Author
hussam-murshed
View
302
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
3
BFC 4043
2.0 SHALLOW FOUNDATION :
2.1 General Concept A shallow foundation must :
be safe against overall shear failure in the soil
not undergo excessive settlement
Nature of bearing capacity failure are : (as shown in Figure 2.1)
general shear failure (for stiff clay or dense sand) local shear failure (for medium dense sand or clayey soil) punching shear failure(loose sand or soft clay)
Figure 2.1 Nature of bearing capacity failure : (a) general shear (b) local shear (c) punching shear
Vesic (1973) proposed a relationship for the bearing capacity failure on sands in terms of relative density, Dr depth of foundation, Df and B*, Figure 2.2 Where :
and B width, L length of foundation
NOTE : L IS ALWAYS GREATER THAN B For square; B=Land for circular; B=L=Diameter of foundation and B* = B
Figure 2.2 Modes of foundation failure in sand, (Vesic, 1973)
2.2 Terzaghis Bearing Capacity Terzaghi suggested for a continuous or strip foundation with failure surface as in Figure 2.3
Figure 2.3 Bearing capacity failure in soil under rough rigid continuous foundation
Soil above the bottom of foundation is surcharge, q = Df The failure zone under the foundation is separated into three parts namely;
triangular ACD under the foundation
radial shear zones ADF and CDE with curves DE and DF as arcs of logarithmic spiral
Rankine passive zones AFH and CEG
CAD and ACD are assume to equal friction angle, Thus ultimate bearing capacity, qu for general shear failure can be expressed as :
Where : c cohesion of soil
- unit weight of soil
q = Df
Nc, Nq, N- bearing capacity factors
And
where - passive pressure coefficient Table 2.1 summarizes values for Nc, Nq, and N
Table 2.1 Terzaghis Bearing Capacitys Factors
NcNqN
NcNqN
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1415
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
255.706.00
6.30
6.62
6.97
7.34
7.73
8.15
8.60
9.09
9.6110.16
10.76
11.41
12.11
12.86
13.68
14.60
15.12
16.56
17.69
18.92
20.27
21.75
23.36
25.131.001.10
1.22
1.35
1.49
1.64
1.81
2.00
2.21
2.44
2.69
2.98
3.29
3.63
4.02
4.45
4.92
5.45
6.04
6.70
7.44
8.26
9.19
10.23
11.40
12.720.000.01
0.04
0.06
0.10
0.14
0.20
0.27
0.35
0.44
0.56
0.69
0.85
1.04
1.26
1.52
1.82
2.18
2.59
3.07
3.64
4.31
5.09
6.00
7.08
8.342627
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
5027.0929.24
31.61
34.24
37.16
40.41
44.04
48.09
52.6457.75
63.53
70.01
77.50
85.97
95.66
106.81
119.67
134.58
151.95
172.28
196.22
224.55
258.28
298.71
347.50
14.2115.90
17.81
19.98
22.46
25.28
28.52
32.23
36.50
41.44
47.16
53.80
61.55
70.61
81.27
93.85
108.75
126.50
147.74
173.28
204.19
241.80
287.85
344.63
415.149.8411.60
13.70
16.18
19.13
22.65
26.87
31.94
38.04
45.41
54.36
65.27
78.61
95.03
115.31
140.51
171.99
211.56
261.60
325.34
407.11
512.84
650.67
831.99
1072.80
From Kumbhojkar (1993)
And ultimate bearing capacity, qu for local shear failure can be expressed as :
Where : Nc, Nq, N(see Table 2.2) are reduced bearing capacity factors can be calculated by using Nc, Nq, N- bearing capacity factors with
Table 2.2 Terzaghis Modified Bearing Capacitys Factors
NcNqN
NcNqN
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
255.70
5.906.106.306.516.746.977.227.477.748.028.328.638.969.319.6710.0610.4710.9011.3611.8512.3712.9213.5114.1414.801.00
1.071.141.221.301.391.491.591.701.821.942.082.222.382.552.732.923.133.363.613.884.174.484.82
5.205.600.00
0.0050.020.040.055
0.0740.100.1280.160.200.240.300.350.420.480.570.670.760.881.031.121.351.551.741.972.25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
