Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 1 of 33
Somerset County Council
Children’s Social Care
Child’s Journey Framework - Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Guidance
Owners Deputy Director – Children & Families,
Authors: Deputy Director – Children & Families, Strategic Managers, Operations Managers
Compiled by: Safeguarding, Care & Quality Assurance Unit
Version: 2.0 FINAL
Date: May 2017
CARE LEAVERS
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 2 of 33
Contents Page
1. Introduction 3
2. Principles 3
3. High Level - Casework Process 4
3.1 High Level Process Map 4
3.2 Service Description 5
3.3 Transfer Principles and Process 5
4. Initial Contacts and New Referrals 8 4.1 Contact and Referral Process Map 8 4.2 Somerset Direct, First Response and Emergency Duty Team 9
4.2.i Where there is a possible safeguarding requirement 11
4.2.ii The Emergency Duty Team (EDT) 12
4.3 Exceptions 12 4.3.i Referrals from Professionals 12
4.3.ii Step Up to CSC from getset level 3 team 13
4.3.iii Contacts in respect of open cases 14
4.4 Professional Disagreements Procedure 14
5. Assessments, Child in Need and Child Protection 15
5.1 Cases transferring from the assessment team 17
6. Child in Need (CiN), where not Child Protection (CP) 18
6.1 Step Down 19
6.2 Child Protection 19 6.2.i Where the threshold for CP is not met 20
6.2.ii Where the threshold for Child Protection (CP) is met 20
6.2.iii Legal cases 21
6.3 Children subject to a CP plan residing outside Somerset 22
6.4 Cases transferring to Somerset from another local authority 22 6.4.i Transfer in’ Child Protection Conferences 22 6.4.ii Where a case is before the family court in another local authority and the court makes a Supervision order to Somerset County Council 22
7. Child Looked After 23
7.1 Planning for a Child to become looked after 23 7.2 Permanence Planning 24 7.3 Where a child has been looked after but returns to family or friends (including parents) 25
7.4 Transfer of cases to Leaving Care Teams 26 7.5 Out of area placements 26
7.6 Missing Children Looked After 26
8. Children with Disabilities 27
8.1 Transition to adult services 28
9. Transfer of cases between area teams 29
10. QA Function 29
Appendix A -Authorisation, Chairing and decision making levels 30
Version Control
Version Status Date Name Comments – amendments made
1.0 Final 25/11/14 A.M. Twort Agreed at Operational Mangers Meeting.
2.0 Final 12/05/17 A.M. Twort Agreed at Operational Mangers Meeting.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 3 of 33
1. Introduction
This guidance aims to support all those who work in Somerset County Council (SCC),
Children’s Social Care (CSC) to understand the decision making, workflow and
management of cases between teams.
The purpose of this document is to clarify the case management, interface and transfer
arrangements from the point of first contact to closure of a case, ensuring seamless
transitions. It also helps professionals understand expectations of one another.
It should be read in conjunction with other CSC policy documents including the relevant
chapters on the Somerset Document Manual (Tri.x); references are provided in the body
of this document.
2. Principles
A child centred approach should be taken. A child’s views, wishes and feelings
should be established, respected and heard.
Understanding the child’s needs so as to ensure the best outcome for each
individual child is at the centre of the Somerset Children’s Social Care systems
and processes.
Interventions change in response to a child’s needs with practitioners moving in
and out of their lives; it is therefore essential to ensure that all professionals work
seamlessly and share information and act together in a timely manner to
safeguard children.
To build trusting working relationships with partner agencies to work
collaboratively so that consistent and appropriate support is provided to children
and their families. Where there is conflict between the needs of the Child and
their Parents/ Carers, decisions should be made in the Child’s best interests.
Eliminate discrimination and promote equality of opportunity for all children.
Monitoring, evaluation and improvement in service provision is based on
evidence and is a continuous process.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 4 of 33
3 High Level - Casework Process 3.1 High Level Process Map
Children’s Social Care, Child’s Journey Framework, High Level Process Map, version 0.10
S. Direct
(Filter)
Open
Access
Assessment
Team
Safeguarding Child in Need Plan (S.17)
Child Protection Plan(S.47)
including IRO
Children
Looked AfterIncluding IRO &
Resources
Possible Children’s Social
Care requirement? Child in Need (S17),
Safeguarding (S47),
Children with Disability Services,
Resources Teams, OT
Meets threshold
for Children’s
Social CareYes
No
C&F Assessment
establishes level of
risk and need for
service?
No
Children in
Need
Step Down
and CloseClose
Leaving Care
Children with
Disability
Team
P2i -
Homeless 16
&17 year olds
First
Response SW
Team
Yes
Yes
Death
Transition to
Adult Services
No
Has requirements
for Early Help
Services?
No
Early Help
Services Yes
Need for S.20,
Court Order,
Child to become
looked after?
Yes
Meets threshold
for Children with
Disability
No
Close
Yes
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 5 of 33
3.2 Service Description – related information and guidance
The roles and functions of teams are described in the Childrens Social Care (CSC)
Service Description, link:
http://www.proceduresonline.com/somerset/cs/pdfs/service_desc.pdf
For a summary chart of ‘Authorisation, Chairing and Decision Making Levels’ see
Appendix B.
For a ‘list of Agency Decision Makers, Designated Managers and Nominated
Officers’ see the Somerset Document Manual, (Tri.x), section 7.1.
http://www.proceduresonline.com/somerset/cs/chapters/pr_desg_man.html
3.3 Transfer Principles and Process
Cases are managed in line with the Child’s Journey Framework and in a timely way that
meets the statutory requirements
Records should be updated within the timescales in the table below:
Table of Case Notes recording to be completed within the following timescales:
Where there is any immediate safeguarding concerns Immediately
A Child Looked After or Child Protection (child protection
marker) with no immediate safeguarding needs
Statutory visits
Within one
working day1
A Child in Need with no immediate safeguarding needs Within three
working days2
A Child Protection Conference minutes and outcomes
A Child looked after review minutes and actions.
Note: Team Manager (TM) to agree the actions and return to
Independent Reviewing Officer (IRO) for finalised version to be
completed within 20 working days.
Within five
working days
All cases:
– Case summaries to be updated at least monthly.
– Chronologies to be reviewed and updated at least monthly.
1 Note: Where a worker is not at work on the next working day then case notes will need to be completed on the
same day. 2 Note: Where a worker is not at work during the next 3 working days then case notes will need to be completed on
the same day.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 6 of 33
Process for transferring case between teams:
Children and families should be clear about who their Social Worker or Lead
Professional/ key worker is at all times
Teams only transfer a case to another team when that threshold is met. There are a
number of points at which cases can transfer between teams:
o When an assessment has been completed by the Assessment Team and a Child
In Need or Child Protection plan is needed
o When a child becomes looked after
o When a child no longer meets the threshold for CSC involvement and the case
needs to step-down to getset and/ or other early help services
o When a child has been successfully rehabilitated home from care, but requires an
ongoing service from CSC in the community
o Where the local authority receives a request from another local authority to
transfer in a case where a child is already subject to a CP plan
o When the local authority receives a request from another local authority to take
on a supervision order
o When a child or adult requires a Leaving Care service
All case transfers (other than those within a team) must be discussed and agreed at
weekly area allocations meetings.
