30
Chandler Elementary A School of Intervention

Chandler Elementary

  • Upload
    gari

  • View
    57

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Chandler Elementary. A School of Intervention. Goal for today:. By the end of the session today, you will be able to identify 3-5 changes our school made in the last two years that increased our student achievement and helped us make AYP. How I will set up our session today. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Chandler Elementary

Chandler Elementary

A School of Intervention

Page 2: Chandler Elementary

Goal for today:

By the end of the session today, you will be able to identify 3-5 changes our school made in the last two years that increased our student achievement and helped us make AYP.

Page 3: Chandler Elementary

How I will set up our session today

Compare the old model to the new and improved model.

Use the graphic organizer of a t-chart. Organize the content of the presentation to a

t-chart in your head or on your paper.

Page 4: Chandler Elementary

Background to the story

New principal “Failing school” Restructured Having a plan Changing our focus

Page 5: Chandler Elementary

One of the first things we did:

Got rid of our fixed mindsets by reading and embracing Mindset by Carol Dweck.

Page 6: Chandler Elementary

And next. . .

Got rid of our inconsistent techniques by using Teach Like a Champion by Doug Lemov.

Page 7: Chandler Elementary

And then. . .

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and hoping for different results.

So, we began to deconstruct the old model and construct a new one.

Page 8: Chandler Elementary

The old model:

You need EL training to teach EL kids.

The new model: We believe much of our knowledge comes

with experience, not only from textbooks or classes we take.

Therefore all of us are EL teachers. We are all qualified to teach EL students.

Page 9: Chandler Elementary

The old model:

EL students and other students need different things.

The new model: “Many students don’t come from strong oral

language or literacy backgrounds. Lower SES students need the same practice with oral language as our EL kids. There is not a huge gap or difference in needs.” ~EL teacher

Page 10: Chandler Elementary

The old model:

The EL teachers often worked alone in isolation.

One EL teacher plugged into three grade levels.

Instructional time lost because EL teachers were going to meetings to find out what teachers were doing.

EL teachers pulled students out.

Page 11: Chandler Elementary

The new and improved model:

Grade level teams For example, the Kindergarten team looks like this:

– EL para, prime time para, Title One Instructor, EL teacher, 3 classroom teachers = 7 staff to support 73 students

Switch from “my kids” to “our kids.” All staff are teachers. PE and Music teacher teach reading during the

reading block.

Page 12: Chandler Elementary

Old model:

EL teachers “guessed” what their students needed. Had more of a set program to take kids through.

The new model: Team Time Collaboration – ½ day every other week. Use data from formative and summative

assessments (around LG’s and objectives) to group students.

Progress monitor – regroup.

Page 13: Chandler Elementary

Old model:

We didn’t know what to do to make Safe Harbor/AYP

The new model: Safe Harbor spreadsheet

Page 14: Chandler Elementary
Page 15: Chandler Elementary

Old model

We didn’t know which students fit which categories

The new model: Tracking students – knowing how many we

need in each category

Page 16: Chandler Elementary
Page 17: Chandler Elementary

The old model

Homeroom teachers kept their 20-30 students during RW/WW/Math.

The new model: During 90 minute Reading Block, we use ALL staff to

group around Learning Goals/Objectives. Groups of 10-12 kids for 90 minutes across the

building. (Safety in small numbers.)

Page 18: Chandler Elementary

The new model:

“We aren’t the little old EL team anymore. We are part of teams and also the broader school team. Because of teams, we are more aware of what a grade level is doing. We collaborate more with what EL and other students need. We trade around duties and use people’s strengths to support our students.” ~EL teacher

Page 19: Chandler Elementary

Old model:

Classroom teachers thought, “I need to keep my students. No one knows them like I do.”

The new model: “These are my kids. I trust my colleagues to

help our students learn.” Intervention meeting story.

Page 20: Chandler Elementary

Old model

“We sort of knew what we were teaching.” ~EL teacher

The new model: A very strong focus on Learning Goals and

Objectives. “Today, I (the student) will read a story and prove I

understand it by answering a who, what, and where question.”

“Today I will write a complete sentence by including a noun and a verb.”

Page 21: Chandler Elementary

Old model:

Inconsistent teaching models.

The new model: Identify objective. Use I do, We do, You do.

– (Model and gradually release the responsibility) Assess.

Page 22: Chandler Elementary

Old model:

Many vague questions with little wait time.

The new model: Focused, well thought out questions with

attention to using the word “How” to preface many.

Teaching and using wait time.(TLC) Using a mix of whole class vs. individual

response.

Page 23: Chandler Elementary

The old model:

Some feedback given. “Great job.” “I am so proud of you.” “I like when you. . .”

The new model: Feedback is focused, frequent, and of high

quality. “When you answered “The story is about Maria,” you gave the right answer to “Who is the story about?” That is excellent thinking.”

Page 24: Chandler Elementary

The old model:

Taught too often in the abstract. “Today we are going to learn about a topic and supporting details.

The new model: “A topic is like this orange I have in my hand.

The details are like the peel, the seeds, and the juice. Watch me while I show you.”

Page 25: Chandler Elementary

The old model:

We are a failing school.

The new model: We made AYP by making Safe Harbor. We are no longer a failing school.

Page 26: Chandler Elementary

The old model:

We are here for the kids. We are here to teach them.

The new model: We are here for student achievement. Our

job is to help kids learn.

Page 27: Chandler Elementary

Old model:

The “test” was our enemy. It is trying to trick kids.

The new model: We made peace with the test and quit

making excuses. Our students deserve to learn what they

have to learn to pass these tests.

Page 28: Chandler Elementary

In closing

As our culture shifted to one of “Intervention for All,” we had to make some very thoughtful decisions.

Happens one step at a time.

There are many variables that make the difference.-

Page 29: Chandler Elementary

Goal for today:

By the end of the session today, you will be able to identify 3-5 changes our school made in the last two years that increased our student achievement and helped us make AYP.

Page 30: Chandler Elementary

Your turn:

Turn to your shoulder partner and share at least three things you learned that our school does to support all learners.

Jot down one thing you will take back to your school that will increase student achievement for your EL students and all students.