CHAPTER 5COMPARATIVE ACCOUNTING

Chapter Outline

China

I. There are some unique features in the accounting profession in China. They include the following:A. Until the 1980s, those who carried out accounting work were not held in high regard in

society, and this has had an adverse effect on the development of the accounting profession in China.

B. Accounting and auditing in China have taken different paths in their development processes. Auditing firms audited mainly domestic companies, and were under the State Administration of Audit (SAA), whereas accounting firms focused on companies using foreign investments and were sponsored by the Ministry of Finance.

C. Unlike in the U.K., where there was a good legislative and judicial environment during the early stages of the development of the profession, in China, a market-oriented legislative and judicial environment is still emerging.

D. Unlike in the U.K., where auditors receive support from the established professional bodies, these support mechanisms are still lacking in China.

II. The recent economic reform program stimulated the growth of the accounting profession in China.A. With the recognition by the State of joint stock company form, the demands for

financial information from investors and other interested parties increased.B. The establishment of two stock exchanges helped rapid growth of the accounting

activities.C. Various government regulations on the implementation of economic reform measures

require the involvement of independent auditors.D. The laws on joint ventures with foreign companies require the audit of annual

statements.E. International accounting firms were allowed to be involved in training local auditors and

setting auditing standards.

III. There are clear signals that Anglo-American accounting principles are replacing Soviet-style accounting.A. This was required as a result of the movement towards private ownership.B. The Ministry of Finance is following international accounting practices in setting

Chinese standards; a conceptual framework was promulgated in 1992, and the China Accounting Standards Committee (CASC) was established in1988.

C. The Chinese Security Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has improved disclosure requirements for companies. For example, it requires listed companies to post their annual reports on the web site of the relevant stock exchange.

D. Both CSRC and the two stock exchanges have developed new corporate governance rules based on those that are common in Anglo-American countries.

E. The CSRC and Ministry of Finance, consistent with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, require auditor rotation every five years.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Doupnik and Perera, International Accounting, 1/e 5-1

IV. Major differences between IFRSs and Chinese GAAP include:A. Accounting standards and practices in China lack conservatism.B. There are no coherent interpretations of the relevant requirements.C. In some areas covered by IFRSs there are no specific rules in China, including

business combinations, impairment of assets, and the definitions of operating and finance leases.

Germany

I. Unique features in German accounting include:A. The primary source of finance for German companies is bank loans rather than equity,

and this determines to a large extent the purpose for financial reporting by companies. B. Auditing dominates the financial reporting related professional activities.C. The auditing profession is headed by the Chamber of Auditors, a State-supervised

organization.D. The Commercial Code contains most of the German financial reporting principles, and

sanctions for non-compliance.E. Unlike in the U.S., partnership accounting is regulated in Germany.F. The principle of prudence (conservatism) is established in the law.

II. There are signs of a change in financial reporting from a creditor orientation towards a shareholder orientation.A. The Companies Act 1965 was the initiator of this change.B. In 1998, German law was amended to allow a private sector body (GASC) to develop

accounting standards (until then the Ministry of Justice coordinated the accounting rule development process).

C. Since 1998, German accounting standards have been developed by following due process, and promotion of international convergence is a main objective.

D. GASB (the standard-setting body of GASC) has been modeled on the U.S. FASB.E. In 2004, the Financial Reporting Enforcement Panel (FREP) was created.

III. Traditionally, the primary function of financial accounting has been the conservative determination of distributable income, rather than presentation of a true and fair view.A. Traditionally bank credit plays a major role in corporate finance.B. German accounting is heavily influenced by tax law.C. German accounting rules allow companies to smooth income over time by using

hidden reserves.D. Although the EU’s Fourth Directive requires companies to present a true and fair view

in their financial statements, it appears that extensive note disclosures are seen as a way of achieving this without changing the tax-based, income smoothing approach to financial reporting.