Any change elements of the transition, for example, communication of change of
Social Worker to the child/family and all relevant agencies, should be planned. The
transition plan will be recorded on the case file prior to transfer and will provide detail
of actions, owners and timelines.
Case transfer will follow a discussion between Team Managers and all
documentation will be completed on LCS including plans and a chronology of
significant events prior to case transfer, as stated below.
Allocated Worker:
o Ensures that all existing records are complete, accurate and up to date
including: updated case summary, demographics and uploading of documents
to LCS; thus ensuring that there is no duplication of assessment and planning.
o The LCS case transfer form must be started by the allocated worker and can
be viewed electronically at the weekly area allocations meeting, to evidence
the stage the casework is at, the rationale for transfer and who will action
which tasks prior to case transfer taking place .
Transferring Team Manager:
o Ensures that the record is fit for purpose. Cases not meeting necessary
criteria will not be transferred and will remain the responsibility of the allocated
social worker and team.
o Point of transfer documented in LCS case note.
Allocated Worker:
o Initiates case transfer in LCS – see case transfer Business Process Map.
o Informs family of change in allocated worker and introduces new worker.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 7 of 33
Receiving Team Manager:
o Briefs the receiving worker.
o Allocates the case in LCS.
Allocation meetings to handover cases are held weekly. Case allocation decisions
must be recorded on the weekly allocations spreadsheet and in case notes on the
child’s LCS record.
The handover will be managed and planned pro-actively by the Team Managers, the
point of case transfer should always include a joint meeting with the family between
the old and new social worker.
Case transfers must take place within 2 weeks of the transfer decision at the
allocations meeting, to minimise disruption and delay to children and families.
Work should be placed in the area unallocated tray for the part of the service that
receiving the case (i.e. Safeguarding or CLA tray) if allocation to a named worker
cannot be completed within the 2 weeks, as set out above.
It is essential that new referrals are assessed in a timely fashion therefore once
assessments have been completed cases should be transferred from the
Assessment Team. This is essential in order to prevent a backlog of new referrals
requiring assessment.
Work in unallocated trays (there are 2 trays in each area office – one for
Safeguarding and one for CLA) must be overseen by the receiving team manager,
with a case note added at least twice weekly to evidence oversight. If a case has not
been allocated within 2 weeks of the transfer decision, the allocation issue must be
escalated to the receiving team’s Operation’s Manager.
Cases which are referred back in to CSC within three months of being closed or
stepped down should be allocated to the previous social worker. If that worker has
left the team the case must be allocated to an assessment team worker in the usual
way.
In the event of any other issues arising or being identified that are not covered by this
guidance they should be discussed with the relevant Operation’s Manager.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 8 of 33
4. Initial Contacts and New Referrals
4.1 Childrens Social Care Contact and Referral Process Map
Somerset Direct
First Response SW Team Triage
Refer to Early Help Services
Possible Children’s Social Care
requirement?
Possible Safeguarding requirement?
RequirementFor Early Help
Yes
YesMeets Threshold
for Children’s Social Care?
No
Meets requirement for
Resources Team?
Yes
Yes
Meets requirement for Disability / OT
services
Yes Yes
No
Close
Pre- front door police notifications sifting
Requirementfor Universal
Services?
Refer to Universal Services
Yes
No
MASH Strategy apply threshold for S47
Yes
Immediate Risk?
Yes
No
Emergency Response
C&F AssessmentResources TeamChildren with
Disability / OT Service
YesYes
Close
To Assessment
Close
Childrens Social Care, Contact and Referral, Process Map, version 0.2Childrens Social Care, Contact and Referral, Process Map, version 0.2
To Resources
To Children with
Disabilities Team
CONTACT REFERRAL
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 9 of 33
4.2 Somerset Direct, First Response and Emergency Duty Team
Somerset Direct is the first point of contact, by phone or e-mail, for members of the
public and professional staff working in partner agencies who are concerned about the
safety or welfare of a child or young person.
Somerset Direct telephone number is: 0300 123 2224
Somerset Direct Call advisors are available:
0800 – 1800 Monday to Friday
Closed on Saturday and Sunday
In the event that the CSC service is required out of these hours a telephone answering
service is available which provides the contact details of the Emergency Duty Team.
The Somerset Direct call centre works closely with First Response Team which is the
front door social work team for Somerset Children’s Social Care services.
Once a call is received the Somerset Direct call advisor records a core data set of
information and filters the call using the contact guidance. In the event of possible
meeting of the threshold for Children’s Social Care Service (of possible safeguarding
concerns or other Children’s Social Care requirement) the information is passed to First
Response.
The Call Advisor logs the call and sends a contact to the relevant work tray in LCS,
these include:
Generic (SDC&YPT)
Police referral
Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH).
Local Authority Designated Officer (LADO)
The contact is reviewed by a Social Worker in First Response.
A contact becomes a referral where:
The social worker assesses if it meets threshold for CSC
The initial contact requires more work from an area Social Work Team to further
assess the situation either through a Children and Families (C&F) assessment,
on-going Section 47 enquiry or for any other reason
Within 24 hours of contacts being received they must be logged, written up and a
decision made by a Social Worker about the type of response required and
threshold.
If there are immediate safeguarding concerns the objective is to have this process
collated and sent to the appropriate area assessment team within a 3 hour period.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 10 of 33
Somerset Direct inputters will send ‘No Further Action’ letters to the initial referrer
within one working day of the contact being received and if any further action is identified
they will send a further action letter (for example a C&F assessment is being completed)
to the initial referrer within one working day (ref Working Together 2015).
The First Response team, is available 0830 to 1700 Monday to Friday, and is
collocated with the Police Safeguarding Coordination unit and the Community Services
health trust (known as Somerset Partnership) safeguarding team at the Police centre in
Bridgwater.
The First Response social work team determine the level of intervention required for a family, in conjunction with referrers, families and other professionals, as appropriate. This decision is referenced against the Working Together 2015 and the Effective Support for Children and Families in Somerset (threshold) document, link:
http://sscb.safeguardingsomerset.org.uk/threshold-documents/
If there is a requirement for Children Social Care Services intervention the referral is
directed to the appropriate team to undertake an assessment of need including:
i) Assessment Team - If there is a possible Safeguarding (Child Protection)
requirement the referral is made directly to the Assessment Team Duty Social
Worker. Go to page 10.
ii) Assessment Team - Where there are no identified safeguarding concerns but
there is a possible Child in Need (CiN) requirement that meets threshold for
CSC, the referral is sent to the Assessment Team tray in the relevant Area
Office. Go to section 5.
iii) Referrals from other Local Authorities are logged and managed in the same
way as other calls. The referral will be sent to the Assessment Team tray in
the relevant Area Office.
iv) Other Childrens Social Care Team - If a referral to another service within
Children’s Social Care is required these will be processed and recorded on
LCS these include:
a. Children with Disability Services, Fieldwork Services as per i and ii above.
b. Children with Disability Services, (Occupational Therapy, Short Break
Care, Somerset Supporters).
c. Young Carer Assessment
d. Youth Offending Team
e. Route 1 Advocacy
f. Pathways to Independence (P2I)
g. Resources Team including: Adoption and post adoption support, Foster
Care and Special guardianship support services
h. Request for information
i. Another Local Authority requesting welfare visit
j. Legal report required e.g. Section 7 or Section 37
k. Access to records
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 11 of 33
v) Early Help and Universal Services - If there is a requirement for early help
services or for universal services. The First Response Social Work Team will
signpost to the appropriate service and record the action on LCS. This
includes referrals to getset services.
vi) No further action - If the Social Worker assesses that threshold for Children’s
Social Care involvement has not been met and there are no other
requirements for Early Help or Universal Services the contact is then closed.
