9
1 Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press CHAPTER 8 BOOK COMPANION Quality management became imperative for the manufacturing sector in the 1970s and 1980s, for service organizations in the 1980s and 1990s, and, finally, for the healthcare industry in the 1990s, culminating with the Institute of Medicine report To Err Is Human. This report detailed alarming statistics on the number of people harmed by the healthcare system and called for major improvement in the quality of healthcare as related to patient safety. The report recognized the need for systemic changes and called for innovative solutions to ensure improvement. The healthcare industry is facing increasing pressure not only to increase quality but also to reduce costs. This chapter provides an introduction to quality management tools and techniques that are available and being used successfully by healthcare organizations. Chapter 8 covers the following major topics: Defining quality The costs of quality Quality programs including TQM/CQI, ISO 9000, the Baldrige criteria, and Six Sigma Six Sigma tools and techniques, including the DMAIC process, the seven basic quality tools, statistical process control, and process capability Other quality tools and techniques including quality function deployment, Taguchi methods, and poka-yoke After completing this chapter, the reader should have a basic understanding of quality, quality programs, and quality tools. This understanding should enable readers to use the tools and techniques to begin improving quality in their organizations. The author invites readers’ comments, recommended readings, website suggestions, or

CHAPTER 8 BOOK COMPANION - American College of … 2E/HC... · CHAPTER 8 BOOK COMPANION. ... Taguchi, Genichi . List of Organizations . Organizations . ... Crossing the Quality Chasm

  • Upload
    dodieu

  • View
    226

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 1 Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    CHAPTER 8

    BOOK COMPANION

    Quality management became imperative for the manufacturing sector in the 1970s and 1980s, for

    service organizations in the 1980s and 1990s, and, finally, for the healthcare industry in the

    1990s, culminating with the Institute of Medicine report To Err Is Human. This report detailed

    alarming statistics on the number of people harmed by the healthcare system and called for major

    improvement in the quality of healthcare as related to patient safety. The report recognized the

    need for systemic changes and called for innovative solutions to ensure improvement.

    The healthcare industry is facing increasing pressure not only to increase quality but also

    to reduce costs. This chapter provides an introduction to quality management tools and

    techniques that are available and being used successfully by healthcare organizations. Chapter 8

    covers the following major topics:

    Defining quality

    The costs of quality

    Quality programs including TQM/CQI, ISO 9000, the Baldrige criteria, and Six Sigma

    Six Sigma tools and techniques, including the DMAIC process, the seven basic quality tools,

    statistical process control, and process capability

    Other quality tools and techniques including quality function deployment, Taguchi methods,

    and poka-yoke

    After completing this chapter, the reader should have a basic understanding of quality,

    quality programs, and quality tools. This understanding should enable readers to use the tools

    and techniques to begin improving quality in their organizations.

    The author invites readers comments, recommended readings, website suggestions, or

  • 2 Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    any other material to be added to this webpage for this chapter or any other chapters. Please click

    here to send an e-mail. Be sure to include Healthcare Operations Management, 2nd edition in

    the subject line.

    Downloadable Resources

    PowerPoint Slides for Chapter 8

    To access a PowerPoint presentation covering the key points of Chapter 8, click on the icon

    below to open/close the attachments panel:

    HC Ops 2 slides - Chapter 8.ppt

    Excel Templates

    SPC Charts

    Statistical process control (SPC) is a statistics-based methodology for determining when a

    process is moving out of control. All processes have variation in output. Some of the variation

    is caused by factors that can be identified and managed (assignable or special), and some of the

    variation is inherent in the process (common). SPC is aimed at discovering variation resulting

    from assignable causes so that adjustments can be made and bad output is not produced.

    In SPC, samples of process output are taken over time, measured, and plotted on a control

    chart. From statistics theory, the sample means will follow a normal distribution. From the

    central limit theorem, 99.7 percent of sample means will be within +/ 3 standard errors of the

    overall mean and 0.3 percent will be outside those limits. A sample mean outside the +/ 3

    standard error limits will be obtained only 3 times out of 1,000 if the process is working as it

    should. These +/ 3 standard error limits are the control limits on a control chart.

    To access a template for quality control, click on the icon below to open/close the

    mailto:[email protected]?subject=Healthcare%20Operations%20Management,%202nd%20edition

  • 3 Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    attachments panel:

    Ch. 8 Quality Template.xls

    The template contains mean charts, a range chart, a p chart, a c chart, process capability

    measurement, and a normal distribution.

    Quality Function Deployment

    Quality function deployment (QFD) is a structured process for identifying customer needs and

    wants and translating them into a product or process that meets those needs. The tool is most

    often used in the development phase of a new product or process, but also can be used to

    redesign an existing product/process. Typically, it will be found in a Design for Six Sigma

    (DFSS) project, where the goal is to design the process to achieve Six Sigma results. The QFD

    process uses a matrix called the house of quality to organize data in a usable fashion. To access a

    template for a QFD exercise, click on the icon below to open/close the attachments panel:

    Ch. 8 QFD Template.xls

    Examples and Problem Data from the Text

    Chapter 8 contains a number of examples and problems. They are featured in the files attached to

    this PDF. Click on the icons to access them:

    Riverview Drug Prescription Process Map (You need Visio software to open this file.):

    Riverview Drug Prescription Process ppt.vsd

  • 4 Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Riverview Clinic Wait Time QC Example:

    Turnaround Time, Problem 1, Data:

    Riverview Customer Satisfaction, Problem 2, Data:

    Websites of Interest

    The quality movement in the United States and around the world has gained substantial

    momentum as can be seen by the extensive array of websites devoted to advancing this science.

    The authors have selected the following sites as excellent examples.

    Videos (available online)

    National Campaign Aims to Curb Hospital MistakesPBS NewsHour with Jim Lehrer on the

    100,000 Lives Campaign

    The Original Dr. Deming Style Red Bead ExperimentThis training video accompanies a

    training product available from this site. It also provides an introduction to TQM. See

    Chapter 2 for links to more Deming videos.

    Podcasts (Audiocasts)

    Diagramming Processes for Six Sigmaa presentation of the various functions in Visio that can

    be used in Six Sigma; from Microsoft

    RV clinic QC.xls

    Problem 1 TAT data.xls

    Problem 2 Riverview CS data.xls

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/health/july-dec06/lives_08-18.htmlhttp://www.redbead.com/http://www.microsoft.com/Office/asx/visio/OperationsSixSigma.asx

  • 5 Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Software

    Students and working professionals engaged in quality improvement work will find these

    software packages useful. All these packages have a limited time free trial use.

    StatToolsan Excel add-in for statistical analyses.

    Minitabfairly inexpensive spreadsheet-based statistical software that can perform more

    powerful statistical analyses than Excel

    Microsoft Visio process mapping software

    Tools

    Specific Six Sigma tools are also available online:

    Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Worksheet (IHI Tool)

    SERVQUALdescription of the SERVQUAL instrument for measuring perceptions of service

    quality and links to other resources

    Tutorials

    To use Six Sigma tools effectively, some practice is necessary. These tutorials provide exercises

    to build skills.

    Microsoft Visiofrom Microsoft

    Seven Basic Quality Toolsan overview of the seven tools; from ASQ

    PDCAIn this interactive exercise, students organize process improvement steps following the

    PDCA model.

    Six Sigma DMAIC Roadmapan extensive discussion with links to tools and other resources

    related to each step

    Statistical Process Control (SPC) Resource Centeran overview with links to other resources

    Statistical Process Control (SPC)A Wayworld Tutorialan introduction to the basics of SPC

    http://www.palisade.com/stattools/default.asphttp://www.minitab.com/http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/visio/default.aspxhttp://www.ihi.org/IHI/Topics/Improvement/ImprovementMethods/Tools/Plan-Do-Study-Act+%28PDSA%29+Worksheet.htmhttp://www.istheory.yorku.ca/SERVQUAL.htmhttp://office.microsoft.com/en-us/training/CR061832751033.aspxhttp://www.asq.org/learn-about-quality/seven-basic-quality-tools/overview/overview.htmlhttp://www.wisc-online.com/objects/index_tj.asp?objID=MFQ202http://www.isixsigma.com/library/content/c020617a.asphttp://www.qualitytrainingportal.com/resources/spc/index.htmhttp://www.wayworld.com/spc/spc.cfm

  • 6 Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    What is Process Capability?a fairly technical tutorial from NIST

    Process Capability Analysisanswers to common questions about process capability

    Yield the Right Wayexplanation of rolled throughput yield

    Benchmarkingoverview from ASQ

    Demonstrations

    Process Capability Index applet demonstrating Cp and Cpk

    Taguchi Loss Functionapplet demonstrating the Taguchi Loss Function

    Data Sources

    A key element in quality improvement is benchmarking. Here is a useful resource.

