114
Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter Four Systems Design: Process Costing

Chapter Four

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Systems Design: Process Costing. Chapter Four. Both systems assign material, labor and overhead costs to products and they provide a mechanism for computing unit product cost. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Chapter Four

Systems Design:Process Costing

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-2Similarities Between Job-Order and Process Costing

• Both systems assign material, labor and overhead costs to products and they provide a mechanism for computing unit product cost.

• Both systems use the same manufacturing accounts, including Manufacturing Overhead, Raw Materials, Work in Process, and Finished Goods.

• The flow of costs through the manufacturing accounts is basically the same in both systems.

• Both systems assign material, labor and overhead costs to products and they provide a mechanism for computing unit product cost.

• Both systems use the same manufacturing accounts, including Manufacturing Overhead, Raw Materials, Work in Process, and Finished Goods.

• The flow of costs through the manufacturing accounts is basically the same in both systems.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-3Differences Between Job-Order and Process Costing

• Process costing is used when a single product is Process costing is used when a single product is produced on a continuing basis or for a long period of produced on a continuing basis or for a long period of time. Job-order costing is used when many different time. Job-order costing is used when many different jobs are worked on each period.jobs are worked on each period.

• Process costing systems accumulate costs by Process costing systems accumulate costs by department. Job-order costing systems accumulated department. Job-order costing systems accumulated costs by individual jobs.costs by individual jobs.

• Process costing systems compute unit costs by Process costing systems compute unit costs by department. Job-order costing systems compute unit department. Job-order costing systems compute unit costs by job on the job cost sheet.costs by job on the job cost sheet.

• Process costing is used when a single product is Process costing is used when a single product is produced on a continuing basis or for a long period of produced on a continuing basis or for a long period of time. Job-order costing is used when many different time. Job-order costing is used when many different jobs are worked on each period.jobs are worked on each period.

• Process costing systems accumulate costs by Process costing systems accumulate costs by department. Job-order costing systems accumulated department. Job-order costing systems accumulated costs by individual jobs.costs by individual jobs.

• Process costing systems compute unit costs by Process costing systems compute unit costs by department. Job-order costing systems compute unit department. Job-order costing systems compute unit costs by job on the job cost sheet.costs by job on the job cost sheet.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-4

Process costing is used for products that are:

a. Different and produced continuously.

b. Similar and produced continuously.

c. Individual units produced to customer specifications.

d. Purchased from vendors.

Process costing is used for products that are:

a. Different and produced continuously.

b. Similar and produced continuously.

c. Individual units produced to customer specifications.

d. Purchased from vendors.

Quick Check

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-5

Process costing is used for products that are:

a. Different and produced continuously.

b. Similar and produced continuously.

c. Individual units produced to customer specifications.

d. Purchased from vendors.

Process costing is used for products that are:

a. Different and produced continuously.

b. Similar and produced continuously.

c. Individual units produced to customer specifications.

d. Purchased from vendors.

Quick Check

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-6

Processing Departments

Any unit in an organization where materials, labor or overhead are added to the product.

The activities performed in a processingThe activities performed in a processingdepartment are department are performed uniformlyperformed uniformly on all on all

units of production. Furthermore, the output ofunits of production. Furthermore, the output ofa processing department must bea processing department must be

homogeneoushomogeneous..

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-7

Learning Objective 1

Record the flow of Record the flow of materials, labor, and materials, labor, and overhead through a overhead through a

process cost system.process cost system.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-8 Comparing Job-Orderand Process Costing

FinishedGoods

FinishedGoods

Cost of GoodsSold

Cost of GoodsSold

Work inProcess

Direct Materials

Direct Materials

Direct LaborDirect Labor

ManufacturingOverhead

ManufacturingOverhead

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-9 Comparing Job-Orderand Process Costing

FinishedGoods

FinishedGoods

Cost of GoodsSold

Cost of GoodsSold

Direct LaborDirect Labor

ManufacturingOverhead

ManufacturingOverhead

JobsJobs

Costs are traced andapplied to individualjobs in a job-order

cost system.

Costs are traced andapplied to individualjobs in a job-order

cost system.Direct

Materials

Direct Materials

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-10 Comparing Job-Orderand Process Costing

FinishedGoods

FinishedGoods

Cost of GoodsSold

Cost of GoodsSold

Direct LaborDirect Labor

ManufacturingOverhead

ManufacturingOverhead

ProcessingDepartmentProcessingDepartment

Costs are traced and applied to departments

in a process cost system.

Costs are traced and applied to departments

in a process cost system.

Direct Materials

Direct Materials

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-11

T-Account and Journal Entry Views of Cost Flows

For purposes of this example, For purposes of this example, assume there are two assume there are two

processing departments processing departments –– Departments A and B.Departments A and B.

