56
CFA Research Challenge 2013- 2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

  • Upload
    enid

  • View
    48

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN. 11% Increase in Sales in 2014 40% Increase in EBITDA EBITDA Margin Widens by 250bps over 2013E Economies of Scale $0.29 Forward EPS BUY Rating $19 Price Target. Summary NASDAQ: HWAY. $19.00. BUY. 18.60 % Upside. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Page 2: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

11% Increase in Sales in 2014 40% Increase in EBITDA EBITDA Margin Widens by 250bps

over 2013E Economies of Scale $0.29 Forward EPS

BUY Rating– $19 Price Target

Page 3: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Market Profile (As of January 31, 2014)52 Week Range $9.59 –

$22.201 Year Return 45.5%Average Volume 502,154Market Capitalization

$ 572.8M

Inst. Ownership 94.5%Insider Ownership 3.9%Summary

Business &

Industry Financial Analysis Valuation Risks

SummaryNASDAQ: HWAY

Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14$8

$10

$12

$14

$16

$18

$20HWAY

18.60 % Upside$16.0

2

$19.00 BU

Y

Key Target Drivers

Economic

Increasing demand for Population Health Management

Shift towards value-based healthcare payment models

Continued demand for SilverSneakers® Program

Political

Formation of Accountable Care Organizations

Affordable Care Act subsidized insurance premiums

Global healthcare legislation encouraging Population Health Management

InternalEconomies of scale creating value for shareholders

Steady expansion into international markets

Page 4: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Business & Industry

Page 5: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Largest independent global provider of specialized population health management solutions for health related cost bearing entities

Scaled proprietary technology infrastructure and delivery capabilities serving >30M people on 4 continents

Return to growth and strengthening financial profile post 2011 customer transition

Healthways OverviewNASDAQ: HWAY

SummaryBusiness

& Industry

Financial Analysis Valuation Risks

Page 6: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

MedicareAdvantag

e

Blue&

Regional

Health Systems

Employers

Customer BreakoutNASDAQ: HWAY

Page 7: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Revenue BreakdownNASDAQ: HWAY

SummaryBusiness

& Industry

Financial Analysis Valuation Risks

$-

$150,000,000

$300,000,000

$450,000,000

$600,000,000

$750,000,000

$900,000,000

-

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000

25,000,000

30,000,000

35,000,000

40,000,000

Revenue Lives

Rev

enue

in M

illio

ns

Live

s U

nder

Man

agem

ent

(Mill

ions

)35%

35%

15%

10% 5%Revenue Segments

Medicare Blues/RegionalSelf-Insured Employers Health SystemsInternational

Lives Under Management vs. Revenue (5% increase in lives leads to appx. 4% increase

in EBITDA)

Page 8: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Competitive AnalysisNASDAQ: HWAY

Advantages First-Mover Experience Wide array of services Individualized

programs

SummaryBusiness

& Industry

Financial Analysis Valuation Risks

Disadvantages High fixed costs Dependency on large

contracts

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 240%

25%

50%

75%VRSK

AETCRVL

HWAY

Industry Relative Value

Current Price to Q3 Sales

Q3

Gro

ss M

argi

n

Public

Comps

PINC

VRSK

CRVL

AET

Page 9: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Financial Analysis

Congressional Budget Office Actuary Data

Non-Partisan Healthcare Analytics Surveys of Hospital Executives Revenue Sensitivity Analysis

Page 10: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Growth StrategyNASDAQ: HWAY

Increasing Demand for Pop. Health ManagementEconomies of Scale

Sector Shift to Value-Based Payment Models

The ACA incentivizes the formation of ACOs

Healthcare sector moving from volume to value-based payment

Shifting trend in the global healthcare landscape

High expected revenues will widen gross margin

SummaryBusiness

& Industry

Financial Analysis Valuation Risks

Page 11: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Healthcare ReformNASDAQ: HWAY

SummaryBusiness

& Industry

Financial Analysis Valuation Risks

Accountable Care Organizations

Premier SurveyAlready enrolled in an ACO 18.30

%Expected to participate by the end of 2013

5.20%

By the end of 2014 26.10%

By the end of 2015 13.90%

After 2015 13.00%

Will not participate 23.50%

Q1 201

1

Q4 201

1

Q3 201

2

Q2 201

3

Q1 201

4F

Q4 201

4F

Q3 201

5F

Q2 201

6F

Q1 201

7F

Q4 201

7F

Q3 201

8F -

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Historical and Projected ACO Growth

Historical ACOs Projected ACOs

Num

ber

of A

CO

s

Page 12: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Healthcare ReformNASDAQ: HWAY

SummaryBusiness

& Industry

Financial Analysis Valuation Risks

Coverage Projections Post-ACA Historical and Projected Revenue vs. LUM

$500

$550

$600

$650

$700

$750

$800

28

30

32

34

36

38

RevenueLives Under Management

Mill

ions

of

USD

Mill

ions

of

LUM

2012A2013A

2014F2015F

2016F2017F

2018F2019F

2020F2021F

2022F2023F

-

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Medicaid & CHIP Employer-BasedNongroup & Medicare Insurance Exchanges

Mill

ions

of

Amer

ican

s

Page 13: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Sensitivity AnalysisNASDAQ: HWAY

