Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Department of Social Services Children's Division
Children's Services Management Report
July 2011
Missouri Department of Social Services Research & Evaluation
221 W. High Street Jefferson City, MO 65101
Children’s Services Management Report Research and Evaluation July 2011
I
State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “To maintain or improve the quality of life for Missouri citizens." The Department of Social Services is an equal opportunity employer. Services provided by the Department of Social Services are offered on a non-discriminatory basis.
Children’s Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011II
Table of Contents
Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this publication is intended for monthly use only. Although the information presented is the best available at the time of publication, because of delays in processing, data may be incomplete. Accordingly, data should NOT simply be summed from one month to the next to obtain 3 month, 6 month or 12 month (etc.) values. Figure 1. Map – Department of Social Services Regions ............................................................. V Child Abuse and Neglect (CA/N) Table 1. Incidents and Children Reported During the Month Compared to Those Reported for the Same Month Last Year ..................................................................... 2 Table 2. Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month ..................................................................................... 4 Table 3. Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed by Conclusion During the Month ................................................................ 6 Table 4. Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month ................................. 8 Table 5. Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month ............................... 10 Table 6. CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During the Month ........................................ 12 Figure 2. CA/N Reports for Four Years Through the Current Month ........................................... 14 Figure 3. CA/N Reports Comparing the Last Two Years ............................................................ 14 Figure 4. Percentage Change in CA/N Reports Made Twelve Months Apart ................................ 15 Figure 5. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion ............. 15 Figure 6. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion ............. 16 Figure 7. Time Between Report and Child Contact for Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month .......................................................................................... 16 Figure 8. Percentage of Investigations/Assessments Completed Within Thirty Days .................... 17 Notes Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures ............................................................. 18 Family-Centered Services (FCS) Table 7. FCS Cases Open at the End of the Month by Reason for Opening ............................... 21 Table 8. FCS Cases Active During the Month by Reason for Opening ....................................... 23 Table 9. Persons in Family-Centered Services During the Month .............................................. 25 Table 10. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ..................................... 27
Children’s Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011III
Table 11. FCS Cases Closed During the Month by Close Reason ................................................ 29 Table 12. FCS Cases Active During the Month Which Have Had Court Involvement ..................... 31 Table 13. FCS Cases Active During the Month Which Have Had No Court Involvement ................ 33 Figure 9. FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month Over the Previous Four Years ................. 35 Figure 10. Percentage Change in FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months Apart .............................................................................................. 35 Figure 11. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ..................................... 36 Figure 12. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ..................................... 36 Figure 13. FCS Cases Closed During the Month by Reason for Closing ........................................ 37 Figure 14. FCS Cases Active During the Month With Court Involvement By Number of Months Open .................................................................................... 37 Figure 15. FCS Cases Active During the Month With No Court Involvement By Number of Months Open .................................................................................... 38 Notes Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures ............................................................ 39 Out-of-Home Placement Table 14. Children Entering Children’s Division Custody for the First Time During the Month By Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ................................. 42 Table 15. Children Re-Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category .............................................. 44 Table 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Last Two Years .............. 46 Table 17. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by Length of Stay and Region ...................................................................................... 47 Table 18. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month By Length of Stay and Case Manager County ............................................................ 48 Table 19. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case Manager County and Placement Category ................................................................. 50 Table 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case Manager County and Placement Type ...................................................................... 52 Table 21. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by Placement Category and Case Manager County ......................................................... 62 Table 22. Children Closed from the Alternative Care System During the Month Grouped by Reason for Case Closing ........................................................................ 64
Children’s Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011IV
Table 23. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody .............................................................................. 66 Table 24. Currently Licensed Children’s Division Foster Homes by Vendor Type .......................... 68 Table 25. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month Grouped By Case Manager County and Legal Status ............................................................... 70 Table 26. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped By Case Manager County and Goal........................................................................... 72 Table 27. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped By Case Manager County and Number of Previous Placements ................................... 74 Table 28. Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year ............................................................................ 76 Figure 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month ........................... 78 Figure 17. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month During the Last Two Years ................................................................................................. 78 Figure 18. Children Closing from Alternative Care During the Month by Reason for Case Closing and Region .................................................................................... 79 Figure 19. Adoptions Finalized During the Last Two Years ......................................................... 79 Figure 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last of the Month by Age and Placement Type ......................................................................................... 80 Figure 21. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last Day of the Month By Placement Category for Four Years ...................................................................... 80 Figure 22. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody by Quarter and Subsequent Disposition ........................................................................................... 81 Notes Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures ............................................................. 82 Intensive In-Home Services (IIS) Table 29. Families Referred to IIS During the Month Grouped by Referral County ....................... 88 Table 30. Families and Children Accepted in IIS During the Month Grouped by Household County .............................................................................................. 90 Table 31. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS During the Month .................................................. 92 Table 32. Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS .................................................... 94 Table 33. Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS .............................................. 96 Notes Intensive In-Home Services Tables ......................................................................... 98
Children’s Services Management Report
Research and EvaluationJuly 2011
V
Figure 1. Department of Social Services Regions
Child Abuse and Neglect
Table 1. Incidents and Children Reported During July 2011
Compared to Those Reported During July 2010
Current Incidents Current ChildrenMonth One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage
Incidents Prior Change Children Prior ChangeNorthwest Andrew 16 9 77.78% 21 15 40.00% Atchison 2 1 100.00% 2 1 100.00% Buchanan 87 106 -17.93% 135 159 -15.09% Caldwell 9 5 80.00% 13 8 62.50% Carroll 2 3 -33.33% 6 4 50.00% Cass 68 72 -5.56% 101 105 -3.81% Chariton 6 6 0.00% 12 11 9.09% Clay 114 111 2.70% 178 172 3.49% Clinton 9 14 -35.71% 22 21 4.76% Cooper 14 16 -12.50% 17 28 -39.29% Daviess 6 5 20.00% 8 5 60.00% De Kalb 6 4 50.00% 11 6 83.33% Gentry 4 6 -33.33% 7 9 -22.22% Grundy 8 13 -38.46% 26 20 30.00% Harrison 6 9 -33.33% 7 18 -61.11% Holt 3 3 0.00% 3 3 0.00% Johnson 36 28 28.57% 56 39 43.59% Lafayette 19 20 -5.00% 32 35 -8.57% Linn 11 18 -38.89% 25 29 -13.79% Livingston 12 16 -25.00% 14 20 -30.00% Mercer 0 1 -100.00% 0 1 -100.00% Nodaway 6 13 -53.85% 9 21 -57.14% Pettis 34 35 -2.86% 58 52 11.54% Platte 25 28 -10.71% 37 51 -27.45% Putnam 1 4 -75.00% 2 10 -80.00% Ray 22 13 69.23% 30 20 50.00% Saline 19 22 -13.64% 31 27 14.82% Sullivan 3 4 -25.00% 6 5 20.00% Worth 4 1 300.00% 5 1 400.00% * Region Total * 552 586 -5.80% 874 896 -2.46%Northeast Adair 18 16 12.50% 26 20 30.00% Audrain 13 22 -40.91% 28 34 -17.65% Boone 85 86 -1.16% 122 118 3.39% Callaway 53 53 0.00% 87 81 7.41% Clark 9 5 80.00% 12 7 71.43% Cole 64 68 -5.88% 101 90 12.22% Franklin 79 68 16.18% 132 114 15.79% Gasconade 10 18 -44.44% 12 32 -62.50% Howard 10 3 233.33% 13 3 333.33% Jefferson 148 105 40.95% 214 168 27.38% Knox 4 6 -33.33% 4 12 -66.67% Lewis 5 12 -58.33% 5 20 -75.00% Lincoln 46 46 0.00% 82 58 41.38% Macon 18 10 80.00% 28 14 100.00% Marion 40 18 122.22% 61 23 165.22% Monroe 12 10 20.00% 18 15 20.00% Montgomery 15 11 36.36% 31 20 55.00% Osage 9 5 80.00% 19 13 46.15% Pike 14 23 -39.13% 29 35 -17.14% Ralls 6 5 20.00% 10 9 11.11% Randolph 24 19 26.32% 39 26 50.00% Schuyler 5 2 150.00% 5 2 150.00% Scotland 4 1 300.00% 5 1 400.00% Shelby 7 10 -30.00% 10 20 -50.00% St Charles 143 106 34.91% 223 161 38.51% Warren 34 28 21.43% 63 44 43.18% * Region Total * 875 756 15.74% 1,379 1,140 20.97%Southeast Bollinger 9 10 -10.00% 16 17 -5.88% Butler 51 41 24.39% 81 69 17.39% Cape Girardeau 46 57 -19.30% 69 77 -10.39% Carter 3 6 -50.00% 5 8 -37.50% Crawford 25 16 56.25% 37 34 8.82% Dent 15 17 -11.77% 25 30 -16.67%
2
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 1. Incidents and Children Reported During July 2011
Compared to Those Reported During July 2010
Current Incidents Current ChildrenMonth One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage
Incidents Prior Change Children Prior ChangeSoutheast Dunklin 36 44 -18.18% 53 69 -23.19% Howell 47 46 2.17% 66 83 -20.48% Iron 5 12 -58.33% 9 20 -55.00% Madison 19 15 26.67% 34 22 54.55% Maries 9 7 28.57% 12 10 20.00% Mississippi 15 13 15.39% 27 19 42.11% New Madrid 16 12 33.33% 24 24 0.00% Oregon 12 13 -7.69% 23 24 -4.17% Pemiscot 16 36 -55.56% 29 61 -52.46% Perry 10 14 -28.57% 13 23 -43.48% Phelps 55 48 14.58% 77 83 -7.23% Pulaski 62 41 51.22% 86 62 38.71% Reynolds 6 6 0.00% 8 7 14.29% Ripley 17 17 0.00% 24 26 -7.69% Scott 47 41 14.63% 75 61 22.95% Shannon 7 8 -12.50% 9 13 -30.77% St Francois 80 51 56.86% 130 70 85.71% Ste Genevieve 12 9 33.33% 20 15 33.33% Stoddard 24 27 -11.11% 43 37 16.22% Texas 23 22 4.55% 36 40 -10.00% Washington 27 21 28.57% 50 30 66.67% Wayne 19 9 111.11% 27 13 107.69% * Region Total * 713 659 8.19% 1,108 1,047 5.83%Southwest Barry 30 30 0.00% 52 40 30.00% Barton 10 11 -9.09% 14 13 7.69% Bates 10 15 -33.33% 15 20 -25.00% Benton 18 15 20.00% 35 18 94.44% Camden 31 35 -11.43% 52 51 1.96% Cedar 18 16 12.50% 32 27 18.52% Christian 62 60 3.33% 87 83 4.82% Dade 6 7 -14.29% 6 13 -53.85% Dallas 18 14 28.57% 28 23 21.74% Douglas 15 4 275.00% 23 5 360.00% Greene 326 259 25.87% 497 355 40.00% Henry 30 25 20.00% 43 37 16.22% Hickory 3 8 -62.50% 4 12 -66.67% Jasper 119 142 -16.20% 183 211 -13.27% Laclede 49 42 16.67% 82 69 18.84% Lawrence 33 24 37.50% 52 38 36.84% Mcdonald 23 37 -37.84% 29 64 -54.69% Miller 34 34 0.00% 45 52 -13.46% Moniteau 12 4 200.00% 14 6 133.33% Morgan 17 12 41.67% 20 17 17.65% Newton 48 56 -14.29% 66 83 -20.48% Ozark 10 6 66.67% 15 7 114.29% Polk 47 28 67.86% 67 52 28.85% St Clair 12 12 0.00% 21 19 10.53% Stone 27 28 -3.57% 44 46 -4.35% Taney 48 52 -7.69% 63 86 -26.74% Vernon 21 19 10.53% 26 29 -10.35% Webster 34 30 13.33% 60 47 27.66% Wright 25 24 4.17% 48 32 50.00% * Region Total * 1,136 1,049 8.29% 1,723 1,555 10.80%Kansas City Jackson 523 438 19.41% 828 670 23.58% * Region Total * 523 438 19.41% 828 670 23.58%St. Louis St Louis City 256 224 14.29% 434 388 11.86% St Louis County 352 334 5.39% 538 504 6.75% * Region Total * 608 558 8.96% 972 892 8.97%Other Out Home Inv 141 118 19.49% 253 182 39.01% Out Of State 8 8 0.00% 12 13 -7.69% * Region Total * 149 126 18.25% 265 195 35.90%State Total 4,556 4,172 9.20% 7,149 6,395 11.79%
3
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 2. Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During July 2011
Substan- Totaltiated Children
Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Pertiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand
Northwest Andrew 0 0 2 8 1 11 0.00 2.53 Atchison 0 0 0 2 3 5 0.00 3.23 Buchanan 11 7 53 30 5 106 0.53 5.06 Caldwell 0 2 6 10 0 18 0.00 7.41 Carroll 0 0 8 0 0 8 0.00 3.09 Cass 3 10 47 75 2 137 0.13 5.88 Chariton 4 6 0 1 0 11 2.00 5.51 Clay 12 12 85 68 3 180 0.25 3.79 Clinton 4 1 17 13 0 35 0.79 6.89 Cooper 1 0 2 8 0 11 0.26 2.89 Daviess 0 1 3 5 0 9 0.00 4.16 De Kalb 1 3 4 3 0 11 0.42 4.58 Gentry 0 0 2 3 1 6 0.00 3.37 Grundy 0 0 2 24 0 26 0.00 10.73 Harrison 0 0 3 11 0 14 0.00 6.66 Holt 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00 1.57 Johnson 6 4 6 28 0 44 0.49 3.63 Lafayette 6 4 16 14 0 40 0.69 4.63 Linn 0 3 3 7 0 13 0.00 3.73 Livingston 0 6 14 17 0 37 0.00 10.41 Mercer 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.00 2.31 Nodaway 2 0 1 7 0 10 0.47 2.36 Pettis 6 1 39 28 1 75 0.58 7.23 Platte 0 6 14 16 0 36 0.00 1.89 Putnam 0 0 3 3 0 6 0.00 4.78 Ray 0 0 9 22 1 32 0.00 4.97 Saline 5 4 19 23 0 51 0.87 8.83 Sullivan 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.00 1.66 Worth 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.00 1.73 * Region Total * 61 70 363 429 17 940 0.30 4.61Northeast Adair 0 4 3 24 1 32 0.00 6.67 Audrain 0 0 12 19 1 32 0.00 5.03 Boone 17 16 65 87 2 187 0.55 6.05 Callaway 6 1 22 31 1 61 0.58 5.88 Clark 0 0 1 3 4 8 0.00 4.32 Cole 2 19 33 26 0 80 0.12 4.63 Franklin 27 12 83 105 1 228 1.05 8.89 Gasconade 5 3 7 17 0 32 1.32 8.42 Howard 0 0 1 3 2 6 0.00 2.45 Jefferson 13 32 49 109 1 204 0.24 3.69 Knox 0 3 0 4 0 7 0.00 6.44 Lewis 1 0 1 1 0 3 0.38 1.14 Lincoln 11 2 14 25 0 52 0.94 4.45 Macon 0 1 3 15 0 19 0.00 4.97 Marion 0 1 8 16 1 26 0.00 3.58 Monroe 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00 0.83 Montgomery 0 4 2 12 0 18 0.00 5.83 Osage 0 0 6 1 0 7 0.00 2.04 Pike 10 0 9 5 0 24 2.33 5.59 Ralls 0 0 4 3 0 7 0.00 2.88 Randolph 6 0 10 21 0 37 1.02 6.30 Schuyler 1 0 0 4 0 5 0.97 4.87 Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Shelby 0 0 6 1 0 7 0.00 4.05 St Charles 21 10 90 115 3 239 0.26 2.91 Warren 9 3 14 17 0 43 1.37 6.53 * Region Total * 129 111 444 665 17 1,366 0.43 4.56Southeast Bollinger 7 0 8 4 0 19 2.22 6.03 Butler 3 10 14 42 0 69 0.30 6.98 Cape Girardeau 5 0 22 34 2 63 0.31 3.91 Carter 0 0 1 7 4 12 0.00 8.04 Crawford 0 8 25 18 0 51 0.00 8.51 Dent 1 1 6 24 0 32 0.27 8.61
4
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 2. Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During July 2011
Substan- Totaltiated Children
Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Pertiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand
Southeast Dunklin 1 11 19 27 1 59 0.12 6.85 Howell 4 12 18 19 0 53 0.41 5.48 Iron 0 1 2 4 0 7 0.00 2.62 Madison 1 3 5 1 0 10 0.34 3.44 Maries 0 6 3 8 0 17 0.00 7.33 Mississippi 0 1 5 6 0 12 0.00 3.40 New Madrid 4 8 19 7 0 38 0.77 7.28 Oregon 0 0 4 2 0 6 0.00 2.39 Pemiscot 4 20 15 34 0 73 0.67 12.14 Perry 1 0 2 6 0 9 0.21 1.91 Phelps 7 22 25 28 0 82 0.74 8.68 Pulaski 3 8 6 15 1 33 0.26 2.91 Reynolds 2 0 2 1 1 6 1.24 3.73 Ripley 0 2 14 10 0 26 0.00 7.76 Scott 6 4 33 26 0 69 0.54 6.22 Shannon 0 0 2 5 0 7 0.00 3.18 St Francois 7 7 52 28 4 98 0.52 7.35 Ste Genevieve 2 3 5 9 4 23 0.42 4.84 Stoddard 3 6 17 25 4 55 0.42 7.75 Texas 0 0 2 14 3 19 0.00 3.31 Washington 2 5 11 13 1 32 0.32 5.16 Wayne 0 0 6 4 1 11 0.00 3.57 * Region Total * 63 138 343 421 26 991 0.38 5.91Southwest Barry 0 8 7 11 2 28 0.00 3.15 Barton 2 0 2 9 0 13 0.58 3.77 Bates 0 1 3 4 0 8 0.00 1.81 Benton 1 1 0 12 0 14 0.28 3.98 Camden 2 7 23 24 0 56 0.27 7.46 Cedar 1 0 5 28 1 35 0.30 10.35 Christian 6 13 53 52 1 125 0.40 8.27 Dade 0 0 0 4 0 4 0.00 2.07 Dallas 1 3 9 17 0 30 0.23 6.97 Douglas 2 3 3 4 0 12 0.59 3.55 Greene 18 16 90 80 2 206 0.34 3.85 Henry 5 5 7 29 2 48 0.96 9.20 Hickory 0 0 0 1 2 3 0.00 1.68 Jasper 5 9 88 59 3 164 0.19 6.08 Laclede 8 27 33 43 1 112 0.92 12.91 Lawrence 6 0 5 6 0 17 0.63 1.77 Mcdonald 4 1 6 4 0 15 0.64 2.40 Miller 4 3 20 21 0 48 0.65 7.74 Moniteau 3 2 10 18 0 33 0.78 8.60 Morgan 6 4 14 38 4 66 1.31 14.36 Newton 3 3 22 24 2 54 0.22 3.91 Ozark 0 1 2 3 0 6 0.00 2.85 Polk 0 3 1 5 0 9 0.00 1.30 St Clair 0 0 3 5 0 8 0.00 3.61 Stone 3 4 18 7 2 34 0.49 5.54 Taney 2 11 17 53 3 86 0.22 9.65 Vernon 0 0 5 26 0 31 0.00 5.70 Webster 4 2 10 22 0 38 0.45 4.24 Wright 2 4 32 26 0 64 0.41 13.12 * Region Total * 88 131 488 635 25 1,367 0.36 5.65Kansas City Jackson 35 13 210 315 20 593 0.21 3.51 * Region Total * 35 13 210 315 20 593 0.21 3.51St. Louis St Louis City 33 54 288 268 29 672 0.37 7.50 St Louis County 34 48 236 243 16 577 0.13 2.25 * Region Total * 67 102 524 511 45 1,249 0.19 3.61Other Out Home Inv 7 0 181 0 2 190 0.00 0.00 * Region Total * 7 0 181 0 2 190 0.00 0.00State Total 450 565 2,553 2,976 152 6,696 0.32 4.69
5
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 3. Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During July 2011
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated Family Assessment OtherNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 22.22% 6 66.67% 1 11.11% 9 Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3 Buchanan 9 12.68% 5 7.04% 34 47.89% 21 29.58% 2 2.82% 71 Caldwell 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 4 40.00% 5 50.00% 0 0.00% 10 Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 Cass 3 3.70% 5 6.17% 28 34.57% 42 51.85% 3 3.70% 81 Chariton 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5 Clay 10 8.13% 7 5.69% 56 45.53% 46 37.40% 4 3.25% 123 Clinton 1 5.56% 1 5.56% 9 50.00% 7 38.89% 0 0.00% 18 Cooper 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 5 Daviess 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 3 42.86% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 7 De Kalb 1 10.00% 3 30.00% 3 30.00% 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 10 Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 4 Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 9 90.00% 0 0.00% 10 Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 6 Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 Johnson 5 17.24% 2 6.90% 6 20.69% 16 55.17% 0 0.00% 29 Lafayette 4 16.00% 2 8.00% 9 36.00% 10 40.00% 0 0.00% 25 Linn 0 0.00% 2 22.22% 2 22.22% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 9 Livingston 0 0.00% 3 12.00% 9 36.00% 12 48.00% 1 4.00% 25 Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Nodaway 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 9 Pettis 3 6.38% 1 2.13% 25 53.19% 16 34.04% 2 4.26% 47 Platte 0 0.00% 2 8.33% 11 45.83% 11 45.83% 0 0.00% 24 Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4 Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8 36.36% 13 59.09% 1 4.55% 22 Saline 4 13.79% 1 3.45% 12 41.38% 12 41.38% 0 0.00% 29 Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 * Region Total * 45 7.55% 38 6.38% 236 39.60% 260 43.62% 17 2.85% 596Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 3 15.00% 2 10.00% 13 65.00% 2 10.00% 20 Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8 36.36% 13 59.09% 1 4.55% 22 Boone 14 10.77% 11 8.46% 42 32.31% 62 47.69% 1 0.77% 130 Callaway 4 9.30% 1 2.33% 14 32.56% 23 53.49% 1 2.33% 43 Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 6 Cole 2 4.88% 8 19.51% 16 39.02% 15 36.59% 0 0.00% 41 Franklin 16 12.31% 8 6.15% 44 33.85% 60 46.15% 2 1.54% 130 Gasconade 2 11.77% 2 11.77% 5 29.41% 8 47.06% 0 0.00% 17 Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3 Jefferson 9 6.67% 22 16.30% 32 23.70% 71 52.59% 1 0.74% 135 Knox 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 5 Lewis 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3 Lincoln 7 21.88% 1 3.13% 8 25.00% 16 50.00% 0 0.00% 32 Macon 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 8 Marion 0 0.00% 1 6.25% 4 25.00% 10 62.50% 1 6.25% 16 Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 Montgomery 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 2 25.00% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 8 Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5 Pike 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 3 33.33% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 9 Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 4 Randolph 2 11.77% 0 0.00% 3 17.65% 12 70.59% 0 0.00% 17 Schuyler 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3 Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4 St Charles 16 10.13% 5 3.17% 60 37.98% 74 46.84% 3 1.90% 158 Warren 2 8.70% 3 13.04% 9 39.13% 9 39.13% 0 0.00% 23 * Region Total * 79 9.35% 69 8.17% 265 31.36% 415 49.11% 17 2.01% 845Southeast Bollinger 3 27.27% 0 0.00% 5 45.46% 3 27.27% 0 0.00% 11 Butler 2 4.44% 6 13.33% 11 24.44% 26 57.78% 0 0.00% 45 Cape Girardeau 3 6.52% 0 0.00% 15 32.61% 25 54.35% 3 6.52% 46 Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 6 Crawford 0 0.00% 5 17.86% 13 46.43% 10 35.71% 0 0.00% 28 Dent 1 9.09% 1 9.09% 1 9.09% 8 72.73% 0 0.00% 11
