CHAPTER 2(20-34)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 CHAPTER 2(20-34)

    1/15

    CHAPTER 2

    2. DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

    2.1 COMPARATIVE STATEMENT

    The comparative financial statements are statement of the financial position at

    different periods of time. The elements of financial position are shown in a

    comparative form so as to give an idea of financial position at two or more

    periods. Any statement prepared in a comparative form will be covered in

    comparative statement. From practical point of view generally two financial

    statements are prepared in comparative form for financial analysis purposes. Not

    only the comparison of the figure of two periods but also be relationship

    between Balance sheet and income statement enables an in-depth study of financial

    position and operative results. The comparative statement may show:

    1. Absolute figure

    . !hange in absolute figure

    ". Absolute data in terms of percentages.

    #. $ncrease or decrease in terms of percentage.

    20

  • 8/12/2019 CHAPTER 2(20-34)

    2/15

    COMPARITIVE STATEMENT ANALYSIS OF INCOME STATEMENT IN

    2008-2009

    TABLE NO.1

    1. %ales have been increased by 1"& and cost of goods by 1& so overallgross profit has been increased by 1'&.

    . Although operating e(penses have increased by 1'& the increase in gross

    profit is sufficient to compensate for the increase in operating e(penses and

    hence there has been an overall increase in operational profits by )&.

    ". There is an increase in net profit after ta( amount increased by )&.

    #. $t may be concluded that there is a sufficient progress in the company and the

    overall profitability of the company is good.

    21

    Partic!ar"2008

    #i$ R"%

    2009

    #i$ R"%

    I$cr&a"&'D&cr&a"&

    #i$ R"%

    P&rc&$ta(&

    #)%

    N&t "a!&" *'"+1*+ 1))*#*#, 11+)++,' 1"

    L&""* c+"t +,

    (++" "+!

    ,#)"* *1)"*" *#'+""# 1

    r+"" /r+,it 1++'#1#* 1'*)##" "11)", 1'

    L&""* +/&rati$(

    &/&$"&"

    "11"'+ *''#, 1#+*)+1 1'

    +/&rati$(

    /r+,it

    ,)1#* +*1#'*# 111,"+ )

    L&""* i$t&r&"t *')1*) "#*'#" ,**+" )

    N&t /r+,it

    &,+r& ta

    ,'')#* 11+,"' -#*,",)1 -*1

    L&""* I$c+&

    ta

    1#"# 1''*"') ,1)#* #)

    N&t /r+,it a,t&r

    ta

    +1""#) "+,"1 1"1,# )

  • 8/12/2019 CHAPTER 2(20-34)

    3/15

    COMPARITIVE STATEMENT ANALYSIS OF INCOME STATEMENT IN

    2009-2010

    TABLE NO.2

    Partic!ar"2009

    #i$ R"%

    2010

    #i$ R"%

    I$cr&a"&'D&cr&a"&

    #i$ R"%

    P&rc&$ta(&

    #)%

    N&t "a!&" 1))*#*#, *+++1"*" -1#1*1#+ -1#

    L&""* c+"t +,

    (++" "+!

    *1)"*" "1"1 -*,)) -11

    r+"" /r+,it 1'*)##" 1#"#*11 -,#,++ -*

    L&""* +/&rati$(

    &/&$"&"

    *''#, +,"+1*+ -+1,', -+

    +/&rati$( /r+,it +*1#'*# ,1)1"+,1 -11+1""" -,

    L&""* i$t&r&"t "#*'#" *#,#)' -+"","# -1*

    N&t /r+,it &,+r&

    ta

    11+,"' ,"*,')+) #),1"" "+

    L&"" *I$c+& ta 1''*"') +1#'1) -1"*"#*) -+'

    N&t /r+,it a,t&r

    ta

    "+,"1 ,##"') -1'1*"# -+

    1. %ales have been decreased by 1#& and cost of goods by 11& so overall

    gross profit has been decreased by *&.

