27
Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed, the pelagic environment encompasses the entire watercolumn of the seas and oceans. The pelagic environment extends from the tropics to the polar regions, and from the sea surface to the abyssal depths, and is a highly heterogeneous and dynamic three-dimensional habitat. The pelagic is home to some of the most revered and reviled marine inhabitants, but great whales and jellyfish alike are subject to the consequences of pelagic ecosystem vari- ability. Physical processes in the pelagic exert major control on biological activity, and lead to substantial geographic variability in production. Knowledge of biophysical interactions is essential for understanding ecological patterns and processes in the pelagic environment, and will be key for predicting changes there induced, for example, by climatic warming. 6.1 Introduction The term pelagic means ‘of the open sea’ and the pelagic realm is a largely open, unbounded environment in which the inhabitants have freedom, within physiological limits, to move in three dimensions. Contrary to the common perception of the sea as an unchanging, relentless expanse, the open ocean is an environment where variability is very much the norm. Patchiness in physical properties (e.g. temperature, salinity, turbidity), biological production, and biomass exists at a range of scales in space (centimetres to hundreds of kilometres) and time (minutes to decades). One of the key challenges to understanding open- ocean function lies in understanding the mechanisms that cause, and consequences of, this patchiness (Mackas & Tsuda 1999). Despite the fact that much of the open ocean is remote from land, beyond the horizon for land-based observers, it has not escaped human impacts. For example, 90% of stocks of large pelagic fish such as tuna (Scombridae) and jacks (Carangidae) may have been removed by fishing (Myers & Worm 2003), and whole zooplankton communities have l The open ocean is an highly variable environment.

Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

Chapter 6

Pelagic Ecosystems

CHAPTER SUMMARY

Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed, the pelagic environment

encompasses the entire watercolumn of the seas and oceans. The pelagic environment

extends from the tropics to the polar regions, and from the sea surface to the abyssal

depths, and is a highly heterogeneous and dynamic three-dimensional habitat. The

pelagic is home to some of the most revered and reviled marine inhabitants, but great

whales and jellyfish alike are subject to the consequences of pelagic ecosystem vari-

ability. Physical processes in the pelagic exert major control on biological activity, and

lead to substantial geographic variability in production. Knowledge of biophysical

interactions is essential for understanding ecological patterns and processes in the

pelagic environment, and will be key for predicting changes there induced, for example,

by climatic warming.

6.1 Introduction

The term pelagic means ‘of the open sea’ and the pelagic realm is a

largely open, unbounded environment in which the inhabitants have

freedom, within physiological limits, to move in three dimensions.

Contrary to the common perception of the sea as an unchanging,

relentless expanse, the open ocean is an environment where variability is

very much the norm. Patchiness in physical properties (e.g. temperature,

salinity, turbidity), biological production, and biomass exists at a range

of scales in space (centimetres to hundreds of kilometres) and time

(minutes to decades). One of the key challenges to understanding open-

ocean function lies in understanding the mechanisms that cause, and

consequences of, this patchiness (Mackas & Tsuda 1999).

Despite the fact that much of the open ocean is remote from land,

beyond the horizon for land-based observers, it has not escaped human

impacts. For example, 90% of stocks of large pelagic fish such as tuna

(Scombridae) and jacks (Carangidae) may have been removed by fishing

(Myers & Worm 2003), and whole zooplankton communities have

l The open ocean is an highly

variable environment.

Page 2: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

shifted their spatial distribution (Beaugrand et al. 2002) possibly in

response to ocean warming, itself most likely caused by

anthropogenically-released greenhouse gasses (IPCC 2001).

The pioneering studies of open-ocean ecology made from vessels

with evocative names such as Discovery, Challenger, and Atlantis have

been enhanced in recent years with observations from technologically

advanced research platforms that include Earth-orbiting satellites

(Bricaud et al. 1999) and unmanned autonomous underwater vehicles

(AUVs) (Griffiths 2003). The aim of this chapter is to provide a synthesis

of open-ocean ecosystem function and the factors that control it, insight

into difficulties associated with sampling the heterogeneous pelagic

realm, and some examples of ecological step-changes (regime shift) in

the global pelagic environment.

6.2 Definitions and Environmental Features

The pelagic realm spans the entirety of the water column, beginning at

the sea surface and ending just above the seabed (the benthic realm;

Chapters 7 and 8). The pelagic realm can be subdivided by total water

depth and distance from shore. The neritic zone lies adjacent to shore,

over continental shelves, and covers about 8% of the Earth’s total sea

area. Out beyond the continental shelf break, which is delimited typic-

ally by the 200 m depth contour, lies the vast, open oceanic zone (92%

of the total sea area that covers 65% of the Earth’s surface). There are

numerous differences between the neritic and oceanic zones, differences

that arise not least because of differences in proximity to land and

consequent differences in nutrient and sediment loading in the water

column (much of the sediment load in the seas and oceans is terrigenous

and is delivered by rivers and estuaries; Chapter 4). Sailing out from a

coastal port towards the open sea it is common to notice a transition

from turbid to clear, blue waters. This transition is obvious not just from

the deck of a ship but is visible from space. Indeed, interpretations

of satellite remote sensed observations of ocean properties have to

distinguish ‘Case 1’ waters, where the ocean colour is determined pre-

dominantly by algal pigments, from ‘Case 2’ waters where reflections

from particulate matter dominate (Fig. 6.1) (Babin et al. 2003). One

adaptive biological consequence of the difference in sediment and par-

ticulate loading between the oceanic and neritic zones can perhaps be

seen in squid anatomy. Myopsin squid inhabit the neritic zone (for

example Loligo forbesi, which is common in north-west European

coastal waters, or L. opalescens from the west coast of the USA) and

have a membrane across the eye that may serve to protect the eye from

particulate irritants suspended in the water: in the open ocean myopsin

l Despite its apparent

remoteness, the open ocean has

been influenced strongly by

human activities such as fishing

and anthropogenic climate

warming.

l The neritic and oceanic zones

are very different, due in part to

their differing distances from the

coastline.

6.2 DEFINITIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES 213

Page 3: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

squid are replaced largely by members of the suborder Oegopsina (for

example the European flying squid, Todarodes sagittatus) in which the

membrane is absent, possibly because it is unnecessary.

The pelagic component of the open ocean can be divided further by

depth. The upper surface of the ocean is known as the neustic zone and,

in the tropics especially, is an habitat made harsh by exposure to high

Case 1

Case 2

Fig. 6.1 An enhanced true-colour view of ocean colour from the SeaWiFS satellite

(18 May 1998 1308 GMT) showing Case 1 and 2 waters around and to the south-west

of the British Isles, North-West Europe. Satellite images were received by the NERC

Dundee Satellite Receiving Station and processed by Peter Miller and Gavin

Tilstone at the Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML) Remote Sensing Group

(www.npm.ac.uk/rsdas/). SeaWiFS data courtesy of the NASA SeaWiFS project

and Orbital Sciences Corporation.

l The presence of a protective

eye membrane in neritic squid

may be an adaptation to

heavy particulate loading in

near-shore seas.

6: PELAGIC ECOSYSTEMS214

Page 4: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

levels of ultraviolet radiation. Floating organisms inhabiting this zone

typically have a blue colouration (Fig. 6.2) due to the presence of pro-

tective pigments that are able to reflect this damaging part of the light

spectrum. The development of the ozone hole in the Earth’s atmosphere

has resulted in increased levels of UV radiation reaching the Earth’s

surface (the ozone layer acts as an UV shield), particularly in the

southern hemisphere. In the Southern Ocean, Antarctic krill (Euphausia

superba) may be particularly vulnerable to UV-induced DNA mutation

because krill DNA is rich in thymine, which is the base that is most

susceptible to UV radiation damage (Jarman et al. 1999). Since krill

migrate away from the sea surface during daylight hours, however, their

behaviour will probably serve to limit DNA damage, but UV damage to

other species remains a distinct possibility.

