Upload
hakiet
View
217
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CHAPTER YI
MARKETIN0 OF FOOTWEAR IN IITH~III, A G R ~ AND mOmS
6 . 0 INTRODUCTION
J n this Chapter, an attempt ls made to study tire
marketing practices followed, znvalvement of middlemen in tile
market channels, the price mark UP rlght from the producer level
until they reach the ultimate consumers, the made of payments,
the problems in credit and advance payment systems, the market
cost6 involved and the instltutional assistance provided to the
footwear artisans In selling the footwear
The shoes produced in Agra are marketed all over ~ndia
mainly through the wholesale dealel-s o f the Hing-ki-mandl market,
partly by 'Bata' and 'Carona' through their chain of retail
market outlet6 and by ths Government agencies like charma Kuteer
of KVIC, LAMCO, Bharat Leather Corporation (BLC) and the non-
governmental organisation of Bharatiya Charmadyog Sangh (BCS).
Apart from meeting the domestic consumptun, the shoes and shoe
uppers made I" the semi-mechanised factories o f A g r a , are
exported to USSR, ern any, UK and Netherlands. similarly, the
kalhapuri chappals made in ~thani find their market all over
India through Chalnalaya (KVIC), the Xhadi ~andars o f KVIC.
and by L I D ~ R through ~ t s emporias and then by the wholesale
dealers in the cities. The mixed leather fnatwcar
made in xadras m , , , n , y cater to the needs of the local plntform
shops and retail dealers in Medras market. Data provided in Table
6.1 the mode selling of foat*tear by these agenctes.
&THAN1
Of the total faotwear produced i n the household ,,nit+
~f Athani centre, 6 0 % 1s procured by the G~~~~~~~~~
the Charmalaya, a Departmental unit of KVIC and itle procurement
centres of LIDWR (Table 6.1). Wlthln this 6 0 8 , the share of
chamalaya work* out to 45% and the LIDXAR 1 5 % . Both these
centres are located I" the midst of the footwear
artisan units concentrated in xalgalli area. 35% ai the faatwear
in the artisan units are procured by the outside
wholesale dealers stationed in Bombay, ~ u n e , ~yderabad,
Bangalare, Trivandrum and the remaining 5 % goes directly t o the
retail dealers who plaoe orders.
In the case of household warkshopa, 57% of their output
is supplied to autslde wholesale dealers and 39% to the
government aqr 'nr l r? of Charmalaya and LIDl<hR and 4 % of the
footwear produced are sold dlrectly to the outside retail
dealers . Thus, institut~onal agencles emerged as the leading
marketers of footwear in Athani centre. It 1s evident from the
fact that the outside dealers procure these footwear against
advances to the artrsan units.
6.1.1 MODE OF PAYMENT
production units, which are given each a code
number, charmalap, takes the orders and specifications
regarding the design, materials to be used, purchase the
raw material., fabricate the footwear In their houses and EuPPlY
them to charmalaya weekly. ~t the time of supply, the quality Of
the pairs, the materials used in fabrication, the uniformity
within the pairs, are inspected visually by the Quality
lnspectnr and paymen: f o r t h e acceiited footwear are w,ii , , l ,
one t o two h o u r s time. The Charmalaya's p ~ . ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , t on
~ ~ ~ k t n g day s t a r t s a t 1 0 AM and gars u p t a 2 PM dlsburspmrt,t
of t akes P l a c e a f t e r 2 PM I f t h e value of t h e footweat
i s l e s s t h a n Rs.2 ,000/- tilo a r t i s n ~ l s are p s i 6 with o = ~ ,
and t f i t e x c e e d s Rs.2 ,000/- t h e y are paid i n t h e form a cheque.
a r t i s a n s a f t e r r e c e i v i n g t h e amount/cheque, a l s o g e t orders
far t h e s u b s e q u e n t week and t h i s modus a p e r a n d i is b e i n g
~ ~ s t e m a t ~ c a l l y fol lowed s i n c e i t s inception. he r e l e c t i o n r a t e
a t t h e i n s p e c t l a " var i e s from 2 t o 5 % . These r e l e c t e d footwear
are a g a i n r e c t i f i e d by replacing t h e p a r t i c u l a r p a r t s and
l e d s u b s e q u e n t l y .
The market ing p r a c t i c e s and t h e made of payment f a r
these i n f o r m a l s e c t o r footwear u n i t s have made t h e market ing
~ n s t i t u t i a n s v e r y p a p u l a r among t h e household a r t i s a n s . T h i s
p r a c t l c e h a s c r e a t e d enormous degree of consciousness among t h e
a r t i s a n s which is unknown t o them e a r l i e r . These changes i n
r a r k e t i n g p r a c t i c e s i n Athani c e n t r e has opened t h e f l o o d g a t e s
of m a r k e t i n g o f t h e s e t r a d i t i o n a l chappals t o modern market ing
techniques . I t has a g r e a t bear ing on t h e marketing of footwear
in t h e o t h e r areas also. he g r w t h of i n r t r t u t i o n a l c h a n n e l s
l i k e Charmalaya and i t s performance i s shown In Annexure 3 3 of
Chapter 111.
he LIDKAR oentre a l s o l n t h e midst o f t h e
l o c a l i t y procure t h o footwear from t h e a r t l s a n s s i m i l a r on t h e
l i n e s o f Charmalaya. he mode of payment i n LIDYAR is o n l y by
cheque b u t in cash. whi le giving t h e o r d e r s the a r t i s a n s are
instructed to follow the Pattern ac s lae s f o l every 12 t o
be made in each si2e as shown b c l o r , ~ :
size in inches No of pairs ---------.--..--..------..---. Gents Chappala 1,adios Chsppnls
1 2 3 ____-------------------..--...--.---...---.---....
