80
Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved. CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS CANDIDATE PREPARATION GUIDE FOR THE INVESTIGATIVE LOGIC TEST March 2005 Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT

DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS

CANDIDATE PREPARATION GUIDE

FOR THE

INVESTIGATIVE LOGIC TEST

March 2005

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 2: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative Logic Test of the Detective Selection Process to make one copy only of the Candidate Preparation Guide for their use for study purposes only. Any other person who seeks to make or display a copy or copies of this guide for any additional or other use must apply in writing to the City of Chicago for permission to make such use of this guide pursuant to a written license from the City of Chicago. Such permission may be granted and such use may be allowed by the City of Chicago pursuant to the terms of a written license, but only to the extent set forth in such license and only for such additional use(s). Sale or resale of a copy or copies of this guide without the express written permission of the City of Chicago is strictly prohibited.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 3: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1

OVERVIEW OF THE DETECTIVE INVESTIGATIVE LOGIC TEST ............................................ 3

Part One: Handouts and Immediate Response Assignments ............................................. 3

Part Two: Ongoing Investigation Assignment .................................................................... .4

INVESTIGATIVE LOGIC TEST MATERIALS .............................................................................. 5

General Instructions ............................................................................................................. 5

ILT Assignment Materials .................................................................................................... 5

IL T Test Question Booklet ................................................................................................... 6

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE INVESTIGATIVE LOGIC TEST ....................................................... 7

Important Points to Remember ............................................................................................ 8

PRACTICE IL T TEST QUESTIONS .......................................................................................... 10

Practice IL T Test Question Booklet Part One: Handouts and Immediate Response

Assignments ..................................................................................................................... 11

Practice ILT Test Question Booklet Part Two: Ongoing Investigation Assignment ............... 17

ANSWERS AND EXPLANATIONS FOR PRACTICE ILT QUESTIONS .................................... 20

Answers and Explanations for Practice Questions Part One: Handouts and Immediate

Response Assignments .................................................................................................... 21

Answers and Explanations for Practice Questions Part Two: Ongoing Investigation

Assignment ...................................................................................................................... 30

STUDYING AND TEST-TAKING TIPS ..................................................................................... 37

Starting Now ...................................................................................................................... 37

Before the Exam ................................................................................................................ 37

At the Start of the Exam ..................................................................................................... 38

During the Exam ................................................................................................................ 38

SCORING AND ELIGIBILITY INFOMRATION .......................................................................... 39

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX B

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX D

DETECTIVE CRITICAL JOB TASKS

DETECTIVE IMPORTANT KNOWLEDGE AREAS, SKILLS, ABILITIES, AND PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS

RELEVANT CPD REPORTS

PRACTICE I l T ASSIGNMENT MA TE RIALS

Copyright© 2005 -i-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 4: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 5: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

INTRODUCTION

This Candidate Preparation Guide is designed to assist you in preparing for the Investigative

Logic Test (IL T) component of the Chicago Police Department Detective Selection Process.

The goal of the Detective Selection Process is to select individuals who are highly qualified to

perform the duties and responsibilities of assignments in the Detective Division, Bureau of

Investigative Services, of the Chicago Police Department. Detective duty assignments include

Homicide/Gangs/Sex Crimes Unit (HGS), Robbery/Burglary/Theft Crimes Unit (RBT), and

Special Victims Unit (SVU). Given the number of candidates participating, there is significant

competition. The Investigative Logic Test is your opportunity to demonstrate your capabilities in

responding to job-related situations that reflect the important duties performed by detectives.

This preparation guide provides suggestions and tips for helping you prepare for the Detective

Investigative Logic Test as well as specific information about the test instructions and format.

This guide provides general information about the test materials and instructions that you will be

asked to follow during test administration. It also contains practice items representing the types

of questions that will be included in the Investigative Logic Test. It is to your advantage to

review these instructions and practice the sample items provided, so that you are familiar with

them on the day of the test. All test materials, questions, and scoring criteria were

developed based on discussion and review with subject matter experts and senior

command personnel in the Chicago Police Department.

In addition to the information about the Detective Investigative Logic Test and related study tips,

this preparation guide provides several appendices containing important information about the

Detective assignments.

);;-- Appendix A contains a list of critical job tasks for the Detective assignments, including HGS, RBT, and SVU. The Investigative Logic Test is designed to measure the duty areas to which these critical job tasks are linked.

Y Appendix B contains a list of the important knowledge areas, skills, abilities, and personal characteristics that are relevant for performing the Detective assignments.

Y Appendix C contains blank copies of CPD reports that may be used during the IL T.

Y Appendix D contains sample IL T Assignment Materials related to the practice questions included in this preparation guide.

Copyright © 2005 -1-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 6: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

All of these materials were developed based on extensive job analysis of the Detective

assignments in the Chicago Police Department, Bureau of Investigative Services (BIS). Job

analysis activities included analysis of data from job incumbents and review with Department

subject matter experts and senior command personnel. Note that the information provided in

Appendices A and B is intended only to describe the Detective job as it is performed by

incumbents in the HGS, RBT, and SVU assignments. The Investigative Logic Test does not

focus on specific knowledge or skills that would be acquired through training after selection or

on the job as a Detective. In addition, it is to your advantage to be familiar with the format,

content, and purpose of the reports contained in Appendix C before the day of the exam.

The City wants each candidate for Detective assignments to have an equal opportunity to

demonstrate his or her capabilities. We encourage you to use the materials in this preparation

guide and believe that you will find this information useful in helping you to do your best on the

Investigative Logic Test.

***

Copyright © 2005 -2-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 7: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

OVERVIEW OF THE DETECTIVE INVESTIGATIVE LOGIC TEST

The Investigative Logic Test (IL T) component of the Detective Selection Process presents

questions relating to investigations and other situations that are often encountered on the job in

the Detective assignments. The IL T is designed to measure the application of important

knowledge, skills, abilities and personal characteristics that are required to perform the critical

duties of the Detective assignments (HGS, RBT, and SVU), including administrative

responsibilities, written communications, investigation of cases, criminal arrests and processing,

collection and preservation of evidence, investigative interviews, and court testimony. You will

be asked to use the information and materials provided during the test to respond to various

types of questions, including multiple-choice and open-ended questions. The IL T presumes

that you are knowledgeable about general departmental procedures, but does not require

specific knowledge of Detective procedures or experience in having performed any of the

Detective assignments.

There are several types of questions that will be presented in the Detective Investigative Logic

Test. The test questions for the IL T will be presented in two separate parts, as described

below. Each part of the IL Twill be separately timed. The time limits are set with the intent to

allow sufficient time for candidates to respond to all of the test questions. The parts of the IL T

are described below, and practice items for each type of test question are included in following

sections of this preparation guide.

PART ONE: HANDOUTS AND IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ASSIGNMENTS

Part One of the IL T includes several types of Detective assignments. Handouts are

assignments in which Detectives are given case reports that were taken by beat officers about

incidents that require follow-up investigation. Detectives often receive these handouts a day or

two after the incident occurred. Another type of assignment involves incidents where

Detectives respond immediately to the scene to conduct their investigation. In these cases,

Detectives often receive information directly from beat officers or others on the scene before

any reports are completed. Part One of the IL T includes both types of assignments. The

information related to each assignment may be presented in the form of case reports that have

been completed and/or information that is told to Detectives at the scene of the incident.

Copyright © 2005 -3-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved. Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 8: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

PART Two: ONGOING INVESTIGATION ASSIGNMENT

Part Two of the IL T includes one assignment regarding an incident that has already had some

investigative activities completed by Patrol Officers and/or Detectives. Your role as the

Detective will be to continue the investigation. Again, the information related to this assignment

may be presented in the form of case reports that have been completed and/or information that

is told to Detectives by other individuals (e.g., beat officers, victim, witnesses, etc.).

NOTE: As indicated by the examples included in this guide, the test is divided into two parts.

Part One will contain multiple assignments that involve less reading of background

information and may have fewer questions related to each assignment. Part Two will

contain one assignment that has more reports and background information and may

have more questions to answer about that particular assignment. The general type of

information presented and the questions asked about the assignments are similar

across Parts One and Two of the IL T. The difference is mainly the degree to which the

incident has already been investigated by the time you take over the assignment as the

Detective.

***

Copyright© 2005 -4-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 9: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

INVESTIGATIVE LOGIC TEST MATERIALS

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

The instructions for completing the ILT will be provided verbally and in writing. All of your

responses to the questions must be in writing. You will be instructed as to exactly when each

part of the test will begin and end, when the materials can be opened, when to review the test

booklet, and so forth. You will be given periodic updates from the test proctors about how

much time is remaining for each part of the test.

ILT ASSIGNMENT MATERIALS

The IL T Assignment Materials will be presented in a separate packet from the booklet in which

you will write your answers to the test questions. These materials will include a description of

your specific role for each assignment and related background information, forms, and reports

that simulate investigative assignments of Detectives in HGS, RBT, or SVU. For each part of

the IL T, you will receive the Assignment Materials that were prepared specifically for the related

assignments. These materials will provide information that you will use to answer the test

questions relating to each individual assignment.

Keep in mind that the different assignments are not related to each other. The materials

associated with each assignment will be presented in sets. The cover page on each set of

materials will include the following information:

Y The Assignment number (e.g., Assignment 1, Assignment 2, etc.) and the numbers of the test questions, so that you know which questions in the separate Test Question Booklet are related to the materials.

Y A list of the Item numbers (e.g., Item 1A, Item 1 B, etc.) and a description of what each item contains (e.g., information received from a beat officer, General Offense Case Report, etc.). The Item numbers will be listed on the cover page and printed at the bottom of each page of the materials related to the assignment. (Refer to Appendix D in this guide for examples of how the materials will be presented.)

Y A brief description of your role for the assignment (e.g., you are given handouts, respond to a crime scene, conduct a follow-up investigation, etc.). Keep in mind that for different assignments you may be responding as a Detective from HGS, RBT, or SVU.

Copyright © 2005 -5-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved. Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 10: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

I l T TEST QUESTION BOOKLET

In addition to the IL T Assignment Materials, you will receive an IL T Test Question Booklet that

contains all of the questions that you will answer about each investigative assignment in both

Part One and Part Two. The questions in the test booklet will be organized by investigative

assignment. They will be clearly marked as to which set of materials you should use to answer

the related questions. You will write your answers to the questions directly in the spaces

provided in the test booklet. You may highlight or take notes on the related materials, but only

the responses that you write in the Test Question Booklet will be scored.

During the IL T, you will be asked questions about the investigative assignments that are

presented in the IL T Assignment Materials, as well as additional information that may be

presented in the Test Question Booklet. Some questions may ask specifically about one item

(e.g., a specific report) related to the assignment. Other questions may ask more generally

about actions or decisions for which you must refer to several items to find the information

needed to answer the question fully.

As you can see, the Investigative Logic Test will present a variety of written materials and

questions, and you will need to do a good deal of reading. It is important to plan and organize

your time to be able to review all of the assignment materials and complete all of the test

questions. Again, some of the materials provided for an assignment may be more important,

while others may be less important. You will need to read all of the information provided and

determine which materials require more attention than others in order to complete all of the test

questions within the time limit.

The following sections of this Candidate Preparation Guide contain instructions and practice

investigative assignments, including background materials and questions. The IL T Assignment

Materials contained in Appendix D of this guide are related to the four practice assignments.

The materials are presented so that they look like the materials (i.e., cover page, related Items,

Your Role) as they will appear in the actual Investigative Logic Test. On the day of the test, you

will be able to separate the materials that relate to each investigative assignment, so that you

can organize them in whatever manner you find most convenient.

*** Copyright © 2005 -6-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 11: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE INVESTIGATIVE LOGIC TEST

For the Investigative Logic Test (IL T), you are to assume the role of a Detective in the fictional

Area 9 of the Chicago Police Department. Keep in mind that for different assignments you may

be responding as a Detective assigned to HGS, RBT, or SVU. For each assignment, read

carefully the information presented in the IL T Assignment Materials, including the cover page

which lists the related items and describes your specific role as the Detective.

In the various assignments, you will be asked to respond to questions related to typical

investigative activities and paperwork that a Detective would be likely to encounter on the job.

The IL T is designed to focus on the critical duty areas that are performed by Detectives in the

various assignments, but it does not require specific job knowledge that would be provided to

you in training upon selection into the position. The IL T requires you to respond to the

questions by using your own judgment, consistent with Department policies and procedures,

about the best or most effective way to handle each assignment as a Detective.

You will write your answers to the test questions directly in the IL T Test Question Booklet. For

a test of this type, it is often useful to review the test questions and related materials first, so

that you understand what you will be asked to do for each assignment. Before you start to

respond to the questions, read all of the materials related to the exercise (e.g., your role,

background information, reports, or other documentation), so that you are familiar with the

information you have available. Again, keep in mind that some of the materials may be more

important than others for responding to the questions. As you read the materials, you may

highlight, underline, or write on them. However, nothing you write on the materials will be

scored. Only the responses you write in the Test Question Booklet will be scored. Also,

do not write on the back sides of any pages in the test booklet. Anything written on the back

sides of the pages will not be scored.

Read the questions carefully. Be sure you understand what you are to do. For example, if the

question asks for a brief response, do not write a page-long essay. If a question asks for a list

of things to do, make a list, do not write a paragraph. If a question asks you to check a specific

number of boxes, do not check more than the number specified.

Copyright © 2005 -7-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 12: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

IMPORTANT POINTS TO REMEMBER

1. Write your responses as clearly, neatly, and accurately as possible. While misspelled words or grammatical errors may not count against you, they do detract from the clarity of your response and make your answer harder to understand. Answers that cannot be read or understood will not be scored.

2. For questions that ask about important actions or pieces of information, provide answers that refer to important things. Some things may be more important than others.

3. While there may be many things you should do in a given situation, some will be of higher priority or greater urgency than others. For example, a question may ask for the first thing you would do, or initial actions you would take to begin your investigation. While "Complete reports" or "Interview offender when located" may be appropriate actions to take when you are further into your investigation, other actions may be of higher priority immediately.

4. Provide only the number of responses indicated by the question. For example, if the question asks for a list of five actions, do not write a list of ten actions. If the question says to check a specific number of boxes, and you check more than that number, you will receive zero (0) points for the question, regardless of the boxes that you checked. Be very careful to check exactly the number of boxes specified in the question.

5. Some questions ask for an explanation for your decision or action (e.g., "What action would you take? Briefly explain why.") Be sure to provide a rationale for your . response if required by the question.

6. Some questions may exclude certain individuals or actions from your response (e.g., "Aside from interviewing the victim and witnesses, what actions would you take ... " or "Other than photographs and fingerprints, what physical evidence should be processed ... "). Focus your response only on the information that is specified in the question.

7. Read the information provided in the materials related to the assignment (e.g., background information, reports, etc.) carefully before answering the questions. Base your responses on the information provided in the relevant materials. Do not jump to conclusions or read more into a question than is there. There are no trick questions.

8. Make certain that you are referring to the correct Item numbers on the materials when answering questions.

Copyright © 2005 -8-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 13: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

9. The purpose of the Investigative Logic Test is to assess your capabilities as they relate to important duties that are relevant to Detective job. Respond to the questions as you would if you were a Detective.

10. Make sure that: (a) you have answered all the questions, (b) you have marked your answers in the appropriate spaces provided, and (c) your answers are relevant to the questions that are asked. If you have time at the end, go back and check.

11. Your score for the IL Twill be based on the total number of points associated with the responses you provide to all of the questions. It is to your advantage to answer every question, even if you have to guess.

12. The situations presented (including names of all people, businesses, streets, phone numbers, etc.) are fictitious. Any resemblance to actual people, places, or events is not intentional.

***

Copyright© 2005 -9-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 14: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

PRACTICE IL T TEST QUESTIONS

This section of the Candidate Preparation Guide contains four practice assignments similar to

the assignments and related questions that will be presented in the Investigative Logic Test.

The materials related to each assignment are presented in the same format that you will see on

the day of the test.

Review the Practice IL T Assignment Materials contained in Appendix D, and practice

responding to the test questions presented on the following pages for each assignment. Write

your answers in the spaces provided. Then, compare your answers to the example responses

presented in the following section of this guide.

Copyright© 2005 -10-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 15: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

PRACTICE IL T TEST QUESTION BOOKLET

PART ONE: HANDOUTS AND IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ASSIGNMENTS

ASSIGNMENT 1 (Questions 1-2)

1. What additional information, related to this incident, would you want to check or verify that could be obtained from resources other than people?

c h ec K c e_ t I( i _s

0 t:,/\ ; f- l/\f-,'OI f t.\ O't !j .t:- 'i \ e_

re Jee( n ·- c r c ,/"\. cJv"\.~ t-

2. Other than talking to the victim and the witness, list what specific actions you would take to assist in locating the stolen snow blower.

c e<-1( P

u

END OF ASSIGNMENT 1 CONTINUE ON TO ASSIGNMENT 2

Copyright © 2005 -11-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 16: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

ASSIGNMENT 2 (Questions 3-6)

3. After Officer Stover, who will you interview first when you arrive at the school? Briefly explain why.

Who)-

Why)-

Copyright© 2005 -12-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 17: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

4. Of the following questions, check the five (5) questions that would be most important to ask the victim about her allegation of abuse.

Check five (5)

.,,1 ·~ Who is the person who abused you?

J D Where and when did the abuse take place?

fl Gl Did you sustain any other injuries in addition to the bruised arms and back?

v ~" Was this the first time or ongoing?

D Have you ever run away before?

D What is your typical relationship with your mother's boyfriend like?

V D What were the circumstances or what prompted the beating?

~ Does your mother's boyfriend drink, or use drugs, or have mental problems?

D Have you ever been arrested?

J :S_ Does your mother have any knowledge of the abuse?

·I D Are there other incidents of abuse that have been reported from your house?

