Upload
stella-dean
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CGIARReview of Total Compensation
May 10, 2004
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
CGIAR Review of Total Compensation
CGIAR Review of Total Compensation
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
BackgroundApproachSurvey Results for Phase 1DiversityDisclosure PrinciplesNext Steps
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
BackgroundBackgroundNationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
CGIAR ExCo concluded at its May 2003 meeting that: “The Secretariat working with CBC, should prepare a paper of compensation structures and levels and mechanisms for ensuring transparency.
Compensation data on the CGIAR should be compared with those from appropriate comparator organizations.
The CGIAR data should be enriched with the expansion of the study to include compensation packages for locally recruited staff. ”
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Terms of Reference
• Drafted in consultation with CBC • Approved in January 2004 by ExCo
Review was divided into 4 Phases
• Phase 1-Review of Compensation Structures and Mechanisms for Ensuring Transparency of Internationally Recruited Staff (IRS)
• Phase 2- Comparison of CGIAR Compensation package for IRS with the Market
• Phase 3- Review of CGIAR Compensation Structures for Nationally Recruited Staff (NRS)
• Phase 4- Integrated Results Report
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Overall ApproachOverall ApproachNationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
• Governance of Project: Steering Group
• Collaborative and Technical Support:Focal points from each Center, appointed by DG’sSAS-HR Director and G & D Leader
• Professional Anchor: Sandra Lawrence for overall coordination, technical advice and quality control
• Survey and analysis: Persis Mathias, Project Leader from Hewitt Associates, Malaysia
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Overall Compensation Philosophyfor IRSOverall Compensation Philosophyfor IRS
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
To internationally recruit the best qualified staff
• To do so, need to address:Often remote location of centerNeed for enhanced securityLimited opportunity for spouse employmentUprooting of families from home countryPolicies to maintain close contact, both professionally and personally to home country in view of term appointments
• These factors affect the design of overall package of salary, allowance and benefits
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Phase 1- Survey of Compensation LevelsPhase 1- Survey of
Compensation LevelsNationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Objective
• To collect and analyze compensation
cash, benefits & administration
information across the centers and
system office of CGIAR
• To cover research, administrative
service and management levels
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Scope Scope Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Mapping• IRS mapped to 9 Hewitt based CGIAR
composite levelsCash compensation
• Actual minimum, median & maximum base salary data
• Bonuses• Other cash payments
Benefits• All employee benefits
Salary administration• Compensation philosophy & structures
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Process and Methodology
SURVEY PLANNINGSURVEY
PLANNING
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
SURVEY ADMINISTRA
TION
SURVEY ADMINISTRA
TION
SURVEY ANALYSISSURVEY
ANALYSIS
SURVEY DELIVERYSURVEY
DELIVERY
Planning
- Finalize scope
- Develop and ratify
level descriptors
- Establish project
milestones
- Establish center focal
points
Finalized customized questionnaires (Based
on ILRI study)
Level Equivalence via Hewitt’s
level descriptors
Electronic data
collection, Data entry
Sent and explained
the questionnai
res to all the Centers
Data verification
Data Clarification
- Cash
- Benefits
Data Analysis
Preliminary Analysis
ReportGeneration
Report Presentatio
n
Communication and
verification of Level Mapping Report
Filled in benefit
questionnaires to
centers that
participated in ILRI
study
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Hewitt/CGIAR Research Level Indicators
Hewitt/CGIAR Research Level Indicators
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Focus on the Role in terms of degree of challenge/complexity in:
Scientific ResearchResource ManagementBuilding collaborations and partnerships
Other indicative dimensions included• Qualifications & experience• Designation/ Position title• Quantifiable dimensions
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
CGIAR Composite Research
Level 3
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Creation & generation of ideas/solutions for new research areas. Highly innovative research. Developing & linking new tools and methods/ new innovations in one large complex project or several disciplinary areas & operating projects. High level development work leading to a defined product. Exacting & precise science.
Scientific ResearchScientific Research
Resource ManagementResource Management
Direction from supervisor/s is largely through planning & direction. Overall resource management. Fairly high level of leadership in the conceptual development of research projects. Oversight of large budgets and expenditures.
Plan and play a major role in securing project funding. May be involved with complex reporting for multiple donors. Responsible for overall resource mobilization for projects one is leading, including initiating proposals for large scale long term projects
Scientists at this level may carry significant management responsibility or else be recognized as a senior in providing intellectual input and disciplinary expertise to programs/projects.