4 N11 1
5 Nil 3
6 1 4
7 2 3
8 4 1
9 4 Nil
10 1 Nil
Total pairs 12 12
Aaart from the aovernnent aaencies menttoned above the
wholesale dealers stationed in major metropolitan olties and
towns also place orders mainly with the household workshops, At
the time of placing order they give advances to the proprietor,
either partly or fully to the value of the orders. This advance
payments again depend upon the mutual understanding and the
confidence built up on either side aver the years. The wholesale
dealers stationed in Bombay, Pune, Calcutta, Hyderabad, Delhi
send thelr representative or place arders In the form of letter
accompanied by the &emend draft. mile procuring, they inepect
the pairs, and arrange to settle the full payment. Earlier, the
artisans used to the footwear and wait for weeks and
months together to receive the payments from the dealers. Rut due
LO the procurement centres started by KVIC and I.IIIKRR, tiip r.l,nln
trend has reversed and today the Production rlnlts t h e
payments before exec~ting the ordcvs. There are Instances t h a t
the wholesale dealers after paying the advances have to for
one o r two weeks far Procurement of f o o t w e a r ~ e c a u s ~ t h e
continuous orders Placed by the Charmalaya. LIDKAR and the
,utaide wholesale dealers, an the whole the lnfomal of
~thani have very few marketing problems. Whenever there has been
an increase in the raw material prices like bag tanned leathers,
the marketing centres also enhance the procurement prices of
the footwear by leaving sufficient margin to the workers.
1 .1 .2 KhRKET COST6
After procuring the footwear, the Charmalays arranges
for stamping its brand "CHARMALAYA" on each chappal. Depending
upon the orders they have from various Kbadi Cramodyog
Bhavans/Bandar. and the KVIC registered institutional retail
outlets, they assort the footwear designwise, sizewise, arranges
for colouring by dipping the footwear rn spindle oil and
transport the footwear to the respectrve addresses of the retail
outlets far which they receive the demand drafts as well as
subsequent orders. The Charmalaya adds around 20% aver its
procurement price in order to meet the expenditure an stamping
1 0 . 2 5 ) , oiling (1.00), packing ( 0 25) per pair and the transport.
costs including loading and unload~nq charges. Tire selling rates
of Charmalaya for different items of Kolhspuri chappals that vary
from design to design are shown in Annexure 3 . 2 of the Third
Chapter.
While LIDI(AR also operates more less on the .+ i m i l a r
lines of the Charnalaya, the wholesale dealcrs add more by o f
costs and include the interest on the advances
taxes and pass an the barden to the retailers and ultimately to
the consumers As a result the price of K O I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ chappais in the
~ I C outlets are leas when compared to the retail prjceq i n the
footwear shops.
6 , 2 EXPORT8 OF XOLHAPURI FOOTWEAR
As mentioned earlier, the major production centres of
Kolhapuri chappals, ViZ. Athani, Nlppani, Madhubavi, Kalhapur and
Miraj and the surrounding villages I" Xarnataka and ~aharashtra
states produce around 41 lakh parrs per year valued at Rs 14.35
crores at an average procurement price of Rs.35 per pair. out of
41 lakh pairs produced by the informal sector of the footwear
units, 12.56 lakh pairs valued around Rs.203 millions have b w n
from Indla durlng 1991-92 as shown in Chart 1.2. A small
fraction of embraldered footwear is also included in this export
value. The export price of a pair of Kalhapuri chappal works out
to Rs.115/- per pair as against around R s 50/- I" the domestic
retall market. ~ h e s e exports are effected through the merchant
exporters stationed in omb bay. The Kalhapurl footwear is widely
accepted during the months of September. October, November in
countries llke USA.
~h~ marketing channels of Kolha~uri chappals
are depicted in the F l o w Chart 6.1.
3 AGE?+
6 , 3 . 1 MARKETING OF SHOE8
1t is avident from the d m g~vcll 11, ~ ~ b l ~ th,t r,,,i
~f the 45 household units covered under this study, 84s, o f tl,a,l
are ~upplylnq therr shoes to tlw cammisa~o~~ n g e n t q / w ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~
traders stationed In the Hlng-kl-"sand1 market of R ~ ~ ~ , 11% o~
them directly supplied to the retailers of the nearby towns a,,d
5% to the government agencies like Bcs o r W ~ C O In the case of
household workshops, 75% of the units covered supply their shoes
to wholesale dealers in Hlng-ki-mandi market, 2 5 % to the
qovernnent procurement centres llke LRMCO, BCS and directly to
the retailers Whlle the household units are not regular in
getting orders from traders, the household workshops almost qet
orders regularly either from the traders or from the government
while issuing the orders, the traders specify the norms
like colour o f the leather, sizes and other product descriptions
and sccordingly the warkehaps effect the supplies. The household
unlts, lacking orders, are at the mercy of the traders in
bargaining the prlces and hence the 'Purcha System' has been in
force over the decades in Agra market.
