Upload
rebeca-martin
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
R E S EA RCH L E T T E R
Characterization of the adherence properties of humanLactobacilli strains to be used as vaginal probiotics
Rebeca Martın1,2, Borja Sanchez2,3, Juan Evaristo Suarez1,3 & María C. Urdaci2
1Laboratory of Microbiology, University Institute of Biotechnology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain; 2UMR 5248, ENITAB, Laboratoire de
Microbiologie et Biochimie Appliquée, Université de Bordeaux, Gradignan, France; and 3Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias, Consejo
Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IPLA-CSIC), Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain
Correspondence: Rebeca Martın, INRA,
UMR 1319 MICALIS-Microbiologie de
l'Alimentation au Service de la Santé
humaine, Pôle Ecosystèmes: Interactions des
bactéries commensales et probiotiques avec
l'hôte, Domaine de Vilvert, Bât 440 R-2
78352, Jouy en Josas, Cedex, France. Tel.:
+33 1 34 65 20 98; fax: +33 1 34 65 24 62;
e-mail: [email protected]
Received 4 October 2011; revised 21
December 2011; accepted 21 December
2011. Final version published online 16
January 2012.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02495.x
Editor: Wolfgang Kneifel
Keywords
vaginal Lactobacillus; adhesion; secreted
proteins; surface proteins; mucin; epithelial
cell cultures.
Abstract
In the present work, the adhesion of 43 human lactobacilli isolates to mucin
has been studied. The most adherent strains were selected, and their capacities
to adhere to three epithelial cell lines were studied. All intestinal strains and
one vaginal isolate adhered to HT-29 cells. The latter was the most adherent to
Caco-2 cells, although two of the intestinal isolates were also highly adherent.
Moreover, five of the eight strains strongly adhered to HeLa cells. The binding
of an Actinomyces neuii clinical isolate to HeLa cells was enhanced by two of
the lactobacilli and by their secreted proteins, while those of another two
strains almost abolished it. None of the strains were able to interfere with the
adhesion of Candida albicans to HeLa cells. The components of the extracellu-
lar proteome of all strains were identified by MALDI-TOF/MS. Among them, a
collagen-binding A precursor and aggregation-promoting factor–like proteins
are suggested to participate on adhesion to Caco-2 and HeLa cells, respectively.
In this way, several proteins with LysM domains might explain the ability of
some bacterial supernatants to block A. neuii adhesion to HeLa cell cultures.
Finally, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) could explain the
good adhesion of some strains to mucin.
Introduction
The balance between the different microorganisms inhab-
iting the human vagina is important for the maintenance
of its homeostasis, affecting directly the health status of
the woman. Among the resident microorganisms, the Lac-
tobacillus isolates represent at least 70% of the bacteria
sampled (Redondo-López et al., 1990; Martín et al.,
2008b) being the most dominant L. crispatus, L. jensenii,
and L. gasseri and in less extent L. salivarius, L. vaginalis,
and L. iners (Boyd et al., 2005; Martín et al., 2008a, b).
Because of their relative abundance, lactobacilli have been
proposed as probiotics to be used against the establish-
ment and overgrowth of pathogenic microorganisms in
the vagina. These benefits would be exerted by two differ-
ent mechanisms: (i) competition for attachment sites
on epithelial cells and pathogen co-aggregation and (ii)
production of antimicrobial compounds (Lepargneur &
Rousseau, 2002). The first leads to formation of a biofilm
that prevents the colonization by undesirable microorgan-
isms (Antonio et al., 2005). In addition, some lactobacilli
can co-aggregate with these potential pathogens, such as
Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, and Gardnerella vagi-
nalis, which may help in the clearance of the pathogen
(Boris et al., 1998; Osset et al., 2001). The antimicrobials
are mainly organic acids produced from the fermentation
of sugars, which leads to the typical low pH of the vagina.
This low pH is able to inhibit the growth of most patho-
gens (Boskey et al., 2001).
