1
Changing Faculty Practice: Promoting the Scholarship of Teaching with Faculty Mentoring Networks Jeremy Wojdak 1 , Sam Donovan 2 , Carrie Diaz-Eaton 3 , Kristin Jenkins 4 , M. Drew LaMar 5 , Nicole Chodkowski 1 , Gabriela Hamerlinck 3 , Deborah Rook 3 , Elia Crisucci 2 , Hayley Orndorf 2 5 Dept. of Biology, Radford University; 2 Dept. of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh; 3 Digital and Computational Studies, Bates College; 4 BioQUEST Curriculum Consortium; 5 Dept. of Biology, College of William and Mary Resources and tools for scholarly teaching Hurdle 1: Engaging faculty Hurdle 2: Maintaining momentum Mechanisms to promote teaching as scholarship: Faculty Mentoring Networks and Open Education Resources Acknowledgements: QUBES can only function because of deep community involvement by individual faculty, professional societies, and curriculum projects – sincere thanks for partnering with us. Funding support from the National Science Foundation under DBI 1346584, DUE 1446269, DUE 1446258, and DUE 1446284. Poster printing thanks to the Office of Undergraduate Research and Scholarship (OURS) at Radford University. Moving disciplinary culture QUBES works with professional societies and education projects to push the disciplines towards more effective STEM instruction. Benefits of participating in a Faculty Mentoring Network Connections with a community of colleagues (relatedness). Increased confidence with quantitative content, biological contexts, evidence-based instructional practices, (competence / autonomy). Surprisingly little is known about what motivates faculty to participate in teaching professional development, but recent literature 1 points to: relatedness - desire to have connections with peers. competence - worries about teaching efficacy. autonomy -gaining comfort with extreme independence to determine instructional practices. Notably, traditional faculty development models (occasional topical workshops) often do little to build community among peers (relatedness), and true competence is only likely to develop through sustained interaction and reflective practice. QUBESHub hosts education resources with teacher notes, assessments, adaptations, reviews, and extensions produced by FMN participants. Open computational software lowers barrier for student and faculty use, and facilitates versioning. Learn more about upcoming FMNs: https://qubeshub.org/community/fmns Explore more resources and tools at https://qubeshub.org/qubesresources References: 1 Bouwma-Gearhart. 2012. Research university STEM faculty members’ motivation to engage in teaching professional development: Building the choir through an appeal to extrinsic motivation and ego. J Sci Educ Technol 21:558–570. 2 Shadle et al. 2017. Faculty drivers and barriers: laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments. Inter J STEM Educ 4:8. 3 Brownell and Tanner. 2012. Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and… tensions with professional identity? CBE—Life Sciences Education 11:339–346. At least eighteen barriers to STEM education reform for faculty have been identified 2 , with adequate training, time for reform, and incentives for change high on the list 3 . How can we foster faculty persistence in teaching reform? The role of faculty identity 3 STEM faculty were nearly all trained primarily as disciplinary. scholars, and research prowess has higher professional status than teaching. Personal interest in teaching is often hidden. Levers to promote teaching as scholarship: tapping into faculty identity as scholars 1. Incorporate in graduate/new faculty training. 2. Build/support outlets for publishing. 3. Leverage professional societies influence on disciplines. Remedy: Teaching as scholarship Just like any scholarship, teaching should: Start with the literature Build from knowledge of others Be collaborative and multidisciplinary Feature open methods, tools, resources Is not finished until results are shared! Recent Faculty Mentoring Networks Explore partner’s activities: https://qubeshub.org/community 40 FMNs have reached ~500 faculty at diverse institutions. Professional societies provide goals, funding, recognition. Faculty receive meaningful recognition for teaching scholarship Professional society-sponsored Faculty Mentoring Network multiplies value of OER resource Original peer-reviewed open educational resource Faculty Mentoring Networks are: Online peer groups, typically 6-10 faculty members per subgroup. Content and/or pedagogy mentors. Meet every 1-2 weeks for sustained support over semester. Sharing Open Educational Resources back to the community. Themes Quotes Community (sense of belonging) “The FMNs are all about community.” “I’m an FMN junkie. I can’t get enough of the community feeling.” It is an outlet for me to have support. I am at a small university. So I have people to share or run my curriculum by for feedback.” Career advancement “My participation in QUBES FMNs helped my tenure package...it shows that I am actively participating in the field.” “As a former member of a tenure committee, I would pay attention to a letter outlining what is involved.” Formal recognition “My university would pay attention to a title name in a national organization.” “A title name is helpful [shows I am active in the greater community..].” Example FMN hosted by the Ecological society of America 2016 Incentives faculty see for sharing Open Educational Resources

Changing Faculty Practice: Promoting the Scholarship of … · 2018. 11. 26. · Changing Faculty Practice: Promoting the Scholarship of Teaching with Faculty Mentoring Networks Jeremy

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Changing Faculty Practice: Promoting the Scholarship of … · 2018. 11. 26. · Changing Faculty Practice: Promoting the Scholarship of Teaching with Faculty Mentoring Networks Jeremy

ChangingFacultyPractice:PromotingtheScholarshipofTeachingwithFacultyMentoringNetworksJeremyWojdak1,SamDonovan2,CarrieDiaz-Eaton3,KristinJenkins4,M.DrewLaMar5,

