25
Part III Imperfectly Compe00ve Markets © Playconomics, LHS 1

Chapter10 Slides

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

d

Citation preview

Page 1: Chapter10 Slides

Part  III    Imperfectly  Compe00ve  Markets    

©  Playconomics,  LHS   1  

Page 2: Chapter10 Slides

Imperfect  vs.  Perfect  

Im-­‐perfect  =  Perfect  except  that  one  or  more  of  the  following  assump?ons  apply:      •  Consumers/suppliers  are    price-­‐takers,  or  •  Goods  are    homogeneous,  or  •  There    externali?es,  or  •  Goods  are    excludable  and  rival,  or  

 (not  full)  informa?on,  or    free  entry  and  exit.  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   2  

Page 3: Chapter10 Slides

Imperfect  vs.  Perfect  

Im-­‐perfect  =  Perfect  except  that  one  or  more  of  the  following  assump?ons  apply:      •  Consumers/Suppliers  are  NOT  price-­‐takers,  •  Goods  are  NOT  homogeneous,  or  •  There  ARE  externali?es,  or  •  Goods  are  NOT  excludable  and  rival,  or  •  Imperfect  (not  full)  informa?on,  or  •  NO  free  entry  and  exit.   So  what  happens?  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   3  

Page 4: Chapter10 Slides

Chapter  10:  Public  Goods  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   4  

Page 5: Chapter10 Slides

Public  Goods  

Some   :  •  Educa&on  •  Health  system  •  Na&onal  defense  •  Judiciary  system    

©  Playconomics,  LHS   5  

Non-­‐rivalry  &    Non-­‐excludability  

Page 6: Chapter10 Slides

Non-­‐rivalry  &  Non-­‐excludability  

Defini0on:  Non-­‐Rivalry:  One  individual’s  consump?on  of  the  good  does  not  impede  another  individual  from  consuming  it  as  well:  the  MC  of  providing  the  public  good  to  an  addi?onal  individual  is  zero.  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   6  

Page 7: Chapter10 Slides

Non-­‐rivalry  &  Non-­‐excludability  

Defini0on:  Non-­‐Excludability:  No  one  can  be  excluded  from  consuming  the  good.  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   7  

Page 8: Chapter10 Slides

Non-­‐rivalry  &  Non-­‐excludability  

Defini0ons:  Pure  Public  Goods  represent  goods  that  are  perfectly  non-­‐rivalrous  &  non-­‐excludable.  Impure  Public  Goods  represent  goods  that  are  non-­‐rivalrous  &  non-­‐excludable  only  up  to  a  point.  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   8  

Page 9: Chapter10 Slides

Pure  vs.  Impure  Public  Goods  

•  Excludable,  but  non-­‐rivalrous  –  Pay  TV  (needs  subscrip?on,  but  your  enjoyment  is  not  affected  by  someone  else  watching  TV)  

–  Busses,  airplanes,  etc  

•  Non-­‐excludable,  but  rivalrous  –  Congested  motorway  (no  toll,  but  takes  longer  ?me)  –  Hospitals,  schools,  public  transport,  this  Micro  1  course    

PURE  IMPURE  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   9  

Page 10: Chapter10 Slides

Aggregate  Demand:    Marginal  Social  Benefit  (MSB)  &  Efficiency  

 

     •  Want  to  hire  a  cleaner    

•  How  many  hours  of  cleaning  per  week  should  they  contract  for?    

©  Playconomics,  LHS   10  

Page 11: Chapter10 Slides

Aggregate  Demand:  MSB  &  Efficiency  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   11  

Page 12: Chapter10 Slides

Marginal  Social  Benefit  (MSB)  

Defini0on:  The  Marginal  Social  Benefit  is  the  ver?cal  sum  of  the  individual  marginal  benefits.  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   12  

Page 13: Chapter10 Slides

Aggregate  Demand:  MSB  &  Efficiency  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   13  

Page 14: Chapter10 Slides

Efficiency  Say   What  is  the  efficient  number  of  hours  Anna  &  Zoe  should  hire  the  cleaner  for?    