Probiotics are defined as ‘live microorganisms which
when administered in adequate amounts confer a health
benefit on the host’ (FAO/WHO, 2006). Use of lactoba-
cilli as probiotic agents in the human genitourinary tract
has a long history of safe use, which dates from 1915
(Newman, 1915). Among the physiological traits that are
desirable for potential probiotic lactobacilli, adhesion to
ª 2011 Federation of European Microbiological Societies FEMS Microbiol Lett 328 (2012) 166–173Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
MIC
ROBI
OLO
GY
LET
TER
S
epithelial surfaces is of paramount importance. It is well
known that, in healthy women, the cervix produces
mucus that is mainly composed of mucin, among other
components (Moghissi et al., 1960) acting as a protective
barrier for the uterus and the vagina (Wang & Lee,
2002). A good adhesion to mucin is thus a desirable char-
acteristic, which may increase the residence time of probi-
otic lactobacilli, as happens with intestinal Lactobacillus
strains (McGrady et al., 1995; Perea Vélez et al., 2007).
The quick turnover of the vaginal mucosa makes adhe-
sion a crucial feature for the establishment and coloniza-
tion of probiotic lactobacilli; thus, it is necessary to
characterize the bacterial adhesion an efficient in vitro
model (Van den Abbeele et al., 2009).
In the present study, the adhesion abilities of 32 vagi-
nal and 11 intestinal Lactobacillus strains to mucin have
been characterized. Among them, eight strains were
selected to characterize their adhesion abilities to Caco-2,HT-29, and HeLa cells, three well-known epithelial cell
models. The interference of the lactobacilli cells and their
secreted proteins on the adhesion of the vaginal patho-
gens C. albicans and Actinomyces neuii to the vaginal cell
line HeLa was determined as well. Finally, secreted and
surface proteins were identified, with some of them being
suggested as molecular elicitors of the interaction between
the lactobacilli and the mucosal surface.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains, cell lines, and growth
conditions
The Lactobacillus strains used in this study were isolated
from the vagina of fertile women or had an intestinal ori-
gin and were selected because of their good probiotic
properties (Martín et al., 2008a, unpublished data). Acti-
nomyces neuii R1 was isolated from a vaginal swab of a
woman with vulvovaginitis, whereas C. albicans CECT
1392, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103), and
Lactobacillus plantarum 299V (DSM 9843) were obtained
from the Colección Española de Cultivos Tipo, the Ameri-
can Type Culture Collection and the German Collection
of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, respectively.
Lactobacilli were grown in MRS broth (Difco, Detroit),
whereas C. albicans and A. neuii were grown in BHI
broth (Oxoid, Cambridge, UK) supplemented with 1%(w/v) yeast extract (Difco), 0.1% (w/v) maltose (VWR,
Haasrode, Belgium), 0.1% (w/v) glucose (VWR), and 1%(v/v) defibrinated horse blood (Eurobio, Les Ulis, France)
(supplemented BHI, S-BHI). When appropriated, 1.5%(w/v) agar (Difco) was added to the liquid medium. Acti-
nomyces neuii, C. albicans, and agar cultures of the lacto-
bacilli were incubated in anaerobic jars using the
AnaeroGen Compact system (Oxoid). All the strains were
grown at 37 °C.The Caco-2 (HTB-37) (LGC-Standars, Molsheim, France)
cell line was routinely grown in Eagle's minimal essential
medium (EMEM) (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Buchs,
Switzerland). HeLa (ATCC CCL-2) and HT-29 (HTB-38)(LGC-Standars) cell lines were grown in Dulbecco'smodified Eagle's minimal essential medium (DMEM)
(Sigma-Aldrich). Both culture broths were supplemented
with 10% (w/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gib-
coBRL, Eragny, France) and with penicillin G/streptomycin
(5000 IU mL−1, 5000 μg mL−1) (Sigma-Aldrich). Cultureswere incubated in 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks (Nunc,
Roskilde, Denmark) at 37 °C in a 5% (v/v) CO2 atmosphere
until confluence. For adhesion assays, 2500 cells per well
were seeded in 12-well culture plates (Nunc) and cultivated,
with a daily change of the culture medium until confluence
(Tallon et al., 2007).
Adhesion assays
Adhesion to porcine gastric mucin (Porcine gastric
mucin, type III, Sigma-Aldrich), Caco-2, HT-29, and
HeLa monolayers of the lactobacilli and the pathogenic
bacteria was tested following the procedure described by
Tallon and co-workers (Tallon et al., 2007), using around
108 CFUs (as determined by plate count) for the adhesion
to mucin and 50 bacteria per eukaryotic cell for the adhe-
sion to epithelial cell tests. Overnight bacterial cultures, in
the early stationary phase of growth, and confluent
eukaryotic cell cultures were used in all cases. Assays were
performed at least in triplicate, and the data are expressed
as the mean ± SD.