Where a referral from professional staff relate to concerns that do not require an
immediate response they will be asked to complete an Early Help Assessment Form.
The Child and Family must be informed of the action taken.
4.2.i Where there is a possible safeguarding requirement
Where the call advisor identifies a possible safeguarding concern, the call is transferred
to the First Response duty social worker who completes the information gathering
process including the information outlined above.
First Response duty social worker collects further details from caller, assesses the risk
and alerts relevant area Assessment Team Manager. They assess if the child is at risk
of significant harm and establish whether a strategy discussion is needed.
The Duty Social Worker completes the strategy discussion consultation case note
including:
Actions and risk assessment.
Outcome of decision
o Requires an Early Help Assessment
o Requires a Children and Family Assessment
o Strategy discussion
o No Further Action (NFA)
Such professional judgements and practise will be informed by Somerset’s ‘Effective
Support for Children and Families in Somerset, Threshold Document’ and Working
Together 2015. If no strategy discussion is needed the social worker will continue to
work on the contact
First Response may use the Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH)3 meeting to
help inform and investigate the level of risk and determine any immediate actions to
protect the child; where they believe there may be section 47 threshold but further
information is needed to clarify this.
3 The Somerset MASH is a joint working initiative between Somerset County Council, Education, Avon and Somerset
Police and Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 12 of 33
Where MASH establishes that the case meets the safeguarding threshold, either a
Section 47 enquiry or a C&F assessment is required, this will be transferred to the
appropriate area Assessment Team tray in LCS.
If Section 47 actions, including consideration of requirement for Legal Advice, are
required the same day the First Response Social Worker and / or Team Manager will
inform and update the Team Manager or Duty Social Worker in the Area Assessment
team by telephone and will send the referral to the Local area Assessment Team Tray
within LCS.
If there are immediate safeguarding concerns the objective is to have this process
collated and sent to the appropriate area assessment team within a 3 hour period
4.2.ii The Emergency Duty Team (EDT) is an out-of-hours service which responds to
emergency referrals to Children’s Social Care when Somerset Direct is not available.
Where it is identified that children are suffering or at risk of suffering significant harm.
EDT make decisions and coordinate services appropriate to the safety and welfare
needs of children and young people; this is regardless of whether or not the case is new
or is currently open and active to Childrens Social Care.
Where there are immediate concerns with regard to a Child’s safety at home and it is
assessed that they may need to be removed the Duty Social Worker will contact the on-
call Senior Manager to establish permission for an emergency placement. See section
6.1 Child Protection.
The case information is documented on LCS as a case note by the EDT worker.
The EDT also takes emergency referrals for Adult Social Care, Frail Elderly, Adult
Learning Disabilities, Mental Health Act assessments and the Somerset District
Councils’ homelessness function.
4.3 Exceptions
4.3.i Referrals from Professionals
If a professional has immediate safeguarding concerns the Somerset Direct call advisers
will obtain basic information and the call will be transferred to the duty officer in the First
Response Social Work Team for further information to be gathered and action to be
taken. The referring professional will still be required to complete an Early Help
Assessment (EHA) form following their telephone referral.
If the concerns are not immediate professionals will be asked to complete an Early Help
Assessment (EHA) form and must gain consent from the family that they are referring.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 13 of 33
The EHA form is a referral form to request involvement from the appropriate Early help
services, getset and Childrens Social Care based on the identified needs.
Professionals are required to state the level of need when completing a EHA form
referring to the ‘effective support for children and families in Somerset threshold
document’ and EHA guidance. Referrals at Level 3 'Complex' Service will be sent to the
early help support hub for triage for Childrens Social Care and getset. Level 4 ‘Acute’
Children's Social Care will be assessed by First Response.
Once an EHA form is received the Somerset Direct call advisor will update LCS with the
information obtained within the EHA form and create a contact. The contact will then be
submitted into the First Response Team for a decision to be made on whether the
threshold for Childrens Social Care intervention is met.
For further information see:
Effective Support for Children and Families in Somerset (Threshold) and consent
documents, link:
http://sscb.safeguardingsomerset.org.uk/threshold-documents/
The Early Health Assessment Form and Professional Guidance documents, link:
http://professionalchoices.org.uk/eha/
4.3.ii Step Up to Children’s Social Care (CSC) from getset level 3 team
Cases can ‘step up’ cases from getset level 3 teams. The referral of cases takes place in
the area weekly CSC and Early Help Officer transfer meetings where it is agreed that
the case meets the threshold for CSC (level 4). The EHA will be sent to the CSC area
business support mail box directly and not go to Somerset Direct.
The area contact and referral process followed is the same as that used by Somerset
Direct and First Response. Namely that the business support staff log the case contact
information on LCS and then allocate the case to the area Assessment Team Tray.
The Team Manager confirms the contact information as correct on LCS and allocates
the case to the Social Worker who completes the referral information on LSC including:
Reason for contact/referral/step up
Risks
Strengths (in relation to the risks)
History
Parental Consent (sought from whom and agreement to speak to who?)
Analysis and Recommended action
Level of Need
Management Overview (If applicable)
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 14 of 33
4.3.iii Contacts in respect of open cases
If a call adviser receives a call on an open case LCS will be checked to establish the
status. This call will be transferred to the appropriate area office. If additional
information is given to the call adviser, this will be recorded as a case note and LCS will
trigger a case note alert to the allocated social worker.
4.4 Professional Disagreements Procedure
If there is an internal professional disagreement in relation to the actions or outcome for
the contact or referral this will be resolved between Team Managers.
If there is an external professional disagreement in relation to the actions or outcome for
the contact or referral this will be resolved in discussion with the First Response Team
Manager. If this is not able to be resolved then the matter should be escalated to the
First Response Operational Manager. The SSCB escalation process will be followed,
link:
http://www.proceduresonline.com/swcpp/somerset/p_escalation.html?zoom_highlight=e
scalation
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 15 of 33
5. Assessments, Child in Need and Child Protection
The area Assessment Team will undertake a C&F assessment of new referrals to
Children’s Social Care. Please refer to ‘Local guidance - Assessments’ for further
information, link:
http://www.proceduresonline.com/somerset/cs/chapters/p_assessment.html
Allocation of cases:
Cases will be allocated by the Assessment Team Manager:
Where a case has been closed within the last 3 months any new referral will be
sent to the last named worker. If the worker is no longer employed in the same
team then the referral should be dealt with by the assessment team. There may
be exceptions to this principle when a Team Manager may use their discretion
and allocate the case to another SW, in the event of the previously allocated
worker already having a full caseload.
