Changeux Et Al - Nicotine Receptors & Addiction, Genetically Modified Mice

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 Changeux Et Al - Nicotine Receptors & Addiction, Genetically Modified Mice

    1/13

    Eery year, ore than fie iion peope ordide diefro the conseqences of soking. These deaths, prin-cipay fro ng cancer, are aoidabe. A foridabeobstace to the preention of these deaths is that tobaccocontains nicotine the aor, if not soe, copondresponsibe for driing the strong addiction to soking1.Of those ho try to qit soking, ony 35% are sccess-f ithot the se of nicotine repaceent therapies, andno ore than one-third are sccessf ith the2. Hocan a sipe cheica sbstance sch as nicotine haeso strong an effect on han behaior? Ansering thisqestion is becoing possibe no that the oecarand cear targets and the physioogica and behaioraeffects of nicotine are being nraeed.

    The actions of nicotine are ediated by nicotinicacetychoine (ACh) receptors (nAChRs) (FIG. 1). Toincrease or nderstanding of the contribtion of differ-

    ent nAChR oigoers3,4 to nicotine addiction, ne strate-gies hae been deeoped. These incde, first, deetions inice5 of neary a knon AChR sbnit genes6, and tar-geted knock-in gene tations yieding gain-of-fnctionreceptor sbnits7,8; second, the re-expression of adeeted gene either sing indcibe transgenic expres-sion systes9 or by stereotaxic inection of a entiira

    ector carrying the issing gene10,11 or the reeant sainterfering RNA11,12; third, the qantitatie anaysis ofthe nerona firing patterns13 and behaiors14 eicitedby nicotine in these ice.

    This Reie ais to bridge the gap fro genes tocognition in the nderstanding of nicotine addiction, on

    the basis of the recent adances in the oecar bioogyof nAChRs and of ania odes ith odified nAChRgene expression.

    Nicotinic receptors

    Nicotine interacts ith a broad popation of nAChRhoopentaers and heteropentaers that are distribtedthroghot the PNS and CNS15. nAChRs are aostericebrane proteins that respond to ACh and nicotinicagonists by the fast opening (s to s range) of a cationicchanne that is pereabe to Na+, K+ and, in soe cases,Ca2+ ions4. In the PNS, nAChRs ediate the rapid, phasiceffects of oca, short-asting, high ACh ees. In the brain,fe exapes of fast transission are docented; bthere, nAChRs are aso the target of tonicay reeased AChin oer, odatory concentrations. Of key iportancefor the nderstanding of nicotine addiction, chronic expo-

    sre to ACh or nicotinic drgs cases a grada decreasein the rate of this ionic response (100 s to intes),eading to a high-affinity, desensitized, cosed state ofthe receptor3,4,16 and to additiona ong-ter changes inreceptor properties. It aso cases an pregation of thenber of high-affinity receptors in the brain17.

    nAChRs are transebrane oigoers consisting offie sbnits (FIG. 1) that rest, in aas, fro thecobinatoria asseby of different nAChR sbnitsencoded by 17 genes. Of these, nine genes encoding-sbnits and three encoding -sbnits are expressedin the brain. The arios nAChR sbnit cobinationsdiffer in their pharacoogica and kinetic properties4

    Collge de France and the

    Institut Pasteur CNRS URA

    2182, 25 rue du Dr Roux,

    75015 Paris, France.

    e-mail: [email protected]

    doi:10.1038/nrn2849

    Nicotine addiction and nicotinicreceptors: lessons from geneticallymodified mice

    Jean-Pierre Changeux

    Abstract | The past decades have seen a revolution in our understanding of brain diseases

    and in particular of drug addiction. This has been largely due to the identification of

    neurotransmitter receptors and the development of animal models, which together haveenabled the investigation of brain functions from the molecular to the cognitive level.

    Tobacco smoking, the principal yet avoidable cause of lung cancer is associated

    with nicotine addiction. Recent studies in mice involving deletion and replacement of

    nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits have begun to identify the molecular

    mechanisms underlying nicotine addiction and might offer new therapeutic strategies

    to treat this addiction.

    R E V I E W S

    NATuRE REvIEwS |NeuroscieNce vOlumE 11 | juNE 2010 |389

    20 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved10

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/28/2019 Changeux Et Al - Nicotine Receptors & Addiction, Genetically Modified Mice

    2/13

    |

    Extracellular

    Intracellular

    ACh ACh

    b

    Na+, K+, Ca2+

    N

    C

    a

    M1 M2 M3 M4

    4

    42

    2

    2

    42

    7

    77

    7

    7

    7c

    d

    HeteromericHomomeric

    and aso in their cear and sbcear ocaizationin the brain15. The to ain types of nAChRs in thebrain are the 7 hoo-oigoer, characterized by a fastactiation, a o affinity and a high Ca2+ pereabiity;and the 42 hetero-oigoer, hich is typified by ahigh affinity and so desensitization3,4. 2 sbnit-containing nAChRs (2*nAChRs) and 7*nAChRs areidey expressed in the brain15, hereas other nAChRsbnits hae a ore restricted expression (FIG. 2). Theexistence of seera fnctiona oigoers ith anysbnit types, different actie site interface profies andbrain distribtions15 has ade it diffict to ecidatethe oecar echanis of nicotine addiction4.

    CNS circuits in nicotine addiction

    many brain areas are inoed in nicotine addiction(FIG. 2). These incde the dopainergic nerons inthe entra tegenta area (vTA; nces A10) of the

    idbrain, hich proect to the prefronta cortex (PFC)and to ibic and striata strctres, in particar thences accbens6,17; and the extended aygdaa,the brain stress syste18, the hippocaps19, thehabeno-interpedncar syste20 and the prefronta(incding insar) cortex21. Fnctiona mRI stdieshae shon that acte nicotine inections in anaesthe-tized ice increase actiation in preibic, anteriorfronta, otor and soatosensory cortices, the ncesaccbens, vTA, sbstantia nigra and the thaas,bt not in the otor cortex and aygdaa22.

    Addiction is ieed as the end point of a series oftransitions23,24 that are characterized by a copsionto seek and ontariy take the drg oing to its rein-forcing effects; this eads to a oss of contro of intakesch that it becoes habita and tiatey copsie(BOX 1). when access to the drg is preented, a nega-tie state eerges that anifests in soatic and affectiesigns, refecting a otiationa ithdraa syndroe24.Addiction ths eerges as a chronic reapsing diseaseof the brain.

    Nicotine addiction differs fro other drg addictionsin that it has feer obios signs of the bingeintoxicationstage and a ess draatic ithdraa effect than, forexape, opioid or acoho addiction24. Nicotine sef-adinistration does not rest in a progressie escaationanifested by a copsiey increased drg intake24,25bt by a oderate change in a nicotine-rearded earn-ing process26. moreoer, there is itte eidence thatnicotine is absed in its pre for27.

    Behavioural effects of nAChR subunits

    To nderstand the effects of nicotine exposre thatead to addiction, hich are ediated by nAChRs, est exaine the roe of nAChR sbnits on beha-ior, earning and reard. The endogenos igand ofnAChRs is ACh; ths, deeting a particar nAChRsbnit ay affect the behaior of ice een in theabsence of nicotine.

    Contribution of nAChRs to cognition and locomotion.Nicotine and nicotinic agonists enhance cognitieand psychootor behaiors and, conersey, nico-tinic antagonists and oss of nAChRs ipair cognitieperforance2831. Hoeer, these findings hae beendebated and the behaiora conseqences of knock-ing ot specific nAChR sbnits hae therefore beeninestigated.

    mice acking the 2 nAChR sbnit (2/ ice)(FIG. 3) sho nora spatia orientation earning inthe ater aze5. By contrast, they do not sho thenicotine-indced eory enhanceent of an aoid-ance response to a id foot shock that is obseredin id-type anias5,9,32, indicating a contribtionof the 2 nAChR sbnit to the retention of aersieeory. In experients in hich to obects arepaced in an open fied, id-type ice progressieyincrease the nber of traectories beteen the toobects, hereas 2/ ice do not, indicating thatcognitie earning strategies inoing spatia e-ory ay aso reqire 2*nAChRs33. moreoer, in a

    Figure 1 | stt nAcr. a | Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are

    transmembrane oligomers consisting of five subunits. b | Each subunit consists of a large

    aminoterminal extracellular domain with an immunoglobulinlike sandwich, a

    transmembrane domain and a variable cytoplasmic domain. The extracellular domaincarries the acetylcholine (ACh)nicotine binding sites at the boundary between subunits.

    The number of binding sites per pentamer ranges, depending on its composition, from

    two (in muscle nAChRs or brain 42 nAChRs) to five (in the 7 homopentamer). Sites forallosteric modulators are located in the transmembrane domain. | The two main types

    of brain nAChRs are the 7 homooligomer, characterized by a fast activation, alow affinity and a high Ca2+ permeability, and the 42 heterooligomer, typified by ahigh affinity and slow desensitization3,4,146. In addition to the principal subunits (2, 3, 4and6) and complementary subunits (2 and 4) of the nAChR, other subunits (5 and3), the role of which has been recently reevaluated6,37,113, form part of the organizationof various heterooligomers. | Side view of an 7 nAChR pentamer model, showing fivenicotine molecules (dark grey) in the binding sites and the volume of the ion channel

    (dark blue). Parts a, and are reproduced, with permission, from ReF. 4 (2009)

    Macmillan Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

    R E V I E W S

    390 | juNE 2010 | vOlumE 11 www.nat.m/vw/n

    20 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved10

  • 7/28/2019 Changeux Et Al - Nicotine Receptors & Addiction, Genetically Modified Mice

    3/13

    |

    Prefrontal cortex:orbital, medial, cingulate and insula(executive control)

    Amygdala(emotions)

    427

    242452347

    424526236423

    4(5)24(5)62623

    347

    22 (IPN)4234 (HB)3347

    HBIPN(withdrawal signs)

    Hypothalamus Brain stem(stress symptoms)

    NAc shellcore(reinforcement) Dorsal striatum

    (habits)

    Hippocampus(contextual information)

    VTA

    SNpc

    LDTg PPTg

    42 42

    Residentintruder test

    A tst for social intraction and

    aggrssiv bhaviour in

    rodnts. An unfamiliar mous

    (th intrudr) is introducd

    into th cag of a mous that

    has bn kpt isolatd in its

    rsidnt cag for svral

    months.

    Navigation

    Spontanous locomotor

    bhaviour charactrizd by

    larg movmnts at fast spd,

    aimd at acquiring gnral

    information about th

    nvironmnt.

    Exploration

    Spontanous locomotor

    bhaviour charactrizd by

    small and slow movmnts,

    nabling mor prcis

    invstigation of thnvironmnt.

    Nigrostriatal pathway

    Th dopaminrgic pathway

    from th substantia nigra to th

    striatum, which is associatd

    with motor control.

