Chapter 7shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/73527/17... · 40 Maharashtra Chemical Products Pvt. Ltd Chemical 06 100 11 183.33 41 Protochem Industries Pvt.Ltd Chemical 10

221

Chapter – 7

Findings And Testing Of Hypothesis

Findings

The findings of the study were broadly classified into specific findings and General

findings.

The specific findings were derived from Qualitative and Quantitative analysis.

7.1 Specific findings(Qualitative Analysis):

Specific findings with reference to analysis of the:

SME unites from engineering, chemical, others, pharmaceuticals and textile sectors in

Navi Mumbai.

Specific Findings with reference to SME development in Navi Mumbai

Employment Generation in SME at TBIB in Navi-Mumbai.

Perception of SME-Land acquisition and allotment

Perception of SME-Infrastructure Development

Perception of SME –Fire safety measures

Perception of SME-Safety and Security

Perception of SME-Consultancy

Perception of SME-Incentives etc.

Findings of MIDC services and facilities (Qualitative)

Employment Generation in SME at TBIB in Navi-Mumbai.

Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) at Thane Belapur Industrial Belt at Navi

Mumbai has shown growing trends in employment generation from the year2000 to

2013.During the study 100 SME has analyzed and favorable feedback has collected

from them regarding employment in their enterprises. For calculating percentage

figure for the year 2000 was taken at base level and calculated the figures for the year

2013.The Following table is showing the responses for the employment generation in

respective SME in terms of numbers and percentage.

222

Table No.7.1

Employment Generation in SME at Thane Belapur Industrial Belt(TBIB) in

Navi Mumbai.

Sr.

No Name of the Company Category

Employment

s in the Year

2000

Employments

in Year the

2013

Num. % Num. %

01 I.I.D. Cast Pvt. Ltd Engineering 15 100 35 233.33

02 Mahavir Pvt. Ltd Engineering 02 100 05 250

03 Sevilax Fabrication Pvt. Ltd Engineering 1 100 14 127.27

04 Eastwest Pvt. Ltd Engineering 12 100 25 208.3

05 Veer Singh Pvt. Ltd Engineering 03 100 08 266.66

06 Swastik Steels Pvt. Ltd Engineering 03 100 07 233.33

07 Anamed Pvt. Ltd Engineering 05 100 11 220

08 Dunnimaa Pvt. Ltd Engineering 25 100 54 216

09 Yeoman Marine Pvt. Ltd Engineering 06 100 200 3333.3

3

10 Union Pvt. Ltd Engineering 10 100 26 260

11 Matharu Sons Pvt. Ltd Engineering 10 100 20 200

12 Saini Engineering Pvt. Ltd Engineering 10 100 18 180

13 Apollo Soyuz Pvt. Ltd Engineering 25 100 40 160

14 Guru Meatal Pvt. Ltd Engineering 07 100 12 171.42

15 Abak Electrofab Pvt. Ltd Engineering 09 100 15 166.66

16 Cliffkumar Pvt. Ltd Engineering 30 100 73 243.33

17 Nilsan Nishotech Pvt. Ltd Engineering 21 100 12 171.42

18 Unitech Corporation Pvt.

Ltd

Engineering 07 100 10 142.85

19 Bombay Metals Pvt. Ltd Engineering 10 100 33 330

20 S.A.Mechanical Pvt. Ltd Engineering 03 100 09 300

21 Meco Instruments Pvt. Ltd Engineering 25 100 43 172

22 Indyeit Shopping Indis Pvt.

Ltd

Engineering 20 100 40 200

23 E.P.L. Electrical Pvt. Ltd Engineering 14 100 27 192.85

223

24 Radixelectro System Pvt.

Ltd


25 Elumate India Pvt. Ltd Engineering 04 100 09 225

26 Shubham Electrtech Pvt.

Ltd


27 Apex Industries Pvt. Ltd Engineering 300 100 10 333.33

28 Micron Industries Pvt. Ltd Engineering 15 100 55 366.66

29 Statmoat Special Machines

Pvt. Ltd


30 Micon Walves Pvt.Ltd. Engineering 15 100 35 233.33

31 Promas Engineering Pvt.

Ltd


32 Golden Engineering Pvt.

Ltd


33 Eata Plast Fabrics Pvt. Ltd Engineering 25 100 43 172

34 Anupteach Pvt. Ltd Engineering 06 100 18 300

35 Motif Indiana Pvt. Ltd Engineering 53 100 81 152.83

36 Incrab Engineering Pvt. Ltd Engineering 10 100 20 200

37 Shree Ganesh Ent. Pvt.Ltd. Engineering 05 100 09 180

38 Zydus Takeda Pvt. Ltd Engineering 35 100 65 185.71

39 Accura Pvt. Ltd Engineering 09 100 17 188.88

40 Maharashtra Chemical

Products Pvt. Ltd

Chemical 06 100 11 183.33

41 Protochem Industries

Pvt.Ltd

Chemical 10 100 26 260

42 Mosil Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 12 100 25 208.33

43 Apna Organics Pvt. Ltd Chemical 08 100 20 250

44 Mayor Chemical Pvt. Ltd Chemical 03 100 06 200

45 Bhakti Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 04 100 08 200

46 Indoco Medies Pvt. Ltd Chemical 25 100 48 192

47 Chembond Ashlasd Water

Technologies Pvt. Ltd

Chemical 110 100 215 195.45

224

48 Bombay Ammonia &

Chemical Company Pvt ltd

Chemical 30 100 60 200

49 BASF Chemical Company

Pvt. Ltd

Chemical 13 100 23 176.92

41 Protochem Industries

Pvt.Ltd

Chemical 10 100 26 260

42 Mosil Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 12 100 25 208.33

43 Apna Organics Pvt. Ltd Chemical 08 100 20 250

44 Mayor Chemical Pvt. Ltd Chemical 03 100 06 200

45 Bhakti Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 04 100 08 200

46 Indoco Medies Pvt. Ltd Chemical 25 100 48 192

47 Chembond Ashlasd Water

Technologies Pvt. Ltd

Chemical 110 100 215 195.45

48 Bombay Ammonia

&Chemical Company Pvt

ltd

Chemical 30 100 60 200

49 BASF Chemical Company

Pvt. Ltd

Chemical 13 100 23 176.92

50 Borregaard South Asia Pvt.

Ltd

Chemical 10 100 25 250

51 Malade Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 08 100 16 200

52 Saif Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 03 100 05 166.66

53 Prasol Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 55 100 200 363.63

54 G. B. Galvanizer Pvt. Ltd Chemical 32 100 56 175

55 Siddhivinayak Pvt. Ltd Chemical 25 100 60 240

56 NGI Fine-Chemical Pvt. Ltd Chemical 25 100 70 280

57 Quality Chemicals

Industries Pvt.Ltd

Chemical 27 100 35 129.62

58 Mode pro India Pvt. Ltd Chemical 37 100 77 208.10

59 Onsar chemical Pvt. Ltd Chemical 40 100 60 150

60 Shirdi Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 30 100 100 333.33

61 Chemtron Science Chemical 35 100 155 442.85

225

Laboratories Pvt. Ltd

62 Savai Ties Printers Pvt. Ltd. Furniture

(Others)

40 100 50 125

63 Jay Elastomers Pvt. Ltd. Printing Roller

(Others)

09 100 30 333.33

64 Gazell Promotion Pvt. Ltd. Promotion

(Others)

12 100 25 208.33

65 DNX Cargo India Pvt. Ltd. Cargo Service

(Others)

04 100 10 250

66 Welcome Teach Pvt. Ltd. I.T. (Others) 33 100 115 348.48

67 VRL Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Transport

(Others)

02 100 10 500

68 Shree Bhavani Pvt. Ltd. Plastic (Others) 06 100 08 133.33

69 Imagico India Pvt. Ltd. Paints (Others) 30 100 60 200

70 Dolphin Offshore

Enterprises India Pvt. Ltd.

Oil Fabrication

(Others)

09 100 20 222.22

71 M.M.Poonijaji Speices Spicess (Others) 20 100 35 175

72 Colorband Dystuff Pvt. Ltd. Dystuff

(Others)

10 100 30 300

73 Fabricolour Pvt. Ltd. Fabrication

(Others)

03 100 07 233.33

74 Paper Pack Industries Pvt.

Ltd.

Paper (Others) 08 100 12 150

75 Maharaja Ice Factory Pvt.

Ltd.

Ice Sheet

(Others)

03 100 17 566.66

76 Sunrise Packaging Pvt. Ltd. Packaging

(Others)

10 100 23 230

77 Sri Chakara Prints Printing

(Others)

10 100 30 300

78 Seagull Mineral Water Pvt.

Ltd.

Mineral Water

(Others)

06 100 12 200

226

79 K.G. Marketing Marketing

(Others)

02 100 04 200

80 BNP Interiors Pvt. Ltd. Furniture

(Others)

06 100 24 400

81 M/S D.G.Gore Pvt. Ltd. Fragrance

(Others)

02 100 08 400

82 Berger Paints India Pvt. Ltd. Paint (Others) 15 100 60 400

83 Tyresoles Pvt. Ltd. Rubber (Others) 10 100 40 266.66

84 Apurva Pvt. Ltd. Drinking Water

(Others)

6 100 15 250

85 Neelam printers & Capers

Pvt. Ltd.

Printing

(Others)

03 100 06 200

86 Sarelock Plastic Pvt. Ltd. Plastic (Others) 45 100 250 5555.5

5

87 Ravi Printers Pvt. Ltd. Printing

(Others)

08 100 15 187.5

88 Delux Industries Service

Pvt. Ltd.

Spare Parts

(Others)

03 100 07 233.33

89 A.S.Controls Pvt. Ltd. Spare Parts

(Others)

20 100 60 300

90 Tit-Bit Foods India Pvt. Ltd. Food (Others) 50 100 100 200

91 A.N.Fabricator Packaging

Water

(Others)

03 100 15 500

92 Pulraj Electronics Electronic

Component

(Others)

20 100 45 225

93 Entel Foods Food( Others) 60 100 160 266.66

94 I.G.C. Abrasives Pvt. Ltd. Textile 10 100 35 350

95 Thackers Velvet India Pvt.

Ltd.