Copyright © 2005 -13-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 18: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

5. Aside from interviewing any parties involved or potential witnesses, list two (2) important actions that you should ensure are taken immediately in response to this situation?

When you go the victim's residence to talk to the mother, you find two children (ages 5 years and 2 years) on the sofa watching TV. The home is in terrible condition. There is garbage everywhere; a lot of roaches, and the toilet is stopped up. The 5-year-old has bruises on his arms and legs. No parent or other adult is present.

6. What would be the most effective next step to take as the Detective?

Check one (1)

D A. Call beat officers to take the children to the hospital. Interview neighbors to try and locate the mother of the children.

~ B. Take custody of the children and transport them to the hospital. Call for an evidence technician, secure the scene for pictures, and interview neighbors for information about the children's mother.

D C. Take the children to the neighbor's residence and ask the person there to watch the children until their mother returns, while you investigate the circumstances at the home.

END OF ASSIGNMENT 2 CONTINUE ON TO ASSIGNMENT 3

Copyright© 2005 -14-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 19: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

ASSIGNMENT 3 (Questions 7-9)

As the Detective, you respond to Park Plaza Hospital to investigate a report of a female victim who is being treated for a sexual assault. The first responding officer is at the hospital when you arrive.

7. Who do you need to interview at the hospital to investigate this assault?

8. In addition to your interviews at the hospital, list the initial steps that you would take or ensure are taken to begin your investigation of this assault.

\JI

(

Copyright© 2005 -15-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 20: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

During the course of your investigation, you speak with a female friend of the victim. She tells you that she did not witness the incident, but that people in the neighborhood are saying that a man named Ross committed the sexual assault. She also provides you with his address.

9. What would be the most effective next step to take as the Detective?

Check one (1)

D

D

A. Follow up on the friend's information about the man and canvass for witnesses in an attempt to verify the identity of the suspect.

B. Ask the friend if she knows of anyone who witnessed the crime and provide her with your contact information in case she learns anything more.

C. Continue to search for individuals who actually witnessed the crime without regard to the information provided by the friend's statement.

END OF ASSIGNMENT 3

END OF PART ONE: HANDOUTS AND IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ASSIGNMENTS

Copyright © 2005 -16-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 21: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

PRACTICE IL T TEST QUESTION BOOKLET

PART Two: ONGOING INVESTIGATION ASSIGNMENT

ASSIGNMENT 4 (Questions 10-15)

10. Aside from overall photographs of the jewelry store office, what specific evidence do you need to ensure is photographed by Evidence Technicians?

11. List the specific evidence in the store that you need to ensure is processed for fingerprints.

u

c 0 f+ee cop

;;. rto-f dOcJ

+ool >

Copyright© 2005 -17-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 22: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

12. Other than photographs and fingerprints, what specific physical evidence do you need to ensure is collected from the scene?

LP cJ

( c

I

As the Detective, you need to prioritize the individuals listed in the Patrol Division-Canvass Worksheets (Items 4B and 4C) for follow-up interviews. Keep in mind that you cannot interview everyone at once. Certain individuals may have information that is more likely to be useful to your immediate investigation. Other individuals may be less likely to have useful information, although you might want to follow-up with them later. Some individuals do not have any useful information and would not need to be interviewed again.

13. On the line next to the name of each of the individuals listed below (refer to Items 4B and 4C), write one of the following letters (I, P, or N) to indicate whether the individual is:

!,

I= Important to interview right away; or

P = Perhaps relevant for interviews later; or

N = Not worth following up in this case. D t"

( '-(,'

J _f'--- Item 48 ( 1 ) Rene Boe

.i.- tJ Item 48 (2) Shirley Standard

--- Item 4B (3) Maria Born

-~F- Item 48 (4) Brent Gaylord

Item 4C ( 1 ) Clive Stockton

I Item 4C (2) Carrie

Copyright© 2005 -18-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 23: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

While interviewing the employees at the White Hen, one of the employees, Jason Smith, stated that he remembers some guys who drove up to the store and came in around 1 :00 a.m. on Sunday morning. They bought sweet rolls and a large coffee. Smith said that he had never seen them in the store before. They seemed to be nervous about somethirl9_:

14. List three (3) important topics of information that you would ask this employee about what he observed.

2);;> Ot°SC(; J

While interviewing one of the daytime White Hen employees, she states that the business has a video camera in place that records 24 hours a day. She states that only the manager has the

I key to the room where the tape is kept. When you talk to the manager about getting the tape, 1 he is reluctant to give it to you.

15. What would be the most effective next step to take as the Detective?

Check one (1)

D

D

A. Tell the manager if you do not get it from him you will get it from the corporate office.

B. Inform the manager that if he does not cooperate, you could arrest him for obstruction.

C. Explain the need for the video and how the tape could help identify possible offenders.

END OF ASSIGNMENT 4 END OF PART Two: ONGOING INVESTIGATION ASSIGNMENT

*** Copyright © 2005 -19-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 24: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

ANSWERS AND EXPLANATIONS FOR PRACTICE IL T QUESTIONS

The following answers are representative of what would be considered correct and complete

responses to the practice questions for the Investigative Logic Test. Keep in mind that your

answers do not need to match these responses word-for-word in order to receive full credit. As

long as your answers are clear and understandable, are responsive to the question, and include

all of the essential elements, they will be considered fully correct.

During scoring, partial credit may be given for some types of answers. For open-ended

questions, the appropriate number of points would be deducted for answers that (a) contain

some, but not all, of the relevant information; (b) include responses that would have a negative

impact on the situation; or (c) do not follow the instructions provided in the question. However,

points would be awarded for the correct portions of such answers, if appropriate.

For multiple-choice questions, pay close attention to the number of responses that you are

asked to check for each question. Some questions ask you to check only one (1) response,

while others ask you to check more than one (e.g., check five (5) or check three (3)). When the

question asks for a specific number of boxes to be checked, you will receive no points (zero; 0

points) if you check more boxes than the number specified in the question.

All of the IL T assignment materials and test questions were developed through discussion and

review with Department subject matter experts. Your responses to the IL T will be scored

according to detailed scoring guidelines developed with these subject matter experts and senior

command personnel in the Chicago Police Department.

To make this Candidate Preparation Guide as informative as possible, explanations of why the

following answers for the practice questions are correct are provided along with the response to

each practice question. You will not need to provide such explanations on the actual test. The

answers provided in the guide represent examples of complete responses expected from

candidates taking the test. Again, your answers do not need to match those shown exactly, but

they should contain the same ideas or information to receive full credit.

Copyright © 2005 -20-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 25: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

ANSWERS AND EXPLANATIONS FOR PRACTICE QUESTIONS

PART ONE: HANDOUTS AND IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ASSIGNMENTS

ASSIGNMENT 1 (Questions 1-2)

1. What additional information, related to this incident, would you want to check or verify that could be obtained from resources other than people?

• Attempt to identify the offender based on nickname Top Dog using the suspect nickname file

• Check for similar patterns of burglaries

• Review contact cards for information about the blue van or individuals called Top Dog

• Review recent penitentiary releases by accessing the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) database

• Conduct a Narrative text search in Data Warehouse to search for information regarding blue vans involved in other burglaries or partial license plate information

Explanation

For this answer, you should provide a list of information that you could check or verify using

various resources (other than people), such as internal and external databases or particular

functions of Department systems (e.g., Data Warehouse). There may be other information that

you would want to check once you have talked to the victim and the witness to the incident and

have obtained additional information about the case. However, at this point, all you have is the

information provided in the case report. Also note that the focus of the question is on the

information related to the incident that you could check or verify based on the information you

have available from the case report. Therefore, your answer should focus on the information,

not just provide a list of databases.

Copyright© 2005 -21-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 26: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

2. Other than talking to the victim and the witness, list what specific actions you would take to assist in locating the stolen snow blower.

• Verify whether the scene was processed by Evidence Technicians

• Enter serial number for the snow blower into databases (NCIC; LEADS; Hot Desk)

• Check with locations or entities that are likely outlets for stolen snow blowers (snow blower repair shops; pawn/resale shops; metal junk yards; scrap metal places; Internet sales websites)

Explanation

Although in the course of your investigation you will take many investigative actions, there are

three actions that specifically relate to locating the stolen snow blower based on the information

you have in the case report.

• Verify whether the scene was processed by Evidence Technicians. This was not

marked on the General Offense Case Report, which only shows that the ET was

notified. As the detective, you have the responsibility to ensure that evidence is

collected and preserved. Processing the scene, including fingerprints in this case,

would be important for identifying who broke into the garage and stole the snow

blower.

• Enter serial number for the snow blower in databases (e.g., NCIC; LEADS; Hot

Desk). Detectives need to ensure that information about stolen property gets entered

into various computerized systems. Because a serial number was given for the snow

blower, it is important to enter it into appropriate databases for tracking purposes if it

is recovered.

• Check locations that are likely outlets for stolen property (e.g., repair shops;

pawn/resale shops; metal junk yards; scrap metal places; Internet sales web sites).

As a detective investigating this type of crime, one of the best avenues to take in

locating stolen property is to check with places burglars would likely try to pawn/sell

the stolen property to get quick money. You would not need to include all of the

examples listed to receive credit for this part of the response.

Copyright © 2005 -22-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 27: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

ASSIGNMENT 2 (Questions 3-6)

3. After Officer Stover, who will you interview first when you arrive at the school? Briefly explain why.

Who ~ Ms. Jamison, the teacher

Why~

(Either of the following reasons would be acceptable)

• Detectives should try to talk to the reporting witness first to get more information before talking to the victim or offender or outcry witness.

• It is likely that the teacher will be able to provide an overview of what has occurred and have an objective point of view.

Explanation

This question asks you to identify who you would interview first when you arrive at the school

and to briefly explain why. The first person you would want to talk with is the teacher, Ms.

Jamison, because she was the reporting witness. Ms. Jamison will have a broad overview and

a more objective point of view about what has occurred related to this situation. You would

want to get as much information as possible from her before talking to the victim, the offender,

or the outcry witness, Ida Winn. Additionally, you know that the victim is in school, so it is not

necessary to try to find her right away for your interview.

To receive full credit for this type of question, you would need to identify who you would

interview first and provide a reason as to why you chose this individual. If you provide the

name of the person without the reason, you would not receive full credit. Additionally, the

question says to briefly explain why. You do not need to write a lengthy paragraph to explain

why Ms. Jamison is the first person you would interview when you arrive at the school. Any one

of the possible reasons listed above would be enough for you to receive credit for the question.

Copyright© 2005 -23-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved. Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 28: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

4. Of the following questions, check the five (5) questions that would be most important to ask the victim about her allegation of abuse.

Check five (5)

(+2) ~ (+2) 0 (+1) D (+2) ~ (+1) D (+1) D (+2) r:i (+1) D (0) D

(+2) ~ (+1) D

Exglanation

Who is the person who abused you?

Where and when did the abuse take place?

Did you sustain any other injuries in addition to the bruised arms and back?

Was this the first time or ongoing?

Have you ever run away before?

What is your typical relationship with your mother's boyfriend like?

What were the circumstances or what prompted the beating?

Does your mother's boyfriend drink, or use drugs, or have mental problems?

Have you ever been arrested?

Does your mother have any knowledge of the abuse?

Are there other incidents of abuse that have been reported from your house?

This question asks you to check five (5) questions (out a list of 11 possible questions) that would be most important to ask the victim about her allegations of abuse. Although there may be other important questions to ask, you are to choose from the list that has been provided. The questions have different point values (shown in parentheses above) relative to their importance to your investigation at this time. The ( +2) questions identified deal directly with the abuse at hand. These are the most important questions to have answered by the victim about her allegation. The (+1) questions, although they may be relevant to the victim's general situation, are not directly related to the abuse incident. The (0) question has nothing to do with

this incident and would be the least relevant question of those listed. You would receive the maximum score for this question if you had checked the five boxes shown above.

Caution

Your score for this question would be the total number of points associated with the five questions you checked. Be aware that if you check less than 5 questions (e.g., 4 instead of 5), you will receive credit for those chosen, but your score will be less than it might have been if you had checked another question. NOTE: If you were to check more than 5 questions (e.g., 6 instead of 5), you will receive no points (a score of 0) for this question. It is very important that you read the directions for each question carefully and make sure that you check exactly the number of boxes specified in the question.

Copyright © 2005 -24-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 29: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

5. Aside from interviewing any parties involved or potential witnesses, list two (2) important actions that you should ensure are taken immediately in response to this situation?

1 )-> Have victim taken to a hospital for a check-up of injuries

2 )-> Check the condition at the home, and take victim's siblings to a hospital for medical examinations and into protective custody, if necessary

Explanation

For this question, you are asked to list two (2) important actions that you should ensure are taken immediately in response to this situation. Although several actions could be taken right away, there are some actions that have a higher priority. These are the actions you should focus on in this type of question.

Highest Priority These responses would receive the maximum number of points. • Ensure the victim is taken to the hospital for a check-up of injuries. The wellbeing

of the juvenile victim is always a critical action in any suspected abuse case. This should be your first consideration.

• Ensure a medical exam of the siblings or check the wellbeing at the home and take the sibling into protective custody. The victim's statement that she is concerned about her siblings raises the concern that the other children in the home also are being abused. You should ensure actions are taken to check on their wellbeing.

Lower Priority The following responses would receive some credit, but not the maximum number of points for this question. Although important, these responses are not the highest priority actions that you would take in this situation.

• Have Evidence Technician called to document injuries (e.g., photos). • Contact mother who reported victim missing. • Contact DCFS for history on the family and notify them of the abuse, if your

investigation warrants.

No Credit Other actions may occur during the course of your investigation, but would not need to happen immediately. For example, conducting a background check on the offender would not take priority over ensuring the wellbeing of the victim and her siblings in this case. Such answers would receive no points if identified as your most important immediate response to this situation.

Copyright © 2005 -25-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 30: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

When you go the victim's residence to talk to the mother, you find two children (ages 5 years and 2 years) on the sofa watching TV. The home is in terrible condition. There is garbage everywhere; a lot of roaches, and the toilet is stopped up. The 5-year-old has bruises on his arms and legs. No parent or other adult is present.

6. What would be the most effective next step to take as the Detective?

Check one (1)

(+1> D A. Call beat officers to take the children to the hospital. Interview neighbors to try and locate the mother of the children.

This answer only partially addresses the Detective's responsibilities. It does not include collection of possible evidence of any abuse that may have been committed at the residence.

(+2) ~ 8. Take custody of the children and transport them to the hospital. Call for an evidence technician, secure the scene for pictures, and interview neighbors for information about the children's mother.

(0) D

The care of children is our primary concern. The siblings of the victim also may be victims of abuse. The documentation of the scene and the home condition is vital. For successful prosecution, you would need to gather all possible information to establish abuse.

C. Take the children to the neighbor's residence and ask the person there to watch the children until their mother returns, while you investigate the circumstances at the home.

The children must be taken to a hospital for medical evaluation, especially after you observe bruises on the 5-year-old. This answer does not ensure that the children are given medical care.

Explanation

Shown in parentheses above are examples of the point values that have been assigned to each

of the response alternatives for this practice question. You would receive the point value

associated with the alternative that you selected. Also shown below each alternative are

explanations for the point values that were assigned to each response by the Department

senior subject matter experts. These explanations are provided here to make this preparation

guide as informative as possible in helping you prepare for the Investigative Logic Test. You

will not have to provide explanations for the answers you choose during the actual test.

NOTE: The point values and explanations were determined by Chicago Police Department senior command personnel who have experience in the Bureau of Investigative Services and are knowledgeable about the Detective assignments.

Copyright © 2005 -26-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 31: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

ASSIGNMENT 3 (Questions 7-9)

As the Detective, you respond to Park Plaza Hospital to investigate a report of a female victim who is being treated for a sexual assault. The first responding officer is at the hospital when you arrive.

7. Who do you need to interview at the hospital to investigate this assault?

• Police Officer

• Victim

• Treating Physician

Explanation

For this question, three responses have been identified for which you would receive points. In

this instance, you would want to talk to the responding officer and the victim. You also want to

talk with medical personnel who are familiar with the condition of the victim. This might be

either the attending doctors or nurses. If you had written "medical personnel," or "doctor," or

"nurse," you would receive credit for this response. However, if you had listed all three

separately, you would only receive credit once for this category of personnel.

Copyright © 2005 -27-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 32: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

8. In addition to your interviews at the hospital, list the initial steps that you would take or ensure are taken to begin your investigation of this assault.

• Have a rape kit done

• Determine the location of the crime scene and have it secured

• Conduct a canvass at the crime scene for witnesses

• Call for an Evidence Technician to process/collect any evidence (e.g., photos taken of any visible injuries, any evidence at the scene of the assault, etc.)

Explanation

In response to this question, it is important to consider what your initial steps would be to begin this investigation. Although there are many steps a detective might take to solve a case, there are some actions or steps that need to be taken first to begin the investigation. In response to this question, there are four initial actions that the detective should ensure are taken in this situation.

• Have a rape kit done. It is important to ensure that a rape kit is done on the victim as soon as possible. This may provide critical DNA evidence to identify the offender.

• Determine the location of the crime scene and have it secured. As the detective, you would want to determine where the crime scene is located and ensure that it is secured as soon as possible. It is important to preserve any evidence that may be available at the scene to assist in your investigation.

• Conduct a canvass at the crime scene for witnesses. You would want to canvass the crime scene for witnesses as soon as possible. Someone there may have seen something or be able to provide information that will assist you in identifying the offender.

• Call for an Evidence Technician to process/collect any evidence (e.g., photos taken of any visible injuries, any evidence at the scene of the assault, etc.). Although the Evidence Technicians process and collect evidence, as the detective, you are responsible for ensuring the ET is called and informing the ET of any specific evidence you wish to have processed and collected.