    Association for Benchmarking Health Care

    Philosophies/Programs/People

    Philosophies/Programs

    The quality movement has a number of programs committed to advancing this science. Here are

    selected links:

    Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Awardoverview from ASQ

    ISO 9000 and Other Standardsoverview from ASQ

    Six Sigmaoverview from ASQ

    iSixSigma.comLinks to a variety of resources to help business professionals successfully

    implement quality in their organizations. Resources include short descriptive articles,

    checklists, forms, and links to other useful websites.

    http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pmc/section1/pmc16.htmhttp://qualityadvisor.com/library/capability_menu.phphttp://www.qualitydigest.com/mar00/html/sixsigma.htmlhttp://www.asq.org/learn-about-quality/benchmarking/overview/overview.htmlhttp://elsmar.com/Cp_vs_Cpk.htmlhttp://elsmar.com/Taguchi.htmlhttp://www.abhc.org/http://www.asq.org/learn-about-quality/malcolm-baldrige-award/overview/overview.htmlhttp://www.asq.org/learn-about-quality/iso-9000/overview/overview.htmlhttp://www.asq.org/learn-about-quality/six-sigma/overview/overview.htmlhttp://www.isixsigma.com/

  • 7 Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    People

    Many individuals have advanced the quality movement in the United States and Japan. Here are

    links to related websites.

    Crosby, Phillip B., more on Crosby

    Garvin, David A.

    Ishikawa, Kaoru, more on Ishikawa

    Juran, Joseph, more on Juran

    Taguchi, Genichi

    List of Organizations

    Organizations

    The following organizations have made quality improvement their primary mission.

    American Productivity and Quality Center (APQC)

    American Society for Quality (ASQ)

    Baldrige National Quality Program (BNQP)

    Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI)

    Institute of Medicine (IOM)

    International Organization for Standardization (ISO)

    Midwest Business Group on Health (MBGH)

    Additional Readings

    Case Studies (available online)

    Healthcare Related Quality Case Studiesfrom ASQ

    Six Sigma Practicesfrom Healthcare Informatics online

    The Promise of Six Sigmafrom Creative Healthcare USA

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Crosbyhttp://www.skymark.com/resources/leaders/crosby.asphttp://dor.hbs.edu/fi_redirect.jhtml?facInfo=bio&[email protected]&loc=extnhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaoru_Ishikawahttp://www.skymark.com/resources/leaders/ishikawa.asphttp://www.skymark.com/resources/leaders/juran.asphttp://www.asq.org/about-asq/who-we-are/bio_juran.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genichi_Taguchihttp://www.apqc.org/portal/apqc/sitehttp://www.asq.org/index.htmlhttp://www.quality.nist.gov/index.htmlhttp://www.ihi.org/ihihttp://www.iom.edu/http://www.iso.org/iso/en/ISOOnline.frontpagehttp://www.mbgh.org/http://www.asq.org/economic-case/markets/http://www.healthcare-informatics.com/article/six-sigma-practiceshttp://www.creative-healthcare.com/resources/promise1.php

  • 8 Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Improving Communication and Documentation Concerning Preliminary and Final Radiology

    Reportsfrom NAHQ

    Articles

    Cost of Quality (COQ)overview from ASQ

    Revamping Healthcare Using DMAIC and DFSSarticle contrasting DMAIC with DFSS

    The Essential Six Sigmaoverview of Six Sigma and a discussion of how successful

    implementation can improve the bottom line

    Six Sigma Program Success FactorsSix Sigma philosophy says it is necessary to determine

    key input variables in a process to manage and optimize the process output. This article

    outlines key factors for successful Six Sigma program implementation.

    Process Capability: Understanding the Conceptanalogy to aid in understanding this concept

    Road Map for Quality Improvement: A Guide for Doctorsshort article presenting the essentials

    of quality improvement that every physician should know

    Mistake-Proofing the Design of Health Care Processes is a synthesis of practical examples from

    the real world of healthcare on the use of process or design features to prevent medical errors

    or the negative impact of errors. It contains over 150 examples of mistake-proofing that can

    be applied in health careand in many cases relatively inexpensively. From AHRQ.

    Reports

    Crossing the Quality Chasm Slide SetPowerPoint slides related to the Institute of Medicines

    report Crossing the Quality Chasm: Health Care for the 21st Century

    http://www.nahq.org/journal/ce/article.html?article_id=276http://www.nahq.org/journal/ce/article.html?article_id=276http://www.asq.org/learn-about-quality/cost-of-quality/overview/overview.htmlhttp://www.isixsigma.com/industries/healthcare/revamping-healthcare-using-dmaic-and-dfss/http://www.asq.org/pub/qualityprogress/past/0102/qp0102lucas.pdfhttp://www.asq.org/pub/sixsigma/past/vol1_issue1/ssfmv1i1goldstein.pdfhttp://www.asq.org/pub/qualityprogress/past/2000/0100/136one_good_idea_jan2000.htmlhttp://www.mjainmd.com/medicine/roadmap_for_quality_improvement.pdfhttp://www.ahrq.gov/qual/mistakeproof/https://www.peacehealth.org/apps/Quality/References/ChasmSlides.pdf

  • 9 Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Books (available online)

    Barry, R. 2003. Nan: A Six Sigma Mystery. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.

    George, M. L. 2003. Lean Six Sigma for Service: How to Use Lean Speed and Six Sigma Quality

    to Improve Services and Transactions. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Pyzdek, T. 2003. The Six Sigma Handbook: The Complete Guide for Greenbelts, Blackbelts, and

    Managers at All Levels, Revised and Expanded Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Tennant, G. 2001. Six Sigma: SPC and TQM in Manufacturing and Services. London: Ashgate

    Publishing.

    Books (links to sources referenced in Chapter 8)

    Berwick, D. M., A. B. Godfrey, and J. Roessner. 2002. Curing Healthcare: New Strategies for

    Quality Improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0873896122&id=wLqbfn85eMoC&pg=RA1-PA1-IA2&lpg=RA1-PA1-IA2&dq=Nan:+A+Six+Sigma+Mystery.&sig=vLVvCj5HCp8DH4kMvEg7WtbJsughttp://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=PpS931Oc5V8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&sig=supoaboCxBdTUK0xbVZKRex4D9k&dq=six+sigma+healthcare&prev=http://scholar.google.com/scholar%3Fq%3Dsix%2Bsigma%2Bhealthcare%26start%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DNhttp://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=PpS931Oc5V8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&sig=supoaboCxBdTUK0xbVZKRex4D9k&dq=six+sigma+healthcare&prev=http://scholar.google.com/scholar%3Fq%3Dsix%2Bsigma%2Bhealthcare%26start%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DNhttp://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ly7iBGNVGe8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&sig=7jQjO_K3ho8G_xMwIDCpdvrXurg&dq=six+sigma&prev=http://scholar.google.com/scholar%3Fq%3Dsix%2Bsigma%26start%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN#PPA5,M1http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ly7iBGNVGe8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&sig=7jQjO_K3ho8G_xMwIDCpdvrXurg&dq=six+sigma&prev=http://scholar.google.com/scholar%3Fq%3Dsix%2Bsigma%26start%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN#PPA5,M1http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=O6276jidG3IC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&sig=eD_VuIt1vYdM-nYSXKVRHTCtwt0&dq=six+sigma+healthcare&prev=http://scholar.google.com/scholar%3Fq%3Dsix%2Bsigma%2Bhealthcare%26start%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DNhttp://www.amazon.com/Curing-Health-Care-Strategies-Improvement/dp/0787964522/sr=8-1/qid=1163597743/ref=sr_1_1/104-4261184-7360724?ie=UTF8&s=bookshttp://www.amazon.com/Curing-Health-Care-Strategies-Improvement/dp/0787964522/sr=8-1/qid=1163597743/ref=sr_1_1/104-4261184-7360724?ie=UTF8&s=books

    Instructions

    Notes on using the QFD (Quality Function Deployment or House of Quality) template:

    All turquoise cells are to be entered by the user. Other values are automatically calculated, and do not need to be altered.

    Cells with red marks in the upper right corner have comments, let the mouse hover over these cells to read the comments to further explain the contents of a cell.

    This spreadsheet is locked/protected in order to keep the cells with equations from being changed. If a cell need to be altered, the spreadsheet first needs to be unlocked/unprotected. Do this by selecting the workbook you wish to unlock, click on "Tools", highlight "Protection", and select "Unprotect Sheet". The sheet will then be unlocked so alterations can be made.

    Begin with the Customer and Design Requirement worksheet. 1. Input a name for your House of Quality 2. Input each customer requirement, an importance rating for that requirement, an evaluation of how well your current process/product meets that requirement, and an evaluation of how well the competition meets that requirement.This information should be gathered from the customer and is often referred to as the Voice of the Customer (VOC). 3. Input the technical requirements of the process/product. These are measureable technical requirements related to the customer requirements. Units for each requirement should be input along with an evaluation of the current process/product and the competition.

    Next, go to the HOQ 1A worksheet. 4. Input the strength of the relationship between each customer requirement and each technical requirement (1=weak, 3=medium, 5=strong) in the center of the HOQ. 5. Input the direction of the relationship among technical requirements in the roof of the HOQ.