Σ  Marginal  Ind.  Benefits  =  Marginal  Social  Benefit  =           Samuelson  Condi0on  

6  hours

©  Playconomics,  LHS   14  

Page 15: Chapter10 Slides

Efficiency  

Defini0on:  The  Samuelson  Condi0on  states  that  the  efficient  quan?ty  of  a  public  good  is  found  by  seing  the  sum  of  the  individual  marginal  benefits  equal  to  the  marginal  cost.  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   15  

Page 16: Chapter10 Slides

Market  Provision  and  Free-­‐Riding  

Do  markets  provide  goods  efficiently?  à  for    goods  à  for    goods  à  WHY?  

 Lek  to  their  own  devices,  will  Anna  and  Zoe  hire  the  cleaner  for  the  efficient  

number  of  hours?  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   16  

Page 17: Chapter10 Slides

Market  Provision  and  Free-­‐Riding  Say  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   17  

4  hours  

Under-­‐Provision!!!

0  hours  Just  Free-­‐Ride  on  Anna  

Page 18: Chapter10 Slides

Market  Provision  and  Free-­‐Riding  

Defini0on:  Free-­‐Riding  denotes  the  ac?on  of  enjoying  a  good  without  paying  for  it  à  is  caused  by  the  non-­‐excludable  nature  of  public  goods  and  it  results  in  their  under-­‐provision.  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   18  

Page 19: Chapter10 Slides

Market  Provision  and  Free-­‐Riding  

Why  shouldn’t  Anna  and  Zoe  AGREE  on  6  hours  per  week  at  $30  per  hour  (the  efficient  #  of  hours)?  

 

Anna  and  Zoe  could  SHARE  the  MC:  •  Anna  could  pay  her  marginal  benefit  à  $20  per  hour  •  Zoe  could  pay  her  marginal  benefit      à  $10  per  hour  

                                             $30  per  hour  

Lindahl  prices

©  Playconomics,  LHS   19  

Won’t  Work!  L  

Page 20: Chapter10 Slides

Market  Provision  and  Free-­‐Riding  

Defini0on:  Lindahl  Prices  imply  that  each  individual  pays  for  the  provision  of  a  public  good  according  to  their  marginal  benefit.  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   20  

Page 21: Chapter10 Slides

Market  Provision  and  Free-­‐Riding  Does  Zoe  prefer  to  pay  the  Lindahl  Price  (6  hours)  or  to  free-­‐ride  (4  hours)?  

Say  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   21  

Page 22: Chapter10 Slides

Public  Goods  and  Externali?es  

A  public  good  is  an  extreme  case  of  posi0ve  externality!    

•  Like  posi?ve  externali?es  (remember  perfume!)  à    (everyone  can  enjoy  Maia’s  perfume)  AND  

 by  the  market  

•  Extreme  case  because  unlike  standard  externali?es  à  the  benefit  accrued  to  those  who  enjoy  the  public  good  does  not  depend  on  who  is  providing  it  (could  be  either  Zoe  or  Anna)  à  another  way  of  defining  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   22  

Page 23: Chapter10 Slides

Market,  Government  &  Taxa?on  

à  each  individual  can  benefit  from  someone  else’s  public  good  provision  

à  an  individual  cannot  be  stopped  from  enjoying  it.  

GOVERNMENT  INTERVENTION  

Solu0on:  

©  Playconomics,  LHS   23  

Page 24: Chapter10 Slides

Market,  Government  &  Taxa?on  

Government  hires  the  cleaner  for  6  hours  and  tax  Anna  &  Zoe  $20  and  $10  per  hour  (their  Lindahl  prices).    

BUT  NOT  PERFECT!    MBAnna  &  MBZoe  are  NOT  common  knowledge!  à  THEY  have  an  incen?ve  to  understate  their  true  valua?ons,  hoping  to  free-­‐ride  on  the  other’s  provision.  

 ©  Playconomics,  LHS   24  

Solu0on:  

GOVERNMENT  INTERVENTION  

Page 25: Chapter10 Slides

Market,  Government  &  Taxa?on  

As  individual  demands  are  private  info,  the  Government  must  follow   :    à  tax  according  to  ability  to  pay    à  tax  according  to  pay-­‐as-­‐you-­‐go  principle  

 ©  Playconomics,  LHS   25  

Solu0on:  

GOVERNMENT  INTERVENTION