Upload
others
View
49
Download
7
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CCEA GCSE SpecimenAssessment Materials for
English Language
GCSE
For first teaching from September 2017For first assessment in Summer 2018For first award in Summer 2019Subject Code: 5030
Version 2: 10 January 2019
ForewordCCEA has developed new specifications which comply with criteria for GCSE qualifications. The specimen assessment materials accompanying new specifications are provided to give centres guidance on the structure and character of the planned assessments in advance of the first assessment. It is intended that the specimen assessment materials contained in this booklet will help teachers and students to understand, as fully as possible, the markers’ expectations of candidates’ responses to the types of tasks and questions set at GCSE level. These specimen assessment materials should be used in conjunction with CCEA’s GCSE English Language specification.
Version 2: 10 January 2019
GCSE English LanguageSpecimen Assessment Materials
Contents
Specimen Papers 3
Unit 1 Writing for Purpose and Audience and Reading to Access Non-fiction and Media Texts
3
Unit 4 Personal or Creative Writing and Reading Literary and Non-fiction Texts
21
Mark Schemes 39
General Marking Instructions 41
Unit 1 Writing for Purpose and Audience and Reading to Access Non-fiction and Media Texts
45
Unit 4 Personal or Creative Writing and Reading Literary and Non-fiction Texts
69
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Subject Code 5030
QAN 603/1346/8
A CCEA Publication © 2017
You may download further copies of this publication from www.ccea.org.ukVersion 2: 10 January 2019
Centre Number
Candidate Number
General Certificate of Secondary Education2018
For Examiner’s use only
Section Marks
A
B
TotalMarks
3
TIME1 hour 45 minutes.
INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATESWrite your Centre Number and Candidate Number on this answer booklet.Complete all the tasks; the single task in Section A and the four tasks in Section B.
INFORMATION FOR CANDIDATESThe total mark for this paper is 150 marks. Section A (Writing) One task marked out of 87 marks. Spend 55 minutes on this section.Section B (Reading) Four tasks marked out of 63 marks. Spend 50 minutes on this section.Pay attention to the suggested timings shown at the beginning of each task, these will enable you to complete all the tasks within the time limit.Figures in brackets printed down the right-hand side of pages indicate the marks awarded to each task.Examiners can only credit what they can read. Keep your work legible.
English Language
[CODE]SPECIMEN PAPER
Unit 1
Writing for Purpose and Audience and Reading to Access Non-fiction and
Media Texts
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
4
Section A: Writing for Purpose and Audience
Task 1: Spend 55 minutes on your response.
Mark allocation: 87 marks
Up to 57 marks are available for an organised and engaging piece of writing that matches form and purpose with audience.
Up to 30 marks are available for the use of a range of sentence structures and accuracy in spelling, punctuation and grammar.
[87]
You are advised to spend:• 15 minutes thinking and planning your response.• 30 minutes writing the article.• 10 minutes checking your writing.
Planning Space:
Write a short article to appear in your college/school newspaper.In the article, persuade the readers that it would be better for everyone’s health if all students went back to taking proper school meals.
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
8
Section B: Reading to Access Non-fiction and Media Texts
Four tasks: 50 minutes
Mark allocation: 63 marks
Additional answer pages are available at the back of this booklet should you require them.
Reading Non-fiction Texts
Tasks 2 and 3 are based on a piece of travel writing. The writer describes the scene of a recent forest fire in Nevada, USA and he then thinks about the experience.
Task 2: Spend 15 minutes on this task.
Read the text below. Explain how the writer has presented his views on the damage caused by the forest fire to engage the reader.
The road was steep and slow and it took me much of the afternoon to drive the hundred or so miles to the Nevada border. Near Woodfords I entered the Toiyabe National Forest, or at least what once had been the Toiyabe National Forest. For miles and miles there was nothing but charred land, mountainsides of dead earth and stumps of trees. Occasionally I passed an undamaged house around which a firebreak had been dug. It was an odd sight, a house with swings and a paddling pool in the middle of an ocean of blackened stumps. A year or so before the owners must have thought they were the luckiest people on the planet, to live in the woods and mountains, amid the cool and fragrant pines. And now they lived on the surface of the moon.
From ‘The Lost Continent’ by Bill Bryson (1989) © Secker & Warburg
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
10
Task 3: Spend 10 minutes on your response.
The writer is thinking about his reactions to this recent forest fire.
Read the text below. In your own words write down two reasons the writer gives to explain why he did not know about this forest fire. Present two pieces of supporting evidence for each reason.
(a) First reason:
[4]
Two pieces of supporting evidence:
[2]
Soon the forest would be replanted and for the rest of their lives they could watch it grow again inch by annual inch. I had never seen such devastation - miles and miles of it - and yet I had no recollection of having read about it. That’s the thing about America. It’s so big that it just absorbs disasters, muffles them with its vastness. Time and time again on this trip I had seen news stories that would elsewhere have been treated as colossal tragedies - a dozen people killed by floods in the South, ten crushed when a store roof collapsed in Texas, twenty-two dead in a snowstorm in the east - and each of them treated as a brief and not terribly important diversion between ads for soap powder and cottage cheese. Partly it is a consequence of the idiotic breeziness common to local TV newsreaders in America, but mostly it is just the scale of the country.
From ‘The Lost Continent’ by Bill Bryson (1989) © Secker & Warburg
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
11
(b) Second reason:
[4]
Two pieces of supporting evidence:
[2]
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
12
Reading Media Texts
Tasks 4 and 5 are based on an advertising brochure.
Task 4: Spend 17 minutes on your response.
Below is some of the text used in this brochure.
Comment on how language has been used to develop a sense that Titanic Belfast would be a really special place for a wedding. Present supporting evidence.
12
Titanic Belfast stands at the head of the original Harland & Wolff Slipways and offers stunning views of Belfast Lough and Cave Hill beyond. This magnificent setting offers a stunning backdrop for your wedding day photography.
With multiple viewing galleries, you have many photo-friendly locations for your ceremony; from the cosy north slipway gallery on the 2nd floor to the original Drawing Rooms where RMS Titanic was first developed.
At the effortlessly unique Titanic Belfast, the only requirement is your presence. By entrusting your important day to us, be assured that every detail is addressed in our quest to ensure you will experience a truly extraordinary service.
© Titanic Belfast
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
14
Task 5: Spend 8 minutes on your response.
Study the front panel of the wedding brochure below.
Select two presentational features used in this image to support the idea that Titanic Belfast is an ideal place to hold a wedding. Explain the intended effect of these two presentational features on the reader.
(a) First feature:
[1]
Explanation:
[4]
© Titanic Belfast
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
15
(b) Second feature:
[1]
Explanation:
[4]
15Version 2: 10 January 2019
Centre Number
Candidate Number
General Certificate of Secondary Education2019
For Examiner’s use only
Section Marks
A
B
TotalMarks
TIME1 hours 45 minutes.
INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATESWrite your Centre Number and Candidate Number on this answer booklet.Complete four tasks; one task in Section A and the three tasks in Section B.
INFORMATION FOR CANDIDATESThe total mark for this paper is 150 marks. Section A (Writing) One task marked out of 88 marks. Spend 55 minutes on this section.Section B (Reading) Three tasks marked out of 62 marks. Spend 50 minutes on this section.Pay attention to the suggested timings shown at the beginning of each task, these will enable you to complete all the tasks within the time limit.Figures in brackets printed down the right-hand side of pages indicate the marks awarded to each task.Examiners can only credit what they can read. Keep your work legible.
21
English LanguageUnit 4
Personal or Creative Writing and Reading Literary and Non-fiction Texts
[CODE]SPECIMEN PAPER
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
22
Section A: Personal or Creative Writing
Task 1: Spend 55 minutes on your response.
Mark allocation: 88 marks
Up to 58 marks are available for an organised piece of personal/creative writing that matches form with purpose to engage the specified audience.
Up to 30 marks are available for the use of a range of sentence structures and accuracy in spelling, punctuation and grammar.
Complete only one task.
Either
(a) Write a personal essay for the examiner about an incident in your own life that did not start well but ended up being a positive experience.
Or
(b) Write your entry for a creative essay writing competition. The audience is young people. The picture below is to be the basis for the competition entry. Provide your own title.
[88]
© omgimages/ iStock/Thinkstock
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
23
You are advised to spend:• 15 minutes thinking and planning• 30 minutes writing your response• 10 minutes checking your writing
Planning Space:
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
24
Complete only one task in this section. Either (a) or (b).
(a) Personal writing: Write a personal essay for the examiner about an incident in your own life that did not start well but ended up being a positive experience:
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
27
(b) Creative writing: Write your entry for a creative essay writing competition. The audience is young people. The picture on page 22 is to be the basis for the competion entry. You may provide your own title.
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
30
Section B: Reading Literary and Non-fiction Texts
Texts A and B Literary texts: Task 2 – 26 minutes
Non-fiction text: Tasks 3 and 4 – 24 minutes
Version 2: 10 January 2019
This insert is for use with Task 2
English LanguageUnit 4: Personal or Creative Writing and Reading Literary and Non-Fiction Texts
[GEN41]
General Certificate of Secondary Education
31Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
32
Task 2
You have 26 minutes in which to read both texts and respond to the task below.
Compare and contrast how the writers of Texts A and B have created a sense of unease. Present supporting evidence from both texts.
Text A
Two young teenagers, Finn and Tara have just met. She takes him to the site of an ancient battle, Cluain na nGall.
She led him to the lily pond and they looked at the lazy lizards. Then she took him through the grove of trees. Finn gasped when they turned a bend and were confronted with a flat wilderness. The stillness was the first thing that hit him. It was as if he had suddenly been clamped with earmuffs. Nothing stirred. The trees stood like silent sentries all around, casting cold shadows over the scrubby grass. Finn shivered and wrapped his arms around himself.
“What’s this place?” he asked in a hushed voice. “It’s creepy.”
“Cluain na nGall. It means the Field of the Foreigners. Dead foreigners,” she added as she moved into the scrubby grass. “Underneath this wasteland is a whole bunch of dead foreigners.”
Finn gave another shiver. “What do you mean?” he asked, following Tara.
She stopped and turned towards him. “It’s true,” she said. “Way back over a thousand years ago, a fierce battle was fought here, between the Vikings and the Irish, right on this very spot. Loads of people died.”
“It’s an eerie place,” said Finn. “Cold.”
“Come on,” said Tara. I’ll show you some of the bumpy graves.”Together they ran across the scrubby field.
“Have you noticed that it’s colder as we go towards the middle?” asked Tara.
Finn had noticed, but he felt it was up to him to keep level-headed.
© Reproduced with permission of Mary Arrigan
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
33
Text B
Four young people with a shared interest in Animal Rights are heading off by car on a night-raid to expose cruelty on a puppy-farm.
It was almost dark, with a bright half-moon occasionally obscured by hurrying clouds. Excitement clutched at Elaine’s stomach. There was no doubt she was regretting her offer to join the others on the raid.
“Won’t there be a farmhouse or anything with people in it?” she asked.
“No it’s half-derelict. What...are you feeling just a teensy bit... worried?” Steve spoke quietly but the nasty edge was quite clear.
“Don’t worry...there’s a public footpath going right through the farmyard,” Karen said from the depths of the back seat, “so if anyone sees us there – not that it’s likely in the dark – we’ve got a perfect excuse.”
They were well away from the town now. Elaine shivered slightly as the car’s headlights illuminated the old trees and hedgerows so that they looked like monsters from a nightmare as they leaned over the mini, leering and creaking in the wind.
“Park about half a mile further up the lane and we’ll walk back,” Steve suggested.
They piled out.
Mike locked the car and gave Elaine’s arm a reassuring squeeze. She smiled back gratefully and followed the others. They hurried along the lane, the farm buildings standing out black against the moonlit sky. The windows of the derelict farmhouse stared like unwinking eyes, so that Elaine gave a sudden shudder. All those half-remembered ghost stories came back to haunt her and her instincts told her to run away – NOW!