If the case has been closed for more than 3 months it should be treated as a new
referral and allocated in the normal way via the assessment team tray.
Upon receipt of the referral the Team Manager will decide on the response time for the
case.
For urgent referrals where an initial strategy is indicated. Where an urgent response
is indicated this must happen the same day. Where there is a need for emergency
placement the SW will obtain the authorisation of the Deputy Director, Children and
Families or Strategic Manager via the relevant Operation Manager. The case must then
be presented at the next available At Risk of Care Panel.
A management oversight case note will be recorded explaining the timescales including
any delays.
If a case is not allocated immediately it will be overseen daily by the Team Manager to
assess any new information received and review the level of risk. A case should be
allocated within 2 working days, where this is not possible there will be management
oversight recording on a daily basis, including when the child is going to be seen.
The area Assessment Teams will undertake a Child and Family (C&F) Assessment on
all new referrals for assessment. The exception to this is when the referral is
subsequently found to contain inaccurate information which suggests that there is not a
need for an assessment e.g. the address of the child is inaccurate and they do not live
ASSESSMENT
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 16 of 33
within the county. In this circumstance, the assessment can be cancelled. A clear
management oversight case note should be added to LCS indicating the reason for the
cancellation.
C&F assessments should be proportionate to the Child’s needs and complexity of the
case such that it is possible to reach a decision on next steps in no more than 45
working days. The Social Worker and the Team Manager will agree the timescale for
completion of the C& F assessment based on the initial analysis and the timeframe in
which the child must be seen. In the vast majority of cases, and as a default position, the
initial timescale will be set at 10 working days. This must be clearly documented in case
notes, including the rationale. The social worker and team manager can agree an
extension beyond the initial timescale, up to a maximum of 45 days, if the social worker
is able to evidence that more time is need to complete the assessment.
Requirements for more a more extensive assessment include:
When the case is complex and has needs which require multi agency planning
Where the case is the subject of specialist assessment for Children with
Disabilities. These will be undertaken by the Children with Disabilities Team.
Where there is an identified risk of Child Sexual Exploitation
Where there are identified vulnerabilities due to factors such as missing
Where the case is the subject of a Section 47 enquiry and an Initial Child
Protection Conference (ICPC)
Where the Child has become looked after
Where there are care proceedings and placement/ permanence planning
Where they are the subject of leaving care pathway planning
This list is indicative and each child’s assessment should reflect their level of need and
their current circumstances.
Please refer to ‘Local guidance - Assessments’ for further information, link:
http://www.proceduresonline.com/somerset/cs/chapters/p_assessment.html
The social worker must revisit threshold criteria upon completion of the assessment.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 17 of 33
5.1 Cases transferring from the assessment team
Upon completion of an assessment, there are a number of possible outcomes:
(i) No further action – when the case will close. It should be exceptional for a case
to close with no ongoing support from any agency.
(ii) Step-down – the case should transfer to a lead professional within early help
services.
(iii) When Children’s Social Care end involvement the case summary must be
updated to include the Safety Plan and the contingency should the issues re-
emerge.
(iv) Short term time limited intervention - case can remain with the assessment team,
for a period of no longer than 2 months after the assessment ends.
(v) CIN or CP plan required – the case will transfer to the safeguarding team at the
point of initial CIN meeting or Initial CP conference (ICPC), the reports for these
meetings having been completed by the assessment team worker. Both the
existing and new social worker should attend the meeting and the receiving Team
Manager.
(vi) Transfer of casework is agreed via the weekly transfer meetings held between the
Management Team. For further information see the Childrens Social Care
Practice Framework, link:
http://enterprise/Learning_Guide/CSCToolkit/Content/Documents/CSC%20practic
e%20framework.pdf
(vii) Child becomes looked after – transfer to the Children Looked After Team
– If the case is before the court then it should transfer at the initial court hearing
unless that hearing is an EPO, when the case transfers at the first subsequent
interim care hearing . Both existing and new SWs should attend the court
hearing at which the case is to transfer.
– If the child is looked after under S20, the case should transfer at the first CLA
review. Both existing and new SWs should attend the CLA review.
Exceptions to the rule for Children Looked After (CLA) cases
Where a child is looked after, but there is a plan and a realistic likelihood of the child
returning home and/or leaving care within a short timescale (less than 3 months) then
the case should remain with the safeguarding team.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 18 of 33
6. Child in Need (CiN), where not Child Protection (CP)
Following completion of the C&F assessment, where a case meets the threshold of
Child in Need (CiN), the area Assessment Team will produce a Child in Need plan.
These cases will then be transferred to the Safeguarding Team at the point of initial
Child in Need meeting, the reports for these meetings having been completed by the
assessment team worker. Both the existing and new social worker should attend the
meeting.
The Child should be seen at home a minimum of every 6 weeks this is in addition to
a visiting frequency agreed in Supervision throughout the assessment and
intervention period.
The CiN plan will be reviewed at 3 months and subsequently reviewed at 3 month
intervals.
Plans should be updated within 5 days of the review
The aim of the CiN plan is to reduce risks so that universal and targeted agencies can
populate an Early Help Assessment and to step down. Step down should be considered
at every CiN review.
For further information on the step down process, link:
http://sscb.safeguardingsomerset.org.uk/threshold-documents/
The exceptions to this:
Pre-birth plans and Supervision Orders.
Where the CiN plan requires a simple intervention and can be completed within a
short timeframe, for a period of no more than 2 months, followed by step-down and
case closure. In this instance the case may stay with the area Assessment Team.
There will be a small number of children who require more sustained support from
CSC under a CiN plan. Whilst the aim is to step down CiN cases within 6 months
there may be cases that, following agreement between the Social Worker and their
Team Manager, may remain with CSC for longer.
All CiN cases will be subject to area tracking with Operational Manager oversight and
agreement for cases exceeding six months to ascertain whether the case should be
stepped up, stepped down or remain as a CiN case supported by CSC.
CHILDREN IN NEED CHILD PROTECTION
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 19 of 33
6.1 Step Down
When a Social Worker has agreed with their line manger that there is no longer a role for
CSC involvement and a ‘step down’ to getset is appropriate the process is now:
1. The case will be discussed in the weekly CSC and Early Help Officer transfer
meeting, and confirmed that it will step-down.
2. The SW will complete section 1,2,3,8 & 9 of the Early Help Assessment (EHA)
and attach the C&F assessment and CiN notes stating the date of the next CIN
meeting. This will constitute the first Team Around the Child (TAC) meeting.
3. The EHA will then be emailed to Early Help Advice Hub (EHAH). The Early Help
Advice Hub will log the ‘step down EHA’ and forward to the appropriate area
mailbox to be allocated.
4. The getset worker will then attend the TAC, where the lead professional will be
agreed and complete the TAC documentation (pages 10,11, 7, 12 of the EHA)
The case discussion notes from the transition meeting will be added by the Social
Worker to LCS case notes and referenced in the Case Summary.
