Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ExamplesofEffectiveTechniquesforImprovingtheQualityofEnvironmentalDocuments
Chapter7.Figures
Figureshelptoenhancereadabilitybyenablingareadertovisualizeconditionsthataredescribedinthetext.Butafigurecandetractfromreadabilityifthefigureitselfisnotclear,orifthereaderfindsitdifficulttocorrelatethedescriptioninthetexttothefeaturesshownonthefigure.ThefollowinggoodpracticescanhelptomaximizetheeffectivenessoffiguresinNEPAdocuments:
Labelkeyelementsthatarediscussedinthetext.Inmostcases,figuresareintendedtobereadincombinationwithaccompanyingtext.Forthefiguretobeeffective,featuresdiscussedinthetextshouldbelabeledonthefigure.Forexample,ifthetextreferstoaseriesofintersectionsornoise‐sensitivereceptors,thereaderexpectsthosefeaturestobelabeledontheaccompanyingfigure.Readersarelikelytobecomefrustratedifthefiguresdonotidentifyfeaturesdiscussedinthetext.
Makeimportantelementsstandoutagainstthebackground.Thebackgroundofafigure‐e.g.,thebasemap‐shouldprovideenoughinformationtoorientthereader,butnotsomuchthatitdistractsfromtheprimaryfocusofthefigure.Inaddition,itishelpfultouselightcolorsforthebackgroundmapandboldcolorsforthemajorelements.
Ensurethatthelegendisclearandcomplete.Includingaclearandcompletelegendshouldbeastandardpractice.Toensurethatthisisdone,thereviewprocessforaNEPAdocumentshouldincludespecialattentiontolegends.Inaddition,ifcolorsareusedfordifferentfeatures,thereviewprocessshouldensurethatcolorsareclearlydistinguishablefromoneanotheronboththefigureandthelegend.
Inadditiontothesepractices,itispossibletousegraphicdesignerswiththeexpertisetodevelopfiguresthatdisplaycomplexinformationincompellingandcreativeways.Buteffectiveuseoffiguresdoesnotrequireunusualsteps.Thekeyistotakethebasicstepsthatenablethereadertounderstandwhatisshownonthefigureandtomaketheconnectionbetweenthefiguresandtext.
Examples of Effective Techniques for Improving the Quality of Environmental Documents
(Thispageisintentionallyleftblank.)
www.environment.transportation.org
Important Features Clearly Labeled(i.e., the figure labels features that are mentioned in the accompanying text and tables)
NC: Mid-Currituck FEIS
OR: OR 62 FEIS
WA: Mukilteo FEIS
N
Scale in Miles
0 1 2
VIRGINIA
NORTH CAROLINA
CURRITUCK CLUBHOUSE DRIVE
AlbemarleSound
CurrituckSound
Jarvisburg
Olds
Powells Pt.
DARE
CU
RRITU
CK
Hog Quarter Landing
Mamie
Spot
SouthernShores
Kitty Hawk
Harbinger
Point Harbor
Duck
12
158
12
Atlantic Ocean
Maple
Swamp
Coinjock
Aydlett
Corolla
Poplar Branch
WaterlilyBarco
Church's Island
Grandy
SR 1140
Aydlett Road
SR 1132
SR 11
42W
aterlil
y Ro
ad
SR 1137
136
136
Olds
158 CurrituckSound
North River
12
12
12
Coinjock Bay
158
158
168
12
158
158
ALBACORE STREETIntra
coasta
l Wat
erway
Jarvisburg ColoredSchool (DOE)
C.W. Wright Store(DOE)
(Former) GrandySchool (DOE)
Ellie and Blanton SaundersDecoy Workshop (DOE)
Christian AdvocateBaptist Church (DOE)
Dr. W.T. GriggsHouse (DOE)
Samuel McHorneyHouse (DOE)
Daniel SaundersHouse (DOE)Coinjock Colored
School (DOE)
Currituck Sound RuralHistoric District (DOE)
Corolla HistoricDistrict (DOE)Currituck Beach
Light Station (NR)
Whalehead Club(NR)
C2
C1
Dexter W. SnowHouse (DOE)
FigureHistoricProperties 3-4
LEGENDDEIS Bridge Corridors
Preferred Alternative Bridge Corridor
County Boundaries
Area of Potential Effect (APE)Resource listed (NR) on or eligible (DOE) for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places
PA
Techniques to note:- important features are clearly labeled,allowing reader to identify featuresdiscussed in the accompanying text
CHAPTER 3: Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures 3 - 408
Figure 3.17-2
#I #I#I"J
#I
#I#I#I
#I
"J#I
#I
#I
#I
#I
#I
#I#I"J
Medford International
Airport
¬Ê62
¬Ê140
§̈¦5
White City
MedfordNSA 01
NSA 02
NSA 03
NSA 04
NSA 05
NSA 06
NSA 07
NSA 08
NSA 09
NSA 10NSA 11
NSA 12
NSA 13
NSA 14
NSA 15
NSA 16
NSA 17
NSA 18
NSA 19
Fig 3.17-3 & 4
Fig 3.17-5 to 3.17-10
N
NoiseSensitive Areas
andNoise Measurement
LocationsOverview
September 2012
Source: Jackson County GIS,ODOT, URS Corp.