We will use T-accounts and We will use T-accounts and journal entries.journal entries.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-12

Raw Materials

Process Cost Flows(in T-account form)

Work in Process Department B

Work in Process Department A

•DirectMaterials

•Direct Materials

•Direct Materials

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-13 Process Cost Flows(in journal entry form)

GENERAL JOURNAL Page 4

Date DescriptionPost. Ref. Debit Credit

Work in Process - Department A XXXXX

Work in Process - Department B XXXXX

Raw Materials XXXXX

To record the use of direct material.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-14 Process Cost Flows(in T-account form)

Work in Process Department B

Work in Process Department A Wages Payable

•Direct Materials

•Direct Materials

•Direct Labor

•Direct Labor •Direct

Labor

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-15 Process Costing(in journal entry form)

GENERAL JOURNAL Page 4

Date DescriptionPost. Ref. Debit Credit

Work in Process - Department A XXXXX

Work in Process - Department B XXXXX

Salaries and Wages Payable XXXXX

To record direct labor costs.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-16 Process Cost Flows(in T-account form)

Work in Process Department B

Work in Process Department A

Manufacturing Overhead

•OverheadApplied to

Work inProcess

•AppliedOverhead

•AppliedOverhead

•Direct Labor

•Direct Materials

•Direct Labor

•Direct Materials

•Actual Overhead

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-17 Process Costing(In journal entry form)

GENERAL JOURNAL Page 4

Date DescriptionPost. Ref. Debit Credit

Work in Process - Department A XXXXX

Work in Process - Department B XXXXX

Manufacturing Overhead XXXXX

To apply overhead to departments.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-18 Process Cost Flows(in T-account form)

Work in Process Department B

Work in ProcessDepartment A

•Direct Materials

•Direct Labor

•AppliedOverhead

•Direct Materials

•Direct Labor

•AppliedOverhead

Transferred to Dept. B

•Transferred from Dept. A

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-19 Process Costing(in journal entry form)

GENERAL JOURNAL Page 4

Date DescriptionPost. Ref. Debit Credit

Work in Process - Department B XXXXX

Work in Process - Department A XXXXX

To record the transfer of goods from

Department A to Department B.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-20

Finished Goods

Process Cost Flows(in T-account form)

Work in Process Department B

•Cost of Goods

Manufactured

•Direct Materials

•Direct Labor

•AppliedOverhead

•Transferred from Dept. A

•Cost of Goods

Manufactured

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-21 Process Costing(in journal entry form)

GENERAL JOURNAL Page 4

Date DescriptionPost. Ref. Debit Credit

Finished Goods XXXXX

Work in Process - Department B XXXXX

To record the completion of goods

and their transfer from Department B

to finished goods inventory.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-22

Finished Goods

Cost of Goods Sold

Process Cost Flows(in journal entry form)

Work in Process Department B

•Cost of Goods

Manufactured

•Direct Materials

•Direct Labor

•AppliedOverhead

•Transferred from Dept. A

•Cost of GoodsSold

•Cost of GoodsSold

•Cost of Goods

Manufactured

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-23 Process Costing(in journal entry form)

GENERAL JOURNAL Page 4

Date DescriptionPost. Ref. Debit Credit

Accounts Receivable XXXXX

Sales XXXXX

To record sales on account.

Cost of Goods Sold XXXXX

Finished Goods XXXXX

To record cost of goods sold.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-24

Equivalent Units of Production

Equivalent units are the product of the number of partially completed units and the percentage

completion of those units.

We need to calculate equivalent units because a department usually has some partially completed units

in its beginning and ending inventory.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-25

Equivalent Units – The Basic Idea

Two half completed products are equivalent to one completed product.

Two half completed products are equivalent to one completed product.

So, 10,000 units 70% completeare equivalent to 7,000 complete units.

So, 10,000 units 70% completeare equivalent to 7,000 complete units.

+ = 1

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-26

For the current period, Jones started 15,000 units and completed 10,000 units, leaving 5,000 units in process 30 percent complete. How many equivalent units of production did Jones have for the period?

a. 10,000

b. 11,500

c. 13,500

d. 15,000

For the current period, Jones started 15,000 units and completed 10,000 units, leaving 5,000 units in process 30 percent complete. How many equivalent units of production did Jones have for the period?

a. 10,000

b. 11,500

c. 13,500

d. 15,000

Quick Check

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-27

For the current period, Jones started 15,000 units and completed 10,000 units, leaving 5,000 units in process 30 percent complete. How many equivalent units of production did Jones have for the period?

a. 10,000

b. 11,500

c. 13,500

d. 15,000

For the current period, Jones started 15,000 units and completed 10,000 units, leaving 5,000 units in process 30 percent complete. How many equivalent units of production did Jones have for the period?

a. 10,000

b. 11,500

c. 13,500

d. 15,000

10,000 units + (5,000 units × 0.30) = 11,500 equivalent units

Quick Check

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-28

Calculating Equivalent Units

Equivalent units can be calculated two Equivalent units can be calculated two ways:ways:

The First-In, First-Out Method – The First-In, First-Out Method – FIFO is FIFO is covered in the appendix to this chapter.covered in the appendix to this chapter.