    . Although operating e(penses have decreased by +& the decrease in gross

    profit is not sufficient to compensate for the operating e(penses and hence

    there has been an overall decrease in operational profits by ,&.

    ". There is an decrease in net profit after ta( amount decreased by +&.

    #. $t may be concluded that there is not sufficient progress in the company and

    the overall profitability of the company is not good.

    22

  • 8/12/2019 CHAPTER 2(20-34)

    4/15

    COMPARITIVE STATEMENT ANALYSIS OF INCOME STATEMENT IN

    2010-2011

    TABLE NO.3

    Partic!ar"2010

    #i$ R"%

    2011

    #i$ R"%

    I$cr&a"&'D&cr&a"&

    #i$ R"%

    P&rc&$ta(&

    #)%

    N&t "a!&" *+++1"*" "*1'*# -+*#1,#1 -"

    L&""* c+"t +, (++"

    "+!

    "1"1 1'1+)))" -,"1,"1+' -#

    r+"" /r+,it 1#"#*11 #+,'*"' -'+**" -+*

    L&""* +/&rati$(

    &/&$"&"

    +,"+1*+ 1,+*,*, -#'" -"

    +/&rati$( /r+,it ,1)1"+,1 1')*#+ -"*1)#'), -,

    L&""* I$t&r&"t *#,#)' #,# -"*+ -1"

    N&t /r+,it &,+r& ta ,"*,')+) 1,"*1** -"*# -1

    L&""* I$c+& ta +1#'1) 1",,1' -#'"'1 -*

    N&t /r+,it a,t&r ta ,##"') 1,,1+*) -"*',1+" -

    1. %ales have been decreased by "& and cost of goods by #& so overall

    gross profit has been decreased by +*&.

    . Although operating e(penses have decreased by "& the decrease in gross

    profit is not sufficient to compensate for the operating e(penses and hence

    there has been an overall decrease in operational profits by ,&.

    ". There is an decrease in net profit after ta( amount decreased by &.

    #. $t may be concluded that there is not sufficient progress in the company and

    the overall profitability of the company is not good.

    COMPARITIVE STATEMENT ANALYSIS OF INCOME STATEMENT IN

    23

  • 8/12/2019 CHAPTER 2(20-34)

    5/15

    2011-2012

    TABLE NO.4

    Partic!ar"

    2011

    #i$ R"%

    2012

    #i$ R"%

    I$cr&a"&'D&cr&a"&

    #i$ R"%

    P&rc&$ta(&

    #)%

    N&t "a!&" "*1'*# ")*")+# #'+" )

    L&"" *c+"t +,

    (++" "+!

    1'1+)))" ,*+*1 "',1* )+

    r+"" /r+,it #+,'*"' 1##))*#" '#1))# )'

    L&""* +/&rati$(

    &/&$"&"

    1,+*,*, +#* ##')#* ,+

    +/&rati$( /r+,it 1')*#+ #*))' ",1+"*"

    L&""* I$t&r&"t #,# #** -,)),# -1)

    N&t /r+,it &,+r&

    ta

    1,"*1** ,)'#,1 "#'1"'

    L&""* I$c+& ta 1",,1' +1"#" -#1+ -,,

    N&t /r+,it a,t&rta

    1,,1+*) ,)",,*+) "#*"')," ,

    1. %ales have been increased by )& and cost of goods by )+& so

    overall gross profit has been increased by )'&.

    . Although operating e(penses have increased by ,+& the increase in gross

    profit is sufficient to compensate for the increase in operating e(penses and

    hence there has been an overall increase in operational profits by &.

    ". There is an increase in net profit after ta( amount increased by ,&.

    #. $t may be concluded that there is a sufficient progress in the company and the

    overall profitability of the company is good.