Focus on Role: Degree of challenge / complexityFocus on Role: Degree of challenge / complexity
Building collaborations and partnershipsBuilding collaborations and partnerships
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
CGIAR Composite Research Level 3
Qualification & experienceQualification & experience
Other Indicative DimensionsOther Indicative Dimensions
Quantifiable dimensionsQuantifiable dimensions
Indicative designations/ titlesIndicative designations/ titles
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Doctoral course in the assigned subject area Post doctoral experience of 15 – 20 years Scientific & Development Recognition
Financial Responsibility Resource Mobilization People Management
Project Leader Senior Scientists
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Base Salary Base Salary Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
• Range of Median Base Salary• Shows base salary paid across all
Centers and the System office at Minimum, Maximum, Median and Mean of each Level across centers
• Base salary is the actual annual amount paid to individuals based on their level of responsibility
• Mean is the average of all individual salaries and median is the 50th percentile
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Overview Range of Median Base Salary
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Research 1
Research 2
Research 3
Research 4
Services 1
Services 2
Services 3
Mgmt 1
Mgmt 2
Figures in USD 000's per annum as of Dec 2003
Legend
Median Mean
Min Max
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Total Compensation Comparisons
Total Compensation Comparisons
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
• Variations and differences come to light when one looks at the over view of compensation and the method of delivery- cash allowance vs. benefit
• Some benefits are paid as cash allowances, others are policies
• In order to approximate total compensation, added all cash payments, quantifiable benefits, estimated pension contribution and cost of insurances
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Allowance and Benefits
Base Salary Annual Base Salary A A A
Rent Allowance A A
Transport / Mobility Allowance A A
Consolidated Allowance A
Responsibility Allowance A A
Medical check/ Dental A
Other Allowance 1- A
Professional Development A
Annual Variable Bonus (Sp.
Scheme for a Function)A
Education Allowance A B A
Home Leave Allowance A B B
Hardship Allowance A B A
Cost of Living Allowance A
Medical Plan B B B
Insurance B B B
Pension B B B
Housing A B
Car B B
Loans B B
Fixed Allowances
Other Allowances &/ or Benefits
Total Fixed Compensation
Total Compensation
Performance Bonus
X Z
CG Centers
Components of payY
Comparison of 3 Centers
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Overview of Median Total Compensation
Figures in USD 000's per annum as of Dec 2003
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Research 1
Research 2
Research 3
Research 4
Services 1
Services 2
Services 3
Mgmt 1
Mgmt 2
Min Max
Legend
Median Mean
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Benefit PoliciesBenefit PoliciesNationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Benefits were analyzed from a policy perspective
• Housing Assistance
• Children’s Education
• Club Membership
• Relocation Benefits
• Time Off
• Medical Plans: hospitalization and clinical plans
• Insurance: Life and Disability
• Pension & Gratuity
• Travel Assistance
• Vacation Travel
• Center Provided Car
Overall policies for benefits are similar but, -variations in plan design details
-different delivery methods across benefits
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Example of Variation in Plan Detail – Home Leave
Example of Variation in Plan Detail – Home LeaveNationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Staff, spouse and:
• Authorized dependents below 23 years of age (2 Centers)
• Dependent and resident children below 24 years (2)
• Eligible dependents up to 21 years of age (3)
• Dependent resident children up to grade 12 (1)
• Spouse or domestic partner, resident children up to 18 years of age (1)
• All dependents below the age of 26 (1)
• 4 children (1)
• Dependents resident at duty station (1)
• Whole family provided staff also takes leave (1)
• Spouse or domestic partner and dependent children (1)
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Center Pay Structures N o . o f E mp lo ye e s
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 01 001 1 01 2 01 3 01 4 01 5 0
Wo rld F ish WA R D A IWMI IP G R I IC R IS A T IL R I IR R I C IMMY T IIT A C IF O R C IA T C IP IC A R D A IC R A F
Internationally Recruited Staff Regionally Recruited Staff
A n n ual R even ue
0
2 0,000,000
4 0,000,000
Wo rld F ish WA R D A IWMI IP G R I IC R IS A T IL R I IR R I C IMMY T IIT A C IF O R C IA T C IP IC A R D A IC R A F
N o. of O ffi c es
0
2 0
4 0
Wo rld F ish WA R D A IWMI IP G R I IC R IS A T IL R I IR R I C IMMY T IIT A C IF O R C IA T C IP IC A R D A IC R A F
Base Salary
Total Cash
TCC
TFP0
5
10
Personal contac t in other companies Partic ipation in survey sponsored by other company No reference Sponsored compensation survey Published surveys Others
0
5
10
15
CGIAR Centres Government Organisations Advanced Research Organisations Private Sector International Development Organisations Others
0
5
10
15
Market where HQ is located Regional market Nationality of the international staff Global market Local market Others
0
5
10
By a fixed percentage Based on market references (market averages) On management disc retion Others
0
5
10