For further information on the step down process, link:
http://sscb.safeguardingsomerset.org.uk/threshold-documents/
6.2 Child Protection
‘Where there is a risk to the life of a child or a likelihood of serious immediate harm, CSC
Social Workers, the Police or NSPCC should use their statutory Child Protection powers
to act immediately to secure the safety of the Child.’ Working Together 2015.
Planned emergency action will normally take place following an immediate strategy
discussion. Where a single agency has to act immediately a strategy discussion should
take place as soon as possible after the emergency action has been taken.
In all cases where a Child Protection investigation is undertaken
The strategy discussion and Section 47 enquiry will be undertaken in parallel with the
C&F Assessment unless a strategy discussion is required as a result of a referral, where
there is a possible Safeguarding requirement identified by First Response, see page 11.
The section 47 enquiry outcomes will be reviewed in the timescale agreed and
consideration for a further review strategy may be required. This meeting will be chaired
by the team Manager and must involve all relevant agencies.
Consideration should be given to a case discussion / consultation with the area CP C-
coordinator at this stage, for advice in relation to proposed progression to ICPC and to
identify any outstanding areas for assessment or information gathering that would be
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 20 of 33
required for an efficient ICPC. The relevant team manager calls strategy discussion with
Police and other relevant professionals to discuss need for ICPC
Once the decision has been made regarding the outcome of the enquiry if indicated an
ICPC will be triggered. The ICPC will need to be held within 15 working days of the
strategy discussion that agrees the ICPC.
If going to an ICPC the C&F assessment must be completed within 10 days to allow it to
be shared with the family 5 days prior to the Conference.
The allocated worker and their Team Manager are expected to attend the ICPC and
future conferences. Where the ICPC is held when the case is allocated to an
Assessment Team worker the area Assessment Team Manager will liaise with the
Safeguarding Team Manager to ensure that there is an identified recipient SW identified
within the Safeguarding Team who will attend the conference in addition to the
Safeguarding Team Manager.
The current and receiving Social Worker’s attend the ICPC and the first Core Group
meeting which follows either immediately after the ICPC or within 10 working days of the
ICPC.
The Allocated worker informs ISRO of case transfer and receiving worker.
The case will transfer from the assessment team to the safeguarding team at the point of
Initial CP conference (ICPC), the reports for these meetings having been completed by
the assessment team worker.
After the ICPC:
CP Chairs will record outcomes within 5 working days of conference
Prior to the transfer to the new worker the allocated Social Worker will write to
the Child, Parent/ Carer informing them of the transfer to the new team,
including: name of key worker/ contact person, address and telephone number.
They will then complete the record of their involvement on the case record and
enter the transfer details on LCS within 10 days of conference.
6.2.i Where the threshold for CP is not met, where there are significant concerns but
no evidence for proceedings, a rigorous child in need plan is produced, which may
include support from getset services. The case will then be reviewed by the area CiN
tracking system.
6.2.ii Where the threshold for Child Protection (CP) is met a Child Protection plan
including detailed actions will be produced at the Conference.
Children meeting the criteria for a CP Plan will have the visiting frequency set at the
ICPC, based on proposals made within the SW report for conference.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 21 of 33
The Child Protection plan will be reviewed at Core Group meetings between CP
conferences, which should take place a minimum of once every calendar month. The
Core Group should review visiting frequency as part of the updated Plan. The Social
Worker should record the minutes of the core group onto LCS within 5 working days.
The first Review CP conference (RCPC) will be held within 3 months and thereafter 6
month intervals unless a shorter time frame is agreed at the CP Conference. Team
Managers will review CP cases monthly in supervision. In the event that the CP plan is
ineffective or there has been a trigger incident the case will be reviewed via the monthly
CP area tracking system with oversight of the Operational Manager and a case note
alert sent to the CP Chair. An early core group may also be called.
Where cases are discussed at area tracking legal advice can be sort, where appropriate,
with a view to recommending PLO or initiation of proceedings via the legal Gateway
panel chaired by the Deputy Director, Children and Families.
All PLO cases and any legal cases where children are not looked after (e.g. child
arrangement order during proceedings or interim supervision order) will be allocated to a
single worker in safeguarding teams.
6.2.iii Legal cases:
Decision to take Legal action (including PLO) will be documented through the
Legal Gateway Panel and area tracking panel.
Cases that meet the Legal threshold will be managed through the PLO process,
unless it is unsafe to do so.
Where it is unsafe to do so, immediate intervention of the Court will be sought.
The first PLO meeting should be completed within 10 working days of the
decision.
It is expected that the reviewing of PLO will reflect the timescales set out in the
actions required.
It is expected that the PLO process will be completed within twelve weeks; any
extension to be agreed by Operations Manager and the Legal Gateway panel.
It is the expectation that the Safeguarding teams will have fully assessed and explored
all options and identified a permanence plan, during the plo process, prior to the
commencement of legal proceedings, except in an emergency.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 22 of 33
6.3 Somerset children subject to a CP plan temporarily residing
outside of Somerset
Temporarily, e.g. on holiday or where there are interim arrangements. The SW must
notify the ISRO, core group members and the relevant local authority in which the child
is staying. The relevant local authority should be notified of the child’s temporary
address in their area as soon as this is known; including the plan involved at the time of
placement, with a reminder sent every six months and a further notification when child
moves back to Somerset or to another local authority
The relevant Local Authority should also be provided with an up to date CP and any
additional actions that that Local Authority are being requested to take on behalf of
Somerset.
Permanent change of address: SW must notify the ISRO, core group members the
local authority and request a transfer case conference in the area where the child is
permanently resident via the Central CP unit.
6.4 Cases transferring to Somerset from another local authority
6.4.i Transfer in’ Child Protection Conferences - where another local authority
requests a transfer of a child who is subject to a child protection plan in their area to the
Somerset CSC Service. The referring Authority contacts Somerset Direct who will inform
the QA & Safeguarding Central Team.
The relevant documentation should be available from the referring local authority:
A copy of the current CP plan
Copies of all previous Child Protection Case Conference minutes
A copy of the last Core Group meeting minutes
A current risk assessment reflecting the impact of the family’s move
The referral is sent to the area Assessment Team tray where the TM checks that the
case meets the transfer criteria. The case should be discussed at the local area
allocations meeting and then transferred to the Somerset Local Area Safeguarding
Team.
In some instances where the transfer-in criteria are not met it may be agreed to
undertake some statutory duties on behalf of a referring Authority by agreement of the
Area Operations Manager.
6.4.ii Where a case is before the family court in another local authority and the
court makes a Supervision order to Somerset County Council, the case should be
discussed at the local area allocations meeting and allocated within the safeguarding
teams, unless agreed otherwise between Team Managers.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 23 of 33
7.0 Child Looked After
When a Child becomes looked after the transfers to the Children Looked After Team
If the case is before the court then it should transfer at the initial court hearing
unless that hearing is an EPO, when the case transfers at the first subsequent
interim care hearing . Both existing and new SWs should attend the court hearing
at which the case is to transfer.
