CFM_Agenda21[1]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    1/44

    Agenda 21 or

    UrbanMobility

    United Cities and Local GovernmentsCits et Gouvernements Locaux UnisCiudades y Gobiernos Locales Unidos

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    2/44

    2

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    3/44

    United Cities and Local GovernmentsCits et Gouvernements Locaux UnisCiudades y Gobiernos Locales Unidos

    Agenda 21 or

    UrbanMobility

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    4/44

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    5/44

    5

    the importance o cities as living space or people is gro-wing. More than hal o the world population today lives incities. Cities are the motor o economic and social develop-ment. They are also the places where the ecological and so-cial challenges o the 21st century are particularly accumula-

    ting. Part o these challenges are the growing trac and theaccessibility o our cities.

    Stuttgart has a long tradition in mobility. The city was ound-ed more than thousand years ago as a stud arm (Stuten-garten). Over 120 years ago the rst automobile worldwidewas invented in Stuttgart. Today Stuttgart is a global com-petence centre or mobility thanks to proessional schools,universities, research and development institutions which areclosely linked with many leading companies notable Daimler,Mercedes, Porsche and Bosch.

    Shaping transportation and trac in our cities is an essen-tial responsibility o cities. To better cope with these tasksthe United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) set up theUrban Mobility Committee. UCLG is representing more than3 billion citizens in 170.000 local authorities rom over 130countries. I have the honour to be chairman o this Commit-tee and president o the European Section o UCLG.

    Started nine years ago as an European- Latin-American URB-AL-Network, Cities or Mobility is today a global networkwith over 500 members rom 70 countries including univer-sities, companies and international organisations.

    With its Agenda 21 or Urban Mobility we will contribute todeveloping sustainable mobility: Socially inclusive, environ-mentally-riendly and economy-promoting. In this endea-vour we cooperate closely with experts rom universities,research institutions, international organisations, NGOs andthe private sector.

    Our network serves as platorm where local governmentscan present their good practices, problems and initiatives.The Agenda 21 or Urban Mobility describes the uture

    trends, challenges and tasks in the eld o urban mobilityand presents a series o good practices rom all over theworld.

    I would like to thank all our partners, members and colle-agues or the ruitul cooperation and I am looking orwardto a successul working together.

    Dr. Wolgang SchusterMayor o StuttgartVice-President o UCLG

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    6/44

    6

    all people are equally entitled to mobility since it is a ba-1.sis or the realization o most other basic rights;

    the eight Millennium Development Goals o the United2.Nations only can be achieved i people have adequate

    and payable access to mobility services;

    urban mobility plays a undamental role in achieving the3.avorable economic, social, ecological and cultural deve-lopment o a community or a large urban area;

    urban transportation systems particularly in many poo-4.rer countries do not yet satisy the demands on a sae,healthy, socially equitable and environmentally com-patible supply o mobility services to people and thusconstitute an obstacle to development;

    the transportation systems o today, especially the5. extensive use o privately owned vehicles in most citieso the industrial countries, currently are not sustainab-le owing to their high consumption o non-renewableresources and their signicant emissions;

    the gap is becoming more dicult between the increa-6.sing mobility needs o a strongly growing urban popu-lation, on the one hand, and a oreseeable scarcity andrise in price o ossil energy sources on the other;

    new solutions involving new uels and sources o energy7.or growing mobility have to be developed in agree-ment with social, ecological and economic require-ments;

    alternative non-ossil uels only are a contribution to8.sustainable solutions i they do not compete with thepreservation o the rainorests and the securing o regi-onal ood production;

    sustainable mobility models in the cities o the world9.must rely on the optimal utilization o all technological,

    planning and organizational resources, but also are de-pendent on the development o a sustainable mobilityculture by transportation users;

    cooperations o cities within the scope o the work o10.UCLG can lead to the more rapid spread o exemplarysolutions, to greater sustainability o the urban trans-portation systems and consequently to a airer globali-zation in our One World.

    Challenges or urban mobility

    We are aware, that

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    7/44

    7

    The population o our cities is constantly growing both1.or demographic reasons and owing to the continuedrural exodus.

    The cities are centers o economic growth and thus o2.

    individual prosperity which lead to a growing dierenti-ation in liestyles and mobility requirements.

    The growing individualization o urban society coupled3.with a growing number o small households leads tomore trac.

    Rising land prices and rising rents in the centers o co-4.nurbations have the consequence that rents or livingspace rise disproportionately, the lower and middleclasses as well as amilies with children migrate romthe centers, and the number o commuters constantly

    grows.

    The cities are developing more and more into metropoli-5.tan regions within which the distances between homes,workplaces and recreational acilities increase.

    An increasing geographic fexibility o employees (mo-6.dern nomadism) makes the streams o commutersgrow between cities too.

    New orms o shopping by car, especially in large malls,7.

    and the use o recreational acilities on the verges ocities generate new streams o trac.

    Increasing e-Commerce, the use o the internet, and8.other orms o a media-based shopping culture, orexample meals on wheels, result in growing individualdelivery operations.

    The just-in-time delivery o physical products and9.services results in the growing transport o goods andpeople in our cities.

    Peoples increasing speed orientation leads to a high10. demand or mobility services on road and rail, on thewater and in the air.

    Future trends or

    urban mobility

    The development o trac and mobility refectsthe social, economic and technical trends in ourcities. These are infuenced by ten mega-trends:

    As the consequences o these mega-trends, ever morepeople are moving ever more and ever aster. More andmore goods are being delivered to more and more places

    just-in-time.The ast growth o transport services worldwide leads tohigher consumption o resources, growing damage to theenvironment and global warming.

    Political structures, legal obstacles, lack o unds, and lack oawareness in the population prevent the changes requiredto organize the growing mobility in our cities in a way whichis socially inclusive, healthy, sae, ecologically acceptable andeconomically ecient.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    8/44

    8

    Envi

    ronm

    enta

    lly-fr

    iendlymob ty Soc a y nc

    sem

    ob

    i

    ty

    Eco

    oy-p mot ng

    mob

    ilt

    bjectives for urban mobility

    To solve the growing problems we need a comprehensive

    and integrated approach with three major goals for:

    socially inclusive mobility

    environmentally friendly

    economy promoting mobility

    The objectives are moving targets. They are depending on

    different living conditions, economic possibilities and financi-

    al resources. To improve the situation every city should crea-

    te a master plan for mobility, integrated in the overall plan-

    ning for the development of the city. To facilitate this work

    we add some guidelines with measures and best practice

    examples as an annex to this agenda.

    Sustainalble

    Mobility

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    9/44

    9

    Tasks or urban mobility

    1. Socially inclusive mobility

    Mobility is a basic condition or participating in working lie,or engaging in social, cultural and political activities, andor availing educational opportunities. Non-participation inmobility leads to social exclusion.An important part o citizens have neither access to trans-portation nor the opportunity to escape the negative eectso growing trac, above all environmental pollution andnoise.The cities want to ensure that all residents are able to sharein mobility; that includes disabled persons, parents withsmall children, the sick and elderly, and poorer people.Mobility is socially inclusive only i it does not pose a subs-

    tantial danger to the health o people. Health is endangeredalso by exhaust gases and noise, which oten aect poorersections o a city. For this reason we want to minimize thethreats to the health o all people through noise reductionand air pollution control programs.Mobility causes thousands o deaths and injuries especiallychildren, old citizens, pedestrians and bikers every year. Wewant to increase the saety o transportation. This calls oreducation and training, community relations work, as wellas trac inrastructure measures in order to guarantee theprerequisites or sae local public transportation, sae pri-vate transportation, but also sae cycling and walking. This

    includes protection against crime in the streets and in masstransit systems.

    1.1 Enable all segments o the population to

    participate in local public transportation

    We want to ensure that all segments o the populationare able to participate in local public transportation andbreak down social, health-related or age-related barri-ers to urban mobility by

    ensuring mobility service o the same standard in allparts o the city;assisting people whose mobility is restricted;

    making ares socially acceptable and target group-oriented.

    1.2 Preserve and extend public inrastructure close to

    homes and jobs

    We want to saeguard and extend public inrastructureespecially in order to provide public and private servicesand everyday necessities to people close to where theylive. This way we avoid not only unnecessary tracfows, but also ensure the supply o peoples needs(especially people with mobility restrictions) close tohomes and jobs by

    decentralizing municipal acilities and services, oerthem locally;securing the supply o essential goods close towhere people live;extending public inrastructure towards jobs espe-cially in industrial and commercial areas.