    Mesolimbic pathway

    Th dopaminrgic pathway

    from th vntral tgmntal

    ara to th nuclus accumbns

    and limbic aras, which is

    associatd with rward

    procssing.

    rsidntintrudr tst, 2/ resident ice sho oreapproach behaior and attept feer escapes to stopthe interaction, sggesting that 2 nAChR sbnitshae a roe in socia interaction33.

    mose ocootor behaior as assessed in an openfied can be diided into navigation and xploration14,33.In 2/ ice10,33 the baance beteen these behaiorsis shifted in faor of naigation and their exporatory

    behaior is different fro that of id-type ice14,33.This indicates a roe of 2*nAChRs in exporation strat-egies and decision aking 14. Re-expression of the 2sbnit in the vTA by stereotaxic gene expression10,11

    restored exporatory behaior in an open fied ithotodifying naigation. Distinct nera echaniss thsnderie exporation and naigation.

    This dissociation as frther inestigated by ea-ating the contribtion of endogenos ACh acting on2*nAChRs in the ascending nigrostriatal pathway andmsolimbic pathway11. Re-expression of 2 sbnits inthe sbstantia nigra pars copacta (SNpc) of 2 / icerestored naigation bt not exporation to id-type

    ees; the opposite effect occrred hen 2 sbnitsere re-expressed in the vTA. Rests fro RNA sienc-ing experients ere consistent ith these findings 11.These data indicate a dissociation beteen the pstrea,choinergic, nAChR-ediated contro of the nigrostriatapathay and that of the esoibic pathay in regatingexporation and naigation11.

    mice acking the gene encoding the 4 sbnit, the

    principa partner of the 2 sbnit, hae nora baseineocootor actiity. Hoeer, copared ith id-typeice they sho a sstained increase in cocaine-eicitedocootor actiity and recoer ore qicky fronicotine-eicited ocootor sppression34. nAChRgain-of-fnction tations3,4 that rest in higherreceptor affinity and oss of desensitization of 4* and6*nAChRs case (in the absence of chronic nicotineexposre) increased ocootion and deficits in otorearning8,35. Ths, both the 4 sbnit and the 6 sb-nit contribte to spontaneos ocootor behaior12,hich as anticipated fro their association ith the 2sbnit in high-affinity oigoers3,4,15.

    Figure 2 | Nna manm nvv n ntn atn: a m. Many brain areas contain nicotinic

    acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunits and are involved in nicotine addiction. First, the somata of the dopaminergic

    neurons that contribute to nicotine intake and reinforcement are in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) of the midbrain: they

    project to the prefrontal cortex and to limbic areas, in particular the hippocampus and nucleus accumbens (NAc) in the

    striatum10,147149. These VTA neurons receive cholinergic innervation from the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg)

    and the adjacent laterodorsal tegmental nucleus (LDTg)150,151. Second, the emergence of a negative emotional state and

    withdrawal syndrome following smoking cessation or nicotine deprivation mobilizes distinct neural circuits that can

    include the extended amygdala and brain stress systems18, the hypothalamus, hippocampus19, substantia nigra pars

    compacta (SNpc), and/or the habenulainterpeduncular (HBIPN) system20. Third, the switch from voluntary nicotine useto compulsive drug use may represent a global topdown gating transition from control by a prefrontal (cortical and

    insular) global neuronal workspace (BOX 1) to subcortical (striatal) control21,82,130.

    R E V I E W S

    NATuRE REvIEwS |NeuroscieNce vOlumE 11 | juNE 2010 |391

    20 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved10

  • 7/28/2019 Changeux Et Al - Nicotine Receptors & Addiction, Genetically Modified Mice

    4/13

    Fear conditioning

    A form of larning in which an

    avrsiv stimulus (for xampl,

    an lctric shock) is associatd

    with a particular nutral

    contxt (for xampl, a room)

    or nutral stimulus (for

    xampl, a ton), rsulting in

    th xprssion of far

    rsponss to th originally

    nutral stimulus or contxt.

    Fractional anisotropy

    A paramtr in diffusion tnsor

    imaging, which imags brain

    structurs by masuring th

    diffusion proprtis of watr

    molculs. It provids

    information about th

    microstructural intgrity of

    th whit mattr.

    The 3 sbnit can assebe ith 6, 4 and 2sbnits in nigrostriata dopainergic pathays. miceacking the gene encoding the 3 sbnit sho ateredocootor actiity and prepse inhibition of the acos-tic starte response (both of hich are partiay regatedby dopainergic transission), spporting a roe for3*nAChRs in odating these behaiors36. Hoeer,behaiora changes eicited by nicotine hae not beentested in these ice.

    3/ ice sffer fro high perinata ortaity, hichipairs research on the effects of nicotine in these ice.Copared ith id-type ice, heterozygos 3+/ iceere partiay resistant to nicotine-eicited seizres bthad nora sensitiity to the hypo-ocootor effectsof 0.5 g per kg nicotine (possiby oing to partiaexpression of this sbnit in the heterozygos ice)37.

    mice acking 7 nAChRs38 sho nora contextaand far conditioning, spatia eory and anxiety39.Hoeer, in an attentiona task that reies on the integ-rity of the prefronta cortex (at east in rats40), 7/ iceere soer and ess efficient than their id-type it-

    terates41. moreoer, ice acking both the 7 and 2sbnits sho greater ipairent in passie aoidanceearning than 2/ ice42.

    In concsion, the aaiabe data fro ose std-ies are consistent ith a roe for actiation of 4*, 6*,2* and 7*nAChRs by endogenos ACh in ocootor

    behaior and cognitie fnction. The data nderine thecontribtion of these sbnits in ascending dopain-ergic pathays and aso in ore eaborate, top-dongating strategies inoing attentiona contro (BOX 1;FIG. 2). The contribtion of 3 and 3 sbnits to cog-nition and ocootion has been noted bt needs fr-ther inestigation, together ith that of the sti pooryinestigated 5 sbnit.

    Role of nAChR subunits in the rewarding effects of nicotine.The reinforcing effects of nicotine can be deonstratedin tests of oitiona nicotine sef-adinistration, hichcan be systeic (by intraenos infsion or introdctioninto the drinking ater43,44) or oca (by nicotine inectioninto the vTA10,45). when ice ere pried ith systeiccocaine sef-adinistration46 and cocaine as sbse-qenty sbstitted ith nicotine, id-type ice con-tined to sef-adinister nicotine, hereas 2/ ice didnot46,47. Drg-naie ice acking the 2, 4 and 6 sb-nits aso did not sef-adinister nicotine systeicay, btthis response as noraized hen these sbnits ere

    re-expressed in the vTA44. By contrast, deetion of the7 sbnit did not affect systeic sef-adinistration ofnicotine. when oca, intra-vTA sef-adinistration astested, ice acking the 2 sbnit again did not shonicotine sef-adinistration10. Re-expressing the genein the vTA noraized this behaior. In 4/ ice,

    Box 1 | Nicotine addiction and the global neuronal workspace

    Addiction is viewed as the end point of a series of transitions from initial voluntary drug use to the loss of conscious

    control over this behaviour. The neural correlates of consciousness have been the subject of abundant discussionand

    model building. In particular, the global neuronal workspace (GNW) model130 proposes that conscious information

    processing recruits networks of neurons with long-range axons that reciprocally connect distinct cortical areas,

    including the prefrontal, parietal, temporal and cingulate cortices130133. In the GNW model, the striatum, hippocampus

    and amygdala are under the top-down control of the prefrontal cortex (FIG. 2). According to this proposal, the GNW isengaged in decision-making and might therefore have a key role in the loss of control that characterizes the ultimate

    stage of nicotine addiction3.

    Patients with damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and people who are addicted to drugs of abuse show

    similar deficits in cognitive behaviour21. In addition, smokers with brain damage involving the insula undergo a

    disruption of smoking addiction and are more likely to quit smoking than smokers with brain damage not involving the

    insula134, an observation corroborated by a study in rats135. The insula sends excitatory projections to the nucleus

    accumbens and acts in concert with regions that are involved in maintaining specific goals, such as the dorsolateral

    prefrontal cortex136. Activation by nicotine might therefore influence the GNW, subverting decision-making to seek and

    procure drugs134 and thereby hijacking the cognitive functions exerting inhibitory control to resist drug use21.

    Consistent with this possibility, repeated high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral

    prefrontal cortex combined with either smoking-related or neutral cues reduced cigarette consumption and nicotine

    dependence. Furthermore, this treatment blocked the craving induced by daily presentation of smoking-related

    pictures137.

    Relevant to a possible effect of chronic drug use on the GNW, diffusion tensor imaging studies have shown reduced

    frontal white matter integrity in people who show cocaine dependence138 or abuse heroin139. The same method has

    revealed that prenatal and adolescent exposure to tobacco smoke alters the development of the microstructure of the

    white matter, with increased fractionalanisotropy in right and left frontal regions and in the genu of the corpus

    callosum140. These observations suggested that nicotine might directly act on white matter. There is electrophysiological

    evidence supporting a direct action of nicotine on axon conduction, possibly at the level of the node of Ranvier80,141,142.

    Moreover, low levels of nicotine applied to thalamocortical axons in slice preparations enhance prefrontal cortical

    activity80,143. These observations support a direct control of the GNW by nicotine at the white matter level and are

    consistent with the expression of functional nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on prefrontal cortical neurons79. The

    observations also support the proposal that a gating circuit modulates, in a top-down manner, the nicotine-elicited

    activation of the reward system involving the ventral tegmental area101(FIG. 2), which is engaged in the volitional

    consumption of nicotine. According to the GNW model, a functional relationship becomes established between nicotine

    self-administration and the noradrenaline- and hypocretin-regulated state of awareness144,145, which is a prerequisite for

    the self-discipline of conscious behaviour.

    R E V I E W S

    392 | juNE 2010 | vOlumE 11 www.nat.m/vw/n

    20 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved10

  • 7/28/2019 Changeux Et Al - Nicotine Receptors & Addiction, Genetically Modified Mice

    5/13

    |

    FLAP XhoI NheI SalI BstBI

    2 IRES2 EGFP WPRE 3-LTR

    U31 kb

    5-LTR

    Genomic RNApackaging system

    Central polypurine tract Central termination sequence(cPPT)

    Rev responseelement

    Gene ofinterestPromoter

    PGK

    Gene cluster

    A group of nighbouring gns

    on a chromosom.

    Conditioned place

    preference taskA tst for nicotin addiction

    potntial in which th mous

    rcivs a dos of nicotin in a

    distinct nvironmnt, aftr

    which th amount of tim th

    mous spnds in that

    nvironmnt is assssd.

    Nicotine discrimination

    Th ability of mic to

    discriminat nicotin from

    salin using a two-bar oprant

    procdur with a tandm

    schdul of food

    rinforcmnt.

    intra-vTA sef-adinistration initiay increased andthen decreased, and re-expression of the 4 sbnit in thevTA noraized sef-adinistration. Deetion of the 6sbnit had no significant effect on intracrania nicotinesef-adinistration14. Ths, 42* and 62*nAChRs,bt not7*nAChRs, are necessary and sfficient forsysteic nicotine reinforceent in drg-naie ice44;in intra-vTA sef-adinistration, the 6 sbnit hasno aor roe bt the 4 sbnit is reqired, togetherith the 2 sbnit, for ong-ter sef-adinistrationbehaior.