5015.5316.3017.1318.0318.9920.0321.1622.3923.7225.1826.7728.5130.4332.5334.8737.4540.3343.5447.1351.1755.7360.9166.8073.5581.31
6.056.547.077.668.319.039.8210.6911.6712.75
13.9715.3216.8518.5620.5022.7025.2128.0631.3435.1139.4844.4550.4657.4165.602.592.883.293.764.394.835.516.327.22
8.359.4110.9012.7514.7117.2219.7522.5026.2530.4036.00
41.70
49.30
59.2571.4585.75
Example 2.1
Given : A square foundation, 1.5m x 1.5m in plan view
Soil parameters :
= 20, c = 15.2 kN/m2, =17.8 kN/m3Assume : FS = 4, general shear failure condition and Df= 1 m
Find : Allowable gross load on the foundation
Solution :
For = 20, (Table 2.1); Nc = 17.69, Nq = 7.44, N= 3.64
Thus
Allowable bearing capacity :
Thus total allowable gross load, Q
Example 2.2
Given : Repeat example 2.1Assume : Local shear failure condition
Solution:
For = 20, (Table 2.2); Nc = 11.85, Nq = 3.88, N= 1.12
Allowable load :
;
2.3 Effect of Water Table on Bearing Capacity All equations mentioned before are based on the location of water table well below the foundation; if otherwise, some modification should be made according to the location of the water table, see Figure 2.4
Figure 2.4 Modification of bearing capacity for water table
Case I : 0 D1 Df q(effective surcharge) =
where :
- effective unit weight =
- saturated unit weight of soil
- unit weight of water = 9.81kN/m3 or 62.4 lb/ft3 in the last term of the equation Case II : 0 d B the value
Case III : d B water has no effect on the quNote : the values of bearing capacity factors used strictly depending on whether the condition is general or local shear failure.2.4 Factor of Safety, FS
, where :
qall - gross allowable load-bearing capacity, qu gross ultimate bearing capacity,
FS factor of safety Values of FS against bearing capacity failure is 2.5 to 3.0.
Net stress increase on soil = net ultimate bearing capacity/FS
, and :
;
Where : qall(net) net allowable bearing capacity
qu(net) net ultimate bearing capacity
Procedure for FSsheara. Find developed cohesion,cd and angle of friction,d;
b. Terzaghis equations become (with cd and d):
With : Nc, Nq, N- bearing capacity factors for dc. Thus, the net allowable bearing capacity :
Example 2.3
Using ; and FS = 5; find net allowable load for the foundation in example 2.1 with qu = 521 kN/m2
With qu = 521 kN/m2; q = 1(17.8) = 17.8 kN/m2
HenceQall(net) = 100.64(1.5x1.5) = 226.4 kN
Example 2.4
Using Example 3.1, and Terzaghis equation
with FSshear = 1.5;
Find net allowable load for the foundation
For c=15.2 kN/m2, = 20 and
cd =
d = tan-1[] = tan-1[] = 13.64
With:
From Table 2.1 : =13.6 ; ; ; (estimation)Hence :
2.5 The General Bearing Capacity Equation The need to address for rectangular shape foundation where :(0 1
NOTE : tan-1(Df/B) is in radian inclination
Where : inclination of load from vertical For undrained condition ( = 0)
Skemptons :
Table 2.3 Vesics Bearing Capacity Factors for General Equation (1973)NcNqN
Nq/ NcTan NcNqN
Nq/ NcTan
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
255.145.38
5.63
5.90
6.19
6.49
6.81
7.16
7.53
7.92
8.35
8.80
9.28
9.81
10.37
10.98
11.63
12.34
13.10
13.93
14.83
15.82
16.88
18.05
19.32
20.721.001.09
1.20
1.311.43
1.57
1.72
1.88
2.06
2.25
2.47
2.71
2.97
3.26
3.59
3.94
4.34
4.77
5.26
5.80
6.40
7.07
7.82
8.66
9.60
10.660.000.07
0.15
0.24
0.34
0.45
0.57
0.71
0.86
1.03
1.22
1.44
1.69
1.97
2.29
2.65
3.06
3.53
4.07
4.68
5.39
6.20
7.13
8.20
9.44
10.880.200.20
0.21
0.22
0.23
0.24
0.25
0.26
0.27
0.28
0.30
0.31
0.32
0.33
0.35
0.36
0.37
0.39
0.40
0.42
0.43
0.45
0.46
0.48
0.50
0.510.000.02
0.03
0.05
0.07
0.09
0.11
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.19