    1.3 Shape demographic change in the area

    o mobility

    We want to adapt urban transportation systems to theactual requirements o demographic change in ourcities. In municipalities in the industrialized countrieswe want to make allowance or the special problemso older people. In the developing countries we wantto give serious thought to the specic mobility needso the younger generation which is still going to schooland training by

    extending the transport oers to all children and

    young people;making allowance or the special needs o seniorcitizens.

    1.4 Enhance road saety

    We want to enhance the saety o road trac or bothmotorized and non-motorized road users by

    enabling sae private transportation through tracguidance and control;ensuring sae cycling and walking;improving security in mass transit systems;

    oering trac education rom childhood on in asystematic way.

    1.5 Protect residential quarters and districts with re-

    creational unctions rom noise and air pollution

    We want to minimize the health hazards posed byexhaust gases and noise also in the poorer quarters ocities by

    reducing air pollution by trac control measures;reducing trac noise by special regulations andcontrol measures.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    10/44

    10

    2.1 Minimize trac fows through integrated urban

    and trac planning

    We want to integrate the central concerns o tracplanning into urban development planning in order to

    avoid unnecessary trac fows in the long term by

    integrating trac planning as part o city develop-ment planning;decentralizing supply acilities to become a city oshort distances;providing links to public and private service acilitiesthrough intermodal transport oers.

    2.2 Encourage non-motorized and public transport

    We want to speed up the shiting o trac to non-motorized and public transport in our cities to minimize

    energy expenditure and the nance required or urbanmobility needs by

    expanding mass transit;making public transportation more attractivethrough comort, saety and lliability;ensuring the saety o pedestrians or example bysidewalks;improving the quality o cycleways;networking the means o transportation by a betterintermodality.

    2.3 Expand mobility management

    We want to make better use o existing means o trans-portation by improving the eciency o the trac in-rastructure and by improving the quality o inormationor the travelers. We will achieve these by

    developing area-based mobility management oreach city district;expanding integrated mobility managementthrough trac guidance and mobility centers;optimizing the management o stationary trac,particularly the parking space management.

    2.4 Reduce uel consumption and emissions

    We want to reduce the consumption o ossil uels andthe emission o pollutants by developing a comprehen-sive and eective set o instruments consisting o re-

    strictive measures, sel-commitments, incentives as wellas technological and inrastructural measures by

    promoting the increased use o alternative uelsand drive system technologies;supporting buses, trucks and cars which are uel-saving and low-emission;applying monetary measures to control the de-mand or transportation locally through systems omobility pricing.

    2.5 Strengthen public awareness o sustainable

    mobilityWe want to raise consciousness that the choice o trans-portation depends on the subjective view and economicpossibilities but also on inormation about environmen-tally riendly alternatives by

    promoting educational schemes and inormationoers about ecological impacts o tracappreciating the environmentally riendly mobilityculture through community relations work;developing positive incentives or an environmen-tally riendly mobility culture;starting mobility education in kindergartens and

    schools.

    2. Environmentally-riendly mobility

    The increasing mobility demands and the growing trac inour cities call or new answers, also or ecological reasons.

    We want to make trac planning an integral part o urbandevelopment planning in order to create a city o shortdistances. We want to achieve an intelligent transportationmix with intermodal transport oers and make it easier tochange to mass transit and to use bicycles.

    Active mobility management should help to better utilize theexisting transport capacities and avoid trac congestion.We

    want to encourage environmentally riendly technologies inorder to reduce emissions and resource consumption, andwe want to strengthen public awareness o sustainable mo-bility through education and inormation.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    11/44

    11

    3.1 Create attractive and ecient transportation

    systems

    We want to develop the urban transportation systemsurther as the central location actor or the local econo-

    my so that they can contribute eciently and with long-lasting eect to a dynamic local development by

    improving the accessibility o cities with dierentmeans o transportation;ensuring the good accessibility o all city districts;acilitating the accessibility o enterprise zones;optimizing goods trac within cities with a logis-tics concept.

    3.2 Ensure ecient mobility or people and goods

    We want to optimize our urban transportation systems

    so that the mobility needed or economic activity can beeciently realized on one hand by limiting trac loadsand simultaneously enhancing the quality o our citiesas places to do business by

    instituting programs to optimize the fow o tracand to avoid congestion;ensuring that places o work and training can bereached within a short time;guaranteeing adequate transport acilities and ca-pacities or reight trac;encouraging company mobility management.

    3.3 Coordinate the requirements o transportation

    with other orms o land use

    We want to ensure that mobility-related demands onthe use o urban land are compatible with other unc-

    tions o a big city in order to maintain the attractivenesso our cities by

    integrating trac planning into urban planning andthe planning o enterprise land use;improving the supply and management o parkingspace or shopping acilities, public and private ser-vices and events.

    3.4 Create ecient institutions or trac control

    We want to improve the networking o all central publicand private institutions in the eld o trac control inorder to eectively coordinate measures towards more

    ecient mobility management and reduce trac loadsby

    improving the eciency o public administrativeauthorities;improving the eciency o public and private tran-sit companies;getting companies and institutions with high tracdemands better involved in trac planning andurban planning.

    3. Economy-promoting mobility

    Transportation is and remains the lieline o cities. Ourcities must be accessible rom the outside by road and rail,

    through the air and on water. In the same way, urban dis-tricts and industrial areas within a community must be easilyaccessible. Trac congestion and the temporal unpredicta-bility are major impediments to positive economic develop-ment.

    We want to ensure that trac conditions can be improvedby ecient public transport to reach the working places andby better logistics or the transport o goods. We want to

    reduce the trac in our cities by installing a modern tracmanagement and by better connecting the real mobili-ty with virtual mobility through digital communication,through ecient inormation highways.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    12/44

    12

    Networks within our cities

    Many groups must be involved in the development o tracplans in order to bring the diverse interests o the variousurban districts into the political discussion and make the

    right decisions. That includes transport companies, cyclistsclubs, schools, the police and other authorities, scientic ins-titutes in the transportation eld, and last but not least civicassociations and citizens who can be queried at local publichearings.Participatory processes thereore should precede decisionson trac planning as an element o overall urban planning.

    Networks o the cities

    The challenges o urban mobility are basically similar in all ci-ties. This makes the exchange o experience and Best Practi-

    ce examples in networks worthwhile. The cities jointly searchor innovative solutions and at the same time orm a lobbyon the national or international level also or the purpose oobtaining more nancial resources or mobility tasks.These network unctions can be perormed on the nationallevel by associations o cities; on the international level main-ly by the UCLG through the Committee Urban Mobility.Their eorts are complemented by specialized organizationssuch as the Union Internationale des Transports Publics,(UITP, Brussels) and the global network Cities or Mobilitywith head oce in Stuttgart.

    Cooperations with national andinternational partners

    Cooperations with universities and scientic and researchacilities are necessary, just as cooperations with private mo-

    bility companies, or the development and on-site testing onew solutions.National governments and parliaments have to be won orlegislative initiatives and the nancial support o transporta-tion projects.Cooperations with international organizations will be acili-tated by the assistance o UCLG. These organizations, parti-cularly UNEP, UN-Habitat, UNESCO, UNACLA, EU and natio-nal and international donor organizations, need the cities aspartners to implement their concrete aims and projects.

    Networks and partners

    or urban mobility

    To achieve the goals and implement the measuresin the elds o action we are operating with manypartners and networks.

    International partners

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    13/44

    13

    As the united voice and world advocate o democratic localsel-government, United Cities and Local Governmentsbrings together the global networks o its three oundingmembers the International Union o Local Authorities,ounded in 1913, the World Federation o United Cities,

    ounded in 1957, and Metropolis, ounded in 1984. Repre-senting over hal the worlds population, the cities and as-sociation members o United Cities and Local Governmentsare present in over 130 countries across seven world regions Arica, Asia-Pacic, Europe, Eurasia, Middle East and WestAsia, Latin America and North America. Over 1000 cities aredirect members o United Cities and Local Governments, aswell as 60 national associations which represent all the citiesand local governments in a single country.

    Since its creation in 2004, United Cities and Local Govern-ments (UCLG) has established itsel as the reerence World

    Organization o local and regional governments and theirassociations. It has gained recognition by representing theirinterests as part o the broad international governanceagenda and uniting their voice beore the international com-munity. The international advocacy actions developed byUCLG on issues such as the Millennium Development Goals,Gender Equality, AIDS and Decentralization have resulted inbenchmarking international tools and statements on the roleto be played by local authorities in these areas. The UCLGCommittees prepare and implement policies within priori-ty areas, as dened by the Executive Bureau and the workprogramme or the current period. Each Committee canestablish one or more Working Groups.