    COMPARITIVE STATEMENT ANALYSIS OF BALANCE SHEET IN 2008-

    2009

    24

  • 8/12/2019 CHAPTER 2(20-34)

    6/15

    5. TABLE NO.5

    Partic!ar"2008

    #i$ R"%

    2009

    #i$ R"%

    I$cr&a"&'D&cr&a"&

    #i$ R"%

    P&rc&$ta(&

    #)%

    Fi& A""&t"*

    r+"" B!+c6 "+11 "+)'## ###*

    L&""* D&/r&ciati+$ 1,)"1,# 1+'+'," 1)'"''

    N&t B!+c6 *)'+" ""''1 -+#*' -*

    Crr&$t A""&t"*

    I$7&$t+ri&" #,1*#" 1,,))) *)"+" 1*

    S$r D&t+r" 1)"** 1*#1*, -+1+)") -1

    Ca" a$ Ba$6 Ba!a$c& 1#*'# 11")" -")++1 -1

    L+a$ a$ A7a$c&" ,*+,+,"+ ,",)),' -,1,,'## -'

    T+ta! Crr&$t A""&t" *,+'1*"# *,,',1, -'++* -).)1

    T+ta! A""&t" '"1#' ''+'1#" -#,+,# -1

    Liai!iti&"*

    Sar&+!&r": F$" #,+"11 ',#* 1" 11

    crr&$t Liai!iti&" +*,,+1, +"*"))") -#),,*, -+

    Pr+7i"i+$" 1'+*1 1*,',+, ,++'# #"T+ta! Liai!iti&" '"1#' ''+'1#" -#,+,# -1

    !urrent assets have been decreased by ).1& than liabilities by +&.i.e.

    current asset are less than current liabilities. Fi(ed assets have been decreased by

    nearly *& and overall assets have been decreased by 1&. !apital has been

    increased by 11& and loan creditors have been increased by 1,&. $t indicates

    fund flow of management is poor. verall financial position of the company is

    not satisfactory in this year.

    COMPARITIVE STATEMENT ANALYSIS OF BALANCE SHEET IN 2009-

    2010

    TABLE NO.;

    Partic!ar"2009 2010 I$cr&a"&'D&cr&a"& P&rc&$ta(&

    25

  • 8/12/2019 CHAPTER 2(20-34)

    7/15

    #i$ R"% #i$ R"% #i$ R"% #)%

    Fi& A""&t"*

    r+"" B!+c6 "+)'## +'")# "+11)" 1#

    L&""* D&/r&ciati+$ 1+'+'," 1+1"* 1"##' *

    N&t B!+c6 ""''1 '+)++, 1**++# +

    Crr&$t A""&t"*

    I$7&$t+ri&" 1,,))) #,"#+ -*)1+#"" -+#

    S$r D&t+r" 1*#1*, )#,"'" -1+"+#+# -*'

    Ca" a$ Ba$6 Ba!a$c& 11")" #+'"* 1"#+'", 1)

    L+a$ a$ A7a$c&" ,",)),' ")++,#, -*",1+ -#"

    T+ta! Crr&$t A""&t" *,,',1, "'1#"" -#,**)*' -,".+

    T+ta! A""&t" ''+'1#" #*'#'** -#"''#1,, -#

    Liai!iti&"*

    Sar&+!&r": F$" ',#* ###'1*'1 11"#" +"

    crr&$t Liai!iti&" +"*"))") #1""#,, -,'+'+,, -'#

    Pr+7i"i+$" 1*,',+, "#'+# -1,)''" -*1

    T+ta! Liai!iti&" ''+'1#" #*'#'** -#"''#1,, -#

    !urrent assets have been decreased by ,".+& than liabilities by '#& i.e.

    current asset are less than current liabilities. Fi(ed assets have been increased by

    nearly +& and overall assets have been decreased by #&. !apital has been

    increased by +"& and loan creditors have been increased by &11. $t indicates fund

    flow of management is poor. verall financial position of the company is not

    satisfactory in this year.

    COMPARITIVE STATEMENT ANALYSIS OF BALANCE SHEET IN 2010-

    2011

    TABLE NO.RE.1

    34