Light also plays an important role in pelagic ecosystem function away

from the neustic zone, both because it drives primary production

(Chapter 2) and because it enables visual predation (predators that hunt

using the sense of sight). In clear oceanic waters the threat from visual

predators is increased because these predators can detect prey over

greater ranges (Aksnes & Giske 1993). Shark attacks on humans often

occur in turbid waters (Cliff 1991), possibly because under these con-

ditions prey recognition is difficult and humans are mistaken for typical

prey such as seals. The upper part of the water column into which light

penetrates is called the photic zone. In clear tropical oceanic waters this

zone may extend as deep as 200 m (much less in more turbid, temperate

locations), although at this depth light intensity will usually be too low

to drive photosynthesis (Chapter 2).

The upper 200 m of the water column is also known as the epipelagic

(Fig. 6.3). Light at the red end of the spectrum is absorbed rapidly by

seawater and does not penetrate far into the epipelagic zone (Chapter 2).

Red colours are effectively invisible at depth, therefore, and many pelagic

crustaceans adopt this colour as a means of camouflage against visual

predators (Fig. 6.4). Below the epipelagic zone are, sequentially, the

mesopelagic (200 m to 2000 m), the bathypelagic (2000 m to 4000 m),

and the abyssopelagic (4000 m to 6000 m) zones. As depth increases,

organisms in the pelagic environment are faced with increasing physio-

logical challenges: pressure increases by 1 atmosphere for every 10 m

increase in depth (Box 6.1; 1 atmosphere¼ 1 kg cm�2 or approximately

the mass of a Mini on an area 25 cm� 25 cm), and in some locations

oxygen-minima layers (Rogers 2000) arise at depth because oxygen is

depleted by bacteria breaking down material sinking from the sea surface.

In general terms the total mass of biota per unit volume of seawater

decreases with depth (Yamaguchi et al. 2002). This is because, with

the exception of energy input by chemoautotrophic processes at

hydrothermal vents (Chapter 8), biological processes in the deep sea are

l Organisms that live in the

neustic zone are particularly

vulnerable to changes in UV

radiation.

l Daily and seasonal changes in

incident light intensity have

profound effects on biological

processes in the pelagic

environment, driving vertical

migrations and seasonal plankton

blooms.

Fig. 6.2 The Portuguese

man-o-war (Physalia physalis, a

colonial Cnidarian) floats

at the sea surface and has a

blue colouration. Photograph

from joaoguaresma.com with

permission.

l The total mass of biota per unit

volume of seawater decreases

with depth.

6.2 DEFINITIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES 215

Page 5: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

fuelled entirely by photosynthetically–generated organic matter that

sinks from the illuminated surface region. As material sinks further from

the surface it becomes distributed through an ever-increasing volume of

water. This dilution effect means that as distance from the surface

increases, food availability decreases, with the consequence that less

animal biomass can be sustained at depth. In the deep pelagic zones,

Fig. 6.4 A mesopelagic

zooplankton/nekton sample

showing the predominance of

red-coloured crustaceans.

Photograph: Andrew Brierley.

Pelagic

NeriticOceanic

Epipelagic

Mesopelagic

200 m

1000 m

4000 m

6000 m

10000 m

Bathypelagic

Hadalpelagic

High water

Low water

Continental shelf

Benthic

Apho

tic

Abyssal

Hadal

Continental slopeBathyal

Littoral

Photic

Fig. 6.3 Depth zones.

6: PELAGIC ECOSYSTEMS216

Page 6: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

energy efficiency is particularly important and animals adopt stealthy,

sedentary lifestyles and use cunning mechanisms to ambush prey in

darkness (Seibel et al. 2000).

6.3 Pelagic Inhabitants: Consequences of Size

Pelagic organisms can be divided in to two categories on the basis of

their locomotory prowess. Plankton are unable to counteract the influ-

ence of currents and drift passively in the horizontal plane (ocean cur-

rents often exceed 1 knot or c.0.5 m s�1). Plankton can move vertically,

adjusting their depth, and do so pronouncedly during diel vertical

migrations at dawn and dusk (Fig. 6.5). Diel vertical migrations are a

ubiquitous feature of pelagic ecosystems (Hays 2003) and are thought to

be driven primarily by the trade off required to enable plankton to feed

in the food-rich upper water column and yet to avoid the illuminated

upper layer in daylight because of the increased risk of visual predation

incurred there at that time (Tarling 2003). Some organisms, such as

copepods and chaetognaths, complete their entire life cycle as plankton

and are called holoplankton. Others, such as fish larvae and barnacle

Box 6.1 Seawater as a dense and viscous (sticky) medium

Seawater is denser and more viscous than air. The increased density offers advantages

to some marine organisms, for example providing physical support that reduces the need

for skeletal strength, but also presents challenges such as rapidly increasing pressure with

depth. Seawater density varies as a function of the concentration of dissolved salts

(salinity; salinity is reported without units since it is defined in terms of the ratio of the

electrical conductivity of seawater to the electrical conductivity of a potassium chloride

standard, see also Chapter 4) and temperature (warm water is less dense than cold

water). The strength of cohesion, or stickiness, of a fluid is quantified by its dynamic

viscosity. The dynamic viscosity of olive oil, for example, is 40 times that of seawater.

The motion of a particle of a given size and velocity is more impeded through a medium

of greater dynamic viscosity (think of marbles sinking through a bottle of water and a

bottle of olive oil). For a fluid of a given dynamic viscosity (e.g. seawater) the continuity of

motion of a particle is controlled by its velocity and size, and can be quantified by the

Reynolds number (Re). For a given fluid, Re is simply ((particle velocity�particle size)/

dynamic viscosity). Re is dimensionless because the units used in its calculation cancel

out. Broadly speaking for small organisms moving at slow speeds Re is less than 1000

and seawater is ‘sticky’: ciliates, for example, stop the moment they cease swimming. For

larger organisms travelling at higher speeds Re is greater than 1000: the inertia of a large

pelagic fish, for example, enables it to continue gliding through the water even after it

has ceased active swimming (see also Chapter 3).

l Energy efficiency is important

in the deep pelagic due to

the dispersed nature of

potential food.

l The word plankton is derived

from the Greek word planao,

which means ‘to wander’

6.3 PELAGIC INHABITANTS: CONSEQUENCES OF SIZE 217

Page 7: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

larvae, spend only a part of their life cycle as plankton, either growing or

settling out to the seabed as they age, and are called meroplankton.

A planktic phase provides opportunities for dispersal and colonization,

but is also a stage that is particularly vulnerable to predation (Pechenik

1999, see also Chapter 13).

Organisms that are capable of swimming to the extent that they can

overcome currents are known as nekton. Inhabitants of the open ocean

span several orders of magnitude of size, ranging from viruses, bacteria,

and protozoa to large predators such as sharks and whales, which

may reach many metres in length and body masses of several tonnes.

Generally speaking, large organisms are nektic and smaller organisms

are planktic: micronekton have intermediate swimming abilities

and are of the order of 4 cm in length (for example large euphausiids).

This size-related difference in mobility arises in part because of the

interaction between size and viscosity (Box 6.1): seawater is essentially

a ‘sticky’ medium for small organisms (Van Duren & Videler 2003) and

a constant expenditure of energy is required to maintain their move-

ment. There are exceptions, however, and the Arctic lion’s mane jellyfish

(Cyanea arctica), for example, may attain tentacle lengths of 40 m

but is a passive, planktic drifter. The very smallest planktic organisms

include viruses and bacteria (Azam & Worden 2004) and protozoa

(Struder-Kypke & Montagnes 2002). The small size of these organisms

belies their importance to pelagic ecosystem function. Dissolved organic

carbon is taken up by bacteria, which are consumed by heterotrophic

nanoflagellates and in turn by ciliates in the so-called microbial loop at

the base of the food chain (Chapter 3). This loop recycles organic matter

l Animals whose larvae have a

planktic phase generally produce

a relatively high number of eggs

for their body mass.