    Politics is the art o the possible. The great challengesthrough the growing mobility in our cities can only bemastered with courageous political decisions taken locally.

    The goals o socially inclusive, environmentally riendly andeconomy-promoting mobility may contradict each other inpart in actual implementation. Thereore it is necessary toinclude citizen participation or setting priorities, and gainingthe support o citizens or these decisions.

    The UCLG Committee Urban Mobility wants to support thisdecision making process as a platorm or exchange and asinitiator o innovative projects. At the same time the com-mittee wants to work as a lobby or cities on the nationaland international levels. Thereore it is worthwhile to partici-pate in the working process o this committee. All cities areinvited to cooperate and actively contribute to the work o

    the committee.

    Active participation in

    the UCLG committee urban

    mobility

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    14/44

    14

    Premium partners

    Over many decades a mobility cluster unparalleled in theworld has developed in Stuttgart. Besides amous companiessuch as Daimler, Mercedes, Porsche and Bosch numeroussystem and components suppliers, specialized service provi-ders, education and research institutes work closely together

    (University o Stuttgart, the Fraunhoer and the Max Planckinstitutes as well as private research institutions). Stuttgart isthereore described as the most important centre o compe-tence or mobility in the whole world.

    Corporations linked to questions o mobility in a particu-lar way can become Premium Partners o the Cities orMobility network. In addition to the services or members,they receive special opportunities to present themselves onthe internet, in publications and during events. The Cities orMobility network has been co-nanced during the last threeyears by nine Premium Partners.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    15/44

    15

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    16/44

    16

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    17/44

    17

    Examples o best practice or urban mobility

    I. Socially inclusive mobility

    Project CIVITAS CARAVEL in Burgos, Spain ............................................................................................................. 18Worlds rst Touch and Sound Atlas o the Ile-de-France Regions public transport networks .................................. 18Zero-are public transport in Hasselt, Belgium ......................................................................................................... 19

    Decentralization in Stuttgart ................................................................................................................................... 19Access to daily needs by new orms o grocery shops ..............................................................................................20Project MOVIMAN Partnership between Stuttgart (Germany),Cartagena de Indias (Colombia) and Porto Alegre (Brazil) ....................................................................................... 20Youth Trac Saety School Stuttgart, Germany .................................................................................................... 21Free Public Transport or Senior Citizens Beijing, China ......................................................................................... 21Helmets, Saety or riders o motorcycles and bicycles Sa Jos dos Campos, Brazil ............................................. 22MOVILIZATION towards accessible cities .............................................................................................................22URB-AL-Project Bus Driver Training .........................................................................................................................23The Vi.Co.Ro.Sa. project (VIr tual COmmunity or ROad SAety) Treviso, Italy ........................................................ 23Weekly No Driving Day program Seoul, South Korea ............................................................................................ 24Towards a Noiseless City Barcelona, Spain ............................................................................................................24

    II. Environmentally-riendly mobility

    Integration o sustainable trac and city planning URB-AL-Project, Lead Partner: City o Arequipa, Per ................ 25Local supply concept in Stuttgart, Germany ............................................................................................................25Park & Ride in Prague ............................................................................................................................................. 26Maxx public transport in the Netherlands .............................................................................................................26Dr Bus vu Chur Successul public transport in Switzerland .................................................................................... 27Toronto a City or pedestrians ..............................................................................................................................27URB-AL-Cycling The City o Utrecht, Netherlands .................................................................................................28Traintaxi in the UK .................................................................................................................................................. 28

    One less car A campaign in Bellevue, USA

    .......................................................................................................29Slimweg Mobility Centres in Belgium ...................................................................................................................29Parking management in Belgrade, Serbia ................................................................................................................30Vxj is halway to becoming ossil uel ree city .....................................................................................................30Low Emission Zone or trucks in Amsterdam ........................................................................................................... 31Congestion Charge in London ................................................................................................................................ 31The Green Schools Travel Program in Dublin, Ireland ...............................................................................................32Walk 21 a movement to promote walking ............................................................................................................32Cultura or a new mobility, City o Graz, Austria ...................................................................................................33The Trac Snake Game .......................................................................................................................................... 33

    III. Economy-promoting mobility

    Saitama City Comprehensive Transportation System Master Plan ............................................................................34Designing a sustainable city Curitiba, Brazil ..........................................................................................................34Partnership or Sustainable Urban Transport in Asia (PSUTA) ................................................................................... 35Veloce System Vicenza, Italy ................................................................................................................................35Urban Trac Management and Control (UTMC) UK ............................................................................................36ToolBox or Mobility Management in companies ....................................................................................................36Project ELCIDIS (Electric Vehicle City Distribution Systems) ......................................................................................37Travelways Mobility management in Dublin .........................................................................................................37Compact urban green: City Planning in Stuttgart ..............................................................................................38Parking Management Guide Victoria, Canada ......................................................................................................38Integrated Trac Management Centre Stuttgart (IVLZ) Stuttgart, Germany ......................................................... 39

    Enhancing the Convenience o the Bus Service Hamamatsu, Japan .......................................................................39Mobility Management Strategy Dresden, Germany ..............................................................................................40

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    18/44

    18

    I. Socially inclusive mobility

    Overall objectiveEnable all segments o the population to participate in local public

    transportation by

    Fields o action

    ensuring mobility service o the same standard in all parts o the city.

    Example or best practice

    Project CIVITAS CARAVEL in Burgos, SpainMedium-sized cities can be considered as a living laboratory toprove how innovative measures in sustainable transport policiescan achieve visible and successul results within a short period otime. With this idea in mind, the city o Burgos in Spain chose aset o demonstration areas where technology and citizens be-havior have been submitted to intensive testing to nd the rightapproach to three key points:

    the recovery o public space or citizens, mainly in the citycenterthe promotion o cycling and public transport as an ecientalternative to the use o private vehiclesthe introduction o bio-uels, providing a political commitment towards a public feet in the context o acleaner and healthier mobility strategy.

    These three sets o measures represent the fagship o the European project CIVITAS, All this work was recog-nized by National Government when Burgos received the Best City o the Year or Sustainable Transport andMobility Award 2007 which was widely reported in the media and placed CiViTAS in Spain as the most remar-kable and innovative project or sustainable mobility.

    Fields o action assisting people whose mobility is restricted.

    Example or best practice

    Worlds rst Touch and Sound Atlas o the Ile-de-France Regions public transport networksThe public transport network o Ile-de-France Region consistingo metro lines, buses and trams is one o the largest systemsin the world. With the new Touch and Sound Atlas, it enablesblind and partially sighted people to orm a mental picture o the

    region and its public transport networks and prepare their travelroutes. These maps have been designed by the City on the MoveInstitute (IVM), and produced by Institute or research into theapplication o engraving (IRAG) with backing and unding romthe Ile-de-France Region and the le-de-France transport Federa-tion (STIF).The Touch and Sound Atlas includes relie and large-print mapso the regional metro, railway and tram lines; the main bus lines in Paris; and bus services to the orty regionalcentres around Paris. Recorded inormation, which describes the routes and provides tourist inormation on theareas around the main stations, are available on CD.The atlas is available in two versions: An embossed version or blind people and a large-print version or partiallysighted people. The point size o the characters varies to refect the hierarchical nature o the inormation. This

    atlas makes Paris the rst big city worldwide to provide a system that enabled visually impaired persons to enjoythe mobility and access that everyone else takes or granted to Pariss great cultural sites.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    19/44

    I

    19

    I. Socially inclusive mobility

    Fields o action making ares socially acceptable and target group-oriented.

    Example or best practice

    Zero-are public transport in Hasselt, BelgiumHasselt (70,000 residents) is one o a small and growing numbero cities around the world providing zero-are public transport.The transport network here is mainly by bus with the bus linescovering a total o about 500,000 kilometers per year.The mobility policy in Hasselt developed into an example ocooperation between the bus line, the Flemish government andthe city o Hasselt, under the motto the city guarantees theright o mobility or everyone. Since 1 July 1997, the town buslines (called H-lijn) have been ree or everyone including tou-rists. Other bus lines are ree or the inhabitants o Hasselt whiletravelling in the territory o Hasselt.Hasselts mobility plan is not limited to ree buses there are

    also ree bicycles and scooters available, and the city has made pedestrian and cycling access a priority. The pri-mary agenda was to reduce car trac and improve citizens mobility and accessibility to their city. The end resultwas not only an improvement in transportation, but an improved quality o lie, an increase o tourism, and lessneed or new auto-inrastructure.The Mobility Plan has saved the City o Hasselt millions o Euros on transportation inrastructure costs and haseliminated the expensive investments in street and parking acilities.