Protein binding assay
Binding assays were performed using the surface proteins
extracted from 50 mL of culture or secreted proteins
extracted from 20 mL of culture and mucin as coated
matrix on 96-well plates as described before (Sánchezet al., 2009). Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and
then visualized by standard silver staining. Proteins able
to bind mucin were identified by its relative electropho-
retic mobility with respect to the surface proteins profiles.
Interference with pathogen adhesion
The effect of the eight Lactobacillus strains on the adhe-
sion of C. albicans CECT 1392 and A. neuii R1 to HeLa
cells was performed as described earlier, using a probiotic/pathogen ratio of 10 : 1. After incubation with the cell line
monolayers and five PBS washes, aliquots of the cultures
or their dilutions were transferred to plates containing
FEMS Microbiol Lett 328 (2012) 166–173 ª 2011 Federation of European Microbiological SocietiesPublished by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
Adherence properties of human Lactobacilli strains 167
S-BHI with 20 μg mL−1 penicillin G (selective for C. albi-
cans) or 16 μg mL−1 erythromycin (Sigma-Aldrich) (selec-tive for A. neuii). The susceptibility of all Lactobacillus
strains to both antibiotics was confirmed prior to the
adhesion assays.
To check the effect of extracellular proteins on the
adhesion of the two pathogens to HeLa cells, 250 or
500 μg of crude extracellular protein preparations was
added to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h prior
to the adhesion assays, which were performed using 50
microorganisms per eukaryotic cell, as already described.
At least three independent assays were performed, and
the results were expressed as the mean ± SD.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GRAPHPAD Prism
Software version 5.00 for Windows (San Diego, CA). The
groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls multiple
comparison post hoc analysis. A P-value of < 0.05 was
considered significant.
Results
Adhesion to mucin of the Lactobacillus strains
Adhesion of 43 human lactobacilli, isolated from the gas-
trointestinal tract or from vagina, to mucin was first
characterized (Supporting Information, Table S1). Of the
43 strains tested, 27 showed higher adhesion capabilities
to mucin than L. rhamnosus GG being statistical signifi-
cant for 10 of them (P-value < 0.05). In fact, the best per-
forming strain, L. plantarum Li70, adhered 51 times more
than L. rhamnosus GG. In the rest of the experiments,
only the eight most adherent lactobacilli with different
RAPD profile were selected (Table 1, Data S1). Strain
Lv67 was also selected as a negative control.
Bacterial adhesion to epithelial cell lines
Adhesion was tested using two epithelial cell lines of
intestinal origin (Caco-2 and HT-29) and the vaginal cell
line HeLa (Fig. 1). Lactobacillus casei Li71, L. gasseri Lv19,
and L. plantarum Li68 were the most adherent strains to
HeLa cells. Lactobacillus vaginalis Lv67, L. plantarum
Li68, and L. casei Li71 showed the best adhesion to Caco-2, and finally, L. plantarum Li68, L. plantarum Li69,
L. plantarum Li70, L. casei Li71, and, to a lesser extent,
L. vaginalis Lv67 were the most adherent to HT-29. Allthe adhesion values showed statistical differences (P-value < 0. 05) comparing to each control in all the cell
lines used.
Effect on pathogen adhesion
The effect of the lactobacilli and their secreted proteins
on the adhesion of the vaginal pathogens C. albicans and
A. neuii to HeLa cells was then investigated (Fig. 2). Inhi-
bition values were calculated as adherent bacteria per
HeLa cell. Lactobacillus gasseri Lv19 and L. plantarum
Li70 increased significantly the adhesion of A. neuii R1 to
HeLa cells (P-value < of 0.05 and 0.001, respectively), as
well as their extracellular proteins (P-value < 0.001),
although the proteins of Lv70 do not show statistical dif-
ferences (Fig. 2a and b). Conversely, the proteins secreted
by L. plantarum Li69 and L. salivarius Lv72 abrogated the
adhesion of A. neuii to the same cell line (P-value < 0.
05) (Fig. 2b). Regarding C. albicans, some Lactobacillus
strains slightly enhanced the adhesion of the yeast (no
significant differences) (Fig. 2c), while their secreted pro-
teins did not have any effect (Fig. 2d).