100

200

300

400

500Dept

h (m

)

Longitude degrees

Echo

inten

sity,

dB

600

700

–38 –36 –34 –32 –30 –28 –26 –24

–50

–60

–70

–80

–90

Fig. 6.5 An echogram showing the rapid ascent of zooplankton and nekton (as

detected using a 38 kHz scientific echo-sounder) from depth to the near surface at

dusk. This migration from 400 m to 50 m takes less than 2 hours. The upper bar indicates

periods of day (light blue) and night (dark blue).

6: PELAGIC ECOSYSTEMS218

Page 8: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

that is too small to be consumed by metazoan plankton, and the

metazoans are able to prey upon ciliates. The microbial loop therefore

fuels the pelagic food chain, and is especially important in oligotrophic

waters (Lenz 2000).

As well as impacting mobility, organism size is also a major architect

of pelagic food web structure. Pelagic organisms will typically consume

food items whole and the size of item that an animal can consume is

constrained by its mouth size such that predators are usually substan-

tially larger than their prey (Cohen et al. 1993; Jennings & Warr 2003).

This concept is well captured by Brueghel’s picture Big fish eat little fish,

in which small fish are tumbling out of the mouths of successively bigger

fish (Fig. 6.6). A more trophically extensive example from the North Sea

has unicellular algae such as diatoms (c.100 mm diameter), grazed by

copepods (e.g. Calanus finmarchicus, c.3 mm length), which are in turn

predated by herring (Clupea harengus, c.20 cm length), which might be

consumed by gannets (Sula bassana, wing span c.180 cm). This strongly

size-structured progression is in marked contrast to many terrestrial

food chains where small predators (for example hyenas, body mass

c.40 kg) may cooperate in social groups to take herbivores that are

considerably larger (e.g. wildebeest, c.250 kg).

Pelagic food webs are often far more complex than the simple four-

linked-chain diatom-copepod-fish-bird example from the North Sea. An

analysis of a 29-species food web for the Benguela ecosystem undertaken

l Very few pelagic organisms

dismantle their prey before

eating, a behaviour more common

in benthic biota such as crabs.

l In terrestrial systems, animals

that forage in social groups can

deal with prey items much larger

than themselves.

Fig. 6.6 ‘Big Fish Eat Little Fish:’

after, by Pieter Brueghel the

Elder (1557) showing smaller

fish tumbling from the mouths of

bigger fish. The Metropolitan

Museum of Art, Harris Brisbane

Dick Fund, 1917. (17.3.859)

6.3 PELAGIC INHABITANTS: CONSEQUENCES OF SIZE 219

Page 9: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

to determine if culling Cape fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus)

would increase hake (Merluccius spp.) biomass (Yodzis 2000) noted that

there were over 28 million pathways from hake to seals! This com-

plexity of food webs, and the fact that most levels can be controlled

either from above (top-down control, e.g. by predation) or below

(bottom-up control, e.g. by food limitation, Verity & Smetacek 1996)

renders it very difficult to make predictions of the consequences of

bioregulation. In general smaller mean predator : prey body size ratios

are characteristic of more stable environments, and food chains are

longer when mean predator : prey body size ratios are small (Jennings &

Warr 2003). Systems that have shorter food chains are generally much

more susceptible to trophic cascade effects (Chapter 7).

6.4 Temporal and Spatial Variabilityin Pelagic Ecosystems

The open ocean is not homogenous. Interactions between physical and

biological processes result in variability over a range of temporal and

spatial scales, and patchiness is a key feature of pelagic ecosystems.

The Stommel diagram (Fig. 6.7) illustrates the scales of variability that

are inherent characteristics of pelagic ecosystems, from centimetres to

thousands of kilometres and from seconds to millennia, and shows how

variations in time and space are interlinked. It is important to appreciate

the interplay of temporal and spatial scale, and it is a theme that recurs

throughout this book. Phytoplankton are short-lived and are influenced

by small-scale mixing processes (Martin 2003). The diel vertical

migration of zooplankton at dawn and dusk is restricted to certain times

of day but occurs everywhere (Pearre 2003). Fish, which are generally

longer lived than zooplankton, are impacted by environmental variab-

ility over longer time scales: the Peruvian anchoveta (Engraulis ringens),

for example, is influenced strongly by the El Nino Southern Oscillation

that exhibits decadal scale variability (Chavez et al. 2003, see also

Chapters 7, 12, and 14).

6.4.1 Physical processes contributing to temporaland spatial variability

The physical properties of the open ocean are heterogeneous by

depth, position (latitude, longitude), and over time. In addition to the

depth-related changes in light intensity and oxygen concentration already

mentioned, vertical gradients in water temperature, density, and nutrient

concentration may also exist. Solar heating warms the upper ocean

leading to the development of a thermal gradient by depth. In some

l The complexity of food webs

means it is difficult (if not

impossible) to predict the

outcome of selective culling of

higher predators on lower tropic

levels.

l Fish, which are generally

longer lived than zooplankton,

are impacted by environmental

variability over longer time scales.

6: PELAGIC ECOSYSTEMS220

Page 10: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

l Where winds are light and

wave action slight, or in water

that is too deep to be mixed

completely by tidal flow, vertical

stratification can develop.

A

B

CD

F

H

G

E K

JI

9

6

3

02

46

810

121 cm

1 cm

100 cm

10 Km

10 Km

100 Km

1000 Km

10000 Km

SpaceTime

Ships

A. 'Micro' patchsB. SwarmsC. UpwellingD. Eddies amd ringsE. Island effectsF. 'El Nino' type eventsG. Small ocean basins'H. Biogeographical provincesI. Currents and oceanic fronts - lengthJ. CurrentsK. Oceanic fronts - width

Moorings

Satellites

Biomassvariability

Log L (cm)

Log P (sec)Minute

Hour

DayWeek

Month

Year

Century

1000 Y

10000 Y

Diel vertical migrationAnnual cycles

Ice age variations

Fig. 6.7 The Stommel diagram, overlain to show the scales that can be sampled with

various platforms, and features such as fronts. Modified from ICES Zooplankton

Methodology Manual, Harris et al. (eds., 2000), page 36, Copyright 2000, with

permission from Elsevier.

regions, combinations of tidal and wind-driven processes cause turbu-

lence and mixing of heated surface water with cooler water below.

However, in regions or seasons where winds are light and wave action

slight, or in water that is too deep to be mixed completely by tidal flow

(Chapter 7), pronounced vertical stratification can become established:

warm surface waters then become effectively isolated from cooler,

deeper waters by a thermocline. Vertical stratification is also promoted

in situations where fresh water is introduced. Rain, river run-off, and

ice-melt all introduce fresh water to the surface of the ocean. Low

salinity waters are less dense than high salinity waters (Box 6.1) and

stabilize the upper water column because more energy is required to mix

low salinity waters downwards. The strong density gradient between the

mixed, buoyant, low salinity surface waters and underlying high salinity

waters is known as the pycnocline. The depth of the mixed layer,

6.4 TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIABILITY 221

Page 11: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

as bounded by the pycnocline or thermocline, will vary depending upon

prevailing conditions (Chapters 2 and 7).

As well as causing downward mixing, wind can lead to the upward

transport of water from depth. Such wind-driven upwelling occurs over

a range of scales. At the small scale, Langmuir circulation is generated as

wind blows steadily across calm water, causing near-surface vortices

several metres in diameter to develop parallel to the wind flow (Box 6.2).

At the interfaces between neighbouring vortex cells, alternating lines of

upward and downward convergence develop. Flotsam accumulates on

the surface above the downward zones, leading to the development of

prominent, parallel wind lanes on the surface. Zooplankton may also

accumulate in downward zones because they are able to swim upwards

against the flow (Pershing et al. 2001).