IV. Since January 2005, all German listed companies are required to use IFRSs in preparing their consolidated financial statements. However, German accounting practices differ from IFRSs in some important respects.A. German accounting law contains no specific rules in some areas. Examples include

the translation of foreign currency financial statements of foreign subsidiaries, disclosures of fair values of financial assets and liabilities, and earnings per share.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Doupnik and Perera, International Accounting, 1/e 5-2

B. There are inconsistencies between IFRSs and German rules in some areas. For example, according to German rules, goodwill arising on consolidation can be deducted immediately against equity, and inventories can be valued at replacement cost.

C. According to German tradition, a management report is an important part of a company’s financial statements, whereas IFRSs do not include specific requirements in this regard.

Japan

I. Unique features in the Japanese business environment include:A. The economy is dominated by a few conglomerates known as Keiretsu.B. The main sources of finance for business are bank credit and cross-corporate

ownership, rather than outside equity finance.C. Corporate earnings are regarded as the source of funds that can be distributed, and

not as a measure of corporate performance.D. Stock exchanges in Japan are government regulated rather than self-regulated. The

stock exchange law is administered by the Ministry of Finance.

II. There are differences between the Japanese accounting profession and its counterparts in Anglo-American countries, including: A. The Ministry of Finance plays a major role, through its Business Accounting

Deliberation Council (BADC), in developing financial reporting standards in Japan, and the influence of the Japanese Institute of Certified Professional Accountants (JICPA) in this respect has been minor compared to that of its counterparts in Anglo-American countries.

B. The accounting profession has a relatively low social status in Japan.C. For cultural reasons, the concept of independent auditor is not readily acceptable

within Japanese companies.D. Unlike in the U.S., and similar to Germany, financial reporting is heavily influenced by

tax law.

III. Recently, major attempts have been made to ensure that Japanese accounting standards fall into line with international standards.A. A Big Bang approach has been taken to achieve this.B. In 2001, the Accounting Standards Board of Japan (ASBJ), modeled on FASB, was

formed.C. In January 2005, the ASBJ and IASB agreed to launch a joint project to reduce

differences between IFRSs and Japanese GAAP.

IV. There are several important differences between IFRSs and Japanese GAAP.A. In general, companies are not under pressure from their main providers of finance to

disclose information publicly, and Japanese companies are reluctant to provide information voluntarily.

B. There are no specific rules in some areas covered by IFRSs, such as impairment of assets, discontinuing operations and segment reporting.

C. There are inconsistencies between Japanese GAAP and IFRSs; for example, inventories can be valued at cost under Japanese GAAP rather than at the lower of cost and net realizable value as required by IFRSs.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Doupnik and Perera, International Accounting, 1/e 5-3

Mexico

I. Many features of the Mexican business environment are common to other developing countries.

A. Until recently, a substantial portion of the Mexican business sector was government controlled, and a large number of business enterprises were government owned.

B. The economy has suffered from persistent balance of payments problems.C. As a result of the effect of the “Tequila crisis,” Mexico accepted a bailout package from

the IMF and the U.S. Treasury.D. In recent years, there has an effort to privatize state-owned enterprises, and many of

the restrictions to foreign investment have been removed.E. The measures aimed at achieving economic growth stimulated the activities of the

stock exchange.

II. Mexico has an established accounting profession with a long history.A. The first professional body was established in 1917.B. The Mexican Institute of Public Accountants (MIPA) was one of the nine founding

members of the IASC.C. Public accounting firms mainly provide bookkeeping, tax, and audit services.D. A professional diploma is required to practice as a public accountant.

III. Regulation of accounting and financial reporting is through legislation, stock exchange listing requirements, and bulletins issued by MIPA.A. The law requires that annual financial statements of listed companies must be audited

by a Mexican CPA and published in a nationally circulated medium.B. The National Banking and Securities Commission (NBSC), an equivalent of U.S. SEC,

oversees information disclosure by publicly owned companies.C. MIPA is responsible for issuing accounting and auditing standards, and follows a due

process.D. MIPA has developed a Code of Ethics which prohibits advertising for public

accountants.