    By contrast, deetion of 5 sbnits or oerexpressionof 4 sbnits enhanced nicotine sef-adinistration48,49,

    sggesting a odatory action of these sbnits onnicotine reard pathays. Interestingy, the 5 sbnitis abndanty expressed in dopainergic nerons50.moreoer,the gene encoding this and the 3and 4sbnits for a gn clustr that has been associated ingenoe-ide association stdies ith ng cancer. Thegenes encoding the 3 and 6 sbnits aso for a genecster that has been associated ith nicotine dependence(see Sppeentary inforation S1 (box)).

    The rearding effects of nicotine can aso be testedin the conditiond plac prfrnc task, in hich a doseof nicotine is paired ith a distinct enironenta ce.

    mice acking the 2 sbnit did not sho nicotine-conditioned pace preference or nicotin discrimination,hereas 7/ ice did51,52. Knock-in ice expressinghypersensitie, high-affinity 4-containing receptors dis-payed conditioned pace preference ith nicotine con-centrations 50-fod oer than id-type ice8. This testaso shoed that the 6 sbnit has a roe in ediatingthe rearding effects of nicotine53.

    Oera, these obserations proide eidence thatnAChRs containing 4,2 and to soe extent 5, 6and 4 sbnits ediate the rearding effects of nico-tine8,46, hereas the roe of the 7 sbnit is ess cear(hoeer, see ReF. 54).

    Physiological effects of nAChR subunits

    Differential effects of nAChR subunits on neural activityin the VTA. Becase the dopainergic syste of the vTAediates the reinforcing effects of nicotine55,56, nicotineis expected to odate firing of these dopainergicnerons. varios nAChR oigoers are indeed expressedon the GABA (-ainobtyric acid)-containinginternerons in the vTA, on excitatory or inhibitoryinpts to the vTA57 and on dopainergic vTA nerons.Dopainergic vTA nerons express nAChR oigoersith arios sbnit copositions (FIG. 4), the distrib-tion of hich ay differ in the soatodendritic andaxona copartents15.

    Singe-ce recordings of vTA dopainergic neronsreea to nerona firing rhyths in vivo, hich occrboth spontaneosy and in the presence of nicotine: aso, regar singe-spike firing and a brsting ode58,59

    (FIG. 5). The brst-firing ode cases a sbstantiayarger dopaine reease than regar spiking and greateractiation of iediate eary genes in the target areas ofthe dopainergic nerons60,61. The transition fro reg-ar (tonic) firing to brsting (phasic) actiity has beenassociated ith receiing reard-predicting stii andnpredicted reards62. Brst firing is absent in idbrainsice preparations (hich ack afferent fibres)63, indicat-

    ing that it depends on the inpt to the dopainergicnerons, incding gtaatergic afferents originatingin part fro the PFC, and choinergic and gtaater-gic inpt fro the tegenta pedncopontine ncesand the aterodorsa tegenta nces, respectiey58,64,65

    (FIG. 4). A coser anaysis of the firing patterns of vTAdopainergic nerons13 reeas for odes of spon-taneos firing in id-type anaesthetized ice: first, ao-freqency, regar firing ode ithot brsting(o freqency, o brsting); second, a o-freqencyfiring ode ith abndant brsts (o freqency, highbrsting); third, a high-freqency firing ode ithfe brsting eents (high freqency, o brsting); and

    Figure 3 | Mt 2 bnt gn -xpn ng a ntva vt.The lentiviral expression vector contains a

    bicistronic cassette that simultaneously expresses the 2 subunit and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) to enabledetection of transduced cells. Vectors were based on the construct termed pTRIPU3 from which the elongation factor 1(EF1) promoter was removed. The mouse phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) promoter was amplified by PCR and inserted intothe plasmid, with the restriction sites EcoRI andBamHI upstream and downstream of the PGK promoter, respectively. To

    create the 2internal ribosome entry site 2 (IRES2)EGFP construct, a newSalI restriction site was created 3 to the EGFPstop codon in the pIRES2EGFP expression plasmid by mutagenesis, and a newXhoI restriction site was created downstream

    of theNheI restriction site. The wildtype mouse 2 subunit was then ligated between theXhoINheI sites of pIRES2EGFP.The2IRES2EGFP construct was then ligated into the pTRIPU3PGK vector usingXhoISalI sites. Finally, the WPRE(Woodchuck hepatitis posttranscriptional regulatory element) sequence was added using SalIBstBI sites. LTR, long terminal

    repeat. Figure is modified, with permission, from ReF. 10 (2005) Macmillan Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

    R E V I E W S

    NATuRE REvIEwS |NeuroscieNce vOlumE 11 | juNE 2010 |393

    20 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved10

    http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v11/n6/suppinfo/nrn2849.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v11/n6/suppinfo/nrn2849.html
  • 7/28/2019 Changeux Et Al - Nicotine Receptors & Addiction, Genetically Modified Mice

    6/13

    |

    NAc

    VTA

    LDTgPPTg

    Glu GABA

    GABA

    462(3)4(5)262

    42

    42

    42

    42

    42

    7

    7

    4(5)24(5)6262(3)(34)7

    ACh

    AChDA

    PFCPPTg

    forth, a ode ith high-freqency firing and anybrsts (high freqency, high brsting) (FIG. 5). Thecontribtion of the arios nAChR sbnits to thesepatterns hae been inestigated in tant ice.

    In vTA dopainergic nerons of 2/ ice, onythe o-freqency, o-brsting ode persisted (FIG. 5),hereas those of 7/ ice shoed ony the high-freqency, high-brsting ode. This sggests thathigh-freqency, high-brst firing reqire the actia-tion of 2* bt not 7*nAChRs. In id-type ice, anintraenos inection of nicotine cased a fast and ss-tained (~10 in) increase in firing freqency in vTAdopainergic nerons. This response as aboishedin 2/ ice46 and restored by entiira re-expressionof 2 sbnits in the vTA10; hoeer, this effect didnot persist for ore than 2 in10. This sggests thatthe sstained firing of dopainergic nerons in thevTA aso depends on the presence of 2*nAChRs inexcitatory strctres proecting to the vTA, sch asgtaate-containing nerons fro the prefronta cor-tex or ponto-tegenta afferents (FIG. 4). In 7/ ice,intraenos nicotine inections cased a arge and rapid

    increase in the firing rate of dopainergic nerons13 thatas short-asting and fooed by a patea at a sightyoer firing rate (copared ith the initia increase).This sggests that the absence of 7*nAChR-ediatedgtaatergic excitation nasks an inhibitory effect ofGABAergic nerons (hich do not contain 7*nAChRs)(FIG. 4). The data ipy that a concoitant actiationof 7* and 2*nAChRs ay be necessary for the fexpression of eents eading to nicotine reinforceent,ith 2*nAChRs sitching nerons fro a resting to anexcited state (goba, tonic regation), and 7*nAChRsfiney tning this state after 2*nAChRs hae beenactiated13.

    Intraenos nicotine inections in 4/ ice66 casedan increase in the firing rate in the vTA that as oerthan in id-type ice, ithot affecting the eanbrsting actiity. By contrast, intraenos nicotineinections cased a siiar response in vTA neronsof 6/ ice and id-type ice. As the spontaneosactiity of vTA nerons of 4/ and 6/ ice assiiar to that of id-type ice, these findings indicatethat the 4 sbnit, bt not the 6 sbnit, is reqiredfor the transition fro tonic to phasic firing that iscrcia for reinforceent14,66 (in particar, in response toreard-predicting stii and npredicted reards62).

    As discssed aboe, the brsting actiity of vTAdopainergic nerons enhances dopaine reease in thestriat (FIG. 4). Tonic ACh reease fro striata choin-ergic (excitatory) internerons is thoght to controdopaine reease in the striat by actiating presyn-aptic nAChRs on the dopainergic terinas6770(FIG. 4).According to one hypothesis71, contined exposre tonicotine desensitizes these nAChRs and so enhances stri-ata dopaine reease fro brsts6770, casing faciitation

    of dopaine-dependent reinforceent. In brain sices ofice acking the 6 or the 4 sbnit, dopaine reeasein the nces accbens is not odified by nicotineappication, in contrast to id-type brain sices, shoingthat both 6* and 4*nAChRs hae a key roe in the con-tro of striata dopaine reease by ACh or nicotine inthe nces accbens70. By faoring dopaine reeasefro brsts hie depressing dopaine reease frotonic signas, nicotine acting on 46*nAChRs effec-tiey increases the signa-to-noise ratio of reard-reatedbrst actiity aong dopaine afferents72.

    The precise roes of 4 and 6sbnits in nicotinereinforceent ight depend on the differentia ceardistribtion of the fnctiona 4* and 6*nAChRs invTA dopainergic nerons (the 2 sbnit being nec-essary for both 4* and 6*nAChR actiation). Ths,462*nAChRs ight be preferentiay expressed onthe axon terinating in the nces accbens, ith42*nAChRs reaining in the soa. Hoeer, this hassti to be confired experientay.

    Athogh nicotine targets nAChRs on both dopain-ergic and GABAergic nerons in the vTA (FIG. 4),it is ncear hich of the to neron types is oreiportant for ediating the effects of nicotine ondopaine reease in the nces accbens. In a stdyon brain sices73, nicotine appication cased a robstincrease in inhibitory postsynaptic crrent (IPSC)

    freqency in dopainergic nerons of the vTA,hich as fooed by a decrease to beo baseineafter the reoa of nicotine. This effect as redcedby bocking 7*nAChRs, and copetey aboished bybocking non-7*nAChRs. The athors73 proposedthat the nicotine-eicited increase in IPSC freqencyas de to actiation of 42*nAChRs on GABAergicnerons (FIG. 4) rather than actiation of nAChRs ondopainergic nerons. As nicotine is knon to haean oera stiatory action on dopainergic ne-rons, the athors frther proposed that the transientnicotine-eicited increase in GABA transission todopainergic nerons is fooed by a desensitization

    Figure 4 | nAcr bnt nt t ant an nt nntvty

    pamng nn m t VTA. Dopaminergic neurons (DA; shown in red) in the

    ventral tegmental area (VTA) receive two main types of excitatory inputs. First, from

    cholinergic neurons (shown in blue) of the laterodorsal tegmental nucleus (LDTg) and

    pedunculopontine nucleus (PPTg); and second, from glutamatergic neurons (shown in

    green) of various sources, including the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the PPTg.

    Dopaminergic neurons also receive inhibitory input from GABA (aminobutyric acid)ergicneurons (shown in yellow) and send axonal projections to the nucleus accumbens (NAc),

    where they receive inputs from intrinsic cholinergic interneurons (shown in blue).Behavioural and physiological studies with genetically modified mice are revealing the role

    of the indicated nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunits in nicotine reward.

    R E V I E W S

    394 | juNE 2010 | vOlumE 11 www.nat.m/vw/n

    20 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved10

  • 7/28/2019 Changeux Et Al - Nicotine Receptors & Addiction, Genetically Modified Mice

    7/13

    0

    0 2 4 6 8 10

    0 2 4 6 8 100 2 4 6 8 10

    |

    1 mV

    1 sec

    LFHB

    LFHB

    HFLBLFLB

    100

    20

    40

    60

    80

    0

    100

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    Spikeinburst(%)

    Spikeinburst(%)

    Spikeinburst(%)

    2/

    WT

    VTA Vec

    HFHB

    Mean frequency (Hz)

    Mean frequency (Hz)Mean frequency (Hz)

    LFLB

    LFLBHFLB

    a b

    c d

    Spike timing-dependentplasticity

    A form of plasticity that rsults

    from functional changs in

    nurons and/or synapss and

    that dpnds on th prcis

    timing of action potntials in

    connctd nurons.

