25
Chet Collett – Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines

Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

Chet Collett – Director Flight Ops Engineering

Alaska Airlines

Page 2: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

2© 2016 Alaska Airlines - Confidential

Agenda•AC 150/5200-30D

•Reporting WET Runway Conditions

•RCAM / Vertical and Horizontal

•FAA Digital NOTAM System Bugs

Page 3: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

AC 150-5200-30D Errata

• Did a fairly good job of capturing the TALPA ARC Recommendation

• But it included some language that caused runway closures when there was no operational hazard:

Page 4: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

AC 150-5200-30D Errata

•Required WET Runway Reporting

•October 1, 2016 was the implementation date

Page 5: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

Wet Runway Reporting

1.12.23 Wet Runway.

A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. For purposes of condition reporting and airplane performance, a runway can be considered wet when more than 25 percent of the runway surface area within the reported length and the width being used is covered by any visible dampness or water that is 1/8-inch or less in depth.

Note: A significant change to condition reporting includes the requirement and ability to report ‘Wet’ when visible dampness, or water that is 1/8-inch (3.3 mm) or less in depth exists on any surface (runways, taxiways, aprons, holding bays). This change is largely due to the airplane performance differences that exist between wet, dry, or runways with water greater than 1/8-inch (3.3 mm) in depth.

Page 6: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

AC 150-5200-30D Errata

•Then on September 30, 2016 . . . FAA Published CertAlert 16-06

Page 7: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

Wet Runway Reporting• 28 days after the FAA made WET runway Reporting optional

• Moderate to Heavy rain at LGA with NO FICON

• Could a 5/5/5 100% WET FICON have alerted the flight crew?

Page 8: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

WET vs Standing Water – Effects of Rainfall Intensity

• Aircraft Performance differences are huge.• DRY

• WET

• Standing Water Greater than 1/8 INCH

Page 9: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

RCAM – Vertical

Page 10: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

RCAM – Horizontal

Page 11: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

Landing RCAM

Page 12: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

12© 2016 Alaska Airlines - Confidential

Takeoff RCAM

Page 13: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

Digital NOTAM System (DNS) Bugs

• Percentage of coverage bug

Page 14: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,
Page 15: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,
Page 16: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

Another example (real world)

ANC 12/002 ANC RWY 33 FICON 50 PRCT ICE, DRY, DRY SANDED OBSERVED AT 1612010204. 1612010205-1612020205

ANC 12/003 ANC RWY 07R FICON 60 PRCT ICE, DRY, DRY SANDED OBSERVED AT 1612010205. 1612010205-1612020205

• In this case the ICE on the first third of these runways should have been either RWYCC 1 or 3 (Dependent on upgrade capability) – so 3/6/6 or 1/6/6

• Instead, NO RWYCC were able to be generated by the DNS

Page 17: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

Digital NOTAM System Bugs

• Slippery When Wet

Page 18: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

Slippery When Wet Should be a NOTAM – NOT a FICON

Page 19: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

DNS should not allow WET or Contaminated RWYCC above 3/3/3

Page 20: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

Other Issues that have been Problematic

• FICON and ATIS do not provide the same information (and required information for Takeoff)

FICON:!ORD 12/491 ORD RWY 28R FICON 5/3/3 100 PRCT WET, 30 PRCT 1/4IN WET SN, 100 PRCT 1IN WET SN OBSERVED AT 1612120337. 1612120337-1612130337

ATIS:

ORD ATIS INFO Y 0351Z. 26008KT 5SM BR OVC008 01/M01 A2975 (TWO NINER SEVEN FIVE). ARR EXP VECTORS ILS RWY 28C APCH. READBACK ALL RWY HOLD SHORT INSTRUCTIONS. DEPS EXP RWYS 22L, 28R. NOTAMS... RWY 4L, 22R CLSD, RWY 9L, 27R CLSD, RWY 10R, 28L CLSD, RWY 15, 33 CLSD. RWY 27L ILS OTS. BA ADZYS ARE IN EFCT. RWY 22L RWY CONDITION CODE,, 5 , ,, 5 , ,, 5 ,,AT, ,, 0142Z RWY 27R CONDITION CODE,, 3 , ,, 3 , ,, 3 ,,AT, ,, 0155Z RWY 27L RWY CONDITION CODE,, 3 , ,, 3 , ,, 3 ,,AT, ,, 0155Z RWY 28R RWY CONDITION CODE,, 5 , ,, 3 , ,, 3 ,,AT, ,, 0338Z RWY 28C RWY CONDITION CODE,, 5 , ,, 5 , ,, 5 ,,AT, ,, 0312Z . USE CAUTION FOR MEN AND EQUIP AT NUMEROUS SITES ON THE FIELD. CPDLC SERVICES, AVAILABLE. WHEN READY TO TAXI CONTACT GND METERING ON FREQ 121.67. ...ADVS YOU HAVE INFO Y.

