Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Challenges of Debt Sustainability during PoliticalTransition in North Africa Countries
Mthuli Ncube & Taoufik Rajhi
African Development Bank
April 6-7, 2014
MULTILATERAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS’ MEETING ON DEBT ISSUESThe World Bank, Washington, DC
F 5P-100 (IFC Building, 2121 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW)
1
Challenges of Debt Sustainability duringPolitical Transition
Introduction
Challenges of Debt during transition
Debt Sustainability Risks
Case Study: Tunisia & Morocco
2
Linking Political Transition and Debt Sustainability?
• Recession/ Negative Output Gap • Social uprising/ Wage & Regional Development Demands• Social & Subsidies Expenses increases• Fiscal Revenue Collection Decreases• Increase of fiscal deficit• Security concerns/Capital Flight/Decrease of Tourism• Depreciation of currency• Increase of inflation• Result: increase fo external and internal borrowing to cover fiscal
deficit
3
North Africa Countries in Transition (NACT): An Overview
Population
(Millions)
Population
Growth
Rate (%)
GDP per capita
(Thousands of US $ )
GDP Real Growth
(%)
Unemployment
rate
(In %)
2012 2000-
2012
2010 2013 2000-
2010
2011-
2013
2000-
2010
2011-
2013
Algeria 37.5 1.7 4480.7 5448.4 3.9 3.1 17.9 10.5
Egypt 82.5 2.2 2779.7 3179.0 5.0 2.0 9.9 12.2
Libya 6.0 1.3 12357.8 13580.
5
4.6 21.2*
Mauritania 3.6 2.7 1017.4 1091.6 3.7 5.5
Morocco 32.5 1.1 2849.9 2951.3 4.6 3.8 10.7 8.9
Sudan 33.5 0.9 1635.3 1880.9 7.3 -2.1 15.8 11.4
Tunisia 10.8 1.0 4212.2 4214.8 4.4 0.8 13.8 17.9
Source: WEO 2014, IMF
TUNISIA: starting 17 Decembre 2010 and ends on January 2011
EGYPT: begins on 25 January 2011 and ends on 11 February 2011
LIBYA: begins on 15 February 2011 and ends on 20 October 2011
MOROCCO smoothlytransition during 2011
4
I- Challenges of Debt during transition
5
NACs trends are comparable on LT but still stillbelow advanced countries levels
0
100
200
300
Gene
ral g
over
nmen
t gro
ss de
bt
2000 2005 2010 2015year
Algeria Egypt
Libya Mauritania
Morocco Sudan
Tunisia
Percent of GDP
General government gross debt
6
NACTs Debt during democratic transition is not so higher thanbefore transition but the trends are upward
Current Account
Balance
(% of GDP)
General Government
Structural Balance
(% of GDP)
Primary Balance
(% GDP)
General Government
Gross Debt
(% of GDP)
2000-2010 2011-2013 2000-2010 2011-2013 2000-2010 2011-2013 2000-2010 2011-2013
Algeria 14.5 5.5 6.1 -2.5 32.4 9.6
Egypt 0.9 -2.8 -8.1 -10.9 -4.2 -5.5 87.1 81.6
Libya 25.4 13.9 16.7 7.0 12.2 0.0
Mauritania -15.6 -21.9 -1.8 1.4 167.4 86.2
Morocco 0.1 -8.4 -3.6 -6.5 0.1 -4.1 60.1 58.8
Sudan -5.3 -7.1 106.1 85.3
Tunisia -3.0 -8.0 -3.0 -2.7 0.5 -3.1 54.1 44.4
Source : WEO 2014, IMF
7
Differences emerged between NACTs
Net Oil importers has increased debt
ratios( Egypt Tunisia Morocco) due to
counter-cycle policies
40
60
80
100
Gen
era
l go
vern
men
t gro
ss d
eb
t
2000 2005 2010 2015year
Egypt Morocco
Tunisia
Percent of GDP
General government gross debt
Net Oil exporters reduced drastically
debt ratios ( Libya, Algeria) through
fiscal surplus
0
100
200
300
Gen
era
l go
vern
men
t gro
ss d
eb
t
2000 2005 2010 2015year
Algeria Libya
Mauritania Sudan
Percent of GDP
General government gross debt
8
Recession Gap: growth goes down and negativeoutput gaps are increasing
-20
24
68
Gro
ss d
om
estic p
rodu
ct con
sta
nt p
rice
s
2000 2005 2010 2015year
Egypt Morocco
Tunisia
Percent of Change
Gross domestic product constant prices
-1-.
