38
3 CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATURE SECTION-I: -River water pollution 1.1Introduction:Water, the unique component of nature has played the crucial role in the evolution of life from molecules to man.All Ancient civilizations emerged on the banks of Rivers andhave been central to the growth of human society 1 . The River is an indicator of Society’s standards. “A dirty river means a dirt society”. Importance of river in assessing healthy, as well as prosperous nation in a healthyenvironment is amply understood, from the very existence of civilization. The aquatic resources of country are its national wealth and their sustained utilization for various purposes should be given top priority. It is believed that life originated in water and is sustained by it. Nearly 90% of the mass of all living organisms is composed of water. The river water is used to satisfy the daily needs of living world in and around. The water resources are used to fulfill the demand for agricultural, industrial and human settlement. 2, 3 Human health and health of ecosystem is directly related with quality of water. The freshwater is finite and limited resource of the total amount of global water; due to rapid growth of population, demand for water has increased. The availability of water for domestic use per capita has reduced drastically. Main reasons are harvesting more water for irrigation, unplanned and uneco-friendly growth of Industries. Most of the people in developingcountries, one fifth of the population in developing countries do not get potable drinking water and have no proper sanitation facilities. It is estimated that less developed countries are affected by disease which spread through contaminated water and food before1980 all the rivers in Western Europe were comparatively free from pollution.In India the problem of aquatic environment has becomes an important issue only very recently.It is readily said that all major Indian Rivers are actually polluted due to anthropogenic activitiesundertaken by man. 4,5 India has a good industrial infrastructure in core industries like metal, chemical, fertilizer, drugs, petroleum, industries like plastics, pesticides, detergents, fuel, solvent, paints, dyes and food additives, release effluents and emissions, polluting water, soil, and plants ecosystem. In India 50% to 70% domestic sewageis released into rivers, lakes, streams.According to reports approximately 1,108000tons of heavy metals are released in to the water every

CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

3

CHAPTER NO. 1

INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATURE

SECTION-I: -River water pollution

1.1Introduction:Water, the unique component of nature has played the crucial role in the

evolution of life from molecules to man.All Ancient civilizations emerged on the banks of

Rivers andhave been central to the growth of human society1. The River is an indicator of

Society’s standards. “A dirty river means a dirt society”. Importance of river in assessing

healthy, as well as prosperous nation in a healthyenvironment is amply understood, from the

very existence of civilization. The aquatic resources of country are its national wealth and their

sustained utilization for various purposes should be given top priority. It is believed that life

originated in water and is sustained by it. Nearly 90% of the mass of all living organisms is

composed of water. The river water is used to satisfy the daily needs of living world in and

around. The water resources are used to fulfill the demand for agricultural, industrial and

human settlement.2, 3

Human health and health of ecosystem is directly related with quality of water. The freshwater

is finite and limited resource of the total amount of global water; due to rapid growth of

population, demand for water has increased. The availability of water for domestic use per

capita has reduced drastically. Main reasons are harvesting more water for irrigation,

unplanned and uneco-friendly growth of Industries. Most of the people in developingcountries,

one fifth of the population in developing countries do not get potable drinking water and have

no proper sanitation facilities. It is estimated that less developed countries are affected by

disease which spread through contaminated water and food before1980 all the rivers in

Western Europe were comparatively free from pollution.In India the problem of aquatic

environment has becomes an important issue only very recently.It is readily said that all major

Indian Rivers are actually polluted due to anthropogenic activitiesundertaken by man.4,5

India has a good industrial infrastructure in core industries like metal, chemical,

fertilizer, drugs, petroleum, industries like plastics, pesticides, detergents, fuel, solvent, paints,

dyes and food additives, release effluents and emissions, polluting water, soil, and plants

ecosystem.

In India 50% to 70% domestic sewageis released into rivers, lakes, streams.According

to reports approximately 1,108000tons of heavy metals are released in to the water every

Page 2: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

4

yearworld-wide6.There are many chemicals present in the environment which are toxic or non

toxic. The toxic solid, liquid and gaseous chemicals are discharged by industries, sewage

water from cities, excessremaining fertilizers and pesticides from agriculture into air, water and

soil.7 They get into the human food chain from environment, once they enter our body system,

they disturb the bio chemical process, leading in some cases to fatal results. Animals and plants

require some trace elements for normal growth and development. But toxic elements As, Pb,

Cd, Hg are required in trace quantities. According to the “International register of potentially

toxic chemicals” of UnitedNationsEnvironment Program, there are four million known

chemicals in the world today and another 30,000 new compounds are added to the list every

year. Among these 60,000 to 70,000 chemicals are commonly used.8, 9Apart from their benefits

to increasing production, living standards and health; many of them are potentially toxic.

In India there are about 4000 large and medium water polluting industries according to recent

report published by the Central Pollution Control BoardNew Delhi. About 50% of these

industrieshave effluent treatment systems, but their technology is quite unsatisfactory.4,10&11

According to NEERI (National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur)

more than 70% inland water in India is not fit for drinking purposes. All rivers in the world

contain compounds of metals such as Fe, Zn, Mn, Cr, Pb, Cd, Ni,and Hg which exceed the

limits prescribed by different agencies. About five million people die of diseases caused by

drinking impure water and incidence of water pollution from heavy metals.12,13.

TABLE 1.1Toxic Metals used in Industries and Hazards

Element Uses Hazards Arsenic Fertilizer, insecticides, herbicides,

paint, leaded petrol, rayon mills, dyes and pigment, chemical industry.

Cancer of skin, lung, liver, lower I.Q., damage to liver and kidney, loss of hair, muscular paralysis, Gangrene, kidney damage.

Mercury Dental amalgams and lighting, chloro alkali industries, pesticides, medicine, electrical equipment, paint.

Irritability, depression, Alzheimer’s, suicidal tendencies, bleeding gums, tremors, Nerve damage, kidney damage, hemolysis, chest pain, headache, Abdominal pain.

Iron Iron, alloy, Manufacturing and Equipment industries.

Skin becomes sensitive to light.

Manganese Dry cell batteries, Glass industries Effect on central nervous system, Causes gait and speech disturbance, tremors, uncontrollable laughter, lung troubles.

Zinc Galvanizing and alloy industry, batteries, ghee manufacturing, spraying, painting.

Vomiting, dehydration, stomach pains, nausea, lethargy, dizziness and muscle in- co-ordination, Skin diseases, lung

Page 3: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

5

problems, pancreas damage, nausea and anemia, toxic to plants at higher levels.

Copper Alloy industry, metal plating Essential trace element, not very toxic, to animals at higher level, anemia, neutropenia, diarrobea, demineralization of bones, amyelination of the central nervous system, malnutrition and malabsorption, toxic to plants at higher levels.

Chromium Tanning, paints, pigments, corrosion inhibitors, fungicides.

A Cr (VI) compound causes lung cancer, skin ulcers, kidney inflammation, Gastrointestinal ulceration, nephritis. Bronchial asthma, allergies.

Cobalt Used in alloys, nuclear power plants, manufacture of blue pigments for glass and china, tungsten carbide, tool industry, ghee manufacturing, pigment industry.

Lung problem, pulmonary oedema, action on blood vessels, rapid change in catecholamine metabolism, decreased heart ratenrepinephrine, increased blood and urine monochrome level, enzyme activities increased, glycogen level and lactate dehydragenase activity decreased.

Nickel Paint industry, steel and iron industry, hydrogenation of oil industry.

Dermatitis, Pneumonia, lung and nose cancer, giddiness, headache, nausea, vomiting.

Beryllium Beryllium alloys used in atomic reactor, air craft, rocket, missile fuel, ceramic part, Household appliances.

Beryllinsis, dermatitis, conjunctivitis or acute pneumonitis, fatal lung disease, heart and lung toxicity.

Cadmium Battery cell industry, electroplating, PVC plastic processing industry pigments, super phosphate fertilizers.

Kidney damage, lungs, respiratory disorders, ailments of lungs, disturb human DNA repair system, abdominal pain associated with nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache.

Lead Paint industry, pipe, storage batteries, printing ,plastics, Gasoline additives

Coma, death, decline in I.Q., damage to heart, kidneys, livers circulatory system and central nervous system Anemia, vomiting, loss of appetite, convulsions, brain damage.

Selenium Glass and photo industry Damage of liver, Kidney and spleen, fever nervousness, vomiting, low blood pressure blindness and even death. Bronchitis, dyspnea, , loss of appetites, cancer deformation of hair and nails depression, giddiness.

Page 4: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

6

SECTION II: Sediment Pollution

1.2 INTRODUCTION:-

The process of sedimentation is a comprehensive natural geomorphological process,

which operates through the chain of erosion of soils; and deposition of these eroded material in

different paths of water bodies. The rivers are the most dynamic on the earth’s ecosystem, their

major function being transportation of water. They also carry to sea, dissolved and particulate

matter from rock weathering, erosion, from land.14,15 River Amazon, transports half the

suspended solids than Ganga. Ganga carries 5times more, total suspended solids compared to

Mississippi, even though the total discharge of Ganga and Mississippi is same.