IV. As a result of Mexico’s membership with NAFTA, Mexican accounting principles are heavily influenced by U.S. accounting practices in recent years.A. The U.S. influence also is exerted through the presence of subsidiaries of U.S.

companies and the Big 4 international accounting firms.

V. A unique feature of Mexican accounting practice is the treatment of the effects of inflation in financial statements by using general purchasing power accounting.

VI. Bulletin B-10 introduced a novel concept known as the “integrated result of financing,” which is calculated by adding the nominal interest expense, the gain or loss due to price level changes on the company’s net monetary position, and the gains and losses due to exchange rate fluctuations on the company’s monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Doupnik and Perera, International Accounting, 1/e 5-4

VII. There are several differences between Mexican GAAP and IFRSs. For example, according to Mexican rules, research and development costs are to be expensed as incurred, pre-operating costs can be capitalized, a statement of inflation is mandatory irrespective of the inflation rate.

United Kingdom

I. In the U.K. the capital market provides the main source of funding for companies, and the limited liability company is the main form of business organization.A. The primary purpose of accounting in the U.K. is to provide information for the efficient

functioning of the capital market.B. Accounting in the U.K. grew as an independent discipline, responding to business

needs.C. The first professional accounting body in modern times was established in the U.K. in

1853, and currently there are six professional bodies in that country, coordinated by the Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (CCAB).

D. The U.K. accounting profession has favored a principles-based approach rather than a rules-based approach to standard setting.

II. Accounting regulation in the U.K. has been driven by the idea that determination of acceptable accounting principles and standards should be left in the hands of the profession.A. U.K. legislators did not feel the need to have a powerful securities commission to

regulate accounting and financial reporting with detailed rules.B. The responsibilities for developing accounting standards and auditing standards lie

with the Accounting Standards Board (ASB) and Auditing Practices Board (APB), respectively, both independent bodies.

C. Changes to traditional thinking began as a result of U.K. joining the EU in 1973. The amendments to the 1948 Companies Act in 1981 as a result of integrating the EU’s Fourth Directive in British law made U.K. company legislation highly prescriptive.

D. In 2003 the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) became the single, independent regulator of accounting and auditing in the U.K.

E. ASB is one of the several national accounting standard-setters that have formal liaison with the IASB, and is committed to align U.K. accounting standards with IFRSs.

III. Accounting principles and practices in the U.K. emphasize investor needs and the importance of transparency.A. The 1985 Companies Act requires corporate financial statements to provide a true and

fair view of the firm’s financial position and results of operations for the financial year. Auditors are given the corresponding duty to render an opinion on whether this requirement is fulfilled. Provision of a true and fair view is an overriding requirement in the U.K.

B. Since January 2005, U.K. listed companies are required to use EU adopted IFRSs to prepare their group (consolidated) financial statements.

C. Financial statements generally are prepared on the basis of historical cost, but companies are allowed to revalue tangible assets.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Doupnik and Perera, International Accounting, 1/e 5-5

D. U.K. accounting standards are generally similar to IFRSs, but there are also differences in some areas. For example, U.K. GAAP allows companies to amortize goodwill at their discretion, whereas IFRSs require goodwill to be tested for impairment annually.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Doupnik and Perera, International Accounting, 1/e 5-6

Answers to Questions

1. Gradual capital market liberalization will open up international investment opportunities for national investors. Poor rating assignments of national firms could therefore trigger an immense outflow of investment capital providing national firms with strong incentives to implement sound and internationally comparable accounting practices.