    Finally, go to the HOQ 1B worksheet. 6. Input the desired target specification values.

    The final House of Quality can be found on the HOQ 1Final worksheet.

    Often this first House of Quality is followed by other matrices. For products, the product target values are translated into parts targets, process targets and production settings. For processes, the process target values are translated into functional requirements, design requirements and key process variables. We have included the process type in this workbook.

    Customer and Tech Requirement

    House of Quality for ________

    Competitive Evaluations (1-5)

    Customer Requirement #Customer RequirementsRelative Importance (1-5)Our Product/ServiceCompetitor ACompetitor B

    1Customer requirement5511

    2Customer requirement5411

    3Customer requirement5311

    4Customer requirement5111

    5Customer requirement5111

    6Customer requirement5111

    7Customer requirement111

    Technical Requirement #Customer Requirement #Technical RequirementsMeasurement UnitOur Product/ServiceCompetitor ACompetitor B

    1Technical requirementMeasurement Unit532

    2Technical requirementMeasurement Unit532

    3Technical requirementMeasurement Unit532

    4Technical requirementMeasurement Unit111

    5Technical requirementMeasurement Unit111

    6Technical requirementMeasurement Unit111

    7Technical requirementMeasurement Unit111

    8Technical requirementMeasurement Unit111

    9Technical requirementMeasurement Unit111

    10Technical requirementMeasurement Unit111

    11Technical requirementMeasurement Unit111

    12Technical requirementMeasurement Unit111

    13Technical requirementMeasurement Unit111

    14Technical requirementMeasurement Unit111

    15Technical requirementMeasurement Unit111

    16Technical requirementMeasurement Unit111

    17Technical requirementMeasurement Unit111

    HOQ 1A

    House of Quality for ________

    +Positive or Reinforcing Relationship

    -Negative or Tradeoff Relationship

    Relative Importance or Weight

    Design RequirementsTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirement

    Our Service/ProductCompeting Service/Product ACompeting Service/Product B

    Customer RequirementsX manufacturerY manufacturer

    Customer requirement5511

    Customer requirement5411

    Customer requirement5311

    Customer requirement5111

    Customer requirement5111

    Customer requirement5111

    Customer requirement0111

    calculations00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

    00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

    00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

    00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

    00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

    00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

    00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

    Importance Weighting00000000000000000

    Measurement UnitsMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement Unit

    Our Value55511111111111111

    Competitor A33311111111111111

    Competitor B22211111111111111

    Target Specification Values

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet

    From customer and design requirements worksheet

    From customer and design requirements worksheet

    From customer and design requirements worksheet

    The triangular roof of the house of quality is used to indicate where technical requirements trade-off or reinforce each other. Does improving one requirement result in a decrease (-) of an increase (+) in another requirement? This information can help the design team by making explicit where tradeoffs are needed.

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet.

    Calculated on this worksheet

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet.

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet.

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet.

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet.

    Input the strength of the relationship between each customer requirement and each technical requirement.

    1 = weak, 3=medium, 5=strong.

    HOQ 1A

    Our Service/Product

    Competing Service/Product A

    Competing Service/Product B

    HOQ 1B

    House of Quality for ________

    0

    00

    000

    0000

    00000

    +Positive or Reinforcing Relationship

    000000

    -Negative or Tradeoff Relationship

    0000000

    00000000

    000000000

    0000000000

    00000000000

    Relative Importance or Weight000000000000

    0000000000000

    00000000000000

    000000000000000

    0000000000000000

    Design RequirementsTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirement

    Our Service/ProductCompeting Service/Product ACompeting Service/Product B

    Customer RequirementsX manufacturerY manufacturer

    Customer requirement500000000000000000511

    Customer requirement500000000000000000411

    Customer requirement500000000000000000311

    Customer requirement500000000000000000111

    Customer requirement500000000000000000111

    Customer requirement500000000000000000111

    Customer requirement000000000000000000111

    Importance Weighting00000000000000000

    Relative Importance Weighting00000000000000000

    Measurement UnitsMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement Unit

    Our Value55511111111111111

    Competitor A33311111111111111

    Competitor B22211111111111111

    Target Specification Values

    Our Value

    Competitor A

    Competitor B

    Target Specification Values

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet

    From customer and design requirements worksheet

    From customer and design requirements worksheet

    From customer and design requirements worksheet

    From HOQ template-1

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet.

    From HOQ template-1 worksheet.

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet.

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet.

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet.

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet.

    From HOQ template -1

    HOQ 1B

    Our Service/Product

    Competing Service/Product A

    Competing Service/Product B

    HOQ 1Final

    House of Quality for ________

    0

    00

    000

    0000

    00000

    +Positive or Reinforcing Relationship

    000000

    -Negative or Tradeoff Relationship

    0000000

    00000000

    000000000

    0000000000

    00000000000

    Relative Importance or Weight000000000000

    0000000000000

    00000000000000

    000000000000000

    0000000000000000

    Technical RequirementsTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirementTechnical requirement

    Our Service/ProductCompeting Service/Product ACompeting Service/Product B

    Customer RequirementsX manufacturerY manufacturer

    Customer requirement500000000000000000511

    Customer requirement500000000000000000411

    Customer requirement500000000000000000311

    Customer requirement500000000000000000111

    Customer requirement500000000000000000111

    Customer requirement500000000000000000111

    Customer requirement000000000000000000111

    Importance Weighting00000000000000000

    Relative Importance Weighting00000000000000000

    Measurement UnitsMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement UnitMeasurement Unit

    Our Value55511111111111111

    Competitor A33311111111111111

    Competitor B22211111111111111

    Target Specification Values00000000000000000

    Our Value

    Competitor A

    Competitor B

    Target Specification Values

    From HOQ template-1 worksheet.

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet

    From customer and design requirements worksheet

    From customer and design requirements worksheet

    From customer and design requirements worksheet

    From HOQ template-1

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet.

    From HOQ template-1 worksheet.

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet.

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet.

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet.

    From the customer and design requirements worksheet.

    From HOQ template -1

    HOQ 1Final

    Our Service/Product

    Competing Service/Product A

    Competing Service/Product B

    Matrix 2

    Matrix 2

    Functional Requirements

    Technical RequirementsRelative WeightFunctional RequirementFunctional RequirementFunctional RequirementFunctional RequirementFunctional RequirementFunctional RequirementFunctional RequirementFunctional RequirementFunctional RequirementFunctional RequirementTotal

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Technical requirement00

    Total0000000000

    Relative Weight (Priority)0000000000

    Our Value

    Competitor A

    Competitor B

    Target Specification Values

    From HOQ template-2 worksheet

    From HOQ template-1 worksheet.

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    Matrix 3

    Matrix 3

    Design Requirements

    Functional RequirementsRelative WeightDesign RequirementDesign RequirementDesign RequirementDesign RequirementDesign RequirementDesign RequirementDesign RequirementDesign RequirementDesign RequirementDesign RequirementTotal

    Functional Requirement00.00

    Functional Requirement00.00

    Functional Requirement00.00

    Functional Requirement00.00

    Functional Requirement00.00

    Functional Requirement00.00

    Functional Requirement00.00

    Functional Requirement00.00

    Functional Requirement00.00

    Functional Requirement00.00

    Total0000000000

    Relative Weight (Priority)0000000000

    From Matrix 2

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    Matrix 4

    Matrix 4

    Key Process Variables

    Design RequirementsRelative WeightKey Process VariableKey Process VariableKey Process VariableKey Process VariableKey Process VariableKey Process VariableKey Process VariableKey Process VariableKey Process VariableKey Process VariableTotal

    Design Requirement00.00

    Design Requirement00.00

    Design Requirement00.00

    Design Requirement00.00

    Design Requirement00.00

    Design Requirement00.00

    Design Requirement00.00

    Design Requirement00.00

    Design Requirement00.00

    Design Requirement00.00

    Total0000000000

    Relative Weight (Priority)0000000000

    From Matrix 3

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    From HOQ 1 Final

    Instructions

    Notes on using the quality control template:

    All values in blue cells are to be entered by the user, lighter blue cells can be entered but will be calculated if not entered, all other values are automatically calculated, and do not need to be altered. Each quality control model has a sample value set entered, make sure to clear all values before proceeding with your own data.

    Cells with red marks in the upper right corner have comments, let the mouse hover over these cells to read the comments to further explain the quality control model.

    This spreadsheet is locked/protected in order to keep the cells with equations from being changed. If a model does need to be altered, the spreadsheet first needs to be unlocked/unprotected. Do this by selecting the workbook you wish to unlock, click on "Tools", highlight "Protection", and select "Unprotect Sheet". The sheet will then be unlocked so alterations can be made.

    Equations for models will be given when available.