    Overall objectivePreserve and extend public inrastructure close to homes and jobs by

    Fields o action decentralizing municipal acilities and services, oer them close to all citizens.

    Example or best practice

    Decentralization in StuttgartThe Stuttgart City administration has established service centerscalled Brgerservice Stuttgart (Citizen Service Stuttgart) ineach o its 23 districts. These service centers serve as one-stop-agencies which oer more than 50 services to the localcitizens, whether it is the registration o a motor vehicle, theapplication or a passport or to the initial issuance o a drivinglicense. With the service centers near their homes and work-

    places, the citizens do not need to go to the city centre to settletheir aairs, thus decreasing the trac fows in the urban areaso Stuttgart.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    20/44

    20

    I. Socially inclusive mobility

    Fields o actionsecuring the supply o essential goods close to where people live.

    Example or best practice

    Access to daily needs by new orms o groceryshopsAccording to the Consumer Federation o Germany eight millionpeople are lacking access to their goods o daily needs. They areno shops in the neighbourhood that can be reached by oot orby bike. This is a problem primarily or elderly and disabled peo-ple. regarding the demographic change, this situation is increa-singly recognized as unacceptable. A main cause is the increasedconstruction o shopping centers in the outskirts o the cities.The changing shopping behaviour has a negative impact onthe smaller retailers in the neighbourhood, which have to closetheir shops due to the absence o many customers. Since 2003,the BONUS gGmbH and the parent company, SBR gGmbH have

    established 10 mini-supermarkets in Stuttgart. They aim to improve the chances o socially disadvantaged youngpeople and long-term unemployed people at the labor market. In addition, the bonus-markets ulll the speci-c task to ensure the supply o the daily needs in the city districts. The establishment o these supermarkets isthereore oten supported by the local Federal Agency or Labor.

    Fields o actionextending public inrastructure towards jobs especially in industrial and

    commercial areas.

    Example or best practice

    Project MOVIMAN Partnership between Stuttgart(Germany), Cartagena de Indias (Colombia) andPorto Alegre (Brazil).Environmental and mobility problems tend to be a constantcompanion in every city. A mere expansion o inrastructure whether in individual trac, public transport or non-motorizedtrac cannot solve these growing urban mobility problems.The answer to ineciency in transport is oten ound in an eec-tive mobility management, e.g. by providing inormation or theusers on adequate alternatives.The main objective o the MOVIMAN project is a new typeo cooperation between the public administration, the privatesector, the transportation companies and the road users in a

    determined urban area. The aim was to achieve a more ecient, more economic and more ecologic mobilityin a specic urban area with an industrial character. The project envisioned the creation o a Mobility Manager,called the MOVIMAN, which is a manager or administrator o territorial mobility responsible or closing the com-munication gaps.Based on the users suggestions, the mobility manager makes proposals to the authorities and also generatesunderstanding o the measures implemented by the authorities among the users. In other words, the MobilityManager adopts the role o an intermediary and oers support to achieve sustainable solutions to the mobilityproblems.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    21/44

    I

    21

    I. Socially inclusive mobility

    Overall objectiveShape demographic change in the area o mobility by

    Fields o actionextending the transport oers to all children and young people.

    Example or best practice

    Youth Trac Saety School Stuttgart, GermanyThe Youth Trac Saety School in Stuttgart, established in 1953,is the rst training school in Germany or children to learn atti-tudes that promote sae behaviour in trac and how to behavecorrectly and to cooperate with other road users. Moreover, theyalso learn to transorm their knowledge about trac rules intopractical skills and compliant behaviour patterns.The attendance o trac saety school is compulsory or all pu-pils. The training comprises o theoretical and practical instruc-tions and is carried out by teachers and certied police ocers.

    The playul practical trainings with bicycles take place at theprotected practice area with intersections, pedestrian crossings,roundabouts and trac lights. There are 3 stationary practicecourses and 1 mobile youth saety school in Stuttgart. The project is organized and nanced by City o Stuttgart,trac police and Road Saety Association

    Fields o actionmaking allowance or the special needs o senior citizens.

    Example or best practice

    Free Public Transport or Senior Citizens Beijing,ChinaFrom 1 January 2009 on, Beijing is allowing its 1.6 million Beijingsenior citizens who aged 65 or above to travel ree o charge ontheir public buses. This simple gesture provides the added incen-tive or these citizens to move around the city instead o stayingat home all the time. In addition, with this added mobility opopulation, there is this side-eect that there will be additionspending rom this group o people.Beijing Public Transport Holdings Ltd (BPT) reported that therewere 1.6 million people aged 65 or above living in Beijing at theend o 2008, and this gure will grow to 1.9 million by 2010.Along with this project, BPT also renovated the busses to ensure

    that more than 10 percent o seats are reserved or the elderly, children, pregnant women, and the disabled. Thedrivers and conductors must also pass a test on the new rules, such as not driving until all needy passengers aregiven seats.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    22/44

    22

    I. Socially inclusive mobility

    Overall objectiveEnhance road saety by

    Fields o actionenabling sae private transportation through trac guidance and control.

    Example or best practice

    Helmets, Saety or riders o motorcycles andbicycles Sa Jos dos Campos, BrazilThe use o motorized two-wheelers and bicycles is rapidly gro-wing in many places around the globe. As a result, there are in-creasing atalities and injuries among its users, with head injuriesbeing a major concern. Helmets are eective both in preventinghead injuries and in reducing the severity o injuries suered byriders and passengers o motorcycles and bicycles. Unortunate-ly, in many countries the use o helmets is still considerably low.The city o Sa Jos dos Campos, one o 20 Brazilian towns wor-

    king with Global Road Saety Partnership (GRSP) , has won theprestigious XVII Prmio Volvo Segurana no Trnsito road saetyaward. The town was recognized or reducing trac deaths(rom 7.2 per 1,000 vehicles to 2.5 per 1,000 vehicles) and or a range o engineering, education and enorce-ment eorts, including its partnership with GRSP.

    Fields o actionensuring sae cycling and walking.

    Example or best practice

    MOVILIZATION towards accessible citiesBy means o developing a toolkit or cities, which containscampaign materials, implementation o simple and cheap tracmeasures, and the development and implementation o traceducation materials, the project MOVILIZATION unded byEuropean Commission aims to improve cycling conditions andthereore the cycling culture in the participating cities in Brazil,Columbia, Ecuador, Germany, the Netherlands and Nicaragua.MOVILIZATION is mostly useul or cities where cycling is alreadya common issue.Cities which are in the phase o developing cycling can also be-net rom the project results. Activities o MOVILIZATION werethe preparation, development and the launching o educational,

    promotional and trac campaigns, combined with the implementation o relatively simple and cost eectivetrac measurements. All results are published in a Handbook which is available on the Cities or Mobility web-site.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    23/44

    I

    23

    I. Socially inclusive mobility

    Fields o actionimproving security in mass transit systems.

    Example or best practice

    URB-AL-Project Bus Driver TrainingFor sae and comortable bus travel, the bus drivers qualicationis very important, along with the improved ttings and techno-logy. In Latin America and Europe, human error is still the maincause o bus accidents. The project aimed at the qualication obus drivers by new training course contents, new learning tech-niques and traditional didactic models.The training ocus is on sae, economic and environmentallyriendly driving. The second aim was the development oconsciousness o the general public by target-group-orientedinormation campaigns or more saety around bus trac. Thecomplete training course (computer based training) is availableon CD in dierent languages.

    Fields o actionoering trac education rom childhood on in a systematic way.

    Example or best practice

    The Vi.Co.Ro.Sa. project (VIrtual COmmunity orROad SAety) Treviso, ItalyThere is a clear correlation between the developmental situationo a country and the number o deaths rom road accidents. Thehigh accident rates in Latin American countries result rom diver-

    se causes, one o them is the lack o trac education or moresaety on the roads or all drivers, pedestrians, and bicycle riders.The Vi.Co.Ro.Sa. project is a programme or the promotion osocial, economical development and lie quality o the LatinAmerican and European population, whose aim is to strengthenthe cooperation among towns, regions and other local andterritorial groups o the European Union and Latin America. TheProject Vi.Co.Ro.Sa. aims at collecting data and inormation re-garding the present situation o road saety in the towns involved in the initiative.The participants rom Latin America and Europe exchanged experiences and innovative strategies in the area oavoiding accidents. For most positive eects, schools were involved in the project as children are the group withthe highest risk or road accidents. Several local partners organized trac education projects in direct cooperati-on with schools and local institutions.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    24/44

    24

    I. Socially inclusive mobility

    Overall objectiveProtect residential quarters and districts with recreational unctions rom

    noise and air pollution by

    Fields o action

    reducing air pollution by trac control measures.

