19
Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts, University of Pennsylvania D. Roberts, Penn

Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities

Leverhulme International Workshop

Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013

Dorothy Roberts,

University of Pennsylvania

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 2: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

Racial Disproportionality

“The disparities in outcomes

are so great that racial/ethnic

inequities can best be

described as a ‘chronic crisis.’”

Casey-CSSP Alliance for Racial Equity, 2006

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 3: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

African American Children

14% of nation’s children v.

27% of foster care

population

AFCARS Report # 19 (FY 2011)(July 2012)

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 4: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

It takes more risk of maltreatment

for a white child to be placed in

foster care compared to the risk

for a black child.

Rivaux et al., 87 Child Welfare 151 (2008); Dettlaff

et al., 33 Child & Youth Services Rev. (2011).

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 5: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

Is Disproportionality Bad for Black Children?

• Black children benefit from receiving needed child

welfare services. (Barth et al. 2000; Bartholet 2009,

2011)

– “When many factors are considered, African

American children are not overserved or

overinvolved in the child welfare system.” (Barth et

al. 2001)

– BUT have we accounted for the harms of

disproportionality?

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 6: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

The System’s Racial Geography

Child welfare agency involvement, especially

placement in foster care, concentrated in poor

African American neighborhoods.

Poor and low-income black families concentrated

in neighborhoods where agency involvement

highest.

Higher risk of growing up in neighborhood

where state supervision prevalent.

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 7: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

D. Roberts, Penn

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

Near West Side East Garfield Park Washington Park Woodlawn Grand Boulevard Chicago

Near West Side 49.8

East Garfield Park 44.9

Washington Park 57.4

Woodlawn 36.7

Grand Boulevard 62.0

Chicago 15.6

Number of Children in Substitute Care Per 1000

Page 8: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

Key Question

What is sociopolitical

impact of state supervision

of families concentrated in

black neighborhoods?

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 9: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

New Research Paradigm• Impact of racial disproportionality

beyond families involved in system.

• Identify the child welfare system itself as aspect of neighborhoods with community-wide impact on residents.

• Focus on neighborhood social dynamics versus accumulated individual outcomes.

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 10: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

Woodlawn Study

• Interviewed 25 African-American female residents; ages 24-56.

• How do high rates of child welfare agency involvement affect:– community life?– residents’ social networks, civic

participation, and collective efficacy?– Attitudes about government and self-

governance?

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 11: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

•All aware of intense involvement in neighborhood;

most estimated number involved as at least half;

main function child removal.

•Impact on social relationships

– interference with parental authority

– damage to children’s ability to form social

relationships

– distrust among neighbors

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 12: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

Ida, 46

The kids with the relatives are not affected

as much because they are at least with

people they know. I feel for the kids who

are with people they don’t know in new

communities. I think they can lose their

background and culture and wonder who

they are – it’s those kids who could really

get into some trouble with drugs and stuff.

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 13: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

Anita, case manager for private agency

I think my friends, family, and neighbors

call more than I do. Sometimes I think they

have DCFS on speed dial like it’s an

answer, a one and only answer. Even

though they will say they think DCFS is

overly involved they will be the first to call.

It doesn’t really make sense, but they do.

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 14: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

Social Impact

• Residents often use DCFS as a means of

resolving family and community conflicts.

• Suggests concentrated agency

involvement has a significant influence on

neighborhood relationships and norms.

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 15: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

Paradox: Is DCFS Too Involved?

• NO!: additional financial resources to

families; monitor foster homes better.

• Key positive role: financial support for

mothers, foster parents, and foster

children.

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 16: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

Angela, 27

It does help them out

financial wise, pay bills and

stuff like that, they help them

out, they do give them money

for keeping the kids too. D. Roberts, Penn

Page 17: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

Wanda, 56

The only [positive impact of DCFS]

that I can think about is the resources

that they do provide children or

grandparents or other family members

who take in their family members….A

lot of people need them.

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 18: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

But a different kind of involvement

• More financial support with less

disruption of family relationships.

• Respondents criticized agency’s

narrow role, rooted in investigating

families rather than helping them.

D. Roberts, Penn

Page 19: Child Protection as Surveillance in African American Communities Leverhulme International Workshop Melbourne, Australia; April 15, 2013 Dorothy Roberts,

Michelle, 34:

D. Roberts, Penn

The advertisement, it just says abuse. If you being

abused, this is the number you call, this is the only

way you gonna get help. It doesn’t say if I’m in

need of counseling, or if my children don’t have

shoes, if I just can’t provide groceries even though

I may have seven kids, but I only get a hundred

something dollars food stamps. … I don’t want to

lose my children, so I’m not going to call DCFS for

help because I only see them take away children.