The Weighted-Average Method – The Weighted-Average Method – This This method will be covered in the main portion of the method will be covered in the main portion of the chapter.chapter.

Equivalent units can be calculated two Equivalent units can be calculated two ways:ways:

The First-In, First-Out Method – The First-In, First-Out Method – FIFO is FIFO is covered in the appendix to this chapter.covered in the appendix to this chapter.

The Weighted-Average Method – The Weighted-Average Method – This This method will be covered in the main portion of the method will be covered in the main portion of the chapter.chapter.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-29

Learning Objective 2

Compute the equivalent Compute the equivalent units of production using units of production using

the weighted-average the weighted-average method.method.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-30 Equivalent Units of ProductionWeighted-Average Method

The weighted-average method . . .

• Makes no distinction between work done in prior or current periods.

• Blends together units and costs from prior and current periods.

• Determines equivalent units of production for a department by adding together the number of units transferred out plus the equivalent units in ending work in process inventory.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-31

Treatment of Direct Labor

Direct labor costsmay be small

in comparison toother product

costs in processcost systems.

Direct labor costsmay be small

in comparison toother product

costs in processcost systems.

DirectMaterials

Type of Product Cost

Do

llar

Am

ou

nt

DirectLabor

Conversion

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-32

Treatment of Direct Labor

Type of Product Cost

Do

llar

Am

ou

nt Conversion

Direct labor and manufacturing overhead may beDirect labor and manufacturing overhead may becombined into one product cost called combined into one product cost called conversionconversion..Direct labor and manufacturing overhead may beDirect labor and manufacturing overhead may be

combined into one product cost called combined into one product cost called conversionconversion..

DirectMaterials Direct labor costs

may be smallin comparison to

other productcosts in process

cost systems.

Direct labor costsmay be small

in comparison toother product

costs in processcost systems.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-33

Weighted-Average Example

Double Diamond Skis reported the following activity in Shaping and Milling Department for the month of May:

Percent Completed

Shaping and Milling Department Units Materials Conversion

Beginning work in process 200 55% 30%

Units started into production in May 5,000

Units completed during May and 4,800 100% 100% transferred to the next department

Ending working process 400 40% 25%

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-34

The first step in calculating the equivalent units is to identify the units completed and transferred

out of the Department in May (4,800 units)

Weighted-Average Example

Materials Conversion

Units completed and transferred to the next department 4,800 4,800

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-35

The second step is to identify the equivalent units of production in ending work in process with respect to

materials for the month (160 units) and add this to the 4,800 units from step one.

Weighted-Average Example

Materials Conversion

Units completed and transferred to the next department 4,800 4,800

Work in process, June 30:

400 units × 40% 160

Equivalent units of Production in during the month of May 4,960

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-36

Weighted-Average Example

The third step is to identify the equivalent units of production in ending work in process with respect to

conversion for the month (100 units) and add this to the 4,800 units from step one.

Materials Conversion

Units completed and transferred to the next department 4,800 4,800

Work in process, June 30:

400 units × 40% 160

400 units × 25% 100

Equivalent units of Production in during the month of May 4,960 4,900

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-37

Equivalent units of production always equals: Units completed and transferred + Equivalent units remaining in work in process

Equivalent units of production always equals: Units completed and transferred + Equivalent units remaining in work in process

Weighted-Average Example

Materials Conversion

Units completed and transferred to the next department 4,800 4,800

Work in process, June 30:

400 units × 40% 160

400 units × 25% 100

Equivalent units of Production in during the month of May 4,960 4,900

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-38

BeginningWork in Process

200 Units55% Complete

EndingWork in Process

400 Units40% Complete

5,000 Units Started

4,800 Units Startedand Completed

Weighted-Average Example

MaterialsMaterials

4,800 Units Completed 160 Equivalent Units 400 × 40%

4,960 Equivalent units of production

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-39

5,000 Units Started

4,800 Units Completed

4,800 Units Startedand Completed

100 Equivalent Units 400 × 25%

4,900 Equivalent units of production

BeginningWork in Process

200 Units30% Complete

EndingWork in Process

400 Units25% Complete

Weighted-Average Example

ConversionConversion

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-40

Learning Objective 3

Compute the cost per Compute the cost per equivalent unit using the equivalent unit using the

weighted-average method.weighted-average method.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-41