    Giant depolarizing

    potentials

    An arly typ of lctrical

    activity that ariss in th

    cours of dvlopmnt and is

    probably du to xcitatory

    actions of GABA.

    of the 42*nAChRs, reoing the tonic choinergicdrie to GABAergic nerons and thereby disinhibitingdopainergic nerons73.

    Conersey, in vivo stdies hae ephasized theiportance of 2*nAChRs on vTA dopainergic ne-rons in ediating the effect of nicotine. Intraenosinection of nicotine cased a fast, teporary bt robstincrease in the firing rate and brsting of these nerons13.This effect as aboished in 2/ ice10,46 and redcedin apitde and dration in 7/ ice. It as proposedthat nicotine acting on 2*nAChRs on dopainergicnerons cases a sitch fro a resting to an excitedstate of these ces, ith a ess iportant contribtion

    fro 7*nAChRs.The differences of interpretation of the in vitro and

    in vivo experients regarding the roe in reinforce-ent of nAChRs on GABAergic erss dopainergicnerons, respectiey, can be addressed sing a en-tiira syste to contro nAChR sbnit expressionspecificay in dopainergic or GABAergic nerons74.Preiinaryin vivo rests sho that 2/ ice inhich the 2 sbnit is excsiey re-expressed indopainergic nerons of the vTA actiey, thoghtransienty, sef-adinister nicotine75; this findingis consistent ith the proposa of the in vivo stdydescribed aboe13.

    Physiological effects in other brain areas. Nicotine affectsattention and cognitie perforance in rodents, priatesand hans76,77, sggesting that the edia prefrontacortex (PFC) ight be a target of nicotine. Indeed, 2*and 7*nAChRs are expressed in the ose PFC5,15,78, andiontophoretic appication of nicotinic agonists to pyrai-da ces in ayers IIIII of the rat preibic area od-ates excitatory synaptic transission79. Aso, gtaatereease fro ayer v pyraida nerons in response tonicotine appied to thaaocortica inpt nerons is abo-ished in 2/ice, deonstrating a contribtion of thissbnit to inforation processing in the PFC80.

    In sice preparations of ose PFC, spik timing-dpndntplasticity (STDP) can be eicited by pairing stiation ofthe excitatory inpts to pyraida nerons of PFC ayer vith postsynaptic spikes81. Nicotine increases the thresh-od for STDP, eiinating ong-ter potentiation (lTP)and casing synaptic depression of the excitatory inpts tothese ces. This inhibitory effect of nicotine sees to con-tradict the knon cognitie-enhancing effect of nicotine(see ReF. 81for a discssion), bt cod be expained by the

    absence of certain featres ofin situ inforation processingin cortica sices13,63.

    The PFC, aygdaa and hippocaps proidegtaatergic inpt to nerons in the nces accbens,hich are aso regated by dopainergic nerons inthe vTA (FIG. 2). The conergence of these inpts in thences accbens is thoght to be the nera basis ofa top-don contro, or gating fnction, of attention onnera processes82(BOX 1). Here, I briefy reie the roeof nAChRs in seera coponents of this circit.

    Sitaneos extracear recordings of neronaactiity in the PFC, entra hippocaps and ncesaccbens in anaesthetized rats reea that the PFC isreqired for the actiation of the nces accbens bythe entra hippocaps83. Seera nAChR oigoers areexpressed in GABAergic and gtaatergic hippocapanerons. Nicotine enhances seera types of hippoca-ps-dependent earning and odates the indctionof lTP84, the ptatie cear sbstrate of earning andeory. Specificay, nicotine eicits lTP at hippoca-pa synapses throgh 7* and/or 42*nAChRs85 andpregates 4*nAChR ees in gtaate afferentsand GABAergic internerons86. At birth, ost hippo-capa gtaatergic synapses are iatre and fnc-tionay sient, bt they can be conerted presynapticayinto condctie synapses by a brief appication of nico-tine at iatre Schaffer coateraCA1 connections87.

    Stdies ith 7/ and 2/ ice shoed that 7* and2*nAChRs are sfficient to odate nicotine-eicitedincreases in the freqency of spontaneosy occrringgiant dpolarizing potntials88. Recordings fro freey o-ing ice frther shoed that nicotine-eicited dopainesignaing in the hippocaps as necessary for lTP atentorhinadentate gyrs synapses89.

    GABAergic internerons in the hippocapa stra-t oriensaes express 2 RNA90,91. Interestingy,2*nAChRs do not desensitize in response to nicotineexposre, and continos exposre to nicotine restsin sstained actiation of 2*nAChRs and contin-os discharge of these internerons92. This raises the

    Figure 5 | r nAcr bnt n pntan p ng an bt ng n

    VTA pamng nn. a | Sample traces showing two types of neuronal firing by

    dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA): singlespike, regular firing (top)

    and burst firing (bottom). A typical burst starts with a short interval (< 80 ms) and ends with

    a long interval (> 160 ms). b |Mean firing frequency is plotted against the percentage of

    spikes that are within a burst for individual cells of wildtype (WT) mice (b),2/ mice (),and in 2/ mice after reexpression of2 subunits in the VTA using a lentiviral vector (Vec)(). Four main groups of cells can be distinguished: highfiring, highbursting (HFHB) cells;

    lowfiring, highbursting (LFHB) cells; highfiring, lowbursting (HFLB) cells; and lowfiring,

    lowbursting (LFLB) cells. VTA neurons from2/ mice show only LFLB activity, whereasreexpressing the subunit in the VTA restores HFLB and LFHB activity. Figure is reproduced,

    with permission, from ReF. 13 (2006) Cell Press.

    R E V I E W S

    NATuRE REvIEwS |NeuroscieNce vOlumE 11 | juNE 2010 |395

    20 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved10

  • 7/28/2019 Changeux Et Al - Nicotine Receptors & Addiction, Genetically Modified Mice

    8/13

    |

    VTA

    NAc

    IFBNST

    Chronic nicotine exposure

    Increased glutamate output

    Increased dopaminergicneuron bursting activity

    Increased dopaminergicneuron activity

    Increased dopamineneuron activity

    42*nAChR upregulation

    Presynaptic 2*nAChRdownregulation

    Increased presynaptic7*nAChR transmission

    Increaseddopamine releasea

    c

    b

    Intracranial electrical

    self-stimulation

    A procdur in which rats work

    (for xampl, prssing a lvr)

    to obtain rwarding lctrical

    slf-stimulation through an

    lctrod implantd in th

    brains rward systm. It is

    usd to masur th snsitivity

    of th brain rward systm

    in vivo.

    possibiity that odation of 2*nAChRs throghinhibitory internerons in the hippocaps contribtesto the oera circit. In concsion, 2, 4, 7 and 2nAChR sbnits contribte to the effect of nicotine onhippocapa synaptic pasticity.

    Nicotine affects the entra hippocaps-to-accbens pathay. Preiinary findings in ice sg-gest that the pattern of phasic brsting actiity in thences accbens and the degree of hippocapsaccbens coherence are affected by nicotine andthat the atered patterns of actiity can persist ongafter nicotine has been reoed fro the syste93.This sggests a possibe echanis by hich nicotineaffects the concerted action of the nces accbensand the hippocaps throgh the top-don, gatingcontro of the so-caed goba nerona orkspace(BOX 1). Co-ctres of entra hippocaps ne-rons fro 7/ ice and nces accbens neronsfro id-type ice hae recenty deonstrated thecontribtion of the 7*nAChR to the hippocaps-to- accbens pathay. These ongoing experients

    reea that 7*nAChRs are reqired to conert thetransient effects of nicotine that are obsered in thispreparation into ong-asting changes in synaptictransission94.

    Both 7* and 2*nAChRs are expressed in the basaand atera aygdaa ncei95,96. A singe, o-doseadinistration of nicotine to ose basoatera ayg-daa sices eicits ong-asting faciitation of gtaa-tergic transission at cortico-aygdaa connections97.Pharacoogica stdies in id-type and 7/ icefrther reea that, in the basoatera aygdaa, actia-tion of presynaptic nAChRs containing the 7 sbnit(together ith non-7*nAChRs) faciitates gtaater-gic transission in an actiity-dependent anner 97. Bycontroing nerona actiity in the aygdaa, hich is abrain region knon to hae a roe in contexta earning(for exape, of soking-reated ces), nicotine cododate an iportant aspect of nicotine addiction76.

    In sary, gene deetion and re-expression stdieshae reeaed distinct contribtions of 4, 6, 7 and2 sbnits (and possiby the sti argey nexpored 3,5and4sbnits) to the short-ter effects of nico-tine on the physioogy of dopainergic nerons in thevTA erss the SNpc, as e as on dopainergic erssGABAergic nerons in the vTA. moreoer, the stdies

    hae distingished the roes of these nAChR sbnits inthe acte behaiora effects of nicotine, as anifestedby cognitie behaiors and nicotine sef-adinistration,for exape. There is aso eidence that acte nicotineexposre ight infence (throgh actiation of 42*and 7*nAChRs) a goba gating circit that incdesthe striat, hippocaps and aygdaa, nder thetop-don contro of the PFC (BOX 1).

    Effects of chronic nicotine exposure

    Chronic nicotine exposre aters brain reard sys-tes. It increases dopaine reease in the ncesaccbens55,98100, and stdies in rats reeaed that

    oitionay consed (bt not pass iey adinis-tered) nicotine oers the threshod ofintracranial lc-trical slf-stimulation for seera eeks25. At the cearee, nicotine sef-adinistration for 2 onths caseshyperactiity of dopainergic nerons in the vTA101.Together, these obserations indicate that sef-adin-istered nicotine resets dopaine reard circits andincreases their sensitiity to sbseqent exposres tonicotine (sensitization). This sees to be niqeto nicotine, as other drgs of abse case decreased sen-sitiity of these circits25,26. Sensitization is thoght to bea key step in the process eading to addiction, and seeraines of research hae expored the oecar echanissnderying this effect (FIG. 6).

    Upregulation of VTA nAChRs. A possibe echanisfor sensitization inoes an pregation of high-affinitybrain nAChRs (osty 42-containing oigoers)indced by ong-ter exposre to nicotine17,102,103. Thispregation is de to post-transcriptiona echanissthat incde an increase in receptor sbnit asseby andconforationa atration of the oigoer104,105 acco-panied by strctra changes17. There is soe eidencethat the pregationhas a roe in the increased ocootoractiity and brain reard responses associated ith theeary stages of chronic nicotine exposre98100. BockingnAChRs in the vTA (bt not in the nces accbens)

    Figure 6 | Pb manm t- t ng-tm ang a by nntn xp. Chronic nicotine exposure alters the sensitivity of dopaminergic

    reward circuits. Several molecular mechanisms have been proposed to underlie this

    sensitization.a | Upregulation of highaffinity nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs),

    mostly 42containing (42*) oligomers, in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) or onmidbrain dopaminergic and GABA (aminobutyric acid)ergic neurons. b | Changes incholinergic transmission (mediated by 2* and 7*nAChRs) in brain circuits at thepresynaptic level. It is possible that chronic nicotine exposure causes a downregulation

    of2*nAChRs (possibly following an initial upregulation), followed by an enhanced7*nAChRmediated cholinergic transmission. The brain locus of this process is stilluncertain. | Topdown enhancement of bursting of VTA neurons. Potentiation of activity

    in anterior regions of the brain (infralimbic cortex (IF) and bed nucleus of the stria

    terminalis (BNST)) induced by chronic nicotine exposure would increase the bursting

    activity of dopaminergic neurons by enhancing glutamatergic input to the VTA.