From ‘Run With the Hare’ by Linda Newbery (1989) © Pearson Education
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
35
Tasks 3 and 4
You have 24 minutes in which to read and respond to the two tasks based on the newspaper article “Why I Hate Fashion”.
Task 3: Spend 12 minutes on your response.
The extract below is the beginning of the newspaper article.
Explain how the writer has tried to gain and hold the interest of the reader.
WHY I HATE FASHION
I am a reasonably normal person – I like food and friends and comfort. It is just that I cannot ignore the fashion silliness any more. I walk past a shop that sells 6 inch heels and I am angry. Top Shop? Angry again. All these adverts for this season’s “must have”... . Don’t even go there. I have had it with the giant faces and figures of overpaid skinny actors telling me what I should buy from every billboard and magazine and TV screen.
I decided to write this piece last year when I read that a 16-year-old girl wearing high-heeled shoes had fallen between the carriages of a train. She died, of course. It was snowing that night, but still this young woman, with a lifetime of fashion choices before her, ran along the platform and is now dead.
Adapted from “Why I Hate Fashion” by Tanya Gold, 22 January 2010 © 2016 Guardian News and Media Limited
Version 2: 10 January 2019
Examiner Only
Marks Re-mark
37
Task 4: Spend 12 minutes on your response.
The extract below is the final four paragraphs of the newspaper article.
As the writer finishes off her article, she is considering the part fashion has played in her own life and also the part it played in the tragic death of a 16 year-old girl.
Explain how the writer has created a negative view of fashion.
I couldn’t help suspecting that had she been wearing a shoe designed for actually walking rather than for fashion, she would be alive. This was different from the usual fashion death, where a model has a heart attack on the catwalk, because she lives on grapes.
This was an ordinary girl, a bystander. And why was she wearing high-heeled shoes on an icy night? Because fashion, the whispering monster, told her to.
I thought about that young woman for days; I couldn’t forget her. Why? Because I realised that fashion has hounded me. It has followed me around like an eternal schoolyard bully, throwing self-doubt and rubbish into my path.
I can look at clothes on the catwalk now and laugh at their daftness. They are not for me. I still think about that young woman on the train tracks though. What price did she pay for her shoes?
Adapted from “Why I Hate Fashion” by Tanya Gold, 22 January 2010 © 2016 Guardian News and Media Limited
Version 2: 10 January 2019
General Certificate of Secondary Education
GENERAL MARKING INSTRUCTIONS
English Language
45Version 2: 10 January 2019
46
General Marking Instructions
A General Introduction to the Assessment of CCEA’s GCSE English Language
IntroductionMark schemes are intended to ensure that the GCSE examinations are marked consistently and fairly. The mark schemes provide markers with an indication of the nature and range of candidates’ responses likely to be worthy of credit. They also set out the criteria which they should apply in allocating marks to candidates’ responses. The mark schemes should be read in conjunction with these general marking instructions.
Assessment objectivesBelow are the relevant assessment objectives for English Language.AO3 Candidates must: (i) read and understand texts, selecting material appropriate to purpose, collating from different sources and making comparisons and cross-reference as appropriate; (ii) develop and sustain interpretations of writers’ ideas and perspectives; and (iii) explain and evaluate how writers use linguistic, structural and presentational features to achieve effects and engage and influence the reader.
AO4 Candidates must: (i) write to communicate clearly, effectively and imaginatively, using and adapting forms and selecting vocabulary appropriate to ask and purpose in ways that engage the reader; (ii) organise information and ideas into structured and sequenced sentences, paragraphs and whole texts, using a variety of linguistic and structural features to support cohesion and overall coherence; and (iii) use a range of sentence structures for clarity, purpose and effect, with accurate spelling, punctuation and grammar.
Quality of candidates’ responsesIn marking the examination papers, examiners should be looking for a quality of response reflecting the level of maturity which may reasonably be expected of a 16-year-old which is the age at which the majority of candidates sit their GCSE examinations.
Flexibility in markingMark schemes are not intended to be totally prescriptive. No mark scheme can cover all the responses which candidates may produce. In the event of unanticipated answers, examiners are expected to use their professional judgement to assess the validity of answers. If an answer is particularly problematic, then examiners should seek the guidance of the Supervising Examiner.
Positive markingExaminers are encouraged to be positive in their marking, giving appropriate credit for what candidates know, understand and can do rather than penalising candidates for errors or omissions. Examiners should make use of the whole of the available mark range for any particular question and be prepared to award full marks for a response which is as good as might reasonably be expected of a 16-year-old GCSE candidate.
Awarding zero marksMarks should only be awarded for valid responses and no marks should be awarded for an answer which is completely incorrect or inappropriate.
Version 2: 10 January 2019
47
The style of assessmentThe exams will be marked using positive assessment; crediting what has been achieved. The mark schemes emanate from the Assessment Objectives and are designed to support this positive approach.
The relationship between tasks, mark schemes and Competence Level StrandsEach task is designed to test a specified series of Assessment Objectives. Every task has either:
(a) a mark scheme that is built around a task specific checklist, Competence Level (CL) Strands and a mark grid
The Competence Levels, which detail increasing levels of proficiency, are made up of three strands. These are derived from the task-specific Assessment Objectives and each of the strands focuses on important characteristics within the response. The job for each examiner is to identify positively what has been achieved and then match each candidate’s level of proficiency to the appropriate descriptors.
Or
(b) an individual task checklist tied to specific mark allocations
Writing: an outline of the marking process
Two discrete assessments have to be made.
The first assessment will be used to gauge the candidate’s performance in Writing (i) and (ii) of the Assessment Objectives. The second assessment is measured against the remaining Assessment Objective, Writing (iii).
The assessment of Task 1 begins with the examiner highlighting what is creditworthy as well as marking up the errors in Spelling, Punctuation and Grammar (SPG). At the conclusion of the response, the examiner will summarise the candidate’s achievement and then select the appropriate mark from the mark grid.
The required process, standard and style of marking will be the business of the standardising meetings. Pre-marked exemplar scripts will be distributed to all examiners at these conferences. These ‘benchmark scripts’ have been marked and annotated by the senior examining team prior to each standardising meeting.
Studying Written Language (Reading): an outline of the marking processThe assessment of an individual response begins with the examiner highlighting what, within a response, is creditworthy. Then, at the conclusion of the response, the examiner will evaluate the candidate’s achievement before selecting the appropriate mark from the mark grid.
These procedures which have been outlined above are described in detail in the Mark Schemes that follow.
Version 2: 10 January 2019
MARKSCHEME
English Language
[CODE]SPECIMEN
Unit 1
Writing for Purpose and Audience and Reading to Access Non-fiction and
Media Texts
General Certificate of Secondary Education2018
49Version 2: 10 January 2019
50
Section A: Writing for Purpose and Audience
Task 1
The Assessment Objectives
Writing (AO4)
(i) Write to communicate clearly, effectively and imaginatively, using and adapting forms and selecting vocabulary appropriate to task and purpose in ways that engage the reader.
(ii) Organise information and ideas into structured and sequenced sentences, paragraphs and whole texts, using a variety of linguistic and structural features to support cohesion and coherence.
(iii) Use a range of sentence structures for clarity, purpose and effect, with accurate spelling, punctuation and grammar.
All are being assessed in Task 1.
The examiner will be required to make two distinct assessments: one for Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii) and a second assessment for Task 1: Writing (iii).
The two required assessments
1 Each response will be assessed on the basis of a single reading and annotated using the three e-marking tools: underlining, circling and wavy underlining.
The following method and style of marking is to be used:
• the underlining tool to indicate creditworthy material
• the circling facility serves two purposes:
(a) to highlight spelling mistakes with each error being circled only once - alot...happend
(b) for indicating minor and/or occasional lapses in punctuation such as missing apostrophes, commas and full stops - run’s/... two three or four/...to me it was not long after...
• wavy underlining will denote failings in syntax. When used vertically in the margin this will indicate ongoing issues, for example, failings in grammar/lapses in sentence structure - he seen yous threw the open door
Version 2: 10 January 2019
51
2 Using the method and style of marking outlined on p. 46 in conjunction with the Competence Level (CL) Strands for Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii) on p.51, the examiner will assess, positively, the features of that response.
This process (a worked example follows below and on the next page) will be carried out in this order:
(a) The examiner will carefully read and annotate the response.
(b) The three Competence Level Strands that best match the candidate’s achievement will be noted.
(c) Only after selecting and noting the three Competence Level Strands will the examiner turn to the mark grid to establish the mark to be awarded. Where the mark grid calls for an examiner judgement, the extent to which a candidate has met the overall requirements of the particular Competence Level will determine the mark to be awarded.
Where a range of marks are available, the following procedure should be followed:
• where a two mark range is available, the examiner will consider whether the response is mostly in the ‘upper half’ or ‘lower half’ of the achieved Competence Levels and award either mark accordingly; and
• where a three or four mark range is available, the examiner will consider whether the response is mostly at the ‘top’, ‘middle’ or ‘bottom’ of the achieved Competence Levels and award the available marks accordingly.
In exceptional circumstances the standard of a candidate’s work might range across more than two strand levels. Such an eventuality is not covered by the mark grids. Where this happens, the examiner should decide the mark to be awarded on a ‘best fit’ basis. The support of the supervising examiner could usefully be sought.
3 A final check of every page of the answer booklet:
(a) Use the ‘E’ tool to indicate the end of the candidate’s final response.
(b) Stamp all blank or planning pages with the ‘SEEN’ tool.
Here is an example of this style of annotation in action for Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii)(this should be read in conjunction with the relevant Competence Level Strands on p. 51):
The response is positively assessed against each of the three strands that make up the Competence Levels for Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii). Let’s assume it can best be summarised by the following descriptors:
• “Generally effective and appropriate development. An increasingly fluent and engaging...” (Development and Style CL3)
• “Clear structuring with a conscious effort to use some structural and linguistic devices” (Structuring/Linguistic and Structural
Features CL3)• “Recognition of purpose and audience...a straightforward direction.... Language
choices...generally appropriate” (Purpose and Audience CL2)
Version 2: 10 January 2019
52
These individual strand levels are noted at the end of the response in a text box:
The next stage in the process is to check these ‘strand scores’ on the mark grid for Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii). This indicates a mark range of 26–29 marks.
This score would then be entered against No. 1i/ii in the scoring facility at the bottom, right corner of the screen.
In order to assess Task 1: Writing (iii), the same process (step 2 on p. 47) is used to make this second assessment using the Competence Level Strands that relate to Writing (iii).
Here is an example of this style of annotation in action (it should be read in conjunction with the relevant Competence Level Strands on p. 53).
The response is positively assessed against each of the three strands that make up the Competence Level Strands for Task 1: Writing (iii). Let’s assume it can best be summarised by the following descriptors:
• “Increasingly sustained competence in the control of sentence structures. Some variety of sentence structuring is evident”
(Range of Sentence Structure CL3)• “The basics of punctuation...increasingly secure...used to add clarity and engage” (Use
of Punctuation CL3) • “Increasingly accurate spelling of regular words...some with irregular patterns...
widening vocabulary to actively help engage the audience” (Spelling and Range of Vocabulary CL3)
These individual strand levels are noted at the end of the response in a text box:
The next stage in the process is to check these ‘strand scores’ across the mark grid for Task 1: Writing (iii). This indicates a score of 17/18 marks.
The selected score would then be entered against No. 1iii in the scoring facility at the bottom, right corner of the screen.
Wi/ii 332
Wii
Wi/ii
Wiii 333
Version 2: 10 January 2019
53
General Guidance on the Application of the Competence Level Strands
The first assessment: Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii)
The following checklist will help to highlight the extent to which a candidate has shaped her/his response appropriately. It offers general guidance on how the candidates, across all the Competence Level Strands, may employ the skills from Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii).
