Upload
duongthuan
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Changes in ceramic blocks porosity with phosphate sludge due to salt crystallization
Civil Engineering Post-Graduation Course University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Brazil
Rosângela Andréia BERSCH
Feliciane Andrade BREHM
Claudio S. KAZMIERCZAK [email protected]
WASCON 2012 Towards effective, durable and sustainable production and use of alternative materials in construction
Phosphate sludge
Phosphate sludge is
originated by the cleaning
of the metallic surface in
the production of
automotive components
(during the phosphate
coating)
Composition:
higher quantity of iron (Fe)
and calcium (Ca)
Others:
sulfur (S)
zinc (Zn)
magnesium (Mg)
phosphorus (P)
silicon (Si)
(detected by X-ray fluorescence
spectrometer))
WASCON 2012
Main project: recycling of phosphate sludge in ceramic bricks
efflorescence
long term
performance
WASCON 2012
Bioblock ®
Development of a ceramic brick with phosphate sludge
- phosphate/clay ratio and sintering process
- mechanical properties
- environmental impact assessment
in situ
evaluation
?
Research project: consequences of salt crystallization
in ceramic blocks with phosphate sludge
mechanical properties
efflorescence
electrical
conductivity
of leaching
pore size distribution of
ceramic specimens
salt
characterization
WASCON 2012
soluble
salt
water porous
material
primary factors
material
weathering contact
time
secondary factors
dissolution and
salt
transportation
migration
through the
pores
evaporation
and
crystallization
Efflorescence Subefflorescence
Dissolution –
Crystallization
cycles
Crystals in the interior
(pores) Crystals in the surface
(1) (2) (3)
(4)
Bersch (2011)
Salt crystallization: mechanism
➙ pathology often observed in materials such as rocks, bricks and concrete
➙ complex phenomenon
➙ economic impact worry manufacturers and builders
WASCON 2012
Arnold & Zehnder (1987)
Subefflorescence
a. crystals are formed in pores between 1 and 10 μm ➙ crystals grows
b. crystal’s dimensions exceed the pore size and start to grow up to other pores
➙ internal tensile stress and cracking
c. cracking increases ➙ evaporation exceeds solution supply ➙ crystallization concentrates on the cracking ➙
solution is only supplied by one or two sides of the fissure ➙ crystal grows in a columnar habit
d. cracking are already too widened ➙ solution tends to finish ➙ crystalline growing stops
WASCON 2012
Experimental research
● reference (0%)
● 2.5% of phosphate sludge
● 5% of phosphate sludge
sludge was added with an average diameter of 7.63mm clay + sludge extrusion
sintered in an oven to different temperatures:
750ºC
850ºC
1050°C
heating rate of 2,5°C/min and plateau of 12 hours sinterization woven
WASCON 2012
Types of exposure
● reference
(no contact with water)
● 180 days with cyles
wetting process by partial immersion
in deionized water for three days
and drying for four days
(cycle repeated along 180 days)
● 180 days without cycles
partial immersion during the whole
exposition time (180 days)
wetting and drying
cycles aim to simulate the seasonal changes of humidity
and temperature due to weathering which
construction materials are subjected to
WASCON 2012
Pore size distribution
parameters calculated:
● volume of pores ≤10 μm according to Arnold & Zehnder (1987), crystallization from
the subefflorescence has a great influence in the pore’s
under 10 mm, which justified this specific analysis
● total pore volume
● percolation threshold
WASCON 2012
MIP samples of high porosity sintered in an oven to 750ºC
≤
Exposition type Analyzed parameters SG 2.5G 5.0G
Percolation threshold (m) 2 2 2
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.1074 0.1264 0.1132
Reference
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1100 0.1311 0.1165
Percolation threshold (m) 2 2 2
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) ND* 0.1079 0.1286
180 days without cycles
Total pores volume (cc/g) ND* 0.1109 0.1300
Percolation threshold (m) 2 2 3
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.9641 0.1138 0.1000
180 days with cyles
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.0967 0.1176 0.1050
There were not significant changes between the pore size distribution of the
reference sample and the others
as the sample had high porosity, the soluble salts may have suffered a solubilization process
and migration to the surface (by capillarity and diffusion), since that an occasional alteration in
the samples’ porosity was not detected
≤
≤
WASCON 2012
MIP samples of medium porosity sintered in an oven to 850ºC
≤
Samples submitted to wetting and drying cycles ➙ it is observed a small decrease in the pore volume in the
samples SG and 2.5 SG with 180 days, as well as in the volume of pores ≤10 μm
soluble salts presented in the sample precipitated and formed crystals inside the pores (without migrating to the
surface), decreasing the total pore volume
≤
≤
Expostion type Analyzed parameters SG 2.5G 5.0G
Percolation threshold (m) 2 2 2
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.1119 0.1359 0.1100
Reference
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1164 0.1387 0.1128
Percolation threshold (m) 2 2 3
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.1187 0.1165 0.1178
180 days without cycles
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1228 0.1189 0.1200
Percolation threshold (m) 2 2 4
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.0953 0.0945 0.1275
180 days with cycles
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.0985 0.0974 0.1300
↓ ↓
↓ ↓
WASCON 2012
MIP samples of medium porosity sintered in an oven to 850ºC
≤
Samples submitted to wetting and drying cycles ➙ it is observed a small decrease in the pore volume in the
samples SG and 2.5 SG with 180 days, as well as in the pores with diameter ≤10 μm
soluble salts presented in the sample precipitated and formed crystals inside the pores (without migrating to the