Textile 05 100 10 200

96 Madhuram Apparels Pvt. Textile 15 100 42 280

227

Ltd.

97 Ameya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Textile 05 100 11 220

98 Spykar Lifestyle Pvt.Ltd. Textile 20 100 70 350

99 Sanofi Pasters India Pvt.

Ltd.

Pharmaceuticals 24 100 67 279.16

100 Anazeal Analyticals &

Research Pvt.Ltd.

Pharmaceuticals 20 100 60 200

(Source – Personal Survey)

Classification as per Category and Type of enterprise:

Selected sample units are classified according to category of enterprises and type of

enterprises. Units are categorized into Engineering, Chemical, Textile,

Pharmaceutical, Others (Plastic, Spare Parts, Rubber, Mineral Water, Fabrication,

I.T., Printing, Transporting, Paints, Packaging, and Paper).

Units are classified into Small enterprises and Medium enterprises as per their level of

investment. unites having investment from Rupees 25 lakh to 5 crores are considered

as Small enterprises and units having investment from rupees 5 crores one rupee to 10

crores are called as Medium enterprises.

Following table showing the details of the classification as per the category and type

of enterprises.

Table No.7.2

Classification of Engineering Enterprises as per the category

and type of enterprises.

Sr.No. Name of the Company Category Type of SME

01 I.I.D. Cast Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

02 Mahavir Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

03 Sevilax Fabrication Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

04 Eastwest Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

228

05 Veer Singh Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

06 Swastik Steels Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

07 Anamed Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

08 Dunnimaa Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium

09 Yeoman Marine Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium

10 Union Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium

11 Matharu Sons Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

12 Saini Enginerring Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

13 Apollo Soyuz Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

14 Guru Metal Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium

15 Abak Electrofab Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

16 Cliffkumar Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

17 Nilsan Nishotech Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium

18 Unitech Corporation Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium

19 Bombay Metals Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium

20 S.A.Mechanical Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

21 Meco Instruments Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

22 Indyeit Shopping Indis Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

23 E.P.L. Electrical Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

24 Radixelectro System Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

25 Elumate India Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

26 Shubham Electrtech Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

27 Apex Industries Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

28 Micron Industries Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

29 Statmoat Special Machines Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium

30 Micon Walves Pvt.Ltd. Engineering Small

31 Promas Engineering Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium

32 Golden Engineering Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

33 Eata Plast Fabrics Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

34 Anupteach Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

35 Motif Indiana Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

36 Incrab Engineering Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

229

37 Shree Ganesh Ent. Pvt.Ltd. Engineering Small

38 Zydus Takeda Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

39 Accura Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small

Table No.7.3

Classification of Chemical Enterprises as per the Category and Type of

Enterprises

Sr.No. Type of Company Category Type of

SME

40 Maharashtra Chemical Products Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small

41 Protochem Industries Pvt.Ltd Chemical Small

42 Mosil Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small

43 Apna Organics Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small

44 Mayor Chemical Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small

45 Bhakti Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small

46 Indoco Medies Pvt. Ltd Chemical Medium

47 Chembond Ashlasd Water Technologies Pvt.

Ltd

Chemical Medium

48 Bombay Ammonia &Chemical Company Pvt

ltd

Chemical Small

49 BASF Chemical Company Pvt. Ltd Chemical Medium

50 Borregaard South Asia Pvt. Ltd Chemical Medium

51 Malade Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small

52 Saif Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small

53 Prasol Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical Medium

54 G. B. Galvanizer Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small

55 Siddhivinayak Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small

56 NGI Fine-Chemical Pvt. Ltd Chemical Medium

57 Quality Chemic Industries Pvt.Ltd Chemical Small

58 Mode pro India Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small

230

59 Onsar chemical Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small

60 Shirdi Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical Medium

61 Chemtron Science Laboratories Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small

231

Table No.7.4

Classification of Others enterprises as per the Category and Type of Enterprises

Sr.No. Name of the Company Category Type of

SME

62 Savai Ties Printers Pvt. Ltd. Furniture (Others) Small

63 Jay Elastomers Pvt. Ltd. Printing Roller

(Others)

Small

64 Gazell Promotion Pvt. Ltd. Promotion (Others) Small

65 DNX Cargo India Pvt. Ltd. Cargo Service

(Others)

Small

66 Welcome Teach Pvt. Ltd. I.T. (Others) Small

67 VRL Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Transport (Others) Small

68 Shree Bhavani Pvt. Ltd. Plastic (Others) Small

69 Imagico India Pvt. Ltd. Paints (Others) Medium

70 Dolphin Offshore Enterprises India

Pvt. Ltd.

Oil Fabrication

(Others)

Small

71 M.M.Poonijaji Speices Spicess (Others) Small

72 Colorband Dystuff Pvt. Ltd. Dystuff (Others) Small

73 Fabricolour Pvt. Ltd. Fabrication

(Others)

Small

74 Paper Pack Industries Pvt. Ltd. Paper (Others) Small

75 Maharaja Ice Factory Pvt. Ltd. Ice Sheet (Others) Small

76 Sunrise Packaging Pvt. Ltd. Packaging (Others) Small

77 Sri Chakara Prints Printing (Others) Small

78 Seagull Mineral Water Pvt. Ltd. Mineral Water

(Others)

Small

79 K.G. Marketing Marketing (Others) Small

80 BNP Interiors Pvt. Ltd. Furniture (Others) Small

81 M/S D.G.Gore Pvt. Ltd. Fragrance (Others) Small

82 Berger Paints India Pvt. Ltd. Paint (Others) Medium

83 Tyresoles Pvt. Ltd. Rubber (Others) Small

84 Apurva Pvt. Ltd. Drinking Water

(Others)

Small

232

85 Neelam printers & Capers Pvt. Ltd. Printing (Others) Small

86 Sarelock Plastic Pvt. Ltd. Plastic (Others) Medium

87 Ravi Printers Pvt. Ltd. Printing (Others) Small

88 Delux Industries Service Pvt. Ltd. Spare Parts (Others) Small

89 A.S.Controls Pvt. Ltd. Spare Parts (Others) Small

90 Tit-Bit Foods India Pvt. Ltd. Food (Others) Small

91 A.N.Fabricator Packaging Water

(Others)

Small

92 Pulraj Electronics Electronic

Component

(Others)

Small

93 Entel Foods Food( Others) Medium

Table No.7.6

Classification of Textile Enterprises as per the Category and Type of

Enterprises.

Sr.No. Name of the Company Category Type of SME

94 I.G.C. Abrasives Pvt. Ltd. Textile Small

95 Thackers Velvet India Pvt. Ltd. Textile Small

96 Madhuram Apparels Pvt. Ltd. Textile Small

97 Ameya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Textile Small

98 Spykar Lifestyle Pvt.Ltd. Textile Medium

233

Table No. 7.5

Classification of Pharmaceutical as per the Category and Type of Enterprises

Sr.No Name of the Company Category Type of SME

99 Sanofi Pasters India Pvt. Ltd. Pharmaceuticals Small

100 Anazeal Analyticals & Research

Pvt.Ltd.

Pharmaceuticals Medium

234

Perception of Respondents- Land Acquisition and Allotment

(Awareness,subsidy,cost,process,employment to land affected people,licensing

procedure)

Table No 7.7

Perception of SME Respondents-Land acquisition and allotment

Sr.

No

Land acquisition and allotment facility Favorable

(%)

Unfavorable(

%)

1 Awareness about land acquisition and allotment

policy of MIDC

89 11

2 Land acquired at subsidies‟ rate 85 15

3 Cost of land in MIDC area as compared to other

areas

91 09

4 Process of acquiring land 94 06

5 Employment for land affected people 06 94

6 Procedure for licensing and permission for

acquiring land

97 03

Note: The level of satisfaction perceived by SME Respondents

0%-33%-To some extent

34%-66%-To a large extent

67% and above-To a very large extent.

The table revels the following specific findings with reference to land acquisition

and allotment facilities offered by MIDC in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt in

Navi Mumbai.

1) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards the

Awareness about land acquisition and allotment policy of MIDC is Favorable to

a very large extent.

2) ) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards the Land

acquired at subsidies rate is Favorable to a very large extent

3) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards the Cost

of land in MIDC area as compared to other areas is Favorable to a very large

extent

235

4) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards the

Process of acquiring land is Favorable to a very large extent


Employment for land affected people is non-favorable to a large extent


Procedure for licensing and permission for acquiring land is favorable to a very

large extent

B) Perception of Respondents- Infrastructure facilities (concession,

upgradation, technical surveys, energy audit, loss, availability of power,

enough water, frequency of water, subsidy loss due to shortage of water,

water subsidy, assistance for damage pipe)

Table No 7.8

Perception of SME Respondents-Infrastructure facilities

Sr.No Infrastructure Facilities Favorable

(%)

Unfavorable

( %)

1. Concession or subsidy in power tariffs 08 92

2. Upgradation of energy infrastructure for

functioning the unit

02 98

3. Technical surveys for monitoring the use of energy 60 40

4. Energy Audit for minimizing the cost and

environmental defects

59 41

5. Loss due to shortage of power 89 11

6. Enough energy for sustaining the SME unit 85 15

7. Enough water supplies to the unit 90 10

8. Availability of frequency of water supply 87 13

9. Entitled for water subsidy from NMMC 83 17

10. Loss due to the shortage of water supplies 09 91

11. Quick assistance from MIDC in case of damage to

water pipe

90 10

236





The table revels the following specific findings with reference to Infrastructure

facilities offered by MIDC in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt in Navi Mumbai.