Identification of the Lactobacillus secreted and
surface-associated proteins
Crude preparations of the proteins secreted by the eight
Lactobacillus strains in MRS broth (Fig. 3a) and their sur-
face-associated proteins (Fig. 3b) were resolved by SDS-PAGE. The most intense bands were excised manually
and identified by mass spectrometry (Tables S2 and S3).
Table 1. Adhesion to mucin, classification according to their RAPD
profiles, and identification of the strains at the level species by partial
sequencing of ribosomal DNA gene 16S. Data have been normalized
using the adhesion values of Lactobacillus casei ssp. rhamnosus GG
(ATTC 53103) because of its good adhesion capacities to this
compound (Gueimonde et al., 2004), which was given the arbitrary
value of 1
Strain
RAPD
profile Species
Adhesion
(mean ± SD) Origin
Li81 1a Lactobacillus plantarum 23.32 ± 9.91* Intestinal
Li82 1a Lactobacillus plantarum 3.11 ± 1.61 Intestinal
Li83 1a Lactobacillus plantarum 36.35 ± 15.17 Intestinal
Li84 1a Lactobacillus plantarum 14.94 ± 12.28 Intestinal
Li85 1a Lactobacillus plantarum 1.95 ± 1.02 Intestinal
Li86 1a Lactobacillus plantarum 41.28 ± 27.98* Intestinal
Li87 1a Lactobacillus plantarum 14.46 ± 5.31* Intestinal
Li69 1a Lactobacillus plantarum 38.20 ± 2.17* Intestinal
Li70 1b Lactobacillus plantarum 51.81 ± 32.47* Intestinal
Lv19 2 Lactobacillus gasseri 17.48 ± 8.01* Vaginal
Li68 3 Lactobacillus plantarum 9.65 ± 1.24* Intestinal
Lv72 4 Lactobacillus salivarius 4.49 ± 0.18* Vaginal
Li71 5 Lactobacillus casei 17.44 ± 10.94* Intestinal
Lv57 6 Lactobacillus jensenii 1.01 ± 0.08* Vaginal
Lv67 7 Lactobacillus vaginalis 0.58 ± 0.67 Vaginal
Results are expressed as the mean ± SD of at least three independent
experiments.
*Strains more adherent than LGG (P-value < 0.05).
ª 2011 Federation of European Microbiological Societies FEMS Microbiol Lett 328 (2012) 166–173Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
168 R. Martın et al.
Among the extracellular proteins detected, cell wall hy-
drolases, muramidases, peptidoglycan-binding polypep-
tides, and a precursor of the collagen-binding A protein
were identified. In addition, some moonlighting proteins,
such as glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, were
also found. The bacterial lysis of the cultures was negligi-
ble, as can be deduced from the comparison of secreted
protein/total protein profiles obtained by SDS-PAGE(Fig. 3c).
Adhesion of extracellular proteins to mucin
Analysis of the relative electrophoretic mobility of the
proteins recovered after binding experiments suggested
that the surface proteins ABC transporter periplasmic
protein, ornithine carbamoyltransferase, and a high-affin-ity cystine-binding protein bound mucin (Fig. 4a). Also,
the secreted GAPDH of L. plantarum Li69 and Li70 and
that of L. gasseri Lv19 bound mucin, as it did murami-
dase and putative extracellular protein from L. plantarum
Lv69 and Li70 (Fig. 4b).
Discussion
One of the tests considered as crucial by the FAO/WHO
for the in vitro evaluation of potential probiotic candi-
dates is their capacity to adhere to mucin and human
epithelial cells, as well as their antagonism toward patho-
gen establishment (FAO/WHO, 2006). The eight most
adherent Lactobacillus strains were selected, and their
adhesion abilities to three cell lines, their capability of
interfering with the adhesion of two vaginal pathogens to
a model human cell line, and the identification of their
extracellular proteins and their ability to bind mucin were
established.
Presence of typical intestinal lactobacilli, such as L. plan-
tarum, in vaginal environment has been reported previ-
ously and related to the decreased risk of bacterial
vaginosis (Antonio et al., 2005). Besides, the vaginal epi-
thelium is also covered by a protective layer of mucus,
which is mainly composed of mucins as the intestinal one,
although no commercial vaginal mucin is available (Dasari
et al., 2007). In this context, mucins produced in the gas-
trointestinal and vaginal epithelium are very different. In
the gut, MUC2 is mainly produced by goblet cells
(McGuckin et al., 2011), whereas in the vaginal epithe-
lium, MUC1, MUC4, MUC5AC, MUC5B, or MUC6 is
produced, depending on the location (Gipson et al., 1997).