    Mean Chart ( known)

    Mean Control Chart ( known)

    UCL0

    zLCL0

    n = number of observations/ sampleMean0

    SampleMeanUCLMeanLCL

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    11000

    12000

    13000

    14000

    15000

    16000

    17000

    18000

    19000

    20000

    21000

    22000

    23000

    24000

    25000

    26000

    27000

    28000

    29000

    30000

    31000

    32000

    33000

    34000

    35000

    36000

    37000

    38000

    39000

    40000

    000

    Mean Chart ( known)

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    Sample Means

    UCL

    Mean

    LCL

    Period

    Mean

    Mean Control Chart ( known)

    Mean Chart ( unknown)

    Mean Control Chart ( unknown)

    n = number of observations/ sampleOverall Mean0

    Average Range1.502

    UCL0

    LCL0

    SampleMeanRangeUCLMeanLCL

    11.38000

    21.06000

    31000

    42.21000

    51.46000

    61.62000

    71.03000

    82.09000

    90.77000

    101.01000

    111.1000

    122.49000

    131.68000

    142.29000

    151.34000

    16000

    17000

    18000

    19000

    20000

    21000

    22000

    23000

    24000

    25000

    26000

    27000

    28000

    29000

    30000

    31000

    32000

    33000

    34000

    35000

    36000

    37000

    38000

    39000

    40000

    n valueA2 factor

    21.88

    31.02

    40.73

    50.58

    60.48

    70.42

    80.37

    90.34

    100.31

    110.29

    120.27

    130.25

    140.24

    150.22

    160.21

    170.2

    180.19

    190.19

    200.18

    The Mean Control Chart (sigma known)plots the mean of a set number of observations (n) for each sample versus period number on the same chart as the overall mean of all observations and the upper and lower control limits based on 3 sigma. In this case sigma or s is known. A sample mean outside the upper or lower control limits is very unusual (would only happen 3 times out of 1000) and indicates assignable or non-random variation that should be investigated and the cause eliminated or corrected.

    Equations:UCL = Upper Control LimitLCL = Lower Control Limit

    Number of standard deviations for a specific confidence level (typically z = 3)

    Sample size (number of observations per sample)

    Sigma, standard deviation of the population

    Upper Control Limit

    Lower Control Limit

    Average of sample means, population mean or overall mean

    The average of the observations in each sample

    Mean Chart ( unknown)

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    Sample Means

    UCL

    Mean

    LCL

    Period

    Mean

    Mean Control Chart ( unknown)

    Range Chart

    Range Control Chart

    nAverage Range0

    UCL0

    LCL0

    SampleRangeUCLMeanLCL

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    11000

    12000

    13000

    14000

    15000

    16000

    17000

    18000

    19000

    20000

    21000

    22000

    23000

    24000

    25000

    26000

    27000

    28000

    29000

    30000

    31000

    32000

    33000

    34000

    35000

    36000

    37000

    38000

    39000

    40000

    LCLUCL

    n valueD3 factorD4 factor

    203.27

    302.57

    402.28

    502.11

    602

    70.081.92

    80.141.86

    90.181.82

    100.221.78

    110.261.74

    120.281.72

    130.311.69

    140.331.67

    150.351.65

    160.361.64

    170.381.62

    180.391.61

    190.41.6

    200.411.59

    The Mean Control Chart (sigma unknown) is similar to the previous chart, except that the control limits are based on the range found in each sample, rather than the standard deviation of the population. The assumption here is that sigma is unknown for the population and/or the range is easier to calculate. The average range of all samples is related to the standard deviation of the population and upper and lower control limits are found by multiplying the average range by a tabulated factor rather than the z value. The tabulated factors begin on A54 of this sheet. In addition to the sample mean values, the range of these values for each sample must be entered.As in the previous chart, a sample mean outside the upper or lower control limits is very unusual and indicates assignable or non-random variation.

    Equation:UCL = Upper Control LimitLCL = Lower Control Limit

    Sample size (number of observations per sample)

    Average of mean values, population mean, or overall mean

    Average of range values

    Upper Control Limit

    Lower Control Limit

    The difference between the maximum and minimum values from the observations taken for each sample

    The average of the observations in each sample

    Range Chart

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    11000

    12000

    13000

    14000

    15000

    16000

    17000

    18000

    19000

    20000

    21000

    22000

    23000

    24000

    25000

    26000

    27000

    28000

    29000

    30000

    31000

    32000

    33000

    34000

    35000

    36000

    37000

    38000

    39000

    40000

    Sample Ranges

    UCL

    Mean

    LCL

    Period

    Mean

    Range Control Chart

    p Chart

    p Chart

    nAverage p0

    0

    zUCL0

    0LCL0

    0

    SamplepUCLMeanLCL

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    11000

    12000

    13000

    14000

    15000

    16000

    17000

    18000

    19000

    20000

    21000

    22000

    23000

    24000

    25000

    26000

    27000

    28000

    29000

    30000

    31000

    32000

    33000

    34000

    35000

    36000

    37000

    38000

    39000

    40000

    The Range Control Chart plots the ranges of the samples on the same chart as the mean of the ranges and the upper and lower control limit for the range. The range is a measure of variability within the samples and sample ranges outside the control limits indicate that the variablility in the sample is very unusual and should be investigated for assingnable causes. The upper and lower control limits for the range are calculated using tabulated factors. These factors are on this sheet, starting at A54.

    Equation:UCL = Upper Control LimitLCL = Lower Control Limit

    Average of range values

    Upper Control Limit

    Lower Control Limit

    Sample size (number of observations per sample)

    The difference between the maximum and minimum values from the observations taken for each sample

    p Chart

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    11000

    12000

    13000

    14000

    15000

    16000

    17000

    18000

    19000

    20000

    21000

    22000

    23000

    24000

    25000

    26000

    27000

    28000

    29000

    30000

    31000

    32000

    33000

    34000

    35000

    36000

    37000

    38000

    39000

    40000

    Sample p's

    UCL

    Mean

    LCL

    Period

    Mean

    p Chart

    c Chart

    c Chart

    z3Average c0

    UCL0

    LCL0

    SamplecUCLMeanLCL

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    11000

    12000

    13000

    14000

    15000

    16000

    17000

    18000

    19000

    20000

    21000

    22000

    23000

    24000

    25000

    26000

    27000

    28000

    29000

    30000

    31000

    32000

    33000

    34000

    35000

    36000

    37000

    38000

    39000

    40000

    The p Chart plots values which are a proportions (typically, proportion of defects.) This chart is similar to both the Mean Chart with s known and unknown, except it is used when the data is proportional rather than absolute. It is based on the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. A sample mean proportion outside the upper or lower control limits is very unusual (would only happen 3 times out of 1000) and indicates assignable or non-random variation that should be investigated and the cause eliminated or corrected.

    Equation:UCL = Upper Control LimitLCL = Lower Control Limit

    Average of proportions

    Standard error of the proportions

    Upper Control Limit

    Lower Control Limit

    Sample size (number of observations per sample)

    Proportion (of defects), all values must be less than 1.

    Number of standard deviations for a specific confidence level (typically z = 3)

    c Chart

    Sample p's

    UCL

    Mean

    LCL

    Period

    Mean

    c Chart

    Process Capability

    Process Capability

    StandardMachineSpecification

    MachineDeviationCapabilityWidthCp

    A00

    B00

    C00

    D00

    E00

    Non centered

    ProcessStandardLowerUpper

    MachineMeanDeviationSpecificationRatioSpecificationRatioCpk

    A000

    B000

    C000

    D000

    E000

    The c Chart is essentially the same as the p Chart. However, In this chart, we plot the number of defectives (per batch, per day, per machine, per 100 feet of pipe, etc.) and the control limits in this chart are computed based on the Poisson distribution (distribution of rare events).

    Equation:UCL = Upper Control LimitLCL = Lower Control Limit

    Defects per unit

    Average defects per unit

    Upper Control Limit

    Lower Control Limit

    Number of standard deviations for a specific confidence level (typically z = 3)

    Process Capability

    Capability Index

    Process Capability is a measure of how capable the process is, assuming the process is centered. A Cp of greater than or equal to 1 means the process is capable, while less than 1 means it is not capable and needs to be "fixed" or changed in order to produce the product. A capable process, with a Cp of 1, will only produce 3 defects per 1000 opportunities. A Cp of 1 means that the CLs and the SLs are the same. Six sigma has a Cp of 1.5, a very capable process. The process will only produce 3.4 defects per million opportunities (DPMO) on one tail.

    Equation:Machine Capability = Standard Deviation * 6Capability = Specification Width / Machine Capability

    For a non centered process (the mean of the process and the center of the specifications are not the same), the Capability Index (Cpk) needs to be calculated. As above, Cpk of greater than or equal to 1 means the process is capable, while less than 1 means it is not capable and needs to be "fixed" in order to produce the product. Note that if the process is centered Cp=Cpk. If the process is not centered, it is possible to get a Cp of greater than 1 and a Cpk of less than 1. Cpk is basically an adjustment for Cp when the process is not centered to get the right answer. Six sigma quality implies a Cpk of 1.5, a very capable process.

