129
Service Line: CADTH Common Drug Review Version: Final with Redactions Publication Date: August 2018 Report Length: 129 Pages CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report Benralizumab (Fasenra) (AstraZeneca Canada Inc.) Indication: An add-on maintenance treatment of adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

Service Line: CADTH Common Drug Review Version: Final with Redactions Publication Date: August 2018 Report Length: 129 Pages

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW

Clinical Review Report

Benralizumab (Fasenra)

(AstraZeneca Canada Inc.)

Indication: An add-on maintenance treatment of adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

Page 2: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2

Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help Canadian health care decision-makers, health care professionals, health systems leaders,

and policy-makers make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. While patients and others may access this document,

the document is made available for informational purposes only and no representations or warranties are made with respect to its fitness for any particular

purpose. The information in this document should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice or as a substitute for the application of clinical

judgment in respect of the care of a particular patient or other professional judgment in any decision-making process. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and

Technologies in Health (CADTH) does not endorse any information, drugs, therapies, treatments, products, processes, or services.

While care has been taken to ensure that the information prepared by CADTH in this document is accurate, complete, and up-to-date as at the applicable date

the material was first published by CADTH, CADTH does not make any guarantees to that effect. CADTH does not guarantee and is not responsible for the

quality, currency, propriety, accuracy, or reasonableness of any statements, information, or conclusions contained in any third-party materials used in preparing

this document. The views and opinions of third parties published in this document do not necessarily state or reflect those of CADTH.

CADTH is not responsible for any errors, omissions, injury, loss, or damage arising from or relating to the use (or misuse) of any information, statements, or

conclusions contained in or implied by the contents of this document or any of the source materials.

This document may contain links to third-party websites. CADTH does not have control over the content of such sites. Use of third-party sites is governed by

the third-party website owners’ own terms and conditions set out for such sites. CADTH does not make any guarantee with respect to any information

contained on such third-party sites and CADTH is not responsible for any injury, loss, or damage suffered as a result of using such third-party sites. CADTH

has no responsibility for the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information by third-party sites.

Subject to the aforementioned limitations, the views expressed herein are those of CADTH and do not necessarily represent the views of Canada’s federal,

provincial, or territorial governments or any third party supplier of information.

This document is prepared and intended for use in the context of the Canadian health care system. The use of this document outside of Canada is done so at

the user’s own risk.

This disclaimer and any questions or matters of any nature arising from or relating to the content or use (or misuse) of this document will be governed by and

interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein, and all proceedings shall be subject to the

exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Province of Ontario, Canada.

The copyright and other intellectual property rights in this document are owned by CADTH and its licensors. These rights are protected by the Canadian

Copyright Act and other national and international laws and agreements. Users are permitted to make copies of this document for non-commercial purposes

only, provided it is not modified when reproduced and appropriate credit is given to CADTH and its licensors.

About CADTH: CADTH is an independent, not-for-profit organization responsible for providing Canada’s health care decision-makers with objective evidence

to help make informed decisions about the optimal use of drugs, medical devices, diagnostics, and procedures in our health care system.

Funding: CADTH receives funding from Canada’s federal, provincial, and territorial governments, with the exception of Quebec.

Page 3: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 3

Table of Contents

Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. 6Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 7

Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 7Results and Interpretation ............................................................................................................. 8Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 12

Introduction ............................................................................................................... 15Disease Prevalence and Incidence ............................................................................................. 15Standards of Therapy ................................................................................................................. 15Drug ............................................................................................................................................ 16

Objectives and Methods ........................................................................................... 17Objectives ................................................................................................................................... 17Methods ...................................................................................................................................... 17

Results ...................................................................................................................... 19Findings from the Literature ........................................................................................................ 19Included Studies ......................................................................................................................... 24Exposure to Study Treatments.................................................................................................... 37Critical Appraisal ......................................................................................................................... 38Efficacy ....................................................................................................................................... 40Harms ......................................................................................................................................... 50

Discussion ................................................................................................................. 52Summary of Available Evidence ................................................................................................. 52Interpretation of Results .............................................................................................................. 52

Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 56Appendix 1: Patient Input Summary.......................................................................... 57Appendix 2: Literature Search Strategy .................................................................... 61Appendix 3: Excluded Studies .................................................................................. 63Appendix 4: Detailed Outcome Data ......................................................................... 64Appendix 5: Validity of Outcome Measures .............................................................. 69Appendix 6: Summary of Other Studies .................................................................... 77Appendix 7: Summary of Indirect Comparisons ........................................................ 92Appendix 8: Summary of Pooled Data From SIROCCO and CALIMA ................... 119References .............................................................................................................. 127

Page 4: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 4

Tables

Table 1: Summary of Results .......................................................................................................... 13Table 2: Key Characteristics of Benralizumab, Reslizumab, Mepolizumab, and Omalizumab ........ 16Table 3: Inclusion Criteria for the Systematic Review ...................................................................... 17Table 4: Details of Included Studies: CALIMA and SIROCCO ........................................................ 20Table 5: Details of Included Studies: ZONDA .................................................................................. 22Table 6: Summary of Baseline Characteristics ................................................................................ 29Table 7: Patient Disposition ............................................................................................................. 36Table 8: Key Efficacy Outcomes for CALIMA, SIROCCO ............................................................... 44Table 9: Key Efficacy Outcomes for ZONDA ................................................................................... 45Table 10: Other Efficacy Outcomes (CALIMA, SIROCCO) ............................................................. 47Table 11: Other Efficacy Outcomes (ZONDA) ................................................................................. 49Table 12: Harms .............................................................................................................................. 51Table 13: Excluded Studies ............................................................................................................. 63Table 14: Subgroups (High-Dose Inhaled Corticosteroid) ............................................................... 64Table 15: Key Efficacy Outcomes (Full Analysis Set Population) .................................................... 66Table 16: Other Efficacy Outcomes (Full Analysis Set Population) ................................................. 67Table 17: Validity and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Outcome Measures .................... 69Table 18: Details of the BORA Extension Study ............................................................................. 78Table 19: Summary of Baseline Characteristics for the BORA Study

Excluding MELTEMI Patients .......................................................................................... 80Table 20: Summary of Baseline Characteristics for the BORA Study, MELTEMI Patients Only ..... 81Table 21: Patient Disposition for the BORA Study .......................................................................... 85Table 22: Treatment Exposure and Important Protocol Deviations for the

BORA Study Excluding MELTEMI Patients ..................................................................... 86Table 23: Treatment Exposure for the BORA Study, MELTEMI Patients Only ............................... 87Table 24: Adverse Events During On-Study Period Excluding MELTEMI Patients ......................... 88Table 25: Adverse Events in MELTEMI Patients ............................................................................. 89Table 26: Asthma Exacerbations During the On-Treatment Period

Excluding MELTEMI Patients .......................................................................................... 90Table 27: Populations, Interventions, Comparisons, Outcomes, and

Study Design Criteria for Study Inclusion ........................................................................ 92Table 28: Response Rate for Non-OCS Patients in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED

(CALIMA and SIROCCO) .............................................................................................. 120

Page 5: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 5

Table 29: Annual Asthma Exacerbation Rate Ratio Treatment Comparison in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO) .................................................... 121

Table 30: Annual Asthma Exacerbation Rate Ratio Treatment Comparison Among Responders in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO) ............. 122

Table 31: Percentage of Exacerbation Types by Treatment Group in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO) ....................................................................... 122

Table 32: Percentage of Exacerbation Types by Treatment Group Among Responders in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO) ..................................... 123

Table 33: Summary of Day-to-Day Utility by Group, No Chronic OCS Use in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO) .................................................... 124

Figures

Figure 1: Flow Diagram for Inclusion and Exclusion of Studies ....................................................... 19Figure 2: Study Flow Chart for CALIMA .......................................................................................... 25Figure 3: Study Flow Chart for SIROCCO ....................................................................................... 26Figure 4: Flow Chart of Study Design for ZONDA ........................................................................... 27

Page 6: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 6

Abbreviations ACMA Asthma Canada Member Alliance

ACQ ACQ-5 ACQ-6 ACQ-7 AE ALWC AQLQ

Asthma Control Questionnaire five-question Asthma Control Questionnaire six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire seven-question Asthma Control Questionnaire adverse event at least well-controlled Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire

AQLQ12+ Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 years and older

AQLQ(S) Standardized Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire

CI confidence interval

CIQ Classroom Impairment Questions

CDR CADTH Common Drug Review

DB DRMI

double blind dropout reason-based multiple imputation

EQ-5D EQ-5D-5L ER FAS

EuroQoL 5-Dimensions questionnaire EuroQoL 5-Dimensions 5-Levels questionnaire Emergency room full analysis set

FEV1 ICC ICS IDC IL-5 IgE

forced expiratory volume in one second intraclass correlation coefficient inhaled corticosteroid indirect comparison lnterleukin-5 immunoglobin E

ITT LABA

intention-to-treat long-acting beta2 agonist

LAMA long-acting muscarinic agonist

LS MD MCID MPPI NWC OCS PEF

least squares mean difference minimal clinically important difference minimal patient perceivable improvement not well-controlled oral corticosteroid peak expiratory flow

Q4W Q8W

every four weeks every eight weeks

RCT randomized controlled trial

SAE serious adverse event

SD SF-36 SHP TASS

standard deviation Short Form (36) Health Survey Specific Health Problem total asthma symptom score

WPAI Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire

WPAI-GH Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire–General Health

Page 7: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 7

Drug Benralizumab (Fasenra)

Indication As an add-on maintenance treatment of adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

Reimbursement Request As an add-on maintenance treatment for adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who are inadequately controlled with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and one or more additional asthma controller(s) (e.g., long-acting beta2 agonist), if one of the following clinical criteria are met: 1. Blood eosinophil count of ≥ 300 cells/μL and have experienced two or more clinically

significant asthma exacerbations in the past 12 months, or 2. Blood eosinophil count of ≥ 150 cells/μL and are treated chronically with an oral

corticosteroid.

Dosage Form(s) 30 mg subcutaneous injection

NOC Date February 22, 2018

Manufacturer AstraZeneca Canada Inc.

Executive Summary

Introduction

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disorder characterized by reversible airway obstruction, inflammation of the airways, airway hyper-responsiveness, and remodelling. Symptoms may include wheezing, dyspnea, chest tightness, sputum production, and cough associated with airway limitation and hyper-responsiveness to exogenous and endogenous stimuli. Onset can occur at any time, including in young children. It is estimated that 2.4 million Canadians aged 12 years and older have a diagnosis of asthma. Severe eosinophilic asthma is an asthma phenotype characterized by the presence of eosinophils in the airways and sputum despite conventional asthma therapy, and it affects 5% to 10% of all asthma patients. The prevalence of severe uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma is likely lower. Eosinophils are involved in the pathogenesis of asthma through the release of pro-inflammatory mediators at the airways, which contribute to epithelial cell damage, airway hyper-responsiveness, mucus hypersecretion, and airway remodelling.

The goal of asthma management is to maintain long-term asthma control with the least amount of medication using a stepwise approach to pharmacological therapy. Patients are started with a low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) before the addition of second-line drugs such as long-acting beta2 agonists (LABA), with an increase in ICS dose if symptoms remain uncontrolled. Long-term use of an OCS (oral corticosteroid) would be considered a last resort due to the significant harms associated with this class. Benralizumab is an interleukin-5 (IL-5) inhibitor, a monoclonal antibody that binds to the alpha subunit of the IL-5 receptor. The IL-5 alpha receptor is found on eosinophils and basophils. Binding of the monoclonal antibody facilitates the interaction of these cells with natural killer cells, resulting in the death of eosinophils. Eosinophils mediate inflammation in asthma, and thus inhibiting eosinophils has an anti-inflammatory effect. Benralizumab is administered by subcutaneous injection, 30 mg once every four weeks for the first three doses, then once every eight weeks thereafter. Injections should be administered into the upper arm, thigh, or abdomen. Benralizumab is indicated as an add-on maintenance treatment of adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

Page 8: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 8

The objective of this review is to perform a systematic review of the beneficial and harmful effects of benralizumab as an add-on maintenance treatment of adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

Results and Interpretation

Included Studies

Three manufacturer-sponsored multinational double-blind randomized controlled trials, each comparing two different regimens of benralizumab, administered every four and eight weeks, met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Only the Health Canada–approved Q8W regimen was of interest for this review. CALIMA (N = 1,306, 56 weeks) and SIROCCO (N = 1,206, 48 weeks) were similarly designed trials that enrolled patients with poor asthma control (at least two exacerbations in the past year) despite high-dose ICS (SIROCCO) or medium- to high-dose ICS (CALIMA). In both studies, two-thirds of patients had high eosinophil counts (≥ 300 cells/μL), and these patients, as well as patients on high-dose ICS (> 500 mcg fluticasone equivalents daily), were the focus of the primary analysis. The primary outcome in both studies was the annualized relapse rate. Key secondary outcomes included change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and total asthma symptom score (TASS). ZONDA was a smaller and shorter study (N = 220; 28 weeks) that enrolled patients with severe asthma who required chronic use (at least six months) of oral corticosteroids to maintain asthma control. The primary outcome in ZONDA was the per cent reduction in OCS dose. There were no multiplicity-controlled secondary outcomes.

Critical appraisal issues included the lack of an active comparator in the included studies, including existing IL-5 inhibitors reslizumab and mepolizumab. Only exacerbations, FEV1, and TASS were controlled for multiple comparisons in CALIMA and SIROCCO, while key efficacy outcomes for this review such as health-related quality of life and exacerbations resulting in hospitalizations and emergency room visits were not adjusted for multiplicity. The included studies all had a relatively short follow-up in which to assess the longer-term safety of this relatively novel pharmacological target.

Efficacy

The annualized exacerbation rate was lower for benralizumab versus placebo in both CALIMA over 56 weeks (rate ratio of 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.95; P = 0.019) and SIROCCO over 48 weeks (rate ratio of 0.49; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.64; P < 0.001), and these differences were statistically significant. The statistically significant reductions in exacerbations are likely clinically significant in a population of patients who were having regular exacerbations at baseline despite high-dose ICS. The annualized exacerbation rate ratio of benralizumab versus placebo over 28 weeks in ZONDA was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.17 to 0.53; P < 0.001). This outcome was not adjusted for multiple comparisons in ZONDA. The percentage of benralizumab patients versus placebo patients who had at least one exacerbation over the course of 56 weeks in CALIMA was 40% versus 51% of patients, respectively; over 48 weeks in SIROCCO it was 35% versus 51% of patients, respectively; and over 28 weeks in ZONDA it was 23% versus 52% of patients, respectively. No statistical analyses were reported for this outcome. Exacerbations associated with hospitalizations or emergency room visits occurred in 8% of patients in each of the benralizumab and placebo groups over 56 weeks in CALIMA, 7% of benralizumab versus 14% of placebo patients over

Page 9: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 9

48 weeks in SIROCCO, and in 1% of benralizumab patients versus 12% of placebo patients over 28 weeks in ZONDA.

In ZONDA, the per cent reduction in OCS dose was the primary outcome — there was a greater reduction in corticosteroid dose with benralizumab than with placebo, and this difference was statistically significant (estimate for difference between groups of 37.5%; 95% CI, 20.8% to 50.0%; P < 0.001). The proportion of patients able to reduce their dose by different percentages was also reported, and 30% of benralizumab patients (11% in placebo) were able to reduce their OCS dose by 100%. For these patients who were able to discontinue their OCS, the benefit of benralizumab is clear. However, for those who remained on OCS, it has not been established whether there is a threshold dose for elevated risk of OCS-related systemic adverse effects. Exacerbations associated with the use of OCS was a secondary outcome in both CALIMA and SIROCCO, although no statistical analyses were planned or provided for these outcomes.

Health-related quality of life, assessed by the change from baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 years and older (AQLQ12+) score, benralizumab versus placebo, was reported in CALIMA after 56 weeks (least squares [LS] mean difference [MD] of 0.24; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.45; P = 0.019), in SIROCCO after 48 weeks (LS MD of 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.50; P = 0.004), and after 28 weeks in ZONDA (LS MD of 0.45; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.76; P = 0.004). Increases in scores from baseline denote improvement in health-related quality of life on this scale. Note that none of these statistical analyses were adjusted for multiple comparisons and should be considered hypothesis-generating. Given the importance of health-related quality of life in a disease such as asthma, controlling for multiple comparisons would have allowed for a more definitive assessment of the impact of benralizumab on this outcome. Although a minimal clinically important difference exists for the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), none has been established for the AQLQ12+, thus both the statistical and clinical significance of health-related quality of life findings in the included studies is unknown.

Pre-bronchodilator change from baseline in FEV1 was an outcome that was controlled for multiplicity in CALIMA and SIROCCO. In both studies the FEV1 was improved versus placebo, and these differences were statistically significant in CALIMA (LS MD of 0.116; 95% CI, 0.028 to 0.204; P = 0.010) and in SIROCCO (0.159; 95% CI, 0.068 to 0.249; P = 0.001). Change from baseline in FEV1 of benralizumab versus placebo was also reported after 28 weeks in ZONDA (0.112; 95% CI, −0.033 to 0.258; P = 0.129). However, no adjustments were made for multiple comparisons for this outcome in ZONDA. The minimal clinically important difference for FEV1 is not well-established and these differences may not be clinically significant. Peak expiratory flow (PEF), assessed in the morning and evening in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and ZONDA was not adjusted for multiplicity. Morning values for PEF, benralizumab versus placebo, after 56 weeks in CALIMA was (LS MD) 15.27 L/minute; 95% CI, 0.90 to 29.64; P = 0.037, and after 48 weeks in SIROCCO, 16.46 L/minute; 95% CI, 2.08 to 30.83; P = 0.025, and after 28 weeks in ZONDA, 30.01; 95% CI, 4.26 to 55.76; P = 0.023. Evening PEF values after 56 weeks in CALIMA were 21.22 L/minute (95% CI, 6.65 to 35.79; P = 0.004) and after 48 weeks in SIROCCO were 19.18 (95% CI, 5.09 to 33.28; P = 0.008) and after 28 weeks in ZONDA were 31.52 (95% CI, 6.32 to 56.71; P = 0.014).

The change from baseline in TASS was a key secondary outcome in both CALIMA and SIROCCO, and thus was controlled for multiple comparisons. TASS was reduced (improved) for benralizumab versus placebo in both studies and these differences were statistically significant in both CALIMA (LS MD of −0.23; 95% CI, −0.43 to −0.04; P = 0.019)

Page 10: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 10

and SIROCCO (LS MD of −0.25; 95% CI, −0.45 to −0.06; P = 0.012). The six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) was also used to assess symptoms in both CALIMA and SIROCCO, but adjustments were not made for multiple comparisons for this outcome. The total ACQ-6 change from baseline, benralizumab versus placebo, was reported after 56 weeks in CALIMA (LS MD of −0.25; 95% CI, −0.44 to −0.07; P = 0.008), after 48 weeks in SIROCCO (LS MD of −0.29; 95% CI, −0.48 to −0.10; P = 0.003) and after 28 weeks in ZONDA (LS MD of −0.55; 95% CI, −0.86 to −0.23; P = 0.001). A decrease from baseline denotes improvement in symptoms on this scale.

Change in rescue medication use, measured as puffs/day of salbutamol, was reported in all three studies. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) change in rescue medication use over the course of 56 weeks in CALIMA was vvvvv vvvvvv puffs/day with benralizumab and vvvvv vvvvvv puffs/day with placebo and over 48 weeks in SIROCCO was vvvvv vvvvvv puffs/day with benralizumab and vvvvv vvvvvv puffs/day with placebo, and over 28 weeks in ZONDA was vvvvv vvvvvv puffs/day with benralizumab and vvvvv vvvvvv puffs/day with placebo. The proportion of nights with nocturnal awakenings was also reported in all three studies. The LS MD from baseline in proportion of nights with nocturnal awakenings over 56 weeks in CALIMA for benralizumab versus placebo was vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv v v vvvvv, over 48 weeks in SIROCCO was vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv, and over 28 weeks in ZONDA was vvvvv vvvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvv. None of these analyses were adjusted for multiple statistical comparisons. All three studies reported the change from baseline in eosinophil counts, benralizumab versus placebo, after 56 weeks in CALIMA (LS MD in per cent change from baseline of 105.0) (95% CI, −115.1 to −94.96; P < 0.001), after 48 weeks in SIROCCO (LS MD in per cent change from baseline of −99.59 (95% CI, −113.6 to −85.59; P < 0.001), and after 28 weeks in ZONDA (LS MD in per cent change from baseline of −159.4 (95% CI, −217.9 to −100.9; P < 0.001).

The manufacturer submitted an indirect comparison that was reviewed and critically appraised by CADTH Common Drug Review (CDR) (see Appendix 7). The objective of the indirect comparison was to compare benralizumab with other monoclonal antibodies in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. The network meta-analysis included vv studies, but only vv studies were included in the match-adjusted indirect comparison vvvvv vvvv of benralizumab (SIROCCO, CALIMA, ZONDA). reslizumab, and mepolizumab, and vvv of omalizumab. vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvv

Harms

The proportion of patients with an adverse event was 76% with benralizumab and 79% placebo after 56 weeks in CALIMA, 72% versus 77%, respectively, after 48 weeks in SIROCCO, and after 28 weeks in ZONDA, 75% versus 83%, respectively. The most common adverse events in all three studies were nasopharyngitis (CALIMA: 19% benralizumab versus 21% placebo; SIROCCO: 12% in each group; ZONDA: 15% with benralizumab and 20% placebo) and asthma (CALIMA: 11% with benralizumab versus 16% placebo; SIROCCO: 11% benralizumab versus 20% placebo; ZONDA: 3% benralizumab versus 24% placebo).

Page 11: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 11

The proportion of patients with a serious adverse event was 10% of benralizumab and 14% of placebo patients over 56 weeks in CALIMA, 14% in each group after 48 weeks in SIROCCO, and in ZONDA 10% of benralizumab patients and 19% of placebo patients. Withdrawals due to an adverse event occurred in 2% of benralizumab versus 1% of placebo in CALIMA and in SIROCCO, and in 4% of benralizumab versus 3% of placebo patients in ZONDA.

Notable harms included infection and immune and injection-site reactions. Upper respiratory tract infections occurred in benralizumab and placebo patients in each of the three studies (CALIMA: 9% benralizumab versus 10% placebo; SIROCCO: 8% benralizumab versus 9% placebo; ZONDA: 7% in each group), while influenza occurred in 3% of benralizumab and 6% of placebo patients in CALIMA, 5% of benralizumab versus 6% of placebo patients in SIROCCO, and 1% of benralizumab versus 7% of placebo patients in ZONDA (Table 12). Serious adverse events of infection were infrequent in the case of both pneumonia (CALIMA: 0% benralizumab versus 1% placebo; SIROCCO: 1% in each group; ZONDA: 3% in benralizumab versus 4% in placebo) and influenza (CALIMA: 1% benralizumab versus 0% placebo; SIROCCO: 0% in benralizumab versus less than 1% placebo; ZONDA: 0% in benralizumab versus 3% in placebo). BORA is an extension that enrolled patients from all three of the trials included in this review, and vvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv.

Potential Place in Therapy1

The standard of care for asthma therapy for adults in Canada is ICS. Most patients who remain uncontrolled can be managed with a combination of non-pharmacologic strategies (e.g., asthma educator, environmental control) and pharmacologic strategies (e.g., adding a second agent such as LABA, and then further increasing the dose of ICS). Despite optimal management, the 5% to 10% of the overall asthma population who remain uncontrolled drive the majority of health care costs.1 Besides benralizumab, there is also mepolizumab or reslizumab, which target a population of patients with severe asthma who have allergic or non-allergic eosinophilic airway inflammation for which anti-IL-5 therapy is the only current option to achieve control.2 Without anti-IL-5 therapy, this population can suffer from the side effects of long-term OCS therapy or from worsened quality of life due to uncontrolled asthma.

Benralizumab is effective at achieving asthma control in patients with eosinophilic airway inflammation who remain uncontrolled despite high-dose ICS with a second controller added or who require an OCS to maintain control.3 These patients should be the ones to receive benralizumab. Some patients who are non-compliant with inhaled therapies, who continue to smoke, or who have ongoing environmental exposures (e.g., pets or occupation) may otherwise appear to meet criteria to receive anti-IL-5 therapy. Peripheral eosinophil levels are easily measured and are a surrogate for airway eosinophilic inflammation. Therefore, patients should meet Health Canada–approved eosinophil levels before initiating therapy.

1 This information is based on information provided in draft form by the clinical expert consulted by CDR reviewers for the purpose of this review.

Page 12: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 12

Conclusions

Three manufacturer-sponsored multinational double-blind randomized controlled trials that compared benralizumab with placebo met the inclusion criteria for this review. In CALIMA and SIROCCO, benralizumab demonstrated superiority over placebo over 56 and 48 weeks, respectively, for the primary outcome, annualized exacerbation rate, in a population of patients with high eosinophil counts (≥ 300 cells/µL) and on high-dose ICS (> 500 mcg fluticasone equivalents). This effect on exacerbations is likely clinically significant in a difficult-to-treat population. However, limited inferences can be made about the effects of benralizumab on exacerbations leading to hospitalization and emergency department visits as analyses of these outcomes were not controlled for multiple statistical comparisons. In ZONDA, in a population of patients who required chronic OCS treatment to maintain asthma control, benralizumab demonstrated superiority over placebo for the primary outcome, reducing the OCS dose over 28 weeks by more than 50%. This is likely a clinically significant finding in a population that is exhibiting corticosteroid resistance. However, no conclusions can be drawn about the key clinical outcome of exacerbations, as these analyses were not adjusted for multiple comparisons, nor were any other secondary outcomes in ZONDA. Limited inferences about benralizumab’s effects on health-related quality of life can be drawn from all three studies. Multiplicity-controlled secondary outcomes such as FEV1 and were improved for benralizumab versus placebo in CALIMA and SIROCCO, but the clinical significance of these differences may be limited as the treatment effect was generally modest. There were no clear or consistent safety differences between benralizumab and placebo, but given the novelty of IL-5 inhibitors, longer-term safety data are needed. Data from BORA, an extension that enrolled patients from the vvvvv included studies, suggested vv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vv vvv vvvvvv A limitation of the included studies is that none compared benralizumab with an active comparator such as another IL-5 inhibitor. A manufacturer-submitted indirect comparison found the efficacy of benralizumab vv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv from mepolizumab vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv. The indirect comparison also found that benralizumab vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv

Page 13: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 13

Table 1: Summary of Results

Outcome CALIMA SIROCCO ZONDA

Ben N = 441

Placebo N = 440

Ben N = 398

Placebo N = 407

Ben N = 73

Placebo N = 75

Mortality

Deaths, n 2/441 (< 1%) 1/440 (< 1%) 2/398 (1%) 2/407 (< 1%) 2/73 (3%) 0

Primary analysis population for all outcomes in CALIMA, SIROCCO: blood eosinophils ≥ 300 cells/μL, on high-dose ICS

N = 239 N = 248 N = 267 N = 267

Exacerbations

Annual exacerbation rate, estimate (95% CI) 0.66 (NR) 0.93 (NR) 0.65 (NR) 1.33 (NR) 0.54 (0.33 to 0.87)

1.80 (1.32 to 2.46)

Rate ratio (95% CI) 0.72 (0.54 to 0.95), P = 0.019a

0.49 (0.37 to 0.64), P < 0.001a

0.30 (0.17 to 0.53) P < 0.001

Hospitalization, Physician, ED Visits Due to Exacerbations

Hospitalization, patients, n (%) 14 (5.9) 12 (4.8) 12 (4.5) 20 (7.5) 1 (1.4) 6 (8.0)

ED visit, patients, n (%) 12 (5.0) 18 (7.3) 6 (2.2) 20 (7.5) 0 4 (5.3)

HRQoL

Mean (SD) baseline overall AQLQ12+ score 3.87 (1.05) N = 232

3.93 (1.04) N = 240

3.93 (0.97)

N = 267

3.87 (0.99) N = 267

4.44 (1.3) 4.11 (1.1)

LS mean change from baseline 1.56 N = 230

1.31 N = 240

1.56 N = 252

1.26 N = 254

1.08 N = 67

0.63 N = 68

LS MD between groups (95% CI)b 0.24 (0.04 to 0.45) P = 0.019

0.30 (0.10 to 0.50) P = 0.004

0.45 (0.14 to 0.76) P = 0.004

Oral Corticosteroid Use

Mean baseline daily OCS dose (mg) NR NR NR NR vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv

Mean (SD) per cent reduction in OCS dose from baseline

NR NR NR NR vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

Estimate for difference between groups (95% CI)c

NR NR NR NR vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

OCS use associated with exacerbations, mean (SD) total dose per patient, grams

vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv

NR NR

Withdrawals

Total, n (%) 51 (11.6) 38 (8.6) 40 (10.1) 40 (9.8) 4 (5.5) 3 (4.0)

Serious Adverse Events

Total patients, n (%) 41 (9.6) 61 (13.9) 54 (13.7) 58 (14.3) 7 (9.6) 14 (18.7)

Withdrawals Due to AE

Total, n (%) 10 (2.3) 5 (1.1) 8 (2.0) 3 (0.7) 3 (4.1) 2 (2.7)

Page 14: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 14

Outcome CALIMA SIROCCO ZONDA

Ben N = 441

Placebo N = 440

Ben N = 398

Placebo N = 407

Ben N = 73

Placebo N = 75

Notable Harms, n (%)

Upper respiratory tract infection 38 (8.9) 42 (9.5) 32 (8.1) 37 (9.1) 5 (6.8) 5 (6.7)

Influenza 14 (3.3) 25 (5.7) 19 (4.8) 24 (5.9) 1 (1.4) 5 (6.7)

Pneumonia-SAE 0 4 (0.9) 2 (0.5) 3 (0.7) 2 (2.7) 3 (4.0)

Influenza-SAE 2 (0.5) 0 0 1 (0.2) 0 2 (2.7)

Injection-site reactions 9 (2.1) 8 (1.8) 9 (2.3) 8 (2.0) 0 2 (2.7)

Any hypersensitivity 13 (3.0) 17 (3.9) 11 (2.8) 11 (2.7) 2 (2.7) 1 (1.3)

AE = adverse event; AQLQ12+ = Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 years and older; ben = benralizumab; CI = confidence interval; ED = emergency department; HRQoL= health-related quality of life; ICS = inhaled corticosteroid; LS = least squares; MD = mean difference; NR = not reported; OCS = oral corticosteroid; SAE = serious adverse event; SD = standard deviation.