    Example or best practice

    Weekly No Driving Day program Seoul, SouthKoreaSeouls Weekly No Driving Day program is a voluntary citizenscampaign by which individual citizens rerain rom driving theircar during one weekday o their choice. Participants are givenincentives, which are provided by public organisations and pri-vate companies, such as discounted petrol, ree parking and carwashing, reduced taxes and congestion charge, to use alternate

    modes o transport o the selected days.People wanting to take part in the scheme select a weekday thatthey will not drive. They register their chosen day on a websitewww.no-driving.seoul.go.kr and receive an e-tag or the wind-screen and sticker or the rear window. This enables the Cityto monitor usage through a RFID (Radio Frequency Identication), which veries compliance and ensures thatparticipants are registered and thereore eligible or the incentive scheme.Since July 2003, the program has improved Seouls air quality, reduced congestion and saved energy. Every year,two million cars stay o the road decreasing trac volume by 3.7%. CO

    2vehicle emissions are being reduced

    by 10% and there is an annual saving o $50 million USD in uel costs.

    Fields o actionreducing trac noise by special regulations and control measures.

    Example or best practice

    Towards a Noiseless City Barcelona, SpainThe BCNsensesoroll Noise Reduction Framework Program is across-disciplinary council project in which dierent municipaldepartments (urban planning, trac, maintenance) and the tencity districts work together. Over 50 dierent noise reductioninitiatives are being implemented, including the installation onoise reducing road suraces on city streets, the promotion osubsidies or the acoustic insulation o buildings, and education

    and awareness activities.Ater an internal participatory process ve working groups wereset up to address dierent topic areas (Motorcycles, SummerNight-time Terrace Bars, Roadwork, Incidents and Complaints,Sound-Reducing Road Surace).

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    25/44

    25

    II. Environmentally-riendly mobility

    II

    Overall objectiveMinimize trac fows through integrated urban and trac planning by

    Fields o actionintegrating trac planning as part o city development planning.

    Example or best practice

    Integration o sustainable trac and city planningURB-AL-Project, Lead Partner: City o Arequipa,PerNot only in Latin America, but also in many parts o Europemunicipal planning processes usually consists o an independentand superordinate city development planning and a subordina-ted trac planning which has no infuence on unnecessary tra-c fows resulting rom an excessive dispersion o urban unc-tions. The integration o city development and trac planningaims to pinpoint institutions generating trac and developing

    suitable measures or reducing trac, resulted rom an inde-pendent city development planning and a subordinated tracplanning which has no infuence on unnecessary trac fows..The project ocuses at integrating both areas o planning and bringing them into accordance with the conceptso sustainability and the Local Agenda 21. The results o practical relevance are compiled in two comprehensivehandbooks published online in the our project languages Spanish, Portuguese, German, and English.

    Fields o actiondecentralizing supply acilities to become a city o short distances.

    Example or best practice

    Local supply concept in StuttgartLocal supply is more than butter and bread. Neighbourhoodthrives on the diversity o its oer. Various acilities complementand support and lead to mutual customers. The broader therange o goods services and even social services is, the morethe center o town is living. The oer o ood plays a key role,but are also other regional oerings like fower shops, kiosks,shops with goods o medium-and long-term needs, cleaningand repair services, bank and post oces, hairdressers, doctors,pharmacies and the gastronomy with its unction as a meetingplace are important.Early November 2007, the City o Stuttgart as rst big city in

    Germany employed a marketing expert as a District Manager.His job is to develop marketing concepts to enhance the Stuttgart city districts. Important objectives are tostrengthen the economic structure in the districts and increase the attractiveness o the district centers and thusthe quality o lie. In addition, the new district Manager serves as an interace between the administration andthe actors in the districts.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    26/44

    26

    II. Environmentally-riendly mobility

    Fields o actionproviding links to public and private service acilities through intermodal trans-

    port oers.

    Example or best practice

    Park & Ride in PragueThe dramatic increase in car ownership and use over the last twodecades in the city o Prague has led to severe trac congestionand pollution in the city centre. These problems were addressedby Pragues Transport Policy, which proposed the introduction oPark & Ride (P&R) schemes or the city, with the aim o reducingcongestion and pollution by reducing the demand or parking inthe city as well as promoting use o sustainable transport modes,including modern metro system and tourist tram).Since 2001 the Park and Ride sites are constructed aroundPrague at a short walking distance to public transport, mainly railstations, with good connections to the metro system. Electro-

    nic signage at the P&R sites provides inormation to the driversabout the availability o parking spaces, distance to the next nearest P&R site and the departure time o the nextpublic transport mode into the city.The P&R sites are included on maps o the public transport network produced by the Public Transport Companyand the users can buy pre-paid tickets and tickets that include the cost o parking and transport into the city.Cars can be let at the secure sites overnight and some sites have a acility or residents to rent spaces on a long-term basis. This has resulted in a reduction o trac congestion on the city centre streets and decreased thedemand or parking in the centre o the capital.

    Overall objectiveEncourage non-motorized and public transport by

    Fields o actionexpanding mass transit.

    Example or best practice

    Maxx public transport in the NetherlandsAlmere (185.000 inhabitants), one o Europes astest growingcities, has launched the new public transport inrastructureMaxx with the aim to acilitate and increase the use o buses.The dedicated cross-city bus lanes (total one way length o 105km) was developed. About 90% o the houses and busines-

    ses are within 400 metres rom a bus stop. The Maxx-websiteprovides the important inormation regarding bus lines, routes,timetable, tickets, special oers, abnormal conditions, suggesti-ons, complaints and lost property. Promotions and special pricesand a ticket structure related to the specic market segments,have become part o the brand. The introduction o Maxx re-sulted in 40% increase o bus passengers rom 2000 until 2006.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    27/44

    27

    II. Environmentally-riendly mobility

    II

    Fields o actionmaking public transportation more attractive through comort, saety and

    liability.

    Example or best practice

    Dr Bus vu Chur Successul public transport inSwitzerlandChur (32,500 inhabitants), the capital o the largest Swiss Can-ton, Graubnden, has one o the best bus services in Switzer-land and was thereore analyzed in terms o its contribution tothe PROCEED project o the European Commission.

    The main success actors o the BUSvuCHUR are:

    Optimal service, based on easy to remember requency,punctuality, reliability and cleanlinessPleasing, modern vehicles including inotainment,accessibility and corporate design

    Using the city bus system as a brand. The name dr Bus vuChur (the bus o Chur in local dialect) helps the local people identiy with their bus. Young people inparticular like the modern bus service and they are the customers o tomorrow.

    The BUSvuCHUR is a good example to show, how improvements in bus service in terms o availability (locationo bus stops and requency), can lead to the increased demand o public transportation use.

    Fields o actionensuring the saety o pedestrians or example by sidewalks.

    Example or best practice

    Toronto a City or pedestriansThe City o Toronto has made enormous strides in creating aculture o walking.

    The ollowing plans were developed to promote the wal-

    king in the City:

    A Walking Website, which provides one-window accessto up-to-date inormation on walking policies, programsand services to encourage walking by Toronto citizens andvisitors.The Pedestrian Priority Phase intersection, which allows pe-destrians to cross the road saely in any direction they wish

    including diagonally across the intersection while the tracis stopped or all vehicles in all directions.The Toronto Walking Festival, in October aims at celebrating walking throughout the city and presented asa calendar o City and community-organized walking activities across the city.The Oce o the Public Realm, a new unit within the Transportation Services Division that will allow thecity to coordinate and deliver pedestrians improvements in a more timely ashion, as well as managing theCitys walking strategy.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    28/44

    28

    II. Environmentally-riendly mobility

    Fields o actionimproving the quality o cycleways.

    Example or best practice

    URB-AL-Cycling The City o Utrecht, NetherlandsThe main objective o this URB-AL project is to strengthen theimportance o cycling in the trac engineering o medium-sizedcities by means o an inter-active program or the education oexperts, exchange o experience between the involved municipalexperts and working out o studies or the benet to its membero European Union and Latin America countries.All project partners introduced their measures to promote theuse o bicycles and their current measures in bicycle route plan-ning and discussed their options or optimization with the otherpartners. All member cities developed a ve year plan or pro-moting bicycle trac in the long term without external nancialresources. The results were summarized in a multilingual manual

    and made available at the homepage o the project.

    Fields o action

    networking the means o transportation by a better intermodality.

    Example or best practice

    Traintaxi in the UKTraintaxi is a practical tool to help both business and leisure tra-vellers take the train instead o the car, by overcoming one o the

    main obstacles: inormation about how to bridge those nalew miles. Traintaxi was created to provide comprehensibleinormation about taxi availability at train stations to clients whorequest it.