2. The economic reforms have increased demand for accounting services in many ways. Key aspects of the economic reforms in China include privatization of SOEs, liberalization of controls, commitment to encourage private investment in business and to attract foreign investment, and emphasis on commercial viability and competition among businesses. All these are integral parts of a market system, and lead to increased demands for accounting services. For example, when businesses compete, they become increasingly cost conscious. Investors need accurate information about the financial performance and position of the businesses they have invested in. When Chinese companies seek to raise funds in overseas markets or the government attempts to attract foreign investors, it is important to ensure that proper financial records are kept, and information is disclosed using internationally acceptable standards. Further, various government regulations on the implementation of economic reforms require the involvement of independent auditors.

3. A unique feature in the development of accounting and auditing in China is that, unlike in many other countries, until recently (1998), these two areas developed as two rival disciplines competing with each other, supported by two separate government agencies.

4. The pressures arise from the need to change from an accounting system designed to provide information to government for planning purposes to a system that is capable of providing useful information for economic decision making. China has expressed a commitment to adopt IFRSs. This is particularly important to China because of the requirement under WTO membership and the need to attract foreign investment. The ultimate objective of accounting regulation is to achieve a high level of compliance with the mandated reporting standards. This requires an adequate number of professionals who are willing and able to implement the standards. However, the accounting profession in China is still at the early stage of development, and a lack of skilled professionals will create problems for regulators. IFRSs are based on western cultural values. Some of the concepts that are fundamental to IFRSs, such as true and fair view or fair presentation and transparency, may not be clearly understood by Chinese accountants.

5. One of the distinct Japanese cultural values is collectivism or group consciousness. This has directly affected the Japanese attitude towards external auditors and the audit function. Prior to the American occupation of Japan after the Second World War, there was no external auditing profession. When it was introduced in 1949, Japanese corporations often considered it as unnecessary. Because of the cultural value orientation of not trusting someone from outside the group, independent auditors had difficulty being accepted by clients.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Doupnik and Perera, International Accounting, 1/e 5-7

6. In the 1990s, Japanese companies were compelled to seek finance from overseas markets due to various reasons, such as large scale losses among Japanese banks and other companies, and the collapse of Japanese asset prices. However, the financial reporting standards used by Japanese companies were criticized for their failure to produce information in a transparent manner. In the mid-1990s the Japanese government initiated a program of financial reform, which included a series of major changes aimed at aligning Japanese financial reporting regulations with internationally acceptable standards. The term “Accounting Big Bang” was used to describe this reform program because of the magnitude of the changes involved.

7. The principle of prudence is firmly established in the German law mainly because of the heavy losses suffered by creditors of German companies during the Great Depression in the late 1920s and early 1930s. The accounting system at the time allowed companies to revalue assets as they wished, and was blamed for the losses as it failed to protect the creditors from becoming victims of companies, which adopted highly optimistic methods to value their assets. The objective of establishing the principle of prudence in the 1937 Stock Corporations Law was to ensure that the events of the 1920s and 1930s would not happen again. This is reflected in the strict adherence to the use of historical cost for measuring asset values.

8. In Germany, tax law has a strong influence on accounting and financial reporting. The reason for this link between taxation and financial reporting is historical. When corporate income taxation was introduced in Germany in 1874, the requirement for annual accounting had already been codified in the Commercial Code in 1862. It was convenient to link corporate income taxation to existing financial statements.

9. There are two main external factors that have influenced financial reporting in Germany in recent years. They are, EU Directives and the forces of globalization. The 1985 Accounting Act implemented the Fourth, Seventh, and Eighth Directives and transformed them into German Commercial Law. The EU’s decision to adopt IFRSs from January 1 2005, was in recognition of the global trends in financial reporting. Even before the EU’s decision, large German companies like Daimler-Chrysler that had their shares listed on foreign stock exchanges were already using internally acceptable accounting standards.

10. The NBSC’s role in the area of financial reporting by Mexican companies is similar to that of the U.S. SEC. It is a government body that regulates the operation of the Mexican stock exchange, including financial reporting by Mexican public companies. For example, NBSC’s permission is required for listing on the stock exchange.