Regarding the adhesion experiments to human cell
lines, the four intestinal isolates presented affinities to
HT-29 cells in the order of the positive control L. planta-
rum 229V. Therefore, this is an especially valuable probi-
otic property that, join to their ability to resist bile salts
and acid (data not shown), might allow the use of Lv67,
Li68, and Li71 in restoration of the vaginal ecosystem
through oral administration.
Fig. 1. Adhesion of the different Lactobacillus strains to HeLa (a),
Caco-2 (b), and HT-29 (c) cells. Results are expressed as the CFU per
eukaryotic cell (mean ± SD) of at least three independent experiments.
Candida albicans CECT1392 was used as positive control of adhesion
to HeLa cells, whereas Lactobacillus plantarum 229V was used with
the same purpose for Caco-2 and HT-29 cells. The adhesion of
Actinomyces neuii R1 to HeLa cells is also represented. Note the change
in the magnitude of the values of the ordinate axis. *P-value < 0.05.
FEMS Microbiol Lett 328 (2012) 166–173 ª 2011 Federation of European Microbiological SocietiesPublished by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
Adherence properties of human Lactobacilli strains 169
Binding of lactobacilli or their secreted compounds
may either hinder colonization of the epithelium by
potential pathogens, or create a barrier between them and
the mucosal cells, thus excluding direct contact with the
underlying epithelium. The lactobacilli strains were con-
fronted to C. albicans, which is responsible for at least
85% of human candidiasis (Rein, 1997), and A. neuii,
which is the second most frequent microorganism iso-
lated in the Ison and Hay grade II and III vaginal micro-
biota represented by bacterial vaginosis-related organisms
(Verhelst et al., 2005) and has been also associated with
bacterial vaginosis in women with intrauterine devices
(Chatwani & Amin-Hanjani, 1994). Four of the lactoba-
cilli enhanced the adherence of C. albicans and A. neuii
to HeLa cells, which contrasts with previous findings,
where pathogen adhesion inhibition was reported (Boris
et al., 1998; Osset et al., 2001). This fact suggests that this
trait is strain specific. In fact, although the formation of a
ternary complex pathogen–Lactobacillus–epithelial cell
might enhance the antimicrobial effect of the lactic acid
generated by this bacteria (Boris et al., 1997; Coudeyras
et al., 2008), these ternary complexes could also enhance
the pathogen adhesion as has been observed with Lacto-
bacillus acidophilus and the adhesion of C. albicans to the
contraceptive vaginal ring (Chassot et al., 2010).
Adhesion of A. neuii was very responsive to the addi-
tion of the extracellular proteins of the lactobacilli in a
strain-dependent fashion. Five of them enhanced adsorp-
tion of the pathogen, thus reproducing the results obtained
when whole bacterial cells were used. It is worth mention-
ing the extraordinary adhesion increment brought about
by L. gasseri Lv19, which could be due to the secretion of
an aggregation-promoting factor–like protein. In fact, it
has already been described that these factors act as bridges
between pathogen and human cells (Marcotte et al., 2004).
This synergistic effect has also been described for some exo-
polysaccharides produced by several probiotic bacteria,
including L. rhamnosus GG (Ruas-Madiedo et al., 2006).
Interestingly, the extracellular proteins of L. plantarum
Li69 and of L. salivarius Lv72 markedly inhibited the
adhesion of A. neuii to HeLa cells. Among the different
proteins secreted by these strains, several contained LysM
domains, such as two peptidoglycan-binding proteins of
Lv72. The LysM domain has been proposed to be the
attachment site of the autolysin AcmA of Lactococcus lac-
tis to peptidoglycan (Steen et al., 2003). Recently, an
extracellular chitin-binding protein from L. plantarum,
containing this domain, has been shown to attach to the
cell surface and to selective bind N-acetylglucosamine-containing polymers (Sánchez et al., 2010). Notably, the
Lv19 extracellular proteome, which enhanced A. neuii
adhesion, did not include any LysM-bearing polypeptides.
