CF M&A

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    1/26

    VALUATION OF FIRMS INMERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

    Submitted to Prof. A. Chauhan

    Corporate Finance - II

    Vikas C.Chaubey

    Roll No: 04/2010

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    2/26

    Flow of the presentationDefinition of M & A

    Types of Mergers Firms valuation in Merger and

    Acquisition

    HP-Compaq Merger Case

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    3/26

    DefinitionsA merger is a combination of two or more

    corporations in which only one corporationsurvives and the merged corporations go outof business.

    Statutory mergeris a merger where theacquiring company assumes the assets andthe liabilities of the merged companies

    A subsidiary mergeris a merger of twocompanies where the target companybecomes a subsidiary or part of a subsidiaryof the parent company

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    4/26

    Types of MergersHorizontal Mergers

    - between competing companies

    Vertical Mergers

    - Between buyer-seller relation-ship companies

    Conglomerate Mergers- Neither competitors nor buyer-seller relationship

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    5/26

    Motives and Determinants ofMergers Synergy Effect

    - Operating Synergy- Financial Synergy

    Diversification

    Economic Motives- Horizontal Integration

    - Vertical Integration

    - Tax Motives

    NAV= Vab (Va+Vb) P E

    Where Vab = combined value of the 2 firms

    Vb = market value of the shares of firm B.

    Va = As measure of its own value

    P = premium paid for B

    E = expenses of the operation

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    6/26

    FIRM VALUATION INMERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

    Equity Valuation Models

    - Balance Sheet Valuation Models Book Value: the net worth of a company as shown on the

    balance sheet.

    Liquidation Value: the value that would be derived if the firmsassets were liquidated.

    Replacement Cost: the replacement cost of its assets lessits liabilities.

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    7/26

    FIRM VALUATION IN MERGERSAND ACQUISITIONS-2

    Dividend Discount Models

    31 2

    0 2 3.......

    1 (1 ) (1 )DD DV

    k k k!

    Where Vo = value of the firm

    Di = dividend in year I

    k = discount rate

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    8/26

    FIRM VALUATION IN MERGERSAND ACQUISITIONS-3

    The Constant Growth DDM2

    0 00 2

    (1

    ) (1

    ) ......1 (1 )

    D g D g Vk k

    !

    And this equation can be simplified to:

    0 1

    0

    (1 )D g D

    V k g k g

    ! !

    where g = growth rate of dividends.

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    9/26

    FIRM VALUATION IN MERGERS

    AND ACQUISITIONS-4

    Price-Earnings Ratio

    0

    1

    11

    /

    P PVGO

    E k E k

    !

    -

    where PVGO = Present Value of Growth Opportunity

    0 1

    1

    (1 )P E b

    E k ROExb

    !

    Implying P/E ratio

    0

    1

    1P b

    E k ROExb

    !

    where ROE = Return On Equity

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    10/26

    FIRM VALUATION IN MERGERSAND ACQUISITIONS-5

    Cash Flow Valuation Models

    - The Entity DCF Model : The entity DCF model values the value of a company as

    the value of a companys operations less the value of debt and other investor claims,such as preferred stock, that are superior to common equity

    . Value of Operations: The value of operations equals the discounted value of expected

    future free cash flow.

    .

    Net Operating Profit - Adjusted TaxesContinuing Value =

    WACC

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    11/26

    FIRM VALUATION IN MERGERSAND ACQUISITIONS-6

    What Drives Cash Flow and Value?

    - Fundamentally to increase its value a company mustdo one or more of the following:

    . Increase the level of profits it earns on its existingcapital in place (earn a higher return on investedcapital).

    . Increase the return on new capital investment.

    . Increase its growth rate but only as long as the returnon new capital exceeds WACC.

    . Reduce its cost of capital.

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    12/26

    FIRM VALUATION IN MERGERS

    AND ACQUISITIONS-7

    The Economic Profit Model: The value of acompany equals the amount of capital invested plus a

    premium equal to the present value of the value created eachyear going forward.