At the large scale, wind plays a role inducing flow in most surface

currents. Currents do not flow parallel to the direction of the wind but,

due to interactions with the Coriolis force, when averaged over the whole

of the water column, currents move at 90� to the wind. Movement is to

Box 6.2 Wind-driven circulation processes

As wind blows over the surface of the sea it generates waves and induces vertical and

horizontal motion in the water. Langmuir cells are small-scale, parallel, helical vortices

that are often apparent as a series of wind lanes on the sea surface running parallel to

the direction of the wind. Vortices are usually not large enough to bring nutrients up

from deep water beneath the pycnocline.

Up welling(divergence)

50 m

Helical vortices

Down welling (convergences where seaweed, debris, foamand plankton accumulate)

Up

Down Down |continues

l Langmuir circulation can

lead to the accumulation of

zooplankton and flotsam, which

forms visible wind lanes, at the

sea surface.

6: PELAGIC ECOSYSTEMS222

Page 12: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

the right of the wind in the northern hemisphere and to the left in the

south. This movement is called Ekman transport (Box 6.2). It con-

tributes significantly to general ocean circulation and can result in

pronounced upwelling. In the case of the Benguela Current, for example,

and other southern hemisphere eastern boundary currents, the prevailing

south-easterly winds blow alongshore and drive near-shore Ekman flow

away from the coast. This in turn draws cold, nutrient-rich waters from

depth to the surface at the coast (Carr & Kearns 2003). Changes in

global wind patterns have the potential to affect upwelling and the

ecosystems that are dependent upon them (Grantham et al. 2004).

Horizontal boundaries between water masses with different physical

properties are known as fronts (Box 6.3). Fronts occur at a range of

BOX 6.2 continued|

Fig. 1 Large-scale ocean currents are also induced by wind, but occur at angles to the

direction of the wind rather than parallel to it. This is because of the interaction between

friction and the Coriolis force. The Coriolis force is the force experienced by a moving

body of water due to the fact that the planet is rotating. The water column can be

thought of as a series of horizontal layers. The upper layer at the sea surface is subject to

wind friction (wind stress) at the top and water friction (eddy viscosity) at the bottom.

Subsequent layers are impacted by friction with layers above and beneath. Slippage

between layers result in an exponential decrease in current speed with depth until, below

the depth of frictional influence, wind influence ceases. Cumulative impacts of

Coriolis force result in an increasing angle of deviation away from the wind with depth.

Current vectors in all layers form a spiral pattern known as an Ekman spiral. The

averaged effect of the spiral is that the mean motion of the wind-driven (Ekman) layer is

at right angles to the wind direction. Reprinted from Ocean Circulation, 2nd ed., the

Open University Course Team 2001, pp. 42 and 68, Copyright 2001, with permission

from Elsevier.

Wind stress

Wind stress

Average motion of the Ekman layer

Average motion of the Ekman layer

Ekman layer

Depth offrictionalinfluence

Coriolis force

Coriolis force

6.4 TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIABILITY 223

Page 13: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

Box 6.3 Front formation and elevated biological activity at fronts

In the same way that fronts on weather maps mark boundaries between different air

masses, fronts in the sea are boundaries between dissimilar bodies of water. Fronts occur

off estuaries at boundaries between fresh and salt water, in shelf seas between mixed

and stratified waters, at continental shelf breaks adjacent to upwelling regions and, at

the global scale, between major current systems. Fronts tend to be sites with higher

biological activity that the surrounding water masses, often because nutrients are

transported upwards into the stratified euphotic zone at fronts.

Tidal mixing fronts (also known as shelf sea fronts) occur between tidally mixed and

stratified waters. They occur when the intensity of turbulent mixing caused by tidally

induced flow over the seabed is sufficient to overcome the barrier to mixing caused by

thermal stratification. In simple terms, this is a function of the strength of the tidal flow

and water depth; a strong tidal flow will generate sufficient turbulence to completely mix

shallow water. On the stratified side of the front, nutrient concentrations in the warm

surface waters are depleted and the strong thermal gradient prevents nutrients from

beneath being mixed upwards. Phytoplankton growth is therefore nutrient limited and

low. On the well-mixed side of the front, although nutrients are not limited, phyto-

plankton are continually mixed down out of the illuminated surface layer and growth is

light-limited. At the front itself stratification weakens sufficiently to enable some vertical

nutrient flux but remains strong enough to hold phytoplankton in the photic zone long

enough for them to take advantage of the nutrients. Increased phytoplankton produc-

tion at fronts leads to higher zooplankton standing stocks and increased densities of

predators and underlying benthos (see also Chapters 2 and 7).

Eddies

Fron

t

Warm stratified

Along-front flow

Thermocline

Weak nutrientflux to base ofthermocline onstratified side of front

Increased fluxthrough weakerstratified side at front

Shallow

Strong vertical exchange

Tidal flowcauses turbulance

Deep

6: PELAGIC ECOSYSTEMS224

Page 14: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

scales, from tidal mixing fronts that separate mixed and stratified waters

in coastal seas (Hill et al. 1993) to major oceanographic boundaries such

as the North Wall of the Gulf Stream and the Antarctic Polar Front

(Taylor & Gangopadhyay 2001). High-velocity current jets associated

with fronts can be important long-distance transport routes for many

marine organisms: Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) are transported

widely throughout the Scotia Sea from breeding centres off the Antarctic

Peninsula on frontal currents (Thorpe et al. 2004), and large oceanic

squid such as Illex illecebrosus take advantage of currents for distribu-

tion and feeding (O’Dor 1992). Meanders in fronts can lead to columns

of water (core rings) being shed from one side of the front to the other;

the retroflection of the Agulhus current around the southern tip of

Africa, for example, sheds warm core rings regularly into the south

Atlantic (Garzoli et al. 1999) and is an important mechanism for trans-

oceanic mixing.

6.4.2. Consequences of temporal and spatial physicalvariability for pelagic primary productivityand biogeography

The depth to which water column mixing occurs, the mixed layer depth,

has major implications for primary production in the open ocean

because photosynthesis only takes place in illuminated surface waters.

If the mixed layer is deep it is possible that phytoplankton will sink or be

carried down below the compensation depth (Chapter 2), reducing net

production. In temperate waters, primary production is minimal during

winter when light levels and temperatures are low and the upper water

column is thoroughly mixed by storm action and convection (Backhaus

et al. 2003). Phytoplankton blooms do not commence until calmer,

warmer weather in the spring leads to upper water column stratification.

From this point on, phytoplankton cells are retained in the upper mixed

layer, benefit from the increased illumination from the sun as it reaches

higher angles in the sky, and grow and reproduce rapidly. Phytoplankton

require nutrients such as phosphate, silicate, and nitrate to grow. As

phytoplankton blooms develop, concentrations of these nutrients

become depleted and the effective isolation of the mixed layer from the

larger nutrient pool beneath means that nutrients are not replenished. In

temperate waters, nutrient limitation may inhibit phytoplankton growth

throughout the summer months. A second bloom may though occur at

the onset of autumn when wind-driven mixing brings nutrient-rich

waters from beneath the pycnocline up in to the illuminated surface

layer (Diehl 2002).

In regions of the world where upwelling is persistent throughout the

year (Box 6.2) nutrients tend not to be limited and annual primary

l Most fronts are highly mobile,

dynamic features that cannot be

represented realistically by single,

static lines on charts.

l Although the development of

stratification is a necessary

precursor to bloom formation, the

persistence of an upper layer that

is effectively cut off by density

and temperature gradients from

the waters beneath can eventually

inhibit phytoplankton growth.

l A phytoplankton maximum

can develop at the pycnocline

late in the season as this is the

interface between nutrient-rich

deep water and illuminated

nutrient depleted surface

stratified waters.

6.4 TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIABILITY 225

Page 15: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

production levels are high. However, in El Nino years, changes in pre-

vailing weather conditions reduce the usually strong upwelling off the

coast of western South America and ensuing nutrient limitation has

dramatic negative consequences for primary production and fisheries in

coastal waters. Tropical ocean basins tend to be permanently stratified

and primary production levels are low. As a consequence surface waters

in these tropical regions lack particulate matter and are very clear: such

waters are termed oligotrophic. Other areas of the world ocean have low

phytoplankton biomass despite the presence of high nutrient con-

centrations. These HNLC (high nutrient, low chlorophyll) regions

include the Southern Ocean and Equatorial Pacific, and hypotheses

proposed to explain their existence include grazing pressure and absence

of trace elements, particularly iron (Chapter 2).