It is thus conceivable that binding of the LysM-bearingproteins to the A. neuii surface might block the ligands
Fig. 2. Adhesion of Actinomyces neuii R1
(a and b) and Candida albicans CECT 1392
(c and d) to HeLa cells in the presence of
lactobacilli (a and c) and their secreted
proteins (b and d). The data are expressed as
the CFU per well (mean ± SD) of at least three
independent experiments. For a better
visualization of the effect of living cells and
extracellular proteins on pathogen adhesion,
values were normalized using the adhesion of
the corresponding pathogen under standard
conditions, which was given the value 1.
**P-value < 0.001; *P-value < 0.05.
ª 2011 Federation of European Microbiological Societies FEMS Microbiol Lett 328 (2012) 166–173Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
170 R. Martın et al.
that recognize the surface of the HeLa cells, as already
shown for other proteins (Spurbeck & Arvidson, 2010).
This fact points out Lv72 as another good probiotic can-
didate, due also to its moderate ability to bind HeLa cells.
However, other bacterial skills such as hydrogen peroxide,
bacteriocin and acid production, and resistance to antibiot-
ics, low pH, and spermicidal compounds, among other
properties, have to be taken into account to do the correct
selection of a vaginal probiotic (Martín et al., 2008a, b).
Besides, nowadays, there is a tendency to use a combina-
tion of various strains to cover the whole range of charac-
teristics required in a vaginal probiotic.
Surface and secreted protein extracts are important to
detect potential mucin-binding proteins. Among the sur-
face proteins, ornithine carbamoyltransferase (R16) and
amino acid ABC transporter periplasmic protein and
high-affinity cystine-binding protein (both in band R126)
of L. vaginalis Lv67 bound mucin. High-affinity cystine-binding proteins are surface proteins that are frequently
suggested to be putative adhesions. For instance, BspA, a
cystine-binding protein of Lactobacillus fermentum BR11,
has been described as a collagen-binding protein (Hung
et al., 2005).
Among the secreted protein fraction, an extracellular
form of GADPH was able to bind mucin. The presence
of surface-associated GAPDH is well known in a huge
variety of microorganisms (Sánchez et al., 2008). As a
secreted form, GAPDH has been shown to be a plasmin-
ogen- and fibrinogen-binding protein in E. coli (Egea
et al., 2007). Furthermore, Neissera meningitidis GAPDH-deficient mutant showed a significant reduction in adhe-
sion to human epithelial and endothelial cells compared
to the wild-type and complemented mutant (Tunio et al.,
2010). However, care should be taken in the interpreta-
tion of these results, because the only criteria applied for
Fig. 3. Representative protein patterns, obtained after SDS-PAGE of
the secreted (a), surface (c), and total (b) proteomes from the
different Lactobacillus strains. Strain names are shown on the top of
the lanes. MM, molecular mass standards. *Unidentified bands.
Fig. 4. Representative protein patters, obtained after SDS-PAGE of
the secreted (a) or surface (b) proteins able to bind mucin of the
different Lactobacillus strains. Strain names are shown on the top of
the lanes. MM, molecular mass standards; BSA, bovine serum
albumin.
FEMS Microbiol Lett 328 (2012) 166–173 ª 2011 Federation of European Microbiological SocietiesPublished by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
Adherence properties of human Lactobacilli strains 171
identification have been the comparison between their
electrophoretical mobility with respect to the surface pro-
tein profiles.
In conclusion, the ability to adhere to mucin and to
the epithelial cell cultures seems to be strain specific
although some association with origin has been found for
HT-29 cells. Some of the strains analyzed have good
capacities on the models tested being good candidates to
be used as vaginal probiotics alone or with other lactoba-
cilli. The data presented in this work also suggest that
certain extracellular proteins produced by intestinal and
vaginal lactobacilli could act as potential mediators in the
molecular interaction with both epithelial cells and patho-
gens. Further research is needed to establish the precise
molecular mechanism of action of these proteins using
convenient genetically modified strains.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the CICYT grant AGL2010-
15097 and RM2010-00012-00-00 from the Ministry of
Science and Innovation (Spain) and the FEDER Plan.
R.M. was holder of a scholarship from FICYT (Princip-
ado de Asturias), and B.S. is holder of a Juan de la Cierva
postdoctoral contract from the Ministry of Science and
Innovation (Spain).