1t is interesting to ohserve that the famous Rgra shoe
market is dominated by the wholesale dealers and mrddlenen in the
marketing of shoes. ~"rther, it was found that the institutional
agencies have not been developed ~n this market and their share
in the marketing of shoes is not that much significant. However,
in v i e w of the huge size the Agra market, the role af these
institutional agencjes is very meagre and they have not developed
to a very significant level. The poor performance of these
, n e t i ~ ~ i f l ' " ~ ' h a s been a g r e a t h a n d i c a p to tile a r t l s ans i l l
,.rketlng t h e shoes. As such, i t was found t h a t the i n f o r m a l
a r t i s a n s are n o t corlscious o f same of t l le d isadvantnqes
f o e them due t o t h e ineffective p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h e s e
i n s t l t u t i a n s .
The busy s c h e d u l e i n Hing-ki-mandl market s t a r t s from
3 . 0 0 PM and t r a n s a c t i o n s t a k e place upto 8 .30 PM d a i l y . on a n
average worklng day, t h e 350 wholesale t r a d e r s s t a t i o n e d i n t h i s
market procure around 3 . 0 0 l a k h p a i r s of shaes valued a t ~ s . 3 . 6 0
crorss and 0 . 3 0 lalih P a i r s of chappals valued a t Rs.9.on lakhs.
~ ~ c h d e a l e r p r o c u r e s s h o e s tram a minimum of 10 t o 12 s u p p l i e r s
( ~ h ~ l i y a w a l l a h s ) each c a r r y l n g around 7 2 p a i r s . The shaes
produced i n t h e whole week a re brought i n head loads c a l l e d
"Ohallyan" or by engaging rickshaws.
A f t e r procurement , t h e wholesale d e a l e r s a s s o r t t h e
shoe5 p u t t h e i r brand names, pack them i n boxcs and despatch t o
var ious r e t a i l e r s s t e t i o l i e d a l l over India . In t h e same way, t h e
BCS, a r e g l r t e r e d K V I C i n s t i t u t i o n and t h e LAMCO p l a c e orders to
the Workshops w i t h a l l specifications and procure t h e shoes a t
a l ready a g r e e d p r i c e s . A f t e r procurement they t r a n ~ p o r t t h e shoes
with t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e brand names t o var ious r e t a l l o u t l e t s . The
BCS s u p p l i e s t o XVIC r e g i s t e r e d r e t a i l o u t l e t s Khndi
Bhandars/shavans/charm Kuteers/Charma S h i l p a s and U M C O t o i t s
elnporias and t o t h e government departments
mta and carom having a l a r g e network of r e t a i l shops
i n t h e c o u n t r y a l s o plaoe orders with the illformal s e c t o r u n i t s
i n Agra. w h i l e issuing t h e o r d e r s , they s p e c i f y t h e raw m a t e r i a l s
to be used, colour, size and designs. After fabrlcatlon shoes
are inspected by their quality control ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ . and arra,,s. fo r
with their respective brand names.
6.1.2 MODE OF PAYMENT
It can be seen from Table 6.1 that 32% of the hm,+rhold
~nlts get the PaYmellt in terms of cash mereas 501 of tllem by
both cash and credit. In case of household workshops 2 2 %
effect their supplies On cah payment and 61% both cash and
oredit In Aqra, the 'Purcha System' prevailing in "ing-ki-mandi
market affect the the household units in selling their shoes. he
modus operandi is that at the tlme of supplying the shoes, the
manufacturer is issued with a credit slip for the value of the
suppl~ed. ~ h l s credit slip called "Purcha" has to he
submitted to the financier of the whole8ale dealer who pays the
amount after deducting 2 to 3 months lnterest at 2% on the total
vallie of the blll. That is, if Lire value of the shoes supplied is
Rs.l,ooO/- an Interest rate of 2% for 3 months that works out to
R5.60/- is deducted from the total amount of Rs.1,000/- alld
the remaining ~ ~ 9 4 0 only 1s p a l r l to the household
owner/supplier. As the manufacturer h a + to invest the sale
proceeds in purchasing raw materials and accessories for
continuing the production on the subsequent days, and to maintain
the camily they are bound to accept this kind of
reduced payment.. mr no fault ofthe hou3ehald owner, his margin
on the is curtailed due to the system o f involving
middlemen and the of "Purcha" system. Hence, the
prevai l ing operation Purcha system of payment in the Hing-ki-
~ a n d i shoe market Aqra clearly indicates the degree
by the informal footwear artlsans the
the middlemen v i z . the commissloil agents, W I I O I P S ~ ~ ~ dealcrl iil,d
the unauthorlsed flnanclers.
In case o f workshops enplayinq hired ti,.