Global variation in the pattern of annual primary production is

strikingly clear in images of averaged chlorophyll concentration obtained

through satellite imagery (see Fig. 2.3, Chapter 2). Regional coherence

in the pattern of annual phytoplankton production has been used as one

diagnostic feature in the hierarchical separation of the global ocean into

distinct biogeographic biomes and provinces (Longhurst 1998). A biome

is the largest coherent community unit that it is convenient to recognize,

and Longhurst (1998) distinguishes four in the global ocean, which are

characterized by the principal mechanisms driving their mixed layer

depth: in the Westerlies biome local winds and irradiance force the

mixed layer depth; in the Trades biome the mixed layer depth is influ-

enced by large-scale ocean-circulation processes; in the Polar biome

the presence of buoyant, fresh water from ice melt in spring constrains

the mixed layer depth; and in the Coastal biome diverse processes

including upwelling force the mixed layer depth. Within these biomes,

51 provinces are recognized (Chapter 1). Separation of the global ocean

into provinces is very useful because it allows regional differences in

physical oceanography to be used to gain understanding, and make

predictions, of regional differences in ocean ecology.

6.4.3 Consequences for higher trophic levelsof variability in primary production

Regions of the world’s ocean with high primary productivity support

richer pelagic communities, with higher total biomass, than do regions

with low primary production. In fact there is a direct linear relationship

between the magnitude of annual primary production and nekton (fish

and squid) production (Sommer et al. 2002) (Fig. 6.8). This relationship

is apparent in the distribution of global fish catches (Chapter 12):

nutrient-rich shelf seas and regions with strong upwelling account for

the vast majority of the world’s commercial catch (Watson & Pauly

l Iron is thought to be one of the

key limiting trace elements in

HNLC regions, and experimental

iron fertilization in these

locations has stimulated

phytoplankton production

(Boyd 2002).

l Knowledge that a particular

area of ocean lies in a particular

province enables predictions to be

made regarding ecosystem

function there, even if field data

for the specific area are lacking.

6: PELAGIC ECOSYSTEMS226

Page 16: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

2001), whereas oligotrophic central open-ocean basins contribute little.

Commercially important pelagic fish species do not consume phyto-

plankton directly but usually predate zooplankton and micronekton that

are primary consumers. Understanding zooplankton ecology is therefore

key to understanding fisheries production.

Zooplankton blooms are only able to develop once phytoplankton

biomass and production has become sufficient to sustain zooplankton

grazing rates. In temperate waters, therefore, peaks in zooplankton bio-

mass occur in spring and autumn slightly after the phytoplankton

blooms. In high latitudes, where seasonality is extreme and the phyto-

plankton bloom is limited to a single spring/summer peak, some zoo-

plankton species survive the dark, food impoverished winter months in

deep water in a dormant state called diapause. Copedods including

Calanus finmarchicus in the sub-Arctic north Atlantic and Calanoides

acutus in the Southern Ocean build up large stores of lipids during

summer feeding, a small proportion of which fuels their survival over

winter. At the end of summer, growth and development are arrested

and individuals sink, overwintering in a state of hibernation at depths

between 500 m and 2000 m (Box 6.4). In late winter or early spring

copepods emerge from diapause and migrate to the surface to spawn.

Because of the short production season, the timing of reproduction is

critical at high latitudes. By using lipid reserves accumulated in the

12 3

50 100 150 200 250 3000

5

10

15

20

25

4

5

6 7

8

910

Total phytoplankton production (g C m-2 yr-1)

Fish+

squid

prod

uctio

n (g w

et wt

m-2

yr-1

)

Fig. 6.8 The relationship between primary production and nekton production. Fish and

squid production¼ (0.095 Phytoplankton production) – 3.73, r2¼ 0.96. 1¼Atlantic

Ocean gyre centre, 2¼Atlantic ocean gyre boundaries, 3¼Hawaiian waters,

4¼Bothnian Sea, 5¼Gulf of Riga, 6¼Gulf of Finland, 7¼Baltic Sea, 8¼Nova Scotian

shelf, 9¼Gulf of Maine, 10¼Mid-Atlantic bight. Redrawn from Iverson 1990.

Copyright 2000 by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.

l GLOBEC (global ocean

ecosystem dynamics) http://

www.pml.ac.uk/globec is a

global research effort to

understand interactions between

primary consumers, higher trophic

levels and fisheries.

l Calanus finmarchicus survives

food depleted winter months in

the north Atlantic by drawing on

lipid reserves. This also enables

them to produce young in

advance of the phytoplankton

bloom in the following year.

6.4 TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIABILITY 227

Page 17: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

previous year to fuel reproduction, these copepods can spawn early,

independent of the present year’s phytoplankton bloom, and ensure that

their young are in place to fully exploit the short livid phytoplankton

bloom.

The timing of the phytoplankton bloom not only influences zoo-

plankton secondary production but also places a significant control

Box 6.4 Diapause depth, water density, and lipid composition

The overwintering depth of the copepod Calanus finmarchicus varies throughout its

distribution range in the north Atlantic. In the eastern Norwegian Sea, for example,

Calanus overwinters at about 800 m whereas in the Iceland Basin overwintering is at

around 1500 m (Heath et al. 2004), despite the fact that both locations have similar total

water depths (c.2000 m). The water column vertical temperature profile varies markedly

throughout the north Atlantic: in the eastern Norwegian Sea the temperature at the

overwintering depth is approximately 0 �C whereas in the Iceland Basin it is much

warmer (4 �C). This physical variation provides much insight into the variation of the

overwintering depth. At the onset of diapause Calanus becomes physically inactive and

sinks passively until it reaches the depth where it is neutrally buoyant. This is the depth at

which the density of the copepod is the same as the density of the surrounding seawater,

which itself is a function of ambient temperature and salinity. One of the major con-

tributors to variation in density between copepods is lipid composition, such that density

decreases as the proportions of lipid increases. Using knowledge of the temperature and

salinity at the overwintering depth in several locations, and hence the density there, it has

been possible to predict the proportion of lipid that should be expected in individuals

overwintering at particular locations. A very good linear relationship has been found

between predicted and actual values (Heath et al. 2004).

It is not yet clear what the main evolutionary drivers of variation in copepod lipid

composition are. In order to survive the winter individuals need to descend below the

depth of winter mixing, and will also have increased chances of survival overwinter if they

descend below depths where predators can operate. In Norwegian fjords overwintering

is shallower in fjords where visual predators are absent (Bagoien et al. 2001), but the

winter distribution of predators in the open ocean is not yet known. Ironically, therefore,

individuals that feed too successfully over summer and lay down excessive lipid reserves

may be unable to sink to depths below predators; this would provide a strong selective

pressure against over consumption and may be one reason why some copepods enter

diapause early in the year when the phytoplankton bloom is still in full swing. Since

current flow is different at different depths, the overwintering depth will also have a

profound influence on the location at which individual Calanus surface after diapuse.

In order to complete its life cycle successfully Calanus has to surface at a location where

offspring can be spawned and hatch and eat, and descend to overwinter to complete the

life cycle. It is likely that few depths will enable this to be achieved, providing another

source of selection. It is clear that the life cycle of Calanus is tied very closely to its

environment; understanding the environmental space-time dynamics will be vital to

gaining full understanding of regional variability in Calanus abundance and con-

sequences to higher trophic levels such as fisheries.

6: PELAGIC ECOSYSTEMS228

Page 18: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

upon organisms that predate upon zooplankton. Developing fish larvae

‘surf on the wave of zooplankton production’ and the match-mismatch

hypothesis (Cushing 1990) proposes that larval fish survival will be

greatest in years when the period of plankton production overlaps

most closely with the period of larval food demand. Satellite data

that revealed between-year variations in the timing of the spring

phytoplankton bloom support this hypothesis with regard to haddock

(Melanogrammus aeglefinus) on the shelf east of Nova Scotia (Platt et al.