    R E V I E W S

    396 | juNE 2010 | vOlumE 11 www.nat.m/vw/n

    20 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved10

  • 7/28/2019 Changeux Et Al - Nicotine Receptors & Addiction, Genetically Modified Mice

    9/13

    inhibits ong-ter ocootor hyperactiity in ice, andoderate exposre to the sae nAChR antagonists pro-dces a transient nAChR pregation in the vTA bt notin the nces accbens17,106. Hoeer, there is a co-pex reationship (graphicay represented as an inertedu shape) beteen systeic nicotine concentrationsand effects on lTP and behaior107. This reationshipcan be expained by the initia enhanced actiity (that is,pregation) of nAChRs by nicotine, fooed by desen-sitization, particary at high nicotine concentrations107.upregation of nAChRs ay therefore contribte to aneary step in a seqence of oecar and cear eentsthat tiatey rest in enhanced reard responses tonicotine fooing chronic nicotine exposre17,108.

    Chronic nicotine exposre ay aso affect nAChRson both idbrain dopainergic and GABAergic ne-rons, athogh possiby in a different anner86. Directhoe-ce patch-cap recordings sho that passiechronic nicotine adinistration increases the baseinefiring rate and the excitatory effect of actey adinis-tered nicotine on GABAergic nerons in the sbstantia

    nigra pars reticata, bt decreases these easres indopainergic nerons86. It is possibe that the preg-ation of nAChRs on GABAergic nerons rests in anenhanced inhibition of idbrain dopainergic ne-rons102. Chronic exposre to nicotine od then restin an enhanced inhibition rather than a sensitization of idbrain dopainergic nerons, ediated bynAChRs on GABAergic nerons (FIG. 4). The potentiacontribtion of sch a process to the effects of chronicnicotine can no be eaated sing differentia expres-sion of genes encoding nAChR sbnits in dopainergic

    erss GABAergic nerons74.

    Opposing contribution of7* and2*nAChR-mediatedprocesses. A second possibe echanis of sensitizationinoes changes in choinergic transission in braincircits at the presynaptic ee. In 2/ ice, passieong-ter nicotine treatent noraized the ateredfiring patterns of vTA dopainergic nerons and theexporatory deficit obsered in nicotine-naie 2/ice.Hoeer, it did not case an pregation of hetero-eric non-2*nAChRs nor of hooeric 7*nAChRsin the brain, sggesting a presynaptic effect109. moreoer,chronic nicotine treatent of 2/ ice noraized theincreased density of presynaptic, high-affinity choineptake sites that is seen in treatent-naie 2/ ice,particary in the cadate ptaen109. most of these

    restoratie effects ere bocked by the 7*nAChRinhibitor ethyycaconitine (mlA), consistent ith apresynaptic ateration at the ee of tonic, 7-ediatedchoinergic transission. Indeed, the phenotype ofid-type ice exposed to chronic nicotine and ith7*nAChRs pharacoogicay bocked as siiar tothat of 2/ ice. Ths, 2* and 7*nAChRs differen-tiay contribte to the ong-ter changes that acco-pany chronic nicotine exposre109: chronic nicotineprobaby cases a donregation of 2*nAChRs (pos-siby fooing an initia pregation), resting in anenhanced 7-ediated choinergic transission, thebrain ocs of hich is sti ncertain.

    Recent stdies on the effects of ong-ter actienicotine sef-adinistration (throgh the drinkingater) in 2/ and 7/ ice confired this proposedechanis54. Initiay, 2/ ice, bt not 7/ ice,shoed decreased nicotine consption reatie toid-type ice. Hoeer, after approxiatey 3 eeksof nicotine access, the 2/ ice retrned to id-typeees of nicotine consption, hereas the 7/ icecontined to sho decreased nicotine consption54.These data sggest that, fooing chronic nicotineexposre in id-type ice, there is a fnctiona ba-ance beteen opposing processes ediated by differentnAChR sbtypes, ith the decreased contribtion of2*nAChR-ediated processes being copensated for,in the ong-ter, by 7-ediated synaptic processes atthe ee of ACh reease109,110.

    Top-down enhanced bursting of VTA neurons. A thirdpossibe echanis for sensitization has recenty beensggestedon the basis ofin vivorecordings in the rat dringong-ter exposre to nicotine in an actie sef-adin-

    istration paradig101. Exposre to sef-adinisterednicotine potentiated the actiity of dopainergic ne-rons in the vTA, anifested by an increase in brst-ing actiity101. This potentiation did not, accordingto the athors, rest fro a direct action of nicotine onthe nAChRs expressed on dopainergic nerons, btfro the potentiation of anterior regions of the brain(infraibic cortex and bed nces of the stria teri-nais), hich are inoed in the oitiona aspect ofnicotine consption. This potentiation od thenincrease, in a top-don anner (BOX 1), the brstingactiity of dopainergic nerons by enhancing gta-atergic inpt to the vTA111(FIG. 4). According to theathors, this echanis, hich inoes enhancedbrsting actiity (discssed aboe), can accont for theeffects of ong-ter sef adinistration of nicotine infreey behaing rats101.

    In sary, the key step in nicotine addiction thatrests in the atered response to nicotine associated ithrepeated adinistration reains insfficienty expored,and a singe e-defined echanis is therefore ack-ing. methods and odes26 are aaiabe to distingish or specify the reatie contribtions of the ong-ter, direct effects of nicotine on nAChRs in the reardsystes fro the top-don regation of nicotineconsption by higher brain centres.

    nAChRs in nicotine withdrawal symptomsThe ithdraa syndroe that accopanies sokingcessation after chronic tobacco se is one of the factorsthat precdes sccess in qitting112. In hans, thisincdes soatic syptos sch as bradycardia, gas-trointestina discofort and increased appetite acco-panied by eight gain; and affectie syptos sch asirritabiity, anxiety, depressed ood, difficty concen-trating, disrpted cognition and nicotine craing112,113.In rodent odes, rearing, ping, shaking, abdoinaconstrictions, cheing, scratching, facia treor, hyper-agesia and a change in ocootor actiity are consideredsoatic ithdraa syptos, hereas affectie signs

    R E V I E W S

    NATuRE REvIEwS |NeuroscieNce vOlumE 11 | juNE 2010 |397

    20 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved10

  • 7/28/2019 Changeux Et Al - Nicotine Receptors & Addiction, Genetically Modified Mice

    10/13

    |

    7 2

    2, (4), 5, 4

    Thalamus

    LC (noradrenaline)6

    Raphe nucleus(serotonin)

    IPN2, 52

    VTA(dopamine)

    7 2

    Affective withdrawal symptoms 6, 2

    Somatic withdrawal symptoms 2, 5, 7, 4

    MHbLHb

    Limbic system

    Basal ganglia

    Medial habenula

    Contextual fear conditioning

    A bhavourial tst in which an

    avrsiv stimulus is givn to

    an animal in a conditioning

    chambr, such that th farrspons can subsquntly b

    licitd in th conditioning

    chambr in th absnc of th

    avrsiv stimulus.

    Conditioned place aversion

    A form of classical Pavlovian

    conditioning in which an animal

    larns to avoid a compartmnt

    that was prviously paird with

    an avrsiv stimulus; for

    xampl, th avrsiv stimulus

    can b th ngativ affctiv

    stat causd by nicotin

    withdrawal.

    incde anxiety-ike behaiors, eeated reard thresh-ods, ithdraa-indced contxtual far conditioningand ithdraa-indced conditiond plac avrsion113,114

    (FIG. 7). The receptor-ediated echaniss ndery-ing nicotine ithdraa can be stdied in anias inhich nicotine ithdraa syptos are eicited bynAChR antagonists115, and in ice acking specificsbnits of the nAChR113,116118. Iportanty, 3, 5,6 and 4 sbnits are predoinanty expressed in thehabenainterpedncar pathays, hereas 2* and7*nAChRs are idey expressed15(FIG. 2).

    Soatic ithdraa signs cased by the nAChRantagonist ecayaine fooing chronic nicotineexposre ere siiar in id-type and 2/ ice113,118bt ere ess eident in 2/, 5/, 7/ and 4/ice113,116,117,119. Affectie ithdraa signs are ediatedby different nAChR sbnits, as id-type ice and5/ and 7/ ice shoed ithdraa-eicited anxiety-ike behaior and conditioned pace aersion, bt 2/ice did not113. Frtherore, 7/ ice shoed siiarchanges in fear conditioning to id-type ice ndergo-ing nicotine ithdraa; these changes ere redced in2/ ice120.

    6*nAChRs are inoed in the affectieanxiety-ike ithdraa signs, bt not in physica ithdraasigns53. The 6*nAChRs are ocated in the vTA and theocs coeres, here they odate noradrenaine

    reease121,122. The contribtion of 6*nAChRs in the vTAto nicotine reard is e estabished, bt it is possibethat, in parae, 6*nAChRs in the ocs coeres ightcontribte to the regation of nicotine ithdraa53.

    There is abndant expression of the 4 sbnitin the edia habena and of the 2 and 5 sbnits inthe interpedncar nces20,119, hich is connected to thehabena throgh the fascics retrofexs. In icechronicay treated ith nicotine, ecayaine casedsoatic ithdraa syptos hen icroinected intothe habena or the interpedncar nces, an effect thatas aboished in 2/ and 5/ ice20. Aso, in knock-inice expressing the hypersensitie 4l9A nAChR, bt

    not id-type ice, inection of a o dose of nicotineincreased Fos expression (indicating nerona actia-tion) in the entroatera region of the edia habena,sggesting a possibe contribtion to ithdraasyptos by the 4 sbnit in the habena123.

    The habena syste has aso been ipicated inithdraa fro other drgs of addiction, incdingopiates, cocaine and acoho124. Ania stdies haeproided eidence that the habena has inhibitoryproections to the vTA and the sbstantia nigra andthat habena esions increase dopaine trnoer inthe nces accbens and the PFC125. Actiity in thehabena and interpedncar nces increases dr-ing nicotine ithdraa possiby throgh redcedactiation of nAChRs thereby controing the acti-ity of dopainergic nerons in the vTA and seroton-ergic nerons in the dorsa raphe nces126, to hichthey proect.

    In concsion, the 2, 5, 7 and 4 sbnits regatethe expression of soatic syptos of ithdraa119,hereas 2 and 6 sbnits contribte to affectie

    coponents of the nicotine ithdraa syndroe113(FIG. 7). The pattern and distribtion of nAChR sbnitsinoed in the nicotine ithdraa syndroe ight dif-fer fro those engaged in the short-ter, phasic effectsof nicotine, hich od offer noe targets for ong-tersoking cessation therapies.

