Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Abstract
The dissertation focuses on impact of ERP system implementation within the business firm to
enhance the performance efficiency of the employees. Performance efficiency of the employees
is evaluated based on three variables such as employee perception towards ERP, employee
attitudes on ERP and management perception towards ERP. In planning the ERP system
implementation to the business firm it is essential to consider employee perception towards ERP
system. As a result of that firm can identify the possible challenges to adapt employees towards
new ERP module with regards to ensure the successful implementation and execution of
business operational practices based on the ERP interpretations.
With regards to ensure the successful implementation of ERP system support and commitment of
Management people of the firm is considered as one of the critical success factor. with regards to
evaluate the management perception towards ERP system it is essential to conduct board
meetings to evaluate the requirements of ERP system to the business firm and how management
will be respond to the new modulus and features of ERP system should be evaluated at the initial
stage.
In addition to that most of the employees are not actively participate into existing ERP awareness
programs and training is within the firm due to most of the employees are not understand the
importance of using ERP for their day-to-day operations activities. With regards to obtain the
maximum support and commitment from the employees to implement and execute the ERP
module within the firm it is essential to conduct employee awareness programs which highlights
the importance of ERP system implementation and how ERP system implementation process
will help to save the time and simplify their day-to-day operational activities within the firm.
Key words: Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Employee Performance, Employee Awareness,
Employee Attitudes, Management Perception.
1 | P a g e
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank my supervising member who supported and guided me to complete this
dissertation successfully.
In addition to that I thank to head of finance department in business firm for giving approval to
conduct the dissertation questionnaire among the staff members. My special thank goes to people
who filled the dissertation questionnaire.
Finally I thank to my family members and friends who encourage me during the dissertation
period.
2 | P a g e
Declaration
3 | P a g e
Table of Contents
Chapter 01: Dissertation Introduction............................................................................................9
1.1 Dissertation background.......................................................................................................9
1.2 Overview of business firm...................................................................................................9
1.3 Dissertation problem..........................................................................................................10
1.4 Significance of dissertation problem..................................................................................11
1.5 Dissertation questions........................................................................................................ 11
1.6 Dissertation objectives.......................................................................................................12
1.7 Dissertation methodologies................................................................................................12
1.8 Dissertation outlines...........................................................................................................13
Chapter 02: Literature Review.....................................................................................................15
2.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................15
2.2 What is Enterprises Resource Planning (ERP) system?.....................................................15
2.3 Advantages of implementing ERP within the firm.............................................................16
2.4 Importance of employee awareness on ERP system...........................................................18
2.5 Importance of management perception and employee perception to implement and execute the ERP system........................................................................................................................ 19
2.6 Challenges of ensuring the employee performance efficiency through ERP system..........20
Chapter 03: Dissertation Methodologies......................................................................................23
3.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................23
3.3 Dissertation strategy...........................................................................................................23
3.4 Dissertation approach.........................................................................................................24
3.5 Target population...............................................................................................................24
3.6 Sample population..............................................................................................................25
3.7 Dissertation hypothesis...................................................................................................... 25
3.8 Ethical considerations........................................................................................................ 26
3.9 Dissertation data.................................................................................................................26
3.10 Dissertation instrument.....................................................................................................27
3.11 Operationalization............................................................................................................28
3.12 Conceptual framework.....................................................................................................29
4 | P a g e
Chapter 04: Dissertation Data Analysis.......................................................................................31
4.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................31
4.2 Dissertation reliability testing.............................................................................................31
4.3 Dissertation data analysis on demographic dissertation questions......................................34
4.4 Pearson’s correlation of coefficient analysis......................................................................37
Chapter 05: Dissertation Conclusion and Recommendations.......................................................40
5.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................40
5.2 Dissertation conclusion......................................................................................................40
5.3 Dissertation recommendation.............................................................................................42
5.2 Dissertation limitation........................................................................................................43
5.2 Future dissertation..............................................................................................................44
06. References..............................................................................................................................45
07. Annexure 01: Research data analysis.....................................................................................47
7.1 Dissertation data analysis on employee awareness on ERP................................................47
7.2 Dissertation data analysis on employee attitudes on implementing ERP............................53
7.3 Dissertation data analysis on management perception towards ERP..................................60
7.4 Dissertation data analysis on performance efficiency of employees...................................64
08. Annexure 02: Dissertation questionnaire...............................................................................69
5 | P a g e
List of tables
Table 3.11.1: Operationalization
Table 4.2.1: Case processing summary
Table 4.2.2: Reliability statistics - Employee Awareness
Table 4.2.3: Reliability statistics - Employee Attitudes
Table 4.2.4: Reliability statistics - Management Perception
Table 4.2.5: Reliability statistics - Employee Performance Efficiency
Table 4.2.6: Cornbach’s alpha
Table 4.3.1: Pearson’s correlation of between employee awareness of ERP and employee performance efficiency
Table 4.3.2: Pearson’s correlation of between employee attitudes on ERP implementation and employee performance efficiency
Table 4.3.3: Pearson’s correlation of between employee attitudes on ERP implementation and employee performance efficiency
Table 7.3.1: Dissertation question 27
Table 7.3.2: Dissertation question 28
Table 7.3.3: Dissertation question 29
Table 7.3.4: Dissertation question 30
Table 7.3.5: Dissertation question 31
Table 7.3.6: Dissertation question 32
Table 7.3.7: Dissertation question 33
Table 7.3.8: Dissertation question 34
Table 7.3.9: Dissertation question 35
Table 7.3.10: Dissertation question 36
Table 7.4.1: Dissertation question 37
Table 7.4.2: Dissertation question 38
Table 7.4.3: Dissertation question 39
Table 7.4.4: Dissertation question 40
Table 7.4.5: Dissertation question 41
6 | P a g e
Table 7.4.6: Dissertation question 42
Table 7.4.7: Dissertation question 43
Table 7.4.8: Dissertation question 44
List of figuresFigure 3.12.1: Conceptual framework
Figure 4.1.1: Gender analysis
Figure 4.1.2: Age group analysis
Figure 4.1.3: Salaries analysis
Figure 4.1.4: Working experience analysis
Figure 4.3.5: Educational qualification analysis
Figure 7.1.1: Dissertation question 07
Figure 7.1.2: Dissertation question 08
Figure 7.1.3: Dissertation question 09
Figure 7.1.4: Dissertation question 10
Figure 7.1.5: Dissertation question 11
Figure 7.1.6: Dissertation question 12
Figure 7.1.7: Dissertation question 13
Figure 7.1.8: Dissertation question 14
Figure 7.1.9: Dissertation question 15
Figure 7.1.10: Dissertation question 16
Figure 7.2.1: Dissertation question 17
Figure 7.2.2: Dissertation question 18
Figure 7.2.3: Dissertation question 19
Figure 7.2.4: Dissertation question 20
Figure 7.2.5: Dissertation question 21
Figure 7.2.6: Dissertation question 22
Figure 7.2.7: Dissertation question 23
Figure 7.2.8: Dissertation question 24
7 | P a g e
Figure 7.2.9: Dissertation question 25
Figure 7.2.10: Dissertation question 26
8 | P a g e
Chapter 01: Dissertation Introduction
1.1 Research background
The dissertation discusses how firm can enhance the performance of employees in Finance
Department of Business firm as a result of implementation ERP module to execute the day-to-
day operations activities (Appelbaum, 2017). The business firm is using Oracle ERP system.
And this dissertation it is evaluated how employer awareness and employee attitudes towards
ERP system will be impact to determine the level of employee efficiency enhancement with
respect to the implementation of ERP system within the firm. in addition to that it is evaluated
how management of the business firm should be support to implement ERP system within the
firm and management perception towards importance of ERP will impact to determine the
maximum outcome from ERP system to the business firm with regards to enhance the
operational efficiency of employees (Barkhi, 2017). Author uses dissertation questionnaire to
gather primary dissertation data with regards to understand how existing employees of the
business firm use ERP system for their normal day-to-day activities and how firm ensure the
knowledge and awareness of the people with regards to the features and functions of ERP system
through training and development programs. Author conducts dissertation questionnaire based
on the employees who are working in Finance Department of the work Firm with regards to
evaluate the effectiveness of ERP system at the initial stage of dissertation.