,holesale dealers place orders wlth I,teilxcd rat... ,,,,#I
accordingly the Procurements are eflected. ?he price ttte
shoes produced in workshops always rule higher than those mnde in
the household units. Knowing fully well, that the traders reduce
the r ~ t e s of the shoes supplied by the housetlnld units, they
resort to purchase low quallty raw materials and fabricate tile
shoes in accordance with the rates offered to them. 1n this case,
except labour, the margin per pair 1s very meagre to the
household units. Various marketing channels operatinq far shoes
produced j n Agra are depicted In Flow chart (,..'.The dominant role
of the wholesale traders of Hing-XI-Mandl has adversely affected
the hausehold artisans. The poor performance of institutional
agencies ~n marketing of shoes emphasises the need to develop
same institutional agency which wlll reduce the role of wholesale
traders. This requires several pallcy measures and urgent action
to serve the household workers in the lnformal sector.
the case of BCS and Charma Kuteer (started in 1991)
o f KVIC, after procurement the payment is paid in cash uPto
RS Z,OOO/- and in the form of cheque if the amount exceed* more
than R~.~,ooo/-. ~h~ w c o C s payments are delved and not regular
and the artisans have to wait for one or two weeks.
worksbops that undertake orders for production and
supply to sata, caronas Liberty shoes etc. receive payments after
two t o t h r e e months. Thlf a c t o f delayed paynents ranginq from
two t o t h r e e nonth4 by t h e country's leading cs tahl ished tVn,iels
like ' B a t e ' and 'Carona' c l e a r l y e x i r i b l t t h e d e g r n e o f
e x p l o i t a t i o n w h i l e Procuring t h e shoes from t h e i n f o m a l sector
footwear u n i t s i n Agra. However, t h e s e u n i t s y e t cnnt~nuouc
o r d e r s f r o m t h e n a s long a s t h e y a d h e r e t o t h e q l l n ~ i t y
a n d s p e c i f i c a t i o n s g i v e n . The B L C and t h e u n i t s
making i n d u s t r i a l s h o e s g e t t h e orders from t h e government
.gencies l i k e Deience or P u b l i c Linl ted Undertakings and e f f e c t
the supplies. BLC l n s l s t s a d v a n c e s f o r t h e i n d u s t r i a l s h o e s
whereas t h e p r l v a t e u n i t s supply a g a i n s t g u o t a t l o n s .
6 . 3 . 3 KIRKETING C06TS
The w h o l e s a l e d e a l e r s , government agencies l i k e BCS,
Charmakuteer, LAMCO and t h e leading shoe companies of ~ a t s and
CarOna h a v e t o m e e t t h e m a r k e t c o s t s i n v o l v e d i n p a c k i n g ,
t r a n s p o r t a t i o n , l o a d i n g and unlaadlny charges a p a r t from meet ing
the C e n t r a l S a l e s Tax of 4 % and s t a t e S a l e s Tax of 6% t h a t are
o p e r ~ t l n g i n t h e d o m e s t i c n a r k e t . I n t h e case of shoes produced
in workshops employing more than 40 workers and using 2 H P power,
an e x c i s e d u t y af 10% is l e v i e d on t h e value of t h e s h o e s .
However, i n t h e r e c e n t budget , t h e levy of e x o i s e duty is l i m i t e d
t o footwear costing more t h a n Rs.120 per p a i r and hence t h e
e a r l i e r norm o f l i m i t i n g t o workers and power has been waived o f f
6.4 EXPORT OF FULL SHOES
R~ has a l r e a d y heen mentioned i n Chapter 111, t h a t o u t
of R9.11252 worth of footwear and footwear oomponents
exported tram l n d i a d u r i n g 1991-92, t h e f u l l shoes and open
footwear constitute ~ ~ . 4 , 2 5 4 n i l l i o n s and t h e remaining
~ ~ . 6 . 9 4 8 m l l l l o n s are through shoe upper and components. I t i s
i n t e r e s t i ng t o "OtP here t h a t a l l tile shoo oppers t h a t are
,xported a r e made from t h e mechaniaed and seni-mechnnired
whereas a l l t h e f u l l shoes are made both in the formal
and informal s e c t o r u n i t s . I t i s estimated t h a t out of the t o t a l
t u rnove r of 108 mi l l l an p a i r s valued a t 115.12,960 m i l l i o n s
i n ag ra , a lmost R s . 1 , 9 4 4 mi l l i ons worth of shoes are exported by
the wholesale d e a l e r s of Xing-ki-mandi market e i t h e r through
direct e x p o r t or through the merchant exporters s t a t i oned i n
bay and o e l h i . Most of t he se shoes are made ~n t he ~ n f a r r n ~ l
,ectar of t h e shoe u n i t s i n Agra and t h e rest of t he shoes
from I n d i a are made i n t he semi-mechanlsed or m r r l i a n i s ~ d
sector sp read rn Agra and Tamilnadu wherein again t he inform~l
o f t h e l abour play a v r t a l r o l e as piece r a t e workel-s Tor
l abou r l n t e n s l v e operat lone For instance, t he country 's
l e ad i l i g e x p o r t e r i n Lad ie s B e l l a r i n a s v i r . "TEJOMALS" p l a c r
orde r s to semi-meclianised workshops i n Agra each employlnq
around 2 0 rrarkers.
