19
Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

Page 2: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

Immigration and Racism

Immigration laws can impact racial groups even when the law does not mention race. This can happen through immigration and the process of becoming a citizen. Early laws did mention race. The Naturalization Law of 1790 indicated that: “Only free white persons who had lived in the United States for at least two years were eligible for citizenship.” (p. 360)

Page 3: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882This piece of legislation in place until 1943 prevented Chinese laborers from entering the United States using both race and class as categories of exclusion. The 1893 case Fong Yue Ting v. United States indicated that deportation was not a punishment, but an administrative act where certain constitutional provisions did not apply such as a right to trial by jury.

Page 4: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

More Racial Exclusions

-Immigration Act of 1924—created exclusions for Southern and Eastern Europeans.-1924 Oriental Exclusion Act—created exclusions for people coming from most of Asia.-The Border Patrol was created.

Page 5: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

From 1924 to 1964 Few Immigrants Permitted Entry Nativism (the tendency to favor

those born within a country over those who come from other countries) was practiced when deportations of Mexicans occurred in 1925, 1929, and in the 1930s

In 1942 up to 1964, the Bracero Program—a guest worker program for Mexican men—was in place

Page 6: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

From 1924 to 1964 Few Immigrants Permitted Entry Operation Wetback—many raids

in the 1950s to arrest workers suspected of being undocumented. These workers had lives and families in the United States.

McCarran Internal Security Act—this act legalized the deportation of immigrants who were suspected of associating with the Communist Party.

Page 7: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

1965 Immigration and Nationality ActThis act overturned the exclusionary policies and set a universal quota of 20,000 people. People could now enter based on family relationship, skills, or education. The results were that immigration increased from Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean and undocumented immigration from Mexico increased.

Page 8: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

Asian ImmigrationSending countries for Asian

immigrants include China, Philippines, India, Korea, and Vietnam

Chinese immigrants were an early group to immigrate to the United States and came in at a steady pace until the Exclusion Acts

Philippines was a U.S. colony from 1898 until 1946 from which they could freely enter the United States until 1934, when immigration was restricted, then opened up again with the 1965 act.

Page 9: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

Asian Immigration Koreans arrived as laborers, then

faced restrictions until many women arrived after the Korean war as wives of service men. High levels of immigration between 1975 and 1990.

Vietnamese entered the country as refugees between 1971 and 1980.

Page 10: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

Latin American and Caribbean Immigration Latin American migration numbers were

high in the 1990s, but not before that with the exception of Mexico. Mexicans stayed temporarily up until the 1970s.

Central American immigration increased in the 1960s, and especially in the 1980s due to civil wars and violence.

Caribbean persons have always been immigrating, and increased since 1965, with Dominican Republic, Cuba, and Jamaica.

Page 11: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

Undocumented Immigration Undocumented immigrants come from various places. In terms of Mexico, prior to 1965, there were no numerical limits on the number of immigrants to be admitted from Mexico. After 1965, with a 20,000 quota undocumented immigration escalated in numbers because of employment opportunities. In the 1970s, the public began to see this as a problem.

Page 12: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986Two provisions: Included a path to become documented for those who met certain qualificationsEmployers would be sanctioned for hiring undocumented workersMany Mexicans decided to stay in the United States, which was something new for both immigrants and local-born whites. Fear of the racial other of immigrants and their “drain on society” circulated around the discussion of this law.

Page 13: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

State PropositionsOne California proposition denied

undocumented immigrants public education and public aid; this passed but was found unconstitutional; just like in earlier U.S. history the immigrants were being used as scapegoats by politicians for poor economic times

Arizona in 2010, Georgia in 2011, and Alabama in 2011 all passed laws that targeted undocumented immigrants.

Page 14: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

More Immigrant Laws Focusing on Deportation and Detention passed in 1996Personal Responsibility and Work

Opportunity Reconciliation Act 1996: This law also prevented documented immigrants from accessing public aid benefits for five years.

Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996: This law created a stipulation for mandatory deportation for certain crimes and could be retroactive.

Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act: Mandated automatic detention in many cases and halted the ability to get judicial review of deportation.

Together the laws weakened the protections for immigrants.

Page 15: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

1996 LawsJudicial review not provided for

deportation casesDetention required for

immigrants under investigation for violations of immigration law

Allowed the use of secret evidence

Allowed legal permanent residents to be deported for crimes committed outside the time period of the 1996 laws

Page 16: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

Top Five Countries for DeporteesMexicoHondurasGuatemala El SalvadorBrazil

Latin Americans are more likely to be deported than Asians.

Page 17: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

Nativism in the Twenty-First Century According to Sanchez (1997), three characteristics of contemporary nativism:-preference for English-fear that immigrants are taking affirmative action slots of the U.S. born-fear that immigrants draw from public resources like hospitals, schools, and public aide

Page 18: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

DREAM ACT

Attempted legislation to allow adults and children who were brought to the United States as children to gain documented status, so they can attend school and find employment.

Immigration legislation still has a disproportionate impact on people of color.

Page 19: Chapter Thirteen: Racism, Nativism, and Immigration Policy By Tanya Maria Golash-Boza

Conclusion Nativism and racism influenced

immigration policy and impacted the lives of many people

This nativism and racism permeated the laws passed by the U.S. government.

Struggles continue today for individuals and family members who do not have a path to becoming documented immigrants