Concession or subsidy in power tariffs is non-favorable to a very large extent


upgradation of energy infrastructure for functioning the units is non-favorable to

a very large extent


Technical surveys for monitoring the use of energy non favorable to a large

extent

4) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards Energy

Audit for minimizing the cost and environmental defects is favorable to a large

extent

5) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards Loss

due to shortage of power is favorable to a large extent

6) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards enough

energy for sustaining the SME unit is favorable to a large extent

7) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards enough

water supplies to the unit is favorable to a large extent

8) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards

Availability of frequency of water supply is favorable to a very large extent.

9) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards Entitled

for water subsidy from NMMC is favorable to very a large extent.

10) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards Loss

due to the shortage of water supplies is favorable to very a large extent.

11) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards Quick

assistance from MIDC in case of damage to water pipes favorable to very a

large extent

237

C) Perception of Respondents- Fire Prevention Measures (Fire protection,

fire safety, fire prevention, technical support, fire services)

Table No 7.9

Perception of SME Respondents-Fire Prevention Measures

Sr.No. Fire Prevention Measures Favorable (%) Unfavorable

( %)

1. Fire protection measures to SME unites 73 27

2. Fire safety policy for SMEs 40 60

3. Fire prevention services to SMEs 09 91

4. Technical support for security and Safety

measures

18 82

5. Timely fire services on the happening of

any disaster

42 58

Note:The level of satisfaction perceived by SME Respondents




The table revels the following specific findings with reference to Fire Prevention

Measures facilities offered by MIDC in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt in Navi

Mumbai.

1) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards Fire

protection measures to SME unites is favorable to very a large extent

2) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites Fire safety

policy for SMEs is favorable to a large extent

3) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites Fire prevention

services to SMEs is non-favorable to a very large extent

4) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites Technical

support for security and Safety measures is non-favorable to a very large extent

5) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites Timely fire

services on the happening of any disaster is non-favorable to a large extent

238

D) Perception of Respondents- Safety and Security Measures(fire brigade, police

station, safe roads, footpath, experience of theft, environmental protection,

awareness, green design, CEPT performance, technical surveys)

Table No 7.10

Perception of SME Respondents-Safety and Security Measures

Sr.No. Safety and Security Measures Favorable

(%)

Unfavorable

( %)

1. Fire brigade station near to SMEs 97 03

2. Police station near to SMEs 96 04

3. Safe roads for transportation and travelling 37 63

4. Footpath on the road side in MIDC area 45 55

5 Experience of theft and robbery 40 60

6. Good and clean alternative for environmental

protection while allocating land to the SMEs

20 80

7.

Awareness for environmental education among

the SME entrepreneurs.

72 28

8. Green design and green procurement to SMEs 69 31

9. Performance and evaluation of CEPT by MIDC 23 77

10. Technical surveys for environmental safety 44 56





The table revels the following specific findings with reference to Safety and

Security Measures facilities offered by MIDC in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt

in Navi Mumbai.

1) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards Fire

brigade station near to SMEs favorable to a very large extent

2) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards Police

station near to SMEs near to SMEs favorable to a very large extent

239

3) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards Safe

roads for transportation and travelling is non-favorable to a large extent

4) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards

Footpath on the road side in MIDC area is non-favorable to a large extent


Experience of theft and robbery is non-favorable to a large extent

6) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards Good

and clean alternative for environmental protection while allocating land to the

SMEs is non-favorable to a very large extent


Awareness for environmental education among the SME entrepreneurs is

favorable to a large extent

8) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards Green

design and green procurement to SMEs is non-favorable to a very large extent.


Performance and evaluation of CEPT by MIDC isnon-favorable to a very

large extent


Technical surveys for environmental safety is non-favorable to a large extend

E) Perception of Respondents- Waste Management(efforts for managing waste,

drainage facility, liquid waste management, disposal of waste, EIA)

Table No 7.11

Perception of SME Respondents-Waste Management

Sr.No. Waste Management Favorable

(%)

Unfavorable

( %)

1. Efforts for managing waste by MIDC 87 13

2. drainage facility in MIDC are 90 10

3. Liquid waste management 86 14

4. Disposal of waste 73 27

5. Environmental impact assessment for

hazardouswaste

74 26

240





The table revels the following specific findings with reference to Waste

Management facilities offered by MIDC in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt in

Navi Mumbai.


Efforts for managing waste by MIDC is favorable to a very large extent.


drainage facility in MIDC area is favorable to a very large extent.


Liquid waste management is favorable to a very large extent


Disposal of waste is favorable to a very large extent


Environmental impact assessment for hazardouswaste is favorable to a very

large extent

F) Perception of Respondents- Consultancy (Quality seminars, timely

information, updates, consultancy, MR support, MR updates, MR for

promotion)

Table No 7.12

Perception of SME Respondents-Consultancy

Sr.No. Consultancy Favorable

(%)

Unfavorable

(%)

1. Quality seminars for SME entrepreneurs 58 42

2. Timely information to SME unites 40 60

3. Updates for green technology 57 43

4. Consultancy for ERP to SME unites 29 58

5. marketing research support 39 61

6. marketing research updates 44 66

7. marketing research for promotion of SMEs 35 65

241




67% and above -To a very large extent.

The table revels the following specific findings with reference to Consultancy



Quality seminars for SME entrepreneurs is favorable to a large extent


Timely information to SME unites is non-favorable to a large extent


Updates for green technology is favorable to a large extent


Consultancy for ERP to SME unites is non-favorable to a large extent


marketing research support to SME unites is non-favorable to a large extent


marketing research updates isnon-favorable to a large extent


marketing research for promotion of SMEs is non-favorable to a large extent

G) Perception of Respondents- Incentives (incentives, interest subsidy,

refund of entry tax, incentive for strengthening SME)

Table No 7.13

Perception of SME Respondents-Incentives

Sr.

No.

Incentives Favorable

(%)

Unfavorable

( %)

1. Incentives by MIDC 17 83

2. interest subsidy 11 89

3. refund of entry tax 11 89

4. Incentives for strengthening the SMEs 54 46

242





The table revels the following specific findings with reference to Incentives



Incentives by MIDC is non-favorable to a very large extent


interest subsidy is non-favorable to a very large extent


refund of entry tax is; non-favorable to a very large extent


Incentives for strengthening the SMEs is favorable to a large extent

243

Table No 7.14

Summary of test of Null-Hypothesis with reference to contribution of MIDC in

the development of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) in Thane Belapur

Industrial Belt(TBIB),Navi Mumbai.

Null Hypothesis with reference to employability t-test ANOVA

1. There is no significant increase in employability in Navi-

Mumbai MIDC over a period of interval (2000-2013).

Rejected NA

Null Hypothesis with reference to Land acquisition and

allotment

Chi-

square

ANOVA

2. There is no association between level of satisfaction of

land acquisition and allotment for SME and type of

organizational the respondent

Rejected Rejected


land acquisition and allotment and type of SME of the

respondent .

Accepted NA


land acquisition and allotment and type of industry of the

respondent

Rejected Accepted


land acquisition and annual turnover of the respondent

Accepted NA

Null Hypothesis with reference to Infrastructure Chi-

square

ANOVA

Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of

Infrastructure for SME and type of organization of the

respondent‟.

Accepted NA


infrastructure and type of SME of the respondent „.

Accepted NA


infrastructure and type of industry of the respondent‟

Accepted NA


infrastructure and annual turnover of the respondent‟.

Accepted NA



Accepted NA

244

Null Hypothesis with reference to Water Supply Chi-

square

ANOVA



respondent‟.

Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA

Null Hypothesis with reference to Fire prevention

measure

Chi-

square

ANOVA



respondent‟.

Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Rejected Not

significant

245

Null Hypothesis with reference to Safety and Security Chi-

square

ANOVA



respondent‟.

Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA

Null Hypothesis with reference to Waste Management Chi-

square

ANOVA



respondent‟.

Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA

246

Null Hypothesis with reference to Consultancy Chi-

square

ANOVA



respondent‟.

Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA

Null Hypothesis with reference to Incentive Chi-

square

ANOVA



respondent‟.

Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted NA



Accepted Significant

247

7.2 Findings of personal observation:

To assess the contribution of MIDC in the development of Small and Medium

Enterprises (SME) in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt in Navi Mumbai physical

observation were conducted. The criteria considered for evaluation were land

acquisition and allotment by MIDC, infrastructure, fire prevention measures, safety

and security, waste management, consultancy and incentives.

Personal observation-SMEs response to the contribution of MIDC

It was observed that most of the MIDC areas indicate the poor infrastructure except

Nerul, Pawne. Only Rabale MIDC area has the highest satisfaction for power and

water infrastructure. Many Engineering unites needs more power supply as compared

to other SME unites in Navi Mumbai. As far as water infrastructure and supply is

considered, Chemical unites still faces problem of short of water in Navi Mumbai

MIDC area.

It was also observed that, at many MIDC areas proper roads for transportation are not

in well conditions. Quality of the roads is very imperfect for the development of SME

in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt in Navi Mumbai. Especially in Rabale, Pawne and

Mahape MIDC area.

As regards to, safety and security, many MIDC area lakhk in adequate safety and

security mechanism. In Pawne MIDC area highest number of theft and robbery are

taken plakhe.

As per the observation, many chemical SME unites are not satisfied with Common

Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) which was specially designed for treatment to

industrial waste. Highest number of unsatisfied chemical unites are from Turbhe

MIDC area.in many MIDC area disposal of waste is not as per the standard. Drainage

facilities in many areas are insufficient as per the requirement of the SME unites.

It was observed that, consultancy for strengthening the SME was not enough and

marketing research practices are not upto the remark. Even in case of incentives many

unites are not satisfied.

248

7.3 Findings of personal interview of MIDC Officials

As a part of the study to root out the problems of SMEs and to find out the efforts

taken by MIDC to deploy developmental practices for SMEs.The Researcher

approached to the MIDC officials to conduct interviews. Disappointingly the MIDC

officials refused to provide the information officially, but informally the officials

provided the Information and difficulties they face in providing efficient services to

the SME.