Note: Estimate of the median per cent reduction from baseline in final OCS dose in the two treatment groups was compared with the placebo group using a Wilcoxon rank sum test, yielding the P value presented. The Hodges–Lehmann estimate and CIs were presented. The estimate was the median for the n1 × n2 differences between treatment groups, where n1 was the number of patients in each benralizumab-treated group, and n2 was the number of patients on placebo. This was not the same as the difference between the observed medians within each group. a Primary outcome of CALIMA and SIROCCO: Statistical analysis model was a negative binomial model including covariates treatment group, region, number of exacerbations in the previous year, and use of maintenance oral corticosteroids. Total follow-up time was defined as the time from randomization to the date of week 56 visit (end of treatment) or last contact if the patient was lost to follow-up. The log of each patient’s corresponding follow-up time was used as an offset variable in the model to adjust for patients having different exposure times during which the events occurred. Annual exacerbation rates were model estimated. b The model was: change from baseline in AQLQ12+ score = Treatment + baseline AQLQ12+ score + region + use of maintenance oral corticosteroids + visit + treatment × visit. The number of patients in the repeated measures analysis represents all patients with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. c Primary outcome of ZONDA: The Wilcoxon rank sum test was the primary analysis method and was used for the multiplicity-protected end point.

Source: Clinical Study Report for CALIMA,4 SIROCCO,5 ZONDA.6

Page 15: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 15

Introduction

Disease Prevalence and Incidence

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disorder characterized by reversible airway obstruction, inflammation of the airways, airway hyper-responsiveness, and remodelling. Symptoms may include wheezing, dyspnea, chest tightness, sputum production, and coughing associated with airway limitation and hyper-responsiveness to exogenous and endogenous stimuli. Onset can occur at any time, including in young children. It is estimated that 2.4 million Canadians aged 12 years and older have a diagnosis of asthma. Severe eosinophilic asthma is an asthma phenotype characterized by the presence of eosinophils in the airways and sputum despite conventional asthma therapy, and it affects 5% to 10% of all asthma patients.7 The prevalence of uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma is likely lower. Eosinophils are involved in the pathogenesis of asthma through the release of pro-inflammatory mediators at the airways, which contribute to epithelial cell damage, airway hyper-responsiveness, mucus hypersecretion, and airway remodelling.7,8

Standards of Therapy

Asthma is managed acutely, largely with the use of inhaled short-acting beta agonists, also known as “rescue” bronchodilators, and through maintenance therapies, many of which address the underlying pathophysiology of the disease. Non-pharmacological measures are considered to be critical underpinnings of good asthma management, and these include environmental control, allergen avoidance, and asthma education. The goal of maintenance therapy is to maintain control of asthma, indicated by absence of asthma exacerbations, and improvement in symptoms. The cornerstone of maintenance therapy of asthma is the use of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). The major drawback of ICS use, particularly at high doses, is systemic absorption of the ICS, which can lead to some of the classic side effects associated with chronic corticosteroid use, including osteoporosis. Adjunctive drugs include long-acting beta2 agonists (LABAs), which are available in fixed-dose combinations with an ICS. As long as LABAs are used in combination with an ICS, they are considered to be relatively safe and well-tolerated in asthma. Additional options, typically for asthma with an allergic phenotype, include leukotriene receptor antagonists and immunoglobin E (IgE) inhibitors. Although the leukotriene antagonists are well-tolerated, they generally have limited efficacy. IgE inhibitors, namely omalizumab, have classic drawbacks associated with monoclonal antibodies, such as hypersensitivity and injection-site reactions, and a major drawback is cost. Other bronchodilators, such as the long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and methylxanthines, such as theophyilline, may be considered, but are definitely not first-line options. Theophylline is associated with significant tolerability and safety issues, as well as numerous drug interactions, limiting its use. Finally, oral corticosteroids (OCSs), due to their poor tolerability and safety profile, are typically reserved for management of exacerbations, or for patients whose asthma has not been controlled on the aforementioned maintenance therapies. OCSs are associated with significant side effects, mitigated somewhat by their short-term use in managing exacerbations. Long-term use of an OCS would be considered a last resort due to the significant harms associated with this class.9,10

Page 16: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 16

Drug

Benralizumab is an interleukin-5 (IL-5) inhibitor, a monoclonal antibody that binds to the alpha subunit of the IL-5 receptor. The IL-5 alpha receptor is found on eosinophils and basophils. Binding of the monoclonal antibody facilitates the interaction of these cells with natural killer cells, resulting in the death of eosinophils. Eosinophils mediate inflammation in asthma, and thus inhibiting eosinophils has an anti-inflammatory effect. Benralizumab is administered by subcutaneous injection, 30 mg once every four weeks (Q4W) for the first three doses, then once every eight weeks (Q8W) thereafter. Injections should be administered into the upper arm, thigh, or abdomen. Benralizumab is indicated as an add-on maintenance treatment for adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

Table 2: Key Characteristics of Benralizumab, Reslizumab, Mepolizumab, and Omalizumab

Benralizumab Reslizumab Mepolizumab Omalizumab

Mechanism of action

Antibody to the alpha subunit of the IL-5 receptor

Anti-IL-5 antibody Anti-IL-5 antibody Anti-IgE antibody

Indicationa Add-on maintenance treatment of adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma

Add-on maintenance treatment of adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who: are inadequately

controlled with medium- to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and an additional asthma controller(s) (e.g., LABA), and

have a blood eosinophil count of ≥ 400 cells/µL at initiation of treatment

Add-on maintenance treatment of adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who: are inadequately

controlled with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and an additional asthma controller(s) (e.g., LABA), and

have a blood eosinophil count of ≥ 150 cells/µL at initiation of treatment with mepolizumab OR ≥ 300 cells/µL in the past 12 months.

Treatment of adults and adolescents with moderate to severe persistent asthma who have a positive skin test or in vitro reactivity to a perennial aeroallergen and whose symptoms are inadequately controlled on ICS

Route of administration

Subcutaneous injection Intravenous infusion Subcutaneous injection Subcutaneous injection

Recommended dose

30 mg administered once every 4 weeks for the first 3 doses, and then once every 8 weeks thereafter

3 mg/kg every 4 weeks 100 mg every 4 weeks 150 mg to 375 mg every 2 or 4 weeks depending on body weight and serum IgE

Serious side effects and safety issues

Anaphylaxis, injection-site reaction, infection

Anaphylaxis, injection-site reaction, infection

Anaphylaxis, injection-site reaction, infection

Anaphylaxis, injection-site reaction, infection

ICS = inhaled corticosteroids; IgE = immunoglobulin E; IL-5 = interleukin-5; LABA = long-acting beta2 agonist. a Health Canada indication. Source: Product monographs for benralizumab,11 reslizumab,12 mepolizuma,13 and omalizumab.14

Page 17: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 17

Objectives and Methods

Objectives

To perform a systematic review of the beneficial and harmful effects of benralizumab as an add-on maintenance treatment of adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

Methods

All manufacturer-provided trials considered pivotal by Health Canada were included in the systematic review. Phase III and IV studies were selected for inclusion based on the selection criteria presented in Table 3.

Table 3: Inclusion Criteria for the Systematic Review

Patient population Adults with severe eosinophilic asthma

Subgroups of interest: baseline asthma control medication baseline oral corticosteroid baseline peripheral eosinophil count baseline IgE levels previous use of omalizumab or mepolizumab or resilizumab.

Intervention Benralizumab 30 mg SC once every four weeks for the first three doses then once every eight weeks thereafter

Comparators Inhaled corticosteroids alone or in combination with one or more of the following: Mepolizumab Reslizumab Omalizumab LABA Leukotriene receptor antagonists Oral corticosteroid (chronic) LAMA Rescue medications (e.g., SABA, SAMA) may be used for acute exacerbations

Outcomes Key efficacy outcomes: Mortality Acute asthma exacerbationsa Hospitalizations, ED visits, physician visits due to asthma excabercationa Use of oral corticosteroidsa Health-related quality of life as measured by a validated scalea Days of missed school or worka Other efficacy outcomes: Change in pulmonary function (e.g., PEF, FEV1) Symptom reduction (e.g., ACQ)a Change in number of asthma symptom-free days or nightsa Incidence of nocturnal awakeningsa Reduction in use of ICSa Reduction in use of rescue medicationa Blood or sputum eosinophil levels

Page 18: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 18

Harms outcomes: AEs, SAEs, WDAEs Notable harms: infection, hypersensitivity reactions, local injection reactions

Study design Published and unpublished RCTs phase III and IV

ACQ = Asthma Control Questionnaire; AE = adverse event; ED = emergency department; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second; IgE = immunoglobin E; LABA = long-acting beta2 agonists; LAMA = long-acting muscarinic antagonists; PEF = peak expiratory flow; RCT = randomized controlled trial; SABA = short-acting beta2 agonists; SAE = serious adverse event; SAMA = short-acting muscarinic antagonists; SC = subcutaneous; WDAE = withdrawal due to adverse event.

a These outcomes were identified as important to patients in their input to CADTH Common Drug Review.

The literature search was performed by an information specialist using a peer-reviewed search strategy.

Published literature was identified by searching the following bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (1946–) with in-process records and daily updates via Ovid; Embase (1974–) via Ovid; and PubMed. The search strategy consisted of both controlled vocabulary, such as the National Library of Medicine’s MeSH (Medical Subject Headings), and keywords. The main search concepts were Fasenra and benralizumab.

No methodological filters were applied to limit by study type. Where possible, retrieval was limited to the human population. Retrieval was not limited by publication year or by language. Conference abstracts were excluded from the search results. See Appendix 2 for the detailed search strategies.

The initial search was completed on March 28, 2018. Regular alerts were established to update the search until the meeting of the CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee on September 20, 2018. Regular search updates were performed on databases that do not provide alert services.

Grey literature (literature that is not commercially published) was identified by searching relevant websites from the following sections of the Grey Matters checklist (https://www.cadth.ca/grey-matters): Health Technology Assessment Agencies; Health Economics; Clinical Practice Guidelines; Drug and Device Regulatory Approvals; Advisories and Warnings; Drug Class Reviews; Databases (free); Internet Search. Google and other Internet search engines were used to search for additional Web-based materials. These searches were supplemented by reviewing the bibliographies of key papers and through contacts with appropriate experts. In addition, the manufacturer of the drug was contacted for information regarding unpublished studies.

Two CADTH Common Drug Review (CDR) clinical reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion in the review based on titles and abstracts, according to the predetermined protocol. Full-text articles of all citations considered potentially relevant by at least one reviewer were acquired. Reviewers independently made the final selection of studies to be included in the review, and differences were resolved through discussion. Included studies are presented in Table 4 and excluded studies (with reasons) are presented in Appendix 3 .

Page 19: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 19

Results

Findings from the Literature

A total of three studies were identified from the literature for inclusion in the systematic review (Figure 1). The included studies are summarized in Table 4. A list of excluded studies is presented in Appendix 3.

Figure 1: Flow Diagram for Inclusion and Exclusion of Studies

10 Reports included

presenting data from 3 unique studies

131 Citations identified in

literature search

11 Potentially relevant reports

identified and screened

18 Total potentially relevant reports identified and screened

8 Reports excluded

7 Potentially relevant reports

from other sources

Page 20: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 20

Table 4: Details of Included Studies: CALIMA and SIROCCO

CALIMA SIROCCO

DE

SIG

NS

& P

OP

UL

AT

ION

S

Study design DB RCT DB RCT Locations 303 centres: 11 countries (Canada, USA,

Europe, South America, Asia) 374 centres: 17 countries (USA, Mexico, Europe, South America, Australia, Asia)

Randomized (N) 1,306 1,205 Inclusion criteria (common to both trials)

Female and male aged 12 to 75 years (adolescents in Europe were not allowed to take the Q4W regimen)

Weight of ≥ 40 kg

Physician-diagnosed asthma requiring treatment with medium- to high-dose ICS (> 250 mcg fluticasone dry powder formulation equivalents total daily dose) and a LABA, for at least 12 months prior to visit 1

Documented treatment with ICS and LABA for at least 3 months prior to visit 1 with or without OCS and additional asthma controllers; ICS and LABA could be parts of a combination product or given by separate inhalers

Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of < 80% predicted (< 90% predicted for patients 12 to 17 years of age) at visit 2

At least 2 documented asthma exacerbations in the 12 months prior to the date of informed consent that required use of a systemic corticosteroid or a temporary increase from the patient’s usual maintenance dose of OCS

ACQ-6 score ≥ 1.5 at visit 1

Documented post-bronchodilator reversibility in FEV1 of > 12% and > 200 mL in FEV1 within 12 months prior to visit 1; if historical documentation was not available, reversibility had to be demonstrated and documented at visit 2

Met ≥ 1 of the following conditions over the 7 days prior to randomization:

> 2 days with a daytime or night-time symptoms score ≥ 1 Rescue short-acting beta2 agonist use on > 2 days

≥ 1 nocturnal awakening due to asthma

Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of < 80% (< 90% predicted for patients 12 to 17 years of

age) predicted at day of randomization visit

Blood eosinophils 300 cells/μL or greater and less than 300 cells/μL at screening in a ratio of approximately 2:1

Inclusion criteria (distinct)

Documented treatment with an ICS + LABA for at least 3 months prior to visit 1, with or without ICS:

The ICS dose had to be ≥ 500 mcg/day fluticasone propionate dry powder formulation or equivalent daily

Documented treatment with an ICS + LABA for at least 3 months prior to visit 1, with or without ICS:

For patients 18 years of age and older, the ICS dose had to be > 500 mcg/day fluticasone propionate dry powder formulation or equivalent daily

For patients ages 12 to 17, the ICS dose had to be ≥ 500 mcg/day fluticasone propionate dry powder formulation or equivalent daily

Exclusion criteria Clinically important pulmonary disease other than asthma

Acute upper or lower respiratory infections requiring antibiotics or antiviral medication within 30 days prior to the date of informed consent

Current smokers or former smokers with a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack-years.

Clinically important pulmonary disease other than asthma

Acute upper or lower respiratory infections requiring antibiotics or antiviral medication within 30 days prior

Current smokers or former smokers with a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack-years

Page 21: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 21

CALIMA SIROCCO

Clinically significant asthma exacerbation, in the opinion of the investigator, including those requiring use of OCS, or an increase in maintenance dose of OCS 14 days prior to the date of informed consent

DR

UG

S

Intervention Benralizumab 30 mg once every 4 weeks or benralizumab 30 mg once every 4 weeks for the first three doses followed by once every 8 weeks for the remainder of the treatment period

Benralizumab 30 mg once every 4 weeks or benralizumab 30 mg once every 4 weeks for the first three doses followed by once every 8 weeks for the remainder of the treatment period

Comparator(s) Placebo Placebo

DU

RA

TIO

N Phase

Run-in 2 weeks minimum 2 weeks minimum Double-blind 56 weeks 48 weeks Follow-up 4 weeks (extension available [BORA study]) 4 weeks (extension [BORA study] available)

OU

TC

OM

ES

Primary end point Annual asthma exacerbation rate Annual asthma exacerbation rate Other end points Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 and post-bronchodilator FEV1

Asthma symptom score (total, daytime, and night time) Rescue medication use Home lung function (morning and evening PEF) Nights with awakening due to asthma ACQ-6 Time to first asthma exacerbation and proportion of patients with ≥ 1 asthma exacerbation AQLQ12+ EQ-5D-5L Annual rate of asthma exacerbations that are associated with an ER/urgent care visit or a hospitalization WPAI+CIQ Asthma-specific resource utilization (e.g., unscheduled physician visits, unscheduled phone calls to physicians, use of other asthma medications) Pharmacokinetic parameters ADA CGIC PGIC AEs/SAEs

Blood eosinophils

NO

TE

S Publications Fitzgerald 201615 Bleecker 201616

ACQ-6 = six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire; ADA = anti-drug antibodies; AQLQ12+ = Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 years and older; AE = adverse event; CGIC = Clinician Global Impression of Change; DB RCT = double-blind randomized controlled trial; EQ-5D-5L = EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels questionnaire; ER = emergency room; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second; ICS = inhaled corticosteroid; LABA = long-acting beta2 agonist; OCS = oral corticosteroid; PEF = peak expiratory flow; PGIC = Patient Global Impression of Change; Q8W = every eight weeks; SAE = serious adverse event; WPAI+CIQ = Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire plus Classroom Impairment Questions.

Note: Seven additional reports were included (manufacturer’s submission,17 Clinical Study Report for CALIMA,4 SIROCCO,5 ZONDA,6 FDA clinical and statistical review,18,19 and Health Canada Reviewer’s Report20).

Source: Clinical Study Report for CALIMA,4 SIROCCO.5

Page 22: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 22

Table 5: Details of Included Studies: ZONDA

ZONDA

DE

SIG

NS

& P

OP

UL

AT

ION

S

Study design DB RCT Locations 64 centres: 12 countries (Canada, USA, Europe, South America, South Korea) Randomized (N) 220 Inclusion criteria Female and male aged 12 to 75 years

Weight of ≥ 40 kg Peripheral blood eosinophil count of ≥ 150 cells/μL assessed by local lab at visit 1 (Week −10). Asthma requiring treatment with medium- to high-dose ICS (> 250 mcg fluticasone dry powder formulation equivalents total daily dose) and a LABA, for at least 12 months prior to visit 1 Documented treatment with high-dose ICS (> 500 mcg fluticasone propionate dry powder formulation equivalents total daily dose) and LABA for at least 6 months prior to visit 1 (Week −10). The ICS and LABA could have been contained within a combination product or given by separate inhalers For ICS/LABA combination preparations, the highest approved maintenance dose in the local

country met this ICS criterion. Chronic OCS therapy for at least 6 continuous months directly preceding visit 1 (Week −10). Patients

must have been on doses equivalent to 7.5 mg/day to 40 mg/day of prednisolone/prednisone at visit 1 and must have been on a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to randomization.

Patients with documented failures of OCS reduction within 6 months prior to visit 1 (Week −10) were not required to proceed through the dose optimization phase during run-in. Failed attempts at OCS dose reduction were those that resulted in documented clinical deterioration or reduced lung function attributed to asthma, defined as: o Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 < 80% of personal baseline o Morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) < 80% of personal baseline o Night-time awakenings increase of > 50% of mean personal baseline o Albuterol, salbutamol use > 4 puffs/day above mean personal baseline o Requirement for a prednisone or prednisolone burst (large temporary increase) to treat an

asthma exacerbation provoked by steroid reduction Morning pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of < 80% predicted at visit 2 Evidence of asthma as documented by either: Airway reversibility (FEV1 ≥ 12% and 200 mL) demonstrated at visit 1, visit 2, or visit 3 (Week −10,

−8, or −6) using the maximum post-bronchodilator procedure or

Documented reversibility in the previous 24 months prior to Visit 1 (Week −10) or

Airway hyper-responsiveness (PC20 FEV1 methacholine concentration ≤ 8 mg/mL) documented in the previous 12 months prior to planned date of randomization OR

Airflow variability in clinic FEV1 ≥ 20% between 2 consecutive clinic visits documented in the 12 months prior to the planned date of randomization (FEV1 recorded during an exacerbation should not be considered for this criterion).

At least 1 documented asthma exacerbation in the previous 12 months prior to the date informed consent was obtained Inclusion criteria at randomization Optimized OCS dose reached at least 2 weeks prior to randomization.

Exclusion criteria Clinically important pulmonary disease other than asthma Acute upper or lower respiratory infections requiring antibiotics or antiviral medication within 30 days prior Current smokers or former smokers with a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack-years.

DR

UG

S

Intervention benralizumab 30 mg once every 4 weeks benralizumab 30 mg once every 4 weeks for the first three doses followed by once every 8 weeks for the remainder of the treatment period

Comparator(s) Placebo

Page 23: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 23

ZONDA

DU

RA

TIO

N Phase

Run-in 8 weeks Double-blind 28 weeks Follow-up 8 weeks (extension [BORA study] available)

OU

TC

OM

ES

Primary end point Percentage reduction in final OCS dose compared with baseline (visit 6), while maintaining asthma control

Other end points Patients with ≥ 50% reduction in average daily OCS dose at visit 14 compared with baseline dose, while maintaining asthma control

Patients with ≥ 25% reduction in the final OCS dose at visit 14 compared with baseline dose, while maintaining asthma control

Patients with 100% reduction in average daily OCS dose at visit 14 compared with baseline dose, while maintaining asthma control

Patients with average final OCS dose ≤ 5.0 mg daily at visit 14, while maintaining asthma control Patients with ≤ 5.0 mg reduction on daily OCS dose at visit 14 compared with baseline dose, while

maintaining asthma control Patients with ≥ 25% reduction in the final OCS dose at visit 14 compared with baseline dose, and with

final OCS dose of ≤ 5.0 mg daily at visit 14, while maintaining asthma control Patients with ≥ 1 asthma exacerbation after randomization Annual rate of asthma exacerbations after randomization Annual rate of asthma exacerbations that are associated with an emergency room (ER) visit or a

hospitalization after randomization Time to the first asthma exacerbation after randomization Time to first exacerbation requiring hospitalization Time to first exacerbation requiring hospitalization or ER visit Number of days in hospital due to asthma Mean number of days with OCS taken for exacerbations Change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) Change from baseline in asthma symptom score (total, daytime, and night time) Change from baseline in rescue medication use Change from baseline in home lung function (morning and evening peak expiratory flow [PEF]) Change from baseline in the number of nights with awakening due to asthma requiring rescue

medication Change from baseline in ACQ-6 Change from baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 years and older (AQLQ12+) Change from baseline in blood eosinophils

NO

TE

S Publications Nair 201721

ACQ-6 = six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire; AQLQ12+ = Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 years and older; DB RCT = double-blind randomized controlled trial; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second; ICS = inhaled corticosteroid; LABA = long-acting beta2 agonist; OCS = oral corticosteroid; PEF = peak expiratory flow.

Note: Seven additional reports were included (manufacturer’s submission,17 Clinical Study Report for CALIMA,4 SIROCCO,5 ZONDA,6 FDA clinical and statistical review,18,19 Health Canada Reviewer’s Report20).

Source: Clinical Study Report for ZONDA.6

Page 24: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 24

Included Studies

Description of Studies

Three pivotal manufacturer-sponsored double-blind randomized controlled trials (DB RCTs) met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. CALIMA and SIROCCO were similarly designed studies that compared two different doses of benralizumab, administered Q4W and Q8W, to placebo. ZONDA was a 28-week study that compared benralizumab Q4W or Q8W with placebo. Only the latter Q8W regimen is of interest for this review, as it is the Health Canada–approved regimen. CALIMA was a 56-week study and SIROCCO lasted 48 weeks. The population in SIROCCO was all on high-dose ICS, while CALIMA included both high- and medium-dose ICS, the latter group added as a protocol amendment. Both studies enrolled populations with high (300 cells/µL) and lower (< 300 cells/µL) eosinophil counts, in a 2:1 ratio, respectively, and the primary analysis in both focused on patients in the high eosinophil count group who were on high-dose ICS.4-6

Randomization was carried out using an interactive Web/voice response system. SIROCCO and CALIMA participants were stratified by age group (adult or adolescent), country (for adults) or region (within/outside EU for adolescents), and peripheral blood eosinophil count (≥ 300/μL or < 300/μL), while CALIMA also stratified by ICS dose (high/medium). Adolescents in the EU were restricted to the Q8W dosing regimen due to regulatory requirements to limit drug burden on children. ZONDA stratified by eosinophil level (≥ 150 to < 300 versus ≥ 300 cells/μL), and country or region.4-6

Blinding was carried out using a matching placebo injection, in what the manufacturer described as a double dummy technique. Patients on the Q8W regimen received a placebo injection in the alternating fourth week, to mirror the Q4W regimen.4-6

CALIMA and SIROCCO each had a two week run-in phase, followed by double-blind phases of 56 and 48 weeks, respectively, and a four-week follow-up. Patients in CALIMA, SIROOCO, or ZONDA could enter the BORA extension, in which case they did not enter into the follow-up phase. A longer run-in phase (eight weeks) in ZONDA confirmed that patients indeed required an OCS to maintain asthma control, and established a stable baseline OCS dose (“dose optimization phase”). There were patients that were considered to have been “historically” optimized coming into the study if they had already tried to reduce their OCS dose and had experienced deterioration of their asthma (evidenced by forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1] and peak expiratory flow [PEF] below 80%, increase in night-time awakenings of more than 50%, salbutamol use of more than four puffs/day, and a need for an OCS or increased dose of an OCS). Otherwise, in this dose optimization phase patients were stepped down in their OCS dose until they experienced the clinical deterioration described above.4-6

Page 25: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 25

Figure 2: Study Flow Chart for CALIMA

EOT = end of treatment; FU = follow-up; SC = subcutaneous.

Source: Clinical Study Report for CALIMA.4

Page 26: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 26

Figure 3: Study Flow Chart for SIROCCO

EOT = end of treatment; FU = follow-up; SC = subcutaneous.

Source: Clinical Study Report for SIROCCO.5

Page 27: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 27

Figure 4: Flow Chart of Study Design for ZONDA

EOT = end of treatment; FU = follow-up; OCS = oral corticosteroid; SC = subcutaneous.

Source: Clinical Study Report for ZONDA.6

Page 28: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 28

In ZONDA, the treatment period with respect to OCS was divided into three phases: induction, reduction, and maintenance. In the induction phase, (from week 0 to week 4) patients remained on the optimized OCS dose. In the reduction phase (from week 4 to week 24, inclusive), OCS dose reduction was initiated at week 4 with dose reduction following at four-week intervals. Patients had their doses reduced according to a set schedule, and dose reductions could only occur if patients met various criteria indicating their asthma was stable, as described previously. 6

Populations

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

In CALIMA and SIROCCO, patients were to have physician-diagnosed asthma, and within three months of visit 1, patients in CALIMA were required to be on at least a medium dose of an ICS (≥ 500 mcg fluticasone dry powder equivalent) plus a LABA and in SIROCCO all patients had to be on a high dose (> 500 mcg fluticasone dry powder equivalent) plus a LABA. Patients were to have a pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of at least 80% of predicted normal, or if 12 to 17 years of age, 90% of predicted normal. Patients were to have had at least two documented asthma exacerbations within the past 12 months, requiring at least a systemic corticosteroid or an increase in dose from the patient’s usual maintenance OCS. The main noteworthy exclusion criterion in all three studies, according to the clinical expert consulted by CADTH on this review, was current or former smoker. 4,5

In ZONDA, patients had to have continuous treatment with an OCS (between 7.5 mg and 40 mg of prednisone daily) as well as documented treatment with a high-dose ICS for at least six continuous months preceding visit 1. Patients with documented failure of dose reduction were not required to enter the dose optimization phase. Documented failure was indicated by clinical deterioration, including a reduction of FEV1 and PEF below 80% of personal baseline, night-time awakenings increased by more than 50% of the mean personal baseline, salbutamol use more than four puffs daily, requirement for a large increase in prednisone or prednisolone level to treat an asthma exacerbation prompted by steroid reduction. If a patient reached an OCS dose of 5 mg prednisone equivalents or less during dose optimization they were to be screened out of the study.6

Baseline Characteristics

Patients in all three studies were approximately 50 years old, and the majority (approximately 60%) were female. The mean standard deviation (SD) eosinophil count was 509 ± 320 cells/µL in the benralizumab group and 656 ± 589 cells/µL with placebo in ZONDA, while mean SD eosinophil counts were 465 ± 360 cells/µL with benralizumab and 488 ± 445 cells/µL with placebo in CALIMA and 470 ± 392 cells/µL with benralizumab and 457 ± 366 cells/µL with placebo in SIROCCO. The pre-bronchodilator FEV1 was between 56% and 62% of predicted normal across all three trials. In CALIMA and SIROCCO, nearly two-thirds of patients had two exacerbations in the past 12 months, and the remainder had three or more in that time.

The mean SD of exacerbations in the past 12 months was 3.1 ± 2.8 for the benralizumab group and 2.5 ± 1.8 for placebo in ZONDA. There were no noteworthy differences in baseline characteristics between treatment groups in CALIMA or SIROCCO according to the clinical expert.

