Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

  • Upload
    lh

  • View
    237

  • Download
    5

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    1/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Business Ethics

    Concepts & Cases

    Manuel G. Velasquez

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    2/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Chapter Seven

    The Ethics of Job

    Discrimination

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    3/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Denition of Discrimination

    The wrongful act of distinguishingillicitly among people not on thebasis of individual merit but on thebasis of pre!udice or some otherinvidious or morally reprehensibleattitude"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    4/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Types of Discrimination

    #ntentional discrimination $ conscious anddeliberate discrimination"

    %nintentional discrimination $ discriminationthat is not consciously or deliberately soughtbut is brought about by stereotypes or as anunintended outcome"

    #ndividual discrimination $ discrimination ofone or a few individuals acting on their own"

    #nstitutional discrimination $ discriminationthat is the result of the actions of all or many ofthe people in an institution and of their routineprocesses and policies"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    5/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    hat is '(rmative 'ction)

    'ny program designed to ensure thatminorities women or members of someother group are ade*uately representedwithin an organi+ation and its various levels

    by ta,ing positive steps to increase theirnumber when underrepresented" hat counts as -ade*uate representation.

    depends on the ob!ectives of the program/ some aim at having the same proportion of

    women or minorities as e0ists in the pool fromwhich new members are drawn

    others aim at achieving the diversity needed tomeet organi+ational ob!ectives

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    6/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Discrimination and the 1aw

    Civil 2ights 'ct of 3456 made it illegal to base hiring ring or

    compensation decisions on race color religionse0 or national origin

    created the E*ual Employment 7pportunityCommission 8EE7C9 to administer the 'ct

    E0ecutive 7rder 33:65 re*uired companies doing business with the

    federal government to ta,e steps to redress racialimbalance in wor,force

    E*ual Employment 7pportunity 'ct of 34;: gave EE7C increased power to combat -under

    representation. and to re*uire a(rmative actionprograms

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    7/23Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Controversy over =s some insist discrimination is

    only individual and intentional" #n the 344=s the view prevails it can also be

    institutional and unintentional"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    8/23Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    ?rima

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    9/23Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Discrimination in the %nitedStates

    Aap between average family incomes of whitesand minorities has not decreased"

    Aaps between average incomes and medianearnings of men and women have decreased

    but are still large" women earn less than lesseducated men

    women earn less in every occupational group

    Aaps between the average earnings of

    minorities and of whites have hardly narrowed inorities earn less than less educated whites

    ?ercent of minorities in poverty is : to times thewhite percentage

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    10/23Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Discrimination in the %nitedStates

    ?overty rate of families headed bywomen is twice that of maleheadedfamilies"

    Salaries of -womens !obs. aresignicantly lower than -mens !obs".

    Toppaying e0ecutive positions are lledby menF a -glass ceiling. stops women"

    The earnings gaps are not e0plained byeducation career choices preferenceswor, history training or absenteeism"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    11/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    #ncreasing ?roblemsfor omen and inorities

    omen and minorities ma,e up mostnew wor,ers but face signicantdisadvantages"

    omen are steered into lowpaying!obs and face a -glass ceiling. andse0ual harassment"

    inorities need s,ills and educationbut lac, them"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    12/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    'rguments 'gainstDiscrimination

    %tilitarian Discrimination leads to ine(cient use of human

    resources"

    2ightsbased

    Discrimination violates basic human rights byholding minorities and women as -inferior". Discrimination cannot be universali+ed"

    Justicebased Discrimination results in un!ust distributions of

    benets and burdens" Discrimination violates the formal principle of

    e*uality by diGerentiating between people on thebasis of characteristics that are not relevant to !obperformance"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    13/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Se0ual @arassment

    %nwelcome se0ual advances re*uests forse0ual favors and other verbal or physicalcontact of a se0ual nature constitute se0ualharassment when/