1.2 Overview of business firm
The business firm, ABC (Private) Limited is telecommunication industrial business entity which
is considered as one of the leading telecommunication service provider in Sri Lanka. When
discusses the product portfolio of business firm, it provides mobile telecommunication services
and broadband connection services mainly. In addition to that it has value added services which
9 | P a g e
increase the capacity and probability to enhance the other income portfolio of the business firm.
The dissertation discusses how implementation of ERP in finance department of the business
firm impacts to enhance the operational performance of the employees.
1.3 Research problem
The dissertation discusses on how to evaluate the relationship between ERP systems related
applications with regards to ensure the performance efficiency of the human resource of the firm.
With regards to evaluate the impact of ERP system to enhance the performance efficiency of
Human Resource it is considered on three independent variables such as employee attitudes,
employee perception and management attitudes. When discuss the dissertation problem it is not a
then there are some gaps between employee awareness on importance of the ERP system with
regards to simplify the operational activities compared to the manual practices. That means most
of the employees of the firm are not willing to change towards ERP system from their manual
operational practices and it will create the inefficiency in performance of the employees within
the business entity. Throughout the dissertation it is evaluated how to mitigate the risk associated
with employee reluctant to change towards new ERP system with regards to enhance the
operational efficiency of business firm and how it will be effect to enhance the performance
efficiency of the employees as well. For that purpose it is evaluated and considered impact from
internal environmental factors and external environmental factors to the business firm with
regards to implement successful ERP system within the business entity.
Due to lack of proper coordination among functional activities of business firms, operational
inefficiency and ineffectiveness will be increased. The dissertation discusses how business firms
can use ERP to ensure the coordination between functional activities with regards to enhance the
operational efficiency and effectiveness. Based on that dissertation problem is defined as does
ERP ensure operational efficiency within telecommunication industrial business firms.
10 | P a g e
1.4 Significance of research problem
The dissertation problem discusses the gaps between operational efficiency of the employees
compared to ERP implemented firm structure and manual operation execution firm practices.
when discuss the significance of dissertation problem it is not a that most of the dissertation
activity should be focused on how to enhance the employee performance using ERP system with
regards to simplify the day to day operation activities and eliminate the unnecessary time
consumption for operation activities as a result of having manual operational of functions within
the firm (Barkhi, 2017). During this dissertation, author evaluates how internal environmental
processes such as training and development programs, employee awareness on ERP etc. Impact
to determine the employee performance level based on the ERP implemented firm culture within
the firm. In addition to that interpretations and implications of dissertation problem significance
analysis used to develop the dissertation objectives and Dissertation questions with regards to
plan or to search activities include in dissertation data gathering process and dissertation data
analysis techniques (Beasley, 2015). Self-motivation is considered as one of the major positive
human behavior in modern business world. with regards to ERP system implementation process
most of the employees are not motivated to use ERP due to existing employees does not have
proper understand about what is ERP and how ERP can be used to save the time and cost of the
pressure process.
1.5 Research questions
Dissertation questions have been determined considering the implications of above
dissertation objectives.
What is the relationship between employee awareness of ERP and performance
efficiency of employees?
What is the relationship between employee attitude on implementing ERP and
performance efficiency of employees?
11 | P a g e
What is the relationship between employee perception towards ERP and performance
efficiency of employees?
How to improve the employee performance efficiency through ERP?
1.6 Research objectives
Dissertation objectives have been determined considering the implications from dissertation
problem and evaluating the impact of significance of dissertation problem.
To identify the relationship between employee awareness of ERP and performance
efficiency of employees.
To find out the relationship between employee attitude on implementing ERP and
performance efficiency of employees.
To find out the relationship between employee perception towards ERP and performance
efficiency of employees.
To find the approaches to improve the employee performance efficiency through ERP.
The primary dissertation objective is to understand the expectation of employees within the firm
with regards to enhance their performance and how ERP system can be used to enhance the
performance of existing employees within the firm. In addition to that it aims to evaluate the
impact of existing business practices of the business firm which create barriers to successful
implementation and execution of ERP system with the support and commitment of existing
employees. In addition to that it is further reviewed how to monitor the performance of Human
Resource compared to the features and specifications in ERP modules.
1.7 Research methodologies
In this dissertation it is used inductive dissertation approach with regards to hypothesis approach
to find out the relationship between dissertation variables and it is used quantitative dissertation
12 | P a g e
data approach to analyses the dissertation data. Quantitative dissertation data approach are used
to save the time to complete the overall dissertation activities due to most of the dissertation
outcome can be derived based on the predetermined dissertation data analysis models. In this
dissertation it is used quantitative dissertation data analyzing technique and applies statistical and
mathematical models to analyses dissertation data. In this dissertation it is evaluated the
operational efficiency of employees in Finance Department of business firm as a result of
implementing ERP system.
Based on that it is defined the target population as total number of employees who are working
in Finance Department of the Business firm. Sample population is determined based on the
behaviors and possible limitations of gathering the dissertation data from about defined target
population of the dissertation. Dissertation ethical consideration need to be evaluated and
considered as the dissertation data gathering process and planning the dissertation data gathering
activities. Author distributes ethical consideration for with the Dissertation question which
indicates how author is going to ensure the confidentiality of the gathered dissertation data
throughout the dissertation period and after the dissertation completion. In this dissertation
author use two types of dissertation data to build the dissertation conclusion and
recommendation and understand the behavior and relationship between dissertation variables.
Primary dissertation data are more specific to dissertation objectives and compared to the
secondary dissertation data it is given more priority to primary search data with regards to
evaluate the accuracy and completeness of the dissertation recommendation and conclusion. In
this dissertation it is used to types of dissertation instruments with regards to gather the primary
dissertation data such as dissertation questionnaire approach and dissertation interview approach.
Dissertation question is developed based on the dissertation independent variables and dependent
variables which are discussed under conceptual framework.
1.8 Research outlines
13 | P a g e
The chapter 2 of the dissertation discusses the literature interpretations on dissertation
independent variables and dependent variables based on other researchers’ findings and
recommendations.
Chapter 3 discusses the dissertation methodologies which are used to gather and analyze the
dissertation data to arrive the dissertation conclusion and recommendations. It includes the
methodologies to perform the research activities.
Further chapter 4 includes critical discussion over dissertation data analysis based on statistical
and mathematical approaches and techniques. It evaluates the relationship between research
variables.
Dissertation conclusion and recommendations are discussed under chapter 5 including
dissertation limitations and future researches. Future dissertation activities and to expand the
sample population considered in the different departments in the firm with regards to evaluate
how employee performance will be increased with respect to the ERP related functions and
features. In addition to that it is expected to use this dissertation approaches to find out the
relationship between employee performance and ERP in different business industries.
14 | P a g e
Chapter 02: Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
Literature review includes the other researchers’ discussions and findings on research dependent
and independent variables. It mainly focuses on impact of employee awareness of ERP,
employee attitudes towards ERP and management perception towards ERP to enhance the
performance efficiency of the employees.
2.2 What is Enterprises Resource Planning (ERP) system?
In order to ensure the integration and combination between all the functional activities of the
firm most of the business firms are implemented in Enterprises resource planning system which
is called as ERP (Beasley, 2015). The primary objective of ERP is to ensure the integration
between functional management activities of the business firm with regards to take the business
decisions at right time and to take the right decisions over resource allocation strategies to ensure
the operational efficiency and effectiveness throughout the production and non-production
activities within the firms. As a result of that most of the business firms are moving to ERP
based firm structure (Brodeur, 2002).