Page 29: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 29

Table 6: Summary of Baseline Characteristics

Title CALIMA SIROCCO ZONDA

Benralizumab Q8W

N = 441

Placebo N = 440

Benralizumab Q8W

N = 398

Placebo N = 407

Benralizumab Q8W

N = 73

Placebo N = 75

Mean (SD) age, years 49.0 (14.3) 48.8 (15.1) 47.6 (14.5) 48.7 (14.9) 52.9 (10.1) 49.9 (11.7)

Male, n (%) 168 (38.1) 176 (40.0) 146 (36.7) 138 (33.9) 26 (35.6) 27 (36.0)

Race, n (%)

White 369 (83.7) 372 (84.5) 287 (72.1) 302 (74.2) 66 (90.4) 70 (93.3)

Black 15 (3.4) 14 (3.2) 15 (3.8) 16 (3.9) 1 (1.4) 1 (1.3)

Asian 55 (12.5) 53 (12.0) 50 (12.6) 50 (12.3) 5 (6.8) 4 (5.3)

Other 2 (0.5) 1 (0.2) 46 (11.6) 39 (9.6) 1 (1.4) 0

Mean (SD) BMI (kg/m2) 28.76 (6.535) 28.89 (6.495) 28.21 (6.178) 28.93 (7.067) 30.24 (6.534) 28.73 (5.244)

Mean (SD) local baseline eosinophil count, cells/μL

465 (359.6) 488 (444.8) 470 (392.8) 457 (366.3) 509 (320.2) 656 (589.0)

FEV1 pre-BD (% PN) 57.9 (14.9) 58.0 (14.9) 56.1 (14.6) 56.6 (15.0) 59.0 (17.9) 62.0 (16.5)

Mean reversibility, %, (SD) 24.6 (22.9) 27.3 (44.7) 27.2 (24.5) 25.5 (23.1) 25.1 (19.0) 23.2 (18.0)

Median time since asthma diagnosis, years (range)

16.81 (NR) 16.22 (NR) 14.38 (NR) 14.17 (NR) 16.34 (NR) 10.48 (NR)

Number of Exacerbations in the Last 12 Months, n (%)

1 1 (0.2) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 21 (28.8) 24 (32.0)

2 287 (65.1) 288 (65.5) 252 (63.3) 244 (60.0) 23 (31.5) 22 (29.3)

3 93 (21.1) 93 (21.1) 79 (19.8) 76 (18.7) 9 (12.3) 18 (24.0)

≥ 4 60 (13.6) 59 (13.4) 67 (16.8) 87 (21.4) 20 (27.4) 11 (14.7)

Mean (SD) 2.7 (1.42) 2.7 (1.63) 2.8 (1.45) 3.0 (1.81) 3.1 (2.83) 2.5 (1.77)

Number of Exacerbations in the Last 12 Months Resulting in Hospitalization

0 363 (82.3) 368 (83.6) 298 (74.9) 300 (73.7) 53 (72.6) 49 (65.3)

Mean (SD) 0.3 (0.66) 0.3 (0.75) 0.4 (0.82) 0.4 (0.79) 0.5 (1.12) 0.5 (0.72)

Nicotine Use at Study Entry, n (%)

Never smoked 348 (78.9) 349 (79.3) 327 (82.2) 328 (80.6) 61 (83.6) 58 (77.3)

Current smoker 3 (0.7) 2 (0.5) 1 (0.3) 5 (1.2) 0 0

Former smoker 90 (20.4) 89 (20.2) 70 (17.6) 74 (18.2) 12 (16.4) 17 (22.7)

Mean nicotine consumption in nicotine pack-years prior to study entry, n (SD)

5.0 (5.0) 4.5 (2.8) 4.9 (2.6) 4.9 (2.8) 4.7 (2.4) 5.5 (2.2)

Mean (SD) ACQ-6 score at baseline

2.75 (0.93)

2.69 (0.92) 2.80 (0.88)

2.87 (0.94) 2.42 (1.21) 2.68 (0.95)

Maintenance Asthma Medications at Baseline

ICS, n (%) 439 (99.5) 440 (100.0) 398 (100.0) 407 (100.0) 73 (100.0) 75 (100.0)

ICS total daily dose (mcg), mean (SD)

904.517 (NR) 863.015 (NR) 902.718 (NR) 896.100 (NR)

1,191.598 (NR)

1,232.256 (NR)

LABA, n (%) 435 (98.6) 440 (100.0) 398 (100.0) 407 (100.0) 73 (100.0) 75 (100.0)

ICS/LABA, n (%) 384 (87.1) 374 (85.0) 378 (95.0) 378 (92.9) 63 (86.3) 68 (90.7)

OCS, n (%) 44 (10.0) 41 (9.3) 71 (17.8) 68 (16.7) 73 (100) 75 (100)

OCS total daily dose (mg), 9.722 (NR) 12.598 (NR) 15.176 (NR) 15.265 (NR) 14.589 15.080

Page 30: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 30

Title CALIMA SIROCCO ZONDA

Benralizumab Q8W

N = 441

Placebo N = 440

Benralizumab Q8W

N = 398

Placebo N = 407

Benralizumab Q8W

N = 73

Placebo N = 75

Mean (SD) (7.8397) (6.7314)

LAMA, n (%) 39 (8.8) 36 (8.2) 33 (8.3) 34 (8.4) 21 (28.8) 21 (28.0)

LTRA, n (%) 124 (28.1) 116 (26.4) 150 (37.7) 153 (37.6) 29 (39.7) 25 (33.3)

Xanthine derivatives, n (%) 55 (12.2) 49 (11.1) 60 (15.1) 65 (16.0) 13 (17.8) 10 (13.3)

Other asthma medications, n (%)

9 (2.0) 5 (1.1) 3 (0.8) 5 (1.2) 1 (1.4) 3 (4.0)

PN = predicted normal value; ACQ-6 = six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire; BD = pre-bronchodilator; BMI = body mass index; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second; ICS = inhaled corticosteroids; LABA = long-acting beta2 agonists; LAMA = long-acting muscarinic antagonists; LTRA = leukotriene receptor antagonists; NR = not reported; OCS = oral corticosteroid; SD = standard deviation.

Note: ICS doses were converted to their fluticasone propionate dry powder equivalent. OCS doses were converted to their prednisolone equivalent for this summary. The conversion factor was not reported. Source: Clinical Study Report for CALIMA,4 SIROCCO,5 and ZONDA.6

Interventions

All three studies compared two different dose regimens of benralizumab with placebo: benralizumab 30 mg administered Q4W and benralizumab 30 mg Q8W. Patients in the Q8W regimens were titrated, initiated on a Q4W regimen for the first three doses before moving to the Q8W regimen. Placebo doses were matched in appearance to the benralizumab groups. In SIROCCO, all patients were on a high-dose (> 500 mcg fluticasone equivalents) ICS plus a LABA and continued on this dose after commencing the study drug. In CALIMA, patients were on either a high- or medium-dose ICS plus a LABA at randomization and remained on those doses during the study.

In ZONDA, the treatment period with respect to OCS was divided into three phases: induction, reduction, and maintenance, as described previously. The induction phase was from week 0 to 4, as patients stayed on their optimized dose. In the reduction phase, beginning at week 4 patients’ dose was reduced every four weeks until their asthma deteriorated. If they met the aforementioned criteria for deterioration of their asthma, they were to be returned to their previous effective dose. Once this up-titration had occurred, they could no longer undergo dose reduction, and the dose they were on was to be maintained until the end of the treatment period. In the maintenance phase (after week 24 to week 28), the dose of OCS reached at week 24 or complete elimination of OCS was maintained. Patients were maintained on their currently prescribed high-dose ICS/LABA therapy, without change, from enrolment throughout the run-in and treatment period.

In all included trials, short-acting beta agonists (metered dose inhaler or nebulizer) were allowed as needed for rescue use and this was recorded in the Asthma Daily Diary. Administration via nebulization was to be recorded separately from metered dose inhaler inhalations.

Outcomes

The annualized rate of unadjudicated asthma exacerbations was the primary outcome of both CALIMA and SIROCCO and a secondary outcome of ZONDA. The annual exacerbation rate in each treatment group was calculated as:

Page 31: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 31

“Annual Exacerbation Rate = 365.25*Total Number of Exacerbations/Total duration of follow-up within the treatment group (days)”4-6

An asthma exacerbation was defined by a worsening of asthma requiring:

“Use of systemic corticosteroids (or a temporary increase in a stable OCS background dose) for at least 3 days (a single depo-injectable dose of corticosteroids was considered equivalent to a 3-day course of systemic corticosteroids)”

“An emergency department/urgent care visit (defined as evaluation and treatment for < 24 hours in an emergency department or urgent care centre) due to asthma that required systemic corticosteroids (as per above)”

“An inpatient hospitalization due to asthma (defined as an admission to an inpatient facility and/or evaluation and treatment in a healthcare facility for ≥24 hours)”4-6

Other analyses that were considered supportive of the primary analysis in CALIMA and SIROCCO included the proportion of patients with at least one exacerbation, proportion of patients with an exacerbation associated with an emergency department visit or hospitalization, the time to first asthma exacerbation, and the reduction in OCS dose associated with an exacerbation. The time to event analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model with covariates for treatment group, region, number of exacerbations in the previous year, and use of maintenance OCS. The manufacturer also performed an additional post hoc analysis of the rate of exacerbations associated with hospitalizations or ED visits.4-6

Health-Related Quality of Life

Health-related quality of life was assessed as a secondary outcome in CALIMA and SIROCCO, using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 years and older (AQLQ12+) and the EuroQoL 5-Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D). The AQLQ12+ was assessed as a secondary outcome in ZONDA.

The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) is a patient-reported, disease-specific, health-related quality of life measure that was developed to assess the problems experienced by adults with asthma in their daily lives.22 The AQLQ(S) is a standardized form of the AQLQ. The AQLQ and AQLQ(S) are made up of 32 questions grouped into four domains: symptoms (12 items), physical activities (11 items), emotional function (five items), and environmental stimuli (four items).22 Each question is scored on a seven-point scale ranging from 1 (severe impairment) to 7 (no impairment). Patients are asked to recall their experiences in the past two weeks,22 and in the included studies they were asked to complete assessments every four weeks. The overall score is calculated as the mean of all the individual scores, with a higher score indicating less impairment from asthma and each of the four domain scores calculated as the mean of the individual scores in that domain.22 The AQLQ12+ version is identical to the AQLQ(S) with the exception of the wording in one of the activity questions being changed from “work-related limitations” to “work-/school-related limitations.”23 The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is 0.5 for overall scores on the original AQLQ instrument, although the MCID for the AQLQ12+ version is unknown. The AQLQ is reviewed in Appendix 5.

EQ-5D is a generic quality-of-life instrument developed by the EuroQol Group.24 It may be applied to a wide range of health conditions and treatments.24 The EQ-5D 5-Levels version (EQ-5D-5L) was introduced in 2005 based on the earlier 3-Levels version.24 It consists of an

Page 32: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 32

EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). The descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each with five levels, ranging from level 1 (“no problems”) to level 5 (“extreme problems” or “unable to perform,”) which is the worst response in the dimension. Respondents are asked to choose the level that reflects their health state for each of the five dimensions. Results from the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system can be converted into a single index score using a scoring algorithm taking the local patient and population preferences into account. The range of index scores will differ according to the scoring algorithm used. However, in all scoring algorithms of the EQ-5D-5L, a score of 0 represents the health state “dead” and 1.0 reflects “perfect health.” Negative scores are also possible for those health states that society (not the individual patient) considers to be “worse than dead.” The EQ VAS records the respondent’s self-rated health on a vertical scale on which the end points are labelled 0 (“the worst health you can imagine”) and 100 (“the best health you can imagine”). The respondents are asked to mark an X on the point of the VAS that best represents their health on that day. The EQ-5D index and VAS scores can be summarized and analyzed as continuous data.16,24 Hence, the EQ-5D produces three types of data for each respondent: a profile indicating the extent of problems on each of the five dimensions represented by a five-digit descriptor, such as 11121 or 21143; a population preference-weighted health index score based on the descriptive system; and a self-reported assessment of health status based on the VAS. The MCID for the index score, overall (versus asthma-specific) was 0.056.25 The EQ-5D is reviewed in Appendix 5.

Symptoms

Patients were asked to complete an Asthma Daily Diary, which included “daily recordings of morning and evening home PEF data, asthma symptoms, inhalations of rescue medication, nights with awakenings due to asthma symptoms, and background medication compliance.”4,5 The total asthma symptom score was a key secondary outcome, controlled for multiplicity, in both the CALIMA and SIROCCO studies. CDR was unable to find an MCID. There were single-item assessments of symptoms in the morning and evening, scored on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (unable to sleep/perform normal activities). The two scores were totalled to arrive at the total asthma symptom score (TASS), and if one score was missing then the score for that day was missing. Additionally, the morning diary captured night-time awakenings (yes/no) and the use of rescue medication during these awakenings (yes/no). Asthma symptoms could include, but were not limited to, shortness of breath, wheezing, coughing, and/or chest tightness. Adherence to the Asthma Daily Diary was checked at each visit by the investigator or designate.4,5

The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) is a patient-reported instrument that measures the adequacy of asthma treatment and the original instrument, the ACQ-7, consists of seven items.26 It includes five items on symptoms (night-time awakenings, symptom severity upon awakening, activity limitation due to asthma, shortness of breath due to asthma, and wheezing), one item on rescue bronchodilator use, and one item on FEV1 as percentage of predicted FEV1.

26 There are two versions of the ACQ-6: one excludes the FEV1 item and one excludes the item on bronchodilator use;27 the version that excludes FEV1 was used in the three included studies, where it was assessed as a secondary outcome. Patients fill out the questionnaire and responses are based on the past seven days. In the included studies, patients were asked to fill out the ACQ every two weeks. Each item is scored on a seven-point ordinal scale, ranging from 0 (well-controlled) to 6 (extremely poorly controlled).26 The ACQ score is calculated as the mean score with all items weighted equally and therefore

Page 33: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 33

also ranges from 0 to 6 with higher scores indicating worse asthma control.26 The MCID is 0.5 in adults for the ACQ-6.27-29 The ACQ is reviewed in Appendix 5.

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire is a self-reporting instrument used to measure the impact of general health and symptom severity on work and on daily activities over the previous seven days.30-32 The WPAI was used to gather information for secondary outcomes such as absenteeism. The General Health WPAI questionnaire has six questions from which the values of four different outcomes can be calculated.31 The WPAI questionnaire can be adapted for a specific disease or condition by replacing the word “problem” in the Specific Health Problem (SHP) version of the WPAI with the specific disease.33 When the Classroom Impairment Questions (CIQs) are added to create the WPAI+CIQ, there are a total of 10 questions, of which at least three are completed by patients.34 While it appears that the WPAI+CIQ was meant to be adapted for specific diseases to yield the WPAI+CIQ:SHP, the statistical analysis plans for the CALIMA and SIROCCO trials indicated that the term “health problems” was used. The answers to the 10 questions in the WPAI+CIQ can be used to generate four types of scores: absenteeism (work missed), presenteeism (impairment at class or reduced on-the-job-effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment), and activity impairment.31 The scores are provided as impairment percentages, with higher numbers corresponding to greater impairment and less productivity.31 The WPAI is reviewed in Appendix 5.

Pulmonary Function

FEV1 was a key, multiplicity-controlled secondary outcome of both CALIMA and SIROCCO. FEV1 is the maximal amount of air forcefully exhaled in one second. The measured volume can be converted to a percentage of predicted normal value, which is adjusted based on height, weight, and race. The minimal patient perceivable improvement (MPPI) for FEV1 is 230 mL or a 10.38% change from baseline.35 FEV1 is reviewed in Appendix 5.

PEF — sometimes referred to as PEF rate — is defined as “the maximum flow achieved during an expiration delivered with maximal force starting from the level of maximal lung inflation.”36 Morning and evening PEF were assessed as a secondary outcome in CALIMA and SIROCCO. Electronic peak flow metres automatically store and download measurements as needed, circumventing the need for patients to manually record PEF values in diaries. PEF is usually expressed in units of litres per minute (L/min) and sometimes as a percentage of the predicted normal value or as a change from baseline average values.37 The MPPI for PEF was 18.8 L/min or a 5.39% change from baseline, with no differences in MPPI values by gender or age, although in a population with moderate to severe asthma.35 PEF is reviewed in Appendix 5.

Statistical Analysis

Sample Size

In CALIMA and SIROCCO, power calculations were based on the high eosinophil count/high ICS population (≥ 300 cells/µL), seeking 90% power to detect a 40% reduction in exacerbations in both benralizumab dosing regimens versus placebo.4,5 In ZONDA, 70 patients per treatment group were required to detect a difference in per cent reduction of OCS dose between each benralizumab group and placebo, with 86% power using a two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test.6 In CALIMA and SIROCCO, the sample size calculation assumed a two-sided alpha level of 0.04 and an annual exacerbation rate of 0.88 in placebo, an assumption based on published data and from a phase II study.4,5 The sample size calculation for ZONDA was based on simulations using OCS reduction data from the Steroid

Page 34: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 34

Reduction with Mepolizumab Study, which reported a 50% reduction in the median percentage OCS dose with mepolizumab versus zero per cent reduction with placebo.6 In CALIMA and SIROCCO, two-thirds of the randomized population were to have high eosinophil counts (≥ 300 cells/µL) and the remaining one-third were to have eosinophil counts below 300 cells/µL.4,5 In ZONDA, approximately 60 patients were to have eosinophil counts between 150 and 300 cells/µL, while 150 patients were to have eosinophil counts of 300 cells/µL or more.6

Analysis of Primary and Secondary End Points

In CALIMA and SIROCCO the exacerbation rate in each of the benralizumab groups was compared with the exacerbation rate in the placebo group using a negative binomial model for the primary analysis. The response variable in the model was the number of asthma exacerbations experienced by a patient over the double-blind treatment period. The model included the following covariates: treatment group, region, number of exacerbations in the previous year, and the use of maintenance OCS (yes/no). The logarithm of the patient’s corresponding follow-up time was used as an offset variable in the model to adjust for patients having different exposure times during which the events occur. The continuous secondary efficacy end points, including change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1, asthma symptom score, ACQ-6, and AQLQ12+, were analyzed using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures analysis. For each end point, the dependent variable was the change from baseline of the parameter at post-baseline scheduled visits up to the end-of-treatment visit. The model included treatment group as the explanatory variable and fixed effects included: region, the use of maintenance oral corticosteroids (yes/no), visit, and treatment x visit interaction while the baseline value acted as a covariate.4,5 Continuous variables were reported both as means with standard deviations and least squares means with 95% confidence intervals. Exacerbations were reported as annualized exacerbation rates in the primary analysis, with 95% confidence intervals.

In ZONDA, the primary end point (median per cent reduction from baseline in final OCS dose) in the two treatment groups was compared with the placebo group using a Wilcoxon rank sum test, and a Hodges–Lehmann estimate was used to estimate the difference in medians between groups. There were secondary outcomes identified in ZONDA, although none were controlled for multiplicity. Similar to CALIMA and SIROCCO, ZONDA used a negative binomial model to analyze asthma exacerbations. The model used the same covariates as the model in CALIMA and SIROCCO except maintenance OCS, and the same offset variable.6 A Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test was used in the comparison of categorical outcomes related to OCS use, such as the proportion of patients achieving 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% reduction in OCS doses. This test controlled for region. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the time to first asthma exacerbation as well as time to first exacerbation that required a hospitalization or an emergency department visit. Continuous secondary outcomes were analyzed in a similar manner to CALIMA and SIROCCO, using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures.6

Sensitivity Analysis

In addition to the sensitivity analyses to account for missing data described below, the manufacturer performed a number of other sensitivity analyses. In CALIMA and SIROCCO, sensitivity analyses were performed to exclude patients with protocol deviations deemed important, as according to the manufacturer there was no per-protocol analysis in these studies. One analysis focused on patients with eosinophil counts below 300 cells/µL, a population that, despite making up one-third of the enrolled population, was not included in

Page 35: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 35

the primary analysis. There was also an analysis by baseline eosinophils broken down into four categories (< 150 cells/µL, 150 to 299 cells/µL, 300 to 449 cells/µL, and ≥ 450 cells/µL), and the results of this analysis are reported as part of the subgroup analysis reported by CDR.4,5

In ZONDA, the manufacturer described a sensitivity analysis of the primary analysis using a proportional odds model that controlled for treatment group, region, and baseline OCS dose. The manufacturer also performed a sensitivity analysis to account for protocol violations in dose titration; this is to account for patients who, instead of having their OCS dose up-titrated to their previous dose after experiencing an exacerbation, were down-titrated in error. In this analysis, the OCS dose associated with the first post-baseline exacerbation was automatically entered into the program as being increased one level. The results of this sensitivity analysis were similar to those of the primary analysis.6

Subgroups

Both CALIMA and SIROCCO performed pre-specified subgroup analyses for the same factors. In SIROCCO these were performed on patients with high baseline eosinophil counts (≥ 300 cells/µL), and in CALIMA they were performed in high eosinophil counts and patients on either a high-dose ICS or medium/high-dose ICS.4,5 The subgroups examined were: OCS use at baseline (yes/no), gender, age (< 18 years, ≥ 18 years to 65 years, and ≥ 65 years), geographic region, body mass index (BMI) (≤ 35 kg/m2, > 35 kg/m2), the number of exacerbations in the previous year (two, three, or four or more exacerbations), race, nasal polyps (yes/no), immunoglobulin E (IgE) (≤ 30 KU/L, > 30 KU/L to ≤ 700 KU/L, > 700 KU/L), atopic status (yes/no), and prior treatment with omalizumab (yes/no). Tests for interactions were also pre-planned. However, the threshold for declaring statistical significance was not reported, and there was no mention of any adjustments made for multiple statistical comparisons. The manufacturer noted that these studies were not powered to assess efficacy within these subgroups and should be considered exploratory analyses.4,5 In ZONDA, subgroup analyses were performed for the following factors: age category (≥ 18 years to < 65 years and ≥ 65 years), gender, BMI (≤ 35 kg/m2, > 35 kg/m2), number of exacerbations in the previous year (1, 2, ≥ 3), region, and OCS dose at baseline (≤ 10 mg, > 10 mg).6 No analyses were planned for these subgroups in ZONDA.

Multiplicity

Multiplicity was accounted for in CALIMA and SIROCCO using a three-step gate-keeping procedure. First, two tests were conducted of the primary outcome, one for each dose regimen versus placebo, at the family-wise error rate of P = 0.04 using a Hochberg procedure. If P < 0.04 for both tests, then the two key secondary end points for both dose regimens were tested as one family at the family-wise error rate of 0.05 using a Holm procedure. However, if P < 0.02 for the smaller P value, then the two secondary end points for the dose associated with this smaller P value were tested at a family-wise error rate of P = 0.01, again using a Holm procedure.4,5

In ZONDA, adjustment for multiple comparisons was only made for the primary outcome (reduction in OCS dose), using the Hochberg procedure, to account for the fact that two different doses of benralizumab were being compared with placebo. Of the two P values generated, if the larger value was greater than 0.05 then the threshold for statistical significance for the smaller value became 0.025. Otherwise if both P values were below 0.05, statistical significance was declared.6

Page 36: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 36

Missing Data

In CALIMA and SIROCCO, the manufacturer employed three different imputation methods to account for missing data. The first, and simplest, approach is referred to as missing at random. This approach assumes that the results for those patients who withdrew from a given group in the study would not differ from the patients who remained in that group. This could mean, for example, that patients who withdrew due to therapeutic failure would still be assumed to be potential responders, when clearly that is not the case. For the other two methods of imputation, dropout reason-based multiple imputation (DRMI) and partial-DRMI, the method of imputation depended on the reason for withdrawal. For partial-DRMI, for benralizumab patients who dropped out for treatment-related reasons (such as adverse event, death, and protocol-defined reasons for stopping therapy) it was assumed that their results would reflect that of the placebo group. For patients from the placebo group who withdrew, it was assumed that their results would be missing at random. DRMI added severe non-compliance to protocol as a treatment-related reason for withdrawal.4,5

In ZONDA, the method of imputation for missing data for the primary outcome was not specifically stated. For secondary patient-reported outcomes (ACQ-6, AQLQ12+), the manufacturer stated that no imputation for missing data was carried out, as an optional sensitivity analysis was only planned to be carried out if there was an “imbalance” in missing data between treatment groups, and this was not the case.6

Analysis Populations

For all included studies, the full analysis set (FAS) included all patients randomized and treated. According to the manufacturer, they followed the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, which they defined as “Patients were analyzed according to their randomized treatment, irrespective of whether or not they had prematurely discontinued, according to the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) principle.” However their definition did not appear to distinguish between patients randomized and treated and those randomized and not treated, which would be a true ITT. The safety analysis set consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug, and patient data were analyzed based on the actual treatment they received, rather than the group to which they were assigned.4-6

Patient Disposition

The percentage of patients withdrawing from CALIMA and SIROCCO ranged between 9% and 12% and in ZONDA it was approximately 5%. There were no notable differences between groups in the proportion of patients withdrawing from any of these studies.

Table 7: Patient Disposition

CALIMA SIROCCO ZONDA

Benralizumab Q8W

Placebo Benralizumab Q8W

Placebo Benralizumab Q8W

Placebo

Screened, N 2,505 2,681 369 Did not enter screening/run-in 324 449 98

Eligibility criteria not fulfilled 213 302 84 Development of study-specific withdrawal criteria

70 114 6

Patient decision 26 24 4 Other 12 2 2

Page 37: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 37

CALIMA SIROCCO ZONDA

Benralizumab Q8W

Placebo Benralizumab Q8W

Placebo Benralizumab Q8W

Placebo

Patient lost to follow-up 2 4 0 Severe non-compliance to protocol 1 0 0 Adverse event 0 3 2

Entered 2,181 2,232 271 Non-randomized 875 1,027 51

Eligibility criteria not fulfilled 634 749 35 Development of study-specific withdrawal criteria

166 188 14

Patient decision 45 46 1 Adverse event 16 21 0 Other 7 17 0 Severe non-compliance to protocol 4 1 1 Lost to follow-up 3 3 0 Death 0 2 0

Randomized, N (%) 441 440 398 407 73 75 Randomized and treated 441 440 398 407 73 75 Discontinued study, N (%) 51 (11.6) 38 (8.6) 40 (10.1) 40 (9.8) 4 (5.5) 3 (4.0)

Patient decision 27 (6.1) 19 (4.3) 15 (3.8) 17 (4.2) 1 (1.4) 0 (0.0) Other 9 (2.0) 4 (0.9) 9 (2.3) 14 (3.4) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) Adverse event 3 (0.7) 4 (0.9) 5 (1.3) 1 (0.2) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.3) Severe non-compliance to protocol 1 (0.2) 2 (0.5) 2 (0.5) 2 (0.5) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) Death 2 (0.5) 1 (0.2) 2 (0.5) 2 (0.5) 2 (2.7) 0 (0.0) Development of study-specific withdrawal criteria

1 (0.2) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.3) 1 (0.2) 1 (1.4) 1 (1.3)

Lost to follow-up 8 (1.8) 6 (1.4) 6 (1.5) 3 (0.7) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.3) Eligibility criteria not fulfilled 0 (0.0) 2 (0.5) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

Full analysis set, N 441 440 398 407 73 75 Per protocol, N NR NR NR NR NR NR Safety, N 441 440 398 407 73 75

NR = not reported; Q8W = every eight weeks.

Source: Clinical Study Report for CALIMA,4 SIROCCO,5 and ZONDA.6

Exposure to Study Treatments

In ZONDA, the mean durations of exposure were 159.77 days (range 1.0 to 190.0 days), and 167.05 days (range 113.0 to 177.0 days) in the benralizumab 30 mg Q8W, and placebo groups, respectively. In CALIMA, the mean durations of exposure were 331.64 days (range: 1 to 399 days), and 336.69 days (range: 1 to 400 days) in the benralizumab 30 mg Q8W, and placebo groups, respectively. In SIROCCO, the mean durations of exposure were 288.02 days (range: 1 to 330 days), and 289.38 days (range: 1 to 343 days) in the benralizumab 30 mg Q8W, and placebo groups, respectively.

Use of asthma-related drugs was allowed as concomitant therapy during the included studies. Use of leukotriene receptor antagonists was most common (31% of patients in CALIMA, 41% in SIROCCO, 38% in ZONDA) followed by methylxanthines (15% in CALIMA, 20% in SIROCCO, 19% IN ZONDA), and anticholinergics (12% in CALIMA, 14% in

Page 38: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 38

SIROCCO, 25% IN ZONDA). There were no notable differences in use of these drugs between studies.

Critical Appraisal

Internal Validity

All included studies used appropriate methods to randomize and allocated patients. All trials were double-blinded, and blinding was facilitated by the use of a matched placebo. Injection-site reactions would be expected to occur more frequently with benralizumab than with placebo, and this might have resulted in accidental unblinding. However the percentage of patients with injection-site reactions was low (3% or less) and the risk of an injection-site reaction did not differ between groups. Therefore, any unblinding that might have occurred due to adverse events is unlikely to have biased the results in a significant way.

The percentage of patients withdrawing from CALIMA and SIROCCO ranged between 9% and 12%, with similar proportions between groups, and withdrawals in ZONDA were low — 6% with benralizumab and 4% with placebo. Larger numbers of data were missing for some patient-reported outcomes in CALIMA and SIROCCO; the manufacturer performed post hoc analyses on these outcomes, and the results were consistent with that of the original analysis. CALIMA and SIROCCO both employed multiple imputation methods to account for missing data, and these sensitivity analyses appeared to support the findings of their original analyses. The FDA statistical reviewer also performed a tipping point analysis, and again this supported the findings of the primary analysis, although the reviewer noted that, with respect to CALIMA, “the results were not so robust to withstand a big variation of assumptions” within the analysis.19

Sample size calculations were performed in each of the included studies, and in CALIMA and SIROCCO these calculations were carried out in the subgroup of interest in the study (eosinophil counts of ≥ 300 cells/µL and high-dose ICS) and the minimum requirements for enrolment appear to have been met for each of the subgroups. ZONDA planned a relatively small sample size compared with the other two studies, and this may have been due to the fact that the phenotype they were looking for is quite uncommon, according to the clinical expert consulted for this review.

The manufacturer employed a hierarchical testing procedure to control for multiple statistical comparisons in both CALIMA and SIROCCO. The hierarchy included the following outcomes: annualized exacerbation rate, FEV1, and TASS. The remaining outcomes, including other key outcomes for this CDR review, namely health-related quality of life and exacerbations resulting in hospitalizations and emergency room (ER) visits, were not controlled for multiplicity, which increases the risk of making a type I error. In ZONDA there was no accounting for multiplicity for any of the secondary efficacy outcomes.

A number of subgroup analyses were performed, with interaction P values reported, and a number of these subgroups were of interest for this review. However, no adjustments were made for multiple comparisons involving these subgroups. Also, the subgroups did not maintain the strata upon which randomization was based, and this is a limitation as it compromises randomization and introduces the potential for bias, both known and unknown.