0.21
0.23
0.25
0.27
0.29
0.31
0.32
0.34
0.36
0.38
0.40
0.42
0.45
0.4726
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
5022.2523.94
25.80
27.86
30.14
32.67
35.49
38.64
42.16
46.12
50.59
55.63
61.35
67.87
75.31
83.86
93.71
105.11
118.37
133.88
152.10
173.64
199.26
229.93
266.89
11.8513.20
14.72
16.44
18.40
20.67
23.18
26.09
29.44
33.30
37.75
42.92
48.93
55.96
64.20
73.90
85.38
99.02
115.31
134.88
158.51
187.21
222.31
265.51
319.07
12.5414.47
16.72
19.34
22.40
25.99
30.22
35.19
41.06
48.03
56.31
66.1978.03
92.25
109.41
130.22
155.55
186.54
224.64
271.76
330.35
403.67
496.01
613.16
762.890.530.55
0.57
0.59
0.61
0.63
0.65
0.68
0.70
0.72
0.75
0.77
0.80
0.82
0.85
0.88
0.91
0.94
0.97
1.01
1.04
1.08
1.12
1.15
1.200.490.51
0.53
0.55
0.58
0.60
0.62
0.65
0.67
0.70
0.73
0.75
0.78
0.81
0.84
0.87
0.90
0.93
0.97
1.00
1.04
1.07
1.11
1.15
1.19
Example 2.5
Figure 2.5Given : A square foundation (B x B), Figure 2.5, Q=150 kN.
Df = 0.7m, load is inclined at 20 from vertical, FS = 3.
Use general bearing capacity factorsFind
: The width of foundation B
;
From Table 2.3 : For =30: Nq = 18.4, N = 22.4, Nq/ Nc = 0.61, Tan = 0.58
;
EMBED Equation.3 ;
;
So
EMBED Equation.3 By trial and error : B=1.3m
2.6 Eccentrically Loaded Foundations Eccentrically loaded foundations give non-uniform distribution of pressure, Figure 2.6
Figure 2.6 Eccentrically loaded foundations
Eccentricity,
qmax and qmin is given by :
and
if e > B/6, and qmin becomes negative then :
Factor of safety against bearing capacity failure; effective area method, by Meyerhof (1953)
a. Find effective dimensions of the dimensions
the smaller of B and L is the width
effective width, B = B 2e
effective length, L = L
if e is in the direction of L than L = L 2e
b. Find the ultimate bearing capacity, qu :
use L and B to find
use B to find
c. Total ultimate load, ; where A effective area
d. Factor of safety,
e. Check FS against qmax ;
Example 2.6
Given : A square foundation as shown in Figure 2.7. Using general bearing capacity factors, (table 2.3)
Figure 2.7
Find : Ultimate load, Qult,
assume one way load eccentricity, e = 0.15mSolution : with c = 0;
Where :
q = 0.7(18) = 12.6 kN/m2for = 30, from Table 2.3 : Nq=18.4 and N=22.4
B = 1.5 2(0.15) = 1.2m
L = 1.5m
Thus values for general bering capacity equations : (using B and L)
Qult = qu X A = 549.2 X (1.5X1.2) = 988kN
Qall = 988/3 = 330kN with FS=32.7 Load on strip footingExample 2.7 :
Given : The strip footing shown below is to be constructed in a uniform deposit of stiff clay and must support a wall that imposes a loading of 152 kN/m of wall length. Use general bearing capacity factors.Find : The width of footing with FS of 3.
Figure 2.8Solution :
And =0; from the Table 2.3 Nc = 5.14, Nq = 1.0 and N=0
B required is 1.5 meter to be conservative
2.8 Dimension of loaded square pad footing
Example 2.8 :
Soil deposit has the following ;=20.44 kN/m3, =30, c=38.3kN/m2Square footing located 1.52 m below surface, carries 2670 kN and groundwater is negligible. Use Terzaghis values, (Table 2.1).
Find : The right dimension B. Use Terzaghis equation
With =30; Nc=37.16, Nq=22.46, N=19.13Assume B=3 m;
Assume B=1 m;
Assume B=2m;
Assume B=1.8m;
Assume B=1.7m;
Therefore use 1.7m x 1.7m 2.9 Contact Pressure and stability check. Can be computed by using flexural formula of :
Where :
q contact pressure
Q total axial vertical load
A area of footing
Mx, My total moment about respective x and y axes
Ix, Iy moment of inertia about respective x and y axes
x, y distance from centroid to the outer most point at which the contact pressure is computed along respective x and
y axes.