When evaluating the business activities within the firm it can be divided as value added activities
and non-value added activities (Beasley, 2015). As a result of non-value added activities within
the firm it is difficult to achieve the operational goals and objectives of the firm as a result of
non-value added activities create additional cost and it consumes the additional operational time
which can be allocated to another value added activities (Pincus, 2017). ERP system is capable
of identifying the non-value added activities within the firm and take appropriate actions to
eliminate the non-value added activities in normal cause of business processes with regards to
promote the value addition of products and Services within the firm through proper value added
activities (Geerts, 2007). When discuss the functional activities integration through ERP, the best
15 | P a g e
example is integrate in production department warehousing, management department and supply
chain management department of manufacturing business firm (Barkhi, 2017). That means
warehousing management department should have proper combination between Production
departments of the manufacturing business firm with regards to maintain the optimum stock
level to provide the adequate raw materials to ensure the continuation of production activities
(Grabski, 2011). As a result of that firm can ensure the production flow without significant
production delays. In addition to that warehouse management department of the firm should be
integrated with a supply chain management department with regards to provide the purchase
order to which is need to be raised with regards to maintain the optimum inventory position in
the warehouses (Nicolaou, 2006). ERP system is important to ensure the kind of integration
between different functional management department of manufacturing business firm with
regards to simplify the functional and tactical decision making process as well. Features and
specifications of ERP models can be varied with respect to the requirements of the business firm
and specific trends and practices in respective industry which is firm operate (Bradford, 2015).
That means business firm should conduct comprehensive internal environment analysis and
external environment analysis with regards to identify the possible changes and conceive
counsels from external and internal environmental factors to the ERP module of the firm.
2.3 Advantages of implementing ERP within the firm
The main benefit of implementing ERP system is it ensures the proper integration between
overall functional activities within the firm and it is considered all the business processes of the
business firm as a single system (Barkhi, 2017). As a result of that it is simplified the functional
and operational management processes within the firm and it is important to understand the
overall picture of processes and procedures of the business firm with regards to take the right
resource allocation strategies different functional departments (Brodeur, 2002). Eventually it
leads to achieve the operational efficiency and effectiveness related business goals and objectives
within the firm with regards to it will enhance the performance of the employees by simplifying
the operational activities.
16 | P a g e
As mentioned about business firms have both none value added activities and value added
activities. As a business firm it is essential to take appropriate actions to eliminate the non-value
added activities within the firm with regards to save the time and financial and non-financial
resources which can be allocated to add values to the business firm (Beasley, 2015). As a result
of implementing Enterprises resource planning system within the firm most of the business firm
has been able to identify and eliminate the non-value added activities within the operational
Management process and statistical decision making process within the firm (Beasley, 2015).
Business firms take functional management decisions and strategic management decisions which
are targeting to ensure the operational efficiency and business growth respectively. With regards
to ensure the success of the business firm it is essential to take the right business decision at right
time considering the existing internal and external environmental conditions (Brodeur, 2002).
With regards to take the right business decisions it is important to maintain proper data
management system with regards to the operational activities of the business firm. ERP system
can be used as business operational related data gathering tool with regards to identify the
relationship between each and every functional activities of the firm with regards to take the
right business decisions at right time (Fulmer, 2014).
As a result of implement in enterprise resource planning system most of the employees can get
rid of manual functional activities within the firm. That means if employees have adequate
knowledge and competencies to operate the ERP system it much more enough to ensure the
operational efficiency and it will help to enhance the operational efficiency of employees as well
(Geerts, 2007). In terms of operational efficiency of the firm, implementation of ERP system is
considered as one of the best tree structure in decision which can be taken by the business firm
with regards to ensure the operational efficiency through proper integration between functional
management activities within the firm.
in some circumstances Enterprises resource planning system can be used as internal control
Framework with regards to manage risk of frauds and misappropriations of assets as a result of
eliminating the non-value added activities of the business process and automate the overall
business activities and eliminate the manual business process which create the risk regards to
assets misappropriation and fraud risk (Appelbaum, 2017). In terms of firm perspective firm can
produce the human resource requirement as a result of implementing ERP due to implementation
17 | P a g e
of ERP reduce the manual business practices and it can be changed the ERP system and Firm can
reduce the human resource requirement (Bradford, 2015).
2.4 Importance of employee awareness on ERP system
Most of the business firms implement ERP with regards to ensure the integration and
communication between business processes and the business operational efficiency and
effectiveness related goals and objectives. It is important to evaluate the significance of
employee awareness on ERP system with regards to ensure the successful execution process of
ERP system related features and functions (Brodeur, 2002). That means employees are involved
in execution the ERP system related functions with regards to perform the business operations in
normal course of business activities. As a result of that it is crucial to ensure high level of
employee awareness on ERP system within the firm with regards to obtain the maximum
benefits from the ERP system related operational activities (Dillard, 2005).
Most of the business firm conducts training and development programs to the Employees at the
initial stage of implementing ERP system to the business firm to make sure employees are aware
about how to operate the ERP system (Grabski, 2011). In some firm ERP guidance book is
distributed among all the employees who are using ERP system with regards to find out the
practical solution went employees are working with ERP system with regards to reduce the
unnecessary time consumption to resolve the ERP related problems and issues (Fulmer, 2014).
Most of the business firms conduct the periodic training and development programs to the
Employees who are used in ERP system with regards to communicate the new trends and
development of ERP system and how to enhance the operational efficiency of the business firm
as a result of using ERP system to ensure the high level of employee awareness (Pincus, 2017).
In addition to that business firm should evaluate the employee awareness on importance and
benefits of the ERP system with regards to consider the ideas and views of the human resource
with regards to develop features and specification of ERP module (Bradford, 2015). With
regards to provide valid ideas and views with regards to develop the existing condition of ERP
system employees of the firm should have comprehensive understand in about how to operate
18 | P a g e
ERP system and value addition activities of ERP system which can be used to enhance the
competitive advantage and operational efficiency of the business firm (Arnesen, 2003).
Human resource management strategies also should be considered operational practices which
are based on the ERP system with regards to plan the recruitment and selection strategies. That
means it is essential to recruit the people who have a previous experience in working with an
ERP system related firm culture with regards to save the additional time and cost to conduct the
training and development to make the awareness and knowledge of the new recruited employees
regarding ERP modules (Brodeur, 2002). Some business firm has internal ERP implementation
team to conduct the training and development programs with regards to ERP system and resolve
the ERP system related functions and activities based on the issues which are created to each and
every employees within the firm. However most of the business firms have been entered to
mutual preferredment between ERP service provider to obtain the training and development
services to the Employees (Geerts, 2007).
2.5 Importance of management perception and employee perception
to implement and execute the ERP system
In implementing and executing the ERP module to the business firms it is essential to consider
implications from internal business environment and external business environment. That means
firm should customize the ERP module based on the requirements and specifications from
internal environment of the business firm and external environmental factors which are created
in industrial norms and values (Fulmer, 2014). In planning the ERP system implementation to
the business firm it is essential to consider employee perception towards ERP system. As a result
of that firm can identify the possible challenges to adapt employees towards new ERP module
with regards to ensure the successful implementation and execution of business operational
practices based on the ERP interpretations. Firm should evaluate how employees of the firm will
respond to the ERP system related module in the existing operational practices which are based
on both manual and automated processes. In addition to that it is essential to consider the
knowledge and skills of employees towards working in ERP oriented firm culture (Dillard,
19 | P a g e
2005). That means when employees of the firm do not have adequate knowledge and
understanding about how to operate ERP system it will create internal Environmental Barriers to
achieve the expected outcome from ERP system implementation process. Based on that firm can
plan the training and development programs to the existing employees to make sure employee
has adequate knowledge and skills to operate the ERP system and employees have understood
the importance of using ERP system to the business firm (Fulmer, 2014). With regards to ensure
the successful implementation of ERP system support and commitment of Management people
of the firm is considered as one of the critical success factor. with regards to evaluate the
management perception towards ERP system it is essential to conduct board meetings to evaluate
the requirements of ERP system to the business firm and how management will be respond to the
new modulus and features of ERP system should be evaluated at the initial stage. With regards to
achieve the successful implementation of ERP system business firm should have clear internal
communication mechanism as well. having proper internal communication mechanism within
the firm will be able to achieve the goals and objectives of business process used in ERP module
by ensuring the accuracy of transaction record in process and generating the operational and
strategic data to take the right business decisions at right time (Bradford, 2015).
2.6 Challenges of ensuring the employee performance efficiency
through ERP system
The most challenging process is to ensure that relevant employees have adequate knowledge and
skills to operate the ERP system. In most circumstances, most of the employees within the
business firms do not have adequate knowledge and skills on working with ERP implemented
working condition (Arnesen, 2003). The main reason for that is, employees are not updated with
advancements and development of different versions of ERP system due to lack of practical
applications of ERP modules in real working environment within the firm (Fulmer, 2014).