    Additional inormation that Traintaxi can provide are:

    Listing o all the train, metro, tram and underground sta-tions in BritainListing o local taxi or cab rms available in each stationAvailability o taxi ranks or cab oces in each stationAvailability o wheelchair-accessible vehicles

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    29/44

    29

    II. Environmentally-riendly mobility

    II

    Overall objectiveExpand mobility management by

    Fields o actiondeveloping area-based mobility management or each city district.

    Example or best practice

    One less car A campaign in Bellevue, USAThe trac congestion in the City o Bellevue (117,000 inhabi-tants) was ranked among the top 5 U.S. Cities. Recognizingthe need to reduce auto-mobile travel, especially the use osingle-occupant vehicles, Bellevue has implemented the OneLess Car campaign in mid 1990s to change travel habits, whichincluded direct marketing to residents, establishing a website,and working with Bellevue schools to educate students about al-ternative travel options, the impacts o the automobile and howto use the public transit.

    The City also worked with community groups, sport leagues,churches and neighbourhood to develop support or travel alter-natives on the grass roots level.The result o the campaign produced a strong awareness o travel alternatives. 85% o residents aware o OneLess Car program and were willing to try travel alternatives. Drive alone rate or commuters reduced rom 85%to 65% over a our-year period.

    Fields o actionexpanding integrated mobility management through trac guidance and mo-

    bility centers.

    Example or best practice

    Slimweg Mobility Centres in BelgiumThe rst mobility centre Smart on the road (or Slimweg), sup-ported by all Flemish transport providers (bus, train, car sharing,car pooling, taxi, cycling ederation and walking ederation)serves as the inormation center or the companies and citizensregarding their travel: walking, cycling, bus, tram, train, taxi andcar sharing.Inormation can be sought online, via telephone, or by simply vi-sit by the mobility centre reception desks. Further, a new onlinetravel planner oers door-to-door travel inormation service Andadditional inormation about carpool parks, park&ride parks, car

    sharing stations and taxi stands throughout the Flemish region.Moreover, the website oers an overview o how to reach themost important tourist locations in Flanders in a sustainable way.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    30/44

    30

    II. Environmentally-riendly mobility

    Fields o actionoptimizing the management o stationary trac, particularly the parking

    space management.

    Example or best practice

    Parking management in Belgrade, SerbiaIn order to organize parking in the streets, especially in the innerpart o the city, Belgrade city administration has marked the streetparking spaces and set the distinction between the spaces or thedynamic trac, stationary trac and pedestrian trac. The timelimitation o the zone parking spaces usage on 1, 2 and 3 hourswas implemented in order to oer the limited parking spaces toa broader number o car users. The implementation o the newzone parking regime was ollowed with the improvement o the public transport, the prohibition o driving on thebus stripes and the campaign to encourage the use o public transport.

    Positive eects:

    Decrease o the number o the irregular parked vehicles. The sidewalks are again or their basic purpose-or the pedestrians.Decreasing o the maximal accumulation o the parked cars on the streets and increasing o using the par-king garagesLong-term parking users with the motivation to come to their work by car, have been redirected romusing street parking spaces to use public transport or o-street parking spaces.Decrease o the time spent nding ree parking spaces.Decrease o air pollution, uel usage and the aggressive driving; resulting in the improvement o environ-mental quality in the city.

    Overall objectiveReduce uel consumption and emissions by

    Fields o actionpromoting the increased use o alternative uels and drive system technologies.

    Example or best practice

    Vxj is halway to becoming ossil uel ree cityAn incredible 51% o the citys energy comes rom sustainableenergy-sources such as biomass, renewable electricity, geother-mal and solar. With this track record, by 2015 Vxj may well bethe worlds rst ossil ree city.Nevertheless, Vxjs transport sector has been much harder

    to convert to a sustainable energy use and still relies heavily onossil uels such as gasoline and diesel. The city is also a logisticscentre or southern Sweden and ex-periences a lot o trac. Asa result, CO

    2emissions increased by 19% in 2005 compared to 1993. Renewable energies or transport currently

    sit at 2% in Vxj, but they are increasing.

    Other programs to reduce transport emissions include:

    Biouels in public transport systemsFirst discussions on developing bio-DME (Dimethyl Ether is a clean alternative uel produced rom naturalgas or coal)Cars uelled by gasoline converted to use ethanolMunicipal car-sharing with environmental vehicles

    A cycling project establishing new cycling roads and in-ormation campaignsFree parking or environmental vehiclesEducation in eco-driving or publicWith the position system, Vxj Taxi reduced the number o km driven by 20%Municipal subsidies were provided or buying environmental vehicles

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    31/44

    31

    II. Environmentally-riendly mobility

    II

    Fields o actionsupporting buses, trucks and cars which are uel-saving and low-emission.

    Example or best practice

    Low Emission Zone or trucks in AmsterdamSince October 9, 2008, a low emission zone or trucks has beenestablished in the area with the A10 ring-road, with the excepti-on o Amsterdam-North and several industrial parks. Only cleantrucks will be allowed to enter this zone. Older trucks not ttedwith a diesel particulate lter will not be permitted to enter thiszone, as they make a relatively large contribution to air pollution.

    Starting 2010, the ollowing admission demands will ap-

    ply to trucks (vehicles above 3,500 kilograms):

    Euro 0 and Euro 1> may not enter the low emission zoneEuro 2 and Euro 3> may only enter the low emission zone ithey are tted with a diesel particulate lter

    Euro 4 and Euro 5> are allowed to enter the low emission zone

    Fields o actionapplying monetary measures to control the demand or transportation locally

    through systems o mobility pricing.

    Example or best practice

    Congestion Charge in LondonLondon is the largest city to have adopted a central area conges-tion charging scheme. Car users are objected to the daily charge

    o 8 or driving or parking a vehicle on public roads withinthe congestion zone between 7 am 6.30 pm on Monday toFridays. Drivers can pay the charge on the web, by SMS textmessage, in outlets equipped with PayPoint an electronic pay-ment system, or by telephone. Various vehicle types are exempt,including buses, taxis, private hire vehicles and motorcycles;other types o vehicle can register or a 90% or 100% discount,such as vehicles used by residents o the zone or used by thosewith a disabled persons badge.Since its implementation in central London in February 2003,the Congestion Charge scheme has led to a 20% reduction in our-wheeled trac within the charging zoneduring charging hours, cutting an estimated 40-50 million litres o vehicle uel consumption inside the zoneand a total 100,000 tons CO

    2emissions annually across London. It also led to an 83% increase in pedal cycle

    use across London, and the reduction o 40 70 road trac causalities per annum. The charge raises 122 Mannually which is then spent on improving transport, including providing more buses, improving road saety andimplementing energy eciency in transport.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    32/44

    32

    II. Environmentally-riendly mobility

    Overall objectiveStrengthen public awareness o sustainable mobility by

    Fields o actionpromoting educational schemes and inormation oers about ecological im-

    pacts o trac.

    Example or best practice

    The Green Schools Travel Program in Dublin, IrelandThe Green-Schools Travel program, unded by Ireland Depart-ment o Trans-port, is a environmental education program,which is currently participated by more than 300 schools throug-hout Ireland.As part o their Action Plan, participating schools will set theirown travel targets, with the ultimate aim o increasing the num-ber o pupils using sustainable transport modes such as walking,cycling, car pooling or public transport. This results in the reduc-

    tion o trac congestion at the school gates, the improvemento pupils physical health and development o road usage senseas pedestrians and cyclists.One o the successul stories comes rom St. Josephs Boys Natio-nal School with its Green Tree idea. The Green Trees, made rom old branches and placed inside the class-rooms identies those pupils who walk or cycle to school each day, as pupils who do so will place a green leaon their tree. Leaves are then later counted rom each class to give the numbers o pupils who cycle or walk toschool.The school is actively promoting WOW (Walk on Wednesday) to encourage pupils to walk to school each Wed-nesday. The class with the most walkers and cyclists each month will receive the Golden Boots award, dona-ted to the school by a local shoe shop. The committee carries out spot checks every week on a Monday or Fridayto assess the number o students who are walking and cycling. WOW has been able to generate the biggest

    modal shit in transport because it is an easy action to implement and be a part o.

    Fields o actionappreciating the environmentally riendly mobility culture through community

    relations work.

    Example or best practice

    Walk 21 a movement to promote walkingWalking is convenient, it needs no special equipment, is sel-re-gulating and inherently sae. Walking is as natural as breathing(John Butcher, Founder Walk21, USA 1999).

