26
Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration Dr. Iswariya Venkataraman Scientific Affairs-Manager EUROIMMUN US April 26 th 2020 An Industry Perspective”

Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Challenges in Development of

Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Dr. Iswariya Venkataraman

Scientific Affairs-Manager

EUROIMMUN US

April 26th 2020

“An Industry Perspective”

Page 2: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Disclosure

• Dr. Iswariya Venkataraman is a full-time employee of EUROIMMUN USA

Page 3: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

EUROIMMUN – Corporate Introduction

Corporate Confidential, Internal use only

Page 4: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Agenda

Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

EUROIMMUN Biofluid Biomarkers

Challenges in Development of Biofluid Biomarkers

In vitro Diagnostic Industry Goals

Page 5: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease

1990s

Amyloid cascade hypothesis

1990s-2000s

Reduced Aβ42 levels in Alzheimer’s Disease

2010

Biomarkers before clinical symptoms

Page 6: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Guidelines for in Alzheimer’s Disease

2018: NIA-AA Research Framework

Alzheimer’s Disease as biological entity defined by positive biomarkers for amyloid and tau

2011: NIA-AA Criteria

Clinical Syndrome with biomarkers for amyloid and neurodegeneration

1984: NINCDS-ADRDA Criteria

Clinical-pathological defination

Page 7: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Paradigm Shift in Alzheimer‘s Disease

Diagnosis

“The term “Alzheimer’s disease” refers to an aggregate of neuropathologic

changes & thus is defined in vivo by biomarkers and by postmortem

examination, not by clinical symptoms”

Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, et al. Alzheimer's & dementia. (2018), Jack CR Jr, Knopman DS, et al. Lancet Neurology (2010)

Symptoms + Signs

(cognitive decline,

biomarkers)

Biological Construct

(underlying pathological

processes)

Page 8: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

NIA-AA Research Framework

Jack et al Alzheimer's & Dementia (2018)

Page 9: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Biofluid Biomarkers from EUROIMMUN

Page 10: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

EUROIMMUN Neurodegeneration ELISA Portfolio

Aβ (40, 42)

Tau (Total & Phospho)

Synaptic Markers

Alpha-Synuclein

NeurofilamentspNFHNFL*

ALS

Neurogranin

BACE 1

CSF Plasma

*: under development

EUROIMMUM Portfolio

Page 11: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

EUROIMMUN Chemiluminescence Platform

CSF Aβ40 and Aβ42

CSF Tau and P-Tau

Blood Aβ40 and Aβ42

Neurofilaments

Random Access Analyzer 10

• Time to First Result: 25 minutes

• 60 samples & 10 parameters

• Throughput: 85 tests/hour

104 cm (41 in)

94

cm (

37

in)

Page 12: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

EUROIMMUN: CSF Aβ 42/40 ratio Concordance to PET

83% Concordance 93% Concordance

Added Value of Aβ 42/40 Ratio

Aβ42/40 ratio shows good concordance (93%) with PET results

Janelidze et al;2015

Page 13: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

EUROIMMUN: Plasma Aβ 42/40 Assay Performance

p<0.0001

Unpublished data

Plasma Aβ 42/40 ratio significantly differentiates AD from control groups

Page 14: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

EUROIMMUN: Plasma Aβ 42/40 Assay Performance

AUC plasma Aβ 42/40 ratio measured with ELISA = 86%

Unpublished data

Page 15: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

EUROIMMUN: Neurogranin/BACE1 Ratio Correlation to MMSE

CT

RL

(20)

MC

I (3

8)

AD

(50)

0 .0

0 .1

0 .2

0 .3

0 .4

ra

tio

ne

uro

gra

nin

tru

nc

P7

5/B

AC

E1

*

****

• Neuogranin or BACE1 alone are not a useful tool to identify AD or MCI

• Neurogranin/BACE1 ratio demonstrated significant correlation with rate of cognitive decline