In addition to that most of the employees of the business firm are related to change from existing
business practices to new business practices as a result of implementation ERP modules
(Beasley, 2015). Reluctant to change problem will be created among the most experienced
20 | P a g e
employees within the firm compared to the newly recruited human resource. internal
communication process of the business firm should be strong enough to communicate those
people were there are no significant changes to be feared with regards to the changes in business
practices as a result of implement in an execution of ERP system. In addition to that most of the
business firms are implement in Change management strategies to manage these kind of changes
of the employees and manage the barriers which are created by the human resource as a result of
restructuring changes within the business firm (Beasley, 2015).
Some employees of the business firm are not willing to contribute their maximum commitment
and support to implement and execute the ERP system within the firm due to fear of losing their
jobs. As a result of implementing ERP system within the business firm it will automate
significant amount of manual business processes and create human resource access position
(Barkhi, 2017). As a result of that most of the business firms tend to introduce voluntary
retirement scheme to the Employees to take their employment continuation decisions within the
business firm. When consider the financial and nonfinancial aspect of implementation and
execution of ERP system, business firm has to invest in significant amount of financial resources
and human resources with regards to implement and execute the business processes based on
ERP system (Bradford, 2015). for example employees has to allocate their working time for the
training and development programs to learn about ERP system and how to use ERP system in
normal course of business activities. At the initial stage of ERP system application to the normal
cause of business activities there is a risk of offering mistakes and errors in normal cause of
business activities and day to day operational process (Dillard, 2005). In addition to that business
firm has to allocate additional human resource to monitor the performance of ERP system and
provide adequate training and development programs to the top management level employees to
take the strategic decisions based on the data interpretations of ERP system (Geerts, 2007).
2.7 Chapter summarization
In modern business world most of the business firms are trying to achieve the operational
efficiency and effectiveness with proper combination of all the functional activities of the
21 | P a g e
business firm with regards to achieve the business goals and objectives and ensure the business
sustainability with regards to retain in the market for long period of time. That means it is
essential to ensure the proper combination and coordination each and every business decisions
with regards to ensure optimum resource allocation and take the business decisions at right time
with regards to face the external market challenges and internal market challenges of the
business firms.
22 | P a g e
Chapter 03: Dissertation Methodologies
3.1 Introduction
The target population is total number of employees who are working in Finance Department of
the Business firm. Sample population is determined based on the behaviors and possible
limitations of gathering the dissertation data from about defined target population of the
dissertation. Dissertation ethical consideration need to be evaluated and considered as the
dissertation data gathering process and planning the dissertation data gathering activities.
Primary dissertation data are more specific to dissertation objectives and compared to the
secondary dissertation data it is given more priority to primary search data with regards to
evaluate the accuracy and completeness of the dissertation recommendation and conclusion. In
this dissertation it is used to types of dissertation instruments with regards to gather the primary
dissertation data such as dissertation questionnaire approach and dissertation interview approach.
3.3 Dissertation strategy
In this dissertation it is considered two types of dissertation strategies such as inductive
dissertation strategy and deductive dissertation strategy. Inductive dissertation strategy
emphasized that it is essential to consider the qualitative dissertation data to arrive the richest
recommendations and it is used the judgment experience of the author with regards to arrive the
conclusion regarding the collected dissertation data (Beasley, 2015). Inductive dissertation
approach is more suitable for the dissertation which uses professional judgment and expecting
derives the new model and theory as the dissertation recommendation. Deductive dissertation
strategy is more towards quantitative dissertation approach which is used quantitative
23 | P a g e
dissertation data with regards to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent
dissertation variables (Dillard, 2005). Deductive dissertation strategy is based on the null
hypothesis and alternative hypothesis of the dissertation with regards to evaluate the relationship
between dissertation independent variables and dependent variables. In this dissertation it is used
inductive dissertation approach with regards to hypothesis approach to find out the relationship
between dissertation variables and it is used quantitative dissertation data approach to analyses
the dissertation data.
3.4 Dissertation approach
Most of the dissertationers are considering two types of dissertation approaches such as
quantitative dissertation approach and qualitative dissertation approach. Quantitative dissertation
approach is used to analyses dissertation data based on statistical and mathematical techniques
with regards to find out the relationship between dissertation variables and graphical
representation methods are used to highlight and represent the dissertation data which are
compatible with quantitative dissertation data analyzing techniques (Bradford, 2015). Qualitative
dissertation data approach is used professional judgment and other dissertationer’s findings to
find out the relationship between dissertation variables. quantitative dissertation data approach
are used to save the time to complete the overall dissertation activities due to most of the
dissertation outcome can be derived based on the predetermined dissertation data analysis
models. In this dissertation it is used quantitative dissertation data analyzing technique and
applies statistical and mathematical models to analyses dissertation data (Geerts, 2007).
3.5 Target population
Dissertation target population should be defined at the initial stage of the dissertation with
regards to plan the nature and scope of dissertation data gathering process (Bradford, 2015).
Defining the dissertation population accurately will impact to ensure the accuracy and
24 | P a g e
completeness of overall dissertation data gathering process. It is required to define the target
population of the dissertation at the initial stage with regards to plan the dissertation data analysis
and techniques and Dissertation data gathering approaches based on the nature and behavior of
the target population participants. In this dissertation it is evaluated the operational efficiency of
employees in Finance Department of Business firm as a result of implementing ERP system.
Based on that it is defined the target population as total number of employees who are working
in Finance Department of the Business firm. Sample population is determined based on the
behaviors and possible limitations of gathering the dissertation data from about defined target
population of the dissertation.
3.6 Sample population
the primary objective of determine in a sample to collect the dissertation data is it is difficult to
collect the dissertation data from all the participants in target population due to time limitation to
complete the dissertation activities. As a result of that dissertationers are using Different
techniques and approaches to sample population from target population with regards to represent
the total number of participants in target population in arrive in the dissertation conclusion and
recommendation regarding dissertation Independent and dependent variables. As mentioned
above target population of the dissertation is total number of employees working in Finance
Department of the Business firm. The total number of employees working in Finance
Department of the Business firm is 50 numbers of employees. As a result of that it is decided to
consider the all target population participants as sample population participants to conduct
Dissertation questionnaire with regards to gather the primary dissertation data.
3.7 Dissertation hypothesis
H0 - Employee awareness of ERP modules determines the performance efficiency of the employees.
25 | P a g e
H1 - Employee awareness of ERP modules does not determine the performance efficiency of the employees.
H0 - Employee attitude on implementing ERP determines the performance efficiency of the employees
H1 - Employee attitude on implementing ERP does not determine the performance efficiency of the employees
H0 - Management perception towards ERP determines the performance efficiency of the employees
H1 - Management perception towards ERP does not determine the performance efficiency of the employees
3.8 Ethical considerations
Dissertation ethical consideration need to be evaluated and considered as the dissertation data
gathering process and planning the dissertation data gathering activities. Author distributes
ethical consideration for with the Dissertation question which indicates how author is going to
ensure the confidentiality of the gathered dissertation data throughout the dissertation period and
after the dissertation completion. It clearly mentioned that author does not transfer the
dissertation data to any kind of third party without prior approval of original dissertation data
collector. In addition to that people can reject the participation for dissertation questionnaire and
it is not compulsory to fill the dissertation questionnaire together the primary dissertation data. In
addition to that in using the literature review from other dissertationer’s findings and
recommendations author use proper citation practices to provide the link and guidance to the
secondary dissertation data extraction source.
3.9 Dissertation data
26 | P a g e
In this dissertation author use two types of dissertation data to build the dissertation conclusion
and recommendation and understand the behavior and relationship between dissertation
variables. Primary dissertation data are more specific to dissertation objectives and compared to
the secondary dissertation data it is given more priority to primary search data with regards to
evaluate the accuracy and completeness of the dissertation recommendation and conclusion. In
this dissertation primary dissertation data is extracted used in dissertation question approach and
dissertation interview approach as discussed under dissertation instrument section. In addition to
that secondary dissertation data involves with considering the other dissertationers findings and
recommendations which are related to the dissertation independent variables and dependent
variables with regards to develop the literature review of the dissertation and evaluate the
operationalization considering the relationship between dissertation independent variables and
dependent variables. In addition to that it is essential to evaluate the reliability of secondary data
extraction sources at the dissertation planning stage.