The FDA statistical reviewer noted errors in dose titration with some patients in ZONDA. Specifically, 4.5% of patients had their OCS dose down-titrated despite not meeting the criteria for down-titration, while 5% of patients failed to have their dose down-titrated despite

Page 39: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 39

meeting the criteria. The manufacturer assumed that the fact that the errors in dosing occurred in roughly equivalent percentages of patients in either direction, thereby cancelling the effects of each other out. The FDA reviewer agreed with the manufacturer’s assessment, but expressed concern that such an error could happen in a pivotal trial and leading the reviewer to “doubt the overall quality of data generated from this trial.”19 Concerned with the overall high proportion of protocol deviations, the FDA reviewer performed an independent per-protocol analysis that supported the results of the primary analysis.19

The included studies defined the FAS as including all patients who were randomized and treated, and therefore this is not reflective of a true ITT analysis, in which all patients randomized are included, regardless of whether they were treated. However, all randomized patients appear to have been treated, and therefore the use of the FAS for assessment of efficacy outcomes is not expected to influence the treatment effect.

External Validity

There were no active comparators in each of the included studies, most notably other biologics such as omalizumab, mepolizumab, and reslizumab, the latter two drugs being IL-5 inhibitors. Omalizumab is a monoclonal antibody to IgE, and is approved for moderate to severe persistent asthma in patients with allergy-induced phenotype.

The populations enrolled in the included studies generally reflected the populations that would be candidates for benralizumab, according to the clinical expert consulted for this review. Between 9% and 18% of patients across groups in CALIMA and SIROCCO were identified as taking OCS at baseline, under maintenance therapy. If this range represents patients requiring chronic OCS to manage their asthma, it would be higher than the estimate of approximately 5% provided by the clinical expert consulted by CADTH on this review. However, it is unclear whether these patients were using OCS on a chronic basis, as in ZONDA, or whether they were simply on short-term OCS when baseline assessments were performed. In ZONDA, all patients were required to be on chronic OCS at baseline, and there was a run-in phase where their reliance on OCS to maintain control of their asthma was confirmed. Such a run-in phase to determine OCS use was not part of the design of CALIMA or SIROCCO, so even if patients were taking OCS chronically there was no way of determining whether they needed the drug to maintain asthma control, as was established in ZONDA. The expert noted that current smokers were excluded from the studies, despite the fact that there are a number of patients with asthma who smoke; this is therefore a potential generalizability issue. The populations of both CALIMA and SIROCCO were enriched with patients with high eosinophil counts — patients that would most be expected to respond to a drug that targets eosinophils. It is noteworthy that a relatively large proportion of patients were screened out of the included studies, and it is not clear why the numbers were so large.

The primary outcomes of all the included studies were relevant in assessing the efficacy of asthma drugs in these populations, according to the clinical expert consulted by CDR on this review. Exacerbations are an important contributor to the pathophysiology of asthma, as they are believed to accelerate and entrench remodelling of the airways, and the definitions used in the included trials ensured that the exacerbations were associated with cost drivers within the health care system, such as hospitalizations and ER and physician visits, or with OCS use, which has important adverse effects. ZONDA focused on patients whose asthma was severe enough to require chronic OSC use, and the primary outcome focused on the reduction of OCS dose. In CALIMA and in SIROCCO, the primary analysis focused on patients with high eosinophil counts (at or above 300 cells/µL), while the indication for

Page 40: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 40

benralizumab merely states that patients should have eosinophilic asthma, without defining a minimum eosinophil count. The manufacturer has proposed reimbursement criteria that more precisely follow the design and findings of the pivotal trials.

None of the included studies were of sufficient duration to assess long-term safety. Benralizumab and other IL-5 inhibitors employ a novel mechanism of action and thus it will be important to monitor for safety issues as their use becomes more widespread and as the length of time they are on the market increases. As these drugs modulate immune/inflammatory responses, one of the potential long-term concerns is development of malignancies. There are longer- term extension trials that are designed to assess the safety of benralizumab, and these are summarized in Appendix 6.

Eosinophil counts for inclusion in all studies relied on peripheral (blood) sampling versus induced sputum, despite the fact that sputum is considered to be a more accurate method for assessing eosinophil levels. The clinical expert consulted by CADTH on this review noted that sputum sampling is much more time-consuming to carry out and this is likely the reason that the manufacturer used blood for sampling. The clinical expert also noted that there are limitations in sampling for eosinophils in general, such as cost, patient discomfort, and lack of sensitivity and specificity, and there is no ideal method for measuring eosinophils.

Efficacy

Only those efficacy outcomes identified in the review protocol are reported below (Table 3). See Table 8 and Table 9 for detailed efficacy data. The primary analyses for all efficacy outcomes in CALIMA and ZONDA were carried out in the population of patients with eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/µL and on high-dose ICS.

Mortality

Across the studies there were six deaths (1% of patients) in the benralizumab group and three (< 1%) with placebo. Only one death in a benralizumab-treated patient was respiratory-related (pneumonia, in ZONDA) (Table 8).

Exacerbations

The primary outcome of both CALIMA and SIROCCO was the annualized exacerbation rate. The primary analysis in CALIMA and SIROCCO was based on the population with eosinophils ≥ 300 cells/µL and on high-dose ICS. The annualized exacerbation rate was lower for benralizumab versus placebo in both CALIMA over 56 weeks (rate ratio of 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.95; P = 0.019) and SIROCCO over 48 weeks (rate ratio of 0.49; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.64; P < 0.001), and these differences were statistically significant (Table 8). In response to a request from CDR, the manufacturer also provided data for the FAS for both studies. It should be noted that this was a post hoc analysis, and the full data are summarized in Appendix 4 (Table 15). The results for the FAS are consistent with that of the primary analysis.

The rate ratio for the annualized exacerbation rate for benralizumab versus placebo over 28 weeks in ZONDA was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.17 to 0.53; P < 0.001) (Table 9). This outcome does not appear to have been adjusted for multiple comparisons in ZONDA.

The time to first asthma exacerbation was also reported, with a hazard ratio for benralizumab to placebo of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.95; P ≤ 0.018) in CALIMA, 0.60 (95% CI,

Page 41: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 41

0.46 to 0.78; P < 0.001) in SIROCCO, and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.17 to 0.57; P < 0.001) in ZONDA.

A total of 40% of benralizumab patients and 51% of placebo patients had at least one exacerbation over the course of 56 weeks in CALIMA and 35% of benralizumab and 51% of placebo patients over 48 weeks in SIROCCO. In ZONDA, 23% of benralizumab and 52% of placebo patients had at least one exacerbation over 28 weeks. No statistical analyses were reported for this outcome in the Clinical Study Report.

Subgroups

Analyses were reported in CALIMA and SIROCCO for subgroups of interest to this review: baseline use of OCS, baseline eosinophils, baseline IgE, and prior use of omalizumab (Table 14). Baseline use of asthma controller medication was already stratified in the design of the studies, as all patients in SIROCCO were on high-dose ICS, and both studies reported the primary analysis in this population. Eosinophil counts were also part of the primary analysis, as it focused on patients with eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/µL. Only interactions with P values below 0.05 will be noted here; the remaining are found in Table 14. Results were compared in SIROCCO for the subgroup of patients who were on baseline OCS (rate ratio of 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.60; P < 0.001) versus those not on OCS (0.54; (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.73; P < 0.001) and the P value for the interaction by baseline OCS use was 0.039. Also in SIROCCO, there was an interaction P value of 0.008 based on IgE, with the largest treatment effect found in those with the highest baseline IgE (> 700 KU/L), with a rate ratio of 0.41 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.81; P = 0.011), followed by those with an IgE between 30 KU/L and 700 KU/L (rate ratio of 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.67; P < 0.001).

Hospitalizations, MD, Emergency Department Visits Due to Exacerbations

In CALIMA, the percentage of patients with exacerbations leading to hospitalizations or emergency department visits was 8.4% with benralizumab and 8.1% with placebo groups over 56 weeks, while in SIROCCO the percentages were 6.7% with benralizumab and 13.9% with placebo groups over 48 weeks and in ZONDA the percentages were 1.4% with benralizumab and 12.0% with placebo groups over 28 weeks (Table 8 and Table 9). As a post hoc analysis, the manufacturer also presented data on the annual exacerbation rate leading to emergency department visits or hospitalizations. In CALIMA the rate ratio for benralizumab versus placebo was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.64 to 2.35; P = 0.538); in SIROCCO, the rate ratio was 0.37 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.67; P < 0.001) and in ZONDA the rate ratio for benralizumab versus placebo was 0.07 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.63; P = 0.018).

Health-Related Quality of Life

The primary analysis in CALIMA and SIROCCO was based on the population with eosinophils ≥ 300 cells/µL and on high-dose ICS. In CALIMA, mean (SD) increase (improvement) in AQLQ12+ score was 1.61 (1.24) for benralizumab and 1.32 (1.19) for placebo groups after 56 weeks (least squares [LS] mean difference [MD] of 0.24; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.45; P = 0.019). In SIROCCO mean (SD) increase (improvement) in AQLQ12+ score was 1.56 (1.17) for benralizumab and 1.25 (1.18) for placebo after 48 weeks (LS MD of 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.50; P = 0.004) (Table 8). The results in the FAS population, provided by the manufacturer in a post hoc analysis, were consistent with the results from the primary analysis (Table 15). Change from baseline in the EQ-5D was reported but no statistical comparisons were provided.

Page 42: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 42

In ZONDA, mean (SD) increase (improvement) in AQLQ12+ score was 1.05 (1.0) for benralizumab and 0.67 (1.1) for placebo after 28 weeks (LS MD of 0.45; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.76; P = 0.004) (Table 9). Note that none of these statistical analyses were adjusted for multiple comparisons and should be considered hypothesis-generating.

Oral Corticosteroid Use

In ZONDA, the per cent reduction in OCS dose was the primary outcome, there was a greater reduction in corticosteroid dose with benralizumab than with placebo, and this difference was statistically significant (estimate for difference between groups of 37.5%; 95% CI, 20.8% to 50.0%; P < 0.001) (Table 9). The percentage of patients able to reduce their dose by different percentages (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%) was also reported. In total, 30% of patients treated with benralizumab and 11% of patients treated with placebo were able to reduce their dose by 100%.

Use of an OCS associated with exacerbations was a secondary outcome in both CALIMA and SIROCCO, although no statistical analyses were planned or provided for these outcomes (Table 8). In CALIMA, the mean (SD) total OCS dose per patient associated with an exacerbation was vvvvv vvvvvvv grams with benralizumab and vvvvv vvvvvvv grams with placebo. In SIROCCO, the mean (SD) total OCS dose per patient associated with an exacerbation was vvvvv vvvvvvv with benralizumab and vvvvv vvvvvvv with placebo. In CALIMA the mean (SD) number of OCS treatment days was vvvvv vvvvvvv with benralizumab and vvvvv vvvvvvv with placebo. In SIROCCO, the mean (SD) number of OCS treatment days was vvvv vvvvvv with benralizumab and vvvv vvvvvv days with placebo.

Days Missed from Work/School

Absenteeism was reported as per cent of hours missed. However, no statistical analysis was planned in either CALIMA or SIROCCO (Table 8, Table 9). In CALIMA, the mean (SD) percentage of hours missed from work was vvvv vvvvvv with benralizumab versus vvvv vvvvvv and the mean (SD) percentage of hours missed from school was vvvv with benralizumab and vvvv vvvvvv with placebo. In SIROCCO, the mean (SD) percentage of hours missed from work was vvvv vvvvvvv with benralizumab and vvvv vvvvvvv with placebo and of hours missed from work was vvvvv vvvvv) with benralizumab and vvvvv vvvvvv with placebo.

Other Efficacy Outcomes

The primary analysis population for other efficacy outcomes in CALIMA and SIROCCO were those patients with high baseline eosinophils (≥ 300 cells/µL) and on high-dose ICS.

Pulmonary Function

Pre-bronchodilator change from baseline in FEV1 was an outcome that was controlled for multiplicity in CALIMA and SIROCCO. In both studies FEV1 was improved versus placebo, and these differences were statistically significant in CALIMA (LS MD of 0.116; 95% CI, 0.028 to 0.204; P = 0.010) and in SIROCCO (0.159; 95% CI, 0.068 to 0.249; P = 0.001) (Table 10). In the FAS population, in a post hoc analysis provided by the manufacturer, results for FEV1 were not consistent with the primary analysis in CALIMA, but were consistent with the primary analysis in SIROCCO (Table 16).

Page 43: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 43

Changes in PEF were reported in both morning and afternoon, for benralizumab versus placebo, in both studies. PEF was not adjusted for multiplicity.

Symptoms

The change from baseline in TASS was a key secondary outcome in both CALIMA and SIROCCO, and thus was controlled for multiple comparisons. TASS was reduced (improved) for benralizumab versus placebo in both studies and these differences were statistically significant in both CALIMA (LS MD of −0.23; 95% CI, −0.43 to −0.04; P = 0.019) and SIROCCO (−0.25; 95% CI, −0.45 to −0.06; P = 0.012) (Table 8). Results for the TASS in the FAS population were provided by the manufacturer as a post hoc analysis, and the results were not consistent with the primary analysis for CALIMA but were consistent with the primary analysis for SIROCCO (Table 16).

The ACQ-6 was also used to assess symptoms in both CALIMA and SIROCCO. The total ACQ-6 score was decreased (improved) from baseline for benralizumab versus placebo in both CALIMA (LS MD of -0.25; 95% CI, −0.44 to −0.07; P = 0.008) and SIROCCO (LS MD of −0.29; 95%CI, −0.48 to −0.10; P = 0.003).

Mean (SD) change in rescue medication use over the course of 56 weeks in CALIMA was vvvvv vvvvvv puffs/day with benralizumab and vvvvv vvvvvv puffs/day with placebo and over 48 weeks in SIROCCO was vvvvv vvvvvv puffs/day with benralizumab and vvvvv vvvvvv puffs/day with placebo, and over 28 weeks in ZONDA was vvvvv vvvvvv puffs/day with benralizumab and vvvvv vvvvvv puffs/day with placebo.

Nocturnal Awakenings

The least squares mean change from baseline in percentage of nights with nocturnal awakenings over 56 weeks in CALIMA for benralizumab versus placebo was vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv v v vvvvv, over 48 weeks in SIROCCO was vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv, and over 28 weeks in ZONDA was vvvvv vvvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvv. None of these analyses were adjusted for multiple statistical comparisons.

Eosinophil Counts

Eosinophil counts, LS MD, benralizumab versus placebo group, after 56 weeks in CALIMA were 105.0% (95% CI, −115.1 to −94.96; P < 0.001), after 48 weeks in SIROCCO they were −99.59% (95% CI, −113.6 to −85.59; P < 0.001), and after 28 weeks in ZONDA they were −159.4% (95% CI, −217.9 to −100.9; P < 0.001). None of these outcomes were adjusted for multiple statistical comparisons.

Two other efficacy outcomes that were not studied in the included trials were the percentage of asthma symptom-free days or nights and the reduction in use of ICS. Regarding the latter outcome, patients in the included studies were required to continue on their current ICS dose during the study.

Page 44: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 44

Table 8: Key Efficacy Outcomes for CALIMA, SIROCCO

CALIMA SIROCCO

Benralizumab Q8W

Placebo Benralizumab Q8W

Placebo

Mortality

Deaths, n 2/441 (< 1%) 1/440 (< 1%) 2/398 (1%) 2/407 (< 1%)

Primary analysis population for all outcomes: blood eosinophils ≥ 300 cells/μL, on high-dose ICS

N = 239 N = 248 N = 267 N = 267

Exacerbations

Annual exacerbation rate, estimate after 56 weeks in CALIMA and 48 weeks in SIROCCO

0.66 0.93 0.65 1.33

Rate ratio (95% CI)a 0.72 (0.54 to 0.95), P = 0.019 0.49 (0.37 to 0.64), P < 0.001

Patients with ≥ 1 exacerbation after 56 weeks in CALIMA and 48 weeks in SIROCCO, n (%)

95 (39.7)

126 (50.8)

93/267 (34.8)

135/267 (50.6)

Time to first exacerbation, hazard ratio (95% CI)b,c 0.73 (0.55 to 0.95), P ≤ 0.018 0.60 (0.46 to 0.78), P < 0.001

Hospitalization, Physician, ED Visits Due to Exacerbations

N = 239 N = 248 N = 267 N = 267

Patients with ≥ 1 exacerbation associated with hospitalization or ED visit, adjudicated events, n (%): after 56 weeks for CALIMA; after 48 weeks for SIROCCO

Hospitalization or ED visit, n (%) 20 (8.4) 20 (8.1) 18 (6.7) 37 (13.9)

Hospitalization, n (%) 14 (5.9) 12 (4.8) 12 (4.5) 20 (7.5)

ED visit, n (%) 12 (5.0) 18 (7.3) 6 (2.2) 20 (7.5)

Annual exacerbation rate associated with an adjudicated ER visit or hospitalization (95% CI)

0.05 (0.03 to 0.08)

0.04 (0.02 to 0.07)

0.06 (0.04 to 0.11)

0.18 (0.13 to 0.25)

Rate ratio [95% CI]a,c 1.23 (0.64 to 2.35), P = 0.538 0.37 (0.20 to 0.67), P < 0.001

HRQoL

Mean (SD) baseline overall AQLQ12+ score 3.87 (1.05) N = 232

3.93 (1.04) N = 240

3.93 (0.97) N = 267

3.87 (0.99) N = 267

Mean (SD) Change from baseline in overall AQLQ12+ score at week 56 in CALIMA and week 48 in SIROCCO

1.61 (1.24) N = 180

1.32 (1.19) N = 191

1.56 (1.17) N = 187

1.25 (1.18) N = 180

Repeated measures analysis for change from baseline in overall AQLQ12+ score at week 56 in CALIMA and week 48 in SIROCCO

1.56 N = 230

1.31 N = 240

1.56 N = 252

1.26 N = 254

LS MD (95%CI)c,d 0.24 (0.04, 0.45), P =0.019 0.30 (0.10, 0.50), P = 0.004

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv v v vvv

vvvv vvvvvv v v vvv

vvvv vvvvvv v v vvv

vvvv vvvvvv v v vvv

vvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv v v vvv

vvvv vvvvvv v v vvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v v vv v v vvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

Page 45: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 45

CALIMA SIROCCO

Benralizumab Q8W

Placebo Benralizumab Q8W

Placebo

v v vvv v v vvv v v vvv v v vvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv v v vv

vvvv vvvvvv v v vv

vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv v v vv

vvvv vvvvv v v vv

vvvv vvvvvv v v vv

vvvvv vvvvvv v v vv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvv v v v v

vvvvv vvvvvv v v v

vvvvv vvvvvv v v v

vvvvv vvvvvv v v vv

ACQ-6 = Asthma Control Questionnaire-6; AQLQ12+ = Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 years and older; CI = confidence interval; ED = emergency department; EQ-5D-5L = EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Level questionnaire; ER = emergency room; ICS = inhaled corticosteroids; LS = least squares MD = mean difference; MI = myocardial infarction; OCS = oral corticosteroid; PE = pulmonary embolism; Q8W = every eight weeks; SD = standard deviation. a Statistical analysis model: a negative binomial model including covariates treatment group, region, number of exacerbations in the previous year, and use of maintenance oral corticosteroids. Total follow-up time was defined as the time from randomization to the date of week 56 visit (end of treatment) or last contact if the patient was lost to follow-up. The log of each patient’s corresponding follow-up time was used as an offset variable in the model to adjust for patients having different exposure times during which the events occurred. Annual exacerbation rates were model estimated. b Cox proportional hazards model, which included covariates of treatment group, region, number of exacerbations in previous year, and use of maintenance OCS. c This analysis was not adjusted for multiplicity. d The model was: change from baseline in AQLQ12+ score = treatment + baseline AQLQ12+ score + region + use of maintenance oral corticosteroids + visit + treatment × visit. The number of patients in the repeated measures analysis represents all patients with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. A positive change in score denotes improvement. e For the EQ-5D a positive change in score denotes improvement.

Source: Clinical Study Report for CALIMA and SIROCCO.4,5

Table 9: Key Efficacy Outcomes for ZONDA

ZONDA

Benralizumab Q8W

N = 73

Placebo N = 75

Mortality

Deaths, n 2/73 (3%) 0

OCS Dose

Mean (SD) baseline daily OCS dose (mg) 14.28 (7.756) 14.15 (6.353)

Mean (SD) per cent reduction from baseline to week 28 57.75 (43.561) 20.48 (54.446)

Analysis for % reduction from baseline in final OCS dose at week 28 while maintaining asthma control Estimate for difference (95% CI)a

37.50 (20.80 to 50.00), P < 0.001

Patients with ≥ 25% reduction from baseline in final OCS dose at week 28, n (%)

57 (78.1) 38 (50.7)

Odds ratio (95% CI) 3.25 (1.62 to 6.52), P < 0.001

≥ 50% reduction in dose, n (%) 48 (65.8) 28 (37.3)

Odds ratio (95% CI) 3.03 (1.57 to 5.86), P < 0.001

100% reduction in dose, n (%) 22 (30.1) 8 (10.7)

Odds ratio (95% CI) 3.63 (1.47 to 9.00), P = 0.004

Exacerbations

Annual exacerbation rate, estimate (95% CI) 0.54 (0.33 to 0.87) 1.80 (1.32 to 2.46)

Page 46: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 46

ZONDA

Benralizumab Q8W

N = 73

Placebo N = 75

Rate ratio (95% CI)b,c 0.30 (0.17 to 0.53), P < 0.001

Patients with ≥ 1 exacerbation, n (%) 17 (23.3) 39 (52.0)

Time to first exacerbation, hazard ratio (95% CI)d 0.32 (0.17 to 0.57), P < 0.001

Total number of exacerbations/follow-up years 0.55 1.80

Hospitalization, Physician, ER Visits Due to Exacerbations

Patients with ≥ 1 exacerbation associated with hospitalization or ER visit, investigator assessment, n

1 14

Hospitalization or ER visit, n (%) 1 (1.4) 9 (12.0)

Hospitalization, n (%) 1 (1.4) 6 (8.0)

ER visit, n (%) 0 4 (5.3)

Annual exacerbation rate associated with ER/hospitalization, estimate (95% CI)

0.01 (0.00 to 0.08) 0.12 (0.04 to 0.35)

Rate ratio (95% CI)e 0.07 (0.01 to 0.63), P = 0.018

HRQoL

Mean (SD) baseline overall AQLQ12+ score 4.44 (1.3) 4.11 (1.1)

Mean (SD) change from baseline week 28 1.05 (1.0) 0.67 (1.1)

Mean (SD) change from baseline overall 0.80 (0.9) 0.51 (0.8)

Repeated measures analysis for change from baseline in overall AQLQ12+ score at week 28, estimate for difference (95% CI)f

0.45 (0.14 to 0.76), P = 0.004

AQLQ12+ = Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 years and older; CI = confidence interval; ER = emergency room; OCS = oral corticosteroid; Q8W = every eight weeks; SD = standard deviation. a The Wilcoxon rank sum test was the primary analysis method and was used for the multiplicity-protected end point. Estimate of the median per cent reduction from baseline in final OCS dose in the two treatment groups was compared with the placebo group using a Wilcoxon rank sum test, yielding the P value presented. b Statistical analysis model: a negative binomial model including covariates treatment group, region, and number of exacerbations in the previous year. Total follow-up time was defined as the time from randomization to the date of week 28 visit (end of treatment) or last contact if the patient was lost to follow-up. The log of each patient’s corresponding follow-up time was used as an offset variable in the model to adjust for patients having different exposure times during which the events occurred. c This analyses was not controlled for multiplicity. d Cox proportional hazards model, which included covariates of treatment group, region, number of exacerbations in previous year, and use of maintenance OCS. e Statistical analysis model: a negative binomial model including covariates treatment group, region, and any exacerbations in the previous year requiring hospitalization or ER visit. Total follow-up time was defined as the time from randomization to the date of week 28 visit (end of treatment) or last contact if the patient was lost to follow-up. The log of each patient’s corresponding follow-up time was used as an offset variable in the model to adjust for patients having different exposure times during which the events occurred. f Estimates are least squares means. The model is: change from baseline in AQLQ12+ score = treatment + baseline AQLQ12+ score + region+ visit + treatment × visit. An increase from baseline denotes improvement.

Source: Clinical Study Report for ZONDA.6

Page 47: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 47

Table 10: Other Efficacy Outcomes (CALIMA, SIROCCO)

CALIMA SIROCCO

BEN Q8W

PLACEBO BEN Q8W

PLACEBO

Primary analysis population for all outcomes: blood eosinophils ≥ 300 cells/μL, on high-dose ICS

N = 239 N = 248 N = 267 N = 267

FEV1 Mean (SD) baseline FEV1, litres 1.758 (0.622)

N = 239 1.815 (0.648)

N = 245 1.660 (0.574)

N = 267 1.654 (0.580)

N = 267 Pre-bronchodilator mean (SD) change from baseline in FEV1 at week 56 in CALIMA and week 48 in SIROCCO, litres

0.332 (0.518) N = 211

0.206 (0.471) N = 221

0.398 (0.546) N = 235

0.237 (0.508) N = 233

Repeated measures analysis for pre-bronchodilator change from baseline in FEV1 at week 56 in CALIMA and week 48 in SIROCCO, litres, LS mean change

0.330 N = 238

0.215 N = 244

0.398 N = 264

0.239 N = 261

LS mean difference (95% CI)a 0.116 (0.028 to 0.204), P = 0.010 0.159 (0.068 to 0.249), P = 0.001 Peak Expiratory Flow Mean (SD) baseline PEF, L/minute – a.m. 246.422

(118.859) N = 236

250.123 (118.155) N = 246

230.074 (112.487) N = 261

230.025 (107.021) N = 264

Mean (SD) change from baseline in PEF at week 56 in CALIMA and week 48 in SIROCCO, L/minute

43.375 (91.865) N = 193

23.961 (71.509) N = 197

36.994 (72.002) N = 181

22.059 (74.434) N = 189

Repeated measures analysis for change from baseline in PEF at week 56 in CALIMA and week 48 in SIROCCO, L/minute, LS mean change

38.13 N = 235

22.86 N = 246

38.96 N = 260

22.51 N = 264

LS mean difference (95% CI)b 15.27 (0.90 to 29.64), P = 0.037 16.46 (2.08 to 30.83), P = 0.025 Mean (SD) baseline PEF, L/minute – p.m. 257.116

(117.253) N = 236

263.998 (121.090) N = 248

241.989 (113.409) N = 262

239.750 (106.080) N = 264

Mean (SD) change from baseline in PEF at week 56 in CALIMA and week 48 in SIROCCO, L/minute

39.270 (89.772) N = 192

15.448 (78.341) N = 197

33.460 (74.017) N = 187

14.784 (68.799) N = 189

Repeated measures analysis for change from baseline in PEF at week 56 in CALIMA and week 48 in SIROCCO, L/minute, LS mean change

33.59 N = 236

12.37 N = 246

34.91 N = 261

15.73 N = 264

LS mean difference (95% CI)b 21.22 (6.65 to 35.79), P = 0.004 19.18 (5.09 to 33.28), P = 0.008 Symptoms Mean (SD) baseline total asthma symptom score 2.76 (1.06)

N = 238 2.71 (1.06)

N = 247 2.68 (1.09)

N = 265 2.74 (1.08)

N = 267 Mean (SD) change from baseline in total asthma symptom score at Week 56 in CALIMA and week 48 in SIROCCO

−1.40 (1.17) N = 185

−1.20 (1.19) N = 187

−1.34 (1.27) N = 178

−1.03 (1.07) N = 180

Repeated measures analysis for change from baseline in total asthma symptom score at week 56 in CALIMA and week 48 in SIROCCO, LS mean change

−1.40 N = 237

−1.16 N = 247

−1.30 N = 263

−1.04 N = 267

LS mean difference (95% CI)c −0.23 (−0.43 to −0.04), P = 0.019

−0.25 (−0.45 to -0.06), P = 0.012

Baseline ACQ-6 score mean (SD) 2.80 (0.95) N = 239

2.75 (0.94) N = 248

2.81 (0.89) N = 267

2.90 (0.95) N = 267

Mean (SD) change from baseline in ACQ-6 score at week 56 in CALIMA and week 48 in SIROCCO

−1.49 (1.13) N = 185

−1.21 (1.12) N = 197

−1.47 (1.05) N = 191

−1.12 (1.15) N = 186

Repeated measures analysis for change from baseline in ACQ-6 score at week 56 in CALIMA and week 48 in SIROCCO

−1.44 N = 239

−1.19 N = 247

−1.46 N = 263

−1.17 N = 267

LS mean difference (95% CI)d

−0.25 (−0.44 to −0.07),

P = 0.008 −0.29 (−0.48 to −0.10),

P = 0.003

Page 48: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 48

CALIMA SIROCCO

BEN Q8W

PLACEBO BEN Q8W

PLACEBO

Rescue Medication Use vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv

v v vvv vvvv vvvvvv

v v vvv vvvv vvvvvv

v v vvv vvvv vvvvvv

v v vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv v v vvv

vvvvv vvvvvv v v vvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv v v vvv

vvvvv v v vvv

vvvvv v v vvv

vvvvv v v vvv

vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv v v vvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv v v vvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv v v vvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv v v vvv

vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvv

vvvvv v v vvv

vvvvv v v vvv

vvvvv v v vvv

vvvvv v v vvv

vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv v −0.03 (−0.08 to 0.01), P = 0.146 −0.06 (−0.11 to −0.01), P = 0.012 Eosinophil Counts Mean (SD) baseline blood eosinophil counts, cells/μL 576.9 (386.84)

N = 239 583.1 (460.17)

N = 248 551.2 (432.66)

N = 276 566.6 (360.93)

N = 265 Mean (SD) % change from baseline in blood eosinophil counts at week 56 in CALIMA and week 48 in SIROCCO

−92.2 (27.65) N = 193

26.5 (435.72) N = 200

−92.2 (31.98) N = 208

6.4 (126.90) N = 201

Repeated measures analysis for per cent change from baseline in blood eosinophil counts at week 56 in CALIMA and week 48 in SIROCCO

−89.0 N = 238

17.72 N = 245

−92.7 N = 264

6.85 N = 263

LS mean difference (95% CI)g −106.8 (−149.7 to −63.88), P < 0.001

−99.59 (−113.6 to −85.59), P < 0.001

ACQ-6 = six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire; BEN = benralizumab; CI = confidence interval; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second; ICS = inhaled corticosteroid; LS = least squares; PEF = peak expiratory flow; Q8W = every eight weeks; SD = standard deviation. a The model was: change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 = treatment + baseline pre-bronchodilator FEV1 + region + use of maintenance oral corticosteroids + visit + treatment × visit. The number of patients in the repeated measures analysis represents all patients with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. b The model was: change from baseline in morning/evening PEF = treatment + baseline morning/evening PEF + region + use of maintenance oral corticosteroids + visit + treatment × visit. The number of patients in the repeated measures analysis represents all patients with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. c The model was: change from baseline in asthma symptom score = treatment + baseline asthma symptom score + region + use of maintenance oral corticosteroids + visit + treatment × visit. The number of patients in the repeated measures analysis represents all patients with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. d The model was: change from baseline in ACQ-6 score = treatment + baseline ACQ-6 score + region + use of maintenance oral corticosteroids + visit + treatment × visit. The number of patients in the repeated measures analysis represents all patients with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. e The model was: change from baseline in total asthma rescue medication use = treatment + baseline total asthma rescue medication use + region + use of maintenance oral corticosteroids + visit + treatment × visit. The number of patients in the repeated measures analysis represents all patients with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. f The model was: change from baseline in proportion of nights with nocturnal awakenings = treatment + baseline proportion of nights with nocturnal awakenings + region + use of maintenance oral corticosteroids + visit + treatment × visit. The number of patients in the repeated measures analysis represents all patients with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. g The model was: per cent change from baseline in blood eosinophil count = treatment group + baseline eosinophil count + region + use of maintenance oral corticosteroids + visit + treatment × visit. The number of patients in the repeated measures analysis represents all patients with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment.