You should always carefully consider the question that you are being asked to answer. In this question, you are asked to provide the initial steps you would take to begin your investigation. Although there are other steps you would eventually take to investigate this case (such as conducting a photo lineup of sex offenders in the area or obtaining a buccal swab from any suspect identified for DNA testing), these are not actions that can be taken immediately before you have additional information to work with. You would not receive any credit for listing such actions, although you would not lose points if they were included in your response to this question.

Copyright © 2005 -28-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 33: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

During the course of your investigation, you speak with a female friend of the victim. She tells you that she did not witness the incident, but that people in the neighborhood are saying that a man named Ross committed the sexual assault. She also provides you with his address.

9. What would be the most effective next step to take as the Detective?

Check one (1)

(+2) A. Follow up on the friend's information about the man and canvass for witnesses in an attempt to verify the identity of the suspect.

Information that leads to a named individual is of utmost importance. Any information about the location and identity of a suspect should be followed up by detectives because it could affect how quickly the offender is arrested.

(+1) 0 8. Ask the friend if she knows of anyone who witnessed the crime and provide her with your contact information in case she learns anything more.

(0) 0

This answer puts too much emphasis on what the friend should do, rather than what the detective should do, but it leaves the door open for the friend to provide additional information.

C. Continue to search for individuals who actually witnessed the crime without regard to the information provided by the friend's statement.

This is not a logical response because it ignores potentially vital evidence that could lead to solution of this crime and the arrest of the offender.

Explanation

Shown in parentheses above are examples of the point values that have been assigned to each

of the response alternatives for this practice question. You would receive the point value

associated with the alternative that you selected. Also shown below each alternative are

explanations for the point values that were assigned to each response by the Department

senior subject matter experts. These explanations are provided here to make this preparation

guide as informative as possible in helping you prepare for the Investigative Logic Test. You

will not have to provide explanations for the answers you choose during the actual test.

NOTE: The point values and explanations were determined by Chicago Police Department senior command personnel who have experience in the Bureau of Investigative Services and are knowledgeable about the Detective assignments.

Copyright © 2005 -29-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved. Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 34: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

ANSWERS AND EXPLANATIONS FOR PRACTICE QUESTIONS

PART Two: ONGOING INVESTIGATION ASSIGNMENT

ASSIGNMENT 4 (Questions 10-15)

10. Aside from overall photographs of the jewelry store office, what specific evidence do you need to ensure is photographed by Evidence Technicians?

• Rear door of building; point of exit

• Roof of building; hole in roof; point of entry

• Safe; attack points on safe

• Tools

• Torch

• Alarm system in the store

• White Hen styrofoam coffee cup

• Cigarette butts

• Telephone wires that were cut

Explanation

This question is limited to photographs, not other processing of the scene that also would be

done by Evidence Technicians. As the detective, you need to ensure that ETs take

photographs of specific evidence. The list of specific evidence to be photographed includes

points of entry and exit, the safe, the torch and tools used to enter the safe, the alarm system

and the telephone wires that were cut, the White Hen coffee cup and the cigarette butts.

Note that this questions excludes overall photographs from your answer, so a response such as

"Take pictures of everything" or "Take overall photos of the scene" would not receive any credit.

The question asks for specific evidence to be photographed, such as those listed above.

Copyright © 2005 -30-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 35: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

11. List the specific evidence in the store that you need to ensure is processed for fingerprints.

• Top and side of safe

• Interior/outside of rear door

• Tools

• Torch

• Wires

• Display case where coffee cup found

Explanation

As the detective, you also need to ensure that the Evidence Technicians take specific

fingerprints of evidence. The list of specific evidence to be fingerprinted includes the safe, the

rear door which was the point of exit, the tools and torch used to open the safe, the wires that

were cut, and the display case where the coffee cup was found. Again, this question asks for

specific evidence. Here the focus is on the fingerprints to be taken rather than photographs. A

response such as "Take fingerprints of everything the burglars touched "would not receive any

credit.

Copyright © 2005 -31-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 36: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

12. Other than photographs and fingerprints, what specific physical evidence do you need to ensure is collected from the scene?

• White Hen coffee cup

• Cigarette butts

o Torch

• Tools

• Sample of wire cut

• Samples of safe insulation

• Sample of roofing material around hole

Explanation

As the detective, you also need to ensure that the Evidence Technicians preserve and collect

evidence from the scene. The list of specific evidence to be collected includes the White Hen

coffee cup, the cigarette butts, the torch and tools, sample of the wire cut, safe insulation, and

roofing materials around the hole. These pieces of physical evidence can be evaluated for

such things as DNA, tool markings on the wire that was cut, materials that may be found on a

possible suspect or vehicle to link it to the scene, etc. You need to think about what reasonably

could be taken from the store as physical evidence. For example, taking the safe would not be

reasonable because it weighs more than a ton, whereas taking a sample of the safe insulation

is possible.

Copyright © 2005 -32-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 37: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

As the Detective, you need to prioritize the individuals listed in the Patrol Division-Canvass Worksheets (Items 4B and 4C) for follow-up interviews. Keep in mind that you cannot interview

, everyone at once. Certain individuals may have information that is more likely to be useful to your immediate investigation. Other individuals may be less likely to have useful information, although you might want to follow-up with them later. Some individuals do not have any useful information and would not need to be interviewed again.

13. On the line next to the name of each of the individuals listed below (refer to Items 48 and 4C), write one of the following letters (I, P, or N) to indicate whether the individual is:

I = Important to interview right away; or

P = Perhaps relevant for interviews later; or

N = Not worth following up in this case.

N Item 4B (1) Rene Boe

N Item 4B (2) Shirley Standard

Item 4B (3) Maria Born

N Item 4B (4) Brent Gaylord

p Item 4C (1) Clive Stockton

Item 4C (2) Carrie

Explanation

To receive full credit for this question, you should have written the letters shown above on the lines next to each individual listed. For this type of question, you should prioritize the likelihood that you could obtain useful information from each person using the information you have available (i.e., the Canvass Worksheets). Do not make assumptions or invent details that are not indicated in the information that you are given.

I = Important to interview right away

The important people to interview right away are Maria Born and Carrie. Maria saw the van behind the store and knows what time it was. She also saw a logo on the van. You will want to see if you can get further details about the description of the van from her and more information on the logo to help you identify a possible rental company. Although Carrie was unwilling to give any information during the police officer's canvass, you will want to follow-up with her because her apartment is located on the 1st floor (like Maria's apartment in the building next door), and she has a view of the back of the store. You also need to find out who she is and if she does in fact live in that apartment (or was visiting). If you don't talk to her now, she may not be there later. Sometimes individuals may not want to talk to uniformed police, but might be willing to talk to a detective.

Copyright © 2005 -33-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 38: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

P = Perhaps relevant for interviews later

Clive Stockton is perhaps relevant for interview later on. Right now, you know he heard a car in the alley, but you don't know what night it was. It could have been outside of the time frame during which the burglary occurred. Even if it was during the relevant time frame, Clive told the officer that he did not observe the car. You may eventually want to follow-up with him depending on other leads or new information, but he is unlikely to have information that is useful to,you at this point in your investigation.

N = Not worth following up in this case

Rene Boe, Shirley Standard, and Brent Gaylord have no information to provide that will assist you in investigating this case. Rene says she did not see or hear anything. Shirley says she was out of town over the weekend, so she could not have seen or heard anything at the jewelry store in the probable time frame of the occurrence. Brent states that he did not see or hear anything either.

Copyright © 2005 -34-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 39: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

While interviewing the employees at the White Hen, one of the employees, Jason Smith, stated that he remembers some guys who drove up to the store and came in around 1 :00 a.m. on Sunday morning. They bought sweet rolls and a large coffee. Smith said that he had never seen them in the store before. They seemed to be nervous about something.

14. List three (3) important topics of information that you would ask this employee about what he observed.

1 > Can he describe the guys he saw?

2 > Were there any other employees in the store at the time?

3 > Were the guys driving a rental van?

Explanation

Although the question only asks you to list three (3) topics of information, four possible topics of information or categories of responses were identified as appropriate for this question. The three responses that you provide should fit into three of these categories to receive full credit.

1. Description of the guys (e.g., did they have any tattoos or distinguishing physical features, how many guys were there, would he recognize them again)

2. Description of conversation (e.g., did he hear any conversation between the guys, what did they say to each other)

3. Anyone else present in the store at the time (e.g., were there other witnesses, such as regular customers or employees, who may have seen the guys)

4. Information about the vehicle (e.g., what type of vehicle were the guys driving, did he notice any rental car name on the vehicle, did he remember any license plate numbers)

This question asks for topics of information. This indicates that you should be thinking broadly. For example, if your answer to this question included "Were the guys driving a van? Was there a logo on the vehicle? and Did he see a license plate number on the vehicle?" you would be given credit for the topic related to Information about the vehicle. However, these

questions all relate to the same topic of information, so you would not receive any points related to two of the other topics. Your answer should include only one question or statement related to three different topics of information that would be important to ask the witness.

Keep in mind that this question asks for topics of information relevant to what the employee observed about the guys he saw in the store. Although there may be additional questions you would want to ask this employee (such as, "Is there a surveillance camera in the store?"), this would not be directly relevant to the employee's own observations.

Copyright © 2005 -35-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 40: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

While interviewing one of the daytime White Hen employees, she states that the business has a video camera in place that records 24 hours a day. She states that only the manager has the key to the room where the tape is kept. When you talk to the manager about getting the tape, he is reluctant to give it to you.

15. What would be the most effective next step to take as the Detective?

Check one (1)

(+1> D A. Tell the manager if you do not get it from him you will get it from the corporate office.

(0) D

This will take some time to accomplish and is not as effective as trying to get the manager's cooperation; however, it will eventually get you the tape.

B. Inform the manager that if he does not cooperate, you could arrest him for obstruction.

This is the least effective step as it will alienate the manager. It may further delay what you seek and may subject you to civil action.

(+2) ~ C. Explain the need for the video and how the tape could help identify possible offenders.

This is the most effective approach you would want to try first, as it may accomplish your goal of obtaining evidence in the most expeditious manner.

Explanation

Shown in parentheses above are examples of the point values that have been assigned to each

of the response alternatives for this practice question. You would receive the point value

associated with the alternative that you selected. Also shown below each alternative are

explanations for the point values that were assigned to each response by the Department

senior subject matter experts. These explanations are provided here to make this preparation

guide as informative as possible in helping you prepare for the Investigative Logic Test. You

will not have to provide explanations for the answers you choose during the actual test.

NOTE: The point values and explanations were determined by Chicago Police Department senior command personnel who have experience in the Bureau of Investigative Services and are knowledgeable about the Detective assignments.

*** Copyright © 2005 -36-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 41: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

STUDYING AND TEST-TAKING TIPS

STARTING Now

The Detective Investigative Logic Test focuses on your ability to apply knowledge, skills,

abilities, and personal characteristics that detectives are required to demonstrate on the job.

You have demonstrated your knowledge of Department directives, the law, and other job­

related information as evidenced by your performance on the Detective Written Qualifying Test.

For the IL T, it is to your advantage to be familiar with the important duties that Detectives

perform (refer to Appendix A), the related knowledge, skills, abilities, and personal

characteristics (refer to Appendix B), the reports contained in Appendix C, and related

Department policies and procedures.

BEFORE THE EXAM

>- Avoid cramming or trying to memorize information at the last minute. It may help, however,

to review the recommended forms and your notes regarding any topics on which you want

to refresh your memory.

>- Eat well and get a good night's sleep before the test. If you are tired or hungry, your

concentration and test performance may be affected.

>- Make sure you know the exact location and time of the test. Allow yourself plenty of time to

arrive, use the restroom, find your seat, and compose yourself.

>- Go into the test with a positive attitude, determined to do your best. Focus on what you

know rather than worrying about what you do not know.

>- Do not discuss the test with other people once you arrive. Generally, this only increases

everyone's anxiety.

Copyright © 2005 -37-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 42: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

AT THE START OF THE EXAM

);> Listen carefully to all of the test administrator's instructions and follow them

step-by-step. If you are working ahead of the instructions, you are likely to miss

important information.

);> Follow ALL instructions given by the test administrator or proctor, including instructions

about handing out and collecting materials, breaks, restroom procedures, etc. Failure

to do so will disqualify you from the exam.

);> You will be asked to preview each entire section of the exam as part of the initial

instructions. This will allow you to notice missing or duplicate pages or other problems

with the production of the materials. Notify the proctor if you find anything wrong with

your test materials at this time.

);> Ask questions at the appropriate times if you are unsure about any directions or

procedures.

DURING THE EXAM

);> Preview all of the materials related to each exercise before you start to answer the

questions. This will allow you to determine which questions will be easier or harder and

help you schedule your test time accordingly. Do not spend too much time on any one

question. Skip difficult questions, then go back to them later.

);> Pay attention to your own work, not to what is going on around you. If you are

wondering how other people are doing or how far they have gotten, you are wasting

valuable time.

);> Try to stay relaxed during the test. If you have trouble concentrating or become tense,

pause and take a few deep breaths before returning to the test.

*** Copyright © 2005 -38-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 43: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

SCORING AND ELIGIBILITY INFOMRA TION ,

The test administrators will be responsible for distribution, collection, and handling (i.e.,

copying, storing, etc.) of all test materials. The test will be scored by the test development

consultants based on scoring guidelines developed with the CPD subject matter experts

and senior command personnel. The test developers make every effort to include scorers

with diverse backgrounds, including individuals of different racial, gender, and age groups. All

of the scorers receive extensive training in the scoring procedures and application of the

scoring guidelines. In a// cases, at least two scorers must agree on the final score awarded for

each candidate's response to each question on the Investigative Logic Test.

You will be asked to provide identification information (i.e., name, social security number, star

number, etc.) on the cover (which will be removed prior to scoring) of the IL T Test Question

Booklet. You also will need to write your social security number on each page of the Test

Question Booklet. This procedure will verify that you received all of the test materials and allow

your responses to be scored without knowledge of your name.

At NO time during the scoring process will any of the scorers or any employees of the City of

Chicago see any candidate's name associated with any test response.

Each test will be scored based on specific scoring criteria established by subject matter experts

and senior command personnel in the Chicago Police Department. Your final score will be the

total points you obtain for all test questions on the IL T. This final score will determine your rank

on the IL T Eligible List. Where more than one candidate receives the same final score,

candidates will be ranked by continuous service date, with more senior candidates ranking

ahead of candidates with more recent continuous service dates.

*** Copyright © 2005 -39-City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 44: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

Copyright © 2005

APPENDIX A

DETECTIVE CRITICAL JOB TASKS

City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 45: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT

Critical Tasks for BIS Detective Assignments (HGS, RBT, SVU)

A. Administrative Responsibilities

1. Manage case files (e.g., create, update, retrieve, and return), ensuring that necessary reports, notes, and other documents are included.

2. Develop files of various types of information (e.g., Modus Operandi/Crime Pattern files, Investigative Alerts, Felony files, Domestic Violence files, etc.), as appropriate.

3. Attend roll call/team meetings to keep abreast of activities in the area, exchange information with other police personnel, obtain work assignments, view streaming video, etc.

4. Attend in-service training.

5. Complete overtime forms, court attendance forms, and other related personnel documentation and submit them to immediate supervisor for review.

6. Use computer software to access computerized databases (e.g., CLEAR "Data Warehouse," CHRIS, LEADS, SOS, NCIC, Court Screen, TRAK System, CPD Intranet, the Internet, etc.).

7. Use word processing software to complete reports, memos, letters, etc.

8. Written Communications

8. Read and review various written communications (e.g., Commanding Officer's book, Daily Bulletins, special bulletins, legal interpretations, etc.) to obtain information.

9. Read field case reports (e.g., General Offense Case Reports, Missing/Found Persons Reports, Crime Scene Processing Reports, etc.) related to assigned cases.

10. Read and review medical reports (e.g., autopsy reports, reports of lab test results, etc.).

11. Prepare General Progress Reports (i.e., field notes, case progress logs) during the investigation of cases to document activities performed, individuals interviewed, surveillance, etc.

12. Complete detailed narrative written reports (e.g., Supplementary Reports, Lineup Supplementary Reports, Arrest Reports, Felony Minute Sheets, etc.) documenting activities performed in conducting investigations.

13. Review case reports prepared related to assigned cases for accuracy and completeness.

Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.- 1 -

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 46: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

14. Complete various forms (e.g., Complaints, Investigative Alerts, Arrest Warrants, photo requests, Community Alerts, bulletins, inventories, court documents, Criminal Debriefing Form, etc.).

15. Write memoranda, letters, electronic mail, and submissions for publication (e.g., Persons Wanted, Look Out Messages, Salutes in Daily Bulletin, To-From-Subject reports, letters of notification to victims/complainants, etc.) to communicate with individuals inside and outside the Department.

C. Oral Communications

16. Communicate with individuals involved in cases (e.g., victims, complainants, witnesses, etc.) to provide information about their cases (e.g., status, process of handling cases, court dates, etc.) and assistance programs, as needed (e.g., victim/witness program, relocation program, etc.).

17. Communicate with partner, supervisor, team members, and other individuals working jointly on cases, regarding investigative activities, progress, and results.

18. Communicate with Patrol officers (e.g., officers in district of occurrence or on the scene of the crime) to obtain additional information and provide technical advice (e.g., crime classification, types of case reports, etc.).

19. Communicate with police personnel in other work units within the Department (e.g., Crime Lab, Narcotics, Extradition Unit, Fugitive Task Unit, Juvenile Advocacy Section, etc.) to share intelligence, update status of investigations, coordinate activities, and make or respond to requests for services or information.

20. Communicate with personnel at prisons and detention facilities and with parole or probation officers to ascertain status of offenders.