Communicate clearly, effectively and imaginatively demonstrating:
• a handling of the topic in such a way as to attempt to consciously persuade the prescribed audience/positively develop the audience’s interest;
• use of a style that builds a positive relationship with the prescribed audience; and• possible use of anecdotes/humour to engage/persuade the prescribed audience.
Adapting form and vocabulary to task and purpose in ways that engage the audience, demonstrating:
• a sense that the piece has been developed for the prescribed audience;• use of an appropriate tone that is specifically designed to engage and sustain the
audience’s attention; and• use of vocabulary that is in keeping with the purpose of the task and audience.
Organise information and ideas into structured, sequenced sentences, paragraphs and whole texts demonstrating:
• a sense of a persuasive pathway being created/a logical progression through the student’s point of view;
• use of engaging/challenging introductory and concluding paragraphs;• use of topic/link sentences for different paragraphs; and• development that endeavours to use organisation to sustain the audience’s interest.
Use a variety of linguistic and structural features to support cohesion and overall coherence demonstrating:
• a conscious varying of sentence length for effect;• the use of connectives to give coherence; and• the use of rhetorical devices (such as the rule of three, questions, hyperbole) to
develop interest/build a case/develop a rapport with the specified audience.
Credit any other valid strategies used that are not mentioned above.
The second assessment: Task 1: Writing (iii)
The following checklist will help to highlight the extent to which a candidate has shaped her/his response appropriately. It offers general guidance on how the candidates, across all the Competence Levels, may employ the skills from Task 1: Writing (iii).
The range and effectiveness of sentence structures:
• the wider the range and the greater the degree of originality and control in structuring sentences, the more opportunity the candidate gives her/himself to establish a positive rapport with the reader; and
• the more assured and varied that manipulation of sentence structuring is, the higher will be the mark awarded.
Version 2: 10 January 2019
54
The use made of accurate punctuation and grammar:
• linked to the control of sentence structure is the control of a variety of appropriate punctuation and accurate use of grammar. Here, too, competent usage can help to maintain the reader’s interest. The greater the control and variation in the use of punctuation, the higher will be the reward.
The use made of accurate spelling and range of vocabulary:
• accuracy in spelling, in isolation, can be misleading; it needs to be viewed beside the range and precision of the vocabulary used. A limited vocabulary spelt accurately is unlikely to capture the reader’s attention; and
• examiners should credit ambitious use of vocabulary where the word may not always be accurately spelt but has been chosen carefully to capture a sense of the situation.
Credit any other valid strategies used that are not mentioned above.
Version 2: 10 January 2019
55
Com
pten
ce L
evel
Str
ands
and
Mar
k G
rids
Sect
ion
A Ta
sk 1
R
espo
nse
time:
55
min
utes
Mar
k al
loca
tion:
87
mar
ks
[87]
Scho
ol/ c
olle
ge n
ewsp
aper
art
icle
. P
ersu
ade
the
read
ers
that
it w
ould
be
bette
r for
eve
ryon
e’s
heal
th if
all
stud
ents
wen
t bac
k to
taki
ng
prop
er s
choo
l mea
ls.
Com
pete
nce
Leve
l Str
ands
Tas
k 1:
Writ
ing
(i) a
nd (i
i)D
evel
opm
ent a
nd S
tyle
Stru
ctur
ing/
Use
of L
ingu
istic
and
St
ruct
ural
Fea
ture
sPu
rpos
e an
d A
udie
nce
CL0
No
cred
itwor
thy
resp
onse
.N
o cr
editw
orth
y re
spon
se.
No
cred
itwor
thy
resp
onse
.C
L0
CL1
Sim
ple
deve
lopm
ent w
hich
con
stra
ins
styl
e an
d lim
its c
omm
unic
atio
n to
a b
asic
leve
l.A
basi
c/ru
dim
enta
ry s
truct
ure
with
som
e at
tem
pt a
t pro
gres
sion
; the
re m
ay b
e so
me
atte
mpt
to u
se s
impl
e st
ruct
ural
or l
ingu
istic
fe
atur
es.
Som
e br
oad/
over
all,
basi
c se
nse
of p
urpo
se
and/
or a
udie
nce
may
be
evid
ent.
CL1
CL2
Del
iber
ate
deve
lopm
ent u
sing
a
stra
ight
forw
ard
styl
e in
a c
onsc
ious
atte
mpt
to
per
suad
e/pr
esen
t a p
oint
of v
iew
.
Logi
cally
org
anis
ed, l
eadi
ng th
e au
dien
ce
thro
ugh
the
resp
onse
. Th
is m
ay
occa
sion
ally
be
supp
orte
d w
ith s
ome
stra
ight
forw
ard
use
of s
truct
ural
or l
ingu
istic
fe
atur
es.
Rec
ogni
tion
of p
urpo
se a
nd a
udie
nce
givi
ng
a st
raig
htfo
rwar
d di
rect
ion
to th
e w
ritin
g.
Lang
uage
cho
ices
are
als
o ge
nera
lly
appr
opria
te.
CL2
CL3
Gen
eral
ly e
ffect
ive
and
appr
opria
te
deve
lopm
ent.
An
incr
easi
ngly
flue
nt a
nd
enga
ging
sty
le c
onsc
ious
ly a
ttem
ptin
g to
pe
rsua
de.
Com
bine
s cl
ear s
truct
urin
g w
ith a
con
scio
us
effo
rt to
use
som
e st
ruct
ural
and
ling
uist
ic
devi
ces
in o
rder
to d
evel
op th
e au
dien
ce’s
in
tere
st.
Pur
pose
and
aud
ienc
e ar
e cl
early
un
ders
tood
. Th
is u
nder
stan
ding
und
erpi
ns
the
resp
onse
and
is e
vide
nt in
the
varie
ty o
f so
me
of th
e la
ngua
ge c
hoic
es.
CL3
CL4
Incr
easi
ngly
com
pete
nt d
evel
opm
ent o
f a
styl
e th
at is
clo
sely
alig
ned
to p
urpo
se. T
he
enga
gem
ent o
f the
aud
ienc
e is
sus
tain
ed.
Pro
ficie
nt s
truct
urin
g al
lied
to th
e po
sitiv
e us
e of
stru
ctur
al a
nd li
ngui
stic
dev
ices
to
enha
nce
the
audi
ence
’s e
ngag
emen
t.
Incr
easi
ngly
con
vinc
ing
sens
e of
pur
pose
an
d au
dien
ce w
oven
with
in th
e fa
bric
of t
he
resp
onse
. Th
is is
app
aren
t in
the
cons
ciou
s ta
ilorin
g of
sui
tabl
e la
ngua
ge.
CL4
CL5
Con
fiden
t dev
elop
men
t of a
n en
gros
sing
/ap
posi
te s
tyle
that
com
man
ds th
e at
tent
ion
of th
e sp
ecifi
ed a
udie
nce.
Ass
ured
com
pete
nce
in s
truct
urin
g is
m
atch
ed b
y th
e sk
illed
use
of a
var
iety
of
stru
ctur
al a
nd li
ngui
stic
dev
ices
to e
nliv
en
the
wor
k an
d ac
tivel
y cu
ltiva
te a
con
nect
ion
with
the
audi
ence
.
A co
nfid
ent h
andl
ing
of p
urpo
se a
llied
to
a c
onsc
ious
ly d
evel
oped
rapp
ort w
ith
the
spec
ified
aud
ienc
e. T
his
is, i
n pa
rt,
gene
rate
d th
roug
h pr
ecis
e se
lect
ion
of
appo
site
lang
uage
.
CL5
Version 2: 10 January 2019
56
Mark Grid Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii) (57 marks)
Strands attained Marks awarded
000 0
100 1–2
110 3–5
111 6–9
112 10–13
221 14–17
222 18–21
223 22–25
332 26–29
333 30–33
334 34–37
443 38–41
444 42–45
445 46–49
554 50–53
555 54–57
Version 2: 10 January 2019
57
Com
pete
nce
Leve
l Str
ands
Tas
k 1:
Writ
ing
(iii)
Ran
ge o
f Sen
tenc
e St
ruct
ures
Use
of P
unct
uatio
n an
d G
ram
mar
Spel
ling
and
Ran
ge o
f Voc
abul
ary
CL0
No
cred
itwor
thy
resp
onse
.N
o cr
editw
orth
y re
spon
se.
No
cred
itwor
thy
resp
onse
.C
L0
CL1
Som
e at
tem
pt to
use
sen
tenc
e st
ruct
urin
g.S
ome
basi
c pu
nctu
atio
n (fu
ll st
ops)
and
gr
amm
ar a
re o
ccas
iona
lly u
sed
in a
n at
tem
pt to
sup
port
mea
ning
.
Som
e ac
cura
te s
pelli
ng o
f bas
ic w
ords
. A
narr
ow ra
nge
of v
ocab
ular
y lim
its
com
mun
icat
ion
to a
bas
ic le
vel.
CL1
CL2
Con
trol o
f stra
ight
forw
ard
sent
ence
st
ruct
ure
is g
ener
ally
mai
ntai
ned.
Th
e us
e of
gen
eral
ly s
ecur
e ba
sic
punc
tuat
ion
(full
stop
s an
d co
mm
as)
and
gram
mar
to s
uppo
rt un
com
plic
ated
co
mm
unic
atio
n.
Gen
eral
ly a
ccur
ate
spel
ling
of re
gula
r, st
raig
htfo
rwar
d w
ords
. S
ome
cons
ciou
s at
tem
pt to
use
voc
abul
ary
to e
nliv
en th
e w
ritin
g.C
L2
CL3
Incr
easi
ngly
sus
tain
ed c
ompe
tenc
e in
th
e co
ntro
l of s
ente
nce
stru
ctur
es. S
ome
varie
ty o
f sen
tenc
e st
ruct
urin
g is
evi
dent
.
The
basi
cs o
f pun
ctua
tion
(full
stop
s,
com
mas
, exc
lam
atio
n an
d qu
estio
n m
arks
) and
gra
mm
ar a
re in
crea
sing
ly
secu
re a
nd a
re u
sed
to a
dd c
larit
y an
d en
gage
.
Incr
easi
ngly
acc
urat
e sp
ellin
g of
regu
lar
wor
ds, a
s w
ell a
s so
me
with
irre
gula
r pa
ttern
s. G
reat
er c
are
in th
e se
lect
ion
of a
wid
enin
g vo
cabu
lary
to a
ctiv
ely
help
en
gage
the
audi
ence
. C
redi
t atte
mpt
s at
am
bitio
us u
sage
.
CL3
CL4
Varie
ty in
sen
tenc
e ty
pes
and
stru
ctur
ing
is c
ontro
lled
and,
whe
re a
ppro
pria
te,
delib
erat
ely
man
ipul
ated
for e
ffect
.
A pr
ofic
ient
use
of a
rang
e of
pun
ctua
tion
and
gram
mar
to s
usta
in c
larit
y an
d to
ac
tivel
y en
gage
the
audi
ence
.
Acc
urat
e sp
ellin
g of
mos
t wor
ds,
alth
ough
som
e er
rors
with
mor
e pr
oble
mat
ic w
ords
will
per
sist
. A
n ex
tend
ed v
ocab
ular
y is
em
ploy
ed w
ith
incr
easi
ng p
reci
sion
.
CL4
CL5
Ass
ured
use
of a
wid
e ra
nge
of s
ente
nce
stru
ctur
es to
enh
ance
the
over
all e
ffect
in
term
s of
cla
rity,
pur
pose
and
aud
ienc
e.
A va
riety
of p
unct
uatio
n an
d gr
amm
ar
is c
onfid
ently
and
acc
urat
ely
depl
oyed
, en
hanc
ing
and
gene
ratin
g a
rapp
ort w
ith
the
audi
ence
.
Err
ors
will
be
limite
d to
one
-off
mis
take
s or
the
outc
ome
of a
mbi
tious
atte
mpt
s to
use
com
plex
lang
uage
. E
xten
ded,
ap
posi
te v
ocab
ular
y co
nsci
ousl
y us
ed fo
r ef
fect
.