2003; Fig. 6.9). An index of larval haddock survival (size of age 1 year

class divided by spawning stock biomass) showed that two exceptionally

strong year classes occurred when the peak of the spring phytoplankton

bloom was between 2 and 3 weeks earlier than the long-term average.

An early bloom may result in lower larval mortality caused by starvation.

Spatial as well as temporal coherence is required between production

and consumption if high-biomass pelagic communities are to develop.

At the large scale, it has been suggested that iron fertilization in regions

of low primary productivity could enhance production up the food chain

to zooplankton and fisheries, and that the increased photosynthesis

could also lead to an increased drawdown of atmospheric carbon

dioxide that may mitigate against climate change. Complex trophic

interactions, however, make implementation of this far from straight-

forward (Buesseler & Boyd 2003; Gnanadesikan et al. 2003). At the

smaller scale, patchiness is essential for maintaining ecosystem function.

If phytoplankton and grazers were mixed homogenously then resource

depletion would soon occur, whereas spatial segregation enables higher

l Survival of larval fish is greatest

when the overlap between the

period of planktic food

availability and food demand by

fish is greatest.

2

4

6

8

10

2 1 0 -1 -2 -3

Anomalies in the timing of spring blooms (weeks)

Survi

val in

dex (

R/SS

B)

20011980

20001979, 1997

1998

1981

1999

Fig. 6.9 Larval haddock survival (size of the year class at age 1 (R) divided by spawning

stock biomass (SSB)) against deviation from the mean time of the annual peak in

phytoplankton production. Timing of the peak of the spring phytoplankton bloom

explains 89% of the variance in larval survival, providing strong support for the match-

mismatch hypothesis. Redrawn from Platt et al. 2003 with permission from the author.

6.4 TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIABILITY 229

Page 19: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

overall biomass to be maintained (Brentnall et al. 2003). Furthermore,

if zooplankton did not aggregate in high densities then pelagic filter

feeders such as basking sharks and baleen whales would not be able to

survive on a diet of these organisms. Whales incur high energetic costs

while foraging (Acevedo-Gutierrez et al. 2002) and it has been esti-

mated, for example, that Right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) require

copepod prey concentrations to exceed a minimum threshold of 4500

individuals m�3 of seawater just to balance the energy expended during

feeding (Beardsley et al. 1996).

Frontal regions tend to be characterized by increased primary pro-

duction and to support particularly rich pelagic communities (Box 6.3).

Fronts are therefore sites of intense feeding activity and are targeted by

mobile predators including fish, squid, marine mammals, and birds

(Durazo et al. 1998). The exact mechanisms by which predators locate

prey in the wide expanse of the open ocean remain largely unknown and

different cues are likely to be important at different spatial scales

(Fauchald et al. 2000). In some ecosystems prey are located regularly in

production ‘hot spots’ (Davoren et al. 2003), attracting larger predators

in a predictable manner. Conservation measures aimed at reducing

conflict between wildlife and fishers need to account for geographic

variability such as this in ecosystem management plans. Fisheries for

Antarctic krill, for example, may in future be required to operate outside

the foraging areas of land-based central-place foragers during their

breeding season (Constable & Nicol 2002).

6.5 Sampling the Open Ocean

The sometimes-extreme horizontal, vertical, and temporal patchiness

that is characteristic of pelagic ecosystems, and the huge size range of

organisms inhabiting the open ocean, present considerable difficulties

for quantitative sampling.

Early studies of the open ocean depended almost completely on nets to

sample living organisms. Netting remains an important component of

biological oceanographic research, but the systems in use today are

considerably more complex than those used in the pioneering days

(Wiebe & Benfield 2003). These days nets are often equipped with depth,

temperature, salinity, and other sensors. Data from these sensors can be

relayed to the ship in real time, either along conducting cables or via

acoustic links, and enable nets to be placed accurately in the section of the

water column of particular interest (Brierley et al. 1998). Optical particle

counters (OPCs) can be used instead of nets to obtain estimates of

zooplankton numerical density (Heath 1995), and photographic and video

devices allow high-quality images of ocean inhabitants to be obtained

l If phytoplankton and grazers

were mixed homogenously then

resource depletion would soon

occur, whereas spatial

segregation enables higher

overall biomass to be maintained.

l Conservation measures aimed

at reducing conflict between

wildlife and fishers need to take

in to account the fact that

predators forage at production

hotspots that occur at

oceanographic features such

as fronts.

6: PELAGIC ECOSYSTEMS230

Page 20: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

(Benfield et al. 1996). Light is attenuated rapidly by seawater though, and

visual sampling is often constrained by water clarity (Chapter 2). Sound,

on the other hand, propagates very efficiently through seawater, as is

testified by the long-range vocal communications of some whales.

Scientific echo-sounders can be used to detect and quantify abundance of

zooplankton and fish (Holliday & Pieper 1995), and ever-increasing

sampling resolution is detecting biologically important features such as

micro-layers (McManus et al. 2003), which are likely to be of very major

importance to pelagic ecosystem function (Box 6.5).

At the larger scale, organisms that must come to the sea surface to

breath (e.g. seals, whales), or that forage over the sea surface (e.g.

seabirds) can be counted at sea by observers on research vessels.

Although much biological oceanographic data is still collected from

ships, logistic constraints place restrictions on the amount of time that

ships can spend at sea. In order to make longer-term observations, or

observations over large extents of ocean, other sampling platforms or

techniques are required. Moored instruments can be used to collect long

time-series of data from spot locations (Schofield et al. 2002). Auto-

nomous underwater vehicles (Box 6.6) have the potential to be able to

operate in weather conditions that curtail sampling from ships, and in

addition can work in environments that are impenetrable to ships.

Earth-orbiting satellites are able to provide coverage of the entire surface

of the global ocean on a weekly basis and deliver near-synoptic infor-

mation on, for example, sea surface temperature, chlorophyll concen-

tration, and frontal position (Miller 2004).

Satellites can also be used to track the movements of larger animals as

they forage at sea over extended periods of time (Thompson et al. 2003).

Box 6.5 Microlayers

Advances in the resolution of optical and acoustic sampling technology have lead to the

discovery of widespread ‘thin layers’ of high biological activity in the ocean. These layers,

which range in thickness from a few centimetres to a few metres, may be many kilo-

metres in horizontal extent and may persist for several days. They contain densities of

organisms several orders of magnitude higher than adjacent depth zones, and layers at

different depths in the same area may contain distinct plankton assemblages. Thin layers

produce microenvironments of physical, chemical, and biological parameters. Microlayers

sometimes occur at the pycnocline as zooplankton forage on material that is suspended

there, but may be deeper or shallower. Layers tend to occur in stratified water where

current sheer is low. The species or populations that comprise each distinct thin layer

probably aggregate in response to different sets of biological and/or physical processes.

The existence and persistence of planktic thin layers generates great biological hetero-

geneity in the water column, and may go some way to explain the ‘paradox of the

plankton’ in which high species diversity occurs in small, apparently homogeneous bodies

of water.

l While modern imaging and

acoustic technology has improved

our ability to sample the ocean

realm, we continue to be reliant

upon often-rudimentary nets to

obtain biological samples.

l Satellites can relay information

from tags attached to air

breathing animals such as whales

and turtles, collecting data about

their behaviour and patterns of

movement in real time.

6.5 SAMPLING THE OPEN OCEAN 231

Page 21: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

Leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea), for example, have been

tracked in the north Atlantic (Hays et al. 2004). Leatherbacks are crit-

ically endangered, and a major source of mortality for them is capture

by pelagic fisheries. Knowledge of Leatherback distribution and dive

characteristics obtained via satellite telemetry could lead to the imple-

mentation of conservation measures designed to reduce the interaction

of turtles with fisheries, and thus reduce by-catch.