Beginning work in process: 200 units

Materials: 55% complete $ 9,600Conversion: 30% complete 5,575

Production started during May 5,000 unitsProduction completed during May 4,800

units

Costs added to production in MayMaterials cost $ 368,600Conversion cost 350,900

Ending work in process 400 unitsMaterials: 40% completeConversion: 25% complete

Beginning work in process: 200 units

Materials: 55% complete $ 9,600Conversion: 30% complete 5,575

Production started during May 5,000 unitsProduction completed during May 4,800

units

Costs added to production in MayMaterials cost $ 368,600Conversion cost 350,900

Ending work in process 400 unitsMaterials: 40% completeConversion: 25% complete

Compute and Apply Costs

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-42

Compute and Apply Costs

The formula for computing the cost per equivalent unit is :

Cost perequivalent

unit

=

Cost of beginningwork in process

inventory Cost added during

the period

Equivalent units of production

+

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-43

Here is a schedule with the cost and equivalent unit information.

Compute and Apply Costs

TotalCost Materials Conversion

Cost to be accounted for: Work in process, May 1 15,175$ 9,600$ 5,575$ Costs added in the Shipping and Milling Department 719,500 368,600 350,900

Total cost 734,675$ 378,200$ 356,475$

Equivalent units 4,960 4,900

Cost per equivalent unit

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-44

TotalCost Materials Conversion

Cost to be accounted for: Work in process, May 1 15,175$ 9,600$ 5,575$ Costs added in the Shipping and Milling Department 719,500 368,600 350,900

Total cost 734,675$ 378,200$ 356,475$

Equivalent units 4,960 4,900

Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Total cost per equivalent unit = $76.25 + $72.75 = $149.00

Compute and Apply Costs

$356,475 ÷ 4,900 units = $72.75$356,475 ÷ 4,900 units = $72.75 $378,200 ÷ 4,960 units = $76.25

Here is a schedule with the cost and equivalent unit information.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-45

Learning Objective 4

Assign costs to units using Assign costs to units using the weighted-average the weighted-average

method.method.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-46

Applying Costs

Materials Conversion TotalEnding work in process inventory: Equivalent units of production 160 100 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of ending work in process inventory 12,200$ 7,275$ 19,475$

Units completed and transferred out: Units transferred to the next department 4,800 4,800 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of units transferred out 366,000$ 349,200$ 715,200$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost of Ending Work in Porcess Inventory and the Units Transferred Out

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-47

Applying Costs

Materials Conversion TotalEnding work in process inventory: Equivalent units of production 160 100 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of ending work in process inventory 12,200$ 7,275$ 19,475$

Units completed and transferred out: Units transferred to the next department 4,800 4,800 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of units transferred out 366,000$ 349,200$ 715,200$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost of Ending Work in Porcess Inventory and the Units Transferred Out

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-48

Applying Costs

Materials Conversion TotalEnding work in process inventory: Equivalent units of production 160 100 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of ending work in process inventory 12,200$ 7,275$ 19,475$

Units completed and transferred out: Units transferred to the next department 4,800 4,800 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of units transferred out 366,000$ 349,200$ 715,200$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost of Ending Work in Porcess Inventory and the Units Transferred Out

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-49

Computing the Cost of Units Transferred Out

Materials Conversion TotalEnding work in process inventory: Equivalent units of production 160 100 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of ending work in process inventory 12,200$ 7,275$ 19,475$

Units completed and transferred out: Units transferred to the next department 4,800 4,800 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of units transferred out 366,000$ 349,200$ 715,200$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost of Ending Work in Porcess Inventory and the Units Transferred Out

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-50

Computing the Cost of Units Transferred Out

Materials Conversion TotalEnding work in process inventory: Equivalent units of production 160 100 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of ending work in process inventory 12,200$ 7,275$ 19,475$

Units completed and transferred out: Units transferred to the next department 4,800 4,800 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of units transferred out 366,000$ 349,200$ 715,200$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost of Ending Work in Porcess Inventory and the Units Transferred Out

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-51

Computing the Cost of Units Transferred Out

Materials Conversion TotalEnding work in process inventory: Equivalent units of production 160 100 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of ending work in process inventory 12,200$ 7,275$ 19,475$

Units completed and transferred out: Units transferred to the next department 4,800 4,800 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of units transferred out 366,000$ 349,200$ 715,200$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost of Ending Work in Porcess Inventory and the Units Transferred Out

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-52

Reconciling Costs

Costs to be accounted for: Cost of beginning work in process inventory 15,175$ Costs added to production during the period 719,500 Total cost to be accounted for 734,675$

Cost accounted for as follows: Cost of ending work in process inventory 19,475$ Cost of units transferred out 715,200 Total cost accounted for 734,675$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost Reconciliation

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-53

Reconciling Costs

Costs to be accounted for: Cost of beginning work in process inventory 15,175$ Costs added to production during the period 719,500 Total cost to be accounted for 734,675$

Cost accounted for as follows: Cost of ending work in process inventory 19,475$ Cost of units transferred out 715,200 Total cost accounted for 734,675$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost Reconciliation

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-54

Operation Costing

Operation cost is a hybrid of job-order and Operation cost is a hybrid of job-order and process costing because it possesses process costing because it possesses

attributes of both approachesattributes of both approaches

Operation costing is Operation costing is commonly used when commonly used when

batches of many batches of many different products pass different products pass

through the same through the same processing department.processing department.