50
.51
lNG
DP
_R
_G
AP
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020year
Egypt Morocco
Tunisia
GDP percent
Output GAP
9
Libya case is different
Shrank of growth
-50
05
01
00
1980 1990 2000 2010
Percent of change
Libya Gross domestic product constant prices
Gro
ss d
om
estic p
rodu
ct con
sta
nt p
rice
s
yearGraphs by Country
Deep Recession (Negative output gap)
-30
-20
-10
01
0
1980 1990 2000 2010
GDP percent
Libya Output GAP
lNG
DP
_R
_G
AP
yearGraphs by Country
10
Increases and persistance of high level of unemployment and inflation (still manageable)
05
10
15
Infla
tion
avera
ge
co
nsu
mer
pri
ces
2000 2005 2010 2015year
Egypt Morocco
Tunisia
Percent change
Inflation average consumer prices
81
01
21
41
61
8
Une
mplo
ym
ent ra
te
2000 2005 2010 2015year
Egypt Morocco
Tunisia
percent
Unemployment rate
11
Greater deterioation of fiscal space and Currentaccount balance
-10
-50
5
Curr
ent a
ccou
nt b
ala
nce
2000 2005 2010 2015year
Egypt Morocco
Tunisia
GDP percent
General government structural balance
-15
-10
-50
Gen
era
l go
vern
men
t str
uctu
ral b
ala
nce
2000 2005 2010 2015year
Egypt Morocco
Tunisia
GDP percent
Current account balance
12
Increase of expenses and decrease of Revenue Collection
22
24
26
28
30
32
Gen
era
l go
vern
men
t re
ve
nu
e
2000 2005 2010 2015year
Egypt Morocco
Tunisia
Percent of GDP
General government revenue
25
30
35
40
Gen
era
l go
vern
men
t to
tal exp
en
ditu
re
2000 2005 2010 2015year
Egypt Morocco
Tunisia
Percent of GDP
General government total expenditure
13
Correlation of subisidies & Public deficit since the transition as government worry about subisidies
reforms(minus public deficit is represented )
MoroccoTunisia
14
2,1 2,32,7
4,6
1,8
3,6
6,16,6
4,0
1,7
-0,5 -0,4
2,2
4,7
6,0
7,3
-1,0
0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
6,0
7,0
8,0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Subsidies (% GDP) Public Deficit ( % GDP)
2,6
3,6
2,4 2,4
4,4
5,15,3
2,7
1
3
1,1
3,5
5,1
6,8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Subsidies (% GDP) Public Deficit ( % GDP)
Key points
Primary
Balance
(% of GDP)
Real Interest
Rate
(%)
Real Exchange
Rate Index
2005=100
Nominal
depreciation
(% Change)
2000
-
2010
2011-
2013
2000-
2010
2011-
2013
2000-
2010
2011-
2013
2000-
2010
2011-
2013
Algeria 6.1 -3.4 0.3 -3.1 106.8 104.6 4.3 4.3
Egypt -4.2 -4.9 4.6 -0.5 1.6 1.8
Libya 16.7 9.7 -4.4 0.0 0.2
Mauritania -1.8 2.0 14.0 12.0 5.5 5.6
Morocco 0.1 -4.7 11.7 102.5 94.8 2.2 2.1
Tunisia 0.5 -2.5 103.8 91.3 0.3 0.4
Total 3.9 -0.6 4.8 2.8 104.4 96.9 2.1 2.2
Sudan 0.9 0.9
Public debt in NACTsincrease rapidly due to recession gap followingArab uprising.