3.10 Dissertation instrument
Dissertation instruments are used to gather the sufficient and appropriate dissertation data with
regards to derive the dissertation conclusion and recommendation on dissertation variables. In
this dissertation it is used to types of dissertation instruments with regards to gather the primary
dissertation data such as dissertation questionnaire approach and dissertation interview approach.
Dissertation question is developed based on the dissertation independent variables and dependent
variables which are discussed under conceptual framework. In addition to that dissertation
questionnaire includes both open ended dissertation questions and closed ended dissertation
questions to understand how author should collect the dissertation data regarding the dissertation
variables with regards to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the dissertation data. In
addition to that dissertation interview approach is used to analyses the behavior and gather the
comprehensive dissertation data based on the face to face discussion with the dissertation
questionnaire participants during the dissertation questionnaire filling process.
27 | P a g e
3.11 Operationalization
Table 3.11.1: Operationalization
Concept Variables Dimensions Indicators Measuring scales
Questions Source
Understanding the level of employee awareness on ERP system
Employee awareness
Employees are aware of importance of ERPTraining and development programs on ERP
Low ERP related mistakesEmployees are satisfied with ERP related activities
Likert scale method
Q7– Q16 Li and Lin (2004)
Evaluating the employee attitudes towards ERP system
Employee attitudes
Employees support to implementing and executing ERPEmployees are motivated to use ERP
Accepting the ERP changesUsing ERP for day to day operations
Likert scale method
Q17 – Q26
Dillard and Yuthas (2006)
Measuring the perception of management people on ERP system
Management perceptions
Management personnel are using ERP modulesManagement personnel encourage ERP improvements
Management understanding over importance of ERPEncourage others to use ERP
Likert scale method
Q27 – Q36
Dillard and Yuthas (2006)
Measure the variation
Performance efficiency
Accuracy of employees’
Employees performance
Likert scale method
Q37 – Q44
Li and Lin (2004)
28 | P a g e
s of employee performance efficiency due to ERP system
of employees
worksTiming efficiency of employees’ works
enhancementsReducing the errors and mistakes
3.12 Conceptual framework
Independent variables Dependent variable
Figure 3.12.1: Conceptual framework
29 | P a g e
Employee awareness of ERP modules
Employee attitude on implementing ERP
Management perception towards ERP
Performance efficiency of employees
3.13 Chapter summarization
Quantitative dissertation data approach are used to save the time to complete the overall
dissertation activities due to most of the dissertation outcome can be derived based on the
predetermined dissertation data analysis models. In this dissertation it is used quantitative
dissertation data analyzing technique and applies statistical and mathematical models to analyses
dissertation data. In this dissertation it is evaluated the operational efficiency of employees in
Finance Department of business firm as a result of implementing ERP system.
30 | P a g e
Chapter 04: Dissertation Data Analysis
4.1 Introduction
In this dissertation, it is used mathematical methods to analyze the dissertation data to evaluate
the relationship between dissertation independent variables and dependent variables. Sample
population of the dissertation is determined based on the random sampling method to ensure the
quality of selecting the sample population. In overall perspective, the dissertation expects to find
the strategic approaches to understand the requirements and necessity of ERP with regards to
enhance the employee performance efficiency within the business firm.
4.2 Research reliability testing
Table 4.2.1: Case processing summary
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases
Valid 50 100
Excluded 0 0
Total 50 100
a. List wise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Cronbach’s alpha testing uses 50 samples, out of that no is excluded for the reliability testing due
to the accuracy and completeness problem of dissertation questionnaire form.
31 | P a g e
Table 4.2.2: Reliability Statistics – Employee Awareness
Cronbach's Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items
N of Items
0.756 0.756 50
Since Cronbach alpha amount is 0.756, internal consistency of the firm is at an acceptable stage.
Table 4.2.3: Reliability Statistics – Employee Attitudes
Cronbach's Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items
N of Items
0.701 0.701 50
Since Cronbach alpha amount is 0.701, internal consistency of the firm is at an acceptable stage.
Table 4.2.4: Reliability Statistics – Management Perception
Cronbach's Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items
N of Items
0.778 0.778 50
Since Cronbach alpha amount is 0.778, internal consistency of the firm is at an acceptable stage.
32 | P a g e
Table 4.2.5: Reliability Statistics – Employee performance efficiency
Cronbach's Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items
N of Items
0.723 0.723 50
Since Cronbach alpha amount is 0.723, internal consistency of the firm is at an acceptable stage.
Cronbach’s alpha measures are as follows;
Table 4.2.6: Cornbach’s alpha
Cornbach’s alpha Internal consistency
α ≥ 0.9 Excellent
0.9 > α ≥ 0.8 Good
0.8 > α ≥ 0.7 Acceptable
0.7 > α ≥ 0.6 Questionable
0.6 > α ≥ 0.5 Poor
0.5 > α Unacceptable
33 | P a g e
4.3 Research data analysis on demographic dissertation questions
Figure 4.1.1: Gender analysis
There are 75% of female population and 25% male population in sample population.
Figure 4.1.2: Age group analysis
When analyze the sample population based on the age categories, majority of the employees in
sample population can be categorized under 20 years to 30 years age category.
34 | P a g e
Figure 4.1.3: Salaries analysis
Majority of the employees of sample population can be categorized to Rs.50,000 – Rs.100,000
salaries and wages category.
Figure 4.1.4: Working experience analysis
Most of the employees in the organization have more than 3 years and less than 5 years working experience as per the primary research data analysis.
35 | P a g e
Figure 4.3.5: Educational qualification analysis
There are 60% of employees who have degree or more qualification according to the primary
data review on educational qualifications of employees.
36 | P a g e
4.4 Pearson’s correlation of coefficient analysis
Table 4.3.1: Pearson’s correlation of between employee awareness of ERP and employee
performance efficiency
Performance efficiency of employees
Employee awareness of ERP modules
Performance efficiency of employees
Pearson Correlation 1 0.667Sig. (2-tailed) 0N 50 50
Employee awareness of ERP modules
Pearson Correlation 0.667 1Sig. (2-tailed) 0N 50 50
95% Significance Level
Correlation coefficient between performance efficiency of employees and employee awareness
of ERP modules is 0.667. It indicates that there is a positive strong relationship between
performance efficiency of employees and employee awareness of ERP modules
Table 4.3.2: Pearson’s correlation of between employee attitudes on ERP implementation
and employee performance efficiency
Performance efficiency of employees
Employee attitude on implementing ERP
Performance efficiency of employees
Pearson Correlation 1 0.485Sig. (2-tailed) 0N 50 50Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0N 50 50
Employee attitude on implementing ERP
Pearson Correlation 0.485 1Sig. (2-tailed) 0N 50 50
37 | P a g e
95% Significance Level
Correlation coefficient between performance efficiency of employees and employee attitudes on
ERP is 0.485 It indicates that there is a positive weak relationship between performance
efficiency of employees and employee attitudes on ERP.
Table 4.3.3: Pearson’s correlation of between employee attitudes on ERP implementation
and employee performance efficiency
Performance efficiency of employees
Management perception towards ERP
Performance efficiency of employees
Pearson Correlation 1 0.566Sig. (2-tailed) 0N 50 50
Management perception towards ERP
Pearson Correlation 0.566 1Sig. (2-tailed) 0N 50 50
95% Significance Level
Correlation coefficient between performance efficiency of employees and management
perception on ERP is 0.566 It indicates that there is a positive strong relationship between
performance efficiency of employees and management perception on ERP.
4.5 Chapter summarization
According to research data analysis, employee awareness of ERP is considered as the most
important factor to determine the employee performance efficiency. In addition to that
management of the organization should have adequate understanding and knowledge to monitor
38 | P a g e
and guide the employees to ensure successful implementation and execution of ERP within
business organization.
