70
Cherry Bekaert LLP Government Services Group Report on the Results from our Government Benchmarking Study

Cherry Bekaert LLP Government Services Group

  • Upload
    braima

  • View
    50

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Cherry Bekaert LLP Government Services Group. Report on the Results from our Government Benchmarking Study. Learning Objectives. At the end of this course, participants should be able to: Understand current management trends for local government entities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

Cherry Bekaert LLP

Government Services GroupReport on the Results from ourGovernment Benchmarking Study

Page 2: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

2

Learning Objectives

At the end of this course, participants should be able to: Understand current management trends for local

government entities Gain insight into the current areas of concern shared

by government finance professionals Gain an understanding of what finance professionals

believe the future holds for government financial management

Page 3: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

3

Presentation Objectives Review data on respondents Review responses in the following functional areas: Work force and benefits Financial reporting and GASB standards Use of technology Green initiatives Long term borrowing Infrastructure External auditor and internal monitoring ARRA funding Budgeting

Page 4: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

Respondent Information

Page 5: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

5

Respondent summary Surveys were taken over the summer of 2011 Good representation from counties, cities and

school districts Most respondents had oversight responsibilities

of the accounting function The size of the responding localities was pretty

evenly distributed.

Page 6: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

6

Type of Entity

Page 7: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

7

Position held by Respondent

Page 8: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

8

Size of Entity (by number of employees)

Page 9: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

Size of Entity (by $ revenue)

9

Page 10: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

Workforce and BenefitsObjective: to gauge the ability of localities to properly staff and maintain their accounting function

Page 11: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

11

Workforce and Benefits Do you agree with the following statement: It is easier today to find

qualified candidates for vacant financial and accounting positions compared to two years ago.

Page 12: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

12

Workforce and Benefits Has your staffing level for financial and accounting positions over

the past two years increased, decreased or stayed the same?

Page 13: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

13

Workforce and Benefits Do you agree with the following statement: We have been able to

adapt to the reduction in our workforce by finding ways to do things more efficiently.

Page 14: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

14

Workforce and Benefits Do you agree with the following statement: The reduction in our

workforce has increased the risk of fraud in our entity.

Page 15: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

15

Workforce and Benefits In the next budget cycle, do you anticipate that

the number of filled financial and accounting staff positions will:

Page 16: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

16

Workforce and Benefits Has the benefits package you offer to new employees decreased in

value over the last two years?

Page 17: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

17

Workforce and Benefits Have other post-employment benefits (OPEB) been

reduced following the adoption of GASB 45?

Page 18: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

GASB Reporting ModelObjective: To measure opinion of the current financial reporting model and certificate programs

Page 19: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

19

GASB Reporting Model Do you agree with the following statement: New GASB standards

issued over the last 5 years have improved overall financial reporting for my government.

Page 20: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

20

GASB Reporting Model Do you agree with the following statement: GASB 54 will improve

understanding of the makeup of governmental fund balances.

Page 21: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

GASB Reporting Model Do you agree with the following statement: The current financial

reporting model is too long and complicated.

How does this answer reconcile with the previous question regarding new GASB standards?21

Page 22: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

22

GASB Reporting Model Do you agree with the following statement: The current financial

model is of value to elected officials and constituents.

What would the pie chart look like if we had surveyed elected officials?

Page 23: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

23

GASB Reporting Model Do you agree with the following statement: Given the current

uncertainty of state and federal funding, information regarding intergovernmental dependency should be included in the financial report.

Page 24: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

24

GASB Reporting Model Other survey results: Over 85% of localities responding post their

CAFR to their web site. Why not 100%?

80% of respondents believe that participation in the GFOA or ASBO certificate program has a positive impact on the perception of financial accountability. Is this a fair conclusion?

GASB Reporting Model

Page 25: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

Use of TechnologyObjective: to assess the condition of IT systems

Page 26: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

26

Use of Technology When did you last upgrade your IT system?

Page 27: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

27

Use of Technology When do you plan to upgrade your IT system?

Page 28: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

28

Use of Technology Do you believe the increased use of technology will be necessary to

keep cost under control?

Page 29: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

29

Use of Technology Which of the following social media websites does your

entity use?

Page 30: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

Green InitiativesObjective: To assess the extent to which green projects have been implemented and gauge whether green projects have had a positive impact on the locality

Page 31: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

31

Green Initiatives Do you currently have any green initiative

projects?

Page 32: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

32

Green Initiatives How long has your green initiative project been

implemented?

Green Initiatives

Page 33: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

33

Green Initiatives Where have you implemented your green initiatives?

Page 34: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

34

Green Initiatives Other findings

Only 15% of those localities who bid green projects felt that they received fewer bids as a result of going green.

Over two thirds of respondents believe that the benefits outweigh the cost

90% believe that green project initiatives create goodwill with the public

Page 35: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

Long Term BorrowingObjective: To assess current plans and prospects for selling bonds and the use of derivative instruments to manage costs

Page 36: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

36

Long-Term Borrowing Do you plan to incur debt in the next…?