Sediment consists of soil and mineral particles washed from land by natural and

manmade activities. River sediments as basic component of our environment provide food

stuffs to living organism.16, 17&18Theyalso serve as a sink and reservoir for a variety of

environmental contaminants. Urbanization and growth of newer industries is causing hung

amount of waste water production. Rivers are used as a major sink of industrial waste as well

as municipal solid waste, consist of organic matter and Inorganic mineral,some harmful

compounds of heavy metals like carbonates, hydroxides, and sulphides get precipitated and get

settled in the river bed. At higher concentrations it becomes harmful to the plant and animal

organisms of the river.19,20&21

Sediment acts as a carrier and possible source of pollution because they do not

permanently fix heavy metals. These sediment release metal into water by the changes in the

environmental condition such as pH, redox potential and organic chelators.22 Sediments are

contaminated by heavy metals from industrialized costal area; therefore evaluation of metal

distribution in surface sediments is used to assess pollution in aquatic environment.23

Metals also participate in various biochemical processes, have significant mobility, can

affect the ecosystem through the bioaccumulation and biomagnifications process and are

potentially toxic for environment and human life.24,25Hence base line studies are required to

determine the status of sediments structure and quality to give complimentary data on the

physico chemical characteristic of these toxic pollutants.

Page 5: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

7

Section—III:Soil Pollution

1.3 INTRODUCTION:-

“Good soil and congenial climate for productivity are valuable assets for any nation.”

Life on earth depends directly on living soil and aquatic ecosystem of river.Human

health is also affected by the quality of environment in the place of work.26

Soil is a mixture of various inorganic and organic chemical compounds. Inorganic

constituents are Ca, Mg, Fe, Si, K and Na.27,28&29 Small amounts of compounds of Mn, Cu, Zn,

Co, B, I and F, etc are present in the soil. The soil solution contains complex mixture of

minerals as carbonates, sulphates chlorides, and nitrates, also organic salts of Ca, Mg, K, and

Na etc. The chief organic component of soils is humus.

Today ecological changes have a direct impact on living organism. The environment

has deteriorated owing to industrial stress, urbanization, population density, and numerous

other villains which make the earth as a paradise for infectious agents.Such chronically

accumulated environment contaminates our air, water, food and soil etc, thereby severally

affecting the health of human life.30,31&32

About 12 crore population in India living in cities and six time more population living

in villages produces nearly 15 million tons of solid wastes which dump their waste toxic

products in open land and nearby river or Nallas. In rainy season these toxic wastes enter into

water bodies or spread in to soil causing chronic pollution of land and water.33

Indian farmers and agricultural technologies have made tremendous efforts in

increasing food production during last 35-40 years. There has been more than a two fold

increase in food-grain-production, the consumption of fertilizer and pesticides has

tremendously increased and has increased the yield of cereals (carbohydrates) of various states

of India, but it has been found that there is 25-30% decline in protein content,when corn,

maize, gram and wheat crop are grown on soil.Fertilizers are used in excess and these give rise

to harmful toxins, these excess Toxins generally enter the human body through food chain.34

It is reported that more than 70 million of organic chemicals are synthesized every year

in the world and have multiplied ten times since 1950. Industrial wastes mainly consist of

organic compounds along with Inorganic complexes and non-biodegradable material. These

harmful compounds adversely affects the bio-chemicals properties of soil.35 About 5 Lack

people die annually because of these toxic chemicals.

It is reported that about 20,000 hectares of land has been degraded due to mining and

another 55,000 hc of fertile land was degradedby manufacturing of bricks. Coal mining affects

20,000 hc of land area.

Page 6: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

8

More than fifty countries of the world with an area of twenty million hc are treated with

80% polluted or partially treated polluted water, has been used for irrigation; has an advantages

of crop production so benefit to farmer and whole community, but causes deleterious effect

and chronic diseases in man and animals.34

The protozoa, bacteria and viruses may begin to grow on sewage water under anaerobic

condition. They may cause spread of water borne-diseases like viral hepatitis, Polio, Cholera,

Dysentery, Typhoid, Amoebiasis etc. These harmful effects can last several years so it cannot

only leach down the soil but has negative effect on ground water quality and also degraded soil

property.35

All this natural and anthropogenic activitiesunder taken by man, about 6,209000 tons of

heavy metals enter into the soil every year in the world. Metallic contaminants in soil are

considered to be the indestructible poison and their accumulation in plant and water may be

highly dangerous.36Nearly 80% of the world’s diseases, particularly in developing world can

be linked with polluted soil and water.

Also waste effluents contain soluble salts. According to Food and Agricultural

Organization, 30 to 80% of the irrigated lands in the world are damaged.37

According to World Bank study, environmental damages in India were to be to the

tuneof Rs. 33,950 crore and the cost of inaction is 45% of GDP in 1992. Of this over 70% is in

terms of the health impact of water and food.

SECTION –IV Pesticides pollution.

1.4 INTRODUCTION:-

Pesticides are the worst enemy of man on the planet earth. They not only contaminate

the lithosphere but also pollute the atmosphere, and act as sink.In 1939, a safe organic

insecticide, DDT was found. It was found to be effective against a wide verity of disease

bearing and agricultural insects. It was also used to prevent epidemic of typhus and malaria

carried by lice and mosquitoes during world war-II. If pesticides are not used nearly one fifth

of the crop yield is damaged The ever increasing pressure to increase food production, to meet

current demand requires protection of crops form pests.38,39In increase in food production, one

of important factor is, reduction of crop-losses caused by pests and diseases and this goal can

be achieved by making use of pesticides. Chlorine is the basis for many of the most toxic and

persistent synthetic chemicals combined with hydrocarbons to from organo-chlorines.

Page 7: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

9

Although many organo-chlorine pesticides have been banned in the 60s, the current use of

DDT in developing countries exceeds the past levels of its use in the developed nations. India

was one of the world’s few producers of DDT, (which the US had banned in 1972 for

environmental and health reason), 40, 41&42DDT and such organo-chlorides were produced in

India at Ankaleshwar for controlling pests chemicals are used but these affects human beings

and animals in vicinity, their effects on humans includes cancer, reproductive and development

impairment, effect on liver and kidney functions, neurological impairment and a number of

other health problems.43,44&45

Organo chlorine compound are persistent chemical poisons and can be also called

asEcopoisons because of their bio- amplification property.46They are non-biodegradable and

are soluble in fats and oil only. When consumed by human body, they try to reduce the quality

of fat, as a result, give rise to various diseases of stomach, kidney, and heart.47

Indian Authorities allow nearly 150 pesticides, which amount to 85,000tones used

yearly organo-chlorine insecticides form the bulk of pesticides used in India of which HCH,

DDT, malathin, methyl parathion, monocrotophos, and endosulphan are widely used. Currently

25% pesticides are used in the total cultivated area. In India about 97420 tons of pesticides are

used for agricultural development every year, Out of 20,000 tones DDT used, about 25%

getsaccess into oceans. Most of the Indian farmers prefer DDT, BHC,as these are simple touse

and easily available and are effective in controlling pests. In 30 years, the pesticide use has

increased about 12 fold but crop losses have doubled because of pests. Pesticides used

worldwide without adequate checks and safeguards, infiltrate soil, air and water, average food

chain and play havoc with human as well as ecological health.47

About 30% of total pesticide poisoning occurs in India.In India, chlorinated

hydrocarbon plants are not banned. The Government of india had banned nearly 12 poisonous

pesticides in 1993. In April 1997, BHC was banned for use as a pesticides and deadly DDT

was banned for agricultural use in India in 1992 when it was found that the daily diet of

Indians contained 0.27 mg of DDT.

These pesticides fall on the ground, contaminate the soil, and get detoxified by

degradation and adsorption. These, residual chemicals remain in the soil for a long time and

reduce the fertility of the soil and harm water bodies nearby.45Pesticides percolate up to the

ground water with rain water and irrigation water. If this ground water is used in Agriculture

the harmful chemicals reach the crops.

Page 8: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

DDT has got a half

still persist.According to a recent report,

remain in the soil.Third of which can cause cancer and another third are feared to affect the

human nervous system46

A WHO study conducted 1990 has shown in

spontaneous absorptions and pre mature deliveries among female

wives of male workers as a result of exposure to pesticides.

pesticides are harmful. For example Aldrin (1500ng/L) BHC (272ng/L)DDT (21.9ng/L)

Endosulphan (2890ng/L) are found in major Indian Rivers. I

between 0.0124 to 0.02 ppm, through soil the harmful chemicals reach the crop.

studies found residues of the BHC/HCN in food grains, oil, seeds, pluses, vegetable

breast milk and in the blood in the um

highest in human beings in India up to

Table 1.2 Pesticides Structure, nomenclature, uses and permissible limit.