Operation costing is Operation costing is commonly used when commonly used when

batches of many batches of many different products pass different products pass

through the same through the same processing department.processing department.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Appendix 4A

FIFO Method

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-56

FIFO vs. Weighted-Average Method

The FIFO method (generally considered more accurate that the weighted-average method) differs from the weighted-average method in

two ways:

1.1. The computation of equivalent units.The computation of equivalent units.

2.2. The way in which the costs of beginning The way in which the costs of beginning inventory are treated in the cost inventory are treated in the cost reconciliation report.reconciliation report.

1.1. The computation of equivalent units.The computation of equivalent units.

2.2. The way in which the costs of beginning The way in which the costs of beginning inventory are treated in the cost inventory are treated in the cost reconciliation report.reconciliation report.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-57

Learning Objective 5

Compute the equivalent Compute the equivalent units of production using units of production using

the FIFO method.the FIFO method.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-58

Equivalent Units – FIFO Method

Let’s revisit the Double Diamond Skis example. Assume the following activity is reported in Shaping and Milling Department for May:

Percent Completed

Shaping and Milling Department Units Materials Conversion

Beginning work in process 200 55% 30%

Units started into production in May 5,000

Units completed during May and 4,800 100% 100% transferred to the next department

Ending working process 400 40% 25%

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-59

Equivalent Units – FIFO Method

Step 1Step 1: Determine equivalent units needed to complete beginning inventory.

Materials Conversion

To complete beginning work in process: Materials: 200 units × (100% - 55%) 90

Conversion: 200 units × (100% - 30%) 140

Units started and completed during May 4,600 4,600

Ending work in process

Materials: 400 units × 40% complete 160 Conversion: 400 units × 25% complete 100

Equivalent units of production 4,850 4,840

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-60

Equivalent Units – FIFO Method

Step 2Step 2: Determine units started and completed during the period.

Materials Conversion

To complete beginning work in process: Materials: 200 units × (100% - 55%) 90

Conversion: 200 units × (100% - 30%) 140

Units started and completed during May 4,600 4,600

Ending work in process

Materials: 400 units × 40% complete 160 Conversion: 400 units × 25% complete 100

Equivalent units of production 4,850 4,840

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-61

Equivalent Units – FIFO Method

Step 3Step 3: Add the equivalent units in ending working in process inventory.

Materials Conversion

To complete beginning work in process: Materials: 200 units × (100% - 55%) 90

Conversion: 200 units × (100% - 30%) 140

Units started and completed during May 4,600 4,600

Ending work in process

Materials: 400 units × 40% complete 160 Conversion: 400 units × 25% complete 100

Equivalent units of production 4,850 4,840

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-62

BeginningWork in Process

200 Units55% Complete

EndingWork in Process

400 Units40% Complete

5,000 Units Started

4,600 Units Startedand Completed

FIFO Example

MaterialsMaterialsMaterialsMaterials

4,600 Units Completed 160 Equivalent Units

400 × 40%

4,850 Equivalent units of production

90 Equivalent Units200 × 45%

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-63

BeginningWork in Process

200 Units30% Complete

EndingWork in Process

400 Units25% Complete

5,000 Units Started

4,600 Units Startedand Completed

FIFO Example

ConversionConversion

4,600 Units Completed 100 Equivalent Units

400 × 25%

4,840 Equivalent units of production

140 Equivalent Units200 × 70%

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-64

Equivalent Units: Weighted Average vs. FIFO

Materials ConversionEquivalent units - weighted average method 4,960 4,900Less equivalent units in beginning inventory: 200 units × 55% 110 200 units × 30% 60 Equivalent units - FIFO method 4,850 4,840

As shown below, the equivalent units in beginning inventory are subtracted from the equivalent units of production per the weighted-average method to obtain the equivalent units of production under

the FIFO method.

As shown below, the equivalent units in beginning inventory are subtracted from the equivalent units of production per the weighted-average method to obtain the equivalent units of production under

the FIFO method.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-65

Learning Objective 6

Compute the cost per Compute the cost per equivalent unit using the equivalent unit using the

FIFO method.FIFO method.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-66

Cost per Equivalent Unit - FIFO

Let’s revisit the Double Diamond Skis Shaping and Milling Department for the Month of May to prepare our production report.

