CCISD Board Update on IR Schools

8/20/2019 CCISD Board Update on IR Schools

1/17

Improvement Required and Formerly Improvement Required

Campus Update

Mr. Victor Hernandez

Every student a learner … Every learner a graduate … Every graduate a success!

Texas Accountabilityand Intervention System (TAIS)

March 7, 2016


2/17


Quarter 2 Update on IR Schools

• This report outlines how each of the 14 Improvement Required and Formerly

Improvement Required campuses performed on the December Benchmark

as it relates to their TAIS Target Improvement Goals

• Also included in this report is the most recent February Benchmark of 5th and 8th

grade math and reading, and 4th and 7th writing.


3/17


Improvement Required

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Former IR

Crockett ES Gibson ES Allen ES

Garcia ES Kostoryz ES Evans ES

Travis ES Oak Park SES Cunningham MS

Zavala SES Haas MS

Driscoll MS

Martin SES

South Park MS


4/17


Spring Benchmark & STAAR Schedule

Distr ict Spring Benchmark Schedule 2015-2016

February 15-19 March 29 March 30

April 1 Apri l 4

April 5

Gr. 5 Math

Gr. 8 Math

Gr. 5 Reading

Gr. 8 Reading

Gr. 4 Writing

Gr. 7 Writing

Gr. 3 Reading

Gr. 6 Reading

Gr. 3 Math

Gr. 4 Math

Gr. 6 Math

Gr. 7 Math

Gr. 4 Reading

Gr. 5 Science

Gr. 7 Reading

Gr. 8 Science

Gr. 8 Social

Studies

STAAR Test Schedule 2015-2016March 29 March 30 May 9 May 10 May 11 May 12

Gr. 4 Writing

Gr. 7 WritingGr. 5 Math

Gr. 8 Math

Gr. 5 Reading

Gr. 8 Reading

Gr. 3 Math

Gr. 4 MathGr. 6 Math

Gr. 7 Math

Gr. 3 Reading

Gr. 4 ReadingGr. 6 Reading

Gr. 7 Reading

Gr. 5 Science

Gr. 8 Science

Gr. 8 Social

Studies


5/17


STAAR Criteria for Met Standard

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOLS

% Score to pass % Score to pass

Reading 3rd 55% 4th 57% 5th 59% 6th 58% 7th 56% 8th 58%

Math 3rd 52% 4th 52% 5th 48% 6th 37% 7th 41% 8th 46%

Science 5th 64% 8th 59%

Social Studies 8th 54%

Writing 4th 57% 7th 57%

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS MIDDLE SCHOOL

% Score to pass % Score to pass

INDEX 1 60% 60%

FOR CAMPUS TO MEET STANDARD

MET

STANDARD Index 1 OR Index 2 & Index 3 & Index 4


6/17


CIP Targeted Subpopulation Areas- Special Education / ELL

Special Education Students in Reading

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade

GIBSON 9 6 3

KOSTORYZ 10 4 4

6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

CUNNINGHAM

10 23 14

DRISCOLL 26 25 32

MARTIN 17 26 12

SOUTH PARK 13 17 17

ELL's Students in Reading

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade

KOSTORYZ ES 12 6 7

6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

MARTIN MS 14 22 13


7/17Every student a learner … Every learner a graduate … Every graduate a success!