    Conclusions and future directions

    There are sbstantia differences beteen the responseof id-type ice and ice acking specific nAChR sb-nits to acte or chronic adinistration of nicotine. Thetant ice share featres ith han genetic ariants,hich egitiizes their se as odes to inestigate theoecar bioogy of nicotine addiction (see ReF. 127and Sppeentary inforation S1 (box)). Inactiationith or ithot re-expression of nAChR genes inthe ose5,10 has identified sets of nAChR sbnitsthat characterize the sccessie steps of nicotine addic-tion, fro the acte effects of nicotine consption toong-ter nicotine addiction.

    The sbset of nAChR sbnits engaged in the acteeffects of nicotine on dopainergic reard nerons inthe vTA are being ecidated, as are those inoedin nicotine ithdraa syptos. Hoeer, the nAChRsbnits engaged in the transition fro the short-terto the ong-ter effects of nicotine exposre are stifar fro being nderstood. This is a path that reqires

    frther exporation to hep deeop drgs that are oreeffectie than those crrenty aaiabe, hich are pri-ariy designed to target the acte effects of nicotine.

    Han genetic stdies on nicotine dependence (seeSppeentary inforation S1 (box)) hae so far onyreeaed eak associations ith the 2 and 7 sbnitgenes, hich pay an iportant part in short-ter nico-tine reard. By contrast, these stdies consistenty shoan association of a 3, 5 and4 sbnit poyorphissand 3 and 6 sbnit poyorphiss ith nicotinedependence128. In ania odes, soe of these sbnitssee to be inoed in nicotine ithdraa rather thanin nicotine reard129; hoeer, ongoing stdies sggest a

    Figure 7 | cntbtn nAcr bnt t ntn wtawa ymptm at

    t v t ma abnantpna ytm. Subunits shown in green

    are implicated in somatic withdrawal symptoms; subunits shown in red are implicated in

    affective withdrawal symptoms. IPN, interpeduncular nucleus; MHb, medial habenula;

    LC, locus coeruleus; LHb, lateral habenula; VTA, ventral tegmental area.

    R E V I E W S

    398 | juNE 2010 | vOlumE 11 www.nat.m/vw/n

    20 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved10

  • 7/28/2019 Changeux Et Al - Nicotine Receptors & Addiction, Genetically Modified Mice

    11/13

    possibe contribtion to reard processes as e. moseodes and the han genetics data of nicotine addic-tion ths point to argey nexpored targets in the designof soking-cessation drgs.

    An interesting featre of the present discssion isthat, in addition to the ch-stdied effect of nicotineon dopainergic reard systes, there is eidence thata goba gating brain circit82 is inoed in nicotineaddiction, hich incdes the striat, hippoca-ps and aygdaa nder the top-don contro of thePFC101,130. This is consistent ith neroogica and brainiaging data in hans that spport the notion that theoss of contro cased by nicotine addiction ay cor-respond to a disrption of prefronta cortex and insa

    fnctions in a goba nerona orkspace (BOX 1). Thisdisrption od sbert attention, reasoning, panningand decision-aking processes that exert inhibitory con-tro to resist drg se21. Nicotine dependence ight thenbe tentatiey ieed as a goba nerona orkspacedisconnection syndroe130, hich od point to noetargets that ediate nicotine action. The conseqencesof these stdies for the nderstanding and treatent ofdiseases sch as depression, Azheiers disease andParkinsons disease reain to be expored. Neertheess,these ose ode experients open a hoe fied ofinestigations, in particar in priates and hans, tonderstand the nero-cognitie processes that are crciato nicotine addiction.

    1. Dome, P. et al. Smoking, nicotine and neuropsychiatric

    disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.34, 295342

    (2009).2. Stead, L. F., Perera, R., Bullen, C., Mant, D. &

    Lancaster, T. Nicotine replacement therapy for

    smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1,

    CD000146 (2008).

    3. Changeux, J. P. & Edelstein, S. J. Nicotinic

    AcetylcholineReceptors:FromMolecularBiologyto

    Cognition (Odile Jacob, New York, 2005).4. Taly, A., Corringer, P. J., Guedin, D., Lestage, P. &

    Changeux, J. P. Nicotinic receptors: allosteric

    transitions and therapeutic targets in the nervous

    system. Nature Rev. Drug Discov.8, 733750 (2009).

    A recent review on nicotinic drugs that are in

    development for the treatment of brain diseases.

    5. Picciotto, M. R. et al.Abnormal avoidance learning in

    mice lacking functional high-affinity nicotine receptor

    in the brain. Nature 374, 6567 (1995).

    6. Greenbaum, L. & Lerer, B. Differential contribution of

    genetic variation in multiple brain nicotinic cholinergic

    receptors to nicotine dependence: recent progress and

    emerging open questions. Mol. Psychiatry 14,

    912945 (2009).

    7. Orr-Urtreger, A. et al. W. Mice homozygous for the

    L250T mutation in the 7 nicotinic acetylcholinereceptor show increased neuronal apoptosis and die

    within 1 day of birth.J. Neurochem. 74, 21542166

    (2000).8. Tapper, A. R. et al. Nicotine activation of4*

    receptors: sufficient for reward, tolerance, and

    sensitization. Science 306, 10291032 (2004).

    9. King, S. L. et al. Conditional expression in

    corticothalamic efferents reveals a developmental role

    for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in modulation of

    passive avoidance behavior.J. Neurosci. 23,

    38373843 (2003).

    10. Maskos, U. et al. Nicotine reinforcement and cognition

    restored by targeted expression of nicotinic receptors.

    Nature 436, 103107 (2005).

    An efficient method of nAChR subunit gene

    re-expression using lentiviral vectors.

    11. Avale, M. E.et al. Interplay of2* nicotinic receptorsand dopamine pathways in the control of spontaneous

    locomotion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105,

    1599115996 (2008).

    12. Le Novere, N. et al. Involvement of6 nicotinicreceptor subunit in nicotine-elicited locomotion,

    demonstrated by in vivo antisense oligonucleotideinfusion. Neuroreport10, 24972501 (1999).

    13. Mameli-Engvall, M. et al. Hierarchical control of

    dopamine neuron-firing patterns by nicotinic

    receptors. Neuron 50, 911921 (2006).

    14. Maubourguet, N., Lesne, A., Changeux, J. P.,

    Maskos, U. & Faure, P. Behavioral sequence analysis

    reveals a novel role for 2* nicotinic receptors inexploration. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000229 (2008).

    15. Gotti, C. et al. Structural and functional diversity of

    native brain neuronal nicotinic receptors. Biochem.

    Pharmacol. 78, 703711 (2009).

    16. Katz, B. & Thesleff, S. A study of the desensitization

    produced by acetylcholine at the motor end-plate.

    J. Physiol. 138, 6380 (1957).

    17. Govind, A. P., Vezina, P. & Green, W. N. Nicotine-

    induced upregulation of nicotinic receptors: underlying

    mechanisms and relevance to nicotine addiction.

    Biochem. Pharmacol. 78, 756765 (2009).

    18. Koob, G. F. A role for brain stress systems in addiction.

    Neuron 59, 1134 (2008).

    19. Davis, J. A. & Gould, T. J. Hippocampal nAChRs

    mediate nicotine withdrawal-related learning deficits.

    Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 19, 551561 (2009).

    20. Salas, R., Sturm, R., Boulter, J. & De Biasi, M.

    Nicotinic receptors in the habenula-interpeduncular

    system are necessary for nicotine withdrawal in mice.

    J. Neurosci. 29, 30143018 (2009).

    This study provides evidence for a role of the

    habenulointerpeduncular system in nicotine

    withdrawal.

    21. Naqvi, N. H. & Bechara, A. The hidden island of

    addiction: the insula. Trends Neurosci . 32, 5667

    (2009).

    22. Suarez, S. V. et al. Brain activation by short-term

    nicotine exposure in anesthetized wild-type and

    2-nicotinic receptors knockout mice: a BOLD fMRIstudy. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 202, 599610

    (2009).

    23. Everitt, B. J. & Robbins, T. W. Neural systems of

    reinforcement for drug addiction: from actions to

    habits to compulsion. Nature Neurosci. 8,

    14811489 (2005).

    24. Koob, G. F. & Le Moal, M. Neurobiological

    mechanisms for opponent motivational processes in

    addiction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363,

    31133123 (2008).

    25. Kenny, P. J. & Markou, A. Nicotine self-administrationacutely activates brain reward systems and induces a

    long-lasting increase in reward sensitivity.

    Neuropsychopharmacology 31, 12031211 (2006).

    26. Gutkin, B. S., Dehaene, S. & Changeux, J. P.

    A neurocomputational hypothesis for nicotine

    addiction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11061111

    (2006).

    27. Balfour, D. J. The neurobiology of tobacco

    dependence: a preclinical perspective on the role of

    the dopamine projections to the nucleus accumbens.

    Nicotine Tob. Res. 6, 899912 (2004).

    28. Newhouse, P. A., Potter, A. & Singh, A. Effects of

    nicotinic stimulation on cognitive performance. Curr.

    Opin. Pharmacol.4, 3646 (2004).

    29. Levin, E. D. Nicotinic receptor subtypes and cognitive

    function.J. Neurobiol.53, 633640 (2002).

    30. Stolerman, I. P., Garcha, H. S. & Mirza, N. R.

    Dissociations between the locomotor stimulant and

    depressant effects of nicotinic agonists in rats.

    Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 117, 430437 (1995).31. Poorthuis, R. B., Goriounova, N. A., Couey, J. J. &

    Mansvelder, H. D. Nicotinic actions on neuronal

    networks for cognition: general principles and long-

    term consequences. Biochem. Pharmacol. 78,

    668676 (2009).

    32. Caldarone, B. J., Duman, C. H. & Picciotto, M. R. Fear

    conditioning and latent inhibition in mice lacking the

    high affinity subclass of nicotinic acetylcholine

    receptors in the brain. Neuropharmacology 39,

    27792784 (2000).

    33. Granon, S., Faure, P. & Changeux, J. P. Executive

    and social behaviors under nicotinic receptor

    regulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100,

    95969601 (2003).

    34. Marubio, L. M. et al. Effects of nicotine in the

    dopaminergic system of mice lacking the alpha4

    subunit of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

    Eur. J. Neurosci. 17, 13291337 (2003).

    35. Labarca, C. et al. Point mutant mice with

    hypersensitive 4 nicotinic receptors showdopaminergic deficits and increased anxiety.

    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 27862791 (2001).

    36. Cui, C. et al. The 3 nicotinic receptor subunit: acomponent ofl-conotoxin MII-binding nicotinicacetylcholine receptors that modulate dopamine

    release and related behaviors.J. Neurosci. 23,

    1104511053 (2003).

    37. Salas, R., Cook, K. D., Bassetto, L. & De Biasi, M.

    The 3 and 4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptorsubunits are necessary for nicotine-induced seizures

    and hypolocomotion in mice. Neuropharmacology 47,

    401407 (2004).

    38. Fernandes, C., Hoyle, E., Dempster, E., Schalkwyk,

    L. C. & Collier, D. A. Performance deficit of7 nicotinicreceptor knockout mice in a delayed matching-to-place

    task suggests a mild impairment of working/episodic-

    like memory. Genes Brain Behav. 5, 433440 (2006).