21. Communicate with federal, state, or local agency personnel (e.g., Customs, FBI Task Force, DCFS, Juvenile Court Advocacy Center, Illinois State Police, Secretary of State, Medical Examiner's Office, other municipal police agencies, etc.) to exchange information, coordinate activities, and make or respond to requests.

22. Present evidence and facts of cases to Assistant State's Attorney during felony review and pre-trial conferences.

23. Provide information to citizens (e.g., juveniles, parents of juveniles, victims, etc.) as necessary, including information about social help agencies, violation of child custody orders, how to obtain orders of protection, etc.

24. Communicate with medical personnel to check on status of victims or offenders.

25. Notify victims' families of serious injury or death.

Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.- 2 -

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 47: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

D. Investigation of Cases

26. Evaluate reports related to assigned cases to determine the nature of the case, schedule investigation activities, establish criminal conspiracy, etc.

27. Develop investigative strategies for interviews, investigations, collection of evidence, etc.

28. Respond to and investigate complaints or requests (e.g., Hot Line faxes regarding child abuse/neglect, identity theft, check fraud, etc.).

29. Investigate and evaluate reports of missing persons following established procedures for regular, immediate action, and high profile cases.

30. Investigate the whereabouts of non-registered sex offenders.

31. Conduct forceful entry (e.g., entering establishments, vehicles, etc.) in exigent circumstances and during execution of Search Warrants.

32. Take charge of investigations at crime scenes and ensure the crime scene is secured.

33. Canvass area around crime scenes to identify and gather witnesses for questioning, including conducting follow-up canvass of area after a crime has occurred.

34. Review various sources of information (e.g., previous addresses, name checks and aliases, voter registration logs, gun registrations, outstanding warrants, citations issued in area of crime, licensed premise checks, title searches, inmate records, utility checks, Field Contact Cards, post office records, currency exchanges, pawn shops, traffic records, etc.) to develop possible leads.

35. Follow up leads provided by witnesses and other relevant individuals (e.g., informants) or records.

36. Determine validity of allegations and assess credibility of individuals (e.g., verifying, comparing, and analyzing accounts of witnesses, victims, and offenders in relation to evidence gathered, checking alibis, determining validity of orders of protection or custody orders, etc.).

37. Review evidence and details of a crime to evaluate and draw conclusions concerning the crime, motives, and possible individuals involved.

38. Revise theories as new evidence or facts are revealed during the progress of an investigation.

39. Obtain necessary legal documents related to cases (e.g., Investigative Alerts, Felony Review papers, Search Warrants, Arrest Warrants, extradition papers, writs, proffers, MUDD and Toll records, PENS, etc.).

Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.- 3 -

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 48: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

40. Schedule and conduct live and photo lineups (including computerized photos using CLEAR System), involving appropriate personnel (e.g., investigators, social workers, etc.) as required for juvenile lineups.

41. Schedule and coordinate with specialists needed to conduct specialized investigative activities (e.g., polygraphs, preparation of composite drawings, Victim Sensitive Interviews, etc.).

42. Determine status of cases (e.g., open, closed, suspended, unfounded, progress, etc.) based on investigation and information available and reclassify case reports, as required, using information obtained from investigation.

43. Investigate police-related shootings (i.e., shots fired at or by police officers) and participate in round table with Assistant State's Attorney, Street Deputy, Commander, and OPS.

44. Review and analyze information contained in paper files and computerized databases to identify crime patterns, possible offenders, distinct problems, similarities across criminal cases and across geographical boundaries, etc.

45. Determine ownership and verify accuracy of stolen property lists (e.g., using serial numbers, l.D. marks, etc.) and notify Records Section.

46. Identify and verify gang allegiance (e.g., through verbal admission, tattoos, signs, etc.).

47. Make identification of dead bodies, including completion of appropriate paperwork (e.g., VICAP form).

48. Review telephone records to identify individuals communicating with suspects or victims.

E. Criminal Arrests and Processing

49. Request, process, and/or serve Arrest Warrants and Investigative Alerts.

50. Detain arrestees for investigative purposes within legal and Departmental guidelines (e.g., probable cause, 48-hour rule, juvenile detention time limits, etc.).

51. Conduct pat-down and custodial searches of offenders.

52. Arrest or assist in the arrest of criminals or suspects, including restraining individuals, advising arrestees of their constitutional rights, and participating in mass arrest situations.

53. Travel to other locations (e.g., out of state, to the suburbs) as necessary to conduct interviews with offenders or witnesses or assist in arrest and transport of offenders, children abducted, etc., according to relevant Federal and/or jurisdictional restrictions (e.g., method of travel, carrying weapons, etc.).

Copyright© 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.- 4 -

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 49: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

54. Transport juveniles, witnesses, victims, and suspects, as necessary, (e.g., to police facilities, home, scene of crime area, protective custody, shelters, etc.).

55. Make decisions concerning the custody of juveniles (e.g., take protective custody, leave in the home), including obtaining information from DCFS (e.g., to put juvenile in custody of relatives).

56. Make decisions regarding adjudication of juvenile offenders (e.g., formal or informal adjustment, court referral, not secure detention, etc.).

57. Confer with Assistant State's Attorney to determine proper charges for offenders, additional information needed, further investigative actions to be taken, etc.

58. Process juvenile offenders who will be charged as adults following appropriate guidelines.

59. Evaluate the need and, when appropriate, request through chain of command that offenders be held past court call.

F. Collection and Preservation of Evidence

60. Evaluate crime scenes or sites of Search Warrant executions and coordinate the collection and preservation of evidence, including directing Evidence Technician/Crime Lab personnel at the scene (e.g., DNA evidence, photographs, fingerprints, etc.).

61. Inventory evidence obtained at crime scenes and establish chain of custody using appropriate procedures and tools (e.g., computerized system to inventory and track evidence and property taken into custody).

62. Obtain "elimination" fingerprints or DNA evidence, as necessary and appropriate given other available evidence.

63. Follow up on collection and processing of evidence in criminal sexual assault and sexual abuse cases (e.g., rape kit by hospital, collection by Evidence Technician, results from Crime Lab, etc.).

64. Examine victim and offender for wounds and identification, including examination of victim's and offender's clothing.

65. Request and process Search Warrants prior to collection of evidence, as required.

66. Ensure that evidence reports and criminalistic reports are included in case files.

67. Confer with Evidence Technician and review related reports to determine the extent and quality of evidence available.

68. Ensure that evidence found by others is inventoried and documented in appropriate reports.

Copyright© 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.- 5 -

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 50: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

69. Ensure request is made to Crime Lab to analyze evidence and follow up to obtain information concerning the results of tests conducted on evidence.

70. Obtain consent to search or court order for buccal swab and DNA testing.

G. Investigative Interviews

71. Conduct interviews over the telephone with complainants, victims, witnesses, and other persons to obtain facts concerning cases.

72. Conduct field interviews with witnesses at crime scenes and other individuals who may provide information potentially relevant to cases.

73. Conduct interviews with juveniles according to rules and regulations.

74. Conduct interviews with personnel representing public and private agencies (e.g., doctors and medical specialists, other police agencies, Medical Examiner's staff, Fire Department members, Public Aid officials, DCFS, Child Advocacy Center, telephone company liaison, insurance agencies, school officials, referral agencies, etc.) to collect information relevant to assigned cases.

75. Conduct interviews of suspects to gather background information, possible alibis, gang affiliation, admission of guilt, implication of offenders, etc.

76. Re-interview witnesses and/or interview individuals identified by witnesses to determine veracity of witness statements.

H. Trial Preparation and Court Testimony

77. Read and review case files in preparation for court appearances.

78. Discuss criminal cases (pre-trial, trial, grand jury, etc.) and review evidence with Assistant State's Attorney in order to be familiar with case details and charges.

79. Obtain evidence from ERPS (Evidence and Recovered Property Section), if requested by court.

80. Testify in court or before the grand jury, as requested or required, to present evidence regarding cases.

81. Notify victims, witnesses, and police officers about the time and place of court hearings, encouraging them to attend and possibly transporting victims and witnesses to and from court if needed.

Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.- 6 -

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 51: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

APPENDIX B

DETECTIVE IMPORTANT KNOWLEDGE AREAS, SKILLS,

ABILITIES, AND PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS

Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 52: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT

Important Knowledge, Skills, Abilities, and Personal Characteristics for BIS Detective Assignments (HGS, RBT, SVU)

Knowledge Areas

1. Knowledge of Illinois Compiled Statues 325-Children (e.g., Abused and Neglected Child Reporting Act)

2. Knowledge of Illinois Compiled Statues 705-Courts (e.g., Illinois Juvenile Court Act)

3. Knowledge of Illinois Compiled Statutes 720-Criminal Offenses (e.g., Criminal Code, Offenses Against Persons, Offenses Against Property, Offenses Against the Public)

4. Knowledge of Illinois Compiled Statues 725-Criminal Procedures (e.g., probable cause, preliminary hearings, grand jury, trial procedures, etc.)

5. Knowledge of Illinois Compiled Statues 750-Families (e.g., Illinois Domestic Violence Act)

6. Knowledge of crime classification using the Incident Reporting Guide

7. Knowledge of general law enforcement methods, procedures, and policies defining the powers and authorities of a law enforcement officer (e.g., arrests, weapons, deadly force, pursuits, warrants, unmarked cars, etc.)

8. Knowledge of Department policies and procedures regarding the conduct of investigations (e.g., preliminary investigations, missing/found persons, death investigations, violent crimes, property crimes, abuse and neglect, domestic violence, overhears, etc.), including reporting instructions and investigative procedures (e.g., lineups, investigative alerts, polygraphs, buccal swabs, etc.)

9. Knowledge of legal considerations connected with the interviewing process (e.g., Miranda, juvenile interviewing procedures, attorney's rights, etc.) and investigative interviewing techniques (e.g., identifying deceptive behavior, assessing witness/victim/suspect credibility, conducting victim sensitive interviews, etc.)

10. Knowledge of evidence recovery, collection, and inventory procedures and techniques (e.g., marking, documenting, Crime Lab, types of tests, packaging, DNA, etc.)

11. Knowledge of Departmental resources (e.g., CLEAR "Data Warehouse," CHRIS, Triple I, SOS, Domestic Violence Advocate, Legal Bulletins, Training Bulletins, etc.) and other resources (e.g., NCIC, LEADS, HIDTA, the Internet, other governmental, civilian/non­governmental) available for use in solving problems, including how to obtain resource information

12. Knowledge of notification requirements and other communication procedures within the Department (e.g., situations requiring notifications, written notifications, radio communication, etc.)

Copyright© 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.- 1 -

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 53: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

13. Knowledge of contacts and communication procedures with other agencies (e.g., Assistant State's Attorney, other police agencies outside the jurisdiction of the Department, federal agencies, etc.)

Skills and Abilities

14. Oral Communication-Understanding, expressing, or communicating information, thoughts, ideas, instructions, or descriptions verbally so that others will understand; listening carefully when others are speaking and asking questions as necessary to clarify points {e.g., speaking understandably, using gestures and body language appropriately, summarizing information clearly and concisely, presenting legal arguments, etc.).

15. Investigative Interviewing-Effectively obtaining information from witnesses, victims, offenders, and other relevant individuals (e.g., changing interview style to communicate effectively and obtain information; interpreting, evaluating, and summarizing information obtained from individuals interviewed; etc.).

16. Written Communication-Understanding, expressing, or communicating information, thoughts, ideas, instructions, or descriptions in writing so that others will understand (e.g., taking notes, completing forms, recording or entering information, using grammar correctly, composing reports including summarizing information logically, clearly, accurately, and concisely, etc.).

17. Critical Thinking/Problem Solving-Systematically collecting and analyzing the full range of information necessary to solve problems; applying knowledge and experience to select, organize, and logically "process" relevant information and draw reasonable conclusions; evaluating and comparing information to identify conflicts with existing information; recognizing facts or information that is incomplete or ambiguous (e.g., comparing objects, interviews, or other pieces of information collected; detecting consistencies and inconsistencies between statements; correctly identifying and stating problems; determining facts of a particular case; recognizing a pattern across a series of events; evaluating conflicting information from witnesses, offenders, or victims; formulating and testing theories).

18. Judgment/Decision Making-Taking appropriate and timely actions in specific circumstances given the information known, even under conditions of uncertainty; assessing and managing risks and likely outcomes of various actions; determining if a crime has been committed, the nature of the crime, and required courses of action. (e.g., releasing suspects from custody, making an arrest, determining presence or absence of criminality in cases, adjudicating juvenile offenders, taking custody of children, etc.).

19. Planning/Organizing/Scheduling-Strategizing and prioritizing multiple work activities; making efficient and situationally appropriate use of time and resources; controlling or coordinating the work of self or others to accomplish tasks and meet deadlines (e.g., directing the collection of evidence at the scene of the crime, prioritizing investigative procedures, establishing investigative goals and methods to achieve them, working on multiple cases simultaneously, scheduling cases and court dates, etc.).

Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.- 2 -Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 54: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

20. Observation-Observing and recognizing events and circumstances taking place; noting others' actions and demeanor in order to evaluate behavior and credibility (e.g., conducting surveillance activities, crime scene processing, searching for missing persons, interrogating suspects, etc.).

21. Memory-Selectively and accurately recalling relevant information at the appropriate time; retaining information as appropriate using both long- and short-term memories (e.g., remembering information collected from interviews, recognizing individuals or methods with possible connections to other crimes, recalling facts for presentation in court, etc.).

22. Computer Skills-Completing reports, forms, and other documentation using computer software; accessing and analyzing information from databases using automated systems.

23. Equipment Operation-Operating Department vehicles, firearms, and other approved weapons safely; using radio and other communication systems.

Personal Characteristics

24. Interpersonal Relations/Empathy-Developing and maintaining effective and cordial working relationships with others; being courteous to victims, juveniles, witnesses, the public, family members, coworkers, etc.; resolving interpersonal conflicts in a professional and diplomatic manner; understanding the feelings, thoughts, or motives of another person; (e.g., cooperating and coordinating actions with others, responding to inquiries courteously, adopting an appropriate interpersonal role with a variety of people; etc.).

25. Influencing Others-Influencing others' behaviors, opinions, attitudes, or judgments; using appropriate language, tone, incentives, or other techniques to gain trust and persuade others to cooperate (e.g., persuading witnesses, complainants, or offenders to provide information; getting work accomplished through others, such as Crime Lab personnel, patrol officers, etc.).

26. Objectivity-Remaining unbiased or detached in the face of rejection or hostility; maintaining a realistic perspective; willing to consider different points of view, versions of events, or other possible theories; remaining uninfluenced by emotion or personal opinion (e.g., dealing with uncooperative witnesses, victims, offenders, medical personnel; etc.).

27. Adaptability-Demonstrating a flexible, changeable approach in response to shifting priorities or ambiguous work situations; switching to different tasks or applying different methods to meet changing schedules or other circumstances; redirecting attention to accomplish tasks after interruptions (e.g., change in status regarding urgency of a case, availability of witnesses, receipt of new information, shift changes due to manpower needs, etc.).

28. Attention to Detail-Giving careful attention to the details of one's work; being thorough and making sure nothing is left undone; ensuring that appropriate quality checks are done to prevent errors or mistakes (e.g., checking reports for accuracy and completeness, ensuring appropriate procedures are followed, completing and reviewing forms, gathering evidence at a scene, etc.).

Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.- 3 -

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 55: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

29. Dependability-Following through on assignments without prompting; maintaining a good attendance record; arriving promptly and prepared for work; requires minimal supervision; conscientious about work performance.

30. Initiative-Anticipating or recognizing a need and taking action; actively influencing events rather than demonstrating passive acceptance of the outcome; initiating or coordinating activities to address situations in which no one has direct or assigned responsibility; providing additional information or assistance to victims; sharing information with co-workers.

31. Stress Tolerance-Maintaining composure and self-control in difficult circumstances; remaining self-assured in conflicts, emotionally charged situations, or in front of large groups; maintaining concentration and level of performance under pressure, opposition, frustration, or crisis (e.g., court testimony, media exposure, crowd situations, unusually high volume of work, limited resources available, etc.).

32. Persistence/Patience-Staying with a task or assignment, despite obstacles or lack of enthusiasm, until it is completed or it is no longer reasonably attainable; tolerating periods of inactivity or delay (e.g., following up on all leads to close a case, waiting for new details or a break before continuing investigation, maintaining awareness of facts or missing information during lulls in activity, waiting for call backs from complainants or for arrival of responsible parties to release juvenile detainees, etc.).

33. Professional Orientation and Commitment-Remaining firm in one's allegiance to the Department's core values and remaining faithful in pursuit of the Department's mission despite obstacles or opposition; setting high standards for personal job performance and working hard to achieve them; following Department policies and regulations and supporting their intent and value; demonstrating positive regard for one's career and profession.

34. Personal Integrity-Demonstrating consistency among one's principles, values, statements, and behaviors; building trust and credibility with others through demonstrated commitment to personal values; accepting responsibility for one's own decisions and actions in the face of challenge or adversity.

Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.- 4 -

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 56: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

Copyright© 2005

Appendix C

Relevant CPD Reports

City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 57: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

DETECTIVE INVESTIGATIVE LOGIC TEST RELEVANT CPD REPORTS

Blank copies of the following reports are provided in this appendix:

Y General Offense Case Report

Y Patrol Division - Canvass Worksheet

Y Case Supplementary Report (Bureau of Investigative Services)

Information relevant to the various assignments included in the Investigative Logic Test will be

presented using these reports. It is to your advantage to be familiar with the format, content,

and purpose of these reports before the day of the test.

Note that the Case Supplementary Report (Bureau of Investigative Services) is a computerized

form that may contain different headings or information, depending on the nature of the

investigation (e.g., burglary, homicide, kidnaping, etc.). The sample provided in this appendix

contains headings that may be used in similar reports for the Investigative Logic Test.

Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 58: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 59: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

GENERAL OFFENSE CASE REPORT

OFFENSE/INCi DENT --PA IMAAY CLASSIFICATION 1-UCA OFF. CODE I

_:_

i2 SECONDARY CLASSIFICATION

l 1~.D NO

CHICA.GO POLICE APT. NO IS. FIRE RELATED 6 DATE or OCCURRENCE TfME -- --~r-oFCJCCURTa 8EAT/UN!T ASS!GN-

1 UJ z UJ u "'

4. ADDRESS or OCCURRENCE

NO.J.. J. I l lDIRl STREET

9. TYPE OF LOCATION OR PREMISE WHERE OFFENSE OCCURRED !GIVE NAME OF LOCATION IF APPLICABLE)

101 YES D2NO

IO LOCA1 ION CODE

_L_.

DAY MO YR.

l 11 DATE R.0.ARAIVEO-· T!fJIE

1

2. ASSIGNED BY

02 Of'i VIEW

Ocos

[J 3 SUPERVISOR

Al! information descriptions ancJ statements in this entire report are app1ox1mat1ons or summar1zat1ons u11les~ 1nJ1ca1etJ oth=e=1w="="·=r=======or=o==========•===;======-

20 NO 21 NAME 22.HOMEADDAESS 123.SEX-RACE AGE]! 24 HOME PHONE 25.BUSINESSPliONE 26.TIMEAVAIL. 27.0CCUPATION l2a !N I 29 V!CTIM VlCTJMs IDENTITY I 'ODE I !~RED REL. CODE

~~--.,,--i-----------IL_A_S_T_-·_F_•R_S_T_-_M_l_.l ________ V_E_A_lr~~'E._D-1-------JN_o_ .. _0_1_A_ .. _sT_A_E_E_r_._A_PT_._N_o_._, ______ 1!,·-" ':~-------+--------r--------f------·---·-f~~E,~S,_N.~O_,.. ______ _

~E '--· u _________________ J__.i_l -------- J_ J_ C--- ---

g> r PARENTiGUAROIAN~JUVE_N_IL_E ___________________ --·-------- I l·BLACK 3·BLACK·~~s~~~?c°ES 5-AMER, !ND./ALASK. NAT.

~ _ ~d'~=±==f=========t:;=======j2·WHITE 4·WHITE·H!SPANlC 6 ASIAN/PACIFIC !SLANDER

~3=0.=,=jQ=+=,=1 "". i..j"""' ·1=0=,=sc=o=v=E=R=E=o=·'i'D=2~w=,=TN=ES=S=E=D==eD=3=A=E=P=O=A=T=E=O=O=F=F=E=N=S=E = F3=2=. ========~====--------;;= 33 • . 3 4 5 ' .. • U~fCORllESPONDING ~~~ ;o~~~l ~;~~~~~Tl~~~~~; 1 ?~0SNH~~l~A~~~~T!ONS>1!P COO fl LANK

WIT· -l 01. WIFE 09 ·BR.OTHER l7 · BR.OTHER·u::;:-LAW 25 ·CARETAKER 02 ·HUSBAND 10· SISHR 18· 51ST£R·!N·LAW

~ ~ ·u 03·fORMERWlfE 1\·A.UN1 \9·0iMERRELATIVE ..... D .. 04. fORMER11U~llAN0 \l ·UNCLE 20. GIRLFRIEND (INCLUDES ·~oRMrn-1

0

~ ~~~~-----~~-----~~--------~------------------------~-i~--~--~------~------~ OS·MDTHER 13·MOTHER·~·LAW 21·80YfR!ENO(!NUUDES.f0R.MER")

~ UNK u Tr 0 ~;:~~~HER ~~: ~~~~1~~~1z~AW ~;: 6~l~~~~~~EUC~;~TANCE D ..l. J_ 08·0AUGHTER 16·0A\JGHT£f\.IN·LAW 24.·STRANGER

=.o"'."N~O~. p===4=1=. O=F=F=E=N=O=E=R=.S=N=A=M=E "1o=R=D=E=sc"A"1"a"E "c"Lo"r"H"1"N"G"."ET=C=.=I ====f======4=2=. =H=O=M=E=A=D=D=A=E=S=S=======i',=:3=. S:'E;=X=-==~:±/'J=:B=:~=-=A=:G":E'T".H';'E:';l!,:G';CH:;;T=r,oW;;;Eo;l~G:;H'i'T=r~E~Y~E~S =r=;H;';A~IR;;==r=;c"ioi'iM7,P~L=. =f='f,M~A'iiAc;;K~S=;, S~C";A~A~S=. f-n C · 44 · C .B ./I.A· N6==r.isA ~Le t/J'8if R -

OFF.

ffi I l ~~~-'------------~----------+-----~--~-~~---------j--i'--~-'--~t----t----t--~-r--~-j-----r-----~~---ic------~---i--~---u.

Oil 50. 51. OBJECT/WEAPON 01 USED 02 DISPLAYED 03UNK 5<. FIREARM FEATURES 53. POINT/ENTRY 5~. POINT/EXIT 55. BURG LAA ALARM 56. SAFE BURGLARY METHOD 57 !F RESIDENCE, WHERE WERE OCCUPANTS

ONA ::l 0 t.> z ~ ~ UNK

~ 0 "' u rt: u

70.

,. r DNA

~ Q c.. 0 a: c.. UNK

0 80-'

"'z 52 UJ 1-> >- <t -0~ I- oa: ¢ «O "'cu. rt: zZ

~0-

90

~ UJ wz

~z ~o 0"' o..rt:

UJ tl.

-

001 HAND GUN

002 SHOTGUN

Do3 RIFLE

Q04 KNIFE

Dos VEHICLE

Dos BLUNT INSTRUMENT

Q07 THROWN OBJECT

Dos EXP.Los1vE

0 09 LIOU JO/GAS

D 10 OCTILE/GLASS

011 RAZOR

D 12 PAY TOOL

013 HANO. FEET

014 OTHER

D 1S ONA

71. DESCRIBE PROPERTY IN NARRATIVE

001 CHROME/NICKEL

Do2 BLUE STEEL

0 03 SHOAT BARREL

004 LONG BARREL

Dos SAWED OFF

Dao OTHER

D 07 UNKNOWN

Dos DNA

001 FRONT DOOR

0 02 REAR ODOR

Oo3w1Noow

Do• ROOF

Dos FLOOR

Do6 s10E oooA

§07 OTHER 08 UNKNOWN 09 DNA

T•TAKEN, A .. RECOVERED

------~--+··--·

001 FRONT OOOA

0 02 REAR ODOR

Do3w1Noow

Do. ROOF

Dos FLOOR

Dos sioe oooR

§07 OTHER 08 UNKNOWN 09 ONA

OONA

ON PREMISE

01 YES 02 NO

ALARM CIRCUMVENTED

01 YES 02 NO

Do1 PUNCH

Do2 TORCH

003 EXPLOSIVE

004 DRILL

Dos REMOVED

I SB. UNUSUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF OFFENS·E·-

Do& PEEL

Doi OPEN

Doa UNKNOWN

Q09 DNA

001 WORK

002 VISITING

Oo3 VACATION

004 WEDDING

Dos FuNERAUWAKE

Do60THEA

001 UNKNOWN

Dos DNA

1 MONEY 12JEWELRY 13FURS I 4CLOTHJNG I 7QFF1CEEOUIPMT. I STV.RADIO.STEAEO 191--0USEHOLDGOODS I OCONSUM.GOOOS 1l·JFIREARMS 1& Narc:.'Oann.Drugs 150THE'R j6NONE

Ors 1Drs 1DTs 1DTs :ors 1Drs ,01s 1 Drs 1Crs 1Crs; ,Ors 1Dr

DR 1DA 1DA I DR I DA I DR 1DR I DA 1DA 1DA 1DR 1DR

Tl. VEHICLE/TRAILER I YEAA 1MAKE lsoOY STYLE ICOLOR I V.LN. l,;r ATE LICENSE NO STAfErx~~~R-O .• P.E._A_T_Y·-,-N-V_E_NT_D._R __ Y_N_O_IS_l ___ ,_T4 VEH INVENTORY NO POL.ND

B~:~~~~E;:~~~T : : : : : ,__.___,_ -'--'~ -'~ L ; .1 ' l ' ·' I , I.. -L •• .L.-~-LL..i..J-~ -~Of~ .. . . . -·'-_j_ __ _ NARRATIVE.!Do not dup!ica1e or repeat wformat1on - for expl;m.1110•1 Qi addition.ill i1)fo1ma1>on only} ~SOBRIETY OF VICTiM--

__ _L~1 SOBER 02 HBO

----~~-:I 82 FLASH MESSAGE SENT?

[] 1 YES 02 NO

--

l - -· - - --· .. - .. .. . 91 EXTAA COPIES REQUIRED l 0 CDNrD. !s2. OFFICER NOTIFYING FOLLOW·Uf> !NVESTIG. UNIT UNIT NOTIFIED PERSON LJNOT!FIED [JAAAIVEO DATE (OAY·~-10-YA) DNORMAL OTHER SIDE! l I l 93. FIRST OFFICE A AT SCENE DR.O ]94. OFFICER NOTIFYING 01sT D/S DET DM.E. PERSON DNOT!FIEO DARRIVEO 0Al E lDAY·MQ-YA/

.l l i -'-95.AEPORTING OFF!CEf-1'5 NAME (PAINT) STAR NO OFFICER'S SIGNATURE I DATE INVEST COMPLETED-TIME 97 SUPERVISOR APPROVING !PAINT NAMEl

l l 96. REPORTING OFFICER'S NAME lPR!l'JTl STAR NO OFFICER'S SIGNATURE APPROVAL SIGNATURE DA rE APPHOVEO - TIME

l L CPD· 11.380 (Rev. 8/96) \ Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 60: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

CONTINUATION OF NARRATIV~

:.1.ucR OFFENSE CODE -

' D 1 CORRECT O 02 REVISED

OFFICER REASSIGNED -STAR NO.

VICTIM IDENTIFIERS

· 01 CORRECT

: 02 REVISED

I

REV. CODE

I DATE

!VICTIM NO.

I

I

•~VALUE OF PROPERTY TAKEN/RECOVERED

1 MONEY

0TS

DA

12 JEWELRY

IDT$

!DA

SERIAL NOS.OR IDENTIFICATION NOS.

I HAVE REVIEWED THIS AEPOAi1 SUPERVlSOR·s SIGNATURE

ANO BY MY SIGNATURE IN01· I

CATETHATlTISACCi:PTABLE. I

R.O.NO

I DATE IO.AY-MO·YA.I

I I

FOR USE BY BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES ONLY

1-UCA METHOD CODE

1METHOO ASSIGNED I UNIT NO.

01 FIELD 02 AOMIN. \ DJ SUMMARY _l_

STATUS Do PROGRESS 01 SUSPENDED 02 UNFOUNDED

DJ CLEARED CLOSED 0 •CLEARED OPEN. Os Exc. CLAD. CLOSED 06 EXC. CLEARED OPEN 01 CLOSED-NON-CRIMINAL

I REVISED NAME

I

OFFICER ASSIGNED STAR NO.

I DATE ASSIGNED 1SUPV. STAR NO. ] INVESTIGATIVE FILE 1REASSIGNED

I 01 YES D2No 01 YES ' I ...1

1F CASE 1S CLEARED, HOW CLEARED !USE THIS BOX FOR SINGLE CLEAR UP OR FIRST CLEAR UP OF MULTIPLE CLEAR UP LISTI

D 1 :~~6~JcuT10N D

2 ~~'l,l'itWD0iT DJ ~g~~~:E'i:1'u'-i-~ED D 4 ~%~~':i-%1ii'JT D s ~~~~~IONAL

1AEVISED ADDRESS

I J REVISED PHONE NO.

I 0HOME

1 Oaus1NESS

D2No

10ADULT

101uv. I

01 ONA

IJ FURS

IDT$

IOA

02 VERIFIED OJ CORRECTED

l4CLOTHING

JOT$

17 OFFICE EOU1PMT.

IDT s

8 TV. RADIO, STEREO

DT s

f!ILL IN niE.-FlJ(l AMOUNT oi::= ONLY THOSE VALUES WHICH E:tTHER DIFFER f:'AOM OR WERE Not REP.OATED O~ T.HE_BEVERSE THE N.<'\AAATl'.'JE QR A SL!PPJ_EMENT_.:.;A.:.;A_YJ.Ai.lf::.P.;:O.:.;R_:.T.:_. -------..,.-----------

lg HOUSEHOLD GOODS I 0 CON SUM. GOODS 11-1 F !REARMS I & NARC/DANG DRUGS I 5 OTHER

IOA IOR

01 DNA 02 VERIFIED 0 J CORRECTED

I OR

10Ts 1DTs 1DTs 10Ts 10Ts

1DA 10A 1DA IDA IDA

LIST ALL CORRECTIONS & NEW OR ADDITIONAL NOS. OBTAINED

I 5 NONE

IDT

IOA

; REMARKS (PERTINENT INFORMATION NOT ON ORIGINAL AEPOATJ

rREPARED SY - SIGNATURE STAR NO. DATE IDAY·MO·YA.\ I APPROVED BY - SIGNAT\JAE STAR NO. I DATE lDAV-MO-YR.)

I

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 61: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

PATROL DIVISION - CANVASS WORKSHEET TYPE INCIDENT RDNO FORM MUST ACCOMPANY GENERAL OFFENSE CASE REPORT INVOLVING ALL SHOOTINGS AND OTHER MAJOR INCIDENTS AS DIRECTED

LOCATION OF INCIDENT JTYPE LOCATION (HOUSE, STREET, ETC.) J DA TE OF OCCUR. jTIME OCCUR.

VICTIM'S ROLE (BYSTANDER, POSSIBLE TARGET, E 1 C) WEATHER/LIGHTING CONDITIONS

1. NAME (LAST· FIRST· M.I.) SEX · RACE rGE - DA TE OF BIRTH rlME OF CONTACT

HOME ADDRESS APT.IFLOOR HOME TELEPHONE OTHER TELEPHONE (Specify)

PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT - ADDRESS - TELEPHONE RELATIVE/FRIEND NOT LIVING WITH WITNESS: NAME-ADDRESS-PHONE

COMMENTS

2. NAME (LAST· FIRST· M.1.) SEX-RACE lAGE • DA TE OF BIRTH rlME OF CONTACT en I-

~ HOME ADDRESS APT.IFLOOR HOME TELEPHONE OTHER TELEPHONE (Specify) I-z 0 PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT· ADDRESS - TELEPHONE RELATIVE/FRIEND NOT LIVING WITH WITNESS: NAME-ADDRESS-PHONE u w a'.j COMMENTS u en z 0

3. NAME (LAST· FIRST· M.I.) SEX-RACE YGE • DA TE OF BIRTH }TIME OF CONTACT

HOME ADDRESS APTJFLOOR HOME TELEPHONE OTHER TELEPHONE (Specify)

PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT· ADDRESS - TELEPHONE RELATIVE/FRIEND NOT LIVING WITH WITNESS: NAME-ADDRESS-PHONE

COMMENTS

4. NAME (LAST· FIRST· M.1.) SEX-RACE l AGE· DATE OF BIRTH rlME OF CONTACT

HOME ADDRESS APTJFLOOR HOME TELEPHONE I OTHER TELEPHONE (Specify)

PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT - ADDRESS - TELEPHONE RELATIVE/FRIEND NOT LIVING WITH WITNESS: NAME-ADDRESS-PHONE

COMMENTS

...J PATROL BEAT UNIT ASSIGNED· OFFICERS' NAMES, STAR No.s ASSISTING UNITS (E.T. MOBILE CRIME LAB.) UJ z z 0 U) SUPERVISOR 0::: UJ a.

CPD-21.956 (7/03)

UNITS NOTIFIED

USE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION: ORIGINAL (WITH CASE REPORT)

1 COPY TO AREA DETECTIVES 1 COPY TO N.A.G.l.S. 1 COPY TO AREA GANG LIEUTENANT 1 COPY WITH PINK

, -

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 62: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 63: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT IR.o. No.

CASE SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT 3510 S. Michigan Avenue, Illinois 60653 (For use ~ Chic~o Police • Bureau of lnvesti_g_ative Services Personnel On!Yl_

PROGRESS l DETECTIVE SUP. SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL

Last Offense Classification/Re-Classification IUCR Code Original Offense Classification IUCR Code

Address of Occurrence Beat of Occur No of Victims No of Offenders No of Arrested SCRNo

Location Type Location Code Secondary Location Hate Crime? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------!------------------------

Date of Occurrence Unit Assigned Date RO Arrived Fire Related? Gang Related? Domestic Related?

Reporting Officer i Star No i Approving Supervisor i Star No i Primary Detective Assigned i Star No -----------------------------------------------------r----------------r------------------------------------------r-------------------r---------------------------------------------r------------------------

:i?:~}~:§:~~i!![~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::f ::g?.!~:6RP-i~~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::=::::::::f :~~~[ii~~~-~ff.YE~:::::::::::==::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

THIS IS A FIELD INVESTIGATIVE PROGRESS REPORT

VICTIM(S):

DOB: RES:.