CL5
Version 2: 10 January 2019
58
Mark Grid Task 1: Writing (iii) (30 marks)
Strands attained Marks awarded
000 0
100 1–2
110 3–4
111 5–6
112 7–8
221 9–10
222 11–12
223 13–14
332 15–16
333 17–18
334 19–20
443 21–22
444 23–24
445 25–26
554 27–28
555 29–30
Version 2: 10 January 2019
59
Section B: Reading to Access Non-fiction and Media Texts
The Assessment Objectives Reading (AO3)
(i) Read and understand texts, selecting material appropriate to purpose.
(ii) Develop and sustain interpretations of writers’ ideas and perspectives.
(iii) Explain and evaluate how writers use linguistic, structural and presentational features to achieve effects and engage and influence the reader.
All are being assessed in Task 1, 2, 3 and 4.
The assessment process
Tasks 2 and 4 will be assessed using Competence Level based assessment.
Tasks 3 and 5 will be assessed using the task-specific checklist.
The required style of annotation for all tasks
1 Each response will be assessed on the basis of a single reading using the two marking indicators: underlining/ticking
• use the underlining tool to highlight appropriate explanation/interpretation;• use the ticking facility to indicate presentation of relevant examples/evidence; and• ignore all errors in punctuation, syntax and spelling as they are not being assessed.
59Version 2: 10 January 2019
60
2 The examiner will carefully read and annotate the response.
The first purpose of the annotation is to clarify, positively, for the examiner, exactly what is creditworthy so that the appropriate Competence Level Strands can be selected, leading in turn to the award of the correct mark. A secondary function of the annotation is to ensure that, if scrutinised, this annotation will make it clear what elements of a response have been credited.
Tasks 3 and 5: the actual assessment of each of these tasks is measured against task-specific criteria laid out in detail later.
The score for each will then be entered in the scoring facility at the bottom, right corner of the screen.
3 Tasks 2 and 4 (a) Having annotated the response as required, the examiner will then assess the
response in relation to each of the three strands of the relevant Competence Level Strands (CL).
(b) The three selected Competence Level Strands will be noted in a text box at the end of the response.
(c) Only after selecting and noting the three Competence Level Strands will the examiner turn to the mark grid to establish the mark to be awarded.
Where the mark grid calls for an examiner judgement, the extent to which a candidate has met the overall requirements of the particular Competence Level will determine the mark to be awarded.
Where a range of marks are available, the following procedure should be followed:
• where a two mark range is available, the examiner will consider whether the response is mostly in the ‘upper half’ or ‘lower half’ of the achieved Competence Levels and award either mark accordingly; and
• where a three or four mark range is available, the examiner will consider whether the response is mostly at the ‘top’, ‘middle’ or ‘bottom’ of the achieved Competence Levels and award the available marks accordingly.
In exceptional circumstances the standard of a candidate’s work might range across more than two strand levels. Such an eventuality is not covered by the mark grids. Where this happens, the examiner should decide the mark to be awarded on a ‘best fit’ basis. Alternatively, the support of the supervising examiner could usefully be sought.
Version 2: 10 January 2019
61
Here is an example of this style of annotation in action for a Task 2 response (it should be read in conjunction with the relevant Competence Level Strands on p. 59).
The response is positively assessed against each of the Competence Level Strands for Reading (i - iii). Let’s assume that the response can best be summarised by the following descriptors:
• “A straightforward understanding...an attempt to exemplify conclusions.” (Read and understand text/select material CL2)
• “An overall explanation...some straightforward appreciation” (Develop and sustain interpretations CL2)
• “A generally purposeful approach...effectively comments on and/or attempts some evaluation” (Explain and evaluate elements of writer’s craft CL3)
These individual descriptors are noted at the end of the response:
The next stage in the process is to check these ‘strand scores’ across the mark grid for Task 2. This indicates a score of 9/10 marks.
The selected score would then be entered against No. 2 in the scoring facility at the bottom, right corner of the screen.
322
61Version 2: 10 January 2019
62
Section B
Task 2:
Response time: 15 minutes.
Total: 21 marks
Explain how the writer has presented his views on the damage caused by the forest fire to engage the reader.
Below is a task specific checklist outlining the material that candidates at all Competence Levels may be expected to draw upon for their responses:
• The writer begins by using descriptive details of his journey to capture the reader’s attention: “The road was steep and slow... to drive the hundred or so miles”.
• The repetition of “Toiyabe National Forest” in the second sentence is used to develop the readers’ curiosity when he adds the following remark/codicil: “or at least what once had been...”
• The writer uses contrasts to emphasise the scale and completeness of the devastation caused by the forest fire.
• The initial comparison is between the untouched - “swings and paddling pool” and the surrounding scene of desolation – “an ocean of blackened stumps”.
• The writer uses a metaphor to illustrate for the reader the scale of the destruction when he describes them as surrounded by “an ocean”.
• The writer paradoxically describes these undamaged properties as “odd”, whereas before the fire these would have been viewed as normal.
• The second comparison is a “before and after” contrast. Before this forest fire the inhabitants might well have considered themselves to be “the luckiest people on the planet” as they lived “amid cool and fragrant pines” but afterwards they had been transported metaphorically to “the surface of the moon”
• The idyllic description of the scene before the fire – “cool and fragrant pines” is metaphorically contrasted for effect with somewhere that epitomises utter barrenness – “an ocean of blackened stumps”/“the surface of the moon”.
Credit any other valid suggestions (check with your Supervising Examiner)
62Version 2: 10 January 2019
63
Com
pten
ce L
evel
Str
ands
Tas
k 2
Rea
d an
d un
ders
tand
text
/sel
ect
mat
eria
lD
evel
op a
nd s
usta
in in
terp
reta
tions
of
writ
er’s
inte
ntio
nsEx
plai
n an
d ev
alua
te e
lem
ents
of
writ
er’s
cra
ft
CL0
No
cred
itwor
thy
resp
onse
.N
o cr
editw
orth
y re
spon
se.
No
cred
itwor
thy
resp
onse
.C
L0
CL1
A ve
ry b
asic
und
erst
andi
ng m
ay b
e su
ppor
ted
by te
xtua
l ref
eren
ces
som
e of
w
hich
may
be
rele
vant
.
Som
e ba
sic
sens
e of
the
writ
er’s
ove
rall
inte
ntio
n m
ay b
e pr
esen
ted.
A ru
dim
enta
ry a
ttem
pt to
offe
r som
e ba
sic
rem
arks
on
how
an
aspe
ct/s
of t
he
text
has
/hav
e be
en u
sed.
C
L1
CL2
A st
raig
htfo
rwar
d un
ders
tand
ing
is
deve
lope
d th
roug
h an
atte
mpt
to
exem
plify
con
clus
ions
.
An
over
all e
xpla
natio
n of
the
writ
er’s
in
tent
ions
is p
rese
nted
. S
ome
stra
ight
forw
ard
appr
ecia
tion
is e
vide
nt.
An
unco
mpl
icat
ed re
view
/ con
side
ratio
n of
som
e of
the
lang
uage
and
/or l
ingu
istic
de
vice
s th
e w
riter
has
em
ploy
ed.
CL2
CL3
Som
e ap
prop
riate
ly s
elec
ted
exam
ples
fro
m th
e ex
tract
are
link
ed to
val
id
insi
ghts
/exp
lana
tions
.
A co
mpe
tent
ove
rall
inte
rpre
tatio
n th
at
reco
gnis
es h
ow s
ome
of th
e w
riter
’s
inte
ntio
ns h
ave
been
del
iver
ed th
roug
h la
ngua
ge c
hoic
es.
A ge
nera
lly p
urpo
sefu
l app
roac
h w
hich
effe
ctiv
ely
com
men
ts o
n an
d/or
at
tem
pts
som
e ev
alua
tion
of th
e lin
guis
tic
stra
tegi
es.
CL3
CL4
Rel
evan
t sel
ectio
n of
mat
eria
l is
used
to
pinp
oint
and
com
men
t on
a se
ries
of th
e w
riter
’s in
tend
ed s
trate
gies
.
An
inte
rpre
tatio
n th
at c
ompe
tent
ly
dem
onst
rate
s a
valid
und
erst
andi
ng o
f ho
w th
e w
riter
’s in
tent
ions
are
refle
cted
in
lang
uage
cho
ices
.
A ge
nera
lly e
valu
ativ
e ap
proa
ch th
at
com
pete
ntly
exp
lore
s th
e us
e of
som
e of
th
e lin
guis
tic s
trate
gies
.C
L4
CL5
Focu
sed,
pre
cise
sel
ectio
n us
ed to
fa
cilit
ate
the
scru
tiny
of th
e w
riter
’s
inte
nded
stra
tegi
es.
An
anal
ytic
al in
terp
reta
tion
that
de
mon
stra
tes
a pe
rcep
tive
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
how
the
writ
er’s
inte
ntio
ns a
re
evid
ence
d in
the
use
of la
ngua
ge.
A co
nfid
ent,
eval
uativ
e ap
proa
ch is
use
d to
exa
min
e re
leva
nt e
lem
ents
of t
he
writ
er’s
cra
ft.C
L5
Version 2: 10 January 2019
64
Mark Grid Task 2 (21 marks)
Strands attained Mark awarded
000 0
100 1
110 2
111 3
112 4
221 5–6
222 7–8
322 9–10
332 11–12
333 13–14
334 15–16
443 17
444 18
445 19
554 20
555 21
Version 2: 10 January 2019
6565
Task 3
Response time: 10 minutes
Total: 12 marks
In your own words write down two reasons the writer gives to explain why he did not know about this forest fire. Present two pieces of supporting evidence for each reason.
The writer presents two reasons. The order in which candidates present them is irrelevant:
(a) First reason and two pieces of supporting evidence: 6 marks [4 marks for the reason and +1 mark for each piece of evidence]
First reason [up to a max. of 4 marks]: The immense size of the USA is such that the country seems to swallow up such dreadful events so that they pass unnoticed.
Validate through the use of underlining
• A confident summary of the above point using his/her own language – 4 marks• A competent summary of the above point mainly using his/her own language – 3
marks• A straightforward, mainly valid attempt to summarise in his/her own words but with
some reliance on the language of the text – 2 marks• A general sense of the above point, relying on the language of the text – 1 mark
Validate any of the following supporting evidence with a tick [1 mark for each piece of correct evidence whether reported or quoted]:
• ‘It’s so big that it just absorbs disasters’• ‘muffles them with its vastness’• ‘mostly it is just the scale of the country’
(b) The writer’s second explanation: 6 marks [4 marks for the reason +1 mark for each piece of evidence]
Second reason [up to a max. of 4 marks]: The way news is presented in the USA trivialises such tragedies.
Validate through the use of underlining
• A confident summary of the above point using his/her own language – 4 marks• A competent summary of the above point mainly using his/her own language – 3
marks• A straightforward, mainly valid attempt to summarise in his/her own words but with
some reliance on the language of the text – 2 marks• A general sense of the above point, relying on the language of the text – 1 mark
Version 2: 10 January 2019
66
Validate either of the following pieces of supporting evidence with a tick [1 mark for each piece of correct evidence whether reported or quoted]:
• “treated as a brief and not terribly important diversion between ads for soap powder and cottage cheese”
• “the idiotic breeziness common to local TV newsreaders in America”
66Version 2: 10 January 2019
67
Task 4
Response time: 17 minutes
Total: 20 marks
Comment on how language has been used to develop a sense that Titanic Belfast would be a really special place for a wedding. Present supporting evidence.
Below is a task-specific checklist outlining the material that candidates at all Competence Levels may be expected to include in their responses. Use of language to generate the sense of a really special wedding venue:
• Use of direct address: “your wedding day photography”/ “you have many photo-friendly locations”.
• Superlatives/adjectives dominate the piece: “offers stunning views”/ “magnificent setting”/ “extraordinary service”.