Increasing expenses due to non reforming Energysubsidies and salaries wages bill reduced the fiscal space
This reflected intoincreased borrowing to fund budget deficit
15
Role of sovereign credit ratings: Too much Too late
• Three countries ( Egypt, Tunisia & Morocco) have credit ratings
• Ratings are overall declining with downgrade outlook
• Bad credit ratings complicate sovereign bonds issusance and decourage FDI
• 2 keys factors for Bad credit ratings: 1) Political instability and 2) fiscal stance ( debt and fiscal balance)
• Too much, Too late
16
Downgrading rating
S&P MOODY's Fitch
Tunisia Egypt Morocco Tunisia Egypt Morocco Tunisia Egypt Morocco
2003 BBB BB+ BB Baa2 Ba1 Ba1 BBB BB+ NR
2004 BBB BB+ BB Baa2 Ba1 Ba1 BBB BB+ NR
2005 BBB BB+ BB+ Baa2 Ba1 Ba1 BBB BB+ NR
2006 BBB BB+ BB+ Baa2 Ba1 Ba1 BBB BB+ NR
2007 BBB BB+ BB+ Baa2 Ba1 Ba1 BBB BB+ BBB-
2008 BBB BB+ BB+ Baa2 Ba1 Ba1 BBB BB+ BBB-
2009 BBB BB+ BB+ Baa2 Ba1 Ba1 BBB BB+ BBB-
2010 BBB BB+ BBB- Baa2 Ba1 Ba1 BBB BB+ BBB-
2011 BBB- B+ BBB- Baa3 B2 Ba1 BBB- BB- BBB-
2012 BB B BBB- Baa3 B2 Ba1 BB+ B+ BBB-
2013 BB B- BBB- Baa3 B3 Ba1 BB+ B BBB-
2014 B- BBB- Baa3 Caa1 Ba1 BB- B- BBB-17
Increase of Spread from Bloomberg Benchmark
Government International Bonds Spread ( Egypt (2010-2020, Morocco -2017, Tunisia(2005-2020)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Spread_Egypt Spread_morocco Spread_tunisia
Government International Bonds Yields
( Egypt (2010-2040, Morocco 2010-2020, Tunisia (1997-2027)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
23
/04
/20
10
23
/07
/20
10
23
/10
/20
10
23
/01
/20
11
23
/04
/20
11
23
/07
/20
11
23
/10
/20
11
23
/01
/20
12
23
/04
/20
12
23
/07
/20
12
23
/10
/20
12
23
/01
/20
13
23
/04
/20
13
23
/07
/20
13
23
/10
/20
13
23
/01
/20
14
Spread_Egypt Spread_morocco Spread_tunisia
18
Decrease of Yield Bonds
Government International Bonds Yields ( Egypt (2010-2020, Morocco -2017, Tunisia(2005-2020)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
23/04/2010 23/04/2011 23/04/2012 23/04/2013
Yield_egypt Yield_morocco Yield_tunisia
Government International Bonds Yields( Egypt (2010-2040, Morocco 2010-2020, Tunisia (1997-2027)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
23/04/2010 23/04/2011 23/04/2012 23/04/2013
Yield_egypt Yield_morocco Yield_tunisia
19
II- DEBT SUSTAINABILITY RISKS The goal of fiscal sustainability analysis is to form a view about
drivers of Debt to GDP ratio and how the outstanding net stock of a government’s debt is likely to evolve over time.
