Upload
swoljaswol1
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 Chapter 10 Genome Evolution
1/3
Chapter 10 Genome Evolution
This chapter covers whole-genome sequencing, the evolution of genome size, the genome
structure of viruses, Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukaryotes. How to test for genome level
selection and the C-value paradox about different genome sizes not relating to the
complexity of the organism also will be introduced. Evolutionary genomics is defined here
as the field of studying population genetics at the genome level and exploring the entireevolution of genomes over time.
Whole-Genome Sequencing
Whole-genome sequencing technology is one of the most important advancements in
science in the past half century. This section details a short history of genome sequencing
with a summary of current data available. We now have over 100 eukaryotic and over 1,000
prokaryotic genomes sequenced.
What can we learn from all the data that is being collected? Resolving the Paradoxes of Genome SizeC value paradox This section addresses the C value paradox and discrepancy between genome size and
complexity. At first look, non-coding DNA accounts for much of the discrepancy,
and among complex organisms there are somewhat similar amounts of coding DNA.
However, the problem is more complex, and one hypothesis is that a balance must
be found between replication speed and transposable elements proliferation.
Organisms control it differently, and that becomes the variation in genome size.
Michael Lynch hypothesized that population size and the ability to excise
deleterious mutations also plays a role. Another paradox is that of gene number. As
multicellular organisms increase in complexity, they do not increase the number of
genes but do seemingly increase in transcription factors, suggesting that regulationof genes is more important than the number of genes.
Why would regulation be more important than gene number in multicellular eukaryoticorganisms?
Why would population size be critical in genome size and buildup of non-coding DNA?Content and Structure of Viral Genomes The genome structure of viruses is
extremely diverse; some are made of DNA, others of RNA. Additionally, both types
can be either single or double stranded. Because many viruses are RNA based, they
are limited in size, with the upper end of RNA-based genomes about 30 kb. For
DNA-based viruses, the upper end is 1000 kbstill very small for a genome. Viral
genomes conserve space by overlapping genes as shown in Figures 10.9 and 10.10.
Discussion Point:
Because viruses have so much variation in their genomes, do you think they are all from
the same lineage anciently, or could they have evolved multiple times?
Content and Structure of Bacterial and Archaeal Genomes
8/13/2019 Chapter 10 Genome Evolution
2/3
Though Archaea is more closely related to Eukaryota, their genomes are very similar to
Bacteria and so the text considers these two prokaryotic genomes together in this section.
Prokaryotic genomes have 85%90% protein coding regions, lack introns, have few
pseudogenes, and very few transposable elements. Along with their main circular
chromosome, prokaryotes carry plasmids, which are small nonessential circular pieces of
DNA. In prokaryotes, the size of their genome is very tightly correlated with the number of
genes. Prokaryotes exchange genetic material with other organisms through horizontal (orlateral) gene transfer (HGT) by way of transduction, transformation, or conjugation
(defined in text and illustrated in Figure 10.16). Though it can have negative impacts, HGT is
a very important process in prokaryote evolution because it is not limited by species but
allows an organism access to the entire bacterial genetic domain. Prokaryotic genomes
show codon bias, especially toward genes that are the most highly expressed, and a large
range of GC content. Hypotheses are offered to explain both phenomena.
Content and Structure of Eukaryotic Nuclear Genomes
Transposable Elements (transponsons)
Transposons facilitate their own replication and movement within the genomeThis section begins with an overview of the multiple genomes in Eukaryotes and a summary
of what is found in all the different types of DNA that is stored within the eukaryotic
genome. Transposable elements are defined, along with their types:
Conservative: cut and paste Nonconservative: copy and paste LINE-1 elements: Retrotransposons SINE elements. Transposons are selfish genetic elements and their three methods of replicating
themselves are explained and outlined in Figure 10.30. A critical point here is that
these elements do not exist because they benefit the host organism; rather, they act
as their own entity and survive at a cost to the host. The eukaryotic genome also
differs from prokaryotes in their chromosome structure, which is reviewed
alongside a hypothesis of the origin of centromeres and a discussion about the
evolutionary consequences of having chromosomes. Introns also pose a significant
difference from prokaryotes, and the text reviews hypotheses about their utility,
why they exist, and why they might have arisen in the genome. Local recombination
rates and recombination hotspots in the genome also are discussed.
Consequences of Transposition
Loss of gene function Changes in gene order or chromosome structure Inversions, tanslocations, deletions, rearrangements
The centromere drive model
Noncentomeric histones, highly conserved DNA histones at centromeres evolving rapidly
8/13/2019 Chapter 10 Genome Evolution
3/3
Tests for Selection The different methods of testing for selection in DNA sequences ofwhole genomes is tackled here, as is distinguishing between purifying and positive
selection and understanding ratios of nonsynonymous to synonymous changes in
coding sequence. When the ratio is: (1) less than one, then purifying selection is
taking place, (2) very close to one, then nearly neutral selection is taking place, (3)
greater than one, then positive selection is happening. The text illustrates this
principle with an example of positive selection in the Hawaiian silversword alliance
group of plants. Another example of selection is provided in which selection is
detected in specific amino acids of the protein sialidase from avian pathogens. To
increase sensitivity for detecting positive selection, the McDonaldKreitman test is
introduced to compare allele substitutions between species to the pattern of allelic
polymorphism within species. This test, used on the genome level to characterize
the types of selection operating on populations, has helped us understand theevolutionary differences between humans and chimps. Looking at broader patterns
such as the distribution of allele frequencies enables scientists to see past selection
events because allele frequencies are easily calculated by effective population size
and mutation rate. When frequencies deviate from the distribution predicted, it is a
sign of past selection events. Recent events of positive selection can be detected by
finding blocks of extended haplotypes because a gene under intense positive
selection will drag the nearby portions of the genome along with it.