Trade name

(1)

Chlorinated hydrocarbons:

Aldrin-Dieldrin Chlordane

Lindane

10

half-life of 15 years. In further period 25% of the original amount would

still persist.According to a recent report, more than 300 pesticides are legally allowed to

ain in the soil.Third of which can cause cancer and another third are feared to affect the 46.

A WHO study conducted 1990 has shown in an increased rate of birth defects,

spontaneous absorptions and pre mature deliveries among female

wives of male workers as a result of exposure to pesticides. Even in small concentrations the

pesticides are harmful. For example Aldrin (1500ng/L) BHC (272ng/L)DDT (21.9ng/L)

Endosulphan (2890ng/L) are found in major Indian Rivers. In Indian field soils BHC is found

between 0.0124 to 0.02 ppm, through soil the harmful chemicals reach the crop.

studies found residues of the BHC/HCN in food grains, oil, seeds, pluses, vegetable

breast milk and in the blood in the umbilical cord. According to studies,

highest in human beings in India up to 28ppm which is very dengerous

Pesticides Structure, nomenclature, uses and permissible limit.

Formula

(2)

Soil insecticide for control of nuts, beetle and cotton pests use now banned in USA

Effective against termites. Potential carcinogen,banned in USA in 1975

Control of cotton insects and rice stem bore

life of 15 years. In further period 25% of the original amount would

more than 300 pesticides are legally allowed to

ain in the soil.Third of which can cause cancer and another third are feared to affect the

increased rate of birth defects,

spontaneous absorptions and pre mature deliveries among female worker and unemployed

Even in small concentrations the

pesticides are harmful. For example Aldrin (1500ng/L) BHC (272ng/L)DDT (21.9ng/L)

n Indian field soils BHC is found

between 0.0124 to 0.02 ppm, through soil the harmful chemicals reach the crop. Different

studies found residues of the BHC/HCN in food grains, oil, seeds, pluses, vegetables meat, and

bilical cord. According to studies, DDT is found to be

which is very dengerous.48,49&50

Pesticides Structure, nomenclature, uses and permissible limit.

Uses Freshwater

permissible limit

(3) (4)

Soil insecticide for control of nuts, beetle and cotton pests use now banned in USA

0.003µg/l

Effective against termites. Potential carcinogen, use banned in USA in 1975

0.01µ�g/l

Control of cotton insects and rice stem bore

0.01�µg/l

Page 9: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

DDT

Toxaphene

Hepachlor

Endrin

Methoxychlor

Organophosphates

Parathion

11

Broad spectrumcottonand peanut pemosquito control. Persistent in the environmentaccumulates in food chain; use banned in USA

Insect control on crops and livestock; widely used in USA; ban has been proposed for carcinogenic properties

Pest control in soil; use suspended due to potential carcinogenicity

Effective against black current mud mite-Zoocide; precautions to be taken to avoid skin contact during application

Popular DDT substably biodegradable, low-toxicity to mammals

Control some peof fruits and vegetablehazard to mammals

Larvicide for mosquito control;

Broad spectrum-cotton,soya bean and peanut pests; mosquito control. Persistent in the environment-accumulates in food chain; use banned in USA

0.01µg/l

Insect control on crops and livestock; widely used in USA; ban has been proposed for carcinogenic properties

5�µg/l

Pest control in soil; use suspended due to potential carcinogenicity

0.001�µg/l

Effective against black current mud

-also used as Zoocide; precautions to be taken to avoid skin contact during application

0.004�µg/l

Popular DDT substitute, reason-ably biodegradable,

toxicity to mammals

0.03�µg/l

Control some pests of fruits and vegetable-little hazard to mammals

0.1µg/l

Larvicide for mosquito control;

-

Page 10: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

Methyl parathion

Diazion

Carbamates: Carbaryl (Sevin)

Baygon

Dimetilan

Chloropheno-xyacids

12

Control of plant pest; ranks second in pesticide consumption in USA

Control fruit and vegetable pests

Used on cropscotton, forage fruits and vegetables; lawn and garden insecticide; low toxicity to mammals

Control of flies, mosquitoes, ants and cockroaches

Control of house and fruit flies

Herbicideof broadweeds, aquatic vegetation, military defoliant (may contain highly toxic TCCD as impurity)

Control of plant pest; ranks second in pesticide consumption in USA

-

Control of many fruit and vegetable pests

-

Used on crops-cotton, forage fruits and vegetables; lawn and garden insecticide; low toxicity to mammals

-

Control of flies, mosquitoes, ants and cockroaches

-

Control of house and fruit flies

-

Herbicide-control of broad-leaf weeds, aquatic vegetation, military defoliant (may contain highly toxic TCCD as impurity)

100 µg/l

Page 11: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

2,4,5-T

13

Weed control; military defoliant

Weed control; military defoliant

-

Page 12: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

14

Reference:-

1 Indian Journal of Environmental Protection (2001), News, Vol 21(8); PP 741.

2 WHO (2002), Water pollutants; Biological agents, dissolved Chemicals, non-dissolved

Chemicals, sediments, WHO CEHA Amman, Jordan.

3 Viganol (2003), water Res, PP 37-50.

4 CPCB (Central Pollution control Board) (1994), Assessment and development of Study

Of River basin Series; ADSORBS/4/1980-81, CBPC-WP, PP 1-52 New Delhi.

5 Krishanamurthy. S (1992), Bio methylation and Environmental transport of metals

Chemical Education (USA), Vol 69(5); PP 347-350.

6 Sawhney. I (2006), On world water Day, Drinking water still eludes many. Delhi

Diary,-Free press J, P 5.

7 Abdel Satar. A.M (2001), Environmental studies on the impact of the drain effluent up

on the southern sector of Lake Manzalah, Egypt, JAquatBiol fish,Vol 5; PP 17-30.

8 Yadav.S.S., Kumar Rajesh (2010), JChemPharma Res, Vol 2(4); PP 564-568.

9 Hasan. I., Rajia. S., Kasi. A. K. and Latifa. G.A (2009), “Comparative study on the

waterQuality parameter in two rural and urban rivers emphasizing on the pollution

levelGlobalJ of Environ Res, Vol 3(3); PP 218-222.

10 USEPA (1997), Manual on monitoring water quality, EPA 841-B-97-009.

11 Abida. B and Harikishna(2008), Study on the quality of water in some streams of

Cauvery River, E J of Che, Vol 5(2); PP 377-384.

12 United Nation Environmental Programme (1994), The pollution of lakes and

Reservoirs, Nairobi, UNEP Po Box 30552 Kenya.(Environment Library No.12).

13 UNEP(1999), Report on the Development and Harmonization of Environmental

Standards in East Africa, Vol 2, PP 1-4

14 Dayal.G., and Singh. R. P (1994), Heavy metal content of municipal solid waste in

Agra India,Poll Res,Vol 13(1), PP 83-87.

15 Environmental information system (2005), Heavy metal pollution in PunjabRivers,

Vol3 (1).

16 Kathiresan.K (2000), A review of studies on pichavarammmangrove, south east India,

Hydrobiology, Vol 430; PP 185-205.

17 Vengadesh.P.N., Rajkumar.M., Perumal.P and Rajasekar.K.T(2009), seasonal

variations of plankton diversity in the Kaduriyar estuary Nagapttinam, south east cost

of India,J Environ Biol, Vol. 30; PP 1035-1046.

18 WILDIW.Research and Management (2004), PP 75.

Page 13: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

15

19. Mary. E.C.V. and Kausar. R(2004), Chemical and microbial quality of different types

OfDrinking water of Hyderabad, Hi-Tech. city A.P India,J Aqua Biol,Vol 19(1); PP 93-

97.

20. Yu. K.Y., Tasi, L.-J, Chen, S-H, HO, S-T(2001), Chemical binding of heavy metals in

Anoxic river sediments, Water Res,Vol 35(7); PP 4086-4094.

21. Alongi. D.M. and Chistofferson. P (1992), Benthic in fauna and organisms –sediments

Relationin a shallow, out welled mangrove detritus and physical disturbance, marine

Ecology Progress series, Vol 81; PP 229-245.

22. Davies. C.A., Torolinson. K. And Stephenson. T(1991), Heavy metals in river tees

Estuary sediments, environ technol,Vol 12; PP 961-972.

23. Singh. H. P. and Mahaveer. L.R(1997), Preliminary observation on heavy metals in

Water and sediments in a stretch of river Ganga and Some of its tributaries,J Environ

Biol,Vol 18(1); PP 49-53.

24. Singh. M(2001), Heavy metal pollution in freshly deposited sediments of the Yamuna

River (the Ganga River tributary), a case study from Delhi and Agra urban centers

India, Environ.GeolVol 40(6); PP 664-671.

25. Singh. A. K (1999), Elemental composition of the Damodar River sediments. A

Tributary of the lower Ganga, India,JGeolSoc India, Vol 53; PP 219-231.

26. Alloway. B. J(1995), Soil Pollution and land contamination in pollution causes,

Effect and control, R. M. Harrison (ed), The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge

UK, PP. 318.