SummaryBusiness

& Industry

Financial Analysis Valuation Risks

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

F20

16F

2018

F $650

$680

$710

$740

$770

$800

$830

$860

Push

Historical Revenue

Bull Case

Bear Case

Base Case

Consensus

Mill

ions

of

USD

Bull Base Bear5% of ACO Market

3% of ACO Market

1% of ACO Market

15% Growth in Blue/Regional

10% Growth in Blue/Regional

5% Growth in Blue/Regional

8% Growth in Medicare

4% Growth in Medicare

2% Growth in Medicare

0% Growth in Employer Segment

-3% Growth in Employer Segment

-5% Growth in Employer Segment

10% International Growth

5% International Growth

2% International Growth

$2350% Upside

$1924% Upside

$1315% Upside

Revenue Sensitivity Analysis

Page 14: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Valuation Price Target:

EV/EBITDA Free Cash Flow to Equity Free Cash Flow to Firm

supports BUY

Page 15: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Enterprise Value / EBITDANASDAQ: HWAY

SummaryBusiness

& Industry

Financial Analysis Valuation Risks

$19Targ

et price:

Premium to the five-year average: Increased market presence Wider gross margins Additional lives under

management

5-Year Average Industry Average

7.33 10.40

2013E 2014F 2015F 2016F 2017F 2018F $-

$20,000,000

$40,000,000

$60,000,000

$80,000,000

$100,000,000

$120,000,000

$140,000,000

$160,000,000

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

$63,262,243

$88,690,351 $99,660,914

$110,199,655 $122,142,256

$133,647,489

10%12% 13% 15% 16% 17%

EBITDA EBITDA Margin

Mill

ions

of

USD

EBIT

DA

% o

f R

even

ue

(Amounts in millions) EV / EBITDA Valuation

       Multiple     10.4x FY14E EBITDA   $88.7 Implied Enterprise Value 922.4

Less: Debt   (246.9)Plus: Cash   1.5

Equity Value   $677.0        Shares Outstanding   35.1

Page 16: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Free Cash Flow to EquityNASDAQ: HWAY

FCFE Model

2014

20 Year Treasury

3.54%

Beta 1.07Market Risk Premium

8.00%

Cost of Equity

12.10%

Shares Outstanding

35,060,000

Current Price

$15.31

PV of FCFE (2014-2018)

$5.99

Terminal Growth Rate

3.00%

Terminal Value

$23.49

PV of Terminal Value

$13.27

Value Per Share

$ 19.26

SummaryBusiness

& Industry

Financial Analysis Valuation Risks

Value Per Share: $19.26 Reaffir

ms BUY25.77% Upside

Potential

(Dollars in Thousands, Except per Share)

Free Cash Flow to Equity Valuation2014F 2015F 2016F 2017F 2018F

Net Income $10,224 $13,832 $17,157 $21,308 $25,153 Plus: Depreciation & Amortization 60,228 65,821 71,478 77,207 83,024 Plus: Net Borrowing 24,596 3,970 2,180 5,075 3,376 Less: Investment in Fixed Capital (34,957) (37,181) (37,614) (38,084) (38,672)Less: Change in Net Working Capial (897) (136) (75) (174) (116)

Free Cash Flow to Equity $59,194 $46,306 $53,126 $65,332 $72,765

Free Cash Flow to Equity per Share $1.69 $1.32 $1.52 $1.86 $2.08

Page 17: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Free Cash Flow to FirmNASDAQ: HWAY

FCFF Model

2014

Cost of Equity

12.10%

Weight of Equity

68.49%

Cost of Debt 5.08%

Tax Rate 30%

Weight of Debt

31.51%

WACC 9.40%

Terminal Growth Rate

3.00%

Firm Value $1,046,282

Less: Debt $(246,926)

Equity Value $799,356

Per Share Value

$ 22.80Summary

Business &

Industry Financial Analysis Valuation Risks

Value Per Share: $22.80 Reaffir

ms BUY48.92% Upside

Potential

(Dollars in Thousands, Except per Share)

Free Cash Flow to Firm Valuation2014F 2015F 2016F 2017F 2018F

Net Income $10,224 $13,832 $17,157 $21,308 $25,153 Plus: Depreciation & Amortization 60,228 65,821 71,478 77,207 83,024 Plus: After-Tax Interest Expense 9,613 9,754 9,831 10,011 10,130 Less: Investment in Fixed Capital (34,957) (37,181) (37,614) (38,084) (38,672)Less: Change in Net Working Capial (897) (136) (75) (174) (116)

Free Cash Flow to Firm $44,211 $52,090 $60,777 $70,268 $79,519

Page 18: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Risk Analysis

Page 19: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Prob

abi

lity

Lo wM

oder

ate

Hi

gh

Impact

Insignificant

Moderate

Severe

Slower than expected international growth

Changing heath plan market

Shareholder activism

Cost reduction pressure

Delayed implementation of the ACA

Vertical integration of healthcare services

Failure to properly hedge against foreign exchange risk

Inability to receive customers’ data timely and efficiently

Loss of Humana contract

Risk AnalysisNASDAQ: HWAY

SummaryBusiness

& Industry

Financial Analysis Valuation Risks

Page 20: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Questions

Page 21: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Presentation Slides

• Summary• Overview• Customer Breakout• Revenue Breakdown• Competitive Analysis• Growth Strategy• Healthcare Reform (ACO)• Healthcare Reform (CBO)• Sensitivity Analysis• EV/EBITDA• Free Cash Flow to Equity• Free Cash Flow to Firm• Risk Analysis