In order to ensure good quality service to SME, MIDC seeks the co-operation

and support from SME by proper use of facilities and services.

7.4 Introduction of Testing of Hypothesis

As per the set objectives and review of literature following hypothesis were designed

by researcher for testing and analyzing. Hypothesis testing begins with an assumption,

called a Hypothesis that we make about population parameter. According to

Prof.Morris Hamburg, “A Hypothesis in statistics is simply a quantitative statement

about a population.” Hypotheses were tested with the help of statistical techniques

like T-test, Chi-square test, ANOVA, Critical Difference (CD).

Following were Null Hypothesis was tested for level of significance of difference.

7.5 Null Hypothesis with reference to employability

1. Null Hypothesis (Ho): There is no significant increase in employability in

Navi-Mumbai MIDC over a period of interval (2000-2013).

Alternate Hypothesis11.There is significant increase in employability in Navi-

Mumbai MIDC over a period of interval (2000-2013).

To study above hypothesis information about number of employees in the year 2000

and in 2013 is collected. Following table indicate comparative information only of

those firms which were established before 2000.

249

Table No 7.15

Comparison of Increase in Employment in Pre (2000)

Pre 2000 Total Employment

2000

Total Employment

2013

Number of Firms 76 76

Total Employees 1237.00 3121.00

Average of employees per

firm

16.2763 41.0658

Std. Deviation 17.24691 45.05266

Above table indicate that there are 76 firms established before year 2000.

Comparative study indicates that total employees increased from 1237 to 3121. This

indicates that there is increase of 1884 employees. Increase in employment in 2014 is

152.30 % as compare to employment in 2000.

Table No 7.16

Comparison of Increase in Employment in Post (2013)

Post 2000 Total Employment

2000

Total Employment

2013




firm

15.3750 39.1667

Std.Deviation 13.34105 28.75030

Table No 7.17

Comparison of Increase in Total Employment

Total(Pre and Post 2000) Total Employment

2000

Total Employment

2013




firm

16.0600 40.6100

Std.Deviation 16.33539 41.59786

250

To test above null hypothesis Paired T-test is applied and results are as follows.

Table No.7.18

Paired Samples Statistics of Increase in Employment

Mean N Std.

Deviation

Std.

Error

Mean

Total Employment 2000 16.0600 100 16.33539 1.63354

Total Employment 2013 40.6100 100 41.59786 4.15979

Table No.7.19

Paired Samples Test for Increase in Employment

Paired Differences T –

Calculate

d

Degree

of

Freedo

m

T – Table

at 5%

level of

significanc

e

Result

of Test

Differenc

e of

Mean

Std.

Deviatio

n

Total

employmen

t 2000 and

2013

24.55000 28.626

95

8.576 99 1.96 Rejecte

d

Above table indicate that T-calculated value (8.576) is greater than T-table value

(1.96) at 5% level of significance. Therefore T-test is rejected. Hence null hypothesis

is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted. Conclusion is there is significant

increase in employability from year 2000 to year 2014.

N2. There is no association between type of SME and year of existence with

respect to year 2000.

For testing above null hypothesis chi square test is applied.

251

Table No.7.20

Type of SME and year of existence with respect to year 2000.

Year of Existence and Type of SME

Year of Existence Type of SME Total

Medium Small

Post 2000 6 18 24

Pre 2000 16 60 76

Total 22 78 100

252

Figure No.7.1

Type of SME and year of existence with respect to year 2000.

Figure No.7.2

Year of Existence and Type of SME

Chi-square calculated value: 0.166

Degree of freedom: 1

Chi-square table value (5% loss.) : 3.84

Result of test: Accepted.

253

Above results indicate that chi-square calculated value (0.166) is less than chi-square

table value (3.84). Therefore test is accepted. Hence null hypothesis is accepted.

Conclusion is There is no association between type of SME and year of existence with

respect to year 2000.

This indicate that proportion of small and medium SME before and after 2000 are in

same proportion.

7.6 Null Hypothesis with reference to land acquisition and allotment

3. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of satisfaction of

land acquisition and allotment for SME and type of organisation of the

respondent.

To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the table format

b given below

Table No.7.21

Level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment for SME type of

organization of the respond

Type of organization Satisfaction of land acquisition

and allotment

Total

Low Medium High

Sole proprietorship 6 13 0 19

Partnership business 0 24 0 24

Private limited companies 4 52 1 57

Total 10 89 1 100

Out of 10 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 06 were from sole

proprietorship, zero unit were from Partnership business and 04 unites were from

private limited companies. Out of 89 SME unites from medium level of

satisfaction,13 unites were from Sole properitorship,24 unites were from partnership

business and 52 unites were from private limited companies. Out of 01 SME unites

from high level of satisfaction, zero unites unites were from sole properitorship,zero

unites were from partnership business and 01 unite were from private limited

companies.

254

The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows :

Fig No.7.3

Level of satisfaction of Land acquisition and allotment for SME and type of

organization of the respondents

To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is

Chi-square: 13.771

Table value: 9.49


Result of the test: Test is rejected

Calculated value 13.771 is more than table value (9.49), therefore test is rejected and

null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted that is: There is

association between level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment for

SME and type of organisation of the respondent.Which indicate that respondents

from small and medium enterprises have uniform satisfaction about land acquisition

and allotment.

As the above Null Hypothesis got rejected the study was set to have ANOVA table

and to have f-test in order to ascertain the level of significance of variance

255

Table No.7.22

Mean Score of land acquisition and allotment and Type of Organization

Type of Organization N Mean Std. Deviation

Sole proprietorship 19 70.1737 17.19314

Partnership business 24 80.5533 6.34235

Private limited companies 57 77.7760 12.72748

Total 100 76.9981 12.92564

Table No.7.23

ANOVA for land acquisition and allotment and Types of Organization

Sum of

Squares

Df Mean

Square

F-cal F-table Significance

Between

Groups 1222.722 2 611.361 3.872 3.08

Significant

Within Groups 15317.428 97 157.912

Total 16540.150 99

Calculated value is 3.872 which is greater than table value 1.96. therefore conclusion

is there is significant difference in mean scores of satisfaction of land acquisition and

allotment by MIDC and type of organization. Partnership organizations are highly

satisfied as compare to others.

256

Table No.7.24

Critical Values for type of organization and satisfaction of

land acquisition and allotment

Type of organization and land satisfaction

No

. Pairs

Number

of

Respon

dents

Mean SD

SE of

diff of

Mean

Differe

nce of

Mean

Calcu

lated

T-

value

Tabl

e T-

valu

e

Significan

ce

1

Proprietor-

ship 19 70.17 17.19

4.26 10.3796 2.43 1.68 Significant

Partnership 24 80.55 6.34

2

Proprietor-

ship 19 70.17 17.19

4.39 7.6023 1.73 1.68 Significant

Private Ltd 57 77.78 12.73

3 Partnership 24 80.55 6.34

2.15 2.7773 1.29 1.68 Non-

significant Private Ltd 57 77.78 12.73

Pair-1: Land satisfaction of partnership organizations is significantly higher than

satisfaction of proprietorship form.

Pair-2: Land satisfaction of private Ltd. Company is significantly higher than

satisfaction of proprietorship form.

Pair 3-3: Land satisfaction of Private Ltd. Company is significantly higher than

satisfaction of Partnership form.

4. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of satisfaction of

land acquisition and allotment and type of SME of the respondent.

To test the Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the table

format given below:

257

Table No.7.25

level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment and

type of SME of the respondent.

Out of 10 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 08 unites were

from small enterprises and 02 unites were from medium enterprises. out of 89 SME

unites of respondents from medium level of satisfaction ,70 unites from small

enterprises and 19 unites were from medium enterprises. out of 01 SME unites of

respondents from high level of satisfaction , zero unites were from small enterprises

and 01 unites from medium enterprises.

The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows

Fig No.7.4

Level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment for SME and type of SME

of the respondents.

Type of SME Satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment Total

Low Medium High

Small 8 70 0 78

Medium 2 19 1 22

Total 10 89 1 100

258


Chi-square: 3.591

Table value: 5.99


Result of the test: Test is accepted

Calculated value 3.591 is less than table value (5.99), therefore test is accepted and

null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of

satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment and type of SME of the respondent.

Which indicate that a respondent from small and medium enterprises has uniform

satisfaction about land acquisition and allotment.

259


land acquisition and allotment and type of industry of the respondent


format given below:

Table No.7.26

level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment and

type of industry of the respondent

Type of Industries Satisfaction of land acquisition

and allotment

Total

Low Medium High


Chemical 6 15 1 22

Others 2 30 0 32

Pharmaceutical 1 1 0 2

Textile 0 5 0 5

Total 10 89 1 100

Out of 10 SME units respondents from low level of satisfaction, 01 unites were from

Engineering, 06 unites were from Chemical, 02 unites were from others, 01 unit were

from pharmaceuticals and zero unit were from textile. Out of 89 SME units

respondents from medium level of satisfaction, 38 unites were from Engineering, 06

unites were from Chemical, 30 unites were from others, 01 unite were from

pharmaceuticals and o5 unites were from textile. Out of 01 SME units respondents

from high level of satisfaction, zero unites were from Engineering, 01 unites were

from Chemical, zero unites were from Others, zero unit from pharmaceuticals and

zero unit were from textile.

260

The above data is presented in multiple bars diagram as follows

Fig no.7.5

Level of satisfaction of Land acquisition and allotment for SME and Type of

Industry of the respondents


Chi-square: 18.290

Table value: 15.15




null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted: There is association

between level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment and type of

industry of the respondent

Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises have uniform

satisfaction about land acquisition and allotment.

261

Table No.7.27

Mean Score of land acquisition and allotment and Type of Industry

Type of Industry Mean N Std. Deviation

Chemical 71.2114 22 15.58395

Engineering 79.0577 39 11.91752

Others 78.1228 32 11.54374

Pharmaceuticals 66.6650 2 23.56787

Textile 83.3300 5 .00000

Total 76.9981 100 12.92564

Table No.7.28

ANOVA for land acquisition and allotment and Type of Industry

Sum of

Squares

Df Mean

Square

F-calculated F-

table.