39 | P a g e
Chapter 05: Dissertation Conclusion and Recommendations
5.1 Introduction
The dissertation discusses on how to evaluate the relationship between ERP systems related
applications with regards to ensure the performance efficiency of the human resource of the firm.
With regards to evaluate the impact of ERP system to enhance the performance efficiency of
Human Resource it is considered on three independent variables such as employee attitudes,
employee perception and management attitudes. When discuss the dissertation problem it is not a
then there are some gaps between employee awareness on importance of the ERP system with
regards to simplify the operational activities compared to the manual practices.
5.2 Dissertation conclusion
Primary dissertation data Review emphasized that most of the employees within the firm are not
aware about the features and modulus of ERP finance models. As a result of that most of the
employees are not used in all the features and functions of ERP with regards to manage the
financial resources within the firm. There are some employees still using traditional manual
process and procedures to record the transaction within the firm and those people are fear to use
ERP with regards to record the financial management transaction within the firm. In addition to
that there are no structured and proper procedures to plan and conduct the training and
development programs within the firm with regards to enhance the employee awareness over
ERP system and its features. in addition to that most of the employees are not actively participate
into existing ERP awareness programs and training is within the firm due to most of the
40 | P a g e
employees are not understand the importance of using ERP for their day-to-day operations
activities.
Self-motivation is considered as one of the major positive human behavior in modern business
world. with regards to ERP system implementation process most of the employees are not
motivated to use ERP due to existing employees does not have proper understand about what is
ERP and how ERP can be used to save the time and cost of the pressure process. It is
recommended to use the support and commitment from managerial level employees within the
firm which will help to ensure the accurate and complete awareness about ERP among the
operational level employees. ERP system documentation is important to ensure the employee
awareness on ERP system and its applications. For Finance, system documentation of critical
processes was available; however, the process documentation was only available for Budget
Preparation & Monitoring, System Coding, and Accounts Payable.
The system documentation provides technical data that may be difficult to understand without a
proper background, process transaction entry, or description of process fields. Business firm
conduct the training and development programs with regards to ensure that employees of the
business firm are aware about importance of ERP system. However most of the employees of the
business firm do not have proper understanding about the features and specification of ERP
module with regards to simplify their day-to-day operational activities. As a result of that most of
the employees are tending to use combination of ERP system related operational practices and
traditional manual operational practices as well. In overall perspective it has been directed to
reduce the performance efficiency of employees and most of the employees of the firm are not
willing to get rid of 100% manual business activities and processes. Business firm should
evaluate the employee awareness on importance and benefits of the ERP system with regards to
consider the ideas and views of the human resource with regards to develop features and
specification of ERP module (Bradford, 2015). With regards to provide valid ideas and views
with regards to develop the existing condition of ERP system employees of the firm should have
comprehensive understand in about how to operate ERP system and value addition activities of
ERP system which can be used to enhance the competitive advantage and operational efficiency
of the business firm (Arnesen, 2003)
41 | P a g e
ERP related policies and procedures have not been formally defined or developed.
It is noted that anti-virus software is currently not used on desktop PC's and the network server
virus scanner is run only once a week. Formal Information system policies and procedures help
to ensure the consistent application of company policy and adequate safeguarding of the
company's information assets. The introduction of virus' can have a severe impact on data
integrity and at a minimum be quite inconvenient to correct once "infected. Due to lack of proper
coordination among functional activities of business firms, operational inefficiency and
ineffectiveness will be increased. The dissertation discusses how business firms can use ERP to
ensure the coordination between functional activities with regards to enhance the operational
efficiency and effectiveness. Based on that dissertation problem is defined as does ERP ensure
operational efficiency within telecommunication industrial business firms.
5.3 Dissertation recommendation
Guidelines over maintenance of system documentations should be established to ensure that it is
kept up to date for any changes made on ERP. This can be aligned with the change control
process that needs to be established. Update the existing documentation to ensure that recent
changes are included. Also, technical and process documents should be created for those areas
not yet documented. It is advised that a list of topics should be kept to ensure that all areas have
corresponding documentations available.
The Company should define and develop written ERP related policies and procedures. These
should address, at minimum, the following;
Management's policy for information security and confidentiality, including a statement
that information including E-mail is corporate asset.
Responsibilities for various user and Information Systems group to apply and enforce
management's policy.
Procedures for adding new user and temporary employee access, if any; for removing
terminated employee access; and for changing access privileges when job functions
change.
42 | P a g e
Physical security responsibilities and physical access control standards.
Procedures defining Change Management with application development.
Procedures for Computer Operations processing, including backups and error reporting.
Procedures for Network Administration, including monitoring, and acceptable usage by
company employees.
Review the employee Performance Management System to factor in project milestones/outputs
in Individual Operating Plans. Whenever milestones/outputs are not clearly determinable when
the Individual Operating Plans are formulated, make a generic mention, to be more specifically
outlined during appraisal meetings and mid-year reviews. With regards to ensure the successful
implementation and execution of ERP system it is essential to have employees support at
maximum and optimum position. In this dissertation most of the employees have highlighted that
firm does not takes the ideas and views of the human resource with regards to decide the features
and specifications of ERP module which is expecting to run the day to day operation activities of
the business. In addition to that most of the employees within the firm are not sharing their
knowledge and skills with other employees due to lack of proper knowledge sharing
organizational culture within the firm.
With regards to obtain the maximum support and commitment from the employees to implement
and execute the ERP module within the firm it is essential to conduct employee awareness
programs which highlights the importance of ERP system implementation and how ERP system
implementation process will help to save the time and simplify their day-to-day operational
activities within the firm. In addition to that firm does not have structure practices and industrial
best practices with regards to evaluate the employee support towards successful implementation
and execution of ERP module within the firm.
5.4 Dissertation limitation
The main dissertation limitation is there is no adequate time to complete overall dissertation
activities. That means author to complete comprehensive dissertation activities within Limited
period of time with regards to achieve the dissertation objectives and find the solution for
43 | P a g e
dissertation questions. In addition to that there is some limitation in executing the dissertation
data collection process. Due to the busy work life schedule of the people it takes a significant
period of time to complete the all the dissertation questionnaire together the primary dissertation
data with regards to arrive dissertation Conclusion and Recommendation. For that purpose most
of the recent questions are not comprehensive and those questions are easy to understand.
Further there are resource limitations in terms of purchasing dissertation data analysis in
software and tools.
5.5 Future dissertation
Future dissertation activities and to expand the sample population considered in the different
departments in the firm with regards to evaluate how employee performance will be increased
with respect to the ERP related functions and features. In addition to that it is expected to use this
dissertation approaches to find out the relationship between employee performance and ERP in
different business industries. During the future dissertation activities it is expecting to evaluate
how qualitative dissertation data such as behaviors and competencies of human resource will
impact to determine the employee performance level based on the ERP implemented firm.
5.6 Chapter summarization
Primary dissertation data Review emphasized that most of the employees within the firm are not
aware about the features and modulus of ERP finance models. As a result of that most of the
employees are not used in all the features and functions of ERP with regards to manage the
financial resources within the firm.
44 | P a g e
06. References
Appelbaum, D. A. K. M. V. a. Z. Y., 2017. Appelbaum, D., A. Kogan, M. Vasarhelyi and Z.
Yan.. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems , Volume 25, pp. 29-44.
Arnesen, S. a. J. T., 2003. ERP merger mania. Strategic Finance, pp. 30-35.
Barkhi, R. a. S. K., 2017. ERP in the classroom: Three SAP exercises focused on internal
controls.. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(1), pp. 77-83..
Beasley, M. S. a. D. S. S., 2015. ERM and sustainability: Together on the road ahead.. Strategic
Finance, pp. 32-39.
Bradford, M. a. G. J. G., 2015. Using process mapping to reveal process redesign opportunities
during ERP planning.. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, Volume 12, pp. 169-
188.
Brodeur, E. a. P. S., 2002. ERP cost and performance systems: Risks and opportunities.. Journal
of Cost Management, pp. 20-24..
Dillard, J. F. L. R. a. K. Y., 2005. Enterprise resource planning systems: A physical
manifestation of administrative evil.. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems,
6(2), pp. 107-127.