Page 22: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Additional Slides

• RIM Valuation• Free Cash Flow 2-Way Tabl

es• EV/EBITDA Sensitivity• Management• Bear Price Justification• Global Legislation

• SWOT Analysis• Comparable Firms• Pro-Forma Financials & As

sumptions• CBO Projections• ACO & Pop. Health Manag

ement• Leavitt Partners Data• Bull, Base, Bear Sensitivity• LUM Estimates• EV/EBITDA• Beta Regression• Free Cash Flow Assumptio

ns• FCFE• FCFF

Page 23: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Largest independent global provider of well-being improvement solutions

30+ years of experience improving health and well-being for health plans, employers and health systems

Operator of the SilverSneakers program, the nation's leading exercise program designed exclusively for older adults

Dependency on large contracts Level of indebtedness could

adversely affect future financial conditions

Growing demand for population health management

Changing macroeconomic trends and company specific-trends

Continued growth in international markets

Vertical integration of population health management services

Short-term pressures to reduce costs from increased competition, decreasing revenues from governmental and private revenue sources, increasing medical costs, and overall market conditions

Expansion into international markets brings additional business,

regulatory, and financial risks

O

S W

T

SWOT AnalysisNASDAQ: HWAY

Page 24: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Comparable CompaniesNASDAQ: HWAY

(Dollars in Millions, Except per Share)

Healthways Comparable Companies - 1/31/14 

Company Price - 1/31

Market Cap EV Revenue

EBITDA Margin

EV / EBITDA EPS

Debt / Equity

TTM TTM (x) TTMLast

ReportedHealthways (Nasdaq:HWAY) $15.31 $357.0 $651.2 $669.2 9.9% 12.3x $(0.02) 85.9

Corvel (Nasdaq:CVRL) 47.36 513.5 492.7 470.5 15.3% 14.4 1.92 - Aetna (NYSE:AET) 68.33 16,132.9 18,111.5 47,290.0 8.6% 8.1 5.86 60.5 Verisk (Nasdaq:VRSK) 63.86 9,962.2 11,328.9 1,680.0 45.1% 15.7 2.09 271.4 Premier (Nasdaq:PINC) 34.69 1,122.9 1,070.0 806.3 39.9% 3.3 1.16 3.9

Mean 45.91 5,617.7 6,330.9 10,183.2 23.7% 10.8 2.20 84.3 Median 47.36 1,122.9 1,070.0 806.3 15.3% 12.3 1.92 60.5

Page 25: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Historical and Pro-Forma Income Statement

(Dollars in Millions, Except per Share)

Source: Company Financials and Team Estimates.

For the Historical Fiscal Year Ended Dec. 31, For the Projected Fiscal Year Ending Dec. 31,

2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018ERevenues $720.3 $688.8 $677.2 $658.7 $728.8 $739.5 $745.4 $759.0 $768.0

Cost of Goods Sold 493.7 510.7 533.9 536.8 574.6 573.4 568.1 568.6 565.3 Selling G&A Expense 72.8 64.8 60.9 58.7 65.5 66.5 67.0 68.2 69.1 Impairment Loss - 183.3 - - - - - - - Restructuring and Related Charges 10.3 9.0 1.8 - - - - - -

EBITDA 143.5 (79.1) 80.6 63.3 88.7 99.7 110.2 122.1 133.6 Depreciation/Amoritization 52.8 50.0 51.7 52.5 60.2 65.8 71.5 77.2 83.0

Operating Income (EBIT) 90.8 (129.1) 28.9 10.8 28.5 33.8 38.7 44.9 50.6 Gain on Sale of Investments (1.2) - - - - - - - - Interest Expense 14.2 13.2 14.1 12.5 13.8 14.0 14.1 14.4 14.5

Pre-Tax Income 77.8 (142.3) 14.7 (1.7) 14.7 19.8 24.6 30.6 36.1 Income Tax Expense 30.4 15.4 6.7 (0.5) 4.4 6.0 7.5 9.3 10.9

Net Income 47.3 (157.7) 8.0 (1.2) 10.2 13.8 17.2 21.3 25.2

Basic EPS (GAAP) $1.36 $(4.68) $0.24 $(0.03) $0.29 $0.39 $0.49 $0.61 $0.72

Growth Rates:Revenue --- (4.4%) (1.7%) (2.7%) 10.6% 1.5% 0.8% 1.8% 1.2% EBITDA --- NM NM NM 40.2% 12.4% 10.6% 10.8% 9.4% Net Income --- NM NM NM NM 35.3% 24.0% 24.2% 18.0%

Margins:Gross 31.5% 25.8% 21.2% 18.5% 21.2% 22.5% 23.8% 25.1% 26.4% EBITDA 19.9% (11.5%) 11.9% 9.6% 12.2% 13.5% 14.8% 16.1% 17.4% EBIT 12.6% (18.7%) 4.3% 1.6% 3.9% 4.6% 5.2% 5.9% 6.6% Net Income 6.6% (22.9%) 1.2% (0.2%) 1.4% 1.9% 2.3% 2.8% 3.3%

Page 26: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Income Statement Assumptions

Depreciation Expense: Expected to remain at a constant percentage of PPECost of Goods Sold: Remains at the 2012 percent of sales (78.84%) until 2015 at

which time it declines by 1% per year until 2018, returning to the pre-Cigna-loss average of 73.61% of sales

SG&A Expense: Expected to remain at 9% of salesInterest Expense: Expected to remain at 5% of Long Term DebtEffective Tax Rate: Expected to remain at the historical average of 30%Share Count: Forecasted EPS assumes constant share count of 35.06M

Page 27: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Historical and Pro-Forma Balance SheetAssets

Source: Company Financials and Team Estimates.