EMPLOYMENT: OTHER COMMUNICATIONS: BUSINESS: SSN:

SUSPECT(S):

DESCRIPTION:

WEARING:

RELATIONSHIP OF VICTIM TO OFFENDER:

VICTIM'S INJURIES:

TRANSPORTED TO: HOSPITAL:

WEAPON(S): SERIAL#: PROPERTY TYPE: OWNER:

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 64: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

LOCATION OF INCIDENT:

DATE & TIME OF INCIDENT:

MOTIVE:

FIREARM(S) TAKEN

OTHER PROPERTY TAKEN:

BURGLARY INFORMATION:

PERSONNEL ASSIGNED:

WITNESS(ES):

PERSON(S) INTERVIEWED:

INVESTIGATION:

SERIAL#: PROERTY TYPE: OWNER:

SERIAL#: PROPERTY TYPE:

OWNER:

POINT OF ENTRY: POINT OF EXIT:

RES:

OTHER COMMUNICATIONS:

RES:

OTHER COMMUNICATIONS:

FIELD INVESTIGATION - AREA 9 - PROGRESS CASE

(This sections contains the narrative description of detectives' investigative activities ... )

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 65: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

Appendix D

Practice IL T Assignment Materials

Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 66: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

ASSIGNMENT 1 (Questions 1-2)

Related Assignment Materials

Item 1A General Offense Case Report (RD No. HL-368361)

Burglary-Forcible Entry

Your Role

Detectives often receive "handouts," which are Case Reports taken by Patrol officers regarding

incidents that require follow-up investigation. You are the Detective who is given the following

handout by your supervisor (refer to Item 1A). You are to conduct the follow-up investigation on

this garage burglary incident.

Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 67: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

. ··-- ··-·-- ·--~

GENERAL OFFENSE CASE REPORT CHICAGO POLICE

1. OFFENSE/!NCIDENT-PRIMAAY CLASSIFICATION l·UCA OFF. CODE

: 01(o I o

i'· SECONDARY CLASSIFICATION _l~~·-~_OL._ fi>~c_, &LE €NTP--'f _ n

5. F t RE A E·-L-A_T_E_O __ _,_~f'-0-A-TE - _D_F_O_C_C_U~R°"A°"E,-N°"C7E-~ T f ME

w z UI u

"'

20. NO VJCT1WS

_, <!"' iS~

DAY MO YA

Z, o 2-:2i __ FE: _~_1 o_5 _L ___ l_7_·~~D~=""== 01 CO.S

"3 SUPEAVISOA

All 1nformat!OO, escnpt1ons an statemen 5 in this entire report are .lpproximations Of Summarizations unless 1nJ1catetJ Otherwise

22. HOME ADDRESS 123. SEX-RACE-AGE! 24. HOME PHONE 25. BUSINESS PHONE: 26. TIME AVAIL. 27. OCCUPA TlON --r;e lN ! 29 VlCT!M REL. COO€

21. NAME

(LAST-FIRST-M.I.) IDENTITY VERIFIED lNO., DIA., STREET, APT. NO.! I !~RED

-~·-~S.cN~O~~'-----·-·-I CODE I

~----'-------------~=-+------------1-t- 31'2._ ,.. ... 11

?12// 10

. v ·z)11

Co(<. t..E 5 _L SAM I 3o1 8cA-IZ c.e.. es IC 'Da.... I M1 LJ 1 54> .SSS---i9 11 · 5~-;,- 3"1 n J't?lJa - Z-1 oo u·-,erA-11.- __ t!:\§>=·~R.,"'-. '---'-'-"-'---=-~ 1_.__

D I J-·----+------1-------+-----·--·---'---''--"-----1--------------u~+-------------+--'---'-- I !:: t; I --'-- _L_ I-. o- I----·-------- ·-------------------------------·-·----------------L-_J--+--------L-------'---·-·------- ---R-ACECDDES- . - -----0 > PARENT/GUARDIAN' IF JUVENILE 1-BLACK 3·BLACK-HISPAN re 5·Af\1EA. !NO I A LASK. NAT.

~<!=='1-==i~======;;cr======-e=i"'=========f==========;==,=·==· ----==b-3""3~..J.,,L .. ~-z·=k===·J========FE'i======"'l 2·WH!TE OFFE~~~t~l:v~;;~~~~!~ATION6~~~~~~~:~lF IC ISLANDER

JO.NO J1TI1 DISTCDj_VER'_tl_ED _ _A-~J.j_ .. .,-2w_.ITNESL-SEAD d Y: ~£PORTED OFFENSE 32. Al\ "JO 34 ·3'1L t'l.. •' 5

· U .. ')v .useco1V1ESPONDINGcooEfOllAL~·srEP"11Evi.HON~H1P~ .oo!:!Q!L£1ov!11ELAnOMH1PcooEsLANK

WIT f'-.I'-'/ 13. J 0 e.eM'- C-l-.6EJ<-. '/::){-'._ • J' !i_ \ ~ ':>°S'<;- 70Z-c,., /V ,_ 01 ·Wlff 09-aROl"ER 17·aROlHER·INLAW 2S ·CAAfTA<ER J_ J-~~--'-/.C.L::!._!:,1-{.:.'-,,~-"':L..!..'...:::_;.::;:..,r-----------J---'---'--=---------'-------- 02. HUSBAND 10 ·SISTER 18 · SISTER·!N·LAW

~ TI TI 0 03-FORMERWlFE ll·AUN'T 19·0Tt1ERRELAT!VE ~ ONA "' 04 ·fOllMfllHU~&ANO 12 •UNCLE 20- GIRLfH.lfND {INCLUDES "FORMER")

I- 0 TI r-r D _l_ _J_ ~i:~~~~~R ~!:~~~~~~I~~~;:-: ;~:;~;~~17:gJ~~~~~~SE"fORMER") B: UNK L....J 07. SON 15- SON·IN-lAW 23 - OTtifR ·SPECIFY

0 __ J_ _J 08·0AUGHTfR 16-0AIJCiHTEIHN·LAW 24.-STRANGER ---------~d=~=====================================~======4o======================================T=:=:':===:::!=::=:~=p;~~7;=~W~E~G~T=r~E~Y~E~S==~H~A~l~R==or;C~O~M~P~L=.=r==;;M~A~R~K~S~.S~C~A~R~SF,~ETC. 44 CB./!R.N6~s OFFENDER 40. NO. 41. OFFENDER'S NAME IOR DESCRIBE CLOTHING, ETC.I 42. HOME ADDRESS 4J.SEX-~i)IJ~-AGE HEIGHT I H REL CODE

~l1---.:.=~~==-==.:=-=~~~-J-~~.:.::.:.::::::.::.:.===-~~-+-1A___JA2.~--+-~-+--+--:--+----+-~t--~~--f·~~~-r-~z~u=-

~ o0i--:.~~'l'~o=-:_P__;1>~o=-.::.G~-~~-~--~~-~-=U~rJ~i<:.-~--------'ilL..!:1v11~'._J_U~N'..!l)::l~~--1--~--+-~--+---+~·--1~---~-1-----~-+--=--'--'~ u.. 0 unK so

DNA ::l 0 u z <! t- UNK

~ D ::J u a: i3

70

51. OBJECT/WEAPON ~1 USED 02 DISPLAYED 03 UNK 5-:!. FIREARM FEATURES 53. POINT/ENTRY

001 HANDGUN

001 SHOTGUN

DoJ RIFLE

D04 KNIFE

Dos VEHICLE

0 06 BLUNT INSTRUMENT

0 07 THAOl/VN OBJECT

Dos Exocos1vE

009 LIQUID/GAS

0 10 Bon LE/GLASS

0 11 RAZOR

D 12 PAY TOOL

~13 HANO, FEET

014 OTHER

015 DNA

71. DESCRIBE PROPEHTY 1N NARRATIVE

0 01 CHROMEIN ICKEL

0 02 BLUE STEEL

003 SHORT BARREL

004 LONG BARREL

Dos SAWED OFF

Dos OTHER

00·1 UNKNOWN

~oa ONA

001 FRONT DOOR

0 02 REAR Doon

Do3 WINDOW

Do• ROOF

Dos FLOOR

JK1_os SIDE DOOR

§07 OTHER 08 UNKNOWN 09 ONA

T "'TAKEN, A"' RECOVERED

54. POJN:..:T.::IE::;X __ l_T_-+ __ s_s. auAGLAA ALARM

0 01 FRONT DOOR

0 02 REAR DOOR

D03 WINDOW

Do• ROOF

Dos FLOOR

fijfoNA

ON PREMISE

D1YES D2NO

ALARM CIRCUMVENTED

D1YES D2ND

56 SAFI: BURGL_A_R_Y_M_E_T_H_D_o ___ 4 ______ 5_7_. _If RESIDENCE, WHERE WERE OCCUPANTS

Do1· PUNCH

002 TORCH

003 EXPLOSIVE

004 DRILL

0 05 REMOVED

Do6 PEEL

Do, OPEN

Ooa UNKNOWN

~ONA

Mo1 WORK

002 VISITING

DoJ VACATION

Oo4 wE001NG

Dos FUNERAL/WAKE

Dos OTHER

001 UNKNOWN

Dos DNA

'l!!:l'.os SIDE DOOR

§07 OTHER I 58. UNUSUAL CHAAACTERtSTlCS OF OFFENSE

0:1~~~RE.~~~~.~-~-¥;/Y_A1~~. 08 UNKNOWN 09 DNA I 'PN A 0 OFFENDER \.)JI./¥-.

>- 01 MTON.EY 12 JEWELRY 13 FURS I 4 CLOTHING ~]OFFICE EOUIPMT. ! 8 TV.RAOIO,STEREO j.9 HJUSEHOLD GOODS I a CONSUM. GOODS I (·J_FJAEARMS \& ,Narc.IDang. Drug~ iso:rHtRC"""f'.lDvJ 16 NONE I 1- ONA 1Dr s 1Dr • 1 DT • 1 Or• 1[h s 1Dr s 1 DT s 1DT s ,Cr>

1t>il'1 s .:>-;VJ{;~ 1Dr

~ o ,_o_R ______ 1~D_A ______ 1_D __ R ______ 1_o __ A _____ :._1D_R ______ :..::10=-'-R'------ 1DR

1 1 DA J,c~R ___ ,oA _______ Jc'JRTBlj 'iOO !~-

0 7

2 VEH!CLEfTRA!LER I YEAR 1MAKE IBODY STYLE ICOLOA I V.l.N. .STATE UCENSE NO STATE EXPlA 73 PROPERTY INVENTORY NOIS! Jq VEH INVENTORY NO POUND

g: uNK DsrnLEN o~~~~T 1 U ~ K 1 N 1 1 lJNh MO/YR

D ~OFFENDEffS ... I I v ft.__ I BLU I '~L~, --'-· - '-' •• L ..... L ' I.. " _, I , '. •. I. L::L3_ L J. ~_jf J- IJ/'!. - -· -------- L== BO ..J f fJAAR~i~E·IDo not dllplicate or n:pe.:.it information - fur exp!ni1.H10n or addwonal information only) . ~ SOBR!ETY OF V!CT!M

~§ ~y' E.1':!.::L :i+ x-x.xxx. .:J? Y\ $'y, VV\VV'.C>,v~ j RI Q Sf2o k-e... w:~ y',' vb'i-"" w\A.o v-e. \""~_j:::b_'!.'±:: 1--i i s ____ _pc;._,_~~E_~2HBO_ ~H -e:~\.,.\?a< Oh.S'e.V--V-e_o{ '\!of ')?o_," Jc·ulC- ih 1-'h-e. s1'd-e- Joor ~- .e.-~·t-e.r h\s --gt;v"0~_/Q~ Do9 -I ~~~ fvok:.- V,'l-1''~ 1 s SV\1Yw blow-e.,.v- <A"'cl. Plc..c.{2.cl ,-~ ~.e. o1e..$°c//:lae_.,{ V'e.hu:..-le....-- vvd-~ Jlv-r .. Fi:;,_I l,'ce,..._s«:_ zQ / t· 1

1

82 FLA.SH MESSAGE SENT]

90.

w wz Uz ::io 0"' 0.. a:

w 0..

)"'.\e- IY\ttV-VV'o<+<'~v::' ...-rbl)<e.n; Ov-e-- Cv--.,J+st"-'°'"'V'I. $Hf '5V\ovJ blowe,,v .i.Se-v-1'~1 ;#::_333VV'8'°i \OL~~YE~-~2No __ =