    Pr ( ) Economic ofit Invested Capital x ROIC WACC!

    where ROIC = Return on Invested Capital

    WACC = Weighted Average Cost of Capital

    Pr ( ) Economic ofit NOPL AT Invested Capital x WACC!

    where NOPLAT = Net Operating Profit Less Adjusted Taxes

    Value=Invested Capital+Present Value of Projected Economic Profit

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    13/26

    STEPS IN VALUATION

    Analyzing Historical Performance

    NOPLATReturn on Investment Capital =

    Invested Capital

    FCF = Gross Cash Flow Gross Investments

    Economic Profit = NOPLAT (Invested Capital x WACC)

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    14/26

    STEPS IN VALUATION-2 Forecast Performance- Evaluate the companys strategic position, companys

    competitive advantages and disadvantages in theindustry. This will help to understand the growthpotential and ability to earn returns over WACC.

    - Develop performance scenarios for the company andthe industry and critical events that are likely to

    impact the performance.- Forecast income statement and balance sheet line

    items based on the scenarios.

    - Check the forecast for reasonableness.

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    15/26

    STEPS IN VALUATION-3 The Arbitrage Pricing Model (APM)

    1 1 2 2( ) ( ) .... s f f f k r E F r E F r F F ! - -

    where E(Fk) = the expected rate of return on a portfolio that mimics the kth factor and is

    independent of all others.

    Beta k = the sentivity of the stock return to the kth factor.

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    16/26

    STEPS IN VALUATION-4 Estimating The Continuing Value- Selecting an Appropriate Technique

    . Long explicit forecast approach

    . Growing free cash flow perpetuity formula

    . Economic profit technique

    T+1 T+1Economic Profit (NOPLAT )( / )( )

    CV = +( )

    g ROIC ROIC WACC

    WACC WACC WACC g

    where

    Economic Profit T+1 = the normalized economic profit in the first year after the explicit

    forecast period.

    NOPLAT T+1 = the normalized NOPLAT in the first year after the explicit forecast period.

    g = the expected growth rate of return in NOPLAT in perpetuity

    ROIC = the expected rate of return on net new investment.

    WACC = weighted average cost of capital

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    17/26

    STEPS IN VALUATION-5Calculating and Interpreting Results

    - Calculating And Testing The Results

    - Interpreting The Results Within The

    Decision Context

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    18/26

    HP-COMPAQ MERGER CASEThe HP/Compaq merger. By The Numbers:HIGH-ENDHigh-end Unix Servers: Worldwide (2000)

    FactoryRevenues ($m) Market Share

    Hewlett-Packard 512 11.4%

    Compaq 134 3.0%

    Closest Rival: Sun Microsystems with factory revenues of$2.1 billion and a 47.1% market share

    High-end Unix servers: US (2000)

    FactoryRevenues ($m) Market Share

    Hewlett-Packard 124 6.1%

    Compaq 66 3.3%

    Closest Rival: Sun Microsystems with factoryrevenues of $1.2 billion and a 60.1%market share

    MID-RANGE

    Mid-range Unix servers: Worldwide (2000)

    FactoryRevenues ($m) Market Share

    Hewlett-Packard 3,673 30.3%

    Compaq 488 4.0%

    Closest Rival: Sun Microsystems with $2.8 billion infactory revenue and a 23.5%market share

    Mid-range Unix servers: US (2000)

    FactoryRevenues ($m) Market Share

    Hewlett-Packard 1552 28.2%

    Compaq 296 5.4%

    Market Leader: Sun Microsystems with revenues of $1.7billion and a 30.5% market share)

    PERSONAL COMPUTERS

    PC Shipments: Worldwide (in thousands of units)

    Hewlett-Packard Compaq

    Units (q2/01) 2,065 3,590

    Share (q2/01) 6.9% 12.1%

    Units (q2/00) 2,260 4.011

    Share(q2/00) 7.4% 13.2%

    Growth -8.6% -10.5%

    PC Shipments: US(in thousands of units)

    Hewlett-Packard Compaq

    Units (q2/01) 991 1,332

    Share (q2/01) 9.4% 12.7%

    Units (q2/00) 1,221 2,293

    Share(q2/00) 10.7% 20.1%

    Growth -18.8% --21.3%

    Market leader: Dell Computer Corp. with a 24% marketshare and a 9.8% growth in the same period.

