Upload
cason-olley
View
223
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Chemotherapeutic Treatment Options for Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Lauren Barney
April 17, 2013
Peyton Lab
Breast Cancer Subtypes
• Breast cancer is classified into clinical subtypes based upon receptor expression
• These subtypes dictate possible therapeutic options and vary in their prognosis– Luminal: derived from the luminal cells
• ER+, PR+• Can use hormonal therapy• Less aggressive
– Basal: derived from myoepithelial cells• ER-, PR-• No specific target for therapies• More aggressive
– HER2-enriched• More aggressive
Luminal A
Luminal B
Claudin-Low
HER2-enriched
Basal
ER: estrogen receptorPR: progesterone receptorHER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
Peyton Lab
Luminal and Basal Characteristics
Basal• Low ER• Low HER2• High CK5/6• c-KIT higher• High EGFR• High p53
mutation• High p53
protein• High cyclin E• Very high
vimentin
Basement membrane
Myoepithelial Cells Basal
Luminal Cells Luminal
Luminal• High ER• Higher HER2• Low CK5/6• Low c-KIT• Low EGFR• Low p53
mutation• Low p53
protein• Low cyclin E• Low vimentin
Peyton Lab
Triple Negative Breast Cancer• 15-25% of all breast cancer, but much higher proportion
of all breast cancer mortality• Lack ER, PR and HER2 – no targeted therapies• Much more aggressive
– Younger age at diagnosis, high grade, large tumor size, aggressive relapse
• High proliferation, poor differentiation, basal marker (cytokeratin 5/6) expression, and aggressive clinical course, with early relapse and decreased survival
• TN tumors have specific morphologic characteristics: elevated mitotic count, tumor necrosis, pushing margin of invasion, and stromal lymphocytic response and high nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio
Peyton Lab
TN vs Basal Subtypes• The terms triple negative and basal are often used interchangeably
in breast cancer subtyping.– Triple negative denotes the lack of ER, PR and HER2 receptors (clinical
observation)– Basal describes the tumors that overexpress those genes that
characterized breast basal epithelial cells based on gene expression– These often overlap!
• Basal-like breast cancer is characterized by certain features that include the TN phenotype, but TN and basal-like are not synonymous terms. A discordance of up to 30% has been described between the two groups.
Peyton Lab
Treatments can be targeted for cancers that express hormonal receptors or HER2; TN remains a clinical challenge.
• Hormonal therapy: blocks estrogen activity
– Tamoxifen, ER antagonist– Competitively binds to ER &
inhibits estrogen effects
• HER2 targeted therapy– Herceptin & others
• These targeted therapies work really well!
• There is no specific target on TN cells! Must use cytotoxic chemotherapeutics, surgery, radiation.
Tamoxifen
Peyton Lab
Current Options for TNBC
• Standard course of treatment is very aggressive: surgery with adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy– Neoadjuvant: administration of a drug before a main
treatment – increases rate of breast conserving therapies and helps to understand a patient’s response to drugs
– Adjuvant: any therapy given after primary therapy – used when there is a high risk of recurrence
• The search is on for specific targets!
Peyton Lab
TNBC Treatment
• Chemotherapy typically includes combinations of taxanes (T), anthracyclines (A), and oxazophorines (C)– Taxanes: disrupt microtubules & inhibit cell division
• Paclitaxel, docetaxel
– Anthracyclines: most effective chemotherapeutics!• Three mechanisms: inhibit DNA and RNA synthesis,
blocks transcription and replication, creates oxygen free radicals
• Daunorubicin, doxorubicin, epirubicin, idarubicin
– Oxazophorine: DNA alkylating agent• Cyclophosphamide (C)
Peyton Lab
Taxane and Anthracycline Based Therapy
• Typical regimens:– AC-T: doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide every 2
weeks for four cycles followed by docetaxel every 2 weeks for 4 cycles
• Investigating taxol before AC (not standard therapy)
– TAC: docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
• Different dosing regimens, frequencies can help to improve efficacy– Dense dosing is better (more frequent doses are
better)
Peyton Lab
CMF therapy may actually reduce recurrence of TNBC compared to
anthracycline or taxane-based treatment
• CMF is a much older therapeutic regimen than TAC or AC-T
• Cyclophosphamide (alkylating agent, oxazophorine)• Methotrexate (antimetabolite, stops cell growth &
division)• Fluorouracil (called 5FU; pyrimidine analog,
antimetabolite)• Many different dosing schedules possible
Peyton Lab
TN Tumors are Chemosensitive
• Recently, studies have shown that TNBC is more responsive to anthracycline or anthracycline/taxane chemotherapy than Luminal subtypes– Patients who had a complete response to
chemotherapy had good prognosis regardless of subtype
• Despite this, TNBC patients still have a worse distant disease free-survival and a poor prognosis– Result of high likelihood of relapse in TNBC
• HER2+ subtype has a similar response to TNBC
Peyton Lab
Beyond brute force chemo: What are some potential treatment options for TNBC?