15
Additional Benefits Higher positioning of Base Additional Allowances Others
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Broad bands/ grades Individual market ref points T radit ional sal st ructure No structure
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
LocationsLocationsNationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Location Spread
• Internationally recruited staff are spread across 62 countries
• At some locations as many as 8 centers have staff
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Locations where Internationally Recruited Staff are:
Locations CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICRAF ICRISAT IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI IWMI WARDAWorld Fish
TOTAL
Afghanistan 2
Australia 1
Bangladesh 3
Benin 1
Belgium 0
Bolivia 2
Brazil 2
Burkina Faso 1
Cambodia 1
Cameroon 4
China 4
Colombia 3
Costa Rica 2
Congo 1
Ecuador 1
Egypt 2
Ethiopia 4
France 2
Gabon 1
Georgia 1
Ghana 2
Honduras 1
India 5
Indonesia 3
Iran 1
Italy 2
Ivory Cost 1
J ordan 1
Kazakhstan 1
Kenya 8
Korea 1
Laos 4
Malawi 6
Malaysia 2
Mali 2
Morocco 0
Mozambique 3
Nepal 2
New Caledonia 1
Nicaragua 2
Niger 2
Nigeria 3
Pakistan 1
Peru 2
Philippines 7
Rwanda 2
Senegal 2
Solomon Islands 1
South Africa 1
Sri Lanka 1
Syria 2
Tanzania 2
Thailand 3
Tunisia 2
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
DiversityDiversityNationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Reviewed base salary differences by
• Gender• Nationality Groupings
•Part 1- Industrialized Countries•Part 11- Developing Countries
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Gender Data - Ratios with Males =100Females Males
Research % Ave base Ave age Ave years % Ave base Ave age Ave years Level salary in Center salary in Center
1 19% 104 34 1 81% 100 39 22 19% 99 42 4 81% 100 44 43 18% 97 46 6 82% 100 49 74 12% 95 47 8 88% 100 52 10
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40% 100 34 1 60% 89 41 22 54% 100 41 4 46% 88 46 43 56% 100 47 6 44% 93 51 84 58% 100 51 10 42% 89 52 10
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
To Summarize:To Summarize:Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
IRS staff at centers and system office mapped to Hewitt based CGIAR composite 9 level scale – 4 research levels, 3 support levels and 2 management levels
Average total compensation USD62,000 at lowest level R1/S1 to USD 217,000 at highest level M2
Similar benefit policies but diversity in plan design, implementation and delivery methods
Steering Committee recommends that Results should not be posted on CGIAR web until completion of phase II. However, can be made available to members upon request
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Transparency and Disclosure
Transparency and Disclosure
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Objective
To recommend mechanisms to ensure disclosure of the compensation structures while maintaining confidentiality for the individual staff
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Practices of Publicly Funded Organizations
Practices of Publicly Funded Organizations
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
• Reviewed practices of a sample of organizations, including Multilateral Development Banks, UN, European Commission, Bilateral Agencies
• All have public disclosure ofSalary StructuresBenefits PoliciesGeneral Employment Data
• Some are disclosed on external web page, others by request
• Generally do not release any individual’s personal data, the exception being the President or Head of the organization
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
CGIAR Disclosure Principles Steering Group
Recommendations
CGIAR Disclosure Principles Steering Group
RecommendationsNationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
• Overview of base salary ranges• Benefits policies• Basic employment data, e.G. Overall
number of staff by employment category
• All material updated periodically • No disclosure of individual staff data
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Approach to Phase 2IRS Comparison to Market
Approach to Phase 2IRS Comparison to Market
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
ObjectiveTo provide a comparison of the current compensation structures with those of comparator organizations particularly those engaged in agricultural research, in private and public sectors, world-wide
Content CoverageCompensation packages and salary levels for out
posted staff
Basket of ComparatorsNational Agriculture Research Organizations (5)Private Sector (2)International Organizations (1 or 2)
Target Completion Date: Early 2005
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Approach to Phase 3Nationally Recruited Staff
Approach to Phase 3Nationally Recruited Staff
Objective• To review key aspects of NRS package
Coverage• Comparison of NRS with IRS in terms of
benefits provided• Comparison of NRS to local market based on
existing data in selected locations• Comparison of NRS across centers in a
particular location
Target Completion Date: Early 2005
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
Phase 4Integrated Results
Phase 4Integrated Results
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10
• Synthesis and Recommendations
• Target Completion Date: End 2005
Nationality Data -Ratios with Part 1 = 100
Part I Part II
Research Number Ave base Ave age Ave years Number Ave base Ave age Ave years
Level salary in Center salary in Center
Part I =100
1 40 100 34 1 60 89 41 2
2 81 100 41 4 70 88 46 4
3 116 100 47 6 89 93 51 8
4 79 100 51 10 57 89 52 10