    Walk 21 has developed an International Charter or Walking,which recognises the benets o walking as a key indicator ohealthy, ecient, socially inclusive and sustainable communitiesand acknowledge the universal rights o people to be able towalk saely and to enjoy high quality public spaces anywhere andat anytime. Walk 21 is committed to reducing the physical, socialand institutional barriers that limit walking activity.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    33/44

    33

    II. Environmentally-riendly mobility

    II

    Fields o actiondeveloping positive incentives or an environmentally riendly mobility culture.

    Example or best practice

    Cultura or a new mobility, City o Graz, AustriaCULTURA is a project initiated and sponsored by the EuropeanUnion as part o its URB AL programme. It is the aim o CUL-TURA to point out the necessity or sot measures like mobili-ty management & travel awareness e.g. campaigns to controlurban mobility and to substitute inrastructure measures or theencouragement o more sustainable modes o transport namelypublic transport, cycling and walking.CULTURA collects and develops a wide range o products ohigh practical use such as best practise examples on sot mea-sures and campaigns, guide-lines & checklists or development& implementation, a living and growing database on successulmeasures etc. All products will be available multilingual, ree

    o charge or downloading or everybody via this website. The main target groups or the products oered byCULTURA are decision makers (politicians), local / regional administrative sta who are in charge o planning &implementation o measures, multiplier & opinion leaders (e.g. journalists), public transport companies and endusers.

    Fields o actionstarting mobility education in kindergartens and schools.

    Example or best practice

    The Trac Snake Game

    The Trac Snake Game is a un game and campaign that sti-mulates young children (and their parents) to go to school in anenvironment-riendly, sae and healthy way such as walk, cycle,car sharing or public transport. The game was part o the Euro-pean project CONNECT and is carried out in 76 schools at thesame time by a select group o primary schools in Austria, Belgi-um, Bulgaria, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Slovenia, The Netherlandsand United Kingdom. The result o the game is the 11% increaseo eco-trips.Regarding the success o the Trac Snake Game, CONNECTwas awarded the Sustainable Energy Europe Award 2009 inthe category Promotional, Communication and EducationalActions. The jury gave praise to CONNECT or setting up new mobility campaigns where pupils and students

    have a central and active role. The high replication actor allows a snowball eect: more and more schools andchildren participating in the project and its aim to in-crease sustainable transport modes. The jury also noted andappreciated the realization o a project consortium that showed a good balance over Europe with a prominentinvolvement o newer member states.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    34/44

    34

    III. Economy-promoting Mobility

    Overall objectiveCreate attractive and ecient transportation systems by

    Fields o actionimproving the accessibility o cities with dierent means o transportation.

    Example or best practice

    Saitama City Comprehensive Transportation SystemMaster PlanThe city o Saitama has developed into the 9th largest city inJapan boasting a population o 1.2 million. The City is accessibleby 14 train and subway lines, especially by the amous Shinkan-sen train. There is a high rate o commuters; the central OmiyaStation has a daily rate o 310.000 passengers.Based on the Saitama City Comprehensive Transportation Sys-tem Master Plan o 2004, the city is striving towards a transpor-tation system that is not heavily dependent on motor vehicles. In

    Japan, route buses are the general mode o transportation usedby city residents.

    There are several measures to improve the access to companies, shops and residential areas:

    Public Transportation Priority System: In Saitama City, trac lights are regulated in avour o route bu-ses to secure priority passage or these buses on the roads. Inormation rom a device on board the bus istransmitted to an optical beacon installed on the roads, to extend the length o green light time or reducethe duration o red lights, thereby ensuring the smooth running o route buses.Bus Location System: The Bus Location System is one in which wireless communication devices or GPStechnology are used to gather inormation on the location o buses and in turn make this inormationavailable at bus stops, on mobile phones or via the internet.

    Fields o actionensuring the good accessibility o all city districts.

    Example or best practice

    Designing a sustainable city Curitiba, BrazilCuritiba, the capital city o the State o Paran, experienced thehigh growth with population increases approximately 5.7% ayear. With the approval o Curitibas Master Plan in 1966, guide-lines were established that restructured the city and consolidateda public transportation system to move people easily throughoutthe metropolitan area and its surrounding municipalities. This

    results in a mass transportation system that today covers eightneighbour cities, and transports 1.9 million passengers daily.

    The transportation system is made up o our complemen-

    tary levels o service that includes:

    Express lines large high-capacity buses that have exclusivetrac lanes, spreading radially rom the city centre in 5 directions. They are treated as an above-groundsubway because o their speed, capacity and requent service.Feeder lines pass through outlying neighbourhoods and make the system easily accessible to lower den-sity areas.Inter-district routes allow passengers to connect to the axis o the express lines without entering thecentral city area.

    Rapid buses: the quickest links between two points with ew stops, linked with tube stations. Curitiba isthe pioneer in the worldwide Rapid Bus development.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    35/44

    35

    III. Economy-promoting Mobility

    III

    Fields o actionacilitating the accessibility o commercial areas.

    Example or best practice

    Partnership or Sustainable Urban Transport in Asia(PSUTA)PSUTA is the project initiated by Clean Air Initiative: Asia (CAI-Asia) and Swedish International Development CooperationAgency (SIDA), which works with Asian countries to strengthenthe implementation o sustainable urban transportation poli-cies. Currently the project is being tested in Xian (China), Hanoi(Vietnam) and Pune (India). These ast growing Asian cities areexperiencing problems with inecient transport access in urbanareas.Xian (3.9 Million inhabitants), the economic center o North-western China, is improving the trac accessibility in the citycenter.

    Currently the ollowing project is being implemented:

    Construction o new ring road o a length o about 71 km, including interchanges and bridgesIntegrating the ring road with the overall urban road networkImprovement o the urban transport system, including bus priority schemeSupply o equipment or road maintenance, transport planning modelling, trac signals and area traccontrol center

    Fields o actionoptimizing goods trac within cities with a logistics concept.

    Example or best practice

    Veloce System Vicenza, ItalySeveral years ago the Municipality o Vicenza has established aZTL ( limited trac) zone in order to preserve the environmentaland architectural goods o the city centre. However, this hasntchanged the congestion problems as heavy reight vehicles werestill operating during the authorised time slots.The objective o the Veloce system (Vicenza Eco-Logistic Center)is to tackle congestion in the city centre. This is achieved by alogistic system that concentrates good distribution. This opti-mizes every trip, minimising hence the environmental impact. Acompany and Logistic centers have been constituted in order to

    implement the system. The Vicenza municipality owns 55% othe company. Various commercial activities o the Vicenza citycentre own the rest.The implemented system works as ollows: trucks transport their goods to a collection centre outside the citycentre. These goods are then unloaded, grouped and reloaded on electrical vehicles that deliver to the city cen-tre. The system is managed by an inormation program connected to personal digital assistants.The system showed to be very reliable: on a total amount o 23.000 deliveries carried out in 2004 and 67.000packages delivered in 2005, no damage or loss has occurred. The economic balance o the activity is also convin-cing. On the environmental side, the system contributes to a PM10 (Particulate Matter < 10 m) reduction andhas reduced the number o reight transport vehicles circulating in the city centre rom 14 to 2.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    36/44

    36

    III. Economy-promoting Mobility

    Overall objectiveEnsure trouble-ree mobility o people and goods by

    Fields o actioninstituting programs to optimize the fow o trac and to avoid congestion.

    Example or best practice

    Urban Trac Management and Control (UTMC) UKLaunched in 1997, the UTMC programme is the ve-year re-search programme rom UK Department or Transport (DT) orthe development o a more open approach to Intelligent Trans-port Systems ( ITS) in urban areas. In January 2001, ollowing a3-year research phase, the Programme embarked on its de-monstration phase by awarding unds to our towns and cities toimplement and showcase real-lie UTMC systems.UTMC systems are designed to allow the dierent applications

    used within modern trac management systems to communica-te and share inormation with each other. This allows previouslydisparate data rom multiple sources such as ANPR cameras,Variable-message sign (VMS), car parks, trac signals, air quality monitoring stations and meteorological data,to be amalgamated into a central console or database. The idea behind UTMC is to maximise road network po-tential to create a more robust and intelligent system that can be used to meet current and uture managementrequirements.

    Fields o actionensuring that places o work and training can be reached within a short time.

    Example or best practice

    ToolBox or Mobility Management in companiesThe toolbox is a search acility rom Belgium to help companiesdevelop their own mobility plan, and to help them promote e-ectively the use o public transport, collective company trans-port, car-pooling, walking and cycling or homework journeys.It has been developed by a consortium o European specialists inmobility management.A company mobility plan also called a green commuter plan orcompany transportation plan tries to bring together transportand other business issues in a coordinated strategy aiming atmaking better use o the companys resources.