27. Yagdik. K.,Azkan. N(2000), Heavy Metal contamination in soils and its effect in

Agriculture, J of Fac of Agric, Omu (in Turkish),Vol 15; PP 109 -115.

28. Giller. K., Witter. E. and McGrath.S (1998), Toxicity of heavy metals to micro

Organisms and microbial process in agricultural soils. A review, soil biology and Bio

Chemistry, Vol 30; PP 1398-1414.

29. Renella .G.,Chaudhari.A andBrokers. P(2002), fresh additions of heavy metals do not

Model long term effects on microbial biomass and activity,soil Biology and

Biochemistry Vol 34; PP 121-124.

30. Zero environment limited (2007), Expert environmental training and consultancy

Services.

31. De Vries. W.,Romkens.P.E.,Schutze. G(2007), Critical soil concentration of

Cadmium, Lead and Mercury in view of health effect on humans and animals.Reviews

of Environmental contamination and Toxicology Vol 191; PP 91-130.

Page 14: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

16

32. Pandey.J.Pandey. U(2008), Accumulation of heavy metals in dietary vegetables and

Cultivated soil horizon in organic farming system in relation to atmospheric deposition

in a seasonally dry tropical region of India. Environ monitoring and Assessment,

PP 1-14.

33 Razo. I.,Carrizales. L., Castro.J., Diaz Barriga., F.,Monroy. M(2004), Arsenic and

heavyMetal pollution of soil water and sediments in a semi-arid climate mining area in

Mexico, water Air and soil pollution.

34 Mingchen and Malena. Q(2001), Soil Sci. Soc AMJ Vol 65; PP 491-499.

35 Bhagure. G.R., Mirgane. S. R (2011), Heavy metal concentrations in ground waters and

Soils of Thane Region of Maharashtra, India, Environ monit Assess, Vol. 173,

PP 643-652.

36 Kim. H. Tan (1994), Environmental soil Sci, Marcel Dekker, Inc. PP 270 madison

Avenue New York 10016.

37 Singare. P.U., Lokhande. R.S., Pathak. P. P (2010), Soil pollution along Kalwa Bridge

Thane Creek of Maharashtra, India,J of environs protection, Vol 1; PP 121-128.

38 Jain.C.K. and Ali.I(1997), Determination of Pesticides in water, sediments and soils

by gas chromatography,IntJ environ Anal Chem,PP 68, 83.

39 Del Pino. J. N. and Diaz. R. D (1998), pesticides, distribution and movement

Biotherapy, PP 11 69.

40 Ademoroti.CMA (1996), Environmental chemistry and Toxicology,foludexpress Ltd.,

lbadan, PP 79-209.

41 Winter.C (1992), Dietary pesticide risk assessment, Rev Environ contam,ToxicolVol

127, PP 23-67.

42 Thakker. N. P. and vidya.M.V(1992), Determination of PP 1,2- dichlorobenzene, PP

1, 2, 4-trichlorobenzene and hexachlorobenzene in surface water; J Indian water works

Asson XXIV, PP 343.

43 Ali. I., Jain. C. K (2001), Pollution potential of pesticides in the HindonriverIndia, J of

Environ hydro, vol-9 (1); PP 1-7.

44 Abida. B., Harikrishna. S., Khan.L(2009), A. Survey of Persistentorgano chlorine

Pesticides residues in some streams of the Cauvery River Karnataka. India,Int J Chem

Tech Res,Vol 1(2); PP 237-244.

45 Bharambe.S.M. and Mahulikar.P.P (2010), Contamination level of pesticides residues

In soil from cotton growing area of Jalgaon District and farmer’s knowledge,J of Adv.

In sci. and Tech. Vol 13(1); PP 30-35.

Page 15: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

17

46 Zhang. H., Lu.Y., Dowson.R., W., Shi.Y and Wan.T (2005), Classification and

Ordination of DDT and HCH in soil samples from the GuantinReservoir China,

Chemosphere Vol 60; PP 762.

47 Forget.G (1991), Pesticides and the third world, JToxicol Environ Health,Vol 32;

PP 11-31.

48 ShenBaocheng (Bozen SUN) and shenQiz(1991), Pesticide pollution, J of Environ

Sci. (China) Vol 3(3); PP 31-47.

49 Dhliwal.G.S. and Singh. B (eds) (1993), Pesticides, Their Ecological impact in

Developing countries, Common wealth publishers, New Delhi.

50 Dudani.A.T. and Sengupta.S (1991), Status and Banned and Bannable pesticides in

India, Voluntary Health Association of India, New Delhi.

Page 16: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

18

SECTION V

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

1.5 Background:

Rivers are vital and vulnerable fresh water systems that are critical for the subsistence

of all life. However the decline quality of water, food due to sewage water, agricultural run-off,

human activities, industrial effluents are directly discharged in to nearby water bodies and soil,

without any pretreatment which renders to reduce the aesthetic value of waterand aquatic

Ecosystemis hampered. The review of literature is the fundamental part of the research work

which provides valuable information about the previous and present research work regarding

our selectedsubject.

PHYSICO CHEMICAL PARAMETERS OF WATER, AQUATIC SEDIM ENTS AND

NEARBY SOIL:-

The physico-chemical characteristic of any reverine system and soil play important role of

Ecological significance, especially in river Ecosystem. Also itreflects the history of the

pollution. Sediments and soil act as both carriers and sink of contaminants in the

environment;both are providers of food staffs for living organisms.

Many workers reported on physico-chemical characteristics of river water. pH in range of 6.0

to 8.3 indicate the of carbonates of calcium and magnesium dissolved in water1.Chetana and

Somashekar2 recorded maximum pH in summer season due to increased decomposition rate

leading to acidification and lower pH. Also low pH was recorded in winter season due to

decreased decomposition rate owing to rate of photosynthesis and microbial activity and

increased algal productivity3,4. pH of water depends upon the presence of carbonates and

bicarbonates in water, which depends upon the presence of CO2 and ionic concentration of the

solution. The quality of water changes due to changes in the pH value of water5.

Emongor et al 6 compare pH of sewage water and river water. They have found that the

pH of water at the sewage discharge point is generally lower than the pH of river water

Aquatic organism are affected by pH of water because most of the metabolic activity is

dependent on optimum pH range 6.5 to 8.2 was sustainable for aquatic life7. Low pH in water

due to less soluble of Pb, contain minerals in natural water8. And high pH in river water may

be result in the reduction of heavy metal toxacity9. Many researcher reported concentration of

metal is influenced by pH since high concentration of metals was observed at low pH 10.

In our country several workers have already studied polluted water used in agriculture,

soil and heavy metal toxicity neither a high pH of soil above neither 8.4 nor low below 5.0 is

Page 17: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

19

favorable for maximum yield of crop11. pH of the soil is interpreted as optimum quality for

plant growth and favorable for nitrogen fixation12.

Electrical conductivity is a measure of the ability of an aqueous solution to carry an

electric current, this ability depend up on the presence of ion, on their total concentration,

mobility and valancy and on the temperature of water13. It is good, proper and rapid method to

measure the total dissolved ions and directly related to total solid14. Increasing levels of

conductivity and cations are the products of decomposition and mineralization of organic

materials15. Electrical conductivity 260 µmohs/cm suggests more conductivity due to presence

of dissolved minerals and gases16. Poreta et al 17 reported high EC 201 ms/cm from Agbore

vicinities due to increase in the concentration of some soluble salts in soil. Masound18.

Compare physico-chemical parameter of waste water irrigated soil and well water irrigated

soil, pH 7.97 to and EC 1.28 and 0.763 dsm-1. The increase in pH and EC of soil irrigated in

waste water may be due to alkaline nature of municipal waste water.

Hardness of water bodies is regulated largely by the level of calcium and magnesium

salts, other metals if present such as Fe, Mn and Al may also contribute to hardness19. If the

hardness of water is more than 200mgL-1, scale formation takes place in the pipes or the

distribution system and to soften it, more and more soap is required. Hard water also gives

scum formation which farther reduces the quality of water20 and hardness below 300 mg/L is

considered potable but beyond this limit it produces gastrointestinal irrigation 21. The abnormal

values of total hardness may be due to the discharge of domestic sewage, paper, textile and

chemical waste 22.

In River water chloride contents normally increases as the mineral contains increases23.

It occurs in all natural water in widely varying concentration 24. High concentration of chloride

is considered to be the indicator of pollution due to organic waste of animal or industrial

origins, chloride are troublesome in irrigation water and also harmful to aquatic life25.

Alkalinity is a total measure of substance in water that has acid neutralizing ability, the

main source of natural alkalinity are rocks which contain carbonate, bicarbonate and hydroxide

compounds, Borate, silicate and phosphates may also contribute to alkalinity 26. High alkalinity

may be lead to in crustation in the distribution pipes, also rise in pH level kills fish and other

river organism27. When alkalinity was greater hardness could be due to the presence of basic

salts of sodium and potassium in addition to calcium and magnesium 28.

