Upload
jocelyn-bentley
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Changing Society with ICTs: An Investigation of Tech. Determinism
OASIS Workshop 2004
Author:
Pratyush Bharati
University of Massachusetts, Boston
Introduction
ICTs driven prognostications abound: Friction-free capitalism (Gates, 1995) Death of distance (Cairncross, 1997; Dyson et
al., 1996; Toffler, 1980) Weightless world (Coyle, 1997) Digital economy (Shaw, 1999; Tapscott, 1998)
Popular and academic discourse claims arrival of a digital world
Introduction
Is the digital world a reality or have we been seduced by the popular rhetoric? Enamored by the novel (Barley, 1998) Wonder overpower scepticism (Barley, 1998) Sweeping predictions mislead (Orlikowski and Iacono,
2000) Need for a balanced perspective (Baskerville and Myers,
2002; Hirschheim and Klein, 2003; Markus and Robey, 1988; Orlikowski, 1992; Orlikowski and Iacono, 2000; Sarker and Lee, 2002)
Research Study
Investigating technological determinism and ICTs Historical accounts of tech. determinism Recent accounts of tech. determinism State of the digital world
International digital divide
Technological Determinism
Given the past and the laws of nature, there is only one possible future course of social change (Van Inwagen,1983)
Technological development determines social change (Bimber, 1994)
Unidirectional relationship (Bimber, 1994)
Historical Accounts of Technological Determinism
On “June 1993” written in 1893 (Marvin, 1987) “Today the inhabitants of this planet … owing to the
unlimited facilities of intercommunication, they are almost as closely united as the members of a family”
On the Telegraph (Wilson et al., 1986) “The influence of this invention… Space will be, to all
practical purposes of information, completely annihilated…”
On the Telephone (Smith, 1986) “Nothing less than a new organization of society”
Recent Accounts of Technological Determinism
On the ‘Work-Free Society’ (Dertouzous, 1997) “The people of the world will do no work, because they
will derive all revenue they need to buy their desired goods and services from the machines that they own. Machines will make the machines that are needed, too”
On the Microchip and Computer (Gilder, 1989) “The central event of the twentieth century is the
overthrow of matter … The powers of mind are everywhere ascendant over the brute force of things.”
Recent Accounts of Technological Determinism
On 2009 (Kurzweil, 1999) “Students of all ages typically have a computer of their
own …” On the new ICTs (Gates, 1995)
“It will enhance leisure time and enrich culture by expanding the distribution of information.”
“… a new world of low-friction, low overhead capitalism …”
“… friction-free capitalism…” “A Computer on every desk and in every home”
Investigating a Digital World
Is the digital world becoming a reality? Global diffusion of technology
Older technologies Atleast 50 years or older
Telephones Television
Newer technologies Less than 50 years old
Cellular phones Internet
Methodology
Country level data on technologies World Bank, UNDP and ITU 130 countries
Hierarchical cluster analysis Six cluster solution for each of the four cluster
analyses
Results
First cluster analysis Both older and newer technologies
First cluster (74 countries) and the second cluster (30 countries) significantly lack both older and newer technologies
Rest of cluster have significantly higher density of both older and newer technologies
Second cluster analysis Newer technologies
First cluster (100 countries) significantly lack newer technologies The rest have significantly higher density of newer technologies
Results
Third cluster analysis Older technologies
First cluster (75 countries) significantly lack older technologies The third (15 countries) and fourth (8 countries) clusters significantly higher
density of both the older technologies Other cluster have a lower density of the telephone mainlines but a higher
density of televisions
Fourth cluster analysis UNDP Index
Second cluster (42 countries) significantly high score First (50 countries) and third (4 countries) clusters high index score for all but
the GDP index Clusters four and five low score on all the four indices
Index Clusters Older Technologies Clusters Newer Technologies Clusters
.72
.43
.361.0
1.0
1.0
.76
.875
Cluster 1Countries: 50EDU: 0.82GDP: 0.64GDI: 0.72HDI: 0.73
Cluster 2Countries: 42EDU: 0.92GDP: 0.86GDI: 0.87HDI: 0.88
Cluster 3Countries: 4EDU: 0.87GDP: 0.45GDI: 0.67HDI: 0.68
Cluster 4Countries: 19EDU: 0.45GDP: 0.43GDI: 0.43HDI: 0.44
Cluster 5Countries: 4EDU: 0.31GDP: 0.33GDI: 0.31HDI: 0.32
Cluster 6Countries: 11EDU: 0.66GDP: 0.50GDI: 0.58HDI: 0.58
Cluster 2Countries:29TEL: 31.91TV: 342.62
Cluster 3Countries:15TEL: 63.14TV: 588.67
Cluster 4Countries:8TEL:49.05TV: 465.13
Cluster 5Countries:2TEL: 28.14TV: 568.00
Cluster 6Countries:1TEL: 8.95TV: 591.00
Cluster 1Countries: 100IH: 7.96CELL: 4.72
Cluster 2Countries: 22IH: 199.54CELL: 40.29
Cluster 3Countries: 1IH: 424.53CELL: 22.65
Cluster 4Countries: 5IH: 776.42CELL: 59.21
Cluster 5Countries: 1IH: 146.09CELL: 63.61
Cluster 6Countries: 1IH: 1479.75CELL: 31.55
Cluster 1Countries:75TEL: 6.02TV: 112.05
0.22
0.53
Figure 2: Cluster Mapping - Index Clusters and Older Technologies Clusters andNewer Technologies Clusters
Preliminary Conclusions
Technological Determinism and Digital world Accounts of technological determinism
Prevalence of historical and recent accounts on ICTs Extremely low density of ICTs, especially older
technologies, challenges the basic assumption of technological determinism Older technologies – acting as primary and independent force for
social change not universally prevalent Substantial number of countries lag far behind in terms of
density in both older and newer technologies
Balanced View of Technology
Balanced views of technology: Complex pattern/path of interaction between
social, economic, political, cultural factors and technology (Castells, 2000; Kranzberg, 1987; Orlikowski and Iacono, 2000)
Involves numerous processes and components (Kranzberg, 1987)
Technology and society relationship is reciprocal not unidirectional (Bimber, 1994)
Balanced View of Technology
Does technology shape society? Non-technical factors take precedence in technology-
policy decisions (Kranzberg, 1987) “… factors affecting technology – from the human personality of
the inventor to the larger social, economic, political, and cultural milieu.”
Technology does not determine society: it embodies it. But neither does society determine technological innovation: it uses it (Castells, 2000) “… final outcome depends on a complex pattern of interaction.”
Thanks!
Questions or Suggestions