• Current and developing therapies– Many in clinical trials– Most target proliferative pathways
• Targets: General proliferation, surface molecules, secondary messengers
Peyton Lab
Potential Systemic Targets for TNBC
Peyton Lab
Platinum Agents
• Platinum agents can bind to DNA and cause cross-linking to occur cell death
• Cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaplatin are approved for some types of cancers and are being studied as treatments for TNBC
Peyton Lab
PARP Inhibitors
• PARP: poly ADP ribose polymerase– Involved in DNA repair by detecting single-
strand breaks– Can be activated in cells with damaged DNA
• Several types of cancer are more dependent on PARP, so it can be a good therapeutic target
• PARP inhibitors prevent breaks from being repaired, causing cell death.
Peyton Lab
Anti-EGFR
• EGFR is overexpressed in 45-70% of TNBC • Cetuximab is an anti-EGFR antibody used to treat
metastatic cancer– Breast cancer patients with metastatic disease respond
twice as well when Cetuximab is added
• Other treatments include tyrosine kinase inhibitors (erlotinib, gefitinib)– Gefitinib is the only one currently approved for breast
cancer, but the others are in clinical trials
• Inhibits an important signaling pathway and provides a specific target!
Peyton Lab
Angiogenesis in Cancer
• Angiogenesis: formation of new blood vessels. – Tumors need blood vessels to grow and spread.
• Angiogenesis inhibitors prevent the formation of new blood vessels, thereby stopping or slowing the growth or spread of tumors.
Peyton Lab
Anti-Angiogenesis• Bevacizumab (Avastin)
– Monoclonal antibody to VEGF– Improves survival in breast cancer patients with combined with Taxol– Approved for metastatic breast cancer but benefit isn’t subtype specific – this has
since been revoked because it slowed progression but didn’t extend length or quality of life and had many adverse effects
• Metronomic chemotherapy: repeated, low, less than toxic doses can destroy endothelial cells and prevent angiogenesis, slowing tumor growth – works in clinical trials
Peyton Lab
Androgen Receptor
• Nuclear receptor activated by binding testosterone or dihydrotestosterone– Closely related to PR
• Expressed in 75% of breast cancer and 10-20% of TNBC– TNBC that express AR are molecularly similar to prostate
cancer and could potentially be treated similarly.
• Bicalutamine: anti-androgen used to treat prostate cancer
• 17-DMAG: semi-synthetic antibiotic derivative, has shown promise in clinical trials
• Enzalutamide: androgen agonist used to treat prostate cancer; is in Phase II for TNBC
Peyton Lab
RTK Inhibitors
• Suninitib (Sutent)– Multiple-target RTK inhibitor
• All PDGFRs and VEGFRs• KIT (CD17) which drives the majority of all GI stromal
tumors & several others
• Imatinib (Gleevec)– Prevents phosphorolation of BCR-Abl, inhibiting
signaling pathways necessary for cancer cell growth• BCR-Abl: Exists only in cancer cells!• Worked in vitro; no effect on metastatic breast cancer
patients in Phase II
Peyton Lab
Src Tyrosine Kinase
• Src is overexpressed in breast cancer• Dasatinib: multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor
approved for CML– Possible efficacy in breast cancer - small
effect seen in Phase II– In vitro: basal breast cancer cells were more
sensitive!
