21
CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

J.Osborne6 November 2009

Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group

J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

Page 2: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

Civil engineering and services• Develop a layout for the interaction region.

This includes civil engineering and technical infrastructure.Work with ILC wherever synergies exist.

• Planning and cost estimates for the construction of the experimental area, including surface buildings.This includes civil engineering, cooling an ventilation,electrical installations, survey, access control, transport and handling, etc.

• Collaborate closely with the Detector Working Group.Follow up the evolution of the detector and MDI layout,starting from existing preliminary layouts.

Page 3: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

CES Working Group Representatives :

Civil Engineering and Chairman J.Osborne (GS)

Technical Secretary M.Gastal (EN)

EN Co-ordinator C.Hauviller (EN)

CLIC Link persons (from other WG’s) P.Lebrun / G.Riddone… (DG&BE)

Cooling and Ventilation CV J.Inigo-Golfin / M.Nonis / C.Martel (EN)

Electricity EL C.Jach (EN/DG)

Survey SU H.Mainaud Durand (BE)

Controls, Safety ASE T.Pettersson (GS)

Horizontal Handling HE K.Kershaw (EN)

Vertical Handling HE I.Ruehl (EN)

CE Layouts, 3d models A.Kosmicki (GS)

SC Link Person R.Trant / F.Corsanego (DG)

Experimental Area Design M.Gastal (EN)

ILC members V.Kuchler (FNAL), A.Enomoto (KEK)

Civil Engineering and Services (CES) WG

Page 4: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

J.Osborne5 November 2009

2007 Design

Page 5: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

J.Osborne5 November 2009

2007 Design

Page 6: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status4.5m tunnel used as baseline for 2007 costing exercise

Page 7: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

7

4.5m tunnel for CDR

Page 8: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

8

Page 9: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

9

CDR Long profile as per ILC

Page 10: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

10

20mrad

To be modified !

Page 11: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

11

To be modified !

Page 12: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

ILC RDR Baseline Layouts for Interaction Region

Page 13: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

400t

400 ton gantry crane is the cost driver

large steel columns down to floor level would be needed

Lot of lost space

ILC RDR Baseline for IR cavern

Page 14: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

Possible layout for ILC Interaction Region for Deep Tunnel Solution using CMS concept

A.Herve (CMS) study 2007

Page 15: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

Proposed new cross section for ILC Interaction Region

Page 16: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

ILC Dubna design for shallow site

Page 17: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES StatusILC 3d models developed at CERN using CATIA

Page 18: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

14.Oct. 2009 CLIC_09 Workshop H.Gerwig/ A. Gaddi/ N.Siegrist

Tunnel part

Thin endcaps

Is this ‘tunnel part’ more stable than cavern ?

“Tunnel is at least ~ 10 times more stable than detector”

(A. Seryi, CLIC08)

Page 19: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

2004

Page 20: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

2005

Stability of CMS platforms could be checked ?

Page 21: CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group

CES Status

Summary

•Design for ILC RDR experimental hall exists but will be developed further for TDP

•For CLIC CDR design should be developed further, better adapted to CERN environment

•Costing for CDR required for all technical infrastructure

•CES will collaborate closely with the Detector Working Group. Follow up the evolution of the detector and MDI layout, starting from existing preliminary layouts.