~ex RA coP1Es REOU1RED a-coNr·o~l[92.~~~;~~;;;0 LL;w.u;~N~:~~~--·uNn uNiT NOT1F1Eo PERSON DNOTIF1Eo L~l~RRiveO DAl E iDAY MO YRI - r1ME I ~j!l(::-cN~O~R~M~A~L-::c:--:-::-:---:-:-------------------~""~o-r_H_E_A_s_1_0_El---"'L.;~·--f?.._""'~e;:'...!p-'o~~c.:::,~-"f'"'!,_. I --l~~_l___--~--~-93. F fRST OFFICER AT SCENE R.0. 01ST D/S ~~bM.E. - PERSON ~NOTIFIED 0 ARRIVED DATE !DAY MO YR! - TIME

~~~~------------J.___;'-.:j_>-<._____ 1---~~---~------'-'-~~.FE:e.oS"_L_l..1~-95· REf'ORTING OFFICER'S NAME (PA INT) ST AA NO I DATE INVEST. COMPLETED-TIME 97. SUPERVISOR APPROVING !PR!Nl NAME) Sl AR NO

Lee Kxxxx z.~ F'E& o~, nY5 ,\). tANK.S Qx:x 96. REPORTING OFFICER'S NAME (PAINT! STAR NO APPRfN SIGt-tA\TURE DATE APPROVED_ T!ME

======= ·=·~=-=-~=b--=_LA.L,_~="'·=2-rtr:~. ~~~ ___ . L~'L~,-~~J __ J:.J.:iQ== Copyright© 2005. City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved. Item 1A Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 68: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

CONTINUATION OF NARRATIVE

Nu+;~·u. eT

I HAVE REVIEWED THIS AEPORT1

ANO BY MY SIGNATURE INDI· I

CATE THAT IT IS ACCEPTABLE. I

R.D.ND

I tf L - 3&/63(oJ

SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE

l0 ' ~V' 'fd__,

I DATE !DAY·MD-YR.I

:z~ .~OS FOR USE BY BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES ONLY

: 1-UCR OFFENSE CODE - REV. CODE l-UCR METHOD CODE

}

METHOD ASSIGNED 1UNIT NO.

! 01 CORRECT I ' 02 REVISED .. I

OFFICER REASSIGNED - DATE STAR NO.

VICTIM IDENTIFIERS

• 01 CORRECT

; 02 REVISED

I

01 FIELD 02 ADMIN. I OJ SUMMARY .J.

STATUS 0o PROGRESS 01 SUSPENDED 02 UNFOUNDED

03 CLEARED CLOSED 0 4 CLEARED OPEN. Os EXC. CLAD. CLOSED Os Exe. CLEARED OPEN D1 CLOSED-NON·CR1M1NAL

r-JICT.IM NO. I REVISED NAME

I

OFFICER ASSIGNED STAR NO.

I DATE ASSIGNED

I

I I lSUPV STAR NO. l INVESTIGATIVE FILE }REASSIGNED

D 1 YES D 2 NO D 1 YES I

IF CASE IS CLEARED, HOW CLEARED !USE THIS BOX FOR SINGLE CLEAR UP OR FIRST CLEAR UP OF MULTIPLE CLEAR UP UST)

0 1 :~.i'~~JcuTION 0

2 ~~'i.:'1~~Ego1'i.T 0 3 ~g~~~~~'i-~ED 0 4 ~iT~~1;JT 0 5 ~~~~~TIONAL

1REVISED ADDRESS

I I REVISED PHONE NO.

I DHOME 1 Dsus1Ness

D2NO

f .VALUE OF PROPERTY TAKEN/RECOVERED 01 ONA 02 VERIFIED 03 CORRECTED ~ILL 1N TAE-~Ull AMO.LINT m: 6NLY THOSE VALUES WHICH ti THEA DIFFER ~ROM OR WERE.NOT ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~R~E~~~ATEDO~TH~~EVERSE THENAARATlVEORASWPPiEM~NT~A:.:.;_:R~Y~B~p~P~O~A~T~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ , MONEY 12 JEWELRY l3 FURS 14 CLOTHING 17 OFFICE EOUIPMT. STV,RADiO, STEREO 19 HOUSEHOLD GOODS lo CONSUM. GOODS H·l FIREARMS I& NARC/DANG. DRUGS IS OTHER I sNONE

DTs !DTs 1DTs 1DTs 10Ts DTs 1DTs 1DTs 1D1s IDTs IDTs IDT

DA============='~D~A=========c=#'O~R======c=====~'O~A~~=========l~D~R~==========~D:!,£R============1=D==A=============1D==R============1=LJ==A============='D==A============='D==A~========='~D~A==:::: 01 ONA 0 2 VERIFIED Q3 CORRECTED LIST ALL CORRECTIONS & NEW OR ADDITIONAL NOS. OBTAINED SERIAL NOS. OR lOENT!FICAT!ON NOS.

; REMARKS (PERTINENT INFORMATION NOT ON ORIGINAL REPORT)

'PREPARED BY - SIGNATURE STAR NO. DATE !DAY·MO·YA.) APPROVED BY-SIGNATURE STAR NO. I DATE lOAY·MO·YR.I

I

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 69: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

ASSIGNMENT 2 (Questions 3-6)

Related Assignment Materials

Item 2A Background information received from Police Officer Stover

Your Role

You are the Detective who has been assigned to respond to Kelvin Junior High School to

investigate a report of suspected child abuse.

Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 70: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

As the assigned Detective, you arrive at Kelvin Junior High School at 0930 hours on Monday,

28 Feb 2005. You are met by Police Officer Stover, who tells you the following information:

• Ms. Jamison, a teacher at Kelvin Junior High, reported a 14-year-old girl, Susan Cole, as

the victim of physical abuse. According to Ms. Jamison, the victim confided to a classmate

(Ida Winn) last Friday that she was afraid to return home because her mother's live-in

boyfriend beat her on Thursday evening. The classmate told the teacher about this

conversation today (Monday morning). Ms. Jamison called police to report the abuse after

talking to the victim, who is currently in school.

• While she was talking to the victim, Ms. Jamison noticed that Susan Cole appeared

disheveled and was visibly bruised across her forearms. The victim told Ms. Jamison that

her mother's live-in boyfriend caused the bruises on her arms and back. The victim stated

that she is worried about her two siblings (ages 5 and 2) who stay at home with the

boyfriend while her mother is at work.

• Officer Stover ran a name check that identified the victim as a missing person. According to

the Missing Person Report, Susan Cole did not return home after leaving school on Friday

afternoon, and was reported as missing by her mother on Saturday morning.

Item 2A

Copyright© 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 71: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

ASSIGNMENT 3 (Questions 7-9)

Related Assignment Materials

NONE

Your Role

You are the Detective who has been assigned to respond to Park Plaza Hospital to investigate

a report of sexual assault.

Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 72: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

ASSIGNMENT 4 (Questions 10-15)

Related Assignment Materials

Item 4A General Offense Case Report (RD No. HL-389453)

Burglary-Forcible Entry

Item 48 Patrol Division - Canvass Worksheet (RD No. HL-389453)

Item 4C Patrol Division - Canvass Worksheet (RD No. HL-389453)

Your Role

You are the Detective who has been assigned to conduct an immediate follow-up investigation

of a burglary at a jewelry store. When you arrive at the scene, the responding officer has talked

to the victim and an employee at the store (refer to Item 4A). Rapid response officers have

conducted a canvass of the area (refer to Items 48 and 4C). Evidence Technicians have

arrived on the scene.

Copyright © 2005 City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 73: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

~!~i~~~00:JENSE , oFFENsE11NclOENT-PA1MARY cLAss1F1cATION 11-ucA oFF. coD,EO /i2 sE~NDARY cLAssiFicATION 'ilZ-, / l 3 H /.:_ 3 g°J y ~3 CHICAGO POLICE l ?., i){(f, LA !Z'-j I O___M_ I . . Lof'..C.-1 6L€ eJv -1 - . -- -=- -·----r-------==~=~~==------L----'--'---='------<'--------------~ 1

APT. NO !5 FIRE RELATED f\. DATE OF OCCURRENCE T!Mf 11 BEAT OF OCCUR 8 BEAT/UNIT ASSIGN. 4. ADDRESS OF OCCURRENCE I ' D"_Y/ MO YA. // 30 - . I 3

w NO. DIA. STREET S17 jDlYEs 18.2NO \Z<(,1-z.1 (§8, 05] o'6Lf0 Z..&JJ I Llf:ll z 1 LJ I .3 I z., o (N I \< 1t<..1.?.'I r Re€:,- }'02-LDCATID~N CODEt· " DATE R.0. ARRIVED_ TltAE 2 ASSIGNED BY iiit'1 c o.s t3 9. TYPE OF LOCATION DA PAeM1sE WHERE OFF~SE OCCURRED !GIVE NAME OF LOCATION IF APPLICABLE)

="'=='===~])~J~S;,..C.;;;;,;;;;,O~tJ~N~· ~=J =~:Jl~e~\="1=£=L=f...=1Y~===================='===='==~=~-=2~='&'.'."_ .'=! fl:,"'."."'·=£:, 1 D 5 J QC'.J 05==='=D=2=0~·='-=v1e=w==~-3 su:EAv1soA All information descriptions and statements in this entire report are app1 ox1mauons oi summarizauom unless 1nJ1catetl otlleiwise.

"'w:=w=>===========2=1 =N=A=M=E===========~i==~==~=~==2=2=. ,=,o='M"=='E=A=:D=:D=:R=:E=:ss========='j'1====''=~o;:C;=E~G:=E:l[=;2;;4:0H':'O:=M:::"E =P=H0;;'1::',~E=j~,-~B':'u'::'s'.:1N'.':'E~s'."s~P=H~O:;.jT~2~s=. T;;l~M:;;=E AVA! L-. ---~~CUPA 1 !O~- 1 28_1_N_] 29. VICTIM

~_0

_;_M;::~w~~-~:~~--:~~~~~-~~-1~~A~•-Tµ~~F~~-~s-~~-~M~J-.u~~~---;::::::_~-E_~~~~:·F.~rE-~~~~-l~4~~~~~-s::~-N-:o~L~-D~'-A~o-·~:-T:A=~~~-T~,-~AA-:-·N-:-'-~---~-S-~~-·2:1~l~i~~ G~~~-2-AE-L-~~00

_E _

_, 7 7 D J q~ --·---------------------~~-l---------~------------1--~---+--- ----------l---------l-------+----------·---"--"-'-'--+-------5~ 'IT I -r- _L l g~ PARENT/_G_U_A_RDiAN~illVENU._E _________________________________________________ J___~~--+-1-----·-- -------··-,·-BL_A_C_K _______ ~.B-L-AC-K--~-~sc~~~?Jfrs"-~:M~INDJ'A~~~~-N-AT-.-<( L ...L- 2-WH!TE 441/HITE·HISPANIC 6·ASIAN!PACIF!C ISLANDER --....j,~--===··=-==-=·=·==·=· =="""'======··====t========="""===·===~-==-=-=~-=-=-"+·~3-=3 .=h·~-=cb===r3=4_=======ip;C:5=======i OFFENDER/VICTIM RELATIONSHIP CODES 30.NO. 31~1 oiscovEAED TI2w1TNESS.Eo TI3 REPORTED OFFENSE 32. .uHCORKHPONOiN<:>coo(FOllAu·~np·11EL.AT10NHlP~ .oO!:!QlLEAvfRELATlaN~111Pcoo£aLANK

WIT V\ C.......-\ M -1. J. Ol·Wlff 09·BROlHER l7·BROTHER·IN-LAW 25 .. CAl!.fTAKER ~ _f--u----"-L""''+-u..4.L.:-'-----u~---------+--------------------·--+-.L--L...--J..-------f-------1 ~~ :~i~~~~~!FE ~~: ~~i;;TR ;~: ~~~~R;l~~~~VE ~ ONA t. 04 • FORMEIHIU~flANO \2 ·UNCLE 20 · GIRtFf\IEND (INCLUDES "FORMER"} f- 0 1--u-------,--,.-------~o~---------+------------------------+--L---.J..L_-t-------+-------1 ~~: ~A~~~~fi :! . ~~~~~~t~~~:t: ;; : ~~:~~/E!~J~~~~~~~SE "FORMER")

3:: LINK L...J 07 ·SON 15 · SON·lN·LAW 23 ·OTHER· SPECIFY

===[~J~=========================*====================o;===o!==...L±:===..1"=r=~===r'~~;;=~~!:==;=~~=r,~~OB=i0;=A=UG"''H"'~"'~~R~c;":'E·~O"'EAUl'.;HTER·IN·LAW 24. SrRANGER --·-------40. No. GE HE JG HT WEIGHT EYES HAIR COMPL MARKS. SCARS. ETC 44. C.8./1.R N6~s OFFENDER

OFF. 1-___ 4_1._o_F_F_E_N_D_E_R_·s_N_A_M_E_1o_A_D_E_s_c_R_1a_E_c_L_D_T_H_1_N_G~,E_T_c_1 ____ j_ ______ 4_2_.H_O_M_E_A_D_D_A_Es_s ________ -l-•-3_.s_E_x_-~~~&~&£~---A--1-----l----+---1----+----4---------·f-~--------+-'~~-

~- I 1 ~ D[f i-...:...------------------------l-------------~--------1--_l-'---L---+---+-----!----t----t-----t---------t-----~

*ti 50

DNA ~ D u z q t- UNK

:E 0 :J u c: u

70

51. OBJECT/WEAPON -~l USED 02 DtSPLAYED 03 UNK 5"2. FIREARM FEATURES 53 POINT/ENTRY 54. POINT/EXIT 55. BURGLAR ALARM "'-_______ _:_ __________ ,_:__--"--"--"-_:__c.:..::_ _ _;:_~+_:..:.._..:.:..:.;..:.::;..:_;.:_.:.._-1-_:..:.:.:..:::.:.:c.:c::..----1----·

001 HAND GUN

Do2 SHOTGUN Do3 RIFLE Do4 KNIFE

Dos vEHJCLE

Dos EXPLos1vE _8'09 LIQUID/GAS D 10 BOTTLE/GLASS

D 11 RAZOR

&f 12 PAY TOOL

001 CHROME/NICKEL

Do2 BLUE STEEL Do1 FRONT DOOR D 02 REAR DOOR Do3w1NDOw jdo4 ROOF

Dos FLDOA

Do1 FRONT DOOR Ji002 REAR DOOR D0Jw1Noow Do4 ROOF Dos FLOOR

DONA ON PREMISE )(11 YES D2 ND ALARM CIRCUMVENTED ~l YES D2NO

56. SAFE BURGLARY METHOD

001 PUNOi

~02 TORCH Oo3 EXPLOsivE

D04 DRILL Dos REMOVED

Do6 PEEL Do1 OPEN Dos UNKNOWN Dos DNA

0 06 BLUNT INSTRUMENT

0 07 THROWN OBJECT

D 13 HAND. FEET

D 14 OTHER

D 15 DNA

0 03 SHOAT BARA EL Q04 LONG BARREL

D 05 SAWED OFF Dos OTHER Oo7 UNKNOWN ~08 ONA

Dos SIDE DOOR

§07 OTHER 08 UNKNOWN 09 DNA

Dos s1DE DOOR

§07 OTHER 08 UNKNOWN 09 DNA

158. UNUS;;:;~ACTEAISTICS OF OFFENSE

71. DESCRIBE PROPERTY IN NARRATIVE T '"TAKEN; R .. RECOVERED

Copyright© 2005. City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved.

57. IF RESIDENCE. WHERE WERE OCCUPANTS

Do1 WORK Do2 VISITING Oo3 VACATION

Do4 WEDDING Dos Fu1>JEAAUWAKE

Do60THER Oo7 uNKNOWN

JK!os ONA

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 74: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

CONTINUATION OF NARRATIVE

R.D.NO

I l±L

2- ft. x z. f±.

1-k

C,,v,,±.

~I.VCR OFFENSE CODE

' 01 CORRECT ,o 02 REVISED

OFFICER REASSIGNED STAR NO.

VICTIM IDENTIFIERS

• 01 CORRECT

; 02 REVISED

REV. CODE

DATE

l N'ICTIM NO.

I

'•VALUE OF PROPERTY TAKEN/RECOVERED

1 MONEY 12 JEWELRY

IDT$

!DA

SERIAL NOS. OR IDENTIFICATION NOS.

of VY\L hn. I

DS , c,t IT3 o fitr,1 I I

N. 6 v-e e'V) s+ .

I -r. I -

I HAVE REVIEWED THIS AEPOATI

ANO BY MY SIGNATURE IND!· I

CATE THAT lT rs AccEPT ABLE. I

I DATE IOAY·MO·YA.l

\\.l V\ I VY\ • I 2-5? I '

FOR USE BY BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES ONLY

1-UCR METHOD CODE

]

METHOD ASSIGNED 1UNIT NO.

01 FIELD 02 ADMIN. I 0JSUMMAAY _]_

STATUS Do PROGRESS 01 SUSPENDED 02 UNFOUNDED

DJ CLEARED CLOSED 0 •CLEARED OPEN. Os EXC. CLAD. cLDSED Os Exc. CLEARED OPEN 01 cLOSED-NON-CA1M1NAL.

I REVISED NAME

I

01 DNA 02 VERIFIED DJ CORRECTED

~:~c~~.ASSIGNEO : DATE ASSIGNED JSUPV. S1 AA NO. ] INVESTIGATIVE FILE ]REASSIGNED

' I _]_ 01 YES D2NO 01 YES

IF CASE IS CLEARED, HOW CLEARED !USE THIS BOX FOR SINGLE CLEAR UP OR FIRST CLEAR UP OF MULTIPLE CLEAR UP usn 0 1 AAA EST 02 DIRECTED TO 0 J COMPL. REFUSED 04 COMMUNITY 05 OTHER

& PROSECUTION FAMILY COURT TO PROSECUTE ADJUSTMENT EXCEPTIONAL

)REVISED ADDRESS I REVISED PHONE NO.

I I DHOME

I 1 Daus1NEss

FILL IN THE.FULL AMO{JNT CTI' ONLY THOSE VALUES WHICH tlTHER DIFFER FROM OR WERE.NOT REP_DATEO 01'! TH~ flEVERSE, THE Nl\RAATl\/E OR"' SUPPj..EM<NTARY BFORT.

13 FUAS

IDT$

IDA

14 CLOTHING

1Dr s 17 OFFICE EOUIPMT.

IDT s

8 TV, RADIO, STEREO

0TS

19 HOUSEHOLD GOODS lo COM SUM. GOODS IH FIREARMS I & NARC/DANG. DRUGS Is OTHER

1DTs IDTs 1DTs 1DTs 1DTs

1DA 1DR 1DR IDA 1DA IOR IOA I DR

Dl DNA 02 VERIFIED DJ CORRECTED LIST ALL CORRECTIONS & NEW OR ADDITIONAL NOS. OBTAINED

I IDAOULT

10Juv.

I 5 NONE

IDT

IDR

: REMARKS (PERTINENT INFORMATION NOT ON ORIGINAL REPORT)

PREPARED BY - SIGNATURE STAR NO. I DATE !DAY·MO-YA.l I APPROVED BY - SIGNATURE STAR NO. I DATE IOAY-MO·YRJ

I

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 75: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

GENERAL OFFENSE l OFFENSE/INCIDENT PA/MARY CLASStF/CATION