surface), decreasing the total pore volume
Sample 5.0 G, with higher PS addition, had an opposite behavior: an increase in pore volume which indicates
leaching
it is estimated that the soluble salt are undergoing the crystallization-solubilization process and migrating to the
surface, generating efflorescence
≤
≤
Expostion type Analyzed parameters SG 2.5G 5.0G
Percolation threshold (m) 2 2 2
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.1119 0.1359 0.1100
Reference
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1164 0.1387 0.1128
Percolation threshold (m) 2 2 3
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.1187 0.1165 0.1178
180 days without cycles
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1228 0.1189 0.1200
Percolation threshold (m) 2 2 4
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.0953 0.0945 0.1275
180 days with cycles
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.0985 0.0974 0.1300
↓ ↓
↓ ↓
↓
↓
WASCON 2012
MIP samples of low porosity sintered in an oven to 1050ºC
≤
reference specimens ➙ lower total porosity and fewer quantity of pores ≤10 μm
increase in the percolation threshold (2 μm in hi-porosity specimens)
≤
≤
↓
↓
Expostion type Analyzed parameters SG 2.5G 5.0G
Percolation threshold (m) 10 10 10
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.0904 0.0889 0.0832
Reference
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1055 0.1024 0.1200
Percolation threshold (m) 10 10 12
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.0880 0.0838 0.0370
180 days without cycles
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1082 0.1095 0.0882
Percolation threshold (m) 10 10 12
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.0668 0.0794 0.0518
180 days with cycles
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1044 0.1029 0.1022
WASCON 2012
Expostion type Analyzed parameters SG 2.5G 5.0G
Percolation threshold (m) 10 10 10
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.0904 0.0889 0.0832
Reference
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1055 0.1024 0.1200
Percolation threshold (m) 10 10 12
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.0880 0.0838 0.0370
180 days without cycles
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1082 0.1095 0.0882
Percolation threshold (m) 10 10 12
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.0668 0.0794 0.0518
180 days with cycles
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1044 0.1029 0.1022
MIP samples of low porosity sintered in an oven to 1050ºC
≤
● pores ≤10 μm of the reference samples (without PS) decrease due to the exposure to the wetting and
drying cycles ➙ soluble salts gone from the clay may be crystallizing in this pores
≤
≤ ↓
Expostion type Analyzed parameters SG 2.5G 5.0G
Percolation threshold (m) 10 10 10
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.0904 0.0889 0.0832
Reference
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1055 0.1024 0.1200
Percolation threshold (m) 10 10 12
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.0880 0.0838 0.0370
180 days without cycles
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1082 0.1095 0.0882
Percolation threshold (m) 10 10 12
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.0668 0.0794 0.0518
180 days with cycles
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1044 0.1029 0.1022
WASCON 2012
MIP samples of low porosity sintered in an oven to 1050ºC
≤
● pores ≤10 μm of the samples SG (without PS) decrease due to the exposure to the wetting and drying
cycles ➙ soluble salts gone from the clay may be crystallizing in these pores
● by enhancing the amount of PS (to 5%), there is a sensitive decrease in the pores ≤10 μm. At 180
days without wetting and drying cycles, it was found a decrease in the volume of pores ≤10 μm around
50% when compared to the reference sample, which demonstrate that the soluble salts when
crystallized become trapped in these pores. At the same time, there is an increase in the percolation
threshold
≤
≤
Expostion type Analyzed parameters SG 2.5G 5.0G
Percolation threshold (m) 10 10 10
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.0904 0.0889 0.0832
Reference
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1055 0.1024 0.1200
Percolation threshold (m) 10 10 12
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.0880 0.0838 0.0370
180 days without cycles
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1082 0.1095 0.0882
Percolation threshold (m) 10 10 12
Pores volume 10 m (cc/g) 0.0668 0.0794 0.0518
180 days with cycles
Total pores volume (cc/g) 0.1044 0.1029 0.1022
WASCON 2012
Conclusions
WASCON 2012
● Soluble salts are susceptible of solubilization and
crystallization: depending on the pore distribution and the
concentration of PS incorporated to the ceramic, the crystallized
salts may be trapped in the lower pores of the ceramic specimen
(decreasing the quantity of micropores) or migrate to the surface,
generating efflorescence.
● The ceramic firing cycle demonstrated to be the most
significant variable (the substrate porosity).
● In ceramics with similar pore size distribution to those sintered at
1050ºC (low porosity), submitted to continuous wetting and drying
cycles: the crystals may precipitate inside the lower diameter pores
(without migrating to the surface), which may result, in a long term, in
internal tensions that may decrease the mechanical strength in a long
exposition time ➙ long term research !
Civil Engineering Post-Graduation Course University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Brazil
Rosângela Andréia BERSCH
Feliciane Andrade BREHM
Claudio S. KAZMIERCZAK [email protected]
WASCON 2012 Towards effective, durable and sustainable production and use of alternative materials in construction
Thank you !
The authors are gratefully acknowledged to CNPq and CAPES for financial support to this research