Result

Between

Groups 1356.624 4 339.156 2.122 2.46

Accepted

Within Groups 15183.526 95 159.827

Total 16540.150 99

The above table indicates that the calculated f-value(2.122) is less than table (2.46) at

5% level of significance.

This indicate that the Null Hypothesis (Ho) is accepted that: There is association

between level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment and type of industry of

the respondent.

262


land acquisition and annual turnover of the respondent.


format given below:

Table No.7.29

Level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment and

annual turnover of the respondent.

Annual Turnover Satisfaction of land acquisition

and allotment

Total

Low Medium High

Below 25 lakhs 1 9 0 10

25 to 50 lakhs 1 20 0 21

Above50 lakhs 8 60 1 69

Total 10 89 1 100

Out of 10 SME Unites from low level of satisfaction group,01 unit were from below

25 lakh group,01 unites were from 25 to 50 lakh group, and 08 unites were from

above 50 lakh group. Out of 89 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction group,

09 unites were from below 25 lakh group,20 unites were from 25 to 50 lakh group,

and 60 unites were from above 50 lakh group. Out of 01 SME Unites from high level

of satisfaction group, zero unites from below 25 lakh group,01 units from 25 to 50

lakh group, and 01 unites were from above 50 lakh group.


263

Fig No : 7.6

Level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment for SME and annual

turnover of the respondents


Chi-square: 1.326

Table value: 9.49

Degree of freedom : 04

Result of the test : Test is accepted

Calculated value 1.326 is less than table value(9.49), therefore test is accepted and


satisfaction of land acquisition and annual turnover of the respondent.

which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform

satisfaction about power infrastructure

264

7. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between satisfaction of land

acquisition of allotment by policy of MIDC in Navi Mumbai and development of

SME


format given below:

Table No.7.30

Level of satisfaction of land acquisition and

allotment policy and development of SME

Satisfaction of land Development of SME Total

Medium Small

High 1 0 1

Low 2 8 10

Medium 19 70 89

Total 22 78 100


Figure No 7.7

Level of satisfaction of land acquisition of allotment policy and development of SME

265



Chi-square table value (5% loss.): 5.99



table value (5.99). Therefore test is accepted that is: There is no association between

type of SME and satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment by policy of

MIDC in Navi Mumbai. Which indicate that a respondent from small and medium

enterprises has uniform satisfaction about land acquisition and allotment.

266

7.7 Null Hypothesis with reference to power supply

8. Null Hypothesis (Ho):-There is no association between level of satisfaction of

power supply for SME and Type of organization of the respondent.

To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the

table format given in the table:

Table No 7.31

Level of satisfaction of power supply for SME and

Type of organization of the respondents

Type of organization Level of satisfaction of power Total

Low Medium High




Total 13 66 21 100

Out of 100 SME units respondents from SME, 21 19 from sole proprietorship, 24

were from Partnership business and 57 were from private limited companies. Out of

19 Sole proprietorship, 3 unites from low level of satisfaction,9 were from medium

level of satisfaction and 7 were from high level of satisfaction. Out of 24 partnership

business,2 unites from low level of satisfaction,15 were from medium level of

satisfaction and 7 were from high level of satisfaction. out of 57 Private limited

companies ,27unites from low level of satisfaction,8 were from medium level of

satisfaction and 42 were from high level of satisfaction.


267

Figure no.7.8

level of satisfaction of power supply for SME and



Chi-square: 7.213

Table value: 5.99





satisfaction of power supply for SME and Type of organization of the

respondent.

Which indicate that all three types of organization has uniform satisfaction about

power infrastructure.

268

9. Null Hypothesis(Ho):-There is no association between level of satisfaction of

power supply for SME and Type of SME of the respondent.

To test the null Hypothesis collected information was classified and presented in the


Table No 7.32


Type of SME of the respondents

Type of SME Level of satisfaction of Power Total

Low Medium High

Small 10 50 18 78

Medium 3 16 3 22

Total 13 66 21 100

Out of 100 SME units respondents from SME, 78 unites from small enterprises, 22

unites were from medium enterprises, out of 78 small enterprises ,18 unites from low

level of satisfaction,150were from medium level of satisfaction and 18 were from

high level of satisfaction. out of 22 medium enterprise ,03 unites from low level of

satisfaction,16 were from medium level of satisfaction and 03 were from high level of

satisfaction.


Fig no. : 7.9



269


Chi-square: 930

Table value: 5.99



Calculated value 930 is less than table value (5.99), therefore test is accepted and null

hypothesis is accepted that is:There is no association between level of satisfaction

of power supply for SME and Type of SME of the respondent.


satisfaction about power infrastructure.

270


power supply for SME and Type of industry of the respondent.



Table no. : 7.33


Type of industry of the respondent.

Type of industry Level of satisfaction of Power Total

Low Medium High


Chemical 4 15 3 22

Others 3 3 10 32


Textile 1 4 0 5

Total 13 66 21 100

Out of 13 SME units respondents from low level of satisfaction, 05 unites from

Engineering, 04 unites were from Chemical, 03 unites from others, zero from

pharmaceuticals and o1 textile. Out of 66 SME units respondents from medium level

of satisfaction, 26 unites from Engineering, 15 unites were from Chemical, 03 unites

from Others, 02 from pharmaceuticals and o4 from textile Out of 21 SME units

respondents from high level of satisfaction, 03 unites from Engineering, 08unites

were from Chemical, 32 unites from Others, zero from pharmaceuticals and zero from

textile.


271

Figure No. 7.10


Type of Industry of the respondents


Chi-square: 5.601

Table value: 15.51





satisfaction of power supply for SME and Type of industry of the respondent.



272


power supply for SME and annual turnover of the respondent



Table no. : 7.34


annual turnover of the respondents

Annual Turnover Level of satisfaction of Power Total

Low Medium High

Below 25 lakh 3 7 0 10

25 to 50 lakh 0 15 6 21

Above 50 lakh 10 44 15 69

Total 13 66 21 100

Out of 13 SME Unites from low level of satisfaction group,03 from below 25 lakh

group,zero from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 10 were from above 50 lakh group. Out of

66 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction group,015 from below 25 lakh

group,44 from 25 to 50 lakh group, and 07 were from above 50 lakh group. Out of 21

SME Unites from high level of satisfaction group, zero from below 25 lakh group,06

from 25 to 50 lakh group, and 15 were from above 50 lakh group.


Figure No. 7.11



273


Chi-square: 7.933

Table value: 9.49




null hypothesis is accepted There is no association between level of satisfaction of

power supply for SME and annual turnover of the respondent



274

12. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is association between development of SME and

level of satisfaction of development of power infrastructure by MIDC in Navi-

Mumbai.



Table No: 7.35

Level of satisfaction of power infrastructure and Type of SME

Level of satisfaction of power

infrastructure

Development of

SME

Total

Medium Small

High 3 18 21

Low 3 10 13

Medium 16 50 66

Total 22 78 100


Fig No : 7.12

Level of satisfaction of power infrastructure and Type of SME

275

Chi-square calculated value : 0.93






Conclusion is There is no association between type of SME and level of

satisfaction of development of power infrastructure by MIDC in Navi-Mumbai

This indicate that proportion satisfaction of small and medium SME for power

infrastructure is uniform.

276

7.8 Null Hypothesis with reference to water supply


water supply for SME and Type of organisation of the respondent.



Table no. : 7.36

Level of satisfaction of water supply for SME and


Type of organization Level of satisfaction of Water

supply

Total

Low Medium High



Private limited Company 8 38 1 57

Total 27 70 3 100


proprietorship, 04 were from Partnership business and 08 were from private limited

companies. Out of 70 SME unites from medium level of satisfaction,13 were from

Sole properitorship,19 unites from partnership business and 08 were from private

limited companies. Out of o3 SME unites from high level of satisfaction, 01 were

from sole properitorship,01 were from partnership business and 01 were from private

limited companies.


Fig No. : 7.13


type of organization of the respondents

277


Chi-square: 2.508

Table value: 9.49



Calculated value 2.508is less than table value (9.49), therefore test is accepted and


satisfaction of water supply for SME and Type of organisation of the respondent.



278


water supply for SME and Type of SME of the respondent.



Table no.: 7.37

level of satisfaction of water supply for SME and Type of SME of the

respondents

Type of SME Level of satisfaction of Water supply Total

Low Medium High

Small 20 55 3 78

Medium 7 15 0 22

Total 27 70 3 100

Out of 27 SME units respondents from low level of satisfaction, 20 unites from small

enterprises and 07 unites were from medium enterprises. out of 70SME unites

respondents from medium level of satisfaction ,55 unites from small enterprises and

15 unites were from medium enterprises. out of 03 level of satisfaction, 03 unites

were from small enterprises and zero unites from medium enterprises

The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows:

Fig no.: 7.14


type of SME of the respondents

279


Chi-square: 1.102

Table value: 5.99




null hypothesis is accepted that is : There is no association between level of

satisfaction of water supply for SME and Type of SME of the respondent.


satisfaction about water supply.

280


water supply for SME and Type of industry of the respondent.



Table No. 7.38

level of satisfaction of water supply for SME and

Type of industry of the respondents

Type of industry Level of satisfaction of Water supply Total

Low Medium High


Chemical 9 12 1 22

Others 5 25 2 32


Textile 1 4 0 5

Total 27 70 3 100

Out of 27 SME units respondents from low level of satisfaction, 11 unites

fromEngineering ,09 unites were from Chemical, 05 unites from Others,01 unit from

pharmaceuticals and o1 unit from textile. Out of 70 SME units respondents from

medium level of satisfaction, 28 unites fromEngineering , 12 unites were from

Chemical, 25 unites from Others, 01 from pharmaceuticals and o4 from textile Out of

03 SME units respondents from high level of satisfaction, zero unites from

Engineering , 01 unites were from Chemical, 02 unites from Others, zero from

pharmaceuticals and zero unit from textile.