A mixture between Backward and Forward Looking Approach. Three ways of Sustainability Analysis are conducted
1) The first calculates the Debt-Stabilizing Primary Surplus, 2) the second establish the Historical Drivers of Debt before the
transition.3) The Third is a Forward Approach Based on Monte Carlo
Simulation for 2014-2019
20
1- Debt-stabilizing primary surplus,
21
Debt basic equation
22
Let’s begin with basic equation of Debt𝑫𝒕 = 𝟏 + 𝒓𝒕−𝟏 𝑫𝒕−𝟏 − 𝑷𝑩𝒕
Where 𝑫𝒕 is level of Debt, 𝒓𝒕−𝟏 is interest rate and 𝑷𝑩𝒕 Primary Balance level. Dividing by GDP we obtain:
Dt /GDPt = (1+r) Dt−1 /GDPt – PBt / GDPt
Given that GDPt = (1+g) * GDPt-1 where g= nominal growth rate, we get:
Dt /GDPt = (1+r) / (1+g) Dt−1 /GDPt−1 – PBt / GDPt
With d=D/GDP and pb=PB / GDP
dt = (1+r) / (1+g) ∗ dt−1 – pbt
Or
pbt = (1+r) / (1+g) ∗ dt−1 – dt
for debt to be stable dt = dt-1. Thus,
pbt = (1+r) / (1+g) ∗ dt−1 – dt−1 =(r-g) / (1+g) * dt-1 = (r-g) dt-1
Changes in the Debt-to-GDP ratio
23
what is the extent of the primary balance that the government needs to
generate in order to maintain or decrease its debt ratio?
pbt = r − g dt−1
The equation shows that the primary balance hinges on the difference
between the interest rate and the nominal growth rate of GDP.
The primary balance is regarded as a target for policy intervention to
secure fiscal sustainability. Government should on average run a
sufficiently large primary surplus to ensure that it has a positive or zero
net wealth.
Primary balance required to maintain netpublic debt at 45 percent of GDP in Tunisia
Pb=-3.1 Real growth rate (%)
d=45% 3 3,5 4 4,5 5 5,5 6
Re
al in
tere
st r
ate
(%
)
2 -0,5% -0,7% -0,9% -1,1% -1,4% -1,6% -1,8%
3 0,0% -0,2% -0,5% -0,7% -0,9% -1,1% -1,4%
4 0,5% 0,2% 0,0% -0,2% -0,5% -0,7% -0,9%
5 0,9% 0,7% 0,5% 0,2% 0,0% -0,2% -0,5%
6 1,4% 1,1% 0,9% 0,7% 0,5% 0,2% 0,0%
7 1,8% 1,6% 1,4% 1,1% 0,9% 0,7% 0,5%
8 2,3% 2,0% 1,8% 1,6% 1,4% 1,1% 0,9%
24
Primary balance required to maintain netpublic debt at 58 percent of GDP in Morocco
Pb=-4,1% Real growth rate (%)d=58%
3 3,5 4 4,5 5 5,5 6
Re
al in
tere
st r
ate
(%
)
2 -0,6% -0,9% -1,2% -1,5% -1,7% -2,0% -2,3%
3 0,0% -0,3% -0,6% -0,9% -1,2% -1,5% -1,7%
4 0,6% 0,3% 0,0% -0,3% -0,6% -0,9% -1,2%
5 1,2% 0,9% 0,6% 0,3% 0,0% -0,3% -0,6%
6 1,7% 1,5% 1,2% 0,9% 0,6% 0,3% 0,0%
7 2,3% 2,0% 1,7% 1,5% 1,2% 0,9% 0,6%
8 2,9% 2,6% 2,3% 2,0% 1,7% 1,5% 1,2%25
Keys points• Fiscal consolidation will require significant effort over the medium
term.
• While countries are at various levels of Debt to Gdp ratio and various stages of fiscal adjustment policy, these illustrative scenarios can shed light on the scale of the challenge: if public debt ratios were to remain at their current levels, the primary balances would be positive and reach in some case more than 1 percent of GDP.
• Restoring debt to sustainable levels (assumed here, for purposes of illustration, at around the 2013 level ) over the medium term will require raising the economic growth to 5 to 6% on average while keeping zero primary balance.
