Upload
lisa-oreilly
View
744
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
CESBCY Survey | Review of 2008-2013 Strategic and Marketing Plan | Frequencies only, further analysis pending (2011 10 14)
Citation preview
Frequencies and early analysis Survey of members and newsletter recipients
2008-2013 Strategic and Marketing Plan (SMP) Review
Produced by Lisa O'Reilly for CESBCY | UVic
October 14, 2011
Response rates
not statistically significant
Population (n=382)
177 CES members in BC & Yukon
4 CES members outside BC & Yukon
201 People on the mailing list
Respondents (n=59)
47 CES members in BC & Yukon
2 CES members outside BC & Yukon
10 People on the mailing list
Confidence level 95% (+/- 11.75)
+/-12.29 CES members in BC & Yukon
moot CES members outside BC & Yukon
moot People on the mailing list
Pro
du
ced
by
Lis
a O
'Rei
lly
for
CE
SB
CY
| U
Vic
O
cto
ber
14
, 2
011
CESBCY members only (n=47)
Years a member?
Statistics
Total Responses 47
Sum 64.0
Average 2.1
StdDev 1.44
Max 4.0
Pro
du
ced
by
Lis
a O
'Rei
lly
for
CE
SB
CY
| U
Vic
O
cto
ber
14
, 2
011
CESBCY members only (n=47)
Where in BC / Yukon ?
Value Count Percent %
Vancouver (Lower mainland) 20 42.6%
Fraser Valley 1 2.1%
Vancouver Island (South) 16 34%
(North) 1 2.1%
Interior (Okanagon) 4 8.5%
(North) 1 2.1%
Yukon (Whitehorse) 4 8.5%
Pro
du
ced
by
Lis
a O
'Rei
lly
for
CE
SB
CY
| U
Vic
O
cto
ber
14
, 2
011
Type of employer (n=59)
Value Count Percent %
Federal Government /Agency 1 1.7%
Provincial/Territorial Govt/Agency 10 16.9%
Municipal Govt/Agency 1 1.7%
College/University 11 18.6%
Healthcare 7 11.9%
Pro
du
ced
by
Lis
a O
'Rei
lly
for
CE
SB
CY
| U
Vic
O
cto
ber
14
, 2
011
Prior training (n=59)
Have you received any…
Yes No Total
formal and specific academic training in program
evaluation? (e.g. university /college courses)
62.7% 37
37.3% 22
100% 59
on-the-job training in evaluation 84.7%
50 15.3%
9 100%
59
continuing education courses/workshops on
evaluation? (e.g. at conferences or other areas outside universities or colleges)
86.4% 51
13.6% 8
100% 59
Pro
du
ced
by
Lis
a O
'Rei
lly
for
CE
SB
CY
| U
Vic
O
cto
ber
14
, 2
011
Evaluation at work (n=59)
To what extent are you involved in program evaluation in your present position ?
Value Count Percent %
Primary focus 21 35.6%
Major Focus 1 25.4%
Minor Focus 16 27.1%
Not at all 7 11.9%
Pro
du
ced
by
Lis
a O
'Rei
lly
for
CE
SB
CY
| U
Vic
O
cto
ber
14
, 2
011
How did you find out about the CES?(n=59)
Pro
du
ced
by
Lis
a O
'Rei
lly
for
CE
SB
CY
| U
Vic
O
cto
ber
14
, 2
011
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Mentoring opportunities
Opportunities to collaborate on projects
Awareness of contracting and employment
opportunities
Networking with colleagues who share
professional interests
Professional credibility
Affiliation with a professional association
Access to professional development and
training opportunities
Understanding of current practices and the
state of research for evaluation in Canada
Not important Somewhat important Very important
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Mentoring opportunities
Opportunities to collaborate on projects
Awareness of contracting and employment
opportunities
Networking with colleagues who share
professional interests
Professional credibility
Affiliation with a professional association
Access to professional development and
training opportunities
Understanding of current practices and the
state of research for evaluation in Canada
minimal somewhat considerable
2.1%
1
46.8%
22
51.1%
24
4.3%
2
42.6%
20
53.2%
25
8.5%
4
46.8%
22
44.7%
21
10.6%
5
46.8%
22
42.6%
20
12.8%
6
46.8%
22
40.4%
19
14.9%
7
36.2%
17
48.9%
23
25.5%
12
48.9%
23
25.5%
12
27.7%
13
38.3%
18
34.0%
16
27.7%
13
53.2%
25
19.1%
9
17.0%
8
55.3%
26
27.7%
13
17.0%
8
53.2%
25
29.8%
14
36.2%
17
53.2%
25
10.6%
5
31.9%
15
38.3%
18
29.8%
14
34.0%
16
51.1%
24
14.9%
7
74.5%
35
17.0%
8
17.0% 8.5%
8 4
70.2%
33
27.7%
13
27.7% 2.1%
13 1
Member benefits, now and in the future
What benefits do you currently derive from the CESBCY? (n=47) Looking forward, please rate how important the following benefits of CES membership are to you. (n=47)
This slide is data rich (and a bit busy). Further analysis and explanation of that information will follow in the next iteration of updates provided.