Source: Clinical Study Report for CALIMA, SIROCCO.4,5

Page 49: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 49

Table 11: Other Efficacy Outcomes (ZONDA)

ZONDA

BEN Q8W N = 73

PLACEBO N = 75

FEV1 Mean (SD) baseline FEV1, L 1.754 (0.635) 1.931 (0.662) Pre-bronchodilator mean (SD) change from baseline in FEV1 at week 28, litres 0.255 (0.508) 0.114 (0.401) Repeated measures analysis for pre-bronchodilator change from baseline in FEV1 at week 28 LS mean change, litres

0.239 0.126

LS mean difference (95% CI)a 0.112 (−0.033 to 0.258), P = 0.129 Peak Expiratory Flow Mean (SD) baseline PEF (L/minute) – a.m. 246.4 (130.2) 262.3 (114.9) Repeated measures analysis for change from baseline in PEF at week 56 (L/minute) LS mean change

39.78 9.77

LS mean difference (95% CI)a 30.01 (4.26 to 55.76), P = 0.023 Mean (SD) baseline PEF (L/minute) – p.m. 263.3 (133.9) 286.1 (125.2) Repeated measures analysis for change from baseline in PEF at week 56 (L/minute) LS mean change

32.33 0.81

LS mean difference (95% CI)a 31.52 (6.32 to 56.71), P = 0.014 Symptoms Mean (SD) baseline total asthma symptom score 2.34 (1.09) 2.43 (0.99) Total asthma symptom score mean (SD) change from baseline at week 28 −0.77 (1.03) −0.58 (1.03) Difference in LS means (95% CI)b −0.18 (−0.51 to 0.16), P = 0.291 Mean (SD) baseline ACQ-6 score 2.42 (1.21) 2.68 (0.95) Mean (SD) change from baseline in ACQ-6 score at week 28 −1.09 (1.09) −0.68 (1.10) LS mean difference (95% CI)c −0.55 (−0.86 to −0.23), P = 0.001 Rescue Medication Use Mean (SD) baseline asthma rescue medication use (puffs/day) 4.30 (5.62) 4.05 (5.43) vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvv vv

vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvv Eosinophil Counts Mean (SD) baseline blood eosinophil counts, cells/μL 434.9 (324.73) 464.3 (315.74) Mean (SD) blood eosinophil counts at week 28, cells/μL 12.2 (56.47) 467.4 (476.10) Mean (SD) % change from baseline in blood eosinophil counts at week 28 (%) −94.9 (16.54) 45.5 (239.51) LS mean difference (95% CI)f −159.4 (−217.0 to −100.9),

P < 0.001 ACQ-6 = six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire; BEN = benralizumab; CI = confidence interval; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second; LS = least squares; PEF = peak expiratory flow; Q8W = every eight weeks; SD = standard deviation.

Note: Estimate of the mean change from baseline at each week in the treatment group is compared with the placebo group using a repeated measures analysis. Estimates are least squares means. The number of patients in the repeated measures analysis represents all patients with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. a The model was: change from baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 = treatment + baseline pre-bronchodilator FEV1 + region + visit + treatment × visit. b The model was: change from baseline in asthma symptom score = treatment + baseline asthma symptom score + region + visit + treatment × visit. c The model was: change from baseline in ACQ-6 score = treatment + baseline ACQ-6 score + region + visit + treatment × visit. d The model was: change from baseline in total asthma rescue medication use = treatment + baseline total asthma rescue medication use

+ region + visit + treatment × visit. e The model was: change from baseline in proportion of nights with nocturnal awakenings = treatment + baseline proportion of nights with nocturnal awakenings + region + visit + treatment × visit. f The model was: per cent change from baseline in blood eosinophil count = treatment group + baseline eosinophil count + region + visit + treatment × visit.

Page 50: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 50

Harms

Only those harms identified in the review protocol are reported below (see 2.2.1, Protocol). See Table 12 for detailed harms data.

Adverse Events

The percentage of patients with an adverse event was 76% with benralizumab and 79% with placebo in CALIMA, 72% with benralizumab and 77% with placebo in SIROCCO, and 75% with benralizumab and 83% with placebo in ZONDA (Table 12). The most common adverse events in all three studies were nasopharyngitis (CALIMA: 19% benralizumab versus 21% placebo; SIROCCO: 12% in each group; ZONDA: 15% with benralizumab and 20% placebo) and asthma (CALIMA: 11% with benralizumab versus 16% placebo; SIROCCO: 11% benralizumab versus 20%.placebo; and ZONDA: 3% benralizumab versus 24% placebo).

Serious Adverse Events

The percentage of patients with a serious adverse event was 14% in each group in SIROCCO and 10% of benralizumab and 14% of placebo patients in CALIMA. In ZONDA, 10% of benralizumab patients and 19% of placebo patients had a serious adverse event (Table 12).

Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events

Withdrawals due to an adverse event occurred in 2% of benralizumab versus 1% of placebo in CALIMA and SIROCCO, and in 4% of benralizumab versus 3% of placebo patients in ZONDA (Table 12).

Notable Harms

Notable harms included infection and immune and injection-site reactions. Upper respiratory tract infections occurred in benralizumab and placebo patients in each of the three studies (CALIMA: 9% benralizumab versus 10% placebo; SIROCCO: 8% benralizumab versus 9% placebo; ZONDA: 7% in each group), while influenza occurred in 3% of benralizumab and 6% of placebo patients in CALIMA, 5% of benralizumab versus 6% of placebo patients in SIROCCO, and 1% of benralizumab versus 7% of placebo patients in ZONDA (Table 12). Serious adverse events of infection were infrequent, such as pneumonia (CALIMA: 0% benralizumab versus 1% placebo; SIROCCO: 1% in each group; ZONDA: 3% in benralizumab versus 4% in placebo) and influenza (CALIMA:1% benralizumab versus 0% placebo; SIROCCO: 0% in benralizumab versus < 1% placebo; ZONDA: 0% in benralizumab versus 3% in placebo.

Page 51: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 51

Table 12: Harms

CALIMA SIROCCO ZONDA AEs BEN Q8W

N = 428 PLA

N = 440 BEN Q8W

N = 394 PLA

N = 407 BEN Q8W

N = 73 PLA

N = 75 Subjects with > 0 AEs, N (%) 323 (75.5) 348 (79.1) 282 (71.6) 313 (76.9) 55 (75.3) 62 (82.7) Most common AEs (10% in any group)

Nasopharyngitis 82 (19.2) 92 (20.9) 47 (11.9) 49 (12.0) 11 (15.1) 15 (20.0) Asthma 48 (11.2) 69 (15.7) 47 (11.0) 82 (20.1) 2 (2.7) 18 (24.0) Bronchitis 46 (10.7) 54 (12.3) 19 (4.8) 30 (7.4) 7 (9.6) 12 (16.0)

SAEs Subjects with > 0 SAEs, N (%) 41 (9.6) 61 (13.9) 54 (13.7) 58 (14.3) 7 (9.6) 14 (18.7) Most common SAEs Asthma 21 (4.8) 19 (4.4) 24 (6.1) 32 (7.9) 1 (1.4) 4 (5.3) WDAEs WDAEs, N (%) 10 (2.3) 5 (1.1) 8 (2.0) 3 (0.7) 3 (4.1) 2 (2.7) Notable Harms Patients, N (%) Upper respiratory tract infection 38 (8.9) 42 (9.5) 32 (8.1) 37 (9.1) 5 (6.8) 5 (6.7) Influenza 14 (3.3) 25 (5.7) 19 (4.8) 24 (5.9) 1 (1.4) 5 (6.7) Pneumonia – SAE 0 4 (0.9) 2 (0.5) 3 (0.7) 2 (2.7) 3 (4.0) Pneumonia bacterial – SAE 0 3 (0.7) 1 (0.3) 0 NR NR Influenza – SAE 2 (0.5) 0 0 1 (0.2) 0 2 (2.7) UTI – SAE 1 (0.2) 0 NR NR NR NR UTI bacterial – SAE NR NR 0 2 (0.5) NR NR Any hypersensitivity 13 (3.0) 17 (3.9) 11 (2.8) 11 (2.7) 2 (2.7) 1 (1.3) Injection-site reactions 9 (2.1) 8 (1.8) 9 (2.3) 8 (2.0) 0 2 (2.7) AE = adverse event; BEN = benralizumab; NR = not reported; Q8W = every eight weeks; NR = not reported; PLA = placebo; SAE = serious adverse event; UTI = urinary tract infection; WDAE = withdrawal due to adverse event.

Note: Adverse events are reported for the on-study period, which includes the treatment period and the follow-up period. Source: Clinical Study Report for CALIMA, SIROCCO, ZONDA.4-6

Page 52: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 52

Discussion

Summary of Available Evidence

Three manufacturer-sponsored multinational pivotal phase III DB RCTs are included in this systematic review. CALIMA (N = 1,306) and SIROCCO (N = 1,205) were similarly designed trials that compared benralizumab with placebo. The studies enrolled patients with high or lower eosinophil counts in a 2:1 ratio, respectively, and patients on medium- (CALIMA) or high-dose ICS (CALIMA and SIROCCO) with poor asthma control (two exacerbations in the past year), over a treatment course of 56 weeks (CALIMA) and 48 weeks (SIROCCO). The primary analysis in both studies focused on patients with high eosinophil counts (≥ 300 cells/µL) and on high-dose ICS. The primary outcome of both of these studies was the annualized exacerbation rate, and key secondary outcomes, controlled for multiplicity, included FEV1 and asthma symptom scores. Other outcomes not controlled for multiplicity included health-related quality of life, assessed by the AQLQ12+ and the EQ-5D-5L, exacerbations associated with hospitalizations or emergency department visits, symptoms using the ACQ-6, OCS use associated with exacerbations, absenteeism, PEF, rescue medication use, nocturnal awakenings, and eosinophil counts. ZONDA (N = 220) was a 28-week study that compared benralizumab with placebo in patients with severe asthma who required chronic use of oral corticosteroids. The primary outcome of ZONDA was the reduction in OCS dose from baseline. Secondary outcomes, not controlled for multiplicity, included annualized exacerbation rate, exacerbations associated with hospitalizations or emergency department visits, health-related quality of life assessed on the AQLQ12+, symptoms assessed using the ACQ-6, rescue medications, FEV1, PEF, and nocturnal awakenings.

Key limitations of these studies included the lack of an active comparator, including comparisons with other IL-5 inhibitors (mepolizumab and resolizumab) or omalizumab, lack of adjustments for multiple statistical testing across end points other than the primary and key secondary, subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Given the novelty of this therapeutic target, these studies were of relatively short duration to assess long-term safety of benralizumab.

Interpretation of Results

Efficacy

The annualized rate of asthma exacerbations was the primary outcome of both CALIMA and SIROCCO, and the primary analysis in both studies focused on the population of patients with high (≥ 300 cells/µL) eosinophil counts. However, the Health Canada indication does not specify a particular eosinophil count that patients must meet to be eligible for therapy. The manufacturer has requested reimbursement criteria that are more in line with the objectives and findings of the pivotal trials, namely patients with high eosinophil counts (≥ 300 cells/µL) or with eosinophil counts ≥ 150 cells/µL and on chronic high-dose OCS. The clinical expert consulted by CDR on this review noted that the population of patients treated with high-dose ICS and who remain with high eosinophil counts, though uncommon, represents an important unmet clinical need in asthma. Therefore the results demonstrating superiority of benralizumab to placebo for reduction in exacerbations in this population are likely to be clinically significant. However, it is noteworthy that exacerbations associated with ER visits and hospitalizations were not part of the statistical hierarchy and therefore limited

Page 53: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 53

conclusions can be drawn about this data, despite the fact that these events are important cost drivers. Results from the BORA extension (reviewed in Appendix 6), which enrolled patients who had been in CALIMA, SIROCCO, or ZONDA, suggest that the effect of benralizumab on vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvv vv vv vvv vvvvv.

Patients in ZONDA represent the most “steroid resistant” population in asthma, i.e., patients who are reliant on OCSs to maintain control of their asthma, and despite chronic use of OCSs and high-dose ICS, still have high eosinophil counts. The clinical expert consulted by CDR on this review noted how uncommon these patients were in clinical practice. However, the expert indicated that they are a challenging population to treat, and thus any drugs that can effectively treat this population would be filling an important gap. ZONDA demonstrated a steroid-sparing effect for benralizumab, reducing the mean OCS dose by greater than 50% compared with placebo, from a baseline of 14 mg daily prednisone equivalents. Long-term use of an OCS has been associated with several serious adverse effects, including osteoporosis, but the minimum dose and duration of therapy required to significantly elevate the risk of osteoporosis has not been established. A meta-analysis by Amiche et al. found that chronic OCS users were at increased risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, although they noted that the risk, though still elevated, seemed to decline somewhat with time. They concluded that the risk of fracture among OCS users may be higher than previously thought.38 Ideally, a study like ZONDA would have not only recorded a reduction in OCS dose with use of benralizumab, but would have gone further and demonstrated a corresponding improvement in bone mineral density, and, optimally, fractures. This would have required a longer follow-up than 28 weeks and this longer follow-up would have perhaps provided more information about the impact of OCS dose reduction on the risk of side effects. Chronic OCS use is associated with significant adverse effects, though approximately 30% of patients treated with benralizumab (versus 11% with placebo) were able to achieve a 100% reduction in OCS dose. Therefore, the remaining question is: how much benefit is derived by the remaining patients who continue on OCS but at a significantly reduced dose?

Benralizumab improved lung function, measured by FEV1 and PEF, in both CALIMA and SIROCCO, in which FEV1 was a secondary outcome that was controlled for multiplicity. However, the improvement versus placebo fell short of what is considered to be a clinically important difference that can be perceived by patients, and there are limited data available upon which to ascertain a minimally important improvement from a patient perspective (See Appendix 5 for detailed review). Improvement in PEF versus placebo was also less than what is considered to be a clinically important difference as perceived by patients.

Symptom scores were assessed using the TASS, which is a scoring system based on the completion of one item twice daily on the asthma symptom diary, and the ACQ-6. The TASS was statistically significantly improved for benralizumab versus placebo in CALIMA and SIROCCO; however no MCID was found for this instrument, which basically consists of two similar questions, one asked in the morning and one in the evening, and the clinical significance of this finding is questionable. The difference versus placebo in ACQ-6 scores did not meet the MCID in either study. Therefore, there is some agreement between the pulmonary function tests and the symptom scales suggesting that, although there may have been statistically significant improvement for benralizumab versus placebo, these improvements may be of questionable clinical significance. One possible explanation for this observation is that the populations in CALIMA and SIROCCO had asthma that was well-established (mean time since diagnosis of approximately 15 years) and if their asthma has

Page 54: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 54

been poorly controlled, they have likely experienced significant remodelling, and this cannot be reversed.

Although health-related quality of life was a key efficacy outcome in this review, it was not adjusted for multiplicity in the included trials. It is clear from patient input to CDR that asthma takes a significant toll on patients’ health-related quality of life. Symptoms such as shortness of breath are frequently cited by patients as affecting quality of life, as are the impacts of the disease on their sleep patterns, and the need for urgent visits to physicians, emergency departments, and hospitalizations. Not adjusting the AQLQ for multiple comparisons thus limits the conclusions that one can draw from the included studies regarding the impact of benralizumab on this important outcome. The AQLQ-12 was the specific instrument used in the included trials, and although it is closely related to the AQLQ, it is not the same, and therefore no MCID was available for this instrument, either.

There were no active comparator trials of benralizumab included in this systematic review, though the manufacturer submitted an indirect comparison (IDC) that was reviewed and critically appraised by CDR (see Appendix 7). No published IDCs were found by CDR. The objective of the IDC was to compare benralizumab with other monoclonal antibodies in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. The manufacturer employed a matching-adjusted indirect comparison, a form of population-based IDC that used patient-level data to adjust for cross-trial differences in distribution of variables that influence outcomes. vvvvvv studies were included in the matching-adjusted indirect comparison: vvvvv vvvv vv benralizumab (SIROCCO, CALIMA, ZONDA), reslizumab, and mepolizumab, and vvv vv omalizumab. Overall the IDC found vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv between benralizumab and mepolizumab for vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv There was vv vvvvvvvvvv between benralizumab and omalizumab for vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv.

The manufacturer’s primary analysis for CALIMA and SIROCCO focused on the two-thirds of patients enrolled in each study who had high eosinophil counts (≥ 300 cells/µL) at baseline. After a request from CDR, the manufacturer provided a post hoc analysis of data for the FAS (i.e., regardless of eosinophil count). The results for the primary outcome for the FAS were consistent with that of the primary analysis. However, some secondary outcomes such as FEV1 and change in total asthma symptom score were not statistically significantly improved for benralizumab versus placebo in the FAS, particularly in CALIMA. It should be noted however that CALIMA also included patients on a medium-dose ICS, and these patients would have also been included in this FAS analysis. The FAS also included adolescent patients, and the indication for benralizumab is currently restricted to adults. The findings from the FAS analysis serve to highlight the fact that the treatment effect was not as large in CALIMA as it was in SIROCCO in the primary analysis. There are no obvious reasons as to why this might be so, and there are limitations to making such comparisons, as these studies were of similar, but not identical design.

Page 55: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 55

Harms

IL-5 inhibitors represent a novel mechanism in the treatment of asthma, with the first IL-5 inhibitor, mepolizumab, having only a few years of additional market experience compared with benralizumab. Fundamentally, blocking the effects of IL-5 would be expected to have an inhibitory effect on the immune system. Therefore, as with many immune modulators that have come before, infections, particularly serious opportunistic infections, were notable harms of interest. There were no clear indications of an increased risk of infections with benralizumab. Monoclonal antibodies are also known for hypersensitivity and injection-site reactions, and these also did not occur more frequently with benralizumab than with placebo. An extension to all three included studies, BORA, found vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv in patients who continued on benralizumab for an additional year, vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv placebo in CALIMA, SIROCO, or ZONDA to benralizumab in BORA.

Potential Place in Therapy2

The standard of care for asthma therapy for adults in Canada is an ICS. Most patients who remain uncontrolled can be managed with a combination of non-pharmacologic strategies (e.g., asthma educator, environmental control) and pharmacologic strategies (e.g., adding a second agent, such as a LABA, and then further increasing the ICS dose). Despite optimal management, 5% to 10% of the overall asthma population remain uncontrolled and drive the majority of health care costs.1 Besides benralizumab, there is also mepolizumab and reslizumab, which target a population of patients with severe asthma who have allergic or non-allergic eosinophilic airway inflammation and for whom anti-IL5 therapy is the only current option to achieve control.2 Without anti-IL5 therapy, this population can suffer from the side effects of long-term OCS therapy or from worsened quality of life due to uncontrolled asthma.

Benralizumab is effective at achieving asthma control in patients with eosinophilic airway inflammation who remain uncontrolled despite high-dose ICS with a second controller added or who require an OCS to maintain control.3 These patients should be the ones to receive benralizumab. Some patients who are non-complaint with inhaled therapies, who continue to smoke, or who have ongoing environmental exposures (e.g., pets or occupation) may otherwise appear to meet criteria to receive anti-IL5 therapy. Peripheral eosinophil levels are easily measured and are a surrogate for airway eosinophilic inflammation. Therefore, patients should meet Health Canada–approved eosinophil levels before initiating therapy.

2 This information is based on information provided in draft form by the clinical expert consulted by CDR reviewers for the purpose of this review.

Page 56: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 56

Conclusions Three manufacturer-sponsored multinational DB RCTs that compared benralizumab with placebo met the inclusion criteria for this review. In CALIMA and SIROCCO, benralizumab demonstrated superiority over placebo over 56 and 48 weeks, respectively, for the primary outcome, annualized exacerbation rate, in a population of patients with high eosinophil counts (≥ 300 cells/µL) and on a high-dose ICS (> 500 mcg fluticasone equivalents). While this effect on exacerbations is likely clinically significant in a difficult-to-treat population, limited inferences can be made about the effects of benralizumab on exacerbations leading to hospitalization and emergency department visits as analyses of these outcomes were not controlled for multiple statistical comparisons. In ZONDA, in a population of patients who required chronic OCS to maintain asthma control, benralizumab demonstrated superiority to placebo for the primary outcome, reducing the OCS dose over 28 weeks by more than 50%. This is likely a clinically significant finding in a population that is exhibiting corticosteroid resistance. However, no conclusions can be drawn about the key clinical outcome of exacerbations, as these analyses were not adjusted for multiple comparisons, nor were any other secondary outcomes in ZONDA. Limited inferences about benralizumab’s effects on health-related quality of life can be drawn from all three studies. Multiplicity-controlled secondary outcomes such as FEV1 were improved for benralizumab versus placebo in CALIMA and SIROCCO, but the clinical significance of these differences may be limited as the treatment effect was generally modest. There were no clear or consistent safety differences between benralizumab and placebo. However, given the novelty of IL-5 inhibitors, longer-term safety data are needed. Data from BORA, an extension that enrolled patients from the vvvvv included studies, suggested vv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vv vvv vvvvv. A limitation of the included studies is that none compared benralizumab to an active comparator such as another IL-5 inhibitor. A manufacturer-submitted IDC found the efficacy of benralizumab vv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv mepolizumab vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv. The IDC also found that benralizumab vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvv.

Page 57: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 57

Appendix 1: Patient Input Summary This section was prepared by CADTH staff based on the input provided by patient groups.

1. Brief Description of Patient Group(s) Supplying Input

Two patient groups, Asthma Canada and the British Columbia Lung Groups, provided input for this summary.

Asthma Canada is a nationally registered charitable organization that provides support to all Canadians affected by asthma. Members aim to advocate for people living with asthma and respiratory allergies. The Asthma Canada Member Alliance (ACMA) is the patient arm and voice of Asthma Canada. Created in 2007, it serves in an advisory capacity with active volunteers to further the purpose of Asthma Canada’s programs and initiatives and increase awareness and education about asthma within Canada.

The British Columbia Lung Groups (BCLG) is a charitable organization. The BCLG’s role is to improve respiratory health and overall quality of life through programs, education, research, training, treatment, advocacy, and prevention of lung disease, including asthma.

Asthma Canada has received funding in excess of $50,000 from AstraZeneca in the past two years, and requested and received a medical briefing from AstraZeneca with regard to this product. Asthma Canada also received funding in excess of $50,000 from GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Teva in the past two years. The BCLG has received educational grants from AstraZeneca totalling $2,000; in addition the BCLG received educational grants from GlaxoSmithKline and Boehringer Ingelheim.

2. Condition-Related Information

The information provided in the submission from Asthma Canada was a summary of: an Asthma Canada online survey sent to ACMA members with respect to the use of medications, daily management of asthma and the impact of severe asthma on quality of life, as well as interviews with six participants involved in the Canadian benralizumab clinical trials (SIROCCO and CALIMA); information from a study conducted by the Asthma Society of Canada in 2014, titled “Severe Asthma: The Canadian Patient Journey”; and peer-reviewed studies sourced for the purposes of this submission. The online survey was sent to ACMA members in November 2017 and 55 responses were received. A total of 87% of respondents had received a diagnosis of asthma and 9% identified themselves as caregivers of an individual with asthma. The information provided in the submission from BCLG was obtained from telephone interviews with seven female and three male patients who are on the medication.

According to information provided by Asthma Canada, eosinophilic asthma is a subtype of asthma characterized by the presence of eosinophils in the inflamed tissues, which can be detected through examination of sputum. In contrast to more classic forms of asthma that tend to be linked to a particular allergic trigger and diagnosed earlier in life, many cases of eosinophilic asthma only appears in adulthood, in patients with few or no allergies. It was also indicated that severe asthma has many different effects and consequences that can impair patients’ quality of life, and that patients living with asthma have experienced a wide range of symptoms relating to the severity and control of their disease, including limitations on daily activities and exercise due to their asthma, increased emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.

It is estimated that 3.8 million Canadians live with asthma. Approximately 5% of Canadians with asthma have severe asthma. The Canadian Thoracic Society classifies severe asthma

Page 58: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 58

as a subset of asthma that remains poorly controlled despite adherence to best practices in terms of self-management and pharmacologic strategies. According to information from Asthma Canada, patients with severe asthma have found there to be restrictions on social and physical activities, and progression can further deteriorate personal health. Patients say their condition prevents them from regularly participating in social activities due to a fear of flare-ups. As a result, staying active on a regular basis can be challenging for some, and depression and anxiety around this condition can develop. Patients will often say that the condition has put a strain and burden on their family and their personal and work life.

In the ACMA survey, 79% of respondents reported that they restrict the type or amount of physical activity they engage in because of their asthma, 36% of respondents reported missing either school or work due to their illness, and 29% of respondents said that it has an impact on family and caregivers. In regards to stigma surrounding the disease, 14% claimed to have felt a negative stigma with their disease. Additional responses included experiencing anxiety and other mental health issues, decreased social life, and inability to work. Avoiding physical activities such as exercising and spending time outdoors was cited by 80% of respondents. Avoiding social activities was cited by 32% of respondents, and when asked about sleeping habits, 41% of respondents claimed that asthma interfered with their sleep.

These sentiments were echoed in the BCLG submission, in which respondents indicated that symptoms experienced as a result of asthma were shortness of breath, chronic cough, wheezing, shortness of breath or tightness on the chest, and fatigue. Other symptoms were depression and frustration as a result of not able to be active and do things that they were once able to do. Depression also plays a factor, given that they are restricted from doing things or face limits on their activities.

When asked about what aspect of asthma is most important to control, 52% of respondents to the ACMA survey said day-to-day symptoms were the most important to control, while 36% identified asthma exacerbations or attacks, and 5% cited cost of medication. The BCLG indicated that reducing or stopping the progression of the disease and subsequent hospitalizations is of critical importance to the treatment of severe asthma.

3. Current Therapy-Related Information

Among the 55 respondents in the ACMA survey to questions about therapy, 88% indicated that they used a combination of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and long-acting beta2 agonists (LABAs), while 83% reported usage of reliever inhalers. Use of an ICS was reported by 30% of respondents, 25% said that they use oral corticosteroids, 18% reported use of leukotriene receptor antagonists, and 3% reported the use of a LABA. Another 5% of respondents said they use anti-immunoglobin E biologics and 13% indicated using an anti-interleukin-5 biologic.

When evaluating the effectiveness of current treatments to control asthma, 38% ACMA respondents reported they are only somewhat effective, indicating they do not maintain adequate disease control. The individuals interviewed with severe asthma by the BCLG indicated that there is no cure for asthma but it can be controlled and they do understand that drugs can slow the progression and relieve their symptoms. Statements from most of the patients interviewed said “it gives them a chance to work again and have less admission to hospital.” They can sleep better and feels less tired. According to “Severe Asthma: The Canadian Patient Journey,” many patients report several years of trying different medications before finding the right medication or combination to maintain symptom control. Some participants have spent up to seven years experimenting before finding the right treatment, while others have not yet achieved this.

Page 59: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 59

The most difficult adverse event reported by ACMA respondents was an increase in weight due to medication, increased heart rate, and hoarseness, each at (43%), followed by headache (37%), dry throat (34%); difficulty sleeping (31%) and mood or behavioural changes (29%). One patient indicated, “[I experience] mood swings, depression, tiredness, hand tremors, insomnia … all thanks to prednisone.” Another patient wrote, “My weight has been steadily increasing despite diet and whatever limited exercise I'm able to do.” Other side effects that patients complained of included upset stomach (20%), thrush (17%), bad taste (14%), and acne (6%).

In regards to difficulties accessing current treatments, 53% of ACMA respondents reported cost as a main concern. Lack of awareness of new treatments was the second most-reported obstacle (47%). An equal number of respondents (9%) reported inability to locate an asthma specialist, and a doctor being unwilling to prescribe treatment. An example of this was expanded: “At this point, when my asthma is controlled I don't have financial difficulties. I work full time. Before my [benralizumab] clinical trial I had to take extra time off because I had daily symptoms and was not able to sleep. It resulted in decreased income.” Another patient wrote, “Sometimes I cannot afford [medication] and ask if doctor might have a sample or I go without.” A third patient indicated that “The most effective inhaler I tried isn't covered by my health plan so I am using something that isn't as effective.” Another response stated, “[Asthma] caused me to not be able to work, then not have insurance, but cost of medications keeps rising, while income diminishes.”