Page 18: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

20

Magnesium is relatively non toxic to man. However a higher concentration causes un

pleasant taste of water.At high concentration magnesium salts has a laxative effect particularly

when present as MgSo429. Sin30 Reported magnesium is an important factor along with Calcium

Sodium Potassium in the bio-chemical phosphiylation reactions tacking in the cells of algae,

fungi and bacteria. In irrigation water Ca: Mg ratio should be more than one preferably. If the

ratio is near or less than one, the uptake and translocation of Ca is diminished due to

antagonistic effect of high magnesium. The water with lower Ca/Mg ratio will be more

harmful. In Mg dominated water the potential effect of sodium may be slightly increased31.

A perusal of more recent literature established the importance of metal for man and

aquatic plant and animals. Shanty32 has observed that Calcium is a major micronutrient in

water and the biotic media. Due to presence of Calcium, hardness of water increases and it

affects the bio-organisms in it. Whenever and wherever sewage and industrial pollutants and

added to river or water bodies, concentration of ions and hardness of water significantly

increases33. Fufeyin34 recorded highest calcium (400 mg/L) was found in most of the sampling

station due to micro organism, which play important role in calcium exchange at the interface

between sediment and overlaying water.

Crops, aquatic plants, animals, plankton require phosphorus for their growth water is

highly loaded with phosphorus when domestic sewage mixes with it at any point due to

domestic sewage, the proportion of phosphorus in water bodies highly increases35. Excessive

potassium fertilizer used in farming decreases other micronutrients in food like vitamin C and

carotene36.

The transport of metals in the industrial and sewage effluents to ground water, lake

water, soil and plants and complexation of metal with organic molecules present in soil have

recently been the subject of much research. If excess zinc is present in soil it reduced the root

growth for low tolerant plant 37. When zinc is applied in soil it can accumulated in root system

due to low mobility in plants 38. Kodam39 analyzed soil near subion River. When polluted river

water was used for irrigation the concentration of Pb, Cu and Hg were above the threshold

limit of 80.84 mg/Ks, 4.05 mg/kg and 2.52 mg/kg. Respectivelythis heavy metal causes

toxicity and poisoning of living organism.

Contamination of soil with copper has health hazard implications as the excessive

concentration of copper could bring about anemia, infection. Thinning of bones thyroid gland

dysfunction, heart diseases and nervous system problem40. When lead exceeding the threshold

Page 19: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

21

levels has been reported to be toxic and can induce hypertension in adults and inhibit

development of intelligence in fetus, cause problems in the synthesis hemoglobin and affect

kidney, gastro in terrestrial tract, malfunctioning and acute or chronic damage to the nervous

system41.

In view of above fact that heavy metals in industrial and municipal solid wastes

percolate through soil strata and contaminate soil area. Adegoke42 reported soil near lead

battery dump site, the soil is contaminated with Pb, Cu in range of 104 to 166 mg/L and 38.5 to

52.0 mg/L and soil is not contaminated with Zn, Ni and As when their values are compared

with maximum allowable concentration. Highest concentration of Pb 1521.0 mg/L Copper

1197.6 mg/L was found in soil due to chemical and metallurgical activities43. Author12 reported

low level of phosphate, sodium, potassium due to the removal of upper layer of soil.

In Ganges water at Narora (UP) concentration of DDT and BHC was 1.36, 1.38 PPb44.

And Hindon River water the concentration of BHC in monsoon season was 0.10 mg/L 45.

Mekkavi46compares average concentration of DDT in cannel water and agricultural waste

water contains 5.3 mg/L and 3.4 mg/L.

Page 20: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

22

SECTION VI

National and International standards/guideline/Tolerance limits of water, soil and

pesticides.

1.6 Standard and tolerance limits of pollutant

The government has issued standards (tolerance limit) for discharge of industrial waste

in to surface water, waste water from treatment plant into in to inland surface water and

industrial effluents in to the public sewers .Central pollution control board (CPCB)describes

the tolerance limits for industrial effluents, discharge in to public sewer .Table 1.3 show

CPCB standards for the discharge of effluents, while Table1.4 shows, drinking water standards

prescribed by WHO/US,Table1.5 shows, USPH European ,Canadian ,US,WHO,ISI ,BIS

,ICMR, standards. Table1.6[A],[B], 1.7shows, organic compound and pesticides permissible

limit on health based guideline by the WHO Table1.8, 1.9 shows Irrigation water quality and

Table1.10 show phytotoxic level metal in soil.

Table 1.3General Standards for discharge of effluents

(CPCB, 1995)47

S. No. Parameter

Standards

Inland surface water

Public Sewer

Land for irrigation

Marine coastal areas

1. 2.

3.

(a) (b) (c) (d)

1 Color and odor See Note-1 --- See Note-

1 See Note-1

2 Suspended Solids, mg/I, Max

100 600 200

(a) For process waste water-100 (b) For cooling water effluent-10 percent above total suspended matter of influent cooling water.

3 Particle size of suspended solids

Shall pass 850 micron IS

Sieve --- ---

(a)Floatable solids, Max 3 mm (b) Settle able solids Max 850 microns.

4 Dissolved solids (inorganic), mg/L, max

2100 2100 2100 ---

5 pH value 5.5 to 9.0 5.5 to 9.0 5.5 to 9.0 5.5 to 9.0

6 Temperature 0C, Max

Shall not exceed 40oc in any

section of the stream within 15

meters downstreamfrom

45 at the point of

discharge --- 45oc at the point of discharge

Page 21: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

23

the effluent outlet

7 Oil and grease, mg/L, max

10 20 10 20

8 Total residual chlorine, mg/L, Max

1.0 --- --- 1.0

9. Ammonical nitrogen (as N), mg/L, Max.

50 50 --- 50

10 Total kjeldahl nitrogen (as N, mg/L, Max 100 --- --- 100

11 Free Ammonia (as NH3), mg/L Max.

5.0 --- --- 5.0

12 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (5 days at 200C) Max.

30 350 100 100

13 Chemical Oxygen Demand, mg/L, Max.

250 --- --- 250

14 Arsenic (as As), mg/L, Max.

0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

15 Mercury (as Hg), mg/L, Max.

0.01 0.01 --- 0.01

16 Lead (as Pb), mg/L, Max.

0.1 1.0 --- 1.0

17 Cadmium (as Cd), mg/L, Max.

2.0 1.0 --- 2.0

18 Hexavalent chromium (as Cr+6) mg/L, Max.

0.1 2.0 --- 1.0

19 Total chromium as (Cr), mg/L, Max.

2.0 2.0 --- 2.0

20 Copper (as Cu), mg/L Max.

3.0 3.0 --- 3.0

21 Zinc (as Zn), mg/L, Max.

5.0 15 --- 15

22 Selenium (as Se), mg/L, Max.

0.05 0.05 -- 0.05

23 Nickel (as Ni), mg/L, Max.

3.0 3.0 --- 5.0

24 Boron (as B), mg/L, Max.

2.0 2.0 2.0 ---

Page 22: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

24

25 Percent Sodium, Max.

--- 60 60 ---

26 Residual sodium carbonate, mg/L, Max.

--- --- 5.0 ---

27 Cyanide (as CN), mg/L , Max.

0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

28 Chloride (as Cl), mg/L, Max.

1000 1000 600 (a)

29 Fluoride (as F), mg/L, Max.

2.0 15 --- 15

30 Dissolved Phosphates (as P), mg/L, Max.

5.0 --- --- ---

31 Sulphate (as SO4), mg/L, Max.

1000 1000 1000 ---

32 Sulphide (as S), mg/L, Max.

2.0 --- --- 5.0

33 Pesticides Absent Absent Absent Absent

34 Phenolic compounds (as C6H5OH), mg/L, Max.

1.0 5.0 --- 5.0

35

Radioactive materials (a) Alpha emitters MC/ ml, Max. (b) Beta emitter’s/ml, Max.

10-7 10 -6

10-7 10-6

10-8 10-7

10-7 10-6

International standards /Guidelines

The World Health Organization (WHO) and European Union (EU) are international agencies

They have provided guidelines for drinking water .WHO’S guidelines for drinking water

quality, set up in Geneva, 1993 are the international reference point for standard setting and

water safety .The EU standard are more recent (1998), stricter than WHOstandards

(1993).Different countries have set up different drinking water standards.

Table 1.4WHO/EU Drinking Water Standards49,50

Sr. No.