    Equation:Lower Ratio = (Process Mean - Lower Specification) / (3 * Standard Deviation)Upper Ratio = (Upper Specification - Process Mean) / (3 * Standard Deviation)Cpk = Min[ Lower Ratio or Upper Ratio ]

    Normal Distribution

    Normal Distribution

    Mean =20

    Std Dev =2

    x =29

    z =4.5

    P(x) =0.0000034008

    Cumulative P(X)NormXZP(X)X

    0.0115.3473060001-2.32634699990.013326098229

    0.0215.8925049621-2.0537475190.024209137129

    0.0316.2384146997-1.88079265010.03402103729

    0.0416.498628866-1.7506855670.04308692529

    0.0516.7102930487-1.64485347570.05156783329

    0.0616.8904526186-1.55477369070.059561473729

    0.0717.0484174344-1.47579128280.067133932129

    0.0817.1898561931-1.40507190340.074333077329

    0.0917.3184891762-1.34075541190.081195272729

    0.117.4368961213-1.28155193930.087749123929

    0.1117.5469430777-1.22652846110.094017744229

    0.1217.6500258375-1.17498708130.100020207929

    0.1317.7472172912-1.12639135440.105772527729

    0.1417.8393610074-1.08031949630.111288336429

    0.1517.9271330527-1.03643347360.116579377529

    0.1618.0110842035-0.99445789820.121655868629

    0.1718.0916695917-0.95416520420.126526775129

    0.1818.1692700358-0.91536498210.131200021429

    0.1918.2442077172-0.87789614140.13568265629

    0.218.3167579163-0.84162104190.139980982829

    0.2118.3871579444-0.80642102780.144100666529

    0.2218.4556140436-0.77219297820.148046818929

    0.2318.5223067859-0.7388466070.151824069229

    0.2418.5873953505-0.70630232480.155436622829

    0.2518.6510209487-0.67448952570.158888310429

    0.2618.7133095941-0.6433452030.162182629129

    0.2718.7743743638-0.61281281810.165322777529

    0.2818.8343172603-0.58284136980.16831168629

    0.2918.8932307558-0.55338462210.171152041929

    0.318.951199084-0.5244004580.173846312129

    0.3119.0082993271-0.49585033640.17639676229

    0.3219.0646023376-0.46769883120.178805472129

    0.3319.120173524-0.4399132380.18107435329

    0.3419.1750735252-0.41246323740.183205157529

    0.3519.2293587927-0.38532060360.185199492429

    0.3619.2830820967-0.35845895160.187058827929

    0.3719.3362929671-0.33185351650.188784506429

    0.3819.3890380819-0.3054809590.190377750129

    0.3919.4413616104-0.27931919480.191839667729

    0.419.4933055178-0.25334724110.1931712629

    0.4119.5449098382-0.22754508090.194373425629

    0.4219.5962129206-0.20189353970.195446965129

    0.4319.6472516522-0.17637417390.19639258529

    0.4419.6980616617-0.15096916910.197210901129

    0.4519.7486775074-0.12566124630.197902441729

    0.4619.7991328512-0.10043357440.198467649829

    0.4719.8494606225-0.07526968880.198906885329

    0.4819.8996931722-0.05015341390.199220426529

    0.4919.9498624204-0.02506878980.199408471829

    0.520.00000000110.00000000050.199471140229

    0.5120.05013757960.02506878980.199408471829

    0.5220.10030682780.05015341390.199220426529

    0.5320.15053937750.07526968880.198906885329

    0.5420.20086714880.10043357440.198467649829

    0.5520.25132249260.12566124630.197902441729

    0.5620.30193833830.15096916910.197210901129

    0.5720.35274834780.17637417390.19639258529

    0.5820.40378707940.20189353970.195446965129

    0.5920.45509016180.22754508090.194373425629

    0.620.50669448220.25334724110.1931712629

    0.6120.55863838960.27931919480.191839667729

    0.6220.61096191810.3054809590.190377750129

    0.6320.66370703290.33185351650.188784506429

    0.6420.71691790330.35845895160.187058827929

    0.6520.77064120730.38532060360.185199492429

    0.6620.82492647480.41246323740.183205157529

    0.6720.8798264760.4399132380.18107435329

    0.6820.93539766240.46769883120.178805472129

    0.6920.99170067290.49585033640.17639676229

    0.721.0488009160.5244004580.173846312129

    0.7121.10676924420.55338462210.171152041929

    0.7221.16568273970.58284136980.16831168629

    0.7321.22562563620.61281281810.165322777529

    0.7421.28669040590.6433452030.162182629129

    0.7521.34897905130.67448952570.158888310429

    0.7621.41260464950.70630232480.155436622829

    0.7721.47769321410.7388466070.151824069229

    0.7821.54438595640.77219297820.148046818929

    0.7921.61284205560.80642102780.144100666529

    0.821.68324208370.84162104190.139980982829

    0.8121.75579228280.87789614140.13568265629

    0.8221.83072996420.91536498210.131200021429

    0.8321.90833040830.95416520420.126526775129

    0.8421.98891579650.99445789820.121655868629

    0.8522.07286694731.03643347360.116579377529

    0.8622.16063899261.08031949630.111288336429

    0.8722.25278270881.12639135440.105772527729

    0.8822.34997416251.17498708130.100020207929

    0.8922.45305692231.22652846110.094017744229

    0.922.56310387871.28155193930.087749123929

    0.9122.68151082381.34075541190.081195272729

    0.9222.81014380691.40507190340.074333077329

    0.9322.95158256561.47579128280.067133932129

    0.9423.10954738141.55477369070.059561473729

    0.9523.28970695131.64485347570.05156783329

    0.9623.5013711341.7506855670.04308692529

    0.9723.76158530031.88079265010.03402103729

    0.9824.10749503792.0537475190.024209137129

    0.9924.65269399992.32634699990.013326098229

    Normal Distribution

    Normal

    X

    Normal Distribution

    n

    )

    (z

    LCL

    n

    )

    *

    (z

    UCL

    sample

    per

    ns

    observatio

    of

    Number

    n

    population

    of

    deviation

    Standard

    confidence

    99.7%

    for

    3

    level

    confidence

    for

    errrors

    standard

    of

    Number

    z

    mean

    overall

    or

    population

    of

    Mean

    *

    -

    =

    +

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    n

    )(z

    LCL

    n

    )*(z

    UCL

    sample per nsobservatio of Number n

    population of deviation Standard

    confidence 99.7% for 3 level confidence for errrors standard of Number z

    mean overall or population of Mean

    *

    R

    A

    X

    LCL

    R

    A

    X

    UCL

    values

    range

    of

    Average

    =

    R

    A54)

    at

    (starting

    level

    confidence

    sigma

    3

    for

    Factor

    =

    A2

    mean

    population

    or

    mean,

    overall

    means,

    sample

    of

    Average

    =

    X

    2

    2

    *

    *

    -

    =

    +

    =

    RAXLCL

    RAXUCL

    values range of Average=R

    A54)at (starting level confidence sigma 3 for Factor = A2

    mean population or mean, overall means, sample of Average=X

    2

    2

    *

    *

    R

    *

    D

    UCL

    R

    *

    D

    LCL

    A54)

    at

    (starting

    for UCL

    Factor

    =

    D4

    A54)

    at

    (starting

    LCL

    for

    Factor

    =

    D3

    ranges

    sample

    of

    Average

    =

    R

    4

    3

    =

    =

    R*DUCL

    R*DLCL

    A54)at (starting for UCLFactor = D4

    A54)at (starting LCLfor Factor = D3

    ranges sample of Average = R

    4

    3

    c

    z

    c

    LCL

    c

    z

    c

    UCL

    3)

    (usually

    level

    Confidence

    =

    z

    unit

    per

    defects

    of

    number

    Average

    =

    c

    -

    =

    +

    =

    czcLCL

    czcUCL

    3)(usually level Confidence = z

    unit per defects of number Average= c

    p

    p

    p

    p

    *

    z

    p

    LCL

    *

    z

    p

    UCL

    n

    )

    p

    (1

    *

    p

    confidence

    99.7%

    for

    3

    level

    confidence

    for

    errrors

    standard

    of

    Number

    =

    z

    ns/sample

    observatio

    of

    Number

    =

    n

    s

    proportion

    sample

    of

    Average

    =

    p

    proportion

    of

    error

    Standard

    =

    -

    =

    +

    =

    -

    =

    =

    p

    p

    p

    p

    *zpLCL

    *zpUCL

    n

    )p(1*p

    confidence 99.7% for 3 level confidence for errrors standard of Number = z

    ns/sampleobservatio of Number = n

    sproportion sample of Average= p

    proportion of error Standard =

    MBD000863BB.unknown

    MBD0001552C.unknown

    MBD00041595.unknown

    MBD00052840.unknown

    MBD0003B55B.unknown

    Chapter 8

    Quality Management: Focus on Six Sigma

    Quality Management: Focus on Six Sigma

    Defining quality

    Cost of quality

    Quality programs

    Six Sigma

    DMAIC process

    Seven basic quality tools

    Statistical process control (SPC)

    Benchmarking

    Quality function deployment (QFD)