Beginning work in process: 200 unitsMaterials: 55% complete $ 9,600Conversion: 30% complete 5,575

$15, 175

Production started during May 5,000 unitsProduction completed during May 4,800 units

Costs added to production in MayMaterials cost $ 368,600Conversion cost 350,900

Ending work in process: 400 unitsMaterials: 40% completeConversion: 25% complete

Beginning work in process: 200 unitsMaterials: 55% complete $ 9,600Conversion: 30% complete 5,575

$15, 175

Production started during May 5,000 unitsProduction completed during May 4,800 units

Costs added to production in MayMaterials cost $ 368,600Conversion cost 350,900

Ending work in process: 400 unitsMaterials: 40% completeConversion: 25% complete

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-67

Cost per Equivalent Unit - FIFO

The formula for computing the cost per equivalent unit under FIFO method is :

Cost perequivalent

unit

=Cost added during the period

Equivalent units of production

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-68

Cost per Equivalent Unit - FIFO

TotalCost Materials Conversion

Costs added in the Shaping and Milling Department 719,500$ 368,600$ 350,900$

Equivalent units 4,850 4,840

Cost per equivalent unit 76.00$ 72.50$ Total cost per equivalent unit = $76.00 + $72.50 = $148.50

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-69

Learning Objective 7

Assign costs to units using Assign costs to units using the FIFO method.the FIFO method.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-70

Applying Costs - FIFO

Step 1Step 1: Record the equivalent units of production in ending work in process inventory.

Materials Conversion TotalEnding work in process inventory: Equivalent units of production 160 100 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of ending work in process inventory 12,200$ 7,275$ 19,475$

Units completed and transferred out: Units transferred to the next department 4,800 4,800 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of units transferred out 366,000$ 349,200$ 715,200$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost of Ending Work in Porcess Inventory and the Units Transferred Out

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-71

Applying Costs - FIFO

Step 2Step 2: Record the cost per equivalent unit.

Materials Conversion TotalEnding work in process inventory: Equivalent units of production 160 100 Cost per equivalent unit 76.00$ 72.50$ Cost of ending work in process inventory 12,160$ 7,250$ 19,410$

Units completed and transferred out: Units transferred to the next department 4,800 4,800 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of units transferred out 366,000$ 349,200$ 715,200$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost of Ending Work in Porcess Inventory and the Units Transferred Out

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-72

Applying Costs - FIFO

Step 3Step 3: Compute the cost of ending work in process inventory.

Materials Conversion TotalEnding work in process inventory: Equivalent units of production 160 100 Cost per equivalent unit 76.00$ 72.50$ Cost of ending work in process inventory 12,160$ 7,250$ 19,410$

Units completed and transferred out: Units transferred to the next department 4,800 4,800 Cost per equivalent unit 76.25$ 72.75$ Cost of units transferred out 366,000$ 349,200$ 715,200$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost of Ending Work in Porcess Inventory and the Units Transferred Out

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-73

Cost of Units Transferred Out

Step 1Step 1: Record the cost in beginning work in process inventory.

Materials Conversion TotalUnits transferred out: Cost in beginning work in process (WIP) 9,600$ 5,575$ 15,175$ Cost to complete beginning WIP: Equivalent units to complete 90 140 Cost per equivalent unit 76.00$ 72.50$ Cost to complete beginning WIP 6,840$ 10,150$ 16,990$ Cost of units started and completed in May Units started and completed in May 4,600 4,600 Cost per equivalent unit 76.00$ 72.50$ Cost of units started and completed in May 349,600$ 333,500$ 683,100$ Cost of units transferred out 715,265$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost of Ending Work in Porcess Inventory and the Units Transferred Out

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-74

Cost of Units Transferred Out

Step 2Step 2: Compute the cost to complete the units in beginningwork in process inventory.

Materials Conversion TotalUnits transferred out: Cost in beginning work in process (WIP) 9,600$ 5,575$ 15,175$ Cost to complete beginning WIP: Equivalent units to complete 90 140 Cost per equivalent unit 76.00$ 72.50$ Cost to complete beginning WIP 6,840$ 10,150$ 16,990$ Cost of units started and completed in May Units started and completed in May 4,600 4,600 Cost per equivalent unit 76.00$ 72.50$ Cost of units started and completed in May 349,600$ 333,500$ 683,100$ Cost of units transferred out 715,265$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost of Ending Work in Porcess Inventory and the Units Transferred Out

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-75

Cost of Units Transferred Out

Step 3Step 3: Compute the cost of units started and completed this period.

Materials Conversion TotalUnits transferred out: Cost in beginning work in process (WIP) 9,600$ 5,575$ 15,175$ Cost to complete beginning WIP: Equivalent units to complete 90 140 Cost per equivalent unit 76.00$ 72.50$ Cost to complete beginning WIP 6,840$ 10,150$ 16,990$ Cost of units started and completed in May Units started and completed in May 4,600 4,600 Cost per equivalent unit 76.00$ 72.50$ Cost of units started and completed in May 349,600$ 333,500$ 683,100$ Cost of units transferred out 715,265$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost of Ending Work in Porcess Inventory and the Units Transferred Out

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-76

Cost of Units Transferred Out

Step 4Step 4: Compute the total cost of units transferred out.

