ È A
ÉÇÊ 2Ë A
Ì Í 2
A
ÎÇÏ 2 Ð A
Ñ Ò 2
Ó AÔ Õ Ö C× Ø Ù AÚ Û ÜCÝ Þ
1 ß àCá â ã Aä å Cæ ç èé 0.02ê 0.15 ë 0.02
ì 0.16 í 0.05
Aî ï ð A
ñ ò 2ó A
ôÇõ 2
A
ö ÷ 2 ø A
ùÇú 2
ûü Aý þ ÿ C� � � A �� �
C ��
1 � C � � A � C ��
� � 0.53 � 0.28 � 0.04
� 0.29 � 0.09
���� �� � �� ��! "$# ��! %&
PRL 94, 121801(2005)
C.C.Wang
B0 '( 0 )0 measurement from Belle
*+, -.0/ 1
Br(B0 23 0 40):(3.12 50.33 )10-6+0.88 -0.82
+0.50 -0.68
Acp= -0.53+0.67+0.10 -0.84 -0.15
hep-ex/0508007
C.C.Wang
B0 67 8:9 ; <>= ?0@ AB 0) CPV measurement at BaBar
CDE FG0H IJ$KL MKN O PQ PR P S S
A B0 TU VXW Y[Z 0 \ f ] A ^ _X` a b fc A d e[f g h f 0 A i 0 j 0
A B0 kl mXn o[p 0 q f r A s tXu v w fx A y z[{ | } f 0 A ~ 0 � 0
Time dependent Dalitz analysis by assuming isospin symmetry:
ρ �π �
ρ �π �
ρ
�
π
�
� ����� �� � A
��
cp = -0.088 �0.049 �0.013C �� = 0.34 �0.11 �0.05S �� =-0.10 �0.14 �0.04�
C �� = 0.15 �0.11 �0.03 S ¡¢ = 0.22 £0.15 ¤0.03
C.C.Wang
B0 ¥¦ §:¨ © ª>« ¬0 ®¯ 0) CPV measurement at BaBar
C.C.Wang
B0 °± ²´³ µ ¶¸· ¹»º ¼¾½ 0) 2 from BaBar
¿ÀÁ ÂÃ0Ä Å
ÆÈÇ É
σ
Ê=(113 Ë6)°-17+27
A ÌÎÍ Ï A Ð ÑÒÓ ÔÕ 0.47Ö 0.15
× 0.14 Ø 0.06
AÙ Ú Û A ÜÎÝÞß àá 0.21 â 0.11 ã 0.04
C.C.Wang
Combined 2/
ä constraint
2=99
å+12-9
æ Note:
ç EWP is not included
è about 1~2
é
effect.
ê Isospin triangle for
ë ë does not close.
ì íî results still have some discrepancies.
C.C.Wang
Combined 2/
ï constraint
2
C.C.Wang
Prospects for 2
ðòñ measurement
ó Coming B ôõ öø÷ ù:ú 0 result from B factory.
û Improve the direct measurement of
ü
2
ýþ ÿ
� B �� � and B �� � with more data �
�
2 constraint from B0 �a1
� is possible
Br(B0� a1
�) (40.2 �3.9 �3.9) �10-6(Moriond QCD 06).
� Some other modes.
� K*0 �+, � � ��� etc......
C.C.Wang
Backup Slides
C.C.Wang
Introduction of Time-dependent Analysis
Flavor specified eigenstate
CP decay
8GeV e-
3.5 GeV e+
�
( 4S)
�z � ��� c
�
t
C.C.Wang
�- � mixing
Implement the !- " mixing form factor based on ALEPH and CMD-2 result.
# Implement the kinematic function.
F s $ BW % 770GS s
1 & '
BW ( 783GS s
1 ) * ) +
BW , 1450GS s -/. BW 0 1700
GS s
1 1 2 1/3BW M
GS s 4 M 2 1 5 d 6 7 8M
M 9 s : f s ; i s
<
s
C.C.Wang
KEKB and Belle
KEKB Co llide r
3.5 GeV e+ & 8 GeV e– beams3 km circumference, 11 mrad crossing angle
L= 1.63 x 1034 cm–2s–1 (world record)
L dt = 550 fb–1 @ (Υ 4S)+off(~10%)
C.C.Wang
PEPII and BaBar
e-
e+
=?> @AB CDEF GH IFJ GKLB CD EF G MJN C IL K MB F GF K O HP N Q
RF GFJ GL K L STE GF KE C I IVUWF S IFJ GF XN YF KF E ZL[ \ M D Y GO R T W N QR K M S G N Y CB ]F KO R N^ Q
_ M I MJ L E `F K GFaA K CJ ZF K O _ `A Q
TEb GKcB F E GF Xd Ica WF Gc KEO T d W Q
3.1 GeV e+ & 9 GeV e– beams
L= 1.00 x 1034 cm–2s–1 (Oct 9, 2005)
L dt = 335 fb–1 @ (Υ 4S)+off (~10%)
C.C.Wang
B0 e0 f0 Result
PRL 94, 181802 (2005)BR(B0 gh 0 i0 )=(1.17 j0.32 k0.10) l10-6
BaBar:
Acp = 0.12 m0.56 n0.06
PRL 94, 181803 (2005)
BR(B0 op 0 q0 )=(2.3 ) r10-6
Belle:
+0.4+0.2-0.5 -0.3
Acp = 0.44 s0.17+0.53-0.52
C.C.Wang
2/
t constraint from B0 u vxw y
C.C.Wang
B0 z{ |~} � ��� ��� ��� 0) 2 from BaBar
C.C.Wang
B0 a1
�
Br(B0� a1
�) � (40.2 �3.9 �3.9) �10-6
C.C.Wang
K*0 �+
� M/Beneke et al. hep-ph/0604005
� assuming SU(3) symmetry
� �=90 �7+2-5