Upload
gaurav-kalra
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 CF M&A
1/26
VALUATION OF FIRMS INMERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
Submitted to Prof. A. Chauhan
Corporate Finance - II
Vikas C.Chaubey
Roll No: 04/2010
8/3/2019 CF M&A
2/26
Flow of the presentationDefinition of M & A
Types of Mergers Firms valuation in Merger and
Acquisition
HP-Compaq Merger Case
8/3/2019 CF M&A
3/26
DefinitionsA merger is a combination of two or more
corporations in which only one corporationsurvives and the merged corporations go outof business.
Statutory mergeris a merger where theacquiring company assumes the assets andthe liabilities of the merged companies
A subsidiary mergeris a merger of twocompanies where the target companybecomes a subsidiary or part of a subsidiaryof the parent company
8/3/2019 CF M&A
4/26
Types of MergersHorizontal Mergers
- between competing companies
Vertical Mergers
- Between buyer-seller relation-ship companies
Conglomerate Mergers- Neither competitors nor buyer-seller relationship
8/3/2019 CF M&A
5/26
Motives and Determinants ofMergers Synergy Effect
- Operating Synergy- Financial Synergy
Diversification
Economic Motives- Horizontal Integration
- Vertical Integration
- Tax Motives
NAV= Vab (Va+Vb) P E
Where Vab = combined value of the 2 firms
Vb = market value of the shares of firm B.
Va = As measure of its own value
P = premium paid for B
E = expenses of the operation
8/3/2019 CF M&A
6/26
FIRM VALUATION INMERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
Equity Valuation Models
- Balance Sheet Valuation Models Book Value: the net worth of a company as shown on the
balance sheet.
Liquidation Value: the value that would be derived if the firmsassets were liquidated.
Replacement Cost: the replacement cost of its assets lessits liabilities.
8/3/2019 CF M&A
7/26
FIRM VALUATION IN MERGERSAND ACQUISITIONS-2
Dividend Discount Models
31 2
0 2 3.......
1 (1 ) (1 )DD DV
k k k!
Where Vo = value of the firm
Di = dividend in year I
k = discount rate
8/3/2019 CF M&A
8/26
FIRM VALUATION IN MERGERSAND ACQUISITIONS-3
The Constant Growth DDM2
0 00 2
(1
) (1
) ......1 (1 )
D g D g Vk k
!
And this equation can be simplified to:
0 1
0
(1 )D g D
V k g k g
! !
where g = growth rate of dividends.
8/3/2019 CF M&A
9/26
FIRM VALUATION IN MERGERS
AND ACQUISITIONS-4
Price-Earnings Ratio
0
1
11
/
P PVGO
E k E k
!
-
where PVGO = Present Value of Growth Opportunity
0 1
1
(1 )P E b
E k ROExb
!
Implying P/E ratio
0
1
1P b
E k ROExb
!
where ROE = Return On Equity
8/3/2019 CF M&A
10/26
FIRM VALUATION IN MERGERSAND ACQUISITIONS-5
Cash Flow Valuation Models
- The Entity DCF Model : The entity DCF model values the value of a company as
the value of a companys operations less the value of debt and other investor claims,such as preferred stock, that are superior to common equity
. Value of Operations: The value of operations equals the discounted value of expected
future free cash flow.
.
Net Operating Profit - Adjusted TaxesContinuing Value =
WACC
8/3/2019 CF M&A
11/26
FIRM VALUATION IN MERGERSAND ACQUISITIONS-6
What Drives Cash Flow and Value?
- Fundamentally to increase its value a company mustdo one or more of the following:
. Increase the level of profits it earns on its existingcapital in place (earn a higher return on investedcapital).
. Increase the return on new capital investment.
. Increase its growth rate but only as long as the returnon new capital exceeds WACC.
. Reduce its cost of capital.
8/3/2019 CF M&A
12/26
FIRM VALUATION IN MERGERS
AND ACQUISITIONS-7
The Economic Profit Model: The value of acompany equals the amount of capital invested plus a
premium equal to the present value of the value created eachyear going forward.