(Dollars in Millions)

As of the Historical and Projected Fiscal Year Ending,2012A 2013E 2014F 2015F 2016F 2017F 2018F

AssetsCash & Equivalents $1.8 $2.6 $1.7 $1.7 $1.7 $1.7 $1.8 Accounts Receivable, net 108.3 93.4 103.4 104.9 105.7 107.7 108.9 Prepaid Expenses 9.7 8.4 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.7 9.8 Other Current Assets 7.2 6.2 6.9 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Income Taxes Receivable 5.9 5.1 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 6.0 Defrred Tax Asset 8.8 7.6 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.8 8.9 Total Current Assets 141.8 123.3 135.3 137.3 138.4 140.9 142.6

Net PPE 156.5 177.3 204.5 236.1 268.0 300.4 333.2 Other Assets 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Net Intangibles 90.2 90.2 90.2 90.2 90.2 90.2 90.2 Goodwill 338.7 338.7 338.7 338.7 338.7 338.7 338.7

Total Assets $748.3 $750.6 $789.7 $823.3 $856.4 $891.2 $925.8

Page 28: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Current Assets:• Expected to remain at a constant percentage of sales Leasehold Improvements:• Held constant over the forecast period Computer Equipment:• Expected to increase by 5% of sales from year to yearFurniture & Office Equipment:• Held constant over the forecast periodCapital Projects in Progress:• Expected to remain at a constant percentage of sales

Historical and Pro-Forma Balance SheetAssumptions – Asset Side

Page 29: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Historical and Pro-Forma Balance SheetLiabilities, Stockholders’ Equity & Metrics

Source: Company Financials and Team Estimates.

(Dollars in Millions)

As of the Historical and Projected Fiscal Year Ending,2012A 2013E 2014F 2015F 2016F 2017F 2018F

LiabilitiesAccounts Payable $26.3 $23.4 $25.9 $26.3 $26.5 $26.9 $27.3 Acrued Salaries & Benefits 24.9 22.1 24.5 24.8 25.0 25.5 25.8 Accrued Liabilities 39.2 34.8 38.5 39.1 39.4 40.1 40.6 Deferred Revenue 5.6 5.0 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.8 Contract Billings in Excess of Earned Revenue 14.8 13.1 14.5 14.7 14.9 15.1 15.3 Current Portion of Long-Term Debt 11.8 10.5 11.6 11.8 11.9 12.1 12.2 Current Portion of Long-Term Liabilities 5.5 4.9 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.7

Total Current Liabilities 128.3 113.9 126.0 127.8 128.8 131.2 132.8

Long-Term Debt 278.5 246.9 271.5 275.5 277.7 282.7 286.1 Long-Term Deferred Tax Liability 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 Other Long-Term Liabilities 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6

Total Liabilities 469.4 423.4 460.2 466.0 469.2 476.6 481.5

Total Stockholder's Equity 278.8 327.2 329.6 357.4 387.2 414.7 444.3

Total Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity $748.3 $750.6 $789.8 $823.4 $856.4 $891.3 $925.8

Balance Sheet Metrics:Working Capital $13.6 $8.4 $9.3 $9.5 $9.5 $9.7 $9.8 Investment in Fixed Assets 18.4 21.5 35.0 37.2 37.6 38.1 38.7 Investment in Working Capital 4.8 (5.1) 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1

Page 30: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Current Liabilities: Expected to remain at a constant percentage of sales Long-Term Debt: Expected to remain at a constant percentage of sales

Historical and Pro-Forma Balance SheetAssumptions – Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity

Page 31: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Congressional Budget Office Projections(Millions of Americans)

*Non-elderlySource: CBO’s May 2013 Estimate of the Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Health Insurance Coverage

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023ECoverage without ACAMedicaid & CHIP 34 35 34 34 33 33 33 33 34 34 34 34 Employer-Based 154 156 157 159 161 164 165 166 167 167 168 169 Total Medicare & Non Group 50 52 53 55 57 58 60 62 63 65 67 69 Uninsured 55 57 57 57 56 56 55 55 56 56 56 56

Total 293 300 301 305 307 311 313 316 320 322 325 328

PercentagesMedicaid & CHIP 11.6% 11.7% 11.3% 11.1% 10.7% 10.6% 10.5% 10.4% 10.6% 10.6% 10.5% 10.4% Employer-Based 52.6% 52.0% 52.2% 52.1% 52.4% 52.7% 52.7% 52.5% 52.2% 51.9% 51.7% 51.5% Total Medicare & Non Group 17.1% 17.3% 17.6% 18.0% 18.6% 18.6% 19.2% 19.6% 19.7% 20.2% 20.6% 21.0% Uninsured 18.8% 19.0% 18.9% 18.7% 18.2% 18.0% 17.6% 17.4% 17.5% 17.4% 17.2% 17.1%

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Coverage Changes per Year

Medicaid & CHIP - 1 9 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 13 13 Employer-Based - 2 - (2) (6) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7)Nongroup & Medicare - - (2) (3) (4) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5)Insurance Exchanges - - 7 13 22 24 25 25 24 25 24 24 Uninsured - (2) (14) (20) (25) (25) (25) (25) (25) (25) (25) (25)

