32
Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Central AreaRedistricting Study

-Committee Meeting 2-

October 30, 2013

Page 2: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

WelcomeTo

nig

ht’

s A

gen

da

5:30 - 6:00 Dinner, Welcome and Introductions

6:00 - 6:30 Review new information and handouts of baseline options

6:30 – 7:15 Break into 3 small groups and review the options

7:15 - 7:30 Discuss next steps and adjourn

Page 3: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

WelcomeTo

nig

ht’

s G

oals

Tonight’s Three Goals:

#1. To review communication logistics and review / answer questions regarding the project and/or background report

#2. To review DRAFT baseline options and homework

#3. Small group exercise to perform preliminary review / markups of DRAFT options.

Page 4: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Committee Chair:

Michael Quinn

Page 5: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Communication Logistics

Page 6: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

• Committee members should have received an invite to the Wiki group page.

• Page is merely a method to communicate between meetings and to answer/discuss issues related to the redistricting between meetings

• Talk with Robin Allen after the meeting if you did not get an invite, to make sure she has your correct contact information.

• Committee can always send emails or call Cropper GIS and/or BCPS with questions or thoughts.

Communication Logistics

Page 7: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

• BCPS Central Area webpage is created!:

- Helps to refer inquiring community to this website to answer questions about the rezoning process, schedule and a quantity of data and maps.- Located under “What’s Happening” section of website (www.bcps.org)

• Direct link to page is:http://www.bcps.org/construction/mayschapel/

Communication Logistics

Page 8: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Contact Info:

Cropper GISMatthew [email protected]

BCPS Office of Strategic PlanningChris Brocato - [email protected] and/or Robin Allen - [email protected]

Qu

esti

on

sCommunication Logistics

Page 9: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Redistricting Study Project Goals

Page 10: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

1. Baltimore County Public Schools is building a new elementary school on the Mays Chapel site.

a) Opening in Fall 2014b) 700-student capacity

2. Schools throughout the region are overcrowded, and redistricting is necessary to balance building utilization and populate the new school.

3. BCPS has organized a committee-based process to work through redistricting options and plans.

a) Work will continue through Winter 2014

Wh

y W

e’re

Her

eProject Objectives

Page 11: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

The following schools in the Central Area could be affected by the redistricting process:

1.Hampton ES2.Lutherville ES3.Padonia ES4.Pinewood ES5.Pot Spring ES6.Riderwood ES7.Sparks ES8.Timonium ES9.Warren ES10.West Towson

ESPot

enti

al A

ffec

ted

Sch

ools

Project Objectives

New school at Mays Chapel Site

Page 12: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Efficient use of available space (i.e. Balance Building Utilization)

Long-range enrollment and capacity needs (i.e. be mindful of future potential population in addition to existing students)

Use natural boundaries, such as railroads, creeks, major highways, election districts, existing school boundaries, and location of feeder schools.

Wh

y W

e’re

Her

eGuiding Principles / Criteria

Page 13: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Cost containment (i.e. Efficiencies such as transportation and facility use)

Elimination of existing satellite zones (areas districted to a school that are outside of its boundary)

Minimize the number of times any one student is reassigned

Feeder pattern continuity

Phasing in boundary changes by grade levels for high schools

Maintaining diversity among all involved schools

Wh

y W

e’re

Her

eGuiding Principles / Criteria

Page 14: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

State Rated Capacity

Page 15: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Study Area School Capacities:

School Name

State

Rated

Capacity

Hampton 648

Lutherville 407

New School 700

Padonia 311

Pinewood 566

Pot Spring 477

Riderwood 463

Sparks 410

Timonium 395

Warren 395

West Towson 451

Total 5,223

Page 16: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Current School Utilization

Page 17: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Current School utilization reinforces the need

School Name

State

Rated

Capacity

2013-14

K-5 Grade

Enrollment

K-5 Live In

Counts (2013-

14)

K-5 Live In

Utilization

Current Live

In Over

Capacity

Hampton* 648 554 656 101.2% 8

Lutherville 407 543 482 118.4% 75

Padonia 311 422 426 137.0% 115

Pinewood 566 590 574 101.4% 8

Pot Spring 477 578 641 134.4% 164

Riderwood 463 490 471 101.7% 8

Sparks 410 561 556 135.6% 146

Timonium 395 466 460 116.5% 65

Warren 395 400 412 104.3% 17

West Towson 451 542 548 121.5% 97

Total 4,523 5,146 5,226 115.5% 703

Current Enrollment and Live-In Counts

*99 students attend Cromwell but live inside the Hampton Boundary. Cromwell Magnet is

located in the Hampton boundary, but most students who attend the magnet live outside of

the study area (except for Hampton).