If the child is looked after under S20, the case should transfer at the first CLA
review. Both existing and new SWs should attend the CLA review.
Exceptions to the rule for Children Looked After (CLA) cases
Where a child is looked after, but there is a plan and a realistic likelihood of the child
returning home and/or leaving care within a short timescale (less than 3 months) then
the case should remain with the safeguarding team.
Disabled Children who live at home may require respite or short break care if this is
provided under section 17 they are not regarded as CLA. However if they are under
Section 20 with short breaks of not more than 17 days each in the same setting (where
the total number of placement days does not exceed 75 in any 12-month period) and/or
families have limited resources to support a child whilst the child is away and may not be
able to fully exercise their Parental Responsibility. In these circumstances, the child is
looked after, see document 4.1.3 Short Breaks, link:
http://www.proceduresonline.com/somerset/cs/chapters/p_short_breaks.html
7.1 Planning for a Child to become looked after
The allocated Social Worker and Team Manager discuss the need for a child to become
looked after in supervision. This discussion must include consideration of Care Diversion
including Family Group Conferencing or an equivalent Family Meeting.
The Team Manager then requests a legal threshold discussion meeting chaired by the
Operational Manager. If the legal threshold meeting upholds the recommendation the
case goes to the legal gateway panel for consideration.
From the point that a child becomes looked after there is a requirement for a CLA
review within 20 days, which is prompted by an alert on LCS. At the point where a Child
comes into care the Child’s Social Worker informs the Central Team and an IRO is
allocated. A date is established for the 20 day review. Prior to the 20 day review the
Child’s SW will contact the named IRO for the pre review discussion. If not already
complete a C&F Assessment will be completed, along with a Care and Placement Plan
and the Social Worker’s report.
CHILDREN LOOKED AFTER
CARE LEAVERS
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 24 of 33
The CLA review, in consultation with the Child and their Family, will consider how to
support the child to return home and if it is safe to do so. The proposed arrangements
for the Child are appropriately assessed and the support required identified.
Subsequent 6 monthly review meetings will be held.
7.2 Permanence Planning
A proactive approach should be taken to Permanence Planning. Good quality
assessment of risks and needs of the Child are essential in order for there to be clarity
regarding the reasons for decisions; to inform options appraisal and to identify
appropriate objectives and outcomes.
Permanence Pathway, for more information, see link:
http://www.proceduresonline.com/somerset/cs/chapters/docs_library.html
Resources Teams function; for further information see ‘Service Description’, link:
http://www.proceduresonline.com/somerset/cs/chapters/docs_library.html#policy
When it has been identified that a Child may be or is to be looked after, (even if being
considered as part of the contingency planning), the Childs SW must produce a
permanence plan.
No child should be accommodated without an appropriate planning meeting (Care
Diversion, Family Group Conference, Strategy Meeting or PLO) and the
permission of the Deputy Director, Children & Families
A delegated authority form must be completed prior to a child being
accommodated, ideally in the pre placement meeting. In an emergency it may be
completed at the placement planning meeting, i.e. within 5 days of being
accommodated.
The SW should:
o Ensure signed copies of all required paperwork are given to the carer at
point of placement, if the placement planning meeting has not yet taken
place.
o Share reports with families prior to CLA reviews
o Support children to lead their reviews
The proposed Permanence Plan to be discussed in supervision and recorded
within 4 weeks of the child being accommodated.
Permanence Planning Meeting should be held prior to 2nd CLA Review.
The proposed Permanence options to be presented to 2nd CLA review which will
automatically be reported to the Permanence Panel within 4 months of becoming
CLA.
The allocated worker will supervise contact regularly, (where it is supervised) and
at least once a month, or in line with the agreed care plan.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 25 of 33
C&F Assessment to be completed annually or whenever there are significant
changes in the child’s life, including detailed assessment of scope for reunification
every 12 months. The C& F assessment informs the CLA review meeting. The
interim CLA review meetings are informed by pre-meeting reports.
IRO outcomes to be recorded within 5 days of review.
Care Plan to be updated within 10 days of review.
A review meeting can be held at any time if a need to do so is identified, this is
essential when there is a significant event or change of care plan (as identified in
the IRO Handbook), i.e. change of placement.
7.3 Where a child has been looked after but returns to family or friends
(including parents)
There may be circumstances where a Child is no longer looked after but requires on-
going support and services to the family following reunification. This includes on a
Special Guardianship Order (SGO).
In this instance, whether a Child’s return to their family is planned or unplanned, there
should be a clear plan that reflects current and previous assessments, focuses on
outcomes and includes details of services and support required. These plans should
follow the process for review as with any Child in Need and / or Child Protection Plan.
Following reunification:
Practitioners should make the timeline and decision making process for providing
on-going services and support clear to Child and Family.
Children should wherever possible be seen alone. Practitioners have a duty to
ascertain their wishes and feelings regarding the provision of services being
delivered.
The impact of services and support should be monitored and recorded, and help
being delivered should be reviewed.
Cases transferring from the Children Looked After team
The case should transfer to the Safeguarding Team, if the family continue to require
services, once the success of the return home has been established (usually 3 to 6
months). The request to transfer the case must go via the area allocations meeting.
Where a child is placed at home on a care order then the case will remain with the CLA
team until the order is revoked, when the process above is invoked. Revoking of care
orders must be discussed at CLA tracking where legal advice will be sought.
The step down process should be considered, link:
http://sscb.safeguardingsomerset.org.uk/effectivesupport-documents/
Relevant Care Leavers stay open as CiN up until the age of 18 years in safeguarding
teams.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 26 of 33
End Section 20 Child Looked After for 16/17yr olds:
Where it is proposed to end the CLA status of a young person who is 16 or 17 and
placed S20, the approval of the Director of Children’s Services must be sought in
advance of the placement ending using the appropriate LCS form. The case must be
discussed at CLA tracking prior to the DCS approval being sought.
7.4 Transfer of cases to the leaving care teams
Where a child has been looked after and is entitled to support as a care leaver from the
Leaving Care (LC) service, the transfer of the case should be discussed and agreed by
the social work Team Manager and the LC Team leader and agreed at CLA tracking.
Eligibility is from the point at which a care leaver becomes Relevant, Former Relevant or
Qualifying.
Where cases transfer to the Leaving Care team the Social Worker ensures that Pathway
Plan, Chronology, Risk Assessment, Case summary and Case notes are up to date and
a transfer summary completed on LCS and also ends the CLA status on LCS. It is then
reviewed, signed off and transfer authorised by the Team Manager following a CLA
tracking meeting. The LC case transfer audit form should be completed on LCS by the
receiving Leaving Care Team Leader.
Where the young person requires specialist adult services on transfer from either CLA or
Children with Disabilities (CwD) teams to Leaving Care, in addition to above, a meeting
should be held between the CLA CwD team, the LC team and the Adult Service provider
and the notes of the meeting recorded in LCS.