Example 2.9A pad footing with dimension of 1.52 x 1.52m acted upon by the load of 222.4kN. Estimate soil contact pressure and FS against bearing capacity.
Given :
1.52m by 1.52m square footing; P=222.4kN; =18.85kN/m3
=24 kN/m3; qu = 143.64 kN/m2Find :
a. Soil contact pressure
b. FS against bearing capacity pressure
Solution :
a. ; Mx=My=0; since load on centroid
Total load calculation, Q :
Column load, P = 222.4kN
Weight of footing base = (1.52m)(1.52m)0.31m(24kN/m3) = 17.19 kN
Weight of footing pedestal = (0.14m)(0.14m)(0.91m)(24kN/m3) = 0.43 kN
Weight of backfill soil
= [(1.52m)(1.52m)-(0.14m)(0.14m)](0.91m) x 18.85kN/m3
= 39.3kN
Q = 222.4 + 17.19 + 0.43 + 39.3 = 279.32kN
Area, A = 1.52mx1.52m = 2.31m2
Soil contact pressure or Stress, q = Q/A = 120.9 kN/m2
b.
Assuming cohesive soil has : =0 and c>0; thus :
Nc=5.14, Nq=1.0, N=0, Df=1.22m
Since FS > 3.0; thus ok.
Given : 2.29m by 1.52m rectangular footing
Find : Contact pressure and soil pressure diagram
Solution :
Using flexural formula;
Q = P + W = 222.4 kN + 88.96 kN = 311.36 kN.A = 2.29m x 1.52m = 3.48 m2; Mx=0; My=88.96(1.22)+81.35=189.88kN.m (Moment about point C)x = 2.29/2 = 1.145m;
Take V = 0 and Mc = 0 will produce :
V = 0 :
Mc = 0 : see Figure 2.12 (b) and (c)
Example 2.11 Checking stability on shallow foundation
Given : A 6 ft x 6 ft footing as shown; load P=60kips; weight of concrete footing including pedestal + base pad, W1=9.3kips; backfill, W2=11.2kips; horizontal load = 4kips; qall for soil = 3.0 kips/ft2.
Find :
1. Contact pressure and soil pressure diagram.
2. Shear and moment at section A-A (in the Figure E3.14)
3. FS against sliding if coefficient of friction, = 0.404. FS against overturning.
Solution :
1.
Q=P+W1+W2=60+9.3+11.2=80.5kips
A=6ftx6ft=36ft2
My=4kipsx4.5ft=18kip-ft (about point C)
x=6ft/2=3ft
Iy=6ft(6ft)3/12=108ft4; Mx=0;Mxy/Ix=0
So : qright = 2.74 kips/ft2 < 3.0 kips/ft2 ; OK
qleft = 1.74 kips/ft2 < 3.0 kips/ft2 ; OK
2. FDG and EDH are similar triangles; so
3.
4.
2.10 Settlement of shallow foundation
Foundation settlement under load can be classified according to two major types :
(a) immediate or elastic settlement, Se(b) consolidation settlement, ScElastic settlement, Se takes place immediately during or after construction of structure.
Consolidation settlement, Sc is time dependent comprises of two phases; namely, primary and secondary consolidation settlement.
2.10.1 Elastic settlement of foundations on saturated clay
Elastic settlement of foundations on saturated clay is given by Janbu et al., (1956) using the equation :
where :
A1 is a function of H/B and L/B and A2 is a function of Df/B
All parameters of H, B and Df (with L into the paper) are as shown in Figure 2.14.
Figure 2.14 : Parameters
Figure 2.15 : A2 Versus Df/B
Figure 2.16 : A1 Versus H/B and L/B
Elastic settlement of foundation on sand based on SPT N- value
By Meyerhof
Refer section 5.13 page 263 Equations 5.61 and 5.622.10.2 Elastic settlement of foundations on sandy soil: use of strain influence factor
Schmertmann, (1978) proposed that the elastic settlement in sandy soil as :
where :
Iz strain influence factor
C1 correction factor due to depth =
C2 correction factor due to soil creep =
- stress at the level of foundation (due to loading + self weight of footing + weight of soil above footing)
Figure 2.17 : Calculation of elastic settlement using strain influence factor
The variation of Iz with depth below the footing for square or circular are as below :
Iz = 0.1at z = 0
Iz = 0.5atz = z1 = 0.5B
Iz = 0
atz = z2 = 2B
Footing with L/B 10 (rectangular footing) :
Iz = 0.2at z = 0
Iz = 0.5atz = z1 = B
Iz = 0
atz = z2 = 4B
2.10.3 Range of material parameters
Elastic parameters such as Es and s in Table 2.4 can be used if the real laboratory test results not available.