Page 21: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

In Conclusion

• Alaska Airlines sincerely hopes the FAA will schedule an industry “After Action TALPA Symposium” to discuss how the first year of implementation went.

• This symposium should include Airports, Airlines, Aircraft Manufacturers and Regulators

• It should include:• Wet Runway Reporting – Future Plans

• Digital NOTAM System – Bug Fixes

• AC 150-5200-30F (Draft Recommendations)

Page 22: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,
Page 23: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

Question?

Page 24: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

Is the portion of the Runway that is being maintained MORE THAN 25%

covered with a contaminant?

Yes, assign Runway Condition Codes and complete the Matrix Report (blue box)

No, DO NOT assign Runway Condition Codes but complete all other sections of the

Matrix Report if any contamination is present (blue box)

Misc. Data

°C

Yes or NoActive Precip?

Outside Air Temp

Local Time

Date

Runway

Airport

Initials

Flight #

Rwy

Mu

Sand Deicing Chem

Time AppliedRwy Treatment Used?

Decel

CFME

Before

After

(If Applicable)

Adjusted Runway Condition Codes

(ONLY If Downgrade or Upgrade Assessments Used)

Requires an explanation in the comments section below

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

“Matrix Report . . . _ _ _ Rwy _ _ _ __/__/__“Matrix Report . . . _ _ _ (Airport) (

Rwy _ _ _ Rwy #)

_ _ _ (inch) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (Highest Depth only for Slush, Wet Snow

or Dry Snow and Standing Water [Water

1/8 “ or less report as WET with no depth])

(Contaminant Type [Report in terms in Green Boxes,

Water 1/8 “ or less report as WET])(

__/__/__Rwy Condition Codes)

(Remarks to be transmitted)

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____________________” (Date) (Time)

(% Coverage - 10,

25, 50, 75, or 100%)

_ _ _ (%)

Dry 6 5 Frost 5 3

2 5GREATER Than

1/8"3 5

1/4" 1/2" 3/4" 1" 3

4 3

Ice 1 0Wet Ice, Water OVER Compacted

Snow, Snow OVER Ice

Wet (Damp)

Water or Slush Slush

1/8" or Less 2" or More

Compacted Snow

-15°C or Colder Warmer than -15°C

Wet Snow or Dry Snow

1/8" or

LESS

DepthDry or Wet Snow OVER

Compacted Snow

GREATER Than

1/8"1/8" or LESS

1st Rwy Third

- For Coverage 25% or Less, Enter Code 6

- Circle (or Mark) any contaminant below that covers more than 25% of the

Rwy Third. Record the most restrictive code in the box to the right.

- Circle (or Mark) Depth Only for:Water, Slush, Wet Snow, Dry Snow, or Any Snow

OVER Compacted Snow

Below Min Friction Level

Classification - Wet SlipperyDry 6 5 Frost 5 3

2 5GREATER Than

1/8"3 5

1/4" 1/2" 3/4" 1" 3

4 3

Ice 1 0

Wet (Damp)

SlushWater or Slush

GREATER Than

1/8"1/8" or LESS

Below Min Friction Level

Classification - Wet Slippery

1/8" or Less 2" or More

Wet Ice, Water OVER Compacted

Snow, Snow OVER Ice

Dry or Wet Snow OVER

Compacted SnowDepth

Compacted Snow

-15°C or Colder Warmer than -15°C

2nd Rwy Third

Wet Snow or Dry Snow

Water, Slush, Wet Snow, Dry Snow, or Any Snow OVER Compacted Snow

1/8" or

LESS

- For Coverage 25% or Less, Enter Code 6

- Circle (or Mark) any contaminant below that covers more than 25% of the

Rwy Third. Record the most restrictive code in the box to the right.

- Circle (or Mark) Depth Only for:

Dry 6 5 Frost 5 3

2 5GREATER Than

1/8"3 5

1/4" 1/2" 3/4" 1" 3

4 3

Ice 1 0Wet Ice, Water OVER Compacted

Snow, Snow OVER Ice

1/8" or Less 2" or More

Compacted Snow

-15°C or Colder Warmer than -15°C

1/8" or

LESS

DepthDry or Wet Snow OVER

Compacted Snow

GREATER Than

1/8"1/8" or LESS

Below Min Friction Level

Classification - Wet Slippery

Wet Snow or Dry Snow

Wet (Damp)

Water or Slush Slush

3rd Rwy Third

- For Coverage 25% or Less, Enter Code 6

- Circle (or Mark) any contaminant below that covers more than 25% of the

Rwy Third. Record the most restrictive code in the box to the right.