Page 37: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

37

Long-Term Borrowing What will you use your next financing for?

Long term borrowing

Page 38: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

38

Long-Term Borrowing What is your outlook on bond ratings in the future based on the

current state of the economy?

Long term borrowing

What about Jefferson County Alabama?

Page 39: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

39

Long-Term Borrowing Do you use derivatives to hedge your interest

rate?

Page 40: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

40

Long-Term Borrowing Other findings:

• For those localities that have derivative instruments, over 85% are currently reported as liabilities.

• Only 3% of respondents believe they will use derivatives to hedge interest rates in the future.

Page 41: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

InfrastructureObjective: Obtain views on the condition of the localities infrastructure assets

Page 42: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

42

Infrastructure Do you feel that existing infrastructure assets

are being adequately maintained?

Page 43: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

43

Infrastructure Would you consider your existing infrastructure

outdated?

Page 44: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

44

Infrastructure Are you currently extending the lives on your existing

infrastructure assets more than in the prior years?

Page 45: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

External Audits and Internal MonitoringObjective: cover questions regarding external audit services as well as internal procedures relating to audit committees and fraud hotlines

Page 46: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

46

External Auditing and Internal Monitoring Which of the following statements best describes how well trained

your external auditor’s staff are in regards to financial statement auditing, OMB Circular A-133, and financial reporting?

Page 47: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

47

External Auditing and Internal Monitoring Which of the following best describes the allotted time your internal

audit department assists the external auditor?

Page 48: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

48

External Auditing and Internal Monitoring Which of the following best describes your views of any

management letter comments that have been provided to you over the past three years?

Page 49: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

49

External Auditing and Internal Monitoring Our fraud hotline is an effective tool in preventing fraud

and abuse.

Page 50: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

50

External Auditing and Internal Monitoring How valuable and effective is your Audit committee?

Page 51: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

ARRAObjective: To determine what types of expenditures ARRA funds were used for and how the end of ARRA funding might affect localities

Page 52: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

52

ARRA What percentage of your revenue does the ARRA

funding make up?

75% of localities who responded to the survey received ARRA funding

Page 53: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

53

ARRA Do you feel that the ARRA grant accomplished its purpose?

The same percentage also believed that ARRA funding was beneficial to the locality.

ARRA

Page 54: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

54

ARRA Check all of the following ways the ARRA grant was/is used for:

Page 55: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

55

ARRA How will you replace ARRA grant money when the funding ceases?

Page 56: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

BudgetObjective: To measure trends in budgeting and the availability of resources

Page 57: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

57

Budget Actual revenues have fallen short of budget in

the most recent fiscal year.

Page 58: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

58

Budget To address budget shortfalls, is your entity contemplating

an increase in existing user or service fees?

Page 59: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

59

Budget To address budget shortfalls, is your entity

contemplating new user or service fees?

Page 60: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

60

Budget The organization is willing at this time or in the near future to

consider a more aggressive investment strategy to increase investment earnings.

Page 61: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

61

Budget Do you believe reliance on federal/state government for

funding will increase or decrease?

Page 62: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

62

Budget Has your entity investigated any outsourcing

opportunities that can reduce costs?

Page 63: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

63

Budget What is the Board or Commission position on property taxes?

Page 64: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

64

Survey Summary Work force and benefits:

Benefit packages have declined in value, making it more difficult to be competitive in the marketplace.

While the ability to hire qualified people may have improved, funding will limit available resources to either the same or less than previous years.

Page 65: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

65

Survey Summary GASB reporting model and technology

Increased use of technology will be necessary in order to manage costs.

A majority of respondents believe that, while the overall model is too complicated, recent standards, including GASB 54 have improved financial reporting.

Page 66: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

66

Survey Summary Infrastructure and green initiatives

A majority of localities believe that they have benefitted from green initiatives, both through cost savings and through increased goodwill.

Over two thirds of respondents believe that their infrastructure assets are adequately maintained, and are not outdated.

Page 67: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

67

Survey Summary External audits and internal monitoring

Only 11% of respondents who have fraud hotlines fully agree that it is an effective tool to prevent fraud and abuse.

Over 80% believe their external auditor is well trained and knowledgeable, and believe that their management letters are at least somewhat beneficial.

Page 68: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

68

Survey Summary Budget and ARRA funds

ARRA funds were most used for construction. The second highest use was to “maintain current positions” which may lead to tough decisions once ARRA funding is completed.

Over two thirds of respondents indicate that actual revenues were under budget.

The same percentage also believe that their governing board will reduce services and cut costs rather than raise taxes.

Page 69: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

69

Survey Summary Other takeaways from the survey? Other questions or comments?

Page 70: Cherry  Bekaert  LLP Government Services Group

Thank you for your time

Contact information:Rob Churchman, [email protected]