6
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 3. Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During July 2011
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated Family Assessment OtherNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 1 2.33% 9 20.93% 13 30.23% 19 44.19% 1 2.33% 43 Howell 3 8.33% 8 22.22% 11 30.56% 14 38.89% 0 0.00% 36 Iron 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6 Madison 1 11.11% 2 22.22% 5 55.56% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9 Maries 0 0.00% 3 37.50% 2 25.00% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 8 Mississippi 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 4 57.14% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 7 New Madrid 2 10.00% 6 30.00% 9 45.00% 3 15.00% 0 0.00% 20 Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5 Pemiscot 4 10.81% 8 21.62% 7 18.92% 18 48.65% 0 0.00% 37 Perry 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 2 28.57% 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 7 Phelps 3 6.12% 12 24.49% 15 30.61% 18 36.74% 1 2.04% 49 Pulaski 3 12.00% 4 16.00% 6 24.00% 11 44.00% 1 4.00% 25 Reynolds 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5 Ripley 0 0.00% 1 6.25% 9 56.25% 6 37.50% 0 0.00% 16 Scott 4 8.70% 3 6.52% 21 45.65% 17 36.96% 1 2.17% 46 Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4 St Francois 3 4.69% 6 9.38% 34 53.13% 17 26.56% 4 6.25% 64 Ste Genevieve 2 14.29% 1 7.14% 4 28.57% 6 42.86% 1 7.14% 14 Stoddard 3 8.82% 6 17.65% 10 29.41% 13 38.24% 2 5.88% 34 Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 18.18% 6 54.55% 3 27.27% 11 Washington 2 8.33% 3 12.50% 9 37.50% 9 37.50% 1 4.17% 24 Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 6 * Region Total * 43 6.90% 86 13.80% 221 35.47% 252 40.45% 21 3.37% 623Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 4 23.53% 5 29.41% 6 35.29% 2 11.77% 17 Barton 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 8 Bates 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 2 28.57% 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 7 Benton 1 9.09% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 9 81.82% 0 0.00% 11 Camden 2 5.71% 5 14.29% 12 34.29% 15 42.86% 1 2.86% 35 Cedar 1 4.55% 0 0.00% 4 18.18% 16 72.73% 1 4.55% 22 Christian 6 7.50% 10 12.50% 26 32.50% 37 46.25% 1 1.25% 80 Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3 Dallas 1 5.00% 1 5.00% 6 30.00% 12 60.00% 0 0.00% 20 Douglas 1 11.11% 2 22.22% 3 33.33% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 9 Greene 14 10.69% 8 6.11% 53 40.46% 53 40.46% 3 2.29% 131 Henry 3 9.68% 3 9.68% 2 6.45% 21 67.74% 2 6.45% 31 Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Jasper 5 4.72% 4 3.77% 55 51.89% 40 37.74% 2 1.89% 106 Laclede 7 10.94% 17 26.56% 10 15.63% 26 40.63% 4 6.25% 64 Lawrence 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 9 Mcdonald 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 9 Miller 3 9.38% 3 9.38% 12 37.50% 14 43.75% 0 0.00% 32 Moniteau 2 7.69% 2 7.69% 6 23.08% 16 61.54% 0 0.00% 26 Morgan 4 10.26% 2 5.13% 9 23.08% 21 53.85% 3 7.69% 39 Newton 2 5.56% 3 8.33% 13 36.11% 16 44.44% 2 5.56% 36 Ozark 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5 Polk 0 0.00% 3 37.50% 1 12.50% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 8 St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3 Stone 2 10.00% 2 10.00% 8 40.00% 7 35.00% 1 5.00% 20 Taney 2 3.39% 10 16.95% 13 22.03% 30 50.85% 4 6.78% 59 Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 22.73% 17 77.27% 0 0.00% 22 Webster 2 8.33% 2 8.33% 6 25.00% 14 58.33% 0 0.00% 24 Wright 1 2.50% 3 7.50% 18 45.00% 16 40.00% 2 5.00% 40 * Region Total * 65 7.40% 87 9.91% 279 31.78% 418 47.61% 29 3.30% 878Kansas City Jackson 25 6.79% 7 1.90% 131 35.60% 189 51.36% 16 4.35% 368 * Region Total * 25 6.79% 7 1.90% 131 35.60% 189 51.36% 16 4.35% 368St. Louis St Louis City 24 5.58% 31 7.21% 179 41.63% 175 40.70% 21 4.88% 430 St Louis County 24 6.38% 31 8.25% 147 39.10% 162 43.09% 12 3.19% 376 * Region Total * 48 5.96% 62 7.69% 326 40.45% 337 41.81% 33 4.09% 806Other Out Home Inv 5 4.07% 0 0.00% 115 93.50% 0 0.00% 3 2.44% 123 * Region Total * 5 4.07% 0 0.00% 115 93.50% 0 0.00% 3 2.44% 123State Total 310 7.31% 349 8.23% 1,573 37.11% 1,871 44.14% 136 3.21% 4,239
7
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 4. Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During July 2011
0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No ContactNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 6 66.67% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 9 Atchison 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Buchanan 66 95.65% 3 4.35% 0 0.00% 69 Caldwell 7 70.00% 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 10 Carroll 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 Cass 67 87.01% 10 12.99% 0 0.00% 77 Chariton 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5 Clay 108 91.53% 10 8.48% 0 0.00% 118 Clinton 16 88.89% 2 11.11% 0 0.00% 18 Cooper 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 Daviess 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7 De Kalb 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10 Gentry 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4 Grundy 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10 Harrison 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 Holt 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Johnson 20 76.92% 6 23.08% 0 0.00% 26 Lafayette 20 80.00% 5 20.00% 0 0.00% 25 Linn 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9 Livingston 23 92.00% 2 8.00% 0 0.00% 25 Mercer 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Nodaway 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 9 Pettis 35 76.09% 11 23.91% 0 0.00% 46 Platte 20 83.33% 4 16.67% 0 0.00% 24 Putnam 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 Ray 18 90.00% 2 10.00% 0 0.00% 20 Saline 29 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 29 Sullivan 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 * Region Total * 512 88.58% 66 11.42% 0 0.00% 578Northeast Adair 19 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19 Audrain 21 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 21 Boone 108 85.71% 18 14.29% 0 0.00% 126 Callaway 36 85.71% 6 14.29% 0 0.00% 42 Clark 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 Cole 38 92.68% 3 7.32% 0 0.00% 41 Franklin 109 85.83% 18 14.17% 0 0.00% 127 Gasconade 16 94.12% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17 Howard 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 Jefferson 112 85.50% 19 14.50% 0 0.00% 131 Knox 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 Lewis 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3 Lincoln 25 80.65% 6 19.36% 0 0.00% 31 Macon 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8 Marion 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 15 Monroe 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Montgomery 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8 Osage 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 5 Pike 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9 Ralls 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4 Randolph 17 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 17 Schuyler 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 Scotland 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Shelby 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 St Charles 126 82.90% 26 17.11% 0 0.00% 152 Warren 22 95.65% 1 4.35% 0 0.00% 23 * Region Total * 710 86.69% 109 13.31% 0 0.00% 819Southeast Bollinger 10 90.91% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11 Butler 41 91.11% 4 8.89% 0 0.00% 45 Cape Girardeau 40 90.91% 4 9.09% 0 0.00% 44 Carter 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4 Crawford 26 92.86% 2 7.14% 0 0.00% 28 Dent 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
8
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 4. Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During July 2011
0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No ContactNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 39 92.86% 3 7.14% 0 0.00% 42 Howell 29 80.56% 7 19.44% 0 0.00% 36 Iron 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 Madison 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9 Maries 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8 Mississippi 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7 New Madrid 15 75.00% 5 25.00% 0 0.00% 20 Oregon 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 Pemiscot 32 86.49% 5 13.51% 0 0.00% 37 Perry 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7 Phelps 45 91.84% 4 8.16% 0 0.00% 49 Pulaski 20 83.33% 4 16.67% 0 0.00% 24 Reynolds 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 Ripley 15 93.75% 1 6.25% 0 0.00% 16 Scott 42 91.30% 4 8.70% 0 0.00% 46 Shannon 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 St Francois 56 91.80% 5 8.20% 0 0.00% 61 Ste Genevieve 13 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13 Stoddard 26 81.25% 6 18.75% 0 0.00% 32 Texas 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8 Washington 20 90.91% 2 9.09% 0 0.00% 22 Wayne 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 * Region Total * 543 89.75% 62 10.25% 0 0.00% 605Southwest Barry 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 15 Barton 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 8 Bates 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6 Benton 10 90.91% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11 Camden 32 91.43% 3 8.57% 0 0.00% 35 Cedar 20 90.91% 2 9.09% 0 0.00% 22 Christian 66 83.54% 13 16.46% 0 0.00% 79 Dade 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3 Dallas 19 95.00% 1 5.00% 0 0.00% 20 Douglas 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9 Greene 103 82.40% 22 17.60% 0 0.00% 125 Henry 23 79.31% 6 20.69% 0 0.00% 29 Hickory 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Jasper 93 89.42% 11 10.58% 0 0.00% 104 Laclede 59 93.65% 4 6.35% 0 0.00% 63 Lawrence 6 66.67% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 9 Mcdonald 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9 Miller 27 84.38% 5 15.63% 0 0.00% 32 Moniteau 24 92.31% 2 7.69% 0 0.00% 26 Morgan 30 83.33% 6 16.67% 0 0.00% 36 Newton 30 88.24% 4 11.77% 0 0.00% 34 Ozark 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5 Polk 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 8 St Clair 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 Stone 16 84.21% 3 15.79% 0 0.00% 19 Taney 46 85.19% 8 14.82% 0 0.00% 54 Vernon 20 90.91% 2 9.09% 0 0.00% 22 Webster 20 83.33% 4 16.67% 0 0.00% 24 Wright 37 92.50% 3 7.50% 0 0.00% 40 * Region Total * 736 86.49% 115 13.51% 0 0.00% 851Kansas City Jackson 302 86.53% 47 13.47% 0 0.00% 349 * Region Total * 302 86.53% 47 13.47% 0 0.00% 349St. Louis St Louis City 298 78.22% 83 21.79% 0 0.00% 381 St Louis County 268 76.57% 82 23.43% 0 0.00% 350 * Region Total * 566 77.43% 165 22.57% 0 0.00% 731Other Out Home Inv 123 50.00% 0 0.00% 123 50.00% 246 * Region Total * 123 50.00% 0 0.00% 123 50.00% 246State Total 3,492 83.56% 564 13.50% 123 2.94% 4,179
9
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 5. The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During July 2011
0 - 30 Days Over 30 DaysNumber Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 9 Atchison 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3 Buchanan 67 94.37% 4 5.63% 71 Caldwell 4 40.00% 6 60.00% 10 Carroll 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4 Cass 16 19.75% 65 80.25% 81 Chariton 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5 Clay 81 65.85% 42 34.15% 123 Clinton 12 66.67% 6 33.33% 18 Cooper 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5 Daviess 1 14.29% 6 85.71% 7 De Kalb 6 60.00% 4 40.00% 10 Gentry 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4 Grundy 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 10 Harrison 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6 Holt 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Johnson 10 34.48% 19 65.52% 29 Lafayette 16 64.00% 9 36.00% 25 Linn 4 44.44% 5 55.56% 9 Livingston 14 56.00% 11 44.00% 25 Mercer 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Nodaway 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 9 Pettis 35 74.47% 12 25.53% 47 Platte 24 100.00% 0 0.00% 24 Putnam 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4 Ray 17 77.27% 5 22.73% 22 Saline 27 93.10% 2 6.90% 29 Sullivan 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 * Region Total * 390 65.44% 206 34.56% 596Northeast Adair 16 80.00% 4 20.00% 20 Audrain 21 95.46% 1 4.55% 22 Boone 87 66.92% 43 33.08% 130 Callaway 23 53.49% 20 46.51% 43 Clark 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 6 Cole 7 17.07% 34 82.93% 41 Franklin 58 44.62% 72 55.39% 130 Gasconade 6 35.29% 11 64.71% 17 Howard 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3 Jefferson 46 34.07% 89 65.93% 135 Knox 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 5 Lewis 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 Lincoln 13 40.63% 19 59.38% 32 Macon 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 8 Marion 10 62.50% 6 37.50% 16 Monroe 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2 Montgomery 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 8 Osage 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 5 Pike 5 55.56% 4 44.44% 9 Ralls 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4 Randolph 15 88.24% 2 11.77% 17 Schuyler 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 Scotland 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Shelby 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4 St Charles 82 51.90% 76 48.10% 158 Warren 16 69.57% 7 30.44% 23 * Region Total * 441 52.19% 404 47.81% 845Southeast Bollinger 6 54.55% 5 45.46% 11 Butler 31 68.89% 14 31.11% 45 Cape Girardeau 20 43.48% 26 56.52% 46 Carter 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 6 Crawford 7 25.00% 21 75.00% 28 Dent 2 18.18% 9 81.82% 11
10
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 5. The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During July 2011
0 - 30 Days Over 30 DaysNumber Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 24 55.81% 19 44.19% 43 Howell 24 66.67% 12 33.33% 36 Iron 1 16.67% 5 83.33% 6 Madison 3 33.33% 6 66.67% 9 Maries 1 12.50% 7 87.50% 8 Mississippi 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 7 New Madrid 5 25.00% 15 75.00% 20 Oregon 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5 Pemiscot 22 59.46% 15 40.54% 37 Perry 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 7 Phelps 19 38.78% 30 61.22% 49 Pulaski 12 48.00% 13 52.00% 25 Reynolds 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5 Ripley 5 31.25% 11 68.75% 16 Scott 38 82.61% 8 17.39% 46 Shannon 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4 St Francois 36 56.25% 28 43.75% 64 Ste Genevieve 11 78.57% 3 21.43% 14 Stoddard 6 17.65% 28 82.35% 34 Texas 9 81.82% 2 18.18% 11 Washington 14 58.33% 10 41.67% 24 Wayne 0 0.00% 6 100.00% 6 * Region Total * 323 51.85% 300 48.15% 623Southwest Barry 10 58.82% 7 41.18% 17 Barton 3 37.50% 5 62.50% 8 Bates 3 42.86% 4 57.14% 7 Benton 7 63.64% 4 36.36% 11 Camden 15 42.86% 20 57.14% 35 Cedar 18 81.82% 4 18.18% 22 Christian 36 45.00% 44 55.00% 80 Dade 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3 Dallas 10 50.00% 10 50.00% 20 Douglas 3 33.33% 6 66.67% 9 Greene 31 23.66% 100 76.34% 131 Henry 6 19.36% 25 80.65% 31 Hickory 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2 Jasper 55 51.89% 51 48.11% 106 Laclede 30 46.88% 34 53.13% 64 Lawrence 4 44.44% 5 55.56% 9 Mcdonald 6 66.67% 3 33.33% 9 Miller 9 28.13% 23 71.88% 32 Moniteau 4 15.39% 22 84.62% 26 Morgan 11 28.21% 28 71.80% 39 Newton 33 91.67% 3 8.33% 36 Ozark 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5 Polk 2 25.00% 6 75.00% 8 St Clair 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3 Stone 14 70.00% 6 30.00% 20 Taney 19 32.20% 40 67.80% 59 Vernon 14 63.64% 8 36.36% 22 Webster 13 54.17% 11 45.83% 24 Wright 16 40.00% 24 60.00% 40 * Region Total * 380 43.28% 498 56.72% 878Kansas City Jackson 182 49.46% 186 50.54% 368 * Region Total * 182 49.46% 186 50.54% 368St. Louis St Louis City 114 26.51% 316 73.49% 430 St Louis County 177 47.07% 199 52.93% 376 * Region Total * 291 36.10% 515 63.90% 806Other Out Home Inv 93 75.61% 30 24.39% 123 * Region Total * 93 75.61% 30 24.39% 123State Total 2,100 49.54% 2,139 50.46% 4,239
11
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 6. CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During July 2011
Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/NCA/N Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality
Reports Assessment Referral Referral Referral TotalNorthwest Andrew 16 0 1 0 0 17 Atchison 2 0 0 0 0 2 Buchanan 87 4 6 12 0 109 Caldwell 9 1 1 0 0 11 Carroll 2 1 0 0 0 3 Cass 68 3 5 4 0 80 Chariton 6 0 1 0 0 7 Clay 114 11 13 5 0 143 Clinton 9 3 1 0 0 13 Cooper 14 0 0 1 0 15 Daviess 6 0 0 0 0 6 De Kalb 6 0 0 1 0 7 Gentry 4 0 0 0 0 4 Grundy 8 0 0 1 0 9 Harrison 6 0 0 1 0 7 Holt 3 0 1 1 0 5 Johnson 36 2 1 1 0 40 Lafayette 19 2 1 2 0 24 Linn 11 1 3 1 0 16 Livingston 12 0 2 2 0 16 Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nodaway 6 0 0 3 0 9 Pettis 34 4 1 4 0 43 Platte 25 4 2 2 0 33 Putnam 1 0 0 0 0 1 Ray 22 0 0 2 0 24 Saline 19 1 3 2 0 25 Sullivan 3 0 1 0 0 4 Worth 4 0 0 1 0 5 * Region Total * 552 37 43 46 0 678Northeast Adair 18 1 2 5 0 26 Audrain 13 1 1 2 0 17 Boone 85 2 4 12 0 103 Callaway 53 1 5 3 0 62 Clark 9 0 0 1 0 10 Cole 64 8 2 6 0 80 Franklin 79 12 5 7 0 103 Gasconade 10 0 1 0 0 11 Howard 10 0 1 1 0 12 Jefferson 148 9 10 16 0 183 Knox 4 0 0 0 0 4 Lewis 5 0 0 0 0 5 Lincoln 46 3 5 3 0 57 Macon 18 0 6 0 0 24 Marion 40 1 1 2 0 44 Monroe 12 0 2 0 0 14 Montgomery 15 1 0 3 0 19 Osage 9 0 0 2 0 11 Pike 14 2 2 3 0 21 Ralls 6 0 0 0 0 6 Randolph 24 2 0 7 0 33 Schuyler 5 0 1 0 0 6 Scotland 4 0 0 1 0 5 Shelby 7 0 0 0 0 7 St Charles 143 3 6 7 0 159 Warren 34 1 2 2 0 39 * Region Total * 875 47 56 83 0 1,061Southeast Bollinger 9 0 0 0 0 9 Butler 51 3 5 4 0 63 Cape Girardeau 46 3 3 6 0 58 Carter 3 0 0 2 0 5 Crawford 25 0 2 0 0 27 Dent 15 0 1 2 0 18
12
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 6. CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During July 2011
Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/NCA/N Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality
Reports Assessment Referral Referral Referral TotalSoutheast Dunklin 36 2 3 8 0 49 Howell 47 1 1 3 0 52 Iron 5 0 0 2 0 7 Madison 19 0 6 4 0 29 Maries 9 1 0 0 0 10 Mississippi 15 0 1 1 0 17 New Madrid 16 0 3 0 0 19 Oregon 12 0 1 1 0 14 Pemiscot 16 1 2 2 0 21 Perry 10 0 3 0 0 13 Phelps 55 2 3 9 0 69 Pulaski 62 1 3 4 0 70 Reynolds 6 0 2 1 0 9 Ripley 17 1 1 1 0 20 Scott 47 0 1 2 0 50 Shannon 7 0 0 0 0 7 St Francois 80 2 9 8 0 99 Ste Genevieve 12 0 0 2 0 14 Stoddard 24 0 3 5 0 32 Texas 23 2 2 2 0 29 Washington 27 2 4 2 0 35 Wayne 19 0 1 3 0 23 * Region Total * 713 21 60 74 0 868Southwest Barry 30 1 3 2 0 36 Barton 10 0 0 0 0 10 Bates 10 0 5 0 0 15 Benton 18 1 2 1 0 22 Camden 31 0 3 2 0 36 Cedar 18 0 1 1 0 20 Christian 62 4 9 11 0 86 Dade 6 1 1 1 0 9 Dallas 18 1 0 1 0 20 Douglas 15 0 0 1 0 16 Greene 326 29 28 48 0 431 Henry 30 3 3 4 0 40 Hickory 3 0 2 1 0 6 Jasper 119 7 8 14 0 148 Laclede 49 3 7 6 0 65 Lawrence 33 4 8 4 0 49 Mcdonald 23 0 2 1 0 26 Miller 34 2 2 3 0 41 Moniteau 12 2 1 1 0 16 Morgan 17 0 0 3 0 20 Newton 48 5 7 7 0 67 Ozark 10 0 1 1 0 12 Polk 47 1 10 3 0 61 St Clair 12 0 1 2 0 15 Stone 27 0 4 3 0 34 Taney 48 2 8 7 0 65 Vernon 21 1 3 3 0 28 Webster 34 4 5 3 0 46 Wright 25 3 2 6 0 36 * Region Total * 1,136 74 126 140 0 1,476Kansas City Jackson 523 52 63 55 0 693 * Region Total * 523 52 63 55 0 693St. Louis St Louis City 256 25 18 23 0 322 St Louis County 352 26 43 39 0 460 * Region Total * 608 51 61 62 0 782Other Out Home Inv 141 0 0 0 0 141 Out Of State 8 0 0 0 0 8 Stat Unit 0 0 0 0 44 44 * Region Total * 149 0 0 0 44 193State Total 4,556 282 409 460 44 5,751
13
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
Jul-0
7
Oct
-07
Jan-
08
Apr-
08
Jul-0
8
Oct
-08
Jan-
09
Apr-
09
Jul-0
9
Oct
-09
Jan-
10
Apr-
10
Jul-1
0
Oct
-10
Jan-
11
Apr-
11
Jul-1
1
Figure 2.Child Abuse & Neglect ReportsFor 4 Years Through July 2011
6,000
Figure 3.Child Abuse & Neglect Reports
From August 2009 Through July 2011
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
July
2009-2010 2010-2011
14
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 4.Percentage Change in CA/N Reports
Made Twelve Months ApartJuly 2010 and July 2011
100%
Figure 5.CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed
During July 2011 by Conclusion
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstianted Family Assessment Other
15
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Substantiated7%
UnsubstantiatedP S I4%
Unsubstantiated35%
Family Assessment46%
Other3%
Figure 6.CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed
During July 2011 by Conclusion
100%
Figure 7.Time Between Report and Child Contact
For Investigations/Assessments Completed in July 2011
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Within 24 Hours After 24 Hours No Contact
16
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 8.Percentage of Investigations/AssessmentsCompleted Within 30 Days During July 2011
Within 30 Days More Than 30 Days
17
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Children’s Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 201118
Notes: Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures
Table 1. • Based upon incidents and children reported during the month. • Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents during
any given month).
Table 2. • Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. • Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents during
any given month). • Conclusions are as follows:
Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not
Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 30 Days Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home
Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)
• Population data is based upon the Total Population Under Age 18, Mapping Census 2000: The
Geography of U.S. Diversity, U.S. Census Bureau, released December 7, 2001.
Table 3. • Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. • Conclusions are as follows:
Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not
Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 30 Days Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home
Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)
Table 4. • Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include information
on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G- Inappropriate report or H- Located out of state.
Children’s Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 201119
Table 5. • Based upon incidents concluded during the month. Table 6. • Based upon incidents and referrals reported during the month.