When asked about needs not being met by current asthma treatments, 49% of ACMA respondents said that they continued to experience poor symptom control, 29% reported that many doses were needed daily, making it difficult to manage their asthma on a day-to-day basis, and 26% indicated that they continued to require frequent hospitalization and doctors’ visits. The lack of affordability of current treatment, resulting in limited access to available medications, was cited by 17% of respondents. One respondent reported “Moderate symptom control, but still limitations day to day.” Another patient stated, “Severe attacks during colds. Constant coughing up of phlegm.”

Asthma effects on caregivers were also captured. A total of 71% of ACMA respondents who were caregivers reported worrying about or fear of exacerbation/attack in their loved ones, and 57% indicated missed work/school days was challenging. About half of respondents (51%) said potential hospital admissions were a substantial concern. About 46% indicated cost and financial burden was a considerable challenge. In terms of the burden that asthma treatments impose on the daily routine or lifestyle of caregivers, 66% stated lack of sleep, 59% mentioned frequent doctor’s appointments, and 50% cited managing multiple medications. One respondent stated, “Drugs are costly, as is the cost of having to give up a full-time career to be available 24/7 to care for my child.” Another respondent indicated “[Caregivers] never get a chance to do what they want. Lack of sport and social activities and worry about sick person can be very depressing.”

4. Expectations About the Drug Being Reviewed

Asthma Canada interviewed six participants involved in the Canadian benralizumab clinical trials (SIROCCO and CALIMA) in December 2017, and BCLG interviewed 10 patients who are on benralizumab.

The feedback received by Asthma Canada was positive, with patients indicating that they experience no negative effects from the drug and that their asthma symptoms were negligible, with no need to use their rescue inhaler. Benralizumab was successful in reducing asthma. One patient stated, “I have tried every asthma medication available in

Page 60: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 60

Ontario. Benralizumab is the only drug that has worked long-term, without any side effects… The only disadvantage is that I have to travel to Hamilton every month from Wasaga Beach [2.5 hours] to receive my injection … It is difficult to describe the impact that this drug has had. For anyone who has a disease or chronic condition of any kind, living with the symptoms, fear, sickness, depression, etc. is as debilitating to family and friends as it is to the individual. To have a condition, that gradually worsened with age, virtually disappear is literally a miracle to me and my family. My life is no longer limited in any capacity by asthma. I literally almost died in 2011, and would have left behind my husband and 2 small children. Knowing that my life is no longer impacted by my asthma is like having a new lease on life.” Another patient wrote, “My current therapy is benralizumab, I have no adverse effects and I am fully happy. My life is back to normal.” A third patient indicated “Benra[lizumab] was amazing, it was like I didn't have asthma. And the adverse effects were minimal if anything. It's not like prednisone which have crippling side effect… Having Benra[lizumab] would make my life easier. I cannot explain what it was like not having asthma for the first time in my life. Not always worrying where my inhaler was, not needing to plan my life around avoiding triggers. A wonderful secondary effect was my nasal polyps shrunk and I got my sense of smell back. I want benra[lizimab] back.” A fourth patient mentioned “The asthma study I participated in was benralizumab. I wish with all my heart that I could afford it when it comes to market, as my severe asthma was noticeably better while I was on the injectable drug, but I can't afford.”

These sentiments were echoed in the submission from BCLG, in which patients indicated that while using benralizumab they experienced fewer side effects, were able to live a normal life, absence of shortness of breath and chronic coughing, reduced flare-ups with asthma, and fewer admissions to hospital. The BCLG also indicated that patients who were using oral prednisone for a long time had a significant reduction or discontinued the use of oral corticosteroids while on benralizumab. It was also mentioned that patients who used benralizumab had better asthma control and their exacerbation rate was lower.

Page 61: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 61

Appendix 2: Literature Search Strategy OVERVIEW

Interface: Ovid

Databases: Embase 1974 to present MEDLINE Daily and MEDLINE 1946 to present MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations Note: Subject headings have been customized for each database. Duplicates between databases were removed in Ovid.

Date of Search: March 28, 2018

Alerts: Bi-weekly search updates until September 20, 2018

Study Types: No search filters were applied

Limits: No date or language limits were used Conference abstracts were excluded

SYNTAX GUIDE

/ At the end of a phrase, searches the phrase as a subject heading

.sh At the end of a phrase, searches the phrase as a subject heading

MeSH Medical Subject Heading

fs Floating subheading

exp Explode a subject heading

* Before a word, indicates that the marked subject heading is a primary topic; or, after a word, a truncation symbol (wildcard) to retrieve plurals or varying endings

# Truncation symbol for one character

? Truncation symbol for one or no characters only

adj# Adjacency within # number of words (in any order)

.ti Title

.ab Abstract

.ot Original title

.hw Heading word; usually includes subject headings and controlled vocabulary

.kf Author keyword heading word (MEDLINE)

.kw Author keyword (Embase)

.pt

.po Publication type Population group [PsycInfo only]

.rn CAS registry number

.nm Name of substance word

medall

Ovid database code; MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE Daily and Ovid MEDLINE 1946 to Present

oemezd Ovid database code; Embase 1974 to present, updated daily

Page 62: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 62

MULTI-DATABASE STRATEGY

Line # Search strategy

1 (Fasenra* or benralizumab* or BIW 8405 or BIW8405 or medi563 or medi 563 or 71492GE1FX).ti,ab,kf,ot,hw,rn,nm.

2 1 use medall

3 *benralizumab/

4 (Fasenra* or benralizumab* or BIW 8405 or BIW8405 or medi563 or medi 563).ti,ab,kw,dq.

5 3 or 4

6 5 use oemezd

7 conference abstract.pt.

8 6 not 7

9 2 or 8

10 remove duplicates from 9

OTHER DATABASES

PubMed A limited PubMed search was performed to capture records not found in MEDLINE. Same MeSH, keywords, limits, and study types used as per MEDLINE search, with appropriate syntax used.

Trial registries (Clinicaltrials.gov and others)

Same keywords, limits used as per MEDLINE search.

Grey Literature

Dates for Search: March 2018

Keywords: Fasenra, benralizumab, asthma

Limits: No date or language limits used

Relevant websites from the following sections of the CADTH grey literature checklist Grey Matters: a practical tool for searching health-related grey literature (https://www.cadth.ca/grey-matters) were searched:

Health Technology Assessment Agencies

Health Economics

Clinical Practice Guidelines

Drug and Device Regulatory Approvals

Advisories and Warnings

Drug Class Reviews

Databases (free)

Internet Search

Page 63: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 63

Appendix 3: Excluded Studies Table 13: Excluded Studies

Reference Reason for Exclusion

SEHMI et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018;2018 Jan 31

Letter

NAIR et al. N Engl J Med 2017;377(12):1205, 2017 KHORASANIZADEH et al. Acta Med Iran 2017;55(5):352-3 CHIPPS et al. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2018;2018 Jan 31

Pooled

FITZGERALD et al. Lancet Respir Med 2018;6(1):51-64 FERGUSON et al. Lancet Respir Med 2017;5(7):568-76

Wrong comparator (placebo)

MENZELLA et al. Multidiscip Respir Med 2015;10(1) :1

Review

Page 64: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 64

Appendix 4: Detailed Outcome Data Table 14: Subgroups (High-Dose Inhaled Corticosteroid)

vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvv vvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvv

vvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvv

vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

v v vv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv v v vv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v v vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

v v vvv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv v v vvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v v vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv v v vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

v v vv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv v v vv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vv vvv vv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

v v vv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv v v vv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vv vvv vv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

v v vvvvv v v vvvvv

vv vvvvvvvv vvv v vv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

v v vv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv v v vv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v v vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

v v vvv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv v v vvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v v vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

v v vv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv v v vv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v v vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv v v vvvvv v v vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

v v v vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv

Page 65: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 65

vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvv vvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvv

vvvvvvv

v v v vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v v vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

v v vvv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv v v vvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v v vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

v v vvvvv v v vvvvv

CI = confidence interval; IgE = immunoglobulin E.

Source: Clinical Study Report for CALIMA, SIROCCO.4,5

Page 66: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 66

Table 15: Key Efficacy Outcomes (Full Analysis Set Population)

vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv

vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv

vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv

VVVVVVVVVVVVV

vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV VVV VV VVVVVV VVV VV VVVVVVVVVVVVV

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

VVVVVVVVVVVVVV VVVVVVV VV VVVV

vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv

vv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvvv vvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

VVVV VVVVVVVVVVVVVVV VVVVV

vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

VVVV VVVVVV VVVV VVVVVVVVVVV

vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

ACQ-6 = six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire; AQLQ12+ = Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 years and older; CI = confidence interval; ED = emergency department; EQ-5D-5L = EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels questionnaire; LS = least squares; MD = mean difference; SD = standard deviation.

Source: Response to information request.39

Page 67: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 67

Table 16: Other Efficacy Outcomes (Full Analysis Set Population)

vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvv vvv

vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvv

vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv

VVVV

vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv v vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvvv v

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv

vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

VVVV VVVVVVVVVV VVVV

vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv

vv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv

vv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

VVVVVVVV

vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv

vv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv

vv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvvv vvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

VVVVVV VVVVVVVVVV VVV

vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv

vv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv

Page 68: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 68

vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvv vvv

vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvv

vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

VVVVVVVVV VVVVVVVVVV

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv

vv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

VVVVVVVVVV VVVVVV

vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvvv

vv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

ACQ-6 = six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire; BEN = benralizumab; CI = confidence interval; FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume in one second; LS = least squares; MD = mean difference; PEF = peak expiratory flow; Q8W = every eight weeks; SD = standard deviation.

Source: Response to information request.39

Page 69: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 69

Appendix 5: Validity of Outcome Measures

Aim

To summarize the validity of the following outcome measures:

forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)

peak expiratory flow (PEF)

Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (ACQ-6)

Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 years and older (AQLQ12+)

Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire plus Classroom Impairment Questions (WPAI+CIQ)

EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L).

Findings

Table 17: Validity and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Outcome Measures

Instrument Type Evidence of Validity

MCID References

FEV1 FEV1 is the volume of air that can be forcibly expired in one second after a full inspiration.

Yes MPPI: 0.23 L or 10.4% change from baseline

Santanello (1999)35

PEF PEF is the maximum flow rate achieved during a maximal forceful exhalation, starting from full lung inflation.

Yes MPPI: 18.8 L/minute or 5.39% change from baseline

Santanello (1999)35

ACQ-6 ACQ-6 is a shortened version of the original 7-item ACQ. It is a patient-reported questionnaire for assessing the adequacy of asthma treatment.

Yes 0.5 points in adult patients Juniper (2001)29 Juniper (2005)27 Wyrwich (2011)28

AQLQ12+ AQLQ12+ is a patient-reported questionnaire for assessing problems experienced by patients with asthma in their daily lives.

Yes Unknown 0.5 points for the original AQLQ

Juniper (1994)40 Juniper (2005)23 Wyrwich (2011)41

WPAI+CIQ WPAI+CIQ is a patient-reported questionnaire for assessing the impact of a disease on work or school as well as daily activities.

Limited Unknown Demoly (2012)42 Chen (2008)43

EQ-5D-5L EQ-5D-5L is a general, non–disease-specific health-related quality-of-life questionnaire.

Limited Summarized mean index score of 0.056 (SD 0.011) and summarized median index score of 0.056 (IQR 0.049 to 0.063) for general use

McClure (2017)25 Hernandez (2016)44

ACQ-6 = six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire; AQLQ12+ = Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 years and older; EQ-5D-5L = EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels questionnaire; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second; IQR = interquartile range; MPPI = minimal patient perceivable improvement; PEF = peak expiratory flow; SD = standard deviation; WPAI+CIQ = Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire plus Classroom Impairment Questions.

Page 70: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 70

Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second

Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) is the maximal amount of air forcefully exhaled in one second. The measured volume can be converted to a percentage of predicted normal value, which is adjusted based on height, weight, and race. The percentage of predicted FEV1 is one of the most commonly reported pulmonary function tests.45

Clinically, the percentage of predicted FEV1 appears to be a valid marker for the degree of airway obstruction with asthma and other respiratory conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Together with measures of asthma symptoms and use of inhaled short-acting beta agonists, FEV1 is used to classify the severity of asthma.46,47 However, the extent to which FEV1 values are associated with quality of life is uncertain, as researchers have reported variable correlations among adults and children with asthma, ranging from no association to strong associations.48-51 Conversely, FEV1 values appear to correlate well with certain final clinical outcomes, such as the likelihood of hospitalization.52 Furthermore, FEV1 values demonstrated high within-session repeatability: In a study of 18,526 adult patients, of whom 11% gave a history of physician-diagnosed asthma, 90% were able to reproduce FEV1 within 120 mL.53

There appears to be limited published evidence relating to a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for FEV1 among adult patients with asthma. In one study of 281 adult patients with mild to moderate asthma symptoms (baseline mean FEV1: 2.30 L/s [standard deviation of 0.66 L/s]), the authors calculated the minimal patient perceivable improvement (MPPI) for FEV1 as the mean change in FEV1 in patients rating themselves as “a little better” (n = 86) on the global rating of change in asthma.35 Across all patients, the MPPI for FEV1 was 230 mL or a 10.38% change from baseline. Male and female patients showed similar MPPI values, but older patients had a lower MPPI (170 mL) than younger ones (280 mL) for FEV1.35

Peak Expiratory Flow

PEF — sometimes referred to as PEF rate — is defined as “the maximum flow achieved during an expiration delivered with maximal force starting from the level of maximal lung inflation.”36 Electronic peak flow meters automatically store and download measurements as needed, circumventing the need for patients to manually record PEF values in diaries. PEF is usually expressed in units of litres per minute (L/min) and sometimes as a percentage of the predicted normal value or as a change from baseline average values.37

PEF values appear to discriminate between patients with reversible and irreversible airflow obstruction.54 PEF values also appear to be a valid clinical marker of airway responsiveness and asthma severity.37 In addition, they seem to correlate well with other measures of lung function, including FEV1,55 although evidence that directly links PEF with quality of life is lacking.

Some trialists have used a value of 25 L/min as an MCID for PEF values among patients with asthma.56,57 However, no research seems to support the use of this MCID. In one study of 281 adult patients with mild to moderate asthma symptoms, researchers calculated the MPPI for PEF as the mean change in PEF in patients rating themselves as “a little better” (n = 86) on the global rating of change in asthma. The MPPI for PEF was 18.8 L/min, or a 5.39% change from baseline, with no differences in MPPI values by gender or age.35 In another study, researchers noted a predicted PEF of about 12% to be a minimal clinically

Page 71: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 71

significant improvement among patients presenting to the emergency department with acute asthma exacerbation.58

Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (ACQ-6)

The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) is a patient-reported instrument that measures the adequacy of asthma treatment. The original instrument, the ACQ-7, consists of seven items:26 five on symptoms (night-time awakenings, symptom severity upon awakening, activity limitation due to asthma, shortness of breath due to asthma, and wheezing), one on rescue bronchodilator use, and one on FEV1 as percentage of predicted FEV1.26 Aside from the item on FEV1, patients fill out the questionnaire and responses are based on the past seven days. Each item is scored on a seven-point ordinal scale, ranging from 0 (well-controlled) to 6 (extremely poorly controlled).26 The ACQ-7 score is calculated as the mean score with all items weighted equally and therefore also ranges from 0 to 6 with higher scores indicating worse asthma control.26 There are two versions of the ACQ-6: one excludes the FEV1 item and one excludes the item on bronchodilator use.27 The ACQ-5 omits both the FEV1 item and the item on bronchodilator use.27

In a study of 50 adults with symptomatic asthma, convergent validity of the ACQ-7 was assessed and a positive association with the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) was demonstrated (Pearson correlation coefficient [r] = 0.76).26 Although high scores represent poorly controlled asthma in the ACQ and no impairment from asthma in the AQLQ, the convention used to assess construct validity was that positive correlation coefficients indicated the association between the two measures was consistent with validity. The change in ACQ-7 and the change in AQLQ were also associated with each other in 36 patients with unstable asthma (r = 0.73).26 The predicted range of strengths of association for both comparisons was 0.4 to 0.8.26 In the same study, acceptable (≥ 0.759) test-retest reliability of the ACQ-7 was demonstrated in 36 patients whose asthma was stable between clinic visits (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.90).26 The ACQ-7 was also responsive to change in the patients with unstable asthma (mean change of 0.73, standard deviation [SD] = 0.54, P < 0.0001).26

Validation and agreement across the shortened versions of the ACQ (ACQ-5 and ACQ-6) has also been investigated.27-29 In a re-analysis of the aforementioned ACQ-7 validation study, all three shortened versions of the ACQ had strong associations with the AQLQ (r ranging from 0.77 to 0.85) and acceptable test-retest reliability (ICCs of 0.89 to 0.90).29 Responsiveness in patients with unstable asthma for the shortened versions were similar to that for the full version.29 These findings were corroborated by two subsequent validation studies based on samples from a 26-week randomized controlled trial (RCT, N = 552) and a post hoc analysis of two larger RCTs (N = 737 and N = 772).27,28 In the 26-week RCT in 552 adults with asthma requiring inhaled steroids, the ACQ-6 omitting the FEV1 item had acceptable (≥ 0.759) internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.98), acceptable test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.82), and a strong positive association with the mini AQLQ (r = 0.76).27 The MCIDs for all versions of the ACQ were found by regressing the changes in ACQ score on changes in mini AQLQ score using a geometric mean regression model.27 Using an MCID of 0.5 for the mini AQLQ, the results indicated an MCID of approximately 0.5 for all versions of the ACQ.27 However, it is not clear how the MCID for the mini AQLQ was determined.60 A separate study determined the MCID for the ACQ-7 to be 0.53 using an anchor-based approach with a global rating, although the conference abstract in which it is cited was not available at the time of this review.61 Studies in pediatric patients with asthma have found an MCID of 0.63 for the ACQ-6 using an anchor-based approach with global

Page 72: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 72

rating of change,62 an MCID of 0.375 for the ACQ-7 using a distribution-based approach,63 and MCIDs ranging from 0.4 to 0.5 for the ACQ-7 using an anchor-based approach.63

A systematic review of the use of the ACQ in trials of commonly used asthma drugs showed that out of 11 studies using the ACQ, none demonstrated a between-groups difference in mean change in ACQ score exceeding the 0.5.64 The authors suggested that ACQ results should be presented as a responder-rate comparison.64

Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 Years and Older

The AQLQ is a patient-reported, disease-specific, health-related quality of life measure that was developed to assess the problems experienced by adults with asthma in their daily lives.22 The original AQLQ includes five questions based on five activities selected by the patient in which the patient is limited by their asthma.22 The standardized AQLQ, also known as the AQLQ(S), replaces those five patient-selected activities with five generic activities.22 The AQLQ and AQLQ(S) are made up of 32 questions grouped into four domains: symptoms (12 items), physical activities (11 items), emotional function (five items), and environmental stimuli (four items).22 Each question is scored on a seven-point scale ranging from 1 (severe impairment) to 7 (no impairment).22 The overall score is calculated as the mean of all the individual scores with a higher score indicating less impairment from asthma and each of the four domain scores is calculated as the mean of the individual scores in that domain.22 Patients recall their relevant experiences during the previous two weeks.22 The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 Years and Older (AQLQ12+) is identical to the AQLQ(S) with the exception of the wording in one of the activity questions being changed from “work-related limitations” to “work-/school-related limitations”.23

Items for the original AQLQ were initially generated from previous work in patients with severe asthma, general health-related quality of life measures, experience of patient with chronic airflow limitation, chest physician input, and interviews with patients with asthma.65 The number of items was reduced by selecting the most commonly identified and important troublesome items according to patients.65 Generic activities for the AQLQ(S) were selected after reviewing the item reduction data from the original AQLQ and databases of clinical trials that used the AQLQ.22

The AQLQ(S) was validated in a sample of 40 adults with symptomatic asthma and the overall score was positively associated with the ACQ-7 score (r = 0.64) and the physical and mental domains of the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) (r values of 0.53 and 0.48, respectively).22 The convention used to assess construct validity was that positive correlation coefficients indicated the association between two measures was consistent with validity. Pearson correlation coefficients varied for the domain scores of the AQLQ(S) and the ACQ-7 (0.28 to 0.72), the physical domain of the SF-36 (0.34 to 0.54), and the mental domain of the SF-36 (0.14 to 0.55).22 Associations between the AQLQ(S) overall score and PEF, FEV1% predicted normal, and beta 2-agonist use were weaker than with the patient-reported outcomes (r values ranging from 0.01 to 0.20).22 The overall scores of the AQLQ and AQLQ(S) were well correlated (r = 0.99).22 Acceptable test-retest reliability was demonstrated in 35 patients with stable asthma for the AQLQ(S) overall score (ICC = 0.96) and the domain scores (ICCs of 0.82 to 0.95).22 The responsiveness index in patients whose asthma changed, calculated by dividing change in AQLQ(S) overall score by the pooled standard deviation (SD) of the change, indicated the ability to detect within-subject changes (responsiveness index of 1.34).22 The change in AQLQ(S) overall score was also able to differentiate between patients with stable and changed asthma (P < 0.0001).22

Page 73: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 73

The measurement properties of the AQLQ12+ were assessed using data from two clinical trials (N = 1,770 and N = 655) in patients aged 12 years and older.23 AQLQ12+ scores were summarized for pediatric and adults patients separately.23 Acceptable internal consistency reliability was demonstrated for the overall and domain scores (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.82 in adult patients).23 In adult patients, r values for AQLQ12+ scores with diary-recorded symptom score, night waking, and rescue medication use ranged from –0.50 to –0.35 for the AQLQ12+ overall score and from –0.56 to –0.22 for the AQLQ12+ domain scores.23 Associations of the overall and domain scores of the AQLQ12+ with FEV1% predicted normal and PEF were weaker than with the patient-reported outcomes (r ranging from 0.06 to 0.35).23 Construct validity and internal consistency validity of the AQLQ12+ were confirmed and acceptable test-retest reliability (ICCs of 0.84 and 0.86) was demonstrated in another analysis of trial data (N = 740 and N = 778).41 No study appears to have formally established the MCID for AQLQ12+, although an MCID of 0.5 was established for the original AQLQ in 39 adult patients with symptomatic asthma.40 The MCID was calculated by finding the mean AQLQ score change in patients with a minimal improvement or deterioration according to the global rating of change.40

Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire Plus Classroom Impairment Questions

The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire is a self-reporting instrument used to measure the impact of general health and symptom severity on work and on daily activities over the previous seven days.30-32 The General Health WPAI questionnaire (WPAI-GH) has six questions from which the values of four different outcomes can be calculated.31 The WPAI questionnaire can be adapted for a specific disease or condition by replacing the word “problem” in the Specific Health Problem (SHP) version of the WPAI with the specific disease.33 When the Classroom Impairment Questions (CIQs) are added to create the WPAI+CIQ, there are a total of 10 questions, of which at least three are completed by patients.34 While it appears that the WPAI+CIQ was meant to be adapted for specific diseases to yield the WPAI+CIQ:SHP, the statistical analysis plans for the CALIMA4 and SIROCCO5 trials indicated that the term “health problems” was used. The 10 questions from the WPAI+CIQ in the trials asked the patient for the following information:

Q1: Currently employed (yes/no). If the answer is “no” the patient skips to Q6.

Q2: Hours of work missed due to health problems.

Q3: Hours of work missed due to other reasons.

Q4: Hours actually worked.

Q5: Degree to which health problems affected productivity while working on an ordinal scale of 0 to 10, with 0 corresponding to “no effect.”

Q6: Attends class in an academic setting (yes/no). If the answer is “no” the patients skips to Q10.

Q7: Hours of class missed due to health problems.

Q8: Hours of class actually attended.

Q9: Degree to which health problems affected productivity while attending class on an ordinal scale of 0 to 10, with 0 corresponding to “no effect.”

Page 74: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 74

Q10: Degree to which health problems affected regular activities other than work or class on an ordinal scale of 0 to 10, with 0 corresponding to “no effect.”

The answers to the questions can be used to generate four types of scores: absenteeism (work missed), presenteeism (impairment at class or reduced on-the-job-effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment), and activity impairment.31 The scores are provided as impairment percentages, with higher numbers corresponding to greater impairment and less productivity.31 The scores for work-related outcomes are calculated using the responses in the following manner:31,66

Work absenteeism =

Work presenteeism =

Work productivity loss = 1 = Work absenteeism + [(1 – Work

absenteeism) × Work presenteeism]

In addition, activity impairment can be calculated for all patients (activity impairment =

).31,66

Although methods for scoring class-related outcomes were not found, the statistical analysis plans for the CALIMA4 and SIROCCO5 trials indicated that class-related outcomes were determined using analogous calculations:

For patients currently attending class in an academic setting:

Class absenteeism =

Class presenteeism =

Class productivity loss = 1 = Class absenteeism + [(1 –

Class absenteeism) × Class presenteeism]

In a study of adult patients with “at least well-controlled” (ALWC; N = 1,480) or “not well-controlled” (NWC; N = 1,677) asthma according to the Asthma Control Test, patients in the NWC group had significantly more work productivity and activity impairment on the WPAI-GH in terms of work absenteeism (mean ± SD: 10.4% ± 23.6% for NWC versus 7.0% ± 22.3% for ALWC; P = 0.01), work presenteeism (mean ± SD: 32.5% ± 27.0% for NWC versus 18.0% ± 23.3% for ALWC; P < 0.001), and activity impairment (mean ± SD: 48.8% ± 29.2% for NWC versus 26.4% ± 28.6% for ALWC; P < 0.001).42 No information was found on the reliability or MCID of the WPAI-GH in the asthma population.

Construct validity of the asthma-specific WPAI+CIQ was assessed in 2,529 patients (1,397 patients were employed and 233 patients were in school and not employed) with severe or “difficult-to-treat” asthma.43 However, this version of the WPAI calculates work absenteeism without asking about work missed due to other reasons.43 Work impairment (an outcome similar to work productivity loss), school impairment (similar to class productivity loss), and activity impairment were weakly correlated with FEV1 per cent predicted (Spearman correlation coefficients of –0.11 to –0.05), moderately correlated with asthma control measured by the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire control index (Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.54, 0.37, and 0.55 for work, school, and activity impairment,

Page 75: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 75

respectively), and moderately correlated with the AQLQ score (Spearman correlation coefficients of –0.65, –0.52, and –0.69 for work, school, and activity impairment, respectively).43 No information was found on the reliability or MCID of the WPAI+CIQ in the asthma population.

EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)

The EuroQoL 5-Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a generic quality-of-life instrument developed by the EuroQol Group.24 It may be applied to a wide range of health conditions and treatments.24 As a generic measure of health-related quality of life that can capture the net effect of treatment benefits and harms, the EQ-5D provides valuable information from a patient perspective. In addition to this purpose, the EQ-5D is used in clinical trials to obtain utility weights for economic models.16 The EuroQoL 5-Dimensions 5-levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) was introduced in 2005 based on the earlier three-levels version (EQ-5D-3L).24 It consists of an EQ-5D descriptive system and visual analogue scale (VAS). The descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each with five levels: a level 1 response represents “no problems,” level 2 “slight problems,” level 3 “moderate problems,” level 4 “severe problems,” and level 5 “extreme problems” or “unable to perform,” which is the worst response in the dimension. Respondents are asked to choose the level that reflects their health state for each of the five dimensions. In total, 3,125 possible unique health states can be defined by the EQ-5D-5L, with 11111 and 55555 representing the best and worst health states. The numerical values assigned to levels 1 to 5 for each dimension reflect rank order categories of function. In terms of measurement properties, these are ordinal data; they do not have interval properties and therefore should not be summed or averaged to, for example, produce an individual dimension “score.” Results from the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system can be converted into a single index score using a scoring algorithm taking the local patient and population preferences into account. Therefore, the index score is a country-specific value and a major feature of the EQ-5D instrument.16 The range of index scores will differ according to the scoring algorithm used; however, in all scoring algorithms of the EQ-5D-5L, a score of 0 represents the health state “dead” and 1.0 reflects “perfect health.” Negative scores are also possible for those health states that society (not the individual patient) considers to be “worse than dead.”

The VAS records the respondent’s self-rated health on a vertical VAS scale on which the end points are labelled 0 (“the worst health you can imagine”) and 100 (“the best health you can imagine”). The respondents are asked to mark an X on the point of the VAS that best represents their health on that day. The EQ-5D index and VAS scores can be summarized and analyzed as continuous data.16,24 Hence, the EQ-5D produces three types of data for each respondent:

a profile indicating the extent of problems on each of the five dimensions represented by a five-digit descriptor, such as 11121 or 21143

a population preference-weighted health index score based on the descriptive system

a self-reported assessment of health status based on the VAS.

The EQ-5D-5L has been validated in terms of feasibility, ceiling effects, discriminatory power, and convergent validity in a diverse patient population from six countries with chronic conditions (including patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).24 MCID estimates for the index score in the general Canadian population were generated by the simulating the effects of single-level transitions in each dimension.25 The results yielded

Page 76: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 76

MCIDs with a summarized mean of 0.056 (SD = 0.011), and a summarized median of 0.056 (interquartile range, 0.049 to 0.063).25 In a European cohort of 316 patients with asthma aged 12 to 40 years, construct validity was established using the known-groups method in groups with good, intermediate, and bad asthma control defined by the ACQ-5.44 The EQ-5D-5L index score was significantly different between the groups with good control (mean = 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.89 to 0.93), intermediate control (mean = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.87), and poor control (mean = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.78).44 No information was found on the reliability or MCID of the EQ-5D-5L in the asthma population.

Conclusion

FEV1, PEF, ACQ-6, and AQLQ12+ appear to be validated outcomes for use in clinical trials of therapies for patients with asthma. Mean changes in FEV1 and PEF corresponding to MPPI in adults with mild to moderate asthma symptoms have been measured. An MCID of approximately 0.5 for the ACQ-6 was found for adults with asthma requiring inhaled steroids. An MCID for the AQLQ12+ was not found, though an MCID of 0.5 has been established for the original AQLQ on which it is based. There is some evidence for construct validity of the WPAI in adults with asthma, but information was not found in the asthma population on the reliability or MCID of the WPAI or the WPAI+CIQ. The EQ-5D-5L has been validated in a diverse patient population and an MCID of 0.056 for the index score has been calculated for general use in the Canadian population. However, information was not found in the asthma population on the reliability or MCID of the EQ-5D-5L.