Element / Substance Symbol/ Formula

Normally found in fresh water surface water ground water

Health base guideline by the

WHO EU Standards

1 Color -- -- Not mentioned Not Mentioned

Page 23: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

25

2 TDS - - No guideline Not Mentioned

3 Turbidity - - Not Mentioned Not Mentioned

4 Dissolved oxygen O2 - No guideline Not Mentioned

5 Hardness mg/LCaCO3 - No guideline Not Mentioned

6 Suspended Solid - - No guideline Not Mentioned

7 BOD - - No guideline Not Mentioned

8 COD - - No guideline Not Mentioned

9 Oxdisability - - - 5.0 mg/L O2

10 Grease / Oil - - No guideline Not Mentioned

11 pH - - No guideline Not Mentioned

12 Conductivity - - 250 micros/cm 250 micros/cm

13 Aluminum Al - 0.2 mg/L 0.2 mg/L

14 Ammonia NH4

<O,2 mg/L cup (up to 0,3 mg/L

in anaerobic water

No guideline 0.50 mg/L

15 Antimony Sb <4 µg/L 0.005 mg/L 0.005 mg/L

16 Arsenic As - 0.01 mg/L 0.01 mg/L

17 Asbestos - - No guideline Not Mentioned

18 Barium Ba - 0.3 mg/L Not Mentioned

19 Beryllium Be <1 µg/L No guideline Not Mentioned

Page 24: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

26

20 Boron B <1 µg/L 0.3 mg/L 1.00 mg/L

21 Bromate Br - No guideline 0.01 mg/L

22 Cadmium Cd <1 µg/L 0.003 mg/L 0.005 mg/L

23 Chromium Cr+3, Cr+6 - 0.05 mg/L 0.05 mg/L

24 Copper Cu <2 µg/L 2 mg/L 2.0 mg/L

25 Iron Fe 0.5, 50 mg/L No guideline 0.2 mg/L

26 Lead Pb - 0.01 mg/L 0.01 mg/L

27 Manganese Mn - 0.01 mg/L 0.01 mg/L

28 Mercury Hg <0.5 µg/L 0.001 mg/L 0.001 mg/L

29 Molybdenum Mb <0.01 mg/L 0.07 mg/L Not mentioned

30 Nickel Ni <0.02 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.02 mg/L

31 Selenium Se <<0.01 mg/L 0.01 mg/L 0.01 mg/L

32 Silver Ag 5-50 mg/L No guideline Not Mentioned

33 Sodium Na <20 mg/L 200 mg/L 200 mg/L

34 Inorganic Tin Sn - No guideline Not Mentioned

35 Uranium U - 1.4 mg/L Not Mentioned

36 Zinc Zn - 3 mg/L Not Mentioned

37 Chloride Cl - 250 mg/L 250 mg/L

38 Cyanide Cn - 0.07 mg/L 0.05 mg/L

Page 25: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

27

39 Fluoride F <1.5 mg/L (up

to 10) 1.5 mg/L 1.5 mg/L

40 Sulphate SO2-4 - 500 mg/L 250 mg/L

41 Nitrate and Nitrite NO3, NO2 - 50 mg/L total

nitrogen 50 mg/L

Table1.5Parameter for water quality characterization and standards48,49,50,51,52,53,54&55

Sr. No.

Parameter USPH

Standards European Standards

Canadian Limit

U.S. limit

WHO limit

ISI standard

BIS limit

ICMR

limit

1 Color Color less - < 16 TCU

�� - - - - -

2 Test Test less - - - - - - -

3 Odor Odorless - In offensive - - - -

4 Turbidity - - 0.9/1.0/0.1

NTU 5NTU - - - -

5 SP.

Conductance µmohs/cm

300 400 - - 6oo - - -

6 pH 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5

6.5-9.2 - 6.5-8.5

7.0-8.5

7 BOD 5.0 - - - - - - -

8 COD 4.0 5.0 - - 10 - - -

9 Total hardness

as (CaCO3) - - 75-150 -

100-500

- <300 <300

10 TDS - - Less than500 - <500 - <500 <500

11 Dissolved oxygen

4.0-6.0 ppm

- - - - 3.0 - -

12 Suspended Solid 5.0 - - - - - - -

13 Chloride 250 250 Less than251 - 500 600 250 200

14 Total Alkalinity - - - - 200 200 - -

15 Sulphate 250 - - - - 1000 200 200

16 Cyanide 0.05 - 0.2 0.2 0.07 0.01 0.05 -

17 Nitrate + Nitrite <10 - 45 10 45 - 45 20

Page 26: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

28

18 Fluoride 1.5 - 1.5 4.0 1.5 3.0 1 1

19 Phosphate 0.1 - 0.010 - - - 0.1 -

20 Sulphide 0.1 mg/L - - - - - - -

21 Ammonia 0.5 - - - 0.5 - - -

22 Calcium 100 100 200 - 100 - 75 75

23 Magnesium 30 - 50.0 - 150 - 30 50

24 Sodium - - 200 - 200 - - -

25 Potassium - - - No

limit listed

- - 1.0 -

26 Boron 1.0 - 5.0 - 0.5 - - -

27 Arsenic 0.05 - 0.010 0.010 0.01 0.2 0.05 -

28 Barium 1.0 - 1.0 2.0 0.7 - - -

29 Cadmium 0.01 - 0.005 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 -

30 Chromium(VI) 0.05 - 0.050 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.05 -

31 Copper 1.0 - 1.0 1.3 1.5 - 0.05 0.05

32 Iron <0.3 - 0.300 0.3 1.0 - 0.3 0.1

33 Nickel - - - - 0.020 - - -

34 Lead <0.05 - 0.010 - 0.05 0.01 0.05 -

35 Manganese <0.05 - 0.050 0.03 0.5 - 0.1 0.1

36 Mercury 0.001 - 0.001 0.002 0.001 - 0.001 -

37 Selenium 0.01 - 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.05 - -

38 Silver 0.05 - 0.050 0.10 - - - -

39 Uranium 5.0 - 0.02 - 0.009 - 0.01 -

40 Zinc 5.5 - 5.0 5.0 5.0 - 5.0 0.1

Page 27: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

29

41 Aluminum - - 0.1 0.05-0.2

- - 0.03 -

42 Antimony - - 0.006 0.006 0.018 - - -

43 Asbestos - - - 7

million fibers/L

No limit listed

- - -

44 Beryllium - - - 0.004 - - - -

45 Bromate - - 0.01 0.010 0.010 - - -

46 Chloramines - - 3.0 - 3.0 - - -

47 Molybdenum - - 0.25 - 0.07 - - -

48 Thallium - - - 0.002 - - - -

49 Phenol 0.001 0.5 - - 0.002 - 0.001 -

50

Polynuciear aromatic

hydrocarbon (PAH)

0.02 0.002 - - 0.2 - - -

51 E Coli </100 ml - - - 10/100

ml - - -

52 Pesticides

(Total) 0.005 0.005 - - - - - -

Table: 1.6[A] Guideline of Organic Compounds in drinking water48.

Group

Substance Formula Health based guideline by

the WHO

Aromatic hydrocarbons

Benzene C6H6 10 µg/l

Toluene C7H8 700 µg/L

Xylenes C8H10 500 µg/L

Ethyl benzene C8H10 300 µg/L

Styrene C8H8 20µg/L

Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons(PAHs) C2H3N1O5P1 3 0.7µg/L

Chlorinated alkanes

Carbon tetrachloride CCl4 2 µg/L

Dichloromethane CH2Cl2 20 µg/L

Page 28: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

30

1,1-Dichloroethane C2HCl2 No guideline

1,2-Dichloroethane ClCH2CH2CH2Cl 30 µg/L

1,1,1-Trichloroethane CH3CCl3 2000 µg/L

Chlorinate Ethenes

1,1-Dichloroethene C2H2Cl2 30 µg/L

1,2-Dichloroethene C2H2Cl2 50 µg/L

Tri chloroethene C2HCl3 70 µg/L

Tetra chloroethene C2Cl4 40 µg/L

Chlorinated benzenes

Mono chlorobenezene(MCB) C6H5Cl 300 µg/L

Dichlorobenzenes (DCBs)

1,2-Dichlorobenzene(1,2-DCB) C6H4Cl2 1000 µg/L

1,3- Dichlorobenzene(1,3-DCB) C6H4Cl2 No guideline

1,4- Dichlorobenzene(1,4-DCB) C6 H4 Cl2 300 µg/L

Trichlorobenzenes(TCBs) C6H3Cl3 20 µg/L

Miscellaneous organic

constituents

Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate(DEHA) C22H42O4 80 µg/L

Di(2- ethylhexyl)phthalate(DEHP) C24H38O4 80 µg/L

Acrylamide C3H5NO 0.5 µg/L

Epichlorohydrin(ECH) C3H5ClO 0.4 µg/L

Hexachlorobutadiene(HCBD) C4Cl6 0.6 µg/L

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid(EDTA) C10H12N2O8 200 µg/L