Figure 2. and Figure 3. • Based upon incidents reported during the month.
Figure 4. • Based upon incidents reported during the month compared to incidents reported during the same
month of the previous year.
Figure 5. and Figure 6. • Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. • Conclusions are as follows:
Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not
Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 30 Days Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home
Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)
• Figures do not include Out-of-Home Investigation, STAT Unit, or Out of State categories.
Figure 7. • Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include information
on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G- Inappropriate report or H- Located out of state.
Figure 8. • Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
Family-Centered Services
Table 7. Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of July 2011
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Court Newborn Totalof Preventive Order Crisis Family Cases
Evidence Services Only Assessment Assessment ActiveNorthwest Andrew 0 2 0 0 2 4 Atchison 2 1 0 0 5 8 Buchanan 7 21 1 10 51 90 Caldwell 3 1 0 0 3 7 Carroll 0 1 0 1 2 4 Cass 36 32 19 8 145 240 Chariton 2 1 1 1 7 12 Clay 13 11 3 5 37 69 Clinton 5 2 0 1 7 15 Cooper 1 6 0 0 10 17 Daviess 6 1 0 0 1 8 De Kalb 0 1 0 0 3 4 Gentry 1 0 0 0 1 2 Grundy 4 7 0 0 7 18 Harrison 2 2 0 0 8 12 Holt 0 0 1 0 1 2 Johnson 8 12 13 6 21 60 Lafayette 6 13 0 4 9 32 Linn 7 8 0 2 21 38 Livingston 4 9 0 2 8 23 Mercer 0 0 0 0 1 1 Nodaway 2 2 0 2 25 31 Pettis 8 9 3 1 17 38 Platte 2 10 0 2 8 22 Putnam 5 2 0 1 2 10 Ray 1 1 0 5 5 12 Saline 8 9 1 0 10 28 Sullivan 2 1 0 1 6 10 Worth 0 1 0 0 0 1 * Region Total * 135 166 42 52 423 818Northeast Adair 7 15 5 1 23 51 Audrain 4 7 0 0 15 26 Boone 20 71 35 9 82 217 Callaway 13 26 2 0 30 71 Clark 2 7 3 1 9 22 Cole 7 25 7 2 64 105 Franklin 58 65 2 10 80 215 Gasconade 3 6 0 1 2 12 Howard 3 0 0 0 5 8 Jefferson 58 49 7 1 324 439 Knox 0 3 0 0 1 4 Lewis 4 11 2 0 3 20 Lincoln 10 10 7 0 46 73 Macon 7 11 2 1 20 41 Marion 20 7 8 6 13 54 Monroe 1 2 0 1 4 8 Montgomery 5 12 0 1 13 31 Osage 1 4 0 0 2 7 Pike 8 4 1 1 21 35 Ralls 2 2 0 0 7 11 Randolph 9 10 15 3 26 63 Schuyler 0 3 0 0 5 8 Scotland 0 0 2 0 4 6 Shelby 0 4 1 0 6 11 St Charles 19 27 16 1 126 189 Warren 17 11 1 5 16 50 * Region Total * 278 392 116 44 947 1,777Southeast Bollinger 2 2 1 0 9 14 Butler 9 15 12 6 49 91 Cape Girardeau 5 12 0 6 67 90 Carter 0 1 0 0 3 4 Crawford 0 17 2 1 48 68 Dent 4 7 0 0 27 38
21
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 7. Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of July 2011
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Court Newborn Totalof Preventive Order Crisis Family Cases
Evidence Services Only Assessment Assessment ActiveSoutheast Dunklin 4 17 2 2 51 76 Howell 11 30 1 6 56 104 Iron 2 6 1 0 19 28 Madison 7 2 0 1 12 22 Maries 1 2 1 0 5 9 Mississippi 2 6 2 0 11 21 New Madrid 7 11 1 10 38 67 Oregon 1 3 0 0 11 15 Pemiscot 2 6 1 10 72 91 Perry 5 4 0 2 15 26 Phelps 2 28 2 1 60 93 Pulaski 0 24 3 0 58 85 Reynolds 0 3 0 0 10 13 Ripley 2 3 4 0 15 24 Scott 13 24 2 5 31 75 Shannon 0 2 0 1 1 4 St Francois 19 47 0 7 49 122 Ste Genevieve 3 6 0 1 6 16 Stoddard 4 19 0 3 124 150 Texas 4 3 2 2 17 28 Washington 19 23 0 3 28 73 Wayne 1 3 1 0 16 21 * Region Total * 129 326 38 67 908 1,468Southwest Barry 10 31 1 0 65 107 Barton 3 1 3 1 20 28 Bates 5 6 3 1 19 34 Benton 0 2 0 0 2 4 Camden 7 5 1 0 43 56 Cedar 1 3 3 0 10 17 Christian 4 40 15 1 41 101 Dade 0 1 1 0 6 8 Dallas 4 2 0 0 10 16 Douglas 1 3 1 1 16 22 Greene 131 100 11 22 582 846 Henry 4 7 2 2 48 63 Hickory 1 5 0 0 8 14 Jasper 15 110 54 12 238 429 Laclede 42 22 5 3 72 144 Lawrence 14 20 2 1 78 115 Mcdonald 8 10 2 2 56 78 Miller 12 39 0 1 25 77 Moniteau 3 4 0 0 14 21 Morgan 4 5 0 0 27 36 Newton 22 28 4 4 79 137 Ozark 4 4 0 0 10 18 Polk 5 9 1 0 27 42 St Clair 0 5 2 1 6 14 Stone 7 12 2 1 49 71 Taney 14 29 22 6 128 199 Vernon 2 5 3 3 33 46 Webster 4 8 0 0 21 33 Wright 3 7 0 2 36 48 * Region Total * 330 523 138 64 1,769 2,824Kansas City Jackson 279 180 91 136 772 1,458 * Region Total * 279 180 91 136 772 1,458St. Louis St Louis City 122 93 7 36 303 561 St Louis County 306 271 65 82 418 1,142 * Region Total * 428 364 72 118 721 1,703State Total 1,579 1,951 497 481 5,540 10,048
22
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 8. Family-Centered Services Cases Active During July 2011
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Court Newborn Totalof Preventive Order Crisis Family Cases
Evidence Services Only Assessment Assessment ActiveNorthwest Andrew 0 2 0 0 3 5 Atchison 2 1 0 0 5 8 Buchanan 9 24 1 11 55 100 Caldwell 3 1 0 0 3 7 Carroll 0 1 0 1 2 4 Cass 36 33 19 8 147 243 Chariton 2 1 1 1 7 12 Clay 15 13 3 5 44 80 Clinton 5 3 0 1 7 16 Cooper 1 6 0 0 10 17 Daviess 6 1 0 0 1 8 De Kalb 0 1 0 0 3 4 Gentry 1 0 0 0 1 2 Grundy 5 8 0 0 7 20 Harrison 2 2 0 0 9 13 Holt 0 0 2 0 1 3 Johnson 8 15 13 6 21 63 Lafayette 6 14 0 4 9 33 Linn 7 8 0 2 22 39 Livingston 4 10 0 2 9 25 Mercer 0 0 0 0 1 1 Nodaway 2 2 0 2 29 35 Pettis 8 10 3 1 18 40 Platte 2 12 0 2 10 26 Putnam 5 2 0 1 6 14 Ray 1 1 0 5 5 12 Saline 9 11 1 0 11 32 Sullivan 2 1 0 1 8 12 Worth 0 1 0 0 0 1 * Region Total * 141 184 43 53 454 875Northeast Adair 7 15 5 1 24 52 Audrain 4 7 0 0 15 26 Boone 22 73 37 9 83 224 Callaway 16 33 2 1 31 83 Clark 2 7 3 1 11 24 Cole 7 27 7 3 75 119 Franklin 60 74 2 12 83 231 Gasconade 3 7 0 1 5 16 Howard 3 0 0 0 5 8 Jefferson 69 52 9 1 340 471 Knox 0 3 1 0 2 6 Lewis 4 11 2 0 4 21 Lincoln 10 12 8 0 52 82 Macon 7 11 2 1 22 43 Marion 23 7 8 6 13 57 Monroe 1 2 0 1 5 9 Montgomery 5 12 0 1 14 32 Osage 1 5 0 0 2 8 Pike 8 5 1 1 22 37 Ralls 2 2 0 0 7 11 Randolph 9 10 17 3 26 65 Schuyler 0 3 0 0 5 8 Scotland 0 0 2 0 5 7 Shelby 0 4 1 0 6 11 St Charles 21 30 16 1 145 213 Warren 19 13 1 5 18 56 * Region Total * 303 425 124 48 1,020 1,920Southeast Bollinger 3 2 1 0 9 15 Butler 9 16 12 7 51 95 Cape Girardeau 8 13 0 6 71 98 Carter 0 1 0 0 6 7 Crawford 1 20 2 1 52 76 Dent 7 8 0 0 30 45
23
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 8. Family-Centered Services Cases Active During July 2011
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Court Newborn Totalof Preventive Order Crisis Family Cases
Evidence Services Only Assessment Assessment ActiveSoutheast Dunklin 4 20 2 3 61 90 Howell 12 32 1 7 68 120 Iron 2 6 1 0 19 28 Madison 8 2 0 1 14 25 Maries 1 2 1 0 5 9 Mississippi 3 6 2 1 12 24 New Madrid 9 11 1 11 40 72 Oregon 1 3 0 0 14 18 Pemiscot 2 6 1 10 73 92 Perry 5 4 0 2 16 27 Phelps 3 29 2 1 65 100 Pulaski 0 28 3 0 61 92 Reynolds 0 3 0 0 11 14 Ripley 2 3 4 0 16 25 Scott 17 27 2 7 35 88 Shannon 0 2 0 1 2 5 St Francois 19 47 0 7 49 122 Ste Genevieve 3 7 0 1 6 17 Stoddard 4 24 0 3 129 160 Texas 4 3 2 2 21 32 Washington 23 24 0 3 29 79 Wayne 1 5 1 0 19 26 * Region Total * 151 354 38 74 984 1,601Southwest Barry 10 33 1 0 71 115 Barton 3 1 3 1 20 28 Bates 5 6 3 1 20 35 Benton 0 2 0 0 3 5 Camden 7 5 1 0 46 59 Cedar 1 3 3 1 11 19 Christian 4 42 15 2 43 106 Dade 1 1 1 0 8 11 Dallas 4 3 0 0 12 19 Douglas 1 3 1 1 16 22 Greene 133 105 11 22 609 880 Henry 4 7 2 2 51 66 Hickory 2 5 0 0 8 15 Jasper 15 113 54 12 245 439 Laclede 42 25 5 3 76 151 Lawrence 14 21 2 1 80 118 Mcdonald 8 10 2 2 58 80 Miller 13 40 0 1 25 79 Moniteau 3 4 0 0 17 24 Morgan 5 5 0 0 32 42 Newton 22 28 4 4 89 147 Ozark 4 4 0 0 11 19 Polk 5 11 1 0 29 46 St Clair 0 5 2 1 6 14 Stone 7 12 2 1 60 82 Taney 14 30 22 6 138 210 Vernon 2 5 3 3 33 46 Webster 4 9 0 0 26 39 Wright 4 8 0 2 36 50 * Region Total * 337 546 138 66 1,879 2,966Kansas City Jackson 285 186 92 140 804 1,507 * Region Total * 285 186 92 140 804 1,507St. Louis St Louis City 130 98 8 37 321 594 St Louis County 319 287 66 85 436 1,193 * Region Total * 449 385 74 122 757 1,787State Total 1,666 2,080 509 503 5,898 10,656
24
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 9. Persons in Family-Centered Services During July 2011
Child Total Persons withAdults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action
Northwest Andrew 8 17 0 25 2 Atchison 13 20 0 33 16 Buchanan 237 249 1 487 66 Caldwell 14 19 0 33 9 Carroll 8 6 0 14 4 Cass 435 453 1 889 286 Chariton 25 27 0 52 16 Clay 168 174 0 342 77 Clinton 37 45 0 82 21 Cooper 34 41 0 75 23 Daviess 16 14 0 30 13 De Kalb 11 10 0 21 4 Gentry 6 7 0 13 7 Grundy 31 49 0 80 31 Harrison 26 30 0 56 8 Holt 5 6 0 11 4 Johnson 111 128 0 239 68 Lafayette 59 68 2 129 36 Linn 73 85 1 159 39 Livingston 49 54 0 103 27 Mercer 1 3 0 4 0 Nodaway 63 69 0 132 66 Pettis 76 110 0 186 56 Platte 56 44 0 100 18 Putnam 20 28 0 48 20 Ray 27 30 0 57 12 Saline 63 78 0 141 34 Sullivan 20 26 0 46 16 Worth 2 3 0 5 3 * Region Total * 1,694 1,893 5 3,592 982Northeast Adair 97 110 0 207 70 Audrain 45 56 1 102 29 Boone 435 490 3 928 207 Callaway 163 172 1 336 89 Clark 44 48 0 92 33 Cole 232 244 0 476 113 Franklin 512 508 1 1,021 226 Gasconade 29 31 0 60 12 Howard 14 17 0 31 17 Jefferson 915 768 6 1,689 590 Knox 9 12 1 22 9 Lewis 37 49 0 86 38 Lincoln 167 197 0 364 116 Macon 81 81 1 163 45 Marion 90 116 0 206 64 Monroe 17 24 0 41 11 Montgomery 54 74 2 130 42 Osage 17 14 0 31 9 Pike 80 84 0 164 47 Ralls 22 23 0 45 11 Randolph 103 128 0 231 82 Schuyler 14 14 0 28 10 Scotland 16 11 0 27 6 Shelby 17 25 0 42 13 St Charles 432 483 1 916 262 Warren 112 132 1 245 77 * Region Total * 3,754 3,911 18 7,683 2,228Southeast Bollinger 37 33 0 70 21 Butler 174 215 0 389 106 Cape Girardeau 198 231 1 430 105 Carter 12 14 0 26 2 Crawford 141 164 1 306 58 Dent 78 84 0 162 30
25
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 9. Persons in Family-Centered Services During July 2011
Child Total Persons withAdults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action
Southeast Dunklin 158 194 0 352 127 Howell 225 271 1 497 68 Iron 54 60 0 114 23 Madison 47 59 0 106 34 Maries 21 16 0 37 7 Mississippi 45 57 0 102 19 New Madrid 129 137 0 266 57 Oregon 33 45 0 78 8 Pemiscot 169 257 0 426 90 Perry 61 61 0 122 30 Phelps 192 213 1 406 98 Pulaski 190 183 0 373 98 Reynolds 33 35 0 68 10 Ripley 52 73 0 125 50 Scott 150 208 0 358 103 Shannon 8 12 0 20 1 St Francois 276 286 1 563 78 Ste Genevieve 37 41 0 78 15 Stoddard 270 256 0 526 192 Texas 62 82 0 144 44 Washington 138 180 1 319 132 Wayne 50 52 1 103 27 * Region Total * 3,040 3,519 7 6,566 1,633Southwest Barry 208 241 2 451 119 Barton 55 60 0 115 29 Bates 64 89 1 154 51 Benton 11 12 0 23 4 Camden 108 124 1 233 67 Cedar 41 47 0 88 15 Christian 190 193 2 385 150 Dade 27 25 0 52 11 Dallas 28 37 0 65 22 Douglas 40 33 0 73 17 Greene 1,530 1,521 4 3,055 1,082 Henry 152 123 2 277 89 Hickory 27 29 1 57 18 Jasper 859 910 7 1,776 631 Laclede 294 308 1 603 158 Lawrence 218 242 0 460 108 Mcdonald 141 144 0 285 105 Miller 156 161 3 320 80 Moniteau 45 49 0 94 18 Morgan 79 99 0 178 51 Newton 282 295 0 577 247 Ozark 36 41 0 77 22 Polk 92 85 0 177 39 St Clair 24 36 0 60 26 Stone 133 175 0 308 81 Taney 363 408 2 773 260 Vernon 67 103 0 170 36 Webster 93 73 0 166 37 Wright 105 114 0 219 53 * Region Total * 5,468 5,777 26 11,271 3,626Kansas City Jackson 2,632 3,168 9 5,809 2,420 * Region Total * 2,632 3,168 9 5,809 2,420St. Louis St Louis City 1,042 1,484 33 2,559 816 St Louis County 1,935 2,651 35 4,621 1,244 * Region Total * 2,977 4,135 68 7,180 2,060State Total 19,565 22,403 133 42,101 12,949
26
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 10. Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During July 2011
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Court Newborn Totalof Preventive Order Crisis Family Cases
Evidence Services Only Assessment Assessment ActiveNorthwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buchanan 1 3 0 2 4 10 Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cass 1 2 0 1 2 6 Chariton 1 1 0 0 1 3 Clay 0 1 0 0 5 6 Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 Johnson 0 1 0 0 1 2 Lafayette 1 2 0 1 2 6 Linn 1 1 0 0 1 3 Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nodaway 0 0 0 0 2 2 Pettis 0 1 0 1 2 4 Platte 0 1 0 1 0 2 Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ray 0 0 0 0 1 1 Saline 2 3 0 0 1 6 Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 7 16 0 6 22 51Northeast Adair 0 1 0 0 2 3 Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0 Boone 3 8 3 1 10 25 Callaway 1 3 0 0 3 7 Clark 0 0 1 0 0 1 Cole 0 2 0 0 9 11 Franklin 9 4 0 0 8 21 Gasconade 1 3 0 0 2 6 Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jefferson 1 0 0 0 12 13 Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lincoln 0 0 0 0 9 9 Macon 0 4 0 0 4 8 Marion 0 0 0 0 1 1 Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 Montgomery 0 2 0 1 3 6 Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pike 1 0 0 0 5 6 Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 Randolph 0 0 1 0 0 1 Schuyler 0 0 0 0 1 1 Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shelby 0 0 0 0 1 1 St Charles 1 2 0 0 13 16 Warren 0 3 0 1 2 6 * Region Total * 17 32 5 3 85 142Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 2 2 Butler 1 0 3 0 2 6 Cape Girardeau 0 1 0 0 4 5 Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crawford 0 1 0 0 3 4 Dent 0 1 0 0 1 2
27
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 10. Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During July 2011
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Court Newborn Totalof Preventive Order Crisis Family Cases
Evidence Services Only Assessment Assessment ActiveSoutheast Dunklin 0 9 0 0 7 16 Howell 0 2 0 0 3 5 Iron 0 0 0 0 2 2 Madison 0 0 0 0 1 1 Maries 0 0 0 0 1 1 Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Madrid 0 2 0 1 2 5 Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pemiscot 0 1 1 2 11 15 Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phelps 0 8 0 0 10 18 Pulaski 0 2 0 0 8 10 Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ripley 0 2 1 0 3 6 Scott 0 2 0 0 2 4 Shannon 0 0 0 1 1 2 St Francois 0 2 0 1 2 5 Ste Genevieve 1 3 0 0 0 4 Stoddard 0 2 0 0 9 11 Texas 0 2 0 1 4 7 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wayne 0 0 0 0 1 1 * Region Total * 2 40 5 6 79 132Southwest Barry 0 2 0 0 5 7 Barton 0 0 0 0 2 2 Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 Camden 0 0 0 0 4 4 Cedar 0 0 1 0 1 2 Christian 0 2 2 1 6 11 Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dallas 0 1 0 0 0 1 Douglas 0 1 1 0 3 5 Greene 1 5 0 2 55 63 Henry 0 1 0 1 2 4 Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 1 Jasper 0 7 1 0 21 29 Laclede 2 3 0 1 5 11 Lawrence 1 0 0 0 4 5 Mcdonald 0 0 1 0 5 6 Miller 1 4 0 0 1 6 Moniteau 1 0 0 0 3 4 Morgan 1 1 0 0 4 6 Newton 0 1 0 1 7 9 Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 Polk 0 0 0 0 2 2 St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stone 0 0 0 0 8 8 Taney 1 1 1 0 16 19 Vernon 0 0 0 1 3 4 Webster 0 2 0 0 2 4 Wright 0 0 0 0 4 4 * Region Total * 8 32 7 7 163 217Kansas City Jackson 6 4 4 7 42 63 * Region Total * 6 4 4 7 42 63St. Louis St Louis City 7 12 0 1 26 46 St Louis County 15 30 2 4 22 73 * Region Total * 22 42 2 5 48 119State Total 62 166 23 34 439 724
28
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 11. Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During July 2011
by Close Reason
Total Goal Achieved Other Cases
Number Percent Number Percent ClosedNorthwest Andrew 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Buchanan 10 83.33% 2 16.67% 12 Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cass 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Clay 10 90.91% 1 9.09% 11 Clinton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Grundy 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Harrison 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Holt 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Johnson 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 Lafayette 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Linn 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Livingston 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2 Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Nodaway 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4 Pettis 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4 Platte 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4 Putnam 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4 Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Saline 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5 Sullivan 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2 Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 50 80.65% 12 19.36% 62Northeast Adair 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Boone 6 66.67% 3 33.33% 9 Callaway 9 75.00% 3 25.00% 12 Clark 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2 Cole 7 41.18% 10 58.82% 17 Franklin 11 64.71% 6 35.29% 17 Gasconade 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4 Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Jefferson 32 94.12% 2 5.88% 34 Knox 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2 Lewis 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Lincoln 7 63.64% 4 36.36% 11 Macon 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Marion 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 Monroe 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Montgomery 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Osage 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Pike 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2 Ralls 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Randolph 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Scotland 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 St Charles 20 83.33% 4 16.67% 24 Warren 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 6 * Region Total * 113 73.38% 41 26.62% 154Southeast Bollinger 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Butler 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4 Cape Girardeau 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 9 Carter 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3 Crawford 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 8 Dent 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 7
29
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 11. Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During July 2011
by Close Reason
Total Goal Achieved Other Cases
Number Percent Number Percent ClosedSoutheast Dunklin 7 50.00% 7 50.00% 14 Howell 9 56.25% 7 43.75% 16 Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Madison 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3 Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Mississippi 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4 New Madrid 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5 Oregon 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3 Pemiscot 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Perry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Phelps 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 7 Pulaski 2 25.00% 6 75.00% 8 Reynolds 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Ripley 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Scott 9 69.23% 4 30.77% 13 Shannon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Stoddard 7 63.64% 4 36.36% 11 Texas 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4 Washington 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6 Wayne 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5 * Region Total * 95 69.34% 42 30.66% 137Southwest Barry 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 8 Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Bates 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Benton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Camden 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4 Cedar 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2 Christian 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5 Dade 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3 Dallas 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Greene 15 44.12% 19 55.88% 34 Henry 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 Hickory 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Jasper 6 60.00% 4 40.00% 10 Laclede 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 7 Lawrence 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 Mcdonald 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2 Miller 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2 Moniteau 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 Morgan 3 42.86% 4 57.14% 7 Newton 7 70.00% 3 30.00% 10 Ozark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Polk 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4 St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Stone 5 45.46% 6 54.55% 11 Taney 7 63.64% 4 36.36% 11 Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Webster 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6 Wright 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 * Region Total * 85 58.22% 61 41.78% 146Kansas City Jackson 32 64.00% 18 36.00% 50 * Region Total * 32 64.00% 18 36.00% 50St. Louis St Louis City 22 62.86% 13 37.14% 35 St Louis County 31 57.41% 23 42.59% 54 * Region Total * 53 59.55% 36 40.45% 89State Total 428 67.09% 210 32.92% 638
30
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 12. Family-Centered Services Cases Active During July 2011
Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months TotalNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Atchison 1 14.29% 4 57.14% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 7 Buchanan 8 24.24% 7 21.21% 1 3.03% 17 51.52% 33 Caldwell 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 4 Carroll 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 4 Cass 30 15.46% 38 19.59% 39 20.10% 87 44.85% 194 Chariton 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 71.43% 7 Clay 11 23.40% 5 10.64% 9 19.15% 22 46.81% 47 Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 30.00% 7 70.00% 10 Cooper 2 18.18% 1 9.09% 2 18.18% 6 54.55% 11 Daviess 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 5 62.50% 8 De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Grundy 5 38.46% 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 6 46.15% 13 Harrison 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 6 Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Johnson 7 15.56% 2 4.44% 6 13.33% 30 66.67% 45 Lafayette 6 24.00% 6 24.00% 6 24.00% 7 28.00% 25 Linn 4 16.00% 3 12.00% 5 20.00% 13 52.00% 25 Livingston 5 31.25% 1 6.25% 1 6.25% 9 56.25% 16 Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Nodaway 9 25.71% 14 40.00% 3 8.57% 9 25.71% 35 Pettis 7 23.33% 5 16.67% 7 23.33% 11 36.67% 30 Platte 4 25.00% 4 25.00% 1 6.25% 7 43.75% 16 Putnam 1 9.09% 3 27.27% 0 0.00% 7 63.64% 11 Ray 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 4 Saline 6 30.00% 3 15.00% 2 10.00% 9 45.00% 20 Sullivan 0 0.00% 2 18.18% 2 18.18% 7 63.64% 11 Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 * Region Total * 110 18.64% 105 17.80% 96 16.27% 279 47.29% 590Northeast Adair 7 17.07% 11 26.83% 6 14.63% 17 41.46% 41 Audrain 4 21.05% 0 0.00% 4 21.05% 11 57.90% 19 Boone 34 27.64% 14 11.38% 13 10.57% 62 50.41% 123 Callaway 8 15.39% 5 9.62% 7 13.46% 32 61.54% 52 Clark 4 17.39% 4 17.39% 2 8.70% 13 56.52% 23 Cole 18 25.00% 17 23.61% 13 18.06% 24 33.33% 72 Franklin 16 14.68% 19 17.43% 19 17.43% 55 50.46% 109 Gasconade 4 57.14% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 2 28.57% 7 Howard 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 4 50.00% 8 Jefferson 79 19.13% 60 14.53% 60 14.53% 214 51.82% 413 Knox 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 83.33% 6 Lewis 3 15.79% 2 10.53% 3 15.79% 11 57.90% 19 Lincoln 23 33.33% 11 15.94% 9 13.04% 26 37.68% 69 Macon 5 17.86% 8 28.57% 4 14.29% 11 39.29% 28 Marion 9 20.93% 2 4.65% 10 23.26% 22 51.16% 43 Monroe 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 4 Montgomery 8 30.77% 2 7.69% 5 19.23% 11 42.31% 26 Osage 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 6 Pike 10 34.48% 9 31.03% 2 6.90% 8 27.59% 29 Ralls 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 6 Randolph 10 18.18% 6 10.91% 5 9.09% 34 61.82% 55 Schuyler 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6 Scotland 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5 Shelby 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 2 25.00% 3 37.50% 8 St Charles 43 29.66% 25 17.24% 22 15.17% 55 37.93% 145 Warren 7 17.95% 4 10.26% 3 7.69% 25 64.10% 39 * Region Total * 304 22.34% 209 15.36% 197 14.48% 651 47.83% 1,361Southeast Bollinger 2 20.00% 3 30.00% 1 10.00% 4 40.00% 10 Butler 12 21.05% 12 21.05% 9 15.79% 24 42.11% 57 Cape Girardeau 15 26.32% 10 17.54% 10 17.54% 22 38.60% 57 Carter 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Crawford 10 25.00% 6 15.00% 6 15.00% 18 45.00% 40 Dent 3 14.29% 3 14.29% 6 28.57% 9 42.86% 21