• The tone is reassuring: “the only requirement is your presence”/ “you will experience”.• Exclusivity is emphasised, Titanic Belfast is “effortlessly unique”.• The piece deliberately sets out to allay anxieties: “By entrusting your special day to
us, be assured every detail is addressed”.• The adjective “stunning” is repeated in the opening paragraph to reinforce the positive
message.• Sibilance is employed to emphasise what is being offered here: “setting offers a
stunning”.• The ‘special’ nature of the location is referred to repeatedly for emphasis: “stands at
the head of”/ focus on “photo-friendly” nature of the location/ “multiple … many” – the idea of a wide range of choices being offered.
• The use of assonance adds to the ‘sense of reassurance’ that is consciously being developed: “assured …addressed”.
Credit any other valid suggestions (check with your Supervising Examiner)
67Version 2: 10 January 2019
68
Com
pete
nce
Leve
l Str
ands
Tas
k 4
Rea
d an
d un
ders
tand
text
/sel
ect
mat
eria
lD
evel
op a
nd s
usta
in in
terp
reta
tions
of
writ
er’s
inte
ntio
nsEx
plai
n an
d ev
alua
te e
lem
ents
of
writ
er’s
cra
ft
CL0
No
cred
itwor
thy
resp
onse
.N
o cr
editw
orth
y re
spon
se.
No
cred
itwor
thy
resp
onse
.C
L0
CL1
A ve
ry b
asic
und
erst
andi
ng m
ay b
e su
ppor
ted
by te
xtua
l ref
eren
ces
som
e of
w
hich
may
be
rele
vant
.
Som
e ba
sic
sens
e of
the
writ
er’s
ove
rall
inte
ntio
n m
ay b
e pr
esen
ted.
A ru
dim
enta
ry a
ttem
pt to
offe
r som
e ba
sic
rem
arks
on
one
or tw
o ex
ampl
es o
f la
ngua
ge u
se.
CL1
CL2
A st
raig
htfo
rwar
d un
ders
tand
ing
is
deve
lope
d th
roug
h an
atte
mpt
to
exem
plify
con
clus
ions
.
An
over
all e
xpla
natio
n of
the
writ
er’s
in
tent
ions
is p
rese
nted
. S
ome
stra
ight
forw
ard
appr
ecia
tion
is e
vide
nt.
An
unco
mpl
icat
ed re
view
/con
side
ratio
n of
som
e of
the
lang
uage
and
/or l
ingu
istic
de
vice
s th
e w
riter
has
em
ploy
ed.
CL2
CL3
Som
e ap
prop
riate
ly s
elec
ted
exam
ples
fro
m th
e ex
tract
are
link
ed to
val
id
insi
ghts
/exp
lana
tions
.
A co
mpe
tent
ove
rall
inte
rpre
tatio
n th
at
reco
gnis
es h
ow s
ome
of th
e w
riter
’s
inte
ntio
ns h
ave
been
del
iver
ed th
roug
h la
ngua
ge c
hoic
es.
A ge
nera
lly p
urpo
sefu
l app
roac
h w
hich
ef
fect
ivel
y co
mm
ents
on
and/
or a
ttem
pts
som
e ev
alua
tion
of th
e lin
guis
tic
stra
tegi
es.
CL3
CL4
Rel
evan
t sel
ectio
n of
mat
eria
l is
used
to
pinp
oint
and
com
men
t on
a se
ries
of th
e w
riter
’s in
tend
ed s
trate
gies
.
An
inte
rpre
tatio
n th
at c
ompe
tent
ly
dem
onst
rate
s a
valid
und
erst
andi
ng o
f ho
w th
e w
riter
’s in
tent
ions
are
refle
cted
in
lang
uage
cho
ices
.
A ge
nera
lly e
valu
ativ
e ap
proa
ch th
at
com
pete
ntly
exp
lore
s th
e us
e of
som
e of
th
e lin
guis
tic s
trate
gies
.C
L4
CL5
Focu
sed,
pre
cise
sel
ectio
n us
ed to
fa
cilit
ate
the
scru
tiny
of th
e w
riter
’s
inte
nded
stra
tegi
es.
An
anal
ytic
al in
terp
reta
tion
that
dem
onst
rate
s a
perc
eptiv
e un
ders
tand
ing
of h
ow th
e w
riter
’s
inte
ntio
ns a
re e
vide
nced
in th
e us
e of
la
ngua
ge.
A co
nfid
ent,
eval
uativ
e ap
proa
ch is
use
d to
exa
min
e re
leva
nt e
lem
ents
of t
he
writ
er’s
cra
ft.C
L5
Version 2: 10 January 2019
69
Mark Grid Task 4 (20 marks)
Strands attained Mark awarded
000 0
100 1
110 2
111 3
112 4
221 5
222 6–7
322 8–9
332 10–11
333 12–13
334 14–15
443 16
444 17
445 18
554 19
555 20
Version 2: 10 January 2019
70
Task 5
Response time: 8 minutes
Total: 10 marks
Select two presentational features used in this image to support the idea that Titanic Belfast is an ideal place to hold a wedding. Explain the intended effect of these two presentational features on the reader.
Each feature and explanation: 5 marks [1 mark for pres. feature/4 marks for explanation]
Validate any of the following presentational features with a tick: [1 mark]
Credit:• the dramatic slanting front cover;• an image of a modern, stylish bride;• an old-fashioned limousine;• the front of the iconic Titanic Centre; • the image is completed with celebratory balloons; • the Titanic Belfast logo appears bottom right on the front cover, clearly reinforcing the
venue; and• the iconic rippled finish of the building is clearly visible and makes an excellent
backdrop for wedding photography.
Credit any other valid suggestions (check with your Supervising Examiner)
Version 2: 10 January 2019
71
Validate any of the following explanations through the use of underlining [up to 4 marks for a relevant and convincing explanation]
• A confident and convincing explanation – 4 marks• A competent explanation – 3 marks• A straightforward, mainly valid attempt to present an explanation – 2 marks• A general attempt to present an explanation - 1 mark
Credit:• images are doing the advertiser’s work of selling this idyllic, iconic, world famous
location by making every aspect of it look so visually appealing;• the intention is to create an immediate visual ‘wow factor’;• the bride is placed in a dominant central position/the focal point of the image – it is ‘her
day’, she is the centre of attention;• sophistication is being sold here – the very modern bridal outfit that contrasts with the
old-fashioned car and then there’s the iconic landmark as a backdrop; and• every aspect of the image hints at a delightful day (even the weather)/ elements of the
‘fairy-tale experience’.
Credit any other valid suggestions (check with your Supervising Examiner)
Version 2: 10 January 2019
MARKSCHEME
General Certificate of Secondary Education2019
73
English Language
[CODE]SPECIMEN
Unit 4
Personal or Creative Writing and Reading Literary and Non-fiction Texts
Version 2: 10 January 2019
74
Section A: Personal/Creative Writing
Task
The Assessment Objectives
Writing (AO4)
(i) Write to communicate clearly, effectively and imaginatively, using and adapting forms and selecting vocabulary appropriate to task and purpose in ways that engage the reader.
(ii) Organise information and ideas into structured and sequenced sentences, paragraphs and whole texts, using a variety of linguistic and structural features to support cohesion and coherence.
(iii) Use a range of sentence structures for clarity, purpose and effect, with accurate spelling, punctuation and grammar.
All are being assessed in Task 1.
The examiner will be required to make two distinct assessments: one for Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii) and a second assessment for Task 1: Writing (iii).
The two required assessments
1 Each response will be assessed on the basis of a single reading and annotated using the three e-marking tools: underlining, circling and wavy underlining.
The following method and style of marking is to be used:
• the underlining tool to indicate creditworthy material.
• the circling facility serves two purposes:
(a) to highlight spelling mistakes with each error being circled only once – alot/...happend
(b) for indicating minor and/or occasional lapses in punctuation such as missing apostrophes, commas and full stops – run’s/...two three or four/...to me it was not long after...
• wavy underlining will denote failings in syntax. When used vertically in the margin this will indicate ongoing issues, for example, failings in grammar/lapses in sentence structure – He seen yous threw the open door
Version 2: 10 January 2019
75
2 Using the method and style of marking outlined on p. 70 in conjunction with the Competence Level (CL) Strands for Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii), the examiner will assess, positively, the features of that response.
This process (a worked example follows on the next page) will be carried out in this order:
(a) The examiner will carefully read and annotate the response.
(b) The three Competence Level Strands that best match the candidate’s achievement will be noted.
(c) Only after selecting and noting the three Competence Level Strands will the examiner turn to the mark grid to establish the mark to be awarded. Where the mark grid calls for an examiner judgement, the extent to which a candidate has met the overall requirements of the particular Competence Level will determine the mark to be awarded.
Where a range of marks are available, the following procedure should be followed:
• where a two mark range is available, the examiner will consider whether the response is mostly in the ‘upper half’ or ‘lower half’ of the achieved Competence Levels and award either mark accordingly; and
• where a three or four mark range is available, the examiner will consider whether the response is mostly at the ‘top’, ‘middle’ or ‘bottom’ of the achieved Competence Levels and award the available marks accordingly.
In exceptional circumstances the standard of a candidate’s work might range across more than two strand levels. Such an eventuality is not covered by the mark grids. Where this happens, the examiner should decide the mark to be awarded on a ‘best fit’ basis. The support of the supervising examiner could usefully be sought.
3 A final check of every page of the answer booklet:
(a) Use the ‘E’ tool to indicate the end of the candidate’s final response.
(b) Stamp all blank or planning pages with the ‘SEEN’ tool.
Version 2: 10 January 2019
76
Here is an example of this style of annotation in action for Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii) (this should be read in conjunction with the relevant Competence Level Strands on p. 75).
The response is positively assessed against each of the three strands that make up the Competence Levels for Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii). Let’s assume it can best be summarised by the following descriptors:
• “Generally effective and appropriate...increasingly fluent and engaging style” (Development and Style CL3)
• “Logically organised...some straightforward use of structural and linguistic features” (Structuring/Linguistic and Structural Features CL2)
• “Recognition of purpose and audience...a straightforward direction... Language choices...generally appropriate” (Purpose and Audience CL2)
These individual strand levels are noted at the end of the response in a text box
The next stage in the process is to check these ‘strand scores’ on the mark grid for Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii). This indicates a score of 23–26 marks. This score would then be entered against No. 1i/ii in the scoring facility at the bottom, right corner of the screen.
In order to assess Task 1: Writing (iii), the same process (step 2 on p. 67) is used to make this second assessment using the Competence Level Strands that relate to Writing (iii).
Here is an example of this style of annotation in action (it should be read in conjunction with the relevant Competence Level Strands on p. 77).
The response is positively assessed against each of the three strands that make up the Competence Level Strands for Task 1: Writing (iii). Let’s assume it can best be summarised by the following descriptors:
• “Increasingly sustained competence...some variety of sentence structuring” (Range of Sentence Structure CL3)
• “The basics of punctuation...increasingly secure...used to add clarity and engage” (Use of Punctuation CL3)
• “Generally accurate spelling of regular, straightforward words. Some conscious attempt to use vocabulary to enliven the writing” (Spelling and Range of Vocabulary CL2)
These individual strand levels are noted at the end of the response in a text box:
Wi/ii 322 Wi/ii
Wi/ii Wi/ii 332
Version 2: 10 January 2019
77
The next stage in the process is to check these ‘strand scores’ across the mark grid for Task 1: Writing (iii). This indicates a score of 15–16 marks.
The selected score would then be entered against No. 1b in the scoring facility at the bottom, right corner of the screen.
General Guidance on the Application of the Competence Level Strands
The first assessment: Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii)
The following checklist will help to highlight the extent to which a candidate has shaped her/his response appropriately. It offers general guidance on how the candidates, across all the Competence Level Strands, may employ the skills from Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii).
Communicate clearly, effectively and imaginatively demonstrating:
• a handling of the topic in such a way as to attempt to positively develop the interest of the specified audience;
• use of a style that builds a positive relationship with that audience; and• if appropriate, use of anecdotes/humour in an effort to engage the audience.