11. The significance of Bulletin A-8 is that it requires Mexican companies to apply international accounting standards for issues that are not covered by Mexican GAAP.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Doupnik and Perera, International Accounting, 1/e 5-8

12. There are three main external factors that have influenced financial reporting in Mexico in recent years. First, NAFTA required Mexico, among other things, to remove barriers to trade with partner countries (the U.S. and Canada). One of the barriers was the use of incompatible financial reporting standards by Mexican companies. Second, the IMF/U.S. Treasury bail-out plan in the mid-1990s after the “Tequila” crisis also included specific requirements concerning information disclosure by Mexican companies. Finally, the efforts of the IASB as global standard setter have also influenced financial reporting by Mexican companies.

13. An important contribution that Mexican accounting has made to international accounting is in the treatment of the effects of inflation for accounting purposes by using General Price-level Accounting. The introduction of the “integral cost of financing” as an income statement item was particularly innovative. This is the net result of three different costs: nominal interest expense, the gain or loss due to price level changes on the net monetary position, and foreign exchange gains and losses on monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies arising from variations in exchange rates.

14. Membership in the EU has had a profound effect on accounting regulation in the U.K. The U.K. pioneered private-sector regulation of accounting where legislation provides broad principles and the accounting profession determines specific rules for financial reporting. However, this approach was changed with the 1981 amendments to the U.K. Companies act that introduced the EU Fourth Directive. These amendments were prescriptive in that they stated exactly how certain matters should be treated, such as the format of financial statements. Another significant change was introduced in the 1989 Companies Act, which for the first time referred to accounting standards. It requires that companies must state whether the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards.

15. The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) was established in 1991 following the Dearing Committee recommendations, with the responsibility for overall policy control over the accounting standard-setting process. The role of the FRC has been further strengthened recently as part of the reform package introduced in the U.K. in response to the recent financial disasters in the U.S. As a result, the FRC will become the new, single, independent regulator, with an expanded role, which includes setting accounting and auditing standards, proactively enforcing and monitoring accounting and auditing standards, and overseeing the self-regulatory professional bodies. To guarantee its independence, the FRC is funded equally by the government, business, and the accountancy profession.

16. The U.K. has taken a principles-based approach in setting accounting standards. This approach focuses on establishing general principles derived from a conceptual framework. One of the main features of this approach is the emphasis on professional judgement. British accounting standards tend to limit guidance for applying the general principles to typical transactions and encourage professional judgment in applying the general principles to specific situations.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Doupnik and Perera, International Accounting, 1/e 5-9

Solutions to Exercises and Problems

1. The purpose of this exercise is to encourage students to consider the approach taken in their own country towards accounting regulation, compare that with another country that has taken a different approach, and explain why the two countries have taken different approaches. In doing this, students should examine the legal and professional aspects of accounting regulation. In explaining possible reasons for the differences, they should refer to the main factors that influence accounting and financial reporting in the two countries.

2. The number of accountants per head of population is much higher in the U.K. than in Japan. The main reason is that there is a greater demand in the U.K. for accounting information, particularly due to the pressures exerted through the capital market’s expectations with regard to how companies should perform financially, and what financial information they should disclose. This is because, in the U.K., the capital market is the main source of funding for business. In Japan, the main source of funding for business is the banking system, and the capital market plays a relatively minor role. Banks can have direct access to company financial information. Therefore, unlike in the U.K., the demand for published accounting information is much smaller.