    Taguchi methods

    Mistake proofing (poka-yoke)

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Defining Quality

    Organizations perspective

    Performance (design) quality

    Conformance (design) quality

    Customer perspective

    Garvins eight dimensions

    Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berrys five dimensions

    Institute of Medicine

    Quality assurance program

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Cost of (Poor) Quality

    External failurecosts associated with failure after the customer receives the product or service

    Internal failurecosts associated with failure before the customer receives the product or service

    Appraisalcosts associated with inspecting and evaluating the quality of supplies and/or final product/service

    Preventioncosts incurred to eliminate or minimize appraisal and failure costs

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Quality Programs

    ISO 9000

    Baldrige criteria

    Six Sigma

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    ISO 9000

    International standards concerned with ensuring that organizations maintain consistently high levels of quality

    Five sections:

    Quality management system

    Management responsibility

    Resource management

    Measurement, analysis, and improvement

    Product realization

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Baldrige Award

    Established to recognize organizations for their achievements in quality and to raise awareness about the importance of quality

    Seven categories:

    Leadership

    Strategic planning

    Customer and market

    focus

    Measurement, analysis, and knowledge management

    Human resources focus

    Process management

    Results

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Six Sigma

    Philosophy

    Eliminate defects through prevention and process improvement

    Methodology

    Team-based approach to process improvement using the DMAIC cycle

    Set of tools

    Quantitative and qualitative statistically based tools

    Goal

    3.4 defects per million opportunities (DPMO)

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Successful Six Sigma

    Top-management support

    Use of quantitative measures

    Culture and Leadership

    Extensive training

    DMAIC approach

    Team-based projects

    Impact on organizations financials

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Six Sigma Infrastructure

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    DMAIC Process

    Define

    Measure

    Analyze

    Improve

    Control

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    DMAIC Process: Define

    Project team chooses a project on the basis of the businesss strategic objectives and the needs or requirements of the customers of the process

    Characteristics of good projects:

    Save or make money for the organization

    Produce measurable process outcomes

    Relate clearly to organizational strategy

    Are supported by the organization

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    DMAIC Process: Measure

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    DMAIC Process

    Analyze

    Analyze collected data to determine the root causes

    Improve

    Identify, evaluate, and implement the improvement solutions

    Control

    Put controls in place to ensure process improvement gains are maintained

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Seven Basic Quality Tools

    Flow Chart

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Statistical Process Control (SPC)

    SPC is a statistics-based methodology for determining when a process is moving out of control.

    All processes have variation in output.

    Some of the variation is inherent in the process (common).

    Some of the variation is due to assignable (special) causes.

    SPC is aimed at discovering variation due to assignable causes and correcting those causes.

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Statistical Process Control (SPC)

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    SPC: Out-of-Control Situations

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Statistical Process Control (SPC)

    50% of patients wait more than 30 minutes

    10% of patients wait more than 30 minutes

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Process Capability

    A measure of how well the process can produce output that meets desired standards or specifications

    Compares process specifications (set by the customer or management) to control limits (the natural or common variability in the process)

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Process Capability

    Cp and Cpk

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Process Capability

    Cp and Cpk

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Process Capability

    Cp and Cpk

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Rolled Throughput Yield

    Step 2

    95/100 error-free products

    Step 3

    95/100 error-free products

    Step 4

    95/100 error-free products

    Step 1

    95/100 error-free products

    Proportions

    Actual

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Quality Function Deployment (QFD): House of Quality

    Correlation

    matrix

    Design

    requirements

    Customer

    requirements

    Competitive

    assessment

    Relationship

    matrix

    Specifications

    or

    target values

    Importance

    Importance weight

    Importance

    Importance weight

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    QFD Example

    Customer needs

    Goal: Develop a system to ensure that diabetes patients receive preventive exams

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Knowledge that it is time for an office visit

    Knowledge of why follow-up is needed

    Convenient to schedule

    Known appointment length

    Appointment on time

    QFD Example

    Technical responses

    On-time appointment

    Appointment length range

    Time to schedule

    Information on need

    Subsequent notification

    Initial notification

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Time knowledge

    Why knowledge

    Convenient

    Appointment length

    Appointment time

    QFD Example

    Importance:

    Patient desire

    Cost

    Competitive

    advantage

    On-time appointment

    Appointment length range

    Time to schedule

    Information on need

    Subsequent notification

    Initial notification

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Time knowledge5

    Why knowledge3

    Convenient4

    Appointment length3

    Appointment time4

    QFD Example

    On-time appointment

    Appointment length range

    Time to schedule

    Information on need

    Subsequent notification

    Initial notification

    Relationships:

    Strong = 5

    Medium = 3

    Weak = 1

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Time knowledge5

    Why knowledge3

    Convenient4

    Appointment length3

    Appointment time4

    QFD Example

    On-time appointment

    Appointment length range

    Time to schedule

    Information on need

    Subsequent notification

    Initial notification

    Replace icons with numbers

    Relationships:

    Strong = 5

    Medium = 3

    Weak = 1

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Time knowledge553

    Why knowledge35

    Convenient43

    Appointment length353

    Appointment time435

    QFD Example

    On-time appointment

    Appointment length range

    Time to schedule

    Information on need

    Subsequent notification

    Initial notification

    Multiply by importance and sum

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Time knowledge553

    Why knowledge35

    Convenient45

    Appointment length353

    Appointment time435

    251515202729

    QFD Example

    On-time appointment

    Appointment length range

    Time to schedule

    Information on need

    Subsequent notification

    Initial notification

    Technical correlations

    Relationships:

    + = Strong positive

    = Strong negative

    +

    +

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Time knowledge553

    Why knowledge35

    Convenient45

    Appointment length353

    Appointment time435

    251515202729

    QFD Example

    On-time appointment

    Appointment length range

    Time to schedule

    Information on need

    Subsequent notification

    Initial notification

    Target:

    100 diabetics/month; 85% compliance

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Time knowledge553

    Why knowledge35

    Convenient45

    Appointment length353

    Appointment time435

    251515202729

    QFD Example: Outcome

    To: Dan McLaughlin

    From: Southview Clinic

    Dear Dan,

    You had an appointment with Dr. Adams about six months ago, and it is now time for another visit. We need to check your blood pressure, do some blood tests, and adjust your prescriptions if needed. We would like to review these preventive procedures in advance, so please see www.southview.com/prev22.

    We have two openings available next week, on Tuesday at 8:30 am and Thursday at 2:30, to see Dr. Adams. Click on one of these days to make the appointment, or e-mail us with dates and times that work for you.

    We appreciate you continuing your care with us, and Dr. Adams looks forward to seeing you.

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Taguchi Methods

    Taguchi loss function

    A quality product is a product that causes a minimal loss (expressed in $) to society during its entire life.

    Design of Experiments (DOE)

    Design for Six Sigma (DFSS)

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Benchmarking

    Process of identifying, understanding, and adapting outstanding practices and processes to improve organizational performance

    Steps in benchmarking:

    Determine what to benchmark

    Determine how to measure it

    Gather information and data

    Implement the best practice

    in the organization

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Mistake Proofing (Poka-Yoke)

    A mechanism that either:

    Prevents a mistake from being made

    Makes the mistake immediately obvious

    Eliminates errors

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Riverview Generic Drug Project: Prescription Process

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Riverview Generic Drug Project: Drug Type and Availability

    Microsoft Excel screen shots reprinted with permission from Microsoft Corporation.

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Riverview Generic Drug Project

    Microsoft Excel screen shots reprinted with permission from Microsoft Corporation.

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    DMAIC Process

    Seven Quality Control Tools

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    DMAIC Process: Other Tools

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    DMAIC Process: Other Tools

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    Copyright 2012 Health Administration Press

    End of Chapter 8

  • OPERATIONS HEALTHCARE

    MANAGEMENTs e c o n d e d i t i o n

    D a n i e l B . M c L a u g h l i n a n d

    J o h n R . O l s o n

    6

    6

    6

    6

    6

    6

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    051015202530

    Day

    Mean Wait Time (minutes)

    +/- 1

    s

    +/- 2

    s

    +/- 3

    s

    Out of

    Control

    Sample

    Observation

    _

    X=0

    UCL=3

    LCL=-3

    8orMoreSamplesAbove(orBelow)Mean

    Observation

    _

    X=0

    LCL=-3

    UCL=3

    6orMoreSamplesIncreasing(orDecreasing)

    Observation

    _

    X=0

    UCL=3

    LCL=-3

    OneSampleMoreThan+/-3StandardErrorsfromMean

    Observation

    _

    X=0

    UCL=3

    LCL=-3

    14orMoreSamplesOscillating

    One Sample More Than +/ -3 Standard

    Errors from Mean

    14 or More Samples Oscillating

    8 or More Samples Above (or Below)

    Mean

    6 or More Samples Increasing (or

    Decreasing)

    Observation

    _

    X=0

    UCL=3

    LCL=-3

    8orMoreSamplesAbove(orBelow)Mean

    Observation

    _

    X=0

    LCL=-3

    UCL=3

    6orMoreSamplesIncreasing(orDecreasing)

