23
Checks and Balances #51, Ambition must be made to counteract ambition. The interest of the man must be connected with the constitutional rights of the place. Inter-branch battles are expected

Checks and Balances

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Checks and Balances. #51, Ambition must be made to counteract ambition. The interest of the man must be connected with the constitutional rights of the place. Inter-branch battles are expected. Separation of Powers Fundamentals. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Checks and Balances

Checks and Balances #51, Ambition must be made to

counteract ambition. The interest of the man must be connected with the constitutional rights of the place.

Inter-branch battles are expected

Page 2: Checks and Balances

Separation of Powers Fundamentals political power is distributed

among the three branches of government

members are selected using different methods

possess some ability to check the power of the others

Page 3: Checks and Balances

The Constitution on Impeachment "Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes

and Misdemeanors" (Article II, section 4) House votes to impeach, majority vote Senate votes to remove, 2/3rds vote Chief Justice of SC presides What is a high crime and misdemeanor?

Page 4: Checks and Balances

Impeachment Background Whitewater Independent Counsel

Appointed Clinton v. Jones Starr Report

Page 5: Checks and Balances

Discussion Questions Was the office of the president weakened

by the impeachment process? Did the system of checks and balances

“work” as intended? Should the impeachment process by

remedied? How?

Page 6: Checks and Balances

War Power Congress can “declare war” President- commander in chief How many declared wars? Role of Courts

Page 7: Checks and Balances

Implications Meanings of Constitution are fuzzy Encourages strife Promotes flexibility

Page 8: Checks and Balances

Ratifying the Constitution approved by at least nine states approved at ratifying convention Not state legislatures or popular vote Debate between federalists and anti-

federalists Needed the big states

Page 9: Checks and Balances

Federalists vs. Anti-federalists Is democracy best served in large or small

republics? (Madison v. Brutus)– Who is likely to be elected?– What is the greatest danger to democracy?– What is human nature like?– Are these questions still relevant?

Page 10: Checks and Balances

Anti-federalists small republic is best People are animated by a concern for public

good strong national government would be

distant from the people

Page 11: Checks and Balances

Madison- Federalist 10 and 51 Liberty is safest in large (extended) republics many opinions and interests in large republic

makes it harder for a tyrannical majority to form coalition formed in large republic are more

moderate Liberty is threatened more by public passions and

popular factions than by strong government

Page 12: Checks and Balances

New Republicanism OLD- positive political engagement – civic

virtue and small republics that required some degree of equality

NEW- negative limitations on government – the balance of interest based on the “invisible hand” of self-interest and on the equality of opportunity

Page 13: Checks and Balances

Assessing the Framers Elite Conspiracy

– Federalists all wealthy planters and merchants trying to get rich

Brilliant Political Theorists– How to prevent tyranny of the majority

Sound Politicians– political expediency is the driving principle

Page 14: Checks and Balances
Page 15: Checks and Balances

Amendment the Constitution proposing amendments

– 2/3rds votes by both house of congress – 9,746 amendments offered, only 29 of which

were officially proposed – Constitutional Convention at request of 2/3rds

of state legislatures – Never has happened, no rules about how to do

it

Page 16: Checks and Balances

Ratifying Amendments by legislatures in ¾ of the states seven state constitutions specify that the

legislature must ratify the proposed amendment by 3/4ths of 2/3rds majorities

by ratifying conventions in ¾ of states The case of the C paper and the 27th

Amendment

Page 17: Checks and Balances

State Constitutions The legislature may provide for an indem-

nification program to peanut farmers for losses incurred as a result of Aspergillums flavus and freeze damage in peanuts. Alabama, 1901.

  The people hereby enact limitations on marine net

fishing in Florida waters to protect saltwater finfish, shellfish, and other marine animals from unnecessary killing, over fishing and waster. Florida, 1968

Page 18: Checks and Balances

Federalist amendments Strengthen Government/ Reduce Separation

of Powers– allow members of congress to serve in cabinet– allow president to dissolve congress require

presidential/congressional teams in congressional districts

– allow congress to require new presidential elections.

– establish 6 year term for president– Lengthen house terms to 4 years

Page 19: Checks and Balances

Anti-federalist Amendments government does too much not, too little

– limit amount of taxes (require a 2/3 vote of congress to raise taxes)

– required balanced budget– give president a line item veto– limit authority of federal courts– term limits for judges and members of congress – Direct referendums

Page 20: Checks and Balances

Miscellaneous Amendments campaign finance reform school prayer abortion Flag burnings

Page 21: Checks and Balances

Discussion Questions Any ideas for constitutional amendments? Do we need a new constitutional

convention? What would happen if we did have a

convention?

Page 22: Checks and Balances

Majority Tyranny What to do about factions? Causes cannot be removed Can only control the effects of faction Set faction against faction; ambition must

be made to counter ambition

Page 23: Checks and Balances

Majority Rule vs. Minority Rights Madison and Federalist #10

Faction: "A number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community." Inherent characteristic of people.