NicoleChodkowski1,GabrielaHamerlinck3, DeborahRook3,EliaCrisucci2, HayleyOrndorf25Dept.ofBiology,RadfordUniversity;2Dept.ofBiologicalSciences,UniversityofPittsburgh;3DigitalandComputational

Studies,BatesCollege;4BioQUESTCurriculumConsortium;5Dept.ofBiology,CollegeofWilliamandMary

Resourcesandtoolsforscholarlyteaching

Hurdle1:Engagingfaculty

Hurdle2:Maintainingmomentum

Mechanismstopromoteteachingasscholarship:

FacultyMentoringNetworksandOpenEducationResources

Acknowledgements: QUBES can only function because of deep community involvement by individual faculty,professional societies, and curriculum projects – sincere thanks for partnering with us. Funding support fromthe National Science Foundation under DBI 1346584, DUE 1446269, DUE 1446258, and DUE 1446284. Posterprinting thanks to the Office of Undergraduate Research and Scholarship (OURS) at Radford University.

MovingdisciplinarycultureQUBES works with professional societies and educationprojects to push the disciplines towards more effectiveSTEM instruction.

BenefitsofparticipatinginaFacultyMentoringNetwork• Connectionswithacommunityofcolleagues(relatedness).• Increasedconfidencewithquantitativecontent,biologicalcontexts,

evidence-basedinstructionalpractices,(competence/autonomy).

Surprisingly little is known about what motivates faculty toparticipate in teaching professional development, butrecent literature1 points to:

• relatedness - desire to have connections with peers.• competence - worries about teaching efficacy.• autonomy -gaining comfort with extreme independence

to determine instructional practices.

Notably, traditional faculty development models (occasionaltopical workshops) often do little to build community amongpeers (relatedness), and true competence is only likely todevelop through sustained interaction and reflective practice.

QUBESHub hosts education resources with teacher notes,assessments, adaptations, reviews, and extensions producedby FMN participants. Open computational software lowersbarrier for student and faculty use, and facilitates versioning.

LearnmoreaboutupcomingFMNs:https://qubeshub.org/community/fmns

Exploremoreresourcesandtoolsathttps://qubeshub.org/qubesresources

References:1Bouwma-Gearhart.2012.ResearchuniversitySTEMfacultymembers’motivationtoengageinteachingprofessionaldevelopment:Buildingthechoirthroughanappealtoextrinsicmotivationandego.JSci Educ Technol 21:558–570.

2Shadleetal.2017.Facultydriversandbarriers:layingthegroundworkforundergraduateSTEMeducationreforminacademicdepartments.InterJSTEMEduc 4:8.

3BrownellandTanner.2012.Barrierstofacultypedagogicalchange:Lackoftraining,time,incentives,and… tensionswithprofessionalidentity?CBE—LifeSciencesEducation11:339–346.

At least eighteen barriers to STEM education reform forfaculty have been identified2, with adequate training, timefor reform, and incentives for change high on the list3. Howcan we foster faculty persistence in teaching reform?

Theroleoffacultyidentity3STEM faculty were nearly all trained primarily asdisciplinary. scholars, and research prowess has higherprofessional status than teaching. Personal interest inteaching is often hidden.

Leverstopromoteteachingasscholarship:tappingintofacultyidentityasscholars

1. Incorporate in graduate/new faculty training.2. Build/support outlets for publishing.3. Leverage professional societies influence on disciplines.

Remedy:TeachingasscholarshipJustlikeanyscholarship,teachingshould:• Startwiththeliterature• Buildfromknowledgeofothers• Becollaborativeandmultidisciplinary• Featureopenmethods,tools,resources• Isnotfinisheduntilresultsareshared!

RecentFacultyMentoringNetworks

Explorepartner’sactivities:https://qubeshub.org/community

• 40 FMNs have reached ~500 faculty at diverse institutions.• Professional societies provide goals, funding, recognition.

Facultyreceivemeaningfulrecognitionforteachingscholarship

Professionalsociety-sponsoredFacultyMentoringNetworkmultiplies

valueofOERresource

Originalpeer-reviewedopeneducationalresource

FacultyMentoringNetworksare:• Online peergroups,typically6-10

facultymemberspersubgroup.• Contentand/orpedagogymentors.• Meetevery1-2weeksfor

sustainedsupportoversemester.• SharingOpenEducational

Resourcesbacktothecommunity.

Themes Quotes

Community(senseofbelonging)

“TheFMNsareallaboutcommunity.”

“I’manFMNjunkie.Ican’tgetenoughofthecommunity feeling.”

“Itisanoutlet formetohavesupport.Iamatasmalluniversity.SoIhavepeopletoshareorrunmycurriculumbyforfeedback.”

Careeradvancement

“MyparticipationinQUBESFMNshelpedmytenurepackage...itshowsthatIamactivelyparticipatinginthefield.”

“Asaformermemberofatenure committee,Iwouldpayattentiontoaletteroutliningwhatisinvolved.”

Formalrecognition

“Myuniversitywouldpayattentiontoatitlenameinanationalorganization.”

“Atitlenameishelpful[showsIamactiveinthegreatercommunity..].”

ExampleFMNhostedbytheEcologicalsocietyofAmerica2016

IncentivesfacultyseeforsharingOpenEducationalResources