ch03-bahria

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    1/34

    Equal Opportunity Employment

    Chapter 3

    By

    Noreen Saher

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    2/34

    Introduction

    Government legislation

    affects all HRM

    functions

    State and municipal

    laws impact HRM, as

    well as the Federal laws

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    3/34

    Laws Affecting Discriminatory

    Practices

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    4/34

    Civil Rights Act of 1964

    Title VII prohibits discrimination in:hiring

    compensation

    terms, conditions or privileges of employmentbased on:

    race

    religion

    colorsex

    national origin

    Applies to any organization with 15 or more

    employees.

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    5/34

    Civil Rights Act of 1964

    Griggs v. Duke Power Company (1971)

    demonstrated that selection criteria must be

    directly relevant to the job.

    Equal Employment Opportunity Act(1972) (EEOA)

    Granted enforcement powers to the EEOC

    Equal Employment Opportunity

    Commission (EEOC)

    The arm of the federal government empowered

    to handle discrimination in employment cases

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    6/34

    Voluntary Action Plans by

    Organisations

    Affirmative ActionReflect the 1972 premise that white malesmade up the majority of workers

    Companies in the 70s were still growing andcould accommodate more workers

    Minorities should be hired to correct pastprejudice

    Legal and social coercion were necessary to

    bring about changeInvolves:

    analyzing current work force demographics

    establishing goals and timetables for correcting

    imbalances

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    7/34

    Controversy and criticism of preferences inemployment for protected groups iscausing legislative bodies to take a secondlook at Affirmative Action.

    Adverse (disparate) impactoccurs when there is a greater rejection rate inan occupation for a protectedgroup (thoseprotected under discrimination laws) than for

    the majority group.

    Adverse (disparate/unequal) treatmentoccurs when members of a protected group aretreated differently than other employees.

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    8/34

    Laws Affecting Discriminatory

    Practices

    Executive Order (E.O.) 11246

    Prohibits discrimination on the basis of

    religion, color, and national origin

    Affects

    Federal agencies

    Those working under federal contracts

    Executive Order (E.O.) 11375

    Added sex-based discrimination

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    9/34

    Laws Affecting Discriminatory

    Practices

    Age Discrimination in

    Employment Act of 1967

    protects those 40 and older

    eliminates mandatory

    retirement and the arbitrary

    replacement of older

    workers with youngerworkers

    provides for oversight in

    pension and benefit issues

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    10/34

    Laws Affecting Discriminatory

    Practices

    Pregnancy Discrimination

    Act of 1978

    Employment decisions may not

    be based on an individuals

    pregnancy

    Must treat pregnancy as any

    other short-term disabilitySupplemented by various state

    laws

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    11/34

    Laws Affecting Discriminatory

    Practices

    The Americans with

    Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)

    Extends protection ofVocational

    Rehabilitation Act to most forms ofdisability status (including AIDS

    and other contagious diseases).

    Requires companies to make

    reasonable accommodations forqualified applicants and

    employees.

    Covers private companies and all

    public service organizations.

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    12/34

    Laws Affecting Discriminatory

    Practices

    The Family and Medical Leave Act of1993

    Employees in organizations employing 50 ormore workers can take up to 12 weeks

    unpaid leave each year forChildbirth

    Adoption

    Own illness or illness of a family member

    Employees must meet eligibility requirementsto be covered.

    Employers must meet certain communicationrequirements under the Act.

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    13/34

    Laws Affecting Discriminatory

    Practices

    Executive Order 11478

    Amends E.O. 11246

    Practices in the federal government

    must be based on merit

    Prohibits discrimination based on:

    Political affiliation

    Marital statusPhysical handicap

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    14/34

    Laws Affecting Discriminatory

    Practices

    Civil Rights Act of 1991Passed afterSupreme Court decisionsdiminished effect of Griggs decision.

    Prohibits racial harassment

    Returns burden of proof to employer

    Reinforces illegality of making hiring, firing orpromotion decisions on basis of race, ethnicity,sex or religion

    Permits women and religious minorities to seekpunitive (penalized /biased) damages inintentional discriminatory claims

    Included the Glass Ceiling Act

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    15/34

    Guarding Against Discrimination

    Practices

    Determining Potential Discriminatory

    Practices

    The 4/5ths Rule

    Restricted Policy

    Geographical Comparisons

    McDonnell-Douglas Test

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    16/34

    Guarding Against Discrimination

    Practices

    The 4/5ths Rule

    Guideline established by EEOC Uniform

    Guidelines on Employee Selection

    Procedures.

    Compares selection ratio for minority

    applicants to that for majority applicants

    If less than 4/5ths (80%), discriminationmay have occurred.

    Applies to all steps in a selection

    process.

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    17/34

    Guarding Against Discrimination

    Practices

    Restricted Policy

    infractions occur when HRM activities

    result in exclusion of a class of

    individualsE.g., laying off employees over age 40 while

    recruiting younger workers

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    18/34

    Guarding Against Discrimination

    Practices

    Geographical Comparisons

    Characteristics of the qualified

    pool of potential applicants

    are compared to

    characteristics of employees

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    19/34

    Guarding Against Discrimination

    Practices

    McDonnell-Douglas Test

    Individual is member of a protected

    group.