The capacity of scientists to be able to collect data from the pelagic

realm seems ever to be increasing. Plans are afoot to establish a series of

permanent, automated ocean observatories that will be able to deliver

multidisciplinary data continuously in real time, year on year. Although

these systems will contribute enormously to our understanding of

ocean ecosystem function, they will present new challenges in terms

of extracting meaningful summaries from potentially overwhelming

quantities of data.

6.6 Pelagic Fisheries

Fisheries for pelagic species have the potential to be among the most

sustainable and least damaging to the environment. Shoaling species like

Box 6.6 Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) are unmanned submersibles that can be

programmed to navigate in three dimensions underwater. They can carry a variety of

scientific instruments and are able to make measurements in parts of the ocean that are

inaccessible, either physically or operationally, to conventional research platforms such as

ships. The Autosub AUV, for example, has been

equipped with a scientific echo-sounder and

deployed on missions beneath Antarctic sea ice.

There, it has made observations on the distribution

of krill under ice, and of ice thickness, that were

impossible to make using ice-breaking research

vessels (Brierley et al. 2002). Autosub is among the

largest of AUVs presently available to the scientific

community, with an instrument payload capacity of

100 kg (weight in water). Autosub is 7 m long�1 m

in diameter, weighs 2400 kg, is powered by man-

ganese alkali batteries, propeller-driven, has a range

of about 800 km, and a maximum depth capability

of 1600 m. Web link: http://www.soc.soton.ac.uk/

OED/index.php?page¼ as

6: PELAGIC ECOSYSTEMS232

Page 22: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

the Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) and North Sea herring

(Clupea harengus) form single-species aggregations and by-catch is

minimal (Chapter 12). Indeed, at the time of writing, stocks of these two

species seem to be bucking the global trend of decline and are thriving

under good management and regulation. Myctophids, or lantern fish,

are small mesopelagic fish that form a major component of oceanic deep

scattering layers. They have been fished historically in the south-west

Indian Ocean and in the south Atlantic, but fishing ceased in 1992

because of unfavourable economics and market-resistance, and mycto-

phids are not presently under threat.

Planktivorous forage fish such as sardine and anchovy have vital eco-

system functions, particularly in upwelling zones, where they typify

mid-trophic-level wasp-waist ecosystems (Cury et al. 2000). Abundance

of these species can fluctuate wildly under variable environmental regimes

and high fishing pressure and may result in major ecosystem changes.

Fishing for large tropical pelagic fish including tuna and jacks has also

had substantial impact. Analyses of long-lining data suggest that 90% of

biomass of large pelagic fish may have been removed (Myers & Worm

2003). Open-ocean fisheries have tended to develop ahead of manage-

ment procedures (maybe by as much as 15 years) and, in the case of

pelagic long-line fisheries, it is possible that the estimated pre-exploitation

biomass to which management processes are anchored are unrealistically

low because they represent already-depleted stock levels. This ‘missing

baseline’ presents particular difficulty for the long-term restoration of

stocks because the size of the stock pre-exploitation remains unknown,

and thus it is very difficult to say when or if restoration has been achieved.

Not only has long-lining hit pelagic fish hard, but it has been and is still

responsible for substantial declines in albatross populations. Albatrosses

take baited long-line hooks as they are thrown from fishing vessels,

drowning as the long-line sinks, and some populations are showing

marked and continuing decline (Tuck et al. 2001). Seine netting for tuna

also suffers from by-catch, particularly of dolphins, although, following

international outcry, practices are in place to reduce the impact to levels

that are now ecologically sustainable (Hall 1998).

Squid are fished on the open seas, mostly using hooked, coloured lures

(jigs) at night to catch animals attracted to bright lights. The high

intensity lights used to attract squid to jigs are so bright that they can be

seen from satellites, and this has opened a new mechanism for poten-

tially monitoring and managing open-ocean squid fisheries (Rodhouse

et al. 2001). Robust management is particularly important for squid

because they are short lived, often semelparous (spawn once and die),

species and therefore vulnerable to over-fishing since there are few

cohorts to provide a buffer from failure of any single generation. Squid

also respond rapidly to changing oceanographic conditions and it is

l Fisheries for pelagic species

have the potential to be among

the most sustainable and least

damaging to the environment.

l It is possible that the estimated

pre-exploitation pelagic fish

biomass to which management

processes are anchored are

unrealistically low because they

represent already-depleted

stock levels, the so called

‘missing-baseline’ effect.

l The whole issue of

‘dolphin-safe’ tuna remains the

subject of debate and there are

moves in the United States to ease

legislation relating to the

definition of the product.

6.6 PELAGIC FISHERIES 233

Page 23: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

becoming increasingly clear that it is essential to understand interactions

between squid and their ocean environment in order to predict inter-

annual variations in recruitment. Recruitment of the squid Illex argen-

tinus to the Falkland Islands fishery, for example, increases in years

when water temperatures over the squid egg-hatching grounds are

favourable (16 to 18 �C). In years when movement of the highly

dynamic front between the Brazil and Falkland currents displaces waters

of favourable temperature from over the hatching area, recruitment is

reduced (Waluda et al. 2001).

6.7 Regime Shifts in Pelagic Marine Ecosystems

Ecologists have long recognized that ecosystems may exist in ‘multiple

stable states’. In the oceans, conspicuous jumps from one state to

another have become known as regime shifts (Scheffer et al. 2001).

Shifts typically take less than one year to occur and regimes may persist

for decades (Hare & Mantua 2000). Regime shifts may be driven by

climatic changes, fishing pressure, or both, and may be manifest in

parameters that measure physical and biological ecosystem state. In the

north Pacific, statistically significant regime shifts in 1977 and 1989 are

apparent in a composite index of 100 biological and physical time series

including the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), zooplankton biomass

estimates and salmon catches (Fig. 6.10).

Regime shifts present major challenges for scientists attempting to

manage fisheries. In the North Sea a regime shift in 1988 was evident

from plankton time-series data from the Continuous Plankton Recorder

(CPR) surveys (Reid et al. 2001). It has been suggested that this shift

was caused by increasing flow of Atlantic waters into the North Sea,

an increase that was correlated with a change in the North Atlantic

Oscillation Index (NAOI). Recruitment of cod (Gadus morhua) in the

North Sea has declined since the mid 1980s and it is possible that

changes in the plankton following the regime shift have had a negative

impact on the supply of food to young cod (bottom-up control)

(Beaugrand et al. 2003). In the face of such possible environmental

impacts on fisheries, it is clear that future attempts to manage fisheries

will need to take environmental factors into account as well as data on

fish population dynamics and catch levels. This realization has led to

calls for the development of an holistic, ecosystem approach to fisheries

management (Pitkitch et al. 2004; Chapters 12 and 15).

Although not necessarily a symptom of regime shift per se, jellyfish

appear to have increased in prominence in many pelagic marine eco-

systems worldwide in recent years (Mills 2001). Jellyfish blooms have

occurred in the Bering Sea, the northern Benguela current and elsewhere,

l Semelparous animals such as

squid are particularly vulnerable

to over-fishing as their

populations are not composed

of multiple cohorts that

provide a safety net against

over-exploitation.

l The 1988 regime shift in the

North Sea may have been caused

by a change in the North Atlantic

Oscillation.

6: PELAGIC ECOSYSTEMS234

Page 24: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

possibly in response to climate and fishing effects. Indeed, it has been

suggested that jellyfish-dominated communities are the inevitable end

point in pelagic ecosystems perturbed by fishing (Pauly & MacLean 2003).

In the North Sea, correlations between the abundance of jellyfish and an

Index describing the periodically fluctuating North Atlantic Oscillation

(NAOI) have been detected (Lynam et al. 2004). Furthermore it seems

as though the recruitment of herring (Clupea harengus) in the North Sea

is adversely effected by high jellyfish abundance (although it is not clear

as yet whether this is due to predation by jellyfish on herring eggs or

larvae, competition between jellyfish and herring for zooplankton

food, or both). Complex interactions between climate and jellyfish may

therefore impact fish stocks, even in the absence of fishing, and could

have major implications for the recovery of fish stocks even after any

cessation of fishing.