3. a. The factor that has exerted the greatest influence on the development of accounting in each of these countries is the providers of finance for business enterprises. While the other factors have also been important, the purpose of accounting is determined largely on the basis of who provides finance. For example, the changes in accounting and financial reporting that are currently taking place in China, Japan, Germany, and Mexico are mainly due to the fact that in all these countries, the source of funding for business are changing. In the U.K., the capital market has been the main influencing factor in the development of accounting.

b. China: A distinguishing feature is the manner in which accounting and auditing have developed. Unlike in many other countries, In China accounting and auditing have taken different paths in their development as rival disciplines with the support of different government agencies.Japan: A distinguishing feature is the manner in which accounting has been regulated. The accounting profession is not strong in Japan, compared to its counterpart, for example, in the U.K., and it has played a relatively minor role in regulating accounting and financial reporting in that country. The main sources of accounting regulation are the Commercial Code and the Corporate Income Tax Law.Germany: A distinguishing feature is the dominance of auditing in the financial reporting related activities. Mexico: A distinguishing feature is the use of General Price Level accounting to incorporate the effects of inflation into accounting reports.U.K.: A distinguishing feature is having six professional bodies representing the accounting profession.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Doupnik and Perera, International Accounting, 1/e 5-10

4. a. China: IFRSs are permitted for some domestic listed companies, but not permitted for domestic non-listed companies.Japan: IFRSs are not permitted for domestic listed companies or for domestic non-listed companies.Germany: IFRSs are required for all domestic listed companies and permitted for non-listed companies. Mexico: IFRSs are not permitted for domestic listed companies or non-listed companies.U.K.: IFRSs are required for all domestic listed companies. The Department of Trade and Industry has a proposal to allow IFRS for domestic non-listed companies.

b. Germany, Japan, and the U.K. have residents who are members of the IASB.

5. a. An issue for which the practices of several countries are at variance with IASB GAAP:Pre-operating expenses: IAS 38 requires pre-operating expenses to be charged to expenses. The practices in China, Japan, Germany, and Mexico are at variance with this requirement. In China, pre-operating expenses are charged to expenses, but can be deferred until the entity begins operations. In the other three countries, pre-operating expenses can be capitalized.

b. While the most important financial accounting practice at variance with IASB GAAP is a matter of opinion, the following are significant differences between IFRSs and each country’s GAAP:

China: Internally generated intangible assets – IAS 38 stipulates that research expenditure is expensed when incurred, and development expenditure can be capitalized under some circumstances. But under Chinese GAAP, all research and development costs are expensed when incurred, capitalization is not allowed.Japan: Inventory valuation – IAS 2 requires inventories to be valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Japanese companies are allowed to value inventories at cost rather than at the lower of cost and net realizable value.Germany: Pre-operating expenses – IAS 38 requires pre-operating expenses to be charged to expenses when incurred. German companies are allowed to capitalize pre-operating expenses, or amortize them over four years.Mexico: Statement of cash flows – IAS 7 requires a statement of cash flows. Mexican companies are required to publish a statement of changes in financial position instead of a statement of cash flows.U.K.: Proposed dividends – IAS 10 does not allow recognition as a liability at the balance sheet date. U.K. companies accrue proposed dividends as a liability.

6. Companies listed on the NYSE as at June 3, 2004:China: 16 companiesJapan: 19 companiesGermany: 18 companiesMexico: 23 companiesU.K.: 71 companies

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Doupnik and Perera, International Accounting, 1/e 5-11

7. The main mechanisms put in place to regulate accounting and financial reporting in U.K. are legislation, professional pronouncements and stock exchange listing requirements. The U.K. tradition has been for company legislation to provide only broad guidelines for accounting, leaving specific rules to be developed by the profession. However, EU membership has changed this tradition, and as a result, certain specific rules affecting accounting have been included in the Companies Act. These include rules regarding the format of financial statements and the need for registration of auditors. In the U.K., accounting standard setting is by a private sector independent body, the ASB. Unlike in the U.K., accounting standard setting in China started only recently, only about fifteen years ago, and it is under the control of the government, with the Ministry of Finance as the responsible government agency. In China, the Chinese Security Regulatory Commission performs a role similar to that of the U.S. SEC. There is no equivalent body in the U.K. In recent years, both the U.K. and China have experienced major changes in the area of accounting regulation. In China the focus of the changes has been to bring Chinese accounting practices closer to internationally acceptable standards. For example, a conceptual framework was issued in 2001 (Accounting System for Business Enterprises). China has not adopted IFRSs, but has committed to use IFRSs as the basis for developing Chinese accounting standards. In the U.K., the focus of recent changes has been to strengthen the position of the independent regulator, the Financial Reporting Council, mainly in response to the recent financial disasters in the U.S. In doing this, special effort has been made to ensure that the regulator is independent from any interested party, including the government. This is different from the approach taken in China.