    Individual is qualified for job.

    Individual is rejected.

    Organization continues to seek other

    applicants with similar qualifications.

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    20/34

    Responding to an EEO Charge

    Employers should discontinue

    practices which cannot be defended.

    Practice reinstated only after

    Careful study

    Practice is modified, if necessary

    Three defenses:

    Business necessity

    Bona Fide occupations qualifications

    Seniority System

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    21/34

    Responding to an EEO Charge

    Business Necessity

    the right to expect employees

    to perform successfully

    shown by demonstrating that

    selection criteria are job-

    related

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    22/34

    Responding to an EEO Charge

    Bona Fide Occupational

    Qualifications

    Can be use whenjob requirements are

    Reasonably necessary to meet thenormal operation of that business or

    enterprise

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    23/34

    Responding to an EEO Charge

    Seniority Systems

    Decisions that adversely affect protected

    group members may be permissible if:

    Based on well-established and

    consistently applied seniority systems

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    24/34

    Selected Relevant Supreme

    Court Cases

    Cases Concerning Discrimination

    Cases Concerning Reverse Discrimination

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    25/34

    Selected Relevant Supreme

    Court Cases

    Cases concerning discrimination

    Griggs v. Duke Power(1971): Tests

    were illegal when they resulted in

    adverse impact and were not job

    related.

    Albemarle Paper Company v. Moody

    (1975): Clarified methods for using

    and validating tests in selection

    Wards Cove Packing Company v.

    Atonio (1989): Statistics alone could

    not support evidence of discrimination;

    burden of proof shifted to the plaintiff.

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    26/34

    Selected Relevant Supreme

    Court Cases

    Cases concerning reversediscrimination

    Bakke v. the Regents of the University

    of California at Davis Medical School(1978): School could not set aside

    seats for minorities.

    United Steelworkers of America v.

    Weber(1979): Court supported

    companys voluntary affirmative action

    training program for minorities.

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    27/34

    Selected Relevant Supreme

    Court Cases

    Firefighter Local 1784 v. Stotts(1984) & Wyant v. Jackson Board ofEducation (1986):

    Affirmative action may not takeprecedence over a seniority system

    Collective bargaining agreement givingpreferential treatment to minorities inlayoffs was illegal.

    Johnson v. Santa Clara CountyTransportation (1987):

    Preferential treatment based on AAgoals permitted if non-minorities

    protected.

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    28/34

    Enforcing Equal Employment

    Opportunity

    Equal Employment

    Opportunity Commission

    Jurisdiction for Title VII and

    other legislation that coverscharges of discrimination

    based on race, color, sex,

    national origin, age or

    disability.

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    29/34

    Five Step Process to Pursue

    Charges

    1. EEOC notifies company within 10 days of

    filing and begins investigation

    2. EEOC notifies company of findings within

    120 days3. If unfounded, process stops

    If founded, EEOC tries to resolve

    4. If unsuccessful, EEOC begins mediation(settlement meeting)

    5. If unsuccessful, EEOC may file charges

    in court

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    30/34

    Enforcing Equal Employment

    Opportunity

    Office of Federal Contract CompliancePrograms (OFCCP)

    EnforcesExecutive Order 11246

    Section 503 of Vocational Rehabilitation Act

    Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Act of 1974.

    Operates within U.S. Dept. of Labor.

    Investigates discrimination complaints; process

    similar to that of EEOC.Can cancel employers contract with federalgovernment

    Applies to any organization with a federalcontract or acts as a subcontractor.

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    31/34

    HRM in a Global Environment

    Laws affecting Human

    Resource Management vary

    greatly by country.

    Canadian laws closely

    parallel those in the U.S.

    In Mexico, employees more

    likely to be unionized.

    Australias discrimination

    laws not enacted until the

    1980s

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    32/34

    Current Issues in Employment

    Law

    What is Sexual Harassment?Unwanted activity of a sexual nature thataffects an individuals employment

    Prohibited under Title VII as sex discrimination

    Sexual harassment can occur where:verbal or physical conduct toward anindividual:

    (1) creates an intimidating, offensive, or hostile

    environment

    (2) unreasonably interferes with an individualswork

    (3) adversely affects employees employment

    opportunities.

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    33/34

    Current Issues in Employment

    Law

    Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson SupremeCourt case: supported hostile

    environment claims; identified employer

    liability.

    Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. Supreme

    Court case: victims dont have to suffer

    substantial mental distress.

    1998 Supreme Court ruling indicated thatharassment can take place even if the

    employee does not experience any

    negative job repercussions.

  • 7/28/2019 ch03-bahria

    34/34

    Current Issues in Employment

    Law

    Are Women Reaching the Top ofOrganizations?

    Comparable worth - determining fair pay for both

    female-oriented jobs and male-oriented jobs

    based on comparable skill, effort, andresponsibility.

    Glass ceiling - lack of women and minority

    representation at the top levels of organizations.

    OFCCP has glass ceiling initiative.Promotes career development

    for women and minorities.

    Looks for such in its audits.