34
Cheatgrass: Biology, Ecology, and Management Jane Mangold Extension Invasive Plant Specialist Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences

Cheatgrass: Biology, Ecology, and Management Jane Mangold Extension Invasive Plant Specialist Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Cheatgrass: Biology,

Ecology, and Management

Jane Mangold

Extension Invasive Plant Specialist

Department of Land Resources and

Environmental Sciences

Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum)

Annual Large and open

panicle Drooping ½ inch awns

Japanese brome (B. japonicus)

Large and open, heavy panicle

Drooping < ½ inch awns

Impacts Across Montana

Rangeland

CRP

Crops

56.7 million acres in western statesExpanding by 14% per year

-Duncan et al. 2004

Cheatgrass Origin and Distribution

Native of southwestern Asia Introduced to North America in several

independent events• Contaminated seed• Ship ballasts

Problematic in western U.S. and Canada and northern Mexico

Weedy Characteristics: Winter Annual

Germinates/emerges in fall Resumes growth in early spring Produces seed May-June Plant dies, seed dormant until fall

Cheatgrass Produces Lots of Seed

400 – 4,000 seeds/plant Short seed life (2-3 years) Dispersed by humans, animals, wind,

machinery, contaminated straw/hay, etc.

Cheatgrass Seeds Germinate Quickly

Days to 25% germination

Species Days

Cheatgrass 3.8a

Medusahead 5.5b

Smooth brome 6.6c

Crested wheatgrass 6.9cd

Siberian wheatgrass 7.3d

Bluebunch wheatgrass 8.1e

Days to 25% germination after exposure to freezing temperatures (Jan. 31-Feb. 15)

Days

***

***

5.5b

4.3a

4.9a

6.2a

***Cheatgrass and medusahead had begun to germinate in the field by February 10

Wilson et al. 1974. J. Range Manage. 27(2):120-122

Cheatgrass Grows Fast

Arredondo et al. 1998. J. Range Manage. 51(5):584-589

Cheatgrass Adjusts to Local Conditions

Photo courtesy of Lori Ziegenhagen, USDA-ARS

Photo courtesy of Lori Ziegenhagen, USDA-ARS

Cheatgrass

Bluebunch wheatgrass

1

1

2

2

Impacts

• Reduces plant diversity• Reduces forage and crop yield

and quality• Alters fire regimes• Ruins my socks!

Cheatgrass Alters Fire RegimesIncrease in

quantity and

continuity of fuel

Larger and more

frequent fires

Perennial species

unable to recover

Further increase in cheatgrass

Cheatgrass Management

Target cheatgrass in spring and fall

X

Prevent seed development!Deplete seed bank!

Control Method Effectiveness

Prevention

Chemical

Revegetation

Mechanical

Grazing/Mowing

Biocontrol

Prescribed Fire

Prevention EDRR Maintain healthy, competitive plant

community• Cheatgrass increases with removal of native

perennial grasses and forbs (which can occur as a result of over-grazing)

Minimize disturbance Limit spread of seeds

Chemical Control--Some Herbicide Tolerance

Photo by Ed Davis, MSU

Non-sprayed control

Sprayed, but cheatgrass only

suppressed

ChemicalHerbicide Active Ingredient

Trade NameProduct per Acre Application Timing

Glyphosate Roundup Pro

6 to 12 ounces Early spring while other grasses are still dormant; after emergence in fall

Targeting Cheatgrass with Glyphosate

Sprayed on May 11, 2009 Non-sprayed control

3 sites (Madison and Ruby Valleys)3 reps/siteSprayed at 0, 6, 8, 10, or 12 oz. Roundup/ASampled June 16-18, 2009

Targeting Cheatgrass with Glyphosate

Sprayed on May 11, 2009 Non-sprayed control

Nu

mb

er o

f p

lan

ts/0

.1m

2

Data pooled across 3 sites

Chemical ControlHerbicide Active Ingredient

Trade NameProduct per Acre Application Timing

Glyphosate Roundup Pro

6 to 12 ounces Early spring prior while other grasses are still dormant

Imazapic + glyphosate Journey

16 to 32 ounces Late summer to early fall before emergence and prior to planting desirable species

Imazapic Plateau

2 to 12 ounces Late summer to early fall before emergence and prior to planting desirable species

Sulfometuron methyl + chlorsulfuronLandmark

0.75 to 2.25 ounces Spring or fall application followed by planting desirable species in fall (at least 3-6 months after spraying)

RimsulfuronMatrix

2 to 4 ounces Spring or fall application followed by planting desirable species in fall (at least 7 months after spraying)

Effect of Imazapic on Annual Grasses*

Rate(oz/ac)

% Control 30

DAT

% Control 60 DAT

Density 60 DAT(plants/m2)

Biomass 60 DAT(g/m2)

0 0a 0a 532a 8a

4 70b 67b 179b 23a

8 75c 80b 164b 16a

*22% cheatgrass, 15% annual bluegrass, 15% medusahead

Shinn and Thill. 2002. Weed Tech. 16(2): 366-370

Revegetation

Seeding desirable, competitive vegetation is necessary if very little desirable vegetation is remaining (<20-30% cover)

Must control cheatgrass• Multiple years of control prior to revegetation

Competitive Effects of Seeded GrassesSeeding

TreatmentPerennial Grass Biomass (kg/ha)

Cheatgrass Biomass (kg/ha)

% Reduction

Critana thickspike wheatgrass

792 913 32

Bozoisky Russian wildrye

900 737 45

Sodar streambank wheatgrass

1135 207 85

Luna pubescent wheatgrass

1714 0 100

Hycrest crested wheatgrass

1596 124 91

Unseeded control --- 1337

Whitson and Koch. 1998. Weed Tech. 12(2): 391-396

Assisted Succession

Restoration of weed-infested rangeland may require multiple steps

Cheatgrass/ annual forbs

Introduced, competitive grass

Native vegetation

Disturbed soil typically increases cheatgrass Multiple treatments or follow up with

herbicide/grazing/mowing

disked strips—notice brown, cured cheatgrass

Mechanical Control

Grazing

Cattle, Sheep, and Goats• Spring

• Accessible but not yet producing seed• >2 defoliations each spring• >2 consecutive years

• Winter • Reduce mulch accumulation• Energy and protein supplements required

Graze/mow before plants start to turn purple!

Grazing Scenario

Dominated by cheatgrassDevoid of perennial vegetation

Dominated by perennialsCheatgrass present

1) 2)

In which scenario will be easier to manage cheatgrass?

Biocontrol

None currently available Researching potential for soil and seed fungi • Soil fungus Pyrenophora semeniperda

• “Black fingers of death”• Kills cheatgrass seeds in soil

• Seed fungus Ustilaga bullata• Infects germinating seeds• Plant grows to maturity but doesn’t produce seeds

Prescribed Fire

Hot fire will destroy seeds on soil surface, in the litter, and on the plant• Reduce germinable seeds by 98-100%

Seeds buried in the soil will be protected Fire can reduce litter accumulation

Prescribed Fire

Risky due to timing• Typically not enough fuel to carry fire at most

appropriate time• Damage perennial, desirable vegetation• Potential for fire to get out of control

More promising for Japanese brome than cheatgrass

Integrated Cheatgrass Management

Prevention Integrate tools to decrease seed production

and seed bank over time Revegetation is imperative where very little

desirable vegetation is remaining Persistence and intelligence—use your

hands and your head! More research is necessary in Montana

Thank you! Questions?

Jane [email protected]