Coverage with ACAMedicaid & CHIP* 34 36 43 46 45 45 45 45 47 47 47 47 Employer-Based 154 158 157 157 155 158 158 159 160 160 161 162 Nongroup & Medicare 50 52 51 52 53 53 55 57 58 60 62 64 Insurance Exchanges - - 7 13 22 24 25 25 24 25 24 24 Uninsured 55 55 43 37 31 31 30 30 31 31 31 31

Totals 293 301 301 305 306 311 313 316 320 323 325 328

PercentagesMedicaid & CHIP* 11.6% 12.0% 14.3% 15.1% 14.7% 14.5% 14.4% 14.2% 14.7% 14.6% 14.5% 14.3% Employer-Based 52.6% 52.5% 52.2% 51.5% 50.7% 50.8% 50.5% 50.3% 50.0% 49.5% 49.5% 49.4% Nongroup & Medicare 17.1% 17.3% 16.9% 17.0% 17.3% 17.0% 17.6% 18.0% 18.1% 18.6% 19.1% 19.5% Insurance Exchanges 0.0% 0.0% 2.3% 4.3% 7.2% 7.7% 8.0% 7.9% 7.5% 7.7% 7.4% 7.3% Uninsured 18.8% 18.3% 14.3% 12.1% 10.1% 10.0% 9.6% 9.5% 9.7% 9.6% 9.5% 9.5%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Page 32: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

“In an ACO, providers take responsibility for the health of a defined population, coordinate care across settings and are held to benchmark levels of quality and cost. Unlike some previous delivery system reforms, ACOs seek to balance cost control with efforts to improve outcomes and enhance people’s satisfaction.”

“[ACO] participation [is] projected to double by the end of 2014 to 50 percent. Overall, 3 out of 4 respondents say their hospitals have future ACO participation plans.”

Excerpt from Premier Fall 2013 Economic Outlook

Page 33: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Excerpt from Premier Fall 2013 Economic OutlookContinued

Source: Premier Fall 2013 Outlook, Published December 2013

Page 34: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Levitt Partners ACO Registration Data

“The current trajectory shows that providers and payers are recognizing the need to shift toward accountable care arrangements, or at the very least to shift away from fee-for-service care.”

Page 35: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

“The shift to population health management, which will require an entirely different way of looking at health care.”

“In an ACO practice, however, attention must shift to the management of all patients in a practice across the entire spectrum of health, from those who are well to those with the most complex conditions, including individuals at the end of life.”

This will be a major transformation for providers and the healthcare systems they are associated with. Making the transition even more challenging, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2011 will extend health insurance to an additional 32 million people and require enhanced coverage for preventative care. At the same time, the aging and growth of the U.S. population will increase the number of patients who need chronic care management.”

Excerpt from American Medical Group Association

Page 36: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

“In the ACO population health model, it is the aggregate results across all patients that matter – even if some individuals are not cooperative or engaged, their results still count in the world of accountable care.”

“ ‘Practice-based population health’ which refers to the responsibility of primary care groups and networks for the health of their patient populations.”

“This would also be the level at which risk-bearing ACOs would stand or fall on a financial basis.”

PBPH, by definition, must address the health needs of a total patient population. Thus, ACOs must proactively reach out, not only to patients who have visited their doctors recently, but to every individual who has a relationship with an ACO physician”

Excerpt from American Medical Group Association

Page 37: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

As discussed in the Investment Risks section of the report, unexpected developments in ACO growth, ACA mandate implementation, or internal lives under management growth will generate revenues outside of our base projection. To compensate for unforeseen events, be they positive or negative, we ran our valuation models with three different sets of assumptions briefly mentioned in the Valuation section of the report.  Base Case:Our base case growth projections are based on a close analysis of ACO growth, macroeconomic shifts in the healthcare sector, international demand, and our estimates of Healthways’ potential for organic growth. These assumptions drive our $19 price target and buy decision for the stock. We expect HWAY can reasonably capture 3% of the new ACO demand for population health management and grow lives under management in the regional health plan, Medicare, and international segments by 10%, 4%, and 5% respectively. The base case also assumes -3% year-over-year decline in sales from the employer segment as described in the report.

Business Segment Sales and Sensitivity AnalysisBase Case BASE CASE

3% of ACO Market

10% Growth in

Blue/Regional

4% Growth in Medicare

-3% Growth in Employer Segment

5% International

Growth

$ 19

Page 38: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Bull & Bear Case:Our bull and bear case projections give us best case and worse case scenarios for company growth. The bull price of $23 represents a 50.23% upside from the January 31 closing price while the $13 bear price constitutes a 15.09% downside. The assumptions for each of these scenarios are listed in the figures on the right. Running the revenue projections with bull assumptions gives us the forecast of $839.41M by the end of 2018 while the bear case assumptions project $735.38M. We expect actual reported revenues to fall somewhere between these two numbers for the next five years. The chart below displays these three set of assumptions, our revenue projection range, and the Street consensus as provided by FactSet.