8. In recent years, both Germany and Japan have undertaken major projects to reform their systems of accounting regulation. Both countries have recognized the need for companies to adopt internationally acceptable accounting standards. Until recently, in both countries, the responsibility for setting accounting standards was with government agencies. In that context, the professional bodies played a relatively minor role. Since professional accounting bodies, not governments, were members of international organizations such as the IASB, this became a major problem for these two countries. As a result, both Germany and Japan have established private sector standard setting bodies (Accounting Standards Board of Japan and the German Accounting Standards Board), so that they have a mechanism to participate effectively in the international accounting standards setting process.

9. First, the level of inflation in Mexico has been much higher in Mexico compared to the other countries covered in this chapter. As a result, incorporating the effects of inflation into financial reports is an important financial reporting issue. Second, the other four countries do not face issues similar to those arising from Mexico’s membership in NAFTA. Mexico is under great pressure to ensure that its companies adopt U.S. GAAP for financial reporting purposes, because the use of incompatible accounting standards would be a barrier to free trade between Mexico and the U.S. This is a major challenge facing the accounting profession in Mexico.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Doupnik and Perera, International Accounting, 1/e 5-12

10. In comparing the financial statement prepared by companies in China, Japan, and Mexico with those of other companies, which have used IASB GAAP, the treatments of the following items should be considered carefully, as they can have a significant impact on the reported financial results and positions of companies. Measurement of property, plant and equipment. IASB GAAP allows the use of either fair value or historical cost, but Chinese GAAP requires the use of historical cost.Treatment of research and development costs. IASB GAAP requires that all research costs are expensed, and development costs, if certain criteria are met, are capitalized, but Chinese GAAP requires that all research and development costs (except patent registration and legal costs) be expensed.Treatment of pre-operating costs. IASB GAAP requires that pre-operating costs be expensed when incurred, but Japanese GAAP and Mexican GAAP allow pre-operating costs to be capitalized.Inventory valuation. IASB GAAP requires inventories to be valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value, but Japanese GAAP allows inventories to be valued at cost rather than at the lower of cost and net realizable value.Treatment of construction contracts: IASB GAAP requires the use of the stage of completion method to recognize contract revenue, but Japanese GAAP allows the use of completed contract method.Creation of provisions. IASB GAAP specifies that provisions can only be created if an enterprise has a present obligation as a result of past transaction, but Japanese GAAP allows provisions to be created before an obligation arises.Statement of cash flows. IASB GAAP requires a statement of cash flows, but Mexican GAAP requires a statement of changes in financial position, instead of a statement of cash flows.

It is always useful to get an opinion about the financial statements of companies domiciled in a foreign country from a professional who is familiar with the financial reporting standards and practices of that country.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Doupnik and Perera, International Accounting, 1/e 5-13

CASE 1: TOYOTA SIGNS AN ENGINE JOINT VENTURE IN CHINA

The major accounting issues involve the choice of GAAP to be used by the joint venture (JV) and the choice of currency for the JV’s accounting records. Should the JV use Chinese or Japanese GAAP and should it keep its books in Chinese RMB or Japanese yen?

There are many specific differences in accounting practices between China and Japan. For example, Chinese GAAP requires that all pre-operating costs (except patent registration and legal costs) be expensed, whereas Japanese GAAP allows capitalization of pre-operating costs. Significant differences could exist in the balance sheets and income statements prepared by the JV depending upon which set of accounting standards is followed. This could have implications for evaluating the performance of the JV by the joint venture partners. Toyota probably would prefer the JV to use Japanese GAAP and keep its books in Japanese yen, as this facilitates comparisons with other Toyota investments. However, the Chinese government is likely to require that the JV use Chinese GAAP and Chinese RMB in keeping its books.