Adapting form and vocabulary to task and purpose in ways that engage the specified audience, demonstrating:
• conscious awareness of the audience and purpose evident in the development of form;• a use of tone that endeavours to engage and sustain the audience’s attention; and• use of vocabulary that is in keeping with the purpose of the task and audience.
Organise information and ideas into structured, sequenced sentences, paragraphs and whole texts demonstrating:
• logical progression/a conscious attempt to develop a storyline;• use of engaging/challenging introductory and concluding paragraphs;• use of topic/link sentences for different paragraphs; and• development that endeavours to use organisation to sustain the audience’s interest.
Use a variety of linguistic and structural features to support cohesion and overall coherence demonstrating:
• a conscious varying of sentence length for effect; • the use of connectives to give coherence; and• the use of rhetorical devices (such as the rule of three or questions) to develop interest
and to build a rapport with the specified audience.
Credit any other valid strategies used that are not mentioned above.
Version 2: 10 January 2019
78
The second assessment: Task 1: Writing (iii)
The following checklist will help to highlight the extent to which a candidate has shaped her/his response appropriately. It offers guidance on how the candidates, across all the Competence Levels, may employ the skills from Task 1: Writing (iii).
The range and effectiveness of sentence structures:
• the wider the range and the greater the degree of originality and control in structuring sentences, the more opportunity the candidate gives her/himself to establish a positive rapport with the reader; and
• the more assured and varied the manipulation of sentence structuring is, the higher will be the mark awarded.
The use made of accurate punctuation and grammar:
• linked to the control of sentence structure is the control of a variety of appropriate punctuation and accurate use of grammar. Here, too, competent usage can help to maintain the reader’s interest. The greater the control and variation in the use of punctuation, the higher will be the reward.
The use made of accurate spelling and range of vocabulary:
• accuracy in spelling, in isolation, can be misleading; it needs to be viewed beside the range of the vocabulary used. A limited vocabulary spelt accurately is unlikely to capture the reader’s attention; and
• examiners should credit ambitious use of vocabulary where the word may not always be accurately spelt but has been chosen carefully to capture a sense of the situation.
Credit any other valid strategies used that are not mentioned above.
Version 2: 10 January 2019
79
Com
pete
nce
Leve
l Str
ands
and
Mar
k G
rids
Task
1:
Res
pons
e tim
e: 5
5 m
inut
esM
ark
allo
catio
n: 8
8 m
arks
(a
) W
rite
a pe
rson
al e
ssay
for t
he e
xam
iner
abo
ut a
n in
cide
nt in
you
r ow
n lif
e th
at d
id n
ot s
tart
wel
l but
end
ed u
p be
ing
a po
sitiv
e ex
perie
nce.
or
(b
) W
rite
your
ent
ry fo
r a c
reat
ive
essa
y w
ritin
g co
mpe
titio
n. T
he a
udie
nce
is y
oung
peo
ple.
The
pic
ture
prin
ted
is to
be
the
basi
s fo
r the
com
petit
ion
entry
. P
rovi
de y
our o
wn
title
.
Com
pete
nce
Leve
l Str
ands
Tas
k 1:
Writ
ing
(i) a
nd (i
i)D
evel
opm
ent a
nd S
tyle
Stru
ctur
ing/
Use
of L
ingu
istic
and
St
ruct
ural
Fea
ture
sPu
rpos
e an
d A
udie
nce
CL0
No
cred
itwor
thy
resp
onse
.N
o cr
editw
orth
y re
spon
se.
No
cred
itwor
thy
resp
onse
.C
L0
CL1
Sim
ple
deve
lopm
ent w
hich
con
stra
ins
styl
e an
d lim
its c
omm
unic
atio
n to
a b
asic
leve
l.R
udim
enta
ry a
ttem
pt to
stru
ctur
e a
resp
onse
. A
ny a
ttem
pt a
t the
use
of
lingu
istic
feat
ures
will
be
elem
enta
ry in
ou
tcom
e.
Som
e br
oad/
over
all,
basi
c se
nse
of p
urpo
se
and/
or a
udie
nce
may
be
evid
ent.
CL1
CL2
Del
iber
ate
deve
lopm
ent u
sing
a
stra
ight
forw
ard
styl
e in
a c
onsc
ious
atte
mpt
to
writ
e ab
out a
n ex
perie
nce,
or w
rite
crea
tivel
y.
Logi
cally
org
anis
ed, l
eadi
ng th
e au
dien
ce
thro
ugh
the
resp
onse
. Th
is m
ay
occa
sion
ally
be
supp
orte
d w
ith s
ome
stra
ight
forw
ard
use
of s
truct
ural
and
lin
guis
tic fe
atur
es.
Rec
ogni
tion
of p
urpo
se a
nd a
udie
nce
givi
ng a
stra
ight
forw
ard
dire
ctio
n to
the
writ
ing.
Lan
guag
e ch
oice
s ar
e ge
nera
lly
appr
opria
te.
CL2
CL3
Gen
eral
ly e
ffect
ive
and
appr
opria
te
deve
lopm
ent.
An
incr
easi
ngly
flue
nt a
nd
enga
ging
sty
le is
cre
ated
to d
iscu
ss a
n ex
perie
nce,
or w
rite
crea
tivel
y.
Com
bine
s cl
ear s
truct
urin
g w
ith a
con
scio
us
effo
rt to
use
som
e st
ruct
ural
and
ling
uist
ic
devi
ces
in o
rder
to d
evel
op th
e au
dien
ce’s
in
tere
st.
Pur
pose
and
aud
ienc
e ar
e cl
early
un
ders
tood
. Th
is u
nder
stan
ding
und
erpi
ns
the
resp
onse
and
is e
vide
nt in
the
varie
ty o
f so
me
of th
e la
ngua
ge c
hoic
es.
CL3
CL4
Incr
easi
ngly
com
pete
nt d
evel
opm
ent o
f a
styl
e th
at is
clo
sely
alig
ned
to p
urpo
se.
The
enga
gem
ent o
f the
aud
ienc
e is
sus
tain
ed.
Pro
ficie
nt s
truct
urin
g al
lied
to th
e po
sitiv
e us
e of
stru
ctur
al a
nd li
ngui
stic
dev
ices
to
enha
nce
the
audi
ence
’s e
ngag
emen
t.
Incr
easi
ngly
con
vinc
ing
sens
e of
pur
pose
an
d au
dien
ce w
oven
with
in th
e fa
bric
of t
he
resp
onse
. Th
is is
app
aren
t in
the
cons
ciou
s ta
ilorin
g of
sui
tabl
e la
ngua
ge.
CL4
CL5
Con
fiden
t dev
elop
men
t of a
sty
le th
at is
ta
ilore
d to
pur
pose
in o
rder
to g
ener
ate
writ
ing
that
com
man
ds th
e au
dien
ce’s
at
tent
ion.
Ass
ured
com
pete
nce
in s
truct
urin
g is
m
atch
ed b
y th
e sk
illed
use
of a
var
iety
of
stru
ctur
al a
nd li
ngui
stic
dev
ices
to e
nliv
en
the
wor
k an
d ac
tivel
y cu
ltiva
te a
con
nect
ion
with
the
audi
ence
.
A co
nfide
nt h
andl
ing
of p
urpo
se a
llied
to
a c
onsc
ious
ly d
evel
oped
rapp
ort w
ith
the
audi
ence
. Th
is is
, in
part,
gen
erat
ed
thro
ugh
prec
ise
sele
ctio
n of
app
osite
la
ngua
ge.
CL5
Version 2: 10 January 2019
80
Marking Grid Task 1: Writing (i) and (ii) (58 marks)
Strands attained Mark awarded
000 0
100 1–2
110 3–6
111 7–10
112 11–14
221 15–18
222 19–22
223 23–26
332 27–30
333 31–34
334 35–38
443 39–42
444 43–46
445 47–50
554 51–54
555 55–58
Version 2: 10 January 2019
81
Com
pete
nce
Leve
l Str
ands
Tas
k 1:
Writ
ing
(iii)
Ran
ge o
f Sen
tenc
e St
ruct
ures
Use
of P
unct
uatio
n an
d G
ram
mar
Spel
ling
and
Ran
ge o
f Voc
abul
ary
CL0
No
cred
itwor
thy
resp
onse
.N
o cr
editw
orth
y re
spon
se.
No
cred
itwor
thy
resp
onse
.C
L0
CL1
Som
e at
tem
pt to
use
sen
tenc
e st
ruct
urin
g.S
ome
basi
c pu
nctu
atio
n (fu
ll st
ops)
and
gr
amm
ar a
re o
ccas
iona
lly u
sed
in a
n at
tem
pt to
sup
port
mea
ning
.
Som
e ac
cura
te s
pelli
ng o
f bas
ic w
ords
. A
narr
ow ra
nge
of v
ocab
ular
y lim
its
com
mun
icat
ion
to a
bas
ic le
vel.
CL1
CL2
Con
trol o
f stra
ight
forw
ard
sent
ence
st
ruct
ure
is g
ener
ally
mai
ntai
ned.
Th
e us
e of
gen
eral
ly s
ecur
e ba
sic
punc
tuat
ion
(full
stop
s an
d co
mm
as)
and
gram
mar
to s
uppo
rt un
com
plic
ated
co
mm
unic
atio
n.
Gen
eral
ly a
ccur
ate
spel
ling
of re
gula
r, st
raig
htfo
rwar
d w
ords
. S
ome
cons
ciou
s at
tem
pt to
use
voc
abul
ary
to e
nliv
en th
e w
ritin
g.
CL2
CL3
Incr
easi
ngly
sus
tain
ed c
ompe
tenc
e in
th
e co
ntro
l of s
ente
nce
stru
ctur
es.
Som
e va
riety
of s
ente
nce
stru
ctur
ing
is e
vide
nt.
The
basi
cs o
f pun
ctua
tion
(full
stop
s,
com
mas
, exc
lam
atio
n an
d qu
estio
n m
arks
) an
d gr
amm
ar a
re in
crea
sing
ly s
ecur
e an
d ar
e us
ed to
add
cla
rity
and
enga
ge.
Incr
easi
ngly
acc
urat
e sp
ellin
g of
regu
lar
wor
ds, a
s w
ell a
s so
me
with
irre
gula
r pa
ttern
s. G
reat
er c
are
in th
e se
lect
ion
of a
w
iden
ing
voca
bula
ry to
act
ivel
y he
lp e
ngag
e th
e au
dien
ce.
Cre
dit a
ttem
pts
at a
mbi
tious
us
age.
CL3
CL4
Varie
ty in
sen
tenc
e ty
pes
and
stru
ctur
ing
is c
ontro
lled
and,
whe
re a
ppro
pria
te,
delib
erat
ely
man
ipul
ated
for e
ffect
.
A pr
ofic
ient
use
of a
rang
e of
pun
ctua
tion
and
gram
mar
to s
usta
in c
larit
y an
d to
ac
tivel
y en
gage
the
audi
ence
.
Acc
urat
e sp
ellin
g of
mos
t wor
ds, a
lthou
gh
som
e er
rors
with
mor
e pr
oble
mat
ic w
ords
w
ill p
ersi
st.
An
exte
nded
voc
abul
ary
is
empl
oyed
with
incr
easi
ng p
reci
sion
.
CL4
CL5
Ass
ured
use
of a
wid
e ra
nge
of s
ente
nce
stru
ctur
es to
enh
ance
the
over
all e
ffect
in
term
s of
cla
rity,
pur
pose
and
aud
ienc
e.
A va
riety
of p
unct
uatio
n an
d gr
amm
ar
is c
onfid
ently
and
acc
urat
ely
depl
oyed
, en
hanc
ing
styl
e an
d ge
nera
ting
a ra
ppor
t w
ith th
e au
dien
dce.