26
2- Debt Drivers
27
DEBT DYNAMIC in OPEN ECONOMY
28
𝑑𝑡 =(1 + 𝑖𝑡 + 𝜀𝑡𝛼𝑓 1 + 𝑖𝑡
𝑓
(1 + 𝜋𝑡)(1 + 𝑔𝑡)𝑑𝑡−1 − 𝑝𝑏𝑡 + 𝜇𝑡
𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑖𝑡 = 𝑖𝑡−1𝑑 1 − 𝛼𝑡−1 + 𝑖𝑡
𝑓𝛼𝑡−1 is the weighted average of domestic and foreign interest rates and 𝛼𝑡−1 is
the share of debt denominated in foreign currency. To determine the factors contributing to the variation in the
debt ratio, simply subtract 𝑑𝑡−1 on both sides to get :
∆𝑑𝑡=𝑖𝑡 − 𝜋𝑡 1 + 𝑔𝑡 + 𝜀𝑡𝛼𝑓 1 + 𝑖𝑡
𝑓
(1 + 𝜋𝑡)(1 + 𝑔𝑡)𝑑𝑡−1 − 𝑝𝑏𝑡 + 𝜇𝑡
1. The Real Interest Rate change : 𝑖𝑡
(1+𝜋𝑡)(1+𝑔𝑡)𝑑𝑡−1
2. Change Real Growth Rate : − 𝜋𝑡 1+𝑔𝑡
(1+𝜋𝑡)(1+𝑔𝑡)𝑑𝑡−1
3. Change of the Exchange Rate (appreciation/depreciation) : 𝜀𝑡𝛼𝑓 1+𝑖𝑡
𝑓
(1+𝜋𝑡)(1+𝑔𝑡)𝑑𝑡−1
Different Historical debt dynamic decreases beforethe Transition
Growth and Exhange depreciation
-3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
-2,1
-0,1
-0,7
-2,6
0
2
-0,7
Morocco 2002-2010
Growth and Privatisation
-3,0
-2,5
-2,0
-1,5
-1,0
-0,5
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
-1,9
0,8
1,5
-1,5
0,2
1,7
-2,7
Tunisia 2008-2010
29
Primary balance and Exchange Depreciation are the main drivers of Debt to GDP increases (Tunisia)
30
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
2011 2012 2013
1,73,4 4,1
40 0,7
0,8
-1,5 -1,1-1,3
-3,2-2,3
Primary deficit Exchange rate depreciation Change in gross public sector debt
Real GDP Growth Other debt creating flow Real Interest rate
Residual
Primary balance and Real Interest Rates are the main drivers of Debt to GDP increases ( Morocco)
31
-5
0
5
10
15
2011 2012 2013
4,4 4,9 2,9
3,095,77
1,6
-2,4 -1,4 -2,6
Primary deficit Exchange rate depreciation
Change in gross public sector debt Real GDP Growth
Other debt creating flow Real Interest rate
Residual
3- Monte Carlo simulation: Tunisia & MoroccoN=10000, T:2014-2019Simulate (foreign interest rate, exchange rate,
domestic interest rate, inflation rate, Real growth, primary balance…) in the future 2014-2019
Build the Debt to Gdp ratiousing Covariance-Variance MatrixNo correlationCholesky decomposition
32
Shocks & Risks
• Growth shocks : decrease of 0.25*std(g)
• Primary Balance Shocks: decrease of 0.5*std(pb)
• Depreciation Shocks: increase of max(dep)-mean(dep)
• Foreign Interest Rate Shocks: + 200 points bases
• Domestic Interest Rate Shocks :+ 200 points bases
33
Debt to GDP Ratio with Cholesky decomposition(Tunisia)
34
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
Without correlation Cholesky Decomposition
Fan Chart Debt to GDP Ratio for Tunisia withCholesky decomposition
35
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
10th-25th 25th-50th 50th-75th 75th-90th Baseline
Increasing Risk of hight Debt to GDP ratio if historial scenario held ( Tunisia)
No correlation Cholesky Decomposition
36
0
20
40
60
80
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Debt/Gdp>48%
Debt/Gdp>50%
Debt/Gdp>55%
Log. (Debt/Gdp>50%)
0
20
40
60
80
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Debt/Gdp>48%
Debt/Gdp>50%
Debt/Gdp>55%
Log. (Debt/Gdp>50%)
Impact of macroeconomic shocks on Debt to GDP profil ( Tunisia)
37
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Cholesky Decomposition Growth shokcs Primary Balance
Depreciation Foreign Interest Rate Domestique Interest Rate
Hight Risks following macroeconomic shocks( Tunisia)
Growth and primary balances are important
38
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Probability of Debt/Gdp>48%
Hisorical scenario Growth shock
Primary balance deterioration Depreciation shock
Foreign Interest Rate Domestique Interest Rate
Log. (Primary balance deterioration) Log. (Foreign Interest Rate)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Probability of Debt/Gdp>50%