CASE 2: CHINA PETROLEUM AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION

1. The net profit figure reported under PRC GAAP is RMB 19,011 million. This is RMB 2,592 million lower than the amount under IFRSs, and RMB 6,566 million lower than the amount under U.S. GAAP.Students are expected to comment on the main reasons for those differences on the basis of the information given in the case. The net profit figure of RMB 19,011 reported under PRC GAAP was increased to RMB 21,593 under IFRSs. The increase of RMB 2,582 under IFRSs was due to the following reasons:

Depreciation and disposal of oil and gas properties RMB 3,044Acquisition of subsidiaries 443

Capitalization of general borrowing costs 389Gain from issuance of shares by subsidiary 136Gain from debt restructuring 82Revaluation of land use rights 18 4,112Unrecognized losses of subsidiaries (182)Pre-operating expenditures (169)Effect on taxation (1,179) (1,530)

2,582The net profit figure of RMB 21,593 reported under IFRSs was increased to RMB 25,577 under U.S. GAAP. The increase of RMB 3,984 under U.S. GAAP was due to the following reasons:

Depreciation of revalued property, plant and equipment RMB 3,998Disposal of property, plant and equipment 1,316Capitalized interest on investments in associates 141Reversal of deficits on revaluation of property, plant…. 86Foreign exchange gains and losses 76Reversal of impairment of long-lived assets…… 47Exchange of assets 23Capitalization of property, plant and equipment 12 5,699Deferred tax effect of U.S. GAAP adjustments (1,715)

3,984

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Doupnik and Perera, International Accounting, 1/e 5-14

2. The differences for CPCC between PRC GAAP and IFRSs, and between IFRSs and U.S. GAAP are given in the case. Students are expected to identify the main areas of difference. As mentioned in the case, treatments of the following items under PRC GAAP and IFRSs are different:

Depreciation and disposal of oil and gas properties Capitalization of general borrowing costs Acquisition of subsidiaries Gains from issuance of shares by a subsidiary Gains from debt restructuring Revaluation of land use rights Unrecognized losses of subsidiaries Pre-operating expenditures Impairment looses on long-lived assets Government grants (Refer pp.5-72 - 5-75 in the textbook)

Treatments of depreciation and disposal of oil and gas properties seem to have a significant impact on reported profit.

As mentioned in the case, treatments of the following items under IFRSs and U.S. GAAP are different:

Foreign exchange gains and losses Capitalization and revaluation of property, plant and equipment Exchange of assets Impairment of long-lived assets Capitalization of interest on investment in associates Goodwill amortization Companies included in consolidation Related party transactions (Refer pp.5-77 – 5-82)

Treatments of depreciation of revalued property, plant and equipment, and disposal of property, plant and equipment seem to have a significant impact on reported profit

3. U.K. readers of the financial statements may not find them very useful, as the information is not reconciled to the U.K. GAAP. There are differences between U.K. GAAP and IFRSs, and between U.K. GAAP and U.S. GAAP. However, with the adoption of IFRSs in the EU, this may not be a major problem any more.

4. U.S. readers should find the information useful. However, it would be better for them if the information was reconciled directly from PRC GAAP to U.S. GAAP.

5. When a company is listed on a foreign stock exchange, it is always useful to explain the differences, if any, between accounting standards used in preparing financial statements, and those that are stipulated by the listing requirements. The need for such explanation is reduced if the two sets of standards are comparable. However, differences can still exist due to different interpretations of the requirements. Therefore, the approach taken by CPCC can be recommended to other companies.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2007 Doupnik and Perera, International Accounting, 1/e 5-15