Map Features
0 0.5 1Miles
"J Long Term Locations#I Short Term Locations
Noise Measurement
Project Footprints
Design Option C
Design Option A
Fig 3.17-11 to 3.17-16
SD Alternative
DI Alternative
Design Option B
Noise Sensitive Area
Techniques to note:- important features are clearly labeled,allowing reader to identify featuresdiscussed in the accompanying text
Mukilteo Multimodal Project | Final Environmental Impact Statement
Final EIS Chapter 3 | Transportation 3-7June 2013
Figure 3-3. Study Area Intersections
Techniques to note:- important features are clearly labeled; insetphotos help readers to visualize theintersections shown.
www.environment.transportation.org
Major Elements Stand Out Clearly Against Background
NC: Mid-Currituck Bridge FEIS
AlbemarleSound
CurrituckSound
Jarvisburg
Olds
Powells Pt.
DARE
CU
RRITU
CK
Hog Quarter Landing
Mamie
Spot
SouthernShores
Kitty Hawk
Harbinger
Point Harbor
Duck
12
158
12
N
Atlantic Ocean
Maple
Swamp
Coinjock
Aydlett
Corolla
Poplar Branch
WaterlilyBarco
Church's Island
Grandy
SR 1140
Aydlett Road
SR 1132
SR 1137
136
136
Olds
158 CurrituckSound
North River
12
12
12
Coinjock Bay
158
158
168
Scale in Miles
0 1 2
12
158
ALBACORE STREET
VIRGINIA
NORTH CAROLINA
Intra
coasta
l Wat
erway
158
CURRITUCK CLUBHOUSE DRIVECURRITUCK CLUBHOUSE DRIVE
DUCK WOODS DRIVE
CYPRESSKNEE TRAIL
CYPRESSKNEE TRAIL
Median AccelerationLane at US 158/Waterlily Road
Intersection
Toll Plaza
SR 11
42
Wate
rlily
Road
SR 11
42
Wate
rlily
Road
Figure
Preferred Alternative 2-2
LEGEND
New Roadway
County Boundaries
Third Outbound Lane for HurricaneEvacuation (Cypress Knee Trail to450 feet west of Duck Woods Drive)Four Lanes
Reversal of Center Turn Lanefor Hurricane Evacuation
New Bridge
Preferred Alternative Bridge Corridor Alignment
InterchangeRoundabout
Techniques to note:- simple, clean background, so that keyfeatures stand out clearly- bold, easily identified colors are usedto depict important elements- important features are labeled
www.environment.transportation.org
Legend Is Clear and Complete(and includes north arrow)
OR: OR 62 FEIS
WA: I-90 FEIS
CHAPTER 3: Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures3 - 308
Figure 3.11-3
Little ButteCree
k
South Jack Creek
North Swanson Creek
South Swanson Creek
Up ton CreekBear C
ree k
Lone Pine Creek
Whetst one C reek
Whetstone Creek N
Project AreaWildlife Linkages
andWildlife/Vehicle
CollisionsSeptember 2012
¬Ê62
§̈¦5
Map Features
Stream
Area of Potential Impact
Wildlife Linkages
Northwestern Pond Turtle
Elk
Project Footprint
Source: Jackson County GIS,Oregon DFW, URS Corp.
Conservation Opportunity Areas (COA)
Antelope Creek COA
North Medford COA
0 0.5 1Miles
Wildlife/Vehicle CollisionFrequency
Highest
Med-High
Medium
Med-Low
Lowest
Note: No wildlife/vehicle collision frequency shown on OR 62 between approximately Delta Waters Rd and Coker Butte Rd
due to lack of data.
Techniques to note:- legend is clear and complete;each element shown on the figureis clearly labeled in the legend.
5.7 Noise
SR 520, I-5 TO MEDINA: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND HOV PROJECT | FINAL EIS AND FINAL SECTION 4(F) AND 6(F) EVALUATIONS 5.7-3
would approach or exceed the NAC, and provides a symbol indicating whether an average person would notice an increase, decrease, or no change in traffic noise. Changes in traffic noise are typically noticeable at 3 dBA. Noise levels at locations shown as having no noticeable change would remain within 2 dBA of current levels.
As shown in Table 5.7-2 and Exhibit 5.7-2, Options A, K, and L would also decrease the number of residences where noise levels exceed the NAC, although the decrease would be less than with the Preferred Alternative. Under Option A, the number of residences exceeding the NAC would decrease to 249. Under Options K and L, the number of residences exceeding the NAC would decrease to 256 and 235, respectively. The
Techniques to note:- legend is clear and complete; each element shownon the figure is clearly labeled in the legend.
(Thispageisintentionallyleftblank.)