    Best examples o Company mobility plan in the website:

    a comprehensive company transport plan rom BASF (Ludwigshaen, Germany)bus network and the success o car-pooling rom FORD (Genk, Belgium)a complete strategy to stimulate car-pooling by Nestl (, France)

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    37/44

    37

    III. Economy-promoting Mobility

    III

    Fields o actionguaranteeing adequate transport acilities and capacities or reight trac.

    Example or best practice

    Project ELCIDIS (Electric Vehicle City DistributionSystems)Most European cities are conronted with problems o the evo-lution o urban logistics, which has led to the increasing use oheavy goods vehicles in city centres, causing nuisance, pollutionand poor accessibility.

    The ELCIDIS project oers a solution or urban logistics in

    a dual way:

    urban distribution with quiet and clean (hybrid) electricvehiclesecient routing o vehicles and the use o central distribu-tion centres.

    The projects o the 6 participating cities:

    Rotterdam and Stockholm: ocus on the deployment o large electric vans and hybrid electric trucks, whichwill operate rom the existing Urban Distribution Centres.La Rochelle ocuses on the development o a new, clean and ecient distribution system, which will set upspecial urban distribution companies and deploy electric vehicles with a payload o 500 kg.Stavanger, Milan and Erlangen ocus on the deployment o (hybrid) electric vehicles or in-house goodsand mail distribution or companies. The vehicles will be integrated into the feets o companies whichoperate within the urban areas o these cities.

    Fields o actionencouraging company mobility management.

    Example or best practice

    Travelways Mobility management in DublinDublin City Council required a mobility management plan orthe Mater Hospital and the Childrens University Hospital whichhave over 3000 employees. Parking and planning constraints ledthe hospitals to take a strategic approach to reducing the num-ber o single-occupant vehicles accessing the site.The mobility management plan addressed the trac and par-king impact in and around the area and placed a ceiling gureon car spaces or the new development. Parking and planning

    constraints led the hospitals to take a strategic approach toreducing the number o single-occupant vehicles accessing thesite.Onsite commuter centres were established in each hospitalto manage the implementation o the travel plan and to communicate travel initiatives to sta, patients andvisitors. Over 5 years, their implementation o the travel plan will achieve a 20% reduction in cars accessing thesite, reducing congestion and parking overheads. So ar, a 16% reduction in sta travel by car was recorded asalready achieved in September 2006 and also that the project won the Irish Times Living Dublin Award in 2007or its contribution to improving quality o lie in Dublin City.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    38/44

    38

    III. Economy-promoting Mobility

    Overall objectiveCoordinate the requirements o transportation with other orms o land

    use by

    Fields o action

    integrating trac planning into urban planning and the planning o enterpriseland use.

    Example or best practice

    Urban develoment in Stuttgart: Compact urban green

    Between 2004 and 2006, the city administration o Stuttgartdeveloped together with representatives rom industry, scienceand politics a comprehensive urban development concept or thecity. The basis o the concept is the commitment to the principle

    o sustainability. Under the motto Stuttgart - compact, urban,green, all development activities undergo an impact assessmentreerring to their contribution to the environmental, social andeconomic stability o the urban area.A ocal point o the development concept is the primacy o innerurban development over urban sprawl. One o the most eectivestrategies to obtain inner development is the conversion o brownelds and suboptimally used urban areasinto integrated vital urban spaces. A typical example or the conversion o a browneld area is the district Burg-holzho in Stuttgart, which was developed on a ormer U.S. army base. The aim o the project was to create acompact city based on short distances. A lower energy and land consumption, good access to public transportand the consideration o the needs o pedestrians and cyclists are essential criteria or the planning o new urba-nizations. Almost 40 percent o the urban area o Stuttgart is now under landscape or nature protection. Based

    on its Land Use Plan, the city has established guidelines, objectives and measures or the development o urbanmobility or the next twenty years.

    Fields o actionimproving the supply and management o parking space or shopping

    acilities, public and private services and events.

    Example or best practice

    Parking Management Guide Victoria, CanadaThe Victoria Transport Policy Institute is an independent researchorganization dedicated to developing innovative and practical

    solutions to transportation problems.Parking management reers to various policies and programs thatresult in more ecient use o parking resources. This report sum-marizes the book, Parking Management Best Practices (PlannersPress, 2006), which describes and evaluates more than two-do-zen such strategies. It investigates problems with current parkingplanning practices, discusses the costs o parking acilities andthe savings that can result rom improved management, descri-bes specic parking management strategies and how they canbe implemented, discusses parking management planning andevaluation, and describes how to develop the optimal parking management program in a particular situation.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    39/44

    39

    III. Economy-promoting Mobility

    III

    Overall objectiveCreate ecient institutions or trac control by

    Fields o actionimproving the eciency o public administrative authorities.

    Example or best practice

    Integrated Trac Management Centre Stuttgart(IVLZ) Stuttgart, GermanyStuttgart is located at the centre o a thriving economic regiono 3 Million inhabitants with a high incidence o trac. Mobilityis a major actor in determining the attraction o the city as anindustrial location and as a place in which to live and work, andthe need or greater mobility is set to increase.Stuttgarts Integrated Trac Management Centre Stuttgart(IVLZ) seeks to address these problem issues: Since the begin-ning o 2006, this agency has been implementing an innovative

    system o trac management taking in all modes o transportwhich is unique anywhere in Germany.

    Comprehensive inormation about the trac situation in Stuttgart is gathered by our dierent

    partner organizations:

    The Stuttgart Oce o Public AairsThe Stuttgart Civil Engineering DepartmentThe public transport operator SSB AGThe Stuttgart Police DepartmentData is centrally collated and evaluated at the IVLZ. It is then used to pro-actively infuence the trac situ-ation through the use o inormation displays, parking direction systems and fexible trac light program-ming.

    Fields o actionimproving the eciency o public and private transit companies.

    Example or best practice

    Enhancing the Convenience o the Bus Service Hamamatsu, JapanHamamatsu residents have several choices when it comes topublic transport, including the train network, but many chooseto ride the bus. The city has issued a new policy to improve theconvenience o the bus service, which includes the introduction

    o IC Card and Bus Location System.The IC Card (Nice Pass) was introduced in 2004 and approx.30% o the citys 820,000 residents own one. The introductiono the IC Card has reduced the amount o time it takes or pas-sengers to get o the bus by 27%.The Bus Location System consists o boards showing the loca-tion o busses through a series o electronic lights have beenput up inside public buildings, such as City Hall and police stations, as well as at bus stops. Inormation on buslocations can also be received by computers and mobile phones using the Internet Bus Location System.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    40/44

    40

    III. Economy-promoting Mobility

    Fields o actiongetting companies and institutions with high trac demands better involved

    in trac planning and urban.

    Example or best practice

    Mobility Management Strategy Dresden, GermanyMobility management has been practised in Dresden since 1996Objectives are less car trac and car emissions by promotingalternative modes o transport and by involving great trac ge-nerators, such as local companies and institutions.With countless individual measures, such as jobtickets, the co-ordination o timetables with shit patterns, relocations o busstops, cycle parking with corresponding inrastructure, Intranet-based car-pooling schemes, and even the establishing o a mobi-lity team at the company Inneon/Qimonda, it has been possibleto record remarkable successes.At Inneon/Qimonda, or example, the proportion o employees

    using private cars or their travel to work was reduced rom 68 %in 1996 to 55 % in 2005.Dresden cooperates with a lot o dierent trac generators which are willing to practise mobility managementwithout special nancial promotion rom the city administration. The successul classic case o MM or compa-nies was expanded to schools, universities, hospitals, leisure activities (beer gardens), cultural and sport loca-tions.

  • 8/2/2019 CFM_Agenda21[1]

    41/44

    41

    Invitation or membership

    We invite all members o UCLG to participate actively in theUrban Mobility Committee.

    We invite you

    Cities and RegionsPublic transportation companiesBusinesses and corporationsEducational and research institutionsNGOs

    to become members o the network Cities or

    Mobility. Your membership is ree o charge.

    Online registration: http://www.cities-or-mobility.org

    The network Cities or Mobility oers a range ouseul services. With your active participation youcan create synergies and mutual benets.

    1. Inormation and communication

    Internet orum All relevant inormation on activities andpartners is available at the web address http://www.cities-or-mobility.org.The Cities or Mobility eMagazine and Newsfash disse-minate best practice solutions, innovative technologies,

    important events, and news rom the network