    Observation

    _

    X=0

    UCL=3

    LCL=-3

    OneSampleMoreThan+/-3StandardErrorsfromMean

    Observation

    _

    X=0

    UCL=3

    LCL=-3

    14orMoreSamplesOscillating

    One Sample More Than +/ -3 Standard

    Errors from Mean

    14 or More Samples Oscillating

    8 or More Samples Above (or Below)

    Mean

    6 or More Samples Increasing (or

    Decreasing)

    Current Wait Time

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    Wait Time (minutes)

    Wait Time Goal

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    Wait Time (minutes)

    -

    -

    =

    -

    -

    =

    -

    =

    -

    =

    s

    x

    USL

    or

    s

    LSL

    x

    C

    x

    USL

    or

    LSL

    x

    C

    s

    LSL

    USL

    C

    LSL

    USL

    C

    pk

    pk

    p

    p

    3

    3

    min

    by

    estimated

    is

    and

    3

    3

    min

    6

    by

    estimated

    is

    and

    6

    s

    s

    s

    -7-6-5-4-3-2-101234567

    1.5

    s

    shift

    LSL

    USL

    3.4

    DPM

    O

    Taguchi Loss Function

    Y ($)

    LSLTarget

    USL

    Loss

    2

    2

    2

    $

    whereLoss

    kTYk

    Best

    Worst

    Range

    of

    values

    Your

    organization

    Best

    Worst

    Range

    of

    values

    Range

    of

    values

    Your

    organization

    Your

    organization

    Patient

    needs

    drug

    Clinician

    prescribes

    drug

    Information

    on drugs

    Type of

    drug

    Drug

    efficacy

    End

    Drug

    efficacy

    End

    Generic

    Drug

    works

    Non-Generic

    Drug

    works

    Drug

    doesnt

    work

    Drug doesnt work

    65%35%

    15%

    20%

    Generic

    Non-Generic,

    Generic

    Available

    Non-Generic,

    Generic Not

    Available

    Tools and Techniques

    Define

    Measure

    Analyze

    Improve

    Control

    Cause-and-Effect Diagram x

    Run Chart xx

    Check Sheet

    Histogram xx

    Pareto Chart xxx

    Scatter Diagram xx

    Flowchart xx

    TAT Data

    ObservationObservation

    1234512345

    DayDay

    14441805125161444353276

    22832584218175284556315

    35483595046182820677669

    45753631552192523352123

    53050626842204674241047

    64240504973213354624027

    72617504791226455621472

    85439398228235349724961

    94662536457241516183578

    10497134424325649514770

    115364123543263621514057

    127543435064272458198816

    137419525559287566342771

    149140661573296042205960

    155932594971305228853967

    RV CS Data column

    DayProportion of patients who were unsatisfied

    10.17

    20.13

    30.15

    40.22

    50.16

    60.13

    70.17

    80.17

    90.11

    100.16

    110.15

    120.17

    130.17

    140.12

    150.15

    160.14

    170.13

    180.15

    190.15

    200.22

    210.19

    220.15

    230.12

    240.16

    250.18

    260.14

    270.17

    280.18

    290.19

    300.14

    310.19

    320.10

    330.17

    340.15

    350.17

    360.15

    370.15

    380.15

    390.14

    400.19

    RV CS Data

    DayProportion of patients who were unsatisfiedDayProportion of patients who were unsatisfiedDayProportion of patients who were unsatisfied

    10.17150.15280.18

    20.13160.14290.19

    30.15170.13300.14

    40.22180.15310.19

    50.16190.15320.10

    60.13200.22330.17

    70.17210.19340.15

    80.17220.15350.17

    90.11230.12360.15

    100.16240.16370.15

    110.15250.18380.15

    120.17260.14390.14

    130.17270.17400.19

    140.12

    Notes

    This workbook contains all the information for the Riverview Clinic SPC Example in Chapter 7 Healthcare Operations Management and utilizes the Excel Quality Control template.

    The RV Wait Times contains the data both with and without the out-of-control observation.

    Mean Chart (sigma known and unknown) and Range Chart are the initial control charts with the out-of-control point included. (Note that the sigma known and unknown charts are essentially the same.

    Mean Chart (sigma known and unknown)(2) and Range Chart (2) are the control charts with the out-of-control point removed.

    The ND charts illustrate the proportion of patients that will experience various wait times given the system mean and s.d.

    The Process Capability worksheet (Machine A) illustrates the Cp and Cpk with the current system. Note that although the Cp implies that the process is capable, the process is not centered on the specification limits and, therefore, the correct measure is Cpk. The Cpk shows that the process is not capable. Machine B-E illustrate process capabilites for the other scenarios discussed in the text.

    The remaining worksheets are for the text illustrations and powerpoint slides.

    RV Wait Times

    Riverview Clinic Wait TimeRiverview Clinic Wait Time (Remove Outlier)

    Observations of Wait Times (minutes)Sample MeanSample RangeObservations of Wait Times (minutes)Sample MeanSample Range

    ObservationObservation

    Day123456Day123456

    129292231293128.509129292231293128.509

    224294026363030.8316224294026363030.8316

    328332526283328.838328332526283328.838

    426313830232829.3315426313830232829.3315

    536292429263229.3312536292429263229.3312

    626273225302928.177626273225302928.177

    722333031373431.1715722333031373431.1715

    840292629323031.0014840292629323031.0014

    932322134282929.3313932322134282929.3313

    1034263527312629.8391034263527312629.839

    1135302930312730.3381135302930312730.338

    1231393232303132.5091231393232303132.509

    1336243029312629.33121336243029312629.3312

    1425232931252326.0081425232931252326.008

    1538433735383237.17111635293025283029.5010

    1635293025283029.50101726292033302827.6713

    1726292033302827.67131822292630362828.5014

    1822292630362828.50141933333437283032.509

    1933333437283032.5092026263434253630.1711

    2026263434253630.1711

    Standard Deviation =4.13Overall Mean =29.62

    Standard Deviation =4.42Overall Mean =30.00

    Instructions

    Notes on using the quality control template:

    All values in blue cells are to be entered by the user, lighter blue cells can be entered but will be calculated if not entered, all other values are automatically calculated, and do not need to be altered. Each quality control model has a sample value set entered, make sure to clear all values before proceeding with your own data.

    Cells with red marks in the upper right corner have comments, let the mouse hover over these cells to read the comments to further explain the quality control model.

    This spreadsheet is locked/protected in order to keep the cells with equations from being changed. If a model does need to be altered, the spreadsheet first needs to be unlocked/unprotected. Do this by selecting the workbook you wish to unlock, click on "Tools", highlight "Protection", and select "Unprotect Sheet". The sheet will then be unlocked so alterations can be made.

    Equations for models will be given when available.

    Mean Chart ( known)

    Mean Control Chart ( known)

    4.42UCL35.4133723316

    z3LCL24.5866276684

    n = number of observations/ sample6Mean30

    SampleMeanUCLMeanLCL

    128.535.41337233163024.5866276684

    230.833333333335.41337233163024.5866276684

    328.833333333335.41337233163024.5866276684

    429.333333333335.41337233163024.5866276684

    529.333333333335.41337233163024.5866276684

    628.166666666735.41337233163024.5866276684

    731.166666666735.41337233163024.5866276684

    83135.41337233163024.5866276684

    929.333333333335.41337233163024.5866276684

    1029.833333333335.41337233163024.5866276684

    1130.333333333335.41337233163024.5866276684

    1232.535.41337233163024.5866276684

    1329.333333333335.41337233163024.5866276684

    142635.41337233163024.5866276684

    1537.166666666735.41337233163024.5866276684

    1629.535.41337233163024.5866276684

    1727.666666666735.41337233163024.5866276684

    1828.535.41337233163024.5866276684

    1932.535.41337233163024.5866276684

    2030.166666666735.41337233163024.5866276684

    2135.41337233163024.5866276684

    2235.41337233163024.5866276684

    2335.41337233163024.5866276684

    2435.41337233163024.5866276684

    2535.41337233163024.5866276684

    2635.41337233163024.5866276684

    2735.41337233163024.5866276684

    2835.41337233163024.5866276684

    2935.41337233163024.5866276684

    3035.41337233163024.5866276684

    3135.41337233163024.5866276684

    3235.41337233163024.5866276684

    3335.41337233163024.5866276684

    3435.41337233163024.5866276684

    3535.41337233163024.5866276684

    3635.41337233163024.5866276684

    3735.41337233163024.5866276684

    3835.41337233163024.5866276684

    3935.41337233163024.5866276684

    4035.41337233163024.5866276684

    35.41337233163024.5866276684

    Mean Chart ( known)

    Sample Means

    UCL

    Mean

    LCL

    Period

    Mean

    Mean Control Chart ( known)

    Mean Chart ( unknown)