31
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 12. Family-Centered Services Cases Active During July 2011
Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months TotalNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Southeast Dunklin 25 40.32% 11 17.74% 10 16.13% 16 25.81% 62 Howell 3 7.69% 5 12.82% 8 20.51% 23 58.97% 39 Iron 6 40.00% 3 20.00% 3 20.00% 3 20.00% 15 Madison 3 18.75% 1 6.25% 1 6.25% 11 68.75% 16 Maries 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 3 42.86% 3 42.86% 7 Mississippi 3 30.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 5 50.00% 10 New Madrid 7 20.00% 5 14.29% 7 20.00% 16 45.71% 35 Oregon 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 5 Pemiscot 14 35.00% 8 20.00% 8 20.00% 10 25.00% 40 Perry 6 33.33% 5 27.78% 0 0.00% 7 38.89% 18 Phelps 14 25.93% 7 12.96% 10 18.52% 23 42.59% 54 Pulaski 14 22.95% 16 26.23% 11 18.03% 20 32.79% 61 Reynolds 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5 Ripley 5 29.41% 3 17.65% 5 29.41% 4 23.53% 17 Scott 13 25.49% 7 13.73% 10 19.61% 21 41.18% 51 Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 St Francois 6 15.39% 9 23.08% 8 20.51% 16 41.03% 39 Ste Genevieve 1 14.29% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 7 Stoddard 52 40.00% 40 30.77% 20 15.39% 18 13.85% 130 Texas 6 27.27% 6 27.27% 1 4.55% 9 40.91% 22 Washington 8 12.50% 9 14.06% 7 10.94% 40 62.50% 64 Wayne 3 20.00% 4 26.67% 0 0.00% 8 53.33% 15 * Region Total * 235 26.14% 182 20.25% 144 16.02% 338 37.60% 899Southwest Barry 13 17.11% 7 9.21% 13 17.11% 43 56.58% 76 Barton 3 15.79% 3 15.79% 3 15.79% 10 52.63% 19 Bates 1 3.70% 3 11.11% 4 14.82% 19 70.37% 27 Benton 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2 Camden 6 15.00% 9 22.50% 4 10.00% 21 52.50% 40 Cedar 1 11.11% 2 22.22% 2 22.22% 4 44.44% 9 Christian 15 16.13% 13 13.98% 12 12.90% 53 56.99% 93 Dade 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 3 50.00% 6 Dallas 1 8.33% 2 16.67% 3 25.00% 6 50.00% 12 Douglas 6 42.86% 2 14.29% 1 7.14% 5 35.71% 14 Greene 137 19.08% 143 19.92% 110 15.32% 328 45.68% 718 Henry 9 16.67% 16 29.63% 10 18.52% 19 35.19% 54 Hickory 1 7.69% 1 7.69% 3 23.08% 8 61.54% 13 Jasper 51 14.45% 56 15.86% 64 18.13% 182 51.56% 353 Laclede 19 19.39% 15 15.31% 14 14.29% 50 51.02% 98 Lawrence 8 13.12% 15 24.59% 8 13.12% 30 49.18% 61 Mcdonald 14 21.54% 18 27.69% 6 9.23% 27 41.54% 65 Miller 6 12.00% 7 14.00% 6 12.00% 31 62.00% 50 Moniteau 4 30.77% 0 0.00% 4 30.77% 5 38.46% 13 Morgan 10 40.00% 4 16.00% 2 8.00% 9 36.00% 25 Newton 28 21.05% 35 26.32% 19 14.29% 51 38.35% 133 Ozark 3 20.00% 4 26.67% 3 20.00% 5 33.33% 15 Polk 3 10.00% 8 26.67% 2 6.67% 17 56.67% 30 St Clair 0 0.00% 1 9.09% 5 45.46% 5 45.46% 11 Stone 9 17.31% 12 23.08% 8 15.39% 23 44.23% 52 Taney 37 23.13% 24 15.00% 23 14.38% 76 47.50% 160 Vernon 4 15.39% 4 15.39% 6 23.08% 12 46.15% 26 Webster 5 20.83% 3 12.50% 4 16.67% 12 50.00% 24 Wright 5 16.67% 8 26.67% 4 13.33% 13 43.33% 30 * Region Total * 399 17.90% 418 18.75% 344 15.43% 1,068 47.91% 2,229Kansas City Jackson 165 12.54% 182 13.83% 199 15.12% 770 58.51% 1,316 * Region Total * 165 12.54% 182 13.83% 199 15.12% 770 58.51% 1,316St. Louis St Louis City 77 16.96% 40 8.81% 35 7.71% 302 66.52% 454 St Louis County 114 14.65% 126 16.20% 109 14.01% 429 55.14% 778 * Region Total * 191 15.50% 166 13.47% 144 11.69% 731 59.33% 1,232State Total 1,404 18.41% 1,262 16.55% 1,124 14.74% 3,837 50.31% 7,627
32
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 13. Family-Centered Services Cases Active During July 2011
Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months TotalNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Northwest Andrew 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 Atchison 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Buchanan 35 52.24% 23 34.33% 6 8.96% 3 4.48% 67 Caldwell 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 3 Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cass 18 36.74% 15 30.61% 6 12.25% 10 20.41% 49 Chariton 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 Clay 24 72.73% 7 21.21% 1 3.03% 1 3.03% 33 Clinton 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6 Cooper 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6 Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 De Kalb 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Grundy 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7 Harrison 3 42.86% 1 14.29% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 7 Holt 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Johnson 9 50.00% 8 44.44% 0 0.00% 1 5.56% 18 Lafayette 6 75.00% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8 Linn 8 57.14% 4 28.57% 1 7.14% 1 7.14% 14 Livingston 1 11.11% 3 33.33% 4 44.44% 1 11.11% 9 Mercer 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Pettis 9 90.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10 Platte 7 70.00% 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10 Putnam 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 Ray 5 62.50% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 8 Saline 11 91.67% 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12 Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 156 54.74% 82 28.77% 27 9.47% 20 7.02% 285Northeast Adair 7 63.64% 4 36.36% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11 Audrain 3 42.86% 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7 Boone 57 56.44% 30 29.70% 7 6.93% 7 6.93% 101 Callaway 18 58.07% 9 29.03% 2 6.45% 2 6.45% 31 Clark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Cole 40 85.11% 4 8.51% 2 4.26% 1 2.13% 47 Franklin 53 43.44% 36 29.51% 16 13.12% 17 13.93% 122 Gasconade 6 66.67% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 9 Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Jefferson 23 39.66% 22 37.93% 9 15.52% 4 6.90% 58 Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Lewis 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Lincoln 7 53.85% 5 38.46% 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 13 Macon 10 66.67% 5 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15 Marion 11 78.57% 2 14.29% 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 14 Monroe 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5 Montgomery 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 Osage 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Pike 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8 Ralls 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5 Randolph 7 70.00% 1 10.00% 1 10.00% 1 10.00% 10 Schuyler 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Scotland 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Shelby 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3 St Charles 38 55.88% 24 35.29% 4 5.88% 2 2.94% 68 Warren 15 88.24% 2 11.77% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 17 * Region Total * 316 56.53% 162 28.98% 45 8.05% 36 6.44% 559Southeast Bollinger 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5 Butler 27 71.05% 5 13.16% 5 13.16% 1 2.63% 38 Cape Girardeau 11 26.83% 19 46.34% 6 14.63% 5 12.20% 41 Carter 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6 Crawford 11 30.56% 13 36.11% 10 27.78% 2 5.56% 36 Dent 13 54.17% 7 29.17% 3 12.50% 1 4.17% 24
33
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 13. Family-Centered Services Cases Active During July 2011
Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months TotalNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Southeast Dunklin 25 89.29% 2 7.14% 0 0.00% 1 3.57% 28 Howell 43 53.09% 22 27.16% 10 12.35% 6 7.41% 81 Iron 4 30.77% 6 46.15% 1 7.69% 2 15.39% 13 Madison 6 66.67% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9 Maries 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Mississippi 5 35.71% 3 21.43% 3 21.43% 3 21.43% 14 New Madrid 7 18.92% 19 51.35% 8 21.62% 3 8.11% 37 Oregon 11 84.62% 1 7.69% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13 Pemiscot 19 36.54% 23 44.23% 9 17.31% 1 1.92% 52 Perry 6 66.67% 2 22.22% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9 Phelps 29 63.04% 10 21.74% 5 10.87% 2 4.35% 46 Pulaski 18 58.07% 9 29.03% 3 9.68% 1 3.23% 31 Reynolds 3 33.33% 3 33.33% 1 11.11% 2 22.22% 9 Ripley 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8 Scott 14 37.84% 11 29.73% 4 10.81% 8 21.62% 37 Shannon 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 St Francois 28 33.74% 24 28.92% 15 18.07% 16 19.28% 83 Ste Genevieve 6 60.00% 1 10.00% 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 10 Stoddard 11 36.67% 11 36.67% 5 16.67% 3 10.00% 30 Texas 9 90.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10 Washington 5 33.33% 4 26.67% 3 20.00% 3 20.00% 15 Wayne 5 45.46% 5 45.46% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11 * Region Total * 333 47.44% 210 29.92% 98 13.96% 61 8.69% 702Southwest Barry 21 53.85% 12 30.77% 3 7.69% 3 7.69% 39 Barton 6 66.67% 2 22.22% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9 Bates 1 12.50% 3 37.50% 3 37.50% 1 12.50% 8 Benton 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 Camden 12 63.16% 4 21.05% 2 10.53% 1 5.26% 19 Cedar 3 30.00% 1 10.00% 3 30.00% 3 30.00% 10 Christian 7 53.85% 4 30.77% 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 13 Dade 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 5 Dallas 6 85.71% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7 Douglas 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8 Greene 104 64.20% 35 21.61% 13 8.03% 10 6.17% 162 Henry 10 83.33% 2 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12 Hickory 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Jasper 37 43.02% 20 23.26% 21 24.42% 8 9.30% 86 Laclede 34 64.15% 11 20.76% 5 9.43% 3 5.66% 53 Lawrence 21 36.84% 18 31.58% 13 22.81% 5 8.77% 57 Mcdonald 9 60.00% 4 26.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 15 Miller 8 27.59% 11 37.93% 6 20.69% 4 13.79% 29 Moniteau 4 36.36% 3 27.27% 3 27.27% 1 9.09% 11 Morgan 8 47.06% 8 47.06% 0 0.00% 1 5.88% 17 Newton 8 57.14% 4 28.57% 1 7.14% 1 7.14% 14 Ozark 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 Polk 8 50.00% 6 37.50% 2 12.50% 0 0.00% 16 St Clair 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3 Stone 24 80.00% 6 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 30 Taney 23 46.00% 15 30.00% 7 14.00% 5 10.00% 50 Vernon 12 60.00% 4 20.00% 2 10.00% 2 10.00% 20 Webster 5 33.33% 4 26.67% 3 20.00% 3 20.00% 15 Wright 15 75.00% 4 20.00% 1 5.00% 0 0.00% 20 * Region Total * 399 54.14% 189 25.65% 97 13.16% 52 7.06% 737Kansas City Jackson 76 39.79% 51 26.70% 32 16.75% 32 16.75% 191 * Region Total * 76 39.79% 51 26.70% 32 16.75% 32 16.75% 191St. Louis St Louis City 80 57.14% 34 24.29% 12 8.57% 14 10.00% 140 St Louis County 194 46.75% 98 23.61% 50 12.05% 73 17.59% 415 * Region Total * 274 49.37% 132 23.78% 62 11.17% 87 15.68% 555State Total 1,554 51.30% 826 27.27% 361 11.92% 288 9.51% 3,029
34
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
8,000
8,500
9,000
9,500
10,000
10,500
11,000
11,500Ju
l-07
Sep-
07
Nov
-07
Jan-
08
Mar
-08
May
-08
Jul-0
8
Sep-
08
Nov
-08
Jan-
09
Mar
-09
May
-09
Jul-0
9
Sep-
09
Nov
-09
Jan-
10
Mar
-10
May
-10
Jul-1
0
Sep-
10
Nov
-10
Jan-
11
Mar
-11
May
-11
Jul-1
1
Figure 9.FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month
Over the Previous Four Years
30 00%
Figure 10.Percentage Change in FCS Cases Active
as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months ApartJuly 31, 2010 and July 31, 2011
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
35
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 11.FCS Cases Opened During July 2011
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance of Evidence Preventive Services Court Ordered Other
Figure 12.FCS Cases Opened During July 2011
by Reason for Opening
Court Ordered3% Preponderance of
Evidence9%
Other65%
Preventive Services23%
36
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 13.FCS Cases Closed During July 2011
by Reason for Closing
Goal Achieved Other Reason
Figure 14.FCS Cases Active During July 2011
With Court Involvement by theNumber of Months Open
0 to 4 Months18%
4 to 8 Months17%
8 to 12 Months15%
12+ Months50%
37
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
0 to 4 Months51%
4 to 8 Months27%
8 to 12 Months12%
12+ Months10%
Figure 15.FCS Cases Active During July 2011 With No Court Involvement by the
Number of Months Open
38
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Children’s Services Management Report
Research and Evaluation July 2011
39
Notes: Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures
Table 9.
• Counts of persons are unduplicated. • Child caretakers are persons under legal age who are also parents.
Table 11.
• Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;
function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist; all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced; case goals have been achieved; services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and family can/will access such resources; no child under age 18 is still in the home;
• Close reason of "Other" includes; client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention; client moved-unable to locate; client moved-other state notified; referred to other appropriate resource; other; family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan; family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed; progress no longer being made; resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;
Table 12.
• All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.
Figure 11. and Figure 12.
• Other includes Newborn Crisis Assessment and Family Assessment.
Children’s Services Management Report
Research and Evaluation July 2011
40
Figure 13.
• Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes; function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist; all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced; case goals have been achieved; services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and family can/will access such resources; no child under age 18 is still in the home;
• Close reason of "Other" includes;
client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention; client moved-unable to locate; client moved-other state notified; referred to other appropriate resource; other; family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan; family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed; progress no longer being made; resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;
Figure 14.
• All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.
Out-of-Home Placement
Table 14. Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During July 2011
by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category.
Group Home/ EntriesAdoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand AgeNorthwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Buchanan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Cass 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.13 8.00 Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Clay 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.02 2.00 Clinton 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.39 12.00 Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Grundy 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.41 0.00 Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Lafayette 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.12 0.00 Linn 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.86 9.33 Livingston 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.84 4.00 Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Nodaway 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.24 6.00 Pettis 0 3 3 0 0 6 0.58 9.00 Platte 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.11 7.00 Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * Region Total * 0 14 8 1 0 23 0.11 7.13Northeast Adair 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.42 1.00 Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Boone 0 2 3 0 0 5 0.16 7.80 Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Cole 0 3 4 1 1 9 0.52 3.11 Franklin 0 6 6 0 1 13 0.51 5.69 Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Jefferson 0 2 10 1 0 13 0.24 5.85 Knox 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.92 5.00 Lewis 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.38 17.00 Lincoln 0 6 5 0 0 11 0.94 9.27 Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Marion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Montgomery 0 2 0 3 0 5 1.62 9.20 Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Pike 0 2 0 0 1 3 0.70 2.33 Ralls 0 2 3 0 0 5 2.06 6.60 Randolph 0 0 4 0 0 4 0.68 3.50 Schuyler 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.97 0.00 Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 St Charles 0 7 11 0 0 18 0.22 5.39 Warren 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.15 3.00 * Region Total * 0 35 48 5 4 92 0.31 5.90Southeast Bollinger 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.63 10.50 Butler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Cape Girardeau 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.06 11.00 Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
42
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 14. Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During July 2011
by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category.
Group Home/ EntriesAdoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand AgeSoutheast Crawford 0 3 2 0 0 5 0.83 5.20 Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Dunklin 0 4 3 0 0 7 0.81 4.57 Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Madison 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.34 13.00 Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Mississippi 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.28 7.00 New Madrid 0 2 2 0 0 4 0.77 2.75 Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Pemiscot 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.17 0.00 Perry 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.21 16.00 Phelps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Pulaski 0 2 0 1 0 3 0.26 7.67 Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 St Francois 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.07 0.00 Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Stoddard 0 4 2 3 1 10 1.41 7.30 Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Wayne 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.65 1.00 * Region Total * 0 21 13 4 1 39 0.23 6.03Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Christian 0 3 5 0 0 8 0.53 5.13 Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Dallas 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.23 3.00 Douglas 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.30 17.00 Greene 0 19 7 13 1 40 0.75 6.25 Henry 0 2 0 1 0 3 0.57 11.67 Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Jasper 0 2 20 1 0 23 0.85 5.52 Laclede 0 9 3 0 0 12 1.38 4.33 Lawrence 0 4 0 0 0 4 0.42 2.00 Mcdonald 0 1 2 0 0 3 0.48 10.33 Miller 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.48 2.00 Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Newton 0 8 1 0 1 10 0.72 3.80 Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Polk 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.43 3.00 St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Stone 0 1 3 1 1 6 0.98 11.67 Taney 0 2 4 2 1 9 1.01 8.22 Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Wright 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.62 2.67 * Region Total * 0 58 48 19 4 129 0.53 5.96Kansas City Jackson 0 11 24 7 11 53 0.31 5.83 * Region Total * 0 11 24 7 11 53 0.31 5.83St. Louis St Louis City 0 9 2 0 0 11 0.12 5.91 St Louis County 0 9 4 0 2 15 0.06 6.27 * Region Total * 0 18 6 0 2 26 0.08 6.12Other Icama 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 17.00 * Region Total * 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 17.00State Total 0 157 147 37 22 363 0.25 6.05
43
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 15. Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During July 2011
by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category.
Group Home/ EntriesAdoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand AgeNorthwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Buchanan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Cass 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.13 11.00 Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Linn 0 2 2 0 0 4 1.15 3.25 Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Pettis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * Region Total * 0 2 5 0 0 7 0.03 6.57Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Boone 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.03 18.00 Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Cole 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.06 16.00 Franklin 0 3 2 0 0 5 0.19 9.60 Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Jefferson 0 0 4 2 0 6 0.11 9.83 Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Marion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Randolph 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.17 14.00 Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Shelby 0 2 0 0 0 2 1.16 3.00 St Charles 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.01 5.00 Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * Region Total * 0 5 7 5 0 17 0.06 9.76Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Butler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Cape Girardeau 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.06 7.00 Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
44
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 15. Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During July 2011
by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category.
Group Home/ EntriesAdoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand AgeSoutheast Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Dunklin 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.23 12.00 Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 New Madrid 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.19 12.00 Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Pemiscot 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.17 15.00 Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Phelps 0 1 3 0 0 4 0.42 11.25 Pulaski 0 1 0 1 0 2 0.18 14.00 Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 St Francois 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.07 18.00 Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Stoddard 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.14 14.00 Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * Region Total * 0 5 5 3 0 13 0.08 12.54Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Christian 0 5 0 1 0 6 0.40 10.17 Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Douglas 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.30 17.00 Greene 0 2 0 1 1 4 0.07 12.50 Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.56 14.00 Jasper 0 1 2 1 0 4 0.15 10.75 Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Lawrence 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.10 16.00 Mcdonald 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.16 15.00 Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Newton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Taney 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.22 2.00 Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * Region Total * 0 13 3 3 1 20 0.08 11.00Kansas City Jackson 0 3 11 0 2 16 0.09 10.19 * Region Total * 0 3 11 0 2 16 0.09 10.19St. Louis St Louis City 0 1 0 1 0 2 0.02 10.00 St Louis County 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.01 7.67 * Region Total * 0 4 0 1 0 5 0.01 8.60State Total 0 32 31 12 3 78 0.05 10.27
45
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 16. Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody
From July 2009 Through June 2011
Month/ TotalYear Entries Reentries (Re)Entries
Jul-2009 400 83 483
Aug-2009 367 92 459
Sep-2009 425 95 520
Oct-2009 408 95 503
Nov-2009 326 67 393
Dec-2009 374 56 430
Jan-2010 409 97 506
Feb-2010 353 83 436
Mar-2010 457 123 580
Apr-2010 493 103 596
May-2010 422 72 494
Jun-2010 443 89 532
Jul-2010 419 78 497
Aug-2010 462 92 554
Sep-2010 487 103 590
Oct-2010 452 87 539
Nov-2010 431 90 521
Dec-2010 320 74 394
Jan-2011 395 66 461
Feb-2011 318 67 385
Mar-2011 502 100 602
Apr-2011 484 106 590
May-2011 435 106 541
Jun-2011 446 101 547
Total 10,028 2,125 12,153
46
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 17. Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During July 2011
by Length of Stay and Region.