References
Antonio MA, Rabe LK & Hillier SL (2005) Colonization of
the rectum by Lactobacillus species and decreased risk of
bacterial vaginosis. J Infect Dis 192: 394–398.Boris S, Suarez JE & Barbes C (1997) Characterization of the
aggregation promoting factor from Lactobacillus gasseri,
a vaginal isolate. J Appl Microbiol 83: 413–420.Boris S, Suarez JE, Vázquez F & Barbés C (1998) Adherence of
human vaginal lactobacilli to vaginal epithelial cells and
interaction with uropathogens. Infect Immun 66: 1985–1989.Boskey ER, Cone RA, Whaley KJ & Moench TR (2001)
Origins of vaginal acidity: high D/L lactate ratio is
consistent with bacteria being the primary source. Hum
Reprod 16: 1809–1813.Boyd MA, Antonio MA & Hillier SL (2005) Comparison of
API 50 CH strips to whole-chromosomal DNA probes for
identification of Lactobacillus species. J Clin Microbiol 43:
5309.
Chassot F, Camacho DP, Patussi EV, Donatti L, Svidzinski TI
& Consolaro ME (2010) Can Lactobacillus acidophilus
influence the adhesion capacity of Candida albicans on the
combined contraceptive vaginal ring? Contracepcion 81:
331–335.Chatwani A & Amin-Hanjani S (1994) Incidence of
actinomycosis associated with intrauterine devices. J Reprod
Med 39: 585–587.
Coudeyras S, Jugie G, Vermerie M & Forestier C (2008)
Adhesion of human probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus to
cervical and vaginal cells and interaction with vaginosis-associated pathogens. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2008: 549640.
Dasari S, Pereira L, Reddy AP et al. (2007) Comprehensive
proteomic analysis of human cervical-vaginal fluid.J Proteome Res 4: 1258–1268.
Egea L, Agulera L, Giménez R, Sorolla MA, Aguilar J, Badía J
& Baldoma L (2007) Role of secreted glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in the infection mechanism of
enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli:
interaction of the extracellular enzyme with human
plasminogen and fibrinogen. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 39:
1190–1203.FAO/WHO (2006) Probiotics in food. Health and nutritional
properties and guidelines for evaluation. FAO Food and
Nutritional paper No. 85 (ISBN 92-5-105513-0).
Gipson IK, Ho SB, Spurr-Michaud S, Tisdale AS, Zhan Q,
Torlakovic E, Pudney J, Anderson DJ, Toribara NW & Hill
JA (1997) Mucin genes expressed by human female
reproductive tract epithelia. Biol Reprod 56: 999–1011.Gueimonde M, Tölkkö S, Korpimäki T & Salminem S (2004)
New real-time quantitative PCR procedure for
quantification of bifidobacteria in human fecal samples.
Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 4165–4169.Hung J, Turner MS, Walsh T & Giffard PM (2005) BspA
(CyuC) in Lactobacillus fermentum BR11 is a highly
expressed high-affinity L-cystine-binding protein. Curr
Microbiol 50: 33–37.Lepargneur JP & Rousseau V (2002) Rôle protecteur de la
flore de Döderlein. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 31: 485–494.
Marcotte H, Ferrari S, Cesena C, Hammarstrom L, Morelli L,
Pozzi G & Oggioni MR (2004) The aggregation-promoting
factor of Lactobacillus crispatus M247 and its genetic locus.
J Appl Microbiol 97: 749–756.Martín R, Soberón N, Vaneechoutte M, Flórez AB, Vázquez F
& Suárez JE (2008a) Characterization of indigenous vaginal
lactobacilli from healthy women as probiotic candidates. Int
Microbiol 11: 261–266.Martín R, Soberón N, Vázquez F & Suárez JE (2008b)
La microbiota vaginal: composición, papel protector,patología asociada y perspectivas terapéuticas. Enferm Infecc
Microbiol Clin 26: 160–167.McGrady JA, Butcher WG, Beighton D & Switalski LM (1995)
Specific and charge interactions mediate collagen
recognition by oral lactobacilli. J Dent Res 74: 649–657.McGuckin MA, Lindén SK, Sutton P & Florin TH (2011)
Mucin dynamics and enteric pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol
9: 265–278.Moghissi K, Neuhaus OW & Stevenson CS (1960)
Composition and properties of human cervical mucus I.
Electrophoretic separation and identification of proteins.
J Clin Invest 39: 1358–1363.Newman D (1915) The treatment of cystitis by intravesical
injections of lactic bacillus cultures. Lancet ii: 330.