1977 regime shift

Ecos

ystem

stat

e

1965 1975 1980 1985 19901965

0.5

1.0

0

-0.5

-1.0

1989 regime shift

Ecos

ystem

stat

e

1980 1985 1990 1995 20001975

0.5

1.0

0

-0.5

-1.0

Fig. 6.10 Mean and standard error of a composite index of 31 physical and 69 biological

parameters from the north Pacific between 1965 and 1997, showing significant step

changes or ‘regime shifts’ in 1977 and 1989. The physical time series represent

atmospheric and oceanic processes, while the biological time series all relate to oceanic

species ranging from zooplankton to salmon and groundfish. Each of the time series was

normalized before plotting and statistical analysis by subtracting the mean across both

regimes and then dividing the data for each regime by the standard deviation for that

regime. Standard errors for each year were computed as s/ffiffiffi

np

, where s is the standard

deviation across all variables within a year and n is the number of time series used in the

calculation (�100). Redrawn from Scheffer et al. 2001 with Nature Publishing Group’s

copyright permission and permission from the author.

l Jellyfish-dominated pelagic

communities may be one

consequence of overexploitation

of pelagic fish stocks.

l The NAO is presently in a high

phase, possibly restricting jellyfish

abundance. If the NAO were to

switch phase, climatic inhibition

of jellyfish abundance may be

relaxed and their numbers may

increase with adverse

consequences for fish stocks.

6.7 REGIME SHIFTS IN PELAGIC MARINE ECOSYSTEMS 235

Page 25: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

There has been an almost exponential rise in the incidence of the

term ‘regime shift’ in the scientific literature since the early 1990s. It is

possible that this is because the incidence of regime shifts is increasing,

or that accumulating time-series of data are enabling more changes to be

detected. A note of caution is perhaps necessary regarding this apparent

increasing prevalence however: simulation studies looking at random,

independent time series with the same frequency content as the Pacific

Decadal Oscillation have shown that techniques used to identify ‘regime

shifts’ may find them in noise. Detection of step-changes does not

therefore necessarily provide evidence of processes leading to any

meaningful regime shift (Rudnick & Davis 2003) since the step changes

may be artefacts of the data.

6.8 The Future for Pelagic Marine Ecosystems

With an ever-increasing human population, and an ever-growing

demand for food protein, it seems likely that pressure on the open

ocean is likely to continue to grow. There is a history of fisheries

advancing further from shore, into deeper and more distant waters, as

conventional coastal resources are depleted and this looks set to con-

tinue. Fishing effort has already had major impacts on the global ocean.

As traditional fish species are removed, fishing effort turns from these

higher-trophic-level predators to smaller species. This phenomenon has

become known as fishing down the food web (Pauly et al. 1998) and is

ecologically unsustainable.

Humans are not just altering the open-ocean ecosystems by removing

biomass but are also degrading it by addition. The incidence of waste in

the ocean is increasing, with floating rubbish potentially distributing

species far beyond their usual ranges, leading to alien colonizations of

distant shores (Barnes 2002). Introductions of alien species in ballast

water from cargo ships has also had devastating effects on pelagic

ecosystems, such as the introduction of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis

leydii to the Black Sea (Kideys 2002). This ctenophore, a native of the

eastern USA, was predatory upon fish eggs and led to the collapse of the

Black Sea anchovy fishery. Dumping CO2 at sea in an attempt to reduce

further increases in atmospheric concentrations is being investigated

(Hunter 1999). As well as the addition of objects and organisms, human

activity has also increased noise levels in the ocean. Low frequency noise

from shipping, oil-exploration, and military activities may adversely

impact cetacean communication and foraging (Croll et al. 2001) by

masking the sounds these animals generate. Killer whales (Orcinus orca)

in the waters of Washington State, USA, increase the lengths of

their calls significantly (by about 15%) in the presence of whale-watcher

l The incidence of waste in the

ocean is increasing, with floating

rubbish potentially distributing

species far beyond their usual

ranges leading to alien

colonizations of distant shores.

6: PELAGIC ECOSYSTEMS236

Page 26: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

boat traffic, and probably do so in an attempt to overcome the noise

generated by these boats that may mask their usual calls (Foote et al.

2004).

A recent forecast of the likely state of aquatic ecosystems in 2025

identified climate warming as the most significant single threat (Chapter

14), and climate changes have already had measurable impacts on sea

ice extent and zooplankton distributions (Polunin, 2005). Perhaps the

biggest climate-related threat to pelagic marine ecosystems arises

from the possibility that increased warming and consequent freshening

of the Arctic may switch off the north Atlantic current and hence per-

turb global ocean circulation (Rahmstorf 2002). It is probable that

changes like this have happened multiple times during the Earth’s his-

tory, and occurred over very short periods. If, as some models predict,

this were to happen again in the near future, the consequences for

the Earth’s ecosystem and climate would be so severe that concern

for the state of the pelagic realm would probably not be at the top of

humanity’s agenda.

l CHAPTER SUMMARY

� The pelagic realm is highly heterogeneous, and production is patchy in both space and

time. Generally production is higher closer to land, because of increased nutrient input

(rivers, upwelling), and close to the surface because of light availability. There is a

direct link between primary production and fisheries production.

� Organism size has a major bearing on mobility in the pelagic environment. Plankton

are generally small (<10 mm long) and are unable to swim against currents and drift

passively on them. Larger organisms (nekton) can move actively against currents.

Plankton can however move vertically and undertake pronounced diel migrations.

� Pelagic food webs are size-structured: small organisms are consumed by a succession

of larger grazers or predators. Most biomass occurs at the lowest trophic levels

(grazers) and gradually decreases at increasingly higher trophic levels.

� Environmental heterogeneity and the large range of pelagic organism-size (from

plankton to whales) presents a severe challenge for sampling the pelagic environ-

ment. Technological advances provide the means to collect ever-increasing quantities

of data, but net sampling remains important for collection of biological material.

� Pelagic fish that form large single-species shoals should be amongst the most

straightforward to manage and can be exploited with little risk of bycatch. Never-

theless, even pelagic species that inhabit remote locations far from land have been

impacted severely by fishing.

� Pelagic ecosystems can suffer step-changes, shifting rapidly from one state to

another. Such regime shifts may be due to impacts of climatic change, and have major

implications for ecosystem management.

CHAPTER SUMMARY 237

Page 27: Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems - University of St Andrewsperg/06-Kaiser-Chap06.pdf · Chapter 6 Pelagic Ecosystems CHAPTER SUMMARY Away from coastal boundaries and above the seabed,

l FURTHER READING

Longhurst (1998) provides an excellent description of the causes and consequences of

geographic variability throughout the world’s ocean. Mann and Lazier (1998) give a

broad coverage of biological responses to physical processes in the ocean. A useful

plankton atlas of the North Atlantic was published in Volume 278 of Marine Ecology

Progress Series (2004). This provides a summary of Continuous Plankton Recorder (CPR)

methods, and describes how this invaluable long-term record has become an important

implement in our understanding of how pelagic ecosystems respond to global change.

Steele (2004) provides a brief review of regime shifts and their definition. His article is

the first article in a special issue dedicated to regime shifts.

� Anonymous 2004. Continuous plankton records: Plankton atlas of the North Atlantic

Ocean (1958–1999). Marine Ecology Progress Series 278, Supplement Available

on line at http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/CPRatlas/contents.html

� Longhurst, A. R. 1998. Ecological Geography of the Sea. Academic Press, San Diego.

� Mann, K. H. & Lazier, J. R. N. 1996. Dynamics of Marine Ecosystems:

Biological-Physical Interactions in the Oceans. Blackwell, Oxford.

� Steele, J. H. 2004. Regime shifts in the ocean: reconciling observations and

theory. Progress in Oceanography 60: 135–41.

6: PELAGIC ECOSYSTEMS238