7.5 Out of area CLA placements - placements outside Somerset:
o Where placement proposed is outside Somerset and not in a neighbouring authority,
approval for the placement must be sought from the Director of Children’s Services
(by the Placements Team).
o Local authority in which child is placed should be notified of placement at time of
placement, with a reminder sent every six months and a further notification when
child moves back to Somerset or to another local authority. It is the social worker’s
responsibility to ensure that this happens.
7.6 Missing Children
Strategy Meeting to be held within 48hrs of a child/young person going missing and a
review strategy meeting convened every 72hrs until return:
• To review progress of attempts locate child/young person
• Consider escalation of decision for media involvement, including parental consent
For more information see the SSCB website for the local guidance and Missing Children Protocol, link:
http://www.proceduresonline.com/swcpp/somerset/p_ch_miss_care_home_ed.html?zoom_highlight=Missing+children
Tracking panels include missing young person and oversight of CSE concerns.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 27 of 33
8.0 Children with Disability
Children with Disability services encompass:
i. The Fieldwork Team for Children with Disability
ii. Occupational Therapy Service,
iii. Children with Disability Resource Team
a. Children’s Autism Outreach Team.
b. Short Break Team
c. Somerset Supporters
iv. Disabilities Early Support
v. Children with Disability Residential Care Units
For Service Description link:
http://www.proceduresonline.com/somerset/cs/chapters/docs_library.html#policy
The service therefore services at all levels of the continuum of need, see thresholds
document, 1.2.2. ‘Effective Support for Children in Somerset’, link:
http://sscb.safeguardingsomerset.org.uk/threshold-documents/
Referrals to the Children with Disability Teams are received from Somerset Direct via
the First Response team.
On receipt of a contact which meets the threshold for Children’s Social Care and the
child is disabled First Response refers to the relevant area CwD work tray.
Referrals to the Children with Disabilities Resource Team and the Children with
Disability Early Support Team are received from Somerset Direct.
On receipt of a contact that meets the threshold for services from the CWD Early
Support Team or the CWD Resource Team [level 2 or 3 of the Effective Support for
Children]; Somerset Direct will refer to the relevant Early Support or Resource Team
work tray.
Occupational Therapy services work across the continuum of need. They may receive
referrals directly from other agencies as well from First Response. They may hold their
own cases or joint work them with Social Workers.
Social Work Team for Children with Disability
The process for the Children with Disability social work teams is the same as for the
general fieldwork teams, described above.
Where Safeguarding concerns are identified for a Child with Disability where the case is
open they will be managed by Children with Disability Team. However if the Child /
Young Person has siblings a joint assessment will be undertaken to consider whether all
the Children should be managed by a Mainstream Fieldwork team for the duration of the
Safeguarding work or whether the Children with Disability team should hold them.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 28 of 33
Supervised contact will be undertaken by contact worker in the area contact team unless
they are not available, when area-based alternative arrangements will be agreed.
Cases transferring between Children with Disability Teams:
If a case needs to step down from the CWD fieldwork team to the CWD Early Support
Team or step up from the CWD Early Support Team to the CWD Fieldwork Team this is
managed through discussion between the relevant Team Managers and the appropriate
LCS processes completed
Cases transferring in to and out of Children with Disability (CWD) teams
CWD teams hold cases of all types - assessment, CIN,CP and CLA. On rare occasions,
there is a need for cases to transfer in to CWD teams from another specialist social work
team, or out of CWD teams, where a child no longer meets the eligibility criteria for the
CWD team.
Where the CWD team assess that a case needs to transfer out of their service to
another frontline social work team, then the CwD Team Manager should first have a
discussion with the assessment team mangers for the correct geographical area to
clarify if it meets their eligibility criteria. It this is the case then the case should then be
added to the area allocations spreadsheet. The CWD Team Manager should then attend
the area allocations meeting at which the case transfer will be discussed.
If an area SW team assess that a case needs to transfer to the CWD team, then the
area TM should first have a discussion with the CWD TM to clarify if the case meets the
CWD team eligibility criteria. If this is the case then the case should be added to the
area allocations spreadsheet, and the CWD TM should be invited to the
area allocations meeting to discuss the case transfer.
8.1 Transition to adult services
Transition to Adult Services is initiated by a social work referral to the new team at 14
years; the case is then managed by the CwD Team until transfer is agreed. The
transition date is agreed on a case by case basis dependant on the Young Person’s
needs. The CwD team will liaise with the Adult Services and leaving care services as
required. A Transition Panel meets termly; this decides which service will provide the
on-going support for the Young Person into adulthood. These services include: Learning
Disabilities, Adult Mental Health, Adult Social Care, and Somerset Partnership. Once the
referral is accepted the transition planning process begins.
It may be necessary for more complex cases to be referred to the Children with Complex
Care Needs Panel, for further information see the protocol, see link: to follow.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 29 of 33
9.0 Transfer of cases between area teams
Where cases transfer between Area Teams the Social Worker ensures that:
The paperwork is prepared and completed including a transfer summary on LCS.
It is then reviewed, signed off and the transfer is authorised by Team Managers.
The recipient Team Manager will undertake an audit prior to the case being accepted
and plan for handover is then discussed and agreed between Team Managers.
Where issues arise cases are escalated for resolution to the Operation Managers.
10.0 QA Function
The independent reviewing officer (IRO) function is outlined in the IRO Handbook, 2010,
and the Care Planning Regulations.
In the event of a dispute about a child’s permanence plan the IRO’s views must be sort
and clearly communicated to the Permanence Panel, where this should be discussed
and the outcome including reasons clearly recorded.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 30 of 33
Appendix A . Authorisation, Chairing and Decision Making Levels Process/ Decision
Director of Children’s Services (DCS)
Deputy Director – Children and Families (DD)
Strategic Manager (SM)
Operations Manager (OM)
Team Manager (TM) Consultant Social Worker (CSW)
Experienced Social Worker (ESW)
Practice Development Officer (PDO)
Casework – Care Planning
Development of service as a whole
Oversight and decision making on individual cases
Day-to-day management & direction of care planning on individual cases
Day-to-day management & direction of detailed care planning on individual cases
Detailed care plans for cases
Casework – case holding
Hold no cases but provide management oversight
Complex cases, including co-working with less experienced staff.
Provide casework consultation
Complex cases, including co-working with less experienced staff
Limited number of cases to maintain practice / HCPC registration
Casework - practice consistency
Oversight and review of county consistency
Oversight and review of service consistency
Oversight and review of team consistency
Casework – Authorisation Chairing and Decision Making
LCS Rollbacks – no manager can request the rollback of a recording that they have made.
Accommodation – out of hours consent to come into care.
Contractual Amendment Form
Residence Orders/ allowances
LCS Rollbacks – no manager can request the rollback of a recording that they have made.
Out of hours decisions to be made by EDT staff, who may consult OMs.
Strategy discussions Risk management / planning meetings
Child’s permanence record. (CPR)
Procurement Card Payment.
PLO Meeting.
Placement Planning Meeting.
Permanency Planning Meeting.
Passport (if acceptable as corporate parent).
LCS Rollbacks - no
manager can request
the rollback of a
recording that they
have made.
Strategy discussions
Care Diversion, Risk management / planning meetings
Child’s permanence record. (CPR)
Procurement Card Payment.