AverageLength of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Northwest 12 52.17% 8 34.78% 3 13.04% 23 14.48 6.52
Northeast 19 37.26% 18 35.29% 14 27.45% 51 23.49 9.39
Southeast 23 56.10% 8 19.51% 10 24.39% 41 17.44 6.63
Southwest 33 40.74% 26 32.10% 22 27.16% 81 20.43 9.49
Kansas City 20 40.82% 20 40.82% 9 18.37% 49 16.57 7.27
St. Louis 12 25.53% 11 23.40% 24 51.06% 47 34.89 12.96
State Total 119 40.75% 91 31.16% 82 28.08% 292 21.76 9.02
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
47
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 18. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Length of Stay and Case Manager County.
Average 0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay AgeNorthwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 30.00 19.00 Atchison 15 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15 4.93 11.07 Buchanan 15 39.47% 12 31.58% 11 28.95% 38 21.61 9.16 Caldwell 4 36.36% 2 18.18% 5 45.46% 11 32.18 9.36 Carroll 1 16.67% 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 6 20.33 3.50 Cass 107 47.14% 78 34.36% 42 18.50% 227 15.15 10.19 Chariton 5 50.00% 1 10.00% 4 40.00% 10 14.00 10.90 Clay 27 36.99% 16 21.92% 30 41.10% 73 30.19 10.34 Clinton 9 26.47% 13 38.24% 12 35.29% 34 24.59 9.12 Cooper 11 50.00% 4 18.18% 7 31.82% 22 27.41 10.18 Daviess 5 38.46% 1 7.69% 7 53.85% 13 30.85 9.77 De Kalb 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2 36.50 17.50 Gentry 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6 28.67 7.00 Grundy 9 42.86% 6 28.57% 6 28.57% 21 21.95 7.62 Harrison 3 27.27% 6 54.55% 2 18.18% 11 23.27 7.36 Holt 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 25.00 11.33 Johnson 21 35.00% 13 21.67% 26 43.33% 60 28.85 8.40 Lafayette 20 50.00% 12 30.00% 8 20.00% 40 20.75 10.25 Linn 26 61.91% 7 16.67% 9 21.43% 42 17.86 8.67 Livingston 10 29.41% 9 26.47% 15 44.12% 34 27.82 11.03 Mercer 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4 20.00 5.50 Nodaway 24 61.54% 4 10.26% 11 28.21% 39 13.54 8.74 Pettis 40 51.28% 8 10.26% 30 38.46% 78 25.60 9.92 Platte 11 44.00% 4 16.00% 10 40.00% 25 26.88 10.68 Putnam 10 55.56% 5 27.78% 3 16.67% 18 16.72 7.89 Ray 11 68.75% 5 31.25% 0 0.00% 16 6.44 8.38 Saline 15 50.00% 5 16.67% 10 33.33% 30 22.63 10.80 Sullivan 3 27.27% 3 27.27% 5 45.46% 11 20.45 9.18 Worth 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 7.50 12.50 * Region Total * 410 45.96% 223 25.00% 259 29.04% 892 21.21 9.67Northeast Adair 35 61.40% 11 19.30% 11 19.30% 57 19.89 8.56 Audrain 16 41.03% 11 28.21% 12 30.77% 39 29.90 11.36 Boone 73 44.51% 29 17.68% 62 37.81% 164 30.08 10.32 Callaway 26 41.27% 13 20.64% 24 38.10% 63 28.59 9.44 Clark 15 45.46% 10 30.30% 8 24.24% 33 19.30 10.64 Cole 63 45.99% 17 12.41% 57 41.61% 137 31.39 10.71 Franklin 101 44.69% 61 26.99% 64 28.32% 226 22.61 8.78 Gasconade 2 28.57% 3 42.86% 2 28.57% 7 29.71 11.00 Howard 7 53.85% 5 38.46% 1 7.69% 13 10.77 8.38 Jefferson 227 48.50% 139 29.70% 102 21.80% 468 18.00 8.79 Knox 7 58.33% 4 33.33% 1 8.33% 12 10.83 12.25 Lewis 8 26.67% 11 36.67% 11 36.67% 30 23.03 12.43 Lincoln 45 57.69% 13 16.67% 20 25.64% 78 15.58 9.23 Macon 15 44.12% 10 29.41% 9 26.47% 34 20.88 12.53 Marion 24 38.10% 19 30.16% 20 31.75% 63 23.00 9.83 Monroe 12 85.71% 1 7.14% 1 7.14% 14 14.14 8.50 Montgomery 16 44.44% 3 8.33% 17 47.22% 36 26.78 12.97 Osage 4 44.44% 4 44.44% 1 11.11% 9 13.89 8.67 Pike 23 47.92% 9 18.75% 16 33.33% 48 19.60 7.83 Ralls 7 43.75% 3 18.75% 6 37.50% 16 12.69 9.69 Randolph 28 35.44% 25 31.65% 26 32.91% 79 24.19 10.59 Schuyler 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 5 13.20 11.20 Scotland 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 2 28.57% 7 22.29 9.86 Shelby 8 36.36% 9 40.91% 5 22.73% 22 16.45 8.55 St Charles 135 57.45% 35 14.89% 65 27.66% 235 20.57 9.77 Warren 22 40.00% 14 25.46% 19 34.55% 55 26.53 10.05 * Region Total * 927 47.54% 460 23.59% 563 28.87% 1,950 22.19 9.64Southeast Bollinger 10 38.46% 10 38.46% 6 23.08% 26 18.27 7.58 Butler 58 61.05% 30 31.58% 7 7.37% 95 13.29 7.92 Cape Girardeau 51 50.50% 26 25.74% 24 23.76% 101 16.97 8.25 Carter 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5 51.20 15.20
48
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 18. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Length of Stay and Case Manager County.
Average 0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay AgeSoutheast Crawford 31 50.00% 17 27.42% 14 22.58% 62 16.63 10.63 Dent 5 27.78% 8 44.44% 5 27.78% 18 33.33 11.89 Dunklin 78 68.42% 25 21.93% 11 9.65% 114 12.86 6.77 Howell 18 33.96% 4 7.55% 31 58.49% 53 27.74 10.94 Iron 8 40.00% 6 30.00% 6 30.00% 20 20.25 12.20 Madison 7 18.42% 19 50.00% 12 31.58% 38 22.34 8.55 Maries 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4 10.25 10.00 Mississippi 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 9 7.56 7.44 New Madrid 21 47.73% 8 18.18% 15 34.09% 44 26.93 8.70 Oregon 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 11 91.67% 12 45.33 14.92 Pemiscot 30 58.82% 10 19.61% 11 21.57% 51 17.82 8.63 Perry 12 52.17% 7 30.44% 4 17.39% 23 15.13 8.39 Phelps 35 41.18% 25 29.41% 25 29.41% 85 24.05 9.89 Pulaski 40 57.14% 20 28.57% 10 14.29% 70 14.79 8.81 Reynolds 3 21.43% 6 42.86% 5 35.71% 14 28.71 12.71 Ripley 13 37.14% 16 45.71% 6 17.14% 35 19.51 10.89 Scott 40 51.95% 20 25.97% 17 22.08% 77 22.27 8.32 Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 3 104.00 16.67 St Francois 34 32.08% 40 37.74% 32 30.19% 106 26.17 9.66 Ste Genevieve 1 5.26% 4 21.05% 14 73.68% 19 32.47 11.74 Stoddard 144 80.90% 24 13.48% 10 5.62% 178 9.89 7.13 Texas 15 33.33% 11 24.44% 19 42.22% 45 19.87 10.22 Washington 35 29.66% 32 27.12% 51 43.22% 118 25.19 9.47 Wayne 8 25.00% 12 37.50% 12 37.50% 32 25.91 11.47 * Region Total * 708 48.59% 385 26.42% 364 24.98% 1,457 19.67 9.01Southwest Barry 29 30.53% 29 30.53% 37 38.95% 95 25.28 9.44 Barton 15 55.56% 6 22.22% 6 22.22% 27 19.19 9.70 Bates 14 30.44% 21 45.65% 11 23.91% 46 21.39 11.15 Benton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 19.00 17.00 Camden 28 38.89% 21 29.17% 23 31.94% 72 20.63 12.21 Cedar 5 38.46% 7 53.85% 1 7.69% 13 15.77 12.08 Christian 45 35.16% 38 29.69% 45 35.16% 128 26.41 11.20 Dade 4 50.00% 1 12.50% 3 37.50% 8 29.25 10.88 Dallas 6 17.65% 19 55.88% 9 26.47% 34 28.38 9.94 Douglas 12 50.00% 5 20.83% 7 29.17% 24 18.79 12.00 Greene 484 45.57% 317 29.85% 261 24.58% 1,062 20.17 8.41 Henry 47 59.49% 25 31.65% 7 8.86% 79 11.46 9.62 Hickory 3 20.00% 5 33.33% 7 46.67% 15 26.67 14.53 Jasper 258 48.77% 165 31.19% 106 20.04% 529 17.96 8.49 Laclede 87 54.04% 40 24.85% 34 21.12% 161 16.10 8.85 Lawrence 34 44.16% 22 28.57% 21 27.27% 77 22.97 10.21 Mcdonald 38 39.58% 32 33.33% 26 27.08% 96 19.95 9.67 Miller 23 34.85% 20 30.30% 23 34.85% 66 24.36 10.03 Moniteau 10 50.00% 4 20.00% 6 30.00% 20 23.15 8.80 Morgan 15 46.88% 9 28.13% 8 25.00% 32 14.66 8.97 Newton 103 55.08% 48 25.67% 36 19.25% 187 17.10 9.22 Ozark 11 78.57% 2 14.29% 1 7.14% 14 10.43 11.43 Polk 18 40.00% 12 26.67% 15 33.33% 45 20.73 11.36 St Clair 12 57.14% 5 23.81% 4 19.05% 21 21.19 11.81 Stone 34 50.75% 19 28.36% 14 20.90% 67 18.00 10.69 Taney 84 39.44% 61 28.64% 68 31.93% 213 20.77 9.05 Vernon 14 35.90% 5 12.82% 20 51.28% 39 29.85 10.21 Webster 17 39.54% 9 20.93% 17 39.54% 43 25.02 13.26 Wright 24 53.33% 18 40.00% 3 6.67% 45 12.29 8.82 * Region Total * 1,474 45.23% 966 29.64% 819 25.13% 3,259 19.89 9.26Kansas City Jackson 716 46.98% 413 27.10% 395 25.92% 1,524 20.17 9.44 * Region Total * 716 46.98% 413 27.10% 395 25.92% 1,524 20.17 9.44St. Louis St Louis City 138 18.98% 163 22.42% 426 58.60% 727 53.00 11.83 St Louis County 351 39.04% 215 23.92% 333 37.04% 899 28.17 10.02 * Region Total * 489 30.07% 378 23.25% 759 46.68% 1,626 39.27 10.83Other Icama 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 1 17.00 * Region Total * 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 1 17.00State Total 4,725 44.12% 2,825 26.38% 3,159 29.50% 10,709 23.37 9.60
49
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 19. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Placement Category.
Group Home/ ChildrenAdoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand AgeNorthwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.23 19.00 Atchison 0 4 11 0 0 15 9.70 11.07 Buchanan 0 20 11 4 3 38 1.81 9.16 Caldwell 0 9 1 1 0 11 4.53 9.36 Carroll 0 4 2 0 0 6 2.32 3.50 Cass 5 67 89 59 7 227 9.74 10.19 Chariton 0 5 5 0 0 10 5.01 10.90 Clay 0 34 16 14 9 73 1.54 10.34 Clinton 0 15 10 8 1 34 6.69 9.12 Cooper 0 8 8 4 2 22 5.79 10.18 Daviess 0 5 6 1 1 13 6.01 9.77 De Kalb 0 1 0 0 1 2 0.83 17.50 Gentry 0 0 5 0 1 6 3.37 7.00 Grundy 0 9 7 3 2 21 8.66 7.62 Harrison 0 9 2 0 0 11 5.23 7.36 Holt 0 3 0 0 0 3 2.36 11.33 Johnson 0 24 17 15 4 60 4.95 8.40 Lafayette 0 7 19 12 2 40 4.63 10.25 Linn 0 27 9 6 0 42 12.04 8.67 Livingston 0 10 11 10 3 34 9.57 11.03 Mercer 0 4 0 0 0 4 4.63 5.50 Nodaway 0 11 20 8 0 39 9.19 8.74 Pettis 0 38 20 12 8 78 7.52 9.92 Platte 0 8 11 5 1 25 1.31 10.68 Putnam 0 6 9 1 2 18 14.35 7.89 Ray 0 4 11 1 0 16 2.49 8.38 Saline 0 5 12 9 4 30 5.20 10.80 Sullivan 0 6 3 2 0 11 6.09 9.18 Worth 0 0 2 0 0 2 3.45 12.50 * Region Total * 5 343 317 175 52 892 4.38 9.67Northeast Adair 0 17 25 9 6 57 11.88 8.56 Audrain 0 15 13 10 1 39 6.13 11.36 Boone 0 62 53 34 15 164 5.31 10.32 Callaway 0 26 20 10 7 63 6.07 9.44 Clark 0 9 15 8 1 33 17.82 10.64 Cole 0 49 43 30 15 137 7.92 10.71 Franklin 0 115 86 8 17 226 8.81 8.78 Gasconade 0 2 2 2 1 7 1.84 11.00 Howard 0 7 5 1 0 13 5.30 8.38 Jefferson 0 130 281 33 24 468 8.47 8.79 Knox 0 3 6 3 0 12 11.04 12.25 Lewis 0 12 9 8 1 30 11.42 12.43 Lincoln 0 28 31 12 7 78 6.67 9.23 Macon 0 11 7 11 5 34 8.90 12.53 Marion 0 37 19 5 2 63 8.67 9.83 Monroe 0 6 8 0 0 14 5.81 8.50 Montgomery 0 8 5 15 8 36 11.67 12.97 Osage 0 4 4 0 1 9 2.62 8.67 Pike 0 27 13 2 6 48 11.18 7.83 Ralls 0 7 6 2 1 16 6.59 9.69 Randolph 0 26 26 19 8 79 13.45 10.59 Schuyler 0 1 2 1 1 5 4.87 11.20 Scotland 0 4 3 0 0 7 4.92 9.86 Shelby 0 4 13 3 2 22 12.72 8.55 St Charles 0 108 86 20 21 235 2.86 9.77 Warren 0 19 25 3 8 55 8.35 10.05 * Region Total * 0 737 806 249 158 1,950 6.50 9.64Southeast Bollinger 0 9 14 0 3 26 8.25 7.58 Butler 2 50 33 8 2 95 9.61 7.92 Cape Girardeau 0 47 44 6 4 101 6.27 8.25 Carter 0 2 1 2 0 5 3.35 15.20
50
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 19. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Placement Category.
Group Home/ ChildrenAdoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand AgeSoutheast Crawford 0 31 14 14 3 62 10.35 10.63 Dent 0 9 5 2 2 18 4.84 11.89 Dunklin 0 45 57 8 4 114 13.24 6.77 Howell 0 33 2 12 6 53 5.48 10.94 Iron 0 12 5 3 0 20 7.48 12.20 Madison 0 16 12 9 1 38 13.09 8.55 Maries 0 2 2 0 0 4 1.73 10.00 Mississippi 0 2 6 0 1 9 2.55 7.44 New Madrid 0 16 23 3 2 44 8.42 8.70 Oregon 0 4 0 4 4 12 4.77 14.92 Pemiscot 0 22 20 7 2 51 8.48 8.63 Perry 0 12 5 5 1 23 4.88 8.39 Phelps 0 43 22 12 8 85 9.00 9.89 Pulaski 0 30 23 11 6 70 6.17 8.81 Reynolds 0 4 4 1 5 14 8.71 12.71 Ripley 0 15 15 5 0 35 10.44 10.89 Scott 0 32 39 4 2 77 6.95 8.32 Shannon 0 0 0 3 0 3 1.36 16.67 St Francois 1 57 22 16 10 106 7.95 9.66 Ste Genevieve 0 13 0 4 2 19 4.00 11.74 Stoddard 0 52 92 24 10 178 25.10 7.13 Texas 0 17 19 7 2 45 7.85 10.22 Washington 0 62 27 24 5 118 19.02 9.47 Wayne 0 12 9 9 2 32 10.39 11.47 * Region Total * 3 649 515 203 87 1,457 8.69 9.01Southwest Barry 0 33 32 22 8 95 10.70 9.44 Barton 0 10 8 7 2 27 7.84 9.70 Bates 0 17 18 4 7 46 10.41 11.15 Benton 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.28 17.00 Camden 0 32 21 10 9 72 9.59 12.21 Cedar 0 8 1 4 0 13 3.84 12.08 Christian 0 46 44 26 12 128 8.47 11.20 Dade 0 4 3 1 0 8 4.15 10.88 Dallas 0 16 11 5 2 34 7.90 9.94 Douglas 0 8 10 6 0 24 7.10 12.00 Greene 10 438 353 192 69 1,062 19.85 8.41 Henry 0 40 24 10 5 79 15.13 9.62 Hickory 0 5 1 7 2 15 8.42 14.53 Jasper 0 187 262 58 22 529 19.63 8.49 Laclede 0 68 74 11 8 161 18.56 8.85 Lawrence 0 29 26 17 5 77 8.04 10.21 Mcdonald 2 51 28 12 3 96 15.34 9.67 Miller 0 31 20 8 7 66 10.65 10.03 Moniteau 0 6 7 3 4 20 5.21 8.80 Morgan 0 21 4 4 3 32 6.96 8.97 Newton 4 102 57 18 6 187 13.53 9.22 Ozark 0 5 7 1 1 14 6.64 11.43 Polk 0 16 12 13 4 45 6.48 11.36 St Clair 0 4 10 5 2 21 9.46 11.81 Stone 0 22 16 23 6 67 10.92 10.69 Taney 0 81 85 36 11 213 23.90 9.05 Vernon 0 18 11 9 1 39 7.17 10.21 Webster 0 10 13 12 8 43 4.80 13.26 Wright 0 25 10 9 1 45 9.23 8.82 * Region Total * 16 1,333 1,168 534 208 3,259 13.47 9.26Kansas City Jackson 1 554 494 312 163 1,524 9.03 9.44 * Region Total * 1 554 494 312 163 1,524 9.03 9.44St. Louis St Louis City 3 327 200 91 106 727 8.11 11.83 St Louis County 4 374 329 111 81 899 3.51 10.02 * Region Total * 7 701 529 202 187 1,626 4.70 10.83Other Icama 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 17.00 * Region Total * 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 17.00State Total 32 4,317 3,829 1,676 855 10,709 7.50 9.60
51
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 20. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Placement Type.
ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGHNorthwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buchanan 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cass 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chariton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Clay 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 Clinton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Linn 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 Livingston 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nodaway 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Pettis 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 5 0 0 16 4 0 0 0 0Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Audrain 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 Boone 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 Callaway 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cole 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 Franklin 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jefferson 0 0 0 7 1 1 0 0 0 Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lewis 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marion 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Montgomery 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Randolph 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scotland 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St Charles 0 0 0 15 1 1 0 0 0 Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 0 0 64 5 5 0 0 0Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Butler 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
52
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 20. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Placement Type.
ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGHSoutheast Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dunklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Howell 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Madison 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mississippi 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 New Madrid 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Oregon 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phelps 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 Pulaski 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scott 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St Francois 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Stoddard 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Texas 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 0 0 9 8 1 3 0 20Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Barton 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Bates 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Camden 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Christian 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Douglas 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Greene 8 2 0 21 13 3 0 0 2 Henry 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jasper 0 0 0 9 2 3 0 0 2 Laclede 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 Lawrence 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Mcdonald 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 7 Miller 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Morgan 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 Newton 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 14 Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Polk 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 St Clair 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taney 0 0 0 3 3 2 0 0 0 Vernon 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wright 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 8 4 2 68 26 9 2 0 25Kansas City Jackson 1 0 0 30 15 6 0 6 11 * Region Total * 1 0 0 30 15 6 0 6 11St. Louis St Louis City 0 1 0 47 1 8 2 0 0 St Louis County 0 0 0 40 3 0 4 0 0 * Region Total * 0 1 0 87 4 8 6 0 0Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0State Total 14 5 2 274 62 29 11 6 56
53
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 20. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Placement Type.
FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHBNorthwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Atchison 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 Buchanan 0 1 1 2 12 1 0 0 Caldwell 0 2 0 2 5 0 0 0 Carroll 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 Cass 0 1 1 2 63 2 0 0 Chariton 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 Clay 0 0 1 2 26 1 0 0 Clinton 0 1 1 2 10 0 0 0 Cooper 0 3 0 1 4 1 0 0 Daviess 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 De Kalb 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grundy 0 0 1 1 7 1 0 0 Harrison 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 Holt 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Johnson 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 Lafayette 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 Linn 0 3 6 0 15 0 0 0 Livingston 0 0 1 0 8 1 0 0 Mercer 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 Nodaway 0 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 Pettis 0 0 0 0 38 4 0 0 Platte 0 0 0 2 6 1 0 0 Putnam 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 Ray 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 Saline 0 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 Sullivan 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 15 27 16 269 15 0 0Northeast Adair 0 0 4 1 12 1 0 0 Audrain 0 1 1 0 8 0 0 0 Boone 0 10 10 2 26 2 0 0 Callaway 0 0 2 2 19 0 0 0 Clark 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 Cole 0 4 0 3 33 3 0 0 Franklin 0 5 7 4 95 4 0 0 Gasconade 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 Howard 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 Jefferson 0 8 7 5 103 7 0 0 Knox 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Lewis 0 4 0 1 6 0 0 0 Lincoln 0 1 0 2 25 1 0 0 Macon 0 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 Marion 0 4 1 1 27 0 0 0 Monroe 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 Montgomery 0 0 2 0 5 2 0 0 Osage 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 Pike 0 6 3 0 18 1 0 0 Ralls 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 Randolph 0 3 0 3 20 1 0 1 Schuyler 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Scotland 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Shelby 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 St Charles 0 8 6 0 79 4 0 0 Warren 0 0 1 1 17 2 0 0 * Region Total * 0 62 46 26 539 33 0 1Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 Butler 0 5 5 1 36 0 0 0 Cape Girardeau 0 1 3 1 42 1 0 0 Carter 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
54
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 20. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Placement Type.
FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHBSoutheast Crawford 0 0 0 1 30 0 0 0 Dent 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 Dunklin 0 0 4 1 32 0 0 0 Howell 0 0 0 0 32 1 0 0 Iron 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 Madison 0 0 1 0 14 0 0 0 Maries 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 Mississippi 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 New Madrid 0 1 1 0 12 0 0 0 Oregon 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Pemiscot 0 1 3 1 17 0 0 0 Perry 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 Phelps 0 1 0 1 35 0 0 0 Pulaski 0 1 2 3 23 1 0 0 Reynolds 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 Ripley 0 1 0 1 13 0 0 0 Scott 0 2 0 4 26 0 0 0 Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St Francois 0 3 2 0 50 6 0 0 Ste Genevieve 0 1 0 1 10 0 0 0 Stoddard 0 0 6 0 46 0 0 0 Texas 0 3 0 2 10 0 0 0 Washington 0 0 0 2 60 3 0 0 Wayne 0 0 0 1 11 1 0 0 * Region Total * 0 21 27 20 552 14 0 0Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 33 2 0 0 Barton 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 Bates 0 1 1 1 12 0 0 0 Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Camden 0 4 0 1 23 1 0 0 Cedar 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 Christian 0 6 5 3 26 5 0 0 Dade 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 Dallas 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 Douglas 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 Greene 0 29 5 8 373 12 0 1 Henry 0 0 4 2 30 0 0 0 Hickory 0 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 Jasper 0 7 0 3 166 2 0 0 Laclede 0 2 0 4 59 1 0 0 Lawrence 0 3 0 0 26 1 0 0 Mcdonald 0 1 0 1 41 0 0 0 Miller 0 2 0 0 27 1 0 2 Moniteau 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 Morgan 0 1 0 1 15 0 0 0 Newton 0 0 0 2 85 1 0 0 Ozark 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 Polk 0 1 0 0 13 1 0 0 St Clair 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 Stone 0 2 2 0 18 1 0 0 Taney 0 11 4 2 61 0 0 0 Vernon 0 1 0 0 16 0 0 0 Webster 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 Wright 0 0 3 0 21 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 74 24 29 1,113 31 0 3Kansas City Jackson 0 46 55 24 382 13 0 0 * Region Total * 0 46 55 24 382 13 0 0St. Louis St Louis City 0 57 6 14 203 39 0 1 St Louis County 0 32 17 5 280 21 0 0 * Region Total * 0 89 23 19 483 60 0 1Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0State Total 0 307 202 134 3,338 166 0 5
55
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 20. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Placement Type.
KHM KHO KHU LGS MMD MMH RFA RFP RF2Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Atchison 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buchanan 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 Caldwell 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cass 0 5 10 0 0 3 55 0 0 Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Clay 0 4 0 0 0 6 12 0 0 Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Daviess 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Gentry 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 Grundy 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Johnson 0 0 2 0 0 4 12 0 0 Lafayette 0 2 2 0 0 1 9 0 0 Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 Livingston 0 2 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nodaway 0 4 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 Pettis 0 1 4 0 0 2 9 0 0 Platte 0 1 2 0 0 0 4 0 1 Putnam 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Saline 0 3 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 30 26 0 1 26 150 0 1Northeast Adair 0 5 5 0 0 3 4 0 0 Audrain 1 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 Boone 0 3 7 0 0 12 31 0 0 Callaway 0 1 3 0 0 7 7 0 0 Clark 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 Cole 0 0 5 0 1 9 25 0 0 Franklin 0 17 9 0 1 10 1 0 0 Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Howard 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Jefferson 0 14 24 1 2 11 29 1 0 Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Lewis 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 0 0 Macon 0 1 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 Marion 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 Monroe 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 6 11 0 0 Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pike 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 Ralls 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 Randolph 0 6 1 0 0 7 17 0 0 Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shelby 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 St Charles 0 6 15 0 0 11 16 0 0 Warren 0 0 3 0 0 6 1 0 0 * Region Total * 1 64 78 1 5 100 172 1 0Southeast Bollinger 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 Butler 0 5 2 0 0 2 8 0 0 Cape Girardeau 0 3 2 0 0 3 5 0 0 Carter 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
56
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 20. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Placement Type.
KHM KHO KHU LGS MMD MMH RFA RFP RF2Southeast Crawford 0 4 0 0 0 2 10 0 1 Dent 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 Dunklin 0 2 2 0 2 2 6 0 0 Howell 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 Iron 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 Madison 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 0 1 Maries 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Madrid 0 1 1 0 0 2 3 0 0 Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 Pemiscot 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 0 0 Perry 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 Phelps 0 7 2 0 0 5 10 0 0 Pulaski 0 0 1 0 0 4 9 0 0 Reynolds 0 1 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 Ripley 0 10 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 St Francois 0 2 1 0 0 2 12 0 0 Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 Stoddard 0 20 4 0 0 7 24 0 0 Texas 0 3 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 Washington 0 1 2 0 0 2 22 0 0 Wayne 0 1 2 0 0 1 9 0 0 * Region Total * 0 66 23 0 2 51 171 0 2Southwest Barry 0 9 0 0 0 5 18 0 0 Barton 0 0 1 0 0 1 6 0 0 Bates 0 0 5 0 0 3 4 0 0 Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Camden 0 1 2 0 0 5 7 0 0 Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 Christian 0 2 3 0 0 2 14 0 0 Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Dallas 0 2 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 Douglas 0 1 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 Greene 0 53 24 0 2 25 145 0 3 Henry 0 0 2 0 0 4 9 0 0 Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 Jasper 0 40 16 0 0 9 52 0 1 Laclede 0 8 7 0 0 7 9 1 0 Lawrence 0 2 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 Mcdonald 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 Miller 0 2 2 0 0 4 8 0 0 Moniteau 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Newton 0 5 4 0 0 2 16 0 0 Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Polk 0 1 0 0 0 3 13 0 0 St Clair 0 0 4 0 0 1 5 0 0 Stone 0 1 0 0 0 3 20 0 0 Taney 0 13 4 0 0 2 24 1 0 Vernon 0 4 1 0 0 1 7 0 0 Webster 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 0 0 Wright 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 * Region Total * 0 145 76 0 2 87 425 2 4Kansas City Jackson 1 32 57 0 4 80 276 0 2 * Region Total * 1 32 57 0 4 80 276 0 2St. Louis St Louis City 0 34 7 0 3 21 68 2 0 St Louis County 0 18 21 0 7 22 80 1 4 * Region Total * 0 52 28 0 10 43 148 3 4Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 * Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0State Total 2 389 288 1 24 387 1,343 6 13
57
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 20. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Placement Type.
RF3 RF4 RFE RFM RFI RFT RHB RHMNorthwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buchanan 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cass 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Cooper 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Daviess 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lafayette 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Linn 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Livingston 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pettis 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 3Northeast Adair 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Audrain 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 Boone 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Callaway 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Clark 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cole 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Franklin 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 Gasconade 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jefferson 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Knox 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lewis 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 Lincoln 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Macon 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marion 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Montgomery 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pike 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Ralls 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Randolph 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shelby 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 St Charles 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Warren 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 20 45 0 0 0 3 0 4Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Butler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cape Girardeau 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Carter 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
58
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 20. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Placement Type.
RF3 RF4 RFE RFM RFI RFT RHB RHMSoutheast Crawford 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dunklin 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Howell 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Madison 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phelps 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pulaski 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ripley 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scott 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shannon 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 St Francois 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stoddard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Washington 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 6 17 1 0 0 0 1 2Southwest Barry 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Camden 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 Cedar 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Christian 2 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Greene 6 19 9 0 0 1 2 2 Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Jasper 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Laclede 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Lawrence 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 Mcdonald 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Morgan 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 Newton 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stone 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taney 0 2 3 0 1 1 0 1 Vernon 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wright 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 * Region Total * 9 39 16 0 1 5 3 11Kansas City Jackson 3 17 0 0 0 2 5 0 * Region Total * 3 17 0 0 0 2 5 0St. Louis St Louis City 3 9 1 0 0 0 5 0 St Louis County 6 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 9 18 4 0 0 0 5 0Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0State Total 51 144 21 0 1 10 14 20
59
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 20. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Placement Type.
RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTALNorthwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Atchison 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 15 Buchanan 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 38 Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Carroll 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 Cass 46 27 2 0 0 2 0 227 Chariton 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 Clay 7 4 0 0 1 2 0 73 Clinton 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 34 Cooper 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 22 Daviess 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 13 De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Gentry 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Grundy 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 21 Harrison 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Johnson 9 6 0 0 0 3 0 60 Lafayette 8 7 0 0 0 1 1 40 Linn 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 42 Livingston 8 1 0 0 0 1 0 34 Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Nodaway 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 39 Pettis 9 6 0 0 0 2 0 78 Platte 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 25 Putnam 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 Ray 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 16 Saline 6 3 0 0 0 1 2 30 Sullivan 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Worth 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 * Region Total * 163 95 2 0 1 12 3 892Northeast Adair 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 57 Audrain 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 39 Boone 25 18 0 0 0 1 1 164 Callaway 6 10 0 0 0 1 0 63 Clark 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 33 Cole 19 19 0 0 0 0 2 137 Franklin 37 22 0 0 0 2 0 226 Gasconade 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Howard 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 Jefferson 130 111 2 0 0 1 0 468 Knox 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 12 Lewis 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 30 Lincoln 17 14 0 0 0 0 0 78 Macon 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 34 Marion 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 63 Monroe 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 14 Montgomery 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 36 Osage 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Pike 6 7 0 0 0 0 1 48 Ralls 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Randolph 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 79 Schuyler 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 Scotland 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Shelby 8 1 0 0 0 1 0 22 St Charles 27 38 3 0 1 1 0 235 Warren 9 13 0 0 0 0 0 55 * Region Total * 367 290 5 0 1 8 4 1,950Southeast Bollinger 4 8 0 0 1 0 0 26 Butler 9 17 0 0 0 0 0 95 Cape Girardeau 16 23 0 0 0 0 0 101 Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
60
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 20. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Placement Type.
RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTALSoutheast Crawford 6 4 0 0 0 0 1 62 Dent 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 Dunklin 13 40 0 0 0 0 0 114 Howell 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 53 Iron 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Madison 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 Maries 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Mississippi 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 New Madrid 15 6 0 0 0 0 0 44 Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 12 Pemiscot 9 9 0 0 1 1 0 51 Perry 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Phelps 10 3 0 0 2 1 1 85 Pulaski 13 8 0 0 0 0 0 70 Reynolds 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Ripley 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 Scott 15 24 0 0 1 0 0 77 Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 St Francois 14 5 0 0 0 1 0 106 Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 Stoddard 19 49 0 0 0 0 2 178 Texas 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 45 Washington 14 10 0 0 0 0 0 118 Wayne 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 32 * Region Total * 210 213 0 0 6 6 5 1,457Southwest Barry 16 4 0 0 1 2 0 95 Barton 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 27 Bates 12 1 0 0 2 0 0 46 Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Camden 14 4 0 0 0 0 2 72 Cedar 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 Christian 31 7 1 0 2 3 1 128 Dade 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Dallas 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 34 Douglas 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 24 Greene 215 56 5 1 4 9 4 1,062 Henry 9 13 0 0 1 1 0 79 Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 Jasper 147 58 2 0 1 3 3 529 Laclede 40 18 0 0 0 0 0 161 Lawrence 21 3 1 0 0 2 1 77 Mcdonald 18 10 0 0 2 0 0 96 Miller 8 4 0 0 2 0 0 66 Moniteau 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 20 Morgan 3 1 0 0 1 0 1 32 Newton 25 23 0 0 0 1 2 187 Ozark 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 14 Polk 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 45 St Clair 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 21 Stone 9 6 0 0 0 2 2 67 Taney 46 21 1 0 1 4 2 213 Vernon 3 3 0 0 0 1 0 39 Webster 11 2 0 0 3 1 3 43 Wright 9 1 0 0 0 1 0 45 * Region Total * 680 250 10 1 21 33 21 3,259Kansas City Jackson 172 227 17 1 2 12 25 1,524 * Region Total * 172 227 17 1 2 12 25 1,524St. Louis St Louis City 94 59 16 0 5 8 13 727 St Louis County 156 134 12 0 0 8 16 899 * Region Total * 250 193 28 0 5 16 29 1,626Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1State Total 1,842 1,268 62 2 36 87 87 10,709
61
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 21. Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During July 2011
by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit.
Group Home/Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total
Home Home Home Care Other ExitsNorthwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buchanan 0 1 0 0 0 1 Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cass 0 1 2 0 0 3 Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 Clay 0 1 0 0 0 1 Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 Johnson 0 0 2 0 0 2 Lafayette 0 0 0 0 1 1 Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nodaway 0 0 8 0 0 8 Pettis 0 4 0 0 0 4 Platte 0 0 1 0 0 1 Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 Saline 0 0 0 1 0 1 Sullivan 0 0 1 0 0 1 Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 7 14 1 1 23Northeast Adair 0 0 0 1 0 1 Audrain 0 0 0 0 1 1 Boone 0 2 1 0 0 3 Callaway 0 0 2 0 0 2 Clark 0 1 0 0 0 1 Cole 0 1 0 0 1 2 Franklin 0 0 1 0 0 1 Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jefferson 0 0 15 0 0 15 Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 0 Macon 0 0 1 4 0 5 Marion 0 2 0 0 0 2 Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ralls 0 0 1 0 0 1 Randolph 0 3 1 0 1 5 Schuyler 0 1 0 0 0 1 Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 St Charles 0 5 1 1 1 8 Warren 0 0 2 0 1 3 * Region Total * 0 15 25 6 5 51Southeast Bollinger 0 0 2 0 0 2 Butler 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cape Girardeau 0 0 1 0 0 1 Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0
62
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 21. Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During July 2011
by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit.
Group Home/Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total
Home Home Home Care Other ExitsSoutheast Crawford 0 0 0 0 1 1 Dent 0 1 2 0 0 3 Dunklin 0 1 5 0 0 6 Howell 0 0 2 0 0 2 Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 Madison 0 1 0 0 0 1 Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mississippi 0 3 0 0 0 3 New Madrid 0 0 4 1 0 5 Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 0 0 Perry 0 0 0 0 1 1 Phelps 0 0 3 0 0 3 Pulaski 0 2 0 0 1 3 Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 St Francois 0 1 0 0 0 1 Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stoddard 0 0 1 0 0 1 Texas 0 0 3 0 0 3 Washington 0 1 3 0 1 5 Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 10 26 1 4 41Southwest Barry 0 2 2 0 0 4 Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bates 0 0 0 1 0 1 Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 Christian 0 0 0 0 1 1 Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 Douglas 0 0 0 0 1 1 Greene 2 13 4 1 1 21 Henry 0 2 0 0 0 2 Hickory 0 1 0 0 1 2 Jasper 0 1 16 0 1 18 Laclede 0 2 3 0 1 6 Lawrence 0 0 0 0 1 1 Mcdonald 0 1 2 1 0 4 Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 Newton 0 5 4 1 1 11 Ozark 0 2 0 1 0 3 Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taney 1 2 0 0 0 3 Vernon 0 1 0 0 0 1 Webster 0 0 1 0 0 1 Wright 0 1 0 0 0 1 * Region Total * 3 33 32 5 8 81Kansas City Jackson 0 17 23 6 3 49 * Region Total * 0 17 23 6 3 49St. Louis St Louis City 0 6 6 5 6 23 St Louis County 1 5 11 1 6 24 * Region Total * 1 11 17 6 12 47State Total 4 93 137 25 33 292
63
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 22. Children Closed from Alternative Care During July 2011by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing.
Returned Other Living with Achieved TotalHome Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buchanan 1 0 0 0 2 3 Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cass 2 0 0 0 1 3 Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 Clay 1 0 0 0 1 2 Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lafayette 0 0 0 0 1 1 Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nodaway 6 0 0 0 2 8 Pettis 1 0 0 0 2 3 Platte 1 0 0 0 0 1 Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 Saline 1 0 0 0 0 1 Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 13 0 0 0 9 22Northeast Adair 0 0 0 1 0 1 Audrain 0 1 0 0 0 1 Boone 2 0 0 0 1 3 Callaway 0 0 0 1 1 2 Clark 1 0 0 0 0 1 Cole 2 0 0 1 0 3 Franklin 1 0 0 0 0 1 Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jefferson 4 0 0 0 2 6 Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 0 Macon 5 0 0 0 0 5 Marion 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 Randolph 3 0 0 0 1 4 Schuyler 1 0 0 0 0 1 Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 St Charles 9 0 0 0 1 10 Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 28 1 0 3 6 38Southeast Bollinger 2 0 0 0 0 2 Butler 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 0 0 0 Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crawford 0 0 0 1 0 1
64
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 22. Children Closed from Alternative Care During July 2011by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing.
Returned Other Living with Achieved TotalHome Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings
Southeast Dent 2 0 0 0 0 2 Dunklin 6 0 0 0 0 6 Howell 0 0 0 0 2 2 Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 Madison 1 0 0 0 0 1 Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mississippi 3 0 0 0 0 3 New Madrid 4 0 0 1 2 7 Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 0 0 Perry 1 0 0 0 0 1 Phelps 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pulaski 3 0 0 0 0 3 Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 St Francois 0 0 0 0 2 2 Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stoddard 1 0 0 0 2 3 Texas 0 0 0 0 2 2 Washington 3 0 0 1 1 5 Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 26 0 0 3 11 40Southwest Barry 2 0 0 0 0 2 Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bates 1 0 0 0 0 1 Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 Christian 0 0 0 1 4 5 Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 Douglas 0 0 0 1 0 1 Greene 13 0 0 0 1 14 Henry 0 0 0 0 1 1 Hickory 1 0 0 1 0 2 Jasper 7 1 1 0 4 13 Laclede 3 0 0 1 0 4 Lawrence 0 0 0 1 0 1 Mcdonald 3 1 0 0 0 4 Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 Moniteau 0 0 0 0 1 1 Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 Newton 7 0 0 0 2 9 Ozark 2 0 0 1 0 3 Polk 0 0 0 0 1 1 St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0 Taney 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vernon 1 0 0 0 0 1 Webster 1 0 0 0 1 2 Wright 1 0 0 0 0 1 * Region Total * 42 2 1 6 15 66Kansas City Jackson 27 1 1 1 6 36 * Region Total * 27 1 1 1 6 36St. Louis St Louis City 14 0 1 6 16 37 St Louis County 14 1 0 1 5 21 * Region Total * 28 1 1 7 21 58Other Icama 0 0 0 0 19 19 * Region Total * 0 0 0 0 19 19State Total 164 5 3 20 87 279
65
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 23. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of July 2011
With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody.
Temporary AdoptionsIn Legal Status 1 In Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized TotalTPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 Buchanan 3 4 0 0 7 Caldwell 0 5 0 0 5 Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 Cass 5 9 1 1 16 Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 Clay 7 9 0 0 16 Clinton 3 5 0 0 8 Cooper 3 2 0 0 5 Daviess 4 0 0 0 4 De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 Gentry 0 1 0 0 1 Grundy 4 1 0 0 5 Harrison 6 0 0 0 6 Holt 0 0 0 0 0 Johnson 9 1 0 2 12 Lafayette 1 0 0 0 1 Linn 2 5 0 0 7 Livingston 2 1 0 0 3 Mercer 1 0 0 0 1 Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 Pettis 10 0 0 2 12 Platte 0 2 0 0 2 Putnam 4 0 0 0 4 Ray 0 0 0 0 0 Saline 3 1 0 0 4 Sullivan 3 0 0 0 3 Worth 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 70 46 1 5 122Northeast Adair 6 0 0 0 6 Audrain 1 0 0 0 1 Boone 5 15 0 0 20 Callaway 4 5 0 0 9 Clark 0 1 0 0 1 Cole 8 6 0 0 14 Franklin 29 11 1 0 41 Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 Howard 0 0 0 0 0 Jefferson 45 19 0 3 67 Knox 0 0 0 0 0 Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 Lincoln 2 5 0 0 7 Macon 0 4 0 0 4 Marion 2 5 0 2 9 Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 Montgomery 1 2 0 0 3 Osage 0 0 0 0 0 Pike 6 7 0 0 13 Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 Randolph 6 4 0 2 12 Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 Scotland 1 0 0 0 1 Shelby 0 7 0 0 7 St Charles 11 11 0 0 22 Warren 6 2 0 0 8 * Region Total * 133 104 1 7 245Southeast Bollinger 1 4 0 0 5 Butler 7 3 0 0 10 Cape Girardeau 7 6 0 1 14 Carter 2 0 0 0 2 Crawford 3 12 0 0 15
66
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 23. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of July 2011
With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody.
Temporary AdoptionsIn Legal Status 1 In Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized TotalTPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children
Southeast Dent 5 4 0 0 9 Dunklin 14 3 0 0 17 Howell 1 2 0 0 3 Iron 2 3 0 0 5 Madison 3 1 0 0 4 Maries 1 0 0 0 1 Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 New Madrid 3 2 1 0 6 Oregon 2 1 0 0 3 Pemiscot 3 2 0 0 5 Perry 1 2 0 0 3 Phelps 4 4 0 1 9 Pulaski 6 1 0 0 7 Reynolds 3 2 0 0 5 Ripley 10 0 0 0 10 Scott 7 7 0 0 14 Shannon 0 1 0 0 1 St Francois 8 10 0 0 18 Ste Genevieve 2 0 0 0 2 Stoddard 13 3 0 0 16 Texas 1 5 0 0 6 Washington 5 10 0 0 15 Wayne 1 5 0 0 6 * Region Total * 115 93 1 2 211Southwest Barry 20 4 0 2 26 Barton 1 0 0 0 1 Bates 11 0 0 0 11 Benton 0 0 0 0 0 Camden 5 0 0 0 5 Cedar 0 1 0 0 1 Christian 11 11 0 2 24 Dade 3 0 0 0 3 Dallas 11 1 0 0 12 Douglas 3 2 0 0 5 Greene 122 100 0 6 228 Henry 18 1 0 1 20 Hickory 2 1 0 0 3 Jasper 71 7 4 8 90 Laclede 11 1 0 2 14 Lawrence 7 7 0 0 14 Mcdonald 24 3 0 0 27 Miller 2 3 0 0 5 Moniteau 1 0 0 0 1 Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 Newton 40 3 2 1 46 Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 Polk 7 1 0 0 8 St Clair 2 0 0 0 2 Stone 3 0 0 0 3 Taney 32 14 0 3 49 Vernon 3 8 0 0 11 Webster 4 0 0 0 4 Wright 5 0 0 0 5 * Region Total * 419 168 6 25 618Kansas City Jackson 265 64 8 12 349 * Region Total * 265 64 8 12 349St. Louis St Louis City 70 53 1 4 128 St Louis County 94 47 9 1 151 * Region Total * 164 100 10 5 279Other Icama 0 0 11 0 11 * Region Total * 0 0 11 0 11State Total 1,166 575 38 56 1,835
67
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 24. Licensed Children's Division Foster Homes on the Last Day of July 2011
by Vendor Type and County.