l - l·UCR OFF CODE j2· SECONDARY CLASSIFICATION

CASE REPORT 'fS,u f<_G,LAfl._j_ I

l 01 <., I 01 f"o~CI '3 L£ e/\J "T f2-v CHICAGO POLICE -

w z w ~

so

DNA ~ D u :z <{ ~ LJNK

~ 0 :J u 0:

Li

70.

~DNA ~ D "-0 0: n.. UNK

D BO~

«z Zo O-w -1-

> t::< - c:> ,_ orr <{ "0 a: o~ ~ z~ zO

90.

w wz u :z ::io 0"' "-~

"-

6FOccURTs c:EAT1uN1TAsS!GN-

{p J J l ·-v,,1s 3NEO BY ~l C.0.S

VIEW LIJ SUPERVISOR

-- -- - BEAT-APT. NO 15. FIRE RELATED 6 DATE OF OCCURRENCE T!ME 4. ADDRESS OF OCCURRENCE

Zl,')z-il .,fG&, y;5J \130- z N01Lt312_i0 JNI

STREET 101vEs ~iNo O~'iV Ki P--ey srr-.:-c£ T

]02:~CODE' 11 DATE A 0.ARR!VEO- THAE 2 ASSJ• 9. TYPE OF LOCATION OR PREMISE WHERE OFFENSE OCCURRED !GIVE NAME OF LOCATJON !F APPLICABLE)

ocios .:r EW et..- f<-i 2:. 'i? J~S.- I U ~j_ []20" "DISLGUNT ··-·-

All information descriptions and statements 1n this enwe report are app1ox1rnat1ons. or summanz;;i11ons unles!> 1nJ1catccJ ome1w1se

-S:L POINT/ENTRY 5~. POINT JEX IT 51. OBJECT/WEAPON 01 USED 02 DISPLAYED 03 LINK 52. FIREARM FEATURES 55. BURGLAR ALAAM 56. SAFE BURGLARY METr!OO 57 !F RESIDENCE, WHERE WERE OCCUPANTS

001 HANO GUN

0 02 Sri OT GUN

Do3 AlrLE

004 KNIFE

Dos VEHICLE

Dos BLUNT INSTRUMENT

0 0"1 THROWN OBJECT

Dos EXRLos1vE

D 09 LIQUID/GAS

010 BOTTLE/GLASS

011 RAZOR

D 12 PHY TOOL

0 l3 HANO. FEET

014 OTHER

D1SDNA

71. DESCRIBE PROPERTY JN NARRATIVE

001 CHROME/NICKEL

002 BLUE STEEL

003 SHORT BARA EL

Do.oi LONG BARREL

Dos SAWED OFF

Do6 OTHER

0o7 UNKNOWN

DoaoNA

0 01 FRONT DOOR

002 REAR ODOR

003 WINDOW

004 ROOF

Dos FLOOR

D 06 SI DE DOOR

§07 OTHER 08 UNKNOWN 09 ONA

'T .. TAKEN, A"' RECOVERED

0 01 FRONT DOOR

002 REAR DOOR

Do3 WINDOW

004 ROOF

Dos FLOOR

D 06 SIDE DOOR

§07 OTHER I 08 UNKNOWN I 09 DNA

·~-~--·~~·-----+~-~

DONA

ON PREMISE

D1YES D2NO

ALARM CIRCUMVENTED

01 YES D2 NO

001 PUNCH

002 TORCH

D 03 EXPLQSI VE

Oo.oi on1LL

Dos REMOVED

58. UNUSUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF OFFENSE

Do6PEEL

001 OPEN

[Joa UNKNOWN

009 ONA

001 WORK

D02 VISITING

003 VACATION

Oo.oi wEDDJNG

Dos FuNEAALIWAKE

I g~1~~~MRELATE°. ~ AFF-ILIAll~~ 0 OFFEN DEA

Do6DTHER

Oo7 uNKNOWN

Dos DNA

l MONEY 12 JEWELRY 13 FURS I 4 CLOTHING I 7 OFFICE EOUlPMT. J 8 TV.RADIO.STEREO J 9 HOUSEHOLD GOODS! 0 CONSUM GOODS J i.J FIREARMS 1& Narc. 1Dany. Drugs 15 01 HE'F! t 6 NONE

DT$ 1DT$ 1DTs 1Drs :ors 1Drs 1DTs 1 0Ts 101s 1CTs

10Ts 1DT

DR 1DR 1DR I DR I DA I DR 1DR I DR ,DR ,DA llR 1DR

Ds~~:'~~EC:t;]~~~ :YEAR :MAKE :BODY STYLE :COLOR : V.1.N. }STATE LICENSE NO STATEr~~~~RR-TIJ~PRclPERTY 1.,vENTOAY NOISI J_T!l VEH INVENTORY NO POUND

DoFFENDER'S i 1 1 ·- 1 1 1 -·~-~ L--1-.-......1~ __ 1 _--..1.. L .. l. i. l 1 _ .J. __ 1 1 1 i .J.._-L-...1. _.L.. .t. .....1. J_.J.._ _ -.L.... ··---·-~_:__J ___ = / "')f'';;:.TIVE IDo noi dopllca1' oc "P"' •nfonnanon - foe "P'·'"·"'o" "' addnional yo•manon only) . Ti SOBRIETY OF VICTIM

1-(--i.c-.Ot"TINUNDotJ - CAGG 3; b111:;:Y\ess Is: 0i Svv-ojc:_e- fv-~~ilt:±-!_J-· J.:~•sosrn o'""o

(""\ r)'7J~'1..-) foteE".$ v=;,zJ '!VL..1 e_) Pfzt-~ u, ~\r?d c-i+ ~e- S~-,re... <AM \,JC-.5 l'Y'"'~Vi'~w-----1 bt11 f?,/ o ovt /Doo hrr. She.... re l"'t-e-d ~-c...-=::fiiloV\..J,·v-...9 lr.fvvVV'\""'h!o"'-: Ms .. pV.-e.\~ 1.--~s wuv/cee{

J .) 182 FLASH MESSAGE SENT7

0.): 0.. S"o.le~~~-K c;"j- P1~~~~i_~~~I_~:'.} -~_c ~_:__~~-· __ _21'~- v-:e-foY'-k-c.( 'h,.,_~ ID~YEs ___ 02No __ _

I )4CONTO. 1192. OFFICER NOTIFYING FOLLOW-UP INVESTIG. UNIT UNIT NOTIFIED PERSON 0 NOT1F!ED LlARR!VED DATE (QA y MO YAl - f!ME I . OTHER SlDE I __,___ _ _J__ _____ _

DR.a. 94. OFFICER NOTIFYING 01sT 01s DE.T. DM.E PERSON DN0T1F1Eo DARA1vEo DATE !DAY MO YAJ TtME

-'-~--'-~-_L_--~~~-9s. REPORTING OFFICER'S NAME IPAINTI STAR ND. OFFICE I DATE INVEST. CDMPLETEb-T1ME 97. suP,;,:;v• 1 s~A 'APP~o;:OtNG tPfi!NT NAMEJ STAR NO

~==-=b~ .. ~f--o~f>6=~~T~$~~--'~~::__~_i_~-=-~:l.LUi'-L.::+--,J-~~-L-Zf'=-=-fi~E&d-J_O~·~~l-L::l~~~~5:__-+-~~=:_~~~~> N ~':t.::X.X.~~-96 REPDRTlNG DFFICEWS NAME IPRINTI STAR NO OFFICER'S SIGNATURE I APPfiovqs1GN?"AE DAT$"PPROVED - T•ME

_________ _J__Q;;L Li'~tA==- .L~fg··-~~-Lj_.iQ,9==

91. EXTAA COPIES REOUIAED DNDAMAL

93. FIRST OFFICER AT SCENE

Copyright© 2005. City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved. Item 4A Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 76: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

CONTINUATION OF NARRATIVE

OlA of' -f-o v.JV"'I ~rs o.s+ we-e.K~,,,{

R.O.NO.

H L- 3<b~Y s 3

2(p ! 0 2&i50

~V\d sl--e.

MuJ Jl\D 1' ""-fov Y"'. v.. -.\-\a >" °'kt.) I/'-+ -tl"te... blAV'jlc-~.

$~{'., Skkol

of

'l.UCR OFFENSE CODE -

, [J 1 CORRECT .: 02 REVISED

OFFICER REASSIGNED STAR NO.

REV. CODE

l DATE

L

ib&± w\,,,~ <:; i,, .e V\ V' '(' 1' v-e..J o..i -JI..-'<-

she.

/-e.-f+ Cc..$€.. .

1 HAVE REVIEWED THIS REPORT!

ANO BY MY SIGNATURE INDI· I

CATETHATITISACCEPTABLE. 1

SUPEA~~Fl'S SIGNATURE

.0' 12.~0------l DATE (DAY·MO·YA.l

: z.~.~& 05 FOR USE BY BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES ONLY

l·UCR METHOD CODE lMETHOD ASSIGNED I UNIT NO.

D 1 FIELD D2 AOMIN. I OJ SUMMARY _L

STATUS Do PROGRESS D1 SUSPENDED 02 UNFOUNDED

OJ CLEARED CLOSED 0 •CLEARED OPEN. Os Exc. CLRD. CLOSED Os EXC. CLEARED OPEN 01 CLOSED-NON.CRIMINAL

OFFICER ASSIGNED STAR NO.

I DATE ASSIGNED TSUPV. STAR NO. I INVESTIGATIVE FILE lREASSIGNED

I J 01 YES D2NO 01 YES

IF CASE IS CLEARED. HOW CLEARED IUSE THIS BOX FOR SINGLE CLEAR UP OR FIRST CLEAR UP OF MULTIPLE CLEAR UP LIST)

0 l :~~g~;CUTIDN 0 2 n': . .°1gego'L9n 0 J i8~~hs'io'i:"u~~ED 0 4 ~~~~~~IJ~T 0 S ~;~~~'nONAL VICTIM IDENTIFIERS IVICTJM NO. I REVISED NAME 1REVISED ADDRESS

I

I REVISED PHONE NO.

I DHOME · 01 CORRECT

; 02 REVISED I

/I .VALUE OF PROPERTY TAKEN/RECOVERED

1 MONEY

DT$ DR

j 2 JEWELRY

IDT$

i0R

SERIAL NOS. OR IDENTIFICATION NOS.

01 ONA

01 ONA

D2 VERIFIED 03 CORRECTED

14 CLOTHING

IDT$

IDR

02 VERIFIED 0 J CORRECTED

17 OFFICE EOU!PMT.

IDT$

IDR

:·REMARKS (PERTINENT INFORMATION NOT ON ORIGINAL REPORT)

l"REPARED BY SIGNATURE

I BTV,AADIO,STEREO

I DT s I DR

1 Daus1Ness

~ILL IN TRE"FULL AMO.UNT 6F ONLY THOSE VALUES WHICH ~ITHER DIFFER FROM OR WERE.NOT REP.DATED 0"! T.HE .f'EVERSE THE Nl\RRATlvE QR.'\ SUPP).EMENTARY !Jf"ORT.

19 HOUSEHOLD GOODS lo CON SUM. GOODS I!-) FIREARMS I & NARC/DANG. DRUGS Is OTHER

IDT$ IDT$ IDT$ IDT$ IDT$

1DR 1DR 1DR !DR 1DR

UST ALL CORRECTIONS & NEW OR ADOJTIONAL NOS. OBTAINED

STAR NO. I DATE (OAY·MO.YA.) I APPROVED BY-SIGNATURE STAR NO. I DATE {OAY·MO-YA.)

I Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 77: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

I

PATROL DIVISION - CANVASS WORKSHEET TYPE INCIDENT RDNO FORM MUST ACCOMPANY GENERAL OFFENSE CASE REPORT INVOLVING ALL 15 \) {l. G L~ '/ HL- 3g--1~55 SHOOTINGS AND OTHER MAJOR INCIDENTS AS DIRECTED

LOCATION OF INCIDENT 1 TYPE LOCATION (HOUSE, STREET, ETC.) 1DATE OF OCCUR. jT!ME OCCUR.

l-/37..-o rJ. l<--1 r( 8 '1. 'Sl. S t:w 'E.1.-f?-j_ STO f',J~ 2.012-7 Fe& 05: \t30 - 0 '.?L/ 0 VICTIM'S ROLE (BYSTANDER, POSSIBLE TARGET, ETC) WEATHER/LIGHTING CONDITIONS

s·n R- G ow f\J er<. "PNA-1. NAME (LAST· FIRST· M.I.) SEX. RACErGE. DATE OF BIRTH . rlME OF CONTACT

/SoE, f..€;JG F 2- Zo 5 :SAl'i '& :; O '130 HOME ADDRESS APT./FLOOR HOME TELEPHONE OTHER TELEPHONE (Specify)

LJ 3 Z-1 N. 611..ce:t-1 3"'- Fl-. SIL 55"S- 03:::-1

PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT· ADDRESS ·TELEPHONE RELATIVEJFRIEND NOT LIVING WITH WITNESS: NAME-ADDRESS-PHONE

SIV1>6v't COMMENTS

Ba~ Live-s . o._12._r. 61 J..21._. QY\ s+r..e.-e __ + be t-i»V' ,~ l e.-v-.-e.. I V_-'::1 .5 to V'<- .• /VI>. I Y\.

I /

0\ V\ ~-th; ""'1 I ·e • . 5+-z,, -te ol She d:e,{ V\Ot se.e._ Dr hec--v $1AS 161 U"- <; over- \.i\j-ee ke~ 2. NAME (LAST· FIRST. M.I.) I SEX-RACE 1 AGE • DA TE Ol='BIRTH rlME OF CONTACT

(/)

'S. t+ l {(_Lt:, 'f £. I 21 2. 3 ~ g~ 0 °IYO 1- SI A J\J t:> .A-TC L> ~ HOME ADDRESS APT./FLOOR HOME TELEPHONE OTHER TELEPHONE (Specify) I- y 3.2..1 N- GiZEBN 2~ FL. ~IL 5ss - 1 ~ z. °I z 0 PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT -ADDRESS ·TELEPHONE RELATIVEJFRIEND NOT LIVING WITH WITNESS: NAME-ADDRESS-PHONE u

$T\Jl) c ,A.Jj w m COMMENTS

~ .::Tv.s.t- Y'e...ThvA..e.c~ h. 0 yY"\. -e.. MVV\.. \/, ·s i -h.-:'.J_ i\. iUr 2.. v..-1"' .e"""' h o~ 'fh..e__ v-re.-Q_ k.. ..e,vJ . z 0

....J w z z 0 (/)

a:: w a.

7 We.. c;. 0\11.-t· uf ThVVV\ d_ LA \I< Vt _'l f-h {__ t-i V'A -e__ ~ °' yV\_ e.... o-f 0 ( £/t.A.. vv Vvi c£.. •

3. NAME (LAST· FIRST· M.I.) SEX-RACE IAGE. DATE OF BIRTH l TIME OF CONTACT Bo ~N ...1. /fl ,'\-((1 A F 3 3o 31 ::f1tJ'1 7S 0'1 SS" HOMEA~RESS APTJFLOOR HOME TELEPHONE I OTHER TELEPHONE (Specify)

3Z..l N. 6((.et:/\J j>J- FL. siz.. 5S'S - '?<i?Y I PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT· ADDRESS· TELEPHONE RELATIVEJFRIEND NOT LIVING WITH WITNESS: NAME-ADDRESS-PHONE

1)t;; I ~/\I STU~ JO, -S1-Z.

3'l') W. 'PO'j u::.1 >SS - °ID ID

COMMENTS

W"'..s o. 0 G<.1S_e V'.e ct b~ \.-i.e.,,,.- cl(.) ..J. '°°',,.Jc \·,..,_..1 D" s V\ V1 cl &\.-...:::1 VI ~hr I °'-J:.f..Y-C>-X.. Cfl.Oo ~7 J -;T

h0. Lo-oke c{ O\Af- wi" ...... A.ow (}, 0-J $ V\ W \/V..V\- °'-+ re °" < o-f .J. .. e. .. .,i\/·~....l Y-VJ sf-ore_ (i 4. NAME (LAST· FIRST· M.I.) SEX-RACE l AGE· DATE OF BIRTH rlME OF CONTACT

_GAY LO f(_\:) ..i.. i>~fN) ti\ 2. YZ. rz.. Nl:N (,2.. JO 15 HOME ADDRESS APT./FLOOR HOME TELEPHONE I OTHER TELEPHONE (Specify)

L/32.3 N. G f...Ee:,'1 3f?\ FL. °Sl"Z... <;s.s- zz. 'i?l PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT· ADDRESS ·TELEPHONE RELATIVEJFRIEND NOT LIVING WITH WITNESS: NAME-ADDRESS-PHONE

'°J)\.J f'lf3{L 's f.61kvYLAJJl_i 2011 N. )f....DON COMMENTS

j),'d \l\.DT Ob S-e.v -.t ~ CvY'. ~Th,· V'\..~ \JVV\ \...\ S V1...t-1 { , ,I }

PATROL BEAT UNIT ASSIGNED· OFFICERS' NAMES, STAR No.s ASSISTING UNITS (E.T. MOBILE CRIME LAB.)

tsT 2...l, L!3 SUPERVISOR

i. -CPD-21.956 (7/0..i)

,-_ 'DUN{,. M<.. .ft xxxxx UNITS NOTIFIED

j\] Dl,.\J NJ)

USE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION: ORIGINAL (WITH CASE REPORT)

1 COPY TO AREA DETECTIVES 1 COPY TO N.A.G.l.S. 1 COPY TO AREA GANG LIEUTENANT 1 COPY WITH PINK

Item 48 Copyright© 2005. City of Chicago, Illinois. All Rights Reserved. Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 78: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 79: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

PATROL DIVISION - CANVASS WORKSHEET TYPE INCIDENT RDNO FORM MUST ACCOMPANY GENERAL OFFENSE CASE REPORT INVOLVING ALL "/5u R-6 L--AIL'f HL-5~~ y ~3 SHOOTINGS AND OTHER MAJOR INCIDENTS AS DIRECTED

LOCATION OF INCIDENT TYPE LOCATION (HOUSE, STREET, ETC.) lDATE OF OCCUR. [TIME OCCUR.

Lf 37-v .N. K-1r'Zi'S_1 sr .;::rew et...(Ly ~'JoiZE 21.,} 2-1 fEe o~ l73o - o?SL/o VICTIM'S ROLE (BYSTANDER, POSSIBLE TARGET, ETC) WEATHER/LIGHTING CONDITIONS

snrze 0 Gl /V2f-. cp{'f fl 1. NAME (LAST· FIRST· M.I.) SEX - RACEJAGE ·DATE OF BIRTH .· JTIME OF CONTACT

S'lo C-K JlJ ,.J > C.Ll vf, ti\ Lf 31 /(, Au~ 13 Io -z.,::; HOME ADDRESS APTJFLOOR HOME TELEPHONE OTHER TELEPHONE (Specify)

Y3Z-3 rJ. G(2..ffrJ zY'd FL. :5,z s'SS - 5CJ 2.5' PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT· ADDRESS - TELEPHONE RELATIVE/FRIEND NOT LIVING WITH WITNESS: NAME-ADDRESS-PHONE

.5 €-L-P Cfa\{'loy E'b COMMENTS

H~c;,,,-) Cer..v IV\ re0¥ °' \\-e~ c). v .... v-,·A J. n-~ V\ ,·"J. hr. j\)ev'e,.r /oo\C-ed

0 {/\+- of n.e.. '1,-J;V'-A_ ov\I. 2. NAME (LAST· FIRST· M.I.) SEX-RACE l AGE· DATE OF BIRTH rlME OF CONTACT

(/) C, ' p 2.. A...t:r.>"o')(. 25- 3o l 035 I- lA VY I e.. ~ HOME ADDRESS APT.iFLOOR HOME TELEPHONE OTHER TELEPHONE (Specify) I- L-f?:> z_ 3 j\J. G~ee:JJ J<;f' FL. z 0 PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT· ADDRESS· TELEPHONE RELATIVE/FRIEND NOT LIVING WITH WITNESS: NAME-ADDRESS-PHONE u w ~ COMMENTS iZ

~ ,,{ o{ ; -h' CIV1 0., l l' o( e,-n. ~f1· e V'S. _&~s;.e_,/ --j.-u ./i_YOV ,'c(~ u ~~se.~ V\""- 'VJ (/)

" --:J z -f\,.\.:("' t'h -e-r iV"lfuyvY'C"-k~ • 0

3. NAME (LAST· FIRST • M.I.) SEX-RACE JAGE ·DATE OF BIRTH J TIME OF CONTACT

HOME ADDRESS APT./FLOOR HOME TELEPHONE l OTHER TELEPHONE (Specify)

PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT· ADDRESS· TELEPHONE RELATIVE/FRIEND NOT LIVING WITH WITNESS: NAME-ADDRESS-PHONE

..J w z z 0 (/)

a::: UJ 0...

COMMENTS

4. NAME (LAST· FIRST· M.I.) SEX-RACE l AGE· DATE OF BIRTH rlME OF CONTACT

HOME ADDRESS APTJFLOOR HOME TELEPHONE 10THER TELEPHONE (Specify)

PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT· ADDRESS ·TELEPHONE RELATIVE/FRIEND NOT LIVING WITH WITNESS: NAME-ADDRESS-PHONE

COMMENTS

PATROL BEAT UNIT ASSIGNED· OFFICERS' NAMES, STAR No.s ASSISTING UNITS (E.T. MOBILE CRIME LAB.)

151 ztp1..-13

SUPERVISOR

l-. CPD-21.956 (7/03)

-J. 'J)<J N & fWZ ::I± XXYJ(X

UNITS NOTIFIED

/\JiYL-UN~

USE REVERSE SIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION: ORIGINAL (WITH CASE REPORT)

1 COPY TO AREA DETECTIVES 1 COPY TO N.A.G.l.S. 1 COPY TO AREA GANG LIEUTENANT 1 COPY WITH PINK

Item 4C Copyright© 2005. City of Chicago, Illinois. All Riqhts Reserved.

-

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com

Page 80: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DETECTIVE SELECTION PROCESS · 2018. 1. 12. · NOTICE: A limited license is granted by the City of Chicago only to individual persons taking the 2005 Investigative

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Digitized by ChicagoCop.com