Page 77: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 77

Appendix 6: Summary of Other Studies

Introduction

The objective of this supplemental issue is to summarize extension studies examining the long-term safety and efficacy of benralizumab administered every eight weeks (Q8W) in adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

Background

Patients who completed the treatment period of the SIROCCO, CALIMA, and ZONDA trials could enrol in the BORA study. The BORA study is an extension study in which patients who received benralizumab in the predecessor trials continued to receive the same treatment regimen and patients who received placebo in the predecessor trials were re-randomized or re-assigned to one of the benralizumab treatment arms. The treatment period was 56 weeks for adult patients and 108 weeks for adolescent patients. The clinical study report67 for the BORA study included safety and efficacy data for adult patients for the full study period and for adolescent patients for the first 56 weeks of the study.

Some adult patients who completed 16 to 40 weeks of the BORA study subsequently enrolled in the MELTEMI study, an open-label safety extension trial. Results from the MELTEMI study were not available at the time of this report.

Page 78: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 78

Table 18: Details of the BORA Extension Study

BORA

DE

SIG

NS

& P

OP

UL

AT

ION

S

Study design DB (SB following analysis of the predecessor trial), parallel-group RCT

Locations 447 centres in 24 countries in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and South Africa

Randomized (N) vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv

Inclusion criteria Completed the double-blind treatment period in one of the predecessor studies (SIROCCO, CALIMA, and ZONDA) on benralizumab or matching placebo

Exclusion criteria Any clinically significant change in physical examination, vital signs, ECG, hematology, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis during a predecessor study which in the opinion of the investigator could have put the patient at risk because of his/her participation in the study, or could have influenced the results of the study, or interfered with the patient’s ability to complete the entire duration of the study

Patients with major protocol deviations in any of the predecessor studies at the discretion of the sponsor

DR

UG

S Intervention Benralizumab 30 mg SC every 4 weeks or

Benralizumab 30 mg SC once every 4 weeks for three injections followed by once every 8 weeks for the remainder of the treatment period

Comparator(s) None

DU

RA

TIO

N Run-in N/A

Double-blind 56 weeks for adults and 108 weeks for adolescents

Follow-up 12 weeks

OU

TC

OM

ES

Primary end point AEs and SAEs Laboratory variables Physical examination

Other end points Annual asthma exacerbation rate WPAI+CIQ Hospitalizations, ED visits, urgent care visits, and all other outpatient visits due to asthma AQLQ12+ EQ-5D-5L ACQ-6 Pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV1 Blood eosinophils

NO

TE

S Publications N/A

ACQ-6 = six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire; AE = adverse event; AQLQ12+ = Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 years and older; DB = double-blind; ECG = electrocardiogram; ED = emergency department; EQ-5D-5L = EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels questionnaire; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second; N/A = not applicable; RCT = randomized controlled trial; SAE = serious adverse event; SB = single-blind; SC = subcutaneous; WPAI+CIQ = Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire plus Classroom Impairment Questions.

Source: BORA Clinical Study Report.67

Page 79: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 79

Summary of the BORA Study

Methods

Study Design

The BORA study was a patient-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial that was an extension study to the predecessor SIROCCO, CALIMA, and ZONDA trials (Table 18). Patients who received benralizumab in the predecessor trial continued to receive the same blinded treatment regimen of benralizumab every four weeks (Q4W) or Q8W for 56 weeks (or 108 weeks for adolescent patients). The first injection of study drug marked week 0 of the BORA study.

Adult patients who received placebo in the predecessor trial were randomized (1:1) to benralizumab Q4W or benralizumab Q8W for 56 weeks with the last injection of study drug at week 52. There was an end-of-therapy visit at week 56 and a follow-up visit at week 68. Some adult patients enrolled in the open-label safety extension MELTEMI study before completing the full treatment and follow-up period in the BORA study. These patients were in the BORA study for at least 16 weeks and no more than 40 weeks.

Adolescent patients at non-European Union study centres who received placebo in the predecessor trials were randomized (1:1) to benralizumab Q4W or benralizumab Q8W. All adolescent patients at study centres in the European Union who received placebo in the predecessor trials received benralizumab Q8W in the BORA study. The planned treatment period was 108 weeks with the last injection of study drug at week 104. The end-of-therapy visit was planned for week 108 and the follow-up visit was planned for week 120. Patients were categorized as adolescents or adults according to their age at baseline in the predecessor trial.

Populations

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Patients in the BORA study had to have completed the double-blind treatment period in the predecessor study (SIROCCO, CALIMA, or ZONDA). Patients could be excluded if they had a major protocol deviation or a clinically significant change in safety parameters during the predecessor study.

Baseline Characteristics

Information on baseline characteristics for patients who did not enrol in the MELTEMI study are presented in Table 19 while Table 20 presents baseline characteristics for patients who enrolled in the MELTEMI study. Patients were grouped according to whether they received benralizumab Q8W or placebo in the predecessor trial (Table 19 and Table 20). Patient demographics, respiratory disease characteristics, and maintenance asthma medication use vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv (Table 19 and Table 20). Since benralizumab exerts its clinical effects through the reduction of eosinophilic inflammation, vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv. The number of asthma exacerbations in the past 12 months ranged from vvv vv vvv for

Page 80: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 80

patients whose predecessor was benralizumab Q8W and ranged from vvv vv vvv for patients whose predecessor was placebo (Table 19 and Table 20). vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv

FEV1, asthma exacerbations, and the six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) score suggested that the patients at baseline in the BORA vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvv studies (see main report). Use of maintenance asthma medications vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vv vvv BORA study.

Table 19: Summary of Baseline Characteristics for the BORA Study Excluding MELTEMI Patients

vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv v v vvv

vvvvvvv v v vvv

vvvvvvv vvv v v vv

vvvvvvv v v vv

vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v vvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvv v vvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv v vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvv v v

vvvvvv vvvvvv v vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv v vv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvv vvvv vv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vv

vvvvv vvvv vvvv vv

vvvvv vvvv vvvv vv

vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv

vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv

v vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv v vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv v vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv v vv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vv v v vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vv v v v vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vv v v vv vvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv

vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv

vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv

v vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vv v vv vvvvv v vvvvv vv vv

Page 81: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 81

vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvv

v v vvvvv v vvvvv vv vv v v vvvvv v vvvvv vv vv

vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv

vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v vvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv v vvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv

vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v vvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvv v vvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v v

ACQ-6 = six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire; BMI = body mass index; ICS = inhaled corticosteroid; LABA = long-acting beta-adrenoceptor agonist; LAMA = long-acting muscarinic antagonist; LTRA = leukotriene receptor antagonist; NA = not applicable; NR = not reported; Pre/BEN Q8W = received benralizumab every eight weeks in the predecessor trial; Pre/PLA = received placebo in the predecessor trial; OCS = oral corticosteroid; Q8W = every eight weeks; SD = standard deviation.

Note: All baseline values in this table reflect the values recorded at baseline in BORA. a ICS doses were converted to their fluticasone propionate equivalent. b OCS doses were converted to the prednisolone equivalent.

Source: BORA Clinical Study Report.67

Table 20: Summary of Baseline Characteristics for the BORA Study, MELTEMI Patients Only

vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv v v vvv

vvvvvvv v v vv

vvvvvvv vvv v v vv

vvvvvvv v v vv

vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv v vvv vv v vvvvv vv v vvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvv v vvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v v v vvvvv vvvvv v vvvvv v v v

vvvvvv vvvvvv v vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv v vv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvv vvvv vv vvvvv

vvvv vvvv vv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv

vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv

Page 82: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 82

vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvv

v vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv v vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv v vvvvvv v vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv v vvvvvv v vvvvvv v vv vv vv vv v vv vv vv vv v v vv vv vv vv v v v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv

v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv

vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv

v vv vv vv vv v vv vv vv vv v vv vv vv vv v vv vv vv vv

vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv

vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v vvv vvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv v vvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv

vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv v vvv vv vvvvv v vvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvv v vvv vv v vvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv v vvvvv v v vvvvv v

ACQ-6 = six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire; BMI = body mass index; ICS = inhaled corticosteroid; LABA = long-acting beta-adrenoceptor agonist; LAMA = long-acting muscarinic antagonist; LTRA = leukotriene receptor antagonist; NA = not applicable; NR = not reported; Pre/BEN Q8W = received benralizumab every eight weeks in the predecessor trial; Pre/PLA = received placebo in the predecessor trial; OCS = oral corticosteroid; Q8W = every eight weeks; SD = standard deviation.

Note: All baseline values in this table reflect the values recorded at baseline in BORA. a ICS doses were converted to their fluticasone propionate equivalent. b OCS doses were converted to the prednisolone equivalent.

Source: BORA Clinical Study Report.67

Interventions

Both patients and investigators were blinded to treatment allocation (except for allocation of adolescents in the European Union) until the blind in the predecessor studies was broken (last patient visits occurred on March 11, April 5, and August 8 of 2016 in the CALIMA, SIROCCO, and ZONDA studies). The study sponsor was no longer blinded to treatment allocation in patients who had received benralizumab in the predecessor trials after this point and the study became single-blind (last patient visit in the BORA study occurred on October 12, 2017). All patients remained blinded to treatment allocation in the predecessor trial and in the BORA study. However, study conduct and blinding at the sites continued without change and it is not clear if investigators could have been informed of treatment allocation in the predecessor trials. Administration of study medication at each visit was determined using an interactive Web or voice response system.

Page 83: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 83

Benralizumab and placebo injections were administered subcutaneously at the study centre every four weeks. Placebo solution was matched in appearance with the benralizumab solution. Injections had to be administered within two or three days before and after the expected date. Patients previously randomized to the Q4W regimen of benralizumab continued injections of active drug Q4W. Patients previously randomized to the Q8W regimen received benralizumab Q8W alternating with placebo to maintain blinding.

Patients in the placebo arm of the predecessor trial randomized to benralizumab Q4W in BORA received benralizumab Q4W. Patients in the placebo arm of the predecessor trial assigned to benralizumab Q8W in BORA received the first three doses of benralizumab Q4W followed by benralizumab Q8W alternating with placebo injections to maintain blinding.

If a treatment visit could not be scheduled within the specified window, that dose of study medication was skipped. If two consecutive doses or more than two of the scheduled doses were missed during course of the study the patient was discontinued.

During the trial, patients were not allowed to use immunosuppressive medication aside from maintenance oral corticosteroids or bolus systemic steroids for treatment of an asthma exacerbation or live/attenuated vaccines.

The same medication restrictions as in the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies applied in the BORA study. Disallowed concomitant medications were taken by vvvv of patients, the most common being other therapeutic products vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv.

Outcomes

The results presented in this summary of the BORA study are for all adult and adolescent patients in the benralizumab Q8W treatment arm of BORA who received at least one injection of the study drug. Patients from the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies were analyzed separately from patients from the ZONDA study due to differences between the predecessor study designs. Results were summarized for the full analysis set (FAS) and grouped according to whether patients received benralizumab Q8W or placebo during the predecessor trials due to different durations of exposure to benralizumab between the two groups. The FAS consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study medication with patients classified according to their assigned treatment. In the FAS of patients from the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies, vv vvv vv vvv patients in the predecessor benralizumab Q8W group, and vv vvv vv vvv patients in the predecessor placebo group were adolescents at the start of the predecessor trial. Statistical testing was not performed for any of the outcomes.

Patients who prematurely discontinued study treatment were to attend a discontinuation visit within four weeks after the last dose of study drug and a follow-up visit 16 weeks after the last dose of study drug. Study assessments were performed at both visits.

Safety

The primary objective of the BORA study was to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of the two dosing regimens of benralizumab. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded at every scheduled study visit, the premature treatment discontinuation visit, and unscheduled visits. AEs were considered to be on-treatment if they occurred up to four weeks after the last injection of study medication. Any AEs occurring after the end-of-therapy visit were considered to be post-treatment. On-study AEs consisted of both on-

Page 84: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 84

treatment and post-treatment AEs. Differences in AE incidence between treatment groups vv vv vvvvv vv were also to be reported.

Efficacy

Efficacy of the two dosing regimens of benralizumab was a secondary objective of the BORA study. Similar outcomes as in the predecessor trials were assessed in the BORA study (spirometry and patient-reported outcomes). However, vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv. To provide information on the long-term maintenance of efficacy of benralizumab vvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv, are provided in this summary of the BORA study. A worsening of asthma requiring use of systemic corticosteroids for at least three days, in-patient hospitalization, or emergency department or urgent care visit was considered evidence of an asthma exacerbation. An asthma exacerbation occurring seven or fewer days following the last dose of systemic steroids from a prior exacerbation did not count as a separate exacerbation event. Occurrence of an asthma exacerbation did not mean that the patient had to discontinue the study. An unscheduled visit could occur to evaluate asthma worsening.

Data on asthma exacerbations were only available for patients who did not enrol in the MELTEMI study. For patients from the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies, asthma exacerbation results were reported separately for patients with predecessor trial baseline blood eosinophil counts of at least and below 300 cells/µL.

Patient Disposition

Of the patients from the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies, vvvv vvv vvvv of patients withdrew from the BORA study in the predecessor benralizumab Q8W and predecessor placebo groups, respectively. There was a vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv. The most common reasons for discontinuing treatment were vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv.

Patients who enrolled in the MELTEMI study were considered to have completed the BORA study.

There was also an approximately vv vvvvvvvvvv in the percentage of patients entering the MELTEMI study between predecessor treatment groups. vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv enrolled in the MELTEMI study regardless of predecessor study.

vvv vvvvvv was excluded from all of the analysis sets due to a breach in good clinical practice.

Page 85: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 85

Table 21: Patient Disposition for the BORA Study

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvvvvvvv

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv

vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvv vvv vvv vv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv v vvv

vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv v vvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv

vv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv

vv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv v vvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv

vv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv v vvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv v v vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv v vvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v v v v

vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v v vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v v

vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v v vvvvv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v v vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv v vvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv v vvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v v v vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

v vvvvv v vvvvv vv vv v v

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v v v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v v v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v v vvvvv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v

BEN Q8W = benralizumab every eight weeks; Pre/BEN Q8W = received benralizumab every eight weeks in the predecessor trial; Pre/PLA = received placebo in the predecessor trial. a Includes patients who later enrolled into MELTEMI. b Only adolescent patients were ongoing in BORA as of the data cut-off for the BORA draft report.

Source: BORA Clinical Study Report.67

Page 86: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 86

Exposure to Study Treatment

Duration of exposure was defined as the time from the first dose of study medication to the last dose (plus one day). The expected duration of exposure was vvv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv. In patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and did not enroll in the MELTEMI study, mean durations of exposure ranged from vvvvv vvvv vv vvvvv days for each group (Table 22). For adult patients who enrolled in the MELTEMI study partway through the BORA study, mean duration of exposure ranged from vvvvv vvvv vv vvvvv vvvv for each group (Table 23).

Within each subset based on predecessor study and subsequent enrolment into the MELTEMI study, patients who had previously received placebo had shorter mean durations of exposure than patients who had previously received benralizumab. Durations of on-treatment and post-treatment follow-up were similar between predecessor treatment groups in patients from the SIROCCO and CALMA studies and were close to the expected values (Table 22). The mean durations of on-treatment follow-up were vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv (Table 22).

Protocol Deviations

Important protocol deviations in patients from the SIROCCO and CALIMA trials who did not enter the MELTEMI study occurred in vvvv of patients in the predecessor benralizumab group and vvvv of patients in the predecessor placebo group. Most of the deviations involved vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv (Table 22).

Important protocol deviations in patients from the ZONDA trial who did not enter the MELTEMI study occurred in vvvv of patients in the predecessor benralizumab group and vvvv of patients in the predecessor placebo group. vvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv (Table 22).

According to the BORA Clinical Study Report, the profiles of important protocol deviations vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv.

Table 22: Treatment Exposure and Important Protocol Deviations for the BORA Study Excluding MELTEMI Patients

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv v v vvv

vvvvvvv v v vvv

vvvvvvv vvv v v vv

vvvvvvv v v vv

vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv v vvv vv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvv v v vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv v vvvvv v v v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv v vvvvv v v v vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv v vvvvv v v vvvvv v vvvvv

Page 87: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 87

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv

v v v vvvvv v

BEN Q8W = benralizumab every eight weeks; Pre/BEN Q8W = received benralizumab every eight weeks in the predecessor trial; Pre/PLA = received placebo in the predecessor trial; SD = standard deviation.

Note: Adolescent patient data were truncated at week 56 or investigational product discontinuation visit, whichever was earlier.

Source: BORA Clinical Study Report.67

Table 23: Treatment Exposure for the BORA Study, MELTEMI Patients Only

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv v v vvv

vvvvvvv v v vv

vvvvvvv vvv v v vv

vvvvvvv v v vv

vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vv

BEN Q8W = benralizumab every eight weeks; Pre/BEN Q8W = received benralizumab every eight weeks in the predecessor trial; Pre/PLA = received placebo in the predecessor trial.

Source: BORA Clinical Study Report.67

Results

Safety

Adverse Events

In patients who did not enrol in the MELTEMI study, the percentages of patients from the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies who experienced at least one AE during the on-study period were vvvvv in the predecessor benralizumab Q8W group and vvvvv in the predecessor placebo group (Table 24). The percentages of patients from the ZONDA study who experienced at least one AE during the on-treatment period were vvvvv in the predecessor benralizumab Q8W group and vvvvvv in the predecessor placebo group. AEs occurring in vv vvvvv vv of any one group of patients from the SIROCCO, CALIMA, and ZONDA studies were: vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv (Table 24).

In patients who enrolled in the MELTEMI study and were therefore exposed to benralizumab in the BORA study for a shorter duration, the percentages of patients who experienced at least one AE during the on-study period were vvvvv vvv vvvvv for patients who had received benralizumab Q8W and placebo in the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies and vvvvv vvv vvvvv for patients who had received benralizumab Q8W and placebo in the ZONDA study (Table 25).

Serious Adverse Events

In patients who did not enroll in the MELTEMI study, vvvvv of predecessor benralizumab Q8W patents and vvvvv of predecessor placebo patients from the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies experienced at least one serious adverse event (SAE) during the on-study period. In

Page 88: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 88

patients from the ZONDA study, vvvvv of predecessor benralizumab Q8W patients and vvvvv of predecessor placebo patients experienced at least one SAE during the on-treatment period (Table 24). The SAEs occurring vv vv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv in any treatment group from the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies who did not enter the MELTEMI study were vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv (Table 24).

In patients who enrolled in the MELTEMI study, vvvv of patients who had previously received benralizumab and vvvv of patients who had previously received placebo in the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies experienced at least one SAE during the on-study period (Table 25). In patients from the ZONDA study, vvvv of patients who had previously received benralizumab Q8W and vvvv of patients who had previously received placebo experienced an SAE during the on-study period.

Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events

Percentages of patients withdrawing from the BORA study due to an AE ranged from 0% to 6.5% (Table 24).

Mortality

During the on-study period, there were vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv in the group that had received benralizumab in the SIROCCO and CALIMA vvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv. vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvv. The AEs leading to death in patients vvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv.

Notable Harms

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvv vvvvv of patients, respectively; SAE of vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv were among the most common AEs and SAEs in patients from the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies. The other notable harms identified in the systematic review protocol of hypersensitivity and local injection-site reactions occurred in less than 3% of patients from the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies (Table 24).

Table 24: Adverse Events During On-Study Period Excluding MELTEMI Patients

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv v v vvv

vvvvvvv v v vvv

vvvvvvv vvv v v vv

vvvvvvv v v vv

vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv v v vvv v vvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvv v vvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv v v vvvv v vvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvv v vvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv v vv vv vvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv

vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvvv v vvvvvv

Page 89: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 89

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv v vvv v vvv v vvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvvv v vvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv v vvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv v v vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv

vvvvvv vv vvvvv v vvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvv v v vvvvv vv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv v vvvvv v vv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv v v vvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvvvv v vv vv vvvv vvvvvvv v vvvvv v vv vv

vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

vv vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv

AE = adverse event; BEN Q8W = benralizumab every eight weeks; Pre/BEN Q8W = received benralizumab every eight weeks in the predecessor trial; Pre/PLA = received placebo in the predecessor trial; SAE = serious adverse event; WDAE = withdrawal due to adverse event.

Note: Adolescent patient data were truncated at week 56 or investigational product discontinuation visit, whichever was earlier. a Identified in the systematic review protocol as a notable harm.

Source: BORA Clinical Study Report.67

Table 25: Adverse Events in MELTEMI Patients

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv v v vvv

vvvvvvv v v vv

vvvvvvv vvv v v vv

vvvvvvv v v vv

vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv v v vvv v vvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv v v vvvv v vvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvv v vvv v v v v

AE = adverse event; BEN Q8W = benralizumab every eight weeks; Pre/BEN Q8W = received benralizumab every eight weeks in the predecessor trial; Pre/PLA = received placebo in the predecessor trial; SAE = serious adverse event.

Source: BORA Clinical Study Report.67

Efficacy

The primary efficacy end point in the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies was the annual rate of asthma exacerbations in patients with a baseline blood eosinophil count of 300 cells/µL or higher. In the BORA study, the mean number of exacerbations per follow-up years in patents from the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies with a baseline blood eosinophil count of at least 300 cells/µL was vvvv in the group that had previously received benralizumab and vvvv in the group that had previously received placebo (Table 26). In patients from the ZONDA

Page 90: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 90

study, the number of exacerbations per follow-up years was vvvv in the group that had previously received benralizumab and vvvv in the group that had previously received placebo. Statistical testing was not performed for any of the outcomes in the BORA study.

Table 26: Asthma Exacerbations During the On-Treatment Period Excluding MELTEMI Patients

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv v v vvv

vvvvvvv v v vv

vvvvvvv vvv v v vvv

vvvvvvv v v vvv

vvvvvvv vvv v v vv

vvvvvvv v v vv

vvvvvvvv vvvv v v vvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvv

vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv

vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv

vvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv

BEN Q8W = benralizumab every eight weeks; Pre/BEN Q8W = received benralizumab every eight weeks in the predecessor trial; Pre/PLA = received placebo in the predecessor trial; SD = standard deviation.

Note: Adolescent patient data were truncated at week 56 or investigational product discontinuation visit, whichever was earlier.

Source: BORA Clinical Study Report.67

Discussion

With patients in the benralizumab Q8W arm of the BORA study grouped by the treatment they had received in the predecessor trials, a difference between groups would suggest a difference in the safety and efficacy of benralizumab based on duration of exposure. There were vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv in the percentages of patients with AEs or SAEs between patients who had received benralizumab Q8W or placebo in the predecessor trial among patients from the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies and patients from the ZONDA study. The most common AEs in patients from the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies were vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv. In patients from the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies, there were vvvvv vvvvvv in the group vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv

Reporting of AEs could have been biased if investigators were aware of treatment allocation in the predecessor trials following breaking of the blinding of predecessor trial data for analysis. It is unclear what measures were taken to protect investigators from knowledge of treatment allocation in the predecessor trials, although most patients likely began the BORA study prior to the blinding being broken in the predecessor trials. Results were reported separately for adolescent patients but not for adult patients. Adolescent patients made up vvvv of patients in the predecessor benralizumab Q8W group and vvvvv of patients in the predecessor placebo groups from the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv treatment and predecessor benralizumab patients vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvv, though the between-group differences were vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv

Page 91: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 91

vv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv. Duration of treatment exposure was vvvvvvv between predecessor treatment groups from the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies and was vvvvvv in patients from the benralizumab group than from the placebo group in the ZONDA study. Given vvv vvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvvv that benralizumab Q8W administered for approximately one and a half or two years vvvvvvv vv vvvv vvv vvvv benralizumab Q8W administered for one year.

The mean number of asthma exacerbations per follow-up years was vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv of predecessor trial. However, no statistical testing was performed. If the reduction in asthma exacerbations with benralizumab therapy takes time to manifest after initiation of therapy, then patients newly assigned to benralizumab treatment (i.e., patients in the predecessor placebo groups) would be expected to experience more asthma exacerbations in the BORA study. There was vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv with continued use following the treatment periods in the predecessor studies.

Conclusions

Based on preliminary data from the BORA and MELTEMI studies, there was no evidence of a change in the safety of benralizumab Q8W with long-term administration of up to two years. The results also suggested that the efficacy of benralizumab Q8W vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvv vv vv vv vvvvv vvv vvvvv.

Page 92: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 92

Appendix 7: Summary of Indirect Comparisons

Introduction and Background

Given the absence of head-to-head studies comparing benralizumab against other biologic therapies in the study population in this CADTH Common Drug Review (CDR) report, indirect comparisons (IDCs) that include benralizumab can provide information on the comparative effectiveness of this drug to existing therapies. The objective of this Appendix is to summarize and critically appraise the evidence available regarding the comparative efficacy of any IDCs that compare benralizumab with other monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma.

Methods

The manufacturer submitted one IDC68 that was reviewed, summarized, and critically appraised. CDR conducted an independent literature search for published IDCs that compared benralizumab with other relevant comparators for the treatment of adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma; no published IDCs were identified.

Description of IDCs Identified

vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv

Table 27: Populations, Interventions, Comparisons, Outcomes, and Study Design Criteria for Study Inclusion

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvv v vv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvv v v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv v v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv v v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv v vv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv

vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

Page 93: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 93

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvv vv vvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvv vvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv v vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv

Page 94: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 94

vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvv vv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

v vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvvv vv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

Page 95: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 95

vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv v vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vv vvv vvv vv vvvvv vvvv vv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvv vv vvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vv v vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vv vvv vvvvvvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvv vvv vv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv v vv v vvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv v vvvvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv v vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv v vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvv

v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv

Page 96: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 96

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv v vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv v

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv

vvvv vvv vv

vv

vvvv vv vv

vv vvvvvvv

vvvv vv vv

vv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvvv

vvvvvv vvvv

vvvvvv vvvv

vvvvvv vvvv

vvvvvv vvvv

vvvvvvv vvvv

vvvvvvv vvvv

vvvvvvv vvvv

vvvvvv vvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvv v vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvv v vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvv v vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvvv v vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvv v vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv

vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvv v vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vv vv vv vv vv vv vv vv vv

vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv v vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv

v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv

vvvv vv vvvv vvvv vv vv vv vv vv

vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvv vvv

vvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv

vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vv vv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

Page 97: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 97

vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

v vvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv

v vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

v vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvv

v vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv

v vvvvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv

v vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv v

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vv vvvvvvv v v vv v v vv v v vv v v vv

vvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv

vvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv

vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv

v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv v v vvvv vvvv

v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv

vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv

vvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vv vv vvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv

Page 98: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 98

vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvv

vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvv

vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv

vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv

vvv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv

vv vv vvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv

vv vv

vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvv vvvv

vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vv vv vv vv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vv vv

vvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv

vvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vv vv vv vv vv

vvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv

vvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vv vv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvv v vvv vvv vvvvv vvvv v vvv vvv vvv

v vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv

vv vv vv vv vvvvv vvvvv vv vv vv vv

v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv

vvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vv vv vv

vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vv vv vv

vvvvv vvvvvvv v vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vv vv vv vv

vvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

v vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

v vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv

Page 99: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 99

v vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv

vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv

vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv

vvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvv

vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv v vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv v vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv v vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvv vvvvv

vv vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vv

vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv

vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vv vv vv vv

vvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvv v vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vv vv

v vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv

vvv vvv vvv vvv vv vv vv vv vvvvv vvvvv

v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vv vv vvvvv vvvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vv vv vvvv vvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vv vv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvv vvv vv vv vv vv vv vv

vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vv vv vv vv

Page 100: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 100

vvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv v vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv

vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv

v

vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvvv

vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvv

vv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvvv

vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvv

vv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvv

vv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvv

vv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvv vv

vvv vvvvvv

v vvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvv

vv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvv vv vvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvv

vv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv v vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvv

vv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv v vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvv

vv vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvv

vv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvv

vv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvv vv

vvvvv vv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv

vvvvv vvvv

vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vv vv

vv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvv v vvvv v vvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv

Page 101: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 101

vvvvv vvvv

vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv

vvvvvv vv vv

vv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv v vvvv v vvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vv vv

vv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvv v vvvv vvv vv vvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv v v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv v

vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vv vv

vv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvv v vvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv v vvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vv vv

vv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvv v vvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv v vvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvv vvv vv vv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv v vvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvv

vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv v vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvv v vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vv vv vv

vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv

Page 102: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 102

vvvvv vvvv

vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv

vv vv vv

vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vv vv

vv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vv vvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vv vv

vv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv

vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vv vv

vv vvvvv

vvvv vv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvv v vvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvv v vvvv vvvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvv

vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvv v vvvv vv vvvv v vvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv v vvvv

vv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvv

vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv v vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvv

vvv vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvv

Page 103: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 103

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv

vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvvv vv

vvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv v v v v v vvvvvv v v v v v vvvvv v v v v v

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v v v v v vvvvv v v v v v vvvvvv v v v v v

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv v v v v v vvvvv v v v v v vvvvv v v v v v

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv v v v v v

vvvvv vvvv v v v v v

vv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvv

vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv

Page 104: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 104

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv

v

vv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vv vvv vvv vv vvvvv vvvv vv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvv vv vvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvv vvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv v vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvv v vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vv vvvvv

vvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

Page 105: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 105

vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv

vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvv v vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

Page 106: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 106

vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv

vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvv v vvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvv v vvvvv vvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vv v vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv v vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv

vvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvv

vvvvv

vvvv vv vv vv v vvvv vvv vv vv v vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvv

vvvvv

vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

Page 107: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 107

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv

vvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvv

vvvvv

vvvv vv vv vv v vvvv vvv vv vv v vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvv

vvvvv

vvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vv vv vv v vvvv vvv vv vv v vvvvvvv vvvvv vv

vv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv

v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvv vvv vv vvvvvvv

Page 108: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 108

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vv vv vv v vvvv vvv vv vv v vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv

vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv

v vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vv vv vv v vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv

vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv

v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vv vvvvv

Page 109: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 109

vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvv

vvvvvv

vvvv vv vv vv v vvvv vvv vv vv v vvvvvvv vvvvv vv

vv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv

v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vv vvvvv

Page 110: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 110

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvv

vvvvvv

vvvv vv vv vv v vvvv vvv vv vv v vvvvvvv vvvvv

vv vv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvv vvv vv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvv

vvvvvv

vvvv vv vv vv v vvvv vvv vv vv v vvvvvvv vvvvv vv

vv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv

vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv

v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvv

Page 111: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 111

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvv

vvvvvv

vvvv vv vv vv v vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv

v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv v vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vv vvvvvvvvv v vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvv v

vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vv vv v vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv

vvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv v vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

Page 112: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 112

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvv vvv vv vv v vvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv

vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv

vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv

vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv

vvv v vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv

vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv

vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvv v vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvv

Page 113: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 113

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv v vvv vvvvvv v

vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv

vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvv v

vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

v vvv vvvvvv v

vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv

vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv v vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

v vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv

Page 114: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 114

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv

v vvv vvvvvv v

vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv

vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

v vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv v

vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv v

vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vv

vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvv

Page 115: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 115

vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv

vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvv vv vvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vv vvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvv vv vvvvv vvv vvv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv

vv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvv vvv vv vvv vvv vv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv

vv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vv vvvvv vvv vvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

Page 116: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 116

vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv

vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv

vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvv vv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv

vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvv vv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv

vv vvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vv vvvvv vv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv

Page 117: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 117

vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvv vv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv vv vvvv vvv v vvvvv

vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvv vvvvvv vv v vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv v vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

v vvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvv vv vvvvv vvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vv v vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vv v vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv v vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv v vvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvv vv vv vvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv v vvvvv vvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vv v vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv

Page 118: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 118

vvvvvvvvvvv vv vv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvv v vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvv vv vvv vvv vvvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvv vv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvv v vvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv

vvv vvv vvv vvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvv vv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvv vv vvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvv vvv vv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv v vvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv v vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvv vvvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvv vv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvv vv vvvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvv vvv vv vv vvvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvv vvvvvvvvv

Page 119: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 119

Appendix 8: Summary of Pooled Data From SIROCCO and CALIMA

Objective

The objective of this Appendix is to summarize and critically appraise the pooled data from SIROCCO and CALIMA trials that were provided by the manufacturer. This summary will inform the pharmacoeconomic evaluation.