Pr ( ) Economic ofit Invested Capital x ROIC WACC!
where ROIC = Return on Invested Capital
WACC = Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Pr ( ) Economic ofit NOPL AT Invested Capital x WACC!
where NOPLAT = Net Operating Profit Less Adjusted Taxes
Value=Invested Capital+Present Value of Projected Economic Profit
8/3/2019 CF M&A
13/26
STEPS IN VALUATION
Analyzing Historical Performance
NOPLATReturn on Investment Capital =
Invested Capital
FCF = Gross Cash Flow Gross Investments
Economic Profit = NOPLAT (Invested Capital x WACC)
8/3/2019 CF M&A
14/26
STEPS IN VALUATION-2 Forecast Performance- Evaluate the companys strategic position, companys
competitive advantages and disadvantages in theindustry. This will help to understand the growthpotential and ability to earn returns over WACC.
- Develop performance scenarios for the company andthe industry and critical events that are likely to
impact the performance.- Forecast income statement and balance sheet line
items based on the scenarios.
- Check the forecast for reasonableness.
8/3/2019 CF M&A
15/26
STEPS IN VALUATION-3 The Arbitrage Pricing Model (APM)
1 1 2 2( ) ( ) .... s f f f k r E F r E F r F F ! - -
where E(Fk) = the expected rate of return on a portfolio that mimics the kth factor and is
independent of all others.
Beta k = the sentivity of the stock return to the kth factor.
8/3/2019 CF M&A
16/26
STEPS IN VALUATION-4 Estimating The Continuing Value- Selecting an Appropriate Technique
. Long explicit forecast approach
. Growing free cash flow perpetuity formula
. Economic profit technique
T+1 T+1Economic Profit (NOPLAT )( / )( )
CV = +( )
g ROIC ROIC WACC
WACC WACC WACC g
where
Economic Profit T+1 = the normalized economic profit in the first year after the explicit
forecast period.
NOPLAT T+1 = the normalized NOPLAT in the first year after the explicit forecast period.
g = the expected growth rate of return in NOPLAT in perpetuity
ROIC = the expected rate of return on net new investment.
WACC = weighted average cost of capital
8/3/2019 CF M&A
17/26
STEPS IN VALUATION-5Calculating and Interpreting Results
- Calculating And Testing The Results
- Interpreting The Results Within The
Decision Context
8/3/2019 CF M&A
18/26
HP-COMPAQ MERGER CASEThe HP/Compaq merger. By The Numbers:HIGH-ENDHigh-end Unix Servers: Worldwide (2000)
FactoryRevenues ($m) Market Share
Hewlett-Packard 512 11.4%
Compaq 134 3.0%
Closest Rival: Sun Microsystems with factory revenues of$2.1 billion and a 47.1% market share
High-end Unix servers: US (2000)
FactoryRevenues ($m) Market Share
Hewlett-Packard 124 6.1%
Compaq 66 3.3%
Closest Rival: Sun Microsystems with factoryrevenues of $1.2 billion and a 60.1%market share
MID-RANGE
Mid-range Unix servers: Worldwide (2000)
FactoryRevenues ($m) Market Share
Hewlett-Packard 3,673 30.3%
Compaq 488 4.0%
Closest Rival: Sun Microsystems with $2.8 billion infactory revenue and a 23.5%market share
Mid-range Unix servers: US (2000)
FactoryRevenues ($m) Market Share
Hewlett-Packard 1552 28.2%
Compaq 296 5.4%
Market Leader: Sun Microsystems with revenues of $1.7billion and a 30.5% market share)
PERSONAL COMPUTERS
PC Shipments: Worldwide (in thousands of units)
Hewlett-Packard Compaq
Units (q2/01) 2,065 3,590
Share (q2/01) 6.9% 12.1%
Units (q2/00) 2,260 4.011
Share(q2/00) 7.4% 13.2%
Growth -8.6% -10.5%
PC Shipments: US(in thousands of units)
Hewlett-Packard Compaq
Units (q2/01) 991 1,332
Share (q2/01) 9.4% 12.7%
Units (q2/00) 1,221 2,293
Share(q2/00) 10.7% 20.1%
Growth -18.8% --21.3%
Market leader: Dell Computer Corp. with a 24% marketshare and a 9.8% growth in the same period.