Current LicensedCareer Foster Foster Newly Number of VendorsFoster Adoptive Group Foster Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months PercentageHome Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 -50.00 Atchison 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0.00 Buchanan 7 0 0 16 0 11 16 20 -20.00 Caldwell 0 0 0 4 0 2 4 4 0.00 Carroll 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 1 100.00 Cass 4 0 1 28 0 16 28 30 -6.67 Chariton 1 0 0 4 0 4 4 3 33.33 Clay 0 0 0 34 0 22 34 29 17.24 Clinton 0 0 0 10 0 7 10 7 42.86 Cooper 0 0 0 8 0 6 8 9 -11.11 Daviess 1 0 0 4 0 3 4 2 100.00 De Kalb 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 1 100.00 Gentry 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 -75.00 Grundy 0 0 0 4 0 3 4 5 -20.00 Harrison 0 0 0 6 0 2 6 3 100.00 Holt 0 0 0 4 0 3 4 4 0.00 Johnson 0 0 0 14 0 12 14 14 0.00 Lafayette 1 0 0 7 0 6 7 12 -41.67 Linn 1 0 1 6 0 4 6 7 -14.29 Livingston 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 4 -50.00 Mercer 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0.00 Nodaway 1 0 0 5 1 3 5 6 -16.67 Pettis 3 0 0 35 0 15 35 38 -7.89 Platte 2 0 0 16 0 9 16 18 -11.11 Putnam 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 1 200.00 Ray 1 0 0 10 0 5 10 10 0.00 Saline 1 0 0 4 1 3 4 6 -33.33 Sullivan 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0.00 Worth 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 -66.67 * Region Total * 24 0 2 235 2 146 235 246 -4.47Northeast Adair 1 0 0 15 0 7 15 18 -16.67 Audrain 2 1 0 9 0 6 9 9 0.00 Boone 18 0 1 58 0 36 58 60 -3.33 Callaway 1 0 0 6 0 5 6 8 -25.00 Clark 0 0 0 4 0 3 4 4 0.00 Cole 3 0 0 28 0 19 28 25 12.00 Franklin 1 0 1 55 0 41 55 67 -17.91 Gasconade 0 0 0 4 0 2 4 4 0.00 Howard 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0.00 Jefferson 6 0 0 49 2 26 49 58 -15.52 Knox 1 0 0 4 0 3 4 3 33.33 Lewis 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 -66.67 Lincoln 0 0 2 22 0 17 22 25 -12.00 Macon 0 0 0 3 0 1 3 4 -25.00 Marion 2 0 1 21 0 19 21 20 5.00 Monroe 0 0 0 6 0 3 6 3 100.00 Montgomery 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 3 -33.33 Osage 2 0 0 5 0 4 5 7 -28.57 Pike 0 0 1 10 0 7 10 10 0.00 Ralls 0 0 0 6 0 5 6 2 200.00 Randolph 4 0 0 10 0 8 10 15 -33.33 Schuyler 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 0.00 Scotland 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 -66.67 Shelby 0 0 0 5 0 3 5 5 0.00 St Charles 8 0 0 39 0 32 39 33 18.18 Warren 0 0 0 18 1 9 18 15 20.00 * Region Total * 49 1 6 387 3 265 387 410 -5.61Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 8 0 8 8 9 -11.11 Butler 1 0 2 20 0 19 22 21 4.76 Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 19 4 14 19 19 0.00 Carter 1 0 0 2 0 1 2 3 -33.33
68
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 24. Licensed Children's Division Foster Homes on the Last Day of July 2011
by Vendor Type and County.
Current LicensedCareer Foster Foster Newly Number of VendorsFoster Adoptive Group Foster Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months PercentageHome Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 6 0 3 6 7 -14.29 Dent 1 0 0 6 0 4 7 11 -36.36 Dunklin 0 0 1 13 0 11 14 17 -17.65 Howell 0 0 1 18 1 9 19 20 -5.00 Iron 0 0 0 5 0 5 5 7 -28.57 Madison 0 0 1 8 1 9 9 5 80.00 Maries 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 -50.00 Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -100.00 New Madrid 0 0 0 5 0 5 5 23 -78.26 Oregon 0 0 0 9 0 5 9 5 80.00 Pemiscot 1 0 0 12 0 11 12 5 140.00 Perry 0 0 0 7 0 4 7 8 -12.50 Phelps 5 0 1 34 0 24 36 38 -5.26 Pulaski 4 0 0 18 3 10 18 27 -33.33 Reynolds 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 4 -25.00 Ripley 0 0 0 13 0 11 13 15 -13.33 Scott 2 0 0 23 0 18 23 20 15.00 Shannon 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 100.00 St Francois 1 1 0 30 2 22 31 27 14.81 Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 6 0 4 6 8 -25.00 Stoddard 0 0 1 13 0 10 13 13 0.00 Texas 0 0 0 21 0 12 21 16 31.25 Washington 0 0 0 16 0 15 16 17 -5.88 Wayne 0 0 0 9 0 8 9 14 -35.71 * Region Total * 17 1 7 327 11 246 336 363 -7.44Southwest Barry 0 0 0 19 1 12 19 17 11.76 Barton 0 0 0 9 0 6 9 11 -18.18 Bates 2 0 0 11 0 6 11 14 -21.43 Benton 0 0 0 12 1 10 12 9 33.33 Camden 2 0 0 12 0 7 12 22 -45.45 Cedar 0 0 0 6 0 5 6 5 20.00 Christian 5 0 0 62 1 44 62 63 -1.59 Dade 0 0 0 4 0 2 4 7 -42.86 Dallas 0 0 0 12 0 7 12 9 33.33 Douglas 1 0 0 8 1 7 8 6 33.33 Greene 9 0 0 103 2 86 104 96 8.33 Henry 2 0 0 16 0 13 16 15 6.67 Hickory 0 0 0 5 0 3 5 8 -37.50 Jasper 8 0 0 85 0 61 85 82 3.66 Laclede 2 0 1 34 2 20 34 40 -15.00 Lawrence 0 0 0 12 0 8 12 14 -14.29 Mcdonald 1 0 2 13 0 10 15 19 -21.05 Miller 1 0 0 8 0 5 9 8 12.50 Moniteau 1 0 0 14 1 8 14 9 55.56 Morgan 0 0 0 11 1 7 11 5 120.00 Newton 3 1 1 38 0 33 39 52 -25.00 Ozark 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 -66.67 Polk 2 0 0 20 0 14 20 19 5.26 St Clair 0 0 0 5 1 5 5 7 -28.57 Stone 2 0 1 6 0 5 6 20 -70.00 Taney 2 0 0 20 1 15 21 18 16.67 Vernon 0 0 0 7 0 5 7 9 -22.22 Webster 0 0 0 17 1 11 17 15 13.33 Wright 1 0 0 7 0 6 7 7 0.00 * Region Total * 44 1 5 577 13 422 583 609 -4.27Kansas City Jackson 26 0 3 212 3 147 215 242 -11.16 * Region Total * 26 0 3 212 3 147 215 242 -11.16St. Louis St Louis City 19 1 0 103 1 71 104 129 -19.38 St Louis County 29 2 1 139 1 104 139 147 -5.44 * Region Total * 48 3 1 242 2 175 243 276 -11.96State Total 208 6 24 1,980 34 1,401 1,999 2,146 -6.85
69
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 25. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Legal Status.
TotalLS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 6 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children
Northwest Andrew 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 Atchison 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Buchanan 38 0 0 3 122 0 0 0 32 0 195 Caldwell 11 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 21 0 97 Carroll 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Cass 227 1 0 1 231 0 0 0 29 0 489 Chariton 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Clay 73 0 0 7 419 0 0 0 48 0 547 Clinton 34 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 73 Cooper 22 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 26 Daviess 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 De Kalb 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 Gentry 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 11 Grundy 21 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 9 0 62 Harrison 11 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 18 Holt 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 7 Johnson 60 0 0 1 105 0 0 0 13 0 179 Lafayette 40 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 46 Linn 42 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 24 0 116 Livingston 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 35 Mercer 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Nodaway 39 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 8 0 99 Pettis 78 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 17 0 215 Platte 25 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 15 0 48 Putnam 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Ray 16 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 11 0 64 Saline 30 0 0 0 142 0 0 0 13 0 185 Sullivan 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 12 Worth 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 * Region Total * 892 1 0 16 1,438 0 0 0 254 0 2,601Northeast Adair 57 0 0 0 54 0 0 0 28 0 139 Audrain 39 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 9 0 94 Boone 164 0 0 4 269 0 1 0 59 0 497 Callaway 63 0 0 3 80 0 0 0 30 0 176 Clark 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 35 Cole 137 0 1 4 164 0 0 0 58 0 364 Franklin 226 1 0 0 210 0 0 0 70 0 507 Gasconade 7 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 6 0 24 Howard 13 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 4 0 35 Jefferson 468 0 1 5 486 0 1 0 241 0 1,202 Knox 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Lewis 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Lincoln 78 0 0 1 114 0 0 0 26 0 219 Macon 34 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 30 0 103 Marion 63 0 0 0 89 0 0 0 30 0 182 Monroe 14 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 15 Montgomery 36 0 0 1 45 0 1 0 9 0 92 Osage 9 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 2 0 22 Pike 48 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 7 0 87 Ralls 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 18 Randolph 79 0 0 2 67 0 0 0 33 0 181 Schuyler 5 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 13 Scotland 7 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 9 0 32 Shelby 22 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 5 0 45 St Charles 235 0 0 8 386 0 1 0 93 0 723 Warren 55 0 0 1 50 0 3 0 16 0 125 * Region Total * 1,950 1 2 29 2,214 0 7 0 769 0 4,972Southeast Bollinger 26 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 33 Butler 95 0 0 8 78 0 0 0 20 0 201 Cape Girardeau 101 0 0 2 170 0 0 0 56 0 329 Carter 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Crawford 62 0 0 3 13 0 1 0 2 0 81
70
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 25. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Legal Status.
TotalLS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 6 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children
Southeast Dent 18 0 0 2 118 0 0 0 1 0 139 Dunklin 114 0 0 4 37 0 0 0 34 0 189 Howell 53 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 58 Iron 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Madison 38 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 40 Maries 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Mississippi 9 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 4 0 20 New Madrid 44 1 0 2 62 0 0 0 52 0 161 Oregon 12 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 18 0 120 Pemiscot 51 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 3 0 61 Perry 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Phelps 85 0 0 0 114 0 1 0 46 0 246 Pulaski 70 0 2 8 108 0 0 0 31 0 219 Reynolds 14 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 53 0 142 Ripley 35 0 0 1 55 0 0 0 11 0 102 Scott 77 0 0 2 90 0 0 0 49 0 218 Shannon 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 St Francois 106 0 0 2 265 0 1 0 57 0 431 Ste Genevieve 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 Stoddard 178 0 0 0 129 0 0 0 125 0 432 Texas 45 0 0 0 67 0 0 0 18 0 130 Washington 118 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 3 0 130 Wayne 32 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 35 * Region Total * 1,457 1 2 40 1,499 0 4 0 589 0 3,592Southwest Barry 95 0 0 0 144 0 1 0 24 0 264 Barton 27 0 0 3 61 0 0 0 10 0 101 Bates 46 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 1 0 60 Benton 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 Camden 72 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 74 Cedar 13 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 7 0 66 Christian 128 0 0 3 184 0 1 0 23 0 339 Dade 8 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 36 Dallas 34 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 36 Douglas 24 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 27 Greene 1,062 0 3 11 766 0 2 0 124 0 1,968 Henry 79 0 0 0 15 0 1 0 9 0 104 Hickory 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 16 Jasper 529 4 0 5 598 0 1 0 88 0 1,225 Laclede 161 0 0 6 6 0 1 0 4 0 178 Lawrence 77 0 0 0 188 0 0 0 23 1 289 Mcdonald 96 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 102 Miller 66 0 0 0 251 0 0 0 52 0 369 Moniteau 20 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 Morgan 32 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 35 Newton 187 2 0 0 354 0 1 0 64 0 608 Ozark 14 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Polk 45 0 0 0 211 0 0 0 33 0 289 St Clair 21 0 0 1 63 0 0 0 5 0 90 Stone 67 0 0 0 87 0 0 0 8 0 162 Taney 213 0 0 6 82 0 1 0 32 0 334 Vernon 39 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Webster 43 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 50 Wright 45 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 42 0 144 * Region Total * 3,259 6 3 40 3,165 0 11 0 561 1 7,046Kansas City Jackson 1,524 8 215 33 2,168 0 12 0 340 0 4,300 * Region Total * 1,524 8 215 33 2,168 0 12 0 340 0 4,300St. Louis St Louis City 727 1 1 7 1,588 0 23 0 540 0 2,887 St Louis County 899 9 7 32 1,246 0 24 0 400 0 2,617 * Region Total * 1,626 10 8 39 2,834 0 47 0 940 0 5,504Other Icama 1 11 0 21 1,817 0 0 0 0 0 1,850 * Region Total * 1 11 0 21 1,817 0 0 0 0 0 1,850State Total 10,709 38 230 218 15,135 0 81 0 3,453 1 29,865
71
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 26. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Goal.
Total01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Atchison 14 0 0 0 0 0 1 15 Buchanan 18 7 0 8 4 0 1 38 Caldwell 3 5 0 2 0 0 1 11 Carroll 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 6 Cass 186 14 0 11 4 4 8 227 Chariton 5 0 0 1 4 0 0 10 Clay 46 16 0 10 1 0 0 73 Clinton 22 8 0 2 0 0 2 34 Cooper 14 5 0 2 0 0 1 22 Daviess 6 4 0 0 1 2 0 13 De Kalb 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Gentry 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 Grundy 12 5 0 4 0 0 0 21 Harrison 3 6 0 1 1 0 0 11 Holt 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Johnson 38 10 0 10 1 0 1 60 Lafayette 31 1 0 7 0 0 1 40 Linn 21 7 0 2 0 0 12 42 Livingston 8 3 0 7 9 2 5 34 Mercer 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 Nodaway 30 0 0 8 1 0 0 39 Pettis 38 10 0 10 6 0 14 78 Platte 14 2 0 3 1 4 1 25 Putnam 11 4 0 3 0 0 0 18 Ray 12 0 0 0 0 0 4 16 Saline 20 4 0 6 0 0 0 30 Sullivan 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 11 Worth 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 * Region Total * 572 116 0 102 37 13 52 892Northeast Adair 37 6 0 6 5 0 3 57 Audrain 25 1 0 10 2 0 1 39 Boone 101 20 0 27 7 6 3 164 Callaway 40 9 0 9 0 2 3 63 Clark 28 1 0 4 0 0 0 33 Cole 66 14 0 43 5 1 8 137 Franklin 132 40 0 19 7 1 27 226 Gasconade 4 0 0 2 0 0 1 7 Howard 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Jefferson 275 64 0 42 47 13 27 468 Knox 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 Lewis 21 0 0 8 0 0 1 30 Lincoln 41 7 0 6 14 2 8 78 Macon 24 4 0 6 0 0 0 34 Marion 40 7 0 6 3 6 1 63 Monroe 12 0 0 1 1 0 0 14 Montgomery 22 3 0 7 1 3 0 36 Osage 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 9 Pike 25 13 0 6 0 0 4 48 Ralls 9 0 0 1 4 2 0 16 Randolph 46 10 0 9 11 0 3 79 Schuyler 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 Scotland 4 1 0 2 0 0 0 7 Shelby 9 7 0 3 1 0 2 22 St Charles 125 22 0 39 10 4 35 235 Warren 17 8 0 17 2 0 11 55 * Region Total * 1,139 237 0 275 120 40 139 1,950Southeast Bollinger 11 5 0 1 5 2 2 26 Butler 64 10 0 6 7 6 2 95 Cape Girardeau 62 13 0 8 7 5 6 101 Carter 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 5
72
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 26. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and Goal.
Total01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children
Southeast Crawford 28 15 0 10 3 0 6 62 Dent 5 9 0 2 2 0 0 18 Dunklin 81 17 0 6 5 0 5 114 Howell 47 3 0 3 0 0 0 53 Iron 7 5 0 5 2 0 1 20 Madison 24 4 0 3 5 1 1 38 Maries 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 Mississippi 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 9 New Madrid 23 5 0 9 3 1 3 44 Oregon 3 3 0 6 0 0 0 12 Pemiscot 33 5 0 8 1 1 3 51 Perry 15 3 0 3 1 0 1 23 Phelps 58 8 0 13 3 0 3 85 Pulaski 46 7 0 8 5 2 2 70 Reynolds 2 5 0 4 3 0 0 14 Ripley 12 10 0 9 3 1 0 35 Scott 47 14 0 7 7 0 2 77 Shannon 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 St Francois 58 18 0 17 2 3 8 106 Ste Genevieve 13 2 0 3 0 1 0 19 Stoddard 128 16 0 14 9 0 11 178 Texas 32 6 0 4 1 2 0 45 Washington 82 15 0 13 3 1 4 118 Wayne 16 6 0 9 1 0 0 32 * Region Total * 908 208 0 176 79 26 60 1,457Southwest Barry 51 24 0 13 4 3 0 95 Barton 19 1 0 1 1 0 5 27 Bates 17 11 0 11 7 0 0 46 Benton 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Camden 50 5 0 14 1 0 2 72 Cedar 11 1 0 0 0 1 0 13 Christian 62 22 0 20 18 1 5 128 Dade 2 3 0 0 2 1 0 8 Dallas 12 12 0 8 1 0 1 34 Douglas 15 5 0 3 1 0 0 24 Greene 612 222 0 111 39 19 59 1,062 Henry 48 19 0 5 6 0 1 79 Hickory 7 3 0 5 0 0 0 15 Jasper 333 78 0 48 14 7 49 529 Laclede 119 12 0 18 4 2 6 161 Lawrence 46 14 0 9 1 0 7 77 Mcdonald 54 27 0 7 3 0 5 96 Miller 38 5 0 13 6 2 2 66 Moniteau 11 1 0 4 1 3 0 20 Morgan 26 0 0 5 1 0 0 32 Newton 96 43 0 13 8 5 22 187 Ozark 12 0 0 1 1 0 0 14 Polk 25 8 0 8 1 0 3 45 St Clair 11 2 0 5 2 1 0 21 Stone 46 3 0 11 1 0 6 67 Taney 123 46 0 30 5 1 8 213 Vernon 26 11 0 2 0 0 0 39 Webster 18 4 0 11 5 5 0 43 Wright 32 5 0 3 4 0 1 45 * Region Total * 1,923 587 0 379 137 51 182 3,259Kansas City Jackson 887 329 0 142 46 20 100 1,524 * Region Total * 887 329 0 142 46 20 100 1,524St. Louis St Louis City 322 123 0 211 41 15 15 727 St Louis County 450 141 0 162 35 21 90 899 * Region Total * 772 264 0 373 76 36 105 1,626Other Icama 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 * Region Total * 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1State Total 6,201 1,741 0 1,448 495 186 638 10,709
73
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 27. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell.
Number of Placements AverageTotal Number of
1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children PlacementsNorthwest Andrew 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2.00 Atchison 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 15 1.20 Buchanan 6 12 7 3 1 4 2 2 38 4.68 Caldwell 6 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 11 3.45 Carroll 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1.17 Cass 110 45 37 9 12 8 3 3 227 2.51 Chariton 0 3 3 3 1 0 0 0 10 3.20 Clay 22 19 9 7 3 12 1 0 73 3.12 Clinton 11 10 4 1 3 5 0 0 34 3.03 Cooper 6 3 3 1 3 3 2 1 22 4.86 Daviess 5 4 0 1 1 1 1 0 13 3.08 De Kalb 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 4.00 Gentry 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 1.50 Grundy 9 6 2 1 0 1 0 2 21 4.52 Harrison 3 4 1 2 0 0 1 0 11 3.18 Holt 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1.33 Johnson 22 9 12 6 5 3 2 1 60 3.22 Lafayette 18 10 5 0 2 3 1 1 40 2.93 Linn 23 8 2 3 1 4 1 0 42 2.33 Livingston 7 9 6 5 2 2 2 1 34 4.29 Mercer 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 3.25 Nodaway 18 8 4 1 2 5 1 0 39 2.82 Pettis 19 21 14 6 2 13 1 2 78 3.96 Platte 9 4 3 4 1 2 1 1 25 3.68 Putnam 6 4 5 2 0 0 0 1 18 3.11 Ray 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 1.25 Saline 9 6 3 8 0 2 2 0 30 3.43 Sullivan 5 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 11 3.45 Worth 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2.00 * Region Total * 352 198 125 65 39 75 21 16 892 3.11Northeast Adair 15 22 4 9 1 3 2 1 57 3.61 Audrain 14 10 3 2 2 2 6 0 39 3.74 Boone 75 17 11 11 7 25 12 6 164 4.20 Callaway 24 11 9 3 3 6 3 4 63 4.14 Clark 15 9 1 1 1 6 0 0 33 2.82 Cole 49 31 14 5 6 21 5 5 137 3.85 Franklin 89 62 23 12 9 20 7 3 226 3.00 Gasconade 2 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 7 2.86 Howard 6 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 13 1.92 Jefferson 188 121 60 31 16 27 13 9 468 2.89 Knox 7 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 12 1.75 Lewis 11 5 1 4 5 4 0 0 30 3.00 Lincoln 32 19 10 6 4 5 2 0 78 2.63 Macon 12 7 6 1 2 3 2 1 34 3.68 Marion 25 19 10 1 2 4 2 0 63 2.59 Monroe 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 2.71 Montgomery 3 9 7 6 3 5 3 0 36 4.50 Osage 4 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 2.89 Pike 23 10 3 2 5 3 0 1 48 2.67 Ralls 7 4 3 1 0 1 0 0 16 2.19 Randolph 27 15 16 4 5 6 4 2 79 3.42 Schuyler 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 1.80 Scotland 4 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 2.43 Shelby 11 4 4 2 0 1 0 0 22 2.14 St Charles 87 58 33 17 12 12 8 8 235 3.38 Warren 22 9 4 3 5 7 3 2 55 4.47 * Region Total * 769 455 226 126 90 162 73 43 1,950 3.27Southeast Bollinger 10 6 2 4 0 3 0 1 26 3.69 Butler 33 26 12 10 4 9 0 1 95 2.83 Cape Girardeau 46 18 21 8 1 6 0 1 101 2.41 Carter 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 5 11.20
74
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 27. Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of July 2011
by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell.
Number of Placements AverageTotal Number of
1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children PlacementsSoutheast Crawford 28 15 5 5 2 6 0 1 62 2.69 Dent 7 2 1 1 1 2 0 4 18 6.94 Dunklin 51 30 14 5 1 8 1 4 114 3.00 Howell 16 7 9 7 2 7 2 3 53 4.28 Iron 7 4 2 3 4 0 0 0 20 2.65 Madison 16 2 8 4 0 3 4 1 38 4.16 Maries 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 2.50 Mississippi 6 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 9 1.89 New Madrid 21 4 7 4 1 1 3 3 44 3.95 Oregon 0 3 0 0 5 4 0 0 12 4.83 Pemiscot 21 7 6 4 3 6 4 0 51 3.49 Perry 9 10 2 1 0 1 0 0 23 1.96 Phelps 27 18 17 7 4 10 2 0 85 3.19 Pulaski 25 20 13 6 1 3 0 0 70 2.23 Reynolds 3 2 2 3 0 3 0 1 14 4.79 Ripley 10 14 1 1 2 7 0 0 35 3.06 Scott 42 14 2 5 2 9 1 2 77 2.71 Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 22.67 St Francois 35 23 20 6 5 9 2 6 106 4.18 Ste Genevieve 3 4 3 0 3 3 2 1 19 5.37 Stoddard 48 73 29 14 5 4 5 0 178 2.56 Texas 22 7 2 4 2 5 2 1 45 3.27 Washington 31 34 20 11 4 11 3 4 118 3.61 Wayne 15 9 2 0 2 4 0 0 32 2.53 * Region Total * 532 357 201 114 55 125 32 39 1,457 3.26Southwest Barry 25 17 17 8 11 13 4 0 95 3.61 Barton 10 10 4 1 1 0 0 1 27 2.89 Bates 11 10 9 5 3 6 0 1 46 3.28 Benton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4.00 Camden 25 16 8 9 4 6 2 1 72 3.17 Cedar 7 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 13 3.08 Christian 45 27 15 10 8 15 5 2 128 3.59 Dade 2 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 8 3.38 Dallas 8 12 5 3 0 5 1 0 34 3.09 Douglas 8 9 1 1 4 1 0 0 24 2.63 Greene 399 264 148 73 41 90 28 14 1,062 2.99 Henry 36 14 11 5 4 3 4 2 79 3.23 Hickory 2 2 3 2 0 5 1 0 15 4.53 Jasper 206 122 70 40 30 38 14 9 529 3.11 Laclede 78 34 19 7 5 10 5 3 161 2.85 Lawrence 27 12 12 4 7 10 1 4 77 4.25 Mcdonald 24 33 19 6 5 6 3 0 96 2.91 Miller 21 13 6 2 7 5 5 7 66 5.65 Moniteau 5 7 3 2 0 1 1 1 20 3.65 Morgan 10 8 6 0 1 7 0 0 32 3.03 Newton 51 56 39 7 12 16 5 0 187 2.91 Ozark 5 1 3 3 1 1 0 0 14 2.86 Polk 16 8 5 5 2 8 0 1 45 3.38 St Clair 7 5 3 2 1 0 2 1 21 4.24 Stone 12 21 12 5 3 13 0 0 67 3.27 Taney 74 53 31 14 9 25 4 1 213 2.94 Vernon 15 3 2 2 4 8 2 3 39 5.49 Webster 12 13 3 3 4 3 3 2 43 4.07 Wright 15 15 4 6 4 1 0 0 45 2.40 * Region Total * 1,156 786 463 230 171 297 90 54 3,259 3.20Kansas City Jackson 498 384 223 132 76 142 29 13 1,524 2.97 * Region Total * 498 384 223 132 76 142 29 13 1,524 2.97St. Louis St Louis City 127 136 103 63 40 138 48 71 727 6.20 St Louis County 281 220 110 48 39 109 43 42 899 4.27 * Region Total * 408 356 213 111 79 247 91 113 1,626 5.13Other Icama 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2.00 * Region Total * 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2.00State Total 3,715 2,537 1,451 778 510 1,048 336 278 10,709 3.47
75
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 28. Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County.