Fulmer, B. P. a. G. J. G., 2014. Selecting an enterprise resource planning system: An active
learning simulation. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting , Volume 11, pp. 71-82.
Geerts, G. L. a. H. J. W., 2007. The timeless way of building REA enterprise systems.. Journal
of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, Volume 4, pp. 161-182.
Grabski, S. V. S. A. L. a. P. J. S., 2011. A review of ERP dissertation: A future agenda for
accounting information systems.. Journal of Information Systems, pp. 37-78.
45 | P a g e
llen, T., 2008. The "secret sauce" that maximizes ROI for ERP.. Strategic Finance, pp. 32-37.
Nicolaou, A. I. a. S. B., 2006. Firmal performance effects of ERP systems usage: The impact of
post-implementation changes.. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems , 7(1),
pp. 18-35.
Pincus, M. F. T. P. W. a. S. X. X., 2017. Do clients' enterprise systems affect audit quality and
efficiency?. Contemporary Accounting Dissertation , 34(4), pp. 1975-2021.
Singh, K. P. J. B. M. B. a. C. B., 2014. Continuous auditing and continuous monitoring in ERP
environments: Case studies of application implementations.. Journal of Information Systems, pp.
287-310.
46 | P a g e
07. Annexure 01: Research data analysis
7.1 Dissertation data analysis on employee awareness on ERP
I know how to use ERP modules
12% of people are preferred strongly, 22% of people are preferred, 38% of people are neither not
preferred not preferred, 10% of people are not preferred nor 18% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Figure 7.1.1: Dissertation question 07
I save the paper cost and environment by storing soft copies using ERP
6% of people are preferred strongly, 16% of people are preferred, 32% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 22% of people are not preferred and 24% of people are not preferred
strongly.
47 | P a g e
Figure 7.1.2: Dissertation question 08
I have seen the guidance poster to teach the ERP within the firm
2% of people are preferred strongly, 8% of people are preferred, 42% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 36% of people are not preferred and 12% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Figure 7.1.3: Dissertation question 09
48 | P a g e
Employees are eager to learn about ERP
10% of people are preferred strongly, 18% of people are preferred, 52% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 14% of people are not preferred and 6% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Figure 7.1.4: Dissertation question 10
Employees are tend to use ERP for day to day operations
16% of people are preferred strongly, 30% of people are preferred, 38% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 14% of people are not preferred and 2% of people are not preferred
strongly.
49 | P a g e
Figure 7.1.5: Dissertation question 11
I have participated to ERP training programs
6% of people are preferred strongly, 18% of people are preferred, 54% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 18% of people are not preferred and 4% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Figure 7.1.6: Dissertation question 12
50 | P a g e
The last participated date for ERP training is more than 3 months back
16% of people are preferred strongly, 30% of people are preferred, 38% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 14% of people are not preferred and 2% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Figure 7.1.7: Dissertation question 13
I have learnt on ERP using on job training approaches
4% of people are preferred strongly, 10% of people are preferred, 50% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 22% of people are not preferred and 14% of people are not preferred
strongly.
51 | P a g e
Figure 7.1.8: Dissertation question 14
I am satisfied with current training programs
6% of people are preferred strongly, 16% of people are preferred, 42% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 28% of people are not preferred and 8% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Figure 7.1.9: Dissertation question 15
52 | P a g e
I think existing training portfolio is adequate
12% of people are preferred strongly, 22% of people are preferred, 38% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 10% of people are not preferred and 18% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Figure 7.1.10: Dissertation question 16
7.2 Dissertation data analysis on employee attitudes on
implementing ERP
I give feedbacks on issues and problems of ERP
4% of people are preferred strongly, 14% of people are preferred, 46% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 14% of people are not preferred and 22% of people are not preferred
strongly.
53 | P a g e
Figure 7.2.1: Dissertation question 17
I allocate additional time to learn ERP modules
2% of people are preferred strongly, 6% of people are preferred, 34% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 30% of people are not preferred and 28% of people are not preferred
strongly.
54 | P a g e
Figure 7.2.2: Dissertation question 18
I actively participated for ERP implementation process
10% of people are preferred strongly, 18% of people are preferred, 52% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 14% of people are not preferred not 6% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Figure 7.2.3: Dissertation question 19
I monitor and inform the performance of ERP
14% of people are preferred strongly, 28% of people are preferred, 46% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 8% of people are not preferred and 4% of people are not preferred
strongly.
55 | P a g e
Figure 7.2.4: Dissertation question 20
I share the knowledge of ERP with others
16% of people are preferred strongly, 24% of people are preferred, 52% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 6% of people are not preferred and 2% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Figure 7.2.5: Dissertation question 21
56 | P a g e
I am trying to use ERP for all my works
6% of people are preferred strongly, 18% of people are preferred, 54% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 18% of people are not preferred and 4% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Figure 7.2.6: Dissertation question 22
I help others to learn ERP and familiar with ERP
4% of people are preferred strongly, 14% of people are preferred, 46% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 24% of people are not preferred and 12% of people are not preferred
strongly.
57 | P a g e
Figure 7.2.7: Dissertation question 23
I have moved to ERP from manual activities
16% of people are preferred strongly, 30% of people are preferred, 38% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 14% of people are not preferred and 2% of people are not preferred
strongly.
58 | P a g e
Figure 7.2.8: Dissertation question 24
I provide the information for ERP audits
4% of people are preferred strongly, 18% of people are preferred, 48% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 20% of people are not preferred and 10% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Figure 7.2.9: Dissertation question 25
I am a self-learner on ERP modules and functions
4% of people are preferred strongly, 16% of people are preferred, 44% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 24% of people are not preferred and 12% of people are not preferred
strongly.
59 | P a g e
Figure 7.2.10: Dissertation question 26
7.3 Dissertation data analysis on management perception towards
ERP
Do management people encourage using ERP?
6% of people are preferred strongly, 10% of people are preferred, 46% of people are neither not
preferred not preferred, 14% of people are not preferred nor 24% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.3.1: Dissertation question 27
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 6% 3Preferred 10% 5Neither preferred nor not preferred 46% 23Not preferred 14% 7Strongly not preferred 24% 12Total 100% 50
60 | P a g e
Do management people use ERP?
16% of people are preferred strongly, 28% of people are preferred, 48% of people are neither not
preferred not preferred, 6% of people are not preferred nor 2% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.3.2: Dissertation question 28
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 16% 8Preferred 28% 14Neither preferred nor not preferred 48% 24Not preferred 6% 3Strongly not preferred 2% 1Total 100% 50
Do management people appreciate ERP generate reports?
24% of people are preferred strongly, 28% of people are preferred, 38% of people are neither not
preferred not preferred, 8% of people are not preferred nor 2% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.3.3: Dissertation question 29
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 24% 12Preferred 28% 14Neither preferred nor not preferred 38% 19Not preferred 8% 4Strongly not preferred 2% 1Total 100% 50
Do management people request ERP generated data to make the decisions?
14% of people are preferred strongly, 20% of people are preferred, 46% of people are neither not
preferred not preferred, 14% of people are not preferred nor 6% of people are not preferred
strongly.
61 | P a g e
Table 7.3.4: Dissertation question 30
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 14% 7Preferred 20% 10Neither preferred nor not preferred 46% 23Not preferred 14% 7Strongly not preferred 6% 3Total 100% 50
Do management people identify gaps between ERP and manual processes?
10% of people are preferred strongly, 16% of people are preferred, 58% of people are neither not
preferred not preferred, 10% of people are not preferred nor 6% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.3.5: Dissertation question 31
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 10% 5Preferred 16% 8Neither preferred nor not preferred 58% 29Not preferred 10% 5Strongly not preferred 6% 3Total 100% 50
Do management people have adequate knowledge on ERP?
4% of people are preferred strongly, 8% of people are preferred, 50% of people are neither not
preferred not preferred, 24% of people are not preferred nor 14% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.3.6: Dissertation question 32
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 4% 2Preferred 8% 4Neither preferred nor not preferred 50% 25Not preferred 24% 12Strongly not preferred 14% 7
62 | P a g e
Total 100% 50
Do management people allocate adequate financial resources for ERP developments?