Business Segment Sales and Sensitivity AnalysisBull & Bear Case

BEAR CASE

1% of ACO Market

5% Growth in Blue/Regional

2% Growth in Medicare

-5% Growth in Employer Segment

2% International

Growth

$ 13

BULL CASE

5% of ACO Market

15% Growth in

Blue/Regional

8% Growth in Medicare

0% Growth in Employer Segment

10% International

Growth

$ 23

Page 39: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E2014F2015F2016F2017F2018F$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

Revenue Sensitivity Analysis

PushHistorical RevenueBull CaseBear CaseBase CaseConsensus

Mill

ions

of

USD

Business Segment Sales and Sensitivity AnalysisBull & Bear Case

Page 40: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

The year 2006 presented several significant changes to Healthways business model. The acquisition of Axia represented a shift from high-risk case management to total population health management with emphasis on prevention. As displayed in the table below, revenue per life since the acquisition has been constant relative to the years before the business model shift. Healthways has not reported total lives under management since 2009, to estimate this number; we took an average of the 2007-2009 revenue per life figures ($21.86) and divided reported revenue into this number. Our forecasting method maintains this $21.86 revenue per life to predict total future sales.

Year Lives Revenue Revenue Per Life

2001 260,000 $75,121,000 $288.93

2002 579,000 $122,762,000

$212.02

2003 852,000 $165,471,000

$194.21

2004 1,335,000 $245,410,000

$183.83

2005 1,883,000 $312,504,000

$165.96

2006 2,426,000 $412,308,000

$169.95

2007 27,446,000 $615,586,000

$22.43

2008 31,700,000 $736,243,000

$23.23

2009 36,000,000 $717,426,000

$19.93

2010 32,950,688 $720,333,000

$21.86

2011 31,506,651 $688,765,000

$21.86

2012 30,976,253 $677,170,000

$21.86

Source: HWAY Annual Reports, Team Estimates in Yellow

Estimated Lives Under Management Calculation

Page 41: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 $-

$150,000,000

$300,000,000

$450,000,000

$600,000,000

$750,000,000

$900,000,000

-

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000

25,000,000

30,000,000

35,000,000

40,000,000

Lives Under Management vs. Revenue

RevenueLivesLives (estimate)

Tota

l Rev

enue

Lives

Und

er M

anag

emen

t

Lives Under Management

Page 42: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Company Ticker EV/EBITDA (ttm)CorVel CRVL 14.35Aetna AET 8.13Verisk VRSK 15.71Premier PINC 3.31*

Average 10.40*Estimate Provided by Capital IQSource: Bloomberg

EV/EBITDA Pricing Model

EV / EBITDA Valuation       Multiple     10.4x FY14E EBITDA   $88.7 Implied Enterprise Value 922.4

Less: Debt   (246.9)Plus: Cash   1.5

Equity Value   $677.0        Shares Outstanding   35.1 Target Price $ 19

Page 43: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Free Cash Flow Valuation AssumptionsBeta

-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

f(x) = 1.07192334640998 x − 0.000113671368359679R² = 0.0848007707797231

S&P Monthly Returns

HWAY

Mon

thly

Ret

urns

We arrived at a beta of 1.07 by running a 60 observation regression of S&P monthly returns against those of HWAY.

Page 44: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Risk Free Rate Our free cash flow models assume a risk free rate of 3.54%, consistent with

the 20 year treasury rate in January 2014Terminal Growth Rate We assumed a terminal growth rate of 3% based on a combination of

company expectations and estimates for GDP growth. A sensitivity analysis is conducted on the terminal growth rate via our two way tables

Tax Rate Our assumed tax rate of 30% is a 2006-2012 average of income tax expense

divided by taxable income

Free Cash Flow Valuation AssumptionsContinued

(Dollars in Thousands)For the Historical Fiscal Year Ended Dec. 31,

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012Income Tax Expense $24,009 $30,163 $37,740 $10,137 $30,445 $15,386 $6,722

Operating Income 62,213 93,469 113,482 73,603 90,776

(129,114) 28,895 Interest Expense 1,053 18,185 20,927 15,717 14,164 13,193 14,149

Pre-Tax Income 61,160 75,284 92,555 57,886 76,612

(142,307) 14,746

Effective Tax Rate 39.3% 40.1% 40.8% 17.5% 39.7% (10.8%) 45.6%

Average Tax Rate 30.3%

Page 45: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Risk Free Rate Our free cash flow models assume a risk free rate of 3.54%, consistent

with the 20 year treasury rate in January 2014.Terminal Growth Rate We assumed a terminal growth rate of 3% based on a combination of

company expectations and estimates for GDP growth. A sensitivity analysis is conducted on the terminal growth rate via our two way tables.

Free Cash Flow Valuation AssumptionsContinued

Weights of Debt & Equity Our Free Cash Flow to Firm valuation discounts using WACC rather than

cost of equity. Calculations for debt & equity weights are shown below.

Price per

Share

Shares Market Total Firm Weight of

Weight of

Outstanding Cap Debt Value Debt Equity

HWAY $15.31 35.1 $537.0 $247.0 $784.0 31.5% 68.5%

Page 46: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Free Cash Flow to Equity Pricing ModelOur free cash flow to equity model supports our price target of $19 proposed by the EV/EBITDA valuation.