CIP Targeted Content Areas for Year 1 Schools

1st Year IR 14 Instructional WeeksFall Benchmarks

Comprehensive SpringBenchmarks

CROCKETT ES 3rd 4th 5th 4TH 5th

Reading 3-5 41% 45% 53% 44%

Math 3-5 33% 59% 74% 79%

Writing 4 50% 24%

Science 5 37%

GARCIA ES 3rd 4th 5th 4th 5th

Reading 3-5 71% 68% 77% 60%

Science 5 67%

TRAVIS ES 3rd 4th 5th 4th 5th

Reading 3-5 31% 35% 34% 49%Math 3-5 29% 53% 64% 79%

Writing 4 37% 25%

Science 5 29%




3rd Year IR 14 Instructional Weeks

Fall Benchmarks

Comprehensive Spring

Benchmarks

DRISCOLL MS 6th 7th 8th 7TH 8th

Reading 6-8 12% 40% 29% 32%

Math 6-8 61% 60% 36% 33%

Writing 7 30% 35%

Science 8 31%

Special Education

6th 7th 8th 7TH

8thReading 6-8 12% (26) 12% (25) 6% (32) 6%

Math 6-8 53% 26% 18% 7%

Writing 7 4% 18%

Science 8 6%

GIBSON ES 3rd 4th 5th 4TH 5th

Reading 3-5

28% 37%

59%

58%

Math 3-5 44% 55% 76% 80%

Writing 4 56% 29%

Science 5 39%

Special Education 3rd 4th 5th 4TH 5th

Reading 3-5 11% (9) 0% (6) 18% (3) 44%

Math 3-5 22% 0% 46% 100%




3rd Year IR

14 Instructional WeeksFall Benchmarks


OAK PARK ES 3rd 4th 5th 4TH 5th

Reading 3-5 53% 38% 42% 56%

Math 3-5 51% 57% 55% 67%

Writing 4 39% 42%

Science 5 21% SOUTH PARK MS 6th 7th 8th 7TH 8th

Reading 6-8 23% 12% 43% 47%

Math 6-8 60% 50% 59% 31%

Writing 7 26% 39%

Science 8 35%

Social Studies 8 26%

Special Education 6th 7th 8th 8th

Reading 6-8 23% (13) 12% (17) 18%(17) 17%




3rd Year IR



KOSTORYZ ES 3rd 4th 5th 4TH 5th

Reading 3-5 39% 30% 48% 49%

Writing 4 23% 37%

Special Education

Reading 3-5 20% (10) 0% (4) 50% (4) 40% ELL

Reading 3-5 17% (12) 17% (6) 29% (7) 43%

ZAVALA ES 3rd 4th 5th 4TH 5th

Math 3-5 45% 52% 54% 65%

Writing 4 20% 13%

Science 5 25%




3rd Year IR 14 Instructional Weeks

Fall Benchmarks Comprehensive Spring

Benchmarks

MARTIN MS

6th 7th 8th 7TH 8th

Reading 6-8 0% 32% 31% 41%

Math 6-8 60% 56% 48% 39%

Writing 7 30% 35%

Science 8 33%


Special Education

Reading 6-8 0% (17) 8% (26) 25% (12) 20%

Math 6-8 39% 19% 8% 0%

Writing 7 0% 0%

Science 8 15%

Social Studies 8 8% ELL

Reading 6-8 29% (14) 9% (22) 0% (13) 8%

Math 6-8 54% 41% 23% 0%

Writing 7 5% 9%

Science 8 7%

Social Studies 8 0%



CIP Targeted Content Areas for Formerly IR Schools

Former IR



ALLEN ES 3rd 4th 5th 4TH 5th

Reading 3-5 48% 22% 51% 63%

Math 3-5 46% 37% 71% 88%

Writing 4 32% 32% 16%

CUNNINGHAM MS

6th 7th 8th 7th 8thSpecial Education

Reading 6-8 40%(10) 17% (23) 0% (14) 0%

Math 6-8 64% 78% 71% 0%

Writing 7 5% 8%

Science 8 0%



CIP Targeted Content Areas for Formerly IR Schools

Former IR 14 Instructional Weeks

Fall Benchmarks


Benchmarks

EVANS ES 3rd 4th 5th 4TH 5th

Reading 3-5 53% 42% 54% 56%

Math 3-5 59% 62% 63% 89%

Writing 4 24% 31%

Science 5 19%

HAAS MS 6th 7th 8th 7TH

Hispanic

Writing 7 48% 54%

Science 8 15%


Economic Dis.

Writing 7 48% 57%

Science 8 17%




Index 1 for All IR Schools

IR SCHOOLS 14 Instructional Weeks

Fall Benchmarks


Benchmarks

ALLEN 45% 58%

CROCKETT 50% 48%

CUNNINGHAM 58% 45%

DRISCOLL 36% 34%

EVANS 50% 56%

GARCIA 70% 59%

GIBSON 52% 55%

HAAS 50% 50%

KOSTORYZ 42% 49%

MARTIN 37% 38%

OAK PARK 43% 54%

SOUTH PARK 41% 40%

TRAVIS 40% 51% ZAVALA 36% 38%

GREEN On Target

YELLOW Approaching Target

RED Below Target



TEA FEEDBACK

GARCIA ES

• The walkthrough data was impressive and the need to have students more involved in the class

discussions will certainly benefit their instruction.

• Student progress is evident in every area. both quarter goals and are on track to meet their annual goals.

• Mrs. Deleon is doing great work and utilizing student data to make effective instructional/campus

decisions.

TRAVIS ES

• Congratulations on making progress in each area, even though two are behind in meeting the annual

goal.• The report indicates that the professional development noted in the improvement plan has been effective.

• I’m confident the skills obtained from the professional development and commitment of teachers working

together collaboratively in their PLC’s will be instrumental in the continued progress for all students.

OAK PARK SES

• Quarter goals were met and annual goal is ahead of schedule.

• Part time tutors are being utilized to ensure students are progressing.

• Teachers are fulfilling the campus expectations with fidelity.



TEA FEEDBACK

ZAVALA SES

• The campus met one of their three quarter goals.

• It is evident that there has been no progress in the area of writing and science.

• It is also evident that the district director, district specialist, PSP and campus leadership have and are

providing numerous interventions that are listed on the PSP progress report.

• The collaborative sessions that you have facilitated with other campuses will encourage effective

conversations regarding analyzing data and understanding how to use the information to drive instruction.

DRISCOLL MS

• The end of quarter report indicates that the campus is on target or progress has been made.• The PSP report contained data for evidence of academic progress and continued needs.

• The campus has implemented an “All Hands on Deck” focus for every teacher including electives.

• I’m confident that the new campus administration will continue moving the campus forward to meet the

academic needs of all students.

MARTIN MS

• Met all of the Q2 quarter goals and progress has been made even though several are behind schedule.• Growth shown for the ELL and special education sub groups when compared to the 2014 data.

• The principal has made several adjustments and is following the TAIS process.

• There is definitely a commitment from the campus leadership to turnaround Martin MS and meet the needs

of their students.


17/17Every student a learner Every learner a graduate Every graduate a success!

TEA FEEDBACK

ALLEN ES

• It is evident that student data was closely monitored to assess the effectiveness of the 3rd and 4th grade

teachers.

• The noted interventions of adding additional supports and splitting up the class to ensure they have the

strongest teachers, the students will continue to advance in their academics.

• As a first year principal, Ms. Gutierrez is making decisions that will not only benefit her campus, but the

students’ success for years to come.

CUNNINGHAM MS

• Data that you provided verifies that there has been student progress.• Campus is on track to meet their annual goals.

• It is evident that the district and campus administration are providing support to the faculty to ensure the

needs of the students who receive special education services are being addressed.

EVANS SES

• Report offers insight and details to ensure the agency has a clear picture as to what is occurring on the

campus level.

• The plan of action to address the needs of the ESL students and providing tutors will continue to move the

campus forward.

HAAS MS

• Principal understands the importance of PLC’s and have returned to weekly meetings.

• Literacy is a focus this year and processes have been put in place.

• Collaboration with the curriculum assistant is occurring and tutors are being utilized.

Documents

CCISD Board Update on IR Schools