Materials Conversion TotalUnits transferred out: Cost in beginning work in process (WIP) 9,600$ 5,575$ 15,175$ Cost to complete beginning WIP: Equivalent units to complete 90 140 Cost per equivalent unit 76.00$ 72.50$ Cost to complete beginning WIP 6,840$ 10,150$ 16,990$ Cost of units started and completed in May Units started and completed in May 4,600 4,600 Cost per equivalent unit 76.00$ 72.50$ Cost of units started and completed in May 349,600$ 333,500$ 683,100$ Cost of units transferred out 715,265$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost of Ending Work in Porcess Inventory and the Units Transferred Out

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-77

Reconciling Costs

Costs to be accounted for: Cost of beginning work in process inventory 15,175$ Costs added to production during the period 719,500 Total cost to be accounted for 734,675$

Cost accounted for as follows: Cost of ending work in process inventory 19,475$ Cost of units transferred out 715,200 Total cost accounted for 734,675$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost Reconciliation

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-78

Reconciling Costs

Costs to be accounted for: Cost of beginning work in process inventory 15,175$ Costs added to production during the period 719,500 Total cost to be accounted for 734,675$

Cost accounted for as follows: Cost of ending work in process inventory 19,475$ Cost of units transferred out 715,200 Total cost accounted for 734,675$

Shaping and Milling DepartmentCost Reconciliation

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-79

A Comparison of Costing Methods

In a lean production environment, FIFO and In a lean production environment, FIFO and weighted-average methods yield similar weighted-average methods yield similar

unit costs.unit costs.

In a lean production environment, FIFO and In a lean production environment, FIFO and weighted-average methods yield similar weighted-average methods yield similar

unit costs.unit costs.

When considering cost control, FIFO is superior When considering cost control, FIFO is superior to weighted-average because it does not mix to weighted-average because it does not mix costs of the current period with costs of the costs of the current period with costs of the

prior period.prior period.

When considering cost control, FIFO is superior When considering cost control, FIFO is superior to weighted-average because it does not mix to weighted-average because it does not mix costs of the current period with costs of the costs of the current period with costs of the

prior period.prior period.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Appendix 4B

Service Department Allocations

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-81

Operating Departments

AnAn operating departmentoperating department carries out carries out the central purpose of the organization the central purpose of the organization

AnAn operating departmentoperating department carries out carries out the central purpose of the organization the central purpose of the organization

The The Accounting Accounting Department Department

at your at your University.University.

The The Accounting Accounting Department Department

at your at your University.University.

An An Assembly Assembly

Department Department at General at General

Motors.Motors.

An An Assembly Assembly

Department Department at General at General

Motors.Motors.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-82

Service Departments

AA service departmentservice department does not directly does not directly engage in operating activities. engage in operating activities.

AA service departmentservice department does not directly does not directly engage in operating activities. engage in operating activities.

The Accounting Department

at Macys

The Accounting Department

at Macys

The Human Resources Department

at Walgreens.

The Human Resources Department

at Walgreens.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-83

Interdepartmental Services

ServiceServiceDepartmentDepartment

OperatingOperatingDepartmentDepartment

Costs of the service Costs of the service department become department become overhead costs to overhead costs to

the operating the operating departmentdepartment

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-84

Allocation Approaches

DirectDirectMethodMethodDirectDirect

MethodMethod

Step-DownStep-DownMethodMethod

Step-DownStep-DownMethodMethod

ReciprocalReciprocalMethodMethod

ReciprocalReciprocalMethodMethod

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-85

Reciprocal Services

ServiceServiceDepartment 1Department 1

ServiceServiceDepartment 2Department 2

When service When service departments provide departments provide

services to each services to each other we call them other we call them

reciprocal services.reciprocal services.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-86

Learning Objective 8

Allocate service Allocate service department costs to department costs to

operating departments operating departments using the direct method.using the direct method.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-87

Direct Method

Service Department(Cafeteria)

Service Department(Custodial)

Operating Department(Machining)

Operating Department(Assembly)

Interactionsbetween servicedepartments areignored and all

costs areallocated directly

to operatingdepartments.

Interactionsbetween servicedepartments areignored and all

costs areallocated directly

to operatingdepartments.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-88

Direct Method

Service Department Allocation Base

Cafeteria Number of employeesCustodial Square feet occupied

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-89

Direct Method

How much of the Cafeteria and Custodial costs should be allocated to each operating department

using the direct method of cost allocation?