FCFE Model 2014 20 year Treasury 3.54%    Beta 1.07 Market Risk Premium 8.00% Cost of Equity 12.10%

Shares Outstanding

35,060,0

00 Current Price $15.31     Abnormal FCFE $5.99 Terminal Growth Rate 3.00% Terminal Value $23.49 PV of Terminal Value $13.27     Value Per Share $19.26 Upside Potential 25.77%

Free Cash Flow to Equity Valuation2014F 2015F 2016F 2017F 2018F

Net Income $10,224 $13,832 $17,157 $21,308 $25,153 Plus: Depreciation & Amortization 60,228 65,821 71,478 77,207 83,024 Plus: Net Borrowing 24,596 3,970 2,180 5,075 3,376 Less: Investment in Fixed Capital (34,957) (37,181) (37,614) (38,084) (38,672)Less: Change in Net Working Capial (897) (136) (75) (174) (116)

Free Cash Flow to Equity $59,194 $46,306 $53,126 $65,332 $72,765

Free Cash Flow to Equity per Share $1.69 $1.32 $1.52 $1.86 $2.08

Page 47: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Free Cash Flow to Firm Pricing Model

We valued HWAY equity with an EV/EBITDA model, a Free Cash Flow to Equity model, and a Free Cash Flow to Firm model. The price target using free cash flow to firm is not as consistent with the other two valuation methods, and hence is not mentioned in the report, but it does confirm our upside expectations for the stock.

Free Cash Flow to Firm Valuation2014F 2015F 2016F 2017F 2018F

Net Income $10,224 $13,832 $17,157 $21,308 $25,153 Plus: Depreciation & Amortization 60,228 65,821 71,478 77,207 83,024 Plus: After-Tax Interest Expense 9,613 9,754 9,831 10,011 10,130 Less: Investment in Fixed Capital (34,957) (37,181) (37,614) (38,084) (38,672)Less: Change in Net Working Capial (897) (136) (75) (174) (116)

Free Cash Flow to Firm $44,211 $52,090 $60,777 $70,268 $79,519

Page 48: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Free Cash Flow to Firm Pricing ModelContinued

FCFF Model 2014 20 year Treasury 3.54%    Beta 1.07 Market Risk Premium 8.00% Cost of Equity 12.10%

Shares Outstanding

35,060,000 Current Price $15.31

Total Equity

$536,768,6

00 Weight of Equity 68.49%   

Debt Outstanding

$246,926,0

00 Tax Rate 30% After Tax Cost of Debt 3.54% Weight of Debt 31.51%    WACC 9.40%    Abnormal FCFF $230,132 Terminal Growth Rate 3.00%

Terminal Value

$1,279,139 PV of Terminal Value $816,151

Total Firm Value

$1,046,282 Minus Debt $(246,926) Value of Equity $799,356 Value Per Share $22.80 Upside Potential 48.92%

Page 49: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

We valued Healthways’ equity share price 6 different ways including the buy-out prices discussed in Appendix 15. Of those 6, we discredited price to earnings and residual income valuations for the following reasons. Price to Earnings ModelThere were several issues with P/E ratios industry wide. Healthways currently has no P/E multiple because EPS ttm is negative. Premier, one of the closest competitors for ACO business, is a new firm with no earnings. Our earnings per share forecasts for Healthways are too low to rely on industry average P/E multiples for share valuation, and hence this model is discredited and does not contribute to our target price.

Residual Income ModelForecasted earnings per share for Healthways were less than the 12.10% cost of equity multiplied by the book value per share, hence residual income is a negative number. Earnings per share is too low for residual income valuation and we discredit the model as a valid contributor to our target price.

2014F 2015F 2016F 2017F 2018FBeginning Book Value Per Share $ 8.76 $ 9.05 $ 9.45 $ 9.94 $ 10.55

EPS $ 0.29 $ 0.39 $ 0.49 $ 0.61 $ 0.72

Dividend Per Share $ -

$ - $ -

$ -

$ -

Change in Retained Earnings (EPS - dividend) $ 0.29 $ 0.39 $ 0.49 $ 0.61 $ 0.72

Ending Book Value Per Share $ 9.05 $ 9.45 $ 9.94 $ 10.55 $ 11.26

EPS $ 0.29 $ 0.39 $ 0.49 $ 0.61 $ 0.72 Per Share Equity Charge (12.10% Cost of Equity × Beginning Book Value Per Share) $ 1.06 $ 1.10 $ 1.14 $ 1.20 $ 1.28

           Residual Income (EPS – Per Share Equity Charge) $(0.77) $ (0.70) $ (0.65) $ (0.59) $(0.56)

Discounted Residual Income $ (2.40)

Value Per Share RIM $ 6.36 (Discounted RI + Beginning Book Value)          

Price to Earning and Residual Income Valuations

Page 50: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Discount Rate and Terminal Growth SensitivityTwo-Way Tables

Buy Sell Hold

FCFF 2 way table Terminal Growth Rate 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50% 4.00%

WACC

8.00% $25.41 $27.79 $30.65 $34.14 $38.519.00% $20.70 $22.37 $24.32 $26.61 $29.37

10.00% $17.18 $18.40 $19.79 $21.40 $23.2711.00% $14.44 $15.36 $16.40 $17.57 $18.9212.00% $12.25 $12.97 $13.76 $14.65 $15.6513.00% $10.46 $11.03 $11.65 $12.34 $13.11

FCFE 2 way table Terminal Growth Rate 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50% 4.00%

Cost of Equity

10.00% $22.76 $23.94 $25.29 $26.85 $28.6611.00% $20.12 $21.01 $22.02 $23.16 $24.4612.00% $18.01 $18.71 $19.48 $20.34 $21.3113.00% $16.29 $16.84 $17.45 $18.12 $18.8614.00% $14.86 $15.31 $15.79 $16.33 $16.9115.00% $13.66 $14.02 $14.42 $14.85 $15.3216.00% $12.62 $12.93 $13.25 $13.61 $13.99