12% of people are preferred strongly, 22% of people are preferred, 46% of people are neither not
preferred not preferred, 12% of people are not preferred nor 8% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.3.7: Dissertation question 33
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 12% 6Preferred 22% 11Neither preferred nor not preferred 46% 23Not preferred 12% 6Strongly not preferred 8% 4Total 100% 50
Do management people recruit competent and skillful people to handle ERP?
12% of people are preferred strongly, 28% of people are preferred, 48% of people are neither not
preferred not preferred, 6% of people are not preferred nor 6% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.3.8: Dissertation question 34
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 12% 6Preferred 28% 14Neither preferred nor not preferred 48% 24Not preferred 6% 3Strongly not preferred 6% 3Total 100% 50
Do management people monitor whether employees are using ERP?
63 | P a g e
4% of people are preferred strongly, 12% of people are preferred, 50% of people are neither not
preferred not preferred, 20% of people are not preferred nor 14% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.3.9: Dissertation question 35
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 4% 2Preferred 12% 6Neither preferred nor not preferred 50% 25Not preferred 20% 10Strongly not preferred 14% 7Total 100% 50
Do management people give more priority to ERP generate reports and information?
10% of people are preferred strongly, 16% of people are preferred, 58% of people are neither not
preferred not preferred, 10% of people are not preferred nor 6% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.3.10: Dissertation question 36
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 10% 5Preferred 16% 8Neither preferred nor not preferred 58% 29Not preferred 10% 5Strongly not preferred 6% 3Total 100% 50
7.4 Dissertation data analysis on performance efficiency of
employees
I submit ERP generate report without mistakes and errors
64 | P a g e
12% of people are preferred strongly, 22% of people are preferred, 38% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 10% of people are not preferred and 18% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.4.1: Dissertation question 37
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 12% 6Preferred 22% 11Neither preferred nor not preferred 38% 19Not preferred 10% 5Strongly not preferred 18% 9Total 100% 50
Accuracy of ERP reports is high compare to manual process
4% of people are preferred strongly, 10% of people are preferred, 50% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 22% of people are not preferred and 14% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.4.2: Dissertation question 38
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 4% 2Preferred 10% 5Neither preferred nor not preferred 50% 25Not preferred 22% 11Strongly not preferred 14% 7Total 100% 50
ERP ensures the completeness of data
6% of people are preferred strongly, 18% of people are preferred, 54% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 18% of people are not preferred and 4% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.4.3: Dissertation question 39
Response Percentage Count
65 | P a g e
Strongly preferred 6% 3Preferred 18% 9Neither preferred nor not preferred 54% 27Not preferred 18% 9Strongly not preferred 4% 2Total 100% 50
ERP eliminates the risk of inherent human errors
10% of people are preferred strongly, 18% of people are preferred, 52% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 14% of people are not preferred and 6% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.4.4: Dissertation question 40
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 10% 5Preferred 18% 9Neither preferred nor not preferred 52% 26Not preferred 14% 7Strongly not preferred 6% 3Total 100% 50
ERP saves my working time
16% of people are preferred strongly, 30% of people are preferred, 38% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 14% of people are not preferred and 2% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.4.5: Dissertation question 41
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 16% 8Preferred 30% 15Neither preferred nor not preferred 38% 19Not preferred 14% 7Strongly not preferred 2% 1Total 100% 50
66 | P a g e
I have excess hours in day to day activities
12% of people are preferred strongly, 22% of people are preferred, 38% of people are neither not
preferred not preferred, 10% of people are not preferred nor 18% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.4.6: Dissertation question 42
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 12% 6Preferred 22% 11Neither preferred nor not preferred 38% 19Not preferred 10% 5Strongly not preferred 18% 9Total 100% 50
I am motivated to working with other departments via ERP to save the time.
14% of people are preferred strongly, 28% of people are preferred, 46% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 8% of people are not preferred and 4% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.4.7: Dissertation question 43
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 14% 7Preferred 28% 14Neither preferred nor not preferred 46% 23Not preferred 8% 4Strongly not preferred 4% 2Total 100% 50
I have increased number of completed tasks per day with ERP
67 | P a g e
6% of people are preferred strongly, 18% of people are preferred, 54% of people are neither not
preferred nor preferred, 18% of people are not preferred and 4% of people are not preferred
strongly.
Table 7.4.8: Dissertation question 44
Response Percentage CountStrongly preferred 6% 3Preferred 18% 9Neither preferred nor not preferred
54% 27
Not preferred 18% 9Strongly not preferred 4% 2Total 100% 50
68 | P a g e
08. Annexure 02: Dissertation questionnaire
Dear participants
I am distributing the dissertation questionnaire to gather the dissertation data to my Master’s
dissertation which is discussed how to use ERP system to enhance the performance efficiency of
the employees. Outcome of the dissertation will be helped to enhance the performance of
employees of your firm as well.
I assure that your data will not be transferred to other parties and you have power to reject the
participation for the dissertation questionnaire. It will takes maximum 10 minutes to complete
the dissertation questionnaire and your support is highly appreciated.
Yours faithfully
Your name
69 | P a g e
Demographic Questionnaire
01. Gender Male Female
02. Age group: Less than 20 20 - 30 31 - 40 More than 40
03. Marital status Single Married
04. Basic salary scale (per month) Less than Rs. 50,000 Rs. 50,000 - Rs. 100,000 Rs. 100,001 – Rs. 150,000 More than Rs. 150,000
05. Working experience works (including current working firm) Less than 3 years More than 3 years and less than 5 years More than 5 years and less than 10 years More than 10 years
06. Maximum education qualifications O/L A/L Diploma Degree or more
You are requested to fill this questionnaire with a 5 point scale with respect to dissertation objectives;
inpreferred
70 | P a g e
1. Strongly not preferred2. Not preferred3. Neutral4. Preferred5. Strongly preferred
Employees are aware of importance of ERP
I know how to use ERP modules
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
08. I save the paper cost and environment by storing soft copies using ERP
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
09. I have seen the guidance poster to teach the ERP within the firm
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
10. Employees are eager to learn about ERP
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
11. Employees are tend to use ERP for day to day operations
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
Training and development programs on ERP
12. I have participated to ERP training programs
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
13. The last participated date for ERP training is more than 3 months back
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
14. I have learnt on ERP using on job training approaches
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
15. I am satisfied with current training programs
71 | P a g e
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
16. I think existing training portfolio is adequate
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
Employees support to implementing and executing ERP
17. I give feedbacks on issues and problems of ERP
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
18. I allocate additional time to learn ERP modules
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
19. I actively participated for ERP implementation process
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
20. I monitor and inform the performance of ERP
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
21. I share the knowledge of ERP with others
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
Employees are motivated to use ERP
22. I am trying to use ERP for all my works
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
23. I help others to learn ERP and familiar with ERP
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
24. I have moved to ERP from manual activities
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
72 | P a g e
25. I provide the information for ERP audits
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
26. I am a self-learner on ERP modules and functions
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
Management personnel are using ERP modules
27. Do management people encourage using ERP?
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
28. Do management people use ERP?
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
29. Do management people appreciate ERP generate reports?
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
30. Do management people request ERP generated data to make the decisions?
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
31. Do management people identify gaps between ERP and manual processes?
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
Management personnel encourage ERP improvements
32. Do management people have adequate knowledge on ERP?
Strongly not Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
73 | P a g e
preferred33. Do management people allocate adequate financial resources for ERP developments?
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
34. Do management people recruit competent and skillful people to handle ERP?
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
35. Do management people monitor whether employees are using ERP?
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
36. Do management people give more priority to ERP generate reports and information?
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
Accuracy of employees’ works
37. I submit ERP generate report without mistakes and errors
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
38. Accuracy of ERP reports is high compare to manual process
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
39. ERP ensures the completeness of data
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
40. ERP eliminates the risk of inherent human errors
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
Timing efficiency of employees’ works
41. ERP saves my working time
74 | P a g e
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
42. I have excess hours in day to day activities
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
43. I am motivated to working with other departments via ERP to save the time.
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
44. I have increased number of completed tasks per day with ERP
Strongly not preferred
Not preferred Neutral Preferred Strongly preferred
75 | P a g e