    839 submission to such conduct is made eithere0plicitly or implicitly a term or condition of anindividuals employment8:9 submission to or re!ection of such conduct byan individual is used as the basis for

    employment decisions aGecting such individual89 such conduct has the purpose or eGect ofunreasonably interfering with an individualswor, performance or creating an intimidatinghostile or oGensive wor,ing environment"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    14/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    oral 7b!ections to Se0ual@arassment Auidelines

    Auidelines prohibit -intimidating hostileor oGensive wor,ing environment". But it is sometimes hard to distinguish this

    from male rudeness not intended to degradewomen"

    Auidelines prohibit -verbal or physicalcontact of a se0ual nature. when it has

    the -eGect of unreasonably interferingwith an individuals wor, performance". But this seems to re*uire use of purely

    sub!ective !udgments"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    15/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    oral 7b!ections to Se0ual@arassment Auidelines

    Auidelines prohibit -verbal conduct. thatcreates an -intimidating hostile oroGensive wor,ing environment". But this can conHict with the right to free

    speech" Auidelines hold employer guilty of

    employees se0ual harassment even ifemployer did not ,now nor could haveprevented it" But some respond that eradicating se0ual

    harassment !usties forcing employer to beresponsible for preventing it and it is an-e0ternal cost. employers should internali+e"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    16/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    7ther Types ofDiscrimination

    'ge which is protected by the 'geDiscrimination in Employment 'ct

    Se0ual orientation which has few

    protections against discrimination

    Transse0ual status which has fewprotections

    Disability which is protected by the'mericans with Disabilities 'ct

    7besity which has no protections"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    17/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    1egal Status of '(rmative'ction

    '(rmative action is legal when used tocorrect a racial or se0ual imbalance that isthe result of previous discrimination"

    #t is also legal when used to correct anegregious persistent and manifest racialimbalance not caused by previousdiscrimination"

    #t can be used in hiring"

    Can be used to achieve educationaldiversity and broadcast diversity"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    18/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    1egal Status of '(rmative'ction

    Cannot use inHe0ible *uotasImust benarrowly tailored to their ob!ectives"

    Cannot be used in layoGs"

    Cannot overrule seniority"

    Cannot be used in government setaside programs e0cept as a last resortin an e0treme case involving previousracial bias by the government"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    19/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Compensation 'rgument for'(rmative 'ction

    Claims a(rmative action compensatesgroups for past discrimination"

    Critici+ed as unfair because those who

    benet were not harmed and those whopay did not in!ure"

    Some argue in response to criticism thatdiscrimination has harmed all minoritiesand women and all whites and maleshave beneted from it"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    20/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    %tilitarian 'rgumentfor '(rmative 'ction

    Claims a(rmative action reducesneed by beneting minorities andwomen in need and so increases

    utility Critici+ed on grounds that its costs

    outweigh its benets and that other

    ways of reducing need will producegreater utility"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    21/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    E*ual Justice 'rgumentfor '(rmative 'ction

    '(rmative action will secure e*ualopportunity by a fairer distribution of

    !obs by neutrali+ing the eGects of

    unconscious bias that aGects!udgments about minorities andwomen and by placing women and

    minorities in less disadvantaged andmore competitive positions incompetitions with males and whites"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    22/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    E*ual Justice 'rgumentfor '(rmative 'ction

    '(rmative action is a morally legitimatemeans for securing e*ual opportunity"

    #t is not a form of -reverse discrimination.because it is not based on invidious !udgments ofmale inferiority nor aims at destroying e*ual

    opportunity"

    #t does not use a nonrelevant characteristic sincerace and se0 are relevant in this limited conte0t"

    #t does not harm minorities and women and anyharm would be less than the harms inHicted bycurrent unconscious discrimination"

  • 7/21/2019 Chapter 7 The Ethics of Job Discrimination

    23/23

    Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Conclusions

    aluing and managing a diverse wor,force is more than ethically andmorally correct"

    #ts also a business necessity"

    Companies that fail to do an e0cellent!ob of recruiting retaining developing

    and promoting women and minoritiessimply will be unable to meet theirsta(ng needs"