FY 2012 Adoptions are Year to Date (YTD).
FY 2012 TotalFY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 YTD Adoptions
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buchanan 5 4 2 8 7 0 26 Caldwell 15 1 2 1 6 0 25 Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cass 24 18 29 14 21 1 107 Chariton 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 Clay 31 33 27 46 24 0 161 Clinton 4 2 0 3 0 0 9 Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grundy 2 0 2 0 3 0 7 Harrison 0 0 0 3 3 0 6 Holt 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 Johnson 3 8 6 2 5 2 26 Lafayette 2 0 0 1 1 0 4 Linn 4 3 4 10 7 0 28 Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nodaway 9 7 4 5 3 0 28 Pettis 14 5 14 11 14 2 60 Platte 1 0 0 0 5 0 6 Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ray 2 5 2 3 2 0 14 Saline 10 7 18 12 12 0 59 Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 128 93 115 119 113 5 573Northeast Adair 7 1 3 4 9 0 24 Audrain 4 3 3 2 2 0 14 Boone 17 31 19 16 35 0 118 Callaway 5 4 7 8 7 0 31 Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cole 10 9 10 16 7 0 52 Franklin 22 22 19 17 16 0 96 Gasconade 2 1 2 2 0 0 7 Howard 6 1 3 0 0 0 10 Jefferson 38 29 28 38 55 3 191 Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lewis 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Lincoln 11 12 8 15 4 0 50 Macon 8 6 6 3 2 0 25 Marion 9 4 11 5 10 2 41 Monroe 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Montgomery 6 7 2 8 0 0 23 Osage 1 1 2 1 1 0 6 Pike 1 3 3 2 0 0 9 Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Randolph 4 7 6 4 4 2 27 Schuyler 1 0 0 6 0 0 7 Scotland 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Shelby 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 St Charles 28 25 38 26 32 0 149 Warren 13 6 0 3 1 0 23 * Region Total * 196 175 170 176 186 7 910Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 Butler 5 15 10 10 4 0 44 Cape Girardeau 20 12 10 4 13 1 60 Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crawford 0 6 5 3 0 0 14
76
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 28. Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County.
FY 2012 Adoptions are Year to Date (YTD).
FY 2012 TotalFY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 YTD Adoptions
Dent 22 9 11 11 5 0 58 Dunklin 1 5 5 7 5 0 23 Howell 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Southeast Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mississippi 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 New Madrid 5 4 6 2 2 0 19 Oregon 4 6 9 9 11 0 39 Pemiscot 0 1 0 3 0 0 4 Perry 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Phelps 14 17 19 6 21 1 78 Pulaski 15 6 6 6 9 0 42 Reynolds 12 13 2 12 8 0 47 Ripley 4 7 0 5 7 0 23 Scott 10 6 4 5 1 0 26 Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 St Francois 32 20 36 13 34 0 135 Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stoddard 15 21 18 8 13 0 75 Texas 13 16 11 5 6 0 51 Washington 2 0 0 0 3 0 5 Wayne 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 * Region Total * 176 166 155 110 146 2 755Southwest Barry 20 22 11 16 19 2 90 Barton 1 2 6 16 0 0 25 Bates 2 2 1 1 1 0 7 Benton 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Camden 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Cedar 4 2 2 3 1 0 12 Christian 19 17 12 11 16 2 77 Dade 6 8 1 2 1 0 18 Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Douglas 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Greene 83 79 73 113 96 6 450 Henry 0 8 4 1 1 1 15 Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jasper 51 59 72 46 51 8 287 Laclede 2 2 2 1 1 2 10 Lawrence 23 16 13 22 14 0 88 Mcdonald 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 Miller 20 35 21 45 29 0 150 Moniteau 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Morgan 1 0 0 3 1 0 5 Newton 31 24 44 47 44 1 191 Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Polk 16 21 18 17 18 0 90 St Clair 10 4 4 16 1 0 35 Stone 10 11 6 9 13 0 49 Taney 8 14 7 7 10 3 49 Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Webster 3 3 0 1 3 0 10 Wright 6 7 7 1 3 0 24 * Region Total * 316 336 305 378 330 25 1,690Kansas City Jackson 195 174 173 190 225 12 969 * Region Total * 195 174 173 190 225 12 969St. Louis St Louis City 80 99 91 79 80 4 433 St Louis County 94 74 79 77 80 1 405 * Region Total * 174 173 170 156 160 5 838Other Icama 3 1 1 2 2 0 9 * Region Total * 3 1 1 2 2 0 9State Total 1,188 1,118 1,089 1,131 1,162 56 5,744
77
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 16.Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody
July 2011
Total Entries Total Re-Entries
11 000
Figure 17.Children Active in Children's Division Custody
on the Last day of the MonthJuly 2009 - July 2011
9,000
9,200
9,400
9,600
9,800
10,000
10,200
10,400
10,600
10,800
11,000
Jul-0
9
Aug-
09
Sep-
09
Oct
-09
Nov
-09
Dec
-09
Jan-
10
Feb-
10
Mar
-10
Apr-
10
May
-10
Jun-
10
Jul-1
0
Aug-
10
Sep-
10
Oct
-10
Nov
-10
Dec
-10
Jan-
11
Feb-
11
Mar
-11
Apr-
11
May
-11
Jun-
11
Jul-1
1
78
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 18.Children Closing from Alternative Care During
July 2011 by Reason for Case Closing and Region
Returned Home Other
Figure 19.Adoptions Finalized by Month
July 2009 - July 2011
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Aug-
09
Sep-
09
Oct
-09
Nov
-09
Dec
-09
Jan-
10
Feb-
10
Mar
-10
Apr-
10
May
-10
Jun-
10
Jul-1
0
Aug-
10
Sep-
10
Oct
-10
Nov
-10
Dec
-10
Jan-
11
Feb-
11
Mar
-11
Apr-
11
May
-11
Jun-
11
Jul-1
1
79
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 - 3 4 - 7 8 - 11 12 - 15 16 +Current Age
Figure 20.Children in Children's Division Custody as of
July 31, 2011 by Age and Placement Category
Relative Home Group Home/Res. Care Other Foster Home Adoptive Home
Figure 21.Children in Children's Division Custody as of the Last Day of the
Month July 2007 - July 2011 by Placement Category
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Jul-0
7
Sep-
07
Nov
-07
Jan-
08
Mar
-08
May
-08
Jul-0
8
Sep-
08
Nov
-08
Jan-
09
Mar
-09
May
-09
Jul-0
9
Sep-
09
Nov
-09
Jan-
10
Mar
-10
May
-10
Jul-1
0
Sep-
10
Nov
-10
Jan-
11
Mar
-11
May
-11
Jul-1
1
Foster Home Adoptive Home Other Group Home/Res. Care Relative Home
80
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2006
-4
2007
-1
2007
-2
2007
-3
2007
-4
2008
-1
2008
-2
2008
-3
2008
-4
2009
-1
2009
-2
2009
-3
2009
-4
2010
-1
2010
-2
2010
-3
2010
-4
2011
-1
2011
-2
2011
-3
Exit
s pe
r 1
00
Ch
ildre
n in
Fost
er C
are
Pop
ula
tion
Figure 22.Children Exiting Children's Division Custody
by Quarter and Subsequent Disposition4th Quarter 2006 Through 3rd Quarter 2011*
Adoption Child Independence Other Legal Status
Relative Home Other Closing Return Home
*Data for the 3rd Quarter is only for themonth of July 81
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Children’s Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 201182
Notes: Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures
Table 14. • This table includes children entering Legal Status 1 for the first time. • Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other • Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon Total Population Under Age 18, Mapping Census
2000: The Geography of U.S. Diversity, U.S. Census Bureau, released December 7, 2001. • Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 15.
• This table includes children re-entering Legal Status 1 who have had prior Out-of-Home Placements. • Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other • Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon Total Population Under Age 18, Mapping Census
2000: The Geography of U.S. Diversity, U.S. Census Bureau, released December 7, 2001. • Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 16. • This data includes children (re)entering (entering and/or re-entering) Legal Status 1.
Table 17. and Table 18.
• Length of Stay is computed for the last continuous period in Legal Status 1 during the month. Table values, for the length of stay, indicate the average number of months in custody.
Children’s Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 201183
Table 19. • This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
• Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon Total Population Under Age 18, Mapping Census 2000: The Geography of U.S. Diversity, U.S. Census Bureau, released December 7, 2001.
• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 20.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only. • Placement Types are: ADF Adoption (by foster parent) ADO Adoption (by other) ADR Adoption (by relative) CFP Career Foster Parent CTO Non-Licensed/Court Ordered Placement DET Detention FAH Foster Adoptive Home FG B Behavioral Foster Family Group Home FG H Foster Family Group Home FG M Medical Foster Family Group Home FHB Behavioral Foster Home FHE Emergency Foster Home FHM Medical Foster Home FHO Foster Home ILA Independent Living Arrangement JHO Juvenile Court Home KHB Kinship Behavioral Home KHM Kinship Medical Home KHO Licensed Kinship Home KHU Unlicensed Kinship Home LGS Legal Guardianship Subsidy MMD Medical Facility MMH Mental Health Facility RFA Residential Treatment Facility RFP Residential Treatment Facility- Initial Placement - No Level RF2 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 2 RF3 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 3 RF4 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 4 RFE Residential Treatment Facility- Emergency RFI Residential Treatment Facility- Infant RFM Residential Treatment Facility-Maternity RFT Residential Treatment Facility-Transitional/Aftercare
Children’s Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 201184
Table 20 (contd). RHB Behavioral Relative Home RHM Medical Relative Home RHO Relative Home RHU Unlicensed Relative Home RUN Runaway SCH School TLA Transitional Living Arrangement TLG Transitional Living Group TLS Transitional Living Scattered Site
Table 21.
• This table includes children exiting Legal Status 1 only. • Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
Table 22.
• Table includes children closing from all legal status categories.
• Closing categories include the following closing reasons: Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s), CYAC child, Returned Child to sending
state) Achieved Independence - Goal Achieved (Child Independence) Living with Other Relatives – Goal Achieved (Placement with a fit and willing relative) Other Agency - Care and Custody with other Agency Other - Married, Runaway, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated, Deceased, Guardianship and
Other
Table 23.
• Legal Status 1, TPR (Termination of Parental Rights) Incomplete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and no completed TPR (TPR is not completed for the mother and the putative and/or legal father).
• Legal Status 1, TPR Complete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and TPR has been completed
(TPR is completed for the mother and the putative and/or legal father). • Temporary Adoptive Custody includes Legal Status 2 children. • Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are counted
as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.
Children’s Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 201185
Table 24. • This table includes vendor types of – CF, FA, FG, and FH. • Newly Licensed Vendors includes vendors which are licensed during the month and have either no
previous license or one which ended more than five years ago. • The categories “Current # of Licensed Vendors” and “Licensed Vendors Twelve Months Ago”
represent unduplicated vendor counts.
Table 25. • Legal Status Definitions: LS 1 - Care and custody with Children’s Division (includes temporary custody) LS 2 - Temporary custody with adoptive parents LS 3 - Supervision only by Children’s Division LS 4 - Care and custody with juvenile court/other agency LS 5 - Final custody awarded to adoptive parents LS 6 – Children’s Division relieved of legal responsibility LS 7 - CYAC Child (Children of Youth in Alternative Care) LS 8 - Chafee Independent Living Program LS 9 - Subsidized Guardianship LS V – Voluntary Placement Agreement
Table 26.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
• Goals are: 01 - Return child to parent(s)/caretaker(s) AD - Adoption 05 - CYAC Child 06 - Child Independence/Independent Living 07 - Guardianship 08 - Live with Other Relatives 09 - Case Plan Goal Not Yet Established / Missing
Table 27.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
• Table values are children active at the end of the month categorized by the number of placements experienced in their most recent stay in Legal Status 1.
Children’s Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 201186
• The number of placements represents the movement of children among distinct vendors. • Short term temporary settings are not counted when the child returns to the previous vendor.
Table 28.
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.
Figure 18.
• Closing categories includes the following closing reasons: Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s)
Other - Achieved Independence, Living with other Relatives, Other Agency , Married, Runaway, Returned Child to Sending State, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated, Deceased, Children of Youth in Alternative Care (CYAC) Child and Other.
Figure 19.
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.
Figure 20.
• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
• Age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Figure 21.
• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
Intensive In-Home Services
Table 29. Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During July 2011
Grouped by Referral County
Referrals Accepted Referrals Referrals Notfor Screening Accepted Accepted Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent ReferralsNorthwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Buchanan 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cass 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3 Chariton 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 Clay 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 4 Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Johnson 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2 Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Pettis 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4 Platte 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Ray 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Saline 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 1 3.70% 15 55.56% 11 40.74% 27Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3 Audrain 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Boone 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Callaway 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cole 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4 Franklin 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 6 Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Howard 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Jefferson 0 0.00% 6 60.00% 4 40.00% 10 Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7 100.00% 7 Macon 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Montgomery 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2 Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Randolph 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3 Schuyler 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 St Charles 0 0.00% 2 18.18% 9 81.82% 11 Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2 * Region Total * 0 0.00% 22 34.92% 41 65.08% 63Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Butler 0 0.00% 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 6 Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3 Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
88
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 29. Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During July 2011
Grouped by Referral County
Referrals Accepted Referrals Referrals Notfor Screening Accepted Accepted Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent ReferralsSoutheast Crawford 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Dunklin 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 5 Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 3 Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Madison 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2 Oregon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Pemiscot 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Perry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2 Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Ripley 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Scott 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 St Francois 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Stoddard 0 0.00% 2 28.57% 5 71.43% 7 Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Washington 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3 Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 2 4.65% 19 44.19% 22 51.16% 43Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Camden 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3 Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Christian 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4 Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Dallas 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2 Greene 0 0.00% 10 30.30% 23 69.70% 33 Henry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Jasper 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3 Laclede 0 0.00% 1 9.09% 10 90.91% 11 Lawrence 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3 Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2 Miller 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 4 Newton 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4 Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 St Clair 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Taney 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6 Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 Wright 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3 * Region Total * 0 0.00% 27 29.67% 64 70.33% 91Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 3 18.75% 13 81.25% 16 * Region Total * 0 0.00% 3 18.75% 13 81.25% 16St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 15 51.72% 14 48.28% 29 St Louis County 0 0.00% 14 60.87% 9 39.13% 23 * Region Total * 0 0.00% 29 55.77% 23 44.23% 52State Total 3 1.03% 115 39.38% 174 59.59% 292
89
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 30. Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During July 2011
Grouped by Household County
Average Average # of Number of At-Risk Total Total Children At-Risk Children Families Children per Children per Accepted Accepted Family Accepted FamilyNorthwest Andrew 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Atchison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Buchanan 2 4 2.00 4 2.00 Caldwell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Carroll 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Cass 3 4 1.33 4 1.33 Chariton 2 6 3.00 6 3.00 Clay 3 5 1.67 5 1.67 Clinton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Cooper 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Daviess 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 De Kalb 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Gentry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Grundy 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Harrison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Holt 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Johnson 3 5 1.67 5 1.67 Lafayette 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Linn 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Livingston 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Mercer 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Nodaway 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Pettis 1 2 2.00 1 1.00 Platte 1 1 1.00 1 1.00 Putnam 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Ray 1 1 1.00 1 1.00 Saline 1 1 1.00 1 1.00 Sullivan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Worth 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 * Region Total * 17 29 1.71 28 1.65Northeast Adair 1 2 2.00 1 1.00 Audrain 1 1 1.00 1 1.00 Boone 1 2 2.00 1 1.00 Callaway 1 3 3.00 1 1.00 Clark 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Cole 2 4 2.00 4 2.00 Franklin 2 5 2.50 4 2.00 Gasconade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Howard 1 3 3.00 1 1.00 Jefferson 6 13 2.17 10 1.67 Knox 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Lewis 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Lincoln 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Macon 2 2 1.00 2 1.00 Marion 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Monroe 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Montgomery 1 3 3.00 1 1.00 Osage 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Pike 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Ralls 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Randolph 1 5 5.00 1 1.00 Schuyler 1 1 1.00 1 1.00 Scotland 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Shelby 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 St Charles 2 7 3.50 7 3.50 Warren 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 * Region Total * 22 51 2.32 35 1.59Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Butler 4 7 1.75 7 1.75 Cape Girardeau 3 10 3.33 9 3.00 Carter 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
90
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 30. Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During July 2011
Grouped by Household County
Average Average # of Number of At-Risk Total Total Children At-Risk Children Families Children per Children per Accepted Accepted Family Accepted FamilySoutheast Crawford 1 3 3.00 1 1.00 Dent 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Dunklin 1 4 4.00 1 1.00 Howell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Iron 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Madison 1 4 4.00 1 1.00 Maries 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Mississippi 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 New Madrid 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Oregon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Pemiscot 1 4 4.00 4 4.00 Perry 1 3 3.00 1 1.00 Phelps 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Pulaski 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Reynolds 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Ripley 1 1 1.00 1 1.00 Scott 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Shannon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 St Francois 1 2 2.00 2 2.00 Ste Genevieve 1 1 1.00 1 1.00 Stoddard 2 3 1.50 3 1.50 Texas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Washington 1 1 1.00 1 1.00 Wayne 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 * Region Total * 18 43 2.39 32 1.78Southwest Barry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Barton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Bates 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Benton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Camden 1 3 3.00 3 3.00 Cedar 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Christian 1 2 2.00 2 2.00 Dade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Dallas 1 3 3.00 2 2.00 Douglas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Greene 9 32 3.56 29 3.22 Henry 1 1 1.00 1 1.00 Hickory 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Jasper 3 7 2.33 7 2.33 Laclede 1 4 4.00 1 1.00 Lawrence 1 2 2.00 2 2.00 Mcdonald 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Miller 2 5 2.50 3 1.50 Moniteau 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Morgan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Newton 2 3 1.50 3 1.50 Ozark 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Polk 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 St Clair 1 6 6.00 6 6.00 Stone 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Taney 3 5 1.67 3 1.00 Vernon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Webster 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 Wright 1 3 3.00 1 1.00 * Region Total * 27 76 2.81 63 2.33Kansas City Jackson 3 9 3.00 4 1.33 * Region Total * 3 9 3.00 4 1.33St. Louis St Louis City 15 47 3.13 32 2.13 St Louis County 16 47 2.94 39 2.44 * Region Total * 31 94 3.03 71 2.29State Total 118 302 2.56 233 1.97
91
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 31. Exit Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During July 2011
Family Not Total Intact Intact Other Families Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent ExitingNorthwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cass 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Clay 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cooper 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Platte 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Ray 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Saline 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9Northeast Adair 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Audrain 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Boone 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Callaway 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 Clark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Cole 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Franklin 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Jefferson 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Macon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Montgomery 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Osage 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Scotland 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 St Charles 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Warren 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 * Region Total * 18 94.74% 1 5.26% 0 0.00% 19Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Butler 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 Cape Girardeau 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
92
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 31. Exit Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During July 2011
Family Not Total Intact Intact Other Families Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent ExitingSoutheast Crawford 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Madison 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Pemiscot 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 4 Perry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Ripley 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Scott 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 St Francois 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3 Ste Genevieve 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Stoddard 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Washington 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 12 63.16% 6 31.58% 1 5.26% 19Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Christian 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Greene 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7 Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Hickory 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Jasper 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4 Laclede 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Lawrence 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Miller 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Newton 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 Ozark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Taney 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 18 78.26% 5 21.74% 0 0.00% 23Kansas City Jackson 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 * Region Total * 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4St. Louis St Louis City 8 66.67% 3 25.00% 1 8.33% 12 St Louis County 11 78.57% 2 14.29% 1 7.14% 14 * Region Total * 19 73.08% 5 19.23% 2 7.69% 26State Total 79 79.00% 18 18.00% 3 3.00% 100
93
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 32. Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During January 2011
Family Family Not Total Intact Intact Other Families Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent ExitingNorthwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cass 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 Chariton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Sullivan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cole 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2 Franklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Jefferson 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 St Charles 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Butler 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
94
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 32. Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During January 2011
Family Family Not Total Intact Intact Other Families Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent ExitingSoutheast Crawford 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Dunklin 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Pemiscot 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Pulaski 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 St Francois 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Christian 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Greene 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Jasper 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Laclede 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Newton 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Taney 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 7 77.78% 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 9Kansas City Jackson 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 * Region Total * 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2St. Louis St Louis City 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 St Louis County 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 4 * Region Total * 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 5State Total 28 80.00% 3 8.57% 4 11.43% 35
95
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 33. Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During July 2010
Family Family Not Total Intact Intact Other Families Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent ExitingNorthwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cass 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Clay 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Linn 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Pettis 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Sullivan 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Boone 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 3 Franklin 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Jefferson 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3 Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 St Charles 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 5 55.56% 1 11.11% 3 33.33% 9Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Butler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Cape Girardeau 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
96
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Table 33. Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During July 2010
Family Family Not Total Intact Intact Other Families Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent ExitingSoutheast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 New Madrid 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 St Francois 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Christian 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Greene 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Jasper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Laclede 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Newton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Taney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 4Kansas City Jackson 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4 * Region Total * 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 St Louis County 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 4 57.14% 7 * Region Total * 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 4 57.14% 7State Total 21 61.76% 5 14.71% 8 23.53% 34
97
Children's Services Management ReportResearch and Evaluation
July 2011
Children’s Services Management Report
Research and EvaluationJuly 2011
98
Notes: Intensive In-Home Services Tables
Table 31., Table 32., and Table 33.
• Tables include only those families with an exit date during the month in question
and an exit status which is not missing. • Exit status includes the following status codes: Family Intact 10 Family Intact Family Not Intact 12 Child Ran Away 13 Child Moved out of Home (not placed) 14 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (not Court Ordered) 15 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (Court Ordered) 16 In Foster Home or Group Home 17 In Residential 18 With DYS (Division of Youth Services) 19 In Juvenile Justice 20 In In-Patient Psychiatric Other 11 Can't Locate Family 21 Information Not Available 99 Other