281

Fig no. : 7.15




Chi-square: 7.551

Table value: 15.51




null hypothesis is accepted. which indicate that respondents from small and medium

enterprises has uniform satisfaction about Water infrastructure

282


water supply for SME and annual turnover of the respondent.



Table no. : 7.39

level of satisfaction of water supply for SME and


Annual Turnover Level of satisfaction of Water supply Total

Low Medium High


25 to 50 lakh 4 16 1 21

Above 50 lakh 20 47 2 69

Total 27 70 03 100


group,04 unites from 25 to 50 lakh group and 10 unites were from above 50 lakh

group. Out of 70 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction group, 07 unites were

from below 25 lakh group,16 from 25 to 50 lakh group and 47 unites were from above

50 lakh group. Out of 03 SME Unites from high level of satisfaction group, zero

unites from below 25 lakh group,01 unite from 25 to 50 lakh group, and 02 unites

were from above 50 lakh group.


Figure no. 7.16



283


Chi-square: 1.296

Table value: 9.49





satisfaction of water supply for SME and annual turnover of the respondent.


satisfaction about Waterinfrastructure.

284

17. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between development of

SME and level of satisfaction of water supply by MIDC in Navi Mumbai



Table no. : 7.40

Level of satisfaction of Water supply and Type of SME

Level of satisfaction of Water supply Development of SME Total

Medium Small

High 0 3 3

Low 7 20 27

Medium 15 55 70

Total 22 78 100


Figure no.7.16

Level of satisfaction of Water supply and Type of SME



Chi-square table value (5% l.o.s.): 5.99


285



type of SME and level of satisfaction of water supply by MIDC in Navi Mumbai.


satisfaction about water supply.

286

7.9 Null Hypothesis with reference to fire prevention and protection


Fire prevention measures for SME and type of organisation of the respondent.


table format given in the table.

Table no. : 7.41

Level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures for SME and

type of organisation of the respondents

Type of organization Level of satisfaction of Fire

prevention measures for

SME

Total

Low Medium High


Partnership Business 5 15 4 24

Private limited company 8 31 18 57

Total 14 54 32 100

Out of 14 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 01 was from sole


companies. Out of 54 SME unites from medium level of satisfaction,08 unites were

from Sole properitorship,15 unites from partnership business and 31 unites were from

private limited companies. Out of 32 SME unites from high level of satisfaction, 10

unites were from sole proprietorship, 04 unites were from partnership business and 18

unites were from private limited companies.


287

Figure No7.18

Level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures for SME and type of

organization of the respondents


Chi-square: 6.951

Table value: 9.49





satisfaction of Fire prevention measures for SME and type of organisation of the

respondent.


satisfaction about fire protection and prevention services.

288

19. Null Hypothesis (Ho):-There is no association between level of satisfaction

of Fire prevention measures for SME and type of SME of the respondent.



Table no. : 7.42

level of satisfaction Fire prevention measures of for SME and type of SME of

the respondents

Out of 14 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 09 unites from

small enterprises and 05 unites were from medium enterprises. Out of 54 SME unites

of respondents from medium level of satisfaction ,43 unites from small enterprises

and 11 unites were from medium enterprises. out of 32 SME unites of respondents

from high level of satisfaction , 26 unites were from small enterprises and 06 unites

from medium enterprises.


Figure no. 7.19

Level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures for SME and type of SME of

the respondents

Type of SME Level of satisfaction of fire protection

and prevention measures

Total

Low Medium High

Small 9 43 26 78

Medium 5 11 6 22

Total 14 54 32 100

289


Chi-square: 1.815

Table value: 5.99





satisfaction of Fire prevention measures for SME and type of SME of the

respondent.

Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform

satisfaction about fire prevention measures

290


fire protection and prevention measures for SME and type of Industry of the

respondent.



Table no. : 7.43

level of satisfaction of fire protection and prevention measures for

SME and type of Industry of the respondents

Type of Industry Level of satisfaction of fire protection


Total

Low Medium High


Chemical 2 18 2 22

Others 4 15 13 32


Textile 1 1 3 5

Total 14 54 32 100

Out of 14 SME units respondents from low level of satisfaction, 06 unites

fromEngineering , 02 unites were from Chemical, 04 unites from Others,01 unit from


medium level of satisfaction, 20 unites fromEngineering ,18 unites were from

Chemical, 15 unites from Others, zero from pharmaceuticals and o1 from textile. Out

of 32 SME units respondents from high level of satisfaction, 13 unites were from

Engineering , 02 unites were from Chemical, 13 unites were from Others, one unit

from pharmaceuticals and three unit were from textile.


291

Fig no. : 7.20




Chi-square: 13.922

Table value: 15.51





satisfaction of fire protection and prevention measures for SME and type of

Industry of the respondent.


satisfaction about fire protection and prevention measures.

292

21. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of

satisfaction of Fire prevention measures and annual turnover of SME in Navi-

Mumbai.



Table no. : 7.44

Level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures and

annual turnover of SME in Navi-Mumbai

Annual Turnover Level of satisfaction of fire

prevention measures facility

Total

Low Medium High


25 to 50 lakh 7 7 7 21

Above 50 lakh 6 43 20 69

Total 14 54 32 100


25 lakh group,07 unites were from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 06 unites were from above

50 lakh group. Out of 54 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction group, 04

unites were from below 25 lakh group,07 unites were from from 25 to 50 lakh

group,and 43 unites were from above 50 lakh group. Out of 32 SME Unites from high

level of satisfaction group,05 unites from below 25 lakh group,07 unite from 25 to 50

lakh group,and 20 unites were from above 50 lakh group.


293

Fig no. : 7.21




Calculated value is greater than table value. Therefore test is rejected. Hence null

hypothesis is rejected. Alternate hypothesis is accepted that is: There is association

between level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures and annual turnover of

SME in Navi-Mumbai.

Conclusion is there is association between turn over and satisfaction of fire protection

and prevention measures .

For detail study mean satisfaction score for each group are obtained as follows

Table No 7.45

Mean Score of fire prevention measures

Annual Turnover Mean N Std. Deviation

25 to 50 lakh 25.0000 21 20.91650

Above 50 lakh 31.8841 69 18.13149

Below 25 lakh 35.0000 10 17.48015

Total 30.7500 100 18.75379

Above table indicate that mean score for turnover of Below 25 lakh is maximum and

for 25 to 50 lakh is minimum.Difference between mean scores is significant or not it

is tested by ANOVA followed by F-test

294

Table No.7.46

ANOVA score of fire prevention measures

Sum of

Squares

Df Mean

Square

F-

Calculated

F-

table

Between

Groups

963.678 2 481.839 1.381 3.08 Not

Significant

Within

Groups

33855.072 97 349.021

Total 34818.750 99

Above table indicate that F-calculated value is 1.381 which is less than standard table

value 1.96. This indicate that there is no significant difference in mean scores of

satisfaction.

This indicates that Null Hypothesis (Ho) is accepted tha is: There is association

between level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures and annual turnover of

SME in Navi-Mumbai.

295

22. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between development of SME

and level of satisfaction of fire protection and prevention measures by MIDC in

Navi Mumbai.



Table no.: 7.47

Level of satisfaction of fire protection and

prevention measures and Type of SME

Level of satisfaction of fire protection


Development of SME Total

Small Medium

Low 9 5 14

Medium 43 11 54

High 26 6 32

Total 22 78 100

Fig no. : 7.22


prevention measures and Type of SME




Chi-square table value (5% l.o.s.) : 5.99

Result of test : Accepted.

296


table value (5.99). Therefore test is accepted that is: There is no association

between development of SME and level of satisfaction of fire protection and

prevention measures by MIDC in Navi Mumbai.


satisfaction about fire protection and prevention measures.

297

23. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between development of SME

and level of satisfaction of fire protection and prevention measures by MIDC in

Navi Mumbai


table format given in the table

Table no. : 7.48


prevention measures and development of SME


prevention measures


Small Medium

Low 9 5 14

Medium 43 11 54

High 26 6 32

Total 78 22 100

Fig no. : 7.23


prevention measures and development of SME






298



Conclusion is There is no association between type of SME and level of

satisfaction of fire protection and prevention measures by MIDC in Navi

Mumbai

299

7.10 Null Hypothesis with reference to safety and security


safety and security and type of organization in Navi-Mumbai.



Table no. : 7.49

level of satisfaction of safety and security and

type of organization in Navi-Mumbai

Type of Organization Level of satisfaction of safety

and security

Total

Low Medium High




Total 12 69 19 100



companies. Out of 69 SME unites from medium level of satisfaction,13 unites were

from Sole properitorship,14 unites from partnership business and 42 unites were from

private limited companies. Out of 19 SME unites from high level of satisfaction, 04

unites were from sole proprietorship, 06 unites were from partnership business and 09

unites were from private limited companies.


300

Fig no. : 7.24

Level of satisfaction of safety and security for SME

and type of organization of the respondents


Chi-square: 1.957

Table value: 9.49





satisfaction of safety and security and type of organization in Navi-Mumbai.


satisfaction about safety and security.

301


satisfaction of safety and security and type of SME inNavi-Mumbai.



Table no 7.50

level of satisfaction of safety and security and type of SME

Type of SME Level of satisfaction of safety and

security

Total

Low Medium High

Small 10 53 5 78

Medium 2 16 4 22

Total 12 69 9 100





respondents from high level of satisfaction , 05 unites were from small enterprises and

04 unites from medium enterprises.


302

Fig no. : 7.25

Level of satisfaction of safety and security for

SME and type of SME of the respondents


Chi-square: 0.266

Table value: 5.99



Calculated value o.266 is less than table value(5.99), therefore test is accepted and


satisfaction of safety and security and type of SME in Navi-Mumbai.