    LAPTOPS/NOTEBOOKS SMART HANDHELDS

    Worldwide shipments of portable computers(thousands of units)

    Hewlett-Packard Compaq

    Units(q4/00) 318 817

    Share(q4/00) 4.5% 11.6%

    Units(q4/99) 139 739

    Shipments(in 000s)

    Share2000 Rank

    Hewlett-Packard 254 3.8% 4

    Compaq 129 1.9% 9

    Market Leader: Palm with a 52.9% market share and

    3.53 million units.

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    19/26

    HP-COMPAQ MERGER CASE-2Arguments About The Merger

    - Supporters

    . HP-COMPAQ will become the leader in most of thesub-sectors

    . Ability to offer better solutions to customers demands

    . New strategic position will make it possible to increaseR&D efforts and customer research

    . Decrease in costs and increase in profitability

    . Financial strength to provide chances to invest in newprofitable areas

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    20/26

    HP-COMPAQ MERGER CASE-3Arguments About The Merger

    - Opponents

    . Acquiring market share will not mean the leadership

    . No new significant technology capabilities added to HP

    . Large stocks will increase the riskiness of thecompany (Credit rating of the HP is lowered after themerger announcement)

    . Diminishing economies of scale sector which bothcompanies have already a great scale.

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    21/26

    HP-COMPAQ MERGER CASE-4 Valuation Process

    - Relative Historical Stock Price Performance

    Historical Exchange Ratios

    Period ending August 31,

    2001

    Average Exchange Ratio Implied Premium (%)

    August 31 2001 0.532 18.9

    10-Day Average 0.544 16.3

    20-Day Average 0.568 11.3

    30 Day Average 0.573 10.3

    3 Months Average 0.557 13.7

    6 Months Average 0.584 8.2

    9 Months Average 0.591 7.1

    12 Months Average 0.596 6.1

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    22/26

    HP-COMPAQ MERGER CASE-5 Comparable Public Market Valuation Analysis

    Firm Values As a Multiple of Revenue EBITDA and LTM EBIT

    Firm Values as a Multiple of

    Companies LTM Revenue LTM EBITDA LTM EBIT

    Compaq 0.5 X 5.7 X 9.8 X

    HP 1.0 X 12.4 X 19.8 X

    Selected Group 0.2-2.1 X 5.3-18 .2 X 8.9-19.9 X

    Closing Stock Prices As a Multiple of EPS

    Closing Stock Price as a Multiple of

    Companies 2001 EPS 2002 EPS 2003 EPS

    Compaq 34.3 X 18 .4 X 14.0 X

    HP 35.7 X 19.2 X 12.5 X

    Selected Group 18 .5-57.3 X 10.7-27.1 X 9.3-19.5 X

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    23/26

    HP-COMPAQ MERGER CASE-7 Pro Forma Earnings Per Share Impact to Compaq

    Accretion/Dilution Analysis

    Accretion/Dilution

    EPS

    2002

    EPS

    2003

    Compaq stand-alone 0.67 0.88

    HP stand-alone 1.21 1.86

    Combined entity pro-forma, excluding proj. synergies 0.74 1.09

    Combined entity pro-forma, including proj. synergies 1.05 1.51

    Accretion/(Dilution) to Compaq, excluding proj. synergies 11% 24%

    Accretion/(Dilution) to Compaq, including proj. synergies 57% 71%

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    24/26

    ConclusionMergers and acquisitions is one of the best

    processes of corporate restructuring that

    has gained substantial prominence in the

    present day corporate world. Restructuring

    usually means major changes and

    modifications in the corporate strategies and

    beliefs. This shift in strategic alliances is

    done with a desire to have an edge over

    competitors, eventually creating a new

    economic paradigm.

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    25/26

    References Http://www.google.com

    http://www.wikipedia.org

    http://www.kpmg.com

    Corporate Finance by Khan and Jain

  • 8/3/2019 CF M&A

    26/26

    Thank you!