Err
ors
will
be
limite
d to
one
-off
mis
take
s or
th
e ou
tcom
e of
am
bitio
us a
ttem
pts
to u
se
com
plex
lang
uage
. E
xten
ded,
app
osite
vo
cabu
lary
con
scio
usly
use
d fo
r effe
ct.
CL5
Version 2: 10 January 2019
82
Mark Grid Task 1: Writing (iii) (30 marks)
Strands attained Mark awarded
000 0
100 1–2
110 3–4
111 5–6
112 7–8
221 9–10
222 11–12
223 13–14
332 15–16
333 17–18
334 19–20
443 21–22
444 23–24
445 25–26
554 27–28
555 29–30
Version 2: 10 January 2019
83
Section B: Reading Literary and Non-fiction Texts
The Assessment ObjectivesReading (AO3)
(i) Read and understand texts, selecting material appropriate to purpose, collating from different sources and making comparisons and cross-references as appropriate.
(ii) Develop and sustain interpretations of writers’ ideas and perspectives.
(iii) Explain and evaluate how writers use linguistic, structural and presentational features to achieve effects and engage and influence the reader.
All are being assessed in Task 1, 2, 3 and 4.
The assessment process
All tasks will be assessed using Competence Level based assessment.
The required style of annotation for all tasks
1 Each response will be assessed on the basis of a single reading using the three e-marking tools: underlining/ticking C & C button
• use the underlining tool to highlight appropriate explanation/interpretation;• use the ticking facility to indicate presentation of relevant examples/evidence;• use the button in the margin to highlight comparing and contrasting; and• ignore all errors in punctuation, syntax and spelling as they are not being assessed.
2 The examiner will carefully read and annotate the response.
The first purpose of the annotation is to clarify, positively, for the examiner, exactly what is creditworthy so that the appropriate Competence Level Strands can be selected, leading in turn to the award of the correct mark. A secondary function of the annotation is to ensure that, if scrutinised, this annotation will make it clear what elements of a response have been credited.
All tasks:
(a) Having annotated the response as required, the examiner will then assess the response in relation to each of the three strands of the Competence Level Strands (CL).
(b) The three selected Competence Level Strands will be noted in a text box at the end of the response.
(c) Only after selecting and noting the three Competence Level Strands will the examiner turn to the mark grid to establish the mark to be awarded.
The mark grid for Task 2 calls for examiner judgement. The extent to which a candidate has met the overall requirements of the achieved Competence Levels (whether the response is in the ‘upper half’ or ‘lower half’ of the achieved levels) will determine the mark to be awarded.
C
C
Version 2: 10 January 2019
84
Where a range of marks are available, the following procedure should be followed:
• where a two mark range is available, the examiner will consider whether the response is mostly in the ‘upper half’ or ‘lower half’ of the achieved Competence Levels and award either mark accordingly; and
• where a three or four mark range is available, the examiner will consider whether the response is mostly at the ‘top’, ‘middle’ or ‘bottom’ of the achieved Competence Levels and award the available marks accordingly.
In exceptional circumstances the standard of a candidate’s work might range across more than two strand levels. Such an eventuality is not covered by the mark grids. Where this happens, the examiner should decide the mark to be awarded on a ‘best fit’ basis. Alternatively, the support of the supervising examiner could usefully be sought.
Here is an example of this style of annotation in action for a Task 3 response (it should be read in conjunction with the relevant Competence Level Strands on p. 86).
The response is positively assessed against each of the Competence Level Strands for Reading (i-iii). Let’s assume that the response can best be summarised by the following descriptors:
• “An overall understanding...some appropriate examples...linked to valid insights/explanations” (Read and understand text/select material CL3)
• “Competent overall interpretation...the writer’s intentions have been delivered through language choices” (Develop and sustain interpretations CL2)
• “Uncomplicated review/consideration of some of the language and/or linguistic devices...” (Explain and evaluate elements of writer’s craft CL2)
These individual descriptors are noted at the end of the response:
The next stage in the process is to check these ‘strand scores’ across the mark grid for Task 3. This indicates a score of 7 marks.
The selected score would then be entered against No. 3 in the scoring facility at the bottom, right corner of the screen.
322
84Version 2: 10 January 2019
85
Section B
Task 2: Response time: 26 minutes
Total: 32 marks
Compare and contrast how the writers of texts A and B have created a sense of unease. Present supporting evidence from both texts.
Below is a task specific checklist outlining the material that candidates at all competence levels may be expected to draw upon to their responses:
• In Text A the scene changes quite suddenly because of a shift of location - they move from the idyllic “lily pond...the lazy lizards” to being “confronted by a flat wilderness”; in Text B, by contrast, a combination of factors gradually build unease as they journey to the puppy farm. They are going on a “raid” on a derelict farm: it’s night time and the moon is “occasionally obscured by hurrying clouds”/“in the dark” and the main character is increasingly nervous about the impending raid.
• Both writers use the reactions of a central character to emphasise the unease generated. The following may be drawn upon to compare and contrast:
TEXT A• Finn is so surprised when he first sees the place he “gasped”. The choice of the verb
“confronted” in the same sentence emphasises the abruptness of the change.• He immediately notices the ominous silence “The stillness was the first thing that hit
him”. The writer’s choice of “hit” to describe the silence emphasises its intensity. This is continued by the description of the effect this silence has: “he had suddenly been clamped with earmuffs”.
• An uncomfortable simile is used to describe the effect generated by the surrounding trees that “stood like sentries all around”. Their frosty effect is seen as “casting cold shadows”. Like Elaine in Text B, Finn “shivered”/“he gave another shiver”.
• He speaks to Tara in a “hushed” voice before going on to describe the place as “creepy”/“eerie”/“cold”.
TEXT B• Initially we learn that “Excitement clutched at Elaine’s stomach... she was regretting
her offer to join the others on the raid”.• Elaine’s anxiety is evident in her comment about the farmhouse and people to the
extent that Steve notices.• “Elaine shivered” as the countryside ‘closes in’ on their car.• Mike, obviously is aware of her nervousness: “...gave Elaine’s arm a re-assuring
squeeze”.• The appearance of the derelict farm engenders a physical response: “Elaine gave a
sudden shudder”.• She’s clearly disconcerted by the end of the text: “half-remembered ghost stories...
NOW!”
• In Text A the barren nature of the place is emphasised by the writer’s language choices: “flat wilderness”/“scrubby field” and repetition of “scrubby grass”/“wasteland”; in Text B a deliberately menacing description of their surroundings is developed as they head to the “half-derelict” farm: the ominous simile - “trees and hedgerows... looked like monsters from a nightmare”/threatening use of metaphoric personification – “leaned over... leering”. Further unease is added by the “creaking” noises.
85Version 2: 10 January 2019
86
• In Text A the violent past is emphasised: “Underneath this wasteland is a whole bunch of dead foreigners”/“over a thousand years ago, a fierce battle... right on this very spot. Loads of people died.” The reference to drop in temperature/“colder” as they move towards the graves adds to the sinister, uneasy feeling that Finn is experiencing; in Text B the writer focuses her readers’ attention using a daunting description of the farm buildings to add to the feeling of unease: they were “standing out black against the moonlit sky”/an uncomfortable simile follows - “the windows... like unwinking eyes”.
Credit any other valid suggestions (check with your Supervising Examiner)
86Version 2: 10 January 2019
8787
Task
2
Com
pete
nce
Leve
l Str
ands
Tas
k 2
Rea
d an
d un
ders
tand
text
/sel
ect
appr
opria
te m
ater
ial
Dev
elop
and
sus
tain
inte
rpre
tatio
ns
of w
riter
’s id
eas
Expl
ain
and
eval
uate
ele
men
ts o
f w
riter
’s c
raft
CL0
No
cred
itwor
thy
resp
onse
No
cred
itwor
thy
resp
onse
No
cred
itwor
thy
resp
onse
CL0
CL1
A ge
nera
l ove
rall
com
men
t or a
n is
olat
ed re
flect
ion
on o
ne o
r tw
o ex
ampl
es. T
hese
may
be
draw
n fro
m
eith
er o
r bot
h so
urce
s.
Som
e el
emen
tary
und
erst
andi
ng o
f th
e te
xt(s
) ref
lect
ed in
a b
asic
atte
mpt
to
com
men
t on
som
e as
pect
s of
the
writ
ers’
use
of l
angu
age.
Rep
ortin
g/a
sim
ple
cons
ider
atio
n of
th
e us
e of
som
e la
ngua
ge fe
atur
es.
Exa
mpl
es m
ay, o
ccas
iona
lly, b
e su
ppor
ted
by s
ome
basi
c at
tem
pt to
su
gges
t the
inte
nded
effe
ct.
CL1
CL2
A st
raig
htfo
rwar
d se
lect
ion
of s
ome
appr
opria
te e
xam
ples
. S
ome
atte
mpt
to
link
thes
e w
ith e
xpla
natio
ns a
bout
w
riter
’s c
raft
and
to d
raw
stra
ight
forw
ard
conn
ectio
ns a
cros
s bo
th te
xts.
A br
oad
gras
p of
the
text
s ex
empl
ified
in
stra
ight
forw
ard
com
men
ts o
n so
me
spec
ific
exam
ples
OR
a v
ery
gene
ral
reco
gniti
on o
f som
e of
the
writ
ers’
in
tent
ions
.
Unc
ompl
icat
ed e
xpla
natio
ns o
f som
e of
the
writ
ers’
use
of l
angu
age.
A
stra
ight
forw
ard
cons
ider
atio
n of
som
e el
emen
ts o
f the
writ
er’s
cra
ft.C
L2
CL3
App
ropr
iate
sel
ectio
n of
exa
mpl
es fr
om
both
sou
rces
and
apt
cr
oss-
refe
renc
ing
to o
ffer e
xpla
natio
ns
and
occa
sion
ally
inte
rpre
tatio
ns.
A so
und,
ove
rall
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
th
e te
xts
resu
lting
in a
gen
eral
ly
appr
opria
te in
terp
reta
tion
of th
e w
riter
s’
inte
ntio
ns. T
hese
are
pre
sent
ed th
roug
h in
crea
sing
ly s
peci
fic c
omm
ents
on
the
use
of la
ngua
ge.
Gen
eral
ly a
ppro
pria
te e
xpla
natio
ns o
f a
serie
s of
exa
mpl
es o
f writ
er’s
cra
ft w
ill o
ccas
iona
lly b
e co
mbi
ned
with
so
me
atte
mpt
to e
valu
ate
thei
r int
ende
d ef
fect
s.
CL3
CL4
A se
ries
of a
ppro
pria
tely
sel
ecte
d m
ater
ial f
rom
bot
h so
urce
s in
ord
er to
cl
early
com
pare
and
con
trast
infe
renc
es
or in
terp
reta
tions
abo
ut w
riter
’s c
raft.
A cl
ear u
nder
stan
ding
of t
he te
xts
supp
ortin
g an
eva
luat
ive
appr
oach
. M
ainl
y ac
cura
te in
terp
reta
tions
on
how
th
e w
riter
s’ id
eas
have
bee
n pr
esen
ted
thro
ugh
lang
uage
cho
ices
.
A ra
nge
of a
ppro
pria
te e
xpla
natio
ns
and
a ge
nera
lly e
valu
ativ
e ap
proa
ch to
co
mm
ent o
n el
emen
ts fr
om w
ithin
the
writ
er’s
cra
ft.C
L4
CL5
A pr
ecis
e se
lect
ion
of il
lust
rativ
e m
ater
ial
colla
ted
from
bot
h te
xts
to p
rese
nt
a fo
cuse
d an
alys
is o
f the
writ
er’s
st
rate
gies
.
An
anal
ytic
al a
ppro
ach
is b
ased
on
an a
ssur
ed u
nder
stan
ding
of t
he
text
s, d
emon
stra
ting
a co
nfid
ent
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
how
the
writ
ers
have
act
ivel
y co
ntro
lled
the
read
er’s
pe
rspe
ctiv
e th
roug
h la
ngua
ge c
hoic
es.