303


satisfaction of safety and security and type of industry in Navi-Mumbai.



Table no. : 7.51

level of of satisfaction of safety and security and

type of industry in Navi-Mumbai.

Type of Industry Level of satisfaction of safety and

security

Total

Low Medium High


Chemical 4 17 1 22

Others 4 17 11 32


Textile 0 4 1 5

Total 12 69 19 100


Engineering , 02 unites were from Chemical, 04 unites from Others,01 unit from


medium level of satisfaction, 20 unites from Engineering, 18 unites were from

Chemical, 15 unites from Others, zero from pharmaceuticals and o1 from textile. Out

of 32 SME units respondents from high level of satisfaction, 13 unites were from

Engineering , 02 unites were from Chemical, 13 unites were from Others, one unit

from pharmaceuticals and three unit were from textile.


304

Fig no. : 7.26

level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures for SME

and Type of Industry of the respondents


Chi-square: 10.613

Table value: 15.51





satisfaction of safety and security and type of industry in Navi-Mumbai.



305

27. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association level of satisfaction of safety

and security and annual turnover of the respondents.



Table no. : 7.52

levellevel of satisfaction of safety and security

and annual turnover of the respondents.

Annual turnover Level of satisfaction of safety and

security

Total

Low Medium High


25 to 50 lakh 3 15 3 21

Above 50 lakh 8 49 12 69

Total 12 69 19 100


25 lakh group,03 unites were from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 08 unites were from above

50 lakh group. Out of 69 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction group, 05

unites were from below 25 lakh group,15 unites were from 25 to 50 lakh group,and

49 unites were from above 50 lakh group. Out of 19 SME Unites from high level of

satisfaction group,04 unites were from below 25 lakh group,03 unites were from 25 to

50 lakh group, and 12 unites were from above 50 lakh group.


306

Fig no. : 7.27

Level of satisfaction of safety and security for SME

and annual turnover of the respondents


Chi-square: 3.377

Table value: 9.49




null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association level of satisfaction of

safety and security and annual turnover of the respondents.



307

28. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between type of SME and

level of satisfaction of safety and security services by MIDC in Navi Mumbai



Table No. : 7.53

Level of satisfaction of safety and security measures and development of SME

Level of satisfaction of safety and security Development of SME Total

Small Medium

Low 10 2 12

Medium 53 16 69

High

15 4 19

Total 78 22 100


Fig No : 7.28

Level of satisfaction of safety and security measures and development of SME

308







type of SME and level of satisfaction of safety and security services by MIDC in

Navi Mumbai.



309

7.11 Null Hypothesis with reference to waste management

29. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of satisfaction

of waste management and type of organization of the respondent


table format given in the table

Table no. : 7.54

level of satisfaction of waste management and

type of organization of the respondent

Type of Organization Level of satisfaction of Waste

Management

Total

Low Medium High




Total 12 85 3 100


proprietorship, 01 units were from Partnership business and 08 unites were from




from high level of satisfaction, zero unites were from sole proprietorship, 01 unites

were from partnership business and 02 unite were from private limited companies.

The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows :

310

Fig no. : 7.29

Level of satisfaction of waste management for SME

and type of organization of the respondents


Chi-square: 2.550

Table value: 9.49





satisfaction of waste management and type of organization of the respondent.


satisfaction about waste management.

311

30. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of satisfaction

of waste management and type of SME of the respondent.



Table No. : 7.55

Level of of satisfaction of Waste Management for SME and


Type of SME Level of satisfaction Waste

Management

Total

Low Medium High

Small 11 65 2 78

Medium 1 20 1 22

Total 12 85 3 100


from small enterprises and 01 unites were from medium enterprises out of 85 SME


enterprises and 20 unites were from medium enterprises out of 03 SME unites of



The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follow

312

Fig no. : 7.30

Level of of satisfaction of Waste Management for SME and



Chi-square: 1.647

Table value: 5.99





satisfaction of waste management and type of SME of the respondent.



313

31. There is no association between level of satisfaction of waste management

and type of industry of the respondent.



Table No. 7.56

Level of satisfaction of Waste Management for SME and


Type of Industry Level of satisfaction Waste

Management

Total

Low Medium High


Chemical 2 19 1 22

Others 5 26 1 32


Textile 2 3 0 5

Total 12 85 3 100

Out of 12 SME units respondents were from low level of satisfaction, 03 unites were

from Engineering , 02 unites were from Chemical, 05 unites from Others, zero unit

were from pharmaceuticals and o2 unit were from textile. Out of 85 SME units

respondents from medium level of satisfaction, 35 unites from Engineering , 19 unites

were from Chemical, 26 unites from Others, two unites were from pharmaceuticals

and o2 from textile. Out of 03 SME units respondents were from high level of

satisfaction, 01 unites were from Engineering , 01 unites were from Chemical, 01

unites were from Others, zero unit were from pharmaceuticals and zero unit were

from textile.

314


Fig no. : 7.31




Chi-square: 5.608

Table value: 15.51




null hypothesis is accepted that is: . There is no association between level of

satisfaction of waste management and type of industry of the respondent.



315


of waste management and annual turnover of the respondent.



Table No. : 7.57



Annual Turnover Level of satisfaction of Waste

Management

Total

Low Medium High


25 to 50 lakh 3 18 0 21

Above 50 lakh 8 58 3 69

Total 12 85 3 100

Out of 12 SME Unites were from low level of satisfaction group,01 units were from

below 25 lakh group,03 unites were from 25 to 50 lakh group, and 08 unites were

from above 50 lakh group. Out of 85 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction

group, 09 unites were from below 25 lakh group,18 from 25 to 50 lakh group, and 58

unites were from above 50 lakh group. Out of 03 SME Unites were from high level of

satisfaction group,zero unites were from below 25 lakh group, zero unite from 25 to

50 lakh group, and 03 unites were from above 50 lakh group.

316


Fig No : 7.32




Chi-square: 1.520

Table value: 9.49





satisfaction of waste management and annual turnover of the respondent.



317

33. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between development of SME

and level of satisfaction of waste management by MIDC.



Table No : 7. 58

Level of satisfaction of Waste Management and Type of SME

Level of satisfaction of Waste

Management


Small Medium

Low 11 1 3

High 2 1 12

Medium 65 20 85

Total 78 22 100


Fig No : 7.33

Level of satisfaction of Waste Management and Type of SME






318


Table value (5.99). Therefore test is accepted that is: There is no association

between type of sme of level of satisfaction of waste management.



319

7.12 Null Hypothesis with reference to consultancy


of consultancy and type of organisation of the respondent



Table No. : 7. 59

Level of satisfaction of Consultancy and Type of SME

Type of organization Level of satisfaction of

Consultancy

Total

Low Medium High



Private Limited companies 33 12 12 57

Total 49 24 27 100






from high level of satisfaction, 08 unites were from sole properitorship, 04 unites



320

Fig no. : 7.34

Level of satisfaction of consultancy for SME and



Chi-square: 10.388

Table value: 0.109



Calculated value 10.388 is less than table value (.109), therefore test is accepted and


satisfaction of consultancy and type of organisation of the respondent .


satisfaction about consultancy.

321

35. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of

satisfaction of consultancy and type of SME of the respondent.



Table no. : 7.60

levellevel of satisfaction of consultancy and type of SME of the respondent.

Type of SME Level of satisfaction of Consultancy Total

Low Medium High

Small 38 21 19 78

Medium 11 6 5 22

Total 49 27 24 100








Fig no. : 7. 35

Level of satisfaction of consultancy for SME and type of SME of the respondents

322


Chi-square: . 997

Table value: 7.81



Calculated value .997 is less than table value(7.81), therefore test is accepted and null

hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of satisfaction

of consultancy and type of SME of the respondent.



323


of consultancy and type of industry of the respondent.



Table No : 7.61

Level of satisfaction of consultancy and type of industry of the respondent.

Type of Industries Level of satisfaction of

Consultancy

Total

Low Medium High


Chemical 11 8 3 22

Others 15 7 10 32


Textile 2 0 3 5

Total 49 27 24 100


Engineering , 11 unites were from Chemical, 15 unites from Others,01 unit from


medium level of satisfaction, 11 unites from Engineering , 08 unites were from

Chemical, 07 unites from Others, 01 unit were from pharmaceuticals and zero unit

were from textile. Out of 24 SME units respondents from high level of satisfaction,

08 unites were from Engineering , 03 unites were from Chemical, 10 unites were from

Others, zero unit were from pharmaceuticals and three unit were from textile.


324

Fig no. : 7.36

Level of satisfaction of consultancy for SME and Type of Industry of the

respondents

To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is:

Chi-square: 10.228

Table value: 21.03





satisfaction of consultancy and type of industry of the respondent.



325


consultancy and annual turnover of the respondent



Table no. : 7.62

level of satisfaction of consultancy and annual turnover of the respondent

Annual Turnover Level of satisfaction of

Consultancy

Total

Low Medium High


25 to 50 lakh 12 6 3 21

Above 50 lakh 34 19 16 69

Total 49 27 24 100


group,12 unites from 25 to 50 lakh group, and 34 unites were from above 50 lakh


from below 25 lakh group,06 units were from 25 to 50 lakhs group, and 19 unites

were from above 50 lakh group. Out of 24 SME Unites from high level of satisfaction

group,05 unites were from below 25 lakh group,03 units were from 25 to 50 lakh

group,and 16 unites were from above 50 lakh group.


326

Fig no. : 7.37

Level of satisfaction of consultancy for SME and



Chi-square: 5.282

Table value: 12.59





satisfaction of consultancy and annual turnover of the respondent.



327


consultancy and development of SME



Table no. : 7.63

level of satisfaction of consultancy and development of SME

Level of satisfaction of consultancy

Development of

SME

Total

Small Medium

Low 42 13 55

Medium 33 9 42

High 0 3 3

Total 78 22 100


Fig no. : 7.38

level of satisfaction of consultancy and development of SME





328



satisfaction of consultancy and development of SME.