    Mean Control Chart ( unknown)

    n = number of observations/ sample6Overall Mean30

    Average Range11.25

    UCL35.4

    LCL24.6

    SampleMeanRangeUCLMeanLCL

    128.5935.43024.6

    230.83333333331435.43024.6

    328.8333333333835.43024.6

    429.33333333331535.43024.6

    529.33333333331235.43024.6

    628.1666666667835.43024.6

    731.16666666671535.43024.6

    8311435.43024.6

    929.33333333331335.43024.6

    1029.8333333333935.43024.6

    1130.3333333333835.43024.6

    1232.5935.43024.6

    1329.33333333331235.43024.6

    14261135.43024.6

    1537.16666666671135.43024.6

    1629.51035.43024.6

    1727.66666666671335.43024.6

    1828.51435.43024.6

    1932.5935.43024.6

    2030.16666666671135.43024.6

    2135.43024.6

    2235.43024.6

    2335.43024.6

    2435.43024.6

    2535.43024.6

    2635.43024.6

    2735.43024.6

    2835.43024.6

    2935.43024.6

    3035.43024.6

    3135.43024.6

    3235.43024.6

    3335.43024.6

    3435.43024.6

    3535.43024.6

    3635.43024.6

    3735.43024.6

    3835.43024.6

    3935.43024.6

    4035.43024.6

    n valueA2 factor

    21.88

    31.02

    40.73

    50.58

    60.48

    70.42

    80.37

    90.34

    100.31

    110.29

    120.27

    130.25

    140.24

    150.22

    160.21

    170.2

    180.19

    190.19

    200.18

    The Mean Control Chart (sigma known)plots the mean of a set number of observations (n) for each sample versus period number on the same chart as the overall mean of all observations and the upper and lower control limits based on 3 sigma. In this case sigma or s is known. A sample mean outside the upper or lower control limits is very unusual (would only happen 3 times out of 1000) and indicates assignable or non-random variation that should be investigated and the cause eliminated or corrected.

    Equations:UCL = Upper Control LimitLCL = Lower Control Limit

    Number of standard deviations for a specific confidence level (typically z = 3)

    Sample size (number of observations per sample)

    Sigma, standard deviation of the population

    Upper Control Limit

    Lower Control Limit

    Average of sample means, population mean or overall mean

    The average of the observations in each sample

    Mean Chart ( unknown)

    Sample Means

    UCL

    Mean

    LCL

    Period

    Mean

    Mean Control Chart ( unknown)

    Range Chart

    Range Control Chart

    n6Average Range11.15

    UCL22.3

    LCL0

    SampleRangeUCLMeanLCL

    1922.311.150

    21622.311.150

    3822.311.150

    41522.311.150

    51222.311.150

    6722.311.150

    71522.311.150

    81422.311.150

    91322.311.150

    10922.311.150

    11822.311.150

    12922.311.150

    131222.311.150

    14822.311.150

    151122.311.150

    161022.311.150

    171322.311.150

    181422.311.150

    19922.311.150

    201122.311.150

    2122.311.150

    2222.311.150

    2322.311.150

    2422.311.150

    2522.311.150

    2622.311.150

    2722.311.150

    2822.311.150

    2922.311.150

    3022.311.150

    3122.311.150

    3222.311.150

    3322.311.150

    3422.311.150

    3522.311.150

    3622.311.150

    3722.311.150

    3822.311.150

    3922.311.150

    4022.311.150

    LCLUCL

    n valueD3 factorD4 factor

    203.27

    302.57

    402.28

    502.11

    602

    70.081.92

    80.141.86

    90.181.82

    100.221.78

    110.261.74

    120.281.72

    130.311.69

    140.331.67

    150.351.65

    160.361.64

    170.381.62

    180.391.61

    190.41.6

    200.411.59

    The Mean Control Chart (sigma unknown) is similar to the previous chart, except that the control limits are based on the range found in each sample, rather than the standard deviation of the population. The assumption here is that sigma is unknown for the population and/or the range is easier to calculate. The average range of all samples is related to the standard deviation of the population and upper and lower control limits are found by multiplying the average range by a tabulated factor rather than the z value. The tabulated factors begin on A54 of this sheet. In addition to the sample mean values, the range of these values for each sample must be entered.As in the previous chart, a sample mean outside the upper or lower control limits is very unusual and indicates assignable or non-random variation.

    Equation:UCL = Upper Control LimitLCL = Lower Control Limit

    Sample size (number of observations per sample)

    Average of mean values, population mean, or overall mean

    Average of range values

    Upper Control Limit

    Lower Control Limit

    The difference between the maximum and minimum values from the observations taken for each sample

    The average of the observations in each sample

    Range Chart

    Sample Ranges

    UCL

    Mean

    LCL

    Period

    Mean

    Range Control Chart

    Mean Chart ( known) (2)

    Mean Control Chart ( known)

    4.13UCL34.6810033364

    z3LCL24.5646106987

    n = number of observations/ sample6Mean29.6228070175

    SampleMeanUCLMeanLCL

    128.534.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    230.833333333334.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    328.833333333334.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    429.333333333334.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    529.333333333334.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    628.166666666734.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    731.166666666734.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    83134.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    929.333333333334.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    1029.833333333334.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    1130.333333333334.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    1232.534.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    1329.333333333334.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    142634.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    1529.534.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    1627.666666666734.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    1728.534.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    1832.534.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    1930.166666666734.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    2034.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    2134.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    2234.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    2334.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    2434.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    2534.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    2634.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    2734.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    2834.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    2934.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    3034.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    3134.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    3234.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    3334.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    3434.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    3534.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    3634.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    3734.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    3834.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    3934.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    4034.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    34.681003336429.622807017524.5646106987

    The Range Control Chart plots the ranges of the samples on the same chart as the mean of the ranges and the upper and lower control limit for the range. The range is a measure of variability within the samples and sample ranges outside the control limits indicate that the variablility in the sample is very unusual and should be investigated for assingnable causes. The upper and lower control limits for the range are calculated using tabulated factors. These factors are on this sheet, starting at A54.

    Equation:UCL = Upper Control LimitLCL = Lower Control Limit

    Average of range values

    Upper Control Limit

    Lower Control Limit

    Sample size (number of observations per sample)

    The difference between the maximum and minimum values from the observations taken for each sample

    Mean Chart ( known) (2)

    Sample Means

    UCL

    Mean

    LCL

    Period

    Mean

    Mean Control Chart ( known)

    Mean Chart ( unknown) (2)

    Mean Control Chart ( unknown)

    n = number of observations/ sample6Overall Mean29.6228070175

    Average Range11.2631578947

    UCL35.029122807

    LCL24.2164912281

    SampleMeanRangeUCLMeanLCL

    128.5935.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    230.83333333331435.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    328.8333333333835.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    429.33333333331535.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    529.33333333331235.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    628.1666666667835.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    731.16666666671535.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    8311435.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    929.33333333331335.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    1029.8333333333935.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    1130.3333333333835.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    1232.5935.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    1329.33333333331235.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    14261135.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    1529.51135.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    1627.66666666671035.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    1728.51335.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    1832.51435.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    1930.1666666667935.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    2035.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    2135.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    2235.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    2335.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    2435.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    2535.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    2635.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    2735.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    2835.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    2935.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    3035.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    3135.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    3235.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    3335.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    3435.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    3535.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    3635.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    3735.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    3835.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    3935.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    4035.02912280729.622807017524.2164912281

    n valueA2 factor

    21.88

    31.02

    40.73

    50.58

    60.48

    70.42

    80.37

    90.34

    100.31

    110.29

    120.27

    130.25

    140.24

    150.22

    160.21

    170.2

    180.19

    190.19

    200.18

    The Mean Control Chart (sigma known)plots the mean of a set number of observations (n) for each sample versus period number on the same chart as the overall mean of all observations and the upper and lower control limits based on 3 sigma. In this case sigma or s is known. A sample mean outside the upper or lower control limits is very unusual (would only happen 3 times out of 1000) and indicates assignable or non-random variation that should be investigated and the cause eliminated or corrected.

    Equations:UCL = Upper Control LimitLCL = Lower Control Limit

    Number of standard deviations for a specific confidence level (typically z = 3)

    Sample size (number of observations per sample)

    Sigma, standard deviation of the population

    Upper Control Limit

    Lower Control Limit

    Average of sample means, population mean or overall mean

    The average of the observations in each sample

    Mean Chart ( unknown) (2)

    Sample Means

    UCL

    Mean

    LCL

    Period

    Mean

    Mean Control Chart ( unknown)

    Range Chart (2)

    Range Control Chart

    n6Average Range11.2631578947

    UCL22.5263157895

    LCL0

    SampleRangeUCLMeanLCL

    1922.526315789511.26315789470

    21422.526315789511.26315789470

    3822.526315789511.26315789470

    41522.526315789511.26315789470

    51222.526315789511.26315789470

    6822.526315789511.26315789470

    71522.526315789511.26315789470

    81422.526315789511.26315789470

    91322.526315789511.26315789470

    10922.526315789511.26315789470

    11822.526315789511.26315789470

    12922.526315789511.2