Page 18: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Review of DRAFT Options

Page 19: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Remember that everything is considered DRAFT!

• Nothing is written in stone• Existing DRAFT Options are subject to change• New options can/will be created

• Focus isn’t on picking the best solution YET, but to openly explore the various options to present to the public for feedback.

Page 20: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

3 DRAFT Options are presented to you this evening• Committee has 8.5x11 maps, as well as plots of

maps for review tonight

• Options maps are also now on the interactive webmap (www.croppermap.com/bcpsredistricting)

• Copies of handouts, including small and large format maps will be posted on the Mays Chapel webpage on the BCPS website (http://www.bcps.org/construction/mayschapel/)

Page 21: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

When analyzing redistricting options, it is best to look at the information in two different ways.• Study the geography i.e. shape of the current

and option boundary lines.• Look at where the lines shift away from current

vs. the option.• Look at road networks and envision how school

buses and parents would travel to the school

• Study the tables and enrollment / utilization estimate• Review the balance of enrollment, and identify

any imbalances that may exist.• Understand why there are any imbalances in the

enrollment / utilization, or examine possible ways to improve the balance.

Page 22: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Examination / Review of

Options Maps

Page 23: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013
Page 24: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013
Page 25: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013
Page 26: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013
Page 27: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

Examination / Review of

Options Tables

Page 28: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

School Name

State

Rated

Capacity

Option 1 Option 2 Option 3

Hampton* 648 96.1% 92.1% 92.1%

Lutherville 407 110.1% 100.2% 100.2%

New School 700 72.3% 82.9% 72.6%

Padonia 311 98.1% 100.3% 98.1%

Pinewood 566 98.4% 96.1% 98.9%

Pot Spring 477 88.9% 100.0% 100.6%

Riderwood 463 89.6% 89.6% 89.6%

Sparks** 410 135.6% 135.6% 135.6%

Timonium 395 99.0% 85.1% 100.3%

Warren 395 99.7% 99.7% 99.7%

West Towson 451 112.6% 112.6% 112.6%

Total 5,223 98.2% 98.2% 98.2%

Utilization Estimates

School Name

State

Rated

Capacity

Option 1 Option 2 Option 3

Hampton* 648 623 597 597

Lutherville 407 448 408 408

New School 700 506 580 508

Padonia 311 305 312 305

Pinewood 566 557 544 560

Pot Spring 477 424 477 480

Riderwood 463 415 415 415

Sparks** 410 556 556 556

Timonium 395 391 336 396

Warren 395 394 394 394

West Towson 451 508 508 508

Total 5,223 5,127 5,127 5,127

Enrollment Estimates

*Hampton option counts remove 99 students attending

Cromwell but living inside Hampton Boundary. Cromwell

Magnet is located in the Hampton boundary, but most

students who attend the magnet live outside of the study

area (except for Hampton).

**Sparks is not affected in redistricting in current options

because there is planned construction to address their

overcrowding

School Name

State

Rated

Capacity

Option 1 Option 2 Option 3

Hampton* 648 -25 -51 -51

Lutherville 407 41 1 1

New School 700 -194 -120 -192

Padonia 311 -6 1 -6

Pinewood 566 -9 -22 -6

Pot Spring 477 -53 0 3

Riderwood 463 -48 -48 -48

Sparks** 410 146 146 146

Timonium 395 -4 -59 1

Warren 395 -1 -1 -1

West Towson 451 57 57 57

Total 5,223 -96 -96 -96

Over / Under

Page 29: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

• Break into 3 small groups

• Each group will review an option for 15 minutes

• Groups have different colored markers, and are encouraged to write, circle, highlight any area on the map they feel needs to be addressed.

• After 15 minutes, the group will swap options and review the next one.

• After each group reviews all 3 options, there will be a discussion around findings / observations

Small Group Exercise:

Page 30: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

General Announcements and Upcoming Schedule

Page 31: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

General Announcements & Upcoming ScheduleNovember 2013: Upcoming Events

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

27 28 29 30 31 November 1 2Committee Meeting5:30-7:30 pm

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16Committee Meeting5:30-7:30 pm

17 18 19 20 21 22 23Committee Meeting5:30-7:30 pm

Page 32: Central Area Redistricting Study -Committee Meeting 2- October 30, 2013

See you next meeting on November 13, 2013!

Same time, same place