1.5 mDms
In Madras, 5 5 % of t h e household u n l t s c o n t a c t e d
d i r ec t ly s e l l t h e i r mixed l ea the r footwear t o t he r e t a i l e r s v i z .
the platform shops l oca t ed i n busy carnmerclal places i n t he c i t y
and 35% t o t h e r e t a l l d e a l e r s o f the Parry's market and 10% only
supply t o TALC0 ( ~ ~ b l e 6 . 1 ) . 1n the case of household workshops
also, 4 7 % supp ly to platform shops, 2 9 % t o r e t a i l dea l e r s and
the remaining 24% t o t h e TALCO. I n Madras cen t r e , the middlemen
i n t he market cha ln are mrninised and manufacturers themselves
d i r e c t l y sell t h e footvear t o t h e r e t a i l e r s catering to
~ a d r R s c i t y . Thus , i n Madras mixed l e a t h e r footwear markek q,lnws
the d i s t i n c t i o n of reducing t h e middlemen to tiie minimum lev+,l
" i th l o w e s t c o n t r o l over t h e Producers , rspecla l ly houc.nl,oid
~ " ~ t s . T h u s , t h e n a t u r e o f demanri TOT C I I ( . + ~ Pl.OdUCtE 4 m R F l y
c o n t r i b u t e d €Or t h e d e v e l a ~ m e n t o f a i p e c z a l malket,ng C1,al,llP,
in t h e i n f o r m a l sector o f Madras c i t y .
6.5.1 MODE OF PAYMENT
Most of t h e footwear manufacturers i n ~ a d r a ~
t h e i r f o o t w e a r against o r d e r s p l a c e d by t h e p l a t f o r m shops
located i n P a r r y s . ' P r l p l l c a n e , T.Nagar, Mylapore, Purasawalkam
areas. The f i e l d r e s u l t s show t h a t 46% of t h e m a n u f a c t u r e r s
t h e i r f o o t w e a r a g a i n s t c a s h , 14% both by cash and c r e d i t
and t h e remaining 2 2 % on c r e d i t . I n t h e case of h o u s e h o l d
workshope a b o u t 3 3 % of t h e u n l t s g e t cash and equal number o f
u n i t s s u p p l y on c r e d i t as w e l l a s both on cash and c r e d l t . At t h e
time of s u p p l y 5 0 1 o f t h e value of t h e footwear s u p p l i e d i s p a i d
t o t h e a r t i s a n s and t h e r e s t i n equal i n s t a l m e n t s w i t h i n a week's
t i n e . ~t RE been o b s e r v e d t h a t t h e shop owners always keep an
o u t s t a n d i n g b a l a n c e of RS.~OQ/- due t o t h e a r t i s a n s , wi th an
a p p r e h e n s i o n t o h a v e assured s u p p l y iron them. Whenever t h e
a r t i s a n s r e c e i v e a d v a n c e s from t h e shop owners, t h e supply p r i c e
i s a lways be l e s s by Re.11- p e r p a i r compared t o t h e r u l i n g
p r i c e . j u s t l i k e i n Agra, t h i s a g a i n forms a c l e a r c u t example
of e x p l o i t a t i o n of t h e informal footwear u n i t s i n t h e hands of
the r e t a i l e r s .
To sum up, it can be oencluded t h a t t h e middlemen In
the market chain ~ i . . t h e comnrsslan a g e n t s and t h e wholeeale
dealers operating l n accordance wlth the ,Purc l ,a System. jn.
,,ntloned earlier) in Hing-ki-Mandi shoe o f Agra, p,ns , ,,,y sisniflcant and vital role it1 erplolting the producers nf
the informal sector. Further, inordinate delay in payment. from
the leading traders 1Ike 'Beta' and 'Carann' and even flom tile
~~vernment agency called ' W I C O ' Indicates a clear example of
exploitation In marketing of shoes. Finally, partial
settlement o f bills by the Pavement shops/retailers in ~ndras
,ity resulted in mast exploitation of the informal producers.
wnce, it can be lnferred that the middlemen in the market chain
play a mast vital role r n explalt~ng the informal sector artisans
while marketrng the footwear in Aqra and Madrae centres.
6 . 6 PRICE MIIRK-UP
an account of involvement of commlsrion agents,
wholesale dealers I " the main markets and then the outside
wholesale dealers ~n the respective states/major towns, and the
retail shop owners, the prices of footwear are increased from its
supplying level by the time ~t reaches the consumers. This price
mark-up is due to packing costs, transport casts,
laading/unloading charges, taxes prevailing in the market,
establishment charges at eve ry stage like sleutriclty,
gadaun/shop rents and the individual's Profit f o r t h e amount
invested in the business.