Methods

These two pivotal trials (SIROCCO and CALIMA) were of similar design, incorporating the same end points and frequency of assessments for efficacy and safety, and have been conducted with consistent inclusion and exclusion criteria in patients with severe asthma. The randomized treatment groups were the same in both trials (benralizumab 30 mg every four weeks [Q4W], benralizumab 30 mg Q4W for the first three doses then every eight weeks [Q8W] thereafter, or placebo). The main difference in efficacy end points between the two studies that affected this analysis was post-randomization follow-up duration: 48 weeks in SIROCCO compared with 56 weeks in CALIMA.

The following subset of the full analysis sets (FAS) was pooled from SIROCCO, CALIMA:

≥ 18 years at study entry

high-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta2 agonist (LABA) (> 500 mcg fluticasone propionate dry powder formulation equivalents total daily dose)

eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/μL

≥ two exacerbations in the last 12 months

not using oral corticosteroid (OCS) at baseline.

All analysis was conducted for benralizumab 30 mg subcutaneous Q8W and standard care (placebo) treatment groups. The treatment group; benralizumab 30 mg, subcutaneous Q4W was excluded from the analysis.

A patient was considered a responder as long as one of the following criteria was met, even if data on the other conditions was missing:

≥ 50% reduction in annual exacerbation rate and/or

≥ 0.1 L change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and/or

≥ 0.5 point decrease in results of the six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6).

The exacerbation rate in each of the benralizumab groups was compared with the exacerbation rate in the placebo group using a negative binomial model. The response variable in the model was the number of asthma exacerbations experienced by a patient over the maximal follow-up time. The model included the following covariates: treatment group, region, and number of exacerbations in the previous year. The logarithm of the patient’s corresponding follow-up time was used as an offset variable in the model to adjust for patients having different exposure times during which the events occur.

Page 120: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 120

The estimated treatment effect (i.e., the rate ratio of benralizumab versus placebo), corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), and two-sided P value for the rate ratio was presented. In addition, the exacerbation rate and the corresponding 95% CI within each treatment group was presented. The difference of annual rates and its 95% CI was derived from the negative binomial model.

Results

Table 28 presents the response rate for non-OCS patients in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO).

Table 29 presents annual asthma exacerbation rate ratio treatment comparison in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO). Table 30 presents annual asthma exacerbation rate ratio treatment comparison among responders in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO). Table 31 presents percentage of exacerbation types by treatment group in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO). Table 32 presents percentage of exacerbation types by treatment group among responders in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO), and Table 33 presents summary of day-to-day utility by group, in patients with no chronic OCS use in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO).

Table 28: Response Rate for Non-OCS Patients in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO)

Treatment Group N Number of Patients Responding to Treatment

Percentage SE

CALIMA Benra 30 mg every 8 weeks vvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvv v vvvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvv v vvvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvv vvvv

Benra = benralizumab; OCS = oral corticosteroid; SE = standard error.

Source: Manufacturer supplied.17

Page 121: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 121

Table 29: Annual Asthma Exacerbation Rate Ratio Treatment Comparison in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO)

Treatment Group

N Number of

Events

Total Follow-Up Time (Years)

Crude Rate

Marginal Annual Exacerbation

Rate Estimate (95% CI)

Marginal Absolute

Difference Estimate (95% CI)

Rate Ratio

Estimate (95% CI)

P Value

CALIMA Benra 30 mg every 8 weeks

208 133 216.5 0.61 0.64 (0.51 to 0.80)

−0.25 (−0.48 to −0.03)

0.72 (0.53 to 0.96)

0.027

Placebo 213 204 225.3 0.91 0.90 (0.74 to 1.09)

SIROCCO Benra 30 mg every 8 weeks

206 124 180.8 0.69 0.75 (0.59 to 0.96)

−0.70 (−1.01 to −0.38)

0.52 (0.39 to 0.70)

< 0.001

Placebo 218 296 195.6 1.51 1.45 (1.20 to 1.75)

POOLED CALIMA/SIROCCO Benra 30 mg every 8 weeks

414 257 397.3 0.65 0.71 (0.60 to 0.84)

−0.46 (−0.65 to −0.27)

0.61 (0.49 to 0.75)

< 0.001

Placebo 431 500 420.9 1.19 1.17 (1.02 to 1.34)

Benra = benralizumab; CI = confidence interval.

Note: Statistical analysis model: a negative binomial model including covariates study identification, treatment group, region and number of exacerbations in the previous year. Total follow-up time was defined as the time from randomization to the date of week 48 for SIROCCO and 56 for CALIMA visit (end of treatment) or last contact if the patient was lost to follow-up. The log of each patient's corresponding follow-up time will be used as an offset variable in the model to adjust for patient's having different exposure times during which the events occur.

Rate ratio = Benralizumab treatment group/placebo.

Source: Manufacturer supplied.17

Page 122: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 122

Table 30: Annual Asthma Exacerbation Rate Ratio Treatment Comparison Among Responders in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO)

Treatment Group

N Number of

Events

Total Follow-Up

Time (Years)

Crude Rate

Marginal Annual Exacerbation Rate Estimate (95% CI)

Marginal Absolute Difference

Estimate (95% CI)

Rate Ratio

Estimate (95% CI)

P Value

CALIMA Benra 30 mg every 8 weeks

vvv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv

vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvv v vvvvv

vvv vv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vv

vvvvv

vvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvv v vvvvv

vvv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv

vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv

vvvv vvvvv vv

vvvvv

vvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvv vvvvv vvvv vvvv vvvvv vv vvvvv

Benra = benralizumab; CI = confidence interval.

Note: Statistical analysis model: a negative binomial model including covariates study ID, treatment group, region and number of exacerbations in the previous year. Total follow-up time was defined as the time from randomization to the date of week 48 for SIROCCO and 56 for CALIMA visit (end of treatment) or last contact if the patient was lost to follow-up. The log of each patient's corresponding follow-up time will be used as an offset variable in the model to adjust for patient's having different exposure times during which the events occur.

Rate ratio = Benralizumab treatment group/placebo.

Source: Manufacturer supplied.17

Table 31: Percentage of Exacerbation Types by Treatment Group in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO)

Exacerbation Type Number of Events Percentage SE

CALIMA

Benra 30 mg every 8 weeks   Exacerbation – OCS use without ER or hospitalization 111 83.5 0.03 Exacerbation – ER or hospitalization (adjudicated) 20 15.0 0.03

Exacerbation – ER visit (adjudicated) 10 7.5 0.02 Exacerbation – Hospitalization (adjudicated) 11 8.3 0.02

Placebo Exacerbation – OCS use without ER or hospitalization 179 87.7 0.02 Exacerbation – ER or hospitalization (adjudicated) 18 8.8 0.02

Exacerbation – ER visit (adjudicated) 11 5.4 0.02 Exacerbation – Hospitalization (adjudicated) 7 3.4 0.01

SIROCCO

Benra 30 mg every 8 weeks  

Exacerbation – OCS use without ER or hospitalization 107 86.3 0.03

Page 123: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 123

Exacerbation Type Number of Events Percentage SE

Exacerbation – ER or hospitalization (adjudicated) 16 12.9 0.03 Exacerbation – ER visit (adjudicated) 4 3.2 0.02 Exacerbation – Hospitalization (adjudicated) 12 9.7 0.03

Placebo   Exacerbation – OCS use without ER or hospitalization 257 86.8 0.02 Exacerbation – ER or hospitalization (adjudicated) 37 12.5 0.02

Exacerbation – ER visit (adjudicated) 21 7.1 0.01 Exacerbation – Hospitalization (adjudicated) 17 5.7 0.01

POOLED CALIMA/SIROCCO

Benra 30 mg every 8 weeks  

Exacerbation – OCS use without ER or hospitalization 218 84.8 0.02 Exacerbation – ER or hospitalization (adjudicated) 36 14 0.02

Exacerbation – ER visit (adjudicated) 14 5.4 0.01 Exacerbation – Hospitalization (adjudicated) 23 8.9 0.02

Placebo   Exacerbation – OCS use without ER or hospitalization 436 87.2 0.01 Exacerbation – ER or hospitalization (adjudicated) 55 11 0.01

Exacerbation – ER visit (adjudicated) 32 6.4 0.01 Exacerbation – Hospitalization (adjudicated) 24 4.8 0.01

Benra = benralizumab; ER = emergency room; OCS = oral corticosteroid; SE = standard error.

Source: Manufacturer supplied.17

Table 32: Percentage of Exacerbation Types by Treatment Group Among Responders in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO)

Exacerbation Type Number of Events Percentage SE

CALIMA Benra 30 mg Every 8 Weeks  

vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv v vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv v vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvv v vvvvv  

vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv v vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv v v vvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv

Page 124: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 124

Exacerbation Type Number of Events Percentage SE

vvvvvvvvvvvv v vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvv v vvvvv  

vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv v vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvv vvv vvvvvvv vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vv vv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvvv vvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvv v vv vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv v vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvv vv vvv vvvv

Benra = benralizumab; SE = standard error.

Source: Manufacturer supplied.17

Table 33: Summary of Day-to-Day Utility by Group, No Chronic OCS Use in CALIMA, SIROCCO, and POOLED (CALIMA and SIROCCO)

Utility/Group Utility Statistics

n Meana Rangea LS Meana SEa

CALIMA EQ-5D-5L (3L crosswalk) utility  

Benra 30 mg every 8 weeks vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvv v vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvv v vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv  

vvvvv vv vv vvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

Page 125: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 125

Utility/Group Utility Statistics

n Meana Rangea LS Meana SEa

vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvv vv vv vvvvv v vvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvv v vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvv  

vvvvv vv vv vvvvv v vvvvv  

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvv v vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvv vv vv vvvvv v vvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvv vvvvvvv

vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv vvvvvvv vvv vvvvvv vvvvvv vv vvvvvv vvvvvv vvvvvvv

ACQ-6 = six-question Asthma Control Questionnaire; AQLQ(S) = Standardized Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; Benra = benralizumab; EQ-5D-3L = EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels questionnaire; EQ-5D-5L = EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels questionnaire; ER = emergency room; FAS = full analysis set; LS = least squares; OCS = oral corticosteriods; SE = standard error.

a Mean and range are based on the within patient means.

b LS mean and SE are evaluated from a general linear repeated measures model of utility index on-treatment group; baseline utility index; region; study; visit; type (day-to-day, OCS, ER, hospitalization); and treatment group by type interaction.

c Pre-assessment is based on all patients over the full follow-up period. One response is defined as a ≧ 50% reduction in the annual exacerbation rate and/or a ≧ 0.1L change in FEV1 and/or ≧ 0.5 point decrease in ACQ-6 at the end of the study.

Source: Manufacturer supplied.17

Page 126: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 126

Critical Appraisal

The clinical expert consulted on this CDR review indicated that CALIMA and SIROCCO trials were similarly padesigned trials and enrolled patients with similar baseline characteristics, and hence pooling of individual patient-level data from these two studies is appropriate.

However, there are several weaknesses in the pooling that was done. Because it does not seem that this pooled analysis was pre-planned, it is a post hoc analysis that was unplanned and performed after the data were collected.

Results for the subpopulation included in the pooled analysis were not reported in the clinical study reports of CALIMA and SIROCCO trials provided by the manufacturer. Hence, it seems that this subpopulation was identified post hoc.

It does not seem that proper adjustment was done; instead of providing weight for each study and then performing the calculation, data from the subpopulation from both trials were combined as if these data were from one study, which is inappropriate when data are pooled. Appropriate weight should be given for each study as it is done in conventional meta-analysis; however, given the similarity in number of patients and results in each trial, it is expected that the results of weighting each study then pooling them would not substantially affect the results in this case.

Page 127: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 127

References 1. Antonicelli L, Bucca C, Neri M, De Benedetto F, Sabbatani P, Bonifazi F, et al. Asthma severity and medical resource utilisation. Eur Respir J. 2004

May;23(5):723-9.

2. Brusselle GG, Maes T, Bracke KR. Eosinophils in the spotlight: Eosinophilic airway inflammation in nonallergic asthma. Nat Med. 2013 Aug;19(8):977-9.

3. FitzGerald JM, Lemiere C, Lougheed MD, Ducharme FM, Dell SD, Ramsey C. Recognition and management of severe asthma: a Canadian Thoracic Society position statement. Canadian Journal of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine. 2017;1(4).

4. Clinical Study Report synopsis: D3250C00018. A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of benralizumab in asthmatic adults and adolescents inadequately controlled on inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting â2 agonist (CALIMA [CONFIDENTIAL internal manufacturer's report]. Cambridge (GB): AstraZeneca; 2016.

5. Clinical Study Report synopsis: D3250C00017. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, phase 3 efficacy and safety study of benralizumab (MEDI-563) added to high-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting â2 agonist in patients with uncontrolled asthma (SIROCCO) [CONFIDENTIAL internal manufacturer's report]. Cambridge (GB): AstraZeneca; 2016.

6. Clinical Study Report synopsis: D3250C00020. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, phase 3 efficacy and safety study of benralizumab (MEDI-563) to reduce oral corticosteroid use in patients with uncontrolled asthma on high dose inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting â2 agonist and chronic oral corticosteroid therapy (ZONDA[CONFIDENTIAL internal manufacturer's report]. Cambridge (GB): AstraZeneca; 2016.

7. Patterson MF, Borish L, Kennedy JL. The past, present, and future of monoclonal antibodies to IL-5 and eosinophilic asthma: a review. J Asthma Allergy [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2018 May 7];8:125-34. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4639549

8. Walsh GM. Mepolizumab-based therapy in asthma: an update. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Aug;15(4):392-6.

9. Lougheed MD, Lemiere C, Ducharme FM, Licskai C, Dell SD, Rowe BH, et al. Canadian Thoracic Society 2012 guideline update: diagnosis and management of asthma in preschoolers, children and adults. Can Respir J [Internet]. 2012 Mar [cited 2018 May 7];19(2):127-64. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3373283

10. Pocket guide for asthma management and prevention (for Adults and Children Older than 5 Years): A pocket guide for health professionals [Internet]. Global Initiative for Asthma; 2017. [cited 2018 May 7]. Available from: http://ginasthma.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/wms-Main-pocket-guide_2017.pdf

11. PrFasenra®, benralizumab injection: 30 mg/mL solution for subcutaneous injection. Anti-eosinophil (anti-interleukin-5 receptor alpha monoclonal antibody) [product monograph]. Mississauga (ON): AstraZeneca Canada Inc.; 2018 Feb 22.

12. PrCinqair™ reslizumab concentrate for solution for intravenous infusion 10 mg/mL vial therapeutic classification interleukin-5 (IL-5) inhibitor [product monograph] [Internet]. Montreal (QC): Teva Canada Limited; 2017 Mar 16. [cited 2018 Mar 12]. Available from: https://pdf.hres.ca/dpd_pm/00038484.PDF

13. PrNucala™ mepolizumab lyophilized powder for subcutaneous injection 100 mg/mL interleukin-5 (IL-5) inhibitor [product monograph] [Internet]. Mississauga (ON): GlaxoSmithKline; 2016 Aug 30. [cited 2018 Mar 12]. Available from: https://pdf.hres.ca/dpd_pm/00036762.PDF

14. Pr XOLAIR® (omalizumab) sterile powder for reconstitution, 150 mg vial Solution for injection, 75 mg and 150mg pre-filled syringe IgE-neutralizing antibody (Anti-IgE) [product monograph] [Internet]. Dorval (QC): Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.; 2017 Sep 26. [cited 2018 Mar 12]. Available from: https://pdf.hres.ca/dpd_pm/00041419.PDF

15. FitzGerald JM, Bleecker ER, Nair P, Korn S, Ohta K, Lommatzsch M, et al. Benralizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 receptor alpha monoclonal antibody, as add-on treatment for patients with severe, uncontrolled, eosinophilic asthma (CALIMA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016 Oct 29;388(10056):2128-41.

16. 2014 Alberta population norms for EQ-5D-5L [Internet]. Calgary (AB): Health Quality Council of Alberta; 2014. [cited 2018 Apr 25]. Available from: https://d10k7k7mywg42z.cloudfront.net/assets/542f01f2edb2f37083002e54/2014_EQ_5D_5L_report_FINALFINAL.pdf

17. CDR submission: FASENRA® (benralizumab), 30 mg/mL solution for subcutaneous injection. Company: AstraZeneca [CONFIDENTIAL manufacturer's submission]. Mississauga (ON): AstraZeneca Canada Inc; 2018 Feb 23.

18. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Clinical review(s). In: Fasenra (benralizumab). Company: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP Application no.: 761070 Approval date: 11/14/2017 [Internet]. Rockville (MD): FDA; 2017 Nov 14 [cited 2018 Mar 12]. (FDA drug approval package). Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2017/761070Orig1s000MedR.pdf

19. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Statistical review(s). In: Fasenra (benralizumab). Company: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP Application no.: 761070. Approval date: 11/14/2017 [Internet]. Rockville (MD): FDA; 2017 Nov 14 [cited 2018 Mar 12]. (FDA drug approval package). Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2017/761070Orig1s000StatR.pdf

20. Health Canada reviewer's report: Fasenra (benralizumab) [CONFIDENTIAL internal report]. Ottawa: Health Products and food Branch, Health Canada; 2018 Mar 5.

21. Nair P, Wenzel S, Rabe KF, Bourdin A, Lugogo NL, Kuna P, et al. Oral glucocorticoid-sparing effect of benralizumab in severe asthma. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2017 Jun 22 [cited 2018 Apr 18];376(25):2448-58. Available from: http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1703501

Page 128: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 128

22. Juniper EF, Buist AS, Cox FM, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Validation of a standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Chest. 1999 May;115(5):1265-70.

23. Juniper EF, Svensson K, Mork AC, Stahl E. Modification of the asthma quality of life questionnaire (standardised) for patients 12 years and older. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Sep 16;3:58. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1262746

24. van Reenen M, Janssen B. EQ-5D-5L user guide: Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-5L instrument [Internet]. Version 2.1. Rotterdam (NL): EuroQol Research Foundation; 2015. [cited 2018 Apr 25]. Available from: https://euroqol.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/EQ-5D-5L_UserGuide_2015.pdf

25. McClure NS, Sayah FA, Xie F, Luo N, Johnson JA. Instrument-Defined Estimates of the Minimally Important Difference for EQ-5D-5L Index Scores. Value Health. 2017 Apr;20(4):644-50.

26. Juniper EF, O'Byrne PM, Guyatt GH, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control. Eur Respir J. 1999 Oct;14(4):902-7.

27. Juniper EF, Svensson K, Mork AC, Stahl E. Measurement properties and interpretation of three shortened versions of the asthma control questionnaire. Respir Med. 2005 May;99(5):553-8.

28. Wyrwich KW, Khan SA, Navaratnam P, Nolte H, Gates DF, Jr. Validation and agreement across four versions of the asthma control questionnaire in patients with persistent asthma. Respir Med. 2011 May;105(5):698-712.

29. Juniper EF, O'Byrne PM, Roberts JN. Measuring asthma control in group studies: do we need airway calibre and rescue beta2-agonist use? Respir Med. 2001 May;95(5):319-23.

30. Reilly MC, Tanner A, Meltzer EO. Work, classroom and activity impairment instruments. Clin Drug Invest. 1996;11:278-88.

31. Zhang W, Bansback N, Boonen A, Young A, Singh A, Anis AH. Validity of the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire--general health version in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2018 Apr 26];12(5):R177. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2991008

32. Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. PharmacoEconomics. 1993 Nov;4(5):353-65.

33. WPAI:SHP V2.0 [Internet].Reilly Associates; 2010. [cited 2018 Apr 26]. Available from: http://www.reillyassociates.net/WPAI_SHP.html

34. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire plus Classroom Impairment Questions: SHP, Version 2 (WPAI+CIQ:SHP, V 2) [Internet].Reilly Associates; 2018. [cited 2018 Apr 26]. Available from: http://www.reillyassociates.net/WPAI_CIQ-SHP_Template_English_US__V2.doc

35. Santanello NC, Zhang J, Seidenberg B, Reiss TF, Barber BL. What are minimal important changes for asthma measures in a clinical trial? Eur Respir J. 1999 Jul;14(1):23-7.

36. Quanjer PH, Lebowitz MD, Gregg I, Miller MR, Pedersen OF. Peak expiratory flow: conclusions and recommendations of a Working Party of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl. 1997 Feb;24:2S-8S.

37. Tepper RS, Wise RS, Covar R, Irvin CG, Kercsmar CM, Kraft M, et al. Asthma outcomes: pulmonary physiology. J Allergy Clin Immunol [Internet]. 2012 Mar [cited 2018 Apr 25];129(3 Suppl):S65-S87. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263032

38. Amiche MA, Albaum JM, Tadrous M, Pechlivanoglou P, Levesque LE, Adachi JD, et al. Fracture risk in oral glucocorticoid users: a Bayesian meta-regression leveraging control arms of osteoporosis clinical trials. Osteoporos Int. 2016 May;27(5):1709-18.

39. AstraZeneca response to April 30, 2018 CDR request for additional information regarding the Fasenra CDR review: Key efficacy outcomes tables [CONFIDENTIAL additional manufacturer's information]. Mississauga (ON): AstraZeneca; 2018 May 7.

40. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Willan A, Griffith LE. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Jan;47(1):81-7.

41. Wyrwich KW, Ireland AM, Navaratnam P, Nolte H, Gates DF, Jr. Validation of the AQLQ12+ among adolescents and adults with persistent asthma. Qual Life Res. 2011 Aug;20(6):903-12.

42. Demoly P, Annunziata K, Gubba E, Adamek L. Repeated cross-sectional survey of patient-reported asthma control in Europe in the past 5 years. Eur Respir Rev. 2012 Mar 1;21(123):66-74.

43. Chen H, Blanc PD, Hayden ML, Bleecker ER, Chawla A, Lee JH, et al. Assessing productivity loss and activity impairment in severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. Value Health. 2008 Mar;11(2):231-9.

44. Hernandez HG, Pont A, Garin O, Marti M, Alonso J, Van Ganse E. Validity of the five-level new version of the EQ-5D in asthma patients. Journal of Thoracic Disease [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Apr 25];8 Suppl 5:AB022. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958743/

45. van Dalen C, Harding E, Parkin J, Cheng S, Pearce N, Douwes J. Suitability of forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity vs percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second for the classification of asthma severity in adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Dec;162(12):1169-74.

46. Yawn BP. Factors accounting for asthma variability: achieving optimal symptom control for individual patients. Prim Care Respir J. 2008 Sep;17(3):138-47.

47. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3): Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma-Summary Report 2007. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Nov;120(5 Suppl):S94-138.

Page 129: CDR Clinical Review Report for Fasenra - CADTH.ca · CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 2 Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help

CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW Clinical Review Report for Fasenra 129

48. Carranza R, Jr., Edwards L, Lincourt W, Dorinsky P, ZuWallack RL. The relationship between health-related quality of life, lung function and daily symptoms in patients with persistent asthma. Respir Med. 2004 Dec;98(12):1157-65.

49. Voorend-van BS, Vaessen-Verberne AA, Landstra AM, Brackel HJ, van den Berg NJ, Caudri D, et al. Monitoring childhood asthma: web-based diaries and the asthma control test. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Jun;133(6):1599-605.

50. Ehrs PO, Aberg H, Larsson K. Quality of life in primary care asthma. Respir Med. 2001 Jan;95(1):22-30.

51. Moy ML, Israel E, Weiss ST, Juniper EF, Dube L, Drazen JM, et al. Clinical predictors of health-related quality of life depend on asthma severity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;163(4):924-9.

52. Corre KA, Rothstein RJ. Assessing severity of adult asthma and need for hospitalization. Ann Emerg Med. 1985 Jan;14(1):45-52.

53. Enright PL, Beck KC, Sherrill DL. Repeatability of spirometry in 18,000 adult patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Jan 15;169(2):235-8.

54. Dekker FW, Schrier AC, Sterk PJ, Dijkman JH. Validity of peak expiratory flow measurement in assessing reversibility of airflow obstruction. Thorax [Internet]. 1992 Mar [cited 2018 Apr 25];47(3):162-6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1021004

55. Ulrik CS, Postma DS, Backer V. Recognition of asthma in adolescents and young adults: which objective measure is best? J Asthma. 2005 Sep;42(7):549-54.

56. Boushey HA, Sorkness CA, King TS, Sullivan SD, Fahy JV, Lazarus SC, et al. Daily versus as-needed corticosteroids for mild persistent asthma. N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 14;352(15):1519-28.

57. Drazen JM, Israel E, Boushey HA, Chinchilli VM, Fahy JV, Fish JE, et al. Comparison of regularly scheduled with as-needed use of albuterol in mild asthma. Asthma Clinical Research Network. N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 19;335(12):841-7.

58. Karras DJ, Sammon ME, Terregino CA, Lopez BL, Griswold SK, Arnold GK. Clinically meaningful changes in quantitative measures of asthma severity. Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Apr;7(4):327-34.

59. Reeve BB, Wyrwich KW, Wu AW, Velikova G, Terwee CB, Snyder CF, et al. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Qual Life Res. 2013 Oct;22(8):1889-905.

60. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Cox FM, Ferrie PJ, King DR. Development and validation of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Eur Respir J. 1999 Jul;14(1):32-8.

61. Juniper EF, Stahl E, O'Byrne PM. Minimal important difference for the asthma control questionnaire. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:642(A).

62. Juniper EF, Gruffydd-Jones K, Ward S, Svensson K. Asthma Control Questionnaire in children: validation, measurement properties, interpretation. Eur Respir J. 2010 Dec;36(6):1410-6.

63. Nguyen JM, Holbrook JT, Wei CY, Gerald LB, Teague WG, Wise RA, et al. Validation and psychometric properties of the Asthma Control Questionnaire among children. J Allergy Clin Immunol [Internet]. 2014 Jan [cited 2018 Apr 25];133(1):91-7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874246

64. Bateman ED, Esser D, Chirila C, Fernandez M, Fowler A, Moroni-Zentgraf P, et al. Magnitude of effect of asthma treatments on Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire and Asthma Control Questionnaire scores: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Oct;136(4):914-22.

65. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Epstein RS, Ferrie PJ, Jaeschke R, Hiller TK. Evaluation of impairment of health related quality of life in asthma: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials. Thorax. 1992 Feb;47(2):76-83. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC463574

66. WPAI scoring [Internet].Reilly Associates; 2018. [cited 2018 Apr 26]. Available from: http://www.reillyassociates.net/WPAI_Scoring.html

67. Clinical Study Report: D3250C00021. A multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, phase 3 safety extension study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of benralizumab (MEDI-563) in asthmatic adults and adolescents on inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting ß2 agonist (BORA) [CONFIDENTIAL internal manufacturer's report]. Cambridge (GB): AstraZeneca; 2018 May 31.

68. MAIC report: Summary and main report. Indirect treatment comparison of benralizumab in severe uncontrolled asthma [CONFIDENTIAL internal manufacturer's report]. Waltham (MA): Parexel International Corp.; 2018.

69. Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, Walter SD. The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Jun;50(6):683-91.

70. NICE DSU technical support document 18: Methods for population-adjusted indirect comparisons in submissions to NICE [Internet]. Sheffield (GB): NICE Decision Support Unit; 2016 Dec. [cited 2018 May 3]. Available from: http://nicedsu.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Population-adjustment-TSD-FINAL.pdf

71. Phillippo DM, Ades AE, Dias S, Palmer S, Abrams KR, Welton NJ. Methods for population-adjusted indirect comparisons in Health Technology Appraisal. Med Decis Making [Internet]. 2018 Feb [cited 2018 May 25];38(2):200-11. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5774635