Upload
peter-anderson
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CES Status
J.Osborne6 November 2009
Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group
J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group
CES Status
Civil engineering and services• Develop a layout for the interaction region.
This includes civil engineering and technical infrastructure.Work with ILC wherever synergies exist.
• Planning and cost estimates for the construction of the experimental area, including surface buildings.This includes civil engineering, cooling an ventilation,electrical installations, survey, access control, transport and handling, etc.
• Collaborate closely with the Detector Working Group.Follow up the evolution of the detector and MDI layout,starting from existing preliminary layouts.
CES Status
CES Working Group Representatives :
Civil Engineering and Chairman J.Osborne (GS)
Technical Secretary M.Gastal (EN)
EN Co-ordinator C.Hauviller (EN)
CLIC Link persons (from other WG’s) P.Lebrun / G.Riddone… (DG&BE)
Cooling and Ventilation CV J.Inigo-Golfin / M.Nonis / C.Martel (EN)
Electricity EL C.Jach (EN/DG)
Survey SU H.Mainaud Durand (BE)
Controls, Safety ASE T.Pettersson (GS)
Horizontal Handling HE K.Kershaw (EN)
Vertical Handling HE I.Ruehl (EN)
CE Layouts, 3d models A.Kosmicki (GS)
SC Link Person R.Trant / F.Corsanego (DG)
Experimental Area Design M.Gastal (EN)
ILC members V.Kuchler (FNAL), A.Enomoto (KEK)
Civil Engineering and Services (CES) WG
CES Status
J.Osborne5 November 2009
2007 Design
CES Status
J.Osborne5 November 2009
2007 Design
CES Status4.5m tunnel used as baseline for 2007 costing exercise
CES Status
7
4.5m tunnel for CDR
CES Status
8
CES Status
9
CDR Long profile as per ILC
CES Status
10
20mrad
To be modified !
CES Status
11
To be modified !
CES Status
ILC RDR Baseline Layouts for Interaction Region
CES Status
400t
400 ton gantry crane is the cost driver
large steel columns down to floor level would be needed
Lot of lost space
ILC RDR Baseline for IR cavern
CES Status
Possible layout for ILC Interaction Region for Deep Tunnel Solution using CMS concept
A.Herve (CMS) study 2007
CES Status
Proposed new cross section for ILC Interaction Region
CES Status
ILC Dubna design for shallow site
CES StatusILC 3d models developed at CERN using CATIA
CES Status
14.Oct. 2009 CLIC_09 Workshop H.Gerwig/ A. Gaddi/ N.Siegrist
Tunnel part
Thin endcaps
Is this ‘tunnel part’ more stable than cavern ?
“Tunnel is at least ~ 10 times more stable than detector”
(A. Seryi, CLIC08)
CES Status
2004
CES Status
2005
Stability of CMS platforms could be checked ?
CES Status
Summary
•Design for ILC RDR experimental hall exists but will be developed further for TDP
•For CLIC CDR design should be developed further, better adapted to CERN environment
•Costing for CDR required for all technical infrastructure
•CES will collaborate closely with the Detector Working Group. Follow up the evolution of the detector and MDI layout, starting from existing preliminary layouts.