T~ study this price mark-up, the fast moving
xapsi type footwear made in Athanl, all leather moccasin shoe
made i n and the mixed leather gent's chappal made in Madras
are considered for their prices at different level of
PRICE MARK UP OF MAJOR FOOTWEAR ITEMS
S.No. Centres Type of unlts Types of Product~an Wholesale Consumer's Percen footwear cost prlce prlce tage
1x5) (Rs) (Rs) lncrease over (5)
1. Athanl H.H.unrts : Gents Xapsl 28.00 37.00 50.00 79 H.H.vorkshops:
N 7. hgra H.H.unlts Gents 55.00 120.00 168.00 98 rn noccas1n
H . H . ~ ~ ~ k ~ h ~ p s Shoe wlth 118.00 160.00 740.00 103 leather soles
3. Madras H.H.units : Mired 24.00 28.00 36.00 50 : leather
H.H.wor!csho~s: ChaDDals
Source : Fzeld surrey.
~t can be seen from the data given i n Table 6 z that In case of
shoes made I n Agra, ii marketed through ~ i ~ ~ - k ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ,
fallowed by outside wholesale dealers and then to retailers, itlp
price increment by the time lt reaches the ultimate
be around 100% over the cost of production. 1f the cast of
production of a pair of shoes in the household workshops works
,,t at ~s.lla/- by the time it reaches the ultimate cansunier in
any town in South India, works out to Rs.210/- for the same pair.
I" the same way, the price mark-up in case of Kalhapuri (Kapsij
chappals works out to 79%. Although the production cost in Athani
is R6.28/- per pair, the consumer In Madras has to pay ns.50/-
f o r the same pair. In Madras oentre, the price mark up is not
~ig~lficant because of the mlnlmum role oC mrddlemen in the
chain. In most cases, the producers directly sell their
footwear to the retailers, in which case the price mark up
including the profit of the producer and the retailer goes only
to the extent of 501. Thus, the presence of middlemen greatly
influence the price mark up and these agents at times influence
the price mark up to the tune of 100% mostly In Agra followed by
Athsnl.
6.7 DEUNIND FOR FOOTWEAR
The demand far footwear bath in domestlc and
international market depends on a host of factors like climirtlc
conditions, income levels of the consumers, fashlan changes and
dresslng habits and awareness of iiearing footwear to protect
their fcrt. per wplta consunptlon of leather footwear of 0.5
pairs in zndie is expected to grow I n future, due to the
improvement in the standard of livlng, lnoome levels, dress
consciousness and fashion changes . I t i s l n t e r e s t i l i g to note t h a t
.bout 60 t o 10% of t h e l e a t h e r produced i n t h e world goes towards
the manufacture of foot*-ear. In o t h e r words, footwear industry is
the s i n g l e l a r g e s t consumer of f i n i s h e d l e a t h e r produced in t h e
and a l s o i n India. Although i n I n d i a , l e a t h e r producks l i k e
g a r m e n t s , t r a v e l g o o d s , handbags a r e made t h e y a re m a i n l y
intended f o r e x p o r t s .
6.8 FINANCIAL A8818TANCE OBTAINED BY THE UNITS
Although v a r i o u s developmental o r g a n i s a t i o n s c la imed
that t h e y had a s s i s t e d t h e household e n t e r p r i s e s f i n a n c i a l l y ,
the f l e l d survey r e s u l t s shown i n Table 6.3 r e v e a l s a d ismal
p i c t u r e . Only ln t h e case o f Athanl c e n t r e , 60% of t h e household
uni ts and 73% of t h e household workshops have a v a i l e d f i n a n c i a l
assistance e i t h e r t h r o u g h l o c a l commercial banks or througli SC/ST
c o r p o r a t i o n s and KVIB. At t h e lns t i ince of t h e Kvrc " ~ h a r r n a l a y a " ,
the commercial banks and t h e IWIB of Karnataka i n Athani came
forward and p r o v l d e d on an average Rs.? ,oao/- and Rs.2,500/-
r e s p e c t i v e l y per household u n ~ t t h a t has a u a l l e d t h e a s s i s t a n c e .
Whereas i n t h e case of household workshops t h e cammerclal banks
have p r o v i d e d an amount of ~s.11,000/- p e r u n l t and t h e K V I B
Rb.25,000. 1t h a s been r e p o r t e d by t h e banks t h a t repayment
schedule from t h e u l r i t ~ is almost regular and t h e r e are c e r t a l n
i l l s tances where t h e units have taken loans f o r mare than t w o o r
three t i m e s .
I,, A ~ ~ ~ , 11% O E t h e household u n i t s and 7% o f t h e
workshops have a v a i l e d t h e f i n a n c l s l a s s i s t a n c e from t h e
commercial b a n k s .
TABLE 6.3
SOURCES AND EXTENT OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE OBTAINED BY THE UNITS -------------------.---.-.-------.--------------------------------------.----------------------- ~.NO. Centres Type of units Total Units % of (51 sources of finance
units recelve& over ( 4 ) ---.----..-----.--------.--------------
a5515- Commercxal KVIc/KvIB Chlts tance banks ------------ ------------ -----------
No.of Ave./ N O . ~ ave./ No.of Ave./ unlts unit units unlt unlts unlt
--------.-------------------------------------------------------- Total H.H.unlts 105 30 29 16 6300 9 2500 5 2800
In Madras city, the sources finance f o r the fnatwenr
,,its are the conventional chit that are i n
However, the interest for this amount exhorbitant lo
the bank interest. The evils of the system are too well known to
be repfated here. Hence, t.hr.r~ I,. nn urql.nt n r l ~ c ~ ti, I,,, , proper
institutional support for these units.