ª 2011 Federation of European Microbiological Societies FEMS Microbiol Lett 328 (2012) 166–173Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
172 R. Martın et al.
Osset J, Bartolomé RM & García E (2001) Assessment of the
capacity of Lactobacillus to inhibit the growth of
uropathogens and block their adhesion to vaginal epithelial
cells. J Infect Dis 183: 485–491.Perea Vélez M, Hermans K, Verhoeven TL, Lebeer SE,
Vanderleyden J & De Keersmaecker SC (2007) Identification
and characterization of starter lactic acid bacteria and
probiotics from Columbian dairy products. J Appl Microbiol
103: 666–674.Redondo-López V, Cook RL & Sobel JD (1990) Emerging role
of lactobacilli in the control and maintenance of the vaginal
bacterial microflora. Rev Infect Dis 12: 856–872.Rein MF (1997) Vulvovaginitis y cervicitis. In Enfermedades
infecciosas: principios y prácticas (Mandel GL, ed), pp. 1197–1214. Panamericana, Buenos Aires.
Ruas-Madiedo P, Gueimonde M, de los Reyes-Gavilán CG &Salminen S (2006) Effect of exopolysaccharide isolated from
“viili” on the adhesion of probiotics and pathogens to
intestinal mucus. J Dairy Sci 89: 2355–2358.Sánchez B, Bressolier P & Urdaci MC (2008) Exported
proteins in probiotic bacteria: adhesion to intestinal
surfaces, host immunomodulation and molecular cross-talking with the host. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 54:
1–17.Sánchez B, Chaignepain S, Schmitter JM & Urdaci MC (2009)
Identification of novel proteins secreted by Lactobacillus
plantarum that bind to mucin and fibronectin. J Mol
Microbiol Biotechnol 17: 158–162.Sánchez B, González-Tejedo C, Ruas-Madiedo P, Urdaci MC
& Margolles A (2010) Lactobacillus plantarum extracellular
chitin-binding protein and its role in the interaction
between chitin, Caco-2 cells, and mucin. Appl Environ
Microbiol 77: 1123–1126.Spurbeck RR & Arvidson CG (2010) Lactobacillus jensenii
surface-associated proteins inhibit Neisseria gonorrhoeae
adherence to epithelial cells. Infect Immun 76: 3103–3111.Steen A, Buist G, Leenhouts KJ, El Khattabi M, Grijpstra F,
Zomer AL, Venema G, Kuipers OP & Kok J (2003) Cell
wall attachment of a widely distributed peptidoglycan
binding domain is hindered by cell wall constituents. J Biol
Chem 278: 23874–23881.Tallon R, Arias S, Bressollier P & Urdaci MC (2007) Strain
and matrix-dependent adhesion of Lactobacillus plantarum is
mediated by proteinaceous bacterial compounds. J Appl
Microbiol 102: 442–451.Tunio SA, Oldfiedl NJ, AlaÁldeen DA, Wooldrige KG &
Turner DP (2010) The role of glyceraldehydes 3-phosphatedehydrogenase (GapA-1) in Neisseria meningitides
adherence to human cells. BMC Microbiol 10: 280.
Van den Abbeele P, Grootaert C, Possemiers S, Verstraete W,
Verbeken K & Vam de Wiele T (2009) In vitro model to
study the modulation of the mucin adherent bacterial
community. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 83: 349–359.Verhelst R, Verstraelen H, Claeys G, Verschraegen G, Van
Simaey L, De Ganck C, De Backer E, Temmerman M &Vaneechoutte M (2005) Comparison between Gram stain
and culture for the characterization of vaginal microflora:
definition of a distinct grade that resembles grade I
microflora and revised categorization of grade I microflora.
BMC Microbiol 5: 61.
Wang Y & Lee CH (2002) Characterization of a female
controlled drug delivery system for microbicides.
Contraception 66: 281–287.
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the
online version of this article:
Data S1. Additional material and methods and results
section.
Table S1. Adhesion of the 43 isolates to mucin.
Table S2. MS and MS/MS data corresponding to the
identification of extracellular proteins produced by the
different Lactobacillus strains.
Table S3. MS and MS/MS data corresponding to the
identification of surface proteins produced by the differ-
ent Lactobacillus strains.
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell is not responsible for the
content or functionality of any supporting materials sup-
plied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing
material) should be directed to the corresponding author
for the article.
FEMS Microbiol Lett 328 (2012) 166–173 ª 2011 Federation of European Microbiological SocietiesPublished by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
Adherence properties of human Lactobacilli strains 173