An
eval
uativ
e ap
proa
ch w
hich
co
nfid
ently
exp
lore
s a
rang
e of
the
writ
er’s
stra
tegi
es a
nd th
eir i
nten
ded
effe
cts.
CL5
Version 2: 10 January 2019
88
Mark Grid Task 2 (32 marks)
Strands attained Mark awarded
000 0
100 1–2
110 3–4
111 5–6
112 7–8
221 9–10
222 11–12
322 13–14
332 15–16
333 17–18
334 19–20
443 21–22
444 23–24
445 25–26
554 27–29
555 30–32
88Version 2: 10 January 2019
89
Task 3
Response time: 12 minutes Total Marks: 15 marks
Explain how the writer has tried to gain and hold the interest of the reader.
• The writer makes extensive use of the first person to connect with the reader: “I am a reasonable...I like...”/“I decided to write...”/“And I couldn’t help suspecting...”
• A conversational style/approach is employed in order to build a rapport with the reader: “Don’t even go there.”
• A question and answer technique draws the reader in: “Top Shop? Angry again.”
• Use is made of use of exaggeration to convey her scornful attitude about fashionable billboard/screen images: “giant faces and figures of overpaid skinny actors telling me what I should buy”.
• An exasperated, angry tone follows on from an initially calm opening – this intrigues/engages the reader: “I am a reasonably normal person...I am angry...I’ve had it”.
• Short sentences are used in order to mirror her strong opinions: “Top Shop? Angry again.”/“Don’t even go there.”
• Short sentence is also used to create a blunt, dramatic effect: “She died , of course.”
• Informal language draws the reader in: “Don’t even go there. I have had it”.
Credit any other valid suggestions (check with your Supervising Examiner)
Version 2: 10 January 2019
90
Com
pete
nce
Leve
l Str
ands
Tas
k 3
Rea
d an
d un
ders
tand
text
/sel
ect
mat
eria
lD
evel
op a
nd s
usta
in in
terp
reta
tions
of
writ
er’s
inte
ntio
nsEx
plai
n an
d ev
alua
te e
lem
ents
of
writ
er’s
cra
ftC
L0N
o cr
editw
orth
y re
spon
seN
o cr
editw
orth
y re
spon
seN
o cr
editw
orth
y re
spon
seC
L0
CL1
A ve
ry b
asic
und
erst
andi
ng m
ay b
e su
ppor
ted
by te
xtua
l ref
eren
ces
som
e of
whi
ch m
ay b
e re
leva
nt.
Som
e ba
sic
sens
e of
the
writ
er’s
ov
eral
l int
entio
n m
ay b
e pr
esen
ted.
A ru
dim
enta
ry a
ttem
pt to
offe
r som
e ba
sic
rem
arks
on
how
an
aspe
ct/s
of
the
text
has
/hav
e be
en u
sed.
CL1
CL2
A st
raig
htfo
rwar
d un
ders
tand
ing
is
evid
ent.
The
re is
an
atte
mpt
to s
elec
t so
me
appr
opria
te s
uppo
rting
mat
eria
l.
An
over
all e
xpla
natio
n of
the
writ
er’s
in
tent
ion
is p
rese
nted
– s
ome
stra
ight
forw
ard
appr
ecia
tion
is e
vide
nt.
An
unco
mpl
icat
ed re
view
/con
side
ratio
n of
som
e of
the
lang
uage
and
/or
lingu
istic
dev
ices
the
writ
er h
as
empl
oyed
.
CL2
CL3
An
over
all u
nder
stan
ding
of t
he te
xt.
Som
e ap
prop
riate
exa
mpl
es a
re
sele
cted
and
link
ed to
val
id in
sigh
ts/
expl
anat
ions
.
A co
mpe
tent
ove
rall
inte
rpre
tatio
n th
at
reco
gnis
es h
ow s
ome
of th
e w
riter
’s
inte
ntio
ns h
ave
been
del
iver
ed th
roug
h la
ngua
ge c
hoic
es.
A ge
nera
lly p
urpo
sefu
l app
roac
h w
hich
effe
ctiv
ely
com
men
ts o
n an
d/
or a
ttem
pts
som
e ev
alua
tion
of th
e lin
guis
tic s
trate
gies
.
CL3
CL4
A cl
ear u
nder
stan
ding
of t
he te
xt
faci
litat
es th
e re
leva
nt s
elec
tion
of
mat
eria
l whi
ch is
use
d fo
r pur
pose
ful
com
men
t.
An
inte
rpre
tatio
n th
at c
ompe
tent
ly
dem
onst
rate
s a
valid
und
erst
andi
ng o
f ho
w th
e w
riter
’s in
tent
ions
are
refle
cted
in
lang
uage
cho
ices
.
A ge
nera
lly e
valu
ativ
e ap
proa
ch th
at
com
pete
ntly
exp
lore
s th
e us
e of
som
e of
the
lingu
istic
stra
tegi
es.
CL4
CL5
An
assu
red
unde
rsta
ndin
g en
sure
s fo
cuse
d, p
reci
se s
elec
tion
of m
ater
ial,
whi
ch in
turn
, fac
ilita
tes
scru
tiny
of th
e te
xt.
An
anal
ytic
al in
terp
reta
tion
that
dem
onst
rate
s a
perc
eptiv
e un
ders
tand
ing
of h
ow th
e w
riter
’s
inte
ntio
ns a
re e
vide
nced
in th
e us
e of
la
ngua
ge.
A co
nfide
nt, e
valu
ativ
e ap
proa
ch is
us
ed to
exa
min
e re
leva
nt e
lem
ents
of
the
writ
er’s
cra
ft.C
L5
90Version 2: 10 January 2019
91
Mark Grid Task 3 (15 marks)
Strands attained Mark awarded
000 0
100 1
110 2
111 3
112 4
221 5
222 6
322 7
332 8
333 9
334 10
443 11
444 12
445 13
554 14
555 15
Version 2: 10 January 2019
92
Task 4
Response time 12 minutes
Total Marks: 15 marks
Explain how the writer has created a negative view of fashion.
• The personal style of the writing, its honesty and direct conversational quality help to persuade the reader to see fashion from her perspective.
• In the opening sentence the writer shares her personal view on the tragedy, blaming fashion for this girl’s death: “I couldn’t help suspecting...rather than fashion”.
• In the other sentence of the first paragraph she employs a tonal shift, moving from the serious tone of the opening comment to a less serious, almost flippant comment on “the usual fashion death”, the model who has “a heart attack” as a result of living “on grapes”.
• There is another change in tone at the beginning of the second paragraph highlighted by the repetition of ‘This was’. The tone of the next short sentence is serious and compassionate by comparison and it portrays the unfortunate girl as a victim: “This was an ordinary girl, a bystander.”
• She uses a series of questions and then answers them in order to lead the reader to share her negative perspective: “And why... icy night? Because...”/ “I couldn’t forget her. Why? Because I realised...”
• Fashion is described in a dramatically negative metaphor as “the whispering monster” and this “whispering monster” is directly responsible, according to the writer, for this young girl’s decision to go out in inappropriate shoes on an “icy night”.
• She uses imagery to portray fashion in a negative light – she admits that metaphorically fashion has harassed her: “hounded me”; in an extended simile she compares fashion to something despicable, a school bully, putting obstacles in her way: “like an eternal schoolyard bully, throwing self-doubt and rubbish into my path”.
• The final paragraph is used to draw together the experiences of the two women. The writer is no longer under the spell of fashion: “I can look at clothes...and laugh at their daftness. They are not for me.” However, she has not forgotten the young girl: “I still think about that young woman...”
• The extract finishes with a question: “What price did she pay for her shoes?” On this occasion it is not answered by the writer; she leaves the reader to reach her/his own negative conclusion about the price this young girl paid to be fashionable.
Credit any other valid suggestions (check with your Supervising Examiner)
Version 2: 10 January 2019
93
Com
pete
nce
Leve
l Str
ands
Tas
k 4
Rea
d an
d un
ders
tand
text
/sel
ect
mat
eria
lD
evel
op a
nd s
usta
in in
terp
reta
tions
of
writ
er’s
inte
ntio
nsEx
plai
n an
d ev
alua
te e
lem
ents
of
writ
er’s
cra
ftC
L0N
o cr
editw
orth
y re
spon
seN
o cr
editw
orth
y re
spon
seN
o cr
editw
orth
y re
spon
seC
L0
CL1
A ve
ry b
asic
und
erst
andi
ng m
ay b
e su
ppor
ted
by te
xtua
l ref
eren
ces
som
e of
w
hich
may
be
rele
vant
.
Som
e ba
sic
sens
e of
the
writ
er’s
ove
rall
inte
ntio
n m
ay b
e pr
esen
ted.
A ru
dim
enta
ry a
ttem
pt to
offe
r som
e ba
sic
rem
arks
on
how
an
aspe
ct/s
of t
he
text
has
/hav
e be
en u
sed.
CL1
CL2
A st
raig
htfo
rwar
d un
ders
tand
ing
is
evid
ent.
The
re is
an
atte
mpt
to s
elec
t so
me
appr
opria
te s
uppo
rting
mat
eria
l.
An
over
all e
xpla
natio
n of
the
writ
er’s
in
tent
ion
is p
rese
nted
– s
ome
stra
ight
forw
ard
appr
ecia
tion
is e
vide
nt.
An
unco
mpl
icat
ed re
view
/con
side
ratio
n of
som
e of
the
lang
uage
and
/or l
ingu
istic
de
vice
s th
e w
riter
has
em
ploy
ed.
CL2
CL3
An
over
all u
nder
stan
ding
of t
he te
xt.
Som
e ap
prop
riate
exa
mpl
es a
re
sele
cted
and
link
ed to
val
id in
sigh
ts/
expl
anat
ions
.
A co
mpe
tent
ove
rall
inte
rpre
tatio
n th
at
reco
gnis
es h
ow s
ome
of th
e w
riter
’s
inte
ntio
ns h
ave
been
del
iver
ed th
roug
h la
ngua
ge c
hoic
es.
A ge
nera
lly p
urpo
sefu
l app
roac
h w
hich
effe
ctiv
ely
com
men
ts o
n an
d/
or a
ttem
pts
som
e ev
alua
tion
of th
e lin
guis
tic s
trate
gies
.
CL3
CL4
A cl
ear u
nder
stan
ding
of t
he te
xt
faci
litat
es th
e re
leva
nt s
elec
tion
of
mat
eria
l whi
ch is
use
d fo
r pur
pose
ful
com
men
t.
An
inte
rpre
tatio
n th
at c
ompe
tent
ly
dem
onst
rate
s a
valid
und
erst
andi
ng o
f ho
w th
e w
riter
’s in
tent
ions
are
refle
cted
in
lang
uage
cho
ices
.
A ge
nera
lly e
valu
ativ
e ap
proa
ch th
at
com
pete
ntly
exp
lore
s th
e us
e of
som
e of
th
e lin
guis
tic s
trate
gies
.C
L4
CL5
An
assu
red
unde
rsta
ndin
g en
sure
s fo
cuse
d, p
reci
se s
elec
tion
of m
ater
ial,
whi
ch in
turn
, fac
ilita
tes
scru
tiny
of th
e te
xt.
An
anal
ytic
al in
terp
reta
tion
that
dem
onst
rate
s a
perc
eptiv
e un
ders
tand
ing
of h
ow th
e w
riter
’s
inte
ntio
ns a
re e
vide
nced
in th
e us
e of
la
ngua
ge.
A co
nfide
nt, e
valu
ativ
e ap
proa
ch is
use
d to
exa
min
e re
leva
nt e
lem
ents
of t
he
writ
er’s
cra
ft.C
L5
Version 2: 10 January 2019
94
Mark Grids Task 4 (15 marks)
Strands attained Mark awarded
000 0
100 1
110 2
111 3
112 4
221 5
222 6
322 7
332 8
333 9
334 10
443 11
444 12
445 13
554 14
555 15
Version 2: 10 January 2019