Page 51: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

EV/EBITDA SensitivityTwo-Way Tables

Buy Sell Hold

EV/EBITDA 2 way table

EV/EBITDA Multiple

Market-Cap Weighted

Industry Average6.28

HWAY 5-Year Average

7.33

Simple Industry Average

10.40HWAY 2013 EV/EBITDA

12.34

Simple Industry Average ex PINC12.76

EBITDA (millions)

Bear 66.95 $5.03 $7.03 $12.90 $16.60 $17.4075.00 $6.47 $8.72 $15.28 $19.43 $20.33

Base 88.69 $8.92 $11.58 $19.35 $24.25 $25.3295.00 $10.05 $12.90 $21.22 $26.47 $27.61

Bull 102.74 $11.44 $14.52 $23.51 $29.20 $30.43

Page 52: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Note on Vertical Integration

It may be the case that Healthways becomes a viable enough ACO contractor that the Company presents an enticing buying opportunity to a larger healthcare conglomerate. Mergers are common in the healthcare sector, and our analysis of recent acquisitions has led us to conclude that when smaller health services providers are bought out, the acquirer typically pays a premium between 20% and 40%. Wellpoint, for example, paid an estimated 20% premium for 1-800-CONTACTS in 2012 in an effort to raise its MLR to comply with new federal regulations. Later that year the company also acquired Amerigroup for 43% above its equity value at the time. We estimate that HWAY’s probability of being bought out before 2018 is 10%. Applying this data to our price targets gives us the value of shares weighted according to buy-out probability. Probability of Buy-

Out 10%   Industry Premiums 20% 40%

    FCFF Buy-out Price $27.36 $31.92

FCFF Weighted Price $23.26 $23.71

    FCFE Buy-out Price $23.11 $26.96

FCFE Weighted Price $19.64 $20.03

Page 53: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Current Management TeamUnder the direction of current CEO Ben Leedle, Healthways revenue has grown by over 300%. Approximately half of that growth was organic, meaning that it doesn’t include revenue captured simply as a result of the 2006 acquisitions of SilverSneakers® and Axia. Leedle has been CEO since 2003, but has been with the Company since 1985. The current upper-level management team has a combined total of 116 years of experience in health care and a combined 58 years with Healthways. While management has been criticized in the years following the loss of the Cigna contract, we are not convinced by the accusations that the firm is not being run in the best interest of shareholders. Our analysis attributes declining revenues to shrinking gross margins after the Cigna loss and slower than expected implementation of Affordable Care Act mandates. The dependency on Cigna before 2011 was a huge weakness and the loss of the contract had an enormous adverse effect on revenue, but our analysis has led us to believe that Healthways will recover, adding lives under management in a more diversified array of contracts thereby securing a more profitable future.

North Tide Capital, LLCNorth Tide Capital, LLC is a Boston-based hedge fund that currently owns approximately 10% of HWAY shares, making the fund the second largest shareholder. In December 2013, North Tide began raising its position in HWAY stock, taking an activist position and calling for the immediate removal of CEO Ben Leedle. The fund claimed that Leedle was harming the value of Healthways stock by missing attractive trends in the domestic healthcare marketplace. Along with the removal of Leedle, North Tide also called for Healthways to discontinue its international expansion efforts and focus on shorter-term trends centered in the United States. Healthways’ board of directors issued a statement defending Leedle and claimed that it had no plans to seek a replacement for the CEO position. We are not convinced that outing a CEO who’s been with the firm for almost 30 years in the midst of a critical macroeconomic healthcare shift would create value for shareholders. We believe that there is value in Leedle’s experience with the firm and the level respect paid to him by the board of directors. However, if North Tide manages to bring in a new CEO its obvious that this new executive would run the company in favor of the hedge fund, most likely by shifting focus away from global expansion and implementing a short-term capital restructuring plan to pay off debt and increase the value of equity. The situation should be monitored closely as it develops; for now, it is not factored into our valuation models.

Note on Management and North Tide Capital

Page 54: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Ben R. Leedle, Jr.• President & CEO• Joined in 1985, CEO since 2003• Steered HWAY towards Population Health Management• HWAY revenues have grown by over 300% under his

leadership

Current Executive Team

Combined 116 years of experience in Health Care

Combined 58 years at HWAY

Average of 5 years as executive

ManagementNASDAQ: HWAY

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013-$0.20

$0.00

$0.20

$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$0.46

$0.72

$0.50 $0.55 $0.61

$0.24 $0.24 $0.18 $0.23 $0.24

-$0.02-$0.06 -$0.04

$0.10 $0.24

Strassmann’s Return on Management 2009 to 2013

HWAY CRVL VRSK

Ret

urn

on M

anag

emen

t

Page 55: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Bear Price JustificationNASDAQ: HWAY

Feb. 14 Price Movement

Source: Bloomberg

Page 56: CFA Research Challenge 2013-2014 Belmont University, Nashville, TN

Global LegislationNASDAQ: HWAY

Country Date Legislation Goal

China 2009 Healthy China 2020

Provide universal healthcare by 2020

UK 2012 Health & Social Care Act of 2012

Abolish primary care trusts & establish smaller clinical commission groups run by general practitioners

Germany 2012 GKV Require all Germans to hold health insurance & make payment a percentage of income

US 2010 Affordable Care Act

Provide healthcare for all Americans by subsidizing premiums & reforming payment systems