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-90

Direct Method

Allocation base: Number of employees

$360,000 ×20

20 + 30= $144,000

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-91

Direct Method

Allocation base: Number of employees

$360,000 ×30

20 + 30= $216,000

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-92

Direct Method

Allocation base: Square feet occupied

$90,000 ×25,000

25,000 + 50,000 = $30,000

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-93

Direct Method

Allocation base: Square feet occupied

50,000

25,000 + 50,000$90,000 × = $60,000

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-94

Learning Objective 9

To allocate service To allocate service department costs to department costs to

operating departments operating departments using the step-down using the step-down

method.method.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-95

Operating Department(Machining)

Operating Department(Assembly)

Step Method

Once a servicedepartment’s costs

are allocated, other service

department costsare not allocated

back to it.

Service Department(Cafeteria)

Service Department(Custodial)

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-96

Step Method

There are three key points to understand regarding the step method:

In both the direct and step methods, any amount of the allocation base attributable to the service department whose cost is being allocated is always ignored.

Any amount of the allocation base that is attributable to a service department whose cost has already been allocated is ignored.

Each service department assigns its own costs to operating departments plus the costs that have been allocated to it from other service departments.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-97

Step Method

Service Department Allocation Base

Cafeteria Number of employeesCustodial Square feet occupied

We will use the same data used in the direct method example.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-98

Step Method

Allocate Cafeteria costs first sinceit provides more service than Custodial.

Allocate Cafeteria costs first sinceit provides more service than Custodial.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-99

Step Method

$360,000 ×10

10 + 20 + 30= $60,000

Allocation base: Number of employees

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-100

Step Method

$360,000 ×20

10 + 20 + 30= $120,000

Allocation base: Number of employees

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-101

Step Method

$360,000 ×30

10 + 20 + 30= $180,000

Allocation base: Number of employees

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-102

Step Method

New total = $90,000 original Custodial cost plus $60,000 allocated from the Cafeteria.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-103

Step Method

$150,000 ×25,000

25,000 + 50,000 = $50,000

Allocation base: Square feet occupied

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-104

Step Method

$150,000 ×50,000

25,000 + 50,000 = $100,000

Allocation base: Square feet occupied

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-105

Reciprocal Method

Interdepartmentalservices are given

full recognitionrather than partialrecognition as withthe step method.

Service Department(Cafeteria)

Service Department(Custodial)

Operating Department(Machining)

Operating Department(Assembly)

Because of its mathematical complexity, the reciprocal method is rarely used.

Because of its mathematical complexity, the reciprocal method is rarely used.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-106 Quick Check Datafor Direct and Step Methods

Allocation bases:Business school administration costs (ADMIN): Number of employees

Business Administration computer services (BACS): Number of personal computers

The direct method of allocation is used.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-107

Quick Check

How much cost will be allocated from Administration to Accounting? a. $ 36,000b. $144,000c. $180,000d. $ 27,000

How much cost will be allocated from Administration to Accounting? a. $ 36,000b. $144,000c. $180,000d. $ 27,000

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-108

How much cost will be allocated from Administration to Accounting? a. $ 36,000b. $144,000c. $180,000d. $ 27,000

How much cost will be allocated from Administration to Accounting? a. $ 36,000b. $144,000c. $180,000d. $ 27,000

Quick Check

$180,000 ×20

20 + 80= $36,000

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-109

Quick Check

How much total cost will be allocated from ADMIN and BACS combined to the Accounting Department?a. $ 52,500b. $135,000c. $270,000d. $ 49,500

How much total cost will be allocated from ADMIN and BACS combined to the Accounting Department?a. $ 52,500b. $135,000c. $270,000d. $ 49,500

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-110

Quick Check

How much total cost will be allocated from ADMIN and BACS combined to the Accounting Department?a. $ 52,500b. $135,000c. $270,000d. $ 49,500

How much total cost will be allocated from ADMIN and BACS combined to the Accounting Department?a. $ 52,500b. $135,000c. $270,000d. $ 49,500

$90,000 ×18

18 + 102= $13,500

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-111

Quick Check Data

Allocation bases:Business school administration costs (ADMIN): Number of employees

Business administration computer services (BACS): Number of personal computers

The step method of allocation is used.

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-112

Quick Check

How much total cost will be allocated from ADMIN and BACS combined to the Accounting Department?a. $35,250b. $49,072c. $18,000d. $26,333

How much total cost will be allocated from ADMIN and BACS combined to the Accounting Department?a. $35,250b. $49,072c. $18,000d. $26,333

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-113

How much total cost will be allocated from ADMIN and BACS combined to the Accounting Department?a. $35,250b. $49,072c. $18,000d. $26,333

How much total cost will be allocated from ADMIN and BACS combined to the Accounting Department?a. $35,250b. $49,072c. $18,000d. $26,333

Quick Check

Copyright © 2008, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

4-114

End of Chapter 4