329

7.13 Null Hypothesis with reference to marketing research


marketing research and type of organization of the respondent



Table no. : 7.64

level of satisfaction of marketing research and

type of organization of the respondent






from high level of satisfaction, 08 unites were from sole proprietorship, 08 unites



Type of organization Level of satisfaction Market

Research

Total

Low Medium High




Total 48 18 34 100

330

Fig no. 7. 39

Level of satisfaction of Marketing Research for SME and



Chi-square: 5.809

Table value: 12.59





satisfaction of marketing research and type of organization of the respondent.


satisfaction about marketing research.

331


of marketing research and type of SME of the respondent.



Table No : 7.65

levellevel of satisfaction of marketing research and

type of SME of the respondent

Level of satisfaction of

consultancy


Small Medium

Low 38 10 48

Medium 11 07 18

High 29 05 34

Total 78 22 100


from small enterprises and 10 unites were from medium enterprises. Out of 18 SME

unites of respondents from medium level of satisfaction, 11 unites from small

enterprises and 07 unites were from medium enterprises. Out of 34 SME unites of

respondents from high level of satisfaction , 29 unites were from small enterprises

and 05 unites were from medium enterprises .


Fig no : 7.40

level of satisfaction of marketing research and type of SME of the respondent

332


Chi-square: 6.067

Table value: 7.81





satisfaction of marketing research and type of SME of the respondent.



333


marketing research and type of industry of the respondent.



Table no. : 7.66

level of satisfaction of marketing research and

type of industry of the respondent.

Type of Industry Level of satisfaction of Market

Research

Total

Low Medium High


Chemical 10 4 8 22

Others 14 6 12 32


Textile 2 0 3 5

Total 48 18 34 100

Out of 48 SME units respondents from low level of satisfaction, 20 unites were from

Engineering, 10 unites were from Chemical, 14 unites were from others, 02 unit were

from pharmaceuticals and o2 unit were from textile. Out of 18 SME units respondents

from medium level of satisfaction, 8 unites were from Engineering, 4 unites were

from Chemical, 6 unites were from others, zero unit were from pharmaceuticals and

zero unit were from textile. Out of 34 SME units respondents from high level of

satisfaction, 11 unites were fromEngineering , 08 unites were from Chemical, 12

unites were from Others, zero unit were from pharmaceuticals and three unit were

from textile.

The above data is presented in multiple nbars diagram as follows

334

Fig no. : 7.41

Level of satisfaction of marketing research for SME and



Chi-square: 5.767

Table value: 21.03





satisfaction of marketing research and type of industry of the respondent.



335


of marketing research and turnover of the respondent



Table No : 7.67

Level of satisfaction of marketing research and turnover of the respondent

Annual Turnover Level of satisfaction of Market

Research

Total

Low Medium High


25 to 50 lakh 10 3 8 21

Above 50 lakh 33 14 22 69

Total 48 18 34 100


group,10 unites from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 33 unites were from above 50 lakh


from below 25 lakh group,03 from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 14 unites were from above

50 lakh group. Out of 34 SME Unites from high level of satisfaction group,04 unites

were from below 25 lakh group,08 unite were from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 22 unites

were from above 50 lakh group.


336

Fig No : 7.42

Level of satisfaction of marketing research for SME and



Chi-square: 1.555

Table value: .956



Calculated value 1.555 is less than table value (.956), therefore test is accepted and


satisfaction of marketing research and turnover of the respondent.



337


marketing research and turnover of the respondent



Table No : 7.68

level of satisfaction of marketing research and turnover of the respondent

Level of satisfaction of consultancy

Development of

SME

Total

Small Medium

Low 38 10 48

Medium 11 07 18

High 29 05 34

Total 78 22 100


Fig No : 7.43

level of satisfaction of marketing research and turnover of the respondent

338

7.14 Null Hypothesis with reference to incentives


incentives and type of organizations of the respondent



Table No: 7.68

level of satisfaction of incentives and type of organizations of the respondent

Type of organization Level of satisfaction of incentives Total

Low Medium High




Total 13 76 11 100

Out of 13 SME units of respondents were from low level of satisfaction, 02 unites

were from sole proprietorship, 03 units were from Partnership business and 08 unites

were from private limited companies. Out of 76 SME unites from medium level of



from high level of satisfaction, 04 unites were from sole proprietorship, 03 unites



Fig No : 7.44

Level of satisfaction of Incentives for SME and


339


Chi-Square Tests

Chi-square: 2.969

Table value: 9.49




null hypothesis is accepted. Which indicate that respondents from small and medium

enterprises has uniform satisfaction about power infrastructure

340


incentives and type of SME of the respondent



Table No: 7.69

level of satisfaction of incentives and type of SME of the respondent

Level of satisfaction of consultancy Development of

SME

Total

Small Medium

Low 10 3 55

Medium 59 17 42

High 9 2 3

Total 78 22 100


from small enterprises and 03 unites were from medium enterprises. Out of 76 SME

unites of respondents were from medium level of satisfaction, 59 unites were from

small enterprises and 17 unites were from medium enterprises. Out of 11 SME unites

of respondents from high level of satisfaction, 02 unites were from small enterprises

and 09 unites from medium enterprises.


Fig No: 7.44

Level of satisfaction of incentives for SME and type of SME of the respondents

341


Chi-square: .108

Table value: 5.99



Calculated value .108 is less than table value (5.99), therefore test is accepted and null

hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of satisfaction

of incentives and type of SME of the respondent


satisfaction about incentives .

342


incentives and type of industry of the respondent



Table No: 7. 70

level of satisfaction of incentives and type of industry of the respondent

Type of Industries Incentives satisfaction level Total

Low Medium High


Chemical 5 16 1 22

Others 1 24 7 32


Textile 0 4 1 5

Total 13 76 11 100

Out of 13 SME units respondents were from low level of satisfaction, 07 unites were

from Engineering , 05 unites were from Chemical, 01 unites were from Others, zero

unit were from pharmaceuticals and zero unit were from textile. Out of 76 SME units

respondents were from medium level of satisfaction, 30 unites were from

Engineering, 16 unites were from Chemical, 24 unites were from Others, 02 unites

were from pharmaceuticals and o4 unites were from textile. Out of 11 SME units

respondents from high level of satisfaction, 02 unites were from Engineering ,

01unites were from Chemical, 07 unites were from Others, zero unit were from

pharmaceuticals and one unit were from textile.


343

Fig no. : 7.45




Chi-square: 11.932

Table value: 15.51





satisfaction of incentives and type of industry of the respondent.


satisfaction about incentives.

344


satisfaction of incentives and annual turnover of the respondent



Table No: 7.71

Level of satisfaction of incentives and annual turnover of the respondent

Annual Turnover Level of satisfaction of

incentives

Total

Low Medium High


25 to 50 lakh 0 19 2 21

Above 50 lakh 12 52 5 69

Total 13 76 11 100

Out of 13 SME Unites were from low level of satisfaction group,01 unit were from

below 25 lakh group,zero unite were from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 12 unites were

from above 50 lakh group. Out of 76 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction

group, 05 unites were from below 25 lakh group,19 unites were from 25 to 50 lakh

group,and 52 unites were from above 50 lakh group. Out of 11 SME Unites were

from high level of satisfaction group,04 unites were from below 25 lakh group,02

unites were from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 05 unites were from above 50 lakh group.


Fig no. : 7.46



345


Chi-square: 13.866

Table value: 9.49




null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted that is: There is

association between level of satisfaction of incentives and annual turnover of the

respondent.

Which indicate that a respondent from small and medium enterprises has not uniform


Table No. 7.72

Mean score satisfaction of Incentives

Annual Turnover N Mean Std. Deviation

25 to 50 lakh 21 37.5000 5.59017

Above 50 lakh 69 29.5290 14.05265

Below 25 lakh 10 40.0000 11.48671

Total 100 32.2500 13.07757

Table No. 7.73

ANOVA for Incentives satisfaction score

Sum of

Squares

df Mean

Square

F-

Calculation

F-

table

Significance

Between

Groups 1690.308 2 845.154 5.379 3.08

Significant

Within

Groups 15240.942 97 157.123

Total 16931.250 99

The table indicates that the calculated f-value (5.379) is much more than the table

value (3.08).

346

Table No. 7.74

Criticalvalues of turnover and fire safety satisfaction turn over and fire safety

satisfaction

Pair

s

Number

of Resp Mean SD

SE of

diff

of

Mean

Difference

of Mean

Calculated

T-value

Table

T-

value

Significance

1

25 to

50

lakh

21 37.50 5.59

2.11 7.971 3.77 1.68 Significant Above

50

lakh

69 29.53 14.05

2

25 to

50

lakh

21 37.50 5.59

4.03 -2.5 -0.62 1.7 Non-

significant Below

25

lakh

10 40.00 11.49

3

Above

50

lakh

69 29.53 14.05

4.19 -10.471 -2.50 1.68 Significant Below

25

lakh

10 40.00 11.49

Pair I- The number of respondents for above 50 lakh is more than number of

respondents for 25-50 lakhs category.

Pair II- The number of respondents for 25 to 50 lakhs is more than number of

respondents for below 25 lakhs category.

Pair III- The number of respondents for above 50 lakh is more than number of

respondents for below 25 lakhs category.

347


incentives and development of SME.



Table No. : 7.75

Level of satisfaction of incentives and development of SME.

Level of satisfaction of consultancy Development of

SME

Total

Small Medium

Low 38 11 49

Medium 21 6 27

High 19 5 24

Total 78 22 100


Fig No: 7.47

Level of satisfaction of incentives and development of SME






348


null hypothesis is accepted that is:. There is no association between level of

satisfaction of incentives and development of SME.



Documents

Chapter 7shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/73527/17... · 40 Maharashtra Chemical Products Pvt. Ltd Chemical 06 100 11 183.33 41 Protochem Industries Pvt.Ltd Chemical 10