LAPTOPS/NOTEBOOKS SMART HANDHELDS
Worldwide shipments of portable computers(thousands of units)
Hewlett-Packard Compaq
Units(q4/00) 318 817
Share(q4/00) 4.5% 11.6%
Units(q4/99) 139 739
Shipments(in 000s)
Share2000 Rank
Hewlett-Packard 254 3.8% 4
Compaq 129 1.9% 9
Market Leader: Palm with a 52.9% market share and
3.53 million units.
8/3/2019 CF M&A
19/26
HP-COMPAQ MERGER CASE-2Arguments About The Merger
- Supporters
. HP-COMPAQ will become the leader in most of thesub-sectors
. Ability to offer better solutions to customers demands
. New strategic position will make it possible to increaseR&D efforts and customer research
. Decrease in costs and increase in profitability
. Financial strength to provide chances to invest in newprofitable areas
8/3/2019 CF M&A
20/26
HP-COMPAQ MERGER CASE-3Arguments About The Merger
- Opponents
. Acquiring market share will not mean the leadership
. No new significant technology capabilities added to HP
. Large stocks will increase the riskiness of thecompany (Credit rating of the HP is lowered after themerger announcement)
. Diminishing economies of scale sector which bothcompanies have already a great scale.
8/3/2019 CF M&A
21/26
HP-COMPAQ MERGER CASE-4 Valuation Process
- Relative Historical Stock Price Performance
Historical Exchange Ratios
Period ending August 31,
2001
Average Exchange Ratio Implied Premium (%)
August 31 2001 0.532 18.9
10-Day Average 0.544 16.3
20-Day Average 0.568 11.3
30 Day Average 0.573 10.3
3 Months Average 0.557 13.7
6 Months Average 0.584 8.2
9 Months Average 0.591 7.1
12 Months Average 0.596 6.1
8/3/2019 CF M&A
22/26
HP-COMPAQ MERGER CASE-5 Comparable Public Market Valuation Analysis
Firm Values As a Multiple of Revenue EBITDA and LTM EBIT
Firm Values as a Multiple of
Companies LTM Revenue LTM EBITDA LTM EBIT
Compaq 0.5 X 5.7 X 9.8 X
HP 1.0 X 12.4 X 19.8 X
Selected Group 0.2-2.1 X 5.3-18 .2 X 8.9-19.9 X
Closing Stock Prices As a Multiple of EPS
Closing Stock Price as a Multiple of
Companies 2001 EPS 2002 EPS 2003 EPS
Compaq 34.3 X 18 .4 X 14.0 X
HP 35.7 X 19.2 X 12.5 X
Selected Group 18 .5-57.3 X 10.7-27.1 X 9.3-19.5 X
8/3/2019 CF M&A
23/26
HP-COMPAQ MERGER CASE-7 Pro Forma Earnings Per Share Impact to Compaq
Accretion/Dilution Analysis
Accretion/Dilution
EPS
2002
EPS
2003
Compaq stand-alone 0.67 0.88
HP stand-alone 1.21 1.86
Combined entity pro-forma, excluding proj. synergies 0.74 1.09
Combined entity pro-forma, including proj. synergies 1.05 1.51
Accretion/(Dilution) to Compaq, excluding proj. synergies 11% 24%
Accretion/(Dilution) to Compaq, including proj. synergies 57% 71%
8/3/2019 CF M&A
24/26
ConclusionMergers and acquisitions is one of the best
processes of corporate restructuring that
has gained substantial prominence in the
present day corporate world. Restructuring
usually means major changes and
modifications in the corporate strategies and
beliefs. This shift in strategic alliances is
done with a desire to have an edge over
competitors, eventually creating a new
economic paradigm.
8/3/2019 CF M&A
25/26
References Http://www.google.com
http://www.wikipedia.org
http://www.kpmg.com
Corporate Finance by Khan and Jain
8/3/2019 CF M&A
26/26
Thank you!