Nitrilotracetic acid (NTA) N(CH2COOH)3 200 µg/L

Organotins

Dialkyltins R2SnX2 No guideline

Tributyl oxide(TBTO) C24H54OSn2 2 µg/L

Page 29: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

31

Table: 1.6[B] Guideline of Organic Compounds in Drinking Water48

Substance Formula Health based guideline by the WHO

Alachlor C14H20 Cl NO2 20 µg/l

Aldicarb C7H14N2O4S 10 µg/L

Aldrin and dieldrin C7H8 Cl6/ C12H8Cl6 O

0.03 µg/L

Atrazine C8H14ClN5 2 µg/L

Bentazone C10 H12 N2O3S 30 µg/L

Carbofuran C12H15 NO3 5 µg/L

Chlordane C10H6Cl8 0.2 µg/L

Chlorotoluron C10H13ClN2O 30 µg/L

DDT C14H9Cl5 2 µg/l

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane C3H5Br2Cl 1 µg/L

2,-4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid(2,4-D) C8H6Cl2O3 30 µg/L

1,2-Dichloropropane C3H6Cl2 No guideline

1,3- Dichloropropane C3H6Cl2 20 µg/L

1,3- Dichloropropene CH3CHClCH2Cl No guideline

Ethylene dibromide(EDB) BrCH2CH2Br No guideline

Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide C10H5Cl7 0.03 µg/L

Page 30: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

32

Hexachlorobenzene(HCB) C10H5Cl7 O 1 µg/L

Isoproturon C12H18N2O 9 µg/L

Lindane C6H6Cl6 2 µg/L

MCPA C9H9Cl O3 2 µg/L

Methoxychlor (C6H4OCH3)2CHCCl3 20 µg/L

Metolachlor C15H22Cl NO2 10 µg/L

Molinate C9H17NOS 6 µg/L

Pendimethalin C13H19O4N3 20 µg/L

Pentachlorophenol(PCP) C6HCl5O 9 µg/L

Permethrin C21H20Cl2O3 20 µg/L

Propanil C9H9Cl2NO 20 µg/L

Pyridate C19H23ClN2O2S 100 µg/L

Simazine C7H12Cl N5 2 µg/L

Trifluralin C13H16F3N3O4 20 µg/L

Chlorophenoxy herbicides (excluding 2,4-D & MCPA)

2,4-DB C10H10Cl2O3 90 µg/L

Dichlorprop C9H8Cl2O3 100 µg/L

Fenoprop C9H7Cl3O3 9 µg/L

MCPB C11H13Cl O3 No guideline

MECoprop C10H11ClO3 10 µg/L

2,4,5-T C8H5Cl3O3 9 µg/L

Page 31: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

33

Table 1.7Disinfectants and disinfectant by- products Standards48

Group Substance Formula Health based guideline by the WHO

Disinfectants

Chloramines NHnCl(3-n), where n=0, 1 or 2 3 µg/L

Chlorine Cl2 5 µg/L

Chlorine dioxide ClO2 No guideline

Iodine I2 No guideline

Disinfectant by- products

Bromate Br O-3 25 µg/L

Chlorate Cl O-3 No guideline

Chlorite Cl O2 200 µg/L

Chlorophenols 2-chlorophenol (2-CP) C6 H5Cl O No guideline

2,4-Dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP) C6 H4 Cl2O No guideline

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol (2,4,6-TCP) C6 H3 Cl3O 200 µg/L

Formaldehyde HCHO 900 µg/L

MX(3-Chloro-4-dichloromethyl-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone)

C5 H3 Cl3 O3 No guideline

Trihalomethanes

Bromoform C H Br3 100 µg/L

Dibromochloromethane CH Br2Cl 100 µg/L

Bromodichloromethane CH BrCl2 60 µg/L

Chloroform CH Cl3 200 µg/L

Chlorinated acetic acids

Monochloroacetic acid C2 H3 ClO2 No guideline

Page 32: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

34

Dichloroacetic acid C2 H2Cl2O2 50 µg/L

Trichloroacetic acid C2 H Cl3 O2 100 µg/L

Chloral hydrate(trichloroacet aldehyde) C Cl3CH(OH)2 10 µg/L

Chloroacetones C3 H5OCl No guideline

Halogenated acetonitriles

Dichloroacetonitrile C2 HCl2 N 90 µg/L

Dibromoacetonitrile C2 H Br2N 100 µg/L

Bromochloroacetonitrile CHCl2 CN No guideline

Trichloroacetonitrile C2 Cl3 N 1 µg/L

Cyanogen chloride ClCN 70 µg/L

Chloropicrin CCl3 NO2 No guideline

Table: 1.8Guidelines for Irrigation water quality56

Sr.

No. Parameter Desirable limit Remark

1

pH- 5.5-6.0 Ideal

>7.0 Causes problems

2 EC

<1.5 Desired range

>1.5 Potential problem

>3.0 Will burn under certain condition

Page 33: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

35

3 Sodium adsorption

ratio(SAR)

<6.0 Desired range (will add Ca to the soil)

>6.0 (will trip Ca from the soil)

4 Calcium 40-120 ppm Desired range

5 Magnesium 6-24 ppm Desired range

6 Potassium 5-10 ppm Desired range

7 Sodium 0-50 ppm Desired range

8 Iron 2-5 ppm Desired range

9 Total alkalinity 1-100 ppm Desired range

10 Carbonate <50 ppm Desired range

11 Bicarbonate <120 ppm Desired range

12 Chloride <140 ppm Desired range

13 Sulphate <400 ppm Desired range

14 Salt Concentration

<960 ppm Desired range

>1900 ppm Increased burn potential and poor tank mix operation

15 Boron 2-8 ppm -

16 Cat ion/Anion Ratio 1:1 Ideal ratio

Page 34: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

36

Table 1.9 Suitability of water with different constituents for irrigation 56.

Parameter Class-I Class-II Class-III

TD Sin. mg/L 0-700 700-2000 72000

pH 6.4-8.4 5.16-6.4 and 8.5-9.5 0-5 and g+

Chlorides in mg/L 0-142 142-355 >355

% Na 0-60 60-75 >75

EC in mmohs/cm 0-0.750 0.0750-2.250 >2.250

SAR 0-10.0 10-26 >26

Mg in mg/L <50 - >50

Guidelines for soil:-

The heavy metal contents in soil where compare with phytotoxic levelsreported by

Kabata-pendias and pendias67 and GLC guideline68. Table2.1 shows the phytotoxic levels and

GLC guideline for the various elements.

Table 1.10phytotoxic level and GLC guidelines

Element Phytotoxic

Level

GLC Guidelines (All Units mg/L)

I II III IV V

Cu 60-125 100 200 500 2500 >2500

Pb 100-400 200 500 1000 5000 >5000

Zn 70-400 250 500 1000 5000 >5000

Ni 1500-3000 200 500 2000 1000 >1000

Fe - 30 50 100 500 >500

As 15-50 200 200 500 2500 >2500

Mg* - - - - - -

Page 35: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

37

REFERENCE:

1. Abida.B.,Harikrishna.S.,Khan.I(2009),Analysis of heavy metals in water, sediments and

fish samplesofMadivala lakes of Bangalore,Karnatak,InterJ tech

Res,CODEN(USA),Vol1(2);PP- 249

2 Chetanas.A. and Somasekhar.R.K(1997), Ecological study on the Riverine Ecosystem of

Karnataka physico chemical characteristics of river Cauvery, J. Environ Pollut, Vol 4(1);

PP 57-63.

3 ShamSundar.et al (2007), Aqua chemistry of Gopalaswamy River in Chitradurga,

Karnataka, and Indian J Env. Pro, Vol 27(5); PP 420-424.

4 Kapsikar. G.B., Khajure.P.V. and Rathod. J.L(2011), Physico chemical features of KALI

River,Karwar, West Coast of India, Recent Rech in Sci. and TECh, Vol 3(4); PP 12-14.

5 Sharma.S., Vishwakarma. R., Dixit.S. and Jain. P(2011), Evaluation of water quality of

Narmada River with reference to Physico-chemical Parameters at Hoshangabad city MP,

India, Res J Chem. Sci, Vol. 1(3).

6 Emongor. V. E., Kealotswe.I., Koorapetse, S. and Keikanetswe. S (2005), Pollution

indicator in Gaborone effluent, J applSci, Vol 5; PP 147-150

7 Gejage.R.M. and Awate. M.R(2006), Biodiversity of Some freshwater and marine water

animals in the state of Maharashtra and Goa, J As Soc, India, Vol 1(1); PP 36-40.

8 Venugopal.T.,Giridharan.L.,Jayaprakash.M(2009 b), Characterization and risk assessment

studies of bed sediments of River Adya –An application of specification study, Int J

Environ Res, Vol 3(4); PP 581-598.

9 Aktar. M.W., Paramasivam.M., Ganguly.M., Purkait.S., Sengupta. D(2010), Assessment

and occurrence of various heavy metals in surface water of Ganga River around Kolkata a

study for toxicity and Ecological impact, Environ monitor Assess,Vol 160(1-4);PP207-213.

10 Patnaik.R.M. and Rao. L.M(2001) Concentration of heavy metals in sediments, water, and

the fish, Bio-Sci Res Bull, Vol 12(1); PP 6-14.

11 Baddesha. H.S., Chabbra. R.,Ghuman. B.S (1997), J of Indian Soci of Soil Sci, 45(2); PP

358-362.