    An elegant demonstration of the contribution of

    the 7 nAChR subunit to working memory.39. Paylor, R. et al.7 nicotinic receptor subunits are not

    necessary for hippocampal-dependent learning or

    sensorimotor gating: a behavioral characterization of

    Acra7-deficient mice.Learn. Mem. 5, 302316 (1998).

    40. McGaugh, J. L., McIntyre, C. K. & Power, A. E.

    Amygdala modulation of memory consolidation:

    interaction with other brain systems. Neurobiol.

    Learn. Mem. 78, 539552 (2002).41. Young, J. W. et al. Nicotine improves sustained

    attention in mice: evidence for involvement of the 7nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.

    Neuropsychopharmacology 29, 891900 (2004).

    42. Marubio, L. M. & Paylor, R. Impaired passive

    avoidance learning in mice lacking central neuronal

    nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Neuroscience 129,

    575582 (2004).

    43. Corrigall, W. Nicotine self-administration in animals as a

    dependence model. Nicotine Tob. Res. 1, 1120 (1999).

    44. Pons, S. et al. Crucial role of4 and 6 nicotinicacetylcholine receptor subunits from ventral tegmental

    area in systemic nicotine self-administration.

    J. Neurosci. 28, 1231812327 (2008).

    45. David, V., Besson, M., Changeux, J. P., Granon, S. &

    Cazala, P. Reinforcing effects of nicotine

    microinjections into the ventral tegmental area of

    mice: dependence on cholinergic nicotinic and

    dopaminergic D1 receptors. Neuropharmacology 50,

    10301040 (2006).46. Picciotto, M. R. et al. Acetylcholine receptors

    containing the 2 subunit are involved in thereinforcing properties of nicotine. Nature 391,

    173177 (1998).

    47. Epping-Jordan, M. P., Picciotto, M. R., Changeux, J. P.

    & Pich, E. M. Assessment of nicotinic acetylcholine

    receptor subunit contributions to nicotine self-

    administration in mutant mice. Psychopharmacology

    (Berl.) 147, 2526 (1999).48. Frahm, S. et al. The acetylcholine receptor 4-subunit

    is rate limiting for nicotinic function in vivo. Society for

    Neuroscience Annual Meeting(Chicago, Illinois)

    Abstract 228.13 (2009).

    49. Fowler, C. D. & Kenny, P. J. Intravenous nicotine self-

    administration in wild type and 5 nicotinicacetylcholine receptor subunit knock-out mice. Society

    for Neuroscience Annual Meeting(Chicago, Illinois)

    Abstract447.15 (2009).

    R E V I E W S

    NATuRE REvIEwS |NeuroscieNce vOlumE 11 | juNE 2010 |399

    20 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved10

  • 7/28/2019 Changeux Et Al - Nicotine Receptors & Addiction, Genetically Modified Mice

    12/13

    50. Klink, R., de Kerchove dExaerde, A., Zoli, M. &

    Changeux, J. P. Molecular and physiological diversity

    of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the midbrain

    dopaminergic nuclei.J. Neurosci. 21, 14521463

    (2001).

    51. Walters, C. L., Brown, S., Changeux, J. P., Martin, B. &

    Damaj, M. I. The 2 but not 7 subunit of the nicotinicacetylcholine receptor is required for nicotine

    conditioned place preference in mice.

    Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 184, 339344 (2006).

    52. Stolerman, I. P., Chamberlain, S., Bizarro, L.,

    Fernandes, C. & Schalkwyk, L. The role of nicotinicreceptor 7 subunits in nicotine discrimination.Neuropharmacology 46, 363371 (2004).

    53. Jackson, K. J., McIntosh, J. M., Brunzell, D. H.,

    Sanjakdar, S. S. & Damaj, M. I. The role of

    6-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors innicotine reward and withdrawal.J. Pharmacol. Exp.

    Ther. 331, 547554 (2009).

    54. Levin, E. D. et al. Nicotinic 7- or 2-containingreceptor knockout: effects on radial-arm maze learning

    and long-term nicotine consumption in mice.

    Behav. Brain Res. 196, 207213 (2009).

    This study demonstrates the long-term

    consequences of nAChR subunit gene deletion on

    mouse behaviour.

    55. Balfour, D. J., Benwell, M. E., Birrell , C. E., Kelly, R. J.

    & Al-Aloul, M. Sensitization of the mesoaccumbens

    dopamine response to nicotine. Pharmacol. Biochem.

    Behav. 59, 10211030 (1998).

    56. Watkins, S. S., Koob, G. F. & Markou, A. Neural

    mechanisms underlying nicotine addiction: acute

    positive reinforcement and withdrawal. Nicotine Tob.

    Res. 2, 1937 (2000).

    57. Overton, P. G. & Clark, D. Burst firing in midbrain

    dopaminergic neurons. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 25,

    312334 (1997).

    58. Kitai, S. T., Shepard, P. D., Callaway, J. C. & Scroggs, R.

    Afferent modulation of dopamine neuron firing

    patterns. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 690697 (1999).59. Grace, A. A. & Bunney, B. S. The control of firing

    pattern in nigral dopamine neuronsJ. Neurosci. 4,

    28662876 (1984).

    60. Chergui, K., Nomikos, G. G., Mathe, J. M., Gonon, F. &

    Svensson, T. H. Burst stimulation of the medial

    forebrain bundle selectively increase Fos-like

    immunoreactivity in the limbic forebrain of the rat.

    Neuroscience 72, 141156 (1996).

    61. Chergui, K. et al. Increased expression of NGFI-A

    mRNA in the rat striatum following burst stimulation

    of the medial forebrain bundle. Eur. J. Neurosci. 9,

    23702382 (1997).

    62. Schultz, W. Getting formal with dopamine and reward.Neuron 36, 241263, (2002).

    63. Mansvelder, H. D., De Rover, M., McGehee, D. S. &

    Brussaard, A. B. Cholinergic modulation of

    dopaminergic reward areas: upstream and

    downstream targets of nicotine addiction.

    Eur. J. Pharmacol. 480, 117123 (2003).

    64. Floresco, S. B., West, A. R., Ash, B., Moore, H. & Grace,

    A. A. Afferent modulation of dopamine neuron firing

    differentially regulates tonic and phasic dopamine

    transmission. Nature Neurosci. 6, 968973 (2003).

    65. Lodge, D. J. & Grace, A. A. The hippocampus

    modulates dopamine neuron responsivity by

    regulating the intensity of phasic neuron activation.

    Neuropsychopharmacology 31, 13561361

    (2006).

    66. Faure, P. et al. Differential role for 4 and 6 nicotinicsubunit in burst response to nicotine in dopamine

    neurons. FENS Forum of European Neuroscience

    (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) Abstract P14006

    (2010).67. Rice, M. E. & Cragg, S. J. Nicotine amplifies reward-

    related dopamine signals in striatum. Nature

    Neurosci. 7, 583584 (2004).

    68. Zhang, H. & Sulzer, D. Frequency-dependent

    modulation of dopamine release by nicotine. Nature

    Neurosci. 7, 581582 (2004).

    69. Zhou, F. M., Liang, Y. & Dani, J. A. Endogenous

    nicotinic cholinergic activity regulates dopamine

    release in the striatum. Nature Neurosci. 4,

    12241229 (2001).

    70. Exley, R., Clements, M. A., Hartung, H., McIntosh,

    J. M. & Cragg, S. J. 6- containing nicotinicacetylcholine receptors dominate the nicotine control

    of dopamine neurotransmission in nucleus accumbens.

    Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 21582166 (2008).71. Cragg, S. J. Meaningful silences: how dopamine listens

    to the ACh pause. Trends Neurosci. 29, 125131

    (2006).

    72. Zhang, T. et al. Dopamine signaling differences in the

    nucleus accumbens and dorsal striatum exploited by

    nicotine.J. Neurosci. 29, 40354043 (2009).

    73. Mansvelder, H. D., Keath, J. R. & McGehee, D. S.

    Synaptic mechanisms underlie nicotine-induced

    excitability of brain reward areas. Neuron 33,

    905919 (2002).

    74. Tolu, S. et al.A versatile system for the neuronal

    subtype specific expression of lentiviral vectors.

    FASEB J.24, 723730 (2010).

    Anin vivomethod to distinguish the contribution of

    nAChRs expressed in dopaminergic versusGABAergic neurons.75. Tolu, S. et al. A versatile system for the neuronal

    subtype specific expression of lentiviral vectors. FENS

    Forum of European Neuroscience (Amsterdam, the

    Netherlands).Abstract 07549 (2010).

    76. Levin, E. D., McClernon, F. J. & Rezvani, A. H.

    Nicotinic effects on cognitive function: behavioral

    characterization, pharmacological specification, and

    anatomic localization. Psychopharmacology (Berl.)

    184, 523539 (2006).

    77. Parikh, V. & Sarter, M. Cholinergic mediation of

    attention: contributions of phasic and tonic increases

    in prefrontal cholinergic activity.Ann. NY Acad. Sci.

    1129, 225235 (2008).

    78. Orr-Urtreger, A. et al. Mice deficient in the 7neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor lack

    -bungarotoxin binding sites and hippocampal fastnicotinic currents.J. Neurosci. 17, 91659171 (1997).

    79. Vidal, C. & Changeux, J. P. Nicotinic and muscarinic

    modulations of excitatory synaptic transmission in the

    rat prefrontal cortex in vitro. Neuroscience 56, 2332

    (1993).

    80. Lambe, E. K., Picciotto, M. R. & Aghajanian, G. K.

    Nicotine induces glutamate release from

    thalamocortical terminals in prefrontal cortex.

    Neuropsychopharmacology 28, 216225 (2003).

    81. Couey, J. J. et al. Distributed network actions by

    nicotine increase the threshold for spike-timing-

    dependent plasticity in prefrontal cortex. Neuron 54,

    7387 (2007).

    82. Grace, A. A. Gating of information flow within the

    limbic system and the pathophysiology of

    schizophrenia. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 31,

    330341 (2000).

    83. Belujon, P. & Grace, A. A. Critical role of the prefrontal

    cortex in the regulation of hippocampus-accumbens

    information flow.J. Neurosci. 28, 97979805 (2008).

    84. Placzek, A. N., Zhang, T. A. & Dani, J. A. Nicotinic

    mechanisms influencing synaptic plasticity in the

    hippocampus.Acta Pharmacol. Sin.30, 752760

    (2009).85. Matsuyama, S., Matsumoto, A., Enomoto, T. &

    Nishizaki, T. Activation of nicotinic acetylcholine

    receptors induces long-term potentiation in vivo in the

    intact mouse dentate gyrus. Eur. J. Neurosci. 12,

    37413747 (2000).

    86. Nashmi, R. et al. Chronic nicotine cell specifically

    upregulates functional 4* nicotinic receptors: basisfor both tolerance in midbrain and enhanced long-

    term potentiation in perforant path.J. Neurosci. 27,

    82028218 (2007).

    87. Maggi, L., Le Magueresse, C., Changeux, J. P. &

    Cherubini, E. Nicotine activates immature silent

    connections in the developing hippocampus.

    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 20592064 (2003).