PLO Meeting.
Placement Planning Meeting.
Permanency Planning Meeting.
Passport (if acceptable as corporate parent).
CIN meetings
SoS Family Meetings
Core Groups
Risk Management Meeting.
Care Diversion Meeting
Strategy Meetings.
Care Diversion
CLA out of county placements
Decision to seek external placement to
Connected persons, agreement to place pending assessment – SM Resources.
Decision to seek external placement to be signed off by OM or above.
Exemptions (foster carers) – OMs
C&F Assessment threshold.
Own team or cover in the absence of other TM, C&F Authorisation, outcome CIN/ CP/
C&F Assessment threshold.
In the absence of TM, C&F Authorisation, outcome CIN/ CP/ ICPC.
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 31 of 33
Process/ Decision
Director of Children’s Services (DCS)
Deputy Director – Children and Families (DD)
Strategic Manager (SM)
Operations Manager (OM)
Team Manager (TM) Consultant Social Worker (CSW)
Experienced Social Worker (ESW)
Practice Development Officer (PDO)
be signed off by OM or above.
Connected persons, agreement to assess – SM Resources.
Fostering
Foster Carer reviews – OMs Fostering
ICPC.
Viability Assessment -Fieldwork TM.
Independent placements – information to go straight to SW and TM from Placements Team
Secure accommodation (72 hrs without an order) sign off by DCS.
Secure Accommodation (Court Order) sign off by DCS.
Approval for 16/17 end CLA
Consent to invasive medical treatment for CLA if are on a care order.
Approval to adopt, as ADM
All care plans for court ratified.
Legal – to instigate proceedings.
Decision to go to Placement Panel, seeking accommodation, TM to OM (in an emergency any TM).
Recommend approval to adopt, TM to OM.
Approval to end CLA for 16/ 17 year olds (S20 or CO) TMs to OMs – seek DCS.
Recommend secure accommodation (72 hrs without an order) TM to OM to SM, sign off by DCS.
Recommend Secure Accommodation (Court Order) TM to OM to SM – sign off by DCS.
Decision to go to Placement Panel, seeking accommodation, TM to OM (in an emergency any TM).
Approval to adopt, TM to OM – seek ADM.
Approval to end CLA for 16/ 17 year olds (S20 or CO) TMs to OMs – seek DCS.
Secure accomm (72 hrs without an order) TM to OM to SM,
Sign off by DCS.
Secure Accommodation (Court Order) TM to OM to SM – sign off by Deputy Director.
Relevant Care Leavers, leaving care network placement – Leaving Care Manager in conjunction with TM.
Staffing - Staff development and Mentoring
Staff development in conjunction with PSWs and ESWs
Liaison with TMs Mentoring to all staff
Co-working cases
Supporting less experienced staff at Court
Identified through practice issues (ASYE/ESW)
Supporting development of less experienced staff, including through co-working + supporting less experienced staff at Court
Managing student placements
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 32 of 33
Process/ Decision
Director of Children’s Services (DCS)
Deputy Director – Children and Families (DD)
Strategic Manager (SM)
Operations Manager (OM)
Team Manager (TM) Consultant Social Worker (CSW)
Experienced Social Worker (ESW)
Practice Development Officer (PDO)
Staffing - cover
For DCS when absent
For other SMs and on occasions for DD
For other OMs For other TMs in area / service
Duty senior tasks in absence of TM
Staffing – Recruitment & Retention (R&R)
R&R strategy
Recruitment of DD level posts
R&R strategy
Recruitment of SM level posts
R&R strategy
Recruitment of OM level posts
R&R strategy
Recruitment and retention of TM & CSW level posts
R&R of ESWs / SWs / SSWAs
R&R of ESWs / SWs / SSWAs
Staffing - Supervision & accountability
Supervision of DD
Supervision of SMs
Agree new posts in structure
Supervision of OMs
Decision to appoint staff following interview
Supervision of TMs/CSWs
Decision to appoint staff following interview
Oversight of staff management & deployment in area / service
Oversight of Staff Performance and respond to issues and concerns.
Supervision of ESWs/SWs
Decision to appoint SW/ESW following interview
Oversight of staff management & deployment in area / service
Monitor caseloads
Oversight of staff performance and respond to issues and concerns
Mentoring of unqualified and less experienced staff
Provide informal supervision and reflection as part of their role, which includes elements of learning as part of critical reflection upon practice.
Supervise unqualified and less experienced staff
Manage Student placements
Recruit, train, manage and support Practice Assessments
Student supervision - expectation that formal
learning supervision is made available to all staff prioritising those on formal learning programmes i.e. OU students. Delivered as part of on-going schedule of monthly supervision groups and one to ones when required.
Customer Feedback (Complaints)
Level 2 Level 2 Level 1
Finance and Budgets
Budget holder Budget holder Budget oversight for county and decisions within agreed parameters
Budget oversight for area and decisions within agreed parameters
Day-to-day budget decisions within agreed parameters
Day-to-day budget decisions within agreed parameters
Inter-agency relations and partnership working
Developing Partnerships at strategic levels.
Developing Partnerships at strategic levels.
Developing networks at strategic levels, including steering groups
Developing networks at strategic levels, including steering groups
Maintaining links / regular liaison with managers in other agencies
Liaison with other services to promote good practice
Performance Investigations
As need identified
As need identified As need identified As need identified
CSC Child’s Journey Framework – Decision Making, Workflow and Case Management Policy Review Date: May 2017, Version No: 2.0 FINAL
Page 33 of 33
Process/ Decision
Director of Children’s Services (DCS)
Deputy Director – Children and Families (DD)
Strategic Manager (SM)
Operations Manager (OM)
Team Manager (TM) Consultant Social Worker (CSW)
Experienced Social Worker (ESW)
Practice Development Officer (PDO)
Performance Data & QA Monitoring (QA Framework provides more detail)
Identification of concerns /theme across county
Monitoring, auditing and responding strategically as trends identified
Identification of concerns /theme across county
Monitoring, auditing and responding strategically as trends identified
Identification of concerns /theme across county
Monitoring, auditing and responding strategically as trends identified
Identification of concerns /themes within area / service
Oversight and management of cases and staff within area / service
Supporting resolution of issues
Identification of concerns / theme within team / area / service
Day-to-day management of individual cases and staff
Identifying issues and possible resolution
Oversight of quality Identification of issues/theme within team / area / service.
Key role in gaining participation of service users i.e. review of services
Key function to undertake case audits
Supporting development of good practice and resolution of identified issues
Learning transfer is evidenced
Performance & QA
Highlight /escalate concerns related to practice.
Where appropriate to undertake case audits
Will impact upon quality of performance and learning transfer evidenced as a result of planned learning.
Highlight /escalate concerns related to practice.
Training Key role in delivery of training in legislation and policy in area of expertise.
Design of best practice training materials.
Identify / assess need / contribute to planning / design and deliver as subject experts
Design of best practice training materials: assess need / plan / design /co-ordination /possibly deliver dependent upon subject expertise / lead on QA of teaching and learning outcomes