Pro
du
ced
by
Lis
a O
'Rei
lly
for
CE
SB
CY
| U
Vic
O
cto
ber
14
, 2
011
Credentials Have you considered applying to be a Credentialed Evaluator (CE) through the Canadian Evaluation Society? (n=59)
Have you begun the application process? (n=38)
8 30
39 20
Pro
du
ced
by
Lis
a O
'Rei
lly
for
CE
SB
CY
| U
Vic
O
cto
ber
14
, 2
011
Applicability of 2008 Goals
The Chapter developed a strategic and marketing plan in 2007. Five goals were developed under this plan.
We would like to know whether these goals continue to be important to the membership.
Please rate the importance of each goal, from low to high.
Pro
du
ced
by
Lis
a O
'Rei
lly
for
CE
SB
CY
| U
Vic
O
cto
ber
14
, 2
011
Success so far for 2008 objectives The objectives of the workplan associated with the SMP are the following, please rate how successful you feel we have been in achieving these outcomes?
The relevance of evaluation to good decision-making is understood and recognised in sectors that could benefit. 20.30% 6.80% 1.70% 71.20%
BC has appropriate provincial policies on evaluation. 28.80% 1.70% 0.00% 69.50%
Non-profits in BC can implement evaluation effectively, relevant to their needs 18.60% 8.50% 3.40% 69.50%
CESBCY members who wish to do so, can find and contact each other 8.50% 59.30% 1.70% 30.50%
Evaluation stakeholders can share information with CESBCY and each other 10.20% 45.80% 1.70% 42.40%
Evaluation stakeholders can learn from each other 8.50% 42.40% 1.70% 47.50%
Evaluation stakeholders are aware of career opportunities and service providers in BC 11.90% 42.40% 1.70% 44.10%
CESBCY has a high profile in the BC evaluation community of practice 16.90% 33.90% 1.70% 47.50%
CESBCY's management is representative of the leaders in the evaluation community 10.20% 30.50% 1.70% 57.60%
CESBCY membership is growing and satisfied 8.50% 15.30% 1.70% 74.60%
Understand professional development needs. 11.90% 35.60% 3.40% 49.20%
Continue to offer standard CES training. 8.50% 64.40% 8.50% 18.60%
Develop/support new professional development offering based on need. 20.30% 35.60% 1.70% 42.40%
Ensure that CES professional designations are relevant and accessible to CESBCY members 13.60% 18.60% 3.40% 64.40%
Encourage and support junior evaluation stakeholders 22.00% 15.30% 0.00% 62.70%
CESBCY has clear strategy. 8.50% 37.30% 0.00% 54.20%
CESBCY has provincial and local structures that allow it to pursue its strategy. 10.20% 28.80% 1.70% 59.30%
CESBCY has the human resources to carry out the work. 8.50% 13.60% 0.00% 78.00%
CESBCY has the tools to carry out the work. 5.10% 15.30% 0.00% 79.70%
This slide is data rich (and a bit busy). Further analysis and explanation of that information will follow in the next iteration of updates provided.
Pro
du
ced
by
Lis
a O
'Rei
lly
for
CE
SB
CY
| U
Vic
O
cto
ber
14
, 2
011