• Several others in trials also seem to have promising preclinical activity
Peyton Lab
mTOR
• Cell cycle regulator and a downstream effector in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway
• PTEN is often mutated in TNBC, leading to increased AKT and mTOR activation
• Everolimus and temsirolimus block mTOR function and inhibit proliferation– Everolimus is approved for some types of cancers -
currently in clinical trials for TNBC in combination with chemotherapy
– Temsirolimus is approved for renal cell carcinoma and completed a Phase II trial with promising results
Peyton Lab
Other possible therapeutic options
• Hsp90 (heat shock protein 90) – upregulated in response to stress signals; regulates and stabilizes many key proteins, including downstream targets of p53, PI3K, AKT and EGFR – can be recruited to ‘protect’ oncogenic proteins, leading to protein overexpression
• HDAC (Histone deacetylase) – can effect epigenetics and cause re-expression of epigenetically silenced genes
Peyton Lab
Other ways to sensitize cells to chemotherapy
• Inhibition of TGF-beta sensitizes to chemo• TRAIL: Lexatumumab (monoclonal
antibody in clinical trials) – TRAIL controls proliferation & induces
apoptosis
• Chk1 (checkpoint kinase 1): involved in cell cycle control. – Inhibition sensitizes proliferating tumor cells to
chemotherapies that damage DNA
Peyton Lab
Mutations that Could be Targeted
• p53 (75% of TNBC) – complex, so target downstream components of pathway
• Myc (40% of TNBC)• Loss of retinoblastoma gene (20% of TNBC)• Mutation in BRCA1 or BCRA2 (15-20% of TNBC)• Rare:
– PTEN– PIK3CA– Amplification of HER2– Amplification of FGFR2
Peyton Lab
We need to get creative: changes in formulation
• EndoTAG®-1: formulation of paclitaxel combined with neutral and positive lipids– Interacts with newly developing and negatively charged endothelial cells that
are forming new blood vessels– Attacks the activated endothelial cells as they divide– Targets blood supply to tumors without affecting healthy tissue– Prevents angiogenesis and inhibits tumor growth!!
Peyton Lab
What’s in clinical trials now?
• New compounds• New drug combinations or dosing regimens• New formulations
Interesting Current Clinical Trials• Re-expression of ER in Triple Negative Breast Cancers• Bevacizumab, Metronomic Chemotherapy (CM), Diet and Exercise
After Preoperative Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer• Laboratory-Treated T Cells After Chemotherapy in Treating Women
With Stage II or Stage III Breast Cancer Undergoing Surgery• Preoperative Clinical Trial of Sorafenib in Combination With
Cisplatin Followed by Paclitaxel for Triple Negative (ER-, PR-, Her2-) Early Stage Breast Cancer
Peyton Lab
Recent news stories
• March 18, 2013 - Copper depletion shows early success in triple-negative breast cancer
• April 8, 2013 – Paragazole (HDAC) excels in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer
• April 12, 2013 - Omega-3 Fatty Acids Slow Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation
• April 15, 2013 - Nanodiamonds could improve effectiveness of breast cancer treatment
Peyton Lab
Outlook for now and future
• Need targeted therapies, new formulations to be able to treat TNBC– Combination therapies will be necessary
because tumors are heterogeneous and can change
– Also need to attack tumors from all sides– Reaching complete remission and preventing
recurrence are key
Peyton Lab
References
• A. Bosch et al. Cancer Treatment Reviews 36 (2010) 206–215 • Cleator et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options. Lancet
Oncol 2007; 8: 235–44 • Pal et al. Triple negative breast cancer: unmet medical needs. Breast
Cancer Res Treat (2011) 125:627–636 • Crown et al. Emerging targeted therapies in triple-negative breast cancer.
Annals of Oncology 23 (Supplement 6): vi56–vi65, 2012 • Oncology (Williston Park). 2008 October ; 22(11): 1233–1243. • Hudis and Gianni. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: An Unmet Medical
Need. The Oncologist 2011, 16:1-11. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-S1-01
• Lisa A. Carey, E. Claire Dees, Lynda Sawyer, et al. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:2329-2334.
• Turner N et al. Targeting triple negative breast cancer: Is p53 the answer? Cancer Treat Rev (2013), http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.12.001