12 Kumar. R. and Dr. T.V. Ramachandra(2011), Water soil and sediment investigation to

explore status of aquatic Ecosystem. Presented at National seminar on River conservation

and management on 2nd to 4th Jan. 2003.At St. Thomas college Thrissur, Kerala.

13 Venkatesharaja. K.,Ravikumar. P.,Somashekar. R.K., Prakash(2010), Physico-chemical

and Bacteriological investigation of the River Cauvery of collegial stretch in Karnataka

Kath Mandurai University, J of sciEngg and TECh, vol 6(1); PP 50-53.

Page 36: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

38

14 Bhatt. L.R., Lacoul. P. Lekhak. H.D. Jha.P.K(1999), Physico chemical characteristic and

phytoplankton of Taudha Lake Kathmandu, Poll. Res, Vol 18(14); PP 353-358.

15 Abida. B. and Harikrishna(2008), Study on the quality of water in some streams of

Kaveri River, E-J. Of chem, Vol 5(2); PP 377-384.

16 Gejage.R.M.,Patil.J.S. and Gejage.M.R(2010), Studies on physico chemical characteristics

of the Krishna River during post monsoon for drinking purpose around Narsingpur Area

of Sangli Dist. Maharashtra, IJEP, Vol 30; PP 867-873.

17 Poveta. A.K., O.V. et al (2011), Physico-chemical characteristics and levels of some

heavy metals in soil around metalscrap dumps, in some part of Delta State, Nigeria, J

applied Sci. Environ management, Vol 14(4); PP 57-60.

18 Masoud. T. Azadeh. S. Jahangard.M. and Alireza. A. Heavy metalcontamination of Zn,

Cu, Ni and Pb in soil and leaf of Robinia P.S. eudoacacia irrigated with municipal waste

water in Iran. Tarbiat, Shahrekord, Gorgan University, Iran.

19 Singh. K.P., Mohan. D., Singh. V.K., Malik. A(2005), Studies on distribution and fraction

of heavy metals in Gomati River Sedimentsa tributary of the Ganga’s,India,J of

hydro,Vol312;PP14-27

20 Singananin.M. andSomasekaraRao. K (1996), Evaluation of Rameswaram island ground

water resources for irrigation and industrial purposes, Indian,JEnvironProt, Vol [16]3; PP

171-175.

21 Meitei.N.S. and Patil.P.M (2004), Physico-chemical analysis of Purna River for Potability,

J Aqua Biol, Vol 19(1); PP 103-105.

22 Naik. P.K., Dehury.B.N. and Tiwari. A.N(2007), Ground water Pollution around industrial

area in the costal stretch of Maharashtra State India, Environ Moni and Asses, Vol 132(1-

3); PP 207-233.

23 Dubey.N (2003), Acomparative status of quality of drinking water of

Mysorefiltrationplants and ground Water with specialreference to heavy metalsand

organo- chemical, Ph. D. Thesis, Barkatullahuniversity,Mysore.

24 Dubey.N (2003), Ph.D. thesis, Barkatullah University, Bhopal.

25 Kumar. P. Kumar.S. and Agarawal.A(2010), Impact of Industrial effluents on water

quality of Behgul River at Bareilly, Advances in Bio res Vol. 1(2); PP 127-130.

26 Dahiya.S. and Kaur. A(1999), Assessment of physico-chemical characteristics of

underground water in rural areas of Tosham Subdivision Bhiwani district Haryana, J Env

And Poll, Vol 6(4); PP 281-288.

Page 37: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

39

27 Sayed.R.A. and Gupta.S.G (2010), River water quality Assessment in Beed District of

Maharashtra.SeasonalParametric Variation,Iranica J Energy and Environ, Vol1(4); PP

326-330.

28 Nayak.S., Jayaprakash.B.M. and Ramkrishna. S(2007) Quality of drinking water in and

around hebbai Valley of Bangalore city, Indian J EnvEco plan, Vol 14(3); PP 437-442.

29 Meita.N.S, Bhargava. and patil P.M(2004), water quality of Purna River in Purna Town,

Maharashtra State, J aqua Biol, Vol 19; PP 77-78.

30 Sin. S.N. , Chua. W. Lo and L.M. Ng(2001), Assessment of heavy metal cations in

sediments of shingmun River, HongKong, Environ Int, Vol 26; PP 297-301.

31 Somawanshi. R.B et al (1999), An Analysis of Plants irrigation water and soil. Ed Patil

A.S. Dept of Agril.Chemistry and soil science, Mahatma Phule. Agricultural University,

Rahuri, Ahmednagar, 1-251.

32 Shanti. V.S.,Muthumeena. A. J. and Florence Boragia.V.J(2006),Physico-chemical status

of Naraga River at Theni District, Tamil Nadu, India, J Aqua. Biol, Vol21(2); PP 123-127.

33 Shukla.G.R.,Sharma.R.R.andManohar.R(2000), Impact of assessment of Industrial

Pollution of Krishna River, Aqua cult, Vol 1; PP 69-90.

34 Fufeyin. P.J(1994), Heavy metalconcentrations in the water, sediment and fish species of

Ikooba Reservoir, Benin city, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Benin Benin city, Nigeria.

35 Peterson.S.O, Petersen. J. Rubaek.G.H(2003), Applied soil,Ecology,Vol24; PP 184-195.

36 Ratan.R.K.,Datta.S.P.,Chhonkar.,P.K.,Suribabu.K.,Singh.A.K(2005),Agriculture

Ecosystem and Environment, Vol 109; PP 310-322.

37 Shekdar A.V (1999), Municipal solid waste management, the Indian perspective J. of

India Asso for environ management, Vol 26; PP 100-108.

38 Onder S., Dursun S., Gezgin S., Demirbas A (2007), Determination of heavy metal

Pollution in grass and soil of city centre green areas (Konya, Turkey), Polish J of Environ

study,Vol 16(1);PP 145-154.

39 Kodom K., Wiafe-Akenten J., Boamah. D. Soil Heavy metal Pollution along Subion River

in Kumasi, Ghana, using X-Ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis.

40 IPCS (1998), Environmental health criteria 200, Geneva International programme on

chemical safety, world Health organization.

41 Agusa T. et al (2006), Lead contamination and its Human health effect in India, vietnam

and Cambodia, Bio medi Res, Trace elem, Vol 17(4); PP 413-416.

Page 38: CHAPTER NO. 1 INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITURATUREshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/12281/9/09_chapter 1.pdf · sustained utilization for various purposes should be given

40

42 Adegoke J.A. Ph.D., owayokun T. O. M. Sc. And Amore I.O. B.Sc(2009),Open land

dumping, an analysis of heavy metals concentration of an old lead battery dumpsite, The

pacific J of Sci and TECh, vol 10(2); PP 592-595.

43 Suciu L., Cosma C., Todica M., Bolboaca S.D. and Jantschi L(2008), Analysis of Soil

heavy metal Pollution Pattern in central Transylvania, Int J mol Sci., Vol 9; PP 434-453.

44 Zehra R, Abdul M, Masood A(1996), Genotoxicity of the Ganges Water at Narora(U.P.)

India, Elsevier, Vol 367; PP 187-193.

45 Ali I, Jain C.K(2001), Pollution potential of pesticides in the Hindon River, India J of

Environ Hydro, Vol 9; PP 1-7.

46 Mekkawi H.E, Diab H, Zaki M, Hassan A(20090, Determination of chlorinated organic

pesticide residues in water, sediment and fish from private fish farms, at Abbasa and sabl

Al Husainia, shakia Governorate. Australian J of Basic and appliedsci, Vol 3(4); PP 4376-

4383.

47 Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) (1995), General standards for discharge of

effluents

48 Great London Council (GLC), Guideline and definition of contaminated soils suggesting

the range of values in skords K., Alexakis D., Kelepertsis E. and Kelepertsis A (2007),

Environmental Geochemical Research of the levels and source of Toxic metals in the

Agricultural soil of dimitraeletherion and platycampos Region, Thessaly, Greece Res J

Chem Environ, Vol1(1).

49 European union Council (1998), Guideline for drinking water standards.

50 U.S. Environmental protection Agency drinking water standards

51 Canadian (1996), Guidelines of drinking water quality sixth edition.

52 ISI (1993), Indian standard specification for drinking water IS: 10500 New Delhi.

53 BIS (1991), Drinking water specification IS; 10500:1991 Bureau of Indian standard New

Delhi, India.

54 ICMR (1975), Manual of standard quality for drinking water supplies, special report series

No. 44, 2nd edition.

55 De,A.K(2010),Environmental chemistry, New age IntPublishers New Delhi(7thed)56

Indian Irrigation water guideline.

57 Kabatta- pendias A. and Pendias H (1992), Trace elements in soil and plant, CRC Press,

Boca Roton Florida, 315.

58 WHO (2006), Guidelines for drinking water quality first addendum to third edition, Vol 1.

Recp,,emdatopm OSBM 924-15-4696-4.