    88. Le Magueresse, C., Safiulina, V., Changeux, J. P. &

    Cherubini, E. Nicotinic modulation of network and

    synaptic transmission in the immature hippocampus

    investigated with genetically modified mice.J. Physiol.

    576, 533546 (2006).

    89. Tang, J. & Dani, J. A. Dopamine enables in vivosynaptic plasticity associated with the addictive drug

    nicotine. Neuron 63, 673682 (2009).

    Anin vivoelectrophysiological exploration of

    nicotine-induced reward responses.

    90. Wada, E. et al. Distribution of alpha 2, alpha 3, alpha

    4, and beta 2 neuronal nicotinic receptor subunit

    mRNAs in the central nervous system: a hybridization

    histochemical study in the rat.J. Comp. Neurol. 284,

    314335 (1989).

    91. Ishii, K., Wong, J. K. & Sumikawa, K. Comparison of2nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit mRNA

    expression in the central nervous system of rats and

    mice.J. Comp. Neurol. 493, 241260 (2005).

    92. Jia, Y., Yamazaki, Y., Nakauchi, S. & Sumikawa, K.

    2 nicotine receptors function as a molecular switch tocontinuously excite a subset of interneurons in rat

    hippocampal circuits. Eur. J. Neurosci. 29,

    15881603 (2009).

    93. Marshall, S. P., Adhikari, A., Nason, M. W., Role, L. &

    Gordon, J. A. Altered theta and gamma activity

    profiles in the ventral hippocampal-accumbal pathway

    of Type III neuregulin 1 heterozygous mice. Society for

    Neuroscience Annual Meeting(Chicago, Illinois)

    Abstract 102.9 (2009).

    94. Zhong, C. et al. Presynaptic type III neuregulin 1 is

    required for sustained enhancement of hippocampal

    transmission by nicotine and for axonal targeting of7nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.J. Neurosci. 28,

    91119116 (2008).

    95. Hill, J. A. Jr, Zoli, M., Bourgeois, J. & Changeux, J. P.Immunocytochemical localization of a neuronal

    nicotinic receptor: the 2-subunit.J. Neurosci. 13,1551 1568 (1993).

    96. Seguela, P., Wadiche, J., Dineley-Mil ler, K., Dani, J. A.

    & Patrick, J. W. Molecular cloning, functional

    properties, and distribution of rat brain 7: a nicotiniccation channel highly permeable to calcium.

    J. Neurosci. 13, 596604 (1993).

    97. Jiang, L. & Role, L. W. Facilitation of cortico-amygdala

    synapses by nicotine: activity-dependent modulation

    of glutamatergic transmission.J. Neurophysiol. 99,

    19881999 (2008).

    98. Benwell, M. E., Balfour, D. J. & Birrell, C. E.

    Desensitization of the nicotine-induced mesolimbic

    dopamine responses during constant infusion with

    nicotine. Br. J. Pharmacol. 114, 454460 (1995).

    99. Schoffelmeer, A. N., De Vries, T. J., Wardeh, G., van de

    Ven, H. W. & Vanderschuren, L. J. Psychostimulant-

    induced behavioral sensitization depends on nicotinic

    receptor activation.J. Neurosci. 22, 32693276

    (2002).100.Vezina, P. Sensitization, drug addiction and

    psychopathology in animals and humans. Prog.

    Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 31,

    15531555 (2007).

    101. Caille, S., Guillem, K., Cador, M., Manzoni, O. &

    Georges, F. Voluntary nicotine consumption triggers

    in vivo potentiation of cortical excitatory drives to

    midbrain dopaminergic neurons.J. Neurosci. 29,

    1041010415 (2009).

    Anin vivoanalysis of the top-down regulation of

    short-term to long-term nicotine consumption in

    the rat.

    102. Nashmi, R. & Lester, H. Cell autonomy, receptor

    autonomy, and thermodynamics in nicotine receptor

    up-regulation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 74, 11451154

    (2007).

    103. Marks, M. J., Burch, J. B. & Collins, A. C. Effects of

    chronic nicotine infusion on tolerance development

    and nicotinic receptors.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.226,

    817825 (1983).104. Sallette, J. et al.An extracellular protein microdomain

    controls up-regulation of neuronal nicotinic

    acetylcholine receptors by nicotine.J. Biol. Chem.

    279, 1876718775 (2004).

    105. Sallette, J. et al. Nicotine upregulates its own

    receptors through enhanced intracellular maturation.

    Neuron 46, 595607 (2005).

    106. Baker, L. K. et al. Nicotine upregulates VTA nAChRs

    and requires these receptors to induce locomotor

    sensitization. Society for Neuroscience Annual

    Meeting(Washington, DC) Abstract 1027.17 (2005).107. Picciotto, M. R. Nicotine as a modulator of behavior:

    beyond the inverted U. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 24,

    493499 (2003).

    108.Vezina, P., McGehee, D. S. & Green, W. N. Exposure to

    nicotine and sensitization of nicotine-induced

    behaviors. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol.

    Psychiatry 31, 16251638 (2007).109. Besson, M. et al. Long-term effects of chronic nicotine

    exposure on brain nicotinic receptors. Proc. Natl Acad.Sci. USA 104, 81558160 (2007).

    110. Koob, G. & Bloom, F. Cellular and molecular mechanisms

    of drug dependence. Science242, 715723 (1988).

    111. Zweifel, L. S. et al. Disruption of NMDAR-dependent

    burst firing by dopamine neurons provides selective

    assessment of phasic dopamine-dependent behavior.

    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 72817288 (2009).

    112. West, R. J., Hajek, P. & Belcher, M. Severity of

    withdrawal symptoms as a predictor of outcome of an

    attempt to quit smoking. Psychol. Med. 19, 981985

    (1989).

    113. Jackson, K. J., Martin, B. R., Changeux, J. P. & Damaj,

    M. I. Differential role of nicotinic acetylcholine

    receptor subunits in physical and affective nicotine

    withdrawal signs.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 325,

    302312 (2008).

    This study shows the role of non-classical nAChR

    subunits in withdrawal symptoms.

    R E V I E W S

    400 | juNE 2010 | vOlumE 11 www.nat.m/vw/n

    20 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved10

  • 7/28/2019 Changeux Et Al - Nicotine Receptors & Addiction, Genetically Modified Mice

    13/13

    114. Johnson, P. M., Hollander, J. A. & Kenny, P. J.

    Decreased brain reward function during nicotine

    withdrawal in C57BL6 mice: evidence from intracranial

    selfstimulation (ICSS) studies. Pharmacol. Biochem.

    Behav. 90, 409415 (2008).

    115. Damaj, M. I., Meyer, E. M. & Martin, B. R. The

    antinociceptive effects of7 nicotinic agonists in anacute pain model. Neuropharmacology 39,

    27852791 (2000).116. Salas, R., Pieri, F. & De Biasi, M. Decreased signs of

    nicotine withdrawal in mice null for the 4 nicotinic

    acetylcholine receptor subunit.J. Neurosci. 24,1003510039 (2004).

    117. Salas, R., Main, A., Gangitano, D. & De Biasi, M.

    Decreased withdrawal symptoms but normal tolerance

    to nicotine in mice null for the 7 nicotinicacetylcholine receptor subunit. Neuropharmacology

    53, 863869 (2007).

    118. Besson, M. et al. Genetic dissociation of two behaviors

    associated with nicotine addiction: beta-2 containing

    nicotinic receptors are involved in nicotine

    reinforcement but not in withdrawal syndrome.

    Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 187, 189199

    (2006).

    119. Salas, R. et al. Nicotine relieves anxiogenic-like

    behavior in mice that overexpress the read-through

    variant of acetylcholinesterase but not in wild-type

    mice. Mol. Pharmacol. 74, 16411648 (2008).

    120. Portugal, G. S., Kenney, J. W. & Gould, T. J. 2 subunitcontaining acetylcholine receptors mediate nicotine

    withdrawal deficits in the acquisition of contextual fear

    conditioning. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 89, 106113

    (2008).121. Lena, C. et al. Diversity and distribution of nicotinic

    acetylcholine receptors in the locus ceruleus neurons.

    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1212612131

    (1999).

    122. Champtiaux, N. et al. Distribution and pharmacology

    of6-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptorsanalyzed with mutant mice.J. Neurosci. 22,

    12081217, (2002).

    123. Fonck, C. et al. Demonstration of functional

    4-containing nicotinic receptors in the medialhabenula. Neuropharmacology 56, 247253 (2009).

    124. Maisonneuve, I. M. & Glick, S. D. Anti-addictive

    actions of an iboga alkaloid congener: a novel

    mechanism for a novel treatment. Pharmacol.

    Biochem. Behav. 75, 607618 (2003).

    125. Matsumoto, M. & Hikosaka, O. Lateral habenula as a

    source of negative reward signals in dopamine

    neurons. Nature 447, 11111115 (2007).

    126. Hikosaka, O., Sesack, S. R., Lecourtier, L. & Shepard,

    P. D. Habenula: crossroad between the basal gangliaand the limbic system.J. Neurosci. 28,

    1182511829 (2008).

    127. National Cancer Institute. Phenotypes and

    endophenotypes: foundations for genetic studies of

    nicotine use and dependence. NCI Tobacco Control

    Monograph20 (eds Swan, G. E. et al.) (2009).128. Saccone, S. F. et al. Supplementing high-density SNP

    microarrays for additional coverage of disease-related

    genes: addiction as a paradigm. PLoS ONE4, e5225

    (2009).

    129. Li, M. D. & Burmeister, M. New insights into the

    genetics of addiction. Nature Rev. Genet. 10,

    225231 (2009).130. Changeux, J. & Dehaene, S. in Learning and Memory:

    A Comprehensive Reference (ed. Byrne, J.) Vol. 1,

    729758 (Elsevier, Oxford, 2008).A general review about the global neuronal

    workspace hypothesis of consciousness.

    131. Sergent, C. & Dehaene, S. Neural processes

    underlying conscious perception: experimental

    findings and a global neuronal workspace framework.

    J. Physiol. Paris 98, 374384 (2004).

    132. Sergent, C., Baillet, S. & Dehaene, S. Timing of the

    brain events underlying access to consciousness

    during the attentional blink. Nature Neurosci. 8,

    13911400 (2005).

    133. Del Cul, A., Baillet, S. & Dehaene, S. Brain dynamics

    underlying the nonlinear threshold for access to

    consciousness. PLoS Biol. 5, e260 (2007).

    134. Naqvi, N. H., Rudrauf, D., Damasio, H. & Bechara, A.

    Damage to the insula disrupts addiction to cigarette

    smoking. Science 315, 531534 (2007).

    135. Contreras, M., Ceric, F. & Torrealba, F. Inactivation of

    the interoceptive insula disrupts drug craving and

    malaise induced by lithium. Science 318, 655658

    (2007).

    136. Miller, E. K. The prefrontal cortex and cognitive

    control. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 1, 5965 (2000).

    137.Amiaz, R., Levy, D., Vainiger, D., Grunhaus, L. &

    Zangen, A. Repeated high-frequency transcranial

    magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal

    cortex reduces cigarette craving and consumption.

    Addiction 104, 653660 (2009).

    138. Lim, K. O., Choi, S. J., Pomara, N., Wolkin, A. &

    Rotrosen, J. P. Reduced frontal white matter integrity

    in coc