6 . 8 . 1 DISTRIBUTION OF UNITS RCCORDING TO PIXED C ~ P I T ~ L
The distribution of small enterprises according to the
value of their fixed assets Obned (Table 6.4) reveals that 52%
of the household unlts in Athani, each owned less than ~s.l,ooo/-
worth of tools and irrplements, whereas the remaining 48% ha".
equipments each worth ranging Rs 1.000 to R S . ~ , O O O by way o f
possessing the seulng machines. In the case o f household
W O T ~ S ~ O ~ S . 66% of the unlts have each a fixed capital of less
than R8.5.000 and the remaining 31% have more than Rs.5,Oon. l'he
above analysis clearly indicate that the small enterprises ill
hthani mostly depend an hand operations l n tbe fabrlcatioll of
~ ~ l h ~ ~ ~ r i footwear with an exception of utrl~sing only the sewlng
nachlnes and hence have less flxed capital The correlation
coefficient (0.43) worked out between the production of footwear
and the fixed capital among the household units of ~thani and the
test procedure callowed to know the extent of significance reveal
that there is relationship between ~roductjan of
footwear and the flaed capital r n these units. Similarly with a
correlation coefficient of 0.11 between the production and fixed
capital, there exists significant relationship between them among
the household workshops of Athani centre^
In Agra. 10% o f the llousehold have each than
R, ~,ooo/- worth of fixed capital. 40% of the ,,,,it.
r u e d assets ranging from Rs.1,Ouo to RS.B,OOO In tile of
household workshops, about 45% of the units each fixed
assets worth more than Rs.15.000/- mainly beoaiise of having
indigenous machinery such as swing, pasting compresior. .phe
correlation coefficients worked out t o stlldy the relat~on~hip
between shoe production and flxed capital in both types of units
in ngra Indicate that there is no significant relationship
between the productIan of shoes and Iixed capital. ~ h l a can bp
explained that some unlts although do not passes. n e c e s s a r y
machines they depend on other job work units for such maciline
operations. As has been nentloned earlier, thls centre has surtl
strong linkages among different types of units.
In Madras, 67% o f the household anits ilave very l o w
fixed assets of less than Rs.1,000/- each, 2 3 % have a c s a t a
ranging from ~s.1.000 to 5,000 and only 10% of the unlts hold
each ~s.5.000 to 10,000 worth of assets. With a correlation
coeffic~ent of 0.9 between the p~aductlan a n d flxed capital in
household units and 0.7 in household workshops of Madras centre.
there exists significant relationship betweell the production and
fixed capital. the production unlts in Madras involve in mined
leather footwear, introduction of small improved tools, sewing
and buffing machines make a blg differrence ~n them volume of
production. It can be deduced that the hausehold units in all the
centres hold less f ixed capital compared to the household
workshops which are fairly blg due to the introduction Of
indigenous machines.
6 . 8 . 2 DISTRIBUTION OF UNITS ACCORDIND TO WORKINO CnPTTnl,
The amount o f warking c a p ~ t a l t h e holds i t -
~ a p a c i t y to t u r n I t over on i t s bnsrnes;, p lays % " i t e l roip <,, , , i n t a m i n g t h e m a n u f a c t u r i n g a c t i v r t y w , t h o u t any g , rp or
~ l a c k n e s i The t u r n aver of working c a p i t a l by t h e ,,nibr. i s
weekly o r d a i l y depending on t h e node O L narket i l lq 71,.
dsta on d i s t r i b u t i o n of u n i t s according t o t h e range of workilll
,.pita1 i n v e s t e d on t h e i r b u s i n e s s i s shown ~n vabie 6.5. ~t war
found t h a t a b o u t 90% of t h e household u n i t s and 41% of t h e
household wnrkahops In A t h a n i have l l n l t e d r o C a t ~ o r i of ~ s . 5 . 0 0 0
each as worklng c a p i t a l t o w a r d s purchase of raw materials. 1n t h e
case of h o u s e h o l d workshops . 24% had working c a p i t a l ranginq from
Rs.5.000 t o 1 5 , 0 0 0 , 19% between Ra.15.000 and 20,000 and 10% had
a maxirnllm working c a p i t a l of more than Rs.D0,000 each. wi th a
c o e r e r l a t l o n c o e f f l c l e n t of 0 . 8 7 between t h e p r o d u c t i o n o f
footwear and t h e worklng c a p i t a l among t h e household u n i t s and
0.86 i n case of household workshops i n Athani c e n t r e , t h e r e
e u s t s v e r y s i g n i f i c a n t r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t v e e n p r o d u c t i o n a n d
working c a p i t a l i n b o t h c a t e g o r i e s of t h e u n i t s . It
may be n o t e d t h a t t h e market ing suppor t provided by Charmalaya
~ n d LIDmR h a v e g r e a t l y c o n t r i b u t e d for t h e effective t u r n o v e r of
working capi tal weekly among t h e s e u n i t s . Hence, it can be
concluded t h a t e f f e c t i v e turnover of working c a p i t a l has a s t r o n g
bearlng on t h e and r e g u l a r i t y of product ion ill Athani
centre .