- Circle (or Mark) Depth Only for:Water, Slush, Wet Snow, Dry Snow, or Any Snow

OVER Compacted Snow

Page 25: Chet Collett Director Flight Ops Engineering Alaska Airlines · A runway is wet when it is neither dry nor contaminated. ... airplane performance differences that exist between wet,

2In

som

e ci

rcum

stance

s, t

hes

e ru

nw

ay

surf

ace

con

dit

ions

may

not

be

as

slip

per

y as

the

runw

ay

condit

ion c

ode

ass

igned

by

the

Matr

ix. T

he

air

po

rt o

per

ato

r m

ay

issu

e a h

igher

runw

ay

condit

ion

code

(but

no h

igher

than

code

3)

if M

u v

alu

es g

reate

r th

an 4

0 a

re o

bta

ined

on a

ll t

hre

e th

irds

of

the

runw

ay

by

a p

roper

ly o

per

ate

d a

nd c

ali

bra

ted f

rict

ion m

easu

ring d

evic

e a

nd a

ll o

ther

obse

rvati

on

s,

judgm

ent,

an

d v

ehic

le b

rakin

g a

ctio

n s

upport

th

e h

igh

er r

un

way

con

dit

ion

code. T

he

dec

isio

n t

o

issu

e a h

igh

er r

un

way

con

dit

ion

code

than

wou

ld b

e ca

lled

for

by

the

Ma

trix

can

not

be

base

d o

n M

u

valu

es a

lon

e; a

ll a

vail

able

mea

ns

of

ass

essi

ng r

un

way

slip

per

ines

s m

ust

be

use

d a

nd m

ust

su

pport

the

hig

her

ru

nw

ay

con

dit

ion

code. T

his

ab

ilit

y to

rais

e th

e re

port

ed r

unw

ay

condit

ion c

ode

to a

cod

e

3 c

an o

nly

be

appli

ed t

o t

hose

runw

ay

condit

ions

list

ed u

nder

code

0 a

nd 1

in t

he

Matr

ix.

The

air

po

rt o

per

ato

r m

ust

als

o c

onti

nuall

y m

onit

or

the

runw

ay

surf

ace

as

long a

s th

e hig

her

code

is i

n

effe

ct t

o e

nsu

re t

hat

the

runw

ay

surf

ace

condit

ion d

oes

not

det

erio

rate

bel

ow

the

ass

igned

code.

T

he

exte

nt

of

monit

ori

ng

must

consi

der

all

vari

able

s th

at

may

aff

ect

the

runw

ay

surf

ace

condit

ion,

incl

udin

g a

ny

pre

cipit

ati

on c

ondit

ions,

changin

g t

emper

atu

res,

eff

ects

of

win

d,

freq

uen

cy o

f ru

nw

ay

use

, and t

ype

of

air

craft

usi

ng

the

runw

ay.

If

sand o

r oth

er a

ppro

ved r

un

way

trea

tmen

ts a

re u

sed t

o

sati

sfy

the

requir

emen

ts f

or

issu

ing t

his

hig

her

runw

ay

condit

ion c

ode,

the

conti

nued

monit

ori

ng

pro

gra

m m

ust

confi

rm c

onti

nued

eff

ecti

venes

s of

the

trea

tmen

t.

Cau

tion

: T

emper

atu

res

nea

r an

d a

bove

fre

ezin

g (

e.g., a

t -3

°C a

nd w

arm

er)

may

cau

se

con

tam

inan

ts t

o b

ehave

more

sli

pper

y th

an

in

dic

ate

d b

y th

e ru

nw

ay

con

dit

ion

code

giv

en i

n

the

Matr

ix. A

t th

ese

tem

per

atu

res,

air

po

rt o

per

ato

rs s

hou

ld e

xer

cise

a h

eigh

ten

ed l

evel

of

run

way

ass

essm

ent,

an

d s

hou

ld d

ow

ngra

de

the

run

way

con

dit

ion

code

if a

ppro

pri

ate

.

Typ

eD

ryW

et

(Dam

p)

Sli

pp

ery

Wh

en

We

t -

Rw

y B

elo

w F

ricti

on

Le

vel

Cla

ssif

icati

on

Wa

ter

(sta

nd

ing

)F

ros

t

Dry

Sn

ow

or

Wet

Sn

ow

OV

ER

Co

mp

acte

d

Sn

ow

Ice

We

t Ic

e;

Wa

ter

OV

ER

Co

mp

ac

ted

Sn

ow

; D

ry

Sn

ow

or

We

t S

no

w O

VE

R

Ice

De

pth

N/A

N/A

N/A

GR

EA

TE

R

tha

n 1

/8"

1/8

" o

r

LE

SS

GR

EA

TE

R

tha

n 1

/8"

1/8

" o

r

LE

SS

GR

EA

TE

R

tha

n 1

/8"

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Te

mp

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

-15

°C o

r

CO

LD

ER

WA

RM

ER

tha

n -

15

°CN

/AN

/AN

/A

Rw

y

Co

de

65

32

52

53

44

33

10

Co

mp

ac

ted

Sn

ow

S

lus

hD

ry S

no

w o

r W

et

Sn

ow

Co

nta

min

ate

d

(Comments or additional PIREPS)