Upload
hoangnhan
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
THE ECONOMIC IN THE VERY LONG RUN
Chapter 8
Economic Growth II:
Technology, Empirics, and Policy
2 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
This Chapter is about...
Incorporating technological progress in the Solow
model
Policies to promote growth
Growth empirics: confronting the theory with facts
Endogenous growth model
3 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
Examples of technological progress
From 1950 to 2000, U.S. farm sector productivity nearly
tripled.
The real price of computer power has fallen an average of
30% per year over the past three decades.
1981: 213 computers connected to the Internet
2000: 60 million computers connected to the Internet
2001: iPod capacity = 5GB, 1000 songs.
2006: iPod capacity = 80GB, 20,000 songs.
4 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
Technological Progress in the Solow Model
Technological progress:
Ability to produce more output with a given amount of capital and labour (inputs).
Here, technological progress works through improving the efficiency of labour input
Labour augmenting technological growth: Let E be defined as the efficiency of labour — as E grows, labour is more efficient.
Examples of things that influence E:
– health, education – new technology (e.g., computers)
5 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
Assume:
Technological progress is labor augmented: it increases
labor efficiency at the exogenous rate g:
The production function as:
where, L E = the number of effective workers
Suppose, L = 100 and E = 1, then L × E = 100 Technological growth gives E = 2, so L × E = 200. Labour is 100 percent more efficient
6 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
So, the labour factor of production (effective labor, L E ) is
growing at a rate (n+g)
So, the break even investment is ( + n + g)k
consists of:
k to replace depreciating capital
n k to provide capital for new workers
g k to provide capital for the new “effective”
workers created by technological progress
7 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
8 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
Now the capital accumulation:
In the SS, :
In steady state:
- y, k, and c, measured as per effective worker, are constant
- Y/L, K/L, and C/L are growing at the rate of technological
progress g.
9 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
Recall,
In steady state:
Since, E is growing at rate g, so is Y/L
Y, K, and C are growing at rate (n+g)
“According to the Solow model, only technological progress
can explain sustained growth and persistently rising living
standards.”
10 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
The Golden Rule:
As before, the golden rule level is derived from consumption
function maximization. When c* is maximized:
or,
11 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
Model’s Predictions
There were two main predictions:
a. Differences in the level of per capita income, explained in
the model by:
o differences in saving rates
o differences in population growth rates
o differences in technology growth rates
b. Differences in the growth rates of per capita income
o differences in technology growth rates
12 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
We can re-organize our assessment in terms of convergence.
Our model makes two predictions concerning convergence of
economies over time:
1. Countries with similar saving rates, technology and
population growth should converge to the same steady state
- output per person disparities disappear in the steady state
2. Under the same conditions, low income countries should grow
faster than high income countries (in the transition to steady
state)
13 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
But, if two economies have different rates of saving, and two
have different SS, then we should not expect convergence.
Instead, each economy will approach its own steady state.
The Solow model predicts the conditional convergence
countries converge to their own steady states, which are
determined by saving, population growth, and education.
This prediction comes true in the real world
14 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
Growth Accounting: Technological Change
The production function with effects of the changing
technology is:
where, A is the current level of technology, called total
factor productivity.
For given levels of inputs, if A increases by 1 percent output
increases by 1 percent.
15 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
Taking log and doing the first order total derivatives:
16 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
or,
This is the central equation of growth accounting
R is the growth in total factor productivity, which is not
observable and cannot be explained by changes in inputs
R is called the Solow residual
17 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
Policy to Promote Growth
a. Evaluating the rate of saving
Use the Golden Rule to determine whether the Canadian saving
rate and capital stock are too high, too low, or about right.
If (MPK ) > (n + g ),
Canada is below the Golden Rule steady state and should
increase s.
If (MPK ) < (n + g ),
the Canadian economy is above the Golden Rule steady
state and should reduce s.
18 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
To estimate (MPK ), three factors required, and for the
Canadian these are given as:
1. The capital stock is about 3 times of one year’s GDP:
k = 3 y
2. About 10% of GDP is used to replace depreciating
capital:
k = 0.1 y
3. Capital’s income share to the GDP is 33%:
MPK k = 0.33 y
Using 1 and 2, we get =0.033, depreciation rate
Using 1 and 3, we get MPK = 0.11
19 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
So, for the Canadian economy MPK = 0.077
Since 1950, the real GDP in Canada has grown at just under 4
percent per year. As such, (n + g)= 0.04
That is, (MPK ) > (n + g )
7.7% 4%
The capital stock in Canada is well below the Golden Rule
Level
Suggests saving/investment should be increased
Increase capital formation has been a high priority of
the Canadian economic policy
20 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
b. How to increase the saving and investment
Reduce the government budget deficit (or increase the budget
surplus).
Increase incentives for private saving:
reduce capital gains tax, corporate income tax, estate tax
as they discourage saving.
replace federal income tax with a consumption tax.
expand tax incentives for IRAs (individual retirement
accounts) and other retirement savings accounts
21 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
c. Encouraging technological progresses
Patent laws: encourage innovation by granting temporary
monopolies to inventors of new products.
Tax incentives for R&D
Grants to fund basic research at universities
Industrial policy: encourages specific industries that are key
for rapid technological progress (subject to the preceding
concerns).
22 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
Endogenous growth theory
Solow model:
sustained growth (long-run) in living standards is due
to technological progress.
the rate of technological progress is exogenous.
Endogenous growth theory:
a set of models in which technological change is
treated as endogenous. At a general level, these are
theories that model the process of creating,
disseminating, and using ideas (new technology)
23 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
Simple AK Model
A Basic Model:
No labour input, just capital.
Let, the Production function:
Y = A K
where, A is the amount of output for each unit of capital
(A is exogenous & constant)
Key difference between this model & Solow: MPK is
constant here, diminishes in Solow
24 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
Investment:
Depreciation:
Equation of motion for total capital:
Dividing the capital accumulation function both side by K, and use Y=AK we get:
Or,
If , then income will grow forever, and
investment is the “engine of growth”.
Here the permanent growth rate depends on s. In
Solow model, it does not.
25 Chapter 8: Economic Growth II. Fall 2012
Does Capital have diminishing returns or not?
Depends on definition of “capital”
If Capital is narrowly defined (only plant and equipment),
then yes
Advocates of endogenous growth theory argue that
knowledge is a type of capital
If so, then constant returns to capital is more plausible,
and this model may be a good description of economic
growth.