As the footwear ",,its in Agra are specia l i -d i n shoe
f a b r i c a t i o n , t h e i r t u r n o v e r of working c a p i t a l on t h e raw
nater ia la /accessor ies is t h a n t h e o t h e r two centres. About
PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF UNITS ACCORDING TO WORKING CAPITAL
S.No. Centres Type of unlts Range of working capltal (Rs.) ................................................................ < 5000 5001 10001 15001 20001 25001 30000 Total
to to to to to and 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 above
1. Athanl H.H.unlts
H.H.workshops w
2. Ama H.H.unrts
H.B.warkshops
3. Madras H.H.unlts
B.H.irorksbops
Total H.H.unlts
A.H.~ork~hops
------------------------------------.-----------..----..-.-----.---.--------~-----------.---.--- St urce : Pleld survey.
45% of the household units in Agra had a capital mn,,
than n s . 3 0 , 0 0 0 each I n contrast t o n 4 a of the llou?chold wn,~.-~,nl,..
having the working capital in tho range oc ns .n .30 I~Y.I,. t o
R s . z , 5 n lakhs. The correlatron corificjrnts and the test r f
~ignliicance procedures followed ~n relation t o <,r
.hoes and the working capital ln bath Ihousehold units and
household workshops of Agra indicate that there is no slgniflrant
relationship between the ProductIan and working capital in the-e
,,its. The operation of 'Purcha system' a.; has been mentioned
,arlier in the Hlng-ki-mandi market and tho delayed payments hy
the leading companies a £ 'Bata' and 'Carona' might be stroilg
reasons far ineffective turnover of working capital which has a
hearing I" the productron schedule among the shoe units in
Agra.
In Madras. 65% of the household unlts and 47% a€ the
household Workshops had a ?:orking capital of Rs.5,000 to 15,onn
each whereas 2 6 % o f the household workshops have a working
capital of more than Rs.30 ,000 each. The correlation coefficients
worked out and the procedure for testlng thelr significance
between the productron and working capltal among the two
categories of units reveal that there 1 s no significant
relationship between production and working capital among the
mlxed leather footwear production units in Madras. The system of
payments in instalment basis by the pavement sI>op owners has been
the major reason attributable for this phenomenon. The delayed
payments by the shop owners have a definite bearing on the
working capital turnover and thereby the production.
The w o r k i n g c a p i t a l r o t n t i a n amollg t h e
o f A t h a n i i s v e r y low because o f t h e weekly t,,rnovrr
and a s s u r e d m a r k e t i n g a s s r s t a n c e provided by charlnalaya (KVI(.I
and t h e a d v a n c e s o f f e r e d by t h e whalesale dealers .
( , g CONCLUSION
TO sum UP, t h e continuous assured marketlnq
p v i d e d by Charmalaya a g a i n s t almost cash t r a n s a c t i o n and I.IDKPIR
, g a i n s t ~ F G U B of cheques is g r e a t l y r e s p o n s i b l e i n r e l i e v l t l g t h e
a r t i s a n s o f h t h a n i c e n t r e from tlie e x p l o i t a t l a n o f middlemen i n
the market c h a i n . Such a system of markatmy a s s i s t a n c e i n i i t h a n i
has made t h e i n f o r m a l producers t o concentra te on t h e product ion
of footwear and t h e r e b y e a r n i n g higher incomes and r e g u l a r work.
r p o s i t i v e t r e n d of wholesale d e a l e r s p r o v i d r n g advances t o t h e
producers h a s s e t i n d u e t o t h e i n s t i t u t i o n a l marketing
i n t e r v e n t i o n s o p e r a t i n g i n Athalli
Al though such i n t e r r e n t i o n s e x i s t ID Aqra, they could
not make an inpact I" reducing t h e e n p l o i t a t l o r ~ ol middlemen.
s t i l l t h e i n i o r n l a l footwear u n l t s 1" Aqrs are being e x p l o i t e d by
the middlemen o p e r a t i n g i n t h e market chain r i g h t from Hing-ki-
nandi market u n t i l t h e y r e a c h t h e consumers The 'Purrha eystem'
of deducting t h e amount by way of i n t e r e s t on t h e value o[ t h e
#hoes s u p p l i e d a vital role i n reducing t h e p r o f i t margin
which is due to t h e small producers. Added t o t h i s , t h e delayed
payment by l e a d i n g companies of ' n a t a ' and 'Cerona' i s a l s o a
g r e a t h indrance f o r t h e informal u n i t s I n marketing ehaes in
Aqra.
The delayed payment I n t e r n s o r i n - t a l m e t l t r TII~I
r,duct~on 1" prices are same of t h n evils tllp i i r t i s d ~ , ~ far." i l l
t h e ~ a f l r a ~ centre. Hence, t o protect ti?^ artlqnns f r n t , t l lo
eyplDlration of mldZllemen In t h e market chain, a serira nf
, t r e o t ~ v e lnatltutional marketlaq Intervont~on. a- l l a i bnnn
experimented in Athani may be set up and popul' ir~sed among t i ) "
producers In the lnformal unlts of Agra and Madras.