• None of the single analytes or other combinations demonstrated the same prognostic value

De Vos A et al 2016

A higher ratio indicated a more rapid decline in MMSE scores

Page 16: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

EUROIMMUN: pNf-H as a Diagnostic Biomarker in ALS

• Serum pNfH concentrations were elevated up to 18 months prior to ALS diagnosis vs healthy controls

• 62% of samples had a concentration beyond the cutoff of 81.9 pg/mL

• Prognostic marker: concentration >226 pg/mL corresponded to a 2x increased risk of death

De Schaepdryver et al., 2019

EUROIMMUN pNf-H ELISA + Serum

Serum pNf-H: a candidate diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for ALS

Page 17: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Challenges Associated in Biomarker Assay Development

Page 18: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Assay Development in a Snapshot

Assay DesignBiomarker

identification / IP & licensing

Assay platform

(Analytical) Validation

Precision ReproducibilityCalibration using

reference materials

Design Transfer

Transfer to production department

Establishment of RUO test

Assay Adaptation

Optimization of design variables

(antibody concentrations,

blocking)

Standardization of production

(manufacturing instructions, quality

control)

(Clinical) Qualification

Clinical performance

Method comparison

(reference test)

Regulatory Process

Appropriate IVD approval

Market Launch

Res

earc

h &

D

eve

lop

me

nt

Co

mm

erc

ial P

rod

uct

ion

RU

O

Page 19: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Challenges Associated in Biomarker Measurement

• Increasing biomarkers identified

• Establishment of a Global Cut-off Value

• Non-commutable assays

• Invasive sample collection methods

• SOPs for sample collection

Page 20: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Pathological mechanisms & Associated Biofluid

Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Molinuevo, J.L. et al 2018

Page 21: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Large Variabilities in Measurement of Aβ42

Aβ42?

Page 22: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

CRMs for Commercial Immunoassays

Bjerke, Maria, et al. CCLM 54.7 (2016): 1177-1191

Released in Dec 2017

CRM: Certified Reference Materials

Reduced between-vendor bias & Re-standardized CRM measurements close to target values (CV≥7%)

Aβ42

Page 23: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

SOP for CSF-handling (Fresh samples)

https://www.alz.org/research/for_researchers/partnerships/biomarker_consortium/gbsc_working_groups

SOP for frozen samples- Ongoing

Page 24: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Blood-Based Biomarkers

Clinical usefulness in AT(N) pathophysiology

• Screening of patients for 2nd grade diagnostic evaluation (CSF, PET, MRI)

• To monitor drug effects on amyloid/tau pathology in clinical trials

Diagnostic performance requirements

• Distinguishable concentrations to identify cognitively unimpaired elderly

• Not required to be disease specific: Positive predictive value (PPV) >40-50 %

High negative predictive value >90-95 %

Challenges to develop blood-based biomarkers

• Very low levels of brain-derived proteins in plasma

• High amount of plasma proteins (50 g/L) > risk for matrix effectsAdapted from Kaj Blennowpresentation: PPSB LA 2018

Page 25: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

Summary

• AT(N) classification system: definition of AD based on biomarkers

• Unified and coordinated approach for identification of candidate biomarkers

• Planning of study design, subjects, methodology, and producing outcomes representative of

wider population

• Concerted and Collaborative effort: academia, diagnostic, and pharma industries

• Development as a companion biomarker useful to practitioners

• Paradigm shift from “one treatment fits all” > biomarker-guided “tailored therapies“

•Validation of sensitive, specific and reproducible biomarkers in neurodegeneration

•Focus on reliable, and inexpensive blood based biomarkers for screening large populations

IVD Industry Goals

Page 26: Challenges in Development of Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration

The presentation documents including the information contained therein are the property of EUROIMMUN US, Inc. and must be treated confidentially. Any processing, use and transfer of these

documents and information is explicitly prohibited.

Thank you for your attention!