Hisorical scenario Growth shock
Primary balance deterioration Depreciation shock
Foreign Interest Rate Domestique Interest Rate
Log. (Growth shock) Log. (Primary balance deterioration)
Debt to GDP Ratio with Cholesky decomposition ( Morocco)
39
0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
70,0
80,0
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Without correlation Benchmark (cholesky)
Impact of macroeconomic shocks on Debt to GDP ratio profil ( Morocco)
40
40,0
45,0
50,0
55,0
60,0
65,0
70,0
75,0
80,0
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Benchmark (cholesky) Growth shoks Primary Balance
Depreciation Foreign Interest Rate Domestique Interest Rate
Fan Chart of Debt to GDP Ratio for Tunisia withCholesky decomposition (Morocco)
41
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
10th-25th 25th-50th 50th-75th 75th-90th Baseline
Increasing Risk of hight Debt ratio if historial scenario held ( Morocco)
No correlation Cholesky Decomposition
42
0,0
20,0
40,0
60,0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Debt/Gdp>65.7%
Debt/Gdp>67.7%
Debt/Gdp>72.7%
Log. (Debt/Gdp>67.7%)
0,0
20,0
40,0
60,0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Debt/Gdp>65.7%
Debt/Gdp>67.7%
Debt/Gdp>72.7%
Log. (Debt/Gdp>67.7%)
High Risks following macroeconomic shocks(Morocco)
Growth and primary balances are important
43
0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
70,0
80,0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Probability of Debt/Gdp>65%
Hisorical scenario Growth shock
Primary balance deterioration Depreciation shock
Foreign Interest Rate Domestique Interest Rate
Log. (Primary balance deterioration) Log. (Domestique Interest Rate)
0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
70,0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Probability of Debt/Gdp>68%
Hisorical scenario Primary balance deterioration
Depreciation shock Foreign Interest Rate
Domestique Interest Rate Log. (Primary balance deterioration)
Log. (Domestique Interest Rate)
Results
• By damaging growth and increasing social expenses, the Arab Spring has put public debt sustainability once again high on the North Africa Countries in Transition’s (NACTs) policy agenda.
• Applying a backward and forward sustainability analysis based on ‘stabilizing primary balance approach’ and Monte Carlo simulations is interesting for understanding debt vulnerabilities
• Forward Debt Sustainability Analysis shows the Moroccan and Tunisian debt levels to be resilient to various shocks, and vulnerabilities linked to the profile of the debt appear moderate.
• However, under primary balance shocks, gross financing needs for Tunisia and Morocco would increase highlighting some risks despite the relatively moderate level of debt.
44
• The main driver of sustainability is growth outlook, and fiscal consolidation.
• This underscoring the importance of economic recovery and even accelerating growth.
• Fiscal consolidation as well as utilizing the borrowing space for growth enhancing will need to play a greater role in maintaining debt sustainability in the future.
45
Conclusion
1. Restoring debt to sustainable levels over the medium term will require raising the primary fiscal balance and Growth1. Fiscal consolidation will require structural reforms over the
medium term. 2. For countries with low fiscal or external buffers, delays in
Consolidation could heighten concerns about Debt sustainability.3. Current account deficits and financing needs are substantial in
many NACTs. How Much?
4. Role of MFIs in supporting NACT’s. Where to borrow? How to borrow?
46
Thanks
47