Table 2.4 : Elastic parameters of various soils
Type of soilModulus of Elasticity, Es(MN/m2)Poissons ratio, s
Loose sand10.5 24.00.20 0.40
Medium dense sand17.25 27.600.25 0.40
Dense sand34.50 55.200.30 0.45
Silty sand10.35 17.250.20 0.40
Sand and gravel69.00 172.500.15 0.35
Soft clay4.1 20.70.20 0.50
Medium clay20.7 41.4
Stiff clay41.4 96.6
2.10.4 Consolidation settlement
(a) Primary consolidation, ScMany methods were developed in estimating the value of consolidation settlement, Sc. Due to simplicity only chart based on Newmarks (1942), Figure 2.18 will be used in estimating the consolidation settlement.
Primary consolidation, Sc calculated as :
where : Cc compression index (given)
H thickness of clay layer
e0 initial void ratio (given)
p = p0 + p, final pressure
p0 overburden pressure
p =4(Ip)q0 net consolidation pressure at mid-height of clay layer
Ip Influence factor (from Figure 2.18)
q0 net stress increase
Figure 2.18 : Chart for determining stresses below corners of rigid foundation and isotropic soilExample 2.7
Given :
Figure 2.19A foundation to be constructed as in Figure 2.19. The base of the foundation is 3m by 6m, and it exerts a total load of 5400 kN, which include all self weight. The initial void ratio, e0 is 1.38 and compression index, Cc is 0.68.
Required :
Expected primary consolidation settlement of clay layer.
Solution :
p0 = 19.83(200 - 198) + (19.83 9.81)(198 - 192) + (17.1 9.81)(192 185.6)/2 = 123.1 kN/m2Weight of excavation = 19.83(200 - 198) + (19.83 9.81)(198 195.5) = 64.7kN/m2
By dividing the base into 4 equal size of 1.5m by 3.0m :
mz = 1.5m
nz = 3.0m
;
From Figure 2.18, the influence coefficient is 0.04
Therefore ;
Final pressure, p = p0 + p = 123.1 + 37.6 = 160.7 kN/m2.
Therefore;
(b) secondary consolidation
Secondary settlement, Ss is computed from the following calculation (U.S. Department of the Navy, 1971)
where :
Ss secondary compression settlement
C coefficient of secondary compression, can be determined from Figure
3.26
H thickness of clay layer that is considered
ts time for which settlement is required
tp time to completion of primary consolidation
Figure 2.20 : Value of C2.11 Allowable bearing pressure in sand based on settlement consideration.
Bowles (1977) proposed a correlation of the net allowable bearing pressure for foundations with SPT (N-values).
The following equations are used :
And
Where :
Fd depth factor =
S tolerable settlement, in mm.
Example 2.8
Given:
A shallow square footing for a column is to be constructed. Design load is 1000 kN. The foundation soil is sand. The SPT numbers from field exploration as shown in the table.Assume that the footing must be 1.5m deep, the tolerable settlement as 25.4mm and the size is > 1.22m.Required :
(a) The exact size of the footing (b) safety factor for foundationSolution :
Navg = (7+8+11+11+13+10+9+10+12)/9=10
With S=25.4mm and N=10
By trial and error (set the table for calculation)
From the table it is seen that the appropriate B=2.4
Setting general equation and equation for net ultimate with c=0 (for sandy soil) :
;
For N=10; friction angle of =34 is considered (from table on SI)
With no inclination so Fqi=Fi=1.0
From table 2.3 Nq=29.44, N=41.06
So for a tolerable settlement of 25.4mm, the SF required is calculated as : SF=Qnet(u)/Q= 10,322kN/1000kN = 10.3 which is OK, therefore most design controlled by tolerable criterion.
EMBED Equation.3
1.5m x 1.5 m
0.7 m
Sand :
EMBED Equation.3
222.4KN
0.14m2
0.91m
1.22m
0.31m
1.52m
Pressure diagram
Figure 2.13
Figure 2.9
Example 2.10
Draw soil contact pressure for footing in Figure 2.11
Conversion to SI unit
P=222.4 kN;
H=88.96 kN;
M=81.35kN.m;
W=88.96 kN
Df=1.22m;
B=2.29m (7.5ft);
L=1.52m (5ft)
2670 kN
= 20.44 kN/m3
1.52m=30
c = 38.3 kN/m2
Figure 2.10
Figure 2.12 (a) and (b)
1.61m
254.46kN/m2
2.29m
2.29m
Figure 2.11
PAGE 26AKS & PM IR AZIZAN SEM 2 200910
_1142856382.unknown
_1321777128.unknown
_1321780833.unknown
_1322383563.unknown
_1322406945.unknown
_1323669513.unknown
_1323669858.unknown
_1323671688.unknown
_1323672375.unknown
_1323672467.unknown
_1323671327.unknown
_1323669724.unknown
_1322416799.unknown
_1322417273.unknown
_1322407060.unknown
_1322383739.unknown
_1322383886.unknown
_1322383582.unknown
_1322375343.unknown
_1322380621.unknown
_1322381021.unknown
_1322375494.unknown
_1322374923.unknown
_1322374972.unknown
_1321782275.unknown
_1322374673.unknown
_1321781343.unknown
_1321778366.unknown
_1321780060.unknown
_1321780596.unknown
_1321780776.unknown
_1321780553.unknown
_1321778482.unknown
_1321779946.unknown
_1321778417.unknown
_1321777372.unknown
_1321778005.unknown
_1321778253.unknown
_1321777399.unknown
_1321777195.unknown
_1321777248.unknown
_1147496804.unknown
_1150782275.unknown
_1273304477.unknown
_1279623636.unknown
_1281962473.unknown
_1281962558.unknown
_1281962693.unknown
_1281963095.unknown
_1281962527.unknown
_1281960730.unknown
_1273306952.unknown
_1273307063.unknown
_1273483137.unknown
_1273306790.unknown
_1152005999.unknown
_1273302621.unknown
_1273303833.unknown
_1152006258.unknown
_1151999961.unknown
_1152005559.unknown
_1150785386.unknown
_1150727563.unknown
_1150781821.unknown
_1150782212.unknown
_1150727564.unknown
_1150720366.unknown
_1150720407.unknown
_1150720126.unknown
_1150700601.unknown
_1147031989.unknown
_1147496440.unknown
_1147496673.unknown
_1147496758.unknown
_1147496559.unknown
_1147496040.unknown
_1147496316.unknown
_1147032021.unknown
_1147494891.unknown
_1143184049.unknown
_1147031729.unknown
_1147031915.unknown
_1143630281.unknown
_1143630294.unknown
_1143184422.unknown
_1143090681.unknown
_1143182291.unknown
_1143182590.unknown
_1143091102.unknown
_1142857024.unknown
_1142857237.unknown
_1142857350.unknown
_1142856510.unknown
_1142774375.unknown
_1142835846.unknown
_1142836711.unknown
_1142846231.unknown
_1142852481.unknown
_1142852726.unknown
_1142846684.unknown
_1142839355.unknown
_1142846173.unknown
_1142836788.unknown
_1142836248.unknown
_1142836413.unknown
_1142836502.unknown
_1142836333.unknown
_1142836106.unknown
_1142836162.unknown
_1142835885.unknown
_1142801860.unknown
_1142835144.unknown
_1142835595.unknown
_1142835764.unknown
_1142835531.unknown
_1142835516.unknown
_1142802024.unknown
_1142835045.unknown
_1142798134.unknown
_1142799682.unknown
_1142800365.unknown
_1142800860.unknown
_1142798735.unknown
_1142797059.unknown
_1142797552.unknown
_1142774491.unknown
_1142762490.unknown
_1142762838.unknown
_1142771228.unknown
_1142771322.unknown
_1142774308.unknown
_1142771278.unknown
_1142769201.unknown
_1142771151.unknown
_1142771070.unknown
_1142768849.unknown
_1142764600.unknown
_1142764594.unknown
_1142762573.unknown
_1142762727.unknown
_1142759813.unknown
_1142761109.unknown
_1142762149.unknown
_1142762171.unknown
